Romney on Huckabee: “I’m afraid he’s running from the wrong party”
ABC News’ Matt Stuart reports: Former Gov. Mitt Romney blasted Republican rival Mike Huckabee Saturday, saying Huckabee is "running from the wrong party." Romney’s comments were sparked by Huckabee’s article in Foreign Affairs, in which he says President Bush has an "arrogant bunker mentality."
Speaking at an event in Humboldt, Iowa, Romney said, "[Huckabee's] comments surprised me, they disappointed me, I expected a great deal more from the article than I saw."
"The last thing you’re gonna hear me say is that the president of the United States, George W. Bush, is a person who is arrogant, with a bunker mentality," Romney said. "That’s simply wrong and not something I would ever do."
Romney and his campaign also repeatedly said Huckabee used a "playground allegory" for foreign policy, suggesting that Huckabee was naive and inexperienced. But when pressed, the Romney campaign could not cite any such "playground allegory" used by Huckabee, only a reference to Huckabee calling for nations to "treat everyone like you’d like to be treated."
Although calling Huckabee a "great friend," Romney tried to tie the former Arkansas governor to the Democratic candidates, claiming that upon reading the report he said, "Did this come from Barack Obama? Or from Hillary Clinton? Did it come from John Edwards? No. It was one of our own. It was Gov. Huckabee."
Romney later stated that he believed he was "more conservative" on issues of immigration, spending and crime, but also stated that "together we’re a lot closer than we are to the people on the other side of the aisle."
Romney reiterated a line heard less and less often in his usual stump, "The truth of the matter is this president’s kept us safe these last six years."
Romney did, however, try to walk a fine line between allying and differentiating himself with President Bush on the war in Iraq. Although Romney claimed during his event that he "believe[s] this president has done everything he could do to keep us safe," he also claimed while speaking with reporters that "following the collapse of Saddam Hussein, we have not done adequate preparation, adequate planning, we had insufficient troop strength, we were under-managed."
Romney has faced criticism himself for a lack of foreign policy experience as a one-term governor of Massachusetts.
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
I’m not a fan of Romney but he is exactly right about the Huckster. How low has the Republican party sunk when we can even think of nominating a charleton like the Huckster. Shame, Shame, Shame. I would vote for a third party if the Repubs ever nominated the Huckter
Posted by: George Albert | December 15, 2007, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
I can’t believe Huckabee is in the lead in so many polls now. This guy is a fraud. The GOP is done in 2008 if Huckabee wins the nomination.
Posted by: Joe | December 15, 2007, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
Either Mitt or Hudkster is a winner. They will continue supporting the “War on Thugs”, those 19 non-Iraq, 15 Saudia Arabia thugs who attack us on 9/11 by continuing the WAR FOREVER, until every terrorist is wiped off the face of the earth.
Best of all the pro-war Republican canidates will not reverse the Bush Presidential Executive Order 13438 which states,
“Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq, issued. The order asserts the government’s power to confiscate the property “of persons determined to have committed, or to pose a significant risk of committing, an act or acts of violence that have the purpose or effect of threatening the peace or stability of Iraq or the Government of Iraq or undermining efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq or to provide humanitarian assistance to the Iraqi people.”
This is great News. Bush can can now take the property (homes, cars, money) of any American who “pose a significant risk of committing” violence, or, if the goverment determines that an American is protesting “efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq”.
The very idea that the 1st Admendment rights of free speech and assembly would apply to war protestors is absurd. We must start taking there property now, that will shut
them up. Yes, we must elect a pro-war Republican Christian, so they can protect us from these anti-American war protestors. Is the Christian thing to do, right?
Posted by: Greg | December 15, 2007, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
Voters need to take their choice very seriously. They need to decide if they are going to send a president to Washington or send a sweet-talkin’ guy. No more sweet talkin’ guys who cannot deliver. We need Romney, a guy with substance who has a record of accomplishment.
Posted by: Lori | December 15, 2007, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
Well said Lori.
Posted by: Travis | December 15, 2007, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
Romney has said nearly identical things to Huckabee on foreign policy and the current administration—back when he thought it would be politically advantageous to do so. This is nothing but another flip-flop.
Posted by: Jake | December 15, 2007, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Mitt Romney for president? Who can trust a man to figure out our financial problems and make a budget when he cant understand the fair tax. And for all of you who believe corporation pay taxes, you might better do a little studying yourself. Huck does understand his math.
Posted by: Walter | December 15, 2007, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Good grief we have allowed these phony creepy politicians to take away so much of our freedom and productivity. The games they play to achieve a position of power only for manipulation and propoganda of their own terrible influence. That’s a wrap.
Posted by: Frank | December 15, 2007, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
Voters who do not honestly look at the platforms of the candidates and make an informes choice are the worst. Informed voters even if they disagree at least keep the system as honest as it can be. Those who would vote for say Sen Clinton just because she is a woman or those who would vote for Huck just because he is christian are the type that should not be voting in my opinion.
Posted by: Walter | December 15, 2007, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Huckabee’s loose mouth would be a national security issue, if he were elected. He is incorrigible.
Posted by: AmericanWoman | December 15, 2007, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
“Mitt Romney for president? Who can trust a man to figure out our financial problems and make a budget when he cant understand the fair tax. And for all of you who believe corporation pay taxes, you might better do a little studying yourself. Huck does understand his math”
Walter, You must be smoking something if you think the fair tax would help our economy. It incentivises using used items because the tax is only on new things. I can tell you right now, I would stop buying new and go immediately to craigslist. That would mean I wouldn’t have to pay any taxes. Fair tax is Naive at best.
Posted by: Casey | December 15, 2007, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
Mitt would be a lot better off if was less worried about Huckabee and more concerned with addressing his own shortcomings (which there are many).
Posted by: JC | December 15, 2007, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
It is always the case that candidates play to the ends when running in the primaries. Republicans to the conservative end and Democrats to the liberal end. Then each party’s nominee rushes to the center to capture the all important swing vote. Republicans should get smart and support someone that can occupy middle groung without having to change positions to get there.
Posted by: bradfl | December 15, 2007, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
oops ground not groung
Posted by: bradfl | December 15, 2007, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
You can’t say that Romney should be worried about his own shortcomings, implying that there are many and then fail to elaborate on them.
A lot of Huckabee supporters and even Giuliani supporters get upset when Romney brings up their shortcomings. Instead of confronting those shortcomings many of you would rather imply that Romney has many shortcomings as bad or worse then the other candidates, yet anyone who say’s so always fails to elaborate leaving the subject open ended.
We know without a doubt by now that both Giuliani and Huckabee have plenty of skeletons in their closets, fact is no one wants to accept them. So far the only real skeleton Romney has is his pro-choice blunder which doesn’t bother me that much compared to Giuliani’s infidelity or Huckabee’s support of illegals.
Posted by: Edison | December 15, 2007, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
I think Huckabee lies too easily. For example, he said his scholarship program for illegal aliens applied to kids who had been in school in the U.S “all their lives,” when the program only required them to have been in high school for three years. Mark Halpern said, “Huckabee is unflappable, unfailingly genial, and willing to pleasantly deny the truth when it suits his purposes (such as claiming that he did not support the quarantine of AIDS patients in 1992).”
What I especially like about Romney is his apparent great kindness. Some years ago, the daughter of one of Romney’s friends went missing in New York City. Romney shut his business down, and all the employees of the company went to New York City to look for her. Thankfully, they found her.
It would be a rare person who would shut his business down to help a friend. I read about that in Newsweek, and it made a great impression on me.
Posted by: Henry89 | December 15, 2007, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
The only fraud in this race is Flip Flop Fraudney. Will he finally decide on whether he’s a conservative or a liberal before the Iowa caucus? And furthermore, what will his position on Mike Huckabee be next week?
Posted by: Jason | December 15, 2007, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
Bush made mistakes, but made the right choice to confront Islamic fascism in their neighborhoods. More could also be said about misinformation and bad advisers.
The media is just nit-picking something to make a story…Huckabee isn’t bashing Bush. This is simply stating his differences from a ‘bunker mentality’ to working with more diplomacy in foreign policy.
Also, remember….9/11…this is all easier in hindsight. Bush did his job, we are just choosing who’s going on with this fight from here.
Go Huck!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Paul Thompson | December 15, 2007, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
Romney is right. Huckabee is in the wrong Party. He’s more Democrat, certainly on fiscal matters, but on economics and Nanny-state social matters too.
If “fiscally liberal/socially conservative” Huckabee pulls this off, you’ll see a massive defection of Fiscal Cons to the Libertarian Party.
If Mitt, Fred or Rudy gets it, we keep the GOP coalition intact. If its Huckabee the Republican Party will fall apart, and the beneficiary will be Wayne Root and the Libertarians.
Posted by: Eric Dondero | December 15, 2007, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
DONDERROOOOOO!
That said, Huckabee is nothing more than a candidate that says what is most opportunistic for his campaign. Look back from 1992 onward and you can see clearly that this is the case. Now he’s ripping off Paul’s crib sheet in order to try and influence New Hampshire’s race where he’s doing poorly.
Huckabee is a huckster and a charlatan of a candidate. If this guy makes it into office, WE ALL LOSE.
Posted by: Jonathan | December 15, 2007, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
Mitt Romney is the REAL liberal. When he was running for Governor of my state he pandered to homosexual groups and stated he was pro-choice. Mitt Romney is not to be trusted conservatism is Mitts flavor of the month being used to get him where he wants to go politically..MITT CAN’T BE TRUSTED!!!
Posted by: Hunter | December 15, 2007, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
Yeah..Mitt would make a lot better president than Huckabee. But, Ron Paul would be a superior president to Mitt Romney!!
Posted by: J. Finn | December 15, 2007, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
I don’t support Huckabee, but he’s right in this case, and its a smart strategy to start separating yourself from Bush. If Romney thinks that defending Bush can win him the presidency, he is delusional. Unpopular parties don’t get elected in the first place: I can’t find a single example in the 20th century.
Posted by: Nick | December 15, 2007, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
I think a lot of the evangelical bigots will get their “reward” when they elect an individual who has so many unanswered ehtical, immigration and taxation skeltons in his closet. They choose to “overlook” a candidate like Romney merely because of religious bigotry, when Romney’s track record far exceeds Huckabee’s in terms of personal and professional accomplishments. Huckabee’s a true weasle (looks like one to with those big eyes)that is only ahead because the slim has choosen to play the religion card. Talk about someone who will do anything to win. What a panderer.
Posted by: Monk | December 15, 2007, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Romney would continue the Bush legacy of draining the American taxpayers, keeping a war going to keep the money flowing overseas. This shows the complete ignorance of the Republican party, they keep giving us idiots to choose from, and that used to be the perception of the Democratic party. Republicans are cowards and idiots when it comes to war, sad but true, the only exception was almost the first True Republican, Abraham Lincoln. We need to get out of thinking we are the savior of the world, the last empire that thought that, were the Romans.
Posted by: True American | December 15, 2007, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Oh Come on Monk.
Mitts Record in Massachusetts ain’t so great, the people in Ma. are not to fond of Mitt. And as for his religion don’t you think its kinda scary to vote for someone who’s faith is a quest to become a god himself, in the Christian religion we would call that heresy..
Posted by: Greg | December 15, 2007, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
Romney is getting desperate … Folks are finally looking at Governor Huckabee and finding the real deal! A man who can articulate populist conservative values … with over a decade of executive experience running a state government … something Romney just can’t match … so he just attacks.
Posted by: citizenatty | December 15, 2007, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
I like Huckabee and he is conservative…at least as conservative as Romney (REAL high standard to beat…Not) Mostly he can communicate and looks to me like he can work with people of all “types”. I’m personally ready to get SOMETHING done. If all he accomplished was to wind down the war and eliminate the IRS I would be happy as pie.
Posted by: Cameron Smiley | December 15, 2007, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
But Huckabee hasn’t played the religion card. He doesn’t attack Romney’s personal faith, and it’s completely hypocritical to ask Huckabee to refrain from talking about his experience as a preacher if Romney et al can talk about their experiences as lawyers, businessmen, doctors, etc. Huckabee’s stance on illegal immigrants is readily apparent to anyone who’s seen the YouTube debate. He expressed his ideas and experience on the issue very clearly. Anyone who argues otherwise is just a shameless propagandist for some other candidate.
Just to clarify- I’m not a Huckabee supporter. I’m really more of a proto-Stalinist, if anything else. I’d vote for Huey P. Long before I voted for Huckabee. I’m just here to set the record straight.
Posted by: Walker Yeatman | December 15, 2007, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
Romney is right on target. Huckabee was jumping on the same bandwagon as the Democrats with this “bunker mentality” criticism. What is now coming back to haunt the huckster (and his Democrat friends) is that he was WRONG! Bush made mistakes, but sticking with this fight (i.e. staying in the “bunker” when all the doubters and Democrats and Huck was criticizing him), surging and leaving the Iraqi people with the liberty Huck’s God gave them was the right call and now that it is working, Huck is running the other way. This is classic behavior of liberal populists like the huckster. Huckabee is an un-educated fool. By the way, he has claimed all year that he has a theology degree, but now that he is running from the religious bigotry he riled up to gain ground in the polls, he reveals that he actually dropped out of theology school without a degree. I think it must be something in the water in Hope.
Posted by: Howard Headlee | December 15, 2007, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
Romney is attacking Huckabee because Huckabee had the gall to attack President Bush? If Romney believes that Bush’s foriegn policy should praised…. then Romney is wrong wrong wrong.
Romney should try to be as authentic as Huckabee…
Posted by: Tom | December 15, 2007, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
Take away all this talk of religion, compare each candidate’s resume, and if executive experience means something, no one really comes close to Romney. I don’t think anyone can fix all the country’s problems, but I think Romney will do a lot of good. Talk is easy, but from what I can tell Romney has actually gone into some pretty bad situations and left them a lot better after a year or two.
Posted by: Paul | December 15, 2007, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
I think America needs to wake up. It is not the president that makes policy. It is your congress!
Posted by: Randy | December 15, 2007, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
Romney is scared to death and well he should be. He has spent 50 million and has nothing to show for it. He is a second tier candidate but for his deep pockets.
Posted by: DAVID | December 15, 2007, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
Romney isn’t perfect…but he is far and away the most qualified candidate for POTUS
Posted by: jbeck | December 15, 2007, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
Romney isn’t perfect, and he’s not even close to being the most qualified.
How many more flip flops is Romney going to do before this is a over? Romney is not an authentic CONSERVATIVE.
Posted by: JoeBlow | December 15, 2007, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
Romney has been on the side of pro-gay marriage, gay rights, pro-abortion, anti-gun, pro-socialized healthcare and appointed democrat activist judges. No wonder Maine does not distinguish marriage as between one man and on woman. I’m confused. Who is the democrat?
Posted by: ADC | December 15, 2007, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
“I’m afraid he’s running from the wrong party.”
Well Mitt, you may be right. Maybe the conservative “party” has walked away from true conservatives like Mike Huckabee. You however just keep squealing like a stuck pig, due to all the money you have spent on your campaign.
Posted by: David - Portland, Oregon | December 15, 2007, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
Gov. Romney supports illegal immigration. Cheap labor comes in handy for his sanctuary mansion.
Posted by: ADC | December 15, 2007, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
If Mitt wants to critize the fair tax he should at least understand it. He cant even explain what he is against.
Posted by: Walter | December 15, 2007, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
How many murderers does Huckabee have to pardon before Huck fans figure out that this guy is dangerous?
Posted by: Douglas | December 15, 2007, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
The lies by the Romney campaign are not working with the voters in Iowa. After Romney has spent millions trying to fool them..
Romney is not a conservative.
Posted by: JoeBlow | December 15, 2007, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
So ADC…I suppose you interview every single employee of every restaurant you go into, just to make absolutely sure they didn’t hire any illegal immigrants? No? I didn’t think so. The exact point Romney clearly made in the debate when Rudy hit him with the “sanctuary mansion” thing, which only backfired on Rudy.
Posted by: Paul | December 15, 2007, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
The Iraq “conflict” is a mess! 70% of Americans want us out and Huckabee is telling it like is. He is not searching for the nice answer so as not to offend anyone. Just the Facts, thank you for saying what you feel, refreshing from a politician. I am a R. Paul supporter and I appreciate an honest answer, even if it means you may not go along with the party mantra! We need a change/real change in Washington!
Posted by: zanstan | December 15, 2007, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
Romney is no more a flip flopper then any other candidate. Every politician takes what they believe and then presents that the best they can to the people who will vote for them. Romney was running as a Republican in a Democratic state, so of course he needed to tell the more liberal groups that he would work with them. IF you look at his actual voting record and what bills fell on his desk, you’ll see he is what he says he is. He gives valid reasons for his change in ideas and frankly, I like that a man can learn, grow and become better as they go through experience. I don’t like stale, “my way is the only way” type of politicians. Pres. Bush said during his re-election that he never made mistakes. Come on people…
Posted by: Wendi | December 15, 2007, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
It’s true Mitt changed his mind on abortion (thankfully), but every other candidate has their own share of flip-flops, Huckabee included. Huckabee showed his true colors this past week when he pretends to take the high road, then bashes Romney’s religion for a few more votes. Huckabee made a series of wrong decisions on all of the key issues: taxes, illegal immigration, and releasing criminals (as long as they said they’d been saved). His one-liners aren’t going to fix our problems.
Posted by: Paul | December 15, 2007, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
The problem, Walter, is that Huckabee doesn’t understand the fair tax, or he wouldn’t have suggested it in it’s present form. How can a guy, who doesn’t even have a degree in Theology think he is any where near qualified to run for President of the United States? Any business background? No. Any foreign country experience? No.
Posted by: J Scott | December 15, 2007, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm
I guess Romney has never been drunk, but hypothetically, if he ever was, he could still make better decisions than Huckabee, especially where the world economy is concerned. Why? Because he’s proven that he understands economies and business. Are we going to turn our future economic prosperity over to a guy with an education in theology and a history of raising taxes as governor?
Posted by: Paul | December 15, 2007, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
If Hucksterbee were to become the GOP nominee, the Demorats would have little trouble tearing into him. In all of my 76 years I cannot recall a less qualified candidate for POTUS.
Posted by: DanNC | December 15, 2007, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
“”If Hucksterbee were to become the GOP nominee, the Demorats would have little trouble tearing into him. In all of my 76 years I cannot recall a less qualified candidate for POTUS.”"
Bush… did you forget about him.
Posted by: JoeBlow | December 15, 2007, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
So what Mr. Romney is saying is that he would continue the policies and attitudes that have isolated us in the world and left our troops fighting virtually alone in Iraq and Afghanistan. And he would squander again all the goodwill we had after 9/11 if he were given the chance. He has learned nothing from the past five years. Brilliant foreign policy, Mitt. Very patriotic.
It seems Romney knows how to pander and spout cliches that his focus groups have told him appeal to the far-out right, but he shows little evidence of leadership. Huckabee at least seems to understand that we need to reconnect with our former allies and friends if we are to effectively confront the problems that face us. It sounds like Huckabee may come from the Bush 41 wing of the Republican Party. The one that won the first Gulf War with the loss of under 100 troops.
Posted by: Mark | December 15, 2007, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
I’ve heard Romney speak of working with our allies. He obviously understands the importance of doing that. The guy has 30 years or so of high-level negotiating experience. I would guess he knows a thing or two about overcoming obstacles, finding common ground, and turning enemies into friends. I can’t think of another candidate who has anything close to that kind of experience.
Posted by: Paul | December 16, 2007, 12:17 am 12:17 am
Why is it conservative to want the government in your social nickers? To me the libertarians are the only true conservatives left our here. Either you want government out of your lives or you don’t. You can’t have it both ways. It is NOT conservative to want the government to decide who gets married or who has an abortion anymore than they should decide who owns a gun or who goes to church.
Posted by: JSF | December 16, 2007, 12:43 am 12:43 am
To all you FairTax supporters out there… Can you tell me two things?
What will it cost the gevernment to send out “prebate” checks every month?
Number 2… How will the government know who the poor people are to send the checks to? Oh, let me guess… they will have to fill out Tax forms to declare their income to get prebates?
Sounds like a shell game to me.
I’m for a simple graduated tax with no loopholes. Much easier and cheaper to administrate
Posted by: FAIRTaxIsStupid | December 16, 2007, 1:21 am 1:21 am
Scribes, Pharisees and Huckabees! Hypocrites!!
The Huckster is lying through his teeth saying he doesn’t know much about Mitt’s religion…..and then he tries to play naive by describing a supposed Mormon doctrine without context that HE KNOWS will be incendiery! I am appalled at his bigotry. Then he sounds just like a dem in calling out the President!!!! Go away Huckster
Posted by: david | December 16, 2007, 1:24 am 1:24 am
Romney may be have flipped (on abortion etc) but he hasn’t flopped. That would be Mike Huckabee who declared in the debate that we are too good as a country to punish them for the sins of there parents and then this week decide that we aren’t really that good and declare they should all go back and get in line. He than touted the endorsement of Jim Gilchrist who has fallen out of favor with the militiamen etc. Gilchrist himself said that the only reason he endorsed the Huckster was because he was the only one to respond to the letter Gilchrist sent to all of the candidates offering his endorsement. What and endorsment!
Posted by: Richard | December 16, 2007, 1:30 am 1:30 am
Romney and Huckabee have the same values in my eyes, but when it comes to records and performance, I don’t think that there is an area where Romney does not out shine him. I want a president who is Tough, Smart, and Ethical, and Mitt is that man.
Just the thought of Huckabee getting the nomination makes me feel sick inside. He does not have anywhere near the experience of Romney, and it shows in how he has run his campaign.
Mitt has run the one of the best campaigns that I have ever seen. He knows how to organize and lead like I have never seen before.
In my eyes, sure Huckabee is a great guy, I do not doubt that at all, but I do not want a President who as Gov. of Ark. pardoned 700 to 1000 criminals, including murders. This troubles me. Plus I do not like his record on immigration. He does not seem very smart to me, and he is the last person that I would want to be making foreign policy decisions.
Mitt is the answer. A vote for Huckabee is a vote for Hillary or Obama, and we simply cannot let that happen. Mitt Will Win.
Posted by: Dustin Hofheins | December 16, 2007, 3:02 am 3:02 am
Strike two for Huckabee. #1 Immigration: No free nothing for illegals. #2 Loyalty: Bashing the president is right from Demo handbook. GOP voters will not tolerate either one.
Posted by: V Racer | December 16, 2007, 7:07 am 7:07 am
I’m an Iowan, and I can tell you right now Romney’s got his work cut out for him. Huck is hot right now… people are buzzing all over the place about him. Romney needs to pay closer attention to how much people are angry with Bush out here. He should keep his mouth shut about defending Bush if he expects any points from any of my neighbors.
Personally, I’d much rather see Ron Paul get the nomination, because I can’t stand the inconsistancy of so-called “social conservatives”. Either you’re conservative (less government in EVERY aspect of your life) or you’re liberal (government can fix all your woes if you cede it more power). There’s no “social conservative” middle ground.
Social Conservativism = Puritan Socialism. The true love of others is the love of liberty, not coerced conformity to your particular social mores.
Posted by: JR | December 16, 2007, 10:24 am 10:24 am
Huckabee: Inexperienced. Arrogant. Pardoned murderers! 700-1000 inmates? Lost weight, big deal. Gave money to illegal immigrants! Raised taxes like crazy. Looks like a nerd (Gomer) and….HE WILL NOT BEAT HILLARY! NO WAY.
Romney: Family man. Self-made millionaire. Passionate. Patriot. Principled. Motivator, eloquent, brilliant. The world will take notice when the AMERICAN President speaks again (unlike now). Experienced businessman. Has charisma. Speaks French fluently…would help out, don’t you think? HANDS DOWN, MITT IS THE BEST CANDIDATE AND…HILLARY WILL NOT HAVE A CHANCE. Clinton’s camp wants anyone but Romney to get the nomination, why can’t you see this?
All you so called ‘conservatives’ can’t you understand this? WHO can beat her? You shouldn’t be thinking Oh, Romney is better than so and so…it should also be Romney is better than Clinton, Obama, etc. Wake up.
Posted by: mac | December 16, 2007, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
Sailor on Romney: “I’m afraid he’s running from the wrong country”
Posted by: Sailor | December 17, 2007, 12:06 am 12:06 am
Funny…I always thought the government was supposed to answer to the people and consider multiple sides of issues, but I keep hearing that Mitt Romney doing just that is a bad thing. A democratic government is based on the idea that the people chose a leader to represent their interests, not to stubbornly cling to what they said five years ago. And as far as I am concerned, Mitt did not say he believed Bush had done everything right regarding forein policy. He only said he believed Bush had acted in the interests of the American people to the best of his ability in a very difficult situation. That does not mean he will adopt Bush’s policies. You know…maybe if we could support our leaders a little more and whine a little less we could actually make some progress in this country.
Posted by: Steve | December 21, 2007, 2:46 am 2:46 am
Huckabee is awsome. He takes things so easily. He is serious and calm at the same time. He is a man of his word
Posted by: Nikkij | January 18, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am
Romney is so transparent its disgusting. He isn’t even good at faking nice. He is just spewing out whatever it will take to get elected as a republican but I don’t believe a word of it. How easily he changes his beliefs to fit the situation.
Posted by: Michelle | January 22, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm