NAFTA Rhetoric? ‘It Didn’t Happen’
ABC News’ Jennifer Parker Reports: A senior Canadian Embassy official in Washington, D.C. disputes a report by the CTV Canadian television network that an Obama campaign staffer telephoned Michael Wilson, Canada’s ambassador to the United States, to reassure him that campaign rhetoric against NAFTA should not be taken seriously.
"It didn’t happen," said Roy Norton, who heads up the congressional, public and intergovernmental affairs portfolio for the Canadian embassy.
Norton said none of the three campaigns for Sen. Barack Obama, Sen. Hillary Clinton, or Sen. John McCain have contacted the embassy.
"Neither before the Ohio debate nor since has any of the U.S. presidential campaigns called Ambassador Wilson or the Canadian embassy to raise NAFTA," he said.
CTV reported last night that two unnamed Canadian sources said a "senior member" of Obama’s campaign team called Wilson in the last month to warn him that Obama would be ratcheting up rhetoric against the North American Free Trade Agreement, but that he should "not be worried about what Obama says about NAFTA" and "Its just campaign rhetoric…Its not serious."
During a debate in Ohio this week, where NAFTA is blamed for job losses, both Obama and Clinton said that as president, they would opt out of the trade deal unless it could be renegotiated.
When asked about the CTV report, Obama’s said today, “It wasn’t true.”
Today Bill Burton of the Obama campaign told ABC News no senior Obama campaign representative called the Canadian embassy. "The news reports on Obama’s position on NAFTA are inaccurate and in no way represent Senator Obama’s consistent position on trade," Burton said separately in an email.
"When Senator Obama says that he will forcefully act to make NAFTA a better deal for American workers, he means it. Both Canada and Mexico should know that, as president, Barack Obama will do what it takes to create and protect American jobs and strengthen the American economy — that includes amending NAFTA to include labor and environmental standards. We are currently reaching out to the Canadian embassy to correct this inaccuracy."
This afternoon the Canadian embassy in Washington, D.C., sent out a press release to deny the CTV report.
"The Canadian Embassy confirms that at no time has any member of a Presidential campaign called the Canadian Ambassador or any official at the Embassy to discuss NAFTA," the statement read. "Last night the Canadian television network CTV, falsely reported that such calls had been made. That story is untrue. Neither before nor since the Ohio debate has any presidential campaign called Ambassador Wilson or the Embassy to raise NAFTA."
The Canadian embassy is proactively reaching out to the campaigns "all the time," Norton said, to try to meet with aides who might form the foreign and economic policy teams of any future administration.
"We talk about the whole range of Canada-U.S. issues which we think it’s critically important that the presidential candidates be aware of including the number of jobs that depend in the United States on Canada-U.S. trade."
The Canadian Embassy says there are more than seven million jobs in the U.S. that depend on trade with Canada.
"We discuss our view that NAFTA has been very good for all three participating countries and has made the continent more competitive in the face of China, India, Brazil," Norton said.
The CTV report suggested the Clinton campaign may have given reassurances to the Canadian government in Ottawa, but the Clinton campaign is flatly denying the claim.
"If anyone did it we don’t know who and they weren’t authorized," Clinton campaign spokesperson Jay Carson told ABC News.
NAFTA has become a hot-button issue in the delegate-rich state of Ohio, which votes next Tuesday. Both Clinton and Obama have tried to woo voters in the economically challenged state by railing against NAFTA, which was pushed through during former President Bill Clinton’s administration.
McCain, however, said today that he plans to highlight his support for the trade deal to draw contrasts between him and his Democratic opponent.
"NAFTA has created jobs," McCain said today while campaigning in Texas, arguing that the trade deal has been good for the American, Canadian, and Mexican economies.
"Anyone who studies history understands that every time this country or other nations in the world have practiced protectionism, they’ve paid a very, very heavy price for it," McCain said, adding that "some would argue that one of the major contributors to World War II was the Smoot-Hawley tariffs acts."
ABC News’ David Chalian, Kate Snow, David Wright, Jake Tapper and Bret Hovell contributed to this report.
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
If it did not happen, then why did the Obama campaign refuse to deny the call had been made?
Where there is smoke there is fire.
Can anyone say cover-up? Amazing that the MSM continues to cover for Obama. Incredible bias!
This comment will probably not even be posted. ABC
Posted by: USAVet | February 28, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
I am sure I will get blasted for this comment – but it is meant to be thought over first, then trashed if it has no merit:
It has become very plain – the masters behind the news readers and their networks have a plan – now if that entails shafting Experience in favor of Incompitent Amateurism – or if it entails ridding the mix of anyone who’ll recognize sinister intent and block it, I don’t know. But it is obvious to me, those that own the media or moving things in a deliberate way, to put the least qualified, most out-matched, and frankly defenseless victim in office.
And this proves yet again, that throughout the last half century, we have been deliberately dumbed down, fattened up, drugged out, and indebted to the point we cannot runaway nor can we rebel. We are too slow, too lazy, too distracted, too poor, too ill, and too dumb to take action – and that is exactly the way they want it. Sort of like Communism, with frosting.
The Russians made the very stupid mistake of crowding their tired, poor, cold, and hungry population into one room, in one small apartment, in the dark, and without distractions or the pretenses of choice.
The New America, that controlled utterly by hand and fist and wallet, is still without true choice or effect on the real blockages in their lives. It is a lot like a Russia in that some electoral college, behind closed doors somewhere, votes in our leader (Politbureau?), or the high courts, appointed by said leaders for life, choose them for us. Anyone ever see a college course to take to become a member of the Electoral College? Ever met someone who was a member? Ever seen a job opening for such a position? Ever been to a meeting? No, chances are you haven’t.
We have nice homes, cars, Internet, plenty of excess food available (whether we can afford it, that is another story). The point is, we have all the accoutrements of luxury available but with just as little truth in the media, and just as little power as any communist worker, in any Soviet-Style Factory. We are just given distractions to keep our mouths shut. When you have a flat screen jumbo plasma TV blathering Girls Gone Wild and ESPN who’s complaining? When you are 300 pounds on a 5 ft. frame, and the supermarket is open 24 hrs. with even more calories waiting – who can complain? And when you vote one way, but the media and your courts and your system choose someone else for you – who can complain, so long as you have all the goodies (and the HUGE debts that go with them) at hand?
The debt is a form of control through covert realms. The loss of freedom and privacy is paraded as the cost of protecting the nation from attack that might have been allowed or sponsored by that same nation. You create the problem, you wait for the demand to fix that problem, and then you impliment the very solution you wanted before the event.
I feel we are in danger of being passified by material goods, diverted from science (so we don’t recognize impossibilities occurring in front of our eyes) and from math (so we can’t use that perfect language to prove we are being taken for a ride). We are bombarded by idiocy for the Idiot Boxes we languish in front of. The media spoon-feeds us like vegetables in half-comas. We believe what we are told and we act on it, like sheep in a herd, with no minds of our own, but rather the herd mentality that says ‘follow the ass in front of you’, even if it is off a cliff.
This deliberate, painstakingly direct movement to place Obama in a position of power is such a cliff. They have one-upped W. Bush this time. You see, the imposter we have actually BELIEVES he is compitent and not out of his league. He actually BELIEVES he can do something about things no genius or general has been able to do since Lincoln 143 years past. Obama actually BELIEVES he is a sort of ‘Messiah Of The People’, like an arabic blended Evita. But he is without the talent to create his own voice. She said ‘I shall return and I shall be millions’. She knew who was in control, and for her brief life, she went right at them, throat and dagger. And the poor for a small time DID get a few things from the Government. But Obama is without the brain to take down the Oligarchy that wants us all robots on production lines. He is being placed their by this Structure, to be controlled from behind like Cheney controls Bush with his fingers up W’s shirt. Obama is dangerous because he believes he is pulling the strings and he is dangerous because he can’t see his own connections to the Puppeteer.
And we can do nothing to stop this. McCain is next to go. Nadar will not be allowed to be a factor. Bloomberg, with his billions, has been told by someone with many more billions even then he, not to enter the race, so today, he tells the world, he won’t enter the race. And all the while, the dumbed down, senseless and fat, uneducated and illiterate masses march along, thinking they are free because they cannot see their chains.
Posted by: 2009 Where Are You | February 28, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
Well thanks for this bit but we will see what CTV has to say in reply to this new piece of information.
Posted by: SJ | February 28, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
The Obama campaign has released a statement that didn’t address whether the conversation had happened but did say that the report inaccurately represented Obama’s position on NAFTA.
Sounds like spin to me.
It appears that the conversations took place, otherwise, why won’t the Obama campaign deny that the calls took place? Why are they dancing around the issue?
Where there is smoke, there is fire. I think there is more to this story than what the Obama campaign and MSM would have us believe.
Posted by: USAVet | February 28, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
Just about anyone who follows politics closely knows, the farther afield from which the slander come, the more it names who is the one to beat.
“First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win.” — Gandhi
Posted by: SE Croft | February 28, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Obama pointed out how much Clinton danced around, not saying she had anything to do with the Drudge Report pictures, and here we have it AGAIN – what is good for the opponent is never good for me.
Deny. Distort. Dodge. Misdirect. Obfuscate. Distract.
The scary part is, no matter how much anyone comes up with negatives, no matter what the source is, his supporters will never believe it. He could shoot up half his audience with his own machine gun, in his hands, and they would say it was a photoshop moment, or a network trick.
Nothing is going to equal legitimate proof. That is the very essence of a cult; immediately, violently rush to the defense of your leader, without question or consideration of facts. Never even glimpse a shred of anything counter to your beliefs. Only recite proof provided by the leader as true evidence. Attack and threaten anyone in the way of the express train. Destroy anyone’s character that stands up to the leader. Blacklist and coordinate groups to apply pressure to businesses and media outlets in order to maintain the leader’s perspective only.
This may be lightweight material here, NAFTA Canada Mexico. But there are tons of direct evidence against this man on his voting record, or lackthereof. On his dealings with Rezko. On his Bills he didn’t write but says he did. On his origins, both racially and financially. On his inspiration (articles sited that do not and never have existed). On the massive, unending distortions of his life in his books. His wifes envolvement in the unseamly U of C hospital and Treehouse. On his taking massive amounts of money from PAC and Lobbyists – about 47 of them so far.
But all of that is just an evil lie, out to smear the Leader. Commrades, unite and weed out the enemy amongst us.
These people sound like 1984 Party Members and the Party is not even in power yet. Brainwashing won’t be required – it has already happened.
Posted by: 2009 Where Are You | February 28, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
This is madness. The Obama camp said it neevr happened, the Canadian embassy said it nevr happened, yet Hillary’s insane, illiterate horde says it did. What part of “It never happened” don’t you morons understand? It looks like the media favors Obama because unlike Hillary, the man has no dirt. There is no difference between the media coverage Obama gets and that which is given to McCain. They are both good guys, unlike Hillary. Hillary’s people, please stop making a fool of yourselves.
Posted by: Kevin | February 28, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
Hillary campaign if you are going to pay the price of going negative, throw real punches.
Dont you realise that whatever way you attempt does not work at all. People are full aware.
Posted by: Peace | February 28, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
Sounds to me like another Clinton dirty trick. Bill has developed a lot of contacts in Ottawa since leaving the White House – maybe through one of those people.
Posted by: Paul | February 28, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
Some of you idiots here better get your facts straight. Next week Hillary will bow out of the race (for the good of the party) and Obama will go on to win in November. Did you see the knockout punch Barack threw McCain yesterday. McMore-War hasn’t been able to stand up yet. Obama 2008!
Posted by: pt | February 28, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
PT
Mr. Uniter has splintered the Democrat party so bad that if Hillary drops out her votes are not going to him.
Posted by: toby | February 28, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
Obama is an empty suit. Did this phone call to Canada happen. I dont know, but would it surprise me in the slightest? Nope.
There doesnt seem to be a real reason for the phone call though. So I doubt it.
Posted by: tomdavie | February 28, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
What the hell is wrong with you people!! The report is FALSE!! Whether you support Obama or Clinton or McCain, please stop spreading your ignorance virus over the internet. I pray that none of you own a gun, drive a vehicle larger than a bicycle, or have young impressionable children that you are raising.
Posted by: Tre | February 28, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Did Obama’s campaign pull a Lewis stunt on a foreign Embassy?
Why did Lewis change all of a sudden, when a minister said he would campaign for Lewis’s seat?
Is this not what had been reported before as a tactic Obama’s campaign was doing, like when Obama during each of his prior campaigns did back door dirty politics by having opponents disallowed over rediculous means, and opened up his rival US Senate candidates divorce record that was under seal?
This guy Obama is the dirtiest politician in recent memory and beware those who oppose him, he will turn it into another spin, just as his wife did with former President Clinton calling Obama’s stance on the Iraq war a fairy tale, Obama’s wife spun it into a racial remark of it being “what a fairy tale that a black man cannot become President”!
I hope one day we do not hear from a foreign country that a candidate threatened them in future dealings if they leaked out information! But with Obama’s record and style of politics, nothing would suprise me!
And anyone who thinks his returning Rezko’s money to charity was a good thing, think again, he didn’t pay for it out of his own pocket, everyone who contributed to his Presidential campaign payed it! Is this change? No a sleeze way to a status quo is still a sleeze when the sleeze is still profiting from the sleezey way he got his present status!
Posted by: Mel | February 28, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
One more thing, got to CTV.CA and see, it is the Canadian channel for Oprah, so has she influenced or will she influence that network to change its story?
Posted by: Mel | February 28, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Why do we have to be idiots? I am no idiot, but one thing I do know is that this is getting out of hand. Everyday there is something else to try to throw supporters of Obama. We aren’t buying into any of this crap, so let’s stick to the facts and stop all the name calling, after all we are all in the same party.
Posted by: oquail | February 28, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
The Obama campaign denies this today, but not when asked by the reporter yesterday!The Canadian Embassy today in the U.S. denies this. Then again, did anyone expect the Ambassador’s office to come out and say, “yes, I will confirm this tremendously damaging report about Senator Obama several days before contests where he could effectively wrap-up the nomination, and thus ensure that I, my embassy, and my country are on the you-know-what list of a man who is potentially the next U.S. President”?
Give me a break, Chicago politics against a foreign country now too Obama style! What threats did Obama’s campaign make towards a foreign government?
Posted by: Mel | February 28, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
US HAS ALREADY BEEN BOMBING IN PAKISTAN!
Only, the STRIKES are supposed to be ‘secret’. lol
Anyone in the know, recognizes that those SILENT & ‘INVISIBLE’ drones that are dropping missiles in the Bad Lands of Pakistan cannot be Pakistani; because the Pakistanis DO NOT own ‘invisible’ and noiseless air crafts from which to fire missiles!
Therefore McCain is either ignorant or playing politics as usual when he called out Obama over the plant to go after maniac muslims in Pakistan.
Posted by: New Yorker | February 28, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
New Yorker – there’s nothing secret about this. These are U.S. strikes. About a week ago, the U.S. took credit for killing the number three guy inside al Qaeda.
But I do agree it makes McCain look a little silly. I wonder if he now is going to call Bush naive, for actually executing the strikes Obama has been calling for since last summer.
Posted by: Paul | February 28, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
Oh Hillary…your campaign stoops to an even lower level every day.
Posted by: JoAnne | February 28, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
In answer to press inquiries Greg McIsaac of CTV said they are sticking by the story regardless of the denials from Camp Obama.
Please ABC keep pursuing this story.
Posted by: Kris | February 28, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
I read the CTV article here in Canada and I feel obliged to say if any of you had actually did your homework on the NAFTA issue I wouldn’t have to get involved in your internal politics. If you want to play around with NAFTA go ahead. Fortunately for us we have more power to hurt you in your pocketbook than any other nation on earth. We are your number one oil supplier and if you screw with us everyone to a man and woman up here wants to add an energy tax on our oil and gas (gas number two supplier) electricity (number one supplier on your eastern seaboard) and believe me you will feel our sting more than anything you could possibly do to us. We are also your number one supplier of raw recourses. We would rather sell to China and India where we can get a much better price. And 3 of 4 vehicles in Canada are from US companies. I have two American vehicles. Two years from now I’ll buy Japanese, German, or Korean made vehicles. Obama had good will up here but his inexperience ###### off Canadian like I have seldom seen. Believe me I’m reading the thousands of emails flowing in and man have you guys opened a can of worms.
Posted by: Canada | February 28, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Dirty tricks again, you say? Well, let’s see: the race card in South Carolina, the Muslim picture, the CTV news story, and McCain is unfairly campaigning against Obama while the nomination process is still to be decided. How many slams or negatives are the Obama camp going to use to bring them sympathy? They are good at dishing it out.
Folks, the nomination process is ongoing. People in Ohio, Texas, Rhode Island, and Vermont have a chance to vote for someone who does not talk out of both sides of her mouth, someone who is knowledgeable and experienced, someone who can stand up to the negative barrage, even to the negative garbage continually thrown by the Obama camp. Vote for someone who is tough, and someone who has solutions for change, not just a soundbite.
Posted by: georgia | February 28, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Just reading some of these comments really shows how much we need Obama. Why don’t you stop for one second and just think about the negative garbage that you spew. We are all God’s children. STOP SPEWING HATRED AND IGNORANCE. It is really sad when people are afraid of a message of HOPE. Get informed before you just believe every negative statement that you hear.
Posted by: mae | February 28, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
What part of don’t you people understand?
“A senior Canadian Embassy official in Washington, D.C. disputes a report by the CTV Canadian television network that an Obama campaign staffer telephoned Michael Wilson, Canada’s ambassador to the United States, to reassure him that campaign rhetoric against NAFTA should not be taken seriously.
“It didn’t happen,” said Roy Norton, who heads up the congressional, public and intergovernmental affairs portfolio for the Canadian embassy. ”
Was it the “IT DIDN’T HAPPEN.” part???? Obama’s camp didn’t call anyone. This is yet another Hillary Clinton camp lie in a long line of lies.
Posted by: karl | February 28, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
I am inclined to believe this story. What motive would CTV have for putting its reputation and credibility on the line? It’s the kind of story that once reported, all parties would be rushing to deny. Canda’s Ambassador to the U.S. would most certainly deny that this conversation took place.
Posted by: Hopesprings52 | February 28, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
To quote HRC, let’s get real here folks.
What possible benefit could there be for Obama’s people to call the CANADIANS??? The idea is completely ridiculous.
Who gives a damn what the Canadians think!
The CTV story doesn’t pass the smell test. What, was the idea that Obama’s people were afraid the Canadians would complain about his proposal?
Posted by: Eric | February 28, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
“The facts of our story are accurate.” – Greg McIsaac, Communications Manager, News Information and Current Affairs, CTV
Posted by: canadian gal | February 28, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
Obama is the dirtiest of politicians. This kind of underhanded tactics goes on everyday in Chicago. Always denying , and what I meant was… Obama talks out of both sides of his mouth. The American voters are starting to wise up finally..
Posted by: Jay | February 28, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
When Obama’s #1 corporate contributor,
Exelon, had radioactive leaks at their plant in Illinois and they failed to let the public know about it which enraged the residents, I would have liked to have heard the conversation between Obama and Exelon then. Obama
came out and scolded his contributor and wrote a good bill protecting the residents from future such incidents by mandating that Exelon inform the public from there on in. Then Obama turns around and rewrites the bill to accomodate his contributor and the nuclear regulators and instead of a mandate there will be “guidance” provided. Pretty slick I’d say. There’s the public scolding of Exelon so he looks good real good to the residents. He writes a good bill taking action beyond his good words, looks good and then turns around and rewrites it to accomodate his funder. I bet there was somewhere in this equation a phone call between Obama and Exelon. Wonder if he reassured Exelon somewhere along the line or did he just surprise them with a rewrite? What a guy. Gee, I guess some of you must think Hillary was behind all that just like she pushed the wrong button for him on those 6-7 votes. All politicians take for granted, with good reason, that we won’t look beyond their rhetoric
and canned messages and they have staff’s who’s job is to get them elected and do damage control even when the damage is the truth. Look closely at Obama’s record and inconsistencies and limited experience- and if I have to hear one more time how he doesn’t take money from corporations then who is Exelon? JP Morgan Chase? If you don’t want a corporate candidate then you better jump ship to Nader, because he’s the only one who can stake that claim.
Posted by: alpaig | February 28, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
Well, Eric, this mouse up north is your number 1 oil, gas, and electricity supplier. We are also your number 1 raw material supplier, our military also hold the most contentious province with the heaviest fighting in Afghanistan. Nevertheless, it is eye opening how you Obama folks so easily go out of your way to alienate your neighbor and ally even before Obama becomes President. Is this a sign of things to come? Furthermore, CTV News Managers have publicly stated they stand by this story.
Posted by: Canada | February 28, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
Ok, the Obama campaign says it didn’t happen, the Candadian Embassy says it didn’t happen. A news program with unnamed sources says it did and people jump. Could one of these unnamed sources be a republican representative assigned to work with the embassy? The GOP has stated that slamming the Dem candidate is their mission, it doesn’t have to be true. I find it amazing when a Republican is attacked it is biased liberal media, and if it is a democrat it is factual reporting no matter how thin the source. As far as why CTV would run the story, who benefits from the lie? Does Canada want a President dedicated to hanging on to NAFTA no matter how many US plants close, keep new energy technlogies down, so we keep buying canadian oil or a President that will be tough on NAFTA and is investing in getting us off foriegn oil? Make no mistake about it, The GOP made the contact and made the promises. They can’t beat him on character, they can’t beat him on the issues and trying to push fear is only getting them pushed back on. Lying is their only option left.
Posted by: Louis | February 28, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
CTV is a very respected media outlet, and if they say their story is accurate, I believe em.
Of course the Canadian Amb. didn’t want to confirm, it would start an incident and p.o. the possible new president of the USA!! I don’t doubt obama did this.
The thing is, Obama has more than a few iincidents like this in his past. The Exelon deal (where he screwed the people but lied and said he didn’t) and the maytag thing which was the same kind of deal, make nice w/ the owners and screw the people, while lying and saying he ‘did his best’. Then he gets a huge contribution from maytag AND exelon.
Why people can’t see this saint obama is a farce is beyond me.
Posted by: Texan | February 28, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Louis, here in Canada our dollar is equal to yours, our labor standards are generally stricter than yours, and our environmental standards have more beef on them then yours as we have been moving toward the Kyoto accord standards. NAFTA was never your problems now or in the past. However, your job losses are directly tried to China and India and perhaps Mexico who are completely undercutting labor with their lower wages and national currencies. Perhaps you aught to check how many new plants opened here in Canada as your plants closed down. NONE is your answer. Now check the India and China stats. There is your answer.
Posted by: Canada | February 28, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
CTN stands by its story. Time for ABC to do somework
Posted by: Redchicken | February 28, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
actually its ctv – one of the largest networks in canada…
what is troubling me is how suddenly us canadians are being called slimy, tiny, etc for a tv report that the network is standing by, i might add.. is this how mr. obama’s supporters treat people?
Posted by: canadian gal | February 28, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
For our Candian neighbors, you’re right and welcome to the wrath of Obama supporters. So much for unity. You should ask them about Obama’s record and experience and you’ll hear the same thing we all do down here- “He’s about hope”, “He’s about change”, “He wrote a book”, “He’s inspiring” , “He’s not Clinton or McCain”, “look at his website”. I don’t know if they haven’t ever looked at his site themselves or if they did if they understood what they read, because I wouldv’e assumed if they had then I wouldn’t have to look at the darn website. Obama’s a corporate candidate just like Clinton, check it out yourself, because obviously his supporters done their homework otherwise I wouldn’t keep reading this dribble on these blogs about how the only money he’s taken is from the people, right, that acccounts for his meteoric rise in his short political career. It doesn’t take too much brains to figure out that for him to get to this point where he’s taking the only the people’s money, that he took someone else’s money before this.
Hum, does Exelon ring a bell.
Posted by: sue | February 28, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
I WONDER HOW MANY OF YOU THT ARE FALLING FOR THIS WERE STUPID ENOUGH TO VOTE FOR GEORGE BUSH TWICE.
STUPID PEOPLE DESERVE WHAT THEY GET.
THE DUMBEST PRESIDENT IN AMERICAN HISTORY.
YOU SHOULD HAVE TO PASS A STUPID TEST TO BE ALLOWED TO VOTE.
QUESTION: IS GEORGE BUSH A GOOD PRESIDENT.
1. YES – GO STRAIGHT TO A PSYCHOLOGIST
2. NO – YOU CAN VOTE.
Posted by: Langx | February 28, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
Senator Obama needs to move forward, he is “politics of the past” (Senator John McCain abcnews.com 2/29/08). America needs to move forward, but Obama won’t move forward out of Iraq.
Posted by: ramona | February 28, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
What we meant to say was ……lol
Posted by: J | February 28, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
For those of you that BLAME Hillary you are so wrong. You CAN’T blame her for everything your candidate does wrong. Not everything is Hillary’s fault. Your candidate NEEDS to take RESPONSIBILITY for all of these actions and such. He NEEDS to stop playing the VICTOM AND BLAMING HILLARY for everything that goes wrong with HIM.
Posted by: Hillary DID help NY: Courtney WNY State | February 28, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
Funny how some folks are saying Obama is covering this up and “where there’s smoke, there’s fire”- all based on a report credited to “two unnamed sources”- and yet when McCain is accused of potentially inappropriate dealings with a lobbyist, some of those same folks laugh it off because the story is credited to “two unnamed sources.”
yeesh.
Posted by: sean in DC | February 28, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
The 1st LINE of this article By Jennifer Parker states: “A SENIOR CANADIAN EMBASSY OFFICIAL in Washington, D.C. DISPUTES a report by the CTV Canadian television network that an Obama campaign staffer telephoned Michael Wilson, Canada’s ambassador to the United States, to reassure him that campaign rhetoric against NAFTA should not be taken seriously.” What that means is the –CANADIAN’S OFFICIAL is saying “IT DID NOT HAPPEN.” So Enough already!–
Posted by: Angie | February 28, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
USAVe
You are correct with 110 percent accuracy I am impressed”
I have had some things rejected on this server”
Because of what i said I am glad however they let yours’
Mine would have just sent the world in panic lol’ In some cases it is better
to save the fox and feed the chicken’s lol’s ;/
Posted by: richard sievert | February 28, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
In all honesty, Hillary and supporters are the ones dividing the party here not Barack and supporters. Someone complained in one of these blogs that Hillary is taking the self-destruct attitude and the “if I don’t win democrats lose” attitude. Now, I can truly see what this person was talking about. Hillary really does want the desperate chance to run again in 2012. I pray to God she loses on all fronts.
Posted by: MadeinUSA | February 28, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
I am learning thank god people are now seeing thing’s as they are
like USAVet
Now maybe that we no the monkey”
is not in the cadge we are’!
We can change this mess so i can go get someone very important’ to the land he must be in’
Posted by: richard sievert | February 28, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
CTV Canadian television network said they are standing by their story according to Taylor Marsh…..interesting
Posted by: SJ | February 28, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
I cannot do this alone even with the power I can wheel***
Posted by: richard sievert | February 28, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
We love you, Canada!
You have some of the nicest, most decent and friendly people in the world and you put up with us!
Please don’t let the rantings of a few cretins colour your attitude toward all of us.
BTW, I checked the credentials of the news reporter who filed the story. He’s a well-vetted journalist.
Posted by: Sofie1006 | February 28, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
Why would you possibly doubt Obama? This is the same guy who says he represents new politics and not tied to lobbyists and corporations. Does he really think that his supporters are that stupid? That information is easily accessible on the internet. His top 20 contributors consist of wall street financial firms and registered lobbyists. Seven of those Wall Street firms are implicated in the sub-prime mortgage scandals. Loans which have accounted for 55% of the loans to blacks, 17% to Whites. Where women are 30% more likely to have one of these loans then men. Where Hispanics are 2x more likely to have one than Whites. One his of contributors, Citigroup, had a former employee testify that it was standard practice to target people based on race and educational level. Just 14 of his corporate contributors alone brought into his campaign $2,872,128. They contribute that money just because he’s a nice guy and has charisma? And it should be mentioned that 3 of his paid staff are registered lobbyists. Obama is not a fighter, he has no political courage, the Republicans and big business don’t fear Obama on economic policy in the slightest. If you prefer Obama over Clinton fine, but don’t delude yourself into thinking he isn’t a corporate candidate. And why would you ever think the Obama campaign don’t/ won’t play dirty politics, his campaign is filled with ex-Clinton campaign staff and we all know how Obama supporters feel about Clinton campaigns. He’s a more savvy and likeable, less experienced (in particular on foreign policy), more conservative and with little to show that he has the fight or political courage to make the change he promises. At least Clinton is a fighter. For someone on the political scene such a short time he certainly is entrenched in the old politics. There is no hope for change with this candidate.
Posted by: alpaig | February 28, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
Obama voted for the 2005 Class Action Fairness Act. Clinton did not. It took almost 5 years of corporations (some the Wall Street firms funding Obama), lobbyists and lots of corporate dollars to get it passed. At least 40 civil rights and labor organizations fought against it. In it citizens are denied the right to use State courts to bring class action suits against corporations that violate State wage and hour and State civil rights law. Those who fought against it said moving these cases into Federal Court would delay and likely deny justice for working men/women and victims of discrimination. He also voted against capping credit card interest rates at 30%. This is inspiring. This gives me hope. I can feel the change already.
Posted by: alpaig | February 28, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
Canadian girl: Yes, that is how Obama’s supporters treat people. Especially Hillary’s supporters. Nice to know what kind of crowd he hangs with huh?
Posted by: jdona | February 28, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
Let’s see- Obama pressed the wrong voting button by accident 6-7 times and said “I voted this but I meant to vote that”; he voted “present” 140-150 times to avoid political flak (that’s what “present” is for); voted yes on the 2005 energy bill which gave 8.5 billion dollars in tax breaks and subsidies for big oil corporations and other forms of energy but his vote he said was “reluctant” (Hillary didn’t vote for it); voted to not cap credit card interest rates at 30% and said “it was just a random number”; he scolded and wrote a good bill when his funder Exelon had radioactive leaks at their plant but then rewrote the bill to accomodate Exelon; he opposed the war in Iraq before he could even vote and then when he got into the Senate he gave an interview where he said he really didn’t know how he would have voted had he been in the Senate at the time and had he had access to the information the Senators had and then he didn’t say peep in regards to Iraq for over a year on the Senate floor for and has been one of the Democrats resisting a timeline in Iraq. He’s basing his campaign on what he couldn’t vote for at the time (Iraq) and for some reason his supporters don’t question or feel he should be accountable for the votes he could and did vote on.
Posted by: alpaig | February 28, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
as said earlier – ctv is standing by the story and source
not sure how to post link but goto to ctv’s site and check out
Opponents slam Obama after CTV story on NAFTA video
Posted by: canadian gal | February 28, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
I look forward to next week. After Tuesday hopefully all this willful ignorance by people will subside.
I cannot believe that Hillary’s supporters don’t bother to read the article and just heave whatever bile they can online.
In case you guys have forgotten, both HRC and Obama are democrats.
It’s time for everyone to take a step back and get a grip.
this constant hateful spewing is not only nonproductive and makes your candidate look worse but, people end up looking like fools.
In other words, Get a Grip!
Posted by: vwcat | February 29, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am
someone above used Taylor Marsh as a source? what planet are they on
Taylor Marsh is a vicious, bigoted, pseudo feminist that Sen Clinton should distance herself from –
Marsh was the person who witnessed with Bill Clinton the (imaginary) Obama people intimidating Nevada Caucus goers
(you know illegal aliens who work in the Kitchens in the hotels on the strip are easy to intimdate when the Former POTUS is talking to them??)
Please –
Taylor Marsh carries the water for the Clintons whether they want her to or not — Taylor Marsh is one of the reasons so many woman are NOT voting for Sen Clinton
Sen Clinton is better than what she reaps with the Taylor Marsh’s of the world decaying the womens vote
Posted by: alison | February 29, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am
2009, I forwarded your comment to some political friends and family of mine. Terrific post. We are, at the heart, sheep. We do allow the media to play us. And while I like Obama, I am very distrustful of the media shoving him down our throats. The fact that they are pushing him, makes me more apt to vote for clinton (which I did). I don’t think that’s all his fault, but I distrust it just the same.
Posted by: An Opinion | February 29, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am
What a bunch of fools. Renegotiate “labor and environmental standards”. Oh, please! Canada’s labor and environmental standards are higher than the US’ and always have been. The US wouldn’t sign any agreement if it wasn’t slanted grossly in your favor to begin with. And even then, you haven’t honored parts of the agreement that weren’t to your advantage (softwood lumber comes to mind). Give me a break!
You want to opt out of NAFTA? I say go for it! We’ll sell our oil, gas, electricity, water and other resources to India and China at market prices instead of the discounted price the US gets under NAFTA. Or maybe we can add a few taxes/export tariffs to it to “Protect Canadian industries and workers”. No benefit to the US eh? Yeah, tell me that again when your gasoline costs $5/gallon and your heat and electricity costs double.
Let the US isolate itself. Your economy is dying anyway, largely because of the “Ohio mentality”. Swarms of your population who seem to believe that they would be still able to buy the cheat Walmart garbage they so cherish even if it was made in US factories by high school dropouts making $68k/year. Why is Ohio losing jobs? For the same reason Toyota is now bigger than GM: because people would rather pay for quality parts assembled by cheap labor (or robots) than cheap parts assembled by over payed US factory workers.
Seriously? You expect job security when your job can easily be done by a robot or a trained monkey? Its the 21st century for crying out loud, you need more than a high school diploma if you want to make it in a western country.
Posted by: Canuck | February 29, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am
Vote for Obama as he is the only one who can change White House to become Blk House… my vote is same as media supporting Obama… to be first Black President of United State and for leading our crazy world.
Posted by: Change2008 | February 29, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am
Canada:read your post,agree mostly but great that your country is doing a good job on enviromental standards, but those electric companies that sell to us are using coal from W.Virginia who blow the tops off mountains, pollute wells, kill fish, and wash away the homes of people who live there. Your corp. don’t care about people anymore than ours.
SeaninDC, Louis: you haven’t kept up with the real news, sources have been named and Obama’s website doesn’t deny just says inaccurate.
Alison: Taylor Marsh links to source more tha I can say for you.
Langx: yes stupid people get what they deserve, but it seems even educated people can be stupid AND DUPED
Posted by: GJM | February 29, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
All I know is that now CTV has named Goolsbee. Seems like ABC needs to do some investigative work.
Posted by: Redchicken | February 29, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
Why isn’t Austan denying all these allegations? That would stop this whole thing. Instead he is not allowed to talk.
Posted by: Fox | February 29, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
Hmmmm…. The Obama campaign ducking press questions. That’s what happened to me a long time ago, before I went partisan for Clinton. Please direct any question to the campaign headquarters. In other words, Mr. Goolsbee, shut up.
Don’t you just hate when journalists do their job? It can be such a drag for old style Chicago political campaigns like Obama’s trying to look like a different kind of politics.
Now no one is surprised to have Mr. Goolsbee possibly talking to Canada. Trying to hide that fact once the story is out is another matter. However, the problem really comes in when Obama is obviously telling Ohio voters one thing to get their votes, while his econ guy is assuring a NAFTA partner that nothing is going to change if he gets into the White House.
Truth is that NAFTA isn’t going to be easy to modify, whether it’s Clinton or Obama in the White House. But the bait and switch politics, in which Obama seems obviously engaged, is not the image he’s running on. It’s not the message either, and now Obama’s campaign team is stiff arming journalists who want to ask questions about what’s unwinding to try to find out the truth.
Who knows, maybe this is just a big misunderstanding. The only way to know what’s going on is for Obama to answer the questions. That his campaign seems unwilling to adds yet another chapter to this story. Not denying the Goolsbee part of the story is the other.
Posted by: egg | February 29, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
The embassy said it didn’t happen because it was the Canadian consulate in Chicago, which hasn’t denied it.
Why would ABC contact the embassy? Do you not know the difference between the embasy and the consulate?
Posted by: s.b. | February 29, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
OF COURSE IT HAPPENED !! AND HILLARY DID THE SAME, I WOUL GUESS
OF COURSE THE CANADIAN DIPLOMATS WILL DENY ENYTHING. AS WE ALL KNOW, IN DIPLOMATIC LANGUAGE “DENIAL”, EVEN IF TRUE OR NOT, ARE NOT CALLED ‘LIES’ (SUCH
AN UGLY WORD !!)
TOM
Posted by: TOM WITTMANN | February 29, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
EDITED AND CORRECTED
TORONTO (WHERE MY FAMILY LIVES) IS BUZZING ABOUT THAT NOT ONLY OBAMA BUT HILLARY CALLED THE EMBASSY.(OBAMA DO NOT EVEN DENIES IT BUT SPEAK OF MISUNDERSTANDINGS. THEN: WHY THEY CALLED AT ALL ??
OF COURSE, THEY SWORE THE CANADIANS TO SECRECY !
THE DIPLOMATS WILL DENY ANYTHING. AS WE ALL KNOW, IN DIPLOMATIC LANGUAGE “DENIALS”, EVEN IF FALSE, ARE NOT CALLED ‘LIES’ (SUCH AN UGLY WORD, N’EST PAS ? !!)
TOM
TOM
Posted by: TOM WITTMANN | February 29, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
For you Obama people, CTV gave the name of the senior economic adviser to Obama. His name is Austan Goolsbee. I’m sure you Obama people will say this Clinton falt. This guy works for Obama. I know the media will hide this.You can find this info on the internet
Posted by: Don, Fl | February 29, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
Another case of the Clinton camp spinning falsehoods about Obama. It is pathetic to think the way people should choose a president is by lying about your opponent. It is embarassing that the first woman with a shot at the presidency has absolutely no morals about running her campaign honestly. Doesn’t this reflect on how she would run the White House? I am a middle-aged white woman who is voting for Obama. He has better ideas to solve the many problems our country faces, (compare the candidate’s plans under ‘issues’ on their websites), he is inspirational which we need at this dark time and he has run his campaign cleanly. That’s the qualities I’m looking for in a president. Oh, and he is modest. When you read bills he sponsored and those that were passed, they are important pieces of legislation.
Posted by: Lydia | February 29, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
Another case of the Clinton camp spinning falsehoods about Obama. It is pathetic to think the way people should choose a president is by lying about your opponent. It is embarassing that the first woman with a shot at the presidency has absolutely no morals about running her campaign honestly. Doesn’t this reflect on how she would run the White House? I am a middle-aged white woman who is voting for Obama. He has better ideas to solve the many problems our country faces, (compare the candidate’s plans under ‘issues’ on their websites), he is inspirational which we need at this dark time and he has run his campaign cleanly. That’s the qualities I’m looking for in a president. Oh, and he is modest. When you read bills he sponsored and those that were passed, they are important pieces of legislation.
Posted by: Lydia | February 29, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
The reports said Canadian Consul in Chicago.
The denial sez no one called the Canadian Embassy or Ambassador in D.C.
See the discrepancy? Come on peeps, learn to read!!! Politics as usual depends on people missing the obvious.
Posted by: Harry Bergeron | February 29, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
The report above states Ambassdador Michael Wilson of Canada’s Embassy to the United States in DC. Canada has a Consulate in Chicago. I found that out only by doing a search not because I find any mention of it in any article. No Consul who wants to keep his or her nice position would dare talk out of line without clearing everything with the Ambassador. I would be very surprised if a highly respected Ambassador would be even talking out of turn to a TV station let alone issuing written denials. The Clinton campaign is also having to issue denials that they have been contacting the Ambassador! Some countries have much stricter laws about libel in the media and CTV may have some explaining to do! And, they do have to keep their license renewed to stay on the air. Furthermore all calls to an Embassy are logged in and one does not easily get direct access to an Ambassador. At this time, Ambassador Wilson is still representing his country to U.S. President Bush.
Posted by: tcnz | March 1, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am
Let’s face it Nafta and Gatt both are crap along with the WOT, only thing we’ve exported since they passed is our jobs.
Trying to fix that is going to annoy our trading partners..I say do it anyways before we’re a 3rd world country like the those who must love getting rich off of us, then rubbing our noses in it.
And the Clintons passed Nafta that’s not in question, and Bush Sr.’s head fell in his soup when our CEO’s and him were in Japan arranging Gatt. So for me those two families are both at fault for our countries decline, and massive trade deficit.
Obama is the only one running that doesn’t have Washington stink on him, and actually has more elected legislative experience, Hillary can’t transfer it from Bill, well in some alternative universe maybe but not here.
And far as Canadians putting the USA down that’s been pretty much a staple of their dialogue for sometime, goe’s with us sending our jobs their way I suppose..lol, no actually Canadians are cool just razzing you all, and your currency is worth more then ours now so brag on.
Online lately it’s better off pretending to be Canadian since we’re hated for letting King George and his merry band of idiots lead us into war and global threats against anyone who doesn’t bow down to our greatness. We shouldn’t have to force liberty, freedom and democracy onto people by force if need be.
McCains gonna be swiftboated by the Vietnam vets so he’s no worry and now he’s got the Catholics ###### at him. Yep this elections gonna be great.
Posted by: rockon | March 1, 2008, 7:02 am 7:02 am
I repeatedly see on these chat boards that Obama has no position, no platform, no experience and nothing but “biased” positive press. This is preposterous. I cannot tell you how many pro-Hillary articles I have read that are really editorials, though they pass themselves off as “news briefs”. For instance, look at the TIME magazine article on “Inspiration vs. Substance,” which, aside from repeatedly making a case for the mutually exclusive existence of these two things (that is, if you are a skilled and eloquent orator, if you “inspire” people and are articulate- that’s an indication that you have little else to offer but rhetoric. The real substance, apparently must come in a plodding, non-inspirational package), the article also inexplicably has a single photo of Barack Obama from high school in the 70′s. Not only does he look young and inexperienced (as most high school students do), but gone is the polished, slender statesmen and instead the undecided voter stares at a very ethnic, large-afro-ed, youth. I will stop short of saying this is a deliberate attempt to appeal to voters uncomfortable with “youth” or his “blackness” (neither of which are things that are immediately apparent about him when one sees photos of the modern day Senator Obama). Why was a high school photo used in an article not about his youth or high school days, you ask? Because the media is slanted every-which-way during election year and that’s just the nature of the beast.
For what it’s worth, there are many things I believe are to be admired about Hillary, and in a way I believe we have an embarassment of riches on the democratic side, but I also firmly believe that Obama is the better candidate to face down McCain, to inspire the country to roll up its sleeves, and to dispense with the bipartisan blood bath that has gone on so long.
Posted by: kakakolo | March 1, 2008, 7:43 am 7:43 am
What does Barack believe? What is he passionate about compared to Hillary ? I was on the bandwagon but this NAFTA story appears to be true. He has no plan to revisit that agreement. He is just pandering as he seems to do a lot. I think Obama would be better than McCain but just barely and worse in some areas. Goolsbe is a good name, “gools”, he is a believer in the free market is everything. Obamas economic advisors do not have populace philosophies.
Posted by: LABR | March 1, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
Obama has said things about his parents and it later turned out to be a different story. He used to say that he did not support the war. Yet, as a Senator he has voted exactly as Hillary to support the war and its funding.
Now this report comes out and it is obvious that the kool-aid drinkers will say it is false and how dare people commit blasfemy against the great Hussein Obama.
Do you want to know how Hugo Chavez came to power in Venezuela?
He spoke the same way that Hussein Obama did, promising that he would change politics, power and the way that government operated. As president he met and sat down with world leaders; Iran, Cuba, Lybia, Colombian rebels, Syria, China, Korea, etc..
Sounds familiar??
This guy does not know what is going on in Afghanistan or nor was he meeting to fix it (which he has the power to do). What is his excuse? He was too busy campaigning. I guess he cannot multi-task.
He did not know that Al-Qaeda was in Iraq???!! Give me a break!!
People, he is not ready to be our President he has no experience!
This is the truth. Please do not drink more of the kool-aid!!
Posted by: Yosef Ortiz | March 1, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
Higher environmental standards, we have really high standards, and against the majority’s conscience we lower that standard in order to supply more oil to keep prices from sky rocketing. We discourage china from investing over here and we charge the same to the US as our own citizens…
Our dollar is equal, we pay our workers more and our taxes are higher which we use to pay for our high social standards
If you really think that what Obama and Clinton are trying to imply, that they will get jobs back to Ohio by reopening NAFTA, is true, then they are far to naive to run your country
If US citizens were properly educated the democratic politicians wouldn’t have to lie in order to get elected
This is how the world sees you
50% Bush 50% Gore/Kerry everyone else doesn’t vote
5% are the super rich
45% are retarded/manipulated
50% are along for the ride
Posted by: Vancouver | March 1, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
I cannot believe alot of what I am reading.I have read almost all of the comments and there are alot that say how you Obama people think about canadians,but most of them were not putting down canadians at all.This is what is so wrong with our world everyone wants to judge a whole group by a few.We need unity.I watch the news,debates,rallys,anything and everything I can everyday on politics at least 3-4 hours.While I cook supper for my boys or doing laundry I turn it up so I can keep in tune.I am a single mom and things are really getting difficult for me and alot of people right now.So this is how I look at it,We have been sliding down a cliff for a long time now and things have got to change.I would love to see a woman president but I see it the other way.I keep seeing Hillary playing the victom on everything and she makes sure she brings it up so that she can get your sympathy.Barack is getting alot of bad publicity from press but he lets it go you don’t hear anything about it,And I ate when she throws in there her gender and trys to use that for votes.I am sorry that is just wrong.I am a woman,but I am not going to vote for her just cause she is.I need to know that if something does happen in the world she is going to say everyone is putting to much pressure on her and start crying or something and just want everyone to feel sorry for her.We have had nothing but bushes and clintons in there for a while so it is time for a change and i believe we are gonna start going back uphill it will be slow but I think he will do it.And for the record it is not you canada we cant blame you for our economic problems just our government.Peace
Posted by: MsInd | March 2, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am
sorry the end of that is suppose to say I need to know that if something does happen in the world she isn’t sorry I am tired!
Posted by: MsInd | March 2, 2008, 2:26 am 2:26 am
The only people throwing a wrench into the political gearbox between Obama and, Clinton are the people who didn’t do there political homework. Lets review. Congress during the BUSH SR, administration, brings N.A.F.T.A. as a possible bill. The Clinton administration ends up signing it in after he takes office as our new prsident. In response to these and other criticisms, Clinton has made U.S. approval of the NAFTA conditional on the negotiation of additional “parallel accords” concerning LABOR and the ENVIROMENT. He later passes near the end of his term the E.P.A. bill that gives Dirty Corporations time and, help to clean up there act. The BUSH JR, Regime trashed that. While president, Bill Clinton told successor George W. Bush that Osama bin Laden and his Al Qaeda network posed the greatest threat to US security, and ranked Iraq last on a list of concerns.
The two men met at the White House after Bush won the 2000 presidential election. “He was putting together an experienced team from past Republican administrations who believed that the biggest security issues were the need for national missile defence and Iraq,” Clinton wrote, in excerpts released by Time magazine.
“I told him that, based on the last eight years, I thought his biggest security problems, in order, would be Osama and Al Qaeda; the absence of peace in the Middle East; the standoff between nuclear powers India and Pakistan, and the ties of the Pakistanis to the Taliban and Al Qaeda; N. Korea; and then Iraq.
“I said that my biggest disappointment was not getting Osama, that we still might achieve an agreement in the Middle East, and that we had almost tied up a deal with N. Korea to end its missile programme, but that he probably would have to go there to close the deal,” Clinton said.
Clinton reportedly made a similar statement to an official panel investigating the attacks, and senior Clinton-era officials have said that their plan to topple Al Qaeda got lost during the transition between administrations. But White House has denied that the Clinton administration provided a plan to attack Al Qaeda. Has anyone noticed that I have nothing to write about on the Obama teams accomplishments, that’s because there are none to write about.As far as the vote Obama gave on the Class Action Fairness Act, his newest supporter,Kennedy even voted against the bill in 2005 because of the Republican taste it has. Trade between Canada and, Mexico is not the problem. It stems from China and, the Asian countries, not the trade bill itself but,the loopholes that were put in it buy the Republicans. Greed is,as greed does, Delphi sent its business overseas, NAFTA made it legal, and thats all it did. So thank the republicans for the problems we are going through. Too the Republic for which IT stands, IT, is the machine and, that is where the Republicans took there platform from. Thats why The DOW Jones looks great but, i can’t afford to by good health care. The rich get rich.
Posted by: Scott Hall | March 2, 2008, 4:12 am 4:12 am
2009 Where Are You…FABULOUS POST!! I have felt this way about Obama for most of the campaign. About the only thing that would make this obvious to people would be for the Dream Team of Obama/Jolie to emerge. I would have said Obama/Winfrey, but I fear people might actually take me seriously on that!! Obama is buying in to his own campaign rhetoric, and if we let his ship come in, ours will surely sink.
Posted by: Happy2BMe | March 2, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am
Scott wonderful posting! I cannot argue it one bit.Bill Clinton was great and I think he got a bum rap all the other presidents had alot of dirt probably worse but it didn’t get drug out.I think he did great things but the republicans distorted it.My problem is he is not the one running and some of the things he has done this campaign, well lets just say I think he has been a jerk.He is a person that thinks of others and uses his heart and to be honest I don’t see heart in hillary.
Posted by: MsInd | March 2, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
Hillary talks about how the country needs Her. Obama talks about how the country needs change. Hello? Who thinks they’re the Second Coming?
I love the people who when given the option of an inspiring, bright, leader (ie Obama) can’t see past their own pettiness to the long term good of the country.
Then again, these are many of the same people who did vote for Bush Jr… twice.
Posted by: David | March 2, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Kudos to ’2009WhereAreYou’ who wrote such a terrific post!
Unfortunately, after this next primary, the country *will* be following Obama over the cliff. As a conservative democrat and Hillary supporter it really makes me sad that to see how she’s had to wage her campaign with both hands tied behind her back. The race is still very close between them but now ‘for the sake of party unity’ they’re going to force her step aside and let the koolaid drikers have their way. Obama has successfully turned her into the Wicked White Witch. IMO, She should have fired her campaign manager right after Iowa. Ever since South Carolina, Obama has picked up on everything John Edwards said and regurgitated it to resounding applause, including all the hullabaloo over NAFTA. Once Hillary’s gone, I’m interesting in seeing how much he supports rewriting the treaty. He’s a just as much of a flip-flop artist as Kerry, it’s just that Obama is so good at feeding the masses crap. After they’re done eating, they think they just had top sirloin.
NAFTA is wrong the way it’s written now, and I agree that to do away with altogether would be terrible for relations with Canada and Mexico, but as a person who’s watching her job getting exported as I write this, I have no sympathy for those who support it. Free trade might be good for southern Texas, Canada and Mexico, but right now I can’t afford to go to the doctor, buy gas for my car or my groceries. How are the vague promises of ‘Hope’ and ‘Change’ going to help me pay my $300 power bills? As a voter, I’m tired of rhetoric and BS, I want SPECIFICS. How are you, Mr. Obama, going to help us lower-income middle class people who can no longer even afford to live in this country? I’m still waiting for a REAL answer on that one.
I look back fondly on the Clinton years because I was doing well then financially. If Bill could run for Prez again, I’d vote for him in a heartbeat. I’d pinned my hopes on recovering some sense of hope for future prosperity on Hillary’s campaign, but since she can’t debate Obama without being called a racist and accused of all the world’s ills, I give up. Obama claims to be able to bring about Change and offers us Hope, but he’s never been specific. He has no experience and it scares me to think of a man with only 2 years in the Senate will be running the country. It’s not his race that’s the issue, it’s his lack of experience. When it comes to defense of this country and the economy, I’ll take Hillary and even McCain over Obama any day.
I’ve voted Democrat all of my adult life, but if Hillary loses in this upcoming primary, I’m voting for McCain. Why? Because A., at least he’s middle-of-the-road enough for me to accept him, and B., because the devil I know is better than the devil I don’t. I don’t know Obama and I’m quite frankly afraid of his messianic persona and cult following.
Posted by: Jillian from SC | March 2, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
Clintons in their madness for desire to have the power and prestige of US Presidency have reduced themselves to a very low level, and in their desperation they do not care whatever will happen to the Democratic Party. Fortunately, for the Democrats and the country, there is hope. Our countrymen do not want extention by four years of Bush Presidency, so they won’t vote for his surrogate Sen. McCain. Sen. Obama has the personal qualities and charm to make him a great President!
Posted by: Naren Patel | March 3, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
Hillary’s call at 3 a.m. is from the Democratic Party asking her to resign from the race and quit slinging silly nonsense at the clear frontrunner. Despite the Clark Kent glasses, she has no real “experience” and nobody likes her. Period.
The next call Hillary gets at 3 a.m. is the local jail telling her to pick up Bill after he has been charged with disorderly conduct and adultery. Why would we want these two sleaze bags back in the White House to further embarass the country?
Exactly what part of being blown out in 11 straight races does Hillary not understand?
Does she really think that the same old tricks will continue to fool us?
Hillary, you are up against a better candidate and you ain’t going to win — get over yourself.
Posted by: Jack | March 3, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am
Lets remember one thing please!We are all still democrats.McCain doesn’t see anything wrong with the economy! So to the person that said they would vote for him if Hillary loses I hope you are ready to see not only your job go but future jobs for our children.I understand your fraustration cause I am there,I have missed work cause I did not have gas in my car,I am lucky if I can buy hamburger just so I can feed my kids dinner and not just a sandwhich.I do know this though,the president has a whole cabinet behind him to guide him and as long as it is a democrat he or she will be working for us lower and middle class people.I will vote for my democratic nominee whether it be Hillary or Obama.Democrats have always been known to stand with democrats.Our country is divided enough lets not divide anymore lets unite!!!!!!!
Posted by: MsInd | March 3, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
Why would CANADA, attempt to interfere with the American electoral process? Has an outside government ever leaked internal documents leveling accusations against a US presidential front-runner?
This odd un-Canadian-like behavior caused me to pause and look for beneficiaries. It quickly became obvious that the Conservative Party of Canada would probably love to help President Bush extend his Conservative hold on the White House. Hon. Michael Wilson – Canadian Ambassador to the US just may have his fingerprints all over this story, which explains the confidence of CTV when they aired (3x) such an explosive story. This is no doubt why CTV was adamant about the Goolsbee statements being made directly to Ambassador Wilson. I quote “The facts of the story are accurate and CTV National News will be reporting on the story again tonight,” said CTV vice president Wendy Freeman.
Upon being summoned to the local Canadian consulate office in Chicago. Goolsbee of the Obama camp finds himself in the center of he said he said.
OHIO here’s a few hard facts to help you make an informed decision.
The Canadian Ambassador to the U.S. Michael Wilson helped author and negotiate the U.S. – Canada Free Trade Agreement [FTA] of 1988 and the National Free Trade Agreement [NAFTA] of 1994. Since 1979 the Ambassador has been a high ranking member of the Canadian Conservative party, and was nicely rewarded when he was named co-chair of the National Canadian Conservative Party campaign in 2006.
Posted by: msdmo | March 4, 2008, 6:15 am 6:15 am