By Jennifer Parker

Jan 19, 2008 10:09pm

Mud

Anonymous robocall against "Barack Hussein Obama" that his campaign says it recorded in Nevada. Listen to it HERE

"I’m calling with some important information about Barack Hussein Obama that you don’t know.

"Barack Hussein Obama says he doesn’t take money from Washington lobbyists or special interest groups but the record is clear that he does.

"In fact, Barack Hussein Obama has taken millions of dollars from federal lobbying firms…Wall Street…big oil, pharmaceutical companies….

"You just can’t take a chance on Barack Hussein Obama."

Grim.

– jpt

User Comments

I want to know what was your prediction of the Nevada caucuses before
Mrs Clinton was declered the winner.
ABC news and the rest of the Obama fans will be left in the dust when
the time comes.
HILLARY ’08

Posted by: UGOCHUKWU | January 19, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

I would love to have a president with the middle name of Hussein, I think it would do wonders for our image abroad.

Posted by: Mary Perry | January 19, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

Tonight I was having fun just watching CNN’s Wolf, Anderson Cooper and the rest of the panels, MSBC’s Chris Matthews, K. Oberman and the rest of the panels, all of them with long faces. They were expecting Obama to win. To bad for he biased media, their candidate lost. Now how they can explain his lost again? They have been giving to him a 100% positive coverage while that have trashed 100% Hillary Clinton and ignored 100% Edwards. Now how come a candidate cant win with FREE media coverage, millions of dollars from big groups, corporate America, celebrity endorsements, etc? Something is wrong with the messenger or America is not as stupid as they think. Obama campaign has spent almost 40-50 millions dollars so far and have gotten just Iowa and maybe South Carolina. They will get Illinois for sure and few more States, that’s it!

Posted by: Terry | January 19, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

Obama is trying to run a general election campaign, he forgot that to get elected he needs the base of the party and that base is now between Edwards and Clinton; Obama can keep flirting with the students, the Republicans and Independents; that sometimes work in the general election but not in the primaries. Now it will get more complicated for him with McCain winning tonight, McCain will take alot of independents away from Obama as he did in NH; people now what McCain stands for, also they know what Hillary stands for or Edwards stands for…nobody knows what Obama stands for other than he wants change and hope! ah and taht he likes Reagan! LOL

Posted by: Patrick | January 19, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

Well as annoying gas the message can be; the message is staying some real facts. Obama received – and he cant denied_ money from lobbyists, big corporations in Illinois starting from Exelon, PAC groups and a lot of “closed doors” fund rising. One of his big fund rising was indicted by the Feds an his trail is about to start in Chicago on Feb 25th. Even now, he doesn’t get contributions from the “corporations themselves” but he gets huge amounts of money from the directors, principals, executives of those corporations!

Posted by: Tim_Chgo | January 19, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

Jake, what do you have against Hillary?? Are you afraid to have a Women lead are Country.. You might want to look at what bush did to us for the last 7 years.. I thought ABC was a fair news media, but I see that old “FOX” slant in more and more of your Election coverage.. You should have the guts to say that your a Republican.. Believe me your opinion shows through in your stories.. Hillary will win, and I hope that she picks Obama as her VP.. That will give us 16 years of Democratic rule

Posted by: J.Murphy, CA. | January 20, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

I am very puzzeled by the media coverage of the campaign. Everytime “Barack Hussein Obama” is mentioned, the Obama people will cry fault, and the media will start to accuse others negative campaigning. But is’t that his name? In fact, some of his supporters, if you read the posts here, love that name.
When you want to make a “change”, you will have to first face the reality, you just can not be scared by your own full name. Or should we start with the change of middlename?

Posted by: JL | January 20, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am

If Hillary gets the party nominattion she be easily kicked out in the general election by any Republican, thai’s clear. Most people won’t vote for her they will turn their vote to the Republican. Hillary is a nice woman but she can’t lead this country into the right direction that the American are expecting, it will be contrally.Thanks….

Posted by: I.A.T Smith | January 20, 2008, 2:59 am 2:59 am

Clinton led rival Barack Obama by 6 percentage points with 98 percent of precincts reporting.Although Clinton won the overall state vote, Obama took more delegates because of the areas where he won. CNN projects that Obama will pick up 13 delegates to Clinton’s 12. Now, WHO IS THE WINNER? I am a woman, lawyer, mother, wife and I’ll never vote for Hillary Clinton.I don’t know what it is with these American women that keep supporting her. What are they trying to prove? She is no Margaret Thatcher. Her records are demeaning to the legal profession, her moral values way below the ones of any woman who respects herself, her campaign the nastiest of the recent years. Anyway, too bad for the Democrats, the Republicans won’t let her win, so she and her followers can keep on dreaming.

Posted by: carmen | January 20, 2008, 6:11 am 6:11 am

masses can be blind, they hear, see what is not there. If they would open eyes, they would see Hillary as great leader. Not the one who cannot express himself clearly so everyone understands his words. When Hillary speaks – I know what she is talking about, when O. has constantly says” oh, I did not mean that” and ” I did not understand the question” – well, if someone does not understand question, good thing is to ask: ” what was the question? What did you mean exactly?” But this does not appeal to Mr. O. It can cause major disaster if this would happen by dealing internationally. Do you think that other countries/leaders would wait for “oops, I did not mean that…but….”? Kind of scarry.
I keep repeating: good leader has to have experience, diplomacy. These I did not see with Obama.
If you need a president that will be
ready from day one,Hillary is the one
and not Mr Obama.

Posted by: UGOCHUKWU | January 20, 2008, 6:48 am 6:48 am

It is not enough to be smart, then in that case Laura Bush could also be running and she has more integrity than “your candidate”. I am not a Republican, I have no political affiliation but I will sure vote Republican if the Democrats are not smart enough to choose the right candidate.

Posted by: carmen | January 20, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am

we need hillary for get thing done the right way just like his husband done not to give all money to the rich people and cut the poor people like medicare and medicade this people need the helpt not a cut
obama not ready for a president
plus he his realy not and american name
go for hillary you will be very happy she his a very smart women

Posted by: magella | January 20, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

carmen says “I don’t know what it is with these American women that keep supporting her”
Maybe they want to be part of history in the making, to have the first woman president?

Posted by: JL | January 20, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am

That’s all? Nothing untrue in that message.

Posted by: geevill | January 20, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

Good lord is it childish to keep fronting Barack’s middle name, as if the coincidental connotation to Saddam is somehow meritorious or telling of something.
Stupidity should be painful.

Posted by: Andre | January 20, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

I agree with carmen. I am a mother and an engineer. I do not support Hillary Clinton. She is the wrong woman to be elected President. She may be smart but she is so divisive. If she is elected it will be like having George W. but only in the reverse. We need someone that can bring people together, not drive them apart. I think Barack Obama is the only one on the Democratic side that can do that.

Posted by: Janet | January 20, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

I wonder why people do not like Hillary. If you would read about her capabilities, and experience you would know more.
Let us find the most inexperienced person in the country to run the super-power country and work hard to make the asian countries such as china and india to become the new superpowers in the next 4 years.

Posted by: Su | January 20, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

honestly, the Clinton machine at mud slinging again!!!!…Well after being president for all those years , obviously you have all the necessary connections to pull the strings!!!!!…how about slinging the fact that Hilary Clinton has only seven years real experience against Obamas 11,as a senator??? lets leave Bill outr of this…..or is it experience by association that counts???
and after listenning to the mud….it really is just half truths….what the clintons perfect at…give them half truths, then twist it….to our favor..!!!.

Posted by: independent234 | January 20, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

and why do Americans hate the name Hussien????
I can name you a Hilary, or a Bill, who are in prison for murder, adultery, theft,child molestations etc……does that taint the persons character becuase of the name????
Barack was in Havard, graduated among the top in his class, hilary on the hand did her bar exam three times to pass…..barack, just one shot…he scored top marks!!!!

Posted by: independent 234 | January 20, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Carmen, Hilary can deal well with certain people, but not all people. She doesnt know how to connect well…..Bill, yes….Hilary no….
Hilary cannot hold talks with say the middle east to bring peace….Bill, maybe….not Hilary…Hilary doesnt even know the flight to Africa..Obama can travel the whole world and connect very well with all sorts of people from Asia, to the middle east, to africa..and back to all levels of people in the melting pot of America…all sorts of backgrounds..to connect with the younger generation…Hilary brought Her daughter…because really she had no idea how to…..Bill…yes!!! Hillary…NO!!!….!!!!!

Posted by: Jennie | January 20, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

To Carmen and Janet.
Hillary is the only Democrat that the party has to defend our party against the Republicans. Especially if McCain wins (Although I predict Mitt the . WHY? Because she is destined to be the first woman President and now is her time. But more importantly, she is qualified. Obama has the gift of an activist not a President at this time. If the youth of America choose to become objective versus emotional while viewing these candidates, perhaps what I am about to share will make sense.Carmen and Janet not all Democrats despise Hillary. That statement from many publications and pundits causes distorted thinking among easily persuaded voters. Think of how the people of New Hamphire and Nevada voted for Hillary based on who is best for the job. Hillary is a woman and a politician that has fought within a good ‘ol boys club for years and successfully maintained political responsibility for this Country despite the obstacles of prejudice and persecution. Try to think of what human behaviour does when constantly attacked, most of us withdraw and do not let ourselves known to others. Because we need to complete circles whether given the information or not, we finish the circle with our own conclusions with self derived explanations. In other words, a professional Stateswoman like Senator Clinton will remain that, because she does have a different image to uphold in the public arena. I am a man and I strongly disagree that she is so divisive. Think beyond the media and think of how a woman has created the biggest change in politics this Country has ever experienced-namely- a female President in the making.A woman in charge will always be persecuted as a whole-try the 7% difference in wages from a male executive versus female–Guess who receives the 7% less. I do not know about you but I think in the year 2008 that is pretty backwards, but moreso is the thought processes of intelligent and profesional women like
you and Janet not supporting the efforts of a qualified, brilliant, presentable Candidate versus a male that is inexperienced to reside in the position of President. What did you think about the hecklers that placed signs in the air at Hillary’s rally that said, “Iron my shirt”? Statements such as these put women back 50 years plus, not emotions of the human element. Do you feel that is as offensive to female and a female Politician as it would be to Obama if hecklers were at his rally with signs that said, “Ride in the back of the bus”? The point is that I think Obama would definitely start a riot over that versus the virtually non-issue of the sexism she still has to do with on a constant level. Again, I do not know your ages or any other demographics but I truelly believe that if you do not know why people despise someone, perhaps you should get to know that person and what they stand for and decide for yourself, because lack of true information and decision mark discuss, and instead of using SUBJECTIVE reasoning, change to “OBJECTIVE” reasoning, it surely will become more valuable to you two. The race between Obama and Clinton seems to be getting the majority of the media attention. Hillary’s apparent emotional moment was compelling.
Please do not be a Hillary hater but a
supporter. HILLARY ’08

Posted by: UGOCHUKWU | January 20, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Way to go, CLINTON’S AND THERE SUPPORTERS, knock a black man down while calling yourselves LIBRALS, way to go.
Hillary has NO EXPERIENCE, Bill Clinton was the President and Gore the Vice.
There was no CO-PRESIDENT that is UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
We have two first term Senators running for the highest office in the world, NO, Hell No.
NO MORE 11 SEPTEMBER 2001’s.
We have had enough greedy, self- serving, me first thinkers, that helped caused the massacre of 911, and the current WAR.
Thanks Bill Clinton & Al Gore way to go.

Posted by: ECU | January 20, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

Hillary is the most qualified candidate to be the President of the United Staes.
Let’s vote fo her.
As simple as this

Posted by: Bob | January 20, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

I would hate to have a president with the middle name Hussein, expecially one who spent his childhood in the Islamic schools of Indonesia like Obama did. He wasn’t raised in Chicago, you know.
He’s the son of a militant Muslim, who maintained a household AND a wife in Kenya during his several years in the US as a student. When Barack was 2 years old, his father abandoned him and his mother, and went back to Kenya to his wife there, where he took a job with Jomo Kenyatta’s government.
While in Kenya, Barack’s father would take yet another wife, another white woman.

Posted by: midwestlady | January 20, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

Barack Obama doesn’t have the kind of past that people think. NOt at all. There are many things about him that would surprise most people.
Teh news media has been giving him a free ride.

Posted by: midwestlady | January 20, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

After Barack’s father abandoned he and his mother, Barack’s mother remarried a man from Indonesia, another Muslim. Barack and his mother left the United States and went to live in Indonesia, where Barack attended Muslim schools and learned to quote the Koran by heart. He is listed in the records of those schools as a Muslim because that was his religion.

Posted by: midwestlady | January 20, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

Barack came back to Hawaii when he was 10, to live with his grandparents until he was old enough to go to college. However, his mother lived in Indonesia for the rest of her life. She died there in 1995.

Posted by: midwestlady | January 20, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

Any African American who would deny this historic moment in history by not supporting the first viable, qualified black canidate for President is still trapped in mental slavery. It’s not an accident that educated voters support Obama, while people who wanted to have a beer with Bush voted likewise. Beyond race, this country needs a united voice to face the new challenges of the 21st Century. How can Hillary unite the world against Terror if she can’t even get the respect and support of Republicans and Independents. She won’t get any laws passed because she doesn’t have the God given talent to inspire and to lead beyond her comfort zone. I would like to see a woman in the White House too, however there is a black man who aligns himself with the ideals of Dr. King (The Great American) and I would not be looking out for my childrens best interest if allowed my vote to be for a “Stay the Course” candidate who just doesn’t have that “IT” to really make change happen.

Posted by: Houston Architect | January 20, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

Obama’man is not a citizen! He doesn’t have a
birth certificate. He was born in Hawaii or snuck
in, and they have NO birth certificate on him. His
mother was NEVER married to his Kenya’s father.
So, that makes him an illegitimate child and not
a citizen of America. You have to be a citizen, to
run for President. He is making a mockery of our
election system and the Presidency, by dividing the
black vote, for a man who can’t be a President, per the American Constitution. Or is he going to rewrite it?
burke

Posted by: burke | January 20, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

I am disgusted by Hillary’s campaign and the way it has stooped to such tactics as this robocall, which attempts, simply by invoking Obama’s middle name of Hussein, to conjure up all of our Islamic boogiemen. OK, his father, who was never part of his life, and his stepfather, were Muslims. And? Obama has chosen a different path, yet at the same time probably has a better understanding of Islamic nations than any president or candidate…that’s a bad thing???

Posted by: Galen | January 20, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

Hussein is his middle name. YES. His father was a muslim. His step father was a muslim. he went to muslim schools. why not try and make this a strength he could better deal with the challanges facing the country? Denying the truth will not help. Remember Bill saying I DID NOT HAVE SEX WITH THAT WOMEN. i think Obama is making a mistake and hurting his credability by down playing his unique past.

Posted by: mike | January 20, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

This election should not be about party affliation, but it is about the influence one will need to correct the dispondent condition of Washington. The National deficit is out of ciontrol, pork barrel legislation is taking the country down as a whole. We have lost way to many American jobs, yet continue to offer re-organiozation tax write offs to corporations. We continue to provide the oil industry tax relief while they make billions in profits. Our military is the weakest since WWII. We have lost our influence in the world arena and our citizens dis-trust Washington. There are only three people with the ability and influence to change Washington’s behavior – Obama, Edwards and McClain. Hillary has burnt to many bridges, cooperated with to many lobbist, is distrusted by Congress and the Senate and holds a likeness to George W Bush, when it comes to fool hardy aggression. If there is going to be change in Washington, that will give justice to the middle class it must begin with the middle class getting more involved and demanding an end to foolish spending, mis-use of our Armed forces, pushing lobbist out of the White House and Congress and greater accountability to the American people. When was the last time you voted yourself a raise? Gave yourself a fully paid health care plan? And why are you on social security when you can be guaranteed almost your full salary at retirement? And how many times have you approved spending hundreds of thousands of dollars, for stupid research projects, or build ing bridges that go nowhere now or later, rather than putting the money toward education of your children? Why have we let members of Congress put themselves on pedestals, while tens of thousands of Americans go without heat, food, and shelter. Do we need change? Do we need a house cleaning in Washington? You bet we do! Vote for influence. Vote for diplomacy. Vote for personal belief> Vote for a better tomorrow our kids demand it!

Posted by: forest | January 20, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

Obama is concealing his past in a big way. The news media is not telling us the truth about him.

Posted by: midwestlady | January 20, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

Obama and Washington ethics:
“I am in this race to tell the corporate lobbyists that their days of setting the agenda in Washington are over. I have done more than any other candidate in this race to take on lobbyists — and won. They have not funded my campaign, they will not get a job in my White House, and they will not drown out the voices of the American people when I am president.”
— Barack Obama, Speech in Des Moines, IA, November 10, 2007
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/ethics/

Posted by: Julie | January 20, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

Okay, look, I’d be as happy as anyone to elect a woman president. It’s about time. But not this woman. I’m sorry, her politics, while I don’t disagree with EVERYTHING she says, just doesn’t appeal to me. She’s still pulling the “I’m a Democrat and we don’t like the Republicans, red-state-blue-state” garbage, and even a casual observer of Obama’s campaigning will show that he has long since let that idea go. This election isn’t about electing a Democrat or a Republican, it’s about electing a president for 50 states full of people of different backgrounds and ideas. Polls show that, among the candidates, Obama is the most favored by independent and registered conservatives, and Hillary is the least BY FAR. Hillary is only leading amongst HALF of all Democrats, and a big part of that is because of misinformation and mudslinging coming from all of the other candidates (and Fox News). Hillary Clinton is no more ready to run this country than anyone else, and I want a leader who I feel I can trust to both unite and strengthen our values, our economy, and our standing in the world. Let’s face it: Regardless of your views on Bill, many leaders in the Middle East did not get along with President Clinton, and THAT name alone would rile up a great deal of trouble there. Which would have more damage realistically: a middle name that’s similar to that of a dead dictator with no more power, or the last name of a hit-and-miss former president whom some world leaders despise?

Posted by: ChristianH | January 20, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

I have been a democrat all my life. And i am an Obama supporter and Clinton was my second choice all along. But after reading the comments from Clinton’s supporters…so hateful some bordering on racist. I realize that if Clinton wins the nomination, i will switch to a third party candidate. I cannot belive the amount of hate within the democrat party. They sound more and more like republications. Clinton Campaign now mirrors Karl Rove. Is this what we need? Republications are going to win for sure because we keep insulting and destroying each other.

Posted by: medemocratworried | January 20, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

Obama’s website says, “Barack Obama Is Not and Has Never Been a Muslim. Obama never prayed in a mosque. He has never been a Muslim, was not raised a Muslim, and is a committed Christian who attends the United Church of Christ.”
But the real truth is:
“Obama occasionally followed his stepfather to the mosque for Friday prayers, a few neighbors said” – confirming that he did pray in the mosque.
“Obama’s 3rd-grade teacher at the Catholic school, who lived near the family [said that] ‘Rarely, Barry went to the mosque with Lolo’” – confirming that Obama attended mosque services.
Frontpage Magazine.com
January 7, 2008

Posted by: midwestlady | January 20, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

Democrats made a very large error in bringing Obama & Clinton to the front. If there were ever an easy year to win…this was it! Neither is electable at this time. Clinton has no idea how to govern without her little minions (Bill et al) around and Obama has a Muslim background. NOT electable. Not in America, not right now. Second reason – we do not elect Senators very often because most times they have never RUN anything. They are lawyers that take money and spend it. Senators spend your money! Thats all they know how to do – if you spent any time running a business you learn how NOT to spend money – or at least spend it wisely. Senators spend it so their budgets will include similar dollars the next year so they can do it all over and justify themselves! Get with the program Democrats!
I’m not a big fan of ANY of the candidates in either party…I think this is the case for most Americans. That is why there is a 2-way and 3-way tie going on…

Posted by: BJ | January 20, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

You remember where you learned about
the huge “right wing consperacy”
For the last twenty some years from
Hillary, everyone is against her and
Bill, she goes on and on and says nothing.
I cannot believe anything that she or
Bill or James Carville, P Baluga or
any of their supporters. They will do
any amount of lying and that is why
Bill is so angry, they got away with it
for years, the MSM covered them and
even now are doing it. You complain
Oboma is being protected by them, wait
a short while and see the truth.
The last people on the face of the earth
would be better than those two people
they have no class, no integrity and
no ideas, they are just spinning the old.
Remember them pretending to sleep at
Reagan’s funeral? I do, and I remember
when they made a political rally out
of the senator they lost while the election was on.
They need kicking out, we do not want
them anymore, they had there day and
we are at war because he had no courage.
President Bush inherited many messes,
but he has class and did not sit and
whine like they did, he simply got to
work.
Repblicans whine and whine and do nothing as usual. Blame yourselves for
the dem majority gov’t that has done
nothing and now are sucking up to the
president. Who thought?
If you are ‘jello” as Rush calls the
complainers who do not vote because they
do not know how to make a decision,
change your thinking. The world needs
it!

Posted by: carole | January 20, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

Who cares if B.O’s middle name IS Hussein. he IS the monst inexperienced candidate in the race. In the fight against Islamic terrorists, we do not need a smooth talker. We need some one who will stay on the offense. Face it, if we don’t win this world wide struggle
non of the other issues we care about will matter.

Posted by: Dave Crandall | January 21, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am

you women out there are you voting just because she’s a woman, do you know any
thing about politics it’s about time you wake up.How about health care,you think your going to get it. she’s supported by drug companys so you will pay dearly.
Running for office is not about race, It’s about what you can do for the betterment of the american people. Just remmeber FOR THE PEOPLE BY THE PEOPLE
Dirty trickery, lies etc. will not get
a person to the president’s seat.I would’nt use the words of Martin Luther
King to get votes.We all know what he
said. So let Martin sleep in peace.
beware of the treacherous beast.
Obama is the man for the presidentcy
my family my cousins my friends will be voting for Obama.

Posted by: j | January 21, 2008, 2:06 am 2:06 am

just remember what george bush has done to this country. He is a male and has been terrible for the US. Obama Hussein is a male and he will finish ruinning the US.
Lets give Mrs Clinton a chance to clean Washington. She has a head on her sholders
and it is not only for decoration.

Posted by: alfred Sanchez | January 21, 2008, 3:40 am 3:40 am

UGOCHUKWU- You say Hillary “successfully maintained political responsibility for this Country despite the obstacles of prejudice and persecution.” When was that exactly? I certainly don’t remember her being politically responsible for our country.
Also in Nevada Obama got 13 delegates to Hillary’s 12 so how exactly did she win? Unfortunately Gore can tell you what popular votes amount to.

Posted by: Holden | January 21, 2008, 4:31 am 4:31 am

It’s a free country and you can vote for whomever you choose. For anyone threatens to vote Republican if Mrs. Clinton is selected as the Democratic nominee, that’s your choice. I think any Republican nominee will be doomed unless the economy recovers or Bush rating goes over 50% by election time, and Mrs. Clinton, if she is the Democratic nominee, will win. After all, she is a very pragmatic politician, and her policies are more centrist than most candidates. All U.S elections have been won with candidates occupying the center, and not on either extreme, right or left. Mrs. Clinton will win because her supporters have always outnumbered her detractors, and she is a proven fighter. She can take anything Republicans throw at her. The same cannot be said about Obama or any Republican candidate who has weaknesses of their own. Obama’s time will come someday but not now. He cannot win the Democratic nomination unless he can pull in more than 15% of the Hispanic votes nationally as compared to 65% for Mrs. Clinton. To do that, he must spend more years working along with Hispanic legislators and people to gain their trust and confidence, rather than just engaging in perpetual running for office, with nothing to show except for some pretty but soon worn-out speeches about hope and change. No one runs for office without espousing these themes in one way or another, including all Republicans. GW Bush did it 8 years ago too. He was to be the ‘uniter’, had success with the Texas Democratic legislature, would reform Washington etc. ad nauseam.

Posted by: Notasnaive | January 21, 2008, 4:53 am 4:53 am

Honestly, the Republicans have already started working on Obama a month ago. There is a website called Human Events where they completely slander Obama in a ~ 6-page article they e-mail you. I am not an Obama supporter, but feel that it is necessary for people to understand and be prepared to unite behind ONE candidate when everything is all said and done after the primaries. If we don’t let go of the hate, we cannot prosper together, and we will face another 4 years of a Republican-run White House. Believe it, they will do whatever it takes to bring our party down. Let’s not help them get there. Thanks. And I am a NICE HILLARY SUPPORTER!!!

Posted by: M&Ms | January 21, 2008, 6:02 am 6:02 am

One poster said this “I would love to have a President with the middle name of Hussein, I think it would do wonders for our image abroad”.
Another said this “Women would make history if they voted for Hillary”.
I sure hope that is not the only reason your supporting one over the other.
I’m not convinced either one has what it takes to be President.
The next debate, better have clear answers regarding the looming economic stress our country is about to face.

Posted by: Kim | January 21, 2008, 7:08 am 7:08 am

Attention all Americans: Is Barack Obama really
one of us? His father was a foreigner. He has no
black roots in our country–that’s what bothers me.
Obama apparently spent his
formative childhood years in a foreign country.
How deeply does he love this country?
I want a black American candidate who is has
some black family here, not just on his wife’s side.a

Posted by: Jeanamericana | January 21, 2008, 8:20 am 8:20 am

Reading thru the comments,i can see why americans are tagged the most ‘ignorant and easily swindled’set of people.If the Dems. base find it hard to rationaly asses the candidates,their hopes and aspirations for america’s future,then america deserves GW for another 8yrs,at least.

Posted by: emmanuel | January 21, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am

It is clearly known that people fear change. While many of us want it, when the chance comes to actually engage in change people get scared and crazy things happen – hence messages bringing up the significance of Mr. Obama’s middle name. The truth of the matter is, our nation needs change. I’m sick and tired of being sick and tired of how this country is run. I want a president that I can be proud of. I want a president that can create a country that I can be proud of. We need a president of integrity and honesty. Mr. Obama oozes sincerity and directness. If anyone can change our country for the better, it is him. Let’s not vote for someone because of their race or gender or name. Let’s vote on who best can help our nation. Mr. Obama has the plans, experience, knowledge and charisma to do it.

Posted by: Yolanda | January 21, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

I am a supporter of Barack AND Hillary. “Hussein”, big deal. He’s seems genuine and has the energy I like to see, but we have to face facts. Politics IS a dirty game and as the saying goes it’s not what you know, it’s who you know. Hillary has been with Bill for the whole ride: Attorney General, Governor, 8 years in the White House, and elected to a second term as Senator from New York. Bill did a great job and left this President with a Surplus of $236 Billion Dollars in 2000.(Go to Zfacts.com and see the national debt monitor spinning like crazy at over $9.2 TRILLION Dollars as of 1/20/08.) It will be a great team Hillary in office, Bill as an ambassador of peace to regain the respect of the world AND Obama in office as Vice-President. As VP Obama will gain the knowledge, get to know the right people and use that position as a strong foundation towards his Prsidency in 2016. I just hope he (or she) will accept the VP job if offered by one or the other and SHOULD be offered to each other for REAL CHANGE IN AMERICA! Economy, Health Care for ALL, Clean up the mess in Iraq, and bring jobs back to AMERICA!
Go Hillary’08 and Go Obama’16

Posted by: T.Wilkinson | January 21, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am

Wouldn’t it be great if Hillary and Obama could join forces as the Democratic ticket for President/Vice President after one or the other becomes the Democratic nominee? Could be the way to unify Democratic voters and really give the Republicans a run for their money…. Hmmmmm….

Posted by: Milagros | January 21, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

I am pleased 2 announce that I am supporting 1 of the most intelligent men N the USA. My suggestion 2 his supporters is 2 not b discouraged by the negative comments. The agenda is 2 eliminate HOPE. Which will ultimately prevent progress. The days have returnd where racist use intimidation 2 discourage blacks. The tactics are too familiar fortunately unsuccessful. N othing has really changed N reference 2racist views. America we HAVE grown pass being limited 2 racist views. Go B.Obama

Posted by: yashminda | January 21, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

Hussein? It’s one of the world’s most common names. Hey, Bill… rather than asking us to dwell on that name, let’s think on what the name Clinton now conjures up in the minds of 1.6 billion muslims. In fact, take any common adjectives used to describe the name Clinton and think how that must go down vs. the teachings of Islam. Unfaithful? Dishonest? Cheater? Opportunistic? Disgrace? Got the picture? Rather than repairing our reputation, the name Clinton only prolongs our global agony.

Posted by: Gorgon '08 | January 21, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Did I mention your claims were false? :) They are.

Posted by: Midwestman | January 21, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

“Change” and “hope” are but words that Obama uses, and in the most nebulous of ways, to sway the populous his way. I see nothing new or outstanding in terms of plans of action, or idea-wise, from Barack Obama. He’s just a run-of-the-mill liberal advertising the same old tired slogan of “change.” Change into what? Haven’t we learned that politics cannot change everything the way culture can? Patrick Moniyan knew this much. Obama will not be getting my vote, and I hope, most of those from thinking peoples.

Posted by: John Roberts | January 21, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

Republicans might actually be smiling right now as they know that who ever becomes their candidate is, will be the next president of the US. Admit it people, ass everyone can see, no one in America is ready for a real change. Do you think america is ready for a black president with a middle name that might be common, but as far as americans are concerned, scary? You think Mr. Obama will win the Midwest and the South? Don’t think so. On the other hand, is the country ready for a woman president? Let’s face it, is the Midwest and the South ready for a woman to be their leader? Ask the conservatives. Unfortunately, both Clinton and Obama are devisive. I will vote Democrat when the time comes. But if Clinton and Obama do not stop putting each other down and being devisive, neither of them will win the Presidential election. Let’s face it, neither of them are without a lie in this election. Both lied about something. So what? What matters most is who can lead the country back to respectability after the dark times of the Bush years.

Posted by: Despondent SSF | January 21, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

This is a wake-up call.
Says Dr. Joseph Lowery: Obama’s
black doubters have a ‘slave mentality’
Wednesday, January 16, 2008, 04:09 PM
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
In an address to the Hungry Club at Butler Street YMCA in downtown Atlanta, the Rev. Joseph Lowery re-stoked the fires on Wednesday when he told the largely African-American audience that “a slave mentality” was fueling black doubts about Obama’s chances of capturing the White House.
The report comes from our AJC colleague, John Hollis, who was at the event.
“No matter how much education they have, they never graduated from the slave mentality,” Lowery said of those who have advised Obama to wait, or have doubted his ability to compete in a general election.
“The slavery mentality compels us to say, ‘We can’t win, we can’t do,’” said Lowery, an avid Obama supporter and a co-founder of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference.
Strong words, when you consider that they include people like U.S. Rep. John Lewis or former Atlanta mayor Andrew Young.

Posted by: Phillip | January 21, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

And what exactly is wrong with the Robocall? His name IS Barack Hussein Obama, or am I mistaken? He did get money from lobbyists, didn’t he? Where’s the beef?

Posted by: Ralph | January 21, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

A question why is Bill Clinton so adamantly trying to cutdown Obama.
While Hillary sits on the sideline smiling. It sure was not like that when Bill got caught up with Monica Lewinsky affair. To include many other such things. Where it comes thinking that black community owes Bill or Hillary anything. What was done in 92-2000 is done and all of it was not good and they try to make it sound. Looks like the are feeling threatened in terms of losing the race. Furthermore, what did Bill Clinton do when Ron Brown his Commerce secretary was murdered. As I recalled nothing was done to try unearth the secrets surrounding it wanting us to believe he did in a crash.
When autopsy showed he a bullethole in his head. I know Bill is not running for office but, he sure acts like he is.
Take for what is worth!

Posted by: Phillip | January 21, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

I would not be surprised if it’s found out that the Robocall came from Obama himself so he can play pretend-victim all over again. PUHLEEZE!!!!

Posted by: Ralph | January 21, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

Mortgage company workers charged in scam (another Hillary donor)
Newsday ^ | October 16, 2007 | ROCCO PARASCANDOLA
Posted on 10/16/2007 1:54:24 PM PDT by JohnLongIsland
Two mortgage company employees were arrested yesterday for their role in a multimillion-dollar mortgage and identity theft scam in Queens and Long Island, police sources said…Two mortgage company employees were arrested yesterday for their role in a multimillion-dollar mortgage and identity theft scam in Queens and Long Island, police sources said…Griffin director and business manager, Jacob Milton, 41, is a Bangladeshi immigrant who has a cable talk show. On the wall of the Jackson Heights office are several pictures of him with Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton and President Bill Clinton.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com …

Posted by: Phillip | January 21, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

I consider myself an Independent and have voted for both parties in the past. I do have to respond to the “Clinton” name conception. I travel the world over and this year alone have stamped over 14 countries in my passport. During Bill Clinton’s administration and to this day the world loves the Clintons the same way they endeered JFK.
Americans have over 152,000 troops in Iraq and evreyone else around 10,000 of which 8,000 are from the UK. The current coallition forces that are backing the US are Albania, Armenia, Australia, Azerbaijan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, El Salvador, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Moldova, Mongolia, Poland, Romania, South Korea, and the United Kingdom with Poland and Denmark soon to pull out.
There are 194 countries in the world and of the list above the US sends $$$ to most of them annualy just to survive. So who do you think is and will pay for the projected
$1-2,000,000,000,000 (trillion) dollars for this war?
The money…big deal, the cost is nothing compared to the numbers that matter. Over 30,000 wounded, 28,000 American and 4236 fatalities, 3929 American. What a shame that our sons and daughters are being killed when 180,000 other countries could have backed up the US to not only help us pay for the war but supply troops.
How many boys and girls would be going home to their families if there were more troops supplied by the other 180,000 countries that despise this current President for abandoning the process,the UN and the common courtesy of involvement. George Sr. was a good man and a smart man to first get the worlds backing.
Disgrace, dishonest, cheater might be what you think and being President doesn’t put anyone above being human, but I can honestly say from correspondance that the world respected and loved Bill Clinton as well as Hillary. I do respect your opinions and thank God we live in a country that can allow us to speak our minds…God Bless America.

Posted by: TWilkinson | January 21, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

John Paul said “to convert to christianity is blessed twice.Obama is convertede to christianity 26 years ago, and we should as christian welcome him and bless him in this election since he is a real christian and knows the teaching of jesus and christianity more than those christians who inherited christianity from their parents.

Posted by: john seigel | January 21, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

No one is against change if it is for the better. No one is against hope if hope can be realized. How do we achieve change in politics? Not by talking about it, but being involved in the trench, working and working and building coalition to a critical mass to make change. American history is evolutionary, never revolutionary. GW Bush promised change and unity when he ran 8 years ago. He also ran as an outsider to clean up Washington. We all knew what happened after he got into the office. Obama has spent so much of his political life running for office and he has not had time to build contacts in the Hispanic community to the point that they will be comfortable voting for him. That’s why his time won’t be now. It’s just simple math from here until convention time. Obama will lose in all the big states, and most of the West where Hispanic votes are critical. He will probably carry South Carolina, his home state of Illinois, and some Southern states where the majority of the Democratic electorate are African-Americans.

Posted by: Notasnaive | January 21, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

As a Democrat, I am so sick of Hillary and Bill trashing Obama that I decided I will give him my vote.
Poor Hillary Clinton needs her husband to protect and fight for her and that is so ridiculous it makes me sick in my stomack. I am a woman but I do not wish to have her for President.

Posted by: joni | January 21, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

I AGREE WITH REV. LOWERY AND HIS POSITION THAT BLACK UNSUPPORTERS OF OBAMA DO IN FACT HAVE A SLAVE MENTALITY. THEY HAVE NOT CONSIDERED THE POSSIBILITIES OF THE NATION NOR WHAT IMPACT IT WILL HAVE ON YOUNG BLACK BOYS AND GIRLS. WITHOUT THE OPPORTUNITY TO VOTE A BLACK PRESIDENT IN THESE CHILDREN WILL CONTINUE TO HAVE INFERIORITY COMPLEXES. I BELIEVE HE IS QUALIFIED & DESERVES BLACK VOTES. ALL BLACKS VOTES, NO REASON NOT 2. WHAT MORE DO U WANT, BLOOD. STOP EMPOWERING RACIST VIEWS 2 SUPPRESS

Posted by: yashminda | January 21, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

The media is giving a free pass to Obama. It has not investigated Obama’s alleged land purchase at a very concessional price from a fund-raising political supporter in real estate business who is facing charges in an unrelated kickback scheme involving investment firms seeking state business in Illinoise. The media has also not dug into the reports of Obama raising funds in Illinois when he was a state senator from lobbyists, PAC groups and big corporations such as Exelon. Now he proudly claims that he is not accepting funds from lobbyists and PAC groups. The media is not investigating how much money he gets from contributions of directos, principals, and executives of corporations.

Posted by: Yermal | January 22, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

Some people here should get a grip and go beyond, race, gender, religion or partisanship preferences. This is not a toy store where you can say: I want a black president, or I want a woman president. Use your judgment, inform yourself. By the way, no matter what you hear from the presidential candidates,Clinton’s formidable health care system, for example, DO NOT BELIEVE SHE CAN DO IT ON HER OWN, SHE NEEDS CONGRESS TO PASS ANY LAWS(and she failed once already). If Clinton says she’ll have universal insurance over her dead body, that’s what will probably happen if we get a Republican congress(THE REPUBLICANS ARE ALREADY SAYING:NO WAY THE USA CAN FUND A UNIVERSAL SYSTEM). America is no dictatorship unless H. Clinton wants to become the female version of Hugo Chavez( which wouldn’t surprise me at all) . So, please, do not believe empty promises. Obama’s plans have a 90% more chance to become real because he also appeals to Republicans: the Executive & Legislative power working together, that is what America needs, think about it…

Posted by: carmen | January 23, 2008, 4:56 am 4:56 am

Do you remember when Hillary was bashing Obama about his involvement
with Rezko.

Posted by: Phillip | January 31, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

I am voting for obama, if hilary wins and becomes this totalitarian dictator that oppresses the underpriviledged’s rights, then I we will see revolt and crisis…and that will be on YOUR conscious.

Posted by: Number One Carmen | February 5, 2008, 6:53 am 6:53 am

If you want to preserve the constitution and our freedom. You had better vote for MCCAIN because Osama will let all of the terrorists inside this country. and he will NOT protect America. HE obviously HATES the west and the WHITE man a long with his pastor and Louis Farrakan. HE is a nazi muslim extremist. who is polished and who will NOT fool American IDiots. Because the Idiots will hopefully WAKE UP!!!!

Posted by: Lisa | February 22, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

i realy like the way do obama start is politic i think if i was american my vote will goes to him but i will continue to support him he is the best candidate who have beeb ever exist we love you i am haitian but the type of love did i got for you is more precious than life my

Posted by: coqmard james | July 19, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

No matter what is said, it is a racial/sexist race. We don’t want to say it…because we feel we need to be politically correct. 99% of those representing Barack are either black, or are women that are jealous of Palin for her political prowess. Let’s get real. Look at Barack Hussein Obama’s connections to those that do not represent the US. Let’s also look at his wife which said she was finally proud to be an American. No matter what her recourse is, she was finally proud because she felt the ‘Caucasian pride’ finally recognized her color. Give me a break. All of us in this generation are not the ones that believed in slavery. We don’t owe Michelle O. anything.

Posted by: Mary | October 11, 2008, 3:54 am 3:54 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.