Obama on Clinton’s ‘Reality Check’
ABC News’ Sunlen Miller reports: Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., took the skirmish over "hope" from the ABC/Facebook debate, and brought it to the campaign trail.
At an event in Derry, N.H., Obama capitalized on Sen. Clinton’s, D-N.Y., “reality check” comment from the debate.
“Last night at the debate, one of my opponents said that you need to stop offering the Americans false hopes about what can get done, you need a reality check. You remember that?” Obama questioned the crowd, and then responded, “We don’t need leaders telling us what we cannot do. We need a president who can tell us what we can do.”
Obama then went through a list of things, such as going to the moon and freeing the slaves, that needed the “can do” attitude.
“Imagine the gall to believe that women have the right to vote, when they’ve never had the right to vote before,” Obama said, in a subtle dig, while criticizing his top opponent, who could be the first woman president.
Email
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
Obama is not JFK! JFK served in the House of Representatives and the Senate for 13 years prior to serving as president. I guess in today’s standards he would be eliminated for too much experience.
Posted by: Wiser | January 6, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
Obama is confused. He’s confusing a false hope to change the entire constitution and government with a false hope to change policy. Does he call the moderators at last night’s debate liars too?
I used to support Obama until I couldn’t take anymore of his hope and believe messages ad nauseum. I expected an elaboration but it never was born. He says change but at the same time his team is made up mostly of former Bill Clinton policy makers and cabinet members?
He is using these words because he knows how to get people to vote for him like any other politican. He even stole those words from Bill Clinton. Sadly I was suckered in but have now woken up.
I now believe he is any angry man with something to prove against this entire nation.
Posted by: Bunny | January 6, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
Obama is right on.
He is leading a movement and instilling hope in people who never believed they mattered in the political system.
That alone is worth something and that is why I so like him.
Posted by: Eddie | January 6, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
I have faith in Obama and believe that he can bring change to this nation. We need change in order to survive. Hillary would only bring more of the same. Do we really need another administration that is well-versed in contraversy, scandal and polarization? If you think that we do, vote for Hillary because that is exactly what we will get.
Posted by: ErininOk | January 6, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
Hillary kills me when she talks about change. How much change did she bring when she was in Arkansas on the board of Wal-mart? Was it her ‘senior employment opportunity initiative’ that created all those Greeter positions? Please.
Posted by: Jaimey64 | January 6, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
stop spamming bunny. i very much doubt you really supported obama. the man does not bring false hope. he brings genuine hope and change that we CAN believe him. i feel sorry your pessimism doesnt allow you to see this. he NEVER has said he wants to change the constitution. he teaches the constitution at University of Chicago. im tired of people making ill-informed arguments and personal attacks. he turned down big money from the ultra powerful law firms to help the underpriveleged on the south side of chicago. he offers the kind of America i can once again say im proud to live in.
Posted by: Alex | January 6, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
I am STUNNED, just STUNNED, have Americans lost their sanity? To fall for the snake-oil salesman tactics of Obama, a man with complete inexperience to be President, and him getting popular by the day? Does experience not mean anything anymore? If you were hiring for any job in the world, experience would be the first thing you look for, not “hope” or “change”. If you were hiring a pilot to take your family across country, would you find the LEAST experienced pilot, if your family’s safety were at stake? Well, our country’s safety is at stake, and the country is after the LEAST experience? Hillary proved in the debate last night that she is the one with the most experience, the most knowledge, the most patience and guts to deal with all our issues. Did you hear in the debate where they were saying that there is a 20-50% chance that in the next 10 years, a US city will suffer a nuclear attack? Are you completely NUTS that an inexperienced neophyte like Obama can handle that? I am just astounded, and ashamed, of my fellow Americans have fallen for his empty rhetoric. It makes me think of 8 years ago when everyone was SO excited about a young upstart from Texas, with little experience but who seemed FRESH and would be president by “intuition”. It’s absurd. Do you really want to take this risk? Obama’s following is almost cult-like, I think of Jim Jones of decades ago, it’s sad and disturbing. The country is not ready for this, the country does not deserve this. WAKE UP PEOPLE. The US is in a dire predicament, there are nations ready to kill us at any moment, how can you possibly put this in the hands of someone so inexperienced? I can only hope and pray that NH voters will wake up to reality come Tuesday. I pray, for the sake of my family, and yours. I would think of the safety of your family when I vote; please do the same consideration for me. “Hope” and “change” do not protect anyone; it is sound experience that will save our country.
Posted by: Tim | January 6, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
America is entering a new chapter in its history and Obama is leading us there. Hillary, who is doubtlessly an honorable person with an incredible history of public service, does not represent the degree of change that the American people are starving for. My support is firmly behind Obama who will be able to end the divisive politics of the Bush/Clinton era and unify the American people.
Posted by: EddyNewHope | January 6, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
i support the Democrats to grab power from the REPUBLICANS but it seems that the Democrats don’t have any credible candidate to face the Republicans at this year’s election contest.why consider Hillary Clinton who is preaching of experience,experience for thirty five years but things are getting out of hand now, experience for voting in support of Iraqi war which have proved to be an unnecessary war ,experience,the number of US soldiers who have died because some people at the top of the authority were able to fabricate some stories and an experience Hillary didn’t check to make sure that going to that war was genuine,experience with just a little frustration at IOWA and everybody is beginning to see Hillary bad side,becoming frustrated and doesn’t understand why Bara Obama should beat her at IOWA.And one thing Hillary should notice is that she didn’t even came in the second position on the DEMOCRATS side instead came third which shows that her message is getting nowhere.Obama’s foreign policy too is soft which doesn’t suit Amreicans and Edwards is too soft a candidate who can be manuplated easily
Posted by: rass b | January 6, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
I think all of us need to stand back for a moment and take a deep breath. While Obama is gifted with gab we should not be satisfied with the good feeling. Those of you who support him challenge him to put beef on the buns so you will not be disappointed. What are you afraid of. If he is worth his salt he’ll pass mustard.
We have to much at stake to be cute again with this election. We are not electing a buddy we are electing a President of The United States. We don’t need someone who is talking about hope we need someone who can realistically governed and get us out of this mess. Look at yourselves people and asked am I really this lazy to fall for the hype again.
Posted by: JamesJ | January 6, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
Oh come on – You think Hillary as president will prevent the next terrorist attack? Sounds like a Karl Rove tactic. The American people have had it with fear driven politics. Enough! We are not afraid. We will deal with our threats firmly and decisively, but not in a reactive way. Stop with the “mushroom cloud” approach to picking a president. That got us Bush in 04 if you remember correctly.
Posted by: EddyNewHope | January 6, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
to obama.i think you are very strong person who could become one of the best president ever,keep on being strong don’t give in you have good idea’s.today we need leaders with good vision’s,i hope you have all the success in the world….sign ceasar jackson
Posted by: ceasar jackson | January 6, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
If Obama wins the nomination our next President will be a republican. He doesn’t have the chops to take on a republican like Edwards or Clinton does. The republicans will make him cry and it won’t be pretty.
Posted by: Jane | January 6, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
People need to realize that among us there are natural born leaders. Ghandi, MLK, Reagan, Kennedy, FDR, Washington. They were all born to lead. Washington’s first job? leading the army in the biggest war this country ever faced. he was the man of the people. and in this country, isnt this government by the people? experience does not guarantee quality leadership. bush ran a state, and a baseball teamn, but that experience did him no good. Did any of you see Hillary shrivel and get defensive when she was attacked last night? That does not make a good leader. Obama, with the help of edwards, parried clinton’s barbs. I remind you that even highly educated people with degrees in political science support obama. hes not some man off the streets. he was the first black president of the harvard law review. he is smart, passionate, and inspirational, which form to make a good leader.
Posted by: Alex | January 6, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
You Obama supporters are stuck in 1968. You’re dreamers. The Republicans need only 270 points to win the electoral college which means the race comes down to Ohio, Florida, Iowa, and Pennsylvania. Obama won’t win 3 of the 4 which means we’re stuck with some idiot Republican pushing the same old thing- neoconism and the destruction of the US as a free secular country. More war, more debt, more illegal immigration. It just isn’t worth it. Be pragmatic- choose the candidate that can win the electoral college.
Posted by: doug | January 6, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
yea, if you watched the debates, you wouldve seen that the republican candidates had no idea how to deal with obama when the question was posed. he was named the only candidate capable of defeating each of the republican candidates.
please, research before you attempt an argument.
Posted by: Ale | January 6, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
So, this is what it has come too. Choose Hillary because she can win the electoral college. And then run this country farther in the ground. When are people going to step up and be strong and support a Man who has Vision and Inspiration.
Obama will be our greatest president in the last 20 years.
Posted by: dennis | January 6, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
I’m struggling to remember a bit of history, can anyone help? I remember Lincoln had some experience before being elected President. Seems it was some ‘state house’ experience and maybe a few years in Washington. Too bad he didn’t have more experience…
Posted by: Larry Jines | January 6, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
Subprime mortgage industry
Obama’s New Hampshire chairman, Jim Demers, “a lobbyist, is president of the New England Financial Services Association — whose work includes defending the subprime industry.”
Posted by: Angelina | January 6, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
Ale-
The republicans want Obama to get the nom.
Posted by: dennis | January 6, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
Take health care. The drug and insurance industries spent $1 billion in lobbying over the last decade. They got what they paid for when their friends in Congress broke the rules and twisted arms to push through a prescription drug bill that actually made it illegal for our own government to negotiate with the pharmaceutical companies for cheaper drug prices.
And because reform has been blocked up to now, there are parents and grandparents in this country who are walking into a drugstore and wondering how their Social Security check is going to cover a prescription that’s more expensive than it was a month ago; those who are being forced to choose between their medicine and their groceries because they can no longer afford both.
Let me be clear, I do not begrudge businesses for trying to make a profit, and I do not begrudge them for hiring lobbyists to plead their case before Congress. It is protected political speech, and we appreciate that there are many lobbyists who represent their clients well and fairly. But it’s time we had a Congress that tells the drug companies and the oil companies and the insurance industry that while they may get a seat at the table in Washington, they don’t get to buy every chair.
Posted by: Angelina | January 6, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
I am tired of this “hope” word. Change & Hope are becoming the nomenclature of a pop-political arena which is already terribly ridiculous. The parties on both sides look particularly goofy in this entanglement, but as an independent voter in the state of Pennsylvania, I am leaning towards Obama. In regard to experience compared to hiring a pilot seems like a juvenile correlation. I favor Obama, despite his frequent and abundant use of a presidential dialect comparative to 5th grade rallies, despite his “lack of experience”, despite his color/ethnicity/religion, despite his win in an Iowa causcas… I favor Obama because its clear we need something different. Whichever direction this country is headed, it’s unlikely anyone can screw things up any more than they already are. It is a drastic change we need, and whether the demographic of young (historically apathetic) or old (historically narrow-minded) vote for him, he has convinced an alarming amount of people. His political history, however brief, has been one that supports his beliefs and those that he represents. He is as consistent as we can expect from modern day politicians. And while he may be young, I can take greater comfort in knowing that some of our greatest social & economical presidents like our 42nd, 35th, & 26nd had the same thing going for them.
Also to believe that whatever moral ineptitude Bill Clinton carried, will translate to his wife is preposterous. I will say that it does seem as though Hillary is fighting greater demons from her past more than any other candidate, minus perhaps Giuliani.
I am not set in stone on any person, in fact I even find more to favor with Kucinich than many others, but with the research I’ve assembled on my own (much beyond online polls and google news wires -let’s read some books colleagues!) I’m thumbing my way towards an Obama in the oval office.
Posted by: Wes | January 6, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
clinton is out of touch..part of the presidents job is to give the american peoples hope and is to inspire..thats what she doesn’t have that..go away clinton
Posted by: charles enoch | January 6, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
Alex/ceasar jackson/ JamesJ:
I am opposed to every letter in your post.
The American Electorates are tire of the marlarkey you, the Republican, and the status quo are selling.
In less than 2 days, Obama will reign supreme again!
I do not know what country you are in but I am in the US and here we can choose whom we please and we can have hope and dreams.
This country is under attack economically and philosophically by other countries and terrorists. To survive it need to be united not fragmented into Red and Blue states.
As far as the Republicans winning in November 2008, it is not going to happen. They ran this country into a ditch. The Status Quo is all for divisive population. That is why we need Obama to inspire us to be teh best that we can be regardless of our demographics.
I will be to South Carolina to do my part to keep hope alive. I think he has NH. I have not worked in a campaign since 1988…have been moved to do so until Obama.
P.S. I do not flip flop on my choice because I do my homework first.
Posted by: j7 | January 6, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
Angelina:
Sour grapes if you ask me! Politics is getting dirty now! I have always thought the Republican pulled all the dirty tricks. It won’t work.
Keep on, keep on giving Obama practice with your slime so he will emerge unscarred and victorious in Nov. 2008.
Posted by: j7 | January 6, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
Angelina obviously is working either for the republicans or Hillary’s campaign. Enough already.
Posted by: Casasis | January 6, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
If I were Barack I would be ticked too. Hillary is making it seem as if only she can get anything done. And Barack is all talk. She shows him little respect and he doesn’t deserve that.
Her sudden negativity is based on what? The fact that she lost in Iowa and decided to respond by throwing dirt.
Her advisers don’t seem very smart to allow her to take this road. She would do better to admit “hey I lost Iowa but we aren’t giving up…we’ll come back” and talk about her record and what SHE offers.
To turn negative against Obama when he didn’t do anything but apparently have the audacity to win Iowa over her. And have the gall to bring in new first time caucasers and win the vote of people under 30, men and women. Oh how dare he?
Now she just looks angry and petty. This speaks to the Clinton tradition of “attacking” their perceived enemies.
But all this is uncessary. She can make her point without throwing dirt at Obama. If she’s not careful she’s going to turn off those traditional African American voters that would vote for her thinking they will also get Bill. She’s also going to alienate those young voters that will picture her as their parents when they don’t agree with them.
If she keeps this up South Carolina is going to be a virtual blooth bath with voters walking away from her in droves.
Posted by: Veda | January 6, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
Uhhh? Am I missing something here? I thought it was Bill Clinton who was the president not Hillary. If that is the case, I would like one of you Hillary fanatic to list for me her experience?! All 35 years please. While you are at it, may be the changes too?
Posted by: tango | January 6, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
Whoa, the Clinton Campaign Seminar Spammers have sure turned out tonight!
Posted by: section9 | January 6, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
experience is overrated. if you were hiring based on experience, you could get a terrible worker just as easily as you could get a good one. while it should be in the equation, people have a tendency to make it an exclusively deciding factor, which can and has had grave consequences.
Posted by: JAKEandtheFATMAN | January 6, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
I agree with you Veda. I think that on paper, Clinton is great and she needs to play to that. Doing the opposite and trying to discredit her opponent is making her seem disingenuine. I think people are incorrect by saying that Obama’s big weapon is change. It is also an unyielding earnestness that no one else on either side has decided to show, whether they have it or not…
Posted by: JAKEandtheFATMAN | January 6, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
Angelina and every one else who would vote for a democrat, shame on you. It is a fact that young people and people who would wage war on unborn babies, vote with their feeelings and not with intellegent reason. Wake up to reality, and stop trying to recreate the human race; you are not God and the compassion your group seems to have for families are like so many lies the democrats have thrown our way in the past, and continue to throw our way every day. Shame on every one of you and especially Obama who would like to win this presidential race, not for the good of the country but for the power it gives them. Try being american for a change and get it right before america becomes a third world country that doesn’t stand for anything but selfishness and a refuge for all you fine soldiers whose only courage is to wage you’re own pathetic war on those who cannot defend themselves.
Posted by: milton bailey | January 6, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
It sounds like Obama is taking advantage of a country in serious need and promising more than he can ever deliver. I thought we decided that we didn’t like those type of leaders at the end of the Third Reich in Germany.
Posted by: Heidi | January 6, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
Heidi
You’re a little late, taking advantage of a our country at a time of need was already done by rushing to needless war for financial gain on the graves of those who died on 911.
Posted by: eehill005 | January 6, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
I support Hillary Clinton, and I am very cautious about Obama’s ideological stance for his campaign and political future. He has adopted a left wing politics full of demagogy, propaganda and empty promises. This is not in the American spirit.
I liked Hillary’s performance in the debate. It was professional, knowing the facts and yes, being aggressive on her rivals. They provoked her many times, and it was a mistake that she didn’t point earlier in the campaign their inconsistencies.
Posted by: Mati | January 7, 2008, 3:21 am 3:21 am
How many of you are being paid to blog for Hillary? We all love Bill Clinton, but the Clintons back in the White House is the LAST thing this country needs. This would be like knocking us back to the nineties, back into the same entrenched rivalries and divisiveness that prevents our government from getting anything accompished and moving foward. Politics is personal, and America NEEDS a fresh face who can build new relationships across lines of party affiliation.
We all want change, but change requires cooperation among Republicans and Democrats. Sen. Obama is a politician who has gained the respect of Reps and Dems alike, has a very broad appeal, and he (far better than Hillary) is capable of bringing some measure of unity. Hillary would like you to think that unity and cooperation aren’t possible, because she’s desperate at this point to tear Obama down. What kind of leadership is that? Why so little faith, Hillary? Is unity really so far-fetched? Maybe it was in 1992, but it’s 2008 now, and I think the majority of the country disagrees with her. We want to move on, and that means ANYONE BUT CLINTON. Twenty years of the same two families in the White House is way more than enough.
Posted by: annieg | January 7, 2008, 3:41 am 3:41 am
It’s unfortunate so many of you are still resisting positive change in America. You still opting for the status quo as John Edwards spoke of in the ABC facebook debate. For a REALITY CHECK, we don’t need shock and awe to get things done for change, nor do we need another candidate who appears angry and vicious as Hillary Clinton appeared at the ABC facebook debate doing the first half of the debate.
The best any presidential candidate can do is tell what they would do and let the voters decide who can best get the job done. We don’t need candidates telling us who we need to vet more or who has been vetted enough to best represent America as President.
Hillary early in the campaign should have promoted what she would do as president instead of presenting herself through her husband’s tenure. Additionally, she came across as she was the only one who should ever be considered to be the next president.
Unfortuantely, John Edwards couldn’t toot his own horn because he didn’t accomplish anything substantial while an U. S. Senator. However, I will Hillary Clinton credit for calling out Edwards that his patient rights initiative with others didn’t pass in the House!
Obama has the experience to think out of the box. We need less of the past and the same way of doing things. America needs leaders who are ready to represent the American people on day one, not their self serving interest to get their legacy vetted to their liking!
Hope and change are characteristics that make America great! NOT trash and burn political tatics!
Therefore, I will support Obama ’08!
Posted by: Lani, GA | January 7, 2008, 3:57 am 3:57 am
Are we really going for better experience? or are we for better judgment? scan history for great leaders and you will find them judging better.
Posted by: Han | January 7, 2008, 4:18 am 4:18 am
what i like about obama is that he is thick skinned, he can take attacks from hillary and not attack back. That is a very good leadership quality. when i hear obama speak i hear about America and its people. When Hillary speaks, its all about her. Listen to her talk, its all I this, and i that, i have experience, i have already done it. reminds me of the devil when he fell from heaven. obama has charm, looks, youth vitality, vision and morals. he believes in the people. Go obama !!!!!!
Posted by: vindy | January 7, 2008, 6:19 am 6:19 am
It’s a pity indeed that people can’t seperate emotions from reality.I really don’t know why anyone would expect Hillary Clinton to change the problem she is part of.This woman collects money from firms that constitute problems to this country.
This woman has been in goverment for the past fifteen years.How on earth is she going to change America for good.Even a blind,deaf and dumb man knows that Obama is the only candidate that have the moral capacity to change America for the better.
American’s are smart enough to know what they want when they see it,that is why I am not suprise about the poll result in NH.GO OBAMA.Only the best is good enough and OBAMA IS INDEED THE BEST.
Posted by: Eronss Odij | January 7, 2008, 8:12 am 8:12 am
Americans vote for looks. Obama is very charismatic but intelligent too. Nobody is upset that JFK (while very good-looking) started the war in Vietnam. Hillary does have substance but so does Obama..but he is young with a killer smile..so he will be our next president.
Thank you
Posted by: Marta | January 7, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am
I do not understand these random comparisons to Bush–please stop using the Hillary camp talking points. Trust Hillary–or better yet a Clinton? She voted for the reckless war in Iraq and now says she would not have waged it if she was President.
I am amazed at her constant switching of positions. Obama is NO Bush. Obama is Intelligent, has good judgment, & DID NOT support the war Iraq.
Clinton is more like Bush in the sense she continues to use lies and distortions of her opponents records–not too mention she too agreed with Obama on Pakistan, when just months ago she called his statements naive.
Hillary MUST BE STOPPED FOR THE FUTURE OF AMERICA!
Obama 08
Posted by: Josh | January 7, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am
Obama makes me proud to be an American again! Good job, Iowa. Don’t disappoint us, New Hampshire! Woo hoo!
Posted by: waka waka | January 7, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
We leadership of america does not belong to only two families the Bushes and the Clintons they had their time and lets have something new,something different, something inspiring,Thanks Obama for making us believe in ourselves again now please get us out of this mesy the clintons and the bushes put us in.
Posted by: sox | January 7, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
I still get amused when people say Obama lacks experience. We now have a president who served as governor of a state that does not give its governor much power and who had never had been to Europe! Lots of experience!
Rkoz
Posted by: RKoz | January 7, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
to Rkoz, yes we did elect george bush who did not have any experience and look at the condition of the country today!! That’s reason enough to let everyone know HOW IMPORTANT EXPERIENCE REALLY IS
Posted by: joan skipper | January 7, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
Perhaps much of America wants a clown to lead them against professional terrorists. That would describe what Obama is after. He has no qualifications – and that ALWAYS means experience – to lead us onward. To get any job, people look for experience. He has no claim to win the poles, unless we all want to get laughed at again!
Posted by: Strong79 | January 7, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
A few points:
1) Abraham Lincoln never served in public office before being elected president. He helped end the Civil War, freed the slaves, and is considered one of the greatest presidents of all time.
2) Many recent polls have stated that while Obama would defeat all of the top 5 republican candidates, Clinton would lose to ALL OF THEM. Talk to me about electablity now.
3) Obama’s mention of womens’ rights to vote had nothing to do with Hillary. If it applied as an attack against her, it applied as an attack against half the people in this country, and it simply wasn’t.
4) The point about Barack Obama isn’t the promises he makes, it’s the conviction and hope he brings to those promises. He honestly believes that he can change the country, and with nearly half a million individual donors, not to mention casual supporters, the public obviously has faith in his abilities.
5) Ask politicians about his time in office, and it’s clear that Obama is not only well-liked in Washington, he has been very capable, often reaching across the aisle to make bills even with extreme conservatives. In the early stages of campaigning, he was the only candidate still attempting to pass legislation while also making the run for president. He may not have been a senator very long, but his time has been well spent.
Posted by: Christian | January 7, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
So where ans what were the Clinton’s vast years of experience in 1992? At that time, the pitch was for “change”. Now, she is basically the entrenched one and the same political mood is doing her in.
Posted by: Jim | January 7, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
So where and what were the Clinton’s experience in 1992? At that time, the pitch was for “change”. Now, she is basically the entrenched one and the same political mood is doing her in. That’s the reality check.
Posted by: Jim | January 7, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
I love Clinton’s experience. She’s experience at distorting the facts. She’s experience at lying to the American people. She’s experience at cover up and she experience at crying on cue! With all that experience, give me Obama anyday!!
Posted by: BobJ | January 7, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
I think every loyal Republican should be sending contributions to Hillary. If she is nominated we’ll see the greatest Republican landslide in 50 years. On the other hand, Obama could actually win. Depending which hack the Republicans nominate, I might even vote for Obama. I held my nose and voted for GWB twice, because Gore and Kerry were just sooo bad. I like the sense of optimism and hopefullness Obama shows. I think he is sincere.
Posted by: Chuck | January 7, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
I think every loyal Republican should be sending contributions to Hillary. If she is nominated we’ll see the greatest Republican landslide in 50 years. On the other hand, Obama could actually win. Depending which hack the Republicans nominate, I might even vote for Obama. I held my nose and voted for GWB twice, because Gore and Kerry were just sooo bad. I like the sense of optimism and hopefullness Obama shows. I think he is sincere.
Posted by: Chuck | January 7, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
l belived obama should be the best american leader,
Posted by: shadze ivo wirsiy | October 12, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm