Southern Protestors Unhappy with Thompson and Romney’s Flag Remarks
ABC News’ Christine Byun Reports: As GOP presidential hopeful Fred Thompson wrapped his South Carolina campaign visit, he had a small handful of protesters outside his event at a Lexington, South Carolina restaurant.
About four men held confederate flags and signs that said "Honk for Dixie" and "The South Does Not Want Fred Thompson."
The men said they were part of the South Carolina League of the South and speaking out against Thompson and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney for recent remarks about something dear to their hearts. At the November 28 CNN/YouTube debate, both candidates said they did not believe the Confederate flag should be flown in a public place. The two Republican hopefuls, who are among the leaders in Palmetto State polls, also said the flag wrongfully divides the country.
"When a Southerner goes bad, we call him a scallywag. Thompson’s a scallywag – he deserves no respect," Jim Hanks, who identified himself as a registered Independent, said. A scallywag is a white southerner who supported the federal government during Reconstruction. Hanks also said he was interested in Thompson, but now supports Ron Paul.
The group also lashed out at Romney – who called the flag was "divisive" at the debate – for being a "carpetbagger."
"Most people think the flag is a racist symbol. I would say not in South Carolina, we don’t. Not in the South, we don’t. We don’t vote for people that say negative things about the Confederate flag," Don Gordon, a protestor who wore a Confederate flag tie, said.
The group intends to protest every campaign stop in South Carolina for both candidates.
"Yesterday, we were at Mitt Romney’s headquarters because Mitt Romney insulted our flag," Hanks said. "We’ll try to be everywhere they are."
The group was at one of four Thompson campaign stops today. Thompson spokesman Jeff Sadosky said they will pay no attention to the protestors.
"South Carolina voters know where Senator Thompson stands on the issue, and that’s what’s important," Sadosky said.

Email
Santorum Clarifies Concerns on Women in Combat
Gulf of Mexico to Become Gulf of America?
What they still don’t get it NO the thing is they get it the know its racist that’s why they still defend it being flown they know it says No non whites allowed I have a question what other country in the world does the losing sides flag in a civil war gets such for lack of a better word reverance ? Only here not because it reps the south well i guess it does in one way seperation and prejudice. that is all it represents that and the LOSING side of a war.
Posted by: Dennis Fort Myers Fl | December 5, 2007, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
Well what ever your position on the Confederate flag you have to be against posts like the one from Dennis from Fort Myers. It looks like English is not his first language.
Posted by: ragebot | December 5, 2007, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
Personally, my allegiance and respect is for the Union flag, i.e., “Old Glory,” & the American patriots who defeated those who harbor hatred and bigotry, and tried (unsuccessfully) to undermine our one republic, under God, for selfish, unpatriotic, and mean-spirited ends. I suppose if we really wanted to turn back the clock on liberty, justice and equality, we should just hoist the flag of Great Britain over the nation, and all rally round it.
Posted by: Justinteim | December 5, 2007, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
The Civil War has so many lunatics sounding off. Put racism aside for a moment and ask why did all those southern boys die? They did not die because they owned slaves or even wanted to. They died because they did not want to be a part of a yankee led country. When Serbia broke up, we were there to insure the seperation. When the south left, we were there to insure they didn’t-pure and simple. But, Americans have been fed this outrageous lie for decades. Sorry folks but the war was absolutely not over slavery as abhorrent as it was. Political correctness is such an awful sin that it masks historical truth–weak reason.
Posted by: rockychance | December 5, 2007, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
Flying a Confederate flag is showing to the world you believe we should go back to the “good” old days of the South. We all know why these flags are flown,much like flying a Swastika. The Civil War is long over,get over it! You Red states lost!
Posted by: AJ | December 6, 2007, 2:21 am 2:21 am
I think we should reverse the result of the civil war and let the south succeed from the union. It’ll be fun watching them try to live without all the govt money that they survive on…… which by the way comes from the north. We’d be better off without them.
Posted by: dk | December 6, 2007, 2:40 am 2:40 am
YOUR RIGHT DK…..we (the south) WOULD be better off. Rockychance hit the nail right on the head! All the people of the south SHOULD support the flag of the south, it is an honorable thing to stand up for what you believe in, win or lose.
Posted by: Terry | December 6, 2007, 7:18 am 7:18 am
This Yankee has lived in the South and I always felt the Confederate Flag was not about bigotry or slavery; instead it is taking pride in one’s history and origins more like a band of brothers. In years of southern living I never once received the impression that it stood for bigotry.
I am big on genrealogy and would fly the flag of every country of my origins. The Confederates states were a country and if I had southern roots, the Confederate flag would be among them.
What gets overlooked here, whether you agree with them or not, is that they had the mind and will to fight for what they believed in. We need more of that with the current administration policies.
Posted by: Larry Friend | December 6, 2007, 7:34 am 7:34 am
Perhaps even Romney and Thompson realize that anyone still flying the Confederate Flag is in serious denial about the outcome of the Civil War and probably too out of touch with reality to vote!
Posted by: Uniblogger | December 6, 2007, 8:42 am 8:42 am
Can anyone out there tell me what the name “Mitt” is short for??? Why would ANYONE with a sane mind name their son MITT??? As for me, I’ll fly whatever as I please and everyone else who doesn’t like it can go pound sand. If illegal aliens can fly their Mexican or whatever kind of flag here and no one says anything about that, then I’ll fly any flag that I want to also. So there.
Posted by: Iam Avoter | December 6, 2007, 9:58 am 9:58 am
“A scallywag is a white southern who supported the federal gov’t during reconstruction.” What!!!!??? There you have it: The confederate flag represents the worst type of racism….
Consider this: Deval Patrick is only the second black governor since Reconstruction. He’s the first from Mass.–in fact, he’s Mitt Romney’s successor. If it were left up to the old south and those who support the conferate flag and all the hatred it stands for, Reconstruction would not even have taken place. Reconstruction was designed to bring former slaves and Blacks into mainstream society…..And the swallywags were those who supported this,,,,,right? Althouhgh I do not agree with Mitt Romney’s religious teachings, I now have more respect and admiration for him because of his position on the confederate flag. There is no place in public where that stupid symbol belongs…….And I am a bit sadden for so many Blacks in South Carolina who still put up with that trash of a flag……South Carolina has a state flag—-it’s blue with the crescent moon and palmetto tree….And the US flag flies above it. What in the world is that racist confederate flag still flying for?
Posted by: tony | December 6, 2007, 11:02 am 11:02 am
A lot of folks are saying the flag represents the pride they have in the South. Lets examine what the South looked like ante bellum. Hordes of uneducated, illiterate men toiling in the dirt, while a select few aristocrats lived richly with slave labor. An almost purely agrarian economy that refused to mechanize and industrialize because that could threaten the supremacy of the few whites living like kings. So you want to celebrate your pride in an uneducated, illiterate populace, backward economy, not to mention racist? Almost every major work on the war itself shows that the South should have been able to win, it was just too damned incompetent to do so. Honestly, taking the racism part out, you still are left with little to nothing to celebrate except ignorance and defeat, have fun with that. Also, remember that the majority of the south fell in the illiterate category, from this display of pride, its clear you guys havent risen much from the muck of your forbearers that you want so much to celebrate.
Posted by: foolish people | December 6, 2007, 11:23 am 11:23 am
A question no Confederate apologist will answer:
If it really was about states’ rights like you insist, why were there no free states in the Confederacy? Why did no free states secede, or any seceded state emancipate after secession?
Posted by: Jeff Cross | December 6, 2007, 11:40 am 11:40 am
Laying aside the question of slavery (as if that were possible, as if it were but a tangential point) no one can deny that the Confederate flag does stand for treason. More Americans were killed in the Civil War than all other wars combined. Who would take pride in that?
Anti-American sentiments will come and go in the world, but none will ever compare to “Southern pride”.
Posted by: Erik | December 6, 2007, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
The education systems in most of the southern states ranks lower than those in third world countries.
Some of that Southern pride for a symbol of the subjugation and enslavement of other people ought to be spent trying ensure that those livingand working in the “south” can at least compete with folks from place like Borneo or the jungles of Brazil.
I am from “the south” and know what conditions are still like in much of the area.
Posted by: Samella Williams | December 6, 2007, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
The use of the swastika dates back to the neolithic period. Why then should I not display it as a symbol of my neolithic heritage? Why, because it’s a symbol of a despicable murderous regime.
Confederate flag lovers: just because you choose to not see it as a symbol of racism, doesn’t mean it isn’t. It’s time to put the stars and bars away.
Posted by: carl | December 6, 2007, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
Yes! The GOP eating it’s own, gotta love it!
Posted by: Sandra Lea | December 6, 2007, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
I personally consider the Confederate Flag to be a symbol of States’ rights and one of rebellion rather than a symbol of racism. What surprised me in the article is the admission by one of its supporters that most people consider the flag to be a symbol of racism…which is true. It’s all about perception. While I maintain my position on the flag’s symbolism, I will not display it on my person or property (or in any form, for that matter) because I know how it makes some people feel.
Posted by: Chris | December 6, 2007, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
I am a sudent at the infamous University of Mississippi (better known as Ole Miss). The Confederate Flag is still in many areas on campus. The state flag (of MS) still waves proudly above the lyceum (Chancellor’s building). On gamedays in the infamous Grove, all types of Confederate flags are everywhere (we ARE the Rebels after all). When the football game starts the band enters the 60,000+ stadium to delight of fans, by playing Dixie. The South is special in so many ways. We are unique. Our culture stands apart, it gave us the blues, jazz, bbq, and many other things that everyone enjoys. If you like these things, please respect OUR culture for once. Lets not forget the Klan was the strongest in Indiana. The Confederate flag represents our people as a Southern Nation (and yes, we are a nation…a nation is a collection of people we have a common culture and history). For any candidate who wishes to win here, Id say soften your position down here on the Rebel flag. Ole Miss will be hosting one of the three political debates between the nominees next September. Im hoping by then, they are informed to not insult such a banner that so many died for. If you need any info on Ole Miss, and its proud confederate history just google the university grays. Until then…as we say at the end of every football and basketball game down here at the end of slow dixie…THE SOUTH…WILL…RISE…AaaaGAIN!!!…
Hotty Toddy and Yall Com’on down and see us! Be glad to have ya
Posted by: Georgia | December 6, 2007, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
It’s amazing to me that in 2007, some people still take pride in their racism and hate. These are the same people who helped elect GWB, so draw your own conclusion.
If the state of South Carolina is truly represented by these haters, I’d prefer to LOSE there if I were running for office.
Remember “In the name of the greatest people that have ever trod this earth, I draw the line in the dust and toss the gauntlet before the feet of tyranny, and I say segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever.”?
Go back to your caves, NEANDERTHALS!
Posted by: David Kaczmarek | December 6, 2007, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Hey ABCNews, don’t you think the rest of the country should hear about these sons of the south who feel that their particular brand of racism is sacred and should be protected? The south is the living embodiment of the old saw, “those that don’t learn from history are doomed to repeat it.”
There are some here who seemed confused about their own history. They say the war wasn’t about Slavery. They are either misinformed or they’re lying. The war was fought to prevent the expansion of slavery and ultimately, to end the practice altogether. The south relied on slaves to keep their farms operating, plain and simple. Enslaving another human being so that you can enrich yourself or your family is nothing to be proud of, rather, it’s a reason to hang your collective heads in shame. Like it or not, the confederate flag is a symbol of that legacy. The blot of slavery on our history is something the entire nation shares but the south, by choosing to sucede from the nation rather than give up the brutal practice, has a uniquely shameful burden to bear. Instead of recognizing the injustice and inhumanity of their forefathers, these modernday sons of the south want to pretend they’re the victims. Please, I’m sure the Univ. Of Mississippi has a book someplace in their library by Fredrick Douglas or by someone else that offers a firsthand look into the realities of slavery. I respectfully suggest you read it before you lay claim to your precious southern heritage.
BTW–The south didn’t invent the blues.
Posted by: nynick | December 6, 2007, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
So, the Civil War had nothing to do with slavery?
The flying of the Confederat flag shows pride in your heritage and has nothing to do with bigotry?
Has any one of them said: I take pride in my heritage but slavery was a stain of massive proportions and was wrong?
When anyone of them makes that statement, then I will believe that they are not racists.
Posted by: Elliot | December 6, 2007, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
The confederate flag is a symbol of treason, slavery, lynching, murder, white men raping black women with impunity, denial of human right, all civil rights and the ultimate of white supremacy
Posted by: Fred | December 6, 2007, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
I live in North Carolina, and I wish people like “Don Gordon” wouldn’t pretend to speak for everyone in the region. Few things are more embarrassing than seeing someone display a Confederate Flag.
And “ragebot”, who cares if English is not Dennis’ first language? He’s as entitled to expressing his opinion as anyone else, so I am much more “against posts like” YOURS than his. By the way, “whatever” is one word, and you’re missing a comma between “flag” and “you”. Is English YOUR first language? If so, you are made of 100% fail.
Posted by: Jon | December 6, 2007, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
Sorry, whenever I see the Stars ‘N Bars I remember my parents carefully planning road trips to avoid stopping in places where our biracial family could have been refused accomodations. My grandparents were considered radical for allowing us in their house. Mom is Asian, but the laws still applied to us. I was three years too young to be relegated to “separate but equal” schools.
Posted by: Sisi | December 6, 2007, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
If they love a flag that stands against our country they can take their redneck asses and move to Iran or somewhere else. I hear Al Qaida is recruiting America haters.
Posted by: Joel | December 6, 2007, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
What happened to my original comment?
Posted by: John A Santomasso | December 6, 2007, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
Finally, it’s ridiculous to argue about this, because if you asked 95% of the people who wear/wave Confederate flags a few questions about the Civil War, they could do little more than belch and open another PBR. You can’t reason with people who hold up symbols of hate and defeat as their symbol of pride. You can only pity them.
Posted by: Fredstrong | December 6, 2007, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
It was actually the most popular battle flag used by Confederate soldiers. They carried it proudly into battle. They fought for what THEY believed in (Lincoln did the right thing holding the Union together). It was a proud symbol and thousands of Southern soldiers fought and died following it into battle. After the war it was a symbol of the sacrifice made by the Southern army, and if it continued to represent that sacrifice I believe most would not object to seeing it displayed. The problem is this once proud symbol was absconded by the KKK and other racist groups. Once these groups claimed the Stars and Bars it no longer represented brave soldiers. The actions of these racist groups converted the flag into a symbol of murder, rape, intolerance, ignorance, hatred and every despicable act perpetrated on blacks and other minorities for the last 140 years. What that flag represents now is RACISM and all the ugliness that goes with it. It should never be displayed as a proud symbol, it’s a disgrace to the memory of the thousands who died following it into battle.
Posted by: Ron Warner | December 6, 2007, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
Georgia:
Your comments may sound like a whole lot of hoopla and support of Dixie and the Flag as it pertains to sports and games, but it’s wrong to continue to display that flag. The flag represents the support of slavery and the southern states rights to maintain the same…..
Posted by: tony | December 6, 2007, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
Wow, some of these posts are downright brutal. The posts make me wonder if our ancestors knew what they were doing to want to leave the fellowship of a Union that dislikes Southerners so much. The interesting question is whether Romney and Thompson want to be president of all honest taxpaying Americans (heritage flag flyers or not)? At least Lincoln welcomed Southerners back into the Union and had Dixie played at an event celebrating the end of hostilities. By the way, was Romney disparaging the Confederate battle flag or the Texas state flag (which was also hanging on the wall)? The Texas state flag also flew over Confederate soldiers from that state. He seemed to zero in on the Confederate battle flag instead of the Texas flag. Maybe this betrayed a lack of understanding on his part that he is running to be president of all Americans who obey the law and mind their own business. There seems to be too much 21st and 20th century experiences and hindsight being applied to a mid-19th century historical unpleasantness. Southerners believed strongly during the mid-19th century that their grandfathers’ fought successfully against the British for the right of self-government and that a central government was created to provide for a common defense and a few other delineated items. They felt that the central government they helped create had no rights to invade another state. Seceding from a Union is not the same thing as trying to overthrow a central government. The South was glad to see the United States continue as a free republic representing those states that wanted to remain with the U.S. Three states insisted before signing the Constitution that secession was a perogative of the individual states forming the Union. Those states were Virginia, Connecticut and New York (New York!). New England was the first area to test secession by threatening it in the early 19th century (how treasonous).
Posted by: Savannah | December 6, 2007, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
For those who continue to say that the Civil War wasn’t about slavery, they need to consult the facts. After seceding each state changed its constituion to allow slavery to continue. Nothing else was changed in their constitution.
As posted elsewhere, the south committed treason and took up arms against the Union. No one should be allowed to fly a flag representative of this action.
Posted by: Dennis | December 6, 2007, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
“As posted elsewhere, the south committed treason and took up arms against the Union. No one should be allowed to fly a flag representative of this action.”
Exactly.
Personally, I think it was Lincoln’s folly. He should’ve let the South cecede…those states mooch off the federal treasury anyway and bloc vote for incompetent fools like George W. Bush.
We’d be much better off without the ol’ confederacy and their flag, a symbol of slavery and treason.
Posted by: Max Power | December 6, 2007, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Savannah says:
“Seceding from a Union is not the same thing as trying to overthrow a central government.”
Come again? Who attacked Fort Sumter?
Yes, Lincoln, in his infinite wisdom allowed the south back into the fold and was more than generous in the terms of surrender but the south DID have to surrender first. They had to promise to lay down their arms and to pledge their loyalty to the union. It wasn’t the other way around. The south has to conform to the rest of the country. What makes your geographic and historical background so special that you should dictate what parts of your history we should ignore and what parts we ought to celebrate? You say:
“The interesting question is whether Romney and Thompson want to be president of all honest taxpaying Americans (heritage flag flyers or not)?”
I wonder if you would give that same prerogative to honest taxpaying communists or honest taxpaying nazis? Why should any presidential candidate kowtow to the refined bigotry of a few who can’t let go of their very selective version of history?
Posted by: ny nick | December 6, 2007, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
The War of Northern Aggression was one of unconstitutional roots. A free union held together by gun point dosent seem to embody much liberty to me. Lincoln even stated that people have to duty to liberty as a free citizens to remove themselves from any government that doesnt not represent their interest, and form a new one. Look it up before you hail him so proudly. The problem with some of these radical arguments about the Confederacy and American South itself is that they are uneduacted. Partly due to the American Publica Education System I presume. I hear of northerns history classes and thei biased teachings of the War Between the States. They discust me! How many soldiers fighting for the Union would have stayed of they are told they were fighting for emancipation?? Not many I assure you. The War was very unpopular at the time, much like the current on i guess (Northerners must have zero patience or will). Lincoln never freed a single slave in his own Nation (The Emancipation Proclamation freed slaves only in the states of rebellion…Maryland, Kentucky, and Missouri continued to retain slaves). So spare me this love for Lincoln that many of Americans so blindly have, and concern yourselves more will the protection of our constitution. There would have never of been a reason to leave the Union had the Consitution been defended like it was entended. I agree…I hate the Patriot Act…I voted for Bush (he was still better than Kerry), but I can no longer vote based upon the lesser of two evils thought.
As for the Confederate Flag, if you’re not from the South we cant expect you to understand. The expectation is for all Americans to defend anyone’s constitutional right to fly it. That includes the states of South Carolina, Mississippi, and Georgia. These People have chosen this symbol to represent them, and Americans must respect a free People’s decision.
Look Away, Look Away, Look Away Dixieland…
Hotty Toddy and Go Rebels
Posted by: Colonel Reb | December 6, 2007, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
Anyone who would refuse to vote for someone on the ground that they believe a flag is a symbol perceived by many in this country, rightly or wrongly, of past racism, and therefore shouldn’t be flown, has severe psychological problems. I am a Southerner but these South Carolinians who now call Thompson and Romney traitors because of their position are no different than the Muslims who resorted to violence because of the publication of a cartoon in Denmark that Muslims found offensive. This belief that the public display of a flag is an important issue exhibits a pathological lack of proportion to what is really important in this world.
Posted by: Jonathan Goldberg | December 6, 2007, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
C Reb,
Don’t sugarcoat it, say what those “unconstitutional roots” were. You just can’t bring yourself to say it but what we’re really talking about is the “right” as southerners viewed things, to continue the institution of slavery. I’m sorry but I just can’t get myself all worked up about you’re forefathers lost constitutional right to enslave people. Slavery was wrong when it was practiced in the north and it was wrong when it was practiced in the south. It had to end for our country to evolve and Lincoln recognized that. Was he perfect? No, he was human just like the rest of us but he knew the time had come to cut this cancer from our collective souls and was willing to risk the union to do it. That is why we hold him in such high regard. He was fighting for, in his words, “the better angels of our nature”. What was your side fighting for?
Posted by: ny nick | December 6, 2007, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
WHAT ALL AMERICANS MUST UNDERSTAND IS THAT MANY AMERICAN SOUTHERNES DIED FOR ‘STATES RIGHTS’ , SOMETHING THAT WE LOST WHEN THE CONFEDERATE SOUTH LOST THE WAR.
AN D THE CONFEDERATFLASG SDHOULD BE HONORED ALONG WITH THE UNION FLAG TO HONOR THSE AMERICANS WH FOUGHT FOR STSATES RIGHTS. AND ANY \ONE WHO KOW THEIR CVIVIL WAR HISTORY KNOWES THAT ABRAHAM INCOLN AWAS A RACIST AND ONLY USEDD THE EMANCIPASTION OF DECLSARATION HALF WAY THROUGHJ TO WAR TO APPEASE TYHE OPPONENTS OF WAR AND RECRUIT NORTHERN SOLDIERS. ABE LINCOLN WASS IN THE POCKETS OF THE NORTHER INDUSTRIALISTS AND THE CENTRAL BANK, JUST AS BUSH IS. “I HAVE NOT NOR EVER HAVE BEEN IN FAVOR OF BRINGING ABOUT IN ANY WAY, THE SOCIAL AND POLITICAL EQUALITY OF THE WHITE AND BLACK RACE.” ABRAHAM LINCOLN 1861, AFTER THE OUTBREAK OF THE CIVIL WAR.
THE HONEST ABE MYTH IS A REPUB;ICAN REVISION OF THE TRUE HISTORY. I HOPE WE HAVE ENOUGH PATRIOTISM TO HONOR THE CONFEDERATE FLAG FOR WHAT IT STOOD FOR, ‘STATES RIGHTS’, THE ONLY DEFENSE LEFT AGANST DICTATORSHIP LEFT.
Posted by: UNCLEJOE | December 6, 2007, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
The Confederate Flag, above all else, is a symbol of treason. Period. There is nothing honorable about the civil war except that the North was kind enough not to crush the South utterly, rather than letting ignorance and cultural recidivism rule the day.
There is a reason why Germans don’t honor their “brave” soldiers that destroyed France.
Posted by: scalito | December 6, 2007, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
Ouch! I honestly cannot believe the ignorant and idiotic comments being posted here. Being able to fly the Confederate flag was an important part of the healing between the North and the South. It isn’t racist, I’ve seen quite a few African-Americans do it. This is just another example of why the Republicans are going to win again. A little history lesson: the Dems are the party of the south, also the party of the south during the civil war (so I suppose voting for them makes you a traitor). It can’t escape your notice that the most prominent Democratic politicians are Southern. And yet the south now votes Republican. Why? Because comments like these spread divisivness and hatred. The south has a very good education system and a strong economy, much of it based in technology. It is also far more politically liberal than people acknowledge. While some parts are poor a think that only makes your comments worse. Comments like these have made Southerners feel isolated from the Democratic party and have thrown them into the waiting arms of Republicans. This incident could have led some Southerners to vote for a democrat. Instead, with this reaction, they are likely to become even more Republican. The condescending reaction to Hurricane Katrina led Louisiana to vote for a Republican govenor. The poorly thought out critisicms of Bush-he was a cheerleader at Andover ,must people constantly call him a cowboy?- have made Texas go from being a 1 party state for the Democrats to a 1 party state for the Republicans. The civil war ended a while back: get over it, let people fly any damn flag they want, and don’t try to revive old tensions. The Democrats lost the first time, if you choose to refight it they’ll lose again.
Posted by: KitKat | December 6, 2007, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
Hmmm. Interesting perspectives. The flag of the CSA and the battle flag were two different flags. Which do you find so offensive? And why would you find a flag flown in an independent country that engaged in slavery for four years more offensive than one in which slaves lived under in the same conditions for almost 90 years? That flag being the Stars and STRIPES.
Posted by: mudpuppysix | December 6, 2007, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
I live in SC and I gotta tell you I am so SICK of the Conferederate flag issue! Yes, it should come down, but you’re dealing with legislators and constiuents whose heads are stuck where the sun don’t shine on this issue.
I long ago decided that the only solution won’t come for about 50 years, when all the die-hards on this issue have died out.
In the meantime, arguing with them is a waste of time and breath.
And I’ve just wasted more of it.
Posted by: Herb | December 6, 2007, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
The south went Republican when the civil rights bill was passed. Johnson knew it when he signed the bill. Being from Texas he understood that he was signing the south to over to the Republican, but he signed the bill because it was the right thing to do. I don’t see either party making that type of costly decision today, but if one did it will be the Democrats. States Rights? why did it take the army to allow one little girl to go to school.
Posted by: Ron Warner | December 7, 2007, 1:21 am 1:21 am
Yes States Rights, its a fundamental aspect of federalism and the Bill of Rights. As for those unconstitutional rights I spoke of earlier, I am talking of Lincoln arresting the entire legislature in Maryland to keep them from holding a convention on the very issue of leaving the union. Lincoln also arrested a congressman from Ohio for speaking out against the war, along with multiple editiors of newspapers. He suspended Habeas Copus, another unconsitutional act that set precedant for FDR’s Japanese camps, the Red Scare, and Guantanamo Bay. After the War Between the States, America was more Unitary than it had ever been and it has yet to reverse that tide. John C Calhoun once spoke of nullification…sounds to me like the States should remind our federald government where the power truly lies. More power to the states is putting more influence of the people in government. A government that is closest to the People (hence more representatives per person like state legislatures) is what a representative democracy is all about. The South represented this. This is what the rebel flag stands for in Dixie. It is a symbol of her people and for that I am proud.
Posted by: Col Reb | December 7, 2007, 2:19 am 2:19 am
The Civil War was nothing more than a grandiose,decades long attempt by England to divide the United States using economic manipulation in our banking system,and propaganda through our newspapers(north and south).The Brits have always held tremendous sway in this country and were never completley kicked out of here during the Revolution or the War of 1812.There were plenty of tories north and south whose sympathies never swayed away from England.There was a concentrated, behind the scenes effort across the country as a whole to foment the hysteria which ultimately led to war.The North was just beginning to feel it’s oats as the industrial revolution was picking up steam.The country was beginning to produce a variety of goods to offer the world most of which were made in the factories in the North.This new economic strength on the world stage was a huge threat to England.The Brits of course needed southern cotton for it’s textile mills but also favored the South in that it was essentially a one trick pony whose only real value internationally was in producing a single crop-cotton.Having a neighbor across the pond whose exports were diversified was not in Britains intrest,nor is it in the intrest of the Free Traders of today(If you dig for it, you’ll find the roots of “Free Trade” or “Free Markets” back in the early 19th century).England heavily backed the South.It made southern war ships on it’s ports.It gave the South,on an unoffical level,everything it could through the blockade.Even the Confederate flagw ith it’s blue X in the middle echoed the Union Jack.England(and France)would have officially recognized the South as a nation and come to it’s aid militarily except for one small problem—Slavery.And here the question of flags and causes arises.Slavery and the recognition of it’s inhumanity was being acknowledged and scorned worldwide.During the American Civil War the Russians emancipated the serfs.In the South emancipation was unthinkable because it meant economic ruin for the region as a whole.The average southerner didn’t own slaves but the wealthy movers and shakers did.In short,I believe the South was used unsucessfully by Britain as a wedge to break this country in half.Most people would never in a million years dare to look at their history outside the box like this.But having a new context in which to view the Civil War-one that won’t ever be given in history books(and that is a whole other story)may help some people realize that the whole country was duped.Sadly,like family members who can’t bury the hatchet,we are left 140 years later to point fingers at each other saying who is and who isn’t a racist.Maybe the question of slavery could only have been settled through violent means.I’d like to think not.Unfortunately,that aspect of the Civil War and the issues surrounding it,those of true equality and peaceful coexistance are still being fought over. In this respect maybe england suceeded in breaking us in half.
Posted by: marklesparkle | December 7, 2007, 3:19 am 3:19 am
“It has nothin’ to do with slavery. — The confederate flag represents a way of life long past, in the glorious Grand Ole South.”
… ‘Course, slavery was the way of life back in them days…
Posted by: ldp | December 7, 2007, 6:26 am 6:26 am
Its no coincidence that the Stars and Bars are always flown at KKK and NeoNazi gatherings
Posted by: exlrrp | December 7, 2007, 8:27 am 8:27 am
Just to point out to some people posting on this story…the issue is not whether or not Southerners should be allowed to “fly whatever flag they want.” The issue is whether it should be flown on public grounds like schools, courthouses, and legislatures. Considering the South did not secede, we are still one country, our official flag is the stars and stripes, and the Confederate flag does not stand for anything in an OFFICIAL capacity it should not be flown at statehouses. That being said, I really could care less what people in the South do with what flag. If you want it flown put it on a ballot and let the citizens decide.
Posted by: common sense | December 7, 2007, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
Posted by: | Dec 7, 2007 8:01:58 AM ABC NEWS
The Confederate Flag is recognized throughout much of the world as a liberation symbol – it was there when the Berlin Wall came down. On the other hand, much of the world looks warily (even with hatred) on the US flag as a symbol of imperialism. So if the people of the world are to ever live in harmony in a global community, it’s the hated stripped banner that should go not some regional flag that is a threat to no one.
NMcC in NC
Posted by: Nathan McCormick | December 7, 2007, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
How interesting, the folks who uphold the right to burn or otherwise desecrate the US Flag, are so adamant about flying the Confederate Flag. Most of what has been written here is so much bunk! Only a very small percentage of the people in the pre-Civil War South ever owned one slave. That included my family, mostly teachers and lawyers; my great grandfather and two of his sons, all served in the Confederate Army, and held various political offices after the War. The Civil War was, to some, a defense of slavery, but to most, it was a battle to enforce the provisions of the Constitution, which was a creation of the several States at the time of its adoption. “States Rights” were and are clearly protected by that document, and the people of the USA are the worse for have ceded those rights to the Federal Government. The Confederate Flag should not be placed on any public building or property, but certainly if the US flag can be freely desecrated by Liberals, then Southerners certainly have the right to fly the Confederate Flag over any private property or on the streets. It is a form of freedom of speech and cannot be abridged.
Posted by: TheOldTrooper | December 7, 2007, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
States Rights – the only Right in question was that of keeping slavery legal. A very bad thing.
HOWEVER: not a Southern thing, exclusively. The Union had slave areas. Also, note that the Emancipation Proclamation, limited as it was, wasn’t passed until very late in the war. You’d think, if slavery were THE issue, it would have been passed immediately when southern delegates were no lonager sitting in Congress. But it wasn’t.
The Union pretty much raped the South both during the war and throughout Reconstruction. It is understandable that the Confederate flag became a proud protest – but unfortunately has also been used by rapists. Context is everything.
Posted by: Jane | December 7, 2007, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
sigh. if the war between the yankees and the americans was over slavery as you insist: (1)why did lincoln propose to the southern states he would support an amendment to the Constitution allowing slavery in states where it currently existed in return for their vote(s)? that amendment, ironically, would have been the 13th; the one which prohibited slavery and (2) why was he making speeches “freeing” slaves in other countries when he would NOT free them in his own? i.e Kentucky, Maryland and Missouri. if slavery was wrong in the 11 Confederate States of America it was also wrong in the United States of America.
the southern states did NOT change their Constitutions after succession. the Confederate Constitution forbade slaves being imported from any foreign country except the US or its territories; chiefly kentucky, maryland and missouri.
the southerners did NOT commit treason; succession is a right the several states granted to themselves in the US Constitution.
slavery existed much longer under the Stars and Stripes (almost 90 years) than it did under the Stars and Bars (4 years). seems to me the s&s would be more a symbol of racism & hatred than the s&b. whatever flag a state chooses to fly from its capitol and state government buildings is none of the federal governments business – as long as it flys underneath the US Flag.
Posted by: mudpuppysix | December 7, 2007, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
If southerners want to fly a flag that is not the stars and stripes, they can do it in another country. Don’t you dare wave that treasonous rag around me. Anyone who says they fly the flag for historical reasons is a liar. Dismiss the fact for a moment that this flag DOES represent racism. The south rose up against the United States of America.
Posted by: Mike | December 7, 2007, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
the war between the yankees and the Americans was a trade war. monies raised to support the government in 1861 was raised through tarriffs. goods the south traded cotton, corn, soy & sugar, eg, for other goods were being hit hard by these tarriffs and the south’s econmic health was is dire straights. their protests fell on deaf ears as they had not the political power to change them. they began to work out their own trade agreements with foreign countries and not pay the tarriffs to the US government. both were no-no’s. the states are proscribed by the constitution from entering into foreign trade agreements. not paying the tarriffs – not much has changed there. try to get out of paying the government what they think is their due today. lol. the rust belts of the north today are pretty much like what is was for the south in 1861. the south went to war because they were being strangled economically. is there anyone out there actually ignorant enough to believe 97% of the south fought for the other 3%s “right” to own slaves? if you are i have some land i want to sell you down in florida about 35 miles west of ft lauderdale.
Posted by: mudpuppysix | December 7, 2007, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
i fought for the Stars and Stripes. I left blood on the battlefield for that flag. i did then and will now defend the right of any citizen to fly any flag he or she wishes.
Posted by: mudpuppysix | December 7, 2007, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
states rights mr cross? was it kentucky, maryland and missouri’s “right” to own slaves because they were part of the union but not for the 11 southern states who seceded to do the same? there was no requirement for the CSA or any of its 11 member states to OWN slaves. importation of slaves from any foreign nation except the US or it territories where slavery existed (maryland, missouri and kentucky) into any southern state was expressly forbidden by the CSAs constitution:
1. The importation of negroes of the African race from any foreign country other than the slaveholding States or Territories of the United States of America, is hereby forbidden; and Congress is required to pass such laws as shall effectually prevent the same.
a quote from the US Constitution. later amended in 1866 deleting any reference to those bound to service or the 3/5ths portion.
“Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.”
So, yes the states had the “right” to be either slave or free under either constitution until 6 December 1865 with the passage of the 13th amendment to the US Constitution.
As amoral and repugnant as slavery was it was “legal”.
Posted by: mudpuppysix | December 7, 2007, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
“The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.” So, did Lincoln have the right to suspend habeas corpus? uh yeah. did Lincoln abuse his powers? yep. but as for states rights…a uniquely American idea. the belief that man has inalienable rights granted him from God – not the government; that the federal governments powers are granted it by the people through the states. not the reverse. yet every time a new federal law is passed we lose not only a right reserved to the states and/or the people but become more dependent on the very institution the founding fathers built so many safe-guards into the Constitution to protect us from. yes, our own government. the important thing is not that we agree or disagree but that we PRESERVE the RIGHT to do so.
Posted by: mudpuppysix | December 7, 2007, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
I guess Romney and Thompson aren’t planning to come to Mississippi, what with the Rebel flag on our state flag and all. They tried to change it but the old flag won the vote by a huge margin. Someone may explain why the North said you can’t secede but after the war it took years to be readmitted to the union that apparently we had seceded from – else why the need to be readmitted. And why didn’t the North vote to outlaw slavery after the secession with no southern votes to oppose it? The War of Northern Aggression is not forgotten in the South, just as the war of American aggression will not be forgotten in Iraq.
Posted by: sratiug | December 8, 2007, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
Can someone please tell these people that it’s not the 1870s any more? Join the 21st Century, people. Hell, even getting your political rhetoric from the 20th Century would be an improvement. Have you no idea how ridiculous you sound?
Posted by: 21stCentury | December 8, 2007, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
WOW, the dumbing down of America has been fully exposed buy this whole flag thing. And what a success!! The comments here just prove to me we as a nation are doomed. The south has its own history about that WAR.I can see why we are where we are today. That flag was flown in a WAR in which that side lost. Well, maybe not, since many of our last few Leaders have come from the south. Anyhow the south lost, surrendered and put down their arms. The Union accepted them into the fold and we became a stronger nation for it. The southern flag should have gone with that lost, burned and buried. That flag has only one meaning to me. Hate filled southern losers who have been taught to love that flag but to hate other people that are not like themselves. How many generations will have to pass before we are truly a united NATION? I hate “your” flag for all it truly represents. Also if the bars & strips are “your” flag where is your country? Because the STARS & STRIPES are The United States of America for which it stands!!!
Posted by: Funpaddler | December 9, 2007, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
Ok. In 1994 I went to the Youth In Government gathering in Columbia, SC. I stood up that day and put forth the proposition that debunks many things said here.
I am a 32 year old mix-race northener who migrated south. In the beginning you may find me very southern, and then again very Northern, but ignore both because I do not write as either.
The Civil War was not just about slaves it was about states rights, the industrialized North forcing the south to trade conditions not benefiting them, and certain issues that were never resolved in the constitution that existed in the Continental congress where we started this great experiment called America.
The Constitution is a document which advocates that many independent states would work together to promote certain goals beneficial to ALL of those states. More or less Defense. Many fights in our congresses halls existed about how strong the Federal government should or shouldn’t be. The Civil War was one of those moments. The South wished to cancel their part of the Contract called the constitution. And should have been given that right.
That being said as a descendant of Black heritage, I though i would fully support the South for fighting for those rights, ideologically on slavery and the treatment of blacks, I could not support the south. I would have inequal rights, no upward mobility, and the designation as less than human. That being said this is only one part of the Confederate flag equation.
That flag which hangs over the capitol of Columbia WAS not there in 1866. In fact it was not there for quite some time. Until 1962 when the flag was placed upon the capitol building. We know exactly at what time that was? It was a political rather than revolutionary stance on the politics of desegregation, voter rights, and basic civil rights. Pretend what you want that flag was not flown for the sense of history, but at fear that federal mandates would change the societal tapestry of SC. It would incorporate a foreign culture the African-American culture to the game. Trust me with a state having the largest minority of Blacks in it, this flag was not their friend.
In the end I filibustered the daylights out of that thing. On the basis that though the flag means different things to people, the reason it was put up was to stand against Civil Rights enforcement. However, again the Federal government did put their hands in state affairs without formally changing the US government to agree that we are just administrative regions called states and no longer states no more.
I say why not pick a flag that everyone can be happy with, not just one or another? It is divisive and destroys the truest testament of states rights, and because of the bigotry of that flags supporters mars the issue. I would like to state I was nominated as most outstanding Statesman by Rev. Jim Clyburn, Strom Thurmond, and Fritz Hollings.
Posted by: D Evans | December 9, 2007, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
The Confederate flag will always be the flag of the South. The US flag is also our flag considering the critical battles ot the revolution were fought in the Carolinas and Virginia. Too many of my ancestors are lying under C.S.A. tombstones for me to forsake this heritage.
Posted by: doug lominac | December 9, 2007, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
nicely done mr evans. accurate as can be. however, under the US Constitution blacks were 3/5ths persons until 6 December 1865 when the 13th Amendment changed the Constitution. Slaves lived under the Stars and Stripes almost 90 years as opposed to 4 years under the CSA flag. And, yes, there were slave-holding states in the north – 3 of them with a fourth being admitted to the Union in 1863. Why one would hold a flag that repressed black people for 4 years in more contempt than one that did for 90 years is beyond me. BTW, more republicans voted for the civil rights act than did dimocrats.
Posted by: mudpuppysix | December 9, 2007, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
I concur Mudpuppysix. I cannot truly defend the Stars and Stripes. The problem I have is with the ideology behind it. I want to support purely the Constitution and the history of the nation, but certain tenths of my heritage won’t allow me to embrace that history. The US government has decided to redefine the constitution to allow my kind certain guarantees. To then ignore it for another hundred years, and then pay attention to it again. The republican party of 1900 and the republican party of 2006 are vastly different parties. Equally so the democratic party of the 1800′s. The Democratic party sticking with the ideal of the name means less government. Of course these days both parties tend to espouse bigger government for differing reasons.
Posted by: D. Evans | December 9, 2007, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
indeed. both parties are vastly different now. but the argument is still the same as it was in 1789. either a weak or a strong federal government. the founders did not create a perfect union but endeavored to create a “more perfect” union. there were some issues they could not resolve but in order to get a union period they “tabled” them for future generations to resolve. hence, the ability to amend the Constitution. in some instances we have failed miserably. in others we have done admirably. the founding fathers belief that our rights are granted by God, that the people grant rights to the government (unless you are a liberal of course. i mean, damn, you need a seeing eye dog to find some of the rights liberals find in the Constitution), is a uniquely American idea. there are times when the leviathan, aka federal government, moves painfully slow. and yes, it might take it awhile to address things but hey, in 1865 you were no longer 3/5ths of a person; i am still an indian , not taxed (yeah, right!). but in the end it all gets sorted out.
the other major argument is who best can solve the country’s problems – big government or its people. what makes America great? her government or her people? typically, if you believe in big government you think the government made the US great. conversely, if you believe in limited government you believe her people made her great. my money is and always will be on THE PEOPLE. how have so few accomplished so much in such a short time? people immigrated here from all over the world, and still do, to make up the US. we are a country that reflects the “citizens of the world” but at the same time are uniquely AMERICAN. my mother, a liberal (rolling my eyes), once remarked that the US had contributed nothing to the world. my argument was rather terse… “we have given the world its greatest gift – freedom.” that is why so many seek this imperfect union for residence.
my country is not perfect. but she sure is the most perfect union ever created by man. in spite of her shortcomings i had no problem leaving blood on the battlefield for her and what she stands for – and the greatness of her people.
mr evans, you may never resolve some of your conflicts but it is people like you who make this country as great as she is and in the end, when all is said and done, despite our differences it is our bond as Americans that make the difference.
Posted by: mudpuppysix | December 10, 2007, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
Has it occurred to anyone who insists on tearing down Thompson and Romney on this issue, that they were the only 2 that had to answer this very difficult question? Can you name me another candidate up there who would have answered that question in a manner more to your liking. And you can’t ask them now, they have had too much time to think about crafting their answers in case it comes up again. Thompson respected that individuals right to hang that flag and also claimed that it was of historical importance. He merely stated that it’s image inflicted painful images on many people and because of this should not be flown over a capitol building. Tell me, who would have had a better answer?
Posted by: Mike | December 20, 2007, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm