By Jennifer Parker

Feb 5, 2008 10:49am

Bob Dole Surely Doesn’t Want a Fight About Bob Dole!

Yesterday, trying to calm the conservative storm, former Senate Majority Leader and 1996 GOP presidential nominee Bob Dole, R-Kansas, wrote to conservative radio talk show giant Rush Limbaugh.

Limbaugh has been on a tear against Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., which you can read about HERE or watch HERE.

"Rush," Dole wrote, "I was the Republican Leader from January 1985 until I left the Senate voluntarily in June 1996. I worked closely with Senator McCain when he came to the Senate in 1987 until I departed. I cannot recall a single instance when he did not support the Party on critical votes.

"Whoever wins the Republican nomination will need your enthusiastic support. Two terms for the Clintons are enough," Dole wrote.

This morning, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney was asked about this letter on Fox News. ]

"Well, it’s probably the last person I would have wanted write a letter for me," Romney said. "I think there are a lot of folks who tend to think that maybe John McCain’s race is a bit like Bob Dole’s race. That it’s the guy who’s next in line, the inevitable choice."

Responded McCain in a statement: "Governor Romney’s attack on Bob Dole is disgraceful, and Governor Romney should apologize. Bob Dole is a war hero who has spent his life in service to this nation and nobody has worked harder to build the Republican Party. Bob Dole deserves the respect of every American and certainly every Republican. Governor Romney denounced Ronald Reagan in the mid ’90s while Bob Dole was working tirelessly to elect Republicans across the country. Governor Romney was missing from those fights when I was standing with President Reagan and Senator Dole to build the Republican Party.

"Governor Romney is trying to divide the Republican Party and his disparagement of one of our Party’s greatest leaders is a sad commentary on Governor Romney’s increasingly bitter campaign," McCain continued.

There’s obviously some jujitsu going on here – with McCain accusing Romney of dividing the GOP, when McCain’s nomination would really give many conservatives agita.

There’s also some dissing by Romney of a GOP candidate that conservatives were not particularly enthused over.

There’s also some dissing by Romney of a loyal Republican presidential candidate who served his country honorably in World War II and worked hard for the Republican party. Perhaps some voters might find it a bit unseemly? And perhaps others will think of McCain as Dole 2 — too old and not conservative enough.

- jpt

UPDATE: In Charleston, WV, Romney clarified his remarks this way:

"Let me make it very clear. Senator Dole is an American hero, a war hero, a fine man and a great leader for our party . What I am pointing to and wanted to in my comment was that the selection of our nominee based on someone having served in the Senate a long time can be seen as the person who deserves the nomination did not do well for us in that election.

"It is that aspect, not Sen. Dole, that I am referring to with that aspect in choosing someone who has been in the senate the longest and giving it to him out of a sense of obligation that I think it was the error, but there is certainly nothing but respect on my part for Senator Dole."

User Comments

I can list a bunch of time McCain went against not only the party but the Conservative Beliefs of Reagan and Conservatism!!
Even though he is a better pick then Obama and Clinton, does not make him better then Romney

Posted by: spock | February 5, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

I think the Bob Dole / John McCain comparison works pretty well.
But of course, Willard “Mitt” Romney is a complete Phony so I guess its a wash as far as this debate goes.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | February 5, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

It doesn’t matter who they select as president. USA is a sham run from hideouts outside the country. Just ask cheney who his real bosses are.

Posted by: Ellis Dee | February 5, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

Romney reminds me of slick willy Clinton: say or do anything to get ahead.
McCain’s a projected winner – when will the Party’s ultra-right wing realize McCain’s better for the country than a legacy Clinton or a well-meaning but far left Obama?
After today, the GOP, Rush included, will need to unify behind McCain.
Kudos to Dole for reminding Rush and his ilk of what duty is.

Posted by: Rummy | February 5, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

When are the Republicans and Democrats going to GET IT. It’s not about their respective parties. It’s about the people of this country and supporting US.

Posted by: Jim | February 5, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Reagan had good intentions that the CIA took advantage of with the Iran/Contra debacle.

Posted by: mnjrupp | February 5, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am

It should be noted also that McCain lost to Ron Paul in Maine as well. I have the highest respect for Ron Paul, but America doesn’t seem ready for his message. Romney is the next best choice.

Posted by: Helen | February 5, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am

According the LA which seems to be factual McCain is a far left Liberal even more then the moderate dems!
Moderate Republicans stand behind the be republican and conservative Romney!
Otherwise the dems will win the presidency even if McCain wins since he is a puppet!!

Posted by: spock | February 5, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am

Big deal… They’re BOTH Democrats!!!!

Posted by: cba | February 5, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am

JIM It is not about SUPPORTING us is about REPRESENTING the CITIZENS of the country, not getting elected and seeing how much money you can burn up.
Step one is to close the electoral college.
Step two is called popular vote.
There is a good start. We are letting ourselves be hoodwinked.

Posted by: Max | February 5, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am

“There’s also some dissing by Romney of a GOP candidate that conservatives were not particularly enthused over.”
^^^^^^^^^^^^
They weren’t enthused about whom when? Are they enthused now? “Dissing?”

Posted by: Grant06 | February 5, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am

So let me get this right Republicans, its a BAD thing that McCain is willing to work with Democrats to get things accomplished instead of allowing partisan politics to deadlock every piece of important legislation (immigration, global warming, etc)?

Posted by: brandon | February 5, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am

Romney who? McCain and Dole have both proudly served their country while he was building his personal wealth. The presidency may be a trophy for Romney or Hillary, but McCain wants to continue to serve his country.

Posted by: CD | February 5, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

massachusetts governer
michael dukakis
arizona senator
barry goldwater
massachusetts governer
mitt romney
arizona senator
john mccain
WHO is the conservative ?

Posted by: diskjockey | February 5, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

I am not so sure that McCain IS a better pick than Obama. I have seen several clips by Obama stating he has the same opinion as McCain on a number of issues — but Obama is not a freaking-out-of-control boorish vitriolic time-bomb that needs to be sent to charm school.

Posted by: Scott | February 5, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

I feel comfortable with McCain and his experience in the U.S. Congress. He will make a good president as we face a war and economic problems. He will also be able to work the disfunctional Democrats in Congress.

Posted by: Glenn Harper | February 5, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

Diskjockey:
What kind of impaired logic is that…?
Are you trying to make the case that since Barry Goldwater was a senator in Arizona, that makes McCain a conservative too…?
Oh wow! I’m scared by who is actually allowed to vote in this country…

Posted by: Alex | February 5, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

Oh my word. That spock fellow is still shillin for the Marvelous Massachusets Liberal himself Willard Romney, aka MITT!
Mitt is what Eddie Haskell turned age 60. Mitt is what Jon Cary looks like on a bad day.
If you want conservative, and if you want someone who kicketh butt and taketh names, vote HUCK.
If you want someone who kisseth butt (MITT!) and taketh naps (McCain), you got other choices.
Nuff said.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | February 5, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

CD, I don’t see how you could lump together hillary and Romney together as wanting the “trophy” of the presidency. I think most people would look at it as McCain and Hillary wanting the glory more than wanting to help people. Not only that, but they have a lot in common. Even Bill Clinton said a debate between Hilary and John Mccain would put people to sleep because they agree with and respect each other so much.

Posted by: McAmnesty | February 5, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am

Mitt Romney seems like he is alot more about straight talk than McCain. McCain has a canned message. He is always touting how he was a republican for all the years he was in congress and how he stood by and watched everything play out. If he is such a leader why is it, that he constantly uses ‘we’ and I stood with ‘so and so’. The message I take, is that he has never led anything and he likes to point out the obvious, but hide the truth. He was a republican that the republicans could never count on. He loves to reach over the aisle, but never wants to reach out within his own party. He opposes core conservative values and he gets elected by avoiding areas that he is not popular on. Never once has he said that he will not seek to offer amnesty, once the borders are secure. Probably because he has that on the adgenda. McCain is the sneaky slimy one if you ask me. He never answers the questions, but twists them to be some propaganda point for him. People who think that Romney is slick have just bought the Media’s twist on him. No one is as qualified as Romney. If the government were to hire him as consultant he could easily charge millions of dollars to benefit our country. He is offering his experience and understanding for free (he has vowed not to take a salary if president). He has American best interests at heart. Elect greatness

Posted by: niqueie | February 5, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Brandon:
You don’t quite get it. McCain doesn’t know HOW to work with other people. If someone disagrees with him, he screams and swears at them. Alientaing people is what he does better thsan anyrthing else, as you will see from the state of our party. Romney, on the other hand, has a proven track record of working WELL with people of differing opinions. He seeks out different opinions so that he can have all the data and come to synergistic solutions.

Posted by: Carol | February 5, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

Carol, Romney also believes Native Americans are the Lost Tribes of Israel ! What do you think about that ? Do you agree ?

Posted by: notsojake | February 5, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

HEY WP, I HAVE MISSED YOU!
AREN’T WE AMERICANS TIRED OF SEEING ROMNEY’S FACE? LET’S BURY THIS GUY TODAY IN THE ELECTION AND SEND HIM PACKING!
THIS VIDEO HELPS MAKE A CHOICE BETWEEN ROMNEY, MCCAIN AND HUCKABEE.
SEMPER FI
Dan Campbell

Posted by: Dan Campbell | February 5, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

I would like to know where the “liberal” McCain votes? Not in the U.S. Senate. That is where Sen. John McCain has followed the party line 87% of the time. Rush Limbaugh: The liberal socialist McCain will get in bed with the democrats at a wink of the eye. 87% What

Posted by: larry | February 5, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

Give me a break. By saying that McCain wants to “continue to serve his country”, you think that Romney doesn’t want to serve his.
A word to all you McCain supporters: PEOPLE CAN SERVE IN OTHER CAPACITIES! Romney served the nation plenty by creating successful business ventures (and yes more people benefitted than were laid off!).
Also, comparing McCain to Goldwater is a HUGE stretch. Why do you think that we’re having these debates in the first place.
I will never vote for McCain. I hold my conservatism too dear!

Posted by: sshmg | February 5, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

The “I don’t want to pay taxes” retoric
of so called “conservative republicans”
Is the MOST UN-PATRIOTIC MOVEMENT EVER STARTED IN AMERICA. They disrespect
true Heros, like John McCain, Bob Dole
Max Cleland(D), They lie about the service of others like John Kerry and send to the White House the least patriotic, least remarkable president of
the 20th century. Lets see…Rush Limbaugh, DRUG ATTIC WITH A FOLLOWING OF
VERY ANGRY, UN-EMPLOYED, SHEEP. Bill O’Reiley, sex maniac who has said he doesn’t even believe the things he says.
It’s just an ACT. The Republican party controlled the Congress for 12 years and the White House for the last 7 miserable years and what did they accomplish….WAR..GREED AND CORRUPTION. No wonder CHANGE is in the Air…good riddance.

Posted by: blackie | February 5, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

The “I don’t want to pay taxes” retoric
of so called “conservative republicans”
Is the MOST UN-PATRIOTIC MOVEMENT EVER STARTED IN AMERICA. They disrespect
true Heros, like John McCain, Bob Dole
Max Cleland(D), They lie about the service of others like John Kerry and send to the White House the least patriotic, least remarkable president of
the 20th century. Lets see…Rush Limbaugh, DRUG ATTIC WITH A FOLLOWING OF
VERY ANGRY, UN-EMPLOYED, SHEEP. Bill O’Reiley, sex maniac who has said he doesn’t even believe the things he says.
It’s just an ACT. The Republican party controlled the Congress for 12 years and the White House for the last 7 miserable years and what did they accomplish….WAR..GREED AND CORRUPTION. No wonder CHANGE is in the Air…good riddance.

Posted by: blackie | February 5, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

Could anybody actually imagine McCain as a CEO? The first thing he would is start calling people to ask them what the heck to do. If you watch the debates, it’s pretty clear that McCain isn’t much for thinking and solving problems.

Posted by: ben | February 5, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

diskjockey: Barry Goldwater, Jr., endorsed Ron Paul (not John McCain), saying he’s the only guy in the entire field who represents his late father’s philosophy. So it’s apparent to anyone with half a brain who the real conservative in the race is.
It’s Mr. Paul–the ONLY Republican candidate who was PERSONALLY endorsed by Ronald Reagan. The other candidates can crow all they want about how “Reagan-like” they are, but none of them can claim what Paul can.
Mr. Paul’s problem is that he has placed loyalty to his country and the Constitution above loyalty to his party and President Bush. Most people inside the party fail to see that Mr. Bush and today’s Republican party are about as “Republican” as a meeting of bolsheviks, which is why Mr. Paul is not welcome.
Today will be a sad day for the party.

Posted by: gb8898 | February 5, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

McCain asserted, “We never lost a battle in Vietnam, it was American public opinion that caused us to lose that conflict.” Oh, now McCain is blaming the American public for Vietnam? What a jerk. The Vietnam war started just like the Iraq war, on false statements used by warmongers, like himself and Bush. After billions of dollars spent, you mean to tell me that we can’t find “Osama bin Laden” after 5 years? Give me a break.

Posted by: helen | February 5, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

“when will the Party’s ultra-right wing realize McCain’s better for the country than a legacy Clinton or a well-meaning but far left Obama?”
Uhh…NEVER! Win with us, or lose without us. Your choice. We’re tired of compromising ourselves into socialism. When you always vote for the lesser of two evils, you always end up with evil, and we’re not doing it anymore. Mark my words… there’s a lot of us out there. If Ron Paul doesn’t get the nomination (and I’m man enough to say I don’t see that happening at this point), then there’s going to be a Democrat in the White house. Bite that one for a while. All of the rest of the Republicratic nominees are traitors to the Constitution…socialistic globalists! Maybe four or eight more years of running the country into the ground will wake the rest of the country up to the reality that the United States is being sold to the highest bidder and absorbed completely into a global government, unless enough Americans love the Constitution enough to defend it. Honestly, our greatest enemies are not Muslim extremists, but white men in 3 piece suits who are destroying our country from the inside out.
By the way, I’m a white man with a family, living this past year below the poverty line, who has voted Republican in every election since 1984, except for 1996 and 2004, when I voted for a third party. LESS GOVERNMENT = MORE FREEDOM. PERIOD.

Posted by: Brian | February 5, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

It is clear to those who have studied personality theory that Hillary and McCain are the candidates motivated by power. Romney and Obama operate from a different motivation, that of intimacy and connectedness. They are both driven people and achievers, but power is not the goal.
Romney’s type will take charge if there is no one capable to take charge, but his personality does not have to be “right” even when he is wrong. The power driven types are always “right” and will seldom admit to having made an mistake. Those of Romney’s type don’t overlook critical details, like “inconsequential” state primaries, and are very, very loyal. You’ll note how he married his high-school sweetheart and has remained true to her despite her MS.
McCain’s just turned his wife in for another model. His type has to “look good” and his first wife bacame disabled in an accident. Romney’s type wants to “be good.”
McCain’s type can be leaders, but they can also be dictators.

Posted by: Carol | February 5, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

Three very good reasons not to vote for McCain.
1. Pro-illegal Immigration
2. Belief in Global Warming
3. Capiagn finance reform.
McCain will never get my vote. I don’t know how any true Republican could ever vote for this man.

Posted by: freaksloan | February 5, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

Whether you like McCain or not he is much more electable than Romney…Romney is just not likeable…he’s a Republican Bill Clinton…Romney has spent tens of millions of his his own dollars for a job that pays much much less…and he wants that job desperately…that really scares me…seriously, how does a multi-millionaire relate to the common man?…AND do we really want Hillary or Obama in the White House with OUR troops on the battlefield? and one last thing on Romney…being a Mormon he sincerely believes that after Christ was killed on the cross he came to America and preached to the American Indians…I think this speaks volumes about the man…character matters doesn’t it? whereas McCain spent 5 1/2 years in the Hanoi Hilton making sure others went home first before he did…think about it

Posted by: Ken | February 5, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

I’m imagining the lackey in a cubicle who periodically goes through this page and deletes anything that’s critical of Jake Tapper.
Don’t be sad, Mr. Lackey, in ten years ABC will make you Senior Pablum Shoveller.

Posted by: JJ | February 5, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

Republican’s need to stop fighting each other. Voters see grid lock. Romney needs to stop annoying people and criticizing McCain. If you can’t say anything nice don’t say it at all.

Posted by: Ms Cake | February 5, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Local News Covers Willie Nelson’s 9/11 Remarks
Jonesreport
Tuesday February 5, 2008
KVUE News 3, ABC’s Austin affiliate, covered country music legend Willie Nelson’s statements about 9/11 he made yesterday on the Alex Jones Show.
The news brief included a snippet of Nelson asking rhetorically, “How naive are we?” before a short story about what it referred to as “controversial statements” Nelson made about the twin towers’ apparent demolition on 9/11.
KVUE did not refute the claims or make an attempt to belittle the claims, though it did mention some of his other political remarks– against the Iraq War and for Kinky Friedman’s bid for Governor of Texas.

Posted by: infowars.com | February 5, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

I have read Dole’s letter, Romney’s reponse and McCain’s response.
Dole did not endorse McCain, Romney did not attack Bob Dole, and as usual McCain LIED about the letter’s intent. You have to give credit to McCain for being able to lie so blatantly and get away with it.

Posted by: Tim Singleton | February 5, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

Romney: “I think there are a lot of folks who tend to think that maybe John McCain’s race is a bit like Bob Dole’s race. That it’s the guy who’s next in line, the inevitable choice.”
Huh? I thought he was the ultra-left wing Maverick who was going to leave the party in 2000? But I guess he’s still “next in line”.
Hey “Washington Is Broken” Romney, Obma called, he wants his campaign theme back!

Posted by: doc | February 5, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

Ken: If we’re going to sit here and pick apart religions, we’re starting down a very dangerous and silly path.
So Romney believes Jesus came to America… who cares? Christians and Jews believe God talked to Moses via a flaming shrub.
All religions are weird and wacky. Mormonism is no more strange than any other when you get down to it.

Posted by: gb8898 | February 5, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

Watching Republicans arguing about conservative credentials is like watching a hammer debate a rock. Can the past 8 years leave no sense of need for change from your bankrupt ideologies? No, it’s still “let’s just call the Clinton’s some more names and hope that something works out for America this time around.”

Posted by: Drumran | February 5, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Any Republican who supported President Bush the past eight years is not fit to be President. Ron Paul is the only choice. If Ron Paul is not nominated we vote Democrat.

Posted by: Joe Republican | February 5, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

All those who would never vote for A or B even if it meant voting for the opposition, or not at all. They could vote that sentiment honestly and comfortably if the ballot included a NO column and the highest net yes wins. They could help their party win by voting no against the opposition while not claiming support for their party’s candidate. Or, if angry enough, they could vote directly against their party’s candidate with a NO without indicating endorsement of the other party. “Just say no”, a conservative Reagan approach, needs to part of the election process, on ballots and polls. A simple addition. A huge impact producing a result that more honestly reflects voter sentiment, is less spinnable and would likely increase turnout. Why do we have to say we want yucky parsnips to really say we don’t want even yuckier broccoli? The politicians, of course, want us limited to voting support only, never the lack of it. It’s more spinnable claiming mandates when they really may have won just by default with the other getting more yes votes but also more no votes. Wouldn’t that be fun to watch them parse it?

Posted by: Valjean | February 5, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

McCain is a spoiler… just ask Republicans and George W. Bush. You’d think the fact that McCain and Huckabee are absolutely in bed with each other would bother their wives, but hey, it’s really no great loss.
Sure McCain has a lot of politician’s doing his talking for him. That’s how corruption works. You get the other guy’s to provide your talking points so that you can pretend to be above it all. The problem is that McCain has shown his true colors too often. No one who knows him is falling for it.
McCain, the liberal, is a sure loser against the Democrats in 2008.

Posted by: Dennis | February 5, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

To ben:
What’s wrong with “to ask them what the heck to do.” If the current guy in office had done more of that, we might not be in the mess we’re in now.
To freaksloan:
Global Warming dosn’t require “belief.” It’s science, like evolution, and belief doesn’t enter into it — facts do.

Posted by: Ralph | February 5, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Lets do away with the term limits for president in the constitution, and corronate Bush KING!! He and his neo conservative sock monkeys have done such a bang up job

Posted by: Tony | February 5, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

What is it with some of you people? Talk about hypocrites. You demand perfection from the candidates but then disply the very attributes you claim to take issue with.
Why can’t there be a civil discussion of issues and qualifications without declaring that your candidate (whoever it is) is a saint and anyone else is pure evil?
You want “united” political parties yet declare boldy that if your candidate does not get the nomination you will not vote for anyone else.
Juveniles.

Posted by: Bob L | February 5, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

McCain will need to pull as many independent voters in the Presidential election (Hilliary-haters & the politically naive) as conservatives he repulses.
Too old & cantankerous, not to be mention dim-witted. (I’ve seen him on CSPAN talking technology issues with industry leaders – he just doesn’t get the dynamics involved much less the technical aspects)
Respect his service to the country not his bid for President.
His service in Congress is HO HUM.

Posted by: PKay | February 5, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

McCain and Huckabee are both absolutely unacceptable candidates for the Republican party. They cannot be trusted on anything, except maybe the right to life. But, must I remind my social conservative friends, that right to life, while important, is not the only critical issue facing our country. We need a candidate, unlike Bob Dole, who can actually win the White House. This will take someone who can tackle the economy, illegal immigration, terrorism, etc, etc, etc, etc. Great, Huckabee is clearly pro life. Great, McCain supports the troops. But, that’s all folks. With those exceptions, they are democrats dressed in one republican sock. Romney supports life-forget the past, look at his record in MA. He supports the troops. AND he can fix the economy, send the illegals home, build the fence, fix the healthcare system, put China and India in the rearview window competitively, improve education, promote business, lower taxes, etc, etc, etc. Romney is the ONLY true conservative and the ONLY gop nominee who can win. Don’t listen to the media-they want McCain. Vote Romney!!!!!!!

Posted by: Spencer | February 5, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

TO OWL @ Feb 5, 2008 1:01:37 PM
You gotta love Owl, bless her heart.
Nobody here has hate in their hearts for the Climatology and the Biology. I mean have you ever spent a summer in a RED state? Sure we have some characters out there such as our Phony Phred and the Willard Romney supporters. But most folks would be down right happy with a Huckabee/ McCain ticket or maybe even the other way around. However the former is definitely better than the Latter!
Sounds like her emoting may be the product of a failed PUBLIC school system. Now if VOUCHERs were around back in her day, we might could have a debate about issues. Once she calms down, I am sure Owl will be more reasonable.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | February 5, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Hey TONY its a party.
Different folks believe differently.
I’m a conservative and believe in evolution. I also believe throwing money at education and teacher unions won’t necessarily fix education.
With their benefits and work year they far surpass most compensation of professional in our state.

Posted by: PKay | February 5, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

What has McCain done in the last 20 years that makes him worthy to be the president? NOTHING!! People scream for change, what from his past tells you that he is going to change anything?? All he talks about is how he was a POW in the war. Great, and he is going to lead our country and change our economy, how?? McCain said out of his own mouth that the economy is not his strength, he is mostly a military man. Does that worry anyone else??? He wines and dines with the democrats. He opposed the Bush tax cuts! He wants amnesty for all the illegals!! He is a democrat who calls himself a republican! He will do no good for our country!
Look at Romney’s credentials and what he has done, he is all about change and fixing things. He has been very successful, he instills values that seem to no longer exist in some parts of America, and he will bring change! He is an honest, hard worker. Oh and in response to Ken, it is absolutely ridiculous to bring Romney’s religion into his presidential election. You probably believe in something that we think is absolutely ridiculous! When I see a man who has good values, lives by them, and instills them in his family and business, then who cares what religion he is!! What religion is Bill Clinton? Did that matter when he had an affair in the white house????
Go ahead, vote for Liberal McCain, but realize he has 0% chance of winning against the democrats!

Posted by: anon | February 5, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

Republicans must impeach Bush to recover their integrity. Choose from a laundry list of impeachable offenses: Spying on Americans, torturing prisoners of war, Going to war under false pretenses, lying to the American people, etc. Republicans have an 80% disapproval rating and cannot win without impeaching Bush.

Posted by: Shameful | February 5, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

As a conservative I refuse to “hold my nose and vote for McCain”. I’m voting for Mitt Romney!

Posted by: Arkansas Girl | February 5, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

BREAKING NEWS….
Huck set to WIN in West Virginia. That is if Mitt and his moneymen don’t pull a fast one at the last minute.
Feel the HuckMENTUM.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | February 5, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

Ken,
That was very nice of McCain to stay at the Hanoi Hilton, but his circumstances there were privileged. He gained special treatment for cooperating.
I’m not blaming him for doing what he needed to survive, but he wasn’t exactly honorable either. And it certainly shouldn’t make him president.

Posted by: Helen | February 5, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

Looks like Romney is going to try pullin an AlGore in WV.
He’s tryin to buy a recount.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | February 5, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Just look how Bob Dole’s career has progressed since Bob Dole lost the election in 1996: from Bob Dole serving as campaign cheerleader for his wife in her Senate race, to Bob Dole acting as spokesperson for erectile dysfunction drugs, to Bob Dole being an apologist for Sen. McCain. Obviously, Bob Dole needs something better for Bob Dole to do.

Posted by: chuck | February 5, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

Liberal? Conservative? It seems everyone is some of each. It just depends on what issue is being considered…and how you define each, in family value language.

Posted by: Valjean | February 5, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.