Obama, Clinton Split Bragging Rights
ABC News’ Teddy Davis Reports: A Democrat won the popular vote, but not the electoral college votes. Sound familiar?
Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., won the Nevada Democratic Caucuses, winning 51 percent of the vote to Sen. Barack Obama’s, D-Ill., 45 percent.
Each candidate is fighting to reach the critical number of 2,025 total delegates needed to win the party nomination. In Nevada tonight, 25 delegates were at stake. But the delegates are awarded proportionally by how the voting went in each district — not across the entire state.
And so ABC News has calculated that even though Clinton won the vote by a large margin, in the race for delegates, Obama gained 13, and Clinton gained only 12. In the overall delegate count so far, however, ABC News calculates that Clinton holds the current lead with 203 delegates, to Obama’s 148.
So, how is it that Obama could have lost the vote and gained more delegates?
The Obama campaign is claiming this delegate victory because of the proportional manner in which Nevada awards district delegates, especially in the state’s rural 2nd Congressional District.
On a conference call with reporters, Obama campaign manager David Plouffe and Obama director of delegate selection Jeff Berman explained that Obama had the majority in districts where there were odd numbers of delegates and therefore he won the majority of delegate seats.
Clinton won in areas where there were even numbers of delegates by a narrow margin and so those delegate seats were split evenly.
Nevada’s largely rural second congressional district is represented by Republican Rep. Dean Heller. It includes 16 of Nevada’s seventeen counties in their entirety, and portions of Clark County in southern Nevada.
Following the Obama campaign conference call, the Clinton campaign press office told reporters that Obama’s calculus that he won more delegates in Saturday’s caucuses is faulty.
"Hillary Clinton won the Nevada Caucuses today by winning a majority of the delegates at stake," said Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson in a statement released to reporters. "The Obama campaign is wrong. Delegates for the national convention will not be determined until April 19."
On April 19, the Democratic party of Nevada will hold its statewide convention. At that point, the county delegates have the right to switch their commitments and throw their support to Clinton or another candidate, if they so choose.
Bottom line: Clinton won more county delegates that were actually at stake on Saturday. But Obama won more national delegates using the kind of extrapolation of future behavior used by ABC News, the Associated Press, and other news organizations.

Email
Santorum Clarifies Concerns on Women in Combat
Gulf of Mexico to Become Gulf of America?
A few things:
1. this was a hillary win
2. the more interesting story is that hillary’s delegate lead is due to her superdelegates which is a product of inquisitional support and not voting of the people
3. hillary had more votes, not only for the reasons you mentioned but because she campaigned in the population rich area ; that should also be mentioned. that is the equivalent of one person campaigning in new york and California and the other person winning 5 other smaller states
i wish someone did a story on that…
Posted by: inspired but discouraged | January 19, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
Congratulation to Clinton on this vitory ,because media and all political Pundits are interesting to damage the Democratic agenda.Obama is great guy but only Clinton is in position to beat Republican and fix the mess and demage to this Nation please.
Posted by: Nausher Ahmad Sial | January 19, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
This was a win for Barack. Delegates are what matters most right now.
Posted by: facemn | January 19, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
Unless Gore is President, Obama Won Nevada!
Obama won Nevada! Did you report “Gore Wins!” in 2000 after all the votes were counted because he was ahead in the popular vote?
“Obama Wins Nevada” should be the headline the same way it was, “Bush Wins” in 2000 for the presidency. Yes with a big foot note that he lost the popular vote, but in both instances the popular vote should not be the lead. Why the double standard?
This is a race for delegates. Your reporting will create your self fulfilling story line (Since N.H. a Clinton come back)
What objective criteria regarding the Democratic delegate count would cause you to report losing the delegate race as a “Clinton Win”? If Clinton continues to ‘win’ by -1 delegate in every state she will lose the nomination regardless of what the headline is.
Posted by: Graham Poor | January 19, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
Congrats to Barack on getting the most delegates. On to SC!
Posted by: J | January 19, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
Geez the fact is that the latino vote that Obama expected he did not get, the jewish vote he did not get, women and seniors are voting against him. I really don’t know how longer he will take to notice the signs that he is losing ground, all this talk about he won more delegates so its a win geez people are voting against this man can anyone not notice that?? The popularity contest is over folks, the votes are coming down and facing reality I only hope the Obama camp “wakes up and get it” as his wife said .
Posted by: Mac | January 19, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
Electoral college? I wasn’t aware delegates to the Democratic Convention were members.
Posted by: Robert, Tulsa OK | January 19, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
I really hope the Nevada delegates go with the popular vote–otherwise we start getting into situations (again….and again) where individual votes within a state just don’t truly count. I really don’t care if Hillary wins or Obama wins…I just want the INDIVIDUAL votes to mean something!
Posted by: DMac | January 19, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
I understand the importance of celebrating the popular vote, but this is the primary process. The American public deserves to know which candidate won the most delegates. I’m sure the Clinton campaign would be making a big deal about it if the situation were reversed.
Posted by: Bethany Donovan | January 19, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
I am disgusted and disheartened. I WILL NOT vote for Hillary. It’s about time that we’re hearing how the Clintons managed to win New Hampshire. There are all sorts of Websites that indicate voter fraud. I want Mr. Obama to know that not ALL white, senior females support Hillary. I’m one who will never vote for another Clinton. Oh, Obama, please, please WIN! We need a real change so bad!
Posted by: Janet | January 20, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am
Yesterday everyone had OBAMA winning NEVADA….just like NH…..the voters rejected what the media and unions told them to do.A win is a win,so THANK YOU MICHIGAN…NEVADA AND LAST BUT CERTIANLY LEAST NEW HAMPSHIRE.The voters have spoken..LET THIER VOICES BE HEARD…Off to SC..WHERE OBAMA IS IN A MUST WIN SITUATION TO GET ANY WIND BACK BEFORE FEB 3.Trust he was sent three back to back blows and you can spin it any way you want….CLINTON WON.
Posted by: NBB | January 20, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am
Sorry NOT LEAST NEWHAMPSIRE….NBB
Posted by: NBB | January 20, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am
Just remember this all Anti-Hillary people: if you hate her now, if you do not approve of her style of campaigning, if you feel she is the wrong choice for the party and the country, then you should still feel that way come November.
Voting is based on principle. Do not sanction her actions by forgiving her and voting for her. I don’t know how stupid the Clinton’s think people are. But, show them you are not sheep and you will not be EASILY MANIPULATED by their games.
So, come November, reject her then as you do now. Don’t buy into that coming together, time to unite, etc. stuff. She is obnoxious and extremely offensive, and you should show her what you think of people like her. Vote for her opponent – whomever that may be.
It will also be a slap in the face to her supporters too. That is actually a good thing for being so stupid….who in their right mind would vote for someone as divisive as Hillary and Bill? Someone with very little chance of winning the national election?
Regardless, stand by your principles and vote against her. Pass the word.
Posted by: Donald | January 20, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am
One last thing,,,,SOUTH CAROLINA prove the pollster and media wrong again…what do think a tax refund will do…..thats right put the 9 trillion dollor deficet to 11 or 12 trillion…We are trying to sell our heart and sole to foriegn countrys..DONT BANKRUPT AMERICA…VOTE FOR THE MOST POWERFUL COUPLE THAT LEFT US A 6 TRIILION DOLLAR SURPLUS….If that looking to the past and not the future…Ill take the past.Can we gamble on the rehtoric or trust the future to a record we already know worked.VOTE FOR HILLARY,,,A CHANGE WE CAN LIVE WITH.THINK,PLEASE.THINK.
Posted by: NBB | January 20, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am
donald….standing by your principles is standing up for what you believe is best for your children; in the face of hatred, in the face of distortions, in the face of those who say you can’t, in the face of those who say you shouldn’t, in the face of arrogance, in the face of hypocrisy, in the face of bad polls, in the face of a media onslaught prematurely reporting your demise; standing by your principles involves voting with your conscience; standing by your child involves standing up for your country and all that makes it great and all that can make it great again; that is why we support Senator Clinton, that is why we believe, that is why we KNOW she is what is best for America right now…..because our principles, our country and especially our children deserve what we know is in their best interest; in this election year when we choose the next President of the United States, we know the best interests of our children would best be served by electing Hillary Clinton to the White House
Posted by: chris | January 20, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am
I thinnk peopple are voting against this gentleman who want is working hard to restore the American image that had been declining to the outside world.We need a real CHANGE NOW IN AMERICA.We are tired with the same old things and story. WAKE UP PEOPLE OF AMERICA FOR CHANGE. NEVER BE DISCOURAGED MR.OBAMA CONTINUE UNTIL THE FINAL VICTORY. WAKE UP MY PEOPLE FOR OBAMA. TIME IS RUNNING OUT. MAY GOD BLESS AMERICA
Posted by: I.A.T Smith | January 20, 2008, 2:08 am 2:08 am
It looks like democrats are not working together with a common goal of beating Republicans. If it goes on like this, am afraid Democrats will never touch the White House again. A strong house always needs a good foundation!
Posted by: Peace | January 20, 2008, 3:42 am 3:42 am
obama got the technical win whereas hillary got the symbolic win, hence it’s a tie in my eyes.
the truth of the matter is that delegates DOES count with the exception of the superdelegates that only count once the convention comes through and only those are the ones that aren’t rock solid.
to say hillary won is just like saying the democrat michigan primary COUNTED which it didn’t because those delegates were stripped away.
or better yet, the truthful perspective is that hillary won the momentum shift that’s all since those delegates regardless of who had more or less won’t be official until april.
Posted by: gluv | January 20, 2008, 3:57 am 3:57 am
also, in defense of the delegate vote vs. the popular vote…you have to understand this:
just because the majority of the nevada population is around the vegas area, does not mean the people of vegas represents ALL of NEVADA!
the reason why obama won more delegates is due to his votes were more spreaded out across the state, especially in the rural areas whereas hillary mostly won at the larger population spots
Posted by: gluv | January 20, 2008, 4:04 am 4:04 am
Always look forward and not backwards. We are now looking for SC next week. Am so depressed and down this week, but a little comfort for more delegates Obama has won so far.
Now its the turn for SC. I trust you very much, I know your votes really have a great value. You are the ones who put Bill into the house. Your votes really matter a lot. Show it next week that you are good defenders and will not allow the ball to roll and pass you so easily. From there the usual respect will be restored again. Good luck SC and make us all proud again!
Posted by: Peace | January 20, 2008, 6:39 am 6:39 am
I just want to say hang in there young people, we are still trying to take America back,especially for you; our future!. I just wish Americans would wake up and smell the coffee!I have never seen so many young voters get involved with the voting process before,and for once because they have something to fight for; A Change You Can Believe In! and not the Washington Status Quo! Obama 08!
Posted by: susie | January 20, 2008, 7:37 am 7:37 am
I certainly thought of voter fraud concerning Hillary and New Hampshire and it was the first thought that came to mind concerning Nevada. Nothing against these states, and truthfully this is not being sour grapes, but the media always carries on about Hillary’s unpopularity. In Nevada Obama was ahead and then suddenly the tables turned and Hillary jumped ahead. A last-minute jump in votes is rather fishy regardless of who is ahead. In these types of scenarios, there is a LOT of room for voter fraud. I wonder about a recount? Billy hangs around and he talks rather threatening if Hillary doesn’t win. I really detect something ominous there. Like right before the Nevada outcome he looked and acted like he would chop the head off of anyone that voted against Hillary. It is like he DARES anyone to disagree with him. As I have said before, are people afraid of him? The Clinton machine is powerful and has the appearance of possibly being vindictive if they do not win the election. God help me, I do not trust him or her. I have a gut feeling that they are capable of doing despicable things. As far as I am concerned, Obama is the winner. He has more delegates than Hillary but you don’t hear much about that. It seems like our nation does not know what to do with someone that is honest, trustworthy, genuine, and stands for ALL people. God bless America and its people if Hillary becomes the Democratic nominee. I will have to vote Republican, the lesser of two evils.
Posted by: CS3539 | January 20, 2008, 7:44 am 7:44 am
Young people and men, get out and vote for Barack. Let’s roll.
Posted by: Mark | January 20, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am
This election is the most disgusting that I have witnessed in years. Clinton won someone called for a recount talks of voter fraud, she wins again now we quibble about who got more delegates, for god sakes can anyone of you just congratulate the win and move on.All these cries because a black man is running for President and as always when others are busy trying to make a living the blacks always feel the world owns them something due to what they had to endure during slavery.Well the world owes nothing to anyone Hillary has a right to win just like everyone else, am getting sick and tired of all this calling foul in every run off, while voters are coming out a saying they are not supporting Obama. If its not race, its fraud or we just don’t get it, as if everyone is just supposed to vote for Obama because he is black. On the other side candidates win some don’t I don’t hear all this nonsense about cheating they move on to the next state and try to win. Is this what we are getting because Obama is in the race constant cries of unfair treatment once the results are not in his favor? This is really disgusting to say the least.
Posted by: Mac | January 20, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am
working as a volunteer (with my family) on Senator Clinton’s campaign was a privilege. she won the caucus with women, men, youth, blacks, whites, latinos, native Americans, and more minorities.
Posted by: rar47 | January 20, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am
Delegates are what matters most. If Hillary gets the nomincation, I won’t vote for her.
Posted by: facemn | January 20, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am
It has nothing to do with Obama.
It has everything to do with the Clintons and the entire Vietnam ‘me’ generation. She is no different than Cheney, Bush, or the guy caught tapping toes in a bathroom stall. They have created an environment where it’s okay to make excuses, whine, etc.
I absolutely disagree with Obama’s policies–but I appreciate his honesty and integrity.
You get what you vote for–so people supporting Hillary better not complain if they get what they want.
I’d really love to see McCain and Obama as the candidates–at least then we can discuss issues without having a dirty campaign.
Posted by: Jim | January 20, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am
i say again, the clinton “win” is actually in vain because its not a popularity contest. obama currently got the most delegates…and the superdelegates don’t even count unless this reach the national convention
not a shift on delegates maybe possible in the future..some either towards hillary or more towards obama…but that remains to be seen and irregardless to the fact of today…and the fact is that obama won the most delegates hence him technically the winner of nevada as of right now….hillary’s “win” was only a symbolic one
Posted by: gluv | January 20, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am
And finally there is a rocking speech that Hillary has given, though hoarse in the throat, but it really is a more direct speech. If anyone is interested it is here on abcnews.com. Hillary Gets Groove Back is the title, and this is the link.
http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=4161356
at least she is saying things that I have said and felt and that peole who live in my town are saying. She is speaking about situations and greed and tax rates and loss of jobs to overseas workers. Please give a listen. And then of course come back and tear her to bits. But know that if this is the direction she is going – democrats should in the end feel confident should she win. That crowd was large (listen to how ‘far back’ they sound) and it was rowdy.
Posted by: Edge-Of-The-Abyss | January 20, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am
Funny- all week Bill Clinton was talking about how the union workers’ votes would be worth ’5 times what another person’s vote is worth’ if they were allowed to vote in their workplace. Hey, Slick Willy, you indefensible liar- what about the SUPERDELEGATES that count more than 5 times what a ‘regular vote’ counts? What about your little power-broking schemes securing those for Hillary? Is that fair? Of course not- but that doesn’t matter to you. Truth never matters to the Clintons. Just power. Barack is taking this thing yet.
Posted by: soldier | January 20, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am
When barack decided to run for president I was absolutely thrilled to be able to vote for someone and not have to hold my nose as I have done for the clinton machine in the past. As the democratic race tightens up and the fear that old hilldog may be the democratic nominee, I become slightly relieved that at least Mccain is doing well. He will more than likely be able to beat the clinton machine because he actually has a solid record of reaching across the isle which is what the middle in america wants now. Not righty or lefty extremists making a fight that really means nothing to the average american. I want washington to work again and clinton’s rhetoric of I can take on anything the republicans throw at me is not a statement to heal our division.
Posted by: AG | January 20, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
If Obama won, why did he leave Nevada before all of the votes were counted? Why didn’t he give a victory speeech?
He was embarrassed, because once again Hillary beat all expectations. He had the union support and even an advantage in the caucus locations. Everyone thought he would win. Why hasn’t he spoken since Nevada? He knows he didn’t win. He knows he is in touble, because the only group he is winning in is the black vote, and that paints him as the black candidate. Whites and Hispanics will not support the black candidate.
Posted by: Bret | January 20, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am
If you don’t want to vote for Hillary don’t talk about just don’t do it. Clinton holds the delegate lead 203 to Obama’s 148. What have you been reading. Obama got 13 and Hillary got 12 but Hillary has the lead on the total. I believe I have said it before that California, Texas, Nevada and Arizona would go to Hillary. South Carolina maybe not because of so many blacks living in the South both the polls have been wrong more than one time so we have to wait. I did not hear Obama congratulate Hillary on her win. Obama is running because he wants to make history as the first black president of America. That is not going to happen. So relax and have a drink.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | January 20, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am
Obama is pathetic sore loser. Did not make a concessia on speech. Flew away to hide in Chicago even before the caucasses were over. Obama and his supporters are just classless. When Hillary won in NH they cried foul about machine were fixed. Now Hillary wins in Nevada they are crying foul again. What a bunch of crybabies like their leader. Grow up..
Posted by: Opandora | January 20, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am
Was watching the Sunday morning news shows for some kind of learning experience about how/why the press totally eclipsed John Edwards throughout 2007 to make him unviable.
(why I never saw him on CNN/FOX/MSNBC last year when he was tied with the other two in Iowa).
It suddenly came clear: Neither Hillary nor Obama can win the general election. As soon as they eliminate the third candidate, who can win the general election, the junk news stations will start all their stories with the suggestion about the inelectablility of the two rock stars.
Posted by: laura | January 20, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am
Hillary ofcourse won! Allthough the dirty games from the unions in NV and her own party(Democratis Party) pulling out of MI knowing that Hillary was going to sweep MI big time , all going against her she won again and again!
At this moment Neither the Democratic Party who most likely are against her with Pelosi, Kerry and all that crap, nor the bought unions and the paid media and the most important thing NOT even the Republican party can stop Hillary!!!
Go Hillary
All the way to the White House!!!Mission accomplished in NV and MI,
Posted by: 8maccabees | January 20, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
Where is Obama with his people (black church) for support? The media outlets say that Obama refuses to comment on his lost to Hillary, talk with his supporters about coming into second, and talk with the media until he attend Church and rally on Monday for MLK. All of candidates at least talked with your supporters after the NV race. If Obama felt he won then why is he refuses to talk with his supporters and the media? He understands that the delegates are not important at this point of the game.
Posted by: suzelee | January 20, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
Ever since Oprama signalled his intention to run many, many months ago, the popular media was unreasonably “in his corner”. This made me suspicious right off the bat. Why would the popular media jump on his bandwagon and help make him a “media star” long before his positions became known? Now with the current Clinton win in Nevada, the popular media is reporting the wins with such headlines as “McCain and Clinton Take The Lead…For Now”. This is more veiled references to the fact the popular media, for nefarious reasons, is openly in the Oprama corner. The popular media is supposed to report the news, not make the news. Another day without Oprama in my face is another day of wonderful sunshine in my life. I am Oprama’ed O-U-T. He only tells his supporters what they “want and need” to hear, not the real deal. I never thought I would find myself rooting for Clinton, but that choice is better than Oprama any day of the week.
Posted by: therockofages | January 20, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
No surprise of voter fraud for Hillary. Low turnout too on the democratic front in the past few caucuses. Seems like Republicans may take the next election if democratic voters don’t show up.
Posted by: cbeargal | January 20, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
Lets not even talk about Obama’s church and that preacher that runs it. This preacher has been saying the most ugly things about white people, Bill, Hillary and so on but the media leaves it alone, race all of a sudden is not a factor in that kind of talk coming from someone aligned to Obama. Obama his self does not say one word to condemn such crap with the highest voice yet he gives a meek response as the preacher does not speak for me.What does the Obama camp expect we must all cry shame of any thing leading to race on the Clinton side but give him a wide berth when his people talks trash? That kind of talk need to go into the dustbin and I can never vote for anyone that does not raise a voice over that, shame on the media for not even making a whimper of this but made a issue over a black man reminding people that Obama did a lot of stuff when he was young, I really wonder which is worse?
Posted by: Mac | January 20, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
as an afro american, I too would love to see a black person in the white house, however I’m more concerned about the need for effective change in how this country is managed.In the position this country is in now, we need to be focused on fixing these problems and not creating divirsive situations that will take our focus away from the issue’s at hand. One of the most damaging cards are yet to be played, will be how black is Senator Obama, will he be a black President, or a President that happen’s to be black. It will take at least 16 years to repair the damage that the Bush Administration has left in place. We that beleave this to be true, must look at this being one of the greatest opportunities to assure this, is to amagine a ticket that probably 80% of the country would back, the problem is can someone be humble enough to admit that one is stronger than the other, when it comes to getting the ball rolling.
Posted by: david | January 20, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
This is a good example on how the Obama’s camp misleads his supporters. He should know how the delegates’ process works and be able to explain it to his supporters so they do not look like and sound like fools.
Posted by: suzelee | January 20, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
one thing…
all of you “democrats” who say they wont vote for hillary if she gets the nomination…please do the rest of us real democrats a favor….
please change your voting registration to republican as soon as possible and leave it that way . talk like that means that you arent liberal enough to be a democrat and you deserve to be labeled exactly what you are…conservative snippy republican wanna be.
obama is a loser ,far to conservative to really be called a democrat in the first place, hes more like republican-lite, and hes a monumentally terrible choice for president given the democratic party alternatives, BUT, given all that i would still vote for him vs any republican always because i am a democrat and a liberal and i denounce the republicans en total , and their money grubbing ,big business loving , complaining about taxes till its sickening fatcat elitist ways, all of them.
i ,like any true liberal , detest republicans/republican ideals and ANY democrat/liberal taking over a republican/conservative held political position of any sort, would be a welcome and needed change in my opinion.
this country needs unity among the thinking informed voter, not division and childish squabbling . obama supporters are mostly naive and emotional younger voters and minorities, rarely do i find them to be informed and objective. they sound like little kids mostly ,ranting instead of listening to reason. basically they are saying ; IF MY FAVORITE DOESNT WIN I WILL VOTE TO HELP THE OTHER SIDE ,BECAUSE I AM A BIG BABY AND I AM MAD I DIDNT GET MY WAY!!!
lets be clear on this…if a democrat, any democrat , is nominated for the presidency and someone does not vote for them ,that person is patently helping the republican machine and shouldnt be in the democratic camp at all in the first place.
go away obama republicans ,you arent liberal enough to be called a democrat…
Posted by: bah | January 20, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
This is so sad, the real competition is between Democrats and Republicans, all this bickering is just plain childish.
I cannot believe some would rather elect another George Bush then to vote for Hilary a Democrat.
The real question here is for the Obama camp,
if Obama is having such a hard time to get the democratic nomination, and Democrats are the most open minded and liberal camp,
what makes you think Obama will be able to win the general election?
Do you people really want another Republican president? Do you really want the war in Iraq to go on? Do you want more deficit?
Lets wake up folks, Bill Clinton gave us a surplus and Hilary will do it again, Obama talk of change are just plain empty words.
Posted by: Gaimpi | January 20, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
Americans whine about how much they want change, but when they’re given the opportunity to vote for real change, they don’t. Why? Because we let fear guide our vote. That’s how Bush got into office the second time and it’s why people won’t vote for Obama. The Clinton machine is working overtime stoking peoples’ fears about electing a person of color to the highest office in the land. Repeated references to cocaine use and his Muslim middle name, his lack of experience (since when does first lady experience count towards elected office)
the intimation that it takes a white person in Washington to get anything done, on and on. Race is the elephant in the room despite what people say in public. When they get inside the polling booth they don’t vote for change–they vote their fears. And for those who say race doesn’t have a role in politics, please explain why there are no African-American senators from the South ?
Posted by: April Campbell | January 20, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
Obama lost and knew it before the caucus even started. He left Nevada Saturday morning and went home.
Now he wants to spin it into a win, why? He is ashamed. The head of the Nevada Democratic Convention already released a statement to the media that they don’t know what Obama is talking about. The state delegates are not chosen until April. Continued to say “the state will choose it’s delegates in the manner the Nevadan’s choose it’s nominee.” Enough said. Hillary will take the delegates fair and square. The state is not going to pull a Bush 2000.
Obama turned out to be not the person he claimed in the beginning. He cried after NH and blamed racisim, Bill Bradley effect and Diebold. Cried for a recount..the recount showed the same results, Hillary won and in fact picked up more votes than Barack during the hand recount. Hillary won MI and he cried MI doesn’t count. Oh yeah?! Even after he ran a campaign there to have people vote uncomitted AGAINST HRC. He tells MI they don’t COUNT. Yikes! Then he cries after his loss in NV and says like a baby I won more I won more! That was debunked. Now he is hiding. No concession speech, no thank you to his NV supporters, what a slap in the face! Ungrateful!
Now he is saying FL doesn’t count! What is his problem?! Sore loser!
He is NOT Presidential material. he is a crybaby when things don’t go his way.
He should be ashamed of himself for pulling the race card, and trying to get the Hispanic population to turn on HRC with those vile ads he ran on the NV radio! No wonder he left in a huff from NV, his head is down, he is a small man and a DISGRACE!
Posted by: MA84 | January 20, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
I am soooooooooooooo proud of you Hillary. As an African American, I am just so full of excitement about the first woman president in the United States being you. I admire the many, many things that you have done in your time on both end of Pennsylvania Ave.
Derrick SD
Posted by: Derrick | January 20, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
Chris, I’m repeating your statement cause I think it so eloquently said it all….Thanks
standing by your principles is standing up for what you believe is best for your children; in the face of hatred, in the face of distortions, in the face of those who say you can’t, in the face of those who say you shouldn’t, in the face of arrogance, in the face of hypocrisy, in the face of bad polls, in the face of a media onslaught prematurely reporting your demise; standing by your principles involves voting with your conscience; standing by your child involves standing up for your country and all that makes it great and all that can make it great again; that is why we support Senator Clinton, that is why we believe, that is why we KNOW she is what is best for America right now…..because our principles, our country and especially our children deserve what we know is in their best interest; in this election year when we choose the next President of the United States, we know the best interests of our children would best be served by electing Hillary Clinton to the White House
Posted by: sjbj2322 | January 20, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
Any one care to notice that there is a recount underway in New Hampshire due to voting irregularities?
As the saying goes, it ain’t over until its over.
Posted by: Bryan Stone-Daly | January 20, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
Let me ego Derrick. I am soooooooooooooo proud of you Hillary. There are many American of color that loves and supports Hillary. Also, this s my first time giving money to a candidate and I gave twice to Hillary….and plan to give more until I reach my max ($2300.00).
Posted by: suzelee | January 20, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
OF COURSE SHE WON !! DO YOU QUESITON OTHER CLOSE RACES? NO..JUST IF A WOMAN WINS
Posted by: dee | January 20, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
Just like the Obama freeky cult weidos saying the popular vote does not matter. The delagates will go with the popular vote percentage. That means hillary will get 51 percent of the delegates. Since when do the delegates get to pick sides.
Posted by: Ebon Beati | January 20, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Republicans for Hillary, stop McCain !
Posted by: Ramsterone | January 20, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
USA,USA HLLARY
Posted by: MIKE | January 20, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
We can blah, blah, talk, talk all we want but the answer to the question is YES – it’s not an opinion… it’s a fact – think of peace – have a good MLK weekend, the votes are not all in until the end of this year – but even if Obama gets some advantage in electoral or the popular in the end Hillary will get way more of both – not because she’s white and not because she’s a she… or even her politics or religion – it’s because HILLARY is the best human for the job of president in the US starting in 2008 and beyond. We are lucky to have her – even if you don’t realize it now… you will. Take care and may peace be with all of us now and into the future as we evolve to a peaceful world:)
Posted by: EDUCATED VOTER | January 20, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
I am another middle aged white female totally supporting Mr. Obama. He is a breath of fresh air. I do not hate Hillary but her premise is totally flawed. What experience does she happen to have. She has never run anything. Obama has more time as an elected politician than she has. Plus leadership is about making good judgments.
Finally, the real biggie for me…Hillary cannot bring in Independents. Guys, the republicans will rally around their candidate except if were Ron Paul. In order to secure the victory we need a person who can bring crossover Republicans or Independents. Not one person can honestly say Hillary can bring in 5% of the middle of the road voters. I fear a McCain/Giuliani type presidency that carries us further into this war while our country suffers domestically and internationally. Lets be rational people and support Obama. Best to you all, SJG
Posted by: Sally Jo. Guilwen | January 20, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
anyone who says hillary is some sort of “status quo” politician doesnt understand american politics at all. that cannot be said about a REAL democrat/liberal ,which she very certainly is . liberals are almost to a tee changers and pacemakers and innovators , not like the republicans who dont want to see anything change at all because they are getting rich(er) currently…
(pssssst btw, thats why they are called “conservatives” they do a large part in “conserving” the status quo of “their” american political system ,ie; a system of patent corruption ,graft ,elitism and mis-use of power(s). they really gotta go…)
“hillary (and her ideals) are a part of the political status quo and we dont need that ,we need CHANGE!! ”
ahem…people use your heads…thats a nifty knee jerk catch phrase that some obama think tanker dreamed up to play mind games with the ignorant , gullible and easily fooled youth/minority voter demographic. guess what, its working!!
ANYONE BUT A REPUBLICAN ,THAT IS THE BATTLE CRY!!!! DONT FORGET IT!!!
Posted by: bah | January 20, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
Every vote for Edwards, who CNN polls show will beat any of the Republicans, shows that some day we Democrats will elect an honest person who cannot be bought.
Posted by: Laura | January 20, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
One of Dutko’s clients is Citgo Petroleum Corp., the Venezuela-owned oil company. Since 1998, Citgo has paid Dutko $3 million in lobbying fees.
In its last report, midyear of 2007, Dutko reported a $175,000 payment from Citgo.
Posted by: washbasin | January 20, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Hillary can’t win in the general election so all of this is just for show and the news makes fluff out it.
Democrats will send another loser like
Kerry to defeat some Republican who may
or may not be worth voting for but any
person with a brain will choose the lesser of two evils.I will vote for anyone but Hillary.
Posted by: Joe | January 20, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Precious little separates the policy positions of Hillary, Obama, and Edwards. Democratic voters must then ask themselves who best can reach across parties in November? In my assessment Hillary cannot win against McCain. End of story.
Unless America wants to continue to export our tax dollars to senseless military initiatives rather than to invest them in America’s future here at home, Senator Obama must become the next Democratic nominee. It takes political courage to acknowledge that nominating Hillary represents more of the same old political gridlock, bipartianship, and lack of transparency in government. I call upon democratic leaders and Americans both to say No to the Bush/Clinton dynasty. This is America’s future, our children’s future.
Posted by: Jennifer | January 20, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
Thanks for responding to my post. My point is that corporate interests are heavily funding the campaigns of both Hillary and Obama to hedge their bets and because some may feel that the only way the Republicans can keep the White House in 2008 is if they are running against a woman or an afro-american candidate. I am a Democrat and I am bewildered to see that the Republicans have out-smarted us again. The only hope is if Hillary and Obama are smart enough to enter the general election as running mates, then I believe we could win. Obama voted against the war in 2003 and he saw the same intelligence that Hillary saw, presumably.
Posted by: Stephen Stockman | January 20, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
I don’t know how anyone can claim that Hillary won. It’s only the delegates that count.
Posted by: KOwens | January 20, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
Al Gore won the popular vote…but that idiot George Bush was the electorate votes.
Hillary Clinton won the popular vote in Nevada…but the fraud Barack Obama won the most delegates.
We made the mistake before…lets not make it again…Hillary WILL succeed George Bush as President and finally… the right candidate will have won.
Posted by: Michael | January 20, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Caucuses should be banned as a means of choosing our next President. As if an “open” caucus were not bad enough, Montana’s Republicans are about to hold a CLOSED caucus, where only party officials will make the choice… NO public participation. “Smoke-filled rooms” and Boss Tweed politics do not belong in our political process. Congress needs to establish ONE primary election day (for ALL states) with BINDING results. This way, the convention farces could be abolished and WE (the people) would be choosing our next President.
Posted by: rmberryman | January 20, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Winning is a group effort.
Hillary Clinton”s narrow and inherited support among already-committed Democratic voters makes a general election victory very iffy.
You need to appeal to independents and a certain number of Republicans.
Accomplishing an agenda for change takes a village, not a round-up of usual suspects.
Only Barack Obama has shown any promise of making a change agenda a community, and a winning, effort.
Martin
Churchton, Maryland
Posted by: Martin Edwin Andersen | January 20, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Well, now. The Rezko the trial is about to begin in Chicago and *shazam*–the Rezko money begins spilling out of Obama last night.
A low-income housing project received more than $14m from taxpayers while Obama was a state senator, but he consistently denied that he had done any favours for Rezko. That was until the Chicago Sun-Times unearthed two letters Obama wrote to state officials in 1998 urging them to grant extra funds for Rezko’s project. Democrats and Republicans alike are intrigued by the question of why Obama paid $1.65m for a mansion in the city’s south side in 2005 -$300,000 less than the asking price – on the very same day Rezko’s wife happened to buy the house next door for the asking price. Obama is a con man, nothing more.
Posted by: Derrick | January 20, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
I TOLD YOU SO, DON’T BELIEVE ON THIS NATIONAL MEDIA, POLLSTERS, PUNDITS, SPIN DOCTORS, NEGATIVE ADS, POLITICIAN, CELEBRITY AND UNION ENDORSER. THEY ARE TRYING TO MANIPULATE THE VOTERS WHO THEY SHOULD VOTE – REMEMBER: YOU ARE THE DECIDING FACTOR ON YOUR VOTE – NOT THEM!
CONGRATURLATION TO THE CULINARY UNION VOTERS – YOU ARE THE HERO!!! YOU DIDN’T GET INTIMIDATED AND YOU DEFY YOUR UNION OFFICIAL. God Bless You!!
Posted by: Samson Lim | January 20, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Can anyone explain to me why in Obama speech today speaking from the pulpit of Ebenezer Baptist Church at MLK service he is once again bringing race and what blacks should do the stop all the oppression in America.When the outside world listens to stuff like this I swear they will feel that ALL Americans do is oppress blacks in this country. All this talk about the walls of Jericho can finally come tumbling down if we march, This is really pushing this talk to the max now, maybe Obama feels life in America was too quiet, things too silent so its time to stir the pot and create some mischief but that is surly a very dangerous road to follow. I really do hope someone puts a stop to all this racial hints and just stick to the issues in this election.
Posted by: Mac | January 20, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
Today, in a major speech, Barack Obama addressed homophobia, anti-semitism and xenophobia among black Americans.
Could you ever imagine Hillary making the same principled comments in front of an interest group?
There is only one Democrat speaking sense to the American people and playing it straight at the same time, and that candidate is Barack Obama.
Posted by: Martin Edwin Andersen | January 20, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
This South Carolinian is voting for Hillary. It took until today to make up my mind, but I want someone with actual plans for real change, not someone with promises of change and no plans to back them up. We had the best 8 years under Bill Clinton, and Hillary will have the best advisor there is. Nuff said.
Posted by: fralene | January 20, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Dear Readers – I am scared. I am afraid of Bill showing up at my doorstep and pointing his finger in my face and TELLING me that I have to vote for him or else.
I will have a GONE FISHING sign starting Monday.
Posted by: Afraid | January 20, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
LOL Obama disses the only democratic presidnt for the past 30 years, Bill Clinton and praises Reagan. I must admit that voted Reagan twice in the 80′s and the Reagan quote makes me have second thouhs about Obma, but, did vote Bill Clinton twice in the 90′s and these were the best years of my life. Whither you democrats and african americans in partcular, did you love Reagan?
Posted by: VPNNathan | January 20, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Just like the Obama freeky cult weidos saying the popular vote does not matter. The delagates will go with the popular vote percentage. That means hillary will get 51 percent of the delegates. Since when do the delegates get to pick sides.
Posted by: Ebon Beati | January 20, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
also, i hear some people saying that hillary is to much of a political divider and we need someone to work with the republicans…
to that i say…HOGWASH! what the democrats need to do is what the democrats USED to do , and that is ; keep big business and the rich on the up and up while instituting needed social programs and taking care of infrastructure needs , eg; bridges ,roads ,dams etc etc… basically butter BEFORE guns ,always. if the republicans want to work with the democrats to do the RIGHT thing , thats fine ,but if not the democrats should just do what needs to be done and let the republicans look bad trying to stop them.
one huge problem though is the supreme court that has largely been nominated during republican dominated governments,thereby ensuring a conservative tack for some time to come.look at their latest decisions and its easy to see how conservative they are. still, there are ways to get around the supreme court and hillary can figure out how to do it if anyone can.
the last 2 republican presidencies rammed their republican agenda down the american peoples throats with no regards whatsoever as to the consequences , now its time to elect democratic majorities in the senate and house ,get a democrat in the white house and do the EXACT same thing to them ,in effect reversing the slimey tide of elitism and favoritism that has made this once great and admired country a shadow of what it was just 40 years ago…. god i miss you jfk…!
Posted by: bah | January 20, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
Obama’s “speech” at the Baptist Church is not the first time he has “played the race card”. Anytime he speaks to a predominantly black audience, he “talks the talk” of a black activist, not a Presidential candidate. I WAS an Obama supporter, but I’m tired of his frequent use of the racial issue. At the moment, my first choice would be Mitt Romney and my second choice would be Hillary Clinton.
Posted by: rmberryman | January 20, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
bah, it’s not just about party affiliation; it’s about the PERSON! No previous Republican has been a theocrat like George W. Bush. In my lifetime, the best two Presidents have been John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan. No one in either party today can be compared to these two REAL Presidents.
Posted by: rmberryman | January 20, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
There is nothing in this world that will make me vote for HC. Nothing. Yes I do have principles and will absolutely not give my vote to shameless dirty trickers. Absolutely not. And believe me there a hundreds of thousands of young voters like me that feel the same way. The two dynasties are so self centered and ego driven that they cannot even recognize that Obama has created a new coalition in this country, has brought in much more young voters in history and independents. Now that the Clintons are engaging in such horrible tactics, they will loose the sympathie, vote of many and if she wins the nomination, believe me she will loose the election. IT’s such a shame, such a shame!!!!!!
Posted by: Sue | January 20, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
FROM ‘HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT WEBSITE’ – PRESS RELEASE 12/12/07
“…She must break recent tradition, cast cronyism aside and fill her cabinet with the best people, not only the best Democrats, but the best Republicans as well.. We’re confident she will do that. Her list of favorite presidents – Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Lincoln, both Roosevelts, Truman, George H.W. Bush and Reagan – demonstrates how she thinks…”
YES WE CAN
Anne
Posted by: annevilla | January 20, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
Remember, superdelegates are not garaunteed; they can change their vote once they get to the national convention, or even before. That isn’t uncommon.
Posted by: Twigster75 | January 20, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
SPIN SPIN SPIN.
Obama is a UNITER in Iowa, but now DITCHES that and plays the ‘DELEGATE CARD’ when its convieninet.
hooboy. To those who say clinton DIDNT win is utterly STUPID.
if clinton won over 500 more state delegates than Obama, you are saying this:
EVERY time clinton won it was 51 to 49
EVERY time Obama won it was 99 -1 %
therefore Obama got more ‘votes’
The random odds of a candidate winning this many MORE state delegates (500) than Obama but Obama got more actual votes is like a BILLION to one.
Posted by: tom | January 20, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm
Well, we’ve had this discussion in another blog, but for the benefit of others….
If precincts were close and they chose to break ties with a card draw, why would you assume that Hillary won the popular vote when actual votes were not counted?
Posted by: Twigster75 | January 20, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
Thank you J. Perez. The media is trying to act like Latinos don’t support Obama. But that’s OK, on supertuesday, everyone will come out. They are doing nothing but making people more resolute in not voting for Clinton.
Posted by: Twigster75 | January 20, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
congratulations to Hillary,You have once again showed that you are the best one qualifiel to take the presidency in 2008.Dont let the other two side track you in getting into the same old mess that they try and drag you into .Keep your eye on the prize and keep letting everyone know what you stand for and can and will get done .God Bless The USA
AND GO GETNM Hillary.
Posted by: Rmeoses | January 21, 2008, 4:15 am 4:15 am
To all those who are going for Hillary, I would say be careful, and not assume that all Obama’s supporters will coalesce behind Hillary if she won. I am a young educated African American man, and I support Barack Obama for president. I am not registered Democrat but as an Independent. While Hillary claims to support Affirmative Action and other issues important to blacks like Obama, I seriously will not vote for her if she wins the election. Character is an important quality too, and when I see Bill and Hillary Clinton smear the first honest black viable candidate in this nations history the way that they are, I just say that Actions speak louder than words. I have several friends who agree with me on this issue. Believe Obama will win, but worse case scenario I’d go with a Republican if need be, because character matters too.
Posted by: O.A. | January 21, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
It’s funny how a comment saying I won’t support Hillary because of her dirty tricks disappears. But, the venomous anti-Obama tirades are allowed to stay. She has definitely lost my vote. It’s sad that the News Media is complicit in her dirty tricks.
Posted by: OhioMargo | January 21, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
So,
Hillary Clinton can only muster 5,355 votes when 98% of the precints had reported and Obama recieved 4,733 total votes to that point.
Seems like nobody won and the candidates were uninspiring. Let’s face it people, there are 50,000 people on the Las Vegas Strip on any weekend.
One more thing is that New Hampshire was a relief and a humongous dissappointment for Hillary Clinton. 1 month earlier winning that state by only a slim margin would have been a disaster.
But Clinton’s lack of ability to connect with people in Iowa and Obama’s star rising because people actually like him. That will never happen for over 1/2 the country with Ms. Clinton
Posted by: John Q. Public | January 21, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
in answer to the one who wrotethat bill gave us a surplus of 6 trillion. it was not him my friend but the republican congress. hillary and bill need to retire better yet leave the country. we have enough phoneys here already! go obama!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: george | January 31, 2008, 8:25 am 8:25 am