Feb 19, 2008 10:43pm

Clinton Forges Ahead After Tough Wisconsin Loss

ABC News’ Kate Snow Report, Eloise Harper and Sunlen Miller Report: "We never expected to win in Wisconsin."

That’s the line of the night from the Clinton campaign.

"We said at the beginning of this month that post Super Tuesday was lousy for us until March and we were right," said Communications Director Howard Wolfson.

They’re not shocked by the win, but they’re having a hard time dealing with the potential size of it. Inside the Clinton shop they believe Barack Obama has won Wisconsin by double digits.

Privately, Clinton associates concede it’s a tough night for the campaign. Texas and Ohio – which hold their primaries in two weeks– have shifted from states they hope to win to states they "must win" says one.

"We thought it would be single digit at worst," he said. "It’s going to be a rough day tomorrow with party activists and leaders."

Though she did not mention the loss in her Ohio speech on Tuesday, campaign aides confirm the candidate called her rival to congratulate him.

Obama aides described the exchange as a "brief congratulatory call".

Clinton did try to cut her time in Wisconsin short this past weekend, before a snowstorm forced her to re-schedule events for Monday.

"We obviously reduced time and commitment for a reason," said one insider.

But it’s not like Clinton didn’t make any effort in Wisconsin. She spent three days here (in part because that snowstorm delayed her departure). Her daughter Chelsea was in the state for four days and President Clinton spent a day touring Wisconsin too.

She was outspent by Obama on the airwaves, but Clinton did run television ads in Wisconsin. And they were harsh. Two ads focused on Obama’s refusal to debate Clinton in Wisconsin.

"Maybe he doesn’t want to explain why his health care plan leaves out 15 million people and Hillary’s covers everyone. Or why he voted to pass billions in Bush giveaways to the oil companies, but Hillary didn’t. Or why he said he might raise the retirement age and cut benefits for social security. But Hillary won’t. Why wont Barack Obama debate these differences? Wisconsin deserves better," the ad intoned.

And the Clinton campaign sent out a sharply-worded mailer, accusing Obama of leaving millions of people out of his health care proposal.

"I’m asking you to hire me for the hardest job in the world. And I come before you with 35 yrs of experience making change for people," Clinton argued to a packed labor union hall in Wausau on Monday.

It wasn’t enough.

Preliminary exit poll results indicated that Obama did well among independents voting in Wisconsin’s open primary.

Clinton also struggled in some of her core support groups – white women, less-educated and lower-income voters.

Top Clinton advisors are studying those results, shaping their strategies in Ohio and Texas moving forward.

Clinton aides also said they did not expect her fundraising efforts to suffer after tonight’s loss.

On Tuesday, Clinton’s team reported raising fifteen million dollars in the first fifteen days of February.

"Our supporters only get stronger when everyone in the media is counting us out," said the senior staffer.

Clinton campaign aides also think time is on their side.

"We now have two weeks and two debates to win the big states," said the insider.

"Obama will win tonight but as more people focus on him as president and commander in chief he’s going to have a tougher and tougher race," said Clinton spokesman Jay Carson.

"All you have to do is listen to Senator McCain tonight to see that Democrats need to have a candidate with the strength and experience to take him on," Carson said.

In his victory speech Tuesday night, McCain referred to Obama, saying: "I will work hard to make sure Americans aren’t deceived by an eloquent but empty call for change."

He also referred to the "confused leadership of an inexperienced candidate."

"It’s all about March 4th" said one confident senior Clinton staffer. "We will win Rhode Island, Texas and Ohio and the race will be back to square one. And then the battlefield will be Pennsylvania, which we will win as well."

User Comments

I have always voted Democrat. I do not find anything about Baracka and his wife redeeming. They are arrogant and condescending who play to minorities. If they were white they’d be the Clintons !
Maybe a moderate Republican wouldn’t be a bad thing.If we can just him to budge on the war and abortion issues we might have a winner.

Posted by: Not Me | February 19, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

Obama won by 114,000 votes in Wisconsin tonight. How many of those votes were Independent and Repubs voting for him to keep Hillary out of the race???
He only picks up a net gain of about 12-13 delegates, and once the big states come into play, it will be a dead heat again. Then what??

Posted by: Jay | February 19, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

I believe it’s over for Hillary ii’m not here to dissapoint anyone but thats the way it’s turning out i’m a republican and i plan to vote for barack here in corpus christi,tx.

Posted by: Anthony | February 19, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

The Clinton campaign has made it clear they do not need my vote. They stated I am a “second class” delegate; red states don’t matter and I don’t really need a president because of my income. If I don’t matter to them and the majority of the US is not important to them, why should we put our trust in someone that thinks so little of us?

Posted by: Sylvia | February 19, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

Hillary we love you. We know you will bounce back to save our country. We are with you.From OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY.

Posted by: jane | February 19, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

Hang in there Hillary! We are waiting to support you in Pennsylvania! I’m hoping that Texas, Ohio, and Rhode Island do the same. It’s time to stop the non-sense and the hype… the winds will come and blow away Obama’s air castles…

Posted by: Chrispy166 | February 19, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

The media has played a huge part in this election by not presenting the voters with more information on Obama and his past.
I want more than just great speeches. I want a president and commander in cheif that can give results. Obama has not proven he can do this. The republican votes he is pulling in will be running the other way in November. I don’t see change. I see more of the same empty promises we have had from Bush. The republican party will chew him up in November.

Posted by: Kurt | February 19, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

Those of you who believe it’s over for Hillary are just using wishful thinking. She can still pull even on March 4th, and leads in superdelegates and will leads in votes once Florida and Michigan are seated. Why should she concede now? If Obama had a 300-400 delegate lead I would say she should consider it , but with a 90 delegates lead, there is still much more campaigning to do. Hillary is not a quitter. When the new scandal hits about Obama and it turns out to be true, he will have to quit.
http://www.thewhitehouse.com

Posted by: Jay | February 19, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

I have no doubt that Hillary is forging ahead. She has more guts and fight than her opponent could ever “DREAM” of. I wouldn’t doubt it if Hillary was already planning her next move for the 2012 election after Obama leaves the country in shambles.

Posted by: sl surratt | February 19, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

So what will the excuse be after Hawaii and so on and so on?

Posted by: Patriot2008 | February 19, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

She can’t just win the big states. She has to CRUSH in the big states. That looks like it won’t happen. Given the trends and recent polls.

Posted by: Lance | February 19, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

feel free to cast your vote for him. I will have my vote for Hillary! If we all hold on to our faith in our candidate and keep supporting her, he would not be able to close the gap. Why do people have to be affected by the so called momentum? Momentum is nothing but false of hope!

Posted by: snakebaby | February 19, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

Don’t count Hillary out. It ain’t over till it’s over! & We in OHIO are chompin’ at the bit to Vote for Her ! Go Girl Go!!!! Ohio For Hillary ! The Common Sense has spoken. Good-nite.

Posted by: georgie | February 19, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

Lance, she doesn’t have to crush at all. She just needs to make up 90 pledged delegated. A decent margin in Ohio, Texas, & PA would put her ahead again.
The race is a long way from over. There very worst thing Mr. Obama could do, was become overconfident thinking he left Hillary Clinton for dead after tonight.

Posted by: Jay | February 19, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

Wait till the media starts disliking Obama. When people start digging in to his background they will tear him apart just like they did the Clintons. Hillary will come back. People will get there head out of the clouds soon. The Republicans will Swiftboat him right out of the sky. :(

Posted by: Faye | February 19, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

In Corpus Christ Tx, Please don’t give up on Hillary!!! She needs your support. Those of us in states who haven’t been able to participate yet are counting on those of you in Texas, Ohio, and Rhode Island to keep Hillary in the race!! It’s too dangerous for the Democrats if you don’t.

Posted by: Chrispy166 | February 19, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

So much for the theory all educated people vote for Obama..lol

Posted by: Jay | February 19, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

The demo breaks don’t look good for Clinton. If things progress along these lines, she may lose the pop. vote in TX and certainly it’s a near dead heat in delegates there. She needs to win OH by a big margin. RI and VT will essentially cancel out. After Mar. 4 Obama will still be up by about 70-80 pledged delegates. Clinton can’t pick that up in PA (at best a 20-30 del. pickup). Sorry to say, but the delegate tally lead will be Obama heading to convention.

Posted by: Kevin | February 19, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

Mr. Obama in his rally tonight, warned that there was still 2 months and a long hard road ahead to win the nomination. I don’t think he is counting Hillary out right now either.

Posted by: Jay | February 19, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

Hillary Clinton will win in Texas, and Ohio! Polls here in Texas, are showing Clinton winning the primary.
John
Houston, Texas

Posted by: John | February 19, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

You are correct Kevin, but you are still not counting Michigan and Florida delegates, which will be seated at the convention somehow. Still a dead heat.
The best thing for the Democratic party is to nominate Hillary and Obama on the same ticket, otherwise, the victory will go the the Republicans in November.

Posted by: Jay | February 19, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

Endorse Obama?!?!? Why on earth would that be considered? You’d definitely have McCain in the White House.

Posted by: Chrispy166 | February 19, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

Go Texas and Ohio!! Glad to hear there is so much support for Hillary!!! Those who are inspired by the convention speeches really need to listen to what is being said… that has substance… not just the hype.

Posted by: Chrispy166 | February 19, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

Jay – Unfortunately that’s wishful thinking. If the FL and MI del.s are seated (still a longshot), it will not be in correlation to the primary results. The only concept being put to the DNC is to seat them in a 50-50 split so they can participate, but not affect the outcome. In fact, my calculations pulled data from the wrong page. After tonight, Obama should be up by about 150 pledged delegates, so after Mar. 4, it’s more like a 90-100 del. lead. And after PA, things look to favor Obama.

Posted by: Kevin | February 19, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

dream-on HRC supporters!

Posted by: Al | February 19, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

Sorry Kevin, the Florida results will stand in Hillary’s favor . She won by over 300,000 votes, and now you think Obama should split them 50/50 with her. I doubt that will happen. I see at the convention there will be a 40-50 delegate separation, and then the superdelegates will nominate Hillary. Oh they will cry and scream, but I think it is the best for the country. If they don’t both go on the same ticket. McCain will win by landslides over each of them individually. Not by the merit of their own voter base, but because we all know, who ever feels slighted at the Democratic convention, all the others people will vote republican to punish their own party. Sad, but this is the way it will play out. Replace Hillary with Obama or vise-versa, it will be a disaster for the democrats. Obama may have won 10 in a row, but the democrats are still equally divided as to who they want for their President.

Posted by: Jay | February 19, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

The latest Texas poll has Barack and Hillary in a dead heat. After Barack’s speech to how many thousand in Houston today, it has probably shifted to Barack. Barack has cut into Hillary’s former advantage among women and less educated and lower socioeconomic voters. The electorate in Ohio is very similar to Wisconsin. As Barack spends more time in Ohio and Texas, Barack will peel off support for Hillary, just as he has in every other state where he has gone one-on-one with her. The writing is on the wall. Obama will win Texas and come mighty close to winning in Ohio, so, at this point it’s over.

Posted by: Karl | February 19, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

Hillary Clinton and her Husband Bill Clinton know how to beat the Republicans in the General elections they have a track record that proves they can beat the Republicans. If Obama wins the nomination the Republican political war machine will shred him to pieces and called him the most Liberal democrat in history and rally the Republican conservatives to vote in high numbers to defeat Obama. And if McCain hires Karl Rove to work in his campaign, Karl Rove will tear Obama to pieces and the Democrats will once again loose the White House. Obama does not have what it takes to Defeat the Republican Political War Machine.

Posted by: John | February 19, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

I really would like people to not use the group they belong in to say that that whole group support their candidate. Like Jane from “Ohio State University” who said to Hillary, “We love you from Ohio State University” is sorely mistaken for talking this way. She made it sound like as if Hillary won Ohio State University’s heart, while there is plenty that found her despicable. I recommend that everyone speaks for him or herself. Those most your want to say is “Love you from the Joneses”; even that, you should make sure that your husband/wife is supporting the same candidate you are supporting.
I am sick and tired of being lumped into things for convenience, like old white women, educated meddle-upper class, college graduates. Those people use my status to make a favorable point for them which I don’t agree or appreciate. Speak for yourself, not for me. Thanks.

Posted by: Jen | February 19, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

Time to pack it in, Hillary!
Tough Loss? Obama destroyed Hillary in
Wisconsin, a tailor-made state for Hillory Clinton! Lots of Uneducated people and Senile seniors, her core
supporters!

Posted by: reaganfan | February 19, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

So Jen, I would say it is safe to say you are an Obama supporter…lol

Posted by: Jay | February 19, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

If Barack is the nominee then McCain will cream him in the GE. No doubt about that. Democrats who are looking for change need to look at someone that has the experience to make change or else the republican will cruise to victory on 2 points – security of the country and experience to handle world’s events as it occurs.

Posted by: kim | February 19, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

Reganfan:
You and I both know why she lost big. The Indies and Repubs came out in full force for Obama. She won 63% of the straight Democratic vote.

Posted by: Jay | February 19, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

Thank you, Juan. I concur.

Posted by: Robin | February 19, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

So far close to a million democratic votes in Wisconsin, and only 350,000 plus Republicans votes. I am willing to be 200,000 of Obama’s votes came from the opposition.

Posted by: Jay | February 20, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am

Jay – If the FL and MI do get seated, it will only be by a scenario of 50/50. They broke the rules, and no one campaigned for votes. Having candidate names off the MI ballot hurts any chance of FL being treated differently. Pelosi has indicated she may allow the 50/50, but nothing else.
The math tends to indicate at least a lead of 140-150 pledged delegates for Obama going to convention. That, and the number of states won by Obama, plus his acceleration in the various demos will likely tilt the supers to Obama. I don’t see Clinton settling for the VP slot. She’s said she’d rather return to the Senate and a leadership position there. It’s true the Dems are split in their affections, but contrary to the early campaign, it’s just not adding up as Clinton’s year. I personally think this is a good thing, as most people expect the blue states to remain blue, and Obama may be able to swing some purple states around. It’s really a good thing, not the end of the world.

Posted by: Kevin | February 20, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am

Jay –”She can still pull even on March 4th, and leads in superdelegates and will leads in votes once Florida and Michigan are seated. Why should she concede now?” — IF Florida and michigan are seated, it will be 1968 all over again.. that sort of underhanded backdoor bargaining to take the nomination away from the person who was voted into it will split the democratic party in half… How bad does she want the nomination.. bad enough to destroy her own party?

Posted by: givemeabreak | February 20, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

I hope you’re calculation are wrong Kevin, but if your man OBama wins the Democratic nomination, do you think he will have a chance in hell against McCain, when all of Hillary’s supporters will be voting for McCain in the general?

Posted by: Jay | February 20, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

Jay – I don’t really believe most Clinton supporters will actually vote for McCain. People are emotional and say things. How many disappointed people moved to Canada/Nepal when Bush got re-elected? This too shall pass.

Posted by: Kevin | February 20, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Sorry Kevin, I am all of my family and friends are Clinton supporters, and we will all vote for McCain. Mr. Obama scares the hell out of me, and I have researched him with an open mind. He is not presidential material.

Posted by: Jay | February 20, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Jay –”Sorry Kevin, the Florida results will stand in Hillary’s favor . She won by over 300,000 votes,” — Ummm, that would be because she was the only one on the ballot… the other two stood with the DNC’s request and did not run their and did not have their names on the ballot.. If the delegates are now given to Clinton for basically disobeying the DNC and running after the primaries were sanctioned.. It will be a great example of the Clinton willingness to do anything to get their way.. and it WILL be very detrimental to the party..

Posted by: givemeabreak | February 20, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Just words? Watch out folks, really change is here. Isn’t this fresh? How long has it been since we have seen something this phenomenal? Despite all the talks about the Republican political machine. Hold on to hope. It is a terrible thing to lose. GO OBAMA. YES WE CAN

Posted by: Lambert | February 20, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Sorry Giveabreak. You are incorrect. All the nominees names were on the Florida ballot and no one ran ads or campaigned there except Mr. Obama, you must be thinking of Michigan.

Posted by: Jay | February 20, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

The D.O.A Leadership in the Whitehouse for the pass 7 going on forever years is a huge reason why the G.O.P will Have ,to coin a phase a rainy night in Georgia,come november…

Posted by: Lee Davis | February 20, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Jay – So be it. I can respect that.

Posted by: Kevin | February 20, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

rachelfarleigh,
I want the Democrats to win the White House, But you are seriously underestimating the Republican Party political war machine they want Obama to win the nomination because they know they will shred him to pieces during the campaign to the White House. Karl Rove will have Field Day tearing Obama into little pieces and once again securing the White House for the Republicans. I’m for the Democrats and I want the Democrats to win, but because the Democrats are split 50/50 in nominating their candidate, the Republican political war machine will use that to their advantage to defeat Obama in the General Election. The Republicans are not split 50/50 and they will back McCain in very high numbers with their money and votes to defeat Obama.

Posted by: John | February 20, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

Kevin- I sure hope there can be unity in the party. If they are both on the ticket and Obama is at the top, I can live with that, but Obama by himself is still an unknown, and I wish I could believe in what he says, but I am not a kid, and I am from Chicago. I Have heard all of the rhetoric and fancy speeches before. I want to keep our country safe, and becoming prosperous once again, as it was in the Clinton years.
Thanks for being respectful and able to disagree civilly. You are rare in that respect.

Posted by: Jay | February 20, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Put the fork in, she’s done. Hillary for the third time failed to congratulate Obama on his victory. Also, as usual, she got out of town and never thanked those who fought the ice and cold to vote for her. HILLARY HAS A LOT OF CLASS – BUT IT’S ALL LOW.

Posted by: Randle Bate | February 20, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Jay, you are so right. and i’m one of the millions of hillary supporters who will vote for mccain in an instant. obama is a cocky, undeserving, media-created jerk and would be worse for the country than bush. and that’s saying quite a lot. also, the repubs are very smartly voting for obama in the dem primaries and caucuses, since he will be so easy to beat (no, cultists, you aren’t right that he’s the one who will be hard to beat). but repubs certainly won’t do so against an actual repub. and obamaites think current polls tell the story, but they haven’t learned a thing from history. obama is this year’s mcgovern. and mcgovern only won one state. i voted for mcgovern, so i know of what i speak – we dems are extremely talented at picking the absolute worst candidate and getting our behinds kicked.

Posted by: so saddened | February 20, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

Hilary is the only candidate who’s name was on the ballot in Michigan and she’s the only one who broke her promise and campaigned in Florida. IF they seat Michigan and Florida delegates it will be because they hold last min caucuses and they’ll get half their allotted delegates. In the primary when Barack held up his promise not to campaign in Florida he lost to Clinton by 20 points. She just lost to him by 17 in a state she spent three days in, plenty of advertising money, a bogus plagarism attack, and also sent in Bill and Chelsea. A last min caucus in Florida will not net her many delegates.
If Clinton doesn’t win Texas, Ohio, and Pennsylvania by at least double digits (some reports are saying she needs 65%) she won’t be close enough in pledged delegates for it to make a difference.
I am thrilled by the possibility of a candidate in the GE that I’m actually excited to vote for, rather than the lesser of two evils.

Posted by: Brandyn | February 20, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

Also – I live in Nebraska a consistently conservative state, and I have been told by MANY Republicans that they will vote for Obama.

Posted by: Brandyn | February 20, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

Brenden. Let’s be honest. There was a huge crossover vote to keep Hillary from winning Wisconsin. That is just obvious. After the whole count is over he will have won 12 more delegates than Mr. Clinton. So this was not a must win for either of them.

Posted by: Jay | February 20, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am

A couple people here have posted that the Democratic Party will seat (meaning count) the Florida and Michigan delegates.
Not a chance in hell of that happening — and for Clinton to be pushing for it is embarrassing.
Obama is the most electrifying politician to come along in a generation or more, and barring something whacky happening he is far better positioned to beat McCain in the Fall.
Come the general election, he’ll get essentially all of Hillary’s votes, plus an incredible number of Independents, plus there will be a huge turnout.
Hillary running against McCain (who’d be smart to pick a conservative woman VP) doesn’t stack up so well for Democrats, I’m afraid. She could win, but there’s a good chance she’ll lose, and if her shenanigans continue then she will NOT get all of Obama’s support come the Fall, and there will not be the record turnouts Obama would deliver.
I like Hillary, but we’re not about dynasties in America, or right now it sure feels like we shouldn’t be.
Obama has my vote. Hillary has my next vote. McCain will never ever get my vote.

Posted by: Johnny | February 20, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am

Jay – To be fair, Obama should pick up 15 more del.s in WI tonight and an extra 5-6 in HI. Adding those 20 to the current 133 puts Obama up by about 150 in pledged delegates. On the bright side, McCain picked up all 31 delegates! (that’s good-natured ribbing).

Posted by: Kevin | February 20, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am

Brandyn: I have to keep you honest here because a lot of Obama supporters re write history. Hillary did not campaign in Florida. She only went there after the polls closed. Mr. Obama was the only candidate to run commercials in the state of Florida tied to his national campaign.
Now as far as Nebraska, which is an awesome state, why would conservatives, votes for the most liberal Senator on record?

Posted by: Jay | February 20, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am

Anthony in Texas, are you voting for Obama because you think it is over for Hillary? Do you believe he can effect change? If so, please tell me how?

Posted by: Jim | February 20, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

You Obama supporters are delusional. Most Hillary supporters, like me, are so disgusted by the hateful, vile, obnoxious and childish rhetoric that Obama supporters spew about our candidate that just seeing Obama’s face on the tv makes us turn the channel so as not to barf.

Posted by: JustOneChris | February 20, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am

lol Kevin. so far with 93% of precincts reporting is it Obama 38 Clinton 27. There are only 74 delegates to be awarded, so I will stand by my 12 figure with only 9 delegates left to award. I might give you 13, but 15 is a stretch.

Posted by: Jay | February 20, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am

Johnny, this is not about dynasties. It is about who is the best person for the job of President and Commander in Chief. Which candidate is best suited for the job? Who could get things done. All the reasons you are voting for Obama have nothing to do with the issues.

Posted by: Jim | February 20, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am

Hillary is just mean (and Phony).
The Clintons will do whatever it takes and look for a Dirty back room deal by the Clintons!

Posted by: Joe | February 20, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

OMG – Senator Obama won with a 17 point margin in Wisconsin? Wow. Goodbye Senator Clinton. Yes we can!

Posted by: TurtleWedge | February 20, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am

Joe, thanks for proving my point. You Obama supporters are disgusting. How do you actually think we could support you or your candidate after say that nasty stuff about someone we highly regard and believe in? You are delusional!

Posted by: JustOneChris | February 20, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am

Joe, with all due respects, this is politics, not Disney on Ice. Do you think Mr. Obama is clean???? Keep digging.
He is trying to buy, steal, and claw his way to the top just like Hillary

Posted by: Jay | February 20, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

Jay – Actually, the ad ran by Obama in Florida was forced as he purchased a nationwide ad package from a major network which was not selective to not run it in Florida. He didn’t actually push Florida in any way and he did no campaigning. Hillary did have fund-raisers before and after in Florida (though small and kept quiet) and she WAS the only one on the ballot and the only one to campaign in Michigan. Everyone, including Hillary, not only agreed to to not campaign there but that their delegates should not be seated. Now that she realizes that if they aren’t seated her chances are greatly reduced on winning this nomination, she’s begging and pleading and making it seem like its because she cares about the citizens of those states. Well, she doesn’t… she just cares about the delegates that she won’t be getting from them. As far as Obama is concerned, to all of those who said “what is his idea of change?” or “what are his stances on policies?” I sure hope you paid attention to his speech tonight. Though long, the speech made sure to add a serious tone that so many felt was missing and stated his position on numerous issues. While he doesn’t have 36 years (I’d like to see Hillary prove that number) of experience, experience isn’t everything. Google’s CEO’s didn’t have experience in running a major company, nor Microsoft. The same goes with people like Gahndi, or Martin Luther King Jr…. The founding fathers of our country didn’t have experience with starting a country, let alone running one and inspiring its citizens to rise up against that which was wrongly oppressing them. Well, we see where that got us?
Also, in reference to the recent attack methods from Hillary, which is trying to be scandalous (how surprising).. Hillary tries to bash Obama for stealing a line from a speech he was permitted to use when literally 2 sentences after she makes a statement about that she uses an identical line from Obama’s speeches and just changes the construction of the family who gave her money.

Posted by: ilforobama | February 20, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

It ain’t over but it ain’t good but I’ll hang with you Hillary as far as you can take it.
They will never seat FL and MI they can’t it will create a riot and guarantee the collapse of democrats in November. The DNC screwed that up the big stick approach was always going to be a mistake.
Hillary can pull it out (long shot)but Barack is doing a nice non committal two step with immigration to try and get the Latino vote.
What I think is woeful is that Republicans in Texas are being encouraged to go and vote for Barack because they aren’t restricted from doing so. Why because they think he is the November easy beat. So Ito use your words Barack I wonder what they have in their “dump truck” for you??????

Posted by: Not Me | February 20, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am

Jay – most of the outstanding precincts are in Milwaukee, Eau Claire, and Clark County, so we’ll see.

Posted by: Kevin | February 20, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am

You know the moment you start reading posts talking about “faith in Hillary”, “forge ahead” and “it ain’t over till it’s over” you know it really is over. Her defeat in Wisconsin was a devestating defeat in a rust belt state she should have won. Problem with Hillary is that she’s campaigning on a resume she really doesn’t have.

Posted by: Peter Cannady | February 20, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am

Jay, what do you mean Disney on Ice? I was asking why my postings were deleted just because I am against Hillary. By the way, tongiht, we are huge majority in Wisconsin.

Posted by: Joe | February 20, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am

ilforobama: You still have it biased. Funds raisers were allowed by the DNC and both Obama and Mrs.Clinton did them. Please, if you want to discredit Mrs. Clinton and gush over Mr. Obama, at least get the real facts straight. Why is that so hard? Why does every Obama supporter gives erroneous information about Hillary Clinton?

Posted by: Jay | February 20, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

No more Bill. No more Hillary. I’m definitely looking forward to this summer when this becomes reality. Go Hillary! (away that is).

Posted by: ctom2008 | February 20, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

I’m am sick and tired of the HRC maniacs calling me a brain washed cultist. I made my decision long ago based on the candidates records and issues. HRC doesn’t have this incredible wealth of experience that impresses me. Health care? She had 8 years to do it and fouled it up with her abrasiveness and arrogance. Whats different now? Plus the line that the are republican attack machine tested is a lie. Bill is, and by the way he won due in large part to his charisma and speaking skills. I cast my vote in Wisconsin for Obama, and I am one of these crossover votes alluded to, but I have no intention in pulling the lever for McCain.

Posted by: Goofus | February 20, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

Joe, I was referring to you saying Mrs. Clinton is mean and plays dirty. I said this is politics, not some New York fashion show. Both play dirty, and I would expect it of both of them.
Yes, I congratulate Mr. Obama on his 17 point win and 12 more delegates in Wisconsin. Lot’s more campaigning and delegates to go!!!

Posted by: Jay | February 20, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am

Jim, you wrote:
“All the reasons you are voting for Obama have nothing to do with the issues.”
When did I say anything about issues?
Actually, I’m impressed with Obama on the issues. Let’s take two examples.
Cuba and Venezuela. My opinion is that Obama could and would reach out to each country — as any president should — and begin a long term dialogue. I bet Obama would talk directly to Chavez and say basically that, “hey, let’s have a long term relationship”, and be able to (over time) smooth things over. He would be willing to begin to build bridges with Cuba, which embarrassingly Bill Clinton never tried to do.
Hillary is ready to be attacked by the right day one. She is very polarizing (like it or not it’s true) and they’d be on her like white on rice.
I think Obama has the sense and style to just maybe get around some of that crap, and I think it’s time to turn the page and move on from Bush-Clintons.

Posted by: JohnnyP | February 20, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am

You Hillary people better get home and feed your dinosaurs. Get you head out and enjoy some fresh air.

Posted by: Walter Devore | February 20, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am

Kevin wrote: “Jay – I don’t really believe most Clinton supporters will actually vote for McCain. People are emotional and say things. How many disappointed people moved to Canada/Nepal when Bush got re-elected? This too shall pass.”
You are right but people might give up their right to vote if they don’t know the candidate’s background very well. Don’t expect all the DEM will support Senator Obama blindly. Election is not a game – “YES, WE CAN” or “NO, YOU CAN’T”. It involves the future of US and many lives of our brave soldiers who risk their lives to protect us.

Posted by: stock_craft | February 20, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am

ilforobama, CEOs and Presidents are different. We elect a President. CEO’s are chose by a Board. What are his positions? How is he going to effect them? Does have a track record in effecting his positions? This is important because you can take any charismatic person and put him up there to say the right things. But can he deliver? I don’t think so. He has no record of delivering. How is he going to change the mind of Congress if they do not agree with him? Lobbyists are not going away. How is he going to deal with them? If you look at his Senate voting records, he seems to not take a position.

Posted by: Jim | February 20, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am

To those of you who say Obama can’t stand up against the Republican War Machine, take note. He has run against the biggest War Machine in the Democratic Party (the Clintons, who I like, but am getting fatigued with) and he leads in popular vote, states, and delegates. Enough for not standing tough. And he has stayed on message throughout the campaign with the same theme and slogan. Hillary has lost hers – or maybe never had it. Hey, we went with the Dem establishment in 2000 and 2004 and both times they ran poor campaigns and lost to the likes of Bush! We can’t afford that again. I ask you, how long has it been since you have seen this kind of genuine excitement in Democratic party?

Posted by: Lee | February 20, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am

The Democrats have the opportunity to elect one of two brilliant politicians to the White House and you spend your time spewing nasty invective about each other’s candidates instead of rejoicing at the magnificent and historic choice you have.
As a Republican, I can’t help but shake my head and be glad that you all are going to manage to screw-up an election that was practically handed to you.

Posted by: Travis Johnson | February 20, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am

I found it funny that Hillary supporters say that if you put Obama on the ticket, than even Democrats are going to vote for McCain.
While the fact it, if you put Hillary on ticket, Democrats are going to vote for McCain. I am sorry it sounds harsh, but people HATE Hillary. For those who don’t support Obama, they don’t hate him. Let me repeat, people HATE Hillary, not Obama. For those who don’t support him, they just didn’t like him enough, no one hates him, but plenty hates Hillary.
So what’s funny is, if Hillary is nominated, Democrat WILL LOSE; yet her campaign tries to convince you that if Obama is nominated, Democrat will lose. It shows you how at all expense she will want to win this nomination, even if that means her party will lose.

Posted by: Tiff | February 20, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am

JohnnyP, why would Chavez listen to Obama over Clinton? As for Cuba, Hillary will be the President and not Bill. Just because Obama calls, doesn’t mean Chavez has to listen. This is where all of the Obama supporters will feel duped. Right now, he just has to promise to do things. When it comes down to it, can he deliver? I think Hillary can deliver better than Obama.

Posted by: Jim | February 20, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am

Kevin- It was great debating with you tonight, but it’s getting late and I have to go home a feed my dinosaur. She is a T-Rex and her name is Hillary..lol
And after losing 12 delegates tonight, she is hungry….

Posted by: Jay | February 20, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am

Plus we’ll get a good look at how Obama will stand up to the Republican attack machine in the next two weeks. I’ve noticed the tenor of the HRC attacks are beginning to track very closely to a Rove narrative. Tonight she invoked the specter of terrorism and asked if we feel safe with Obama as CINC. Next, she’ll probably announce she’s selecting fellow New Yorker Rudy Guilliani as her running mate.

Posted by: Goofus | February 20, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am

Travis, we are rich in choices. This stuff here is just hard core supporters bickering on a message board, dude.
I think there’s at least a very strong chance that is IS being handed to us (the election, that is).
Think about it. Young vs. old, war vs. peace, etc., etc. I’m not counting out anything, but if Obama wins the nomination it could well be a done deal to the White House.
And Lee — good points.

Posted by: Johnny | February 20, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am

Obama actually has more legislative experience than Clinton. Clinton was a poverty lawyer, Wal-mart board member, First Lady and now U.S. Senator. Obama was a community organizer, Harvard Law graduate, State Senator, U.S. Senator and now front-running Dem. presidential candidate. He’s doing what Reagan did for all you new-age haters. People who’ve never been part of the voting process are registering and voting in record numbers for Obama. You don’t have to “hate” Obama while voting for Clinton. Those of you idiots who will vote for McCain in the GE if Obama is the nominee lack deductive reasoning skills. I’m voting for Obama but Clinton is my girl if she’s the nominee. Hands Down!

Posted by: RO | February 20, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am

Hillary will win Ohio, Texas and Pennsylvannia.She will win these states. I will vote for the right candiate and Hillary is that.For me to vote for her opponent is committing suicide. I don’t like anyone who doesn’t salute our flag, or wear a pin on his lapel, he’s not patriotic. I thought well at least his wife has some intellect. But just look at what she said yesterday. I’m sorry I don’t believe Yes We Can crap. We are learning more each day how he really feels about this country. Her speech was disrespectfull to say the least and she’s wanting the position of First Lady? I don’t ever remember any candiate running for office who wasn’t proud of these United States.

Posted by: sherrypie1953 | February 20, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am

Jim, Chavez will meet and talk with Obama, no question about it. What Hillary won’t do (because she will have to stay so darn tough in the face of Republicans ready to pounce) is even make attempts to talk to our enemies. My opinion is that Obama will be able to begin dialogue with our “enemies” where Hillary will just not be able to do it.

Posted by: Johnny | February 20, 2008, 1:14 am 1:14 am

Travis Johnson, I and many of my friends agree to join your party to vote for John McCain although we don’t like him and President Bush so much if Mr. Obama is nominated. At least we know John McCain’s background and what he stands for.

Posted by: stock_craft | February 20, 2008, 1:14 am 1:14 am

Johnny D. said, “The American people recognize the great woman with intellect, judgement and ability that Hillary is.”
I asked already and I will ask again – please do not speak for me. I am American and I thoroughly disagree with you. You speak for yourself, respected; when you want to lump me in, thanks but no thanks.

Posted by: Jen | February 20, 2008, 1:14 am 1:14 am

Yall are deluding yerselves.
Republicans don’t “cross over” in primaries; that’s a Democrat trick.
Obama is leading because he’s not Hillary, pure and simple. There are massive numbers of Dems who just will never vote for Hill no matter who the GOP nominates; given that McCain will be the nominee, there are even more, since he’s a moderate.
The DNC has greatly overplayed their hand, as usual; the wishful thinking that the country is now looking Left is just that, wishful thinking.
This is the most beautiful electoral situation we’ve seen in years; the Democrat Party tearing itself in a million pieces while the GOP has nominated a candidate that although not a majority of conservatives favor, is imminently electable.
It really doesn’t matter now which of the candidates the left puts up; either one will be skewered.
Obama’s camp “is finally proud” to be Americans; Hillary thinks no one remembers the “Hell to Pay”. The GOP won’t forget either, and neither will the voters of the USA.
Sihonara, lefties. Four more years in the wilderness ROFLMAO

Posted by: Henry Jennings | February 20, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am

Lee,
I want the Democratic Party to win the White House, but I am not going to tell myself a “fairy tale” that Obama will win the General Election against the Republican Party political War Machine. Do you honestly think a divided Democratic Party will put Obama in the White House when already the Republican Political War Machine is encouraging Republican voters to vote for Obama in the Democratic primaries to make sure that Hillary looses the primaries and Obama becomes the candidate. Republicans are united and they will shred Obama in the General elections, look back in the 2004 elections the Republican Party Political War Machine successfully defeated the Democratic Party by unifying the Republicans to vote in record numbers to defeat John Kerry. If Hillary wins the nomination she and her Husband Bill Clinton know very well how to defeat the Republican Party Political War Machine.

Posted by: John | February 20, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am

It’s all downhill for Clinton from now on. Just believe it. Texas is already even. Ohio next. I am tired of Bill Clinton’s anger. I pray to God that I do not become like him when I grow old.

Posted by: Al, San Francisco | February 20, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am

It doesn’t matter which one wins now. Party insiders know that the blood bath will be so severe that McCain will win in November. It is amazing that the Dems will lose an election that was in the bag. The truth is that Hillary is losing now because she ran to the center in preparation for November. A Ted Kennedy supported liberal will not win in the light of a general election.

Posted by: Hill | February 20, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am

John, you are not confident that Hillary can win the nomination, yet you are dead sure that she will beat the Republicans.
I have two words for you, “Dream on!”

Posted by: Jen | February 20, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am

Henry writes:
“either one will be skewered”
Hah! I suppose that could be, Henry, but what will you be saying when it’s a landslide to the contrary and Obama or Hillary are your next President?
Jus’ sayin’, don’t be so sure of yourself.

Posted by: Johnny | February 20, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am

Henry, your smug, cocky, condescending bravado is but much hot air, signifying NOTHING.
You righties are doomed. You blew it, BIG TIME. Your duffer candidate is the one to be skewered, as the “Forked-Tongue Express” goes right over the cliff.
Everyone knows that a vote for McCain is a vote for a continuation of the asinine, failed policies of BushChenyRove, and NO ONE wants to see a George W. McCain anywhere near the Oval Office.
You right-wing extremists are already in the congressional wilderness, and now you’re going to lose the WH too.
Your time has passed. You are a dinosaur. Enjoy the political wilderness, rightie.

Posted by: adam | February 20, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am

Jen,
Hillary can still win the nomination, and if she does win the nomination she will have a far better chance to win the General Election, and the reason I’m saying that she can beat the Republicans just look at the Clinton’s track record, She and her Husband successfully beat the Republicans two times in a row and if Bill Clinton would had run a Third term he would of successfully defeated George W. Bush. “A House divided cannot stand” and in this case the Democratic party is divided and will once screw up in the General Election, successfully handing over the White House to the Republicans.

Posted by: John | February 20, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am

John, I am sorry but she was not a candidate when Bill was running, I disagree, “She and her Husband successfully beat the Republicans two times in a row”. There was much much more played into Bill’s win, but I will never agree it was because of her in any way. Her interfering with Travel Gate or White Water are not a plus on her record either.

Posted by: Jen | February 20, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am

Of course she’s going to keep on fighting. She may even win. It’s just very refreshing to see a candidate punished by the voters for childish and dirty tactics.
17 points has to sting.
But, its still not over till it’s over.
Funny how wolfson went from we are “very competitive” to we knew we didn’t have a chance.

Posted by: john | February 20, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am

It might be time for DEM to break up. Senator Hillary Clinton should form a new middle and working class party if she loses the DEM nomination. I think many moderate DEM and conservative GOP will follow her. It seems like she can’t continue helping this liberal and flips flops DEM party any more.

Posted by: stock_craft | February 20, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am

Hillary please stop and think!
This attitude of lack of introspective is not sign of experience.

Posted by: guevera | February 20, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am

John wrote: “Lee, I want the Democratic Party to win the White House, but I am not going to tell myself a “fairy tale” that Obama will win the General Election against the Republican Party political War Machine. Do you honestly think a divided Democratic Party will put Obama in the White House when already the Republican Political War Machine is encouraging Republican voters to vote for Obama in the Democratic primaries to make sure that Hillary looses the primaries and Obama becomes the candidate. Republicans are united and they will shred Obama in the General elections, look back in the 2004 elections the Republican Party Political War Machine successfully defeated the Democratic Party by unifying the Republicans to vote in record numbers to defeat John Kerry. If Hillary wins the nomination she and her Husband Bill Clinton know very well how to defeat the Republican Party Political War Machine. ”
I agree with you. Obama might win the DEM nomination and lose the big one – general election to the GOP. In fact, his political career might end on November 04 if he wins the DEM nomination.

Posted by: stock_craft | February 20, 2008, 2:04 am 2:04 am

Jen,
I’m for the Democratic Party to win the General Election, but Obama does not impress me. A vote for Hillary Clinton is a vote for Bill Clinton to be in the White House again, and I remember how the economy prosper very well during the Clinton Administration. The facts are the Clinton’s know how to defeat the Republican Political War Machine. I can “dream on” and say that Obama will win the General Election, but I will not underestimate the Political power of the Republican Political War Machine, that War Machine has lots of money and with the help of Karl Rove they will easily defeat Obama in the General Election. And that Republican Political War Machine is already hard at work to make sure that Obama is the Democratic candidate because they know Hard core Republicans will not vote for the most liberal democrat in history.

Posted by: John | February 20, 2008, 2:12 am 2:12 am

For those saying Obama can’t win the general, take a look at all the polls. Almost every poll shows Obama leading McCain. Do a search for Obama vs McCain Polls and see for yourself. As for the political machine, some of you may jump ship for McCain but most of the party elite and power and brains will not. Obama will have the best Democrat minds on his side. Either you believe in them or you don’t.

Posted by: jb1510 | February 20, 2008, 2:39 am 2:39 am

Well keep on dreaming that Obama will win the the General Election against a unify Republican Party, when the Democratic party is and will be divided in the General Election, because Hillary supporters, the majority will not vote for Obama, ensuring a victory to the Republicans.

Posted by: John | February 20, 2008, 2:40 am 2:40 am

Notice the number of votes for DEM (1081888 votes in which 641967 votes for Obama and 449972 votes for Hillary Clinton) is about 3 times the number of the votes for the GOP (367683 votes in which 223149 votes for McCain and 149644 votes for Huckabee) in Wisconsin after 97% Precincts Reporting.
Don’t you feel some kind of uncomfortable? Indeed, can anyone tell me how many voters actually register in DEM and how many are registered under Republican?
Beside the independent votes, it seems to me that many voters cross the party line voting for Obama in order to defeat Hillary Clinton. And I am wonder if those voters continue to support Mr. Obama in general election if he does win the DEM nomination.
The DEM should not allow any independent or voters to register and vote on the same day during primary.

Posted by: stock_craft | February 20, 2008, 2:44 am 2:44 am

Yknow, I’m really amused that some people think more than 50% of the country has been subliminally brainwashed into not liking Hillary Clinton. Just because.
Sorry. Most of us aren’t that stupid. We don’t like Clinton purely for who she is. And as she’s finding out, no amount of media spin on HER side, is counteracting that.
Every time she opens her mouth, she digs her hole deeper. I really think the Caucuses comment is what is finishing her off.
Good riddance.

Posted by: Amused | February 20, 2008, 2:48 am 2:48 am

John: Although, as I just posted, I think H.C.’s candidacy is finished, I profoundly disagree with your nostalgic view of of a Hillary Clinton presidency. Hillary is not Bill. Not only because he was a great campaigner and a great communicator which she is not, but because he was a great listener. Bill Clinton’s economic policies were very conservative, in the best sense (responsible and based on sound economics) while he was too timid in advancing more liberal (in the best sense) social policies. Hillary is neither a good campaigner (note the worst political campaign in recent memory then watch her speech tonight “Look at my web page… read my policies…” feeh…) nor is she a good listener. Combine that with her history of really very crude ruthlessness and her stubborn attachment to a plan to “reform” our health care system that would make it very much like Nation Health Care in England. Do you know anything about National Health Care in England? I do. It sucks. That’s what happens when you add more people into a system each year but fail to increase funding proportionally; then pile a private insurance system on top of it, with expensive premiums that most people either can’t afford or are excluded from by “pre-existing conditions.” So everybody, who is not very rich, waits & waits & waits for mediocre medical care. That sort of system does work in places like the Netherlands, Switzerland and France where people have a greater sense of community. That’s not the way things work here. The way America treats every social program as if it were welfare, Hillary’s “policy” has the potential to make America’s defective health care system even worse. No thank you. As to this mythical twin “Clintons”ability to “defeat the Republican Political War Machine,” I also disagree.. I think the Clinton’s baggage would be fresh-meat for the Republican-slime-factory, which will have to generate new sewage to attack Senator Obama. He may even courageously counter-attack; then, with any luck, he could make his professional-slanderers look as petty, partisan, dishonest, vicious and cowardly as they actually are.

Posted by: Joey Tranchina | February 20, 2008, 2:50 am 2:50 am

stock_craft,
I agreed with you those same republicans will not vote for Obama in the General Election. The Republican Party Political War Machine wants Obama to win the nomination in order to shred him to pieces in the General Election.

Posted by: John | February 20, 2008, 2:54 am 2:54 am

This Hillary supporter will vote for McCain if Obama is the Democratic Party nominee!
Obama is inexperienced, unqualified, immature, and naive. And then he has the nerve to plagiarize speeches and have an attitude about it when confronted?

Posted by: NS | February 20, 2008, 2:54 am 2:54 am

At work no one hire a new grad to work on a critical project which must delivery on time. I don’t know people who claim well educated can give the job of US President to a candidate who has only 3 years experience in the Senate beside unknown background. God bless America.

Posted by: stock_craft | February 20, 2008, 2:57 am 2:57 am

NS,
You just prove my point, Hillary supporters will not vote for Obama, the democratic party is split 50/50 while a unify Republican party 100% plus 50% of the votes from Hillary supporters to vote for McCain will easily defeat Obama in the General Election even if only 30% of Hillary supporters vote for McCain, Obama will still loose the General Election.

Posted by: John | February 20, 2008, 3:08 am 3:08 am

John: Once again, I profoundly disagree with your analysis of the state of the two parties going into the general election. Far more Hillary supporters will find Barack Obama acceptable than Huckabee Conservatives will ever make peace with John McCain. The wing-nut wing of the Republican Party is united in hatred of McCain. As the Rev. James Dobson, chairman of Focus on the Family stated” Should John McCain capture the nomination, as many assume (only those who can count…jt) I believe this general election will offer the worst choices for president in my lifetime.” Or as Ann Coulter stated with her usual charm: “I would vote for the Devil over John McCain, thus my claim that I would vote for Hillary over John McCain.” You say that Barack Obama would face a united Republican Party in November? I don’t think so. We should remember that the Republican nominee in the last two election cycle pleased these geniuses… that should discredit their perspective for at least a generation…jt

Posted by: Joey Tranchina | February 20, 2008, 3:14 am 3:14 am

Joey Tranchina,
I want the Democratic Party to win but Hillary supporters the majority will not support Obama, and McCain and the Republican Party will take advantage of that and win the White House. Look at the facts, the popular vote among Hillary and Obama is virtually a tie, a split of 50/50 that shows very clearly that the Democratic Party is split 50/50. True hard core Republicans no matter what will support their presidential candidate just to have a Republican in the White House.

Posted by: John | February 20, 2008, 3:24 am 3:24 am

People please have some respect for
President Obama, we need to support him
to bring back our country to greatness
again.

Posted by: Frank latino | February 20, 2008, 3:28 am 3:28 am

This is another lesson for HILLARY. A BIG LOSS IN WISCONSIN.Her continous attack on OBAMA won’t just work. WHY??
Because the more she continue to Obama, the more his momentum rises and people will love him more and more.Even in TEXAS where she is now focusing is going to be very very dificult for her. I think people just want to see different person in the WHITE HOUSE but not the CLINTONS.That is the message and it is the reality no doubt about this.They want something new for this nation. THE MESSAGE HAS BEEN DELIVERED. I think is good for her to see this herself. May God bless America.

Posted by: I.A.T Smith | February 20, 2008, 3:42 am 3:42 am

This is the year of the non partisan. Hillary Clinton represents sleaze and deceit. Returning the Clinton’s to the White House is the last thing the country needs.
While I am not entirely pleased with either party’s front runners, I can accept either one as the next POTUS.
If its McCain, Hillary gets another shot at it in 2012. If its Obama, she’ll have to wait until 2016.
Maybe between now and then, the people of New York come to their senses and throw her out on her ear.

Posted by: Tom E. | February 20, 2008, 3:45 am 3:45 am

John: What you say simply does not make sense. There is no indication that the Democrats who have voted for Senator Clinton in the primaries will hesitate to vote for Senator Obama in the general election. Democrats are far more united in their opposition to the Republican policies of the Bush presidency — the worst of which John McCain has embraced — than they are divided by there primary preference. Where do you get the idea that there is more hostility among H.C. supporter, towards Barack Obama than there is towards George Bush or to his surrogate, John McCain. ps. I don’t think I would have written that before Senator McCain caved in to the brain-dead right and voted for the bill to accept torture. That act of ambition and cowardice will be tattooed to his forehead in November and it will cost him dearly, especially among people like me who have admired John McCain for many years.

Posted by: Joey Tranchina | February 20, 2008, 3:46 am 3:46 am

I was an Edwards guy, so I think my perspective isn’t really completely pro OBama or Hillary. However, something to consider. Hillary, although unquestionably intelligent and very capable, has more than a few things in common with George W Bush, and not in a good way. Hillary likes to portray her roots as humble, but her father was a textile executive. While not exceptionally wealthy, she certainly had a privelaged upbringing. Now to the Bush similarities. 1. Both attended private schools, both high school and college. 2. Hillary while acknowledged as a very bright attorney early on (unlike Bush’s early business career) never made partner of her law firm until her husband became an influential member of the Arkansas government. While this may not have been the sole reason for partnership, it is undeniable that a certain coziness with the executive branch was an advantage. Compare this with Bush’s Spectrum 7 and Harkin deals.
3. Clinton ran for Senate with Bill’s people, contacts, influence and fundraising, and without it would not and could not have won. Just to put it in perspective…If a powerful, but relatively unknown corporate lawyer moved to your state from halfway across the country just to run for the senate, what do you think there chances would be? Compare this to Bush running for governor as a failed businessman with Bush 1′s people and influence.
4. Bush had a grand total of 1 and a half terms as Texas governor. Hillary has had 1 and a half terms as New York senator.
5. Hillary claims White House experience because she was there with her husband. W claimed he saw his run things in the white house.
6. Now some of these are stronger points than others, but the main gist is that both Bush and Hillary had a fair amount of things handed to them. This is a weakness not due to class warfare or envy, but because they never had to learn to make the compromises that are necessary to achieve high office, rung by rung, inch by inch. You can see where this has gotten Bush during his illustrious 7 years.

Posted by: roger mcgarry | February 20, 2008, 4:13 am 4:13 am

So… it seems Hillary supporters are not well versed in math. lol.

Posted by: RT | February 20, 2008, 4:25 am 4:25 am

The Super Delegates better learn from the WI results if they want to win in November. Only Obama can win a majority of Independents and a significant amount of Republican votes. If the Super Delegates put Hillary over the top, she will spell doom for the party!

Posted by: John Halterman | February 20, 2008, 4:36 am 4:36 am

I wonder why Hillary made the blunder of saying that the red states don’t matter when election time is coming in November? That kind of message inspires hatred. I guess she accidentally said the truth.

Posted by: Lana Castillo | February 20, 2008, 4:46 am 4:46 am

Hillary’s gonna have to cheat by seating the florida delagates to win the nomination. Hope she bows out gracefully rather than destroy the party.
It would be a stupid move on her part if she pulled a stunt like that… she’d loose the african-american vote and the election.

Posted by: Lumpy | February 20, 2008, 4:53 am 4:53 am

People just do not like Hillary because of the tons of baggage from the 90′s. It’s not her fault, but she can’t do anything about it. I am a Democrate, and I don’t know anyone who want to vote for her in the primary or general election. If she is nominated, she would lose against McCain in the general election.
Garland, TX

Posted by: J. Dominguez | February 20, 2008, 4:55 am 4:55 am

Just a thought……….Why is it I notice most people that can’t spell are DEMOCRATS?
Schwartzenegger for Prez!!!! (wishful thinking)

Posted by: just wondering | February 20, 2008, 5:01 am 5:01 am

I am a Democrate, but I have been very turned off by Bill’s and her divisive behavior this campaign season. She decided to be divisive and only concentrate on big states with lots of hispanics, ignoring everyone. Any states that she didn’t win, she just said that they don’t count! The message to to any one who is if your state doesn’t voter for her, then you don’t count. You have to be from a big state that votes for her, preferably hispanic, making under 50,and over 50. I hate to say it, but that’s a very divisive approach and that’s why she’s losing.
E.W. – Houston

Posted by: Eric White | February 20, 2008, 5:05 am 5:05 am

The candidates will be Obama vs. McCain. And, I think it will be a civil race. Both are decent men. But, I think the outcome will be Obama winning. McCain’s age is going to matter in the race…standing besides a youthful Obama, he seems very old…with ideas tied to – and seen as a continuation of – our current President and his policies.
The negativity (and polarization) in the US is destroying our country. You can see the ugliness even on these blogs. We must change to survive. We are one people – Americans. And, I believe that there are enough people of good will that change will happen. We will be great again, turning from the corruption we have seen in business and government and recapturing world leadership. I believe we can be a nation of ethics again. I believe that we can be a nation that adheres to the constitution again. There has never been a time when change was more needed. It’s coming…

Posted by: Minister Zel | February 20, 2008, 5:16 am 5:16 am

If Hillary doesn’t win this election then McCain will be President.
It’s that simple.
Go Girl!

Posted by: Alecki | February 20, 2008, 6:08 am 6:08 am

My bet is, no matter how well Obama does, by hook or by crook, Hillary WILL get the nomination. Don’t worry, there’s plenty of time for the Clinton War Room to dig up dirt on Obama.

Posted by: Joe | February 20, 2008, 6:09 am 6:09 am

If the Clintons would really love America, they would step aside and support the popular vote, they should support Sen.Obama against more blood shedding in Irak and the sinking of the U.S. economy. They should work to unite the Democratic Party against more insanity and arrogance. Just think about it, for once swallow your pride and think about America instead of your own political ambitions!

Posted by: carmen | February 20, 2008, 6:22 am 6:22 am

Ready on Day One!
She can’t even plan a campaign strategically despite her early edge in the race. How can we trust her for being ready on day one?

Posted by: Lance D | February 20, 2008, 6:32 am 6:32 am

the popular vote is split, so dont rush to judgement and think that hillary is going to quit now. once the republican machine goes after obama and shows his true colors, you will see what a phony he really is. the hope he dictates to all of his supporters is a feeling, not an action, and if you think that obama can change washington having no real experience there, you are all living in a dream world, or should I say an obama world. get real obama supporters. the hope he offers can only be possible through god, and he is not god.

Posted by: shewill | February 20, 2008, 6:59 am 6:59 am

The article states that “Clinton struggled in some of her core support groups – white women, less-educated and lower-income voters. Top Clinton advisors are studying those results, shaping their strategies in Ohio and Texas moving forward.” Does this mean that Clinton considers Ohio and Texas to ripe with idiots, even forming the majority, and so they are changing their message (again) in order to convince the tards in those states to vote for them? I think I know why she’s lost 10 straight, and will lose Ohio and Texas as well!!

Posted by: NamakoOH3 | February 20, 2008, 7:01 am 7:01 am

When Hillary loses in Ohio and Texas, I suppose her die-hard supporters will be saying, “Just wait until Pennsylvania, she’ll turn it around there.” Sorry, but you can’t show such disrespect for voters in the majority of states–saying their votes don’t matter–and expect to win. I do expect Hillary and Bill to get progressively more nasty as March 4 approaches. They seem to care only for themselves and their own political fortunes. Too bad they have decided on a scorched earth policy, but it was predictable when one sees the kind of people Hillary has picked to run and advise her campaign.

Posted by: azjim | February 20, 2008, 7:01 am 7:01 am

The ruthless Clintons will never give up even if they ruin the Democrat Party. THEY ARE SELFISH, ARROGANT PEOPLE WHO WILL DO NOTHING FOR THIS COUNTRY ONLY FOR THEMSELVES. Their scorched earth behavior will do them in in the end. I certainly pray that happens.

Posted by: Skylark | February 20, 2008, 7:08 am 7:08 am

The Giliuanisation of the Clinton is moving fats, bad assupmtions, bad predictions, bad policies and no real winning strategy. Texas and Ohio will go Obama and against McCain it is old versus new, bad experience versus change. Being a prisoner of war does not qualify anybody to be president and long term stay in Washington DC disqualify anybody to be the US presdident

Posted by: BKMC | February 20, 2008, 7:26 am 7:26 am

I dont think Mccain will win against Obama. Obama has run a good campaign always focussing on issues.
If he wants to go negative, he can talk about the scandals(watergate, file gate etc), monica lewinsky affair, the supposed murder of their lawyer etc.
There are a lot of intelligent people out here who arent going to be fooled by negative campaigns. M

Posted by: dheep | February 20, 2008, 7:36 am 7:36 am

If Obama wins the nomination I believe Hillary’s supporters will definately vote McCain and put him in office. That would be okay with me even though I am a democrat. I do like Obama and did not like him from the beginning. He is only after making History and the public is too dumb to see that. He wants to show what a black man can do. He got some of his speeches from Patrick and he probably will be the VP. They are very good friends. That would bring this country in a disaster. Obama would change from what you see and show his real self. Then the public would be kicking themselves for voting him in.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | February 20, 2008, 7:37 am 7:37 am

The headline will read :
” End of The Clinton Era- for Good!
( finally)”

Posted by: Jack | February 20, 2008, 7:44 am 7:44 am

nill i dont trust the bill.they are big liars wont even release her tax,hillary for christ sake will you pls release you tax lets see how you make you millions if ur not corrupt then i will trust u once more,do what you obama did instead of liein.

Posted by: dia20 | February 20, 2008, 7:56 am 7:56 am

Hillary is in a loose-loose situation and that won’t change. She will need to win with decisive numbers before getting to the convention….a tie going into the convention where she wins will loose her the general election….African Americans will feel it was stolen from them and not vote. She will either loose just by numbers to Obama or win in a close race with Obama only to loose the BIG one. If Obama wins then a lot of Hillary people will be going to McCain….a lot of Obama’s winning votes came from people crossing party lines to stick it to Hillary….they won’t be there in Nov. for him. The out come…Repubs win WH…Dems keep both houses.

Posted by: Tom Annandale virginia | February 20, 2008, 7:59 am 7:59 am

Hillary clinton supporters won’t vote for Mccain. They Wont Vote period.
This should be very very interesting.
Im not alone, there are alot of voters who feel the same way. The media has made obama the chosen one and who do they represent Big Business.

Posted by: Carol | February 20, 2008, 8:12 am 8:12 am

Carol: “Hillary clinton supporters won’t vote for Mccain. They Wont Vote period.” The I will need to change my assesment…Repubs take WH and both Houses.

Posted by: Tom Annandale virginia | February 20, 2008, 8:21 am 8:21 am

“IF” Obama happens to get lucky enough to become President he is not going to save the world from racism. I believe many of his supporters are riding an emotional wave that will crash to shore once he gets elected and they realize he can’t solve all the issues he’s claimed he can “CHANGE”.

Posted by: Justin | February 20, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am

My wife and I will be voting republican for the second time in 40 years, rather than vote for Obama. Many of our friends feel the same way and the general election will prove that out.

Posted by: vnvet68 | February 20, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am

The GOP AND MCCRAZY are so scared of OBAMA!!!! THEY PROBALLY will LEND HILLARY MONEY!

Posted by: Nando, Florida | February 20, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am

If Osama wins the primary, a lot of Hillary supporters will vote for John McCain or a third party candidate. He will not get many Hispanic and Asian American votes either. Democracts will not even carry CA and NY. How can you win white house?

Posted by: Hard | February 20, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am

John McCain’s best days are behind him.
So his wife can talk and dress up for him? Michelle Obama words were taken out ot context by McCain’s wife.
John McCain trying to Swift Boat Obama wont help McCain in Nov.
Obama wins Texas and Ohio

Posted by: Lookup | February 20, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

Do you think the people who vote for Senator Obama in Red state during DEM primary will continue support him in general election if he does win the nomination from liberal DEM? So far, Hillary Clinton won all the votes from big states. Most of the voters in those states are middle and working class, moderate DEM, Hispanics, Asians, White men and women do not automatically vote for Mr. Obama once Hillary is out.
In fact, with the rule, winner takes all delegates in November Election, DEM will definitely hand the White House to GOP again in 2009 if Mr. Obama does win the nomination.
“YES, WE CAN” or “NO, YOU CAN’T” Kid Game will not work in General Election.

Posted by: stock_craft | February 20, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

stock_craft,
Obama is running a good campaign so far. Do you think that his staff would not be preparing for the november election in case he does win?

Posted by: Sharon | February 20, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

I agreed Sharon but the Media and GOP will start getting him once Hillary is out. Beating Senator Obama is much more easily than beating Clinton. They, Clinton have survived the GOP attacks for more than 15 years.

Posted by: stock_craft | February 20, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

Well stock_craft that may be true but I’m hoping if he does win over Clinton he will still have major support. I have always thought that with Obama and Clinton on the same ticket will ensure a victory. Whether that happens or not who knows.

Posted by: Sharon | February 20, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

I wonder how this election, in this democracy would look if we didn’t have the male media to decide what we see and hear and if the male didn’t interpret for us what we’ve seen and heard. At some point, the male media’s egotistical pawing of each other in their search for the ultimate one up-man-ship in describing for us what we’ve seen and heard is at best humorous and at worst a laying open to the entire world that their impressions of us are well founded; the American people are incredibly naïve and shallow. Obamacans got a taste of “vetting” and the Republican machine last night when John McCain wasted no time stepping into the ring, to take on both Hillary and Obama. It seems that McCain, unlike the press huddle their locker room, has no fear in talking about Obama’s lack of experience, “an eloquent but empty call for change”, his naive proposal to bomb Pakistan and his wife’s quip about her “first proud” moment of being an American. I wonder why the press hasn’t said more, hasn’t ask more tough questions about Obama, hasn’t “tested” him like they have Hillary. I’m sure they’ll tell me, if I need to know.

Posted by: AmazonTraveler | February 20, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

It is a testiment to Hillary’s strenghth, endurance, smart and hardwork that she has made this far. The media has play a big part in stealing this election away from her. I’ve never seen such blant bias against a candidate in my life. It is a shame that my daughter has to watch sexism play out on a national stage with so many folks going along with it. Again, a hard working experienced woman is being overlooked for an inexperience smooth talking man. I am amaze at HIllary. I am amaze at how fabulously strong she is. I will enjoy watching her battle this race to victory. And I will be proud that my daughter will witness one of the greatest woman role model in her life becoming the next president. The voters are smarter then the media gives them credit for. I for once will vote for Hillary for many reasons but one is to cast a vote against the media. In a democracy, the corporate media should NOT have the power to swing votes and play bias publicity games. The clintons have been very outspoken against the media madness for ratings with little regards to public interest and they have paid for it dearly. It won’t be the media that will win HIllary this election. It will be voters, voters who recognize the true warrior in this race and the true worker bee who will deliver great changes and not just entertain them will regurgitated speeches from the past with orchestrated timming. Hillary 08

Posted by: San Francisco, California | February 20, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am

It is very telling….Rich/educated are for Obama and Middleclass, Poor/uneducated are for Hillary. All these folks want change but it is the middleclass, poor that need real and immediate change. It doesn’t surprise me that the people who are most desperate for immediate change and solutions are recognize the warrior in HIllary. They know who will deliver. The rich and educated can afford to role the dice and weather through four years of an inexperience president who will run an experiemental governement. The poor can not afford 4 years of waiting because things are breaking now and they are struggling now. Those who need immediate change do not have the luxury to take on an inexperience president who can regurgitated great speeches of the past with orchestrated timming. Food, healthcare, equality, opportunities and hope is needed now. Hillary08

Posted by: chris | February 20, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

It amazes me how the media is so obvious with their dislike of Hillary. The polls are showing her +5-8 points in texas, 20+ points in Ohio and 20+ points in pensalvania and they are already writing her death notice. These 3 states will take Hillary back to even and the delegate count will continue on. And for all those who media folks who continue to talk of how super delegates should not overturn voter counts…..its funny how they conviently leave out the fact that Hillary won overwhelmingly in florida in the popular votes even with Obama and edward on the ticket and without campaigning. So while the wave the noble flag of how popular votes should count they selectively leave out several million voters in Florida where their candidate did not win…..hmmm. I have no doubt that Hillary win win the nomination and the popular vote and florida will need to be calculated into the thinking of ‘popular’ votes because no democracy can put aside 5 million voters voices and still call itself a democracy.

Posted by: Charlene | February 20, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am

San Francisco,
I understand that you are proud that a strong & smart woman is running for president but why is Obama only a smooth talker? It SEEMS like you are voting for Hilliary because she is a woman by the comments you made. Hilliary does not have 36 or 35 yrs exp in politics. Her husband have a lot of years of experience. Please don’t get that confused. A lot of people are seeing Clinton but have to realize that Bill Clinton was president not Hilliary. Yes she may have SOME inside knowledge but not that much. And I think it would be a mistake to put her husband in a position of power because people might complain that Bill is running things instead of Hilliary stepping out on her own. All people on the campaign trail make speeches. This is all people have been associating Obama with. But I am confused why no one would bring up his time in the Senate? Maybe because Obama and Hilliary actually agree on more issues than they disagree on.
If the only thing people can say bad about Obama is that he makes good speeches then ……..( I will let you fill in the blank)!

Posted by: Sharon | February 20, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am

Charlene If Hilliary is in the lead in the polls then you are right the media should not count her out. But I don’t know if the points are that large.

Posted by: Sharon | February 20, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am

The reason the democrats always looses is because democrats are naive and dumb and do not work cooperatively as well as the GOP. The GOP wants Obama to win the nomination. It is Obama that they will beat in the general election. The GOP was hopeless at the beginning of this campaign but they found an opportunity to actually win back the whitehouse. Not just an opportunity but a realistic one. They banded together first, they are organizing wasted votes for Obama to get HIllary out of the race and they are already beginning their general election campaign against Obama. Obama has no chance against Mccain. His Iraq claim will go no where against a candidate who has not only serve in government longer then him but who had opted for a strategy that is bringing victory for troops and iraqies. On top of all this, how in the world can Obama debate patriotism against a man who sacrafice his life and body such as mccain. Like or hate Mccain, the guy wear respect perfectly on his shoulders. Economically, they are both equal. Mccain may have an edge because he’s got much more experience to speak of. Obama’s argument will be that Mccain is old and this country need new. Well, I do not believe people will swallow that message well when Obama uses it on Mccain. Mccain’s old looks differently then others….his old tends to spell experience, battle scars, dedication to country, maverick fighter…..not the kind of old that Obama is able to connect Hillary with. Obama has no chance….and I must say the GOP may be alot of things but they are a bunch of brilliant people when it comes to elections. For the GOP to be sitting on pretty right now for the white-house when all wrote them off as hopeless has been the greatest story that have not been told.

Posted by: Charlene | February 20, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am

To assume that if HIllary wins, her husband will be in the power seat is as ignorant as Michelle Obama claiming it was HIllary’s fault that Bill cheated on her. This woman is her own person…who thinks, feels and has put herself where she is today. Trust me, bill’s public humiliation of her did not get her to where she is at. If anything it is a testiment of her strenghth, will and endurance and I do not believe we will ever see a stronger person in elected office then this woman. Her strenghth amazes me.

Posted by: San Francisco, California | February 20, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

Charlene wrote: “It amazes me how the media is so obvious with their dislike of Hillary. The polls are showing her +5-8 points in texas, 20+ points in Ohio and 20+ points in pensalvania and they are already writing her death notice. These 3 states will take Hillary back to even and the delegate count will continue on. And for all those who media folks who continue to talk of how super delegates should not overturn voter counts…..its funny how they conviently leave out the fact that Hillary won overwhelmingly in florida in the popular votes even with Obama and edward on the ticket and without campaigning. So while the wave the noble flag of how popular votes should count they selectively leave out several million voters in Florida where their candidate did not win…..hmmm. I have no doubt that Hillary win win the nomination and the popular vote and florida will need to be calculated into the thinking of ‘popular’ votes because no democracy can put aside 5 million voters voices and still call itself a democracy”
Good post, I agreed. If DEM can’t solve this internal problem, I think it is time to join another party. This party is death.

Posted by: stock_craft | February 20, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

Jay:
Obama won by almost 200,000 votes!
That’s a swamping in anybodys book!
The fat lady is warming up in the bullpen! Bye Bye Hillary!

Posted by: reaganfan | February 20, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Okay why do Dem. have to be naive and dumb just because they don’t vote for Hilliary? I think most people are ready for a change. whether that change will be Clinton, Obama, or Mc Cain that still is up in the air.
I think people underestimate Obama they didn’t think he would have a chance against Hilliary. Now they are singing a different tune of that it will be very close. And yes I believe that it is still anyone’s race.
To be honest I don’t hate any of the canidates that are running. Do I favor some over others? Yes I do. Most people on this site seems to like one but hate another. On all of my post I have not said anything bad about a canidate. In a earlier post I was trying to show some realism to a poster who seems to only go for Hilliary because she is a woman. I mention that everyone seemed to be saying how Hilliary has all this experience because the Clintons have been in the white house. I was just pointing out that it was Bill that had the experience not Hilliary (as far as the white house). And that it would be a mistake to put him in a position of power. (Not that she said this or will do this) It was just my opinion.

Posted by: Sharon | February 20, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

San Fran: “It is the Clinton’s conviction not to play along with the media”……the Clintons not talking to the media and expecting to win this election is like going to a football game and expecting to win with never having touched the ball. Like it or not she needs to be more involved with the media…..they don’t call it MASS MEDIA for nothing….. it’s a way that information is given out to large numbers of people….the only other way is to go to a zillion malls and go door to door to get your message out….not very pratical. She only wants to send out her message but not be questioned on it. Sorry, doesn’t work that way. She needs to say her stuff and then they get to ask questions to clarify….if she can’t handle the stresses the media then how in the hell is she going to handle the stresses of Commander in Chief? Sorry to hear you are willing to pull the lever for ANY woman just because she is a she….not a very in depth thinker are you.

Posted by: Tom Annandale virginia | February 20, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

Also Obama wife words were taken out of context. But it seems like everybody words are in this election. :-)

Posted by: Sharon | February 20, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Tom- Newsflash- Ignorance is not bliss! To imply that part of a politician’s qualification is to play along with the media no matter what is ignorance at its best. The media is a corporate machine who’s bottom line interest is in ratings and viewers. If you are unaware that CNN is competing with MSNBC and ABC and FOX then I”m sure i’m wasting valuable time explaining this to you. The object of the game is not to deliver facts and allow the public to decide and form their own judgement. If this is the case, we would not see such a massive wave of opininated journalistic shows today. Opinionated journalism is vast, wide and powerful because it sensationalizes the facts to capture viewers attentions, thus boost ratings, thus ad dollars, thus remaining competitive in a cut throat business of media news today. Any network that place public interests first and the mightly dollar last will find themselves off the air quicker then you can say ‘Obama’. Hillary is idealistic enought to go against this dangerous trend because she trust that her experience, hardwork, dedication and smart will shine through. It has for me and many voters. However, people are busy these days with too much stuff to have to shift through the inflated sound bites to find the truth and this is how the media has been able to swing votes and play their bias publicity game. The clintons has been the only campaign with enough guts to point this out and they are paying for it dearly. However, exceptional people take hard stands because they have convictions and principles. Below average politicians settle on immitation and play along to get ahead. The differences are clear. Hillary08

Posted by: San Francisco, California | February 20, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

Hillary WILL take Ohio. I and everyone I know will get out and vote for her if we have to crawl to the precinct ! It is time for the press to stop giving a pass to the Teflon Kid !! Hillary is the only one with the intelligence and the experience to do the job!! Go Hill ! We are there for ya !

Posted by: Shiloh | February 20, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

SanFran: Of course it’s competative…it always has been and always will be. However, if the choice is put out information to them vs not putting information out there then one had best get talking…FAST. Like you said…it’s competitive, not only for them but for the candidates. If Hillary won’t talk then there is nothing to write about…if Obama, McCain or Huckabee want to talk then it will get written about. She can’t operate in a vacum. Someone’s message is going to get out…..a given….if she wants hers out there then she has to get out there. Also there could be a lot of Hillary fatigue….she’s been campaigning longer than any of the others and they may feel thay have covered her and there is nothing new from her where as the others have stuff to say that wasn’t repeated by them for 2 plus years. If she plans to win this she needs to be more in the game….running for President is a contact sport….she can’t be an armchair quarterback and win this.

Posted by: Tom Annandale virginia | February 20, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

Once again ABC news shows its bias. When Clinton was winning the majority of stories had her name, now she is losing and her name is still ‘the story’ most often written up.
greenlee2,for the very reasons Clinton and McCain voted for this war, are the very reason they won’t get us out of it. A lot of the reasoning to go into Iraq had to do with oil supply and oil prices. Look at the price of oil before and after we invaded Iraq. How many rich people here and in the mid-east saw their net worth multiply? Obama is not on the payroll of the corporations as evidenced by his refusal of corporate donations to his campaign. Hillary has taken even more money from them than the Republicans. Obama will be working for us, the ordinary American.

Posted by: Lydia | February 20, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

I wonder who Hilliary plants in her next audience for Bill to slap down with false indignation. (“How DARE she/he!”) It’s either gonna be that or another staged “crying” spell… Can’t wait for the next chance for Hilliary to show how phony she and her campaign really is again. Don’t worry at 0 for 10!!! Just wait for it, cause it’s COMING!!! Pathetic… PLEASE see thru their charade. Have a little dignity. Please.

Posted by: cba | February 20, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

Tom- there is a big difference in Media Competition and Media Bias. The Media has gotten out of hands and I imagine with a Hillary in the white-house, things will change. This is the reason why the media has been so Anti-Hillary. You’re right on one point, it is a game but exceptional people do not participate in games that endangered the integrity of democratic principles. Exceptional leaders take hard stands against dangerous games for profit in order to take the side of the larger public….who, after all are the people they are representing. Hillary is taking this stand and answer only to the voters so that she is not a participant in this sensationalism reporting for profit game and that is why I and many Hillary voters admire her so very much. The guts that this woman has to go against the giant corporate media at great cost is the same guts she will have to go against self-serving interest groups that has showered Obama with money in order to run the show with an inexperience president. This woman will allow no such things and her actions and records indicates such character. I do not need to rely on her words alone because her past actions and records has given life to the leadership ability she possesses.

Posted by: San Francisco, California | February 20, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

For the first in history i see majority of Americans losing their heads particularly the so described educated. Granted the youths are unenlightened,how do we describe the so called educated who could not discern an intuitive elevated mind from a caricasure who has so far succeeded in casting spell on people with shallow borrowed phrases,and who has employed “change” without telling people the very substance of change.And, i must confess the media are the most culpable feeding furlong hope into the people’s psyche.Let’s hope that this cup of fury the media are dangling before us will pass over us.I rest my case.

Posted by: Yomi | February 20, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

The Republicans are not voting for Obama
because they feel he will be easy to beat People. Get Real. They are Voting
for Obama Because they remember John
MCains Voting Record against them on key
issues over the past couple of Years and
it’s a bit of a backlash. Obama is easy
to like no matter if your a Dem or Rep.
He is Honest,Intelligent,Sincere,Means
Business and is Quite well spoken. He will put America back on the Map as #1.
I Think even the Republicans Secretly
Realize Greatness when they see it!
Leader

Posted by: GlamourGurl77 | February 21, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am

If the Democratic candidates can’t combine the Republicans will win because
both sides are very angry. Hillery has been criminally attacked in the media. Obama’s group can’t get their vote because of the evil relentless attacks on the internet(1000 sites) and tv. We want our candidate and vote respected.

Posted by: bj | March 10, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.