By Jennifer Parker

Jan 14, 2008 5:43pm

Obama Damps Down Racial Controversy

ABC News’ David Wright, Andy Fies, and Sunlen Miller Report: Sen. Barack Obama told ABC News Monday there is nothing in Sen. Hillary Clinton’s record that would give him any cause for concern about her in terms of racial politics.

Asked how Obama interpreted two recent remarks by the Clintons that prompted an angry reaction from some in the Black community, Obama sought to damp down the racial dynamics of the controversy.

Many African Americans were offended when Hillary Clinton told an interviewer in New Hampshire, "Martin Luther King’s dream became a reality when Lyndon Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964." 

Some say she seemed to suggest that it took a white politician to fulfill a black man’s dream.

"I don’t think it was in any way a racial comment," Obama told ABC News.  "That’s something that has played out in the press.  That’s not my view."

But, he said, the comment was revealing about her political character.  "I do think it was indicative of the perspective that she brings, which is that what happens in Washington is more important than what happens outside of Washington," he said.

He said he believes the quote betrays a belief on her part, "that the intricacies of the legislative process were somehow more significant than when ordinary people rise up and march and go to jail and fight for justice." 

He called that a "fundamental difference" between them.

Former President Bill Clinton also offended some African Americans when, addressing Dartmouth College students, he referred to Obama’s campaign as "the biggest fairy tale" he’d ever seen.

Did Obama feel dissed? He laughed and shook his head. 

But, again, Obama looked past the racial controversy.

Instead, Obama directed his response to the dispute over whether opposition to the Iraq War was consistent.  (Clinton has since reiterated that is what he meant when he invoked the "fairy tale" line.)

"Both he and Sen. Clinton have been spending a lot of time over the past month trying to run down my record," Obama said.  "What particularly distresses me is this notion that I wasn’t against the war from the start.

"This is coming from a former president who suggests that he was and nobody can find any record of it," he said.

On Monday evening, Obama called a news conference to second these points, noting he is: "concerned about the tenor of the race in these past few days," and stressing that he, former Sen. John Edwards, and Clinton all share the same goals when it comes to civil rights and equal justice issues.

The controversy shows no signs of abating. Former President Bill Clinton will be on Al Sharpton’s radio show for a full hour Tuesday afternoon.

User Comments

Thank g-d there is at least one classy candidate in this race. Nice job, Barack.

Posted by: David | January 14, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

Yes, Bill Clinton was against Iraq from beginning, just like he didn’t inhale, just like he didn’t have sex with that woman, Miss Lewinsky. Why in the world does this man have credibiilty on anything?

Posted by: Yvonne | January 14, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

I’m glad Obama has gone on record about this. The whole thing *has* played out entirely in the media and has unfairly painted the Obama campaign as playing a victim. Obama has tried hard to stay above the fray while the Clintons have distorted his record. But he knows as well as we do that they’re not racist, just very clumsy.

Posted by: Howard | January 14, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

Obama has my out right respect! He had class and honor. Sticks to the issues. May God bless him and his family! Obama 08!

Posted by: Erik | January 14, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

That’s what bothered me about Hillary’s comments as well. People seem to be ignoring that she was dissing JFK as well. So I don’t think it was racially motivated so much as just plain wrong.

Posted by: Mike | January 14, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Well done, once again, Senator!

Posted by: Matthew Sutton | January 14, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

Obama, thank you for rising above petty bickering!

Posted by: chyke | January 14, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

There you go Barack…your attack dogs stir up there racial controversy and the you come afterwards withe a nice comment to show the issue is behind you. What a clever sneaky and calculated politician are you? uh-huh.
You are dishonest man!

Posted by: Barack the smooth | January 14, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Damn, he’s good.

Posted by: marcus | January 14, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

Yes, they are fundamentally different, which is why she is obsessed with promoting herself as a leader and he as a uniter, a coalition builder. His response to Billary is very presidential. It takes a very self-confident person not to go OFFFFF.

Posted by: Getty Israel | January 14, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

“This is coming from a former president who suggests that he was and nobody can find any record of it,” he said.
hahahahahaha!!! I’m dyyyyyyyyyying!!!! LOL

Posted by: Uzoma | January 14, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

Well, it took a little time to hear from him, but it was worth the wait. Great response!

Posted by: indy | January 14, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

pure class, with a little humour/dig thrown in at the end. if only this was the normal level of discourse in American politics. after all of this nonsense over the past few days, its the perfect response. good for you, Mr. Obama.

Posted by: blackstar | January 14, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

Obama is a calculated, fake, masterminded politician, very disciplined and well coached by the same people he is saying he is going to fight. I don’t trust that man. He is a risk so are his “cult” followers that are supporting him without relaly even getting to know the man well.
He will do more damage to the Democratic party, because he is deceiving us all. SHAME SHAME OBAMA!

Posted by: Paul | January 14, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

Obama is a crook politician like many before him. He plays the race card now and try to blame on the other.
What a shame. I always voted for Dem I will vote for GOP if he get nominated

Posted by: MyLe | January 14, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

Get a life people … everyone gets offended because someone says something that is taken way out of context. Politicians can say something without publicly saying it. Obama is just playing politics behind the scenes .. and fooling the American people…don’t be naive .. Our country’s future depends on it
Obama does is not unique – he does not stand for anything but himself and it is ashame the people of America are going to be fool again like they were fooled when Busg was elected….

Posted by: hopelesspolitics | January 14, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

why is the mainstream media continuing to mis-characterize prez clinton’s comments?…the “fary tale” he spoke of was not obama’s candidacy, but his record on the iraq war…it is clear in the quote, when examined in context…what is happening with the press?…but then again, these reprters ore the ones who stood up at bush’s final press conference before invading iraq and dutifully read their submitted questions…without a vibrat, truthful and hard-working 4th eastate, the democracy is #######..sigh…keep it up kids…

Posted by: edshea | January 14, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

Also, if you look at what has been said over and over again during these past months; The Clinton’s have been telling us that Barack Obama, isn’t good enough to represent any race, or class of people. That is why this is so disheartening, the since of her” Entitlement.”
We don’t owe anyone our vote, you must first earn it! This is how the American people are being pushed into voting for the Clinton’s. What was done in the past is just that, the past! What matter now is what you have done Lately! We need to know Hillary’s experience now, and not Bill’s experience back then in the 1990’s.
Has Hillary made any major changes since she has been in the “Senate” now! However she did vote for the Iraq war and the Iran resolution, what bills has she passed that has helped the American people within the last 7 years? What makes you think that anything will change, does she have the ability to work across party lines?
From what I see so far from Hillary is that we are “Being had,” all talk and no action. So my point is this “We the People of the United States of America,” must judge for ourselves and not what anyone is willing to say, or do to get elected.
So, Hillary if we don’t have unity instead we will still have division, and then what good would it do to elect you?
Now, if Obama can bring about change then we are better off going with a new way of thinking instead of having the same old thing and expecting different results equal the definition of Stupidity!
As, to race and the gender card being played it has been played all along by the Hillary Clinton. Example: “I am a woman, I sorry that you don’t like me, crying to get votes in New Humphries, I’ve been vetted, and the list goes on and on” What does that say about what you are willing to do to get elected, at any cost? Remember there isn’t any crying in politics; just simply state your case and move on! Let us make our own choice, stick to the facts and stop the BS’!
Barack OBAMA, he’s smart, speaks well, inspirational, educated, young, black, but ask yourself this, does he point this out himself, our do we! He has never mentioned these things only other have.
That is what the Clinton campaign is “Afraid” of! That you will take the time to look at him, and see what is really wrong with American, because he doesn’t fit the stereotype of what White America really thinks about Black people!
This is the fear that the Clinton campaign is afraid of, that we will see this in them. That is why they have been visage in attacking Barack Obama, and they are trying to dismiss him, and all of his accomplishment.
So don’t be fooled by the Clinton’s or Karl Rove, they are both using the same playbook. “Attack, Attack, Attack, Dismiss, Dismiss, Dismiss, Blame, Blame, Blame, Destroy Destroy Destroy, Defeat, Defeat Defeat”! Then we the people LOOOOSE!!!!!
So, I ask you again; we are free to choose the candidate of our own choice, but don’t be fooled by what you see, or hear the Clinton’s say they can’t be trusted. Bill Clinton, hasn’t never been a black president for black people, but rather the president of the United States of America. That “IS” the same opportunity that Barack Obama is asking of us too!
We don’t need petty insults of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr, or of any other person who was willing to lay their life on the line for America to achieve the “Dream of Equality of all its people, Black, White, Brown, Asian, Women and Children”!
To add food for thought; Perhaps we all need to look deep within our own hearts and ask ourselves the one major burning question. Why would you first of all be so disrespectful to someone whom only wants to have a seat at the table? Barack Obama, no doubt must be pretty important.
The movement of inspiration of change and hope that he brings, I would contributed this to his up bring, teaching, character, and his abilities to inspire others by the message of hope, that he now brings us. You see he is living the dream!
What compassion and strong conviction he must have to put himself, and his family out their for so many people to look at. That takes courage and the willingness of sacrifice that he wants to bring about “Change like so many others that came before him!”
He isn’t an empty suit as others have suggested; but rather most importantly enough a “Man” that has the courage to run for president, and to give apart of himself too, and for others.
He has instead demonstrated these gifts of service through his community outreach efforts, community organizer, and his works within the Illinois house of legislation, and now a State Senator. He has achieved many great accomplishments and will continue to achieve greater successes.
But, one thing that I do know; If you allow fear to rule your mind and your hearts, you will never be able to appreciate the efforts of others. “The goal for each individual is to give more than you take from this life, and not the other way around.” And lastly and more importantly: “Dare to Dream” Barack Obama for president of the United States of America!

Posted by: thomca2 | January 14, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

Well, I hope I get the chance to vote for him. We need a whole new way of doing things in Washington D.C. and I’m confident he will appoint people just like JFK did — “the best and the brightest”.

Posted by: MizLiz | January 14, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

Hillary and Bill Clinton are 2 con artists, portraying themselves to be allies of the Black community when in fact they have done no more than any other Democrat to support Black causes.
I recall that under his Administration, in 1993, the nation got its criminal crime bill that has caused the incarceration of millions of young black men due to unfair sentence guidelines regarding crack and powder cocaine. Under his administration, poor black women became the victim of Welfare Reform and dead end jobs while corporate welfare escalated. In addition, in an effort to show his military muscle, be illegally bombed Iraq and a Sudanese pharmaceutical plant. Inspired by corporate influence, he decimated the businesses of several Caribbean islands when he used the power of his presidency to transfer European markets for Caribbean bananas to Chiquita Brands, a major supporter of his campaign. He refused to intervene during the Rwanda genocide during which millions were killed and/or displaced. He did not support Lani Guinier, his nomination for the Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, and the hypocrite fired Joycelyn Elders for speaking candidly about human sexuality.
Since throwing her hat into the race for president, Hillary Clinton has adopted the same, “I am Black and I feel your pain” nonsense as her spouse. Throughout his days in the White House and the US Senate, she has failed to politically demonstrate any real concern for issues facing Black people or Africans throughout the Diaspora. In contrast, during each debate, she attempts to come across as being more “black” than Obama, which I find offensive.
She, like her husband, has done nothing of value to earn the consistent loyalty and respect of black people. Moreover, while she is comfortable going to a black church, hugging black politicians and ministers, misquoting SoJourner Truth and making references to the historical oppression of Black people, such symbolic gestures should not be misinterpreted to mean that Hillary is a political ally of Blacks or Africa

Posted by: Liz Allen | January 14, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

Thank you Barack for being a bigger person! The difference between you and Hillary is that people, regardless of race, color, creed, or gender, TRUST you!

Posted by: M Smith | January 14, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Go Barack! Finally, someone shows some class up in this primary!

Posted by: onceler | January 14, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

He may not have been playing this game(politics) long but he sure knows when to lay down his cards.

Posted by: Dennis | January 14, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

Oops he’s doing it again. His surrogates create and exploit the issue and at the end the “savior” Obama talks and all is forgotten. LOL
Who is he think is fooling????
What a fake man!

Posted by: Barack is fake | January 14, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

Once again The Huckster took time off his busy schedule to attend service and even preach a summon or two, a strong reminder that he is not disconnected from his faith based approach to Government. In Huckabee, the Christian conservatives and social moderates have found their leader, one who understands that the fear of God is the beginning of wisdom.
“The First Amendment requires that expressions of faith be neither prohibited nor preferred. We should not banish religion from the public square, but should guarantee access to all voices and views. We should share and debate our faith, but never seek to impose it. When discussing faith and politics, we should honor the “candid” in candidate – I have much more respect for an honest atheist than a disingenuous believer.” Said the Huckster regarding faith in politics.
Huckaboom adds “My faith is my life – it defines me. My faith doesn’t influence my decisions, it drives them. For example, when it comes to the environment, I believe in being a good steward of the earth. I don’t separate my faith from my personal and professional lives. Real faith makes us humble and mindful, not of the faults of others, but of our own. It makes us less judgmental, as we see others with the same frailties we have. Faith gives us strength in the face of injustice and motivates us to do our best for the least of us.”
Then he capped his views with one of his famous one line cliché’s “Our nation was birthed in a spirit of faith – not a prescriptive one telling us whether to believe, but one acknowledging that providence pervades our world.”
On the democratic front, we find ourselves in the middle of a lost campaign. While Clinton may have clawed her way out of an abyss in the New Hampshire primary on Tuesday, the shadows over her campaign are a reminder that the path she’s forging is still in the deep woods. The questions surrounding the crocodile tears are systematically being answered.
On realizing that her top advisor had been busted and spend the day in jail for driving under the influence, (DWI) and reckless driving, 70mph in a 30mph zone, (residential), Billary shed a tear to mark the impending end of her campaign because the polls showed Obama winning by double digits.
As the liar she is, she did not disclose this information to the New Hampshire voters, nor did she publicly condemn Sid Blumenthal. Her lack of disciplinary action would have infuriated the mothers against drunk drivers, the majority of whom are baby boomers, her core voting block.
Billary is so full of it, she mistakenly thinks Americans are idiots too. On “Meet The Press Yesterday”, she unequivocally claimed that the Iraqis are changing their ways because of her remarks. “The Iraqis follow everything that I say” she ranted on while all along she has been ambivalent on the war, speaking against it yet voting in support of the President’s entire requests, from war authorization to additional funding. Now with success in sight, she unashamedly takes all the credit, while in fact she never had anything to do with the effort other than croak away her ambivalence; another pathetic show of idiocy.
That is truly the fairy tale. And it is driven by a refusal to admit real success because that success has been achieved under the leadership of President George W. Bush! Surely, when will she stop?
How can the most divisive and least popular politician be elected into office? With a lot of questions surrounding their horrid past with a blood trail rivaled only by the Nazis, the Clintons campaign based on deceit and disinformation is walking on very thin ice; when the people know the truth, will they be as sympathetic?

Posted by: Grapevine Daily | January 14, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

Obama’s campaign is full of it! If they think experience does not count in this election, wake up everyone. Even the corporate world looks for talented people who grow, get years of experience, and if they are lucky, they get promoted to run companies. Folks, we’re talking about running this country with enormous domestic and global challenges. What we need is track record of experience, know how, and less oratorical abilities and not a complainer when words seem disagreeable for them.

Posted by: Normita | January 14, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

I hope he means what he says. At this point, I’ve lost faith. I watched this practitioner of “the politics of hope” either participate in smearing the Clintons as racists himself or happily stand by while his surrogates did it.
It’ll take a while before I can bring myself to vote for him with the enthusiasm I once had–back when I believed he was a different kind of politician. The past few days he has not been. And while I’m glad to see him climb back on his high horse, I’m not inclined to forget this episode.

Posted by: fed up | January 14, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

Bill and Hillary will say anything to get elected. They have this sense of entitlement and arrogance. I am proud to say I only voted for Bill one time (once was enough).
Obama offers real change by building a broad new, more inclusive Democratic majority. As a result, he will get more done as President than Hillary ever could.
Bill and Hillary rule by divide and conquor…the Karl Rove playbook. It’s sad and pathetic and I wont vote for her in the general election.

Posted by: Henry | January 14, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

Another example of the true leadership we need. Once again, takes it to the level that all politics should achieve. A class act.

Posted by: Harris-Utah | January 14, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

wow. what a pitch perfect response.

Posted by: manny | January 14, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

Now Obama damps down racial controversy simply because he and his campaign know that it will backfire. They are seeing other African American leaders disagree with him and it will polarize the African American vote, it was silly to try to portrait Bill Clinton as racist. That was foolish and there many African Americans if not the vast majority of them that remember Bill Clinton and know he was a good President.

Posted by: Tina | January 14, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

I would also like to know what kind of role model Obama thinks he is for our children?? I would ask more about his lack of voting when it counts? 130 present votes in a YEAR?????
I would also like to know what Obama is trying to tell women by this:
(isn’t this just as bad as Hillary’s comments, Yet the media doesn’t confront him…. Maybe it is a fairytale?)
“PRESIDENTIAL hopeful Barack Obama claims to run a clean campaign, but someone in his camp took a swipe at Hillary Clinton through the candidate’s theme song.
As Obama and his wife, Michelle, strolled triumphantly into his victory party in Des Moines, Iowa, on Jan. 3, Jay-Z’s “99 Problems” was blaring. In it, Jay raps, “I got 99 problems, but a bi*ch ain’t one.”
Some listeners took it as a not-so-sly reference to Hillary.
“We didn’t know he used that,” a shocked Clinton spokesperson said. ”
I would also like to know what kind of role model that is for our children??

Posted by: Dan -w | January 14, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

Im not a supporter or Mr Obama but in all fairness this man is a leader. He has handled the problem with class and dignity. Just that we differ on social issues I would have been voting for him.
He is a good man to be honest

Posted by: EE | January 14, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

I was going to say something but then I forgot. Oh yeah…Obama already said it!

Posted by: Dave | January 14, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

-PollM
You are drawing parallels where there aren’t any. Those numbers were in place before this controversy began; they were already beginning to shift to Obama around the time of the Iowa caucuses and really pushed in his favor immediately after the caucus.
If you were being at all objective and looked at current polls, you would notice his % of margin in South Carolina has dropped from 20% or so to 5% in the past few days.
I am an Obama fan, but I can admit that this thing was bad for everyone. (I like his response, but it may, as someone else said, polarize some people)

Posted by: Ross | January 14, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

I was not sure I would vote for Obama, if he let this dissolve into a racial issue. But now I know he has the leadership qualities for this nation.

Posted by: Absolutely sure | January 14, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

Obama has done nothing but run a CLEAN race. The Clinton’s are concerned about doing whatever it takes to win. She wants to be role model for women everywhere by breaking the “glass ceiling”, how can you get behind that and support it?

Posted by: tired of it | January 14, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Congrats to Obama for attempting to bring this out of the gutter.

Posted by: Bob, DC | January 14, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Looks like Obama ended up being the bigger person here. Go Obama!

Posted by: Cat | January 14, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

Can’t you people hear, read???? Obama NEVER started the race issue!!!! It was the media ONCE AGAIN, just looking for a story.

Posted by: tired of it | January 14, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Obama is a class act.

Posted by: Ju | January 14, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

New Hampshire was used!

Posted by: Ken | January 14, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Obama’s comments were classy, and as usual he stayed above the race bait THE CLINTION MACHINE put in front of him. He is NOT an idiot people, in NH she played the gender card, by crying now in SC she is playing the race card. Lovely, I respect this man more day by day. AMERICANS 1-2-3 END THE BUSH-CLINTION DYNASTY!!!

Posted by: Classy | January 14, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Obama continues to prove he’s a class act. If he says Hillary’s comments weren’t racial, I believe him. Hillary’s inartful point was that it took the actions of Politicians to bring MLK’s dream [closer] to reality.
Hillary has my respect. Obama’s got my respect and my vote.

Posted by: AppeaseThis | January 14, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

What a classy guy.
Obama for change I can believe in!!!

Posted by: Republican | January 14, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

I keep hearing the same mis-quote over and over again. Bill said Obama’s record on the Iraq war was a “fairy tale.” He was not talking about Obama’s candidacy. Let’s stick with the facts.

Posted by: chermathews | January 14, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

Now THAT’S presidential. Better than ANYTHING I’ve heard from the rest of the candidates. Thank You Barack Obama for reminding us of what this campaign is all about HOPE you can believe in.

Posted by: Joyce | January 14, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

If he wasn’t using it for political gain, then why didn’t Obama say this last week? … he is just as political as the next politician.

Posted by: Jackson | January 14, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

Black voters began moving away from Clinton before she interjected race in this issue. Barack has never once presented himself as the “black candidte”. In contrast, Hillary has made feminism and experience her platform.
As for Alice Palmer, she was a veteran career politician whose time as a politician has passed. Obama replaced her in Chicago as Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr replaced his dad – younger and more progressive leadership that is not predicated on race and victimhood.

Posted by: Linda Davis | January 14, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

I echo the thanks to Obama for being decent enough to defend his opponent on this matter. Stay above the fray. GO-bama!

Posted by: Jason | January 14, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

Give me a break Obama is a an inexperience person. Only claim to fame is a great speach he did at Kerry’s Campaign that is why Kerry endorsed him. Have you heard of the Cauldron of Division Obama is a memeber of the church. If it was a church geared toward whites I believe it would be considered racist it a controversial church in Chicago Obama attends.
The beliefs are very racist… how will those beliefs play into our political world if he is elected. Racistism can go both ways. When a minority still sees color and when a non manority see color either way it is dangerous.

Posted by: hopelesspolitics | January 14, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

It seems the democrats are out to destroy themselves and create the likelihood of the Republicans gaining the white house in the next election. In my opinion, Obama appears to be the most qualified candidate for the presidency—only if people can look past petty racial matters.

Posted by: WMD5 | January 14, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

How does anyone in America believe a damn thing that comes out of Bill Clinton’s mouth?? As stated by former Clinton supporter, media mogul David Geffen in an interview with New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd. He said, “Everybody in politics lies, but [the Clintons] do it with such ease, it’s troubling…”

Posted by: Christopher London | January 14, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

Does helping the race-baiter twist the knife in your back make you perceived as a dude that has class? Ummm. This battle between Hillary and Obama needs some clarity. Obama is in a fog over this.

Posted by: Bill | January 14, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

Obama is a nice man. He is smart, yes. He is dignified. He has yet to complete a term in high office and that does say something about experience. We have a dumb bell in the oval office that had no experience (because the Lt. Gov. in Texas makes all the decisions) and look what a mess he made of things. And furthermore, where on earth is the press coverage that Obama seems to be keeping the white/asian/hawaiian side of his family hidden as though it were a dirty secret. You have seen truly touching stories on his Kenyan Grandmother, and what a strong soul she is, impressive in her own language – it showed, but Obama never shows the family that styled him, raised him, and educated him. What in the world is going on that no one shows a stage shot of that side of his family! It’s as if he is ashamed and scared to let the public see ALL of his family, not just the side that plays so well on TV.

Posted by: Dave | January 14, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

What style-what class! It shows that Obama is genuine! It never ceases to amaze me that people have forgotten Whitewater and Slick Willy getting impeached for lying to all of us on national TV saying he did not have an affair with Ms. Lewinsky.Hillary stayed with the idiot just for political reasons. As always the CLinton machine is at it again. They started the race mess and now are trying to say it is Obama’s fault. What hypocrites they are. I’m voting for Obama.

Posted by: CS3539 | January 14, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

Listen to all of you saying Obama is the good guy. He started all of this, neither Bill nor Hilary said anything racially. Obama is not the man for president. Obama does not have any class at all. People say he gives inspirational speeches, the little known fact is that he is not looking at the audiance, instead he is looking at a teleprompter. He is not sincere. Don’t buy into it. Any of us can get up on stage and read off a teleprompter and say change and hope 1000 times. The candidates are just talking now, it is what they area actually going to do is what I want to know. We need a president who can get things done and who knows what the heck is going on. Clinton has been in the Senate longer than Obama, I’m sure she understands what’s going on. Obama and Edwards have said we don’t need a washington insider instead we need a president who knows the people. I believe we need a president who knows how to handle things especially a war on two fronts. On primary or caucus day vote experience, vote Hilary Clinton.

Posted by: lawyer2b | January 14, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Way to go Barack! The Clinton’s are slinging mud so take the high road! Hey Hilary I hear Karl Rove is waiting on your call!

Posted by: geddesman | January 14, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

See Obama has class, he shows he can run a nation. Clinton, she is a mess, a complete mess. Honestly I’m for Obama, Edwards is my second choice. If hilary wins I voting republican and wow, I never thought I would see the day I do that. If its clinton as the nominee that that day is coming nov 08

Posted by: DJ | January 14, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

Obama tacitly accused Hillary of being racially insensitive when he said quote:
“Senator Clinton made an unfortunate remark, an ill-advised remark, about King and Lyndon Johnson. I didn’t make the statement, I haven’t remarked on it, and she, I think, offended some folks who felt that somehow diminished King’s role in bringing about the Civil Rights Act. She is free to explain that, but the notion that somehow this is our doing is ludicrous.”
Got that? Obama has not even remarked on Hillary’s “unfortunate” and “ill-advised” statement. And then Mr. Innocence comes in for the final kill with the observation that some folks feel that Hillary “diminished King’s role in bringing about the Civil Rights Act.” Obama buried his campaign last weekend – he lost my vote today.

Posted by: doug | January 14, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Now this is funny!!! OK Obama, after we get everybody in an uproar, you will make a statement that goes like this (insert statement) you will come out smelling like a rose!!! Talk about politic’s as usual!! If you fall for this you are the idiot!! Good strategic attempt by the Obama camp though!! Kudos for a well conceived plan.

Posted by: Jerry | January 14, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Remember the uproar when Joe Biden said “Obama is articulate, bright, clean and nice-looking guy”? Remember the outrage when Bill Clinton called Obama’s campaign a “fairy tale”? And now he did the same thing to Hillary because she complemented Dr. King’s astute political intelligence. OBAMA IS A SERIAL RACE-BAITER. Race baiting is the art of taking a nice thing a white person says about a black person COMPLETELY OUT OF CONTEXT and seeing Obama play that game 3 TIMES SO FAR makes me confident in my decision not to vote for him. I wont vote for a man who fans the flames of racism, no matter how passively he does it.

Posted by: doug | January 14, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

Why is Obama now speaking with a southern drawl? He’s from Hawaii and lived in Chicago and went to school at Harvard, but now he speaks with a southern genteel accent? Give me a break! What a phony!

Posted by: Nick | January 14, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

How does one call a ‘truce’ on a bully? It never worked before. LOL
If bullies are relentlessly attacking you, how do you call a truce with the Clinton bullies? LOL
The Clintons are the one who decided do PERSONAL ATTACKS after they lost in Iowa in their bid for a THIRD CLINTON TERM!
Bill Clinton is using Hilary as a front to sneak a THEIR CLINTON TERM! And they will do anything for their personal ambition.
The Clintons will continue the divisiveness that causes nothing to get done in Washington on the nation’s behalf.

Posted by: Gobama | January 14, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

dave, you’re assertion is just wrong. barack’s indonesian sister campaigned for him heavily in iowa and has been stumping for him since day one. his parents are both dead so they’re a bit, um, unavailable. and his grandparents, if they’re still with us, are probably too frail to stump for him, even if it’d satisfy folk like you. sorry. meanwhile, ol’ chelsea and her grandma haven’t exactly been chatterboxes on behalf of the clintons. so what’s your point? actually, nevermind.

Posted by: sickofitall | January 14, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

Now this is a PRESIDENT. Way to go Barack. Pay attention Hillary apologists. This is called class.

Posted by: Will | January 14, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Obama speaks his mind.When he don’t know something he he says he don’t know. That is what a great leader is all about. Obama didn’t comment about the remarks before Clinton stated to accuse him of twisting the words. She is the one who said it in ABC ‘meet the press’, why does she want to blame somebody for what she said?I like her but she portrayed a side that we didn’t know about her.President Clinton need to leave Obama alone. I don’t think people are that desperate to listen to a fairy tale. America respect him but Hillary is not Clinton, they are two different individuals. Obama is guy who want to change our approach of policies, he is serious for what he believes and capabl of, all politicians have bad days-Clinton should know better but that doesn’t hold them back.

Posted by: Herman | January 14, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Hillary is a really desperate. What is wrong with her? She should talk about her policies instead of trying to further divide an already divided nation

Posted by: alix oge | January 14, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

Very diplomatic. Who is acting like the experienced candidate now?

Posted by: Rob | January 14, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

To those who are complainting that Sen. Obama “let” this thing (whatever you want call it) go on too long, it’s my understanding that yesterday, Sunday, when it really heated up, was a day he had scheduled a long time ago to take off and be with his family. The only activity I’ve heard of was a conference call that he may have been on (or it may have been just Sen. Durbin and some others from the campaign).
I truly can’t begrudge any of them a day off now and then. That goes for Sen. Clinton, too.
In addition, none of this stuff came from his campaign – except one staffer’s statement that she was concerned there might be a pattern and a memo that was **never** given out to the press (by the campaign) exploring that possibility. So injecting himself into the issue before it was clearly and badly needed would have been inflaming rather than calming.
And, in truth, it’s not Sen. Obama’s job to ‘babysit’ everyone, staff and opponents alike, to make sure they act nice at all times — and if you think that IS his job, then surely you want him to be President!
I was disappointed that the ones I considered true statesmen (Biden and others) had left the race. But this makes me think that there may be a real statesman among the younger generation.

Posted by: Elizabeth | January 14, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

Campaigns 101: Professor Rove
Surrogates: operatives, journalists and commentators who attack on your behalf. Best used for the sulliest attacks as they present maximum deniability for your candidate. State party chairs, former politicians and communit
y leaders are the best tool for distorting opponent record. Journalists and pundits are best for personal and character smear. Surrogates must never be directly connected to daily campaign operations
“The High Ground Strategem”. When the candidate disavows, or condemns the surrogate message. Make sure candidate compliments opponent: military service, family-man, person of character/faith. The strategem provides two benefits: (1) it brings attention to the planted smear and (2) it allows the candidate to be above the fray (ie very presidential).

Posted by: cf | January 14, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

Good for you, Obama! Let’s not let the Clintons start irrelevant discussions.

Posted by: Cat | January 14, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

the wierd thing is that hillarys supporters seem to be as tone deaf as she is they dont seem to read the part where he defends her record he did the same thing with Baden when a moderator of Iowa debate insinuated that Biden had problem with black people. this is not some act he is real this way.
i remeber thinking that defending Joe Biden was inoportune, but decent thing to do, i also remeber him standing up for Mike Gravel in one of the debate where Gravel raised his hand and he he was the odd one out.

Posted by: jan | January 14, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

I’m sorry, but this article missed a few key points. 1)Hillary openly stated yesterday before Obama did (one hour ago) that she would like to take race out of the equation in this election (See CNN Commentators today 01/14/07). 2) Bill’s comments were clearly about Obama’s shifting stance on the war in Iraq (you would know this if you heard what he said immediately before stating “fairytale”; watch the video please recorded on 01/07/08) 3)Obama again indirectly threw a spin on this – now it’s that she’s saying that somehow LBJ’s executive powers are more important than MLK Jr.’s inspiration and grass roots organization. Hillary NEVER said this. Listen to the MEET THE PRESS interview (01/13/08) and you will see that she clearly gives credit to MLK Jr. for the struggles he underwent, his inspiration and organization. She said this from the beginning, but again the media cut this part out of the clips, just like they did with Bill’s. 4) Obama is playing under the radar dirty politics and is, basically, perceiving the public as fools. Given some of the comments here, I think he may be right. Wake up and listen and read the full statements of both of these candidates and you will realize how badly the media has distorted the facts. Go to CSPAN and on here ABC and listen to Obama’s statements at yesterday’s congregation and when a reporter asked him questions, he clearly contributed to bringing the issue of race into this election; not to mention that Mr. Jackson, Jr., a close friend and campaign supporter of Obama’s, also rallied up the issue on several news stations, including CNN 5) Notice that Obama also came up with an economic plan ONLY AFTER Hillary came out with hers to see how well or not it was received, and then he offers the exact same plan with $5 billion more and injects the word “immediately”. Sorry, but this guy is playing us for fools and clearly it is working for some.

Posted by: Maris | January 14, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

This man exudes such class! Not one time did he stoop to the level the Hillary campaign and the media wanted him to stoop. He carries himself as a president should. I find it interesting that Hillary did not mention finding “common ground” in her multitude of interviews, and did only after Barack Obama did. Leaders lead.

Posted by: Classy | January 14, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

I sill have a little bit of respect for bill(trying to make up for him cheating on his wife by helping her get elected), however I will loose all respect if he continues these personal attack claims. They are the ones using personal attacks> I will vote for OBAMA not because of his race, because of his readiness, the fact he does not take money from federal lobbyist (like Clinton)and he has the support of Jonh kerry

Posted by: TomWilcox | January 14, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

Wow!
There sure are a lot of right wing and clinton operatives in this comment area. And as usual, they are lying, distorting, and somehow intimating that Barack Obama is somehow “too slick” and that he is “A fake”. They must think we are incredibly stupid, or perhaps they just want to add to the noise machine.
Hey.. they tried that on JFK mate. Didn’t work then. Won’t work now.
Not only that, Barack’s existing donor base is over 600,000 people. If they all gave the maximum, that would be 1.38 BILLION dollars. I don’t think Billary has those kind of pockets.
I think you guys are just jealous, and you’re being bitter. Just like all the bullies I have dressed down in my lifetime. So far.
:)

Posted by: TB | January 14, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

WOW! Now you got my vote what a response!Proud to have some one like you.

Posted by: sam | January 14, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

Hey Dan-W: It wasn’t 130 present votes in one year it’s out of 4,000 and that’s eight years of voting! Do a little math and it’s a present vote only one-third of ONE FREAKIN PERCENT OF TOTAL VOTES CAST. You know Hillary’s voting record percentage is on the Iraq War Resolution? 1-for-1! 1.000 Percent. Hall of Fame worthy…
Read an objective story on what present votes mean in Illinois and how both Dems and Repubs use them:

Posted by: Chuckles | January 14, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

Look, Hillary Clinton is married to the man that African Americans fondly called our first black President.
The Clinton’s are the poster family for what African Americans want white people to be like. They are more black than some African Americans I know.
So give it a rest. Because as we say down south. “That dog wont hunt.”
Sincerely
A descendant of African American Slaves…

Posted by: herfan | January 14, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

she’s SO unoriginal. this from msnbc’s “first read” (sorry, abc!):
From NBC’s Mark Murray
Hillary Clinton just released this statement: “Over this past week, there has been a lot of discussion and back and forth – much of which I know does not reflect what is in our hearts. And at this moment, I believe we must seek common ground. Our party and our nation is bigger than this. Our party has been on the front line of every civil rights movement, women’s rights movement, workers’ rights movement, and other movements for justice in America.
More: “We differ on a lot of things. And it is critical to have the right kind of discussion on where we stand. But when it comes to civil rights and our commitment to diversity, when it comes to our heroes — President John F. Kennedy and Dr. King — Senator Obama and I are on the same side. And in that spirit, let’s come together, because I want more than anything else to ensure that our family stays together on the front lines of the struggle to expand rights for all Americans.”

Posted by: sickofitall | January 14, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

Senator Clinton’s comment is nothing more than a statement of HISTORICAL FACT!!! What is wrong with you people??? Had it not been for the 1964 Civil Rights Act signed by the President of the United States, Dr. King’s dream would have never become a reality and he would have died in vain. It was BECAUSE of all the hard work that Dr. King did, because of Dr. King’s dream, because of Dr. King’s passion that the President was given the Civil Right’s Act to sign into law.
So stop jumping on the ani-Clinton bandwagon and go learn some history.
I’ve no doubt that Mr. Obama’s campaign was behind taking Ms. Clinton’s comments and blowing it up out of proportion so he could make himself look good.
Just remember that all that glitters is not gold, and if something looks too good to be true – generally, it is.

Posted by: Susan | January 14, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

OBAMA WAS CAUGHT WITH HIS PANTS DOWN race-baiting and now all his cronies are out in force spinning it as if Obama’s somehow taking the high road.
No.
Classy politicians do not race-bait. The Media did NOT turn this into a racial issue, Obama did. Obama is not taking this issue out of the gutter, he’s the one that drove it in the gutter.
Obama is a SERIAL RACE BAITER.
Race baiting is the art of taking a nice thing a white person says about a black person COMPLETELY OUT OF CONTEXT and seeing Obama play that game 3 TIMES SO FAR makes me confident in my decision not to vote for him.
Remember the uproar when Joe Biden said “Obama is articulate, bright, clean and nice-looking guy”? Remember the outrage when Bill Clinton called Obama’s campaign a “fairy tale”? And now he’s doing it again to Hillary because she complemented Dr. King’s astute political intelligence.
I wont vote for a man who fans the flames of racism, no matter how passively he does it.

Posted by: doug | January 14, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

All I have to say is Hillary give up Bill give up. Obama seems to have alot of appeal among republicans and democrats, they should rally around him instead of trying to knock him down in order to win an election. We have learned from the last elections and we will make sure we vote for the right candidate

Posted by: Ryan | January 14, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

FOR THOSE WHO DO NOT LIKE TO READ…HILLARY SAID THIS AS EARLY AS YESTERDAY (EVEN EARLIER ACTUALLY, BUT PEOPLE KEPT PRESSING HER ON THE ISSUE) AND OBAMA ONLY SAID IT A LITTLE OVER AN HOUR AGO NOW. SO HOW COME THE MEDIA DIDN’T COVER HILLARY’S CALL FOR A CEASE ON RACE AS A FACTOR IN THIS ELECTION? SEE CNN’S COMMENTATOR’S TODAY (01/14/08) WHERE THEY EXPLAIN THAT HILLARY SAID IT WELL BEFORE OBAMA. THANKS.

Posted by: Maris | January 14, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

“Many African-Americans were “offended?”–Well, I’m African-American and many like me were NEVER OFFENDED by what Senator Clinton said. We knew what she was saying and what she meant. We’re more angry how others made and attempt to exploit what she said to their advantage in an attempt to garner African-American voters for themselves. It sicken us to no end how they used the very methods they’ve complained about to others for decades.
They sullied the name and memory of Dr. King and what he stood for and all those who fought, marched and stood for equality with him. They were of many races, many classes and varying religions. Whites fought, died and lost their livelihoods in the fight for equality for all Americans too! In fact, at least at the beginning, there were as many blacks as whites who tried to bring down Dr. King. Only after they saw he had the support of some pretty important white people did they jump center stage as if they’d been there all along!

Posted by: Not Offended | January 14, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

I am glad to see that someone realizes that the poeple want to stick with the issues and not with the mudslinging that is so typical in political races. We, the people are fed up with all of this childishness and we want CHANGE!!!! I’m talking about the man in the mirror! Candidates impress the American public for once and stick with the issues!

Posted by: Freelovechild | January 14, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

Ex-Clinton supporter? Is this really Ann Couter? Tell me Ann, Whats with the Adams apple?

Posted by: Jerry | January 14, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

Sam: Hillary never said anything racial. What she said didn’t really require a response. The “CIVIL RIGHTS ACT” was a big step forward. I do thank senator Obama for placing the issue within the proper perspective. Again, “PLEASE, evade FOX NEWS.”

Posted by: Pointman | January 14, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

This is a media driven story taken right out of the Karl Rove”s playbook of divide and smear. Bits and pieces paste together to [create] what appears to be a story. This nonsense plays right into the hands of the drowning republicans. This country has sought “change” since 2004 prez election.Huckabee and Obama speak to this issue,but their platforms failed to illustrate or separate them
from other candidates in their respective parties on such issues as the
Iraq war,taxes and health insurance.
These polarizing issues continue to be
the core of what each candidate stands
for,but are not actually presented in the their stump speeches.THIS IS WHY
THEY ARE CALLED POLITICIANS.

Posted by: Wendy | January 14, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

I AGREE WITH MOST OF THE PEOPLE IN THIS POST.OBAMA DEFINITELY IS PRESIDENTIAL. HERE HILARY IS BLAMING OBAMA’S CAMP FOR RACIAL COMMENTS(WHICH WAS UNTRUE) THEY NEVER EVEN COMMENTED ON IT…SO INTSTEAD OF HILARY APOLOGIZING FOR PUTTING HER FOOT IN HER MOUTH SHE BLAMED ANOTHER CANDIDATE(HER COMPETITION).FOR THE OTHERS WHO SPEAK NEGATIVELY AGAINST SUCH A POSITIVE MAN …IT JUST SOLIDIFIES HOW DIVISIVE AMERICA IS AND HOW MANY IGNORANT PEOPLE WE STILL HAVE IN THIS WORLD…LET GO OF YOUR HATRED FOR CHANGE..A GOOD CHANGE AT THAT.WHAT OBAMA IS DOING IS SUCH A BEAUTIFUL THING…UNITY PEOPLE PLEASE ITS 2008!

Posted by: LAUREN | January 14, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

Anybody that’s not voting for Barack because of this, probably was never voting for him anyways.

Posted by: Brwnizofmine | January 14, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

I love this stuff :)
SERIAL RACE BAITER
BE AFRAID!
Heh. You guys just don’t get it. :) That won’t work baby. Not anymore.

Posted by: TB | January 14, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

Obama blew it – he had my vote on Saturday but he lost it on Sunday. I feel totally betrayed AND IT’S BETTER TO FEEL BETRAYED NOW THAN AFTER I VOTED LMAO !!

Posted by: doug | January 14, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

Barack absolutely amazes me sometimes! Few people could handle such a tense issue with this kind of class and honesty.

Posted by: Evan | January 14, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

Obama pulled the plug on his entire campaign last weekend – it’s over.

Posted by: doug | January 14, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

He is soon to be my president. I like the cult follower comment. This black female Episcopalian is in the cult Obama.
Also people, stop with the experience argument, Hillary had never been elected dog catcher before that political deal and taking up residence in New York. Was she even opposed the first time out?

Posted by: Heather, Memphis, TN | January 14, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

Why CNN wants Mrs. Clinton to win, whereas ABC is neutral. Any reason?

Posted by: Julius Figaro | January 14, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

What really needs to happen is that President Clinton needs to take a step back and chill. He cannot win the presidency for Hillary. To me he is being just as divisive as her. I voted for him twice and I love the Clintons, but he needs to take a “chill pill.” He is making things worse! They make Barack look presidential!

Posted by: Brwnizofmine | January 14, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

Race baiting is the most reliable way to destroy someone’s reputation – it’s foolproof and I bet a campaign manager told Obama to go for the kill but FOR THE FIRST TIME IN RECORDED HISTORY, a race-baiting ploy BACKFIRED. The difference is that we expect more from our American president than cheap race-baiting tactics.

Posted by: doug | January 14, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

Julius I think that CNN and ABC are just trying like so many others to create a fight where there really isn’t one, while avoiding asking tough questions of ALL candidates. They want ratings, they love drama. In the end they need to ask people what experience do they have, why that IS experience, and why they are running and on what credentials. We’ve got the media drumming up the past, picking on dresses, hair color, wrinkles, and types of laughter. When is the last time you heard McCain asked about his shoes, or Obama about his brand of suits or the number of hours of sleep he had last night. The media is trying to Paris Hiltonize-Brittanyize this campaign.

Posted by: Dave | January 14, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

For you people who continue to insist this Clinton ploy was started by Obama or the media, please refer to the statements made by South Carolina Representative, Jim Clyburn, Bob Hebert, and Donna Brazile, immediately after Clinton’s fairy tale speech. Clyburn took exception to Clinton’s statement as did Bob Hebert of the NY Times, who totally misconstrued it, then Donna Brazile, one time Gore campaign manager chimed in with “using a fairy tale as he did last week, it’s an insult”. What does Bill Clinton do then, he picks up the phone and calls the Al Sharpton radio show. He could have called CNN, or ABC, or even maybe FOX, but no, he calls the nation’s number one individual who is bound to misconsture the whole matter as being racially toned, and Sharpton also has a bone to pick with Barack for announcing his candidacy for president since Sharpton was considering announcing. Barack shot him out of the saddle by announcing first. After Sharpton starts the racial bandwagon rolling, he’s joined by Jesse Jackson Jr. Now it’s a conflagration. Bill Clinton knew this would happen if he were to call Sharpton. Barack didn’t utter a word, if he had, it would only have made the matter worse. Instead he did just as he did when in Harvard law school debates. Sit back and listen while others argued and made fools of themselves, until gathering all the facts, then lower the boom with a carefully rationalized and intelligent decision. That’s the mark of a true leader. I give Senator Obama high Kudo’s for a righteous and intelligent decision, and showing his superior intellect in this matter. It’s about time too as he now has to contend with the Clinton lawsuit in Nevada challenging the DNC caucus rules they have known about since August.

Posted by: gc | January 14, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

YES WE CAN !!

Posted by: Paul | January 14, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

Let’s see, who did Hillary trounce in the first election? Rick Lazio. Who lost almost every single REPUBLICAN county in NY. So I guess she got some non-Dems to vote for her. Oh yeah, her re-election results. She won by nearly 30 points. And swept the Republican Northern rural districts nearly ENTIRELY. Are we going to suggest that the republicans all fled the northern counties for a day? Let’s at least give her credit for one thing that no one can ever change: she is the first first lady to win office; she is the first female in the 232 year history of this nation to win a state primary. No amount of white-out or black-out or Right-out can erase that fact.

Posted by: Dave | January 14, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

Sen. Clinton says she’s got all of this experience, but she has no governing or management experience at all. The only experience she’s got is in making enemies across the isle and taking money from oil and insurance companies. No thanks, lady — been there, done that.
Can we please elect a person to the White House with integrity and honesty, who will unite this country again?
YES WE CAN!!!!!!! GO OBAMA!!!!

Posted by: a woman voter | January 14, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

Hillary and Bill are no more racist than they are unsavvy politicans. Obama’s response addresses the Clinton’s comments for what they were, clumsy. Obama continues to show his consistency on what in means to unify in both his rhetoric and his character and I’m tired of hearing people attack those things as if it were bad to have a motivational president who is principled. If you have any doubts listen to what his fellow senators have to say about him. From Bradley to Kerry they all praise him as first and foremost a good person. Inexperienced in the ways of our broken political system? maybe, but please stay away from the man’s character. Obama 08′.

Posted by: dbforobama | January 14, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

Hillary already said what he just said, yesterday. Once again he is following behind Hillary, who is a seasoned politician and knows how to handle tough situations. Nothing she or Bill said was ever racist and they sure didn’t call their own comments racist. So who started it? It was Obama’s campaign that started it. I am black and I will vote for Hillary and Bill.

Posted by: Bret | January 14, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

I predict the Clintons efforts to “swift boat” Barack Obama will backfire.

Posted by: Nadine | January 14, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

“Many African-Americans were “offended?”–Well, I’m African-American and many like me were NEVER OFFENDED by what Senator Clinton said. We knew what she was saying and what she meant. We’re more angry how others made and attempt to exploit what she said to their advantage in an attempt to garner African-American voters for themselves. It sicken us to no end how they used the very methods they’ve complained about to others for decades.
They sullied the name and memory of Dr. King and what he stood for and all those who fought, marched and stood for equality with him. They were of many races, many classes and varying religions. Whites fought, died and lost their livelihoods in the fight for equality for all Americans too! In fact, at least at the beginning, there were as many blacks as whites who tried to bring down Dr. King. Only after they saw he had the support of some pretty important white people did they jump center stage as if they’d been there all along!

Posted by: Christy | January 14, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

A-B-C = Anyone But Clintons!
What’s really irking the Clinton clan as they vie for a THIRD TERM?
And a chance to again foul the White House and undermine the US Presidency?

Posted by: Gobama | January 14, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

Experience??? Hillary is only experienced at campaigning! She’s real good at that, but that’s where her experience stops.

Posted by: M Smith | January 14, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

This is the man I want for my president. I’m now committed to caucus for Senator Obama.
Thank you, Senator Obama, for exemplifying the respectful demeanor that the leader of the free world should. And thank you for not deliberately misleading voters, even though your opponent has done so.

Posted by: Amos | January 14, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Folks, Christy has it RIGHT on the head. You go girl! If you track exactly what was said, and you did, you cannot come to the conclusions that the media and Obamas staff did. He has made so many calls for apologies, while having amnesia about his remarks in the past, he is starting to sound like soap box looking for an audience. Enough. He cannot challenge on experience; he has even less time served than Clinton. He cannot run on change, he hasn’t made any. And let’s not call out age – Bill was Governor at 34. Obama cannot run on this persecution-complex strategy because the uglier side of our nation WILL jump on that as an excuse not to vote for him (race driven pity will backfire). He cannot run on his high office accomplishments – he has none. He cannot run on his executive experience – he has none. He cannot run on a record of results – he hasn’t any YET. I know there is potential. We voted for potential (not me though) and got W as a result. Anyone who says that some experience is worthless obviously has never amounted to much in the decision making realm. Years in the company of a governor, campaigning, meetings, policy opinions, years in the white house beside the President, meetings, campaigns, decisions that might have included her opinions, her terms in the Senate and her seats on very important Armed Forces Committees. If you think that that isn’t important than you failed your civics classes enmass. Christy you are right. Go Hill.

Posted by: Dave | January 14, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

Wow. Nicely done Senator Obama. What a gracious gesture. Again, Senator Obama steps up, walks the walk, and speaks above the base, business-as-usual, divisive politics that have become the norm in Washington. Kudos to you Senator Obama.

Posted by: EddyNewHope | January 14, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

The Clinton’s have created this “race-baiting” fiction in an attempt to distract from Obama’s news cycle strategy of unveiling new endorsements and getting his uplifting speeches broadcast.
This is classic Rovian politics. Attack on the man’s strength (unifier) by blaming him for your own clumsy missteps and get a good drug reference in while people are paying attention.
To the average voter, these are the kinds of negative emotional associations that the Clintons hope will prevent them from taking his candidacy seriously. Note how “high school drug use,” as the media cycle runs as “drug use” as the story becomes more of a soundbite for the masses.
Media outlets typically don’t take the time to fact-check or clarify the substance behind these attacks, so it just becomes a bunch of competing assertions in which the guy with the most airtime with the word “drug” and “race” attached to it ends up getting sullied.
This is how the Republicans did it to John Kerry, this is how Iraq was linked to 9/11…it’s all about wagging that dog.
I am hopeful beyond hope that the American people can recognize the cynical and cannibalistic political strategies being employed the Clintons and their handful of self-interested black surrogates in this situation.

Posted by: Truth | January 14, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

Stop it! Both of you! All of you!!…blacks and whites! We have more important things to deal with, like homelessness, soldiers dying, people without health care.
Martin Luther King was a great man, Lyndon Johnson did great things.
But one thing is for certain, neither of you, or anyone of us is great if we act like school children drawing lines in the sand in our sandboxes.
Everybody apologize…including you Obama and you Hillary!

Posted by: Terry Neal | January 14, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

The only people bringing up race in the media are Obama supporters(Chris Mathews)et.al…. They are trying to make the Clintons look like raving rascist. The only racist are the ones who support Obama bacause he IS black. I could not be more liberal, but I will not support anyone who speaks in such generalities as Obama. I have no Idea how he plans to bring this country together besides the fact that he says he will. Tell me Barack: How you will do it and you will have my vote, otherwise tell your supporters to stop trying to play the race card and not make Bill and Hillary look like card carrying members of the KKK.

Posted by: buddy | January 14, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

Bret – -”I am black and I will vote for Hillary and Bill.” —- Ummm hate to break this to you, but bill isn’t running in fact, the moment he takes on even ONE function of the president, he is in violation of the 22nd ammendment and the impeachment on his wife will start immediately… This is not a co-president situation…

Posted by: givemeabreak | January 14, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

I don’t think people are stupid enough that they cannot discern it. After taking advantage and exploiting the situation making it as A RACIAL ISSUE – they are really playing with fire and wan’t to divide the country again… The bottom line IS they want to get ALL AFRICAN AMERICAN VOTES. If Senator Obama deliver the speech that he did today from the very beginning this won’t happen. Now he is making it looks that he is Presidential!!! You know what THIS TACTICS WON’T WORK ANYMORE!!! The best way is to just PRESENT YOUR CASE TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE – TELL THEM WHAT YOU’VE DONE AND ACCOMPLISHED AS A SENATOR. AT THE END OF THE DAY THE VOTERS WILL BE THE ONE WHO WILL REALLY DECIDE NOT THE PUNDITS, POLLSTERS, NATIONAL MEDIA, POLITICIAN AND CELEBRITY ENDORSER. VOTERS ARE MUCH WISER AND SMARTER NOW! THEY CAN DISCERN PLUS WE ARE ALREADY IN THE 21st CENTURY!
God Bless America!!

Posted by: Samson Lim | January 14, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Mr. Obama is class act, race is still an issue no doubt but I seriously doubt it was meant in the context taken by the media at some levels.

Posted by: Dinero80 | January 14, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Let me put this clearly – no republican has an ounce of empathy for the underprivileged when it comes to forcing corporations to pay a fairer wage. No republican would choose a family over a firm. No republican would choose assistance for the poor over accounting loop holes for the rich. I will vote for Obama if he wins the nomination, do not doubt that. I give Huckabee credit for some kindness and McCain for his honor, but in the end the party will bend those two like rubberbands until they spout the usual business first, everyone else last. Cut taxes on the rich, pay the poor just enough to keep them alive to work harder for them. I apologize if I pointed out some uncomfortable things, but in the end, some of these things make us stronger and more true than plastic Mitt or noun/verb/911. Let’s remember what it means to lose this election and vote accordingly.

Posted by: Dave | January 14, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

Baracks new way of politicking is what this country needs. He’ll convince many, but will never convince some: The racsits…the bigots. Hillary will also miss the vote of the misogynists, so good riddance to all of these types.
The others who troll these sites to spew such silly vitriol as comments is disheartening. I think a 13 year old is loose on a computer somewhere…but we can change all of this.
We, Americans who are tired of this old school type of petty politics, can change this.
If Hillary wins the nomination, I unfortunately, will vote for Mike Hucabee (with Chuck Norris as his VP.) PORK CHOPS and KARATE CHOPS FOR EVERYONE!

Posted by: chezburger | January 14, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

Thanks Obama…some of us Love and Live the truth, some of them have lied and lived a lie for so long thats all they can do, and really do feel it’s justified because it gets them what they seek.

Posted by: jtrace81 | January 14, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

doug, you obviously work for the clinton campaign. Your multiple posts don’t make any sense, they consist solely of insults and name-calling without any substance… I guess that’s why you relate so well to Billary, eh?

Posted by: swirlyturtle | January 14, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

“I could not be more liberal, but I will not support anyone who speaks in such generalities as Obama.”
Oh, gosh. Read his book, The Audacity of Hope. He explains how he would approach the problems we face, and evidences both a historical understanding and an awareness of the competing forces that stand in the way of change. I was not sold on Obama until I read it.
This guy knows what is going on.

Posted by: David | January 14, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

Corporate Mitt, Dead Fred, and Moody Rudy are loving this. They will use all of these pity party comments as commercials. Even if the writer’s strike continues, they have enough ammunition to please the NRA. Maybe we should agree to disagree and focus on the enemy – greed VS need.

Posted by: Dave | January 14, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

YES IN THE FACE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Go OBAMA

Posted by: nupe942001 | January 14, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

It’s Hillary is playing the racial card……. she is scared of Obama’s popularity. She thought presidency is under her belt…but I bet Obama and Edwards wud make her to run for life…
Obama has inspired Americans..truely he is the one who measured the importance of independents, republicans and democrats … now everybody is following his method… Hillary evil intention is that ” if she somehow able to convince that Obama is playing race card” ..so that whites wud vote for her… but she is at fault …
white, blak, hispanic voted for Obama and continue to vote for him…. I’m sure on the last day Bill wud vote for Obama…
Hillary wud stant outside and clap what a man is Obama…
lastly she will embrace to become a preach at a church… hehehhehe..
Obama is the man for americans …

Posted by: sud | January 14, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

swirlyturtle – cool name, btw – I do not work for the Clinton campaign, I’ve been trolling the abcnews comment threads all day PRO BONO because I felt betrayed by Obama – he had my vote – not anymore. I’ll probably end up voting for McCain but it’s still early so we’ll see.

Posted by: doug | January 14, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

It’s Hillary is playing the racial card……. she is scared of Obama’s popularity. She thought presidency is under her belt…but I bet Obama and Edwards wud make her to run for life…
Obama has inspired Americans..truely he is the one who measured the importance of independents, republicans and democrats … now everybody is following his method… Hillary evil intention is that ” if she somehow able to convince that Obama is playing race card” ..so that whites wud vote for her… but she is at fault …
white, blak, hispanic voted for Obama and continue to vote for him…. I’m sure on the last day Bill wud vote for Obama…
Hillary wud stant outside and clap what a man is Obama…
lastly she will embrace to become a preach at a church… hehehhehe..
Obama is the man for americans …

Posted by: sud | January 14, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

I can’t imagine four years of an Obama adminstration’s race baiting nonsense.
First we see Michelle Obama on national television spouting that blacks will “wake up and get it” and vote for her husband simply because he black, which insults every African American by implying they lack the intelligence to vote for someone based on something other than race. Even highly liberal National Public Radio sharply criticized that attempt by the Obama campaign to play the race card.
Now we have his minion Al Sharpton out this week creating a race riot over use of the phrase “fairy tale” to describe a position of Obama’s. Wow. Hardly racist. And Clinton saying LBJ helped realize MLK’s dream is racist? Not even close.
So Obama the “uniter” stands on the sidelines for days delightfully fueling the impending race riot (of which he thinks he will benefit from) with statements about how many black leaders have supposedly called him to express “outrage” that someone would describe his position as a “fairy tale.” Hogwash. His campaign is clearly dying to play the race card and is looking for anything, including “fairy tale,” to pounce on.
You either worship him and agree with him — or you’re a racist. This is NOT the direction we should be moving in this country. Four years of Obama’s racial games? Nobama. No way.

Posted by: derrick | January 14, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

Barack Obama’s response to the so-called “racial” comments from the Clinton camp reminds me of the way Tiger Woods handled the “lynching” comment from the Golf Channel — it’s a non-issue. I don’t agree with everything the Clintons say and those things aren’t always said in the best context, but the Clintons are too intelligent to resort to racist remarks or diminish the legacy of Martin Luther King. It’s refreshing to see the way Obama has handled all this. Hopefully the whole thing will be put to rest and misinterpretations of people’s words won’t stand in the way of these important campaigns.

Posted by: ekm621 | January 14, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

Has anyone read the article on how Obama in the past has changed things? I have. There is no evidence that he has EVER brought about significant change in anything. In fact, he seems to be happy with very little change in many areas. Talk about a person of the establishment. So explain to me the big changes he will make in the Federal government, unless the voters fire everyone, and then put Obama people in there. It Will Never Happen. But then he can go back to changing stuff a little bit, and calling that success. Do you think that the people cheering for him really understand that. Hurrah, we want everything change, really mean Hurrah, lets just change stuff a little and call it success. (There was also a great article on how Presidental candidate who promised change faired in that department. Unfortunately, poorly, that should tell us something).
The other fighting going on over race and other insifnicant stuff are just a smoke screen so you don’t have to ask the candidates about their records, and the Issues. Now how smart do we look. I really think we voters look manipulated.

Posted by: NewMexicoFan | January 14, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

Obama, you are a lovely lovely man. Whatever the dynamics of this issue, this evening you came out above the fray. A true class act. Very presidential. Hillary is desperate. She provides no hope. Thoughts and wishes to the Obamas

Posted by: Rachel | January 14, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

What is your take on “you are likable enough” comment.
To me it seemed more like: this is kinda silly and a little embarassing. I’m likeable, you’re likeable, let’s move on”.
It was like a dad talking straight to his daughter.
Or maybe I am responding to my own disdain to this “I am nice and soft” girly talk.
Yes, Barack IS a high road guy and he also IS calculating.
I am glad he KNOWS the political talk and he can fuse it with the inspirational talk like FDR (we have nothing to fear, but fear itself).
He WILL be talking to political leaders and to the communities of the world after all.
By the way, nice sermon thomca2

Posted by: Yorgs | January 14, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

Here’s what happened. Al Sharpton made national news about 3 times more than he should have last year, nonetheless, every time Sharpton race-baited, it worked out to his favor.
So it looked like a sure thing when Hillary made a comment that could be TAKEN COMPLETELY OUT OF CONTEXT…then BOOM – it backfired.
No politician will ever make that mistake again because today we showed Washington that we expect more from presidential candidates than petty race-baiting.
Al Sharpton will still descend flapping from a bellfry like a vampire whenever an average white person tries to say something nice about a black person – but politicians can’t get away with it – we expect more than that.

Posted by: doug | January 14, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

The Clintons are a real circus act. They bring this clown Johnson, of BET fame, and of the filthiest lyrics you have ever heard or can imagine as their defender. If this cartoon is their example of a symbol of fairness and a CLEAN campaign, THEY should give it up. As for Mr. Clinton, he is the biggest spinner of “fairy tales” of all time: “I did not have sex with that woman – Monica Lewinski.”

Posted by: Randle Bate | January 14, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

Well played, Mr. Obama, well played.

Posted by: AW33 | January 14, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

See how snaky Obama subtley twists the fact of what Hillary says so people could still think ill of it. That’s what I’m saying!!! He’s in the image of the old mold himself, so why is he running aginst Clinton on the basis of being not of the status quo!
I’ll repeat the obvious fact that I’ve been declaring: Obama is a pure Washingtonian!!!

Posted by: PC | January 14, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

OK Dan Abrams just had a great story on MSNBC about this “racial controversy.” He nailed it right on the head. The stupid media have created a race story where there is none. The Clinton comments were taken completely out of context by the media for whatever sensationalist story they wanted and then they baited the Obamba camp to comment on this story but only giving them the out of context comments so they could get a race story going. THE MEDIA S U C K S!!!

Posted by: libby | January 14, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

I can’t count how many times some Obama-bot said on this thread “You’re a class act, Obama!” It’s like you’re trying to polish the all the tarnish away but it wont go away! HE’S A DIVIDER! HE’S NOT A UNIFIER!

Posted by: doug | January 14, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

Yes, Obama’s campaign IS a fairy tale if he claims he’s been consistently against Iraq. He hasn’t, I rememeber when he said: “My views aren’t really different from Bush’s,” after Obama funded the war! And after the invasion, when Obama said, “Looking back, I don’t know if I would have voted for the war or not, really.” Calling that clean could make one laugh all day long!!

Posted by: GT | January 14, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

Sharpton opened up a pandoras box with this smear-tactic and I don’t think they’ll ever get it shut. Voters expect more from an American president than cheap petty race-baiting tactics. American presidents DO NOT fan the flames of racism!! WTF people?!? Voters EXPECT MORE than that and Obama’s backpedaling today proves that he heard us LOUD AND CLEAR. The question is: is it too late to repair the damage? All I can say is IT’S TOO LATE to win my vote back.

Posted by: doug | January 14, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

Where was Saint Obama days ago when these words could have made a difference? Answer: he was sitting back quietly fueling the controversy. This guy is no “uniter.” He’s a major con man.

Posted by: Black but not falling for it | January 14, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

I can`t believe that Obama can fool so many people at the same time.. But then maybe its easy to fool dools.

Posted by: V.Casella | January 14, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

Just politics people. Surprise, surprise! Yeah, they criticize each other, they want to get elected, duh! After someone wins the nomination, they will all be in love again. Does nobody know this?

Posted by: Rudy | January 14, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

1st off I would like to commend Sen. Obama on being the bigger person and ending this non sense even though he didnt start none of this.
2nd I love how all you other people who say that he is a phony just level charges without one seed of evidence. I think you should try to back it up but you cant. So I can understand your frustration that alot of people admire Obama. As so do I.
Obama 08

Posted by: William | January 14, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

Hey Obama — this is all cute fun and games that may play well in South Carolina, but Americans will ultimately reject your diviseness strategy. Keep playing your games and see what happens.

Posted by: no way | January 14, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

I would like to point out that the comments the Clintons made were NOT racist until Obama and his camp followers MADE them racist. Also I would like to reiterate and correct a previous comment. “But then maybe its easy to fool fools.”

Posted by: V.Casella | January 14, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

As I recall, the marches, speeches, rallies, and hosings, beatings and dogs all galvanized a country to recognize a serious flaw in our system. The contributions and sacrifices by those who engaged in that vocal public exposure cannot be minimized or marginalized by today’s leaders. It stands the test of time. Still, had there been no legislative leadership to take this energized cause and make it into something doable in day to day dealings, we’d still be marching.

Posted by: Percy F. Lodge | January 14, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

A question for the Obama Pom Squad:
Why do suppose Shawn Hannity and so many other conservatives are biased toward Obama?
Answer: The guy is a lightweight they can beat in November. They are far, far more concerned about their ability to defeat Clinton.

Posted by: Dick Morris | January 14, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

I am so glad that Obama took the higher road on this one. I watched Meet the Press yesterday and did not hear Hillary answer one of Tim Russert’s questions the way it was asked. He even tried to ask her the same question a few times hoping to get an actual response out of her. Her typical response “Look Tim, we can sit here all day and argue, or we can look at the facts.” I am so tired of her facts! I have been following the race very closely, watching all of the debates, and the more I hear from her, the more I cannot stand. I will vote for the Democratic nominee whoever it may be in November (although I hope it’s Obama!!) because we need a Democrat back in the White House; HOWEVER, I will still not be proud to be American. If Hillary wins the nomination, it is because her and Bill have brainwashed and convincingly lied to a majority of people. If Hillary gets the nomination, I fear that it will be a lot easier for the Republicans to put another of their kind into the White House…especially if Bloomberg decides to run.

Posted by: Rachael | January 14, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

re – Dick Morris: I agree with your asessment 100% And you can add Rusty Humphrey to the list of right-wing talk radio hosts siding with Obama on this issue.

Posted by: doug | January 14, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

Will you people stop buying into the story that Obama was race baiting. He hasn’t said ANYTHING and you Hillary supporters act like he started it. Hillary and Bill made some comments that were misunderstood and some people in the black community got offended. That wasn’t either candidate starting it. It was stupid and the media took off with it.
Hillary tried to act like everything being said against her was coming from Obama and it didn’t.
Not everything that is said is approved by the candidates. Did Hillary say she was working for the black community when Barack was doing drugs in the street? No, that was a supporter.

Posted by: coop | January 14, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

You can blame Al Sharpton all you want but Obama sat back quietly, fueled the controversy and divided the country – he’ll never make that mistake again. But don’t worry, he’s still young: OBAMA 2012 !!!!!!!!!!!! LMAO !!!

Posted by: doug | January 14, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

It seems increasingly clear to me as a white, middle-aged, male professional that the Clintons are trying to incite a divide between civil rights and women’s rights, in a desperate attempt to hold onto political power. I hope Obama finds the correct balance between defending himself against these reprehensible people and staying on message about the politics of national unity. If Hillary gets the nomination by hook or crook, I’ll join the independents in voting Republican.

Posted by: Drew Rockerd | January 14, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

Obama “went to school at Harvard”
In fact, he attended law school at Harvard but he graduated college from Columbia (Class of ’83).

Posted by: Truesdell | January 14, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

Obama is so in to himself I can’t stand the way he is so caught up in himsel I knew ths was going this way Edwards and him put women down then when they realized they had offended them The they changed that the Clintons were racist COME ON OBAMA SUPPORTETRS “lket the record show that Obama is the one that thiniks he is exclusive going to a black only church Obama people in glass houises should not throw stones and then when you do say it wasnt me it was them Obama is a joke

Posted by: JLV | January 14, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

I am undecided beween Edwards and Obama. Still: Bravo Obama! As for all of the negativity toward him on this board: Some people just aren’t accustomed to a politician who speaks to the American people like adults instead of six year old children. It’s a pity that there are so many children on this board.
When people said that it would take a miracle for the Republicans to retake the White House in ’08, I always said, No, it would merely take hateful, vitriolic, operatives in the Democratic Party who are no better than their counterparts in the Republican Party. They are the very reason why the Democratic Party is so apt at imploding. The toxic voices on this board (you have to be semi-retarded to really believe that Obama is a race-baiter) are the primary reasons why the Democrats may not recapture the White House. Which sucks big time for all of us–we may not survive another one of them in power.
Question: Do you people really believe all of this hate is helping the party or the country? Do you care about the party or the country? Or do you only care about whether your candidate wins? You imbeciles are the best things that those vile Republican candidates have going for them. Dial it down and focus on what’s important: the country and the party, in that order. Obama is not your enemy.

Posted by: PB | January 14, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

Read Obama’s history. He DOES have experience-uniting people and working in his community to better the lives of the people in it. Read about the direction he took in his law career–didn’t look for the big bucks, but worked with and for the people, as did his wife. THAT experience is more valuable in my opinion than a lawyer with shady deals in the past and a record of dividing and polarizing people for her own gain. Also–just because Hillary says his campaign is up to something doesn’t mean it is. Research the facts and quotes. Don’t even get me started on Bill’s “honesty.”

Posted by: Susan George | January 14, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

He is too passive aggressive about this. I was offended he didn’t step out earlier to calm the flames.
He lost my vote.

Posted by: Vanessa | January 14, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

Does anyone Know that Hillary’s dad was a Republican? And I would say that doesnt make her a true Demo!

Posted by: LIsten up | January 14, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

A-B-C = Anyone But Clintons!
What’s really irking the Clinton clan as they vie for a THIRD TERM?
And a chance to again foul the White House and undermine the US Presidency?
Clintons demand the title of “First Black President”. Get it?
Clintons the masters; Blacks the servants/slaves.
How dare a so-called Black run against their master for the Presidency and beat them out of the box in Iowa? LOL

Posted by: Gobama | January 14, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

A lot of people here are dissing Obama because they claim he set up the Clintons in the first place, and is now trying to look good by being graceful about the whole thing.
Two points: (1) Hillary began the whole thing by demeaning Obama’s talking about hope by calling them “false hopes.” That escalated into the MLK reference and the racial wars. It was also Hillary’s people who were talking about drugs, dealing, “shuck and jive,” and “doing things in the neighborhood.”
(2) If Hillary said tried to dampen the fires by being as graceful as Obama was, these same people who are dissing Obama would be praising Clinton for states(wo)manship.

Posted by: suntzu | January 14, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

Barak Hussein Obama is not a true democrat. He has bad mouthed Hillary and Bill from the beginning. Thank God he’s not going to be president. Well, maybe president of the senate.

Posted by: Dave | January 14, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

NOBAMA!!!!!!!!!!
NO MUSLIMS IN THE WHITE HOUSE!!!!!

Posted by: Wrap it Up | January 14, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

How did the whole thing get started?

Posted by: lw | January 14, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

I see the same three kids are here spamming about Obama. Get lives and take a bath. I’ve never seen uglier people in my life looking at your pictures.

Posted by: Ugh | January 14, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

Am I the only one that doesn’t care about this story?? This has been so overblown and so overthought. Much ado about nothing! I don’t care about this story!
Dick Morris was on Fox News and he said the only way that Hilary can win is if she keeps reminding people that Barack is black. He said it is a dirty trick but he said its the only way she can win. Don’t fall for this b.s. people. Mark Dick Morris’ word, Hilary will continue to constantly bring up race from here on out as a ploy to win the nomination!!

Posted by: cablenewswatcher | January 14, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

re coop: But Obama did participate in the race-baiting. Here’s what Obama said quote:
“Senator Clinton made an unfortunate, an ill-advised remark, about King and Lyndon Johnson. I didn’t make the statement, I haven’t remarked on it, and she, I think, offended some folks who felt that somehow diminished King’s role in bringing about the Civil Rights Act. She is free to explain that, but the notion that somehow this is our doing is ludicrous.”
Get it? Obama did not remark on Hillary’s “unfortunate” and “ill-advised” statement.
And then Mr. Uniter comes in for the final kill with the observation that some folks feel that Hillary “diminished King’s role in bringing about the Civil Rights Act.”
It was a passive and sneaky way to fan the racial flames of America.

Posted by: doug | January 14, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

OBAMA LOOKS LIKE HE HAS EGG ON HIS FACE. NOT ONLY IS HE CHEATING IN NEVADA BUT HE WANTS TO GO BACK TO THE 60S I GUESS THATS HOW HE IS GOING TO SOLVE THE PROBLEMS IN THE INNER CITIES HE WANTS US TO GET MAD AND BURN THEM DOWN Obama, you’re a man just a man….

Posted by: THE DODGE | January 14, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

Barack Hussein is not going to win. HRC has all the delegates wrapped up. She is creaming the empty suit run on buzzwords Barack bin Obama.
He is nasty. A basketball head on a skinny body with catcher mitts as ears.

Posted by: Independant | January 14, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

What a load of crap. Dude was handed his ass by loads of black leaders so now he is trying to take the heat off him. Damn I wish the republicans would unleash what I’ve been privy to. The Clinton’s have nothing on him like we do.

Posted by: Jamie | January 14, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Obama is so playing people and many seem to be buying it. The guy is good.

Posted by: Sandra | January 14, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

Obama wears panties. What a waste of human skin. He should go back to his muslim family in Kenya and leave americans alone.

Posted by: Military man | January 14, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

Obama played “99 Problems But A Bi+ch Ain’t One” by Jayzee at his Iowa victory party (the bi+ch being a not-so-subtle reference to Hillary) and no one has made a big deal about that. Now THAT is blatant when you consider how far Obama had to take Hillary’s Doctor King comments out of context to try to smear her.

Posted by: doug | January 14, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

I’m so sick of his garbage. Obama thinks he’s going to skate on into the white house on AFFIRMATIVE ACTION.

Posted by: SAY NO TO OBAMA THE FRAUD | January 14, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

This is how extremist libs operate. They make the accusation, knowing it is false or misleading, then let it blow over or have someone else deflect the blame,,,, damage done, move on to the next attack. Poor Obama. He is so naive he does not know what is about to hit him next. The Clinton War Machine is just revving up.

Posted by: Bill | January 14, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

Elect Obama? What, and spoil our chances to rent the Lincoln bedroom?

Posted by: Wesley | January 14, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

Intricacies of the legislative process? I thought it was part of Johnsons Great Society agenda.

Posted by: BTL musings | January 14, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

Once more Barrack beat the Clintons on this one. Thank you for your Honesty and since the Clintons are Power hungry and want the Presidency even by injecting race to win, you have demonstrated once more that you are a different species from the Clintons and I and my family admire you for that.
Keep the good work and we will continue to pray for your victory.
God Bless America.

Posted by: Nzuixx | January 14, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

It’s a shame Obama had to play the race card to get SC votes. Dirty politics. It’ll work for one state, but not the rest. Signed, No longer an Obama voter.

Posted by: Tatiana Johnson | January 14, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

I think Hillary just lost my vote. Those two comments were kind of ignorant. I’m not sure if I can vote for a candidate that can say something like that.
King’s dream didn’t consist of a single bill; it was much greater than that. The Dream is one of cooperation between all people of all backgrounds, but more importantly, the dream is about social change.
The Civil Right Act itself can not realize a whole encompassing social change. It’s a step toward social change. It’s that aspect of her comment that I find ignorant and impractical.
This change of perspective is not just due to one comment. It’s been a string of things lately. All the Clintons have done in the last few days is attack Obama with stupid trite claims.
I think I’ve finally converted.

Posted by: Cleo Writters | January 14, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

Obama thinks hes the second coming of buda He insults women has no plan to help any of us. He gets his help from the gangsters in Chicago. But thats okay… I guess that will be his answer for the people who have foreclosed: Find A Gangster….Buy a House, even if you cannot afford it. Is that really okay? Yeah he called it a bonehead thing to do?????? What do you really owe this guy Obama???????? Whose shady now? Your supporters sure are looking for a hero(weak at that) that they overlook some very important things about you.

Posted by: Emilee | January 14, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

There is so much hatred on this board its completely mind blowing. Interestingly enough I bet all the “haters” on this board don’t vote or take any active positive roles in their community.

Posted by: wow...so sad | January 14, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

While I’m pretty bad at math, I’m always baffled when people question Barack’s 11 years in elected office and 13 years as a community organizer as no experience, and just blindly accept the claim of 35 years of experience from one term of elected office for Senator Clinton. After talking personally on more than one occasion, and listening to several speeches and watching campaign staffers interact (as a candidate leads a campaign, so do they lead the nation), and researching VOTING RECORDS and ETHICS…well, guess who I’m supporting??

Posted by: Mary, Iowa voter | January 14, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

Common sense tells you that Obama stirred the pot to get the black votes in South Carolina.

Posted by: lw | January 14, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

All of this is needless noise and part of a depressing trend to focus on trivia instead of issues, many of which are burried here. Why?
Fools no longer rush in where angels fear to tread – they can’t shoulder their way past the pollsters.
The current pollster chatter is the two big issues in the presidential race are the war in Iraq and the economy, with race on standby in case those predictions develop fatal New Hampshire disease.
With February 5 and “Tsunami Tuesday” primaries less than a month away, what you don’t hear is much talk about illegal immigration and what we do about 14-16 million souls, most Hispanic and mostly Mexican.
That’s very odd when you look at the Tsunami states: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Kansas, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Utah. Illegal immigration has been an issue in all.
For some – notably Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado and New Mexico — it has been a Very Big Issue. Which is why the overwhelming silence from the frontrunners, punctuated by occasional projectile politicking, is so depressing.
Of the top six candidates who have yet to become trivia-quiz answers, only Huckabee puts illegal immigration at the top of his website list of issues. For the others, Clinton, Obama, Edwards, McCain and Romney, it doesn’t even make the top five. And for all six, the menu is pretty much Platitudes with Piety Salad or Red Meat With DeportEm Sauce.
All the politicians pretty much ignore that deciding the fate of 16 million fellow humans is also deciding our own, whether now or in the court we all will face. For this issue, there are no easy answers or simple plans. But there are, increasingly, frameworks for discussion, mostly in books.
I wrote one such, “Opening the Borders” (Level 4 Press 2007). Patrick Buchanan wrote another, “State of Emergency” (St. Martin’s Griffin 2007). And a search on Amazon or Barnes and Noble or other booksellers will find those viewpoints and everything in between.
All the books are probably candles in the political whirlwind, but when the 2009 presidential inauguration trash hits a landfill, the problem of illegal immigration will remain. And it will grow unless something is done that begins with thought and walks hand-in-hand with reason, fairness and a sense of common humanity.
It would be nice to see such an initiative coming from our current political leaders, but history suggests it must first come from us. Remember that individual liberty, universal voting, ending slavery and segregation didn’t come from the top down – they came boiling up from the bottom.
On illegal immigration, it’s time to bring the bottom to a boil.
Larry B

Posted by: Larry Blasko | January 14, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

I WANT OBAMA TO ANSWER THIS QUESTION:
Why did you wait one week to condemn accusations against Hillary that her remarks (and her husband’s) were racist in nature? Moreover, upon condemning these accusations, you then proceeded to state to ABC News here that the comment was revealing about her political character. “I do think it was indicative of the perspective that she brings, which is that what happens in Washington is more important than what happens outside of Washington.” He said he believes the quote betrays a belief on her part, “that the intricacies of the legislative process were somehow more significant than when ordinary people rise up and march and go to jail and fight for justice.” He called that a “fundamental difference” between them. Is there not a hypocrisy in your statement? Didn’t Hillary explicitly acknowledge Dr. King’s contributions in all the aspects you outlined beforehand? What is this “fundamental difference” you refer to? Please explain and justify your statements with hard evidence that clearly outlines this intention on Hillary’s behalf.

Posted by: Marisol | January 14, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

Wow he’s so refreshing! Wait a minute..have attacks dogs go after Hillary, wait a few days then go on camera to say the issue is a non-issue. And he calls this CHANGE

Posted by: Joey | January 14, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

It’s over, he blew it for now: Obama 2012

Posted by: doug | January 14, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

The sad truth of the matter is that Obama’s spin meisters have taken comments of Hilary and Bill Clinton that when heard in their full context cannot concievably be interpreted as racist, and made them so. They have done so by preying upon the sensitivities of Afro-Americans. After allowing ample time for the maximum damage to be unfiarly done to the Clinton candidacy, Obama then appears to take the high road and concede that the Clinton’s statements were not racist, but in the same comment, under the guise of explaining the difference between he and Hilary plants the unmistakable message that in fact her statememt was racist. Doing so demonstrtates real facility with the language, but do we want such disengeniousness in the next leader of the free world? Instead of rising above the fray, Obama has sunk himself deeper into the mire.The unfortunate thing is that people have swallowed it hook line and sinker. I suppose that is to be expected: the United States has failed the national intelligence test by electing one of the worst presidents we have ever had, not once, but twice. I am sure that Obama’s spin doctors can make this final comment into a racist attack on the intelligence of Afro-Americans. Afro-Americans have an understandable senitivity, but I hope they can put their emotions to one side and analyze what the Clinton’s really. said.Do we want just another skilled polititcal team to win an election. Obama’s handling of the “rascist” comments has been a display of calculated politics. He has however, served to divide,contrary to his claim to be a uniter.It comes down to who you can trust to do right by all of us. It seems that Obama has concluded, like the Bushg administration that the ends justify the means. Hilary Clinton, based on experience knows they do not.

Posted by: chris mccurdy | January 14, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

People,
Leaders are not made by race or gender. Leaders are born. Leaders are passionate and show patience. They unite and not divide. They are the great and impressive speakers. These all and many more qualities I see in Barack Obama. Someone who graduated from Harvard law school and was also leader in the harvard law school. He is a natural leader.
I would like to challenge anyone who is writing all the bad comments about Obama. Talk foolish about Obama only if you have these credentials or more. I am sure no one can come close to what this person has achieved.
He never commented on race ,only Hillary Clinton brought up this whole issue by her uneducated and wrong use of words.

Posted by: samyr | January 14, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

What Obama said has not grain of truth. He’s trying to cover his after realizing that what his cult followers and the media did was going to get the white folks running frm him…its too late. Your race-neutral approach will not help you. We will respect you more if you call it as it is. You are the first Black man have come across who is race-neutral!

Posted by: victoria | January 14, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

if deceitful clintons win the nomination, i’m voting republican. I don’t care if i have to vote for julliani

Posted by: a concern gentleman | January 14, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

Thank you Obama case closed, now can we go on with the real issues everyone here?

Posted by: Gloria | January 14, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

I may disagree with Barack Obama on many issues, but he certainly seems to be an honest, decent man. I’ll be voting Republican (hopefully McCain or Huckabee), but if it has to be a Democrat, Obama would be my choice.

Posted by: James | January 14, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

by her uneducated and wrong use of words. That is rich, really rich.
Bill Clinton said Barack’s claiming he is different on Iraq is a fairy tale.
Barack claiming he is somehow like JFK and MLK is a fairy tale.
Claiming you are not commenting while you comment on it for 3 minutes is a fairy tale.
Saying you can bring change and unite people while hide your white family from black America is a fairy tale.
Touting your world experience because you have lived in Indonesia when you were 9, and that that is = or > than Hillary is a fairy tale.
Trying to paint Hill and Bill as racists when you know and have now said is not true is a fairy tale.
Promising what you can’t deliver because you haven’t got a clue is a fairy tale.
And there’s a few uneducated, wrong words.

Posted by: Frustrated With The Fairy Tale | January 14, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

This is why Barack Obama must be our next president!

Posted by: The Robman | January 14, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

I’m afraid Samir that there are many people that have more education AND Experience then your demigod Obama But obviously to you he walks on water

Posted by: emilee | January 14, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

who else but the president would have been able to put ‘it’ into law?! yes it was dr. king’s dream, but i do remember some resistance to it. i think it was the reason he was assassinated! duh!! everyone that’s had the same dream for him was either shot at or assassinated. still like this country? still like “guns”? still wondering if this is still a free country? check your “red flag” and start praying!!!!!

Posted by: gwenn2006 | January 14, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

Senator Obama has remained focused on the issues while the Clintons argue with themselves, then blame Obama for “attacks”. Where exactly did Obama attack the Clintons? But facts and reason aren’t important in an election year: just sound bites, slimy attacks (Obama sells drugs, is a muslim, hates freedom, etc.), then the Clintons say Obama is playing the “race card” – for something the Clintons themselves said. Typical, politics as usual. Bill is selling his legacy for this election. Americans will not view him in the same light after seeing him play the attack dog on the campaign trail.

Posted by: EddyNewHope | January 14, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

Yet another Bogus Headline from the network that’s “in the tank” for Hillary Clinton!
Obama has nothing to “damp down”!
It was Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton who made the racial comments!
It is and was Hillary Clinton supporters
who keep referring to Senator Obama as
Barack Hussein Obama!
The difference between Barack Obama and the Clintons is this: Obama is a class
act, the Clintons have no class!
They will do anything and say anything to win the nomination, even if it means dividing the Democrat Party along racial lines!

Posted by: reaganfan | January 14, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

He’s been running for office for a year and a half he’s said. Anyone see his Mom yet on National TV? No? Wonder why? Hill’s Mom was on CNN while in Iowa. What gives Barack? Where are the folks that raised you? Where are the people sent you to Havard? Why are you keeping them quiet and invisible? Because, a stage of multi-racial families doesn’t turn on your target audience. It wrecks the fairy tale. But I don’t think it wrecks it at all. It makes you real. It shows your proud. It tells America look, I am a fabulous, diverse mix. I am beautiful and so is everyone on this stage. But since you are such a coward – I don’t want race in this race – you hide them. You damn sure don’t want race in this race because you are afraid your OTHER side will hurt the imaginary FAIRY tale you’re trying to perpetrate on the nation. Be proud, show them. See the results will be successful. Don’t hide them.

Posted by: Frustrated With The Fairy Tale | January 14, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

A Leader for Reform
Obama reached across the aisle and challenged leaders of both parties to pass historic ethics reforms both in Washington and Springfield, IL. Unlike other candidates, he refuses to accept campaign contributions from PACs and Washington lobbyists.
Close the Revolving Door
Obama will close the revolving door between the executive branch and K-Street lobbying shops. Obama’s appointees will serve the American people, not their own financial interests.
Increase Transparency
Obama will increase transparency so that ordinary Americans can understand their government and trust that their money is well spent.
End Wasteful No-Bid Contracts
Obama will clean up government contracting and end the abuse of no-bid contracts.

Posted by: Ryno | January 14, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

I can’t speak for anyone else but as for me (Doug), I was a former supporter but not anymore because last weekend, he made it black versus white. Presidents don’t do things like that.

Posted by: doug | January 14, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

You don’t see Obama’s mother because she died from cancer nearly 20 years ago,!

Posted by: Yvonne | January 14, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

Independent here. Fights between Obama’s and Clintons’ supporters are worse than the feud between the candidates themselves. President Bill Clinton is the leading man in this fight. I am moving away from Democratic Party for this moment and will pay more attention what Senator McCain can do for this country. I may end up vote for GOP if these candidates keep blaming others for their careless mistakes. However, I am glad to know Senator Obama came to sense and to decide to end this non-sense and I am glad that Senator Clinton was willing to follow his action.

Posted by: middle | January 14, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

A candidate of all talk and no substance pull out the RACE CARD ahead of South Carolina votes and many excitable people fell for it instantly. How sad! Race is a very divisive issue. It’s deplorable that a man who aspires to be the President of America stooped too low to use the race issue for political gains. What did he do for the blacks in America? What is his record for civil rights issues? What does he have in common with African Americans?
Instead, we should let Obama spell out what CHANGES he is going to make for America and how. Let him explain what he is going to do about the power vacuum and chaos after American troops’ withdrawal from Iraq. Let him tell us where he would get the money to provide healthcare for all American citizens. Ask him what serious repercussions he foresees by taking unilateral action in Pakistan, a Muslim country with happens to have a nuclear bomb. Let him tell us how his POLICIES (if he has one) will make America a better place. Above all, let him argue with other candidates on REAL POLICY ISSUES, not RACE.

Posted by: Miriam | January 14, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

Glad to see Obama handle the matter thoughtfully and gracefully. Quite honestly, I think the issues of race and sex have been blown WAAAAAAAAAAAAYY out of proportion by the media. Not that the Clintons’ actions helped matters, either, but the newsies really took this way further than they should have. It’s not responsible journalism in any sense.
Honestly, I’m well aware that Obama is not perfect as a person or a politician. However, compared to the rest of the field of presidential candidates he looks pretty good, at least if the comparison is done with any thought, objectivity, or open-mindedness whatsoever. He is perhaps the only candidate I’ve seen whose approach is most consistently gentle, calm, and thoughtful. My impression of him (having gotten the chance to examine many candidates thoroughly in Iowa) is that he’s the least likely to make rash decisions based on a knee-jerk reaction in a difficult moment. I think that is what we need most in a president. It will help him resist one American tendency that is becoming entirely too common: the tendency to come to snap judgments based on too little information, such as short, sensationalized media sound-bites. I mean that in all seriousness.
Clinton and Edwards do not have the necessary qualities of thoughtfulness and grace. I know less about the Republicans, but I don’t have much confidence in any of them except perhaps John McCain. (God, how I wish he’d gotten the Republican nomination in 2000 instead of Bush. If that had happened, then one way or another things would be very different today. How sad that we don’t seem to learn from our past.) I particularly think that the Clinton campaign needs to stop the acrimony. Simply put, Hillary is the most divisive candidate in the entire field because she is so immersed in negative politics, and so skilled at manipulating the media, who just LOVE to report bad news and controversy. That’s not what America needs! Does she not understand the damage she’s doing? Does she even know that there are people who’ve started referring to her as “Hitlery” because of the kind of campaign tactics she’s using? (And make no mistake, I find that very sad and disturbing, especially as a woman voter.)
If the founders really are watching us from beyond the grave, I feel really sorry for them. The situation America finds itself in today, not only with our politics at home, but also our standing in the world, were not what our founders intended for us. We have to bring an end to this nonsense as quickly and decisively as we can.
The media ought to be helping us toward that goal by being more responsible and objective in their coverage of the campaigns and the nomination contests. We need somebody rational, professional, and trustworthy like Walter Cronkite back. Speaking of not being hasty….

Posted by: Karen | January 14, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

I now know how Bush got elected after reading some of the post’s on this and other blogs. Scary

Posted by: gc | January 14, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

I am so disheartened by all of the negativity that is spewing on this blog. I’m a teacher and I’m up late trying to plan math lessons, but I can’t sit here and let people disparage an honest, intelligent, decent man who would never disparage anyone in the way that some people here have. For the person who just talked about his mother, please think before you speak. She died of cancer. Please people educate yourselves about this man that you are so quick to judge. Read both of his books. He is honest, he is being attacked from all angles and all he is trying to do is help the people of this country help themselves. I wholeheartedly support Barack Obama and have hoped that he would run for president ever since I heard his speech in 2004. It is not naive to hope for a better future, it is naive to think that it is one man’s job to bring that better future to your doorstep. It is not his job, it is our job. He has already done this country a great service by inspiring so many people to care again, to believe in the values that make the United States such a unique and amazing country. I hope that Barack is keeping his hopes high, because mine will not be affected by negativity coming from all angles. I believe in the American people and I believe they will make the right choice. Thanks you Obama, you make me want to be a better teacher, a better person and a better American!

Posted by: Karima | January 14, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

Would you trust a presidential candidate who in a 2002 speech said he was against the war but who in 2004 — for political considerations — said he doesn’t know how he would have voted about the war?
Would you trust a man who touts his good judgment but said (about a real estate deal where he bought a $1.6 million house) that approaching Rezko — a man now being indicted on various charges — was a “bone-headed” mistake?
Would you vote for a candidate who voted “PRESENT” close to 130 times in the Illinois senate, effectively avoiding to take a stand on so many issues?
Would you elect a man who’s so ambitious that he thought of running for the presidency just one year after being elected to the U.S. Senate?
You will agree that these are very simple questions to answer…

Posted by: Otillap | January 14, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

Otillap,
I read both sides of ‘stories’ about Obama and Clinton. There are reasons behind what you mentioned about Senator Obama.
Please read the blog from newsweek (it is not so bias site):
http://www.newsweek.com/id/91755
please don’t attack the candidate you don’t support. You only drive independent like me away and look into GOP candidates. Basically, they (Edward included) are good candidates and please look into their characters without paranoid and suspicion to the ones you don’t support. Pick the one match your own characters.

Posted by: middle | January 14, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

Karima: It’s scary to see so many people, so ill informed, and to think they are actually ones who will have a large hand in the election of the one to lead our United States Government for four or more years.

Posted by: gc | January 15, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am

Dear Frustrated -
Obama hasn’t “shown” his parents because they are both dead.
Obama is a class act. We can’t know for sure who would be the best president, but we sure can judge who is running the best campaign, and who attracts the best kinds of non-attack oriented comments.
Go Obama!

Posted by: R | January 15, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am

All you people who think Barack’s campaign played the race card need to step back and LOOK AGAIN. The media and HRC are the only ones playing in this foolish little game. You people will do anything to make Obama look bad just like people in his own political party will. Barack never even responded to Hillary’s blunderous comments and attack retorts for 2 whole days. He sat back while this whole thing played out. I believe he and his campaign got fed up with this smear campaign and decided to FINALLY respond to all this. He did so in a clear, concise, well spoken, positive manner. And guess what? You people still attack this man. This is the exact negativity that Barrack says is ruining our great Nation. This is the REAL change this man can bring. Even if he loses to someone like Hillary, just seeing what he has already done in this election is INSPIRATIONAL.. the future is starting to look a little brighter, just maybe.
-Formerly Cynical

Posted by: Kyle | January 15, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Obama brought up MLK for inspiration.
Hillary brought up MLK as a dreamer; not a doer like LBJ.
And Hillary blames Obama for the negative reaction to HER statements?
WTF?
Obama is all class. Why does Hillary have to be so goddang negative and not talk about herself but only of Obama?

Posted by: RobK | January 15, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Wow sorry to hear that. New Hampshire media is not national. I know that 11 years after my mother’s death I still talk about her every single day. I have pictures of her on my walls, in my wallet. On display. And when I am speaking to America about my life you can be DAMN certain that the huge portrait on the telescreen behind me would feature her. And when I have my family on stage it won’t be without her EVER EVER. I would say to America, THIS is who lovingly raised me. This is who I honor and want the world to know. This is the person whom without I would not be here before you today. No media outside small local areas has ever heard her story. Magazine pics? Cnn? Fox? MSNBC? Where is the biopic? I just find it funny that he rarely mentions this monumental person that made him who he is today, or at least helped him greatly. My mom’s face would be as known as mine out or love, honor, and respect for her. I am sorry he has lost her but I wouldn’t just conveniently keep a lid on it.

Posted by: Frustrated With The Fairy Tale | January 15, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

Lucky for Obama they’re not voting today. He lost half his voters today maybe more. He’s going to have to do something really impressive to win us all back.

Posted by: chris | January 15, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

middle,
I just read the Newsweek story you provided. Thanks.
Of course you know that Obama’s “PRESENT” votes on the proposed Illinois abortion bill (as detailed in the Newsweek article) was just a few of more than 100 on which he voted “PRESENT”. Go figure…

Posted by: Otillap | January 15, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

I am an African American Woman. I have followed politics sense I was 16 years old. I have voted in every election sense I was 18 years old. It was ingrained in me from a child that Martin Luther King and many other Civil Rights Activist suffered/ died so I could have the right to vote.
I have been following this race closely to make my decision on who to support.
I was watching the New Hampshire race when Hillary made the MLK Comment and Bill made his Fairy Tale Comment. I was Offended by what Hillary said. I didn’t see her statement as racist, but I did see it as DISRECPTFUL to the memory of MLK and all the others who fought and died for equality for of all Americans.
I wasn’t the only AA that felt that way. The mainstream media didn’t pick up the story on the Clinton’s comments until a couple days after Black Radio was flooded with calls. This is when the MLK and Fairy Tale Comments became a issue for Clinton’s. Bill Clinton went on Al Sharpton’s Show to do Damage Control for himself and Hillary. When that didn’t work The Clinton Camp decided to Blame Obama for the very comment that Hillary made.
Obama never commented or made a statement about Hillary putting her foot in her mouth until the Clinton’s tried to Spin their mess on him. I agree, the media started the race dialogue/ headlines, and the Clinton’s pick it up, (not Obama).
All Hillary had to do was Apologize to those who where offended by her ill advised speech. This issue would have never escalated to what it has become. The Clinton’s used the situation to their advantage by trying to make Obama interject race into his campaign. To Obama’s credit he stayed above the fray.
Having voted for Bill Clinton twice in my life time, it sadden me to see the Clinton’s try to Spin this story to damage Obama. Today they had all their African American Spin Doctors /Supporters on the shows doing Damaged Control.
It just makes me sad that Martin Luther King fought so hard to make things better for this country. And all I watched for the past few days is Prominent African Americans attacking The African American Democrat candidate running for President.
Happy Birthday Martin Luther King.
I watched Hillary on “Meet The Press”. Good job Tim Russert on bringing up how Hillary and her brothers accepted money from a a man Bill Clinton Pardoned before he left office. I didn’t know about that.

Posted by: Vote | January 15, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am

Thank you OBAMA for extinguishing the whole issues.May God bless you and bless this nation.Your are so bright and wise.

Posted by: I.A.T Smith | January 15, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am

First of all this talk of voting republican out of reaction to either Clinton or Obama MUST STOP. You Republicans must think about it too. The Republican party has been corrupted by the Rove-DeLay-Chaney etc gang ( I don’t include GW into this because he is not a thinker; just an opportunist) and must be purged from the political leadership for a few years to give it a chance to receive new blood. There is nothing wrong with being a conservative. I know of no ship that will reach it’s destination without steering left and right continuously.
But this is a party that has manipulated the public and sent a man to the White house that professes to be a Christian and yet sends mindlessly the young people to die. That professes he is companionate yet lets the veterans rot in those crumbling hospitals. The Times had an article recently about veterans of the Iraq war committing murders, suicides causing tragedies in their families while suffering from PTSS. Where are the programs to help these people? They are so clueless or so callous to think that you come back from Iraq and just turn the page as if nothing happened. War is a HORRIBLE, HORRIBLE, HORRIBLE business. Anyone of you that has suffered from a broken heart, reflect on how long it took to heal and how easy was it even with so many opportunities to find a new love. The Dead don’t come back except to haunt you and then they never leave. Just like the Disneyland commercials they fed us about going to Iraq, kicking Saddam out and everybody falls into each others and be friends again. And they would rain upon our soldiers rose petals. And that the Iraqi oil would defray the costs of war. Talking about FAIRY TALES!
The awful truth is that human life is cheap and expendable. If they don’t think that in so many words they certainly act it. Go and find out how much we pay the Iraqi families for collateral life loss. I am not gonna tell you, you go find out; it’s easy.
A man so uneducated in history to think that this thousands years old distrust would just end with a few American bombs and some “democracy” rhetoric. Remember the Crusades? I am sure they were just as arrogant then. History is there to teach us.
And now he is knee-jerkily trying to end the Palestinian-Israeli conflict in his last 11 months to enhance his …legacy. I am laughing as I am writing this. It’s too funny. In the last 7 years he visited Israel how many times? Once, last week. Another FAIRY TALE. This sleep-waking dangerous man has not learned a thing.
I could go on (environment, social and economic inequality that’s becoming toxic, on and on) but you get the point. This is what this party has cooked up for us. If you think you are supporting him, or the party, think again. You are only supporting your choices. You just don’t want to be wrong. Just forgive yourself, like Jesus forgave his tormentors because they didn’t know what they were doing, and let’s move on.
Not that the Democrats have done any better with their timid, fearful, looking behind their shoulders approach. They have precious little to show since they took over.
These are dangerous times. There is no time for political fun and games. The ship is listing and may be even past the tipping point. I pray it’s not.
We definitely need a new approach. Obama may offer this ray of Hope.
I don’t know for sure but I sense (go ahead attack me) that he is not motivated by blind ambition but by a personal calling to do right. I hope he has the stamina to go through this process. So don’t begrudge him if he is using the political tools offered him. A tool is a tool. What you do with it is what matters.
Quit this reactionary talk and give your Republican party some time to…find it’s voice.

Posted by: Yorgs | January 15, 2008, 2:26 am 2:26 am

Wow and wow. As I can plainly see, the Obama bashers here are making idiots of themselves. I have not seen ONE comment against Obama that has any real factual and intelligent research base to it. If one were to be completely objective and paid real attention to politics and current events and world culture instead of just who won the ballgame or who is the finalist on American Idol this country might be better off. Sadly it seems as if the majority out there are wearing blinders and are completely consumed with the narrow vision of their own reality. Sure we need to focus on our life but our individual lives are all interwoven and our contact with others stretches across the globe. Hence our decisions ultimately have consequences in others lives. So we need to make well informed decisions.
I have been asked on a number of occasions this past week why I support Obama and I explain to them why. I ask if they plan to vote and they say ‘yes.’ I ask fro whom and the response is generally something to the effect of ‘I don’t know, I haven’t really been paying too much attention.’ I have to get on them for that and remind them they have a lot of homework to do since the vote is only 2 weeks away.
Those of you who believe what Hillary and Bill tell you are just as wrong as telling others that Obama is in the back pocket of lobbyists and blowing smoke in your eyes. If that’s the truth, certainly the same is true of the Clintons. Check the facts people.

Posted by: matt | January 15, 2008, 2:36 am 2:36 am

Yes, well, he’s a bit late. The purpose of Obama’s race-bating was to shore-up African-American support in South Carolina, pure and simple. Now that that’s done, he pretends to take the high road. Total bull. The guy’s a real creep.
Obama staffers infest these comment boards trying to astroturf these non issues. Notice how many cover the same points with the same cut and paste remarks. Typical of the deception we’ve come to expect from Obama. This whole race thing in a con job by Obama and his friends in the press.
No mention by Obama press officers David Wright and Andy Fies, of their close ties to the campaign. This really is the pits, ABC. When are you going to show some balance, or just change your name to the Obama Broadcasting Company?

Posted by: winslowgirl | January 15, 2008, 4:02 am 4:02 am

Obama is just a class above the Clintons and his response to these criticisms from the Clintons shows that he really is a different type of Leader….A leader that this country needs.
I question I have is just what did Hillary mean by the statement about MLK and Lyndon Johnson? What was she driving at? Very simply she just was trying to put down Obama and it backfired. The problem that Clinton has is that Obama is the best thing to happen to this country since MLK, and can be a really great leader that will take the country in a new direction.

Posted by: gaurev | January 15, 2008, 4:26 am 4:26 am

I have watched this whole thing about MLK unfold from the very start and am sick at heart because of how the Obama campaign distorted Hillary’s comments and the media’s overt bias in refusing to quote her correctly or fairly. Obama in my mind has plummeted almost overnight from one of the good guys to scumbag. And I truly mourn the loss.

Posted by: afgail | January 15, 2008, 4:27 am 4:27 am

What a load. Hillary came out yesterday at the MLK event and said we should come togther as a party. We need to win in November as one party to beat the republicans.
The media lies just go on and on and on about Hillary. I wonder if it a grudge agaist the Clintons or do they just like the good ole boy network the way it is.
And by the way, why wasn’t Obama at the MLK event? Hillary flew all the way across country to be there. And I heard Obama had 5 camp stops in Nevada yesterday. SHAME OH HIM!
Nice to see its all about him!

Posted by: C DEPP | January 15, 2008, 4:33 am 4:33 am

President Clinton and Hillary Clinton did a he!! of allot. And continue to do so. Why do you think African Americans named President Clinton the “first black president.” For kicks.
One among many, many things that President Clinton did for African Americans was to make it much easier for people in the African America community’s to get loans for their businesses. Favorable rates so they could open stores in their neighbors and put food on the table for their families.
Did you know it took Bill Clinton to break the strangle hold the Republicans had on the white house. Twelve long horrible years of Reagan and daddy Bush. And it will take another Clinton to get those useless Republicans out of the chair in the White House. Every American knows Bush has an October surprise in his sock drawer. Bush is watching and waiting for the very moment the DEMS think they can win the white house back and then boom. And the Clintons already see it coming and they will be prepared for Bushs October surprise. If history proves any lesson, it will come from over seas. Remember that Bin Ladens tape the media was peeing on themselves to release before the election. It changed the course of the election. And Bush is still sitting there grinning and laughing at everyone that fell for his load.
Research history, there is only one DEM president the republicans never took down and destroyed on the campaign trail. And that is Bill Clinton. When they went after Hillary and blamed her for health care, even though it was the Republicans that killed it, she stood up and kept going.
THE REPUBLICANS HAVE NEVER, NEVER, NEVER BEATEN THE CLINTON’S. NOT IN ONE THING. THAT IS WHY THEY HATE THEM SO MUCH. And that is why she will beat any republican they throw at her. She will destroy them and hopefully bring them to tears.
More than anyone I have ever seen the Clinton’s can see a railroad coming a mile away. That is why they are ready for it. They do not lay down on the railroad tracks for anyone. They work hard and get the job done. They have not said one lied about Obama. I am not talking about someone speaking for them either. They are good people and the stuff Obama is trying to do to them is laughable. They are two of the smartest, strongest people I have ever met. He has no idea who he is up against. They lay down for no one. And when they are lied about, they come out roaring like lions. We should all be more like them. Bush and Cheney would have been impeached by now.
I would give a million dollars to see Bin Ladens face when he hears a woman has been elected President of the United States. Priceless.

Posted by: C DEPP | January 15, 2008, 4:38 am 4:38 am

Are we going to have a president who disrespects our flag, national anthem and disses the flag pin? I am a proud american. I would dearly love to elect an african american president(we have come a long way that to you MLK Sir) with SUBSTANCE and someone who respects the falg of our contry bu certainly not Mr.Obama.
Are you going to nominate him as the presidential nominee? The republicans will go to town with the pictures and video.

Posted by: VPNNathan | January 15, 2008, 5:30 am 5:30 am

Unfortunately, “Bro Bill,” the first white “black” President just can’t bring “too white and Republican” Hillary into the sacred circle with him. Bill Clinton, I believe, is authentic with his multi-racial, multi-cultural beliefs. He grew up poor and in the South and he felt the pain of all the people. Hillary grew up a Goldwater Republican in the suburbs of Chicago. Sorry, she may talk a good game, but there’s no way she feels it. She’s a sympathetic white chick, but no way does she truly understand racial or economic discrimination. Get real. She may “sympathize,” but there’s no way she knows what Barack Obama went through to graduate from Harvard Law. Also, in fact, John Edwards made it through law school with less support than either Hillary or Obama.
Does that make him a superman? No, but it definitely makes him a man to consider. Remember, he got to where he is with less resources than eith Hillary or Obama.

Posted by: radlib1 | January 15, 2008, 5:56 am 5:56 am

Rep. Clyburn was on Charlie Rose’s show tonight. It was spectacular. What a class act.

Posted by: Michele | January 15, 2008, 6:08 am 6:08 am

I just want to ask everyone a question, why is it that those who actually lived through and participated in the civil rights movement support Hillary? I see that a lot of people bash these elderly people, yet, they were the ones who brought about change and gave us the opportunities we have today. Surely, they must know something about what it takes to bring about change. Thanks.

Posted by: Anonymous | January 15, 2008, 6:45 am 6:45 am

These are quotes from Obama’s book where he admits to doing drugs:
“We were always playing on the white man’s court . . . by the white man’s rules,” he writes. “If the principal, or the coach, or a teacher . . . wanted to spit in your face, he could, because he had the power and you didn’t. . . . The only thing you could choose was withdrawal into a smaller and smaller coil of rage.
In the book, Obama acknowledges that he used cocaine as a high school student but rejected heroin. “Pot had helped, and booze; maybe a little blow when you could afford it. Not smack, though,” he says.
What do you think this teaches Americas children? Take drugs the president did. Be angry at another race and you can become president. We already had one of those. Never, never again.
BET founder was repeating what Obama admitted to. He spoke about what was in Obamas own book and the Obama camp is crying foul. Sickening dirty tricks. If Obama wouldn’t have been a drug user in the first place, this would not being brought up.
Everyone I know wants to know if a person running for president has fried his brain cells on drugs. Again, we have already had enough of that. I want my children to look up to their president. And I want to say be more like this person. I would never say to my daughters be more like Obama.
And Obama is not trying to be an example to anyone. He’s just talking about it before someone who knew him then does. Obama would never freely admit this unless he had no other choice. Would anyone? GIVE ME A BREAK!
I want my daughters to look up to a strong, smart woman president. Who keeps going and going and going no matter how many lies everyone drops on top of you.
American needs to wake up and not vote for Obama. Take a stand America.

Posted by: C DEPP | January 15, 2008, 6:47 am 6:47 am

Obama = Republicians only hope.

Posted by: drwfll | January 15, 2008, 6:51 am 6:51 am

Lately I’m reminded of a line from the poem IF, “If you can stand to hear the words you’ve spoken , twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools…”
From an Ivory tower point of view, exploiting someone’s past to make political points may make sense to opponents but for the people whose life it is touching they appreciate some truth “I didn’t inhale” is not helpful and shows the disconnect and generation gap.
kids are “inhaling”, snorting, and injecting at a younger age and an alarming rate. Not just experimenting but escaping their reality.This is a problem!
The problem is across all socio economic groups, from ecstasy, pot, coke, abuse of prescription drugs and meth labs that are cranking out poison that is killing our children
Role models are few, schools are crowded and underfunded, after school programs have been cut, both parents need to work.Peer pressure wins out.
Parents are faced with sending kids to schools that are filled with drugs. Their kids are walking through neighbourhoods that have drug dealers on each corner.
We have a candidate for the leadership of the Democratic Party,who has “a past’ and wrote about it. Understands the influences and pressures these kids are under. Took all of his life skills and worked with families in the inner city, to make a difference. ” A Doer”
Time for a “reality break” .We have real problems and we need a candidate who is willing to tell us the truth ( we can handle it) and be a role model for “Change we can believe”

Posted by: M Rogers | January 15, 2008, 7:00 am 7:00 am

Barack Obama is a bundle of contradictions.
It was Barack Obama’s camp that sent the memo causing all these erroneous misinformation.
I am disappointed that Barack Obama is a disgrace to our noble African heritage.
I would have recommended him for an Igbo chieftaincy title in Eastern Nigeria, but he has lost my respect.

Posted by: Orikinla Osinachi | January 15, 2008, 7:10 am 7:10 am

I hope its Huckabee and Obama!!! Hilary Clinton scares the crap out of me

Posted by: John Smith | January 15, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am

I don’t give a flip about who said what or when they said it. AMERICANS are sad! You guys fight over Bs and talk about restoring our position in the world. Who in their right mind would want to be part of a nation that conducts themselves like this?
Black vs. White
Dems vs. Reps
Roe vs. Wade
rich vs. poor
insider vs. outsider
young vs. old
fat vs. thin
intelligent vs. stuck on stupid
beer crowd vs. wine crowd
fair trade vs. corp greed
war vs. peace
believe in God vs. any one’s right not to.
I can go on all day but, what good with it do? All you people need to go look in the mirror and take responsibility for your own lives. If you support something in life, no matter what it is GOOD!. Don’t tell me what I have to do, or what I can or can not do. Get the facts, think for yourself. Then be men and women enough to live with your decision . If you discover that you were wrong no matter the circumstance or situation, learn from it and grow! If you were right, build a bridge to those who feel left out and alienated.
What baffles me is that there is an immigration issue illegally / legally. Who wants to deal with this mess we call America? And for those of you who would tell me to leave… Its seriously under consideration. At least I will be able to live with my decision.

Posted by: Mike | January 15, 2008, 9:01 am 9:01 am

Could someone who supports Obama explain one thing to the rest of us, please? Why is it that, on many occasions, when legislation that Obama stated he didn’t like came up for vote in the Illinois legislature, instead of casting votes against these bills he simply stated he was ‘present’? He’s a pretty smart guy, and a first-rate speaker, but he doesn’t seem to have the courage of his convictions. That’s something that bothers me greatly, and it should bother everyone who wants to support him. If you don’t like a bill you vote AGAINST it! Is this how he would react to something a foreign government was doing that he felt was wrong – basically ignore it, rather than confront the issue? BTW, it’s a good thing he didn’t try to paint Hillary’s or Bill’s comments as racist. Bill Clinton did more to help blacks and other minorities than any president since Johnson. He did this partly because he grew up in the same socio-economic class as many blacks of the ’50s and ’60s, and probably had as many black friends as white. People used to make light of his saying to people “I feel your pain”, because they didn’t know what his background was, and how he grew up. Bill Clinton probably has more empathy for the plight of poor blacks (and others) than Barack Obama simply because Obama was raised in an upper middle class environment that would have been well removed from the poor black neighborhoods. Hillary Clinton absorbed a great deal of that empathy as a result of both being married to Bill, and working with him on ways to reduce poverty, both in Arkansas and Washington. I think Obama is the person to be this country’s first black president, but not yet. I think the best thing for him and the country would be a Clinton/Obama ticket. Hillary is a very smart, capable, and accomplished woman, and they could learn from each other while providing the leadership this country so desparately needs.

Posted by: Bob | January 15, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am

Looks like the educated are voting for Obama.
:-)

Posted by: Jack K | January 15, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am

I’m shocked! And here I thought that Mr. O’Bama was of Irish descent. :)

Posted by: citellus | January 15, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am

I am a Republican but I am starting to believe that this man will be our next President. The time has come for a concilatory and classy person to assume the Presidency. I believe that the supermajority of us can at lease agree on one thing: Hillary must go and please take that doddering con man with ya!

Posted by: Easy | January 15, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

There is no doubt that America will never, never see a politician in the likes of OBAMA. Just Like MJ. They don’t come that often. America should take advantage of this man. He is a rare breed. VIVA OBAMA

Posted by: Bosede | January 15, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

So here we are, trying to elect another buffoon without credentials to the Presidency of the U.S, the current one was a former alcoholic, can’t speak English or much experience; but it was O.K. He was soooo nice and we would love to have a beer with him, besides he “PROMISED” to us to be the UNITER and NOT A DIVIDER! and we believed him. Now we are listening to another buffoon, a former pothead and drugs addicted, without any experience that is also very nice, big smile and big slogans just like his ambitions; but this one really knows how to speak English and play with words. Ironically there is a parallel between both campaigns and Obama campaign is practically a play book of Rove tacts of demonizing their opponents and talk about “his” candidate to be the outsider and ready to CHANGE Washington. They demonized Gore, Kerry, McCain and anyone that dared to opposed the chosen and well financed candidate; just like is happening with Obama. They spent more time destroying other candidates reputations in order to avoid the discussion of real issues because Rove knew there as Axelrod knows now that his candidate is a light weight and can’t stand a real hard questioning.
Bush became the devised, polarized and inexperienced President that have to rely in his “big well experienced advisers” who dictated the agenda; just as Obama will do, he has no experience at all in government, business or foreign affairs or economics and he will rely mostly in his advisers. Thats scary. Not to mention the divised campaign his strategist are conducting and he passively is allowing…they playing the race card, the age card, the generation card, the sexism card. The only change Obama will bring to the White House is to replace the Texas gang for the Chicago gang! The lobbyst, corporations and special interest will be very happy to have the “nice” boy they can manipulate at the expense of the American people.

Posted by: Jim | January 15, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am

“Former President Bill Clinton also offended some African Americans when, addressing Dartmouth College students, he referred to Obama’s campaign as “the biggest fairy tale” he’d ever seen.”
Once again, ABC has taken President Clinton’s original “fairy tale” comment completely out of context and intentionally misrepresented what he said. If anyone would take a minute to actually go back and listen to the entire quote, he was referring to the Senator’s record of shifting stances on the Iraq War between 2002-2004. What I don’t understand is why the general public is now responsible for vetting what reporters report as credible journalism. Please give us the entire quote and let us decide.

Posted by: Cory | January 15, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am

I have no ill will toward the Clinton’s, however I am just sick and tired of the 2 family DYNASTY. There has been a Bush or Clinton in the White House (counting back to George HW as Vice Pres) for almost 30 yrs!! Put in Clinton in and we are talking a possibility of almost 40 yrs!? C’mon people, wake up. Then you’ll have Jeb trotted out, followed by Chelsea….or maybe the Hispanic Bush? LOL We need NEW blood in the White House.

Posted by: B. | January 15, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

Bob, he voted Present to demonstrate that he was willing to work with the sponsors of the Bill, it is a common tactic, it says, we have room to work with you on this.

Posted by: Louis | January 15, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

“I have no ill will toward the Clinton’s, however I am just sick and tired of the 2 family DYNASTY.” – Cory
True, but if you want to get rid of the real danger (Repubs). Obama will not be the winning candidate. In the real America we live in, any one of the top three Repub candidate WILL beat Obama. Unless America transformed overnight into this fantasy utopia, most Americans will vote for the white guy running against Obama, sadly but true.

Posted by: CriminalGeorgeW | January 15, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am

4 reasons why Hillary will not win the General Election
1. Generally she alwasys seen as a very polorizing figure. (more people hate her … the Republicans and half of the democrats)
2. She will not get Independants’ votes. Again, the Clinton politics will not excite new voters which is what wins elections. She is very divisive.
3. Character. The Clintons are a well-know crooks and all of America is truly aware of it. Once this “machine” game ends and the general election comes, most America will vote for McCain the hero.
4. She has offended 45 million Americans (blacks) and she is just not going to win their votes after how she “swift-boated” a very nice man who really wanted to change things for the better. She is already seen as an evil lady and hardcore racist.
5. McCain has always been a mavrick of some sort against Bush and he is widely seen as an honest, patriotic American war hero who did his service for American and he is widely respected by many democrats and hispanics after he tried to help the Latinos. He will get the Latino vote because of McCain-Kennedy bill.

Posted by: Esup | January 15, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am

It is not in the democratic party’s best interest to keep this media created non-story on the front page. Glad both candidates have called for an end to it. It is, on the contrary, in the media’s best interest to keep this nonsense on the front page.. to sell advertising, of course. Just look at this blog.

Posted by: amazed, atlanta | January 15, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

bob: Voting present is a political tool available in many state legislatures meant as a way of registering an opinion on a piece of legislation that may have some merit, but in principle is flawed, either constitutionally, worded incorrectly, etc. etc. . If the bill may have some merit to the public, the one voting present is not on the official vote record as being either against totally,nor for totally. For an example it alleviates situations just such as has been created by the Patriot Act vote where Mr. Obama originally was against then he voted for. Mr. Obama is on record saying the bill was flawed and he could not support it without amendments. Once in the Senate, and this bill came to floor vote, it had been amended and even though still flawed, funding to support the troops was tied to the bill so Barack, who supports our troops, no matter what the situation, was more or less forced to vote for a still flawed bill. If the press would report his entire floor statement you would hear him saying exactly that. If voting present were a tool available in the U.S. Senate, I imagine he and many others would have voted present on that bill.

Posted by: gc | January 15, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

Help me out. Where/when did the Obama campaign introduce race into the dialogue. Was it when Andrew Cuomo – a supporter of the Clinton – introduced the “shuck and jive” into the conversation. Or was it when “it took a president” to effect real gains – not Martin Luther King and the myriad of individuals who supported the civil rights movement; or was it the fairy tale reference by the former president.
When the “shuck and jive” comment was made I searched for the complete text to better understand its contextual use. After reading the full text, I at first concluded that it was an objective comment directed at both campaigns – as Mr. Como himself had claimed. However, on further reflection it occurred to me that given the terms historical usage, it is inconceivable that it was used for both candidates. Shucking and jiving is not something that Mrs. Clinton can conceivable do unless of course she is a “sister.” She might be duplicitous but surely she can’t shuck and jive.
Hilary Clinton’s statement – “it took a president to bring about real action” downplays the contribution, if not Dr Martin Luther King himself, but of the civil rights movement and its demand for change. She is claiming on NBC meet the press that is an “unfortunate story line the Obama campaign has pushed very successfully.” Yet no one in Obama’s campaign uttered that statement. Should the Obama campaign allow itself to be defined by the Clinton campaign without response?
The former presidents fairy tale remark was unfortunate. Not because Bill Clinton has a greater love for blacks that anyone else, but because the comment like that of Andrew Como infuses a hostile terminology from a more general context and places it into a specific context. Even as he spoke specifically about the Obama’s record on the Iraq war issues he was introducing language – deliberate or not, conscious or subconsciously – that spoke to the wider and deeper concerns. At the time of both statements made the overriding threat of the Obama machine an its gathering momentum was surreptitiously attacked both from the context of race, and its core of hope. The vested interests do not want us to dream, for to do so will break the system from which they are poised to, or continue to reap benefits. Are you listening Charles Rangel, Andrew Como?

Posted by: Euclid | January 15, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

I was 21 years old when John F. Kennedy was elected President. He had a lot of ideas that were refreshing and different from what we the living had experienced before he came to the executive branch. Tragically, he was killed before he could accomplish much. Kennedy’s successor, President Lyndon Johnson, coming from a strong position as the former US Senate leader before being elected as Vice President and with the help of a nation of grieving and sympathetic persons both in and out of Congress, was able to provide the leadership necessary to have Congress pass legislation that was extremely beneficial and favorable in aiding the Reverend Martin L. King and like kind thinking and acting people in getting their agenda and policies enacted and subsequently administered.
Accordingly, former President Bill Clinton’s message was DEAD ON when he stated that it took action by a strong President Johnson to get the Rev. King’s and like kind others, agenda enacted.
To say that it was any other way is just wrong.
For the young among you, it is not your fault that you have not lived long enough…..but it is your fault if you accept the media take because it agrees with your bias.
Robert A. Bishop

Posted by: RAB. | January 15, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

I think Obama handled this beautifully, great job. Now if it continues I sure hope the media will call it as it is: “Clinton attacks Obama on race”, not Clinton vs. Obama, or Clinton and Obama in race fight, etc. After all, it gets me sick in the stomach when I see that someone clearly starts a fight and the one being attacked is looked upon as though he started it. Get it right next time, media, follow the yellow brick road and it will take you to the truth, then report the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

Posted by: RuthieM | January 15, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

All Obama can say is CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE no details. He’s not talking about ANY real issue. Listen to his speeched – all filled with dreams, hope, jokes about President or Dick Cheney – come on. These STUPID voters are flaling for it. S.O.S is Obama mantra – Style Over Substance. At leas Hillary is talking issues.

Posted by: Dean O | January 15, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

I believe that both the Obama camp, and the media were watching and waiting for the first opportunity possible to jump on the “race” band wagon. It is absolutely true, The media reran only the most inflamatory snippets of the quotes by the Clinton’s…not their entire statement. Mr. Obama stood up at the most opportune time for himself, and tried to ‘smooth things over’. Too little, too late, in my opinion. My own family is culturally and racially diverse…I have found it very easy to love each and every one of them on their own merit, not color, heritage or belief. I do not trust Mr. Obama on what I have read, heard (from him) and witnessed. He touts change, but only in words…I see no clear cut plan. I unfortunately see this democratic race fracturing the party and sending another republican to the White House…and that would be a disaster for everything from the economy to the US Supreme Court.

Posted by: Sandi | January 15, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

Obama promised us “change” in Illinois too — but failed to deliver anything. He has NEVER inititated or supported the kind of fundamental changes that would improve our lives or rid Illinois of the politics as usual that has crippled it. On the contrary, he has supported, and benefited politically and financially from our corrupt system here.
The media has an obligation to provide a more insightful and meaningful exploration of Obama’s lack of record on the issue of “change” in Chicago and Illinois.
This guy is a major con man, folks.

Posted by: Robert Jones | January 15, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

My educated view is that Hillary Clinton was playing to the similarities that have been drawn between Martin Luther King, Jr. and Barack Obama and trying to dilute the potency of such a connection. Therefore, she attempted to discern between the ability to make a movement and to make a change. Hillary basically said that though MLK lead a great movement and had a great dream but he was not a ‘President’ and could not make change. Hillary then emphasized that it takes a “President’ to make change!” such as Lyndon B. Johnson insinuating that she is, like LBJ, the true change agent.
Hillary attempted to pose the question: “Who was the true change agent MLK or LBJ?” She attempted to make her case that though Obama has a great vision and can spark a great movement it takes a President to make change and more than a movement. Hillary was attempting to present her case that she had the resolve to be a better change agent.
Though this was not an attempt at racism and perhaps a calculated statement, the statements did belittle the image of MLK and his role in making prompting change. This was indeed a very ill-advised statement and risky contrast to try an distinguish. One could insinuate that Hillary was saying that Obama would need her to realize his vision as she implied that MLK needed LBJ to realize his dream.
I feel that any person can see that Obama has the vision and resolve of both MLK and LBJ and Hilary is no MLK but perhaps an LBJ. In spite of all, I cast my vote for Obama not because of the comments that are spun in the media but because I believe in Obama’s vision, I believe in Obama’s character, and I believe in Obama’s leadership and resolve to make this country a better place than that which we inherited. I believe in Obama’s ability more so than any other candidate.
-CDR

Posted by: CDR | January 15, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

OBAMA IS TREADING VERY CAREFULLY ON THIS AS HE SHOULD. THE RACE THING DIDN’T START UNTIL WE GOT TO A STATE WITH MAJORITY OF BLACK VOTERS. IT WASN’T STARTED BY OBAMA OR THE CLINTONS. OBAMA DOES NOT WANT THIS TO BE A RACE ISSUE. BECAUSE IF IT IS AND THE WHITES VOTE WHITE AND BLACKS VOTE BLACK IT COULD BE VERY BAD FOR A CANDIDATE WHO IS DOING VERY WELL AND SO FAR HAS MY VOTE.

Posted by: WAYNE | January 15, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

I think the Clinton’s camp unleashed their zoo, some of the previous comments can only be written by “insane” people: get a book, get informed, show respect for human beings and then make a decent comment; hopefully the right candidate wins, in the end this is a real test for America and Americans will get what they vote for..

Posted by: carmen | January 15, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

This report is so biased, I cannot believe more people have commented. Sen. Obama is seen as so fair, when he milked this so completely.
He should have clarified his stance on Sen. Clinton immediately. To let this “perception” that was discussed by allthe talking heads throughout the week-end go on as long as it did was pathetic. The only think he could say was well, I didn’t say she was racist. How immature and condensending. By not saying anything, he said a lot, and showed just how manipulative he can be. Compare this to how quickly the Clinton campaign has reacted to anything negative being said by her supporters. Sen. Clinton has my vote, she has worked for the betterment of the lives of women, children and minorities all her life.

Posted by: Silvia | January 15, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Obama is all talk and little action! What change is he speaking of? What does he stand for? Health care for all but 15 million Americans! Oh yeah his plan will not start till “his 4th year”. He has the words but not the deeds. God save us all if he gets in. If we can remember the past few weeks he was the one that started the personal attachs not the Clintons!

Posted by: g-dog | January 15, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

g-dog spare me, there is all this fluff on race and gender, mostly fueled by media speculations nad innuendo. In the mean time little reporting on the actual issues. His health care plan is what it is because there is no support for a single payer system of universal health care. So he has to work with what he can get passed to help the most people. here is a link to a sketch of his economic plan, a Dem putting out tax cuts who knew?

Posted by: Louis | January 15, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

Bill Clinton is making an idiot of himself. His rants and blaming the press and the electorate for Hillary’s near loss in New Hampshire is UN-presidential, at best. I can’t believe I once supported him.
If you folks did your homework, you’d realize that Bill Clinton’s statement that Obama wasn’t consistent in his stance against the war has no basis. If Clinton was honest, he would provide Obama’s full quote (context and all).
The New York Times printed Obama’s original 2004 quote
OBAMA SAID: “I’m not privy to Senate intelligence reports. What would I have done? I don’t know. What I know is that from my vantage point the case [for authorizing the war] was not made.
OBAMA is the only one with INTEGRITY here. Clinton and her camp are the ones making all the rude and disrespectful comments against Obama lately–eliciting racial stereotypes by bringing up the drug use, calling him a “kid”, . . .
All of you who are blindly following what the Clintons are saying, oughta do your research first. I did, and thankfully, now I see the light.
GO OBAMA!

Posted by: I see the light | January 15, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

To Obama’s credit, he has stayed above the fray. His message of unity across racial, gender and party lines remains intact.
While I don’t believe the Clintons are racist, I do believe they are willing to do whatever it takes to get to the White House, and that includes stirring up racial and gender tensions so that she can secure the Caucasian vote and the female vote. It is unfortunate, because when the general election comes along, she will need the AFrican American vote and they will think twice about giving it to her.
Being a woman, my vote will go to Obama.

Posted by: Asian for Obama | January 15, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Well, I’ll just be “side-gated,” from “Oklahoma!” What I see is Barack Obama thinks he can use those prosaic styled words and not define his program and because young people have not either lived long enough to know the questions, not to mention the answers, they are supporting him. God forbid if policy is set by young people for this country. One thing for sure, there are a lot of blacks who support him, simply because of his race. I, as a woman, 61 years old, took strong exception with the press and journalists who kept beating up on Hillary, so that is what pulled me firmly into her camp.
It does not matter that he is a black candidate (seen as a black candidate), though he would rather see himself as a candidate who transcends race, he had better be careful, because the caucasians who identify with him now might reconsider, “Now that you mention it, by God, he is a black man,” and that could back-lash on him.
Blacks must learn to look for substance in a candidate, not prose that addresses the emotions. Remember, we need to have our thinking and feeling balanced – not skewed on the bell-shaped curve too mush to the right or to the left.
As for me and everybody else, we have had one rookie in Washington who did not have any foreign affairs experience on his own, and he depended on his daddy’s oldsters, who had brought a policy forward from a time past into the Millennium and that has been a disaster. That, coupled with his hard-head, arrogance and stubborness, has made all of the difference in America’s image – and I forgot to add calculating lies told by his Advisors with the latest being the Iran Boat incident with the voice dubbed. Now, of all things, they want to investigate an apparent “jokester” who interferred with the voice transmission. Thank God the Iranians taped their encounter, or we’d be hearing a strong case for war.
Mind that we don’t end up with George Bush hanging on with the declaration of war with some other country so the inauguration of another President, of either party, would be delayed…just an idea to throw out to you.
As to the women who think a man is always the one to take charge, we must not think much of our own gender or ourselves. Other countries more archaic than ours is supposed to be have already tested the waters and as the old saying goes, “been there, done that!” Barack is young, could use more experience, tone down his ego – yes, there is ego there, and ambition (not the desirable type), who thinks he could be equated in effect to Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. – not so! He went through much soul growth to arrive at his non-violence stance. I would suggest Barack slow down and grow his soul a bit longer so that he might balance his knowledge with Wisdom, or what he says will always be hollow rhetoric. He was the first to create the idea that Dr. King was being disparaged through what Hillary said. Any idiot, not just a scholar, could tell what she meant, and it was intended to be a lesson to Barack that the greatest dreamer and visionary could not make anything happen until the law was signed by the President Johnson, who succeeded JFK – and it was out of President Johnson’s emotional deference to him then. JFK he supported Dr. King’s dream, and the bill was stuck in Congress. It was actually President Johnson who signed into law many of the programs that JFK envis-ioned.
If Barack can’t take the heat, stay out of the kitchen! If he can’t keep away from pettiness on the campaign trail, he sure can’t run a country. Even if he wins the Nomination, watch out; Karl Rove has begun strategizing. He called him lazy and trash-talking like a basketball player, even offering hints on what he could do to successfully defeat Hillary. Well, he need not be flattered; he will hear those words again, should he win the nomination, and he will not win the election then. The Republicans manufacture more Republicans, it seems, and there we go with four more years of George Bush types.
While you are on the trail, I would suggest you put some teeth into your little “theological discources,” and talk to God – either way – for your nomination and for your ability to stand against the Republican machinery, should that happen.
Remember when everybody kept hearing George Bush say he was a “Uniter,” well…so much for his brand of unity. He has trampled on everybody’s rights with his Patriots Act and the War in Iraq. The deepest thing about that war is they went into there to please the fundamentalist Christians. They keep saying that: “When the temple is rebuilt in Jerusalem, Jesus will come again.” Well, I wonder what is on that site right now? I can tell you – the Mosque that was built on top of the Temple. If anyone touches that mosque, there will be world-wide fighting…for you fundamentalists, if you don’t know, you better ask somebody!!! They are trying to “force the rapture.” Well, I have news for you – there “ain’t” going to be no rapture, and Armegeddon is a strip of land that has had so many deaths due to fighting over it for years. It is basically between two half-brothers’ descendants – both Abraham’s sons (i.e. Ishmael and Isaac).
We had better be reading the Bible as an instrument that grew out of history, nnot that it made history – all in Allegorical format.
When I saw Barack on the first Debate, I realized that was a “B’sing lawyer,” waiting on some concrete idea to roll into his mind when he said, “I know what you know, and you know what I know, and what I know is….” I began to have my doubts about his candidacy then. I worked for lawyers for 12 years, and what you are talking about is the arrogance of Harvardites as expressed in Obama. A Harvard MBA co-worker told me once that “You work for a man for five years, and in five years, if you have not taken over his business and having him work for you, then you have not lived up to the Harvard principles.” I have never forgotten that. The question is, has Obama’s ego taken him down the path where he thinks he can use his “religious-styled courtroom rhetoric” to just take over from all of the Senators, Congressmen, Statesmen, etc…, and go to the “head of the class” without knowing the ins and outs of historically important methods of government, as a little maverick – I don’t care what he learned in his Constitutional Law Classes. There is a greater law, though invisible, that is in control, and it existed long before there was even a country called America, or the world, as we know it; it is eternal, changeless and unchang-. The outworking of that law is based on what you put into the universe, and it is always just, pays in mental equivalence and in reciprocity, mental equivalence, based on the Law of Sowing and Reaping.
The one thing which everyone should be mindful of is, “Thoughts held in mind produce after their own kind.” In view of the past few days, I think we should “Think on these things….” Phil. 4:8.

Posted by: MarianC | January 16, 2008, 3:03 am 3:03 am

All of you people have your own opinion. Some of you all don’t know anything about these candidates but what the media tells you. Read their personal speeches instead of just listening to the news. Focus on what they are saying themselves not what the media claims they’ve said. Stop bad talking them. They are people like each and every one of us and they are bold enough to at least try to make a change. Us as people can’t even come together to make a change so think about that. At least they are making an attempt as individuals. You should appreciate them just for stepping up to the plate because you all aren’t trying to change anything. Just know your facts before you bad talk them on a message board. Maybe ATTEND some of their campaign speeches. The media is sparking up unnecessary tension. Just make your decision when it comes time to vote. God Bless you all

Posted by: uthinkuknow | February 6, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

MarianC, you discuss the Iranian boat incident in your post, yet you know absolutely nothing of what occurred. I am NAVY, so I DO know what happened. That Iranian Boat video was taken as part of their current PR campaign to divide the American Public, so as to allow for harassment of USN Forces, while at the same time preventing actions against Iran. They have been doing this very same thing for Months on end, constantly swerving in front of our vessels, making fake attack runs towards our craft, and blaring verbal threats over comm. links. Are you so gullible that you could not even believe for one second that the radio op. was:
A. On a seperate boat from the one which the Iranian video was filmed.
or
B. The radio threat came in from an Iranian shore based comm. center.
The fact that you jump in and believe an enemy state before your own nation is very sad. It never hurts to have an open mind, but please do not insult us by taking a terrorists side over our sailors.
BTW, just to let you know, much of what the media reports in terms of military activities, and success, is off base and inaccurate. So much positivity is currently taking place within the Iraq and Afghan. OP areas, and yet it seems to never see the light of day in regards to mainstream media. I hope some of what I said has enlightened you, or at the very least garnered a feeling that you shouldn’t necessarily believe everything you hear or see on television.
On a side note, I give you credit for what you stated about Obama. You seem to be one of the few who has failed to fall victim to his empty rhetoric. I do not see why so many Americans have fallen for it, and it truly frightens me. Have we forgotten our History? Have we forgotten how some of the greatest ills of the world have come about by gullible constituents? 70 Years ago many believed one man would bring about “Hope”, and “Change”, and it ended up bringing forth World War II, and the deaths of Millions. I do not claim Obama to be as twisted as the sick individual I speak of, but I do feel it necessary to demonstrate what happens when citizens fall prey to falsified rhetoric. I would love nothing more than to have a Black American United States President, but I wish them to be an individual full of character, tenacity, honesty, and true convictions. Why not Colin Powell or Condeleezza Rice as two examples? These are two individuals who actually experienced a segregated America, and fought through real adversity to become a shining example to all. I feel it would be a shame to elect a completely empty, even controversial candidate as our History Making First Black President. We have so many better candidates, why not save the honor for them?

Posted by: TPL | February 27, 2008, 4:46 am 4:46 am

The Rev. Wright controversy is not going away any time soon. Can you imagine the reaction if another candidate’s long-time pastor held such racist and anti-American views? We would be outraged. And justifiably so.

Posted by: Uncle Sam | March 14, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

Obama will not be our next President of the United States! Alot of people are not ready for that kind of change!!! Hillary supporter’s will not vote or they will vote REP.

Posted by: Susan | May 21, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.