Clinton Accuses Obama of Distorting Her MLK Comments
ABC News’ Eloise Harper and Sunlen Miller report: Sen. Hillary Clinton told reporters for the first time that she believes Sen. Barack Obama’s campaign is distorting what she said about Martin Luther King.
Her comments have created a lot of heat for Clinton in the African American community. When asked who is distorting her words, Clinton said, “I think it clearly came from Sen. Obama’s campaign.”
Clinton added that she had spoken to Rep. Jim Clyburn, D-S.C., who was also concerned about Clinton’s comments.
“I have spoken with him and I regret the way that this matter has been used," she said. "The comments about it were baseless and divisive. I was personally offended by the approach taken."
Clinton commented on the a pending lawsuit in Nevada filed by members of the teachers union that would make it harder for many members of the state’s union to caucus in Nevada. Clinton did not say whether she supported or opposed the suit.
“I know about the lawsuit that has been filed and I hope that it can be resolved by the courts and by the state party, because obviously we want as many people as possible to be able to participate," she said. "That is the whole idea.”
Clinton was asked what she thought about an alleged Obama statement that, "I am the jackpot" — which appeared in print but apparently was not an accurate quote.
“Yes I heard that," Clinton said. "I don’t know what that means.
“The jackpot belongs to the American people, that they would once again have a president that would stand up and fight for the middle class,” she said. "To me this is not a gamble. I’m ready to lead. Nobody has to take a chance on me.”
An ABC News review revealed that Obama actually was reflecting on his campaign theme of change when he said, "I hit the jackpot."
"Since I’m in Las Vegas, I just want you to know that I hit the jackpot," he said. "My bet is paying off because America is ready for change. They are responding all across this nation."
Email
Santorum: Money Will Not Defeat Obama, Ideas Will
Rick Santorum's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
Notice how Hillary “accuses” or “attacks” and the other politicians “claim”. What is with that?
Oh, I forgot Romney “disses”.
Posted by: Denise in Illinois | January 12, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
Instead of defending, explaining or apologizing for her comments, Clinton has twisted the issue into one she can blame Obama for.
For as long as I’ve watched the Clintons, I really loved them, but during this campaign I have become as disgusted with them as I am with George Bush. If Politics is filled with dirty liars who twist the truth to get elected, who have to be negative about the other person solely to discredit any hope that voters may have in the other candidate, can they then shed that habit when they get into the White House? Clinton is aquiring some bad habits. She will make a President in the Bush Order, nothing new, nothing changed. Obama offers a different style, a right ethic, and I pray he doesn’t stoop to this twisting and distorting and lack of culpability that the Clintons have accepted as the campaign standard.
Posted by: Jerome Stueart | January 12, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
She blaming Obama for her comments. Are you kidding me! She was caught in video on FOX news diminishing Dr. King and now its somehow Obama’s fault. She is destroying the Democratic party.
Posted by: Erik | January 12, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
please abc report on this on the nightly news. How is it possible that she made the comment, it was reported on the national news (at the time i do not even think the networks realized she had made a mistake) but she blames obama?
NOW THAT IS A NATIONAL STORY. PLEASE REPORT IT… YOUR RATINGS WILL SOAR.
Posted by: margaret | January 12, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm
I have to agree with you Erik. Her campaign is killing the party. During the past week, she has pit women against men, Whites against Blacks, Hispanics against Blacks,young against old, older women against young women and if her supporters actions today are any indication, she is now quietly supporting Union busting. She is shameless, no tactic is beneath her in her quest towards the presidency.
Posted by: kimbers | January 12, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
Doug for some reason you are forgetting Obama never made the degrading comment about Dr. King, Obama never made the comments about him being a drug dealer, shucking and jivin’, hip black friend or a fairy tail. Clintons supporters aides, husband and staff did that. I can see that you want Clinton to win but you can only blame her for her comments not Obama. He has nothing to do with it. Obama is trying to bridge divides while Clinton is pushing this racism out to divide the country and hurt Obama campaign so she will win. Dude you are being used right now and don’t even know it. By making the statement she has she is counting on good people like yourself to get mad and lash out at Obama for something he never said. Doug no disrespect intended in any thing I’m writing but please please don’t let people fool us as a country in to more hate and division. May God bless.
Posted by: Erik | January 12, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
” … Obama offers a different style, a right ethic, and I pray he doesn’t stoop to this twisting and distorting and lack of culpability that the Clintons have accepted as the campaign standard.” Way too late for that.
Hillary knows what she’s doing. From TRULY watching Obama up till know, it’s clear he’s a contradiction to his whole message and uses low tactics to get ahead. (Wink, Edwards, Media … & Rezko).
He’s even recently been financed by big members of the establishment, while claiming he’s a candidate reperesenting all that’s out of “the old mold.” He shouldn’t have potrayed himself as someone out of the “old mold” ever!!! Hillary is REAL.
Posted by: GT | January 12, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
Obama is the one who fools, besides Edwards. Obama says: Believe it, because I say so. But there’s nothing tangible to his offers. He offers only emptiness. Obama, I don’t want a preacher but a doer.
Posted by: GT | January 12, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
Wake up America! Obama can’t be our next President with his troubling ethics and poor posture. See what have happened to our country when we voted Bush. Be sensible!
Posted by: vnwlui | January 12, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
OOH my goodness!! Hillary Clinton is not feeling well! she is down in the polls: she is starting to choke on her words and look pitiful and sad>…. lets vote for her to make her feel better!! Is this what America is looking for!!1 Are those cookies ready grandmother!!!
Posted by: RG | January 12, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
Obama hasn’t say anything and doesn’t want to play in this dog fight. He is better than that, he is above the fray.
Clinton Tactic.
Open the fire, attack obama personaly so that he can react and then, people will confuse him with the same old, same old.
Sorry it wont happen. Obama knows better than that.
Posted by: demos | January 12, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
Media, you should learn your leasson.
Please, please be very accurate and don’t play with the words as you have been so so unfair and mistreating Senator Clinton including President Clinton.
Best to check the records of Mr. Obama extensively and the words coming out of him attacking other candidates.
Thank you.
Posted by: Loi & David | January 12, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
In response to Demos’ posting:
Obama silence makes him more suspicious. Why is he quiet… isn’t better deal with the Clinotns as the devil(s) we know than the angel(Obama) we do not know?
Keeping quiet makes Obama untrustworthy…how do you elect a person who people do not know what he thinks and says about his race and fellow race men. At least if what the Clintons say is right oe wrong it reflects what white folks are ‘supposedly’ known to do!
Do you know why republicans win? Its’ because they are so honest to who they vote for…if they choose to vote along race,gender, and religion lines they do just that…no ifs or buts They are not hypocrates like Democrats. Wait and see what will happen in November…(I am not even thinking about SC)they will be in the WH!
Posted by: Vee | January 12, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
Clintons are not being beat up ladies. You are using this argument as a tactic for a win. Clinton made the comments about DR. King.
I see how this is going down. Women are choosing not to see Clintons comments and are going to stick with she is being attacked no matter what she says. So now its fear saying anything or the women will raise up against the media. You are all hypocrites. You want fairness for clinton but not for African Americans. Hmmm lets see how about the all of the female journalist question her from now on. That will cure this unfair defense. Here is something else to think about. YOU ARE DEFENDING SOMEONE WHO DEGRADED DR. KING. If it was not for him women would not have greater civil rights today. Think about truth instead of distortions ladies.
Posted by: Erik | January 12, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
I can’t imagine four years Obama’s race baiting nonsense.
First we see Michelle Obama on national television spouting that blacks will “wake up and get it” and vote for her husband simply because he black, which insults every African American by implying they lack the intelligence to vote for someone based on something other than race. Even highly liberal National Public Radio sharply criticized that attempt by the Obama campaign to play the race card.
Now we have his minion Al Sharpton out this week creating a race riot over use of the phrase “fairy tale” to describe a position of Obama’s. Wow. Hardly racist.
Where is Obama the “uniter?” Well, he’s standing on the sidelines delightfully fueling the impending race riot (of which he thinks he will benefit from) with statements about how many black leaders have supposedly called him to express “outrage” that someone would describe his position as a “fairy tale.” Hogwash. His campaign is clearly dying to play the race card and is looking for anything, including “fairy tale,” to pounce on.
How divisive this attitude would be in the White House. If someone disagrees with an Obama agenda item, it will inevitably always be because of race. You either worship him and agree with him — or you’re a racist. This is NOT the direction we should be moving in this country.
Obama is a major con man, but what did we expect — he’s a product of the highly corrupt Daley Machine out of Chicago.
Posted by: Den | January 12, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
Note to media: The more you try to shove Obama down our throats, the more we will reject him.
Posted by: Derrick | January 12, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm
Den explain to me why your position makes sense when 94% white Iowa and half of the vote in 97% white New Hampshire were for Obama. Also a fact most of his supporters are white too. your argument has no merit my friend. he fact are the Clinton are using racism and sexism as a campaign tactic. Face the truth Clinton supporters.
Posted by: Erik | January 12, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
Hey Erik — I grew up in Iowa and attended undergrad and grad school there. The attention Iowans receive every four years is always amusing, but the the Iowa Caucus is a joke. The fact that Obama won only confirms that fact. Iowans, especially college students, like to try and shake things up because it gives Iowa the only attention it EVER receives in the national press. Fact is, without a sitting president running, the winner of the caucus becomes president only 50 percent of the time. Flip a toss, it’s the same odds. Iowa means nothing.
As for New Hampshire. Well, Erik, did you hear Obama lost?
Posted by: Greg | January 12, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
Victoria, Where in the US constitution did you find that race is a part of politics and must be discussed during the campaign? Why would a black man stand up and proclaim that he is “black and proud”. Why would a white man stand up and proclaim that he is “white and proud”. That, little lady, would be political suicide. OBAMA IS DOING THE RIGHT THING, STAYING OUT OF THIS BLACK/WHITE THING. Hil should have been smarter than that! OBAMA AGAIN SHOWS HIS GREAT JUDGEMENT. THERE ARE A LOT OF BLACK PEOPLE WHO ARE AFRAID TO DO AN ANALYSIS OF THE MLK MOVEMENT! THAT’S JUST AN OFF LIMITS SUBJECT. Why she thought she could lecture black people on black issues is beyond me. Go figure!
Posted by: Marcus | January 12, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm
She said what she said about MLK, then after she caught some grief for it, came out a few hours later and tried to amend it, now she is blaming Obama? Right after she blames Obama, she misquotes him on the “jackpot” comment? I’m sure that’s Edwards’ and Obama’s fault……..
Posted by: sad | January 12, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm
First of all, I understand Senator Clinton’s point about Lyndon Johnson. What she was saying is that MLK created a powerful movement, but that movement needed a president to join in. In other words, it’s great that Obama can inspire people with his words, but she would accomplish things with action. Whether you agree or not, she NEVER criticized MLK. That’s, once again going after her in a nasty way. One more thing, BIG mistake for Obama to stir this up because Sharpton is passionately disliked by many otherwise fair-minded people. I wish it hadn’t come to all this. I myself will try my best to look past the nastiness on all sides and decide who has brains and ability. I’m leaning Clinton, but I’m proud of all three democratic candidates.
Posted by: Lucy | January 13, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am
We will see in he end. God only knows what will happen. The fact is you don’t have to win ever battle just the war. To me its a good thing Obama came in narrowly behind. Clinton is now exposing herself to the country as someone who will do anything to win by using sexism, racism, fear tactics and union busting to do it. What is really sad with all due respect to you, is that you and others are so consumed by her winning you choose not to see the injustice. I’ll pray for you and this country. May God bless.
Posted by: Erik | January 13, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am
Hearing the former president say it’s a “fairy tale” that a minority person could be president and that this wanna-be president say’s that Dr. King had little to do with the civil rights amendment, shows just how much these people trust the americans they supposedly represent. Embracing a real minority leader is the only way real change will come to our great country, not the empty promises from the past.
Posted by: nom De plum | January 13, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am
nom De plum — President Clinton NEVER said that it’s a fairy tale for a minority to be president. He said that the position that Obama took on the Iraq war is a fairy tale. Get your facts straight. People sure love to distort the truth.
The Clintons are not racist and for any one to say otherwise just disgusts me.
Posted by: Lucy | January 13, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am
Lucy, Dr. King fought and died for our freedom Lyndon Johnson was pressured into helping due to the civil unrest. Please familiarize your self with the true history. As for Sharpton, blame Bill Clinton for that. He reached out to him on his own which is a fact! In the interview Sharpton says it quite a few times that Bill Clinton called him not Obama. Please place the blame were it belongs and that is Senator Clinton. Again I know you want her to win but on this she is wrong. Dr. King did the hard work and bleed for civil rights for all. Please do some research on this. To assume Obama is behind this is not fair to him or the blog readers. Truth is the key. may God bless.
Posted by: Erik | January 13, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am
Obama promised us “change” in Illinois too — but failed to deliver anything. He has NEVER inititated or supported the kind of fundamental changes that would improve our lives or rid Illinois of the politics as usual that has crippled it. On the contrary, he has supported, and benefited politically and financially from our corrupt system here.
The media has an obligation to provide a more insightful and meaningful exploration of Obama’s record — or rather lack of a record – on the issue of “change” in Chicago and Illinois.
This guy is a first class con man. He hasn’t done anything while on our payroll as our senator but cut deals to enrich himself (e.g. Rezko) and his wife (tell us, Michelle, what was the deal Obama cut that more then tripled your salary to $350,000 at the U of Chicago Hospitals immediately after he was elected to the senate?).
Posted by: Dab 5 | January 13, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am
Lucy, Obama didn’t “stir this up”. Infact, he never said anything about any of this. This originated in the black community in S.C. Now you get YOUR facts straight!
Posted by: Marcus | January 13, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am
Well it’s obvious it’s going all over the world it’s no fair tail nor was MLK but someone is twisting media around and it’s obvious.
Posted by: Gloria | January 13, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am
Erik, I know what MLK did. I know how long and hard he fought. Once again you’re assuming that because LBJ is even mentioned, it somehow diminishes what MLK did. It does not. She never meant it that way. As for Sharpton, I think then it is unfortunate for Obama that his name is now in the picture. I will say it again that I admire and respect all three candidates, so don’t assume I’m a diehard Clinton supporter. I just hate the way words are so twisted to each sides advantage. And both (all) sides are guilty of the twisting.
Posted by: Lucy | January 13, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am
Convincing yourselves that minority americans are better served by staying on the plantation of the clinton legacy, screams of your willingness to give up your voices to those who are oblivious at best or worse to those who desire to be your master’s. Waking up this country from the darkness of its past will help heal it, the future knows this is true and so do the americans who see the potential to cast off these shackles we have burdened ourselves with for so long. Keeping this country from reviving from its slumber, props up the dealers of this hate and empowers them with no end. It is time to keep moving forward and not look to the past anymore.
Posted by: nom De Plum | January 13, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am
The “plantation of the clinton legacy!!!!!!!!” Where is that coming from? Give me a break. That’s just plain dumb.
Posted by: Lucy | January 13, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am
Lucy, Obama never pushed this. Fox, Drudge, Politico and black radio picked up on her comments. Don’t blame Obama. Your are really angry with the media but the media would not have this story to talk bout if Clinton had not made her NOTracist but DEGRADING comments about MLK. After reading your post I apologies you to you but the facts are Obama did not push this. Clinton would be better off owning up to it, apologies and move on. I know by experience of being one African Americans are very forgiving people. Take care.
Posted by: Erik | January 13, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am
Erik, from what I have heard, she has tried to explain it and so has President Clinton. I can’t imagine either of them degrading MLK. I believe in my heart that they are not racist, so perhaps a better understanding of her response to Fox News’ question would calm things. These candidates are constantly bombarded with questions and the media are like vultures waiting for one little misstep to distort and destroy. I feel that we democrats are in an enviable position for this election. All three candidates — Clinton, Obama, Edwards — are outstanding in my mind. That is why it is so hard to decide. I truly like them all. And when you think about it, isn’t it sad that it’s 2008 and both women and African Americans are only now given a great chance of becoming president. Too bad only one can win. How about a Clinton-Obama or Obama-Clinton ticket.
Posted by: Lucy | January 13, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am
So Senator Obama made Senator Clinton make her remarks to Fox News? I thought Senator Clinton was the strength candidate . . . getting forced to make this type of gaffe by the inexperienced candidate is going to hurt that claim.
Pathetic.
Posted by: Keith | January 13, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am
I’m shocked that anyone would pull the “RACE CARD.” I don’t see where the Clintons’ made any racist comments about anyone, or about anything. Folks, I believe those attempting to turn this election into a RACIST matter, should be ashamed of their actions. Divided, we will never fix the problems facing this great nation. United, we can solve the MESS created by this administration.
Posted by: pointman | January 13, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am
Lucy:
This isn’t about racism, this about Senator Clinton making statements, that at least on their surface, seem to marginalize/diminish the role MLK and JFK played in the advancement of civil rights. Recall Senator Clinton tried to diss Senator Obama with the false hope comment during the debate. When he pointed to MLK and JFK, she countered that it took LBJ to get something done–in essence prove her argument that it takes actions not words. The only person she has to blame is herself, but given her track record I won’t count on that happening anytime soon.
Posted by: Publicus | January 13, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am
Lucy, thinking about what you wrote I agree with you. Look I know this a tough contest and all of the candidates are under a lot of strain. I believe Clinton should just clarify and move on. Like
I said earlier I DO NOT see her to be a racist she was trying to make a point (which I understand) but she used a poor choice of reference in my opinion. Sometimes I wish we could some how morph clinton and Obama together then everyone would be happy. Perhaps they will do what is in the best interest of the Democratic party and work together. Nice blogging with you. Democrats in 08!
Posted by: Erik | January 13, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am
Clarifying his statement, president clinton reminds one of the trent lott remarks regarding jesse helms … fyi he had the decency to resign.
Slicing down to the facts of how the clinton legacy enriched the minorities of this country we only have to look to the minority of the ceo, benefitting ken lay, tyco, worldcom …
Moving away from this generation who suffers this embrace that their america still is unready for a minority president is the best medicine to cure her.
Posted by: nom De plum | January 13, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am
Pointman:
The fact that you don’t think they are racist is fine where you are concerned. The problem is, though, you aren’t the only one concerned. I agree that the Clinton’s aren’t racist. That being said, there have been some incredibly tone-deaf statements made by the Clintons during this campaign–and her comment on MLK/JFK was terrible on multiple fronts, none of them flattering to her, easily misinterpretted and definitely NOT Senator Obama’s fault. Apparently when she found her new voice, she didn’t find any responsibility for statements made in that voice.
Posted by: Common Sense | January 13, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am
Obama promised us “change” in Illinois too — but failed to deliver anything. He has NEVER inititated or supported the kind of fundamental changes that would improve our lives or rid Illinois of the politics as usual that has crippled it. On the contrary, he has supported, and benefited politically and financially from our corrupt system here.
The media has an obligation to provide a more insightful and meaningful exploration of Obama’s record — or rather lack of a record – on the issue of “change” in Chicago and Illinois.
This guy is a first class con man. He hasn’t done anything while on our payroll as our senator but cut deals to enrich himself (e.g. Rezko) and his wife (tell us, Michelle, what was the deal Obama cut that more then tripled your salary to $350,000 at the U of Chicago Hospitals immediately after he was elected to the senate?).
Posted by: dab 5 | January 13, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am
Publicus,
I understand how many would believe that she diminished MLK’s efforts by stating that it took LBJ to pass the Civil Rights Act. I do not think she meant to diminish him. She will be on Meet the Press for an hour tomorrow, so hopefully you can hear her explanation.
Posted by: Lucy | January 13, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am
Although a loyal Dem, I have lost all respect for Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton and her campaign this past week. She keeps attacking Obama instead of just talking about the issues.
After reading her stand on the issues on her website I can see why. She has no new ideas, in many cases she just watered down Edwards or Obama’s plans.
The hypocrisy of her talking about being the champion of the middle class is a real joke. She only started talking about this after Edwards took second place in Iowa. Edwards has made helping the middle class one of his main topics for years, yet Hillary just ‘adopted’ it as part of her agenda. Are we American voters that stupid that we won’t notice her huge change in tactics and recognize them for what they are a sign of; a politician with no real message of her own.
Please read Edwards and Obama’s websites where under issues you’ll find their positions and solutions on our most pressing problems. Stop deciding on sound bites. Decide because the candidate makes sense on the issues.And remember that Obama and Edwards are not taking big corporate donations from the health care industry, the pharma industry or the oil industry, that should speak volumes about who’s best interests they will have in mind as our next president.
Posted by: Lydia | January 13, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am
Poor Hillary!!! She can’t help she’s not part of her own conspiracy theory on words against Obama. Talking about not being divisive and ready to lead the people on day one. Who made Queen Hillary ready to lead? Let’s see, she voted for the war that she now say she won’t to get us out of; she breaks down with misty eyes when she faces possible defeat or can’t stand the heat because she deserves to be President; she and Bill play dirty, divisive politics to distort another candidate’s fairy tale of a campaign; she makes all these promises to different constituents to get their votes when she been in Congress long enough to make these recommendations before now. Remember these issues just didn’t start three months ago. They’ve been around for quite some Bush years! GO FIGURE…It’s time to end the Bush and Clinton families claim to the White House.
Posted by: Lani, GA | January 13, 2008, 1:14 am 1:14 am
Rooting for the past to return is without doubt not progressive and in some ways traditional, dare I say conservative. Relinquishing power and promoting the future posterity to take the reigns of government should be the goal of the previous generation. Burying the past with its burdens allows the new and invigorated to coalesce and live that “fairy tale”.
Posted by: nom De plum | January 13, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am
Marcus:
Politics involves the everyday discourse of our lives. I do not understand what you mean by citing the constitution. I do not care about it after all it says all men are created equal and my lived expereinces do not match the assertion. Do I then make noise about this-yes, a noise that makes sense to those who have ste up structures that create inequalities between Americans. What is the defining factor of this inequality? Race. It is how we talk about it that will make or brake America. Conversations about race both in the private and public sphere matter.Its not about ‘I am Black & proud/ I am white and proud’ in the literal sense, it is about presenting scenerio where the public can analyze to gain a deeper undersntading of why this election is important to Blacks and indeed the indegenious people of this land, Native Americans. You analysis is rather shallow. If Obama is walking the thin line as his friend Oprah, then tell him to advice his campaign to shut up when race issues arise!
Posted by: victoria | January 13, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am
Victoria, I should shut up and forget this countries history. Forget that people died and families were destroyed because of America’ s racist past. I don’t think so miss. I’m a african American OBAMA supporter! Do I feel Hillary is racist NO. Did she degrade Dr. King YES. Only she is to blame for what she said not Obama.
Respectfully I have to tell you please learn to see and accept the truth instead of what you want to believe.
Posted by: Erik | January 13, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am
Victoria. Point well taken but again I say. Obama isn’t bound by anything legally or morally to respond to this new “thing” on the radar…but I assure you he will. Just give him a few more days. Like the master mind he is, he’ll allow this to simmer, and be the “Negative” Clinton lead story for a few days then he’ll respond. I’ll bet anything on that! His response is going to be very calculated and will make the best of the days left before election day. Just like he’s allowing the endorsements to trickle out every other day. He wants his positive/her negative to last as long as possible. It would not be wise for him or any candidate to jump everytime something happens. Hil didn’t when her staff were making those comments about Obama, she waited 3-4 days then “fired” (some say allow to resign) a few people.
Posted by: Marcus | January 13, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am
Obama’s foreign policy experience consists of a college course in international relations and watching “From Russia with Love” one night with his wife while the kids were asleep. Oh – and he occasionally makes a long distance call to Kenya to talk with his relatives. (That’s “foreign relations,” right?) Combine that with two years of experience in the U.S. Senate, most of which was spent simply campaigning for president, and you have a sure-fire winner. Sure, this guy is ready to assume the most powerful position in the world. LOL
Posted by: Jon | January 13, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am
Oh — and Obama’s foreign relations experience also includes a trip to Mexico with his 8th grade Spanish class and I understand he has watched “Roman Holiday” and “My Big Fat Greek Wedding” several times.
Sure, obama is qualifed to become the most powerful leader in the world. How tough can it be? LOL
Posted by: jon | January 13, 2008, 2:18 am 2:18 am
Jon. Hilary’s foreign policy experience is confined to tea and crumpets with foreign dignitaries wives! So what’s your point. since you “wanna-go-there”. What are you 12! Stop (cut & paste) from other news blogs and come up with something original! I read that on CNN.
Posted by: Marcus | January 13, 2008, 2:25 am 2:25 am
I am really confused about Clintons. Before NH primaries, Bill Clinton becomes angry and tells everyone that Obama’s dream is a biggest fairy tale he ever heard and today he says Obama might win and his campaign is very strong. Hillary makes useless and uneducated comments about Dr MLK during her speech and defends it five hours later and try to explain she meant something else. Before Iowa caucus Hillary was praising Iowa, after she lost Iowa she said I knew I am not going to win in Iowa and Iowa people won’t vote for me. Then why she went to Iowa asking for vote? Does this reflects the accountability of Clinton’s for their own words? Does America needs President who is not accountable? People of this Great Country Wake Up!!
I have been following Obama’s campaign and speeches. What he wants say is we need a united country to make the things work. He is not divider but uniter and he is consistent with his words.
Think this way, the women who did not stand for her own rights when her husband cheated on her, do u think she has courage and heart to stand for whole Nation? She would might cry and ask for sympathy. We do not want a President who will cries we want someone who will fight for our rights and make whole Nation rise with dignity and self pride.
Posted by: samyr | January 13, 2008, 2:26 am 2:26 am
From Tuesday’s Chicago Tribune:
“All this pro-Barack hope and change and excitement, all these delicious, Barack-inspired comparisons to the Kennedys and Camelot and Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., it’s all quite overwhelming, until you consider what’s been cut out:
That Obama is only a few short years removed from taking orders in Springfield, in the Illinois State Senate, and you know how clean Illinois politics is. So as we wait for Obama to transform our politics, let’s hold our breath and see who turns purple first.”
Posted by: Christina | January 13, 2008, 2:29 am 2:29 am
Hey samyr — Obama teared and sniffled on Oprah’s couch. Is he a manipulator?
Obama hides in bathroom stalls and cars on the campaign trail to sneak cigarettes and hide his smoking addiction from the public like a frightened school girl. Is he a manipulator?
Posted by: Lloyd Benson | January 13, 2008, 2:32 am 2:32 am
Oh please. Michelle Obama goes on national television and insists that blacks will “wake up and get it” by voting for Obama simply because he is black and you’re whining about the Clintons.
Where is your outrage at the Obama campaign, which is clearly using and insulting blacks by implying they lack the intelligence to think for themselves, examine the issues outside of skin color and vote based on anything but race?
The Obama campaign’s “vote your race” philosophy is a disgrace. Keep in mind, however, that if race is held out as a reason to vote FOR someone, it must also be a reason to vote AGAINST someone. You can’t have it both ways.
Posted by: Julie | January 13, 2008, 2:37 am 2:37 am
Hey Marcus — you’re right. I forgot that Obama’s foreign relations also includes playing a lengthy game of Risk against his college roommate (Obama won). He has also read “The Day of the Jackel” twice. Sure, this guy is ready to assume the most powerful leadership position in the world. LOL
Posted by: Jon | January 13, 2008, 2:41 am 2:41 am
If you ask someone a question and they begin their response to you with “Well, I’ll be honest with you,” as Obama did to the Washington Post reporter who asked him about his indicted pal Rezko, close your eyes, cover your ears and brace yourself, because a whopper load of BS is going to hit you in the face. I thought used car salesmen were the only ones still using that cheap psychological sales ploy. I guess con men like Obama still like that line also.
Posted by: Robert Berridge | January 13, 2008, 2:46 am 2:46 am
Julie She didn’t say that! Why don’t people read for themselves! What she said was that black Americans are interested in voting for Obama BUT are hesitant because they fear their votes will be wasted because white America will never elect him. That’s what we have been faced with for 200+ years…no- and dis- respect from white America. She said that we will “wake up” and realize that America can transcend color and look at caracter and issues. That’s all she was saying and nothing more. If you think the Obamas are trying to make this about race then you’re truly misguided. We make up less than 12% of the US population and a lot less than that of people who are actually voting. Trust me, they’re not stupid!
Posted by: Marcus | January 13, 2008, 2:49 am 2:49 am
I think its sad that we as Americans will never get it. The ignorance that we continue to live in. As we vent our insults about each other, shows our ignorant we are. We can disagree without being so disrespectful toward one another. And we claim to be a Christian nation. Where is the love. We have an obligation to our children to be better than that. God’s is not the author of confusion. God is the God of Hope, the God of Love, and the God of Peace. We need to take time and hear what God is saying, and what he has been saying for generations. Dr King once said, “that we will either learn to live together as brothers or die together as fools. People can vent to the anger, and say all the nasty thing they want to say about Obama, but it won’t work this time. We are not fooled by this ploy. We are here to unite and heal this nation from the ignorance and division that has cause us to hate and disrespect one another for so long. I pray that we will understand that God chooses his leaders. Man looks on the outside, but God looks at the heart. So, let us pray for our leaders that
God has given to us. After, they rejected Moses, and Christ. But they were sent by God. May God Bless Our Nation.
Posted by: bennie | January 13, 2008, 3:42 am 3:42 am
As an African American male let me say this– and this is somthing that I believe many proud to be black would agree with–Change is indeed what we need but transformation is a shot in the dark. What we need to do is take this country back, not transform it. The Clinton Administration was a blessing to countless numbers of Americans of African descent, let us not be so hasty to disavow those blessings because one of our own is doing well with the “White Vote”.
Hillary you go girl!!!!
Posted by: Jason Smith | January 13, 2008, 4:56 am 4:56 am
If Hillary is speaking…she is lying.
Posted by: Alox | January 13, 2008, 7:09 am 7:09 am
I do not trust anything Hillary Clinton says. Every statement she made in this article is twisted to her benefit and attempts to put down Barack Obama. I hope the voters see through her lies.
Posted by: Bob | January 13, 2008, 7:20 am 7:20 am
Totally agree with Kimbers who wrote:
Her campaign is killing the party. During the past week, she has pit women against men, Whites against Blacks, Hispanics against Blacks,young against old, older women against young women and if her supporters actions today are any indication, she is now quietly supporting Union busting. She is shameless, no tactic is beneath her in her quest towards the presidency.
=======
Well said.
If she wins, Hillary will likley be the most devisive President in history.
Posted by: Bob | January 13, 2008, 7:25 am 7:25 am
Hillary’s comment that President Lyndon Johnson was more important than Martin Luther King for gains in civil rights was rediculous. The Clinton’s lust for power will make they say and do almost anything. The Clintons need to bow out gracefully. They are making a mess of this election process and the Democratic party.
Posted by: Bob, DC | January 13, 2008, 7:29 am 7:29 am
Hello fellow bloggers, lets not deteriorate to the same low levels of twisting facts like many a media outfits. Be objective, support your candidate, dont misrepresent facts by taking things out of context. Someone has tried to criticise Mrs Obama; that was clearly out of context, as wrong as trying to label Mrs Clinton as racist. However, I think Mrs Clinton should learn to be more careful in her choice of words next time. But then again, someone of her level ought to know better, she claims 35 years of experience in the public sector.
Posted by: Hill | January 13, 2008, 7:41 am 7:41 am
Reminding voters that obama is black is the clinton strategy for victory. Relying on the racist past of this country emboldens them to recapture the “white” house, just listen to the supporters of the clinton campaign
“you can’t shuck and jive” to the house – andrew cuomo.
“the whole thing is the biggest fairy tale I’ve ever seen” – bill clinton
“Dr. King’s dream began to be realized when President Lyndon Johnson passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964” – hillary clinton
Correcting the intended meaning of their words after they’ve spoken them, illuminates the doldrums whence they came. Blaming others for your own words is only damage control.
Dr. King had a dream and hillary clinton is not it.
Posted by: nom De plum | January 13, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
Sen Obama needs to distance himself from Sharpton. When someone from Sen Clinton’s camp crosses the line, she fires them. I have not seen that ACTION from Sen Obama’s camp. If he can not stand firm within his own camp,then how is he going to run this country? Are we going to 4 years of the race issue dividing our country? BTW, I’m tri-racial… and a women… I could roll in pity on many fronts..but prefer to rise above!
Posted by: Denise in Illinois | January 13, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
Hillary Clinton is becoming the most devisive candidate in history — women vs men; old vs young; blacks vs whites; hispanics vs blacks. Now she’s sounding like a union buster. She and her husband are damaging the Democratic party. The Clintons need to bow out gracefully and let the nation move on to a better future.
Posted by: Bob, DC | January 13, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
Obama is not playing the “race card” anymore than these other politicans are playing the “race card.” If you’re not going to be honest with others, people – please at least be honest to yourselves. Don’t make assumptions about a person’s behaviors if you do not understand them. Many decisions are made within a political campaign that can seem to have entirely different motivations. Please think about this.
Posted by: Rudy | January 13, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am
‘Sen Obama needs to distance himself from Sharpton.’ Huh? Did I miss something? In the event I did, why would that be? Is he reserved for the Clinton’s only?
Posted by: kimbers | January 13, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
Might want to turn on meet the press right now on NBC and have it playing in the background. She is spinning Obama again. Russert just told her that he wanted to stay talking about her. I’m sure later we’ll hear that Russert was picking on her and distorting her when he is quoting her own words at her.
Posted by: kimbers | January 13, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am
I failed to see what is wrong in the statement “Dr. King’s dream began to be realized when President Lyndon Johnson passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964″
Let us analyze it:
1. Dr. King’s dream
There is recognition that Dr. King has a powerful dream for change.
2. dream began to be realized when President Lyndon Johnson passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Do you think President Lyndon Johnson would have passed the Civil Rights Act without Dr. King’s action? Dr. King not only dream for change but took actions to make the dream successful. Dr. King’s actions were important for President Lyndon Johnson to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Now, voters have to decide between “Action for Change” and “Believe for Change”
Posted by: CPM | January 13, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am
Let’s see… to Sharpton words like … “lynching” and “fairy tale” are now racial. Forget that many whites & American Indians were also lynched!! And MLK was the only champion of Civil Rights… I remember the riots after his death… in all major cites EXCEPT Indy where RFK was at the time. Now there was a person that influiced the movement. It took alot of citizens to unite in the civil rights movement. And lets see who arises to the occasion this time? I’m not seeing Obama out there!!
Posted by: Denise in Illinois | January 13, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am
“The Clinton Administration was a blessing to countless numbers of Americans of African descent”
I keep hearing people say that, but I don’t get it. What exactly did Bill do which was such a blessing? He willfully ignored the genocide in Rwanda, pushed through NAFTA and pushed through getting China permanent most favored nation trade status. How exactly were any of those things blessings for Africans or African-Americans?
Posted by: John | January 13, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am
I remember that period of America’s history very clearly too Denise. And all the years since. What I see in Obama is a man who is out there representing exactly what all the years of struggle were for. That the common denominator that we each have is that we are all Americans, inspite of or perhaps because of our differences. He is a man who is willing to represent all of us, even those who disagree with him. He is running his campaign as he lives his life, with quiet strength and integrety. I happen to think that it’s a great thing, to want the best for America and believe that under good leadership Americans will rise to the occasion and we will all be better for it.
Posted by: kimbers | January 13, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am
Kimbers
I would like to see some action by Sen Obama right now. This is the moment! It is not about who started this … it is about who ends this.
I just watched Meet the Press and feel like Sen Clinton is trying to move to the issues. Now is the time for both Sen Clinton and Sen Obama to present to the people a united front against this race issue. And the person who can NOT or refuses will be the worst for it. My vote is in the balance here.
Posted by: Denise in Illinois | January 13, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am
I’ve already been to his web site. I’ve been to Edwards’, Clinton’s and Obama’s web sites. I have read through all the plans. I have researched all the canidates. Wouldn’t be able to make a decision with out all the information. I’m now watching the candidates for their leadership actions. That’s why it an important moment for all of these candidates. Are they words or action? No doubt you saw a different Hillary than I did. We all have our own history we bring to the view.
Posted by: Denise in Illinois | January 13, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am
When is the media going to start to discuss the issues?
Posted by: Kardasia_Prime | January 13, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
I can’t beleive the Obama Campaign is accusing the Clinton Campaign of making tthe election racial. I am also shocked that more was not written about the below qoute in the press. Why is Hillary being taken to task and Obama campaign via Jesse Jackson Jr. is not taken to task on the qoute below. The below comment by Jesse Jackson Jr. are balantly racist. They are anti female and are accusing the Clinton’s of not carring for the Black victims of Katrina because she did not cry during the Hurricane Katrina Crisis. I recall the Bill Clinton and Bush Senior raised money for the victims-as did the whole country. Obama’s campaign is reaching new lows. He is the candidate for change all right change for the worse. Please read below
Here’s one key quote:
…there were tears that melted the Granite State. And those are tears that Mrs. Clinton cried on that day, clearly moved voters. She somehow connected with those voters.
But those tears also have to be analyzed. They have to be looked at very, very carefully in light of Katrina, in light of other things that Mrs. Clinton did not cry for, particularly as we head to South Carolina where 45% of African-Americans who participate in the Democratic contest, and they see real hope in Barack Obama.
And:
We saw something very clever in the last week of this campaign coming out of Iowa, going into New Hampshire, we saw a sensitivity factor. Something that Mrs. Clinton has not been able to do with voters that she tried in New Hampshire.
Not in response to voters — not in response to Katrina, not in response to other issues that have devastated the American people, the war in Iraq, we saw tears in response to her appearance. So her appearance brought her to tears, but not hurricane Katrina.
Posted by: anonymous | January 14, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am
Obama getting a free ride IN THE PRESS with his campaign minions making racist comments. See above. Bill Clinton was right about the Press on this one Fairtale land coverage. Where is the press coverage of Jesse Jackson Jr. racist remarks while Hillary gets taken to task for speaking the truth about the history and really old history of the LBJ administration and MLK.
Posted by: anonymous | January 14, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am
LISTEN!!! LET’S CLEAR THE AIR BY FIRST SAYING BILL IS NOT THE FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT. LET’S NOT GIVE HIM PROPS LIKE THAT. HE HAS NEVER BEEN BLACK AND KNOWS NOTHING ABOUT BEING BLACK. OUR STRUGGLE HAS NEVER BEEN AND WILL NEVER BE HIS STRUGGLE. OBAMA IS SHAKING THE NATION WITH HIS VIEWS, THOUGHTS, PLANS FOR THE FUTURE. THEY ARE ALL AFRAID THAT HE COULD WIN. WHO IS BILL TO DEFEND HIS WIFE. HE CHEATED ON HER IN FRONT OF AMERICA. HE LIED TO AMERICA, HIS WIFE AND CHELSEA ABOUT IS AFFAIR. BILL IS A COOL LIAR AS FAR AS I CAN SEE. HE’S A SMOOTH MANIPULATOR AND WILL DO WHAT HE CAN TO DISCREDIT BARAK. LOOK AT WHAT THE CANDIDATES STAND FOR, WHAT THAT SPEAK ABOUT AND LISTEN. LISTEN TO WHAT THEY HAVE TO SAY, AND YOU WILL SEE BARAK OBAMA IS THE REAL DEAL AND HE WILL BRING ABOUT CHANGE.
Posted by: Crystal | January 14, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
This frustrates me. Do people not realize the media are trying to turn them against Hillary so that if she’s the Dem nominee, all Obama supporters will instead vote Republican?
They realize that the only way a Repub can win this election is if McCain goes against Hillary, and all of Obama’s supporters hate her enough to vote for McCain. This is irrevelant and stupid, ABC.
Posted by: Jackie | January 14, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
The real news story here is that black leaders are willing to support the Clintons even though they abandoned Rwanda in 1994.
I’m not some anti-Clinton freak – there are a lot of those – with a consipracy theory.
The 1994 Rwanda Genocide was real. Over 800,000 blacks were really butchered to death at a murder rate 5 times the Holocaust.
Clinton helped whites in Kosovo but not blacks in Rwanda and not a peep out of our black leaders – or media for that matter.
What’s going on?
Posted by: Look2theWest | January 14, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
IS THIS BOARD CENSORED???
Somebody removed the contributions to this board from Jan 13, 2008 3:21:43 PM to Jan 14, 2008 8:52:52 AM. My contribution and few after it (all critical of Clinton), posted yesterday evening are missing. The gap is filled with two pro-Hillary contributions, instead.
WHAT IS GOING ON???
Posted by: pds | January 14, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm