Suicide Bomber Strikes Near Defense Secretary Gates
ABC News’ Martha Raddatz Reports: A suicide bomber in Kabul, Afghanistan Tuesday struck near Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who is in Afghanistan for talks with President Hamid Karzai and other officials.
The suicide bomb went off on the same airport road Gates was on, within 20 minutes of Secretary Gates’ convoy, a U.S. official tells ABC News.
The Associated Press reports the bomber struck a two-vehicle convoy belonging to NATO’s International Security Assistance Force near the city’s airport. There were no casualties in the NATO convoy, however the blast wounding civilians passing nearby.
A suicide bomber also struck the last time Vice President Dick Cheney visited Afghanistan.
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
How misleading can you be? The story title “Suicide Bomber Strikes Near Defense Secretary Gates” implies to the average person that it was an attack on his personal convoy. But once you read on, you’ll notice that it wasn’t his convoy, he wasn’t in the area, and he probably didn’t even know it went on. Heck, it doesn’t even say if it was 20 minutes before or 20 minutes after! Stop trying to make us believe that he was in imminent danger because of this event. Perhaps next time, a homicide bomber will strike within 1,000 miles two days before a dignitary and you can mislead the public with another sensational headline to try to attract site visitors…
Posted by: reader | December 4, 2007, 8:38 am 8:38 am
ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN are all in the pocket of the DNC and are still struggling with the 2000 election. Anything, ANYTHING that can appear to sound negative about what is going on in Iraq, Afghanistan, or anyplace else and puts Bush in a bad light will be twisted to their purpose. This is a non-story except the bad news has been light for a while and they search high and low for these sorts of things.
Posted by: reader 2 | December 4, 2007, 8:58 am 8:58 am
Sounds like good news to me. The only one who died was the bomber.
Posted by: Kevin Cato | December 4, 2007, 9:01 am 9:01 am
I agree with the comments of “Reader 2″. That about sums it up in a nutshell.
Posted by: homjett | December 4, 2007, 9:06 am 9:06 am
the reporter failed to point out the possible contribution to global warming from the bomb!
Posted by: larry williams | December 4, 2007, 9:13 am 9:13 am
still a homicide bomber that just happend to die as a side effect. The correct label: homicide bomber with side effect.
Posted by: fred | December 4, 2007, 9:15 am 9:15 am
It seems everyone here agrees ABC, will you people actually start learning from what your customers say about your product, or are you all going to be stubborn and keep producing the same flawed product? I’m sure someone out there will be glad to take over the news business once ABC has drivin its image as low as many of the failing print media companies are experiencing.
Posted by: Chris | December 4, 2007, 9:16 am 9:16 am
With traditional news outlets losing readership (money) left and right, I think they’re getting desperate.
Bear in mind, however, that the person who writes the story isn’t the person who writes the headline (that being the Copy Editor), so don’t be too hard on the reporter.
Posted by: Jeff | December 4, 2007, 9:21 am 9:21 am
Of course he knew it went off behind him. I don’t know about you but every time a car bomb went off I jumped a little. After time you get used to it but not when you just get off a jet. But is it news? Not really, just a coincidence.
Posted by: Ben | December 4, 2007, 9:22 am 9:22 am
I would like to know if Hillary remained calm and presidential durng this time. After all, as a mother she is even more concerned then the rest of us.
Posted by: Jim | December 4, 2007, 9:24 am 9:24 am
Reader 2 – Both parties get unfair treatment; Bush and the GOP got a walk from the media leading up to the war in Iraq. But if you don’t like the ABC product then don’t use it – that’s how the free market works. Besides, this story doesn’t have anything to do with party or partisanship.
Posted by: Benmurphynyc | December 4, 2007, 9:25 am 9:25 am
Relax people. Sheesh, conspiracy this and that…
Posted by: hawkrew | December 4, 2007, 9:28 am 9:28 am
Im interested in knowing if some policy Bush has instituted had anything to do with this poor, globally warmed, uninsured and misunderstood SUICIDE Bomber’s decision to blow himself up?
Posted by: James | December 4, 2007, 9:29 am 9:29 am
I wonder if the enemy bomber was actually after Gates. That would send quite a message. Due to security and diversionary tactics NATO probably uses there was no way of knowing which convoy was actually his. Maybe the bomber was taking his chances on limited intelligence and hit the wrong target. Good thing they were not successful. No, I am not high.
Posted by: Mike | December 4, 2007, 9:33 am 9:33 am
Jim,if it has nothing to do with a party or partisanship why run the story!We all know that bombs and gunfire are heard everyday there!
Posted by: Jason | December 4, 2007, 9:33 am 9:33 am
Here’s some news ABC. The US military is winning. Even the Washington Times is starting to admit it.
Posted by: Rick | December 4, 2007, 9:33 am 9:33 am
Ironically, it is usually neo-cons that jump on a story like this as support for why we are fighting and need to vote republican.
The title of the story is sensationalist. There is no mention of Afganistan, if I was not aware of Gates being in the Middle East right now, I might have thought this happened in the US.
Like the first comment stated, the incident happened 20 minutes either before or after Gates was in the area. It’s like saying I was almost in a car crash, because I passed the scene of an accident that happened 20 minutes earlier.
Posted by: JoeBob | December 4, 2007, 9:37 am 9:37 am
What, no analysis of the disproportionate impact on women and minorities?
Posted by: Ardmoor Oakes | December 4, 2007, 9:40 am 9:40 am
I was stationed at Bagram Air Base when the homicide bomber attacked the gate that Vice President Cheney MIGHT have travelled through that day. Just like in this case, it was reported in such a way as to let you believe there was actual danager to the VP. Somewhat misleading…
Posted by: smallwood | December 4, 2007, 9:41 am 9:41 am
What, no analysis of the disproportionate impact on women and minorities?
Posted by: Ardmoor Oakes | December 4, 2007, 9:41 am 9:41 am
If we would just quit meddling in their country their countries affairs you wouldn’t find as many people willing to blow themselves up to in order to make a statement. But hey, lets just plant the rose bush of democracy around the globe at any cost since we are such a great model of how that works.
Posted by: Greg Kita | December 4, 2007, 9:43 am 9:43 am
Winning? Winning what? We invaded a sovereign nation to steal some oil. You Fox news blow hards need to have your heads checked. As for all the negative talk about people defending their own country, if another nation invaded the US would you roll over like a b!tch and take it? I hope not. I hope you would be in the trenches fighting for your country next to me. I am a vet of first Gulf War. 63 combat mission for the US Air Force.
Posted by: Mark | December 4, 2007, 9:43 am 9:43 am
Smallwood I can see your point. Anton you are also right on the money. JoeBob I am not convinced that you know how to read.
Posted by: Mike | December 4, 2007, 9:46 am 9:46 am
Hey ! I almost got blown up in the World Trade Center. I had just taken a picture of it 2 days before it blew up.
headline should have been: Suicide Bomber Blows himself up, No casulaties reported.
Posted by: MikeyG | December 4, 2007, 9:50 am 9:50 am
Another piece of propaganda from the failing networks. That sucking sound is your ratings, falling day by day. Ever think that changing your tune might reverse things? But you dinosaurs never learn….
Posted by: B. Samuel Davis | December 4, 2007, 10:02 am 10:02 am
Win? We may have “won” some small, insignificant war for a fossil fuel that the cavemen wonder why we’re still using, but we lost everything else.
Only a fool could be proud of that.
Nutfarm! haha that was funny.
Posted by: mickeylicksit | December 4, 2007, 10:03 am 10:03 am
I suppose that ABC is going to do a follow-up story on how this was all Bush’s fault. I’m sure they’ll link this, in their own whacked out way, to the White House. ABC. . .it’s only a matter of time before you reap what you haved sowed. LOL
Posted by: JWD | December 4, 2007, 10:04 am 10:04 am
I am very confused. This is not a news story because we are winning and car bombs and suicide bombers are a common event in Afghanistan? Something about those two statements don’t make a lot of sense.
Posted by: Khen | December 4, 2007, 10:09 am 10:09 am
It appears that ABC’s game here is to make the enemy appear more powerful and successful than they really are, in support of their own ideological agenda to defeat the US. In this case, an IED goes off somewhere on a road used by Gates within twenty minutes, which means Gates is probably ten to twenty miles away from the blast. That means that from the point of the blast, Gates was at least on the edge of the horizon from danger. Could he even hear the blast which ABC implies came so close to him?
Likewise, the suicide bomber which ABC claims struck against VP Cheney had nothing to do with Cheney’s visit. He struck at a gate on the other side of the base where Cheney was having a meeting. It is more hyperbole, not facts, from political hacks, not newsmen, at ABC.
They’re trying to spin the war for the bad guys, just like they did in Vietnam. But we’re on to them this time.
Posted by: Tantor | December 4, 2007, 10:10 am 10:10 am
It’s the Drive By Media at it’s best!
Posted by: Mikey | December 4, 2007, 10:15 am 10:15 am
To a liberal, liberalism comes before anything (and I mean ANYTHING) else…even making a product that will be viable enough to make a profit and remain in business. That is why they will eventually end up on the trash heap of history.
Posted by: Andy | December 4, 2007, 10:21 am 10:21 am
Reaction to:Reader 2 – Both parties get unfair treatment; Bush and the GOP got a walk from the media leading up to the war in Iraq. But if you don’t like the ABC product then don’t use it – that’s how the free market works. Besides, this story doesn’t have anything to do with party or partisanship.
————–
We hear a lot about “if you don’t like what the news media says…then don’t watch, don’t read that paper, or don’t tune into that radio station, etc…
Well the fact remains, a lot of people do, and all of the information is distributed to millions of people, whether or not if it is factual or swayed to a cause..in this case against the Bush Adm. People believe what they hear. I long for the days when truth was presented to the masses by trusted media and the country rallied behind a cause and REALLY supported the troops and freedom around the world!
Posted by: Scottyron | December 4, 2007, 10:22 am 10:22 am
How many more deaths will it take before the U.S. acknowledges that it has lost the battle for Washington D.C.? We need to get our policemen and politicians out of there, as the deaths will never stop.
Posted by: mojoe | December 4, 2007, 10:23 am 10:23 am
One of those cell phone activated personal destruction devices no doubt. Oops! Wrong number!! Sorry
Posted by: bluesky | December 4, 2007, 10:43 am 10:43 am
Gates should have quoted Steve Buscemi after he got shot in the face in Fargo:
YOU SHOULD SEE THE OTHER GUY!!!
Posted by: edh | December 4, 2007, 10:45 am 10:45 am
The Media gave President Bush a pass? Are you serious? I guess I didn’t see it that way.
How about after 9/11, the media and Dems were all over Bush for not going into Afghanistan fast enough. The truth was our military had been depleted by Bill Clinton and his wagg the dog wars.
Posted by: bill | December 4, 2007, 10:47 am 10:47 am
Story should have read ” Defense Secretary slips by suicide bomber while visiting planet mars.”
What a close call Mr. Secretary.
Posted by: I lol'd | December 4, 2007, 10:50 am 10:50 am
preserve liberty
can a liberal!
Posted by: veto longwene | December 4, 2007, 10:51 am 10:51 am
The Excecutives at ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN etc……need to watch The Glenn Beck Show to understand that we are on to their antics and deceit in so many different areas…..ie….the war, immigration. Maybe someday they will realize that their “business” would prosper if they actually told us the truth the majority of the time……
Posted by: Matt | December 4, 2007, 10:51 am 10:51 am
Remember, ABC is owned by Disney!
They have been creating fantasy for years!
Posted by: Steve | December 4, 2007, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Posted by: Scottyron | Dec 4, 2007 10:22:50 AM
“How many more deaths will it take before the U.S. acknowledges that it has lost the battle for Washington D.C.? We need to get our policemen and politicians out of there, as the deaths will never stop.”
Nation Building is a hell of a business people. I say we cash out asap. The thing that bothers me is that Americans are willing to sign the death warrants of hundreds of thousands of people by leaving those places immediately. Especially Iraq. Regardless of the pre-text for this show we owe it to the civilians of that nation to help them fix what we let become broken; (A Saddam-less Iraq). It’s our short sight that allowed them to each others throats. Pointing fingers at a newly elected majority govt that for decades lived in absolute fear of 20% of the population is obtuse. We turned our back on the Shia of Basra in 91′. That was a horrible thing to do, and I find nobility in trying to fix that. Alot of people died thinking we were going to help them rebel, and the other Bush said. “Syke! We gotta go. Later!” How horrible?. There is good and bad in everything. So New Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Wolfowitz fed us a big Doo Doo sandwich and only some of us seem willing to do the right thing: Finish eating it. That way A regional war doesn’t break out. That’s no gloom and doon either. That’s a near fact that would unfold. If radical Shia’s get a chance to get their way there won’t be a Sunni left in Iraq, and before they can finish that job The Sunni Boys will come to help them. In turn Iran will assist the Shias, and that’s a far bigger, stinkier sandwich. Hopefully we can wash the one we are already eating down with a glass of chocholate milk in the end.
Posted by: Todd | December 4, 2007, 11:03 am 11:03 am
Two Nations,One Cup :-)
Posted by: Todd | December 4, 2007, 11:04 am 11:04 am
edh – Depleted military from wag the dog missions??? IFOR was 20,000 US troops. Regime change in Belgrade without a single soldier on the ground or a casualty. Not seeing how Clinton destroyed the military.
I was still active duty when Bush came into office. Much credit to him for a fantastic pay raise for mid-level NCOs, but active duty numbers were still being pared down. Now we have 150k in Iraq, 40k in Afghanistan and are still operating with basically the same numbers that we had in 2000.
Posted by: Khen | December 4, 2007, 11:06 am 11:06 am
They all deserve big $$$, and full benefits along with fully paid signing bonuses when injured in the line of duty.
Posted by: Todd | December 4, 2007, 11:14 am 11:14 am
If he blew himself up in the U.S., would he be covered by Hillary-Care?
Posted by: Kevin | December 4, 2007, 11:19 am 11:19 am
nut-wingers blame the liberal media at the drop of a hat, failing to see the over-all propaganda machine that ultimately supports neo-cons
Posted by: GETALIFE | December 4, 2007, 11:20 am 11:20 am
Honestly, is there a day when a bomb doesn’t go off in Afghanistan? So any time an American leader happens to find himself on the ground there, ABC could print a sensationalized story about it. Seriously, “Strikes Near Defense Secretary Gates”, because the bomber was on the same road? This story would be equally accurate if a bomb went off on I-90 in Washington State and gates was on I-90 in South Dakota.
Posted by: Bustyn | December 4, 2007, 11:31 am 11:31 am
Readers, remember that the reporters often get things right, and then the headline writer, under the direction of the copy chief, writes a misleading lead. And it’s not the reporter who decides where the story is placed or how much emphasis it receives. Those calls are made by the editors who are often the ones who slant the news to fit their points of view. They also demand reporters to emphasize the points they want emphasized, and sometimes a weak-minded reporter will be so focused on pleasing his supervisors that he’ll resort to exaggerating, ignoring key points or outright propaganda to earn brownie points.
Posted by: Rich | December 4, 2007, 11:33 am 11:33 am
I agree with the 2nd post, why cant all the networks be just like Fox News… they have no agenda at all…..
Posted by: Kyle | December 4, 2007, 11:47 am 11:47 am
What Democrat leaked to the Terrorists what area and time where Roberst Gates was going to be so they could send a Homicde Bomber? REID MURFTHA, HILLARY, BILL OR PEEELOSI?
ALL OF THE ABOVE! The Dems are treasonists they need something bad to happen in IRAQ to help them try to win in 08, I have no doubt they leak info to the Terrorists all the time, why do you think the Muslim groups like CAIR only contribute money to Democrats? 15% of all contribution to Hillary comes from Muslims an 75% comes from the CHINESE GOVERNMENT, Hamas endorsed Hillary and the Democrats publicaly as did most of the terrorist groups they want weakness and free rein to kill and a weak president who can’t fight just take campaign BRIBES Hillary. TREASON is in the air to win in the DNC, the worse Iraq is the more people die is good for the DEMOICRATS with thehelp of Drive by Media who needs to have death and destruction of US soldiers so the can continue the Body counnt, so who leaked the info? DNC on down including Hilery!
Posted by: James Deaniac | December 4, 2007, 11:48 am 11:48 am
Advertisements… contain the only truths to be relied on in a newspaper.
–Thomas Jefferson
Half of the American people have never read a newspaper. Half never voted for President. One hopes it is the same half.
–Gore Vidal
Posted by: Swinehound | December 4, 2007, 11:50 am 11:50 am
Yes, the Democrats are so treasonist. They give up CIA agents names all the time. hahahahaha
Posted by: Kyle | December 4, 2007, 11:50 am 11:50 am
Don’t forget, the Dems are always holding hands with the kings of countries that release AQ terrorists when they promise to play nice.
Posted by: Khen | December 4, 2007, 11:52 am 11:52 am
I suppose you are referring to Valerie Plame?
eh… Again check your facts… oh yea, facts are not important to Demmicrats, only baseless opinions shouted into the echo chambers…
Posted by: Swinehound | December 4, 2007, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Headline: Reporter Almost Captures News
A journalist yesterday reported an event that occured within a short walking distance of another event that occurred later, noting that it might have been compelling if the two events had occurred at the same time and place.
No animals were harmed while shooting the footage.
Posted by: Steeley | December 4, 2007, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
News flash: “Bomber pwned lol”
Posted by: Chickenbutt | December 4, 2007, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
James Deaniac – thanks for the information. I was not sure that CAIR could contribute to political campaigns. But based on what you wrote, it sounds like they can. I know CAIR gets a lot of funding from the Saudi government, but I didn’t know they were giving money to Hillery.
I also didn’t know that Muslims only give money to Dimocrats. I didn’t see a religion filter on the FEC’s disclosure page. But if you say so, I have to believe you. Hillery must be stopped.
Posted by: Khen | December 4, 2007, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
I wonder how different the world might be if we had helped crush the Tamil Tigers when they first “invented” the modern suicide bomber technique.
Posted by: platypus | December 4, 2007, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
homjett suggests that the bomb may have contributed to global warming – doesn’t he know that the bombing was caused by global warming!
Posted by: goodguy | December 4, 2007, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
For Greg Kita: If you have problems with invading Iraq because it was a sovereign nation, did you have the same problem when Bill Clinton waged war on Yugoslavia because of Kosovo? If not, why? I would like to hear your reasoning. Please respond.
Posted by: Tom | December 4, 2007, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
Let’s be fair now. News like this ISN’T about what happened, but what COULD have happened. Oh My Gosh…think of the implications! Perhaps the bomber thought it was President Bush that was going to be on that road…maybe ABC could run something sensational along that line…
Posted by: Jeff | December 4, 2007, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
Tom – Good question. I was opposed to the Kosovo operation. Didn’t believe that we should get involved in an internal issue in another country.
The difference would be that the Kosovo operation was done by NATO. And the US and NATO did not have to put boots on the ground.
Posted by: Khen | December 4, 2007, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
Whew, that was close. I am glad the SecDef is OK. He really should be more careful.
Posted by: Big Dog | December 4, 2007, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
Hillary must be desperate, on the other hand I have five fingers.
Posted by: Chaim Yankel ibn Gefilte-Fish | December 4, 2007, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
when did misleading headlines become an accepted form of “journalism”?
I find it most pathetic.
Posted by: juniper | December 4, 2007, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
Bush and Cheney and Rice should all have gone over with Gates. If they want to run Afhganistan let them move their and become citizens and run for office. If the bomber had picked the right convoy how would you guys have dismissed his action? If he’s so ignorant and clueless maybe you can tell us what road Osama is on so we can almost catch him again?
Posted by: David | December 4, 2007, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
This story could have been written, another suicide bomber committed suicide and Gates was in the country. Then you could say that Harry Reid and Nancy P want to run up the white flag of surrender. They are still saying the surge is not working and we are loosing everything.
Posted by: Jeff In Miami | December 4, 2007, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
“There were no casualties in the NATO convoy, however the blast wounding civilians passing nearby. ”
Does anyone ever proofread your stories?
Posted by: MadMonk | December 4, 2007, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
This conflict is not about Afghanistan and Iraq.
It is about the preservation of Israel!
Think about it, Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq and Syria all flank Israel. By taking out two, Afghanistan and Iraq, we isolated Iran and Syria.
To get right to the point, Israel would not hesitate to use it’s nuclear weapons if they thought the end of Israel was a reality.
Radiation in that region would render ANY oil useless because no human being could work to get it out of the ground.
I’ll let your imagination figure out the world consequences of that.
Posted by: Steve | December 4, 2007, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
No….the headline should have read:
“Some dope, somewhere, in a dopey country, tries to kill some US dope, but the dope is the only casualty” !!
Now that’s journalism….
Posted by: flossmore | December 4, 2007, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
John, a free Israel with freedom for Jews under the rule of law is worth paying your figure of $4,000 per person.
I also read this blog with the understanding that not every post is by an American.
Some people that post here do not understand nor have the freedom to say in public what we can write here, JOHN.
Remember, freedom is not free, it has a monetary and personal cost.
Posted by: Steve | December 4, 2007, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
I hear the bomber insisted on field test before placing it in operational status…what a terrible terrorist.
Posted by: Barney | December 4, 2007, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
Misleading title. Bad reporter. Bad! Bad! No soup for you!
Posted by: Tom | December 4, 2007, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
Strikes near? Same road, twenty minutes off-target? Ah…..this is a pathetic effort to make something more of some poor mind-controlled fool killing themself.
Posted by: Schratboy | December 4, 2007, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Headline: One more Dumb$&$$ blows self to bits, one peice of said dumb*&$% thought to have landed within yards or miles , or maybe even inches of where Gates may or may not have been or be going recently or shortly.
Oh, Gates un-injured
Posted by: whatthe? | December 4, 2007, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
The story title should have been “Homocide bomber lives pointless life and dies pointless death”.
Posted by: Scott | December 4, 2007, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
Did the suicide bomber have health insurance? It seems obvious to me this was a cry for help from the democrates to provide health care for suicide bombers.
Posted by: Hayden | December 4, 2007, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
“”still a homicide bomber that just happend to die as a side effect. The correct label: homicide bomber with side effect.”"
Haha no. The man wanted death. He was a SUICIDE bomber. Sure he is a homicide bomber… but he is a specific type– a suicidal homicide bomber. “Suicide” bomber is the appropriate label. It appropriately conveys the man’s desire to kill himself.
Posted by: Jibryal | December 4, 2007, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
Who do we bomb if they suceed in killing one of our officials. It will take a pre-emptive nuclear attack to send the message to the right people about the ultimate weapon, a bomb on a human being. If the Moslems in the Middle East realize that they will all commit suicide if they make the right people mad is the message we have to send.
Posted by: Charles | December 4, 2007, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
SunFlares strike near Bin Laden Hideout!! in Laden escapes unharmed.
Give or take 91 or so million miles.
But hey, if you think everyone is stupid this kind of reporting makes perfect sense.
Posted by: abubakersmith | December 4, 2007, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
OK… I understand that things blowing up can be scary when you have never personally experienced it. Let me fill you in, Ms Raddatz, and any other reporters that may take the time to read this.
A bomb blast can be considered “near” when you feel it, have debris land near you or even if the noise of it makes you duck. Just hearing it is not enough to call it “Near” as the sound from a large blast can carry for quite a distance.
Being in the same country within 20 minutes of the blast is not considered “Near”.
I hope this helps clear up up any confusion on your part. Have a nice day.
Robbie
US Army
Posted by: Robbie Seal | December 4, 2007, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
To Jeff, who wrote:
Tom – Good question. I was opposed to the Kosovo operation. Didn’t believe that we should get involved in an internal issue in another country.
The difference would be that the Kosovo operation was done by NATO. And the US and NATO did not have to put boots on the ground.
Excuse me, but I was there in 1999, side by side with the US Army, the Greek Army, The Russians (they were fun), and a host of other forces, called ‘KFOR”.. All of our boots touched the ground, too.
Posted by: Jefftoo | December 4, 2007, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
Why not just print that the bomber had a premature detonation on the way to meet the secretary………………..What a dumb story.
Posted by: Rich | December 4, 2007, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
Couldn’t the headline have easily read, “NATO Forces Repel Suicide Bomb Attepmt”?
Posted by: Some Guy | December 4, 2007, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
Off topic Hsu idicted for straw donors to Hillary through Chinese government money! They always say once a criminal always a criminal! by jan 3 2008 85% disaproval of Hillary, the Clitoons Ship is sinking for ever!!!!!!!
Posted by: James Deaniac | December 4, 2007, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
media-are you sure is wasn’t an SUV involved in the blast. You know that any wreck here in the USA always gets more headlines with a global warming SUV!!!!!
Posted by: Alec | December 4, 2007, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
Having failed to coverup the positive news in Iraq, the Dem Propaganda Machine now focuses it’s anti-war spin on Afganistan. Good luck media hacks!
Posted by: Robert Leavitt | December 4, 2007, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
Sounds like ABC’s bias is being uncovered. It’s amazing they have any viewers left.
Posted by: Scott | December 4, 2007, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
I like the ending: 1 suicide bomber dead with no innocent loss of life. I call that a win.
Posted by: Dean | December 4, 2007, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
“Suicide Bomber Attack Occurs Outside of White House, Washington D.C.”
Although admitted the attack did not come from inside the White House, it did occur somewhere outside of the building’s walls in an area near Kabul, Afghanistan.
Posted by: Adam S | December 4, 2007, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
This report is just as phony as all the other mainstream media’s reporting techniques. My solution was to take ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, and MSNBC off my remote control presets, so if I click to run through all the preset channels, it just skips those channels.
To tell you the truth, I haven’t missed them at all, and my life is much better having done so. Of course I have to enter the channel number to watch some football games, but other than that, I am happy.
Posted by: Mike | December 4, 2007, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
Someone ask John Murtha if the surge is working (he said yes finally) and then let’s see if he’s asked to be on the Sunday morning lib TV shows hosted by the likes of NBC’s Chris Matthews and ABC’s Georgie Snafulapolous. Nah, lib media bias is a total freaking neocon myth. Sure.
CNN plants a Hillary supporter during the Snowman-Youtube “debate” and “picks out” questions from Youtubers with all important topics such as gays in the military and Clinton’s Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Policy – and Bible thumping. Yeah, no media bias. Bah bah, liberal sheep.
Posted by: FreddieMac | December 4, 2007, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
I am so sick and tired, as Im sure are all other Americans, of only WEALTHY people being “allowed” to run for president. All of these silver spoon fed people have absolutely no idea of what is going on in this country. It should be made mandatory that all the losers running for president should have to place into a pot the equivalent of 4 times the money they spent on their race for presidency to only be allowed to be spent by “ordinary folk” in any presidental election. The same goes for all congressmen.
Posted by: jose | December 4, 2007, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
Anyone can run for president. Simple requirements, no conscience, willing to bend (extremely) the truth, lack of morals, able to tell anyone anything anytime, then tell someone else something different, even at the same place, time, event, conference, etc.
NOTE: you are not required to meet ALL the above stipulations, but it helps.
Oh, and I think you have to be over 35 years old.
To be a part of the media, the same seems to apply in different degrees.
FOX NEWS SUNDAY has people on there that tell the biggest ‘stories’ I’ve ever heard. I think their mama should wash out their mouth with soap.
Well, so much for my rant and two cents (Whoops, $.29 with inflation) worth.
I may need a loan to file bankrupcy.
I may be financially, morally, spiritually, and socially bankrupt.
Don’t ask, don’t tell.
Posted by: PayMeMore | December 5, 2007, 12:29 am 12:29 am
This is news? Suicide bombers in that part of the world, among others, is about as newsworthy as rain in Seattle. Pardon my un-PC, but these are clearly savages, in areas where savages are quite common.
Posted by: tony | December 5, 2007, 2:28 am 2:28 am
There is a “road” that runs from Seattle to Boston and when I am on it I do not feel that I am “near” that drunk driving Kennedy… or a possible explosion 20 minutes away either.
Posted by: tony | December 5, 2007, 2:36 am 2:36 am
Come to think of it, we haven’t seen Al Franken anywhere since that happened, have we?
Posted by: Pog Mahone | December 5, 2007, 5:14 am 5:14 am