By Jennifer Parker

Jan 29, 2008 4:56pm

Clinton Camp: Florida Matters

ABC News’ Eloise Harper Reports: The Clinton campaign has a message for the media: Florida matters. After Clinton’s loss in South Carolina, the campaign has been pushing the message that the Sunshine State is important — even though Democratic National Committee has said Florida’s delegates will not be seated at the convention, as punishment for moving its primary date up to January.

Clinton announced the morning after her loss in S.C. that she would be spending the evening in Florida – presumably to celebrate her victory.

After a conference call with reporters the campaign stressed it would be unwise to ignore the voters of Florida.

"We don’t envision a circumstance in which the Democratic National Convention doesn’t seat delegates from Michigan and Florida," Clinton campaign communications director Howard Wolfson said on a conference call to reporters. "We know at the end of the day these delegations are going to get seated."

The Clinton campaign also touted the endorsement today of Florida Democratic Senator Bill Nelson.

The Clinton campaign did not pay attention to Michigan, which also does not have delegates, before their primary. They argued that Michigan only had Clinton’s name on the ballot – whereas Florida carries the names of all three leading Democrats. The campaign also defended their position of not campaigning in Florida until now, saying they were honoring their pledge to the DNC.

However the Clinton campaign, smarting from Sen. Ted Kennedy’s endorsement of Sen. Barack Obama yesterday, and a loss in S.C., is arguing the campaign "is a battle for delegates" and they want the media to get their message that any Clinton win in Florida has significance because of the state’s large, diverse voting pool.

User Comments

Why isn’t anyone outraged at Hillary Clinton’s bald-faced and sleazy attempt to steal delegates from a state where the other two candidates did the right thing and took their names off the ballot (MI); and a state where no one has (legally) campaigned (FL)? Does the Clinton campaign actually think that a nomination secured by this change-the-rules-after-the-game tactic would actually be worth having? The only fair thing to do is schedule caucuses in these two states in June, if the nomination is still in doubt by then.

Posted by: jac13 | January 29, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

Gerard C., my friend, your spin is making me positively dizzy. Mrs. Clinton DID INDEED vote for the Iraq invasion, and in fact voted for the one of two competing versions of a war-authorization bill which more Democrats at that time (and today) found most disturbing, essentially handing Bush an open-ended blank check.

Posted by: Mark | January 29, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

Obama and Edwards asked their supporters in Michigan to vote for uncommitted. Clinton supporters voted for her. You really can’t have it both ways, wanting to make a statement by having supporters vote uncommitted, and then crowing about how many votes uncommited got, but not accepting that Hillary got more. In Florida, all the candidates are on the ballot, let’s see who gets votes. Politics is politics, everthing counts.

Posted by: Silvia | January 29, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

CNN, while covering the MI primary rightfully asserted that hundreds of thousands went out to vote, why should the media ignore it.
Although a few people in Washington stripped FL of it’s delegates, when a million people vote, it’s indeed news.

Posted by: James | January 29, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

It is intriguing to me how the supporters of Barack Obama can suggest that, in a democratic nation, it is perfectly acceptable, even righteous, to disenfranchise 1 MILLION voters so you can win the nomination.

Posted by: kristoph | January 29, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

The primary system is dysfunctional at best. During the last election, my vote didn’t matter because the democrats and the media had annointed John Kerry before Super Tuesday. Every state should have a right to be counted. If I was a democrat living in Michigan or Florida, I would be hopping mad that my party was playing games instead of making sure everyone had a fair say in who was the party’s nominee.

Posted by: Mary from Decatur | January 29, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

jac13: You asked, “Does the Clinton campaign actually think that a nomination secured by this change-the-rules-after-the-game tactic would actually be worth having?”
Apparently they do. And what part of ‘change the rules-after-the-game tactics’ of the Clintons surprises you?
Remember Nevada and the teacher’s union (supportors of Hillary) trying to close the polls in the casinos after sites had been chosen and approved months before. Oh, yeah, they had nothing to do with that. Right. End of story:The Clintons have no shame and will do ANYTHING to get elected.

Posted by: propanek | January 29, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Forgive me, kristoph, but what on earth are you talking about??? Please explain how Obama and his supporters are disenfranchising *anyone,* much less 1 million voters? Obama is *bringing new voters* to the polls in huge numbers!

Posted by: Mark | January 29, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

In the first bipartisan polling done… RON PAUL beat Hiliary…. HAHAHAHAHA!!!!
Good for her the Republicans are too dumb for that and are pushing “Mitt the MORON” and “Madman McCain”, looks like the only person who will be given a chance to beat Hilliary…. is Bill.

Posted by: wake up! | January 29, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

UM, it was agreed and ruled upon by the DNC that Florida and Michigan will not have delegates in the Primary. It is a done deal and not going to be changed. She’s prepping for the general. That’s all, and falsely so, she won’t be running.

Posted by: Louis | January 29, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

The Clinton’s backstabbing, lying, whatever it takes policies is pathetic. She agreed not to campain in Florida before the election.So actually she is within her rights to go there after the fact….However why didn’t she go to Michigan after the fact also? Hmmmmm… could it be that she was looking better and had just won N.H? Yep thats why. After S.C. she’s not looking as good. The funny thing is, she had good ole Bubba Clinton go after Obama and she said “attack!” What happened? She got bit on the butt! PRICELESS!! I guess their duo political slander isn’t working out quite so well this time around.

Posted by: jojo | January 29, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

Clinton is a two-faced opportunist. After agreeing with the party that Florida was off the table she goes there to campaign for a symbolic win, just like in Michigan. It will be touted, but there will no delagates and the turnout will be a gesture at best. She is looking for press. She will be another four years of Bush. Lying when it suits her and trating the American people as too stupid to know what they want.

Posted by: Louis'wellsaidcomment | January 29, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

I don’t think that Ted Kennedy will sit by and let the DNC reverse their positions on Florida and Michigan. I also suspect other Democrat powerhouses will take sides.
The Clintons will damage the Democratic Party in pursuit of their singular goals.

Posted by: Ann B. | January 29, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

jac13 – All 3 democratic canidates are on the ballot in Florida and Obama is the only canidate that has been showing ads in Florida and Michigan. The people have a right to vote in all 50 states and all states should count, you should not punish the people for something the admistration did.

Posted by: Kardasia_Prime | January 29, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

jac13- I agree with you that we should all have a vote. My family is in Michigan and let me assure you that Obama would take Michigan. The issue is Clinton wanting to bend the rule’s to what will benefit her- again! She was the only one on the ballot in Michigan , unless you picked “other.” This woman will do whatever it takes. But the votes wont matter- more’s the pity. With a up and up vote Obama would have taken Michigan also.

Posted by: jojo | January 29, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

Jojo – uh, there was essentially an up and down vote in Michigan with Obama and Edwards supporters voting uncommitted and Clinton supporters voting for her. And Clinton beat out “uncommitted”.

Posted by: Cepher | January 29, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

Doesn’t anyone on her team realize this is making her look desperate and dishonest? Don’t they know appearance is important in any election? Seems to me they are either too stupid or too arrogant or both. Reminds me of another fool who was on tv last night!

Posted by: Richard, Memphis, TN | January 29, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

cepher- hardly anyone voted because it wouldnt matter on the democrat side!..geeze…

Posted by: jojo | January 29, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

They must have alot of trust in the media in order to try and pull something like this off. Judging from the media’s attempts to crucify Obama over his “snub”, I’m guessing they’re correct. The media is in their pocket.

Posted by: Mike | January 29, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

I wouldnt vote in Michigan if they wern’t handing out delegates! What would be the point? I agree with you jojojune.Clinton’s latest attempt to play another game is comical.

Posted by: jeff | January 29, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Uhhggg….I am so sick of the Clintons. 4 years of Herbert, 8 years of Bubba, 8 years of Dubya. It’s hard to imagine 4 more years of this if the Shrill gets elected. For god’s sake, move on already.
I’m pretty sure we are realizing why the constitution only allows a President to be in office for 2 terms. The whole country starts to go to sh*t after.
Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Turn the page.

Posted by: ryaple | January 29, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Right On Kristoph! I have more outrage at the comments filled with vile hatred from Obama supporters toward Hillary, regardless of their political views, they’re attacks are disgraceful and petty. It’s weird cult like behavior.

Posted by: inkrun | January 29, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

Let’s call this ploy exactly what it is: Hillary Clinton’s Florida “signing statement”!

Posted by: Callimaco | January 29, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

Posted by: Silvia,
What about the amount of people that did not bother to come out because they KNEW it was a waste of time and it wouldn’t count? What about those people? If she wants Michigan, then she should be prepared for a do over. You don’t know if their supporters ALL voted.
Regardless, it doesn’t matter if she actively campaigns or not, the message is out there………
This is just another attempt at grabbing power. This is one of many reasons I will not vote for Hillary. Different day, same bull….
This also another example of how this campagin is and always has been all about her, while the others campaigns are about the nation…..What does Hillary want? What will benefit Hillary? How can Hillary come out on top? Hillary, Hillary, Hillary, Hillary…Sick and tired of Hillary.
I say let her go for the delegates. It’s already been reported they’ve been trying to get them for some time now anyway. The more this is in the news, the more it drives people AWAY from Hillary – much like having Bill as her lap dog. Needless to say, I agree with Richard, Memphis, TN……..Just more of a spotlight on her. But not a positive light, more like desperation and willing to do whatever it takes to win…..
I do have one question for her supporters though: What happens if she is not the benefactor of the delegates? What if this back fires, will you all then say the delegates should count?
And while you all are fussing with Obama supporters, you might want to use your heads. Stop trying to find something on the guy. Compared to the Clinton’s he is SPOTLESS, yet they are criminals. So, it looks bad when you all defend her at the expense of your party and loyalty to her. After all, She won’t be able to win if fellow Dems vote against her and many I suspect will.
Face it, she doesn’t evoke warm and fuzzy feelings in most people…. Anyway, fellow Dems might decide to join the Rep. and throw this election to them. Have you all ever thought of that? In other words, grow up. She is not more important than your party. And you all make 3rd graders look mature.

Posted by: Maryland | January 29, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

well hate to bust all of you obama kumbya singers but 1 million voters as of 6:30 az time does matter especially since again got less than 25percent of the white vote and lost 2 to 1 of the latino vote face it folks he is not viable period.i know those of you on the far left of the party hate the clintons and want a true leftist for the nominee thus teddys endorsement however you will just give a landslide to the republicans just like you did in 1972 grow up the center wins and it will take a fighter to win in november not a kumbya singer

Posted by: don tufts | January 29, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

When former supporters of her husband and her say her actions in Florida amount to narcissism and sleaze… when it is ok to bend the rules to suit you, but scream bloody murder when they are against you… your name is Clinton.
Please America, wake up… vote for the future and not the past… vote for a candidate who name is not Clinton.

Posted by: Jade7243 | January 29, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

Ok, if Clinton wants to count the delegates and the DNC agrees, then the DNC should pay for a special election in June for Michigan and Florida. All three candidates should seek votes in both states by Campaigning for the votes. If the DNC says the rules stay, then NO delegates period. That’s fair.

Posted by: Tennessee | January 29, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

If the news media called Obama’s win in SC a sweep look at the figures in Florida for Hillary then you’ll know what a sweep is and she swept Obama under the rug. Florida and Michigan are going to try and obtain the delegates back because its not fair to the people and the state. I hope they take it to court.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | January 29, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

Over 500,000 plus Floridians voted for Hillary Clinton. Floridans understand the proven and tested experiences counts. They understand the empty promises and beautiful speaches wont solve this country’s problems. Hillary 2008 – the 1st woman President!!!
Obama supporters need to read their facts first – NO democratic candidates campaign in Flordia.

Posted by: mary | January 29, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

If Billary is on the ticket, she will not win a single southern state. She cannot compete with McCain b/c he knows the truth and she does not. Can a Billary supporter tell me one piece of policy she has enacted that has helped Americans? Please do not include whitewater, travel gate, our wonderful universal health care, and her lies about the Children’s Defense Fund support. Do you just look at her and believe the words that come out of her mouth. Check the facts on Hillary.

Posted by: creswell313 | January 29, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

I’ve met more people who don’t have a preference of a canidate state that under NO circumstances that they would vote for Hilliary. Short of George W. Bush, I don’t know of anyone who can bring out such anti sentiment. She’s alienated everybody but the white female vote. And that alone will win her nothing.

Posted by: wake up! | January 29, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

if mccain wins the republican nomination, it is over b/c he will get the independent vote which was not allowed to vote today in FL. thus, this is an important win for him b/c he proved that he can win among republicans only. also, a theme is emerging on some of the black logs that a growing percentage will vote for him as well. he is a proven leader and he tells the truth. if the republicans get 20% of the black conservative vote which they do each election, mccain can get another 5-15% of the black vote, the conservative latino vote, the traditional republican vote, and the moderate independent southern white vote, billary is toast. the black vote is a loyal base for the dems. but it seems that the post civil rights generation is sick of the race-baiting and is beginning to look at alternative candidates. Again, billary is toast. she is a divider and just examine her record. when are people going to investigate the records of the candidates? i am sick of reading sites that cannot provide any evidence (i.e., policy)regarding why his/her candidate. u cannot win an election w/o carrying at least one southern state – remember 2000 & 2004. the dems are in trouble. who will be her running mate? there are at least two southern govs. that are democrats(males) and if she does pick one of them, it does not mean he can carry his state. in north carolina, they vote a split ticket all the time (i.e., gov. dem. and vote rep. in the national election). u guys are missing the big picture with the diversions (non countable delegate votes and the snub). she is destroying the base voters with her tatics. amazing!

Posted by: creswell313 | January 30, 2008, 3:05 am 3:05 am

If Obama wins the nominee, I am a democrat I will vote REPUBLICAN

Posted by: Nancy | January 30, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

DITTO DITTO THE LAST RESPONSE THANK YOU NANCY — As a conservative democrat, I am so alienated by the rather desperate and “childish” behaviour of the Clintons’ in their sleezy, low life attempts to discredit Obama that I am not likely to vote for her even as dog catcher if she should win the nomination — unless of course Obama is on the ticket. Otherwise, I will vote my conscience on the one issue which concerns me — abortion, I hate to say — Republican.
c gingrich

Posted by: c gingrich | January 30, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

I am a Democrat, have been for 35 years but that may end this year. Between the media bias and my party trying to defeat my candidate I am ready to terminate my support and money to the Democratic Party.
Howard Dean is helping to create the perfect storm. According to Brazile Hillary has to go through a caucus in Florida to re-earn her already earned delegates.
Howard you are really messing things up. Stubborn always loses.

Posted by: Boo Hall | January 30, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

Democrats… snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

Posted by: God Help Us | January 30, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

Hillary Clinton have been in politics
all of 35 years and is experience has
to what and how to get things going.
A woman can do just as good as a man.
Most of the men that have been in the
higher office have wives that they con-
fer with also.Give Hillary a chance to
show her expertise of what a woman of
her experience of being in politics for
35 years can do in that President Office.

Posted by: Beatrice | January 30, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.