Feb 10, 2008 3:43pm

Clinton Secretly Visits Edwards; Obama Next

ABC News’ Eloise Harper and Sunlen Miller Report:

ABC News has learned that Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., met with former Sen. John Edwards secretly at his home in Chapel Hill, North Carolina on Thursday. Clinton’s rival for the Democratic presidential nomination, Illionis Sen. Barack Obama will meet with Edwards on Monday, sources say. 

Clinton initially told reporters that she was not asking for Edwards’ endorsement immediately after he got out of the race. Yesterday, speaking in Lewiston. Maine Clinton said "I’ll ask John Edwards to help with anything I do in the White House."

This would be an important endorsement for Clinton to secure, and is essential enough to her that she made a stealth trip to North Carolina, despite her busy campaign schedule. Clinton was two hours late to her first event last Thursday in Virginia, presumably things in the Tar Hill state tied her up.

Sen. Obama would very much like Edwards’ endorsement too. Pundits have speculated that Edwards’ populist message is more closely aligned with Obama.

Before exiting the Democratic presidential contest, Edwards secured pledges from his rivals to make fighting poverty a priority.

The meetings were initiated by Clinton and Obama, according to sources. 

ABC News’ Raleyn Johnson contributed reporting.

User Comments

Some secret.

Posted by: Tonya | February 10, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

If Edwards endorses Clinton he will be a real disapointment to me. She represents everything he stands against. She takes money from lobbyists, she is status quo, she is so engulfed in the Washington ways that Edwards spoke out against. I do hope he endorses Obama, and I would love to see Al Gore endorse Obama as well- but dream I may.

Posted by: Sarah | February 10, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

This, plus the firing of her campaign manager, begins to smell largely of panic. She’s one more tearful episode from being gone from this race.

Posted by: Chris | February 10, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

Something fishy going on!

Posted by: Ron | February 10, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

Meeting with Edwards for any Candidate is a huge win. However it is sad to see that she was late to her town hall meetings because of it and forced all her loyal constituents to wait.

Posted by: I for O | February 10, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

I saw a motorcade getting a police escort the other day. I was wondering what was going on and why there was no mention on the local news. I bet that was her. Maybe, I’ll run into Obama on Monday!

Posted by: kings2beat | February 10, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

I believe Senator Edwards must endorse Senator Obama. Senator Edwards ran from the start, knowing that Senator Clinton was the establishment candidate. He chose to run against her. I remember well the passion I heard in Senator Edwards voice in why he was runnning for President in two different town hall meetings he had in Concord, NH in the 2004 race. That same passion and beliefs should lead him to endorse and fight for Senator Obama. Only Senator Obama can rally the party, the independents, and Republicans to bring about the change that Senator Edwards himself believes in.

Posted by: Ray Foss | February 10, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

I hope Edwards endorses Hillary Clinton.
We definitely need the changes that she
can bring to america

Posted by: Lillybell | February 10, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

The intellectual mind of a Republican: The Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (1980) established the ANWR (Arctic National Wildlife Refuge), But someone forgot to tell GW Bush before he stood in front of the cameras during a speech he made and spoke these words:”I think it is a good idea to start and build ANWR in the Artic, it’s beautiful country up there. You can all visit and see how beautiful the Artic country is.”

Posted by: Angela | February 10, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

I am a republican, I feel John should just switch parties, and run against McCain. He would get my vote, I am sure among many more.

Posted by: Marilyn Oliver | February 10, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

I hope Edwards endorses Hillary because Obama has been using Big Pharma tactics to swiftboat Universal Health Care.
After learning that Obama has brought the “Harry & Louise” campaign Big Pharma used to defeat UHC in the 90s we all know Obama is no populist.
I hope he saw the article in the NYT about Obama lying about passing the nuclear energy in IL after he watered it down for his donors at Exelon.
Edwards should also remember that Obama swiftboated him and accuses him of losing those Whirlpool jobs even though Obama’s donor’s at Maytag had a big say in those jobs being shipped overseas.

Posted by: LatinVoter | February 10, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

Supporting Hillary Clinton is like walking around with a handful of mashed potatoes and gravy on Main street.

Posted by: wiseowl | February 10, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

Well as an Edwards supporter that voted for him AFTER he suspended I will have to say there is just NO WAY I can vote for Obama even if John endorses him. It is STILL my vote! I will be forced to write John in if Obama gets the nomination. You who think Obama isn’t a dirty politician better do your research a little better…choir boy he is NOT!

Posted by: Annie | February 10, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

The Dream Team. OBAMA/EDWARDS.

Posted by: Linda D | February 10, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

If anyone thinks that things are falling apart in the Clinton campaign and think she is about to fold up her tent an go home is living in self deception! She is not one tear away from getting out. At the very least she’s pretending to have a broken wing to draw away what she perceives as preditors away from her nest. The Clintons are very calculating and I would be disappointed if the drama were any less calculating and media free attention getting as it is. There has to be drama in order to keep the media focused and interested in what she’s doing, and she is going to play it up until the bitter end. And for the media, the more bitter the more better blues!

Posted by: Dale | February 10, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

When is Hillary going to release her tax returns?

Posted by: Sloane | February 10, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

I was a supporter of Edwards, if he endorses Obama, I will vote MaCain.
MaCain is a moderate.

Posted by: Pat | February 10, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

Hopefully John will remember the nasty, false robo-calls the Clinton campaign made about him in SC.

Posted by: Janet | February 10, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

Some idiot says we need the changes that Hillary would bring to America. Would that be like California spending 200 million dollars teaching first graders about alternative sex. Or would that change be like a 12 year old girl leaves school to go to church and goes to jail for it. Or a 12 year old girl leaves school to get an abortion and get full support from the school. Yes democrats are changing things for sure.

Posted by: demslie | February 10, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

That’s ok if you support Obama with any reasons or no reasons at all. But please be fair and realistic: it would be so ironic, naive and sad for any of you to think he was perfect or even paint him as like Jesus or some sort of hero. In a word, he’s merely another dirty politician that says and does anything to get elected! Who wouldn’t say or do anything to get elected? He is different in this election for his rhetoric speeches vs. Hillary’s much more specific deliveries. Imagine how you would feel IF everything stays the same but his speeches sounded boring even the contents are the same? That’s not wise although it is your choice to vote for him simply because he delivers more exciting speeches. Also when you Obama supporters back him and against Hillary, please be like an adult, you can be biased, but don’t use dirty words to bash someone, or it would only show the world that a lot more O supporters are not mature therefore one has to wonder whether these supporters are able to make correct judgments.

Posted by: snakebaby | February 10, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

Hopefully, Edwards will remember the almost sneering dismissal of “John” in their last debate.

Posted by: Tom im MA | February 10, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

I’m with Dale. With Clinton, we get drama for drama’s sake. Really can’t imagine four years of this – its fatiguing just to ponder the notion.

Posted by: Paul | February 10, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

This is what Clinton need to do.I hope Edwards does support Clinton.
Clinton has the best national health plan, plus the best economic plan.
Obama plan for change is pocket change
Pocket Change Obama.

Posted by: warner | February 10, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Obama is a great motivational speaker, and gifted with a talent to inspire people to dream. Unfortunately that is about all he is. I can understand why people, after the past 8 years, are so desperate to believe in a better future, but people need to recognize that talk that is not backed up by real knowledge, experience and understanding of the world will get us nowhere. Seriously people need to take a good realistic look at the world around us and understand what it will take to turn it around. The Republicans and their status quo will not simply give up in the face of Obama’s nice flowery language and idealistic intentions, nor will America’s enemies abroad. It will take someone strong and pragmatic who has the experience that is invaluable in order to make real changes. That person without a doubt is Hillary. Not only does she have her heart and mind focused on change and a better future, but will also have the capability, judgement and strength to actually accomplish this.

Posted by: Johnny D. | February 10, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

GO HILLARY GO! I don’t care about th flavor-of-the-month candidates.
Hillary has been a fighter for over 30 years and they’ve thrown everything including the kitchen sink at her, but she is so resilient!
I hope to God that she makes history in 2008. It’s time for a WOMAN!

Posted by: Brad | February 10, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

For all those naive folks who thinks Obama doesn’t take money from lobbyists, you should check your facts. He has taken more money from Big Pharma than any other candidate. It’s a fact. Edwards even pointed that out during the Nevada debate. He has also taken more money from energy companies and their executives – and we’re talking about companies that promote dirty coal and nuclear energy. Don’t be fooled by rhetoric.

Posted by: MHHUNT | February 10, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

As a middle-class women, juggling job and family, I strongly believe Hillary Clinton is the voice of the middle-class and the unfortunate in America. I for one hope, John Edwards will support Hillary Clinton. I also believe John Edwards would make an excellent Attorney General , for he knows how to fight for the little people.

Posted by: jp,michigan | February 10, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Wiseowl: I give you a BIG Amen. Obama is all smoke and mirrors. Would someone PLEASE tell me what his main platform is? If it gets down to Obama and McCain, I’m for McCain all the way. Anyone who spent 5 years of his life in a Vietnamese prison camp and survived, deserves to be president. Obama is way too risky. Hillary Clinton has more devotion to this country than anyone I know. Can you think of anyone who has spent almost 20 years researching Health Care Reform? Who will put that kind of time in? It takes a village to make sure Obama isn’t running our country in a few months.

Posted by: Jen4Hil | February 10, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

So the new line is the world is a dangerous place, and only Clinton has the judgment and experience we need.
Not buying it. She overstates her experience and I haven’t seen any judgment I can recall as noteworthy.
I’ll take Obama as president any day of the week. At least he seems to understand the job. With Clinton, you get the feeling she sees it as chief executive office of the nation. Obama understands the president is only chief executive of the executive branch of the federal government.

Posted by: Paul | February 10, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

If Obama really cared about the US of America, He could have waited 4 yrs. before he ran. Hillary is the best one to be our president. He knew what would happen if they both ran. (divide the party). He is still a young chick and he could have done alot to help Hillary. Instead, he is greedy. If the Reps. win it will be his fault and the McCains will stay for another 8 years. At the last National Convention when they addressed him as a Rising Star, boy he ran with it. He is more of a good speaker I give him that but to intelligience I give it to Clinton. We cannot go wrong with her. What is Obama trying to proof anyway? Just watch, If Obama gets it, he will not beat McCain. The Replicans will rally and there goes our time.

Posted by: jane Garcia | February 10, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

it’s typical that She does things in secret and Obama makes it transparent to us all.
I’m so sick of the Clinton drama and secret dealings. Time to turn a new page for a different kind of politics.

Posted by: Ann B. | February 10, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

Excuse me, I mean, Annie, not wiseowl. Messed up on the arrows there. :)

Posted by: jen4hil | February 10, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

Yes, give Hillary another chance at taking all of the furniture in the Whitehouse. They need the money from the pardons. Four more years of their tedious melodrama – you have got to be kidding. The Hillary supporters are brainwashed.

Posted by: disambiguates | February 10, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

Jen4Hill – can you really, honestly tell us you don’t understand Obama’s platform after nearly 12 months of this campaign?
Wow. That’s an incredible statement about any candidate – I feel I knew the campaign positions of the last 10 candidates across both parties.
If you want detail on Obama, go read his website, or google to find independent, non-campaign sources. These blogs aren’t a good place to gain information. In a way, these are like the Colbert Report – entertaining to us junkies, but it helps to have a good understanding of the news before you get there.

Posted by: Paul | February 10, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

First you meet the ones you kiss goodbye.

Posted by: Mike | February 10, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

Jane Garcia: “If Obama really cared about the US of America, He could have waited 4 yrs. before he ran.”
Right… the way to serve the country best is by not offering its citizens too many choices.

Posted by: Paul | February 10, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

When asked by pollsters leaving caucus locations last night to name one thing Obama had done-nobody could answer. How frightening is that. If I wanted to vote for charismatic big talk I’d vote for Brad Pitt.

Posted by: molly | February 10, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

The problem with the Clinton campaign in the general election is two fold. One it will galvanize the Republicans and two it will fracture the Democrats. How can you win with that? Recent poles that matched Obama or Hillary proof this point.
Hillary is a politician while Barack Obama is a leader. Inherently, she tries to expand her support base by trying to divide the country into groups with “us” versus “them” mentality. Inherently as well, Obama tries to lead by brining everyone together by focusing on a common ground. Mind you, there is a distinction between working across the isle and brining people together. The former is limited in its scope, while the later has no limit in the possibility it brings.
We need a leader and not a politician in this election!

Posted by: Tom | February 10, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

I’ll be very dissapointed with Edwards if he endorses Hillary. That would make him a real hypocrite to me and million of others. Remember how strongly he was against Hillary’s status quo? How can he then turn back and endorese her? Im even surprise he hasn’t endorsed Obama up to this day because his policies were more in line with Obama’s. What holding him back not to endorse him? If he really loves this country and wants to see the changes he desires, he should endorse Obama and not hillary.

Posted by: Louis | February 10, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

If Edwards Supports Hillary, it will look like a white Southern conspiracy to defeat Obama (and he will look like a hypocrite). Not a good idea!

Posted by: garba maigoro | February 10, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

I think it is an excellent idea to ask for Edward’s endorsement! The Apaches say you should keep your enemies close and your family far away. Edwards was certainly competitive!

Posted by: Suzannaquanashawn | February 10, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

I am very much in line with most of those who think Edwards will support Obama. Edwards is a southerner with southerner’s values. He pretty much stood against many things supported by Hillary. His values and beliefs lean more to the Obama’s philosophy. He is a wise man and he will make wise decisions I would hope.

Posted by: Fafa Ceesay | February 10, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

Maine has just been called for Obama.
So, make that 19 out of 29 states.

Posted by: Paul | February 10, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

Who has experience for the presidency? It seems that those with experience are the ones who messed this country up in the first place. Great leaders like great athletes are those who can inspire others to greatness. Men who had a dream to start a new country like the Ben Franklin and Thomas Jeffersons in our history. Barack Obama is that man for today. He represents all that America claims to be. I guess most of you doubters would rather he stay around Washington so as to be contaminated by the very thing that we say we want change from. No one can inspire Americans like Obama, and if you ever listened to him you would know that he states his positions quite clearly and he knows that the task ahead is not easy but with our help we can all make change happen, I’m inspired, my children are inspired, my neighbors are inspired. I invite all you you to get on aboard this train, America for all Americans is finally on it’s way.

Posted by: WordSource | February 10, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

Think, folks!
If Hillary runs and loses it will set women back 50 years.
And she will lose against McCain. Where does her “experience” argument go against him?
Also, McCain known as a crusader against earmarks and she is known as the “Queen of Pork.”
Polls show she loses to McCain whereas Obama wins. Where is the change if we get Bush 3 by McCain?

Posted by: Sam Dobermann | February 10, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

John edwards voters and his platform are non educated blue collar workers. Edwards is also a universal healthcare guy. A son of the poor south. How does he now go and throw it all out the window to support the Starbucks crowd Obama. You know the same african americans who voted 3% for Edwards in South carolina?
you know, the same John Kerry who SNUBBED him and got on the Obama train?
How does edwards possibly ignore all this and jump on the Obama campaign is ridiculous in my opinion. If he is loyal to his campaign and his fight for the poor, its Clintons camp he should endorse.

Posted by: tom | February 10, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

I wish that the writer of the article would check their spelling …… the state of Illinois and the Tar Heel (not Hill) state!!!

Posted by: Liz Toney | February 10, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

I hope he endorses neither of them. If he was to do so, there is nothing to hold them to their promise to not only talk about fighting poverty and all the other policy proposals he has, but to actually follow through with action.

Posted by: Noreen | February 10, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

28 years is two much for two families to rule, it’s un-American. This is not a Monarchy.

Posted by: WordSource | February 10, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

And AP just seconded the call – Obama in Maine.
Its closer than yesterdays margins. I think currently its 57-43. But given how the state was considered a toss-up this morning, another day of good news for the Obama camp.

Posted by: Paul | February 10, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

A little music please! “Turn out the lights the parties over…”

Posted by: Hog-Wild | February 10, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

In these type of political meetings, you meet with the person you are saying “no” to first, i.e. – Hillary. Edwards is meeting with Obama tomorrow to say “yes.”

Posted by: douglasdao | February 10, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

Is Hillary trying to “Bribe” Edwards with a VP spot for his endorsement? Smells like that to me….Some Fuzzy deal I cant understan

Posted by: Louis | February 10, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

I love those who paint this story as another “plot” by Hillary by doing this in secret. The media creates these sensational headlines and you fall for it. It was known two days ago that Edwards would be meeting with BOTH of them at his house. Obama will meet with him tomorrow. I wish people would also stay on topic and have a real dialogue about what these meeting could mean.

Posted by: Noreen | February 10, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

I just hope that Hillary recognizes that many of the angry, bitter leftists (people like me who read firedoglake and are secure in our gender identification) want Bush impeached as a war criminal. Unless Hillary recognizes the extreme left and our agenda of hateful rhetoric, she will never get the nomination.

Posted by: twin_peaks_nikki | February 10, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Hill’s excuses that she have been outspent in Barack’s sweep just debunked
her claim of her vast 35 years experience, perhaps like the vast right wing conspiracy. It also exposed her mismanagement of campaign finances that
debunked her vow of micro-managerial ability ! So, she is down to her last
firewall in Texas. Ohio won’t help her just like how Missouri didn’t her her
with the white votes. Northern white voters are more open to a black candidate than Southern whites, specially after they’ll hear Barack speaks from the heart and see nothing phony about him. Barack’s strong support comes from the Youth who have the natural ability to detect a phony from a distance and that is very true. Hill can’t overcome that, and no amount of re-programming can help her change her phony persona and no amount of deodorant can hide the Clintons’ bad political smell ! No one can deny that it is Barack who have been able to bring
in so much voters into the primaries more than anyone else, and Super delegates should consider that before they cast their decision instead of letting the Clinton ties bind them to her and risk alienating a very large swat of voters and dampen their enthusiasm. Texas may be the only realistic firewall left, but it won’t bring her any victory at all. It can only bring a stalemate and toss
the race into the hands of Super Delegates. However, if Barack wins Texas, then we can definitely write the Clintons’ political obit. Before I forget, perhaps another Hill tear up image might be of little help. However, considering the writers are going back to work, that may no longer catch the attention of TV viewers.

Posted by: wilson | February 10, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Noreen-
Obama supporters can’t do this because all they spew is hate toward Hillary. What they need to remember is that they will need her supporters if he is the nominee of this Democrat. I love this country too much to vote for a rookie like Obama.

Posted by: Mike | February 10, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

Paul- you say “the way to serve the country best is by not offering its citizens too many choices.”
Well I think that has already happened by getting it down to the media’s choice and it’s only February. The majority of voters have already been deprived of many choices.

Posted by: Noreen | February 10, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

Rob-is-Right
They both have to earn my vote. Obama hasn’t exactly been innocent, I have heard things he has said about Edwards and I have not been pleased. Michelle had even gotten in on the act. Of course now Obama wants his endorsement and has been silent except to co-opt Edwards ideas and not give him any credit.
I also don’t appreciate being told who I should support, I have a mind of my own. Supporters can still vote for Edwards in the primaries if they chose to do so, regardless if Edwards does endorse someone. It is our right and we are not throwing our votes away.

Posted by: Noreen | February 10, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

Edwards and Clinton’s health care plans are the same. Obama has none- his whole campaign is based on nothing but hype and fluff. I am most concerned about health care, the economy, and lastly Iraq.
If John Edwards is smart, he will endorse Clinton. If Obama wins the nomination, this lifelong Democrat will for the first time since I voted for President in 1972 (for McGovern) will be forced to vote for McCain.

Posted by: peter | February 10, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

the democratic side is not even a real election. Most of the dirt against Hillary is from her so called “personality” or “character.” Who gives a crap about that. It is about the issues people, not that Hillary is evil for laughing in a debate (which I have read from time to time). Also, the argument for Obama is so vague. He can make change, he can move our country forward, he will do things differently, etc. However, most of his supporters have no clue HOW he will do those things. Oh it’s because he talks so inspirationally in his speeches, and that is what they are basing it on. Also, 90% of African Americans are voting for Obama. What the hell is that? That is just voting by race not the issues once again. If 90% of women or 90% of white people are voting for Hillary, the media will go nuts and talk about how crazy it is and that people aren’t voting rationally. (BTW Im neither white nor black) For Obama, that 90% of Black votes is OK and the media does not respond negatively about it. The republicans are probably laughing at the democrats because the party is extremely divided. Many people are saying if ______ wins then I will vote for Macain. The only way the democrats can even win against the republicans is if Hillary and Obama join together.

Posted by: sam | February 10, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

Mike- I think what you are trying to say is that people here need to stay on topic. I agree with you on your one point. Not to paint all of Obama’s supporters with one broad brush, that would not be fair. But I have read some awful, venimous comments about Hillary on many sites. So much of it is very sexist, having nothing to do with her policies, etc. Considering polls out there say most people would not vote for a woman for president no matter who it was is a sad telling sign.

Posted by: Noreen | February 10, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

A huge warning to Democrats- Barack Obama if nominated by the party will not win in November- The party is making a huge mistake this this man.

Posted by: peter | February 10, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

Everyone knows it is divisive to vote in racial terms, and I think African Americans cannot surely expect to break heavily for Barack because he is black and expect to be treated in a race blind way everywhere else? It has all the characteristics of a coming backlash.

Posted by: shravan | February 10, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

Sam wrote”if Hillary runs and loses it will set women back 50 years”.
The Clintons have already set women back 50 years. I am amazed that the Hillary crowd so easily forgets that way they savaged the women who complained about Bill exposing himself and worse.
The governor of Kansas,Sebelius, is in fact a great candidate. If we could get the Clintons off the stage, we would get these good people.

Posted by: disambiguates | February 10, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

Secret meetings that make you two hours late to greet your supporters. Not traits i look forward to in my president. Won’t release her tax records until after she’s the candidate, nice chance for ‘buyers remorse’ Falls in line with my expectations for someone who was the ‘inevitable candidate’ Oligarchy destroy’s democracy.

Posted by: teopa | February 10, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

Tom- A correction, not all of us Edwards supporters are non-educated blue collar workers. That includes myself and many others I know. We just believe in his message and his detailed policy proposals. I grew up poor but have never forgotten where I came from and appreciate that I worked hard to get where I am now. Edwards wants that for all Americans.

Posted by: Noreen | February 10, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

Whether Clinton or Obama— “Attorney General John Edwards” would be a huge win for the United States!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: GL | February 10, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

Just from the way Edwards campaigned, it’ll be surprised if he endorses Hillary. I’ve a feeling, Hillary may be more likely urging him not to endorse Obama. Looking at past endorsers- Obama seems to have the message and ability to get endorsments that he needs. Kansas Gov, Washington Gov, etc.
I hope Edwards not only endorses Obama, but campaigns for him in OH and TX. Edwards can appeal to the demographics that haven’t gravitated to Obama yet

Posted by: Kashy79 | February 10, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

Edwards will endorce, I believe. His plans for America are almost the same as Clinton’s.

Posted by: BY | February 10, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

The queen is not taking an audiance today?

Posted by: LongT | February 10, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

I am still not convinced that the Iowa caucus was not filled with non-residences. Their caucus rules do not require proof of residency or any ID at all for that matter. Would explain the sudden surge of people registering on the spot. There were reports from precinct captains of many people showing up who they never saw before in the many months leading up to the caucus when they went door to door. I am not a conspiracy theory kind of person, I just wish there would have been some research into this. It might explain the large number of votes for Obama or maybe not. The media might not have called his victory a sign that he will take the nomination. We probably will never know for sure. What is done is done.

Posted by: Noreen | February 10, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

The Clinton machine is churning!

Posted by: LongT | February 10, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

Race card? Its also something called demographics- which also includes income, educational attainment, AGE-
The Demographics thus far have shown that Mr. Obama has one in either the following; States that are caucuses, with a small ’boutique’ white population that is highly educated’ states that have a high African American Population;
He (Mr. Obama) has failed to wine any large state that has allot of diversity, with large numbers of wealthy, working class, those with older populations, less educated etc—these are social demographics- thus far Mr Obama has failed to win the states of California, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Florida, AZ, New Mexico- all states that veer far from the boutique demographics that Obama has done well in.
Oh yes he may win Maryland and DC as well as VA- all states that key into his demographic strengths.
GL please–

Posted by: p | February 10, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

Sorry if this is repetitive but have your heard that Clinton is replacing her campaign manager with a Latina? Not collapsing yet, just more maneuvering! I Don’t think the former manager “stepped down”, do you?

Posted by: BryAnn | February 10, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

How about Gore as Obama’s vice president?

Posted by: Mr. Bell | February 10, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

Rob-is-Right
I really don’t get your last point about Clinton having anything to do with my comment. If you think about it, the result in Iowa gave Obama the boost he needed so that by the time we got to the states you mentioned, I live in one, people were convinced to vote for him even with a lack of substance on his part. Add to that that we were stuck with just two candidates to vote for by this time. I won’t get into why I think so many people are supporting Obama because I don’t have the time. I won’t be responding to anymore of your posts considering your obvious hatred for Hillary. I don’t support her but I am sick of these venimous postings against her, not just from you but many others. Some of which are very sexist in nature. . BTW, I am not playing “tricks”, I just want to know the truth.

Posted by: Noreen | February 10, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

Hillary what you need to do is copy ever word by word MLK transcripts have your new manager copy all MLK transcripts for all your speaches. This is how Obama has been doing it, so if he does it so can you it will work for you as well what your old manager failed at was how to cheat like Obama, so get with you new manager to copy al for you now.

Posted by: Gloria | February 10, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

Some People have got to be kidding Me, Why should Hillary Clinton have to release any Tax Document because she funded her own Campaign with a Loan,First of all shes Married to a Former President, I Smell Millionaire duhhh!!Now that, thats said.. Wow!! There is No Other President That has ever had to do such, so thereforth why should she have to..I diffenently do see the Double Standards ALREADY.. I Must remind you all this Country is very screwed up in every aspect of the WORD..It is not a Job for a Rookie..That thinks he knows how to come in and Clean up this Mess the Bush Administration has made and is going to leave for the next President, We All Really Need to get the BIG Picture..So in saying all above, Hillary Clinton is the most Qualified the Democratic Party has to Offer to Clean House..Any Body can make Promises, come right in and do the same as any other President, But when it comes to getting things done, Shes like a Mother and a Good Mother, and those of us that have one, KNOWS A Good Mother Gets the Job Done ALWAYS, Every Single Time!!

Posted by: whatever2 | February 10, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

EDWARDS DON’T GIVE UP ON THE POOR AND THE NEEDIEST BY EVER ENDORSING OBAMA. HILLARY HAS REAL SOLUTIONS THAT HAVE BEEN ANALYZED BY SEVERAL ECONOMISTS’ SHOWING THAT HER PLANS WILL WORK.
FOR EXAMPLE, ON HEALTHCARE: THE NYT RELEASED AN ARTICLE THAT COMPARED THEIR TWO PLANS SIDE-BY-SIDE (THE FIGURES WERE DERIVED BY A WELL-RESPECTED ECONOMIST AND IS SUPPORTED BY MANY ANALYSTS).
HILLARY’S HC PLAN:
ANNUAL COST – $124 MILLION
COVERAGE – 45 MILLION PEOPLE
COST PER NEWLY INSURED – $2,700
OBAMA’S HC PLAN:
ANNUAL COST – $102 MILLION (80% OF HILLARY’S COST)
COVERAGE – 23 MILLION (~50% OF WHAT HILLARY’S PLAN WOULD COVER)
COST PER NEWLY INSURED – $4,400
HILLARY’S HEALTHCARE PLAN IS BY FAR SUPERIOR AT EVERY VANTAGE POINT AND; THEREFORE, MORE LIKELY TO PASS LEGISLATION.
HILLARY STANDS FOR REAL SOLUTIONS THAT AMERICA NEEDS MORE THAN EVER!

Posted by: MR | February 10, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

Some people are crazy about change, but look at the change Bush has brought us. When people talk about change without specifics, it’s likely that they will do us more hard than good.

Posted by: Step B | February 10, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

BryAnn: Get your facts straight. Here new campaign manager has been with her for years and worked on Bill Clinton’s campaign so it’s hardly to get votes.

Posted by: Peter | February 10, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

I wanted to bring something up to everyone. I was curious why Obama did so well in Caucus states and not as well in those that have a regular vote. I did some research and found that Obama, on his website, when answering frequently asked questions about caucuses, instructs his people to say the following:
“I’m an independent (or Republican). I can’t caucus, can I?
As a matter of fact, you can. There is no party registration in Washington. Upon signing in at the caucus you will need to attest that you are a Democrat to participate, but you can switch your affiliation just for Caucus Day. You can be an Independent, Republican, Green, Libertarian or anything else the next day.”
So it appears to me that much of Obama’s so-called great caucus support in Red States is an anti-Hillary vote and not necessarily a pro-Obama vote. This seems unethical for Obama’s campaign to do this!

Posted by: Mike | February 10, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Surely John Edwards will endorse Barack. He was more closely alligned and ran a clean campaign unlike the Clintons.
Although they(Hillary and Bill) are claiming to turn the campaign around and that Bill has “realized his mistakes” (good grief-how he behaved was as an attack dog not a suppportive husband!), they are a calculating, well oiled, political machine. They will do and say anything to get elected.
That is not how I saw John Edwards. I hope his integrity holds firm and he endorses Barak, not Hillary who won’t come clean with where her bail out $$ came from specifically.

Posted by: Diane | February 10, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

Clean campaign Diane, read my prior posts!
Anything to win I guess!

Posted by: Mike | February 10, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Diane: Specifically, if it is possible, what kind of unclean things have the Clinton’s done? Obama attacks her on a regular basis and all she can do is grin and bear it or be accused of being racist.

Posted by: Jeff | February 10, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

I remain hopeful Hillary will have success in the forthcoming blue collar States. However, I am so disgusted with the democratic party that should Hillary falter, I will join the Republican Party. I also want to put forth a winning ticket: John McCain and his running mate Michael Bloomberg. John can handle foreign affairs/Iraq/terrorism and Michael can fix this broken economy. I am so excited. But, Hillary is my immediate interest.

Posted by: benvictor | February 10, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

I can’t even entertain the idea of electing a president with no foreign policy experience in a time of war. Please Edwards, endorse Hillary.

Posted by: anon3 | February 10, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

Whose business is it anyways about peoples taxes. If Barack actually had any money he probably wouldn’t be so open. Now give someone who had to borrow money from Rezko to pay off his home, the strings to the US Budget. God save the Queen.

Posted by: Ann | February 10, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

If you want people to listen to your point of view, why not talk about the positive contributions you expect from that person; compare their plans to their opponents and why you think their’s is best. There are a whole lot of non-issues, speculation and half-truths that are starting to dominate this campaign. We need to step away from all this emotional rhetoric. One candidate will win the nomination and all this venom creates such negative feelings that we need to get beyond in order for our party to be successful in this election. Stop bashing each other. Stop forwarding the “Swiftboat” types of emails, the half-truths, and the outright lies. This is how we ended up with Bush.

Posted by: Lori | February 10, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

ANN, you’ve have a long list. I dont even care to read it, so disgusted to long!!! GO HILLARY/ EDWARDS!!! HUCKABEE, ROMNEY!!!

Posted by: ricca | February 10, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

John Edwards would make a fine Vice President. Maybe John McCain could have Rush for his VP,that would attract the Rightwing nutjobs for sure!

Posted by: AJ | February 10, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

I hope Edwards doesn’t endorse anyone. He should stay above the fray to let the people decide! I say this and I am a Hillary backer because I do not believe that in November Obama will be elected nor do I like the way he or his wife have behaved on the campaign trail. They are too sold on themselves, have made divisive statements, and Michelle can easily be described as having an attitude.
For example, her first answer on whether she would campaign for Hillary was “it depends on her tone.” Really! Obviously, she would need a muzzle as a first lady.

Posted by: two-cats | February 10, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

No those States the last few days is where Obama’s train ride ends, Hey Texas, we will be doing our thing on March 4th and so will Ohio, you cannot predict anything til we go to the poles, so please When it comes to Texas which happens to be Hillary’s neighboring State, I must say you may need to go back and follow the routine of what the neighboring States have been doing, No Here let me help you out, Nebraska, Neighbors Iowa and Iowa Neighbors Illinois…All I can say is Take notes, and As far as Louisiana is concerned it is Heavly African American Vote, Imean have we forgot about Katrina already..on the other hand Texas is balanced with all Races Hispanic/Black/White.. Cant speak for Ohio, but I can speak for Texas and after 45 yrs. BEING A LIFELONG RESIDENCE OF THIS STATE, Hillary is Clearly the Winner..

Posted by: whatever2 | February 10, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

Noreen: “Considering polls out there say most people would not vote for a woman for president no matter who it was is a sad telling sign.”
Noreen, that’s sad if true. I doubt it is – I think the public in general is ready for a woman president, if its a woman who runs as a candidate who happens to be female, rather than a female candidate.
But let’s assume those polls are true. As sad and unfair as that would be, it is all the more reason why the Democrats shouldn’t nominate a woman this year. Its an election, and the party should try to win it, rather than use it to make a social statement about gender equality.
Just my male two cents.

Posted by: Paul | February 10, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

80 million of the tax payers dollars to find Clinton had an indiscretion in the White House. I’m so proud you’re proud of that expenditure. By the way, over 50% of married couples have affairs. It seems common but not many people are spending millions to find out what you’re doing in your bedroom. And quite honestly, I’m thankful for that.

Posted by: Jeff | February 10, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

Even with his 5 victories in a row Mr. Obama has pulled ahead in pledged delegates by only 60 or so at last count. This is not actually a landslide. Now if these states he won were CA, NY, NJ etc , and he would be ahead by 500 or more I say let the coronation begin. Still plenty of time for Hillary to make a quick surge even if Obama wins all three Tuesday states, because they are small and Virginia will be an even split.
Let’s talk about delegates after Ohio,PA & Texas and once Florida and Michigan are seated. If Mr. OBama is close, then the Super Delegates will decide if he will receive the nomination. Let’s not Crown the media favorites King too prematurely. I still think Hillary will be the strongest to win the nomination at the end. Let’s just see how it plays out, shall we.

Posted by: Jordan Clinton | February 10, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

Paul, 12 months is not nearly long enough to get to know a candidate. Get real. I’ve been to Obama’s website many times and I see a lot of headlines, but not a lot of depth.
I sure would hate to be judged by MY husband’s actions, how about YOUR signifigant other??
There’s nothing tougher than a woman scorned!!

Posted by: jen4hil | February 10, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

An unqualified male before a qualified woman. Get used to it ladies. Men know that you won’t stand up for yourselves and be ostracuzed. Sexism is acceptable if you haven’t figured it out, but racism isn’t.

Posted by: Walt | February 10, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

I can’t get over Obama’s insane idea of allowing illegal immigrants to have U.S. driver’s licenses. That and his weak health care plan is the only thing that stands in the way of my vote for him rather than Clinton.

Posted by: Bill in Mission KS | February 10, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

Jordan – with that one, I agree with you. Obama has a lead in pledged delegates, but certainly not a decisive one at this point.
But as an Obama supporter, who has been watching his candidate of choice swim upstream for a year against an opponent once considered the “inevitable” nominee, I’m pretty happy having even a slim lead in pledged delegates a few states after Tsunami Tuesday.

Posted by: Paul | February 10, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

Are you kidding me! Now, you’re an expert on other countries. Actually, European countries can’t understand what all the fuss is about. The are more free in their views on sexuality. I just wanted to clear this up, since clearly you are misinformed, Mr. Wrong.

Posted by: Jeff | February 10, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

“That’s why other countries look down upon us as being a ‘lost cause’, because we’ve lost our moral fiber, haven’t we?”
HUH???? WHERE DID YOU HEAR THAT?

Posted by: Anonymous | February 10, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

I do not understand my fellow democrats who embrace a candidate who has not yet finished his first term as Senator and who has the least experience of all the candidates (Rep or Dem) and who is wholly unprepared for the job of the leader of the free world..it also makes me suspect the judgement of Obama himself. John Edwards understands the importance of a woman candidate and experience necessary for the job and I hope he will work with Hillary.

Posted by: Montana | February 10, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

I love that people like Diane are wanting to know where Hillary’s donations come from but yet doesn’t ask for the same about Obama. They just trust what he says when he says he gets his money from small donors. He was supposed to release his bundled donations sources weeks ago. I am still waiting.

Posted by: Noreen | February 10, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

True Paul: Mr. OBama has make great strides since a year ago, but you remember, Hillary Clinton is no push over. This is still not over by a longshot. My best guess if they are still very close after the next round of big states the DNC will meet with them and ask for a truce and will look more like a Clinton/Obama ticket for the good of the party and to insure a win. I am wondering if this is the scenario that might play out in the end?

Posted by: Jordan Clinton | February 10, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

I respect Edwards. I think he is much closer to Obama philisophically,and for him to back Clinton would be an ethical error. Obama shares his vision and methods.

Posted by: bookwerm | February 10, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

“I do not understand my fellow democrats who embrace a candidate who has not yet finished his first term as Senator and who has the least experience of all the candidates (Rep or Dem) and who is wholly unprepared for the job of the leader of the free world..it also makes me suspect the judgement of Obama himself.”
But he’s for change and he looks and sounds good!

Posted by: Ren | February 10, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

jen4hill – 12 months isn’t long enough to get to know a candidate? Hmmm, not sure I’m with you on that one. What timeframe would you prescribe? Thirty-five years?
As for being judged by a spouses actions, I’m not sure where you are coming from with that one. Is it a comment on how Bill might be hurting Hillary on the trail? If so, didn’t see that coming in this conversation, but people have to decide for themselves what all they like and dislike about all candidate, and one of the things that’s a little unsettling for some is the idea of having a former president back in the White House, when he seemingly might not feel the need to control his rhetoric.
Its an odd situation. We’ve never have a former president so involved in a campaign. We’ve had sitting presidents advocate for their party’s candidates, and even attend a few campaign rallies and fundraisers – during the general election. But never someone so constantly on the stump, especially not in a party intramural race.
People are comfortable with former presidents as statesmen, above the shallowness of partisan politics (at least in appearance). Now, obviously no one was expecting Bill to not be for his wife, but seeing a former president take such a prominent role in a nominating race is different. And ‘different’ stresses some people’s comfort levels.

Posted by: Paul | February 10, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

No one here is whining about any of Hillary’s loses. I even congratulate him, but you’re naive and quite the fool if you think Mr. Obama has a cakewalk from here on in…
Lot’s of peoples votes have not been heard. Momentum is a funny thing. It comes and goes.

Posted by: Jordan Clinton | February 10, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

Let’s talk about the drug-card for a second. Obama admits in his book, that he has done marijuana, cocaine, and didn’t do heroine only because he “didn’t like the pusher.” I don’t know how this isn’t important in this campaign. To me it shows about his judgement and his character. I was a military officer and had to get a “Secret” security clearance. If I had done, as a youth, what Obama admits to, I would have been denied that clearance. But Obama will get information that requires much more than a “Secret” clearance, and his past indiscretions don’t matter. No one will make a point of this because they will be called a racist by Obama and his supporters. I think trying marijuana is one thing, but going beyond that is way beyond what I want for a President!

Posted by: Mike | February 10, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

if Hillary won these last 5 states and was ahead by 60 delegates or so, you would not say she had momentum, you would say she just got lucky and Obama is nipping at her heels, which would also be a more true representation.

Posted by: Jordan Clinton | February 10, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

if Obama is just another dirty politian.. THEN THEY ALL ARE A BUNCH OF DIRTY POLITITIANS.. DON’T BE SO CRITICAL OF ONE AS IF THEY ALL ARE NOT IN IT THE SAME WAY .. MCAIN, HILLARY, OBAMA, PAUL, AND HUCKABEE.. SO I GUESS THE QUESTION IS WHICH DIRT ARE YOU WILLING TO EAT.

Posted by: tai | February 10, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

Rob, you must be a younger American. Indiscretions and immoral deeds have been going on in the White House since the 1800′s with business as usual..lol
Have you ever heard of John F. Kennedy and Marilyn Monroe. Get real now, denying Hillary the White House because of her husbands actions is outrageous. Plus I am pretty sure Bill Clinton has learned his lesson.

Posted by: Jordan Clinton | February 10, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

Tai-
I’m willing to eat the dirt of the candidate whose past has been looked into, has a record to stand on, and ideas on how to bring about that change, and that is not Obama!

Posted by: Mike | February 10, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

Mike – that’s not true, about being denied a clearance based on past drug use. I’m a retired officer myself, so know a thing about the military. You can waive previous use, so long as you disclose it, and still receive your commission, and thus the almost de facto secret clearance.
In an odd twist, as a father with an ADHD son, I’ve learned that if he were to go on prescription amphetimines for ADHD, he would then be ineligible for military service. Several recreational uses can be waived, but regular prescription use can’t, at least under current guidelines.
Fortunately in my son’s case, he’s a handful but not to the point of us seeing a need for medication.

Posted by: Paul | February 10, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

Bill Clinton wasn’t the first man to commit an immoral act in the White House. Just the first one who had to deal with people willing to spend $80 million dollars to reveal it. That’s the funny thing about the Rove machine. But your guy Obama will find out soon enough.

Posted by: Jeff | February 10, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

I beg to differ Paul. With an admitted regular use of marijuana and cocaine a person would not get that clearance, let alone a “Presidential” clearance. In my career I saw it happen, maybe you didn’t.

Posted by: Mike | February 10, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

.
What Bill Clinton did in 10 years ago doesn’t really concern me since HE’S NOT THE ONE RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT. But by Hillery’s grace, she forgave him. Which speaks volumes on her character. Anyhow it doesn’t mean squat since it’s nobody’s personal business but the Clintons.

Posted by: Bill in Mission KS | February 10, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

Again, just for you Clinton supporters: Let’s make one thing perfectly clear here…..who has the MOMENTUM?? Well, it sure isn’t Hillary!! And, Obama’s momentum will carry him to the Dem nomination….just keep your eyes on the prize, that’s what Obama is doing!
_________________________________________
Rob, your above quote will be Mr. Obama’s downfall. He treats the White House as if it were a prize. He has a fixation with becoming POTUS, he always has.
Hillary is running because she loves the people of this country and feels it is her duty to help us in any way she can. Hillary has all the power and money she will ever need. I believe she is running to fight for a better future for all of us. I am not yet clear about Obama’s intentions for this Prize or Trophy called The White House.

Posted by: Jordan Clinton | February 10, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

I can’t believe people are falling for the ‘experience’ Clinton has, what experience ? it is nothing but artificial, a fluff and a bluff, she is weak, she is deceptive and will do whatever to get into power, even it means to cry, she is an evil woman.
Obama is a smart man, he has the experience, thats what it matters, even if he didn’t, he is a sharp guy, smart people always have smartter people around them and thats what obama will do, but clinton, she’ll be like i know it all don’t need ur advice, Obama might not be able to fix the gut renching damage done by the stupid bush who made more enemies faster then he can kill them, hopefully Obama will start the healing, but he will face many many tough decesion, and i hate to see the guy have to pick up the junk by this mron bush.

Posted by: Jonathan Fieldman | February 10, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

I guess it not too much of a secret if everyone knows that Hillary visited Edwards. Now when Obama visits Edwards, will it be secretly?

Posted by: Waggdogg | February 10, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

It took a Clinton to clean/steal the furniture after Bush the first time. Who knows what she is planning to steal this time. Dont ever send Hillary back to the Whitehouse.

Posted by: Mandy | February 10, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

Jonathon-
Do you know Mrs. Clinton personally to make a judgment call that she is an “evil woman” or are you just believing the right-wing and Obama propaganda?

Posted by: Mike | February 10, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

Obama can’t answer a simple question and that’s the problem. Jimmy Carter was nice and he got eaten alive. Obama’s big brother Ted Kennedy won’t let anyone challenge Obama on anything and the media has given him a free pass. If he wins the nomination, you are going to see more dirt than ever. It won’t be the spitballs the Clinton’s are barely allowed to throw, it will be real bullets. They will bring up his cocaine use, his religion, his associations, his background, his stance on the war. My goodness, they have a war veteran against the equivalent of a 60′s hippie. Who do you thinks going to win that one? Peace, love, and prosperity brother.

Posted by: Beth | February 10, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

Great post Juli An

Posted by: Mike | February 10, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

Edwards will not side with a Clinton. They are exact oppisites and he knows she is nothing but a Republican in Democrats clothing.
The ideal match up would be a “OBAMA/EDWARDS TICKET”………There would be no stopping them and that is probably what has The witch worried. Hillary probably wanted to make sure if he was or was not thinking about being Obama’s VP. If he was, she is smart enough to know there is no further use in her wasting her money on this election.

Posted by: Dave Peck | February 10, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

What changes will Hillary bring to the US? In about 1957 Krushev of the Soviet Communist Party said to an American TV audience: “… I can prophesy that your grandchildren in America will live under socialism. Please do not be afraid of that…”
Hillary is a socialist and the changes that she will bring about will be to make Krushev’s words true. If that fact alone doesn’t scare you, nothing will.

Posted by: AJ | February 10, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

I had to laugh when I saw an Obama interview and he said that if people want his specific positions they could go to his website. I think that’s because he couldn’t remember what somebody wrote they were!

Posted by: Mike | February 10, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

I can’t believe the desperation of this woman. I also can’t believe SHE believes Edwards would really want to support her. She is sooooooounlike him. I’d love to know what ‘promises’ she’s made to him. I really do think Mr. Edwards’ philosophy lies more in line with Obama than Hillary.

Posted by: dream on | February 10, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

May 18, 2001 the General Accounting Office issued a three-page letter that said that it was unable confirm the damage largely to a lack of records from the White House. The letter also said that the condition of the White House offices was “…consistent with what we would expect to encounter when tenants vacate office space after an extended occupancy.” As to any details of damage, the GAO letter said For supporters of former President Clinton, that seemed to end the matter. They proclaimed victory, called the whole story an urban legend, and asked the White House to apologize.

Posted by: Beth | February 10, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

The perfect Dream Team:
Edwards/Clinton

Posted by: Ren | February 10, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

Hi Paul-
First of all, I appreciate your intelligent, non-confrontational response.
I certainly don’t believe we should vote based on gender OR race. But sadly it does exist. It’s not the way I vote, I vote on the issues after doing my homework. I watch C-Span for unbiased reporting and there have been many men who have called in who said they would never vote for a woman but would vote for Obama. I also know that there are still those who would never vote for a black man. I hope they are in the minority.
A friend of mine pointed to a Yahoo poll that revealed that more people were willing to vote for a Catholic or an African-American for president than for a woman. I haven’t had time to find that poll.
I don’t want this to become a contest between gender and race. It is more of a statement that this country may not be as enlightened when it comes to gender equality then we think. This primary season is starting to show that this may be true. I hope it isn’t.
I wish we had a media that engaged in unbiased, intelligent, in-depth reporting on this issue but I may be holding my breath for a long time.

Posted by: Noreen | February 10, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

Dave Peck write- “There would be no stopping them and that is probably what has The witch worried.”
Again Obama supporters hatred at it’s best. Go to any blog and see the same. They are quite the uniters aren’t they! I remember the Republicans used the same thing a few years ago by saying that if you weren’t for Bush, you were un-American. Deja-Vu!

Posted by: Mike | February 10, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

She was begging for his endorsement because her campaign is dying out with all this bad news. Obama is gonna run a Boston on her by Tuesday. Her only win could be Hawaii, maybe. By the time March 4th rolls around, there’ll be under 2,000 people at her rallies while Obama is packing in 25,000 with overflows of 6,000.
Edwards’ wife won’t let him endorse Hillary. Besides endorsing her would only prolong this messy election, and is wholly stupid considering her support is evaporating and Edwards doesn’t share her principles.
She needs to pull a ‘Romney’ and check out. That would make her much more likable and go a long way to destroy the negative image she has.

Posted by: dionysus | February 10, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

Obama supporters talk about him like he is the “Messiah”! Kind of scary isn’t it?
Some people drink the Kool-Aid all of the time!

Posted by: Mike | February 10, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

Edwards will endorse Obama.He’ll go with the guy because he is a guy and they will be guys together. I don’t think his guy advisors will let him see the path to really get done what he claims is his life’s passion. I like John and think he will make significant contributions regardless of his decision. His health plan was real close to Hillary’s and people need a great plan. Hillary could use the endorsement but I doubt his goal is to help her, although that’s the real change I keep looking for. Hillary will eventually win.. it all.

Posted by: AmazonTraveler | February 10, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

Jordan – you guys have really been looking for his baptism? Lol, wow, that’s some oppo research.
Personally, I don’t think you should have stopped with his kindergarten records. I’ll bet there’s a few skeletons in his pre-school years.

Posted by: Paul | February 10, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

With Bush’s screw up America is faced with real problem with our Economy, Healthcare, national and international security and Image around the world.
To fix all those concerns, I firmly believe that we need a President who possessed competent experience and qualities. While Sen. Obama maybe charismatic and charming, this asset will not bring back America to prosperity. Sen. Clinton is proven, she will not weather in time of rough times, she handle and find right solution over all trials and problems. I pray that we all can unite and support Sen. Clinton to become our next President and the 1st woman president of the free world, USA.

Posted by: Joy | February 10, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

Sam I just had to respond to what you said about the Black vote. Please be clear about something. It’s not just Black people voting for Obama. I live in Minnesota. Do you know how many Blacks there are up here? Very few! Obama won this state. North Dakota. Do you know how many Blacks there are in North Dakota? Like 2 ok! Idaho. Maine. These aren’t “Black Strongholds”! People like you can keep talking about the fact that a large number of Blacks voted for Obama or you can look at the fact that a large number of Blacks AND a large number of Whites voted for him. Race isn’t the issue – change and a desire to see the US go in a more positive direction is the issue. Also, please think about this. There are some White people who are not going to vote for Obama because he is Black. Just like there are some Blacks who are going to vote for him because he is Black. But who cares? This is the first time in history that the United States has had a viable Black candidate (please don’t bring up Jesse Jackson – I said VIABLE candidate). People like him because they feel that he is not polluted by the political machine. They feel that he is fresh and energetic. That is why Obama captures the votes of Whites, Blacks and others. Sam please don’t try to make this a Black and White issue (pun intended)!

Posted by: Kela | February 10, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

Actually Paul, not me personally..lol
But it does bring up a good point, as an Adult Christian myself, we are supposed to be baptised in water. There is no record of this at his Unity Church in Chicago, just going up for a alter call and saying you believe is not enough. In the Christian world, you must be baptized by water, and so far no records of this have been found in Mr. Obama’s adult life. Am I reading too much into this..maybe, but it is food for thought.

Posted by: Jordan Clinton | February 10, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

Just saw the Maine Delegates. Mr.Obama 15 Mrs. Clinton 11
Wow…that 4 delegate win is a huge momentum builder.
All kidding aside. I respect Mr. Obama and I think he would make an excellent Vice-President. He could learn all aspects of the Washington system and still be a great visionary and future president.
He needs to bow out and allow Mrs Clinton to lead the way right now, and along with her, they can win the nomination in the general and we can claim back our country and strive toward a brighter future.

Posted by: Jordan Clinton | February 10, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

You Clinton supporters are so full of Hate! I wonder WHY?? LOL LOL

Posted by: Tired of the Bickering | February 10, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

I admire and respect John Edwards and have supported him in the past. I would lose a lot of respect for him if he sells out to Clinton.

Posted by: mel coladonato | February 10, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

Not for me, Jordan, it isn’t food for thought. The idea of a candidate proving his Christian beliefs by supplying a baptismal certificate seems a little odd, and calling for it a little unseemly.
Maybe its just me, but I’m more than willing not to delve into such things. Bush says he was born again. Okay, fine, but lets not dwell on it. Romney says he’s not for polygamy – again, let’s not drag a secular political race through a religious history of his church. For that matter, I’ve heard that one of the chapters from Clinton’s book, It Takes a Village, includes Scientology theories on child cognitive development. I don’t care.
I haul myself off to Mass every Sunday (or Saturday night – another Catholic benefit). But I don’t see a need to bring faith into a political race for head of the executive branch.

Posted by: Paul | February 10, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

Kela-
You asked so here goes:
“Some pundits claim she has “little” experience. This is simply nonfactual, so I decided to list some of her many accomplishments in her life.
* Her first cause was children, fighting abuse, and chairing the Children’s Defense Fund.
* She began her career as a lawyer after graduating from Yale Law School in 1973.
* following her career as a Congressional legal counsel; she was named the first female partner at Rose Law Firm in 1979 and was listed as one of the one hundred most influential lawyers in America in 1988 and 1991.
* During 1974 she was a member of the Nixon impeachment inquiry staff in Washington D.C., advising the House Committee on the Judiciary during the Watergate scandal. She helped research procedures of impeachment and the historical grounds and standards for impeachment.
* Hillary co-founded the Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families, a state-level alliance with the Children’s Defense Fund, in 1977.
* In late 1977, President Jimmy Carter appointed her to the board of directors of the Legal Services Corporation.
* She was the First Lady of Arkansas from 1979 to 1981 and 1983 to 1992, and was active in a number of organizations concerned with the welfare of children, and was on the board of Wal-Mart and several other corporate boards.
* Bill Clinton appointed her chair of the Rural Health Advisory Committee where she successfully obtained federal funds to expand medical facilities in Arkansas’ poorest areas without affecting doctors’ fees.
* One of the most important initiatives of the entire Clinton governorship, she fought a prolonged but ultimately successful battle against the Arkansas Education Association to put mandatory teacher testing as well as state standards for curriculum and classroom size in place.
* She introduced Arkansas’ Home Instruction Program for Preschool Youth in 1985, a program that helps parents work with their children in preschool preparedness and literacy.
* As First Lady of the United States she took a very prominent role in public policy.
* She was the initial first lady to hold a post-graduate degree and to have her own professional career up to the time of entering the White House. She was also the initial first lady to take up an office in the West Wing of the White House.
* She fought hard for Universal Health Care as First Lady, although it wasn’t successful, it’s something she learned from.
* She visited over 80 countries as First Lady giving important speeches, about such controversial topics as human rights/women’s rights in China.
* Her major initiative, the Clinton Health Care Plan, failed to gain approval by the Congress in 1994, but in 1997 she helped establish the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) and the Adoption and Safe Families Act.

Posted by: Elliot | February 10, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

Jordan – for some reason I’m not sure if Obama is going to take your call to drop out too seriously, especially seeing how he is leading at the moment in pledged delegates (and only behind by a handful when factoring in super delegates).

Posted by: Paul | February 10, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

Kela here is the rest of the post:
* As a Senator and after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, Hillary worked with her colleagues to secure the funds New York needed to recover and rebuild.
* She fought to provide compensation to the families of the victims, grants for hard-hit small businesses, and health care for front line workers at Ground Zero.
* She is the first New Yorker ever to serve on the Senate Armed Services Committee.
* She has visited troops in Iraq and Afghanistan and in countless other locations, truly understanding the challenges facing our troops.
* Hillary passed legislation to track the health status of our troops so that conditions like Gulf War Syndrome would no longer be misdiagnosed.
* She is an original sponsor of legislation that expanded health benefits to members of the National Guard and Reserves and has been a strong critic of the Administration’s handling of Iraq.
* She has introduced legislation to tie Congressional salary increases to an increase in the minimum wage.
* She has supported a variety of middle-class tax cuts, including marriage penalty relief, property tax relief, and reduction in the Alternative Minimum Tax, and supports fiscally responsible pay-as-you-go budget rules.
* She helped pass legislation that encouraged investment to create jobs in struggling communities through the Renewal Communities program.
* She authored legislation that has been enacted to improve quality and lower the cost of prescription drugs and to protect our food supply from bioterrorism.
* She sponsored legislation to increase America’s commitment to fighting the global HIV/AIDS crisis.
* She has lead the fight for the expanded use of information technology in the health care system to decrease administrative costs, lower premiums, and reduce medical errors.
* Clinton has successfully worked to ensure the safety of prescription drugs for children, with legislation now included in the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act.
* She has also proposed expanding access to child care.
* She has passed legislation that will bring more qualified teachers into classrooms and more outstanding principals to lead our schools.
* Hillary is one of the original cosponsors of the Prevention First Act to increase access to family planning.
* She fought with the Bush Administration and ensured that Plan B, an emergency contraceptive, will be available to millions of American women and will reduce the need for abortions.
* She introduced the Count Every Vote Act of 2005 to ensure better protection of votes and to ensure that every vote is counted.
When Senator Clinton said she has been fighting for causes important to her for 35 yrs, she is VERY accurate. Her accomplishments are staggering. Those who are questioning her accomplishments, and the things she has fought for, should take a little history lesson.

Posted by: Elliot | February 10, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

it’s only food for thought if your brain is starving

Posted by: daro | February 10, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

What is there to be so delicate for Sen. Obama not being open about his life story from childhood including his environment with his parents or guardian? I never heard Sen Obama mention at any of his speeches mention how he was growing up. Whereas, Sen. Edwards takes pride of his younger years as a son of a mill worker. America deserve to know the background of the person aspiring to become the nation’s next president. Hillary, McCain, Romney all of them were center of talk scrutinized of their life story on family, finance, association and religion. Why should Sen. Obama be exempted from telling America who exactly is he as a person? America must demand from Sen. Obama to tell America where is he from before coming to Illinois, how did he come from being?

Posted by: Brmanassaspark | February 10, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

Hey Jordan,
Right now she has only slim chances of getting in. Watch what is going to happen when she will go and steal the super delegates and claim to be a winner – not an elected winner by the masses. At best, she will try to compromise with Obama in promising some position in her administration. There should be blood after this, bring in the baricades and crowds to the streets of Washington. I bet Hillary will hide behind the “constitution” after this and hide behind the national guard and call in the TANKS as during the Prague Spring. ELECTED BY THE PEOPLE is THE TRUE LEADER not by the FEW GOVERNMENT INSIDERS !

Posted by: Jimydean | February 10, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

ummm rob, then by that standard, obama has said all he has to say, and has proven hes a christian! anyway, i have read scripture, and i know that the teachings of jesus are profound and widespread because they are right, not because he said them! if the reason you beleive them is because jesus said them, then they themselves could not mean anything, so why would anyone care who jesus was? in short, THE NAME OF THE THING IS NOT THE THING. and the thing that flew over your head was not an angel! PEACE OBAMA 08!

Posted by: daro | February 10, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

Whoa Jimmydean, slow down buddy..lol
You are a little too militant for my tastes.
Paul and all the others shocked that I would dare call for Mr. OBama to stop down for the good of the party. I was speaking after all the primaries and caucuses are done and they are still in a statistical tie. Sorry for not explaining myself. Should I just walk to the gallows or be beheaded right on the spot…
The fanaticism of many of Obama’s followers truly frightens and concerns me. So , what you are saying if Hillary is elected by the Super Delegates, there will be blood in our American streets? Will it really go that far?

Posted by: Jordan Clinton | February 10, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

Did she visit him for an endorsement or for the delegates he accumulated?

Posted by: jon sid | February 10, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

The best thing Obama and Edwards could do for this country would be to ignore Hillary.

Posted by: Patriot2008 | February 10, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

ddd, real christians leave judgement to god, and see everyone as brothers and sisters. guess what? god made homos to test you! and you flunk, because like most “christians”, you have created God in your own image

Posted by: daro | February 10, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

Hillary’s most recent actions are some of the best examples of exactly why she should not be president!

Posted by: seaman | February 10, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

“We all thought she was dead in the water”-April 2008 BHO Campaign
Hillary may be down, but certainly not out.

Posted by: Jordan Clinton | February 10, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

Hillary has used Solis Doyle to secure the Latino votes. Now she has Maggie to secure the black votes. What a user and a loser.

Posted by: infiniti2 | February 10, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

Sorry Rob, I don’t buy into your rhetoric. Those stale old lines have been used since the 80′s against the Clinton’s.
Mrs. Clinton is a dedicated public servant and a brilliant politician. You show me one politician who doesn’t have dirt on his hands. There are none.
Oh and your so called MOMENTUM? 15 delegates to Mr. Obama 11 to Mrs. Clinton in Maine.
He won 5 states with a total net gain of 62 delegates. I call that SLOWMENTUM…lol
One thing is for sure, lot’s more politics yet to come.

Posted by: Jordan Clinton | February 10, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

Was Hillary begging for the delegates Edwards won?

Posted by: jon sid | February 10, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

The only thing genuine about Hillary is her phoniness.

Posted by: VasNichols | February 10, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

As one of many millions of Americans that live from paycheck to paycheck, I hope Mr. Edwards supports Senator Clinton as the presidential candidate. Based on the results from past primaries, Senator Clinton’s message has been the credo for many blue collar workers as well as hispanics. Senator Obama on the other hand, has been always trying to identify himself with the intellectual and wealthy voter.
At the end is not about how many celebrity endorsements a candidate gets or how many star-like qualities this candidate has. It’s about us, the American people that struggle from paycheck to paycheck and how they can help us get out of the whole.
Although I voted for George Bush in the past election, this year my vote goes to Senator Clinton.

Posted by: Anthony | February 10, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

I am not familiar with the behind the scenes favors, grudges,slights, etc., that I am sure have transpired among these three candidates, but I do know that a lot of Edward’s supporters will be very disappointed if he does not endorse Barack Obama. He will seem very self-serving.

Posted by: saraz | February 10, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

brian says BRO-bama is SATAN! wow. the voice of blind racist rage has spoken! brian you write very well for an 8 year old, keep practicing bro!

Posted by: daro | February 10, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

Edwards endorsing Clinton would be a wise move for him. Clinton/Edwards has a nice ring to it.

Posted by: Dave | February 10, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

Edwards endorsing Clinton would be a wise move for him. Clinton/Edwards has a nice ring to it.

Posted by: Dave | February 10, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

If Obama gets the nomination, he’ll have gotten it through doing nothing that politicians do!! He’s been carried by the partial media!!!!! Hillary will be alright, but we shouldn’t be alright with this kind of Media domination!!! Obama has earned nothing!!!!!

Posted by: Stfluttr | February 10, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

Obama was always expected to win between Feb. 4 and Mar. 5, but the media also campaigns for him – through unjustifiable tactics like not mentioning the truth about Hillary’s strengths, but only about Obama’s. If Hillary is so non-trust worthy, why do they have to conceal truths about her, in order to act against her? The media is doing much of the work for Obama; he must be sitting there wondering when their unprecedented support for him will end. But meanwhile, he would have won the democratic nomination not due to doing what politicians do!! Look at it. Nearly three elections in a row, of unjust behavior by the powers of this country. Obama deserves nothing. If he still wins the democratic nomination, those of us who weren’t for him should refuse him.

Posted by: Stfluttr | February 10, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

Obama’s successes, including winning Maine, aren’t merely about his bringing people together. The media has played a great part in his successes by making him look better than Hillary, by never scrutinizing him; as if he’s just perfect so there is nothing to scrutinize in him. Obama has earned nothing!!!

Posted by: Stfluttr | February 10, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

Hillary is also for change, but we don’t hear this simple truth most of the time. Instead we only hear this of Obama plus other praises for him. The Media is just using Obama to an end, just as Obama used Hillary to get into the senate in 2004. As for Hillary, the media is playing out of bounds, because you may distrust somebody but you don’t have to be flat out unfair.

Posted by: Stfluttr | February 10, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

ddd edwasss
If CLINTON gets the nomination, she’ll have gotten it through doing nothing that politicians do!! He’s been carried by the partial media!!!!! OBAMA will be alright, but we shouldn’t be alright with this kind of Media domination!!! CLINTON has earned nothing!!!!!
HA HA HA

Posted by: Jimydean | February 10, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

Stfluttr count me in. If Senator Clinton doesn’t win the Democratic nomination, I won’t be wasting my vote. I rather stay home.
The whole media and hollywood bias toward Obama is ridiculous.. first Oprah and now a Grammy winner.. this Obama guy is just as fake as the Obama girl on that cheesy video who not even voted for him.

Posted by: Anthony | February 10, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

Obama’s successes, including winning Maine, aren’t merely about his bringing people together. The media has played a great part in his successes by making him look better than Hillary, by never scrutinizing him; as if he’s just perfect so there is nothing to scrutinize in him. Obama has earned nothing!!!

Posted by: Stfluttr | February 10, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

I don’t see Edwards endorsing Billary Clinton. It would be contrary to everything he stands for.

Posted by: bob | February 10, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

Its already a given that many of us who support Clinton will vote mc cain if Obama wins. We feel that he is an empty suit and the media has propped him up.
Its already a given that Obama supporters will support John Mc Cain if Hillary wins, because she is everything they hate for some reason.
So, if the democratic party hopes to win the nomination , I STRONGLY suggest they are both on the ticket. Regardless who is prez and vice prez.
Obama seems to think he doesnt need her to win. Oh yes he does.

Posted by: tom | February 10, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Yeah.
AND THE LOS ANGELS TIMES ‘ENDORSED’ OBAMA , AS WELL AS OPRAH AND GEORGE CLOONEY AMONGST OTHER.
SEE HOW WELL HE DID IN CALIFORNIA?

Posted by: tom | February 10, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

Tom, don’t forget Teddy Kennedy, Caroline, John Kerry, & Maria Shriver.. they also endorsed him and he lost not only California but also in Teddy’s home state.

Posted by: Anthony | February 10, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

yeah hillary was ahead before we had any…ummm…elections, yeah that’s the word

Posted by: daro | February 10, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

It has been a fun tonight but let’s face it.. whether it’s Hillary or Barack Hussein, the presidential nomination will be negotiated at closed-doors sometime before the Convention since neither one will possible make it to the 2,025 delegates needed. So no matter how much we fight here or how many jokes we crack at each other, at the end is out of our hands.

Posted by: Anthony | February 10, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

People seem to forget real fast how the night Edwards called Clinton and Obama to inform them of his intention to quit, who was the ONE candidate to ask for Edwards support, wasn’t the name Obama?
Edwards isn’t going to suport Obama, if he was going to, he already would have! Problem is Edwards distain for Obama care when it was revealed about the “present” votes! Edwwards would also be a fool to climb in behind someone who has Kerry and Kennedy’s backing since Edwards is dead set against them!
Edwards also isn’t stupid, he knows Clinton takes in Lobby money, but it is up front and not concealed behind bundlers like Obama’s is!
Let’s not forget, Edwards wants Universal Health care, Obama doesn’t! Edwards spoke of the woman in Kansas who couldn’t afford heat story he continually spoke of, which candidate has had his entire political career supported by a slumlord who wouldn’t provide heat to his slum tenants?
Edwards has integrity and won’t deface that woman by supporting Obama because his doing so throws out all his core values

Posted by: me | February 11, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

Tony,
This is too long, not interesting and not funny. It would have been different if Barack himself was caught in the act.
Otherwise, it is not an issue.

Posted by: Jimydean | February 11, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

Hello there me!
You are absolutely right. And by the way, some of Edward’s former campaign aids have already been spotted in Clinton’s campaign. Some of them were part of Bill’s campaign back in the days and seems the have returned to their nest.

Posted by: Anthony | February 11, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Edwards will endorse Hillary within the next 2 weeks. He may very well be VP.

Posted by: C DEPP | February 11, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Obama´s absolute value: unity.
In the words of Karl Marx, the abolition of “divisions”?
Economic unity? Social unity? Abolition of economic divisions?
This sounds very familiar.

Posted by: Fernando | February 11, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

For all those Clinton haters- Gallup poll today has Clinton 48%, Obama 43%.
M
O
M
E
N
T
U
M

Posted by: Mike | February 11, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

o and fernando dont confuse “unity” which is good, with “uniformity”, which is what conservatives want, which is bad. keep reading. OBAMA 08! UNITY NOT UNIFORMITY! keep it real blogga

Posted by: daro | February 11, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

Hilary plans to force 15 million Americans to get health insurance. The reason millions of Americans don’t have health insurance is because they can’t afford it.
We should have free government health insurance for all Americans, and private health insurance should be outlawed.

Posted by: John | February 11, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am

Seven years of a freshman Bush in the WH is enough! I do not really like all she says, but I have no choice.

Posted by: Andy | February 11, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am

Edwards isn’t going to suport Obama, if he was going to, he already would have! Problem is Edwards distain for Obama care when it was revealed about the “present” votes! Edwards would also be a fool to climb in behind someone who has Kerry and Kennedy’s backing.
We all know Obama has been using Big Pharma tactics to swiftboat Universal Health Care. He is the Democratic candidate that offers the worse chance to beat republican. Sen. Clinton has exerienced the republicans’s attacks in the past, she will be the best choice.

Posted by: Mary | February 11, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am

If Edwards endorses Obama he will be a real disapointment to me. Obama represents everything he stands against. He takes money from lobbyists, He is status quo, he is so engulfed in the Washington ways that Edwards spoke out against. I do hope he endorses Hillary, and I would love to see Al Gore endorse Hillary as well- but dream I may.

Posted by: John | February 11, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am

EXPERIENCE DOES COUNT. If Obama becomes the nominee, McCain will clean house. The only one still standing is Hillary. If all you soundbiters out there were really thinking, she has the experience, the intelligence, the wisdom, and the toughness to be a very good president. Why do some of you hate her so?
Geo

Posted by: georgia | February 11, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am

WE THE AMERICANS HEVE TO WATCH CAREFULLY TO BARACK OBAMA.
HE IS GEETING TO FAST MONEY AND VOTES..
ARE OUTSIDERS OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY HELPING OBAMA..?
MAY BE HILLARY IS HAVING TO A MEETING WITH EDWARDS TO INVESTIGATE IN DEEP THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY?

Posted by: J.C.T. | February 11, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am

This is a no-brainer. Louisiana’s 9th ward has already decided on Obama.
Over the course of a month we have learned that Hillary cannot manage her staff, her campaign budget, or her husband.

Posted by: Murry | February 11, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am

The only way to have Health Care for All is to have (1)Preventive Healthcare,(2) Reduced or no cost Prescription Drugs,(3)Long Term Care and after surgergy care like Physical Therpy Care. (4) Any Major Surgery must be but in an Insurance Pool with the cost cover plan of 75/25 patient expense… Preventive Care, Prescrpiton Drugs and Long Term Care are needed to off set cost to the what is left of the Middle Class Amercian People. SORRY Hillary, just can’t cover every U.S Citizen. Texas can afford all those who come across the Border for Free Health Care, Education and Food Stamps. They dont pay enough in Taxes… Drop the coverage and freebies and we may be able to do it. Universial Health Care will not happen. Unless Congress gets the same plan as we do. NOT!

Posted by: buddhabear | February 11, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am

Jimmydean:
I’d be more worried about Obama pushing the wrong button..
oops, I made a mistake, sorry Russia, Oh well, we need to wipe off the face of the earth a billion or so white folks anyway (Obama chuckles) So, what’s next on my to do list today…….

Posted by: Jordan Clinton | February 11, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am

do i hear somebody talking about race or experience? pls, we need somebody who can geniuely bring america back to its leading role globally, somebody who is not ready for business as usual. America is role model to the world and so it should be. america is the only countr7y in the modern world that appreciates all races. Experiece matters but we must remember that hilllary too can ‘t do it all alone. A tree can’t make a forest, so if obama gets there with little experince, with exprienced people like hillary and others, he can make wonders. Besides, to our Almighty God,experiece doesn’t transform in to fortune. God made King Solomon wiser with better knowledge of administration than his father David. Remember, In GOd we trust. So, Obama is our man for now, peoples man is God’man. Americans are looking for changes, clintons have been in it for years, nothing really happens, we really need A CHANGE.

Posted by: omotolola dennis | February 11, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am

slowmentom? LOL, He may have sweeped all 5 states this weekend, by huge 20 to 30 point margins, and you call it slowmentium, or whatever, because of his net gain of delegates… but thats the nature of the delegates being distributed, not the nature of his huge wins, don’t you think? What word would you to describe a close race? Since you recognize a blowout only as ‘slowmenthalom’, I guess an actual close race would have to have a new cute word, maybe super-micro-nano-momentus?

Posted by: Rob | February 11, 2008, 2:33 am 2:33 am

Exactly Rob.. SLOWMENTUM..
He won 5 states in a row by a huge 20-30 point margin and what was the prize??? About 60 delegates for everything. You think he would have jumped out way ahead, but in the small states, that is just not possible. If he wins all 3 states on Tuesday, he will still only jump ahead by another 20-30 delegates, so there is still a lot of votes and delegates to be doled out. Let’s just see what happens in Ohio, PA & Texas before we declare Hillary dead.

Posted by: Jordan Clinton | February 11, 2008, 2:38 am 2:38 am

She must be desperate, visiting Edwards and firing her campaign manager. If Patty Solis could write a book about the campagne and all she know about the Clintons, it would be a best seller. Please do it, America needs to know the truth!

Posted by: carmen | February 11, 2008, 3:51 am 3:51 am

With all due respect Marie. Islam as we have experience it in the USA is not know for it’s calming effect in troubled waters. I hope for everyone’s sake Mr. Obama is as pure and decent as you claim, for if he becomes subversive in any way, million of US citizens will suffer.
I have too many doubts and fears and most of all a gnawing uncertainty to be able to feel comfortable and secure with him as our President right now. I am sure there are many of us who feel this way. I know and trust Mrs. Clinton, and I would be happy to have both of them in the White House instead of a Republican.

Posted by: Jordan Clinton | February 11, 2008, 3:57 am 3:57 am

Hillary has used Solis Doyle to secure any body. Now she has Maggie to secure any body else. What a user and a loser.

Posted by: Paul | February 11, 2008, 5:03 am 5:03 am

To all Obama supporters trashing Hillary and all Hillary supporters trashing Obama: Please keep in mind our candidates are of the same party, with many very similar policies and plans for the American people. After the primaries are over, we will need to unite. And to those who say they would rather vote for McCain than thier candidate’s rival, keep in mind that McCain doesn’t care if he keeps us in Iraq for ‘a hundred years’…. Listen to both Obama and Hillary on this one…A vote for either will be better than a vote for McCain.

Posted by: CCH | February 11, 2008, 5:16 am 5:16 am

More Hillary bashing, ABCnews.
Why is Hillary’s meeting “secret” – and Obama’s “next” ?
Why not let American’s choose without your bias? Or do YOU need the drama to draw an audience?

Posted by: hildegard | February 11, 2008, 6:38 am 6:38 am

Why do the same people who decried the inadequate FEMA response to Hurricane Katrina want the same government to “manage” healthcare? Do you expect a different result?
As for Edwards, he’s extending a wetted finger to the breeze in typical opportunistic fashion. It has nothing to do with values, he just can’t afford to endorse the loser. No cabinet postion in that, now, is there?

Posted by: We the Sheeple | February 11, 2008, 7:02 am 7:02 am

As a loyal Democrat of 48 years. I hope John Edwards will endose Senator Clinton. As a southerner and Southern Baptist I have realized less southerners will vote for Obama than Clinton. Many have told me. There is still alot of bias in the south. Any new voters that OBama is attracting will be off set with the loyal Democrats leaving on account of OBama. I am so sick of the media and certain people comparing OBama to Kennedy and Clinton. Clinton had ten years plus experience and Kennedy 12 years plus experience. ALl I hear OBama is We need changes. Give me Sepecifics.

Posted by: ROB | February 11, 2008, 8:30 am 8:30 am

I agree with you Rob.

Posted by: Mike | February 11, 2008, 8:44 am 8:44 am

..
Obama has no experience — 2004 got elected Senate and Delivered keynote address and that’s it
Yes he is fairy tale- If goes against McCain he going to loose for sure

Posted by: phil | February 11, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

phil – So you’re saying that there is no difference between Obama and Clinton?

Posted by: Publius | February 11, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

I have sent an email to John Edwards to let him know my feelings about who I hope he supports, here’s what I wrote.
“Dear John Edwards,
I know that you are to meet with Senator Hillary Clinton (my States’ Senator) and Senator Barack Obama in the next day or so.
I just want you to know that if you choose to support Senator Clinton I WILL NOT follow suit. I do admit that I voted for her twice as my State Senator. The first time I voted for her was with much joy and enthusiasm but the second time I held my nose, I mean what was the alternative besides her.
My problem with Hillary and why I swore not to vote for her for the Presidency was because of her support for “Bush’s war”. I was like Barack Obama and could see plainly that war with Iraq was wrong and I felt tremendious fustration that Senator Clinton didn’t take a stand against it.
Senator Obama speaks plainly and honestly regardless of what people think and I LOVE that! When Senator Obama speaks I feel he is truly saying what is in his heart unlike Hillary who sounds like she is reading from a card or something she has memorized.
I believe passionately that Senator Barack Obama will change our nations’ status in the world because Bush didn’t care, he did what he wanted and what drove him was mainly money for his personal advancement (and Cheney’s)
I apologize for making this so long I know you are a busy man, thank you for your time.
Warm regards,
Sandra”

Posted by: Sandra | February 11, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am

How soon we forget…..
Do you people not remember when Hillary was asked for papers from the Rose Law Firm?
Remember the reason that those papers were asked for?
Some reason she just couldn’t find them….?
Then her partner from the Rose Law Firm was found dead in a park as a result of Suiside? A man who had a lot going on for him commits suiside?
Come on…I do not believe this man committed suiside…
What about all those things she “took” from the white house and was told to return them?
and her husband,who in my opinion is a joke..like we need more disgrace at the white house..
You Hillary people better jog that memory and then ask yourself do I want someone to be my president when I already know how dishonest they are?
If we don’t get back to people that are honest,with integrity and charactor we will never be what we need to be.. this country is going to hell because of our lack of knowledge (or just don’t care) about who is running our country…

Posted by: Carla Vandergriff | February 11, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am

Hey Paul & others, Back up a little. I never said I though Obama was a Muslim. I said, I am hoping and praying he is being straight with the American Public and I don’t know enough about him to know if he is telling the truth or not. That being said, I still respect him and the democratic party and want what is best for the Dems to win the general election.

Posted by: Jordan Clinton | February 11, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

Barack Obama used dirty politics to smear John Edwards in Iowa, probably giving him his front-runner status.
Then he “borrowed” without credit both John’s actual language AND speaking style. Both are absolutely unforgiveable. Ethically, John is head and shoulders above the corporate front-runners. What a tragedy for our country that these egotists forced him out.

Posted by: helena | February 11, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

Jordan: What you actually said is: “I hope for everyone’s sake Mr. Obama is as pure and decent as you claim, for if he becomes subversive in any way, million of US citizens will suffer. I have too many doubts and fears and most of all a gnawing uncertainty to be able to feel comfortable and secure with him as our President right now.”
How can you advocate someone for the vice presidency when you have, as you say, too many doubts and fears about this person’s loyalty to the nation to feel comfortable with him as president?

Posted by: Paul | February 11, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

As a John Edwards supporter I cannot see how he could endorse Hillary Clinton. I agree with others who say that she would be perfectly happy slipping right into the same corporate owned system we have now. She has taken more money from corporate lobbyists than any candidate from either party so she has two choices. Either she is in their pocket like so many other politicians or she is the kind of person who will take from you for personal gain and then turn her back. Which is it?

Posted by: TSnow27604 | February 11, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am

Paul: As long as he become the Vice-President there are checks and balances in place, so I think he would do ok in the position. I don’t dislike Obama, but I have an uneasy feeling about him in the pit of my stomach. I don’t know why yet, but some might call it instinct or a gut feeling. I think he really needs a few more years of seasoning before I could begin to trust him fully. I guess simply put, it is the fear of the unknown. Everyone seems to follow Mr. Obama blindly and it gives him a cultish persona imho. I hope I am wrong.

Posted by: Jordan Clinton | February 11, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

This country needs change and I believe Hillary can do just that. Obama is a great speaker and can certainly rally people together but I just don’t think he has what is takes. Maybe he’ll be ready in 2012.

Posted by: S.Amaral-Sweeney | February 11, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

No Surprise Here!
Hillary Clinton makes Putin of Russia look like a pro-democracy freedom fighter in comparison!
She’s all about secret meetings,
unavailable tax returns, unavailable
First Lady papers, records from her former law firm that disappeared and re-appeared! It is a joke that she is
so close to being the Democrat Party nominee for president in 2008!

Posted by: reaganfan | February 11, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

One thing and one thing only. What happens when Obama’s style of speaking isn’t enough. Once the debates begin between Obama and the republicans. Goodbye Obama. This guy has no idea what he is getting into. They will eat him alive. The media has built him up and the media will eventually take him down.
Saying I am going into office and change everyting – what he talking about. He still has to deal with Congress, the senate and the house of reps, the lobbyists and the big Corps – but oh yes Obama will change everything. Goodbye United States. It was fun being the most powerful country.

Posted by: Frank- South Hampton | February 11, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

First, Hillary donated 5 mil. to her own campaign, why didnt she just give it? Second, Hillary’s own Campaign Manager steps down, that needs to be looked onto, sounds like her Campaign Manager could hold the info to send Obama straight to the White House! Third, A Top News Paper lady on the Matthews Show Sunday morn said, Hillary and McCain do alot of traveling around together!I allways said Hillary reminds me of a Republican.A Vote for Hillary would be like Voting for a Republican, and no wonder the Repubs. would rather run against hillary then Obama

Posted by: Listen Up | February 11, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

Hey Sandra – YOU BETTER GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT. OBAMA VOTED “PRESENT” ON THE WAR VOTE. HOW SAFE AND SLEAZY IS THAT. HE WRITES A LETTER DENOUNCING GOING TO WAR AFTER THAT. THIS GUY IS SUCH A PLAYER. HE SPEAKS VERY WELL WITHOUT SAYING A WORD. I DON’T KNOW WHAT OBAMA STANDS FOR. I FEAR FOR THIS COUNTRY IF THIS JOKE OF A PERSON GETS IN. I AM A DEMOCRAT. THE REPULICANS ARE CONVINING PEOPLE INTO VOTING FOR OBAMA BECAUSE THEY KNOW THEY CAN BEAT HIM DISGRACEFULLY. IF OBAMA IS NOMINEE – I AM VOTING FOR MCAIN .

Posted by: Wendy | February 11, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

Why is that people are so crazed in this election over Obama and Clinton. They both need a few more years under thier belt.
Obama – I just don’t get it. I guess the young people must have run out of cults to belong too. If we look at the votes this guy is winning the majority are blacks, young and the college kids. These are the people being pulled for the general election poll and that is why you are seeing Obama as the stronger candidate against McCain. I think if Obama is the nominee we are in serious, serious trouble. He will be ripped to shreds by the media and the repubs. Let see what happens with the land deal from Rezko. Things finally have a way of making it around.

Posted by: Trina NYC | February 11, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

Jordan – I’m not sure you are being completely truthful. Above you clearly said that you were uncomfortable with Obama because he might not be loyal to the United States.
When I pointed out that you had advocated him as a running mate for Clinton, you then said you weren’t comfortable with Obama because of his experience level.
Like I said above, it sure sounds like you just want Clinton to win, and are looking for anything to throw out there against Obama – doesn’t matter what, so long as it sticks.
And this from a Clinton campaign staffer. You did say you are one, right?

Posted by: Paul | February 11, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

I was hoping Edwards would be a vice president. He and Obama would make a great team and would balance each other very well. I would trust John to have the people’s interest at heart more than any other candidate. Obama is second. Hillary is down there with McCain, bottom feeders.

Posted by: Susan Crossen | February 11, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

Wendy, did you notice that Barack is beating Hillary in the polls among EDUCATED voters? Sorry it’s not just the “blacks, college kids, etc.” that you’re so dismissive of that are voting for him. Open your eyes!

Posted by: Jade | February 11, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Edwards, certainly will endorse Obama. Reasons:
1) They were like twins during their campaign debates, both defending each other when need be.
2) Both detest ‘Old Washington politics’
3) Both detest ‘Old washington players’
4) Both detest ‘Washington Lobbyists’
5) Both detested Hillary of changing positins during those campaign debates.
6) Both described their lives coming/growing up from poor/middle class backgrounds.
7) Both convey populist messages, with Edwards hammering more on it though.
8) Their victories in Iowa and from what Edwards said (about the process for him and Obama) stipulated a whole lot of things. Hillary’s visit, will unlikely change that Iowa moment of victory.

Posted by: vee | February 11, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

I hope that Edwards doesn’t endorse either candidate. I don’t believe in these endorsements. I think democratic leaders should stay out of the process and let the democratic rank and file make their own choices. To me endorsements are like those nasty polls. But as a supported of John Edwards in his run for President in 2004 and in 2008, if he does endorse any one I wouldhope that he would endorse Hillary Clinton and perhaps consider being her running mate. Obama lacks experience and can’t get the job done and is absolutely no competition for McCain.

Posted by: Cybermom75 | February 11, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

I hope and pray that Edwards will endorse Hillary. Hillary deserves the endorsement. She dedicated her whole career and life for public service.
There so much media hype about Barack Obama – calling it an Obama phenomenon, Obama movement. What exactly does it mean. Obama’s campaign is all about political slogan – “Change” “Yes we can”. I admire Obama’s public speaking skills but we deserve more than that. We need someone who can bring about real change. Let’s elect someone who is ready from day one.

Posted by: JQ | February 11, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

Besides, Obama/Edwards will be the best dream ticket for America anytime, anywhere.

Posted by: vee | February 11, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

As I work with a grass roots group in Connecticut for Obama I have met a lot of former Edwards supporters as he was not making headway and after he dropped out– seems that they feel more aligned with Obama in my state anyway.
I would think personally that his supporters would feel really disappointed, if he came out and endorsed Clinton at this point, especially with his PAC money message — it seems that Hillary would be the last person that would get Elizabeth’s or John’s vote for President.

Posted by: paulet | February 11, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

Can i just say, as a member of the Human Rights Campaign.. I don’t see using the money that i spend to support my cause as a bad thing.
Call it taking money from lobbyists if you want. But it’s also pledging to those people that you will DO what you SAY.
She didn’t take money from Nazi’s.. she took money from people who support her campaign and what she stands for. Just as Obama has.
Hollywood itself is the biggest lobbyist in California.. i know, i live here.

Posted by: Jay | February 11, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

No sense for either candidate to chase Edwards. Rather, they sould ride around in an ambulance and let him chase them.

Posted by: Chas | February 11, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

Wendy: YOU BETTER GET YOUR FACTS
STRAIGHT! OBAMA WASN’T IN THE U.S.
SENATE WHEN HILLARY CLINTON VOTED TO
AUTHORIZE PRESIDENT BUSH TO GO TO WAR
AGAINST SADDAM HUSSEIN IN IRAQ!
OBAMA VOICED HIS OPPOSITION TO THE WAR
WHILE IN THE ILLINOIS LEGISLATURE!

Posted by: reaganfan | February 11, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

I hope Obama picks Edwards as his running mate.Ideologically, they have a lot in common. Edwards is a white son of the South from a working class background with a populist message who has used his law degree to defend the working people and Obama came from a single parent household and used his Harvard Law degree to do inner city community activism, not to get wealthy in the corporate world. And it doesnt hurt that they are both young, vibrant and drop-dead Hollywood gorgeous with alot of Star Power going on. They would make an unbeatable team!!

Posted by: Obama/Edwards2008 | February 12, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am

I am tired of people criticizing Obama with statements such “he is all rhetoric” or Obama is “all talk and no substance”. If you are one of these individuals with this criticism of Obama tell me one thing have you taken the time to look for yourself (what any resonantly informed voter should do) to see what Obama has fought for and stood for through his 14 years in either the state or U.S. senate, as a professor of constitutional law at an IVY institution, as a community and church group organizer on the southside of Chicago, environmentalist, and a best selling author two books (before anyone even knew who he was) — first autobiographical book at age 33.
I would be happy to reveal the substance of Obama as so many individuals writing these posts obviously have not taken the time to see for themselves. The point is though that I shouldn’t have to if you really are an educated responsible voter. Unfortunately the truth to the matter is that most of the harsh critics of Obama haven’t even made the effort to educate themselves on what Obama’s history and where he stands on specific issues. Secondly lets be realistic in order to get things done in Washington you must have bipartisan support. with that in mind…..Obama is the solution to such an ailment as there is no other candidate in either party that can match him in intelligence and his history of gaining bipartisan support in legislature reform.

Posted by: Drew | February 12, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am

Do you really think if Obama was just a talker and all rhetoric he would have all these longtine washington politcians supporting him like Kennedy and Kerry. They both know the game of politics more than anyone of us therefore logic and reason would tell me that they would choose the canidate that is most likely to change and better washington politics. The fact is no other canidate has taken more money from Lobbyists than Clinton (dem or rep)

Posted by: Drew | February 12, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am

It’s striking to note how Clinton supporters get rather nasty in their responses and lacking obvious facts. It’s the sound of a desperation and that reflects the Clinton campaign’s situation and tone at the present so it’s to be understood.
I’m a 54 year old “white” woman so enough talk about Senator Obama’s supporters being young or cult driven or men but the intelligent, educated part though I’ll claim. *smile*

Posted by: Sandra | February 12, 2008, 7:53 am 7:53 am

I’m a 60 year old high tech software testing white male from North Carolina and I think Obama is awesome.

Posted by: Bill | February 12, 2008, 8:39 am 8:39 am

I am a post grad engineer. I was never a Hillary fan. I have educated myself on Obama. However, I like Obama much better on paper.
In person, on the other hand, I think he’s smug, arrogant, and chauvenistic. I can stomach him as long as I don’t have to hear him speak. I don’t need inspiration like so many other uninspired people. I just need someone to roll up their sleeves and get to work. Something I don’t think Obama cares much for.
I will not vote for Obama. Period.

Posted by: Sam | February 12, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am

If Hilary has nothing to hide, why she is hiding her Tax Returns?
Hilary is bumping to Obama about slum landlord Rezko, but she has taken $12,000.00 from Rezko. Remember fugutive Hu who gave millions to Hilary! There are many Rezkos on Hilary’s list!
C’mon! Give me a break!
Hilary, cry me a river!

Posted by: TonyRezko | February 12, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

I am a 45 year old post grad engineer. Never was a Hillary fan until I started watching Obama last year. I’ve done my research on him. Although, I do like him on paper, I do not like him in person.
To me, he is just another smug, arrogant, and chauvenistic Harvard grad. I don’t need inspiration, unlike so many other un-inspired people. I simply can’t stomach another one of his speeches.
Obama has not earned my vote. He needs to be a public servant for a long time before he earns it.

Posted by: Sam | February 12, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Obama is a fabulous speaker. Of course Hitler was a great speaker, Constantine was a great speaker, in fact we have had great speakers throughout history, many with an unfortunate outcome. We want our politicians to be honest with us, but we really don’t want to hear the truth. The truth won’t get them elected.
We all dream of the perfect life. The 5000sq ft house, but we also want the Prada Bag, the $500 iPhone. Now many can’t pay their mortgage, they spent it on luxuries. There was a day when we were happy with the 1500sq ft house with the white picket fence, we had no Prada, no pricey gadgets, but we had plenty of savings. Many of the “Hillary statistics” (older woman) still had their savings and now the young dreamers are losing their homes, they need to be bailed out. To bail out the spenders we have in the past just printed more money, which makes the elderly persons savings worthless.
None of us want War. Recently Chavez, has vowed to freeze oil exports to the US and wage a “100-year war” if Washington ever tried to invade his country. Venezuela only provides about 15 per cent of US oil imports. But what if it were more, would we wage war? We all want, but no one is willing to pay the price.
I am with Hillary on most issues, she seems to be more honest the Obama, he seems to be mostly talk. Still I believe pulling the troops out within 60 days may be unrealistic. But that’s what we all want to hear.
We all want change, but change is not always good. It’s easy to make promises. If you don’t have the experience to make positive change, the change we get may be from one of the most powerful countries into total devastation. When you need surgery do you seek out a charismatic speaker or do you seek an experienced doctor? The United States is sick and I want the experienced leader to heal it.
We have all bought on credit… Soon it will be time for the collectors and we will be unprepared.
But in all reality, does it really matter who gets elected? They all seem to have their own agenda… Immortality – to go down in history.
Still, if Obama gets the nominee – I’m with McCain.

Posted by: Yahtah | February 12, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

Part two:
I am with Hillary on most issues, she seems to be more honest the Obama, he seems to be mostly talk. Still I believe pulling the troops out within 60 days may be unrealistic. But that’s what we all want to hear.
We all want change, but change is not always good. It’s easy to make promises. If you don’t have the experience to make positive change, the change we get may be from one of the most powerful countries into total devastation. When you need surgery do you seek out a charismatic speaker or do you seek an experienced doctor? The United States is sick and I want the experienced leader to heal it.
We have all bought on credit… Soon it will be time for the collectors and we will be unprepared.
But in all reality, does it really matter who gets elected? They all seem to have their own agenda… Immortality – to go down in history.
Still, if Obama gets the nominee – I’m with McCain.

Posted by: Yahtah | February 12, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am

I think Obama is still wet behind the ears no true experience he has not paid his dues to this country yet. Talking about change is wonderful but how? What is he really gonna change. At least with Hilary she has some what of experience being the first lady before and all who feels that big bill has done a good job well he will be there. Two heads are always better than one. Its a fact. Hilary will show her finances when Obama shows how he bought that house maybe a slum landlord? So if Obama gets in I will go Republican Either one I like them both.

Posted by: Lori | February 12, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Don’t be delusional. Obama is full of rhetoric. He does not care for people. Recent experience .The letter was sent to Obama in SEP07 for a real concern for the senator intervention to help a family. No response. The family was hoping that they will get a response and help from Obama because he is running for a president and that he would respond. Even an acknowledgement reply was not sent from his office. Family also sent a same request to Atlanta senator, and the family got an immediate reply from the senator’s office and was also helped. The Atlanta senator is not even facing election this year. I am not for any party and I choose a candidate every time based on the work they do to the country and how genuine they are. This is a real tru experience. Please do not get carried away.

Posted by: Moderate | February 12, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

It’s interesting reading everyone’s input. Everyone keeps talking about experience and they have a point. However, Obama with his limited expereience, was the only one who had the courage to vote against the war in the first place. It seems his lack of experience helped him make a choice that would have been much better for our country. I believe Clinton & McCain have worked hard and love this country. And that’s not enough. A president doesn’t stand alone. No matter who gets in, they will all have a cabinet to seek counsel from.

Posted by: Anya | February 12, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

I agree Yahtah! Obama is full of lofty language with a hint of High School pep rally thrown in. Edwards would be wise to back Clinton, if for no other reason then “A friend in need is a friend indeed.” He would have a better chance of seeing his cause become policy with Hillary.
I too, will vote for McCain if Obama wins the Dem. nomination. We need experience, not a lofty History professor.

Posted by: Independant in KC | February 12, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

Obama will beat McCain, Hillary will not. Obama is able to take half the male vote from McCain, Hillary does considerably worse, so if women want to pick the next president of the united states, they should back obama and let the men cancel each other out :)

Posted by: Andy | February 12, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

obama/edwards would be a dynamic ticket for the future of america

Posted by: al | February 12, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

“Bill:
I’m a 60 year old high tech software testing white male from North Carolina and I think Obama is awesome.”
Me too, Bill! :)
Senator Barack Obama is new, not old guard and he had the wisdom to know that this country should not enter into war with Iraq. Just look at the mess over there now it’s heartbreaking what we have done to this country of Iraq. I will never forgive Hillary for not stepping up to plate and saying no to war against Iraq, look at the death to our service members (I’m a veteran so it is an extra sore point for me!) and look at the debt that this war has cost us and has taken money away from Americans that need healthcare, college education, etc. I hold Hillary as responsible as Bush, goodbye old guard hello to the new and better Senator Barack Obama.

Posted by: Sandra | February 12, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

The more I listen to the news, read the blogs, and read postings like these, it makes me realize more and more how much so many people are out of touch with the essence of America, and the essence of change. The greatest accomplishments in history have come by going against the grain. The people who started America were all seasoned Nation leaders; the first American military wasn’t as seasoned and organized as the British army; MLK wasn’t experienced in leading a national movement when he first started; Sam Walton didn’t start Wal-Mart as a seasoned big-company CEO. The greatness of America is rooted in its “HOPE.” “HOPE” is a foundational American ideal; the country was founded on “HOPE.” Whether you support Obama or not, don’t get the requirements for leadership twisted. Great change does not usually come through experienced leadership; fresh leadership is usually a part of significant change. The status quo is usually afraid to attempt monumental change. That’s why we are in our current situation–all of the experienced, seasoned, status-quo politicians are usually too afraid of destabilization to move the change needle too much. Real change agents are willing to stand-up for what they believe, regardless of the cost.

Posted by: Tommy | February 12, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

Correction:The people who started America were NOT all seasoned Nation leaders;

Posted by: Tommy | February 12, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

Well said, Tommy!

Posted by: Sandra | February 13, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

Hillary’s got NOTHING on Obama if you look at all her scandals, funny $$, lying — she wont even release her tax returns (unlike Obama)!

Posted by: Young | February 13, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

I dunno why everyone is getting all het up about Obama vs Clinton. The congress (Electoral College) will elect the president, as they have since the early 1800s. If the popular vote mattered, Gore would have won the election in 2000, but because the electoral college chose Bush, that’s what we got. And because the law has established the Electoral College, SCOTUS sorta had to go with Congress’s choice instead of the people’s. If it happens again this year, and Obama is chosen by the people and Clinton is chosen by the legislature, there just might be a popular uprising to make sure that “one man, one vote” really means something in America. Look up the Electoral College on the Internet and you’ll see for yourself.

Posted by: Kaelinda | February 17, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

I hope he makes the right choice and Endorses Hillary, we need results not promises and she can Deliver experience does count

Posted by: AL | February 17, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

Edwards would be smart to support Clinton as she is the smarter candidate and has the real experience. For those of you saying she should release her finances and has recieved money from the wrong kind of people, how is it right that oprah gives millions to obama and all the black people in this world forgot race should not be the issue, but experience . all the clintons did for blacks over all these years and most vote to have a “first black president?” Gee, and if he is a failure with his lack of experience, what do you think they will say then? give him 8 more years to ripen and then vote for him. besides, mccain is going to pick condy rice and obama won’t stand a chance.

Posted by: samarafnp | February 27, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

I hope Edwards endorses Obama. If he does, there most surely will be a cabinet position for Edwards, something which would allow him (Edwards) to promote the ideas that he had on helping Americas poor, among other things.

Posted by: John Lee | March 21, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

The Bush/Cheney/McCain/Clinton Axis, otherwise known as the Darth Vader Death Star Axis, has one goal – to serve its wealthy clients. Obama has one goal – to do the most good for the greatest number of Americans. Edwards can endorse, Obama, who wants to empower the middle and working class, or he can endorse the Axis, that wants to serve its wealthy clients. It’s Obama and, for this conservative, it’s ABC – Anybody But Clinton.

Posted by: AlPal | April 29, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

If Edwards endorses Obama instead of Hilary, I will for the first time vote Republican and Edwards will never get my support again.

Posted by: Shelley | May 9, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

If Edwards endorses Obama instead of Hilary, I will for the first time vote Republican and Edwards will never get my support again.

Posted by: Shelley | May 9, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.