By MichaelJames

Jan 12, 2008 6:12pm

Clinton Attacks Obama on Health Plan

ABC News’ Eloise Harper reports: Sen. Hillary Clinton, for the first time, directly accused Sen. Barack Obama of leaving millions of people out of his health care plan because of politics.

Clinton, speaking in Reno, Nev., told a crowd at a Mexican restaurant:  “Sen. Obama leaves 15 million people out and you can’t tell me that was not done for political reasons.”

Obama has taken issue with Clinton’s claims that his plan leaves people out. Obama has argued people should not be forced to buy health care if they can’t afford it.

Obama spokesman Bill Burton shot back at Clinton over today’s remarks.

“What’s political is the misleading attack Hillary Clinton continues to make on Barack Obama’s health care plan, even though she knows full well that every single American who wants health care could get it under Sen. Obama’s plan," he said. "The real difference here is that Barack Obama doesn’t start by having the government force people to buy health insurance if they can’t afford it, and that’s why his plan does more to bring down the cost of health care than any other plan in this race. As Bill Clinton’s former labor secretary has said, Barack Obama’s plan would actually cover more Americans faster than Hillary Clinton’s would."

Clinton later took the debate even further.

“We know that several of his advisors, when asked why he didn’t  cover everybody, said it was politically controversial, said that it was politically ambitious," Clinton told reporters. "And yes it is.”

User Comments

Sen Clinton’s Health care plan coverage includes adults and children. This is one of the areas where they differ. And there are simply NOT very many areas of their platforms that Sen Clinton & Sen Obama differ. Personality is the biggest difference.

Posted by: Denise in Illinois | January 12, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

Clinton’s plan asks that everyone chip into the system, it is about personal responsibility. Everyone should pay into the system, similar to social security and medicare taxes. So much for together and yes we can. It seems like the working class on up will pay for everyones healthcare, once again squeezing us until we are poor too. Asking everyone to pay is not a big deal, it comes out to less than @30 dollars amount, it might be $350 a year for everyone, maybe more, but it will certainly be less than what it costs now if you don’t have health insurance.
So much for change. Obama sounds like the same old same old democrat in washington, take from the people who work and give to those that don’t work.
Not having it. Vote Hillary.

Posted by: Brian | January 12, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

Hillary, How’s your health plan going, You had 16 years to do something.

Posted by: Patriot2008 | January 12, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

“Sen. Hillary Clinton, for the first time, directly accused Sen. Barack Obama of leaving millions of people out of his health care plan because of politics.”
Hillary hadn’t attacked him over it, because she knew what she was doing. I respect Hillary in that. Obama truly has left millions out of his healthcare plan for a stupid argument: “The real difference here is that Barack Obama doesn’t start by having the government force people to buy health insurance if they can’t afford it, and that’s why his plan does more to bring down the cost of health care than any other plan in this race.”
What a narrow, insular perspective; a smug remark. And he also isn’t making everyone get it. Everyone knows that there are many people out there who are so bogged down with important responsibilities, they won’t get it while they can. Has Obama thought of all this? He certainly hasn’t shown that he has.
Obama deserves the criticism.

Posted by: PC | January 12, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

Two points -
First, Hillary has tried to take issue with Obama’s health care plan multiple times; however, she fails to acknowledge the issues caused by a purely universal health care plan. Just look at our neighbor to the north, Canada, and you can see that both the quality and quantity of physicians suffer under this particular form of health care. Simply saying everyone *has* to have health care does not resolve the key issues.
Second, as Obama has said, his plan does not “leave people out”. Clinton is distorting Obama’s plan much like how pro-life advocates say those who are pro-choice are baby killers. The two are simply not one in the same. Obama seeks to make health care affordable by encouraging economic competition while not “forcing” people to get it or suffer some sort of penalty.

Posted by: Ross | January 12, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

Obama seems to win that argument handily whenever he gets a rebuttal. I don’t see how this works for Hillary unless she’s hoping people don’t hear that rebuttal.

Posted by: Mike | January 12, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

@denise
obamas plan also includes children via mandate since they have no choice. with obamas healthplan everyone can afford healthcare withoul penalizing people.

Posted by: aa | January 12, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

HEY ROSS
“forcing” and paying penalties???? I am being forced to take care of my family because I go to work every day, and because I believe it is my responsibility. People don’t by Health Insurance, not becuase they can’t afford, because they don’t want to pay for it. Put anything on the ballot, like asking for higher taxes or building new roads, people would vote it down. Forcing people to pay in certain instances when costs and uninsured are sprialing out of control, makes complete sense to me and the rest of the people voting in the primaries. Also you make sound as though the poor are going to have to pay, whihch is untrue, the poor are covered through social security and medicare, and it state’s, which all 50 do, support the poor through other healthcare plans. g

Posted by: Brian | January 12, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

@aa
Obama’s plan is weak on the coverage for adults. Of course his coverage includes children.. would not be much of plan without the kiddies. But the adult coverage is lacking. Obama is in tight with the BIG insurance companies so he has to present a plan that they can live with.

Posted by: Denise in Illinois | January 12, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

Whatever Obama isn’t, he sure is a politician. I wonder what Spanish phrase he is coming come up with for “his” health plan. Don’t get me wrong, I do want Obama to be President- in 2016. Hillary is right on track.

Posted by: Casey | January 12, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

“The real difference here is that Barack Obama doesn’t start by having the government force people to buy health insurance if they can’t afford it, and that’s why his plan does more to bring down the cost of health care than any other plan in this race. As Bill Clinton’s former labor secretary has said, Barack Obama’s plan would actually cover more Americans faster than Hillary Clinton’s would.”
Apparently Hillary’s supporters have as hard a time with the truth as she does. That’s ok. The rest of us do not.

Posted by: Terri | January 12, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

Actually, Obama supported a single payer health care plan in 2003..
“And that’s what Jim is talking about when he says everybody in, nobody out. A single payer health care plan, a universal health care plan. And that’s what I’d like to see.”
and in a interview with meet the press he suggested imposing a penalty on those who avoided purchasing health care.
“one way of avoiding them waiting till they get sick is to charge a penalty if they try to sign up later so that they have an incentive to sign up immediately”

Posted by: Ralph | January 12, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

Does anyone elsde see the humor in using the word “truth” when discussing politics?
@Terri
Seems that Obama supporters have that same arrogance that got him in trouble in NH.
When the primary is over … Dems are going to have to repair the implode that has been created…or McCain will be the next president.

Posted by: Denise in Illinois | January 12, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

Mandates are a concession to the insurance industry, and somehow Clinton claims this is politically ambitious of her!? Obama’s position is courageous precisely because it is less of a compromise to special interests. Ask someone who makes minimum wage if they want to be forced to buy health insurance they cannot afford. Then ask the CEO of a health insurance company if they want poor people to be forced to join their plan. I am sure you can predict which one favors Clinton’s position and which one rejects it.

Posted by: Pedro | January 12, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

Politic of personal destruction, HRC is so personal, lovely that she cannot come forth the american people that her VOTE FOR THE IRAK WAR WAS A MISTAKE. But when she was loosing in NH, she cried like a baby. She better untersdand that the parent of those soldiers cry everytime as well.
I am going to college in Utah and they want to force us to pay for insurance even though i cannot even afford my tuition.
So if i dont pay, they charged me for that? What a joke. How does HRC will force people to pay for health care?

Posted by: @@@ | January 12, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

No Matter what the Health care plan is, HRC is not the person who can deliver it. She was in the white house for 8 years plus 7 years in the senate why dont we have universal health care?
Because HRC is not competent and is not good at bringing people together for a common cause. She is divisive and close minded. She things she knows it all and hence will always fail.
She turn up the heat on republican who by the way are american and now she wants to deal with them? Sorry?
Obama is the only atypic politician who can deliver on all those issue.
Obama is smart, visionary, flexible thinker and closer to people than clinton who thinks that people should shut up and just accept whatever she has to say.

Posted by: @@@ | January 12, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

Hillary Clinton’s health care plan will be too costly and unwieldly. Obama’s plan is a sensible balance and will improve the overall provision of care across all strata of society.

Posted by: William | January 12, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

First of all, we have to remember that we’re all arguing about which health care plan is better. This is a good problem to have, and we have to remember to stay united on the fact that a universal health care plan, mandated or not, is better than paying money to private insurance companies for less than ideal coverage.
Barack’s plan is clearly the way to go. Republicans and big lobbyist groups will try to fight universal health care by saying it takes away our freedom of choice. Barack’s plan silences that claim. Competition between government and private insurance is paramount to the success of a universal plan and this is impossible with mandated health care as proposed by Hillary.

Posted by: Justin | January 12, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

“Forcing people to pay in certain instances when costs and uninsured are sprialing out of control, makes complete sense to me and the rest of the people voting in the primaries.”
What I find interesting about this statement of yours is that you believe that health care needs to be enforced by the government when prices are spiraling out of control, as you admit. The two points you make here make little sense together. You believe that people should be forced to pay for plans that you yourself admit to being too costly. How can we expect to force people to purchase something that has far too high a cost.
Furthermore, I am not sure what you are getting at when you mention the whole voting against higher taxes thing, but I am fairly certain people *want* health care plans. After all, many people are left without the means to having their medical problems addressed if they do not have a health care plan. Can you honestly tell me why anyone would not want to be covered? That is what Obama’s point is in his plan. People want health care, but they simply cannot afford it; thus, that is the problem we should be looking to solve.
Finally, you bring up Medicare and Social Security when discussing how “the poor” would be paying for their plans, but you completely miss the fact that both Medicare and Social Security are failing – they are a huge part of the health care problem facing the 21st century. When I said Hillary does not resolve the “key issues”, I was referring to issues such as these. She wishes to force people to purchase something they cannot afford now, and if they do not buy it they are penalized. Furthermore, she has no means of answering the Medicare/SS issues in this particular plan. Obama’s plan looks to lessen the financial burden for everyone, thus lessening the dependency upon both the SS and Medicare programs.

Posted by: Ross | January 12, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

More Baloney from the Clinton Loyalists!
Barack Obama’s plan preserves our
“Freedom of Choice”!
Hillary Clintons plan takes it away!
Could Big Brother be far behind?
Obama’s plan is the more Democratic plan!
Hillary Clinton’s is the Socialist-Communist plan!

Posted by: reaganfan | January 13, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

Hearing a Hillary supporter suggest that Obama is like “the same old Democrat in Washington” is laughable. If Hillary were to end up in the White House, that would be 24-28 years of Clinton/Bush. Talk about “same old”. The American people won’t allow another 4 years of divisive politics in the White House. It’s so bizarre to see the Clinton operation using Rove-style tactics to hang on to power when all of America is calling for a new direction.

Posted by: EddyNewHope | January 13, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am

I also just went to both Clinton’s and Obama’s websites to read their healthcare plan.
One big clue about who will actually make a change that will matter is the front page of Obama’s site that declares he has not taken donations from the Health Industry (or the Oil Industry or the Weapons Industry) which tell me his plan isn’t going to protect the insurance companies unfair profits. Clinton’s plan is a poor copy of Obama’s because it doesn’t mention insurance companies profits as one of the causes of health care being so high in this country. Obama wants to make the insurance affordable for all by giving everyone a chance to buy into a similar insurance plan that Congress can buy into. And you better believe that’s a good one. Just the fact that he isn’t taking money from the health insurance companies and Clinton has taken a lot tells you who will be on ‘our’ side.
John Edwards, who is being virtually ignored by the (corporate influenced-they buy ads) media has the best plan for health care if you take the time to read his website where he has a lot of wonderful workable ideas under ‘issues’. And he isn’t taking big corporate donations either. Vote Edwards or Obama if you want meaningful change to the many problems facing our dear country.

Posted by: Lydia | January 13, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am

Clearly — very clearly, Senator Obama’s plan provides choice and limits the escalation of taxes to Americans because his plan includes the OPTION of purchasing health care at a lower rate that the ridiculously high rates that currently exists. This train of thought is quite brilliant, because it will probably encourage more Republicans to “buy into” that train of thought — and it can be PASSED. Let’s remember that though a candidate has a plan, the plan must be passed in order to take effect. I’ve carefully reviewed both the Clinton and Obama plan — and OBAMA’S PLAN IS THE BEST because it’s more likely to PASS. Brilliant.

Posted by: T. | January 13, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am

You people keep going on about those that would be “FORCED” to buy health insurance,for about $30 per month,when they cant “AFFORD” it.Do you mean to say that these same people..should they get very sick or in a bad accident..could AFFORD a hospital/Dr. bills of about $30,000 OR MORE? Which ones of you are going to pick up their tab? Hmm?SOMEBODYS gotta pay it,by taxes or other means! Its only common sense that a small amount each month is VERRY affordable..considering the consequense, of losing your job,home foreclosure,ruined credit.etc.Wake up people and have some common sense!..or volunteer to pick up these peoples’tabs that cant ‘AFFORD” it..and i’m sure they would let you too.

Posted by: texan | January 13, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am

Hillary’s plan is Mitt Romney’s plan he had when he was Gov. of MA. That should be scary enough to reject her. Go rent Sicko and see how progressive Hillary is. I’m not thrilled with Obama’s health care plan either, it doesn’t go far enough by a country mile. If it is between the two of them though, Obama wins hands down. She represents the politics of the past at a time we need to send a strong message to the rest of the world that we are sorry for unleashing King George II on them and we “get it” now.

Posted by: Mike R. | January 13, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am

The goal should be making healthcare affordable, so people will go out and buy it not force it down there throats. Our healthcare system needs to be retooled but this is not how to do it.

Posted by: Matthew | January 13, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am

Obama promised us “change” in Illinois too — but failed to deliver anything. He has NEVER inititated or supported the kind of fundamental changes that would improve our lives or rid Illinois of the politics as usual that has crippled it. On the contrary, he has supported, and benefited politically and financially from our corrupt system here.
The media has an obligation to provide a more insightful and meaningful exploration of Obama’s record — or rather lack of a record – on the issue of “change” in Chicago and Illinois.

Posted by: greg | January 13, 2008, 2:09 am 2:09 am

I think everyone having to purchase a healthplan sounds un-american. Don’t we all have a right to make choices? If the insurance is truly affordable and gives good coverage then wouldn’t most people want it? Maybe even switch to it. But some people because of their religious believes may not want or need the plan. I don’t blindly trust others. I want the right to be able to learn all about the insurance everything it covers how much it would cost me personally I don’t want to be forced.

Posted by: AnnD52 | January 13, 2008, 2:34 am 2:34 am

15 million is a meaningless number tossed out by the Clinton camp to confuse voters about which is the best way to achieve universal healthcare. Hillary’s plan is designed to benefit drug and insurance companies because it would leave all their inflated profits in place! Sen. Clinton claims 100% coverage is only acheivable by FORCING everyone to buy into the most overpriced health system in the world. She does not say how her “mandate” would be carried out. Would she garnish wages, impose fines or place liens on peoples’ homes like the IRS?
In contrast, Sen. Obama’s plan is specifically designed to LOWER the cost of health insurance, so that most everyone could afford to purchase it. By providing prevention care, removing 30% of bureaucratic waste, and bargaining for the very best price with providers, Obama’s plan would cut costs dramatically. Obama has stated many times that people fail to purchase health insurance not because they don’t want it but because they can’t afford it. His plan is designed to make health insurance easily available and affordable, but for those that could still not afford it there would be assistance. So Hillary’s claims that Obama would leave 15 million out is just another election time lie. Obama’s plan is more afforable, more likely to be acheived and is fair to all Americans regardless of their income level.

Posted by: donna L. | January 13, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am

I am tired of working to care of my family, just to have it taken away to take care of everyone elses. Clintons plan does provide health care for all, but at the expense of me and my family.

Posted by: mike mcewan | January 13, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

Health care in Canada is not perfect, but is better than not having any at all. Part of family lives in Canada and my son-in-law and a few years ago he had leukemia and spent many months in the hospital! He was very very happy to have this type of healthcare. You go Hillary!

Posted by: Sabrina | January 13, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

when u force people to do what they really can’t do, that is simply attacking their freedom of choice to do what they can do and not what they cant do. if you force (poor) people to buy healthcare when you know they really cant, that’s clippiing their freedom to choice. that’s not good at all, moreso in a democratic society. obama’s health care plan gives freedom of choice to poor people who cant afford it. when you allow freedom in people’s lives, they embrace what is needed to embrace wholeheartedly.

Posted by: vee | January 13, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

When we had President Clinton we where out of debt. His wife is smart and has the know how to help U.S.A. the best we have I am for her all the way..

Posted by: Margaret | January 13, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

If Hilliary’s (Canadian style) health care plan is so great. Tell me why Canadians have to come HERE for health care. Socialized medicine means we all suffer. Believe me folks, it CAN be worse!!!

Posted by: rw3 | January 13, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Brian,
Your 16 year comment hit a cord as if you knew anything about healthcare, you would know that most of the issues she tried to garner while first lady were put into place during the Bush administration under the cloak of a republican leadership. Go back and check the facts. Gina C

Posted by: Gina | January 13, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

Obama’s plan for healthcare does NOT cover everyone! Hillary Clinton’s plan DOES. Look at the facts: Obama says he will work with insurance companies to ask them to make insurance more affordable (good luck in that), AND he says that once insurance is “affordable” (whatever that means), that everyone will just go out and buy it – even young twenty year olds with low paying jobs! Yeah, right. Last time I checked, most young people thought they were “indestructable”, and would rather go out and buy a new flat screen TV, instead of buying health insurance. Obama shows a real lack of understanding of human nature, when he says that young people will all rush out and buy insurance, all on their own! The reality is that everyone needs insurance – because we ALL have to pay for the irresponsible people who refuse to buy their own insurance, once those people get sick (the hospitals raise OUR costs to cover those uninsured people.) People need to pay their fair share. Obama doesn’t understand this basic principle – scary! That’s why he needs more experience, and time to study issues, before he could even think about becoming president.

Posted by: Ravenn | January 13, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

Hillary’s plan is to offer CHOICE in healthcare – they can keep private insurance, OR get the same kind of coverage now offered to US Senators, OR they can have something similar to Canada, if that is what they choose. Why can’t I have this choice?
As far as everyone chipping in their fair share – it is no different than everyone chipping in to pay for police coverage, firefighters, or the town library. If we’ve decided those are important enough to ask all citizens to chip in and pay their fair share, why isn’t health care important enough?

Posted by: truthy | January 13, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

The government bookeeper (OMB) has gone public with the fact that by financing three wars, adding prescription drug coverage, as well as the baby boomers retiring, not to mention with a devauling currency…. We CAN’T afford ANY kind of national health care plan! His own words. Any new entitlement on top of what we are currently funding under a trillion dollar defict, will BANKRUPT this country. In 1913 a dollar was worth one dollar, NOW it’s worth $0.13. People if we don’t change, we will not make it. This is how Russia’s economy collapsed in the Cold War. Half the world is moving from the dollar into Euros. And China, the IMF and the World Bank , own our national debt. What happens when they decide to get off the collapsing dollar and call in their loans? America’s economy is on the brink of collapse. If we don’t strengthen the dollar, 1929 will look like paradise. Nobody knows how to grow and maintain an independent food supply. What will you do when the dollar can’t buy you ANYTHING!!! Wake Up, and do something while we still can.

Posted by: rw3 | January 13, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

I urge everyone to check Senator Obama’s voting record. You will be shocked as I was that even though present he only voted about 25% of the time.
He voted against Head Start for children, he voted against placing an extra funds into a program for pregnant women, mothers and children, but he voted to give a million dollars to preserve Woodstock. He voted against a healthcare bill that would have given every child in the United States health care. He voted against health insurance for children whose parent(s) are on Social Security.
Please check his voting record. This man should not be our President.

Posted by: Patricia | January 21, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.