Clinton: Playing Field for Her as Candidate Not Even Because of Her Gender
In an interview with ABC News’ Cynthia McFadden to air on this evening’s "Nightline," Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., says it’s tougher for her to run as a woman than it is for her male opponent.
Asked why she thinks so many women may be feeling sorry for her, Clinton said, "I think a lot of women project their own feelings and their lives onto me, and they see how hard this is. It’s hard. It’s hard being a woman out there. It is obviously challenging with some of the things that are said that are not even personal to me so much as they are about women.
"And I think women just sort of shake their head," Clinton continued. "My friends do. They say, ‘Oh, my gosh, this is so hard.’ Well, it’s supposed to be hard. I’m running for the hardest job in the world. No one has ever done this. No woman has ever won a presidential primary before I won New Hampshire. This is hard. And I don’t expect any sympathy, I don’t expect any kind of, you know, allowances or special privileges, because I knew what I was getting myself into.
"Every so often I just wish that it were a little more of an even playing field," she said, "but, you know, I play on whatever field is out there."
Of course, it might be observed that it likely hasn’t exactly been a complete walk in the park for an African-American to run for president, either.
But apparently Clinton thinks — based on this comment — that the "playing field" is easier for a black man than a white woman.
I also wonder if former Sen. John Edwards, D-N.C. — and all the other men vanquished by Clinton (and Obama) so handily — think that they had an easy go of it.
What do you think?
- jpt
Email
Chrysler Super Bowl Ad Pro-Obama?
President Obama Tops Mitt Romney in New Poll
Tapper, I wouldn’t expect you to get it. You are a guy.
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | February 28, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
It’s not because it’s hard, it is because you didn’t look beyond the first Super Tuesday. It’s called poor planning and over confidence.
Posted by: Chan | February 28, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm
Let’s get this straight. So establishment candidate with name recognition, the donor base, an organization built coast to coast over 20 years, Bill’s goodwill is the victim because she actual has to work for the nomination instead of being anointed.
Typical HRC.
She was counting on riding her husbands coattails
Posted by: The Commander Guy | February 28, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
WestCoastLib
Dude, you do realize that your girl HRC has officially abandoned the Rudy strategy and adopted the Huckabee strategy, don’t you?
Posted by: The Commander Guy | February 28, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
I think it is odd that Clinton’s gender wasn’t a problem when she was up 30 points six months ago, but now…she is down and naturally…its the gender…(shaking my head)
I am glad Barack doesn’t go this route
Posted by: Brando | February 28, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
Oh NO! She finds a way to “cry” right before every election!!! MORE tears! Feel sorry for me because I’m a woman. I am a woman and don’t find the need to have people feel sorry for my gender in order to do MY job!!!
Posted by: Mary S | February 28, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
Guess she’s back to the gender-pandering card.
I’m not sure what’s more insulting to me, as a woman, about her statement. Is it A) That we women had NO IDEA how difficult it was to run until Hillary decided to do it, sorry Elizabeth Dole or B) That as a woman, it’s harder for me to do anything a man can do, so I have to work twice as hard.
Maybe she can get her husband back in the campaign to hold her heavy microphone or something.
That’s the difference between her generation and mine, I guess.
Posted by: LadyVoter | February 28, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
If Clinton thinks it’s harder for her to run being a woman try running as a black man…there’s a REAL reason why he has more security.. LOL She takes the cake and would sell her daughters soul for a shot at the White House.
Posted by: Sam | February 28, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
It is obviously the guys vs the girls. Both Dems and Replican men ganged up on Hillary and did what they could to shove her out of the way and now they act like she’s invisible. I hope there are more women like me watching her get treated like we do every day. Women fainting for Obama are still looking for their knight in shining armor. Gimme a break. The fat cats are afraid of her because she knows their tricks. COME ON. VOTE 4 HILLARY and save our communities, our children. Don’t let a bunch of insecure warmongers to stay in control of our children’s future. Hillary kicks a**!
Posted by: USneedsHillary | February 28, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
WAIT A MINUTE I just read the post where someone leaks from the mouth and says Trapper does not get it because he is a man…it’s people like YOU who don’t get it! She needs to stop making excuses for her poor showing and take responsibility for her own decisions during this race and her past life. SHE choses to lie time and time again and people are tired of it! YOU denegrate ALL women with blanket statements such as that and I for one don’t appreciate YOUR attempt at explaining why someone won’t climb on the pity wagon with a weak woman!
Posted by: Sam | February 28, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
Black backers steadfast for Clinton
African-American superdelegates said Thursday that they’ll stand up against threats, intimidation and “Uncle Tom” smears rather than switch their support from Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton to Sen. Barack Obama.
Read the full report in politico dot com
Posted by: pat | February 28, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
I think that I agree with her that there is sexism, but we’ve seen clear evidence of racial overtones in the media and by surrogates as well. The difference is, if Barack Obama mentions his race as a hardship he is playing an affirmative action card that will be seized upon and he’ll lose votes.She gains a sympathy vote here.
I think overall, this was smart because she needs to make the case for women to rally around the flag.
The real untold story here: Hillary Clinton is a politician with HUGE historical negatives. If Elizabeth Edwards ran for president with HRC’s resume, she would have locked this down in Iowa. Why? She has more charisma, sharper on the stump and more inviting, and can launch an attack without incurring the shrill and annoying labels (note her fight w/the media and taking on all Edwards enemies and acting the vP).
We need a candidate with political skills: NY was a cornoation in the primary and Giulliani got sick. She hasn’t fought a serious fight before this, a lot like the rap Obama gets. Hell, McCain is in a similar boat.
This is a hail mary play that is bad for women as a whole IMO.
But, whatever.
Posted by: Rhoda | February 28, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
JT, ask your wife that question.
Posted by: pat | February 28, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
Hillary has worked extreemly hard. Also, I can’t believe the media denies their love affair with Obama. Anything Hillary has said, whether it be positive or negative, is put in a negative light for an indefinate amount of time. Moreover, I watched Ohio’s debate and Hillary was more specific than Obama and looked like a stronger, more polished candidate than him (even though the “experts” wouldn’t agree). When it comes down to it, I really don’t vote based off of bias media reports, but rather on issues themselves.
Tapper, lets hear about how Obama’s campaign called the Canadian Ambassador and told him to ignore their negative NAFTA comments. Even though this should speak volumes on Obama’s “commitments” he’s making to voters, this story will probaly die tonight.
Can’t wait to watch SNL again!
Posted by: Kim | February 28, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
Maybe its just you that makes the playing field so hard. I wouldn’t hesistate to vote for a Condi Rice or in her prime, Jeanne Kilpatrick. For me, they were as close (especially Jeanne) to a Margaret Thatcher that the US was going to get.
Posted by: A Republican | February 28, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
Naturally, if you disagree with Hillary or don’t support her, you hate women in general. A wonderful platform.
Posted by: Henriette Wayne | February 28, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
Well, it might very well be the case that the media has been harder than HRC in this season. But, for the 8 years during the Clinton administration, and perhaps many more years before and after that, the Clintons had been treated favorably by the media. And we hear her whining and whining and whining.
Posted by: Doan | February 28, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
A senior official from the Obama campaign contacted Michael Wilson, Canadian ambassador to the United States, and told him that the Senator was going to harshly criticize NAFTA during his race against Clinton in Ohio, but added: “Don’t worry… it’s just campaign rhetoric…Don’t take it seriously”.
He is a liar. Don’t trust him.
Posted by: pat | February 28, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
Being a woman didn’t seem to hurt Margaret Thatcher… Sounds like a cheap bottle of whine to me. You want cries wid that?
Posted by: Krankcase | February 28, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
Hillary is right, it would be harder to elect a woman than a black man at this time. I’m an Obama supporter, but I sympathize with her. I would like there to be a woman president soon but there was too much at stake to risk going with her this time around. Obama will win easily. Clinton might have won, might have lost. I wasn’t willing to take a chance on that. I firmly believe that Hillary can continue to do good things for this country w/o being president and the next female serious contender for prez will be more likely to win because of what she’s achieved this year. Go Obama! Go Dems!
Posted by: Dem in Chicago | February 28, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
Was the playing field uneven when she was up 30 points? I think the truth is that she has been out organized, out inspired, out worked, out brained, and out moneyraised to the point where we are basically watching an oldfashioned butt whooping. Obama is winning Texas and will probably do the same in Ohio.
She needs to get out to save her Clinton brand for another day.
Posted by: Easy | February 28, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
Are there hate groups that want to see a woman dead simply because she is a woman?
Level playing field? Hill’s getting good at putting her foot in her mouth lately.
Anyone notice that Bill’s been relegated to the back of
pick-up trucks for speeches?
Posted by: Spike the Poet | February 28, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
Wow. Listen to her whine. Then, of course, “I don’t expect any kind of, you know, allowances or special privileges, because I knew what I was getting myself into.” First she whines to get sympathy, then denies she’s whining to get the stigma of being a whiner off.
She does this again and again. So sick of Hillary and Bill.
Posted by: Alan | February 28, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
Clinton campaign song: “Please cry for me, Ohio…oh, how I need your vote, I will stop NAFTA, unless it’s for Texas…”
Posted by: H. Aslan Aslani-Far | February 28, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
Kim, I have to agree with you. I saw the SNL skit and then saw the Ohio debate where the Hillary was asked nearly every question first. Oh, my, you would think they might not follow the SNL skit but they did. It would be funny if this wasnt so important an election. Hillary’s responses were thoughtful and top-notch; it’s clear she is prepared and ready for the Oval Office!!
Posted by: Bobo | February 28, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
Due you want a litte cheese with that whine. What a baby. She wants to lead the free world? Please!!!! Honestly, what do some of you see in this egomaniac, enabling, shrill woman???
Posted by: eagle1 | February 28, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
DOoooon’t Cry For Me Cincinnatiiiiii,
The truth is I don’t reaaaally need youuuu,
I’d just get the Party
To nominate me
I am a woooomaaaaaannnn
Boys keep your distance
I am a wooomaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnn
Posted by: Clevita | February 28, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
This would be funny if she were only running for dog-catcher! Face it Hillary, the media has demoted you to whiner and has elevated McCain to your former status of victim and has elevated Obama to your formerly former status as “she who can do no wrong”. Sorry about that!
Posted by: RD | February 28, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
I think it’s too bad she squandered the 20 point lead that she had earlier in the campaign season on high priced hotel suites, party platters and donuts instead of hard nosed organizing to protect her lead. When she had that 20 point lead the field wasn’t looking very level to anyone else in the race either. If she had acted the part of a serious candidate she wouldn’t be in this position…. “Not expecting any sympathy.”…. Right ;^)
Posted by: Dennis | February 28, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
Wow. I just watched Senator Obama and I’ve changed my mind. He has my full support…and my vote.
Obama in ’08!!!
Posted by: Bobo | February 28, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
Mrs. William Clinton, wife of the impeached ex president, should quit complaining, the smartest woman on earth knew what she was going to be facing when she decided to run, but had not planned on being up set with Super Tuesday,and now is playing the victim card… go obama
Posted by: Joanne San Diego | February 28, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
I cant believe she really thinks that this crap is going to work. You act like a snake all your life and then complain that it is hard to be a lady when hissing striking their ankles with the venom of the worst poison imanagable.Good thing the American people woke up before she became POTUS. Now lets just hope they wake up to the dangers of Obama
Posted by: pachylover | February 28, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
Sorry guys, I shouldn’t have been so rude. The truth is that it’s tough for me to see Senator Obama doing so well. I like Clinton, but I’m realizing that Obama is the one to make this happen. I just hope they can come together and unite the Democratic Party.
He’s got my vote, though. I admit it.
Posted by: To all the OBAMA VOTERS | February 28, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
There is nothing harder in this country than the business world, and that includes politics. But, I don’t look around and see female CEO’s complaining. Oprah Winfrey has made a fortune and has built an empire. Meg Whitman presides over E-bay and there are many other female CEO’s excelling. The difference is, they don’t waste their time, or their resources whining about how hard things are. Hillary Clinton whines about this, just as she whined about not being able to make good on her Senate campaign pledge to create 200,000 new jobs in New York because a Democrat didn’t win the White House. Yet, she says she’s tough and will fight and lead the country and has the foreign policy experience to sit down and deal with Russia and China and North Korea and Iran? Will her whining work on Vladimir Putin who interrogated prisoners in the dungeons of the KGB?
Posted by: H. Aslan Aslani-Far | February 28, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
This would be funny if she were only running for dog-catcher! Face it Hillary, the media has demoted you to whiner and has elevated McCain to your former status of victim and has elevated Obama to your formerly former status as “she who can do no wrong”. Sorry about that!
Posted by: RD | February 28, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
Obama cant do anything wrong in the eyes of MSNBC.He could be seen kissing Farrakhans ass and they would find some excuse for it.
Posted by: benj | February 28, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
If it is harder for a woman to RUN for president, then it is also probably harder for a woman to BE president.
One more reason why the smartest woman in the world probably shouldn’t be elected, and why she should just drop out of the race and go home.
Posted by: ericG | February 28, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
At least Hillry is not afraid to admit that she is a woman. Mr.Obama failed to show up at the State of The Black Union,will not campaign with Jesee Jackson or Al Sharpton both of whom have endorsed him. He does not like the photo of himself in african garb even tho he had a film crew folling him the whole time. It appears that Mr. Obama is afraid to run as a black man. Hillary is not afraid to run as a proud woman!
Posted by: Russell | February 28, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
It’s also hard on Sen. John McCain, but I don’t hear him complaining about how his 187 year old legs are getting tired.
Posted by: H. Aslan Aslani-Far | February 28, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
Just joking. I’m an Obamacan.
Posted by: benj | February 28, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
Again, Hillary wants in both ways. She insist that she is tough enough to be Commander-in-Chief,yet she whines that she isn’t treated fairly just because she is a female. She was the one screaming a week ago for the debate in Ohio then when the time came she was whining about getting the first question. Talk about playing the gender card.
Posted by: Ed Ohio | February 28, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
I find it laughable that Hillary Clinton is playing the “poor little woman” card. Does she not think we remember her shaking her head in that (Gennifer Flowers? Paula Jones?)interview long ago and saying she was not “some little woman standing by her man” or that she “chose a career instead of staying home and baking cookies”? She is one tough cookie, and it is a pathetic ruse to try and act otherwise now.
Believe it or not, I started off pulling for her in this campaign, thinking that she had done a good job in the Senate, etc. It didn’t take long to see her claws come out, the cheap shots taken, and the win at any cost attitude. What a turn-off! I am on the band-wagon for Obama, one of the millions of disillusioned folk aching for change from this mean state of politics.
Posted by: Cheryl | February 28, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
Leave Britney Alone!!! Sorry meant Hillary.
Posted by: Bob | February 28, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
I AM WOMAN HEAR ME ROAR!!!….until the mean mens start being bad to me…and then I am tiny, and oh so vulnerable and bitsy tears run down my cheek because it is sooooooo hard, and then…and then, I winned New Hampshire and then I AM WOMAN HEAR ME ROAR!!!until the mean mens started being mean to me again……..Yawn
Posted by: John | February 28, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
Sometimes it’s reassuring to see someone as synthetic as Mrs Clinton get the kind of press comment she deserves.
Posted by: salvatore | February 28, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
I am not a Senator Clinton supporter, but I do believe that she does has a point.
I am reminded of Shirley Chisholm the first woman to run for the Democratic Party presidential nomination, and the first black female congressperson. She said “Of my two “handicaps” being female put more obstacles in my path than being black.”.
Posted by: Hip2b2 | February 28, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
PLAYING THE GENDER CARD! LOL
Hilary is obviously A LOSER, NOT A LEADER!
The Clintons played the ‘race card’ in South Carolina.
Now Hilary is whining AGAIN with the ‘gender card’ in order to get sympathy votes.
Thank the stars Barack is astute enough to never entertain the ‘race card’, and wise enough to brush it aside when used against him. lol
That is one reason the media is in love with Barack Obama: Barack regally rises above the fray.
Obama “gets to work” and never whine (a sure sign of weakness); because Barack ALWAYS knew that THIS CAMPAIGN WILL BE CHALLENGING!
Posted by: New Yorker | February 28, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
Hillary can’t be serious.
Every rally she has attended, every campaign stop she has made, there are women out there supporting her.
Obama, on the other hand, travels through (and campaigned in) whole states where there are not enough Black people to fill an auditorium. The same can be said about Mitt Romney and his fellow Mormons.
When she was leading by 30 points in the polls, you never heard a peep about how hard it was for a woman. Nary a word when she won California and New York.
What is she going to do next? Start crying again?
In 1988, Jesse Jackson proved that it was possible for a Black American to win the White House. It just wasn’t going to be him.
In 2008, Hillary has clearly proven that it is possible for a woman to win the White House. Unfortunately for Hillary, that woman will not be her.
To be fair, Hillary faced some sexism out on the campaign trail, some subtle, some outright. But in a few short years when the first female president is elected, she will be standing on the shoulders of Barbara Jordan, Shirley Chisholm, Pat Schroeder, Geraldine Ferraro – and Hillary Clinton.
My bet is that she will be a governor or a sitting vice-president.
Posted by: Dave from NY | February 28, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
Quite frankly, Even though I would never
vote or support The Clinton machine, I
think the Clintons can never be stopped.
She will figure out a way to get the nomination. They just never, never
quit.She is like a nightmare that never
ends. I really believe this.
Posted by: Fred Akel | February 28, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
HRC’s problem is not being a woman. In fact that’s the only reason she’s still competitive in the race. It’s clearly the only reason she won New Hampshire.
She has no plan … her surrogates paint a picture of detailed, “Day 1″ plans but she doesn’t have one. What has she said concrete? Nothing. She’s talked about healthcare … she’s laid very little specific out there, except she’ll garnish wages and continue to erode the spirit of the “land of the free and home of the brave.” As if the fee and brave have their wages garnished.
Experience? She has no more than any other 1 term Senator, less than many.
She’s losing for the same reason many men lose elections — she’s not a good candidate.
Posted by: Incredulous | February 28, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
Hillary has worked extremly hard. I can’t believe the media denies their love affair with Obama. Anything Hillary has said, whether it be positive or negative, is put in a negative light for an indefinite amount of time. Moreover, I watched Ohio’s debate and Hillary was more specific than Obama and looked like a stronger, more polished candidate than him (even though the “experts” wouldn’t agree). When it comes down to it, I really don’t vote based off of bias media reports, but rather on issues themselves.
Tapper, lets hear about how Obama’s campaign called the Canadian Ambassador and told him to ignore their negative NAFTA comments. Even though this should speak volumes on Obama’s “commitments” he’s making to voters, this story will probably die tonight.
Can’t wait to watch SNL again!
Posted by: Kim | February 28, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
Hillary has worked extremly hard. I can’t believe the media denies their love affair with Obama. Anything Hillary has said, whether it be positive or negative, is put in a negative light for an indefinite amount of time. Moreover, I watched Ohio’s debate and Hillary was more specific than Obama and looked like a stronger, more polished candidate than him (even though the “experts” wouldn’t agree). When it comes down to it, I really don’t vote based off of bias media reports, but rather on issues themselves.
Tapper, lets hear about how Obama’s campaign called the Canadian Ambassador and told him to ignore their negative NAFTA comments. Even though this should speak volumes on Obama’s “commitments” he’s making to voters, this story will probably die tonight.
Can’t wait to watch SNL again!
Posted by: Kim | February 28, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
A statement of fact: Voting for Sen. Clinton does not make one a racist just as voting for Sen. Obama does not make one a sexist.
Posted by: H. Aslan Aslani-Far | February 28, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
Guys…I just switched to Obama!!!
Posted by: Kim | February 28, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
pat, the story about NAFTA and Ambassador Wilson is false. The Canadian embassy has denied it.
As a Canadian, I can tell you that no American presidential candidate cares what the Canadian government thinks about presidential races. It will affect the presidential race not. one. iota.
That anyone would even believe this tells me how little people understand the process.
Posted by: Katherine | February 28, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
A different Hillary every day.
Posted by: Lori from Arizona | February 28, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
OBAMA ’08!!! He’s clearly the most presidential of the bunch.
Posted by: smeard and tested Hillary 08 | February 28, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
Right on target, Hillary Clinton! Obama plays the race card and he looks ‘unifying’. Her gender is seen by
all media as ‘divisive’. He is authoritative. She is shrill. She had to work twice as hard and be far more qualified than this political neophyte who’s yet to learn to change his political diapers!
Sure, His New Age Hopeness may get nominated. But his anorexic (xeroxed) resume will be devoured by old warrior McCain–without digestive enzymes!
Obambi has a Dream. But hard-working, overqualified, smart Hillary is the one with the prescription for America’s recovery! But the sexist comic journalists(?) are used to covering blondes in rehab and two-headed babies. Covering Politics is not tabloid journalism’s job any more! It was left to TINA FEY on SNL to get it right!
P.S. Start filing your applications for IMMIGRATION TO CANADA come November if Obambi gets in!
Posted by: Mary Sakel | February 28, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
It’s not too late to believe in Obama, everybody. I had my own doubts, but he’s got my support.
Posted by: smeard and tested Hillary 08 | February 28, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
You never heard the Iron Maiden, Margaret Thatcher or Isreal’s Golda Meir whine “ohhh its sooo hard being a woman running for office, blah blah blah.” Those tough ladies lead their countries in times of peace and war. Golda had enemies on three sides and exacted vengance upon those who slaughtered Isreali athletes in Munich. Hillary is not fit to clean their bathrooms.
Posted by: Texan | February 28, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
I can assure you it’s an insult to women to call HRC “the smartest woman in the world.” She isn’t. Not even close.
As for “staying home and baking cookies” — it’s a great choice if one makes that choice, and the children remember it and are grateful for it forever. It’s an honor.
There are minions of moms “baking cookies” at home keeping a nation stabilized with a lot more upstairs than Hillary Clinton.
Posted by: DMC | February 28, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
Kim: I’m not an “expert” either, but I wholly disagree with you. In my opinion Sen. Clinton lost the debate in Ohio badly. On the question of Health Care, her strongest issue, she and Sen. Obama were a draw. However, on Iraq, NAFTA, PAC contributions and the economy, he clearly bested her…as far as the allegations that his campaign contacted the Canadian Ambassador, they are false, as has been verified by the Ambassador’s office. That story doesn’t have legs because it’s propaganda and a lie. The reason why the NAFTA allegations will plague Sen. Clinton is because in the same week she talked in Texas about how wonderful NAFTA is, while in Ohio she talked about how devestating it is…
Posted by: H. Aslan Aslani-Far | February 28, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
DMC: Nice point…
Posted by: H. Aslan Aslani-Far | February 28, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
TINA FEY ENDORSED HILLARY!!
WATCH THE SNL video on NBC. THE REST OF MISOGYNIST MEDIA ARE HYPNOTIZED BY OBAMARAMA!! WAKE UP BEFORE IT’S TOO LATE!!!
Posted by: Hillary kicks | February 28, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
To Kim
One. How about all the years HRC put down all the women who came forward about Bubba Bill.
Two. How about the media who fell in love with Clintons for all the years before the last few months over the vast right-wing conspiracy.
Three.How about the free pass on Hilllary’s tax return.
And on, And on, And on Please Kim.
Your responses are so detailed, you must be on the HRC payroll
Posted by: Fred Akel | February 28, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm
For all those who thinks that Senator Obama is getting special treatment, let me tell you once and for all:
THE DIGNIFIED, POSITIVE, UPBEAT & PRINCIPLED BARACK OBAMA GETS THE RESPECT HE EARNS!
Barack Obama hails from a lineage that has produced leaders of men down the generations.
THAT IS WHY “THIS IMPROBABLE JOURNEY” TO THE WHITE HOUSE IS JUST WATER OFF A DUCK’S BACK TO OBAMA!
No offense; but Hilary Clinton is of a peasant lineage. Leadership of men IS ALWAYS going to be a burden for her, and not because of her gender.
Posted by: New Yorker | February 28, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm
Sen. John McCain just released a statement saying “…I knew Joan of Arc…I served in battle with Joan of Arc…Sen. Clinton, you’re no Joan of Arc…”
Posted by: H. Aslan Aslani-Far | February 28, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm
Neither Obama nor Clinton have the QUALIFICATIONS to become POTUS. Period. But not because of their race or gender. Rather, they disqualify themselves from any world leadership position simply due to their failed philosophy. Neither of them will be strong social, military or financial leaders. The Democratic/Socialist philosophy is dead; the only people who support it are those who get a free ride, and those who profit from giving people a free ride.
I expect both candidates to play their respective “card” whether it be the race or gender card, because that’s ALL either of them have to go on. And the mental midgets who would vote for ANYONE in ANY party because of their gender, race or looks really aren’t qualified to vote.
There is NO “level playing field” in the REAL world. The idea that a level playing field is a hoax driven by left-wingers who want to see Socialism rule the world. It’s a good thing that thinking people won’t tolerate that sort of thing.
Posted by: Sue | February 28, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
Is it just me? I am so, so tired of seeing the Clintons in the news and their sleezy politics. Hillary, please retire, buy an RV and take Slick with you.
Posted by: l | February 28, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
Why does it matter that a presidential candidate is black? Blacks and whites have fought and died together in every single war this country has waged. Blacks fought on the side of American colonists during the Revolutionary War, even though the British were offering them freedom. Blacks have been patriotic on the front lines, and many have bled and died for the United States of America. Yet, “fair-minded” Americans say they’re “not quite ready for a black president.” What does that mean? How can you say you believe in a creed that says all men were created equal, and then hesitate about electing someone simply because of their skin color? Which one is it? All men are created equal, or some are a bit more “equal” than others?
Posted by: QUESTION | February 28, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
The reason why Hillary is losing. She and her campaign underestimated Obama and by the time they realized that it was too late. It’s no coincidence that Solis stepped down from her campaign and was replaced with a black woman. Another reason why Hillary is losing, she’s not in her prime anymore and Obama is in his prime. It’s like having an old horse race a young horse.
Posted by: Eric | February 28, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
Standard: If you approach your vote for Sen. Clinton, the same way Sen. Clinton maintains her stance on issues, like say NAFTA, does that mean if you travel 100 miles in any direction in your state that you may vote for Sen. Obama or Sen. McCain?
Posted by: H. Aslan Aslani-Far | February 28, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
“THIS IS A MAN’S WORLD But it wouldn’t be nothing without a woman or a girl”
James Brown
It really is a woman’s world, they know it they just don’t want to admit it,
Hillary included.
Posted by: Popolop | February 28, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
Give me a break…the Clintons have enriched themselves at the public trough for long enough and now she’s whining. A more privilidged existence has rarely been lived. HARD! How is it hard when Hilliary had every advantage. The truth is the more the american people listen to her tripe the more we realize what a lightweight she truly is. All politicians lie and promise the world during campaigns but she is almost as good a liar as Bill. Almost.
Posted by: TAKE MY MONEY | February 28, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
Why does it matter that a presidential candidate is black? Blacks and whites have fought and died together in every single war this country has waged. Blacks fought on the side of American colonists during the Revolutionary War, even though the British were offering them freedom. Blacks have been patriotic on the front lines, and many have bled and died for the United States of America. Yet, “fair-minded” Americans say they’re “not quite ready for a black president.” What does that mean? How can you say you believe in a creed that says all men were created equal, and then hesitate about electing someone simply because of their skin color? Which one is it? All men are created equal, or some are a bit more “equal” than others?
-People are equal. Obama’s probably going to win. So what’s your point?
Posted by: Steve | February 28, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
Yes, STAND tall Obama, and maintain the high road. Don’t let the Clintons and their sleezy politics get in your way. OBAMA 08′
Posted by: Lori from Arizona | February 28, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
No matter the gender or race…what’s missing from the previous posters’ is the obvious lack of leadership from HRC and BHO. Historical leaders such as Winston Churchill, Ronald Reagan put their principles first…in the face of an apparent majority of whiners, complainers and whimpy so called officials, they bowed their chest out, kept their chin up and loudly reinforced their principles. None of the most recognized leaders in history “rose to power” through the political ranks…they were very patriotic and principled folks who had the courage and cared enough to speak up. Are there any real patriotic leaders left?
Posted by: JSL | February 28, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
Take My Money
Glad to hear you are going to vote for
Hillary. With your vote and other ignorant voters, she might get to 30%.
And You deserve for somebody to take your money
Posted by: Fred Akel | February 28, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
Right on schedule… playing that gender card for all it’s worth … like any good little faux feminist would. Ugh.
Posted by: SE Croft | February 28, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
I WILL NEVER VOTE FOR OBAMA: I believe the wife you’re referring to who never knew how proud she became is actually, much more appropriately applied to Sen. Clinton, who was humiliated by her husband, and took it on the chin because she wanted to further her political career and found herself extremely proud at the start of this race when she was in the lead…not so much now…
Posted by: H. Aslan Aslani-Far | February 28, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
What a whiner. Where was all this playing field crap a year ago when she was ahead in the polls by double digits?
La-hoo-za-HER!
Well, whatever playing field she’s on, I want in. I got a hot $1000.00 I’d like to invest in cattle futures for a 10,000% return, LOL!
Posted by: JohnnyT | February 28, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
Is this an excuse for losing? Real or perceived, Hillary has been labeled as manipulative. I have to wonder if she is trying to sway some of the undecided women voters with this story.
Posted by: Alox | February 28, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
CTV News the network that reported Obama’s story is the most trusted news network in Canada, and Lloyd Robertson is the most trusted journalist in Canada.
CTV has announced that they “stand by their story”, someone is lying and I think is Obama.
Posted by: Steve | February 28, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
The irony doesn’t escape me. Back in 1992 nobody saw Bill Clinton coming. Some hillbilly from Arkansas running for President? And he won. Fast Forward 16 years, Bill and Hillary never saw Obama coming. Shakespeare in his wildest dreams couldn’t have written anything better! I guess conservatives are more in tune to seeing history repeating itself.
Posted by: Johnny | February 28, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
Hey Catmacdee – Good luck in the Republican Party. Because come 2009, you’ll be saying “President Obama.”
OBAMA in ’08!!!
Posted by: Breaking News | February 28, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
Catmacdee: Yes, Dan Abrams, he’s a solid source for things, the guy who wet his chops on the O.J. Simpson trial, expounding on the virtues on Mark Furman…
Posted by: H. Aslan Aslani-Far | February 28, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
It’s a Man’s world, baby out there. And it looks as if it’s gonna stay that way for this century! Just listen to John Lennon’s famous video:
“Woman is the Negroe of the World”
You’ll have a white, a blue, a black, a yellow president–but they’ll be MEN. Younger women haven’t gone through Life’s mill yet–they haven’t yet met date rape, domestic abuse, incest, family courts, social workers, shelters…so, they’ll punch down a strong woman with the nerve to apply for the Top Job, just like misogynist media…just wait…it’s a beautiful world out there and you’ll meet it…some day…good luck, Ladies!!!!
Posted by: It's a Man's World | February 28, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
HRC is the smartest and most knowledgable presidential candidate and will be the best president.PERIOD.I predict that she will be better than her husband.In addition to being ready on issues, she is also a kind and caring woman as her battles for civic,women’s and childrens rights show.Can you see the obvious bond and love between HRC and Chelsea.She is a loving and caring mother.The only other candidate with understanding with the issues of the people was Edwards while he was in the race.Hillary for president.
Posted by: VPNathan3 | February 28, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
Steve…forget the news organization, the source they quoted explicitly said the report was false. So who are you going to trust, the news organization, or the source?
Posted by: H. Aslan Aslani-Far | February 28, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
To: JOHNNY T
Don’t speak for Latinos Johnny, because I’m a Latino and I know lot’s of Latinos who voted for Obama. My mother is conservative latino and she voted for Obama.
Posted by: Eric | February 28, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
Hillary should have played the gender card when her husband was sexually harassing and assaulting women, then maybe I would believe her about the uneven playing field. It was her power that allowed the First Felon to get away scott-free. So much for levling the playing field.
HILLARY RELEASE YOUR TAX RETURNS (2005; 2006) and your White House calendar and notes.
Posted by: Debbie | February 28, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
Blah blah blah. I’m so tired of hearing people whine about how it’s more difficult for them to lead a normal life because they are (insert “minority” status here). You know what? Bullcrap! It’s 2008 — unless you live in some inbred little dirthole of a town, you most likely have the same chance to get ahead regardless of your race, gender or religion. In fact, if I had to name one group most at a disadvantage now, it’s the straight white Christian male!
Posted by: Al Santangelo | February 28, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
when she states she got the 1st question (in 5 of the last 6 debates)this is to be characterized as “whining”?
how do you characterize a previous statement by him, “what can I say – I give a good speech?”
there comes a time when even a woman deserves to be able to stand up for herself. and, for those of you with daughters, would you maybe be of a little different view point if it was your daughter fighting this fight?
Posted by: american2 | February 28, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
Henbell: I’ve never quite heard anyone defend a candidate’s qualifications or ability or good judgment by pointing out how cleverly they evade continued scandals and their ensuing investigations. I guess that’s something to consider, if your benchmark for presidential ability is such a comparison, I think the Whitewater scandal and Mr. Foster’s murder investigations pale in contrast to say, Watergate, since Nixon was forced from office. Perhaps Sen. Clinton should be running Walmart or Enron or…oh, yeah, she was on the Walmart board…
Posted by: H. Aslan Aslani-Far | February 28, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
I am a bit amazed by the ineffectuality of feminists in bolstering Hillary’s candidacy to date.
Perhaps women voters recall her complicity in denigrating the women who were abused by her husband.
Or perhaps younger women aren’t buying into the feminist agenda. Maybe feminism is fast going the way of disco and polyester suits and other, best forgotten vestiges of the 70′s.
Posted by: politwriter | February 28, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
American2: What if the first question was posed to her out of courtesy because (1) she is the more senior senator, and/or (2) out of general decorum because she is a lady? Why does it have to be some conspiracy?
Posted by: H. Aslan Aslani-Far | February 28, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
Business as usual for Clinton. Look for some staged event the day before March 4, and if she does not win March 4 look for her to blame voter fraud. She will not go away gracefully. OBAMA 08′
Posted by: Lori from Arizona | February 28, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
ASLAN, my point is, there is nothing there. the clintons do everything clean. when she release her tax, they would look and look. but not incriminating or damning. the hater never learn..
Posted by: henbell | February 28, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
Henbell: If she has nothing to hide, why does she resist releasing her records?
Posted by: H. Aslan Aslani-Far | February 28, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
You must be kidding. Anyone with 1/2 a brain can see what is going on here. She is targeting women big time now, as she most likely sees this as her only way to win as all her other demographic groups have dwindled. As I read her comments I cannot believe that anyone could not see through her tactics. This is all for show to get votes based on pity. Pretty weak if you ask me. But….she will do and say anything to win. Enough said about her charactoer.
Posted by: pam | February 28, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
What I always found so ironic about poor Hillary is that her biggest asset and accomplishment is marrying Bill Clinton. She is losing not because she is a woman. She is losing because she is a loser who has been catapulted into power. I live in upstate ny. I could have kissed Tim Russert for asking her about the 200K jobs she promised to create. He was the first journalist to call her on her promise. Listen to her excuse and you will know why she will never be president. Of course she blames G. Bush.
Posted by: victory | February 28, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
This woman complains about everything. She can really belly-ache with the best of them. No wonder people are turned off by her. She’s predictably tiresome!
Posted by: Sheilah | February 28, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
hmmm… i still wonder what would happen when the republicans and indepents leave obama in NOV. what a land slide, imagine CA, NY,FL,TEXAS ALL GOING TO MCCAIN
Posted by: henbell | February 28, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
Steve: My head would be hurting too if I spent my time making things up that didn’t make any sense. Next time, could you at least be funny?
Posted by: H. Aslan Aslani-Far | February 28, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
What do I think? I think it’s not hard being a woman. I’ve been one all my life. I wouldn’t have it any other way. It must be even easier when you marry the right guy, who becomes president of the United States and then vaults YOU into the public sphere, with all his fame, political connections, fund-raisers and amazing earnings from slimy overseas business deals. Wow. That must be really cool.
You know what’s really hard, though? Being a no-talent. A rigid, prissy, antagonistic clod with a history of bad judgment. Then the media kinda gets on ya, and no matter how mad your husband gets at them, they ask you questions! As we used to say, bummer.
Posted by: phillygirl | February 28, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
Victory…nice comment, good point.
Posted by: H. Aslan Aslani-Far | February 28, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
Oh poor Hillary. Whoa is me. I feel ill.
Please OHIO nad TEXAS, be smart and don’t vote for this woman. Professional vvictims have no business in any position of authority. OBAMA 08′
Posted by: Lori from Arizona | February 28, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
Phillygirl…glad to have another voice of reason here…nice…in particular about the slimy overseas business dealings. At the end of the day, you’re right…clinging on to coattails can take a person all the way to the Senate.
Posted by: H. Aslan Aslani-Far | February 28, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
Have a tough time mustering any sympathy for Hillary Clinton on this one – privileged white girl in Chicago, Wellesley, Yale Law, married to the president … it’s sad that her husband cheated on her so many times, but other than that, I just don’t see a lack of opportunity in her life. Not to say she’s a bad candidate. Just don’t see how her gender has inhibited her. At all.
Posted by: benintn | February 28, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
Historically speaking, women have had a harder time politically than African American men in some ways. While the woman’s movement fought hard for the abolition of slavery, they were amazed that women were not given the same rights as African American men after the Civil War was over. In fact, this resulted in a split in the woman’s movement for some time.
However, Hillary is right. It is a sad commentary on the state of journalism, particularly that of television journalists, that they do seem to take great glee in her downfall and have tossed Obama softballs.
But then, I wonder if it is just that Hillary is a Clinton and a lot of people simply do not want 4-8 more years of the Clinton soap opera. I think that Obama may be getting a lot of Independent/Republican votes which are not necessarily pro-Obama but Anti-Clinton. If so, this may make the race between McCain and Obama very interesting.
Posted by: Cheryl Morris | February 28, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
Bark: Actually the GOP was not betting on Sen. Obama, they were betting on Sen. Clinton…that is why they are afraid that Sen. Obama will win the Democratic nomination, because every national poll in the country has Sen. Obama beating Sen. McCain, while Sen. McCain has the clear advantage over Sen. Clinton. Nice try, but plain wrong.
Posted by: H. Aslan Aslani-Far | February 28, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
If you do not buy into Hillary’s sad excuse for a campaign then you must be part of the vast sexist American (male)conspiracy determined to destroy her and other strong, moral, pure champions of women and protectors of children, and the American dream.
Her rant is a classic example of the paranoid style of politics.
Posted by: mark | February 28, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
If it’s not the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy or the Republican Attack Machine, it must be that the men are ganging up on her. Maybe it’s just karma catching up with her. She has been spewing hate virtually her entire life. Why is she surprised that she’s getting some of it back? Maybe because she’s gotten away with so much? Maybe because a few more people have caught on to her endless lies, ineptitude, excuse-making, evasion, paper-shredding, evidence-hiding, etc.? It takes a village to hide behind, I guess.
Posted by: Mick Smith | February 28, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
Preaching hope, inspiration, change, with no substance, no specifics, no media challenge, and media fawning, Obama is instructive of how demagogues rise to power to inflict horrors on humanity.
The pro-Obama biased media against Hillary Clinton have swayed votes to cult leader Obama. The pro-Obama biased media against Hillary Clinton continue to undermine the Democratic nomination process.
Maureen Dowd in the Washington Post spews ascerbic diatribe daily against Hillary Clinton. Jonathan Alter of Newsweek magazine wrote a biased article stating Hillary Clinton should “get out” of the Democratic primary. Both Maureen Dowd and Jonathan Alter are in the traveling press for cult leader Obama. Both Maureen Dowd and Jonathan Alter interact socially with cult leader Obama on his campaign plane. Jonathan Alter was recently on the Ed Schultz radio show expressing strong biased comments against Hilliary Clinton. So there is clearly complicity and conspiracy between cult leader Obama, Maureen Dowd, and Jonathan Alter to use the media power of the Washington Post and Newsweek to attack Hillary Clinton.
Hillary Clinton will win Ohio and Texas. If she doesn’t win these states, it will be because of the pro-Obama biased media against Hillary Clinton that swayed votes to cult leader Obama.
Hillary Clinton is about the future of America; she is the qualified, experienced, visionary leader America needs to make change real and restore America to prosperous times and restore our good standing in the world.
Posted by: crat3 | February 28, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
I will be generous and say that this election has shown that there are indeed vestiges of sexism in this country. If Barack Obama were a woman, he and his resume (or lack thereof), admitted drug use and overall smugness would be handily shown the door in any national election. But he’s not a woman so…
Further, Hillary Clinton is faced with an untenable position. She has to be so serious and so fact-based to prove she can play with the boys, but that very requirement then doesn’t allow her to kick back, have a beer and BE one of the boys like Obama can. It is what it is, but I am just so diasppointed that other women don’t see the disservice being done to them by the way this election has unfolded. It will be a very long time before there is again another woman who has enough gravitas to meet the standards set by men for even being on the same stage as them.
Posted by: SleeplessInNewYork | February 28, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm
That’s very obvious. It is harder for her to run as a woman than it wuold be for ANY man to run as a woman.
Who would want to?
And this is from the “smartest woman in the world”??
I guess she came a long way baby, and it wasn’t far enough to make it, eh?
What a total loser.
Posted by: CCH | February 28, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
What an unbelievable self-serving interview. I wish the interviewer had mentioned that she is not running against a WASP, but an African-American who is also having a lot of hills to climb to become President. She never complained last November when she was ahead by 20-30 pts. Doesn’t anyone see through this sham of her’s.
Posted by: hank | February 28, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
Hillary is desperately trying to scrounge sympathy votes from gullible females. It worked for her in New Hampshire, with that Oscar-worthy display of waterworks, and she’s hoping that it will work again, with this “level playing field” line. I think, by now, most people know her game: she’ll say and do virtually anything to get elected. As our President most eloquently put it: “There’s an old saying in Tennessee — I know it’s in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can’t get fooled again.” Hillary…you’re done. The people will not be fooled again!
Posted by: Don Bo | February 28, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
Crat3: By definition a “cult” is a subculture. In assessing Sen. Obama’s appeal and the number of supporters voting for him, if Sen. Obama is a cult, then so too, is Sen. Clinton. In fact, neither are a cult because their appeal, as broad as it has been is representative of the vast majority of the nation. Calling Sen. Obama and his supporters a cult is the equivalent of calling Microsoft a computer shop.
Posted by: H. Aslan Aslani-Far | February 28, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm
Maybe it’s time to realize that many people just do not like Hillary. SHe comes across as condescending, cold with contrived emotions, privileged, she tells people what they want to hear with what strikes me as fake sincerity.
I believe this whole episode starting with moving to New York and becoming a senator is about Hillary and a legacy, the rest is just doing and saying what she needs to do to win the position. If she can not take a first question, maybe she’s not day one material If it’s too hard now because she is a woman, how will she deal with those who don’t give a what she is in the real world of leadership and international turmoil.
Concede and fade away!
Posted by: Dave I | February 28, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
This is ridiculous. Hillary was ahead in almost every poll by 20-30 points. The press covered her every move and added to her air of inevitability. She didn’t lose this race because of her gender. What male candidate could lose 11 primaries in a row, fall behind in fundraising, and fire his campaign manager and still be considered a contender?
Posted by: Margie C. | February 28, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
One has to wonder who is the BEST QUALIFIED to be president not whether s/he is the first black or the first woman to run for the job. Just because someone is black or a woman, does not make them more qualified than a white man. Furthermore, I can’t imagine Margaret Thatcher whining about a fraction of what Hillary whines about (or whining at all for that matter). Thatcher could not only play with the big boys, she could beat them too — without using crying or whining to manipulate people. Thatcher earned the respect she got … she didn’t demand it as Hillary has.
Posted by: Mairead | February 28, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
SleeplessinNewYork: Sen. Clinton did best in the debates when she did kick back and ease off and represent herself as a normal human being. The problem she has is that she is too serious all of the time, just as she was when she admonished elected members of Congress to adopt her health care plan as first lady. To try and force people to do things is simply her way and why she has such a difficult time with both likability and respect. As far as your observations regarding Sen. Obama’s background and his race and his public disclosures, it is an interesting point, however, I think a great amount of the courtesy and respect that is accorded to him comes from where he has come and how he has handled himself and the very way he conducts himself both on the national stage, and by all accounts, behind closed doors. I think if a female, african-american counterpart with a similar background and ability and message were available, I would like to think it would be the same response…but, perhaps not.
Posted by: H. Aslan Aslani-Far | February 28, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
This is ridiculous!!! She is full of it…… Lets face it! Has nothing to do with gender….has everything to do with her and her husband……
We dont want you back! Try to understand this! If you can?????
Posted by: timtan | February 28, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
Why should gender inhibit a woman? Isn’t it about time that women value the great strides courageous women have taken to obtain equal rights and progress in any career path? What about the right to vote? What about the rights to be educated in all the professional fields? What about all the women who led the way to be able to be doctors, scientists, astronauts, architects, and business CEO’s? The list is endless. But, too many forget the times, or are too young to know when the times only allowed women to be teachers, secretaries, clerks, or were expected to get married and “settle down”. Those choices are fine and noble, but what about the limits that were placed for women to have very low expectations? Now, in this race, we have a chance to elect a woman who is definitely qualified, well-educated, experienced in all the relevant fields of governmental service, with a brilliant track record for serving all the citizens of this country. It does not make much sense to me that she would not be the obvious choice for the Democrats. She is the most knowledgeable, intelligent, and prepared of the three candidates. Her biggest asset is that she works hard, she gets things done, and she never gives up. She’s tough!
There is no need to criticize the original candidates in the race. John Edwards, Joe Biden, Chris Dodd, Bill Richardson are all capable leaders with great service to this country. Hillary is still standing because millions of people voted for someone who is the strongest candidate.
I believe that many not voting for her just do not want a woman in the Presidency. So, on that basis, it is not a level playing field.
Posted by: georgia | February 28, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
Hillary deserved to be treated the same way Obama has been treated by ABC; you guys are practically drooling over every letter of his name.
Posted by: troyd | February 28, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
Reversing the chronology for comments discourages discussion between commenters. It does so by requiring readers to scroll to determine the commencement of any given thread within the comments. Is this the intended result? Are we to assume ABCNews is more interested in our response to your dispensations than the discussion that might develop from them? Is this a performative allegory for the attitude of the legacy media to its audience?
Posted by: malaclypse the tertiary | February 28, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
Republicans will help rescue poor Hillary in the Texas vote by voting in mass for her. Just to be nice.
Posted by: RT | February 28, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
I would never vote for Hillary. She is not honest. Both Clintons thrive on sleezy politics. Hillary, please retire, buy and RV and take Slick with you.
Posted by: Lori from Arizona | February 28, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
This is why she’s losing.
There are currently 16 female senators and 1 African-American Senator. To think that she’s losing to Barack Obama because she’s a woment is ridiculous.
The fact that she can’t figure out why she’s losing just shows she wasn’t presidential material to begin with.
Posted by: Brad | February 28, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
Mr. Obama will NOT win the general election. He will NOT win because thankfully the more informed voters will cast their votes for McCain. He will not win because he has no substance. He is a creation of the media and that alone will not give him the November election. You will also see those huge numbers shrink because now you have independents and conservatives alike crossing over and voting for him simply to keep Clinton out of the picture. They will not do that in the November election. Polls also will never actually reflect Obama’s true numbers because there are still far too many Americans who will never admit they will not vote for a black president. To the poster who indicated that all National polls show Obama beating McCain, wrong. You may want to do a quick google and you will find that statement inaccurate. To the poster who defined a cult as being an entire subculture and therefore disqualifies the Obama followers as not being so, again, inaccurate. When you read news article after article comparing Obama to Christ, your gag reflex sets in, but you totally understand that they are creating a cult around Obama.
Toss in the occasional set up fainter, and you have a national sideshow, TV Evangelicals pale to the Barack Obama show.
America will never put him in office.
Posted by: MeeMa2008 | February 28, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
What’s Hard?
Flying around in a charter Boeing 737, Fleet of Cadillac Escalades, eating 5-start catered buffet 24/7, Hotel Suites, staff of 200+ assistants: hairstylists, make-up artists, wardrobe, secretaries, pollsters, image consultants, speech writers, etc., etc. $150 Million spent since January. That’s Hard ?
A Challenge is working for a living, paying the mortgage, ever increasing taxes, cooking meals, raising children, cleaning house, doing the lawn, having bad bosses & job changes every 5 years.
Clintons don’t live in a world like average people do, they are out of touch with the real world — they’ve NEVER been a part of it!!
Posted by: Sylvia | February 28, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
You know what I LOVE? That Obama has never, never brought up his race and whined about it. Yet Hillary loves to, but only when she’s down in the polls.
Posted by: Claire | February 28, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
If Obama said “BLACK MAN” for Every time Hillary said “woman” America would be up in arms and he’d surely lose the race!
Hillary’s over emphasis on “women” can be a turn off. That may be part of the reason why the white male base has shifted away from her.
Posted by: Elena | February 28, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
For anyone who is engaged on the issue of respect and fairplay by the media, consider these words, spoken by Eleanor Roosevelt:
“It never seems quite real to me to sit at a table and have people whom I have always looked upon with respect…explain why they are granting me an honor. Somehow I always feel they ought to be talking about someone else. I will do my best to do what is right…not with the sense of my own adequacy but with the feeling that the country must go on, that we must keep democracy and make it mean a reality to more people…we should constantly be reminded of what we owe in return for what we have.”
Mrs. Roosevelt at the time had the highest approval rating of any first lady and these sentiments are a clear indication of how one commands respect. This is in stark contrast to the sense of personal entitlement that Sen. Clinton exhibits, and it is clear from Sen. Clinton’s words she does not command respect, but demands it.
Posted by: H. Aslan Aslani-Far | February 28, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
“Not a level playing field”. No it is not! Who else gets to carpet-bag to a state she never lived in before, become a U.S. Senator as an entry-level job, and run for President after 1.3 terms on the job?
Someday a woman will run for President who REALLY did qualify on her own (Big-time CEO, governor of a state) and NOT run as a woman, but as another qualified candidate. Hillary has done none of that.
She got where she is because of who she married, period. She’s done almost nothing to qualify herself for the job. She’s never lead anything or anyone.
Posted by: Popeye | February 28, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
To Mick Smith: You say she “has been spewing hate virtually her entire like!” Please enligten the rest of us.
Posted by: georgia | February 28, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
Oh, geez, here we go again. Hillary and her: Poor me! I’m not getting a fair deal! The press is against me. So all you women out there must realize what it’s like to be persucuted by men. Good grief, Hillary. Get a grip. Where’s the Hillary who spoke proudly of her accomplishments and compared her positions with those of her opponents in clear concise terms? She ‘found her voice’ alright, and since super Tuesday, her campaign has become little more than spiteful, whining, pettiness. And THAT’s why many of her staunchest female supporters are looking elsewhere.
Posted by: prairie town | February 28, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
Hmm: Easy, Sen. Obama’s campaign has attacked Sen. Clinton on policy. If you’d like to provide any information as to personal attacks I would like to see them.
Posted by: H. Aslan Aslani-Far | February 28, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
Thank you Liberals for putting out Obama.
McGovern 2
Posted by: Bo | February 28, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm
Hillary and Bill should hit the road. We have seen enough of the Clintons to last a lifetime. I’m just tired of seeing Hillary whine and cry and Bill pointing his finger and getting red in the face. The co-presidency is slipping away from them and they can’t take it. What evil deeds will they think of next to try and discredit Obama? Thank goodness Obama’s too much of a gentleman to let Hillary know what he really thinks of her. Barack’s wife is very much a lady….a very intelligent lady. I’ll bet she even bakes cookies for her darling little girls. I can’t wait for January 20, 2009. That will be a great day for America. I feel this will improve our standing in the world and we can regain some of the prestige Bush lost for us. I am a white elderly woman(just for the record).
Posted by: Lorraine Lubker | February 29, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am
I don’t disagree that there are some gender obstacles and running as a woman can be tough, but I think running as a black man with a Muslim-sounding name is a lot tougher. Clinton is not behind because she is a woman. She is behind because Obama has run the better campaign, plain and simple. I am not unsympathetic to the gender bias in this country, but I think the persistent racism as well as fear of racism among Democratic voters who fear Obama’s skin color makes him unelectable more than cancels out any gender disadvantage in this race.
Posted by: Laura | February 29, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am
Hmm: I believe Sen. Obama has a tremendous amount of character and do not deny that Sen. McCain deserves our respect. However, Sen. McCain has tied himself to President Bush’s failed policy in Iraq and has avered that he will continue the tax cuts for the rich, so in the end, I do believe that policy will matter as much as character. You see, by summer, the US recession will be indisputable, regardless of how often President Bush calls it a slow down and since Sen. McCain has adopted the tax plan and has admitted that the economy is not his strong suit, I believe that Sen. Obama will win in November, so I have no reason to stop advocating for the changes that this country needs. At the end of the day, I simply don’t want to see us all brought to ruin, including you, My Friend.
Posted by: H. Aslan Aslani-Far | February 29, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am
I think that there is some truth in her message. You look at the history of congress, the house, the supreme court, in each group, the order is –white men gets there first, then black guys in before they get a woman in. So, it has been going on for a long time but nobody wants to admit it.
Another thing is the Obama plays the race card very well through Bill Clinton. Obama’s camp was the one who brought up the charge against Bill Clinton about using the race card, and the press just follows suit without carefully investigating where the source of the accusation comes from and the context of Bill’s comment. For some reasons, the country is so paralyzed with fear of being labeled ‘racist’; Obama gets upset and McCain has to apologize because somebody calls out his entire name including middle name; Obama gets furious of the photo of him wearing somale (sp?) clothing;
Somehow, being sexist is more acceptable label than racist. Clinton is an easy target because of those experience with Bill’s scandals and she is a women on top of that.
Instead of looking at how many ‘firsts’ that she has achieved and opened many doors, the press is focusing on Obama’s first black candidate who is a great speaker. Even Obama’s wife is benefiting from Clinton’s effort; she broke the mold of what it means to be the first lady – that it is ok to be a first lady and have a career minded, instead of the traditional one-choice path for a woman, a stay-home wife. There is nothing wrong with the choice of staying home, but it was wrong that it was the only acceptable choice.
Nobody said that Obama was whining about Bill playing the race card, he did not know which Clinton he is running against, his photo in foreign clothing, etc. but if Clinton makes any negative then it would painted as whining
Clinton is not just running against Obama, she is running against years of ingrained perceived beliefs about women.
Posted by: Sylvie | February 29, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am
Never has been, the media bias against Hillary is sickening. When you Obama
maniacs get your wish and have Obama
the nominee all that will happen is McCain will end up winning this election. By November the Obama love fest will be over and the republicans
will march back into the White House again. Hang in there Hillary. This country needs you.
Posted by: angela | February 29, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am
The press in this country does not have any objectivity. It is totally corrupt. This was just as clear when they were riding the “Inevitability” thing with Senator Clinton. They were never objective in saying that either. Senator Obama and all the other candidates attacked her every chance they had. Senator Clinton did not respond to those attacks. She tried to be a good candidate. The press played along. From that time, the press never thought twice. She was red meat to them. Senator Obama continued with that attack approach while the Press continued to give him a free ride. He has been treated like someone who would not have stood on his own and needed help to have a head start. No one asked him hard questions. So he played his strengths, which his oratory skills. And since people would follow the “feel good” train in this country, they just did.
Remember George W. Bush candidacy against former V.P. Al Gore? The press told us that then Governor G.W. Bush was the kind of guy you would have a beer with. The press gave him a free pass and never questioned his inability to even speak correctly. George W. Bush took advantage of that and turned his “intellectual weakness” into a strategy against the brilliant Al Gore with the blessing of the press. The press told us Al Gore was boring. They critized his clothes, and everything else. Please understand that the press has the capacity to sway public opinion. Most people have given up thinking in this country. They follow the sound bites from the press.
We are witnessing the same thing here again. I am hoping that some day, we will have a mechanism for holding the press accountable in this country. They seem too powerful.
Take this one example: After the Ohio debate, I watched on the internet and noticed that MSNBC for instance brought Jesse Jackson to comment on the performance of Senator Obama. Well, he is an Obama supporter so his comment were going to be favorable to Obama. There was no one to positively speak for Clinton. These are some of the things they do, very subtle, but very effective. People did not hear a positive comment on Clinton at the same time they heard a positive comment on Obama.
Senator Obama is being set up here because should he be the nomminee, he will have a very hard time competing against the republican machine. Let’s wait and see.
Posted by: Paix E. Joie | February 29, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am
President”OBAMA”–Makes one feel queasy at the thought of America’s first media created President. Hopefully, voters in Texas and Ohio will not be stampeded by the media blitz into voting for such an experienced, unknown and questionable candidate.
Posted by: cart | February 29, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am
Never doubt for a moment that HC will use whatever means necessary to get to the White House. Anything goes – anything. Why? If she gets there, it will never matter how, just that she got there. That’s the way this game is played.
Posted by: Americanfirearms.org | February 29, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am
Sylvie: If anyone before this campaign charged that Bill Clinton had any kind of negative or racist tendencies, they would have been castigated. He was, after all, called America’s first black president for a reason. However, in the course of this primary season and on behalf of his wife he has attacked Sen. Obama with some very troubling tactics, tactics that are short of bigotry, but certainly tactics that imply that the country is going to elect an African American — and it is the use of race, by Bill Clinton in this race that is getting notice. Sen. Obama has never made an issue of it. As such, these tactics are going to reflect poorly on Bill Clinton’s legacy — which I find troubling as I voted for him twice.
Posted by: H. Aslan Aslani-Far | February 29, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am
Senator Clinton has had the advantage of association with her husband a former president, huge political and other connections and personal wealth, as well as the advantages of being born into a relatively well off family who were able to give her a good private education.
There have been world leaders who were women who came to prominence through their own individual hard work: Margaret Thatcher, Mary Robinson, Angela Merkel.
Clinton does a disservice to feminism.
Posted by: Maeve | February 29, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am
Hillary, you’re running for President of the U.S…….imagine what actually BEING the President of the U.S. is like….give up now!!! P.S. You’re slip is showing!
Posted by: Whochebama | February 29, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am
Two words, one name. Margaret Thacher. Can you imagine Margaret Thacher whinning? I can’t. I would be happy to vote for a woman or an African American or any other protected class if they were stong leaders and shared my vision for the future of the country. Just so happens this cycle the only person that matches that descripiton in a white male (again).
Posted by: Pundit in training | February 29, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am
If she becomes president what will she do?
If the Red Chinese start war will she cry? If she doesn’t like what the press is doing to her now what would she do if she was in W’s shoes? Is she going to get all misty and go call her hubby to get mad at them again?
If Putin says; “a head of state at least should have a head” about her again what is she to do? Is she going to tell the American people; “he’s picking on me!” Wah-wah-wah!
Lady wake up. This comes with the territory!
Posted by: Ken Chapman | February 29, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am
There is so much false reporting in the media. As is common, so many articles talk about Hillary’s big comeback win in New Hampshire. Yes, she won the popular vote, but Hillary LOST new Hampshire by delegate count.
Posted by: Warren | February 29, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am
Georgia: A person’s record of service became irrelevant with the catastrophic administration of President Bush. Here was a governor, who had the inside line on politics surrounded as he was by his father’s cronies. He was assisted by Cheney, whose resume is longer than just about anyone else’s in D.C., but yet, the Terrible Two have run the country into the ground. By the way, Abraham Lincoln, the greatest President this country has ever known, had far less experience than Sen. Obama.
Posted by: H. Aslan Aslani-Far | February 29, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am
And Obama is a black man. When will the excuses end. Maybe she should just fact the facts… WE ARE SICK AND TIRED OF THE CLINTONS. One scandal after another.
Posted by: VinnieB | February 29, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am
Hey Cart,
You rail against Obama b/c of his supposed inexperience? How experience was Reagan compared to Carter? How experienced was Slick Willy to HW Bush — 20 years head of the CIA, 8 years VP? Who were better presidents? The B-list actor and the governor of one of the most bumf(ck states in America. I don’t know if Obama will be as good as he sounds. There’s no way of knowing. But what I do know is this: every significant change in this country came from the people. It has NEVER come from politicians. So if all Obama can do is rile up the people and inspire them, then it can move and shake up Washington. I don’t care if he does it w/speeches or an iron fist. I only care that the deed gets done. And the same goes for McCain. If it’s Obama vs. McCain it’s a win-win for me. I could see either guy as a good president and America wins.
Posted by: Tron Carter | February 29, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am
give me a break….if she can’t take the “uneven playing field” after she was set up with the largest money machine and all of the connections based on her husband’s office, then HOW IS SHE GOING TO STAND UP TO THE BIG STUFF??? She’s a joke. I have hated the way the Clinton’s have marginalized Barack Obama’s candidacy and nobody had a more intelligent political organization than he did. He really is ready from day one, and he’s endured more stereotypic insults and received more apologies than any of the other candidates. And who cares about Tina Fey????? Hillary has made all women look like they “cry baby cry” when things get hard. Wasn’t Bush the one who used the same silly little word when he was defending how “hard” it is to be in at war. Obama is not a complainer. He is a man of great behavioral consistency. A true leader.
Posted by: gayla | February 29, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am
Come on people. Open your heads and sqeeze that sponge you call a brain and soak in some intelligence. This is not YOUR election. This election belongs to the young people. You had your chances. Some of you in the past made uneducated choices, while others went to the polls blindfolded and pushed the first button they touched.
Barack is being accused of being inexperienced, too young, sexist, a cult leader, a black man with an agenda for his people, etc., etc. In reality, he is just another ‘human being’ (regardless of ethnic background, religious beliefs, etc.) who offers NOT YOU PEOPLE, but the young people a chance at fixing this government and putting this country on a new track. I am a senior who has lived and learned from many previous presidential campaigns; that you don’t always get what you wish for. I have never been able to pick a winning candidate. As such, I have had to live through the choice of others. Believe me when I say… This Obama is a winner. He lacks the corrupt history of government politics, because we get to pull him out of his government position before he becomes “old school”, like McCain. He has Constitutional Law behind him, so we know that he will defend our inherited rights (I don’t recall reading in GWB’s biography, any Constitutional studies). He is honest and straight forward. He told us before the question even came up, that he did drugs in his youth. How many of you have tried drugs in your past and would reveal that fact to your family (kids), employer, etc., without them asking you? Enough. You know the past of the people in this campaign. Lets not be selfish by making foolish choices based on our personal agendas. In God’s name, let’s please make the right choices for our kids’ sake not ours. Start voting for your kid’s future.
Posted by: germanguy | February 29, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am
Oh, and if I remember correctly, HRC once made a snide comment about women who stay home to “bake cookies”. Well, guess what’s on the homepage of her site? A recipe for Snickerdoodles . . . yep, SNICKERDOODLES!
Hmmmmmmmm. Can someone tell me what snickerdoodles have to do with running for President? If she doesn’t want to be attacked for her gender, she should stop pulling out the gender card whenever she thinks it will work for her. And she should definitely fire the high-schoolers that control her website.
Posted by: Jaine | February 29, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am
I think the Clinton Machine would sputter and die in about a week if it were Republican instead of privileged, media-assisted Democrat. It is unconscionable for anyone in Team All-Slime-All-the-Time to complain to anyone about anything. Yet complain they do, and the media has obediently over the past three weeks tried its best to “go after Obama” as the Shrieking Harpy has virtually commanded them to do. It’s sickening, and it’s unfair to the Republicans and Independents coast-to-coast who would kill for a single day of fair media treatment but never get it. I just hope to God the voters drive the Machine out of this race for once and for all because–for the first time in memory–we will have two good choices, two people of honor and character, to choose from in November.
But for the lemming-like Clinton holdouts: if to their glee the Shrieking Harpy steals the nomination, that’ll work, too, because we’ll end up with President John McCain. In a landslide.
Posted by: Rex Range | February 29, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am
We’ve gone from the vast right wing conspiracy to the vast media conspiracy, and now we’re in the vast sexist conspiracy.
Please Hillary, STOP IT NOW!!! You’re making all women look bad with these antics.
Posted by: Susan | February 29, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am
Of course it’s not an even playing field, it’s never been an even playing field. WHy can’t she mention it without people making snide comments? Watch the debates, even the moderators treat her differently, it’s sometimes blatant and sometimes subtle but it’e there and you’d have to be a blind man or a sexist not to notice.
Posted by: Man | February 29, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am
Hillary whining about “how hard it is for a woman” sets women back more than anything else possibly could.
Playing the gender card is exactly what certain types expect her to do, and it’s exactly what she does.
She’s losing because the more you see her speak, the more you see how she runs her campaign, the more you see the low blows she constantly throws, the more you realize she’s just an empty pantsuit with an oversize lust for power. That’s it.
Posted by: Jason | February 29, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am
H denied she was running for president for years. she lies! McCain will win the white house. Obama does not stand a chance.
Posted by: rick | February 29, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am
I’m an Obama supporter but you better believe it’s been easier for Obama than it has been for Hillary. A lot of this has to do with her being a woman. The fact is that it is far more acceptable to be openly sexist than openly racist in the US.
The media have been unfairly tough on Hillary, too. It makes me feel a little guilty for supporting Obama; I don’t want to be cast in the same lot with the likes of you.
Posted by: Jason | February 29, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am
I am amazed at the clintons. I have heard supporters of HC that Rush Limbaugh caused her to lose. How can that be? Is it not the Democrates that are voting? Since when does any Dem listen to R Limbaugh? HC you are losing because the people in your party are not voting for you. If the Rep is the party of the white male then why is HC losing?
Posted by: Give Me a break | February 29, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am
GermanGuy: Great post. These old farts are shaking in their boots. They’re claiming to be “glad” that Obama will be the nominee but it’s false confidence or stupidity. They don’t care about America. They care about the status quo being maintained. They’re afraid of what might happen to their lot in life. That’s Hillary’s problem. She can’t grasp the audacity of this 46-year-old who should wait his turn for the presidency. Unfortunately for these dinasaurs — and I mean both Dems and Repubs — they’re not intelligent enough to grasp the enormity of what’s happening. They’re hanging on to yesterday. Remember, EXPERIENCE IS OVERRATED. Revolution of the mind and body politic doesn’t come from career politicans. It comes from mavericks who don’t have to kowtow to their friends in Washington. EXPERIENCE prevents you from taking risks, from rocking the boat. EXPERIENCE is indeed a handicap. You owe too many ppl in Washington if you have this EXPERIENCE. I don’t want a EXPERIENCE. I want COMPETENCE, INTELLIGENCE, VISIONAIRIES. You can have the Hillarys. I won’t badmouth McCain though. I think he’s an honorable and decent man who deserves respect. People who are saying Obama will be a disaster are really HOPING he will be one. It’ll make them feel better about the last guy they voted for president despite his four prior years of incompetence — that little blow monkey GW Bush
Posted by: Tron Carter | February 29, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am
To HAAF: You surely do not know enough about Eleanor Roosevelt. In her time, she was criticized and ridiculed for trying to make a difference in people’s lives. She stood her ground for workers’ rights, racial equality, help for those in poverty, and assistance for those in need. She was tough at a time when many thought she should keep her mouth shut and stay in her place. She is Hillary Clinton’s role model. She is also one of mine.
We have come a long way and made many advances since Eleanor Roosevelt. The ridicule and criticism of her took place in the mediums of the newspaper and radio. Now, we have cable news networks, the internet, computers, bloggers, and spinners. The negative barrage taken daily by some candidates is amazing, with much of it being about the most personal things. Many people get their “news” these days from soundbites. And if networks like CNN, MSNBC, and FOX are doing it, then it must be fair game. So don’t tell me that Hillary Clinton has not taken the brunt of personal negatives. Where have you been?
A sense of “personal entitlement”? If Hillary Clinton has not worked as hard, or harder, in her life as the other candidates in Campaign 2008, you need to look a little deeper.
Posted by: georgia | February 29, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am
How hard has she had it for crying out loud?
She’s a U.S. Senator and former First Lady! She and her husband are worth more than $45 million!
Posted by: Gloria | February 29, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am
How can Sen. Clinton say that it’s harder for a woman to win the nomination. Last time I checked, women significantly outnumber men in the Democratic Party.
Posted by: Randy Goodwin | February 29, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am
I love how Hillary thinks she is the great representative of all women’s struggles. I know a lot of women that throw up a bit in their throats every time she opens her mouth.
That doesn’t sound representative to me.
Posted by: xohdis | February 29, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am
Everything HRC does is calculated. When she makes a fuss about media coverage, she gets MORE media coverage. Like tonight with a big segment on Nightline. Allthe buzz this week – if you trace it – all originated with HRC. Where does the gender bias end and personal responsibility begin??
Posted by: Kathy | February 29, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am
To Jaine: You don’t get the SNICKERDOODLES thing? It’s comedy, kinda like working women jargon. Staying home and baking cookies! Tammy Wynette took it the wrong way, but it has become a comical slogan Hillary has learned to live with. I like it! When working, I didn’t have time to stay home and bake cookies either.
Posted by: georgia | February 29, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am
H. Aslan Aslani-Far you sound like a broken democratic sound bite. Failed iraq? When have you been over here? Bush failed administration, Clown get out of the New York Times editorials and talk to the people coming back. More kids in Iraq are named for President Bush, We fly by and they lift there children to the sky to see. Unemployment record lows, Stock market up to 14000 at one time. You my friend are a stooge for the dems. military will always have republicans backs.
out!
Posted by: CW2iniraq | February 29, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am
1: Start the Crying next for sympathy and that will pickup a few votes.
2: Blame Media
3: Keep Bill out of spotlight as much as possible
4: Try the “I’m Proud To be Running With Obama”
After loosing, demand recount…..Then the ole tried and true “Vast Right Wing Conspiricy” line
Posted by: Clinton Playbook | February 29, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am
Oh Please. Not the gender card now.
Undoubtedly there are many American women out there who have an axe to grind because of negative gender biases that have been experienced in America.
Hillary is currently making a play on this circumstance. This is interesting because I really have trouble seeing how Hillary could possibly improve the situation. She has already proven herself to promote divisiveness above all else.
I feel that her unpopularity is rooted in disingenuousness and self-centered motivations. She has shown herself to be a “do or say anthing to win” candidate beyond the shadow of a doubt. I really dont think she cares much about women other than herself.
In fact, I would guess that Michelle Obama would accomplish 100 times more for women than Hillary would. Michelle Obama is another league than is Clinton. Listen to her speak and you will sense integrity. She also is far more articulate and “real” than Hillary. If HIllary were voted into office, it could easily do more harm than good for women.
I honestly would love to see a female president. There are inspiring, impressive women out there, who I know can rise to the requirments of being president. But it would have to be someone more selfless and genuine than Ms. Clinton.
Posted by: Mike Denhof | February 29, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am
Snickerdoodles? Funny. Campaigning is a strategy; targeting votes is apart of that strategy. This doesn’t mean she isn’t the best candidate. I don’t mind the silly gender card that’s being played. Hillary does care about people, will change healthcare, and will rebuild the middle class. Her history speaks for itself. I would suggest everyone do some research on these candidates instead of voting by what you hear. The media is using what’s called imagery. It’s where you paint a picture of someone and they are no longer the “person”, but rather a title. The army uses this type of method as well. When going into combat, they usually will call the enemy by a different name, causing the soldiers to forget that they’re people. It’s easier to dismiss someone that way. The media has painted Hillary as a cold, sneaking, manipulative, whiney women. Yes, she may be playing cards, but friends- so is Obama. I just encourage everyone to do INDEPENDENT research. Look in other reference sources besides the information the media put out. Even if you don’t vote for her, she’s still a human being who cares for people (fact).
Open your minds!
Posted by: Kim | February 29, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am
Since it’s her fellow democrats that are not buying into her sense of entitlement to the presidency and not voting for her in these primaries, I guess she’s saying that the democrat party is full of sexists!
Posted by: Elmer Flork | February 29, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am
Really? Women have it tougher? How many women are currently in the Senate? Sixteen. How many blacks of either gender? One.
Women have it tougher? How many women governors have there ever been? Over 20? Hmmm, and how many black ones? Two. Ever? Yes. Two.
Only one campaign has stooped to making this all about race and gender — and that’s the campaign that has everything to gain by marginalizing blacks and kissing-up to women. Oh wait, but women have it inherently tougher. Right.
If Hillary and her supporters think that she or any candidate can win a general election by insulting state after state that doesn’t go their way, mocking the majority of voters of their own party by insisting that party elders pick their candidate over the will of the people and dividing America along gender warfare lines, they’re nuts.
Posted by: Mickey | February 29, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am
Many of you are upset by Hillary Clinton’s “lies”. I can tell that you have not conducted your own research on her background…therefore, shut up!
Yes…she’s playing cards…so is Obama. Moreover, because Obama lacks experience, he will have his own “NAFTA”. EXPERIENCE DOES MATTER!
Clinton ’08!
Posted by: Kim | February 29, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am
Thank goodness, less than a week to go and DING DONG the witch is dead, the wicked witch is dead.
Keep it up hillary, its so enjoyable watching you self distruct.
Posted by: Albino Alligator | February 29, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am
I’m all for seeing Hillary play the gender card…cry a little…laugh a little…do just about anything to win Ohio and Texas. Then I get to watch as the Dems implode at the convention with infighting and the world is safe from whiny weak lefty socialists for at least another four years.
Posted by: Joe | February 29, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am
Obama is a flip flopper
and nobody will vote for him next tuesday nor in the fall if he gets the nomination.
Mccain said we are in war with Islamic Fascism means do not vote for obama….
Obama hussain will never win in his life or 1000 life times..he done gone a fade, hype just an empty memory.
keep going muslim hussain obama
Posted by: Muslims | February 29, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am
Obama muslim born first US president
Pllleease….never…
Posted by: ISLAM | February 29, 2008, 1:31 am 1:31 am
Obama thinks he has earned the respect of the AMERICAN people…keep dreaming
you might have the media but never the voters in the FALL!
I will never vote for a muslim jew hating farrakhan loving president…never
Posted by: steve | February 29, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am
Obama the race is over, your name being Hussein is a big deal.
the drive by media might not mind. But at home people are scared of you.
call me a bigot, narrow minded, I don’t care….Obama will never win or get the majority of the votes.
He is a muslim
Posted by: Never in my life | February 29, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am
Steve: I don’t know if he’s anti-Jewish; however, he did seem uncomfortable talking about that in the debate.
Posted by: Kim | February 29, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am
Obama people are so nasty that here in Florida most are talking about Republican voting any way. The added reason of being disenfranchise by the Democratic party will give our state to McCain.
Obama calling us renegades didn’t help nor his remarks about Ohio & Florida in his Who’s gonna stop us speech.
His dirty dealings are coming out more and more now too. Take your blinders off.
He will never be President, especially with Florida & Michigan voting the other way now.
Posted by: Katie | February 29, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am
I’m not a hater but I love free speech. if you don’t believe people should be able to speak their minds, move to Russia, or any dictatorship countries for that matter
Posted by: enertron | February 29, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am
Opponents slam Obama after CTV story on NAFTA
Updated Fri. Feb. 29 2008 12:37 AM ET
CTV.ca News Staff
Allegations of double talk on NAFTA from the Obama and Clinton campaigns dominated the U.S. political landscape on Thursday.
On Wednesday, CTV reported that a senior member of Barack Obama’s campaign called the Canadian embassy within the last month saying that when Senator Obama talks about opting out of the free trade deal, the Canadian government shouldn’t worry. The operative said it was just campaign rhetoric not to be taken seriously.
Posted by: Obama the NAFTA false promises | February 29, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am
Feel sorry for me because those mean old men are picking on me because I’m a girl. Seriously? You really want to be a world leader with that attitude. Let me find you a copy of Golda, I’m sure there has to be one here somewhere.
Posted by: Louis | February 29, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am
That “woman” must surely be outright lying unless she’s absolutely stupid and unfit to run. People may dislike her, even hate her, and some most certainly not want her for president, but they won’t try to kill her because of her gender.
For Obama, unfortunately, there are some really ignorant, bigoted hate-mongers gunning for him, just because he’s not Caucasian. And she claims she has it tougher than her?
How stupid does this woman think we are? It’s bad enough having a bunch of weirdo’s spreading lies about him being a muslim, and trying to belittle him for donning an African costume while visiting Africa……what about Preident Coolidge who loved to put on American Indian headdresses?
Hillary needs to quit playing the gender card and quit whining. Nobody begged her to run for president – she planned it years ago. Did she expect a free ride just because she’s a woman? And, while I’m at it, those “tender moments” she exhibits make me want to fwow up.
Posted by: andonandon | February 29, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am
DIRTY DEALS AND FALSE PROMISES BY OBAMA!!!
Opponents slam Obama after CTV story on NAFTA
Updated Fri. Feb. 29 2008 12:37 AM ET
CTV.ca News Staff
Allegations of double talk on NAFTA from the Obama and Clinton campaigns dominated the U.S. political landscape on Thursday.
On Wednesday, CTV reported that a senior member of Barack Obama’s campaign called the Canadian embassy within the last month saying that when Senator Obama talks about opting out of the free trade deal, the Canadian government shouldn’t worry. The operative said it was just campaign rhetoric not to be taken seriously.
Posted by: Obama = Rezko | February 29, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am
The Obama camp MUST respond to this right away or the same thing that happened in New Hampshire is about to happen again. Does she really want us to believe that it’s harder to be a white woman than it is to be a black male in this country? If Obama does not respond strong he will loose! Also it was irresponsible of Nightline to do this puff piece and let her get away with it. This is all part of the Clinton plan, blame the media and put them on the defensive then she gets exposure like this. Is Nightline planning a rebuttal from Obama tomorrow?
Posted by: Lee | February 29, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am
I like how some people are so poorly educated that they believe Obama to be Muslim. This shows nothing but sheep marching to the tune of warmonger McCain’s drums or Hillary’s lies. You know, if you stopped being so stubborn and managed to do your research, you’d know that Mr. Obama is a Christian man of faith. You’d also notice how clean he’s been playing this game. While Clinton lies and cries, he takes it with a grain of salt and doesn’t fling such horrible things back. Her superdelegates are switching sides. She’s losing votes. She has lost this race, and she’s too headstrong to admit it. I hear she’s suing Texas – you might want to look into it. It wouldn’t surprise me if you didn’t, however, seeing as it seems few on these comments have any knowledge of what they’re speaking of at all! The only way for her to look good at all at this point is to pull out gracefully and run again in four years. She may even regain some respect.
Obama ’08. :)
Posted by: TJ | February 29, 2008, 1:43 am 1:43 am
IRTY DEALS AND FALSE PROMISES BY OBAMA!!!
Opponents slam Obama after CTV story on NAFTA
Updated Fri. Feb. 29 2008 12:37 AM ET
CTV.ca News Staff
Allegations of double talk on NAFTA from the Obama and Clinton campaigns dominated the U.S. political landscape on Thursday.
On Wednesday, CTV reported that a senior member of Barack Obama’s campaign called the Canadian embassy within the last month saying that when Senator Obama talks about opting out of the free trade deal, the Canadian government shouldn’t worry. The operative said it was just campaign rhetoric not to be taken seriously.
Posted by: OBAMA THE MAGICAL POTION | February 29, 2008, 1:43 am 1:43 am
andonandon: What cards do you think Obama is playing? He may not be playing the gender card; however, he’s got a card up his sleeve. Don’t be fooled.
Posted by: Kim | February 29, 2008, 1:44 am 1:44 am
So Rezko and Obama are idential according to the article they promise one thing and say something else….
hmmm obama your shady deals are showing you can’t even talk with the Canadian Government…
Posted by: I heart NAFTA noo not really | February 29, 2008, 1:44 am 1:44 am
Obama can’t talk with allies that’s funny, NAFTA SCAM!!!
keep making false promises and deals Obama you are under full scrutiny now… I hope you will see what it feels like to run a campaign filled wit fake promises
Posted by: fake prophet | February 29, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am
I wonder how much the SAUDIS have filled his MUSLIM bank account.
I wonder what the Muslims want from Obama a FREE TRADE deal for all muslims all will get american citizen ship.
People we are going to be flooded with Muslims if he wins
Posted by: obama the new muslim prince | February 29, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am
TJ: Obama Christian? I’m not saying for sure he’s not. However, He came out with his Christian statement after the first time he was being questioned about whether he was Muslim or not. I’m not saying he is a Christian or Muslim; nevertheless, I do think he’s playing the Christian card so people don’t question his faith. The pastor of his church sounds questionable.
Posted by: Kim | February 29, 2008, 1:52 am 1:52 am
I am extremely upset that Hillary is using the “woman” card. If Obama tried to use the “race” card, the media would raise holy Hell. This is very unfair and as a woman, I resent it very much. She is playing for sympathy and it is ridiculous. She very much knows what she is doing, I’m surprised she didn’t CRY crocodile tears.
Posted by: Marne | February 29, 2008, 1:52 am 1:52 am
Sexism is alive and well in America! You can read it in post after post here. Men still don’t want to admit it. Especially in the media. But guess what? Women, unlike you, are fully aware of its existence. Hillary Clinton doesn’t need to spell it out. Tina Fey just brought attention to it. It’s something most women have had to battle in one form or another most of their lives. But women are resilient and tenacious. I think deep down most women know how hard it must be for Hillary. She is in uncharted waters right now. But I think what some men may view as whining, a lot of women will view as fighting for your rights. Fighting for what’s important to you. Having to battle for every point. And when the stakes are this high, every point counts. Every issue matters. Because it seems clear to me that she has received very negative media bias. And unlike Obama, who can count on the media to do the negative campaigning work for him, if Hillary points out the negative, she is considered a shrew. I think it’s fine for a man to not want to support her as his candidate, but the sexist remarks should not have to go along with it. It’s seen as very demeaning to women and completely unacceptable. I think one of Hillary’s dreams might be a level playing field for all women, and who knows maybe as the first women President she may be able to speed that along. Go Hillary!
Posted by: Jessica | February 29, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am
Marne: If Obama could use the race card with-out raising hell, I’m sure he would. He knows enough about polotics to not play that card.
I loathe his lack of integrity-NAFTA!!!
Posted by: Kim | February 29, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am
i agree with Hillary anyone who doesn’t is a Moron. Women have it harder then men , its a fact
Posted by: werdup | February 29, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am
Hillary gets plenty of media breaks as a woman. The debate on MSNBC had a bias that slipped by most people. Hillary’s CU camera was noticeably softer than anyone else’s on the set. Nothing in these debates happens by accident, who in MSNBC prettied up her image by softening her looks. I am media professional and that was no accident. Somebody retouched her camera intentionally. Is that not a sexist bias in her favor?
Posted by: Bob | February 29, 2008, 2:00 am 2:00 am
It’s clear. One candidate is going to try to bring us together to work for solutions (no preconceived hard and fast plans) in a bipartisan, multi-regional, fresh way. The other candidate is going to play groups against each (race against race, religion against religion, gender against gender) and we’ll have 8 years of more partisan warfare in Washington. The choice could not be more stark.
Posted by: A Democrat from Hawaii | February 29, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am
That’s funny Bob…never noticed. I really don’t think that made an impact in any way. I watched the debate. However, the “experts” giving their opinions on why they think Obama scored a few points, that was bias. I thought he looked weak in the debate.
Both canidates are in polotics, even the mezmorizing Obama will play cards.
Posted by: Kim | February 29, 2008, 2:07 am 2:07 am
Hillary is now seeking sympathy because she is not a man? No surprise there. What is insulting is that she feels the need to collect more sympathy for herself – on the backs of women that have successfully learned how to compete and survive in the world – despite the fact that they are – women.
A ‘man’s world’ is unfair or too hard for Hillary? According to her example, every woman in America should just sit right on down and start complaining because you know, those darned men, well, they are just too domineering for the rest of us to deal with. Hillary needs to find another excuse, outside of living in a ‘man’s world,’ for her poor ratings from voters.
I hope that our daughters never accept the message that Hillary sent to women today. Women are not weak, women are not ‘outgunned,’ we are not second-class citizens, and we should never allow anyone to define who we are or what we can be.
A ‘man’s’ world – is now a ‘woman’s’ world. If Hillary truly believed in her own power as a woman and as an individual – she would have left Bill at home when she started her campaign.
‘Pity me because I am a woman?’ No. Message – rejected.
On media coverage, it has been pro-Hillary since day one but I have to say that seeing the shock on some anchor’s faces as Mr. Obama pulled forward to date was priceless. The overt Clinton supporters (Matthews) literally looked as if they were in a trance for a few days but appear to be coming around. The saddest aspect of that discussion involves the fact that the media was/is so far out of touch with the level of anger – on the US street.
‘Fair’ media coverage would require an equal number of pro-/anti-Clinton and pro-/anti-Obama stories, every day, until one candidate wins. Integrity in journalism and reporting – is it still possible?
Posted by: redcat | February 29, 2008, 2:09 am 2:09 am
Imagine for a second how many people would be turned off if this story were in reverse. Tough to be a woman? She got elected to the senate in large part by using the sympathy play and she is trying it once again. I think women are smarter than that. Although they did fall for the tears before the New Hampshire primary.
Posted by: Bart | February 29, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am
Hillary, your biggest problem is that you’re just not a likeable person. Stop being your underhanded, phoney self and stop pointing your finger everywhere else except at yourself. You have run the single worst major presidential campaign in modern history and squandered 10′s of millions while you were at it. And you actually think America’s going to elect you? No way!!
Posted by: petee | February 29, 2008, 2:17 am 2:17 am
it’s absolutely harder to run as a woman than as a black man in this country- keep in mind, historically speaking that women’s rights followed the abolitionist movement and came actually not very long ago…
the fact is, the media knows it cant get away with saying something blatantly racist because it will be called out on it- but they say sexist things ALL THE TIME without any ramifications, because no one wants to acknowledge that sexism even exists in this country, the fact that this article tries to discredit the notion is only proof of that. Think of how many times people yelled out “iron my shirt” at hillary speeches and the media just observed with amused ambivalence. If someone at a barack rally yelled out “shine my shoe” it would be on EVERY newspaper in the country.
let’s get honest, she’s right. it’s not a remotely level playing field, she’s been fighting against such a blatant bias from the media since the very beginning.
Posted by: max | February 29, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am
My ten year old son summed it all up one day about a month ago.
He said, “Mom, nobody is going to vote for a girl to be President.”
Obama’s race isn’t even an issue. He has always gone to multi-racial schools and in preschool he would refer to his brown friends. I thought he meant the hispanic kids but when he pointed out one of his brown friends I was surprised it was an African American boy.
Then it hit me. Black people aren’t really black – they are simply shades of brown. Children see the world how it is – not how we want it to be.
Even a 10 year old boy knows that a girl being President is a way bigger deal than a brown man becoming President.
Out of the mouth of babes as they say.
Posted by: Jee Wilson | February 29, 2008, 2:27 am 2:27 am
Well, well, well … The sexism from both genders is blatantly obvious here.
I just hope that if/when Hillary loses both Clintons will just leave us alone and GO AWAYYY!!
Posted by: Arlin | February 29, 2008, 2:38 am 2:38 am
In current American society, some women want it both ways. They want a level playing field and then complain when they are treated as men always have been treated, coldly, harshly, and sometimes even brutally. Hillary and her supporters should just quit whining and get on with the job of running for the nomination.
Both remembered and documented history works against Hillary. Eight years of being , as she likes to portray, co-President with husband Bill, the cattle futures scandal, Whitewater, the Rose Law firm billing fiasco, her public acquiescence to Bill’s rather flagrant philandering, and the large amount of smoke (and maybe a little fire, too) about Arkansas dope deals, Vince Foster, the lost records, and ad infinitum all paint her as tainted goods, part of the business-as-usual crowd which Obama offers to stand against and change.
People who like it the way it is will vote for Hillary. People who want change see Obama as the best chance in any recent time. He is new, fresh, and charismatic, and a hell of a lot more personable and likable than Hillary ever was or is.
Hillary is losing this race on her own steam, not because she is a woman.
Posted by: JonSE | February 29, 2008, 2:40 am 2:40 am
Hillary whips out the victim card when she isn’t letting the tear ducts loose. She’s losing because she isn’t likable. Period.
Plus she talks out of both sides of her mouth and then whines when this is pointed out—as with the NY State Drivers’ License illegal immigrant answer.
Her obnoxious hubby played the race card in S. Carolina and got busted. Whiners like West Coast Messenger are a dime a dozen in Hillary’s corner and her incompetent campaign staff—overpaid and underqualified—also helped her get into the tight corner she’s in now.
I guess we’ll have to wait til the other Hsu drops!
Posted by: daveinboca | February 29, 2008, 2:49 am 2:49 am
I think that affirmative action should apply to politicians as well.
Before the presidential election starts, a women or an african-american, should start off with 200 extra collegiate votes to make the playing field level. – - or – -
Mccain should not be allowed to receive any votes from the two largest states since he is a white male.
Posted by: Jim | February 29, 2008, 2:54 am 2:54 am
Why would women in New Hampshire vote for Hillary because she was a little misty eyed.(Not crying) It’s ridiculous. And it’s sexist too.
I feel that that video was played a day or two before the New Hampshire primary with the hopes that some voters might think that Hillary might be too emotional to be president. Rarely does Hillary get this amount of coverage, so you know it was based on trying to make her look bad and lose voters. So I don’t think they would have played this video at all if they thought it would gain her more votes. But it looks like their plan didn’t work. Women and others voted for Hillary not because of that moment but because she is the best qualified candidate. And who has never experienced an emotional moment? I think we all have. But their take on it was sexist. And why did Hillary go on to win Feb 5, Super Tuesday’s big Democratic states? She has won CA,NY, NJ, MA, NH, OK, TN, AR, AZ, NM
Another poster pointed this out:
9 of the states Senator Obama won have voted Republican for the last 4 Presidential elections (1992, 1996, 2000, 2004). Two others have been carried by the Republican in three of the last four Presidential elections. Do we really think this will CHANGE?
This “success” is the biggest hoax played on the American public in years.
States carried by the Republican in all four elections:
Alabama
Alaska
Idaho
Kansas
Nebraska
North Dakota
South Carolina
Utah
Virginia
States carried by the Republican in three of the four elections
Colorado
Georgia
Posted by: Tina | February 29, 2008, 3:02 am 3:02 am
She is a phony and people don’t like her. Not because she’s tough, but because she will say anything to get elected.
Obama has resorted to the Shame on you crap that she has. Her husband has tried to make Obama the black candidate.
. Also, if she is such a great leader why did she get rolled on Health Care despite having a large mandate and a Democrat Congress. She got beat so bad she lost 35 year grip the Dems had on Congress. Then what did she do, write books from the perspective of the damn cat. We didn’t hear a peep from her again, until Bill cheated on her.
Do you really think she has shown judgement about people. Most people can agree that Bush got duped by his staff. Look at how she has been duped, do you really think she thought her husband didn’t cheat on her again or was she just lying.
Also how come she can find out Barak billing 3 hours for Tony Resco but she lost her hundreds of hours of her own legal work.
I can understand problems in marrige but if she is such a strong women why then did she let her husband make her look like a fool time and time again.
Posted by: Mike | February 29, 2008, 3:05 am 3:05 am
Don’t worry about it Hillary. I don’t know anyone who really thinks of you as a woman anyway.
Posted by: mslady | February 29, 2008, 3:11 am 3:11 am
While I am sure that this not the reason they[hill&Bill} are running, Ya’ gotta wonder :Should she win the race and live in the whitehouse again, will she wait until the final days to steal all that hundreds of years old furniture or simply try to take on her last day like last time?
Until New York, They never owned a house;it was always provided by the public at the public expense. Now they In a mansion in upstate N.Y. and their monthly mortgage is approx $10,000.00 per month …guess how much they rent out the Garage to the secret service that protect them for? $10,000.00 per month …So we are not just Paying Bills retirement, we will also be paying hillary’s senate retirement ,plus we might be also paying her $300,000.00 per year for the rest of her life as well as their mortggage ….So Bill gets #00 K plus she will get her senate retirement,I think it is about $134,000.00 a year plus her retirement for as either of them should live .
That comes to approx $750,000.00 a year plus $10,000.00 per month to pay for her or his secret service to live there .
Ain’t America Great …all this fot the two biggest crooks in America. In the very unlikely chance thatshe becomes president, at the swearing in , she should be wearing a mask ….
Posted by: mike | February 29, 2008, 3:14 am 3:14 am
What do I think of it? Whiny, unpresidential, as always.
Posted by: saraz | February 29, 2008, 3:18 am 3:18 am
I just find extremely coincidental that before a big Tuesday election, ABC channel with the special Night light manages to have an interview with Mrs. Clinton. I was, and I still waiting for the interviews with the other two candidates. This shows me how “balance” this ABC station is, and specially Cynthia asking the wrong questions letting Mrs Clinton give a fair answer to them. For the closing of the interview they showed a video of Hillary waving from an airplane like presidents do.
Posted by: Zimerald | February 29, 2008, 3:20 am 3:20 am
I can’t even imagine a man trying to get votes by conjuring up images of his wife’s extramarital affairs.
Posted by: saraz | February 29, 2008, 3:22 am 3:22 am
gender is a grammatical term.
you ar eusing the PC term gender when you mean SEX!
this is the uptight people who wnat to pretend there is no difference to use the incorrect term of gender when it is SEX.
yes, it’s SEX.
Posted by: deroy | February 29, 2008, 3:24 am 3:24 am
America needs good candidates and and an election which focusses on relevant issues. The gender and race of the candidates should be irrelevant.
Posted by: amr | February 29, 2008, 3:47 am 3:47 am
I am a 62 year old female …retired from a job that had always been held by a man prior to my getting it 35 years ago. and my advice to Hillary..based on my 35 years experience is this…IF YOU CAN’T RUN WITH THE BIG DOGS…STAY ON THE PORCH. And quit whining…you only make it worse for other women.
Posted by: beth | February 29, 2008, 3:49 am 3:49 am
Just another ploy for the sympathy of women right before the next primary. She disgusts me.
Posted by: 57-year old white woman | February 29, 2008, 3:49 am 3:49 am
Even playing field? How ’bout having a former president of the U.S. as your partner in strategy, co-campaigning and “asset” on the ticket?
Posted by: Boo Hoo | February 29, 2008, 3:51 am 3:51 am
“It’s hard being a woman out there”? Sounds like the title to an Oscar-winning song.
Hillary’s felt oppressed all her life and wouldn’t change as president. Her slogan should be “Victim on Day One.” That would scare the hell out of Putin, Chavez, and those mean old terrorists!
Posted by: S. Britchky | February 29, 2008, 4:01 am 4:01 am
If you can’t even admit Obama is getting a free pass from the press — then you are all lying to yourselves.
Posted by: ohidosee | February 29, 2008, 4:03 am 4:03 am
If we go beyond the political rhetoric, the issue is not as cut & dried as most of the posts here make it out to be. Our base line presidential image is male. It is also white, Protestant, and the “right” age (not “too young,” not “too old”). In an exciting way, we’ve discarded everyone who fits the profile and are left with an old guy, a woman, and a young black guy. Personally, I wish that the “Hispanic guy” was still in the running, too.
In this exciting political year, Sen. Obama has shown himself best able to approach his “negatives” in a positive way. While Sen. Clinton (negatively) worries over a playing field that is not level, he (positively) points out the power of hope that has allowed him to get to where he is in spite of racism. He has turned racism to his advantage; he makes his supporters proud to vote for an African-American. Sen. Clinton has not yet found a way to turn sexism to her advantage; she seems to be trying to make those who do not support her feel guilty.
In this difference is yet another measure of the two candidates.
But let’s not pretend that this is easy for either candidate. Sen. Clinton’s gender is an issue for her, no question. Sen. Obama’s race (and name!) is an issue for him. It’s what each one is doing with the hand they’ve been dealt that is crucial and telling.
Posted by: Villager | February 29, 2008, 4:08 am 4:08 am
Hillary just got done playing the Mexicans against the Blacks … now
it’s on to playing males against
females … “those terrible men just
aren’t being fair to me girls … so
you have to vote for me – us women are in this together”
Posted by: bob | February 29, 2008, 4:16 am 4:16 am
Hey WAIT one Minute .. .since
when did Hillary become a
woman !
Posted by: bob | February 29, 2008, 4:18 am 4:18 am
Since mid-December, when the presidential candidates turned their full attention to the Iowa caucuses, Sen. Barack Obama has led the race for good press and Sen. Hillary Clinton has lagged the farthest behind. From Dec 16 through Jan 27 five out of six on-air evaluations of Obama (84%) have been favorable, compared to a bare majority (51%) of evaluations of Mrs. Clinton.
Go read the facts… The press hasn’t vetted Obama. It isn’t that Obama has no negatives or spun his negatives into positives — it is the press coddling him.
Why hasn’t the press looked into who is contributing to Obama’s campaign for one.
Posted by: ohidosee | February 29, 2008, 4:22 am 4:22 am
Spot on JonSE. Most woman want all the benefits of being a woman and a man then NONE of the cons. Thankfully people are starting to see it.
As for this yet another desperate kitchen sink by Clinton, it just shows how much of a loser she is, how unpresidential and basically is one of the many reasons she is losing the election. Oh and before the women swarm on me, I hate the entire field. I wouldnt cast a vote for any of them. However, Hillary’s actions changed that and insured I will be voting, against her
Posted by: Riz | February 29, 2008, 4:40 am 4:40 am
oh poor poor Hillary… i’m a woman and i’m getting tired HRC complaining about Obama’s moving speeches, mailings on her healthplan, being picked on by the media, leveling the playing field, etc etc..
It’s always easy to blame the other but never your own self! Get a grip Hillary and release your tax returns!
BTW, if women vote for her is because they feel sorry for her. HRC is trying, like she did in NH, to make women feel guilty into voting for her. It’s a shame!
Posted by: ellie | February 29, 2008, 4:47 am 4:47 am
Obamanites—Obama can not win without the CLinton supporters.
Posted by: FedUp | February 29, 2008, 4:54 am 4:54 am
Go Senator Clinton!!
Posted by: FedUp | February 29, 2008, 4:55 am 4:55 am
This from an amateur political scientist: Yes, she’s using the gender card and trying to play different groups against each other. But Hillary is just trying to mobilize her supporters to go out and vote and without emotion there is no mobilization, she needs people to be energized and feel sorry for her.
This is just about politics, not a battle of genders or races or anything like that.
I am sure she didn’t just think of that stuff, it was planned by the campaign
- probably they told her to become emotional a long time ago but she resisted the advice.
She has problems with her very cold personality – people don’t connect to her – and she’s been trying to humanize herself as best she can.
I think it’s a good idea, she needs to be seen as a human, not the robot she projected herself into (also a planned image campaign, thinking she would walk in the primaries and would only need to be competitive against a Republican on national security.)
But it might be too late now to go back to humanity, she already has this cold, calculated image. With Hillary Clinton, the problem is she has a long history and it’s hard to repackage her now in a hurry for this primary election.
It was all a miscalculation? Maybe it appears so now, but political advisers can’t predict the future and in 2000 when they started working on her the situation was different. And who could have predicted the Obama phenomenon?
Posted by: alex | February 29, 2008, 5:12 am 5:12 am
Forget gender. What’s remarkable is how the main stream media now colors almost everything written about Senator Clinton with implied negatives. Even in a positive story, there is always the prominent “yes but”. This is how conservatives have been dealt with by the MSM for decades. The MSM denies this but its obvious. It does cripple political movements. It is also why so many news aware people no longer use the NY Times or other MSM as their source for news.
Posted by: Jeff Rifken | February 29, 2008, 5:22 am 5:22 am
I am getting so fed up with the completely brain dead moronic twits who keep insisting that because Obama has the middle name of Hussein, he’s automatically a Muslim. So, for those on here whose names happen to be David or Sam or Michael or John, does this automatically make you Jewish?
How this country has survived for 200 years being populated with so many totally ignorant, clueless idiots is beyond me…
Oh, yeah, Hillary sucks like a Hoover upright.
Posted by: Michael P. | February 29, 2008, 5:31 am 5:31 am
Riz I guess Hillary Clinton during her life has not had to face any “cons”. She is 60 years old. She has earned every one of her successes and they are numerous. She has worked extremely hard for what she has achieved. She graduated from Wellsley College, Yale Law School, at a time when there weren’t that many women doing such things. Did they make it easy for her at Yale? I don’t think so. She’s devoted her life to public service and truly believes and has dedicated herself to helping the disadavantaged. She has been a pioneer for women. She has been a champion for women’s rights around the world. She has also devoted herself to children’s issues. She is dedicated to ensuring that Americans have healthcare in this country. Fifty million Americans do not. That is no easy task. But she is willing to take it on. She is a fighter and that is what this country needs. She has become a twice elected senator. She became the first women ever to win the New Hampshire primary. She could be our next President. Obviously you know nothing about her. She isn’t playing the “gender card” because the majority of Democratic women voters are supporting her. She has won their support based on her qualifications. It’s a shame some people don’t like to see successful women. I am proud to be supporting Hillary Clinton.
Posted by: Kathy | February 29, 2008, 5:34 am 5:34 am
It seems that Hillary and her supporters choose to play the gender card when convenient. She has a harder time because she is a woman? Maybe people feel like I do, that she is not trustworthy, is the ultimate politician (not a compliment), and is not fit to lead our nation. Crying about the hardships of being a woman as an excuse seems a little self-serving and whiny.
As a woman, I would never vote for Hillary. And she sure doesn’t get my respect by failing to look at herself and instead blaimng the sexist world for her troubles.
Does sexism exist? Sure does. But I cannot vote for her simply because she is a woman. Just like being a woman doesn’t mean she shouldn’t run, neither does being a woman mean she should win.
Posted by: M Houser | February 29, 2008, 5:34 am 5:34 am
she is a liberal, of course she is going to play a -icsm card, it is just a matter of which one.
Posted by: stan | February 29, 2008, 5:39 am 5:39 am
Bob is right, HRC’s close-up camera had “Babba-Wawwa” a soft-focus lens on it!
That face was not hers. It took some state-of-the-art electronic digital image technology. Plus probably a lot of spackle.
Posted by: Sandy | February 29, 2008, 5:41 am 5:41 am
I believe Obama has more of a hurdle to overcome. Blacks were granted the right to vote in 1870 but were socially prohibited (primarily by Democrats) until the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Women won the right to vote by the 19th amendment in 1920 with little resistance, thereafter. Along with this there was still the stigma that blacks had to undergo (drinking fountains, restrooms, etc.) that white women were not pressured with.
All of this from the woman that says she is ready from day one and still whines about always being asked the first question in a debate. She feels entitled to the office of POTUS but lacks the fortitude.
Posted by: Tarmangani | February 29, 2008, 5:42 am 5:42 am
She is complaining how hard it is to be a female in this race!?!?
Seriously, does anyone in the entire world think that she would even be a senator if she wasn’t the WIFE of a president???
Being a woman gave her a huge leg up.
Anyone who thinks HRC would be nationaly known without her husband please post and explain why.
She is so not a role model for women or girls.
Posted by: nicole gibson | February 29, 2008, 5:55 am 5:55 am
GEEZ!! Had to mention HRC and “leg up” in the same post. Now I have to poke out my mind’s eye!!
Seriously, she has basically told women and girls that being an enabler for a serial adulterer and suspected rapist is a fair trade off for personal gain.
Posted by: Tarmangani | February 29, 2008, 6:04 am 6:04 am
Don’t you people get it? It’s her turn! I can’t believe we are even bothering with an election! She should be camped out in the lawn of the white waiting to take over. That how easy she thought this was going to be for her, and when it isn’t she plays the gender card. She about ready for another crying fit. Hopefully the next time we see the water works will be March 4th when she concedes and blames America for it, and she will, She will lay a heavy guilt trip on the country for her failure.
Posted by: Trav | February 29, 2008, 6:08 am 6:08 am
Obamabots: Hillary Clinton wasn’t complaining about being asked the first question in a debate. But being asked the question first many times during the debate. And this causes an unfair advantage to your opponent. Hillary should know, she was the champion of her debating team at Wellsley College, (no small feat). Barack can sit back and listen to her answers and then basically just say I agree with Hillary on that and repeat her answer. He’s done this so often that I’m sure she was well aware of it. If Barack were forced to answer some of the difficult foreign policy questions she had to answer, he would have been speechless. Ex. The name of the successor to Putin. Of course, Hillary had to answer this one and got it right. If any of you actually watched the previous debates you would have noticed it. Maybe not. She was right to call this out. She should have done it at the last debate. Or the one before that? When the media doesn’t play fair you have to call them on it.
Posted by: Rachel | February 29, 2008, 6:09 am 6:09 am
ya, but she’s ready from day one, right Rachel? Quit whining….no, really, quit.
Posted by: Barny | February 29, 2008, 6:16 am 6:16 am
She will do anything to get what she wants. It just shows what happens when you try to put ten pounds in a five pound bag.She thinks she is God and we should all just step aside and let her do what ever she wants because she is correct, we are dump, so get out of the way.
Posted by: Jerry | February 29, 2008, 6:25 am 6:25 am
Let’s see; they’re all against her because she is asked the first question at a debate, the playing field is not fair and so that’s why she is losing – wow- that gives me confidence she could handle Russia and China – as long as they played fair and didn’s ask her a question first.
Posted by: Carl | February 29, 2008, 6:25 am 6:25 am
Does Hillary know Barack is black?
That’s got to be it! She’s so busy thinking about new ways to win at any cost, she hasn’t noticed he’s BLACK.
Sorry Hillary. “It’s so hard.” doesn’t stack up to a couple hundred years of opression, being taunted because you’ve got a black face, and worrying your kids will have fewer options because of the color of their skin.
Concede, already- and put us out of your misery.
Posted by: TV Diva | February 29, 2008, 6:25 am 6:25 am
Now lets see… Let me get this right.
We are down to three. I don’t see much difference in the three, do any of you? They are part of the system are they not? HC, BO, JMc. Is there a difference in them? HC will say anything you want to hear to get your vote, JMc is attacking BO because of his crush on HC and wanting to run against Her.(so it will be a kind civil contest)BO is blessed with the gift of gab..
Well all three are a part of just 545 people Not counting the VP. which makes 546 people that make the laws among other things and are the scoundrels that are responsible for the mess were in. Now I know your thinking what is this person talking about. 545? Well lets define it this way
Senators 100
Congressmen 435
Supreme Court Justices 9
President 1
Total 545
Not counting the VP
All are responsible for the mess were in, It looks to me that 300 million people could change the faces in Washington D.C. We voted them in! We can vote them out.
Another thought is…
Abortions do you know that from 1973 to 2007 49,523,945 abortions have been preformed funded by our tax dollars…
That is more people killed than the population of more that 20 of the largest cities in the USA in just 34 years….. Have a great day
Posted by: tensins | February 29, 2008, 6:26 am 6:26 am
She will do anything to get what she wants. It just shows what happens when you try to put ten pounds in a five pound bag.She thinks she is God and we should all just step aside and let her do what ever she wants because she is correct, we are dump, so get out of the way.
Posted by: Jerry | February 29, 2008, 6:26 am 6:26 am
Sorry Rach. If this was a collage debate I might cede this but, since there is barely a scintilla of difference between the two on their stances, I would think that expressing your opinion first and thereby causing your opponent to have to parrot the same answer would be an advantage. She’s a whiner in public and in private would be cursing like a sailor and throwing lamps when she doesn’t get her way.
And just because I can’t stand HRC does not mean I think any more of BHO. I just don’t know enough about him to like or dislike him as a person. Both are socialists and will never get my vote.
Posted by: Tarmangani | February 29, 2008, 6:29 am 6:29 am
People who should be voting for Sen. Clinton are not. The majority of those going for Obama are male. A black man became a congressman over 30 years before women even had the vote. So is sexism okay but racism not? You bet and if Obama were white he would never be in the position he is. Is there white guilt? Do people think they are being progressive if they vote for this empty suit? You bet. He really has nothing substantial to say in his speeches. They are gears towards those who don’t care about policy or issues, two things he know little about.
He needs someone to give him the facts during interviews because he doesn’t have a clue. The first time he actually showed up for a meeting of the Foreign Relations committee, of which he is a member, he handed a staff member a note stating “shoot me now”…amusing? Not in this day and age it isn’t. The more he goes off message the more you see his inexperience. And YES experience does matter…even so his views on foreign policy and his promise of unity are as foggy as the man himself.
He is now using the use of his middle name to get our minds off his negatives. Reminds me of a current President.
Posted by: Devs | February 29, 2008, 6:34 am 6:34 am
Maybe Hillary should get the surgery often touted by Rush Limbaugh. It is called addadicktome.
Posted by: boojumsnark | February 29, 2008, 6:49 am 6:49 am
As a supporter of HRC, I find all these attacks against her distasteful. I’ll nver vote for Obama and his singing angels. HRC has the substance, the experience and yes, she is the first female candidate that has come so far. What is so wrong to utter Barrack Hussein Obama’s middle name? We have George Herbert Walker Bush, James Earl Carter, William Jefferson Clinton – all were known before they got elected, so Hussein is Hussein…so what…there are so many Hussein in the world who are allies of us. If Barrack can’t handle people talking his middle name, too bad, grow up. Michelle Obama said people saying Barrack’s middle name is desperate, drop the fear bomb etc etc, big deal. BTW, I don’t find two millionair blacks running around telling people it is hard, it is difficult and can’t be proud of this country have a lot of “hope” to offer. Tell to the white girls growing up poor and can’t goto college because of there are no affirmative action for them, there are no special scholarships for them. Tell to the white women in this country that they gotta be a racist because they don’t support Barrack. I can’t understand why people are beating up Hillary saying she is playing the victim card, she is too emotional, she is too manufactured. Well, at least she knows how to run a tough campaign, at least she will promise base on reality, and at least most of us will know what kind of President she will become once she is in the office. Look at Deval Patrick of Mass. Now that he is the first black govn. of Mass. (a very blue state with single party ruling), what has he done to fulfill his soaring rheortic during his election campaign – a big GIANT ZERO. Beware of Barrack, if history is the guide, we democrats will yet find ourselves to have a president promises one thing on the trail and accomplishes the opposite while in office. Go HRC go, forget the Obamabots.
Posted by: Mika | February 29, 2008, 6:59 am 6:59 am
Hillary is pathetic. She has gotten everything she has wanted. ONLY because she is losing (with good reason) is she whining. I don’t want aleader who whines. Every single day she drowns on about “poor me”. This cannot be ourt choice, or we are doomed. She is a pandering fool (think NH and the fake tears). I have had it with this whiner. Hoping she loses and goes away. She deserves none of what she has. If not for Bill she would not be here. But, Bill would have made it without that baggage. What a pathetic figure and the gall to use gender. How dare she. What a pity the press tried to rush her in at one time. Go away, Hillary.
Posted by: Joe Luke | February 29, 2008, 7:05 am 7:05 am
Well, sorry, Hillary, but Ahmadinejad doesn’t care about the levelness of the playing field.
Posted by: MathMom | February 29, 2008, 7:08 am 7:08 am
hillary is a whiner
first …. before the last debate she had been asked the first question 5 times to abamas 4 times in the last nine debates so now it is 6 to 4 big deal.
second …. who cares if she is a woman,if she showed one ounce of true compassion the people would see it and maybe vote for her.
third …. hillary says she is ready day one to be president …. well she was the wife of the president…who didnt even have high security clearance in the whitehose …. thats like saying my wife could run my construction company because sheis my wife and has had discussions about it with me at the dinner table ..it is ridiculous.
the people are just really tired of the clintons …. not the bo is much better …. but he is a thinker and has a very positive outlook for the future
Posted by: bill | February 29, 2008, 7:09 am 7:09 am
How insulting!! This is pathetic pandering. And I’m a woman. She sounds like George Bush. He said it was a hard job. If it was easy, everyone would do it.
Posted by: jo | February 29, 2008, 7:24 am 7:24 am
HRC is doing what she is good at… crying, race baiting,poor little rich girl. She makes me sick to my somach. She thought she would be a shoo in for democratic party. HELLO, welcome to the real world. Take your worn out butt back to NY and go back to the senate and lie like you clintons do. The party is over for you. I am so very happy no more clintons.
Posted by: Jim | February 29, 2008, 7:24 am 7:24 am
Never doubt for a moment that HC will use whatever means necessary to get to the White House. Anything goes – anything. Why? If she gets there, it will never matter how, just that she got there. That’s the way this game is played.
Posted by: Americanfirearms.org | February 29, 2008, 7:25 am 7:25 am
Hillary reminds every man on this board of his ex-wife. Obama reminds every woman on this board of her first lover. Guess who wins?
Posted by: Ted | February 29, 2008, 7:29 am 7:29 am
LEVEL PLAYING FIELD? Are you kidding me? Clinton had ALL of the benefits-a 2-term President stumping for her, endless amounts of cash, and she’s complaining that her gender, which she’s used as a weapon along with race baiting and deception (yeah, I’m SURE you had no idea where that robed photo of Obama came from), is somehow a handicap? It’s yet more proof that the Clintons will do ANYTHING, say ANYTHING, to get or retain power. It’s just the way it is. Of course, I guess that depends on what my definition of “is” is, right Bill?
Posted by: Todd | February 29, 2008, 7:31 am 7:31 am
Sounds like Hillary is just whining again, hoping to get some sympathetic votes…I WOULD NEVER EVER vote for that woman!
Posted by: Maricarol | February 29, 2008, 7:38 am 7:38 am
Amazon, you obviously believe that HRC belongs in the WH just because she is a woman and anyone that thinks different is a misogynist. Sorry to disappoint but I have seen, heard and read enough about her, in particular, to know that I would not want that precedent set to judge other qualified women that will come later. She is a hateful, self-serving person that could teach Cruella DeVille lessons. There is no joy in that laugh of hers except possibly the kind that comes from a child pulling the wings off butterflies. Don’t leave that taste in people’s mouths that could prevent them from voting for a woman that could be really good.
Posted by: Tarmangani | February 29, 2008, 7:39 am 7:39 am
Hillary needs to do much more crying. Think Tammy Faye, girl…..mascara running down into big puddles…….
Posted by: jojo | February 29, 2008, 7:40 am 7:40 am
One more time. Hillary did not get Medvedev’s name right, she mumbled something with most of the letters and followed it by the phrase ‘whatever’. And as she was stumbling over it Tim Russert helped her with the pronunciation. Had George Bush done the same thing there would have been an outcry over how stupid he was. Unfair – give me a break (and I’m no George Bush fan.)
Posted by: Dennis D | February 29, 2008, 7:41 am 7:41 am
most of the people commenting here are playing on type or another of a sex card. Lets face facts, the womens rights movement was created to make things level, ALL THINGS LEVEL. Now that women are treated like men, they dont like it. What HRC wants is all the benifits of being a man, while not having the plumbing.
She has played a lot more dirty tactics in this election and people are tired of it. She has PIMPED out her daughter, and husband to do some of her dirty work. SHE will do anything to win this election, including playing a gender card that has nothing to do with politics.
Posted by: MIke | February 29, 2008, 7:43 am 7:43 am
Indira Gandhi.
Golda Meir.
Thatcher
Vast range of politics and policies
All women who have in common: No Whining
Posted by: Wondering | February 29, 2008, 7:44 am 7:44 am
She is so full of crapola. She says, “I don’t expect any sympathy, I don’t expect any kind of, you know, allowances or special privileges, because I knew what I was getting myself into.” A the same time she says,
“Every so often I just wish that it were a little more of an even playing field,” she said, “but, you know, I play on whatever field is out there.”
She always talks out of both sides of her mouth. “Why do I always get the first question?” And “I have no problem with getting the first question, of course.”
How can we tell a Clinton is lying?
Posted by: steve | February 29, 2008, 7:44 am 7:44 am
It’s about gender one day, then she says that it is not about gender another day. the fact is this is what’s wrong with her, she is a shameless panderer. Obviously she is losing women votes to Obama, this is a last ditch effort to leverage gender, but gender won’t trump race in the “what’s been tougher” arena. what is encouraging is that people are tired of the clintons,this ain’t the 90′s,hil is not bill, and they can’t strong arm people any more. Their scorched earth tactics in the past just don’t work now. She simply looks weak and whiny,not tough, you think the rest of the world leaders care about Hilary feeling sorry for herself with the privaleged “hack” life she has had, her millions ? Maybe she will now work on real causes and actually help people instead of her phony “self promotion end game run” of trying to be president. Any guesses on when her next new gazillion $ book release happens ? Jimmy Carter picked up a hammer, she will do what she is best at, pointing fingers in the senate.
Posted by: Chuck | February 29, 2008, 7:53 am 7:53 am
Me thinks Hillary is confused… or more likely in denial.
It’s not her gender, it’s her character that’s causing her the problems.
It’s not a lack of an X Chromosome, it’s a lack of a moral foundation that people find distasteful.
She thought she’d walk over Obama with ease and her arrogance was her downfall. Check it out… America has come a long way but it’s still more challenging to be black than female. If you don’t think so, try catching a Taxi in NYC as a white woman then as a black man.
She lacks experience, organizational skills, judgment, and character. Add her cackle which is like fingernails on a blackboard and it’s not an un-level playing field, it’s simply that she is being outclassed and outplayed at every turn.
Posted by: Dewey Pruett | February 29, 2008, 7:54 am 7:54 am
Why are so many men threatened by this. Most of these comments are from sexist men. LOOK at you words.
Posted by: TO | February 29, 2008, 8:06 am 8:06 am
Has anyone noticed the systematic trial and error throughout her campaign?
Being too tough, not working, ok, tears? Nope, they saw through that one.
Fear-instilling pics featuring the competition in ‘Muslim garb’? Hmm, now Kenya wants an apology, which has got to have the Obama camp rolling in the aisles.
That is publicity you can’t buy.
And now, finally, the ‘I can’t get a fair break because I’m a woman’ routine?
*Close curtains*
How about the little people who don’t have the slightest CHANCE to work their way into her situation because they lack the money and opportunities afforded to them because their spouse wasn’t in the white house 8+ years ago?!
How about the largest social barrier?
Her and her camp embodies the worst human traits. What’s next, water-boarding voters into submission?
Oh, wait, that isn’t popular right now…
Posted by: MJ | February 29, 2008, 8:07 am 8:07 am
It’s not any harder because she’s a woman! It’s equally difficult for everyone but she’s only a girl so it shows harder. LOL! Getout!
Posted by: DJ Knights | February 29, 2008, 8:07 am 8:07 am
To Hillary, WestCoastMessenger, and especially Mika:
Your chickens have come home to roost.
I thought you told us that people should respect you for your ideas and pay no attention to your gender, etc. When that fails, somehow now you are being “picked on by the men?” or “the black person is getting more affirmative action than the white person.”
You were all in favor of affirmative action when it was helping you to “break the glass ceiling.” You created this.
Posted by: Jacquie | February 29, 2008, 8:10 am 8:10 am
Like it is so much easier for a black man to run for President. She only has the advantage of geting whatever press she wants when she wants it; a former two-term persident to stump for her; the backup of what many know will be a “co-president”. Poor, poor victim Hillary, so terribly abused.
I think we have proven that at the beginning of the 21st century we are very much ready to elect a woman and a minority as President — even if they both lose to an old white man.
Posted by: kcuhC | February 29, 2008, 8:11 am 8:11 am
IT’S MORE HARD FOR MS HILLARY BECAUSE OF WHAT AND WHO SHE IS. A FEMMINIST LIBERAL WITH A ‘ISIS’ HUSBAND WHO IS NOT HELPING HER SOCIALIST CAMPAIGN. AT EVERY TEAR OR TURN OF HER CAMPAIGN SHE HAS PIT RACE AND GENDER AGAINST EACH OTHER IN AN ATTEMPT TO HELP HERSELF AS USUAL. THE CACKLE OF A LAUGH HAS NOT HELPED EITHER WHEN ASKED ABOUT HER RECORDS FOR TAX OR PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY
INFO.
Posted by: STORY REPORTS | February 29, 2008, 8:14 am 8:14 am
And this is why white males continue to dominate …some minorities seem to want to argue about who is the most disadvantaged instead of working as a team. I am a woman veteran in a male dominated field all my life and I don’t for a minute believe I have had it any harder than an african american, hispanic or anyone else who doesn’t fit the WASP mold. I hate that the bickering between the two sides may drag them both down and ruin what is the best opportunity we have had in years to shake up the status quo.
Posted by: Kris | February 29, 2008, 8:19 am 8:19 am
Let’s see-it is difficult for her, a multi millionaire, wife of a former president, senator, with unlimited attention, support, and for the most part, using everyone else’s money to do something.
How about those who try every day to keep a business or family running, volunteer at schools, churches and charities and keep America running? Oh, that’s right-like Bill, it’s all about ME-Hillary, not you.
Posted by: harpo | February 29, 2008, 8:21 am 8:21 am
I am woman hear me roar!!! More like a whimper from a dog that has been beaten – and beaten badly.
HRC needs to come to the conclusion that it became hard once the Dems had a choice. And it became harder when they actually listened to all the candidates and actually chose someone they wanted. Now that they did, HRC wants to nullify that voice and/or play the gender card. Grow up HRC!!!
Posted by: Mac | February 29, 2008, 8:22 am 8:22 am
More women who do not whine:
Diane Feinstein
Kay Hutchison
Elizabeth Dole
Janet Reno
Hillary Clinton’s statement is more in line with the Mary Landrieu School of Victimology.
I agree that John Edwards for all his faults is braver to attempt success, risking defeat and humiliation, without being able to blame failure on anything but whether or not his own candidacy was embraced by voters.
Posted by: D.C. al Fine | February 29, 2008, 8:25 am 8:25 am
Clinton had every advantage going into the campaign. She was way up in the polls, and was “inevitable”. She had more money than the other candidates. The campaign was hers to win begin with, and her’s to lose.
Through horrendous blunders, ego, fake displays of emotion, setting Bill loose to pi$$ off the American public, she has managed to destroy her own chances. Booo hooooo, it is so unfair.
Yeah right!!
Posted by: Darrel | February 29, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am
She’s just a little girl…
Posted by: x32792 | February 29, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am
If we know too little about Obama we know too much about the Clintons (both) and that is her downfall. For a few days there when her finances were from her own pocket it even looked like she was applying her own makeup (and can you imagine the men using that much reflective material to hide their age?) The way she has gone through her campaign funds living high on the hog only shows the way she will be going through the US treasury-she has always lived through the largess of other people’s contributions. Hillary we know you too well!
Posted by: RD | February 29, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am
No doubt, it is harder to be a woman in this world. All of us (including white 40 something males) have to overcome something though. I’m so sick of the victim mentality! Hillary is a very wealthy woman that has access to anything she wants in the world. Period.
She is flatly crazy to play the gender card as she is far more privileged than the majority of us.
Here’s the real bottom line. Obama was smart enough to let her hang herself — and she is doing it daily. Hillary is a stone cold sell-out. Nobody likes over-ambitious, pushy, arrogant, phony people. Obama will win because he has not (openly) played dirty and he’s spent his time watching the Clintons make asses of themselves.
Hillary is not going to quit though and the Dems are going to lose yet again. When are the Dems going to learn that they need to come back to respectability? Where are the FDR dems? Pathetic.
Posted by: Reality | February 29, 2008, 8:29 am 8:29 am
Thank heaven Hillary won’t become president! Whining and excuses and “playing the gender card” at every turn would have remained continually disgusting. Its great that the Democrats are freeing both the Democrats and the Republican Party interactions from the slimey Clinton plague–let’s purge ourselves of their legacy, and take a breath of fresh air.
Posted by: Seattle Mark | February 29, 2008, 8:35 am 8:35 am
If Hillary was as smart as liberals never tire of telling everyone she is she wouldn’t be wishing for a “more level playing field”, she would wish she was a better candidate.
Just another example of a so-called feminist playing the “victim” card when things are going her way. Next she’ll threaten to take her ball and go home. Or she’ll cry again. I’m sure a little foot stomping and crying would have worked on Ahmadinejad……
Posted by: Tom | February 29, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am
Marry a man who becomes Governor, and get and job with a big law firm due to your political connections. Make a sudden windfall in the futures market of $100,000 trading with a broker known for illegal activity, conveniently connected to businesses that need the support of the Governor. Travel the world at taxpayer expense as First Lady. With no political experience, move to a state where you never lived with a huge Democratic population, and have experienced candidates drop out so that you can get a Senate seat. Run for President claiming 35 years of experience, without releasing any records showing what you actually did as first lady, and having sponsored no significant legislation as a Senator. The playing field is not level. HRC has had every advantage, and whines about her troubles. Whatever happened to personal responsibility?
Posted by: Herb | February 29, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am
Gee, more than half the electorate is female. So how could she be losing? Hey, I know, maybe it’s because Hillary is detestible, disgusting, and mean. That could be the reason. You think?
Posted by: myron | February 29, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am
The reason Hillary C is even a potetial nominee is BECAUSE SHE IS A WOMAN. She only has name recognition at all as a result of HER HUSBAND.
Get out now.
Posted by: Grant | February 29, 2008, 8:44 am 8:44 am
Have you all listened to the media coverage? It has clearly been one-sided…let’s not criticize Obama: shady relationship with Rezko…aw shucks, Obama says, I made a blunder–no more reporting; hasn’t held a committee meeting in 14 months…aw shucks, Obama says, I’ve been busy campaigning; lies about never taking money from special interests or having lobbyists on his campaign…the media never calls him on these things. Well, McCain and the Republicans will and they will be relentless…bet Obama cannot stand up to that level of scrutiny…I’m just waiting for everything to come out. Mark my words, it will be President McCain in 2009.
Posted by: Jennifer | February 29, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am
People aren’t rejecting her becuase she a woman…. they are rejecting her becuase they don’t like her, or trust her, or like her policies.
She is right the playing field has not been level… she has had every advantage… We just don’t like her!
Posted by: KansasMom | February 29, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am
This is the woman who thinks she’s ready to lead the most powerful country in the world from ‘day one’. Her incessant whining about how hard it is makes my stomach turn. She and her husband are attack dogs who’ll do anything for a win. Their public faces/personalities change with the wind. Just remember: People get the government they deserve…Shame on us if we elect this woman. Can a woman di the job?? Absolutely…just NOT this woman!
Posted by: Middleagedbusinesswoman | February 29, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am
No offense; but Hilary Clinton is of a peasant lineage. Leadership of men IS ALWAYS going to be a burden FOR HER, and not because of her gender.
HOW MANY WHITE FEMALE US SENATORS EVER? 35
HOW MANY BLACK US SENATORS? (MALE OR FEMALE)? A FEW
HOW MANY WHITE FEMALE GOVERNORS?
HOW MANY BLACK GOVERNORS (MALE OR FEMALE)? A FEW MALES?
So from the above statistics, does gender trump race for US political leadership? YES!
The Clintons are just p!ssed and whining because they are being bested by an ‘assigned’ Black American, for a THIRD TERM US Presidency they deludedly think is due them as WHITES!
In the same way that there have ALREADY been MANY WHITE FEMALE US Senators & Governors, there will be female President and Vice President. They just won’t be Clintons!
Posted by: New Yorker | February 29, 2008, 8:54 am 8:54 am
This is the real difference between most men and women. Most men accept that the world is not fair. As a result they either suck-it-up or do something about it. Women on the otherhand claim that the world is fair except, of course, when it doesn’t suit their purposes. They have raised pissing and moaning to a high art form a la Hillary in this article. The VERY LAST thing they want is to fix the problem – BECAUSE THEY FEEL IT EMPOWERS THEM.
Posted by: Mike Hansen | February 29, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am
I will generalize here and state that guys don’t have a problem with A woman running for President. We have a problem with THE woman who is running for President. Hillary continues to act like she’s entitled to something; and that will continue to be her downfall. It’s too late in this election cycle for her change her approach.
Give us Elizabeth Dole and I’ll campaign all day long. I’d even cross party lines to do so.
Posted by: Donny McCoy | February 29, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am
I think many democrats have long been spoiling for the chance to finally kick the Clintons to the curb without having to vote for a republican to do it.
This is what we’re seeing. If she was Mrs. Smith or Mrs. Jones and got this far, Obama would already be a footnote just like Fat Dodd and Hairplug Biden.
Posted by: Ken | February 29, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am
She’s just another feminist playing the “victim” card. This is what being a feminist is about? sad… Oh, and ah, by the way, Hillary Clinton created a false affidavit signed HERSELF against a 12 year old to win her first big case.
Posted by: USA32 | February 29, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am
I imagine Kathleen Willy, Juanita Broaddrick, Paula Jones, Jennifer Flowers and Monica Lewinski (to name a few) wish the playing field were a little more level as well.
Especially when they were being portrayed as either “nuts or sluts” by the Clinton damage control machine with Hillary at the helm.
Posted by: Scott | February 29, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am
The “Clintanic” is listing to starboard and slowly taking on water. It is going to sink to the bottom and merge into all the other putrid crap mongers that have attempted to buy, extort or steal elections.
AMERICANS, you have finally spoken, you all have “done good”
Now, we must develop and vote into the Presidency a worthy individual. Sadly, the available selections are not really viable.
Posted by: Scott | February 29, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am
vote for who care for americans, lets bring back our job and be # 1 in the world again.
Posted by: anju | February 29, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am
this is a slap in the face to other women in power. nancy pelosi doesn’t complain about an uneven playing field, neither do sandra day o’connor and condoleeza rice. the fact is that she is losing and is showing how shallow she believes the women electorate to be. she has no dignity and no shame.
Posted by: jimmy | February 29, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am
Typical Hillary Clinton- she cannot grasp that perhaps she has a character flaw that people are now finally beginning a see. Blame it on the fact she’s a woman! I don’t believe I have ever heard her accept blame for anything- she mas misled by the President on Iraq, she was misled by her husband Bill regarding Lewinski, she was misled about the missing Rose law firm documents that mysteriously showed up in the White House living area. Just yesterday she blamed the fact that she did not keep as key promise to bring 250,000 new jobs to Upstate NY to the fact that Al Gore did not win the presidency. She’s a fraud, a liar and people are finally seeing the wickedness in her character. But of course, she believes it’s because she’s a woman. As the Church Lady use to say, “How Convieeeennnaannnt”
Posted by: CaptChaos | February 29, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am
I thought women wanted to be treated equal? Oh, that’s right, they only want to be treated equal when it is to their advantage. When being treated equal to their disadvantage, they whine about things not being fair. Grow up, this is not a fair world. Poor people think it is unfair that rich people have more opportunities. Dumb people think it is unfair that smart people have more advantages. Unlucky people think that it is unfair that lucky people have more advantages. Weak people think that it is unfair that strong people have more advantages. HRC is not losing becasue she is a woman, and it is not harder on her becasue she is a woman. Politics is just hard, period. It will turn the strongest of people into crying little children. It will destroy peoples lives. Grow up HRC and everyone who thinks it is “Too hard” on her just becasue hse is a woman. If you can’t hang, get out. Period. Life is hard for everyone, but some people handle it better than others. HRC is not one of them.
Posted by: JJ | February 29, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am
In order to level the playing field we need to impose an Obama blackout on Monday, Tuesday and Friday. Also, Obama has to give Hillary half his money. New gender rules that in the past have only been applied to cripple white males will now be applied to all males no matter what their race. Transgenders are excluded. We must keep in mind that according to Hillary and her feminist backers the world is unfair to women especially in the US and they need affirmative action in the form of punitive action against all others in order to succeed.
Posted by: Adealia Artist | February 29, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am
You know: this isn’t really about her being a woman. It’s about the idea that she thought she was the -inevitable- candidate, and it turns out that she was just -another- candidate is an election cycle that, frankly, has no real inspiring messages at a time when the American people are a little burned out regarding partisan hatchet jobs.
My opinion, fwiw, is that Obama is a Jimmy Carter — someone extremely nice and not very seasoned who has captured the American imagination in a way which Senator Rodham-Clinton can not. He is affable and comes across as intelligent without being self-involved. She isn’t. Hillary Clinton comes across as shrewd, calculating, and somewhat self-entitled.
BTW, if you Democrats are really looking for a candidate who would leap over the gender barrier and shatter stereotypes, you need to think about finding more women in your ranks like Camille Paglia. Then the issue wouldn’t be likeability or credibility or whatever: it would be your politics, and you could then make a real assessment about whether or not you have a vital political philosophy and purpose which the American people will buy. Or at least vote for.
Posted by: F. Turk | February 29, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am
Hillary is a despicable person, routinely has trashed in the worst way those she sees as in her way, beneath her, or no longer useful to her. She does not have the character to be President and I believe Obama does although I am a Republican and don’t agree with his policies.
Hillary has a very long history of character flaws going back to the Watergate investigation. This from her supervisor:
“During my 14-year tenure with the House Judiciary Committee, I had supervisory authority over several hundred staff members. With the exception of Ms. Rodham, Doar and Nussbaum, I recommend all of them for future positions of public and private trust.”
Jerry Zeifman is the author of “Without Honor: The Impeachment of President Nixon and the Crimes of Camelot,” which describes the above matters in more detail.
Posted by: jilly | February 29, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am
EVEN PLAYING FIELD?
This from a person with a hugely disproportianate amount of media coverage and name recognition. Ask Ron Paul about even playing field. Ask Kucinich about even playing field. Ask NAder and other third party candidates about even playing field.
Posted by: L Buck | February 29, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am
With comments like this it proves she is not up to the challenge of being President. A strong leader doesn’t whine but finds a way to rise to the top.
Posted by: Mike | February 29, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am
The succession of caucuses and primaries prior to the nomination in an American presidential campaign is a lot like qualifying to participate in the decathalon in the Olympic games. If you have not properly prepared for all ten of the individual competitions, you fail to qualify for the finals. As just one example of failing to prepare, Hillary’s campaign did not file entire slates of delegates in the 19 Congressional Districts for the April 22nd primary in Pennsylvania, a state where Hillary supporter Ed Rendell is governor. Yet somehow, the campaign of that never-was-a-frontrunner Ron Paul accomplished the task. Hillary’s campaign is coming undone because of the failure to plan because of the arrogance of her early expectations.
Posted by: ken | February 29, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
When the press doesn’t bend over backward for you it’s an uneven playing field. What a piece of garbage.
Posted by: Steve | February 29, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am
She is losing but finishing a strong second. If she drops out graciously and throws her total support behind Barack Obama she may still become the first woman to be elected President of the United States of America. Only a few are lucky enough to make it on the first try. If she learns from her mistakes her next try could be a real winner. The whole world will be watching on Tuesday night. She should seize the moment.
Posted by: avotor | February 29, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am
“My ten year old son summed it all up one day about a month ago.
He said, “Mom, nobody is going to vote for a girl to be President.”
===================
Sounds to me like he grew up in a sexist home.
Posted by: McRumi | February 29, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am
With the left-leaning media, Hillary now feels the effect that every Republican feels when running for office. For years the Clintons could do no wrong in the eyes of reporters. After a Republican was elected president, the Clinton Adminstration took on the aura of the mythical King Arthur and the round table. Now with a further left-leaning candidate, Hillary now sees what every Republican sees. The last person who pointed out the unfair and biased treatment of the Press was Richard Nixon. He too was correct, but it did not do him any good either.
Posted by: William | February 29, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am
I noticed this sort of view point of “entitlement” from Hillary long ago. Since her campaign began, I have been disappointed and surprised by her deceptive tactics to do anything to win. As a Black Woman, who could probably think of several things to complain about when it comes to race and sex, I am a bit insulted by Hillary’s using “sexism” as an excuse for why her campaign is not doing well. Perhaps she should think about the schizophrenic way in which she has acted over the past several days when one minute she shakes Sen. Obama’s hand and says how proud and honored she is to be there with him. Then, two days later, makes a dramatic tirade about fliers sent out by the Obama campaign, knowing that she has put out far worse fliers about Sen. Obama. Later, she makes a sorry attempt to be comedic by actually mocking voters who have sided with Obama, with her “skies will open”, speech. All of this in the course of only about three to four days. If she weren’t so underhanded and mean spirited, she wouldn’t need to come up with excuses like her claim of “sexism”.
Posted by: Nicol | February 29, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am
Anyone who believes anything that Clinton says is an idiot. She is losing, so anything goes.
1. Seat Florida and Michagan (even though her campaign was a part of the original sanctions when she was heir apparent).
2. Superdelegates wait until after Texas and Ohio to announce support (once they began to jump ship to Obama).
3. Drops her Hispanic campaign manager for a Black manager when Black voters began to back Obama (figures she has the Hispanic vote no matter what).
4. Attacks Hope and Faith with a childish satirical outburst (we should abandon all Hope and have Faith only in her?).
What has happened to Clinton? Nothing. She is still the same evasive (tax returns), calculating (when to cry, when to attack), Washington insider that she has always been.
What has happened to Obama? he has evolved. He has learned vry quickly how to deal with the attacks of both Clinton and McCain. He has learned that people do have Hope and Faith that things can change for the better.
He has learned that it is better to be supported by the people that by the system.
Clinton has all the answers, all the solutions, and wants to rule
Obama realizes he does not have all the solutions and needs us to help. He wants to govern.
Posted by: joes | February 29, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am
Define “woman.”
Posted by: Buster Hymen | February 29, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am
She needs to shut up. The only thing she is missing is being black. The media loves liberal, women and minorities. So she has no one to blame but herself
Posted by: Norm | February 29, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am
Ah, so now we’re back to the feel-sorry-for-the poor-woman gambit.
The sleazebag Clintons have no class whatsoever.
Posted by: Chuckamok | February 29, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am
Most unfair, however, was Hillary’s failure to realize that almost every black not on her payroll would shift support to Hussein. She failed to realize that all the dem brothers would shift their support to the brother. And, now that she sees that fact, she says it’s unfair.
Posted by: Marty | February 29, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am
I think Hillary is playing a condescending game with the female population.
This ‘vote for me, because I’m a sensitive woman’ ploy is demeaning to the intelligence of all women and sets the feminist movement back 50 years.
Posted by: Tucker | February 29, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am
Level playing field? I suppose the millions of women that vote for you just because you are of the same gender makes it “unfair” to you? That provides an uneven playing for Obama. Get over it former First Lady! The bottom line is that you are a terrible candidate with no likable character qualities. Obama, on the other end, has great character and only wish he supported the policies I agree with.
Posted by: Timmay | February 29, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am
I guess when all else fail blame and bash Hillary Clinton but never be accountable for Obama’s FLOP in CANADA!
No we can’t defend that but we can bash Hillary.
You guys have an incompetent leader who is making back door deals with Canada that he can’t even deliver.
He is not competent, he is unfit and would make a horrendous president!
Obama should have had Rezko deal with Canada. Obama says Washington politics needs to go away, well you just performed a Washington deal.
You sir, in my eyes are two faced a lier and I guess ‘words’ are Just words…..
Posted by: Mark | February 29, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am
Notice a pattern? Everytime Hillary is about to lose a primary, she either cries, whines, gets misty, does anything to expolit her gender….She is the biggest phoney to ever hit the political sceen…Will do anything, say anything to get elected…Commander in Chief? how about Commander in Cheat!
Posted by: debbie | February 29, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am
Oh, boo hoo hoo! Poor baby! Hilary, you are so in love with yourself you just don’t get it. The problem isn’t your gender. The problem is you.
Posted by: sharon | February 29, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am
how manipulative!! tugging at the emotions of women who feel discriminated against. everyone has something against them. the deal is to accept it, rise above it, and enjoy the ride. hillary isn’t that sound, neither was bill. and the beat goes on. I don’t hear obama complaining about being black, or tall, or from illinois. he believes he is a human, a man, not just a black man. he wouldn’t be resonating with people so well if he behaved as a victim of others shortcomings.
Posted by: mark | February 29, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am
The reason GWB is president is because in 2000 the Democrats gave us Al “Bore” me to death and John “Swift Boat” Kerry in 2004.
This year it is not much better. We get to pick from BO, HRC and “the Breck girl.”
It is a shame the first Black and the first woman are such losers.
Posted by: Andy | February 29, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am
well Hill, it might just be that the playing field will never be “level,” since most all of the world leaders are boys…
You won’t get much pity worldwide by whining when you don’t get what you want from these boys, espesially since some actually treat their women like property… get used to it, or go home.
Posted by: Fstoppr | February 29, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am
I actually believe Democrats would have welcomed a strong woman candidate. From the start, Hillary seemed to communicate that she was going to be tougher than a man; in effect, that she was going to out-man the men. And she has. And that’s a problem. Voters want empathy, judgment, and a less strident communications style. It’s not the gender that’s the problem, it’s this candidate.
Posted by: Deborah | February 29, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am
Hillary was given the nomination on a silver platter: biggest names in the party backing her, a huge war chest, national name recognition, she received a gift wrapped senate seat, and had the media oohing and aahing all over her for a year about her being the presumptive nominee. She dropped the silve platter and blew the race all by herself. Obama out hustled, outworked, out organized, outflanked, and basically us just a better politician than she is. If anyone could complain about an unfair playing field, it is Obama, not her.
Posted by: cosmiccastaway | February 29, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am
All you Hillary and MCcain Haters,
go read the head lines about your so called Prophet Obama, making FAKE and disturbing promises to Canada.
What a clown. I hope Hillary wins or Mccain but never ever OBAMA!!!
This man is the most INCOMPETENT person to lead this nation.
Go OBAMA you and REZKO will be come great partners.
Posted by: DENIAL | February 29, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am
She wants to have it both ways. If she weren’t Bill Clinton’s wife she never would have been a Senator, let alone a candidate for President. Now she claims that because she is a woman this is an “un-level” playing field.
What a crock.
Posted by: Tired of Divisions | February 29, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
If anybody wants a good read, try The Hillary Trap by L. Ingraham. She lays it all out, chapter by chapter. Hillary is right where she put herself. I know LOTS of strong wonderful women who’ve actually done something with their lives. Read the book people, you are going to understand her much better. You might even agree with her attitudes, it will help you vote for her instead of a “rotten man”. I also read a book called The Truth about Hillary by H. Stein which helped me finally put to bed any feelings I might of had about giving Hillary a chance at leading our nation. Realwife
Posted by: RealWife | February 29, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am
Well, me, I’d like to see Clarence Thomas as President (because of his intellect, fairness, dedication to ‘truth, justice, and the American (Constitutional) way’, and (if it were possible) Ayaan Hirsi Ali (only as VP because I’m not sure about ALL of her principals, just some important ones), but it’s just a pipe-dream I guess.
Posted by: Mark Paquette | February 29, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am
Keep screaming your frustrations at Hillary, while your Messiah President Barack Hussein Obama fumbles his way out of this NAFTA scandal!
OBama will play the black card today and the fact that people are bullying him about his Hussein name.
President wannabe Hussein is not to be trusted or to ever lead USA.
We will become a third world nation under his leadership. You guys live a delusional world by only blaming hillary for being a woman and all the other nasty poison that comes out of your mouth. The fact is your leader is a clown and a made up politician.
I am beginning to see his cracks are getting bigger and bigger who is going to cover up all the bone headed mistakes his is doing.? Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson?
He said I was right from DAY one!! Well Obama you just stirred up the Canadians, and oops no you are not ready from DAY 1
Posted by: Al Sharpton | February 29, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am
Poor poor me! I’m a victim! Is this what she’ll tell Putin? Ahmadinejad? Hu Jintao?
It’s a tough world Hillary! Stand up or get out of the way!!!
Posted by: doug | February 29, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am
One issue that nobody has explored is what happens to the Clinton Business when Hillary loses? Bill Clinton gets millions of dollars because he is seen as the most influential leader in the US who does not hold an office. Sort of like a supreme-lobbyist-in-chief. For foreigners and Wall Street Elites, who get their inputs from NYT, and big media, Bill is the “go-to” guy to get a favor from the Government. This is especiallly true when the Democrats took control of the House and Senate. If Hillary loses, then Bill’s business, getting favors for clients, goes bust. I think this was what Hillary was thinking when she talked about we’ll be OK not matter what happens.
Posted by: See the issue | February 29, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Hillary — you go girl!
I would support Hillary all the way up to and through the convention up to the point where she gets the nomination.
She is the kind of candidate that we need to challenge Republicans.
Naturally, the electorate will make mincemeat out of her in the general election, but that is a good thing for the country.
Hillary — you go girl!
Just say No-bama.
Posted by: gxb | February 29, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am
Hillary has received preferential treatment from the press. No other candidate could lose 11 consecutive contests and be considered viable. In addition someone should investigate NPR’s Hillary bias. They ran a piece last night about the Texas primary that could have been produced by Mark Penn. The morning of the New Hampshire primary they gave Hillary free and unfettered air time to make her case. To the extent NPR takes public money, they should be held to account.
Posted by: Robert | February 29, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am
she rides her husband’s coat tails for as far as they will take her and when it comes down to just her, she doesn’t have “it”. Face it Hillary. People just do not like you. Even Bill voted against you with his intern under the table.
Posted by: David | February 29, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am
Tarmangani: Not because she is a woman, it’s because she is the smarter, more intelligent, more knowledgeable of the two. Obama is a good speaker but not strong enough to beat McCain. Want 4 more years with the GOP? It might be the last 4 we have, because we will be completely out of the newly printed money that is becoming worthless.
Posted by: AmazonTraveler | February 29, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
Hillary is single-handedly destroying the feminist movement by whining and crying whenever things don’t go her way.
This is an example of a strong woman?
She wouldn’t even be a senator if it wasn’t for riding her husbands name to get elected in NY.
Posted by: John | February 29, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Robert
Rules should be suspended when it comes to Hillary.
She is the hope for the future for the next four years.
Whilst the electorate MIGHT err and elect Obama, they most certainly NOT elect Hillary.
So — Hillary you go girl!
Take the nomination from Obama.
Just say No-bama
Posted by: gxb | February 29, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Are there any gender specific election laws on the books? Or, is this a response to how she perceives the Media has treated her? This is the reason for her slide in the pols in the first place! How can we trust her with our futute when she is still operating in the past!
Posted by: bluesteye | February 29, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am
It’s hard for a woman. It’s hard for a person of color. It’s hard for a 71 year old to even get out of bed in the morning. What is her point? That life is hard?
Posted by: applecrispbetty | February 29, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am
I am skeptical that HRC’s principal campaign difficulties are anything to do with her gender. They are much more to do with poor management, persistently high negatives in the polls, and a failure to put forward anything resembling a political message until the eleventh hour.
In the early going she ran almost as an incumbent, taking great care to avoid answering any questions of substance. This was perceived by voters as presumptuous and arrogant. She has now changed her tone to one of shrill desperation as she continues to assert that she is the candidate “ready to hit the ground running on Day 1.”
She will be hitting the ground long before Inauguration Day, and she ain’t gonna be running.
Posted by: Rick S. | February 29, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Hillary’s personality (not her politics)is more suited to the republican party. Or course, she started out as a “Goldwater girl”.
The Dems are a “touchy feely” bunch and for whatever reason Hillary has a hard time going that route. Obama is making the women cry and that is a big part of winning the Dem nomination. What’s happening with Obama right now is what I would have thought would have happened with the late JFK jr should he have ultimately gone into politics.
Posted by: Tom | February 29, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
The Clintons represent the worst that is Amerika!
While you might not like George Bush or Barack Obamas policy ideas. I believe both of these men are good and honorable. The Clintons, on the other hand, represent WINNING at any cost. They have many evil and scorched earth tendencies.
And,finally, POOR LITTLE HILLARY…Does she want us to treat her like a Southern Belle?
Posted by: randy swearengin | February 29, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
Amen David!
This woman has made it where she is today on her husband’s name. Hillary has done nothing on her own. She’s only a Senator because her last name is Clinton!
Feminists everywhere must be cringing whenever Hillary opens her mouth. Women have been trying for decades to be looked at for their experience and knowledge, not their gender. And what does HRC do? Relies on her husband’s name to get her where she is today, and now plays the “gender” card to try and get people’s sympathies and their votes.
What a hypocrite.
Posted by: Kathleen | February 29, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
Whining is so unattractive!!!
REAL women don’t want to vote for Hillary. Long ago, Hillary was making condescending remarks about women who make the choice to put their families first. Sometimes staying home and making cookies for your kids is more important than climbing the corporate ladder.
I would gladly vote for a qualified women for President. The problem is that all of the policies and big government programs Hillary supports would put an even bigger tax burden on families. Women who would like to be home to take care of their children are usually forced to work because the government takes so much of our money in taxes. One income families are almost impossible.
A note to Hillary: If you did’t seem like such a calculating, heartless, self-promoting woman, you might get more support.
I have friends who will not leave their unfaithful, selfish, husbands. I look at them as extrememly weak and vulnerable. How are we suppose to view your tolerance of a cheating, lying husband? If my husband treated me the way your husband treated you…. I’d have enough pride and self respect to have dumped him a long time ago.
Hillary, you are not the kind of woman we would ever want running our great country.
Posted by: shelly82 | February 29, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Whining is so unattractive!!!
REAL women don’t want to vote for Hillary. Long ago, Hillary was making condescending remarks about women who make the choice to put their families first. Sometimes staying home and making cookies for your kids is more important than climbing the corporate ladder.
I would gladly vote for a qualified women for President. The problem is that all of the policies and big government programs Hillary supports would put an even bigger tax burden on families. Women who would like to be home to take care of their children are usually forced to work because the government takes so much of our money in taxes. One income families are almost impossible.
A note to Hillary: If you did’t seem like such a calculating, heartless, self-promoting woman, you might get more support.
I have friends who will not leave their unfaithful, selfish, husbands. I look at them as extrememly weak and vulnerable. How are we suppose to view your tolerance of a cheating, lying husband? If my husband treated me the way your husband treated you…. I’d have enough pride and self respect to have dumped him a long time ago.
Hillary, you are not the kind of woman we would ever want running our great country.
Posted by: shelly82 | February 29, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Well, me, I’d like to see Clarence Thomas as President (because of his intellect, fairness, dedication to ‘truth, justice, and the American (Constitutional) way’, and (if it were possible) Ayaan Hirsi Ali (only as VP because I’m not sure about ALL of her principals, just some important ones), but it’s just a pipe-dream I guess.
Posted by: Mark Paquette | Feb 29, 2008 10:13:01 AM
Mark, I prefer Ambassador Alan Keyes because of his issue positions and superior ability to articulate them.
And no, I’m not Sen. Joe Biden who says about Barack Hussein Obama, “I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American presidential candidate who is articulate and bright and clean-cut and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that’s a storybook, man.”
But Justice Thomas would be a close second.
Posted by: Black 'n Anti-Barack | February 29, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Being a single mother is hard. Watching a loved one battle cancer is hard. Living on minimum wage with five kids to support is hard.–Choosing– to run for president may be challenging, but it is not HARD. I feel no sympathy for this woman. She knew what she was signing up for, and her stance of “oh it’s hard, but don’t give me sympathy” leaves me cold. She is being ironic; she wants ths sympathy vote, and it’s inappropriate. If she can’t handle campaigning without whining, she can’t handle leading this country. She supports the standard, negative stereotypes of women when she acts like this: women are weak, whiners, unable to challenge men, unable to function without emotion, etc.
As a woman, I am completely annoyed that she can’t buck up and be strong. I am quite sure Golda Meir and Margaret Thatcher did NOT use this type of language when they were in positions of leadership. In my opinion, those are real women leaders, not Hillary Clinton.
H
Posted by: RRL | February 29, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am
well Hillary now knows what it’s like to be a Republican. The difference is the media still is going soft on her, they just prefer Obama.
If she thinks the media is too tough on her, wait until she has to deal with world leaders who hate her. They are alot worse than the lazy media.
Posted by: Dave Fortay | February 29, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am
This banter back and forth is hilarious. I hate em all. It is kind of like picking the least of the two evils. I am about to pack up and just move to Canada.
Posted by: CAK | February 29, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am
Maybe the problem was that she thought it was going to be so easy! If so, that misjudgment alone should disqualify her.
BTW, I’m in the over-60 female (physician) demographic that she wrongly assumed would support ANY woman who ran for president.
SK
Posted by: SK | February 29, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am
Will Cynthia McFadden remark on the comments that have been posted here at the conclusion of this piece? And why is it that Hillary Clinton is always interviewed by other women? Are these fair questions?
Posted by: amused | February 29, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am
Hillary is going to lose and what we hear from her is:
1) it’s because it’s harder for a woman
2) it’s because Obama is being superficial
3) it’s because of an inept campaign staff
What you DON’T ever hear, is
“it’s because of me (Hillary)”
And THAT my friends, is why she will not win. A complete inability to take any personal responsibility herself.
End of story.
Posted by: ironchef | February 29, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am
Bill’s illusion of being “first gentleman” in the White House where he could find a little more “action” is quickly diminishing. Once Hillary loses the nomination, he’ll not only lose his room at on Pennsylvania Ave, but will most likely be sitting across the table from Hillary’s new divorce lawyer team. When she finds the Presidency couldn’t be handed to her on Bill’s coat tails, she’ll have no further use for him. All together now — “Poooooor Willy!”
Posted by: Bobcat | February 29, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am
The correct cliche is “LEVEL playing field,” not “even playing field.” (The phrase was originated or at least popularized by the late Walter Wriston, former chairman of Citicorp.) How can you have confidence in a candidate who can’t keep the facts straight?
Posted by: Martin Fridson | February 29, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am
Dear Hillary,
First of all, life is hard for most.
Second, Margaret Thatcher and Golda Meir were great leaders; and you are not. Third, Your husband and you had a great time while you were in the whiteHouse…and you treated the secret service agents like trash…was that hard? Will you stop at nothing to get a vote? End the whining.
Posted by: Robert B | February 29, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am
Hillary Clinton’s problem IS that she is running as a female candidate for President. In these moments of desperation, her weaknesses are exposed by her need to classify herself as a minority. Successful leaders do not identify themselves by their race, gender or sexual preference, rather by their positions, experience and abilities to do the job.
Posted by: Bob | February 29, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
Wait- HRC playing the gender card? Obama hasn’t played the race card at all, and for HRC to think that it’s more difficult for a white woman than a black man? HAHAHAHAH, think about it- that’s funny! It’s harder for HRC because of HRC- she turns people off with her harsh personality. She wants to fight all the time- that’s not a good look. If elected, she will only draw thicker dividing lines between all groups- polital, foriegn, etc. I like the Clintons, but Hillary IS NOT Bill!
Posted by: ohny | February 29, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am
“Whining Hillary Shrine” Posters should be made available to all those voters that believe this manipulative woman is
“experience-ready” to lead any nation.
The voting public is still wating for the Clinton-Clan Tax Returns. Maybe her
“friend” Mr. Foster took them along when he died?
Posted by: jrldev | February 29, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am
Not only is playing the sympathy card AGAIN, we get the gender card AGAIN, and to top it off, the WIFE of a TWO TERM FORMER PRESIDENT has the nerve to complain about an uneven playing field???? Are you effinkiddinme???? Here she has had this nomination practically handed to her by the media for 12 months — at least!!!! — and now that she’s losing her asbestos pantsuit the “playing field’s not even.”
Yeah, and Barack Obama…. oh never mind… this woman is a complete and utter dolt. I DO NOT reject nor denounce my statement.
Posted by: Jade7243 | February 29, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am
Folks,
Don’t miss Hillary’s real point, one she hopes everyone will think of without her having to mention it directly. Although she alluded to it when she said that she’s “been tested” and has had to “face [her] share of crises.”
We’re all supposed to run out and vote for her ’cause her husband stuck a cigar in an intern in the Oval Orifice.
How’s that for qualifications?
Well, that settles it.
Ready on day one.
Posted by: Tammy W. | February 29, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am
apparently she thinks it is still 1950…grow up Hillary and welcome to the 21st century…
…ever think people dont like you because of your socialist policies or your phony personality?
Posted by: joe | February 29, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am
Hillary can level the playing field if she’ll stop acting like a post menopausal woman-victim and stop with the trembling chin, faked vulnerability, and crocodile tears. Man up, Hillary!
John McCain (whom I can’t stand) isn’t whining about elder abuse.
Barak Obama hasn’t bitched about racial discrimination holding him back, but rather seems grateful and amazed that he is being accepted so widely.
Hillary is just dazed and bitter that she and her husband have been trumped by a younger and much smarter black man. They expected to be crowned the heirs apparent by now and it hasn’t worked out that way. Seeing Bill and Hillary together so much in recent months brought back the 90s in a bad way (and I’m a democrat)
I’m white, a woman, and I love how this campaign is going.
Posted by: shanana | February 29, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
It would be great if all these guys would stop whining about Hillary. Other than the supercilious comments that are lacking in connectivity to logical real time thought, these men are just whining, whining, whining. Wait until they see what’s really happening in Texas. The boy media misses the real story and they are afraid to tell you, ’cause you would whine and whine. Vote smart! Vote Hillary!
Posted by: AmazonTraveler | February 29, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
I wonder what would have happened if a male candidate had teared up in response to the question, “How do you do it?”
As a woman, I find it offensive that a very rich woman (who won’t release her tax info, by the way), who is the wife of a popular former President and was considered the front runner in this campaign for a long time has the nerve to talk about how hard it is!
Posted by: Carol Wandrey | February 29, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
But, the only woman in the race is already out. John Edwards left weeks ago. Hillary is a real woman as much as Bill is a real man. They don’t even qualify for androgynous.
Posted by: Len | February 29, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am
Leaders will lead and followers will follow. If she is gathering fewer followers than her opponent, it ain’t rocket science is it?
Posted by: Mick Davis | February 29, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am
If you feminist really want a woman POUS
it would seem to me that you would want oone that is not a known liar, thief, whiner, and a socialist liberal. Condi Rice would be the one that people could vote for and feel good about it plus she does not have the baggage (Slick Willy) to have to watch 24/7 because of his loose zipper.
Posted by: Ken Taylor | February 29, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
she couldnt stand in the same room with any of these women…..
Indira Gandhi.
Golda Meir.
Margaret Thatcher.
these are real women leaders from all different political arenas
Posted by: bill | February 29, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am
Maybe just a few more days of this, please. I don’t see Obama complaining that it’s so tough to be a black person running for the same office. What a whiner Clinton is………. jeez!
Posted by: CelticOdyssey | February 29, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am
Funny how Hillary did not consider the even playing field when her husband was doodling young impressionable interns, or attempting to fondle a poor unsophisticated woman like Paula Jones. Where was the playing field of equality and decency then?
Posted by: Adrian | February 29, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am
When Elizabeth Dole had a go at the presidential race, I don’t believe gender was an issue since she had already held positions that negated that fact. Younger voters have transcended the gender/race issues. Now is the time to let go of the tired old props.
Posted by: angela | February 29, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am
It would be great if all these guys would stop whining about Hillary.
Translation: How DARE anyone say anything negative about Hillary. No criticism of Hillary is allowed.
Other than the supercilious comments that are lacking in connectivity to logical real time thought,
Translation: Look at how many big words I can string together into a meanningless sentence!
these men are just whining, whining, whining.
Translation: Much like Hillary, I am going to PROJECT my own faults onto others instead of facing up to them.
I certainly won’t bother to REPLY to any of them, nope, I’ll just attack the messenger.
Wait until they see what’s really happening in Texas.
Translation: I have no idea what is really happening in Texas, but since Hillary hasn’t lost THAT vote (yet) I can pretend like she’ll win this time. After all, it’s HARD to lose 12 in a row.
The boy media misses the real story and they are afraid to tell you, ’cause you would whine and whine.
Translation: I’m going to play the “sexism” card because the press isn’t giving us free positive coverage anymore. WAHHHHHHHHHHHHH.
Vote smart! Vote Hillary!
Translation: The Hillary campiagn still has just enough money to pay their plants to come onto message boards and pretend like Hillary has a chance to win.
Posted by: AmazonTraveler | Feb 29, 2008 10:57:07 AM
Translated by: IronChefofMunchies.
Posted by: ironchef | February 29, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am
How is she “going to be ready from day one” if being a woman is such a handycap? Will she tear-up when Iran rattles their non-existent nuclear saber at us?
Posted by: Richard | February 29, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am
I wonder if she shed any tears when Vince Foster was murdered errr committed suicide?
Posted by: shaggy | February 29, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am
she talks about how hard it it is … because she really thougnht she was going to be annointed by the democrat party and spent all her money believing it would be done by super tuesday …. this woman is so arrogant and self centered and you are all so blind to it.
thank god for obama not htat he is much bbetter
Posted by: bill | February 29, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am
Hillary is consistently paranoid. She always refers to the ‘Republican attack machine’, famously the ‘vast right-wing conspiracy’, she’s whined about media bias, the way questions are asked at debates, etc. I have not heard any of this from any of the other candidates. She never fails to reach out to blame others.
The Clintons did not invent the politics of personal destruction, but they certainly used it effectively. In the process, they’ve destroyed their own credibility. Now that it appears that they have little political power left to wield, people are jumping ship.
It will be interesting to see how her Senate reelection bid goes.
Hillary, people aren’t against you because you are a woman, they are leaving you in droves because you are a loser.
Posted by: Opeth | February 29, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am
A vote for Hillary is a vote for America!
Stick with Hillary.. she has the experience and she knows the lay of the land.
All she needs is enough votes to be close going into the convention — and then she can wrangle those superdelegates to put her in the seat!!
Stick with Hillary — it is the best thing that can happen for America.
With her as candidate for president we are virtually assured of four more years of GOP control, and that is a GOOD thing!
Just say N0-bama
Posted by: gxb | February 29, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am
what hillary won’t accept is the real truth of why she is doing poorly — most Americans can’t stand her, it’s that simple.
Posted by: gunter | February 29, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am
Hillary Clinton’s appeals are directly to those on the left side of the bell curve. Hillary is a “faux feminist” who has been largely dismissed by thinking women (See: Oprah, Caroline Kennedy, Maria Shriver, Susan Eisenhower, Lorna Breet Howard, Naomi Wolf and multiple female governors and senators within her own party). You have to be a complete moron to believe that Hillary is in any way shape or form a victim. The woman rose to the Senate based upon her husband’s Presidency. She has the weight of the DLC, Democratic Establishment & support of the mainstream media in her favor. HILLARY LOST 11 CONTESTS IN A ROW, has never held a lead in actual pledged delegates and yet she lives, breathes and fights on because the mainstream media wants the campaign to go straight to the convention. If the roles were reversed, calls for Obama to withdraw from the campaign and unify the party behind Hillary would be deafening. AMERICA NEEDS A COLONIC TO CLEANSE ITSELF OF THE STENCH OF CLINTON POLITICS & CORRUPTION. Hillary is a shape shifting, morally bankrupt, inauthentic, insincere, fraudulent candidate. That is the reason why Hillary faces challenges from the electorate and not because she is a woman. Educated women have abandoned her campaign in masse. Why won’t the mainstream media write about the fact that for whatever reasons, intelligent and successful women do not support Hillary.
Posted by: Christopher London | February 29, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am
I THINK SHE PUT HER BIG GIRL PANTIES ON AND DEAL WITH IT
Posted by: JAZZ | February 29, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am
As a woman I am disappointed that Hillary is playing the ‘gender’ card. Yes, some men (and some women) won’t vote for a woman but some won’t vote for a Black (man or woman) either.
I believe that America is ready for a woman President, just not Hillary who brings Bill and a lot of baggage, garbage, junk and scandals with her.
I believe that Hillary knew it could possibly be a difficult race, but she thought that she would be the phenomena. She thought that she would have Clintonmania. She thought that she would be the bright star. She thought that she would walk on city streets paved with gold and welcome mats would be thrown in front of her every where she went and that the good people of America would hail her as our Savior and throw flowers at her feet.
But then Obama came along with his great speeches and his voice filled with rich cadence and inflections. And he came along with the innovative idea of a transparent government and a government by the people for the people; he makes us know that it will be difficult and we will have to sacrifice and roll our sleeves up but he makes us believe that America can be all that it promises to be. He came along with new ideas of how to solve old problems and he makes every America believe that the American Dream can be real again. And guess what? We believe!
Posted by: Charm | February 29, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am
If she were more than just a ball of unbridled entitlement and ambition she would be taken seriously. It is her calculating the political impact of words and tears that has discounted her, not anything that’s reactionary or misogynistic about us.
Posted by: Jeff M. | February 29, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am
Vote Smart, Vote Hillary??? Tim Russert hit the nail right on the nail the other night when he reminded Hillary that she promised 200,000 new jobs in NYS when she campaigned as senator in 2000. Russert pointed out that instead, there’s been a net LOSS of 30,000 jobs. She asked if she had been over exuberant in that pledge. In her response, she blamed it on the fact that Al Gore didn’t become president and the Democrats hadn’t yet taken control of Congress. But now she’s promising 5 MILLION new jobs in America if she becomes president. So Russert asks if that’s another promise she can’t keep, but she insists that ‘as President’ she can. So who’s she gonna blame this time when she can’t keep her pledge?
Posted by: CelticOdyssey | February 29, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
Oprah, Caroline Kennedy, Maria Shriver, Susan Eisenhower, Lorna Breet Howard, Naomi Wolf All thinking women!!!!!
Posted by: rocky | February 29, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am
Who is Hillary? I bet that even she can’t answer that question……
I think she has adart board with personality types on it; she gets up each, morning, throws the dart…..you get the idea…….
Posted by: grailh | February 29, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am
It is not about the GENDER/ a woman, but about this woman. I don’t think she was a regular normal American woman; she didn’t have her own house till recently. They bought one when it was required by NY election law. She ” stand by this man” for future oportunistic political reasons. How does she expect the majority of American women to identify with herself and vote for her ?
Posted by: Andrei | February 29, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am
Hillary is a proven liar who is ONLY out for HERSELF. We cannot go back to the Clinton days when she cursed the staff, security,and the military in the foulest of terms. I know because I have a relative who was on duty there and heard more than you would like to know. I have prayed every day for God to give us a fair president who works well with people and do hope it won’t be the Hillary and Bill show anymore. A president is supposed to work for the good of the people not for the good of themselves which is what the Clinton’s did.
Posted by: Rebecca DuMonde | February 29, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am
I’m not ‘threatened by powerful, competent women’ as Ariel suggests, and I don’t believe most other men are, either. There are plenty of powerful women that I admire- just not Hillary.
Posted by: CelticOdyssey | February 29, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am
Of course, Hillary’s troubles have nothing to do with her. People aren’t turning away from her because she’s shrill and unlikeable, or because she’s as phony as a three dollar bill.
It’s because you’re all sexists.
Posted by: Larry | February 29, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Interestingly enough, CelticOdyssey, I never indicated that specifcally men are threatened by powerful women, merely that Americans are. You inferred that on your own. There are plenty of women in this country who are under the impression that they are inferior beings, simply on the basis of their gender. Almost all oppressed groups have self-hating members.
Posted by: Ariel | February 29, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Hillary, according to former President Bill Clinton, has already served her 2 terms in office while he was President. Most Americans do not believe she should be given 2 more.
Posted by: Sara | February 29, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am
When will ABC News and all the rest of the media outlets stop referring to Obama as a “black man” when he is in reality a “mixed race” person.
I can call myself an eskimo, but that doesn’t make me one.
He identifies himself as black because it is politically expedient for him to do so. A white person with his experience would not have been taken seriously as a Presidential candidate no matter how good a speaker he was.
Posted by: Horatio | February 29, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Hillary, you make me feel ashamed to admit that I am a woman.
Posted by: Patty Beiner | February 29, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Isn’t this the “person” who is “ready on day one”? 35 years of experience? Been vetted by the Republicans for 16 years?
OMG! She has shown us her real self as most of us have known since the White House years…
Debating over the word ‘reject’ vs ‘denounce’? Oh, yeah, she’s really ready for global terrorism, economic trouble, energy trouble, education demise, etc, etc, etc. She is and always was a sham!
Posted by: Holy Mackeral | February 29, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am
You know, I agree there’s a lot of sexism out there. I am a feminist, enough so that the thought of a female VP for the old McCain (who may very well die in office) might even make me consider voting for him simply because a female president would be the ultimate way to level the playing field. Sexism is malignant in that it pervades every culture, every time period– and it’s still strong today.
Having said that, I would never vote for Hillary Clinton. My disgust at her conduct over the last sixteen years in politics, and my desire never again to see such a dirty, corrupt politician in the highest office is that strong, that I can pass up this chance at a female president.
Hillary Clinton, not her gender, doomed Hillary Clinton.
Posted by: SJM | February 29, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
Oh, yes, she’d definitely have a much easier go of it if she were Bill Clinton’s brother! And if only her daddy had enough money and gave her encouragemet enough to get into an ivy league school.
Posted by: Jasper | February 29, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
she is not going to let something like not getting enough votes keep her out of the white house. what she cant get at the ballot box she will get in the courts. she is a liberial and that is how they do things.
Posted by: parn | February 29, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
Amused asked. “Will Cynthia McFadden remark on the comments that have been posted here at the conclusion of this piece?” Does anyone know the status of the IPA/John Burgess sexual harassement case? He is one of her biggest donors . This was one of the EEOC’s largest lawsuits ever filed, The last thing I heard was that HRC was refusing to return his donation – yet she keeps saying she is a strong supporter of womens issues. Are any journalists investigating this?
Posted by: Mbw55ed | February 29, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
Hillary wants to win because there are some rooms she didn’t get a chance to plunder and steal back at the White House. Let’s all vote for Hillary in Ohio and Texas and keep the Democratic party fractured a little longer.
Posted by: ARMYMAN | February 29, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
I don’t refuse to vote for Hillary because she is a woman. I refuse to vote for her because of her platform.
I don’t agree that it is tougher for her because she is a woman. I think the playing field is even and she just got beat on her beliefs.
Posted by: Wendy | February 29, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
Hillary, Hillary, HILLARY… STOP WHINING!! Life is not fair, war is not fair, politics are not fair. Your whining and little outbusrts of emotion are not only insulting to the intelligence of American women but unacceptable behavior for “our future leader”. Please find another “playing ground”….. and take your husband with you.
Posted by: tm | February 29, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
If she’s fighting a stereotype then why did she cry before the NH primary? Hillary played the ‘woman card’ there to great effect and she is trying it again by playing upon women’s own fears to garner a greater vote share in the hopes of defeating Obama. Fact is that is all she has left at this point.
Obama is much more charismatic than her and she is outclassed in every way. Since Super Tuesday he has steadily reduced Hillary’s vote share in nearly every segment of the population.
Added to Obama’s charisma is her own gross overconfidence and she has clearly underestimated his abilities. Hillary’s serious tactical errors like getting Bill to engage in attacks on Obama before the Carolina primary, leaking ‘Taleban-esque’ photos of Obama to Drudge, and just not differentiating herself from Obama in any significant way have put her in the position she’s in now and it matters not what sex she happens to be.
When Kennedy ran against Nixon in 1960 nothing could prevent JFK from winning because he had charisma and the ability to connect. Her husband had the same abilities during the campaigns in 1990 and 1994; why then did she not think a message of experience would matter less than the ability to connect? She had a poorly thought through campaign and she might get another shot like Nixon, but 2008 will not be her year.
Posted by: JR | February 29, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
Hillary is right! In my view women do have more opportunities in this country than in other countries however there are many challenges to overcome. It begins as early as grammer school for young girls. When you have a whole system denying the reality of gender discrimination…when a woman does call attention to it she becomes a victim or is playing the gender card.
Posted by: Suzanne | February 29, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
You name them (Lincoln, Kennedy, FDR, TR, Washington, Reagan, Jefferson, etc)if any of them had worn a skirt they would have been baking pies. Hillary is the greatest political leader of all time. She was the backbone of his Bill Clinton’s 8 great years in office. Her healthcare plans were shot down by a vast right wing sexist conspiracy. A woman of low self esteem was planted in the oval office by sexist pigs to distract Billy C via his “course male” needs. Yet Hillary endured and showed us great character. She moved to the mean streets of NY with hardly a penny in her pocket and overcame the “Rick Lazio hate machine”, and now, she’s supposed to move aside for somebody who’s only qualifier is an endorsement from a woman who provides lightweight tv shows for low self esteem homemakers. When will we be shown the light.
Posted by: Go Hillary | February 29, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
lifelong democrat here … I’m not passby her by because she’s a woman, I’m not supporting her because of her triangulation and substantive positions, and the fact that I’m sick & tired of 20 yrs. of Clintons & Bushes. Bill mucked it up royally and paved the way for the worst president in the history of the US and why would I want to reward or encourage that behavior?
And she either couldn’t see what everyone else did about being hoodwinked on Iraq, or else she just plain got it wrong.
no … my disdain for her has nothing to do with gender, it has to do with substance.
Posted by: fendertweed | February 29, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
Women say all the time that men and women are equal. Men are outnumbered in this country. So, what’s the problem Hillary? Oh yeah, you also have “35 years of experience” behind you!
Posted by: Jake | February 29, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
Exactly. I’m glad that someone finally pointed out that Oprah is not the penultimate voice of American women.
Posted by: Ariel | February 29, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Would Ms. Clinton be making the same comments if she was winning. Exactly!
She will say or do whatever it takes to WIN.
Posted by: R | February 29, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
Don’t go away mad, Hillary.
Just go away.
Posted by: Mark | February 29, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
Playing the gender card again. Does she have no shame? No, Hillary, it’s not about women in general — it’s about YOU and only you. I worked for Geraldine Ferraro when she ran for VP with Mondale, so please don’t foist this claptrap on me.
Posted by: AG | February 29, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
Clinton is obviously the more seasoned and intelligent candidate. Why hasn’t Obama’s magic changed the Senate? What has he done in the Senate to make a rational person THINK he could accomplish anything as president? Obama, the Mulatto McGovern, has had an “Affirmative In-action” free ride by the jeans-creaming press from day one. Why? Sure, there’s the white guilt thing…but there’s more. The corporatist media is gladly assisting with the engineering of a McCain-Lieberman administration–Obambi will lose 40+ states in a general election–so as to make facilitating a BIG war with Iran, on behalf of Israel, effortless. The only good thing which would come of Obama winning the nomination of his party is that after losing in the general election, a la McGovern, we won’t have to again suffer his reading of the mean, tent revivalist speeches from teleprompters. I think it’s time to short the smelling salts distributors. LOL
Posted by: ecog | February 29, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
So, let’s. see . If any other candidate had lost 11 primaries in a row, would the press still see him/her as a contender? She won’t release tax returns showing $5 million loan and where the $ came from; The press does not question her campaign aides who say she took in $35 million in February after all her losses; they just accept it hook, line & sinker.
You’re telling me that 500,000 people sent in $70. each on the internet to Hillary??? She gets so much deference from the press because she’s a Clinton, and a good story. Give me a break
Posted by: Kara | February 29, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
Regarding Hillary saying “..it’s tougher for her to run as a woman …”. I wonder if she thinks it would be easier if were Saudi Arabia, or any middle east country, for that matter?
Posted by: Hayduke | February 29, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
Oprah and Obama are corporate shills. Hillary will set us free. We will no longer be oppressed by fat balding right wing men. Hillary will kill Osama Bin Laden with her bare hands and liberate his 200 wives. This is all one big media conspiracy. The whole thing is rigged by the Bush and Royal family so they can turn the world into a big golf course. Wake up America. You fight that machine Hillary.
Posted by: Go Hillary | February 29, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
Yeh! A level playing field would be nice. To bad every candidate isn’t married to a popular ex-president. Face it, if she hadn’t been married to Bill, we would not even know who she was. Does coat tails mean anything to anybody.
Posted by: Belladonna | February 29, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
Most of us democratic voters will feel a lot better when HIllary will bow-out,hopefully with grace, leaving the democratic party with dignity.
righ now she is to polarizing and divisive.
Posted by: Patty | February 29, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
Addendum:
Why is my first thought hearing that $35 mil was raised by Hillary, that it’s actually coming from Bill’s “foundation” , laundered the way she did early in this campaign (remember the guy in San Francisco, now indicted for delivering all those “small contributions ” to Hillary??) OR some other sources that I wish the media would look into. I think the numbers are bogus and she’s putting them out so she can suggest she is still a player even when she bombs in TX and OH. This just doesn’t add up.
Posted by: Kara | February 29, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
For those of you who think woman have it hard in this country, I suggest you read “Boys Adrift” by Leonard Sax. It outlines the problems with todays young men and the challenges they face in todays society. Many young men are unmotivated to achieve anything in life, and resort to the internet and video games for an identity. College enrollment has decreased significantly, today 58% woman 42% men, and the gender gap will worsen.
We are creating a generation of hard working women, and lazy, unmotivated men, which will have far reaching consequences for years to come for our society. I am all for woman succeeding, as they tend to be the best and brightest students. However, having young men self loathing themselves due to the messages we keep sending them as they grow and develop as boys, will hamstring our society.
Hillary is crying because she is losing! She had every advantage going into this election cycle from the Democrats. She and her team blew it and are playing the blame game!
Posted by: Aprofessor | February 29, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
No Obama, No Way!
HUSSEIN, HUSSEIN, HUSSEIN.
Posted by: John Romano | February 29, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
She couldn’t have it easier. She was the frontrunner and expected to win by everyone. She is much, much wealthier personally than Barack. She had total name ID. Barack is black and has an Arab middle name. How much easier did she want it? So here she is talking about how hard it is for women — which it is — but is using that as a manipulative tool (which has been the sum total of her campaign). It is “hard” to lose, but for Hillary it’s hard not to be campaigning and obsessed with winning this office because it has been her life-long ambition.
Posted by: joyce | February 29, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
The poor, frail, little, helpless victim of the un-level playing field.
C’mon….she’s got a bigger set than most men. This little “unfortunate” would shoot her parents… in order to attend the “Orphan’s Picnic”.
Posted by: Oh God! | February 29, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
When are we going to see the end of this self-important moron HUSSEIN OBAMA? We are all sick and tired of his bragging and Empty Words! Hillary’s got more substance in her little inert finger than He has in his whole non-activated brain.
Hey, did you see his smirk when he looks at Hillary, wow, the guy’s some weird insecure piece of work. He sure HATES WOMEN!!!! Hussein’s XEROXED WORDS IS HIS PRESIDENTIAL TICKET!!!! Great stuff…but one day we’ll be asking ‘WHERE’S THE BEEF’, HUSSEIN???!@!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Hillary for President | February 29, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
oh, cry me a river….WAHHHH! Don’t run for office if you handle the pressure…
Posted by: Mellie | February 29, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
It IS harder for a woman. Most men would rather have any man than a woman be their leader. I work for a company who has a woman CEO and many of the men in the company resent her just because she is a woman. I say Hillary is smart,
strong and very capable of being President of the United States and more qualified than Obama.
Posted by: Richard | February 29, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
“Hillary for President”, what absurd comments you make – me thinks you may have had a tad too much caffeine this morning. Just when I think the dumbing down of America can’t get any more out of hand than it is, there’s people like you with their sound-bites from information that is outdated and disproven. And the multiple exclamation points, well now that there is just special. Ed.
Posted by: Feronia | February 29, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
I tell you all what, women will be set back at least another 200 years if Hillary does not win.
She is the most qualified person running, and see what the media is doing to her.
She defines Obama the way Obama defined himself in his own book, and see how the media make her comments on defining Obama as if those are her words.
Wake up people!
Posted by: Sam1 | February 29, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Both race and sex are challenges. Shut up with the Hussein crap – the guy’s just as much (if not more) a Christian than most. Where have people’s ambitions got them? A life a bigoted, racist fear? Obama in 2008, 2009, and so on. Give him a chance to prove himself. Where one sees a smirk another sees a smile.
Posted by: Save_This_Country | February 29, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Good point about the CEO’s. All male ceo’s are loved by MALE workers. Nothing bad is ever said about male ceo’s as long as they hand out corporate golf apparel for their male employees. Put a woman in charge and you hear nothing but the “b” word. Same goes with presidents. Nobody ever said anything bad about Bush because he was a MALE. If he had been a female you would have heard about him being the worst president of all time, warmonger, chickenhawk, etc. I tell you. We really do live in a sexist world. Especially here in the USA. At least in the middle east women aren’t coerced into wearing makeup to please male corporate interests.
Posted by: Go Hillary | February 29, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
If Hill is so strong and talented, blah, blah, blah – why did she need to bring ole slick willy in to do her heavy lifting? Will he do her heavy lifting in the White House, too? No chance, McCain’s got it in the bag now.
Posted by: ronski | February 29, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
Mrs. Clinton back in 1998 started a program which became the law and has helped thousands of families with handicapped children with their treatment and education needs. It was called then Medical/Education for Special Needs Children. It passed into legislation shortly thereafter.
Hillary Clinton has been a consistent staunch supporter and a real fighter for the issues that matter to Women and Children. Who benefited was the American families. We should not ever forget this woman’s gigantic efforts on behalf of families. Even vising China in 1995 at the UN Conference, this brave woman dared to confront the Chinese officials, telling them Women’s rights are Human Rights. No one can match Hillary Clinton’s fighting spirit and much-applauded record in this area. Epileptic children got a big funding boost and research Fund for Epilepsy. It was Mr. Obama’s Campaign manager, Mr. David Axelrod’s wife Susan who had asked Mrs. Clinton for help. And Clinton visited the hospital and talked to children and then started her immense efforts to assist the children.
And look what Mrs. Axelord’s husband is doing to her now. I support Hillary Clinton all the way. She deserves it.
Posted by: Black Women for Hillary | February 29, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
Oh, please! Hillary is so whiny! Every time she gets beat up in the press, she pulls the gender card, and convinces me more that she doesn’t have what it takes to be leader of the free world.
Posted by: Anahi | February 29, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
Between Clinton crying because the campaign trail is too hard and this wimpering kind of self-pity, I believe Clinton has put women’s politics back about two decades. She is the most calculating politician I have had the displeasure to watch and the most self absorbed that I have EVER heard of. While most of the other candidates speak about their platform aim barbs at the other candidates, Clinton can only complain and whine about how SHE is being ganged up on or how SHE is so tired or how SHE is blah-blah-blah. Get over yourself woman and realize that if you want the presidency, a position which was created to be the most comletely selfless public service position in the United States, no one cares about your personal feelings and you should worry about it even less. As a woman who has spent 30 years in a “man’s world” (engineering and the military) I have ZERO sympathy for her whining about the boys club.
Posted by: Karen | February 29, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
Yes, there is a lot of media mysogyny out there against Hilary. If Barack Obama were a woman and only served one year in the senate, do you think he would be where he is today?
Posted by: lauren o'rourke | February 29, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
We all know Hillary is white man in this race.. She wearing the pants in this family. She is being treated like any other person running for this office. She is not above being told she is incorrect. Now she has played the gender card. .She can not do dealing with world leaders. The Bristish had Thatcher as PM.. She held the world attenton… Hillary is no Thactcher
Posted by: Tim White | February 29, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
While Margaret Thatcher is a divisive figure in British politics, much like the Clintons with both ardent fans and those who believe she was terrible for the country, the one thing everyone can agree on is that her gender had nothing to do with it. She never made an issue of it, and never pandered to those who thought it should be an issue.
To win in politics you have to be tough, whether male or female, and Thatcher showed that men have no monopoly on that. As soon as you complain, you may as well have lost. If you think its hard to run, imagine how hard its going to be being president.
Posted by: Thomas | February 29, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
ecog and others who claim Obama has done nothing with his so-called magic in the senate, how about you do an internet search on Lugar-Obama. There’s a nifty little piece of legislation, very important in terms of foreign policy and national security that he not only co-authored, co-sponsored and managed to push through with a unanimous vote, plus Bush signed it into law despite his threat to veto it. There are many, many more like it. Obama has done plenty in the senate, which is why senior senators encouraged the junior senator to run for the Presidency.
As for the unlevel playing field, cry me a freakin river. Out of one side of her mouth (and the medias) we hear how she’s been vetted, she’s a fighter, the Clinton Political machine is phenomenal and entrenched (this is true, sadly). She started out on the upper hand, and every male candidate for president KNEW they’d have one helluva fight on their hands to best her. Add race to the issue, and this is why Obama, despite all his work and positive change at both the state and federal levels, was considered a wash before it began. Besides all of the above, he has his race to contend with, and NO ONE, political insider, media personnel, political pundits, thought that he could do this.
Lastly, this blog just makes me sad. One would think that after a year of this campaign the hate mongerers – and yes, I am pointing at Jake and Hil for Pres (something I never, ever do) would crawl back under their veils and stay there. This is supposed to be about education oneself and talking about REAL issues, not talking points collected form the media or Sen. Clinton’s campaign.
And Sam1, the only way a Clinton loss sets women in general back 200 years is if we women lie down and let that happen. That’s a load of bull. I’d love to see a woman president in my lifetime, but not this one. I want one who can stand on her own, not ride her hubbies coat tails and those of the special interest and career politicians she paid to get the lift. (Lord knows, she isn’t done paying yet!)
Posted by: MommaKat | February 29, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Fact: Hillary has a personality disorder and is dilusional. She really believes that she’s being mistreated. No self-awareness. And she’s ego-centric. Maybe I shouldn’t even have mentioned this because now she’ll play the mental disability card. Face it, she can dish it out, but she can’t take it.
Posted by: Al | February 29, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
This crying thing is getting old, Hillary.
Boo hoo; yeah, we got it.
Posted by: jimmyb | February 29, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
Does anyone recall Maggie Thatcher or Jeane Kirkpatrick whining about a level playing field?
Posted by: Caustic Commoner | February 29, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
GAG ME WITH A SILVER SPOON! How dare HRC play the “gender” card. She’s never ACTED as a woman, never faced the TURMOIL of being a single mother or SINGLE WOMAN. She’s attached herself, like a Remora (sucker fish) to her “man.” A real woman would take sufficient CARE of her “man” … so he didn’t need to stray. She hitched her wagon to what she thought would be a “star.” And reeked havoc wherever she went — was so “bitchy” she couldn’t get a HEALTH CARE BILL passed WHEN HER HUSBAND WAS president and PUT HERE in charge of Health Care. READY ON “DAY ONE” >??? PLEASE! This “woman” has never experienced the REAL EVILS in the world; never had to worry WHERE her next meal was coming from. And never spent one second WONDERING if her child was getting enough to eat == or medical care sufficient to survive!
PLAY THE GENDER CARD — NO WOMAN IN HISTORY has “played” THAT CARD .. until now!
HRC is not a woman — she’s a political cut out … a paper doll assuming the “BOSS” role she’s always wanted to PLAY – BECAUSE she doesn’t have the “personal POWER” to make it ON HER OWN!
Posted by: Karen Lee | February 29, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
I find this particularly ironic since:
-The only reason she is running is because she is a WOMAN married to a previous President. Without Bill nobody would know her name because she never would have won a Senate seat leading to her run as President.
-She has been exceptionally brutal to the WOMEN who have accused her husband of sexual misconduct in the past. Ask them how hard being a woman is.
-She wants us to take her seriously as a leader, yet whines about how unfair being a woman is. Ummm… does she realize America is one of the least mysogenistic societies in the world? What about when she has to deal with Saudia Arabian leaders who don’t think women are equipped to drive a car?
She is not doing women any favors with this campaign of hers. It’s over Hillary, time to get off the stage. We don’t want you to win because enough people pity you.
Posted by: Denise | February 29, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
Nicol. I think as an African American woman, if Barack Obama were not in this race, you would be supporting Hillary Clinton. As would most African Americans, including Oprah Winfrey.
Posted by: Catherine | February 29, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
Wait – is that the level playing field behind the White House? you know, the place you lived for 8 years while your husband was president? I guess you should have tried to get that field more level while you were living there. For 8 years.
Posted by: katie | February 29, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
As a woman, I don’t buy into Clinton’s argument. Obama has run a much better campaign with extremely motivated ground team and volunteers. I organized an event for BOTH campaigns to speak in my county after I was contacted by the Obama campaign. It took 10 phone calls to the Clinton campaign to before they found speaker..who never showed due to a flat tire. Not only was the Obama worker on time, but graciously suggested that we use the speaker feature on my cell phone to enable the crowd to ask the Clinton campaign worker questions.
My county isn’t the only one that felt the Obama campaign was much better prepared. The active democrats (precinct captains, chair, elected officials, SDEC member) in the next county are now all for Obama for similar reasons.
It’s not only the message, it’ the superbly organized Obama campaign that’s swaying voters.
Posted by: mattie | February 29, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
He didn’t come to this race with CLEAN HANDS. He said this himself in S.C. at the Debate “I didn’t come to politics with clean hands…nobody does”…
Maybe he can sell the house Rezko bought for Michele next to his and GIVE THE MONEY TO CHARITY! HE’S A PHONY AND WE;LL SOON FIND OUT!!!
Posted by: Obama sucks | February 29, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
OH WHAT A PITY PARTY
RACISTS AND SEXIST ATTITUDES ARE AT WORK ALL THE TIME AND ALL WAYS.(REMEMBER THE DUKE LAX PLAYERS WHO WERE CRUCIFIED BY THEIR OWN UNIVERSITY PRESIDENT/PROFS AND THE LIBERAL MEDIA BECAUSE THE LIE WAS TOO GOOD NOT TO SUPPORT.)
HILLARY HAS HAD EVERY ADVANTAGE IN LIFE BUT STILL CRIES FOUL WHEN THE SUN DOESN’T SHINE EACH AND EVERY DAY.IT’S ALL ABOUT POWER FOR HER AND BILL.
Posted by: PETE | February 29, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
First, she made a choice to run for President, knowing that it would be hard. In making that choice, I would think that she would accept all challenges.
Second, what happened to her statement that she’ll be fine but what’s important is that America may not be fine. Her difficulties in running for President as a woman are nothing compared to that which others face in their daily lives, that which others never assumed.
As a woman, I find that her candidacy has actually hurt women given her chaotic message, emotion and desperate tactics. I also find Obama’s taking everything in stride, his calm demeanor and choice to not respond to every attack or mention the difficulties he faces as a black man, inspirational, as a model of how I should deal with challenges and any personal attacks. Turn the cheek, be gracious, which is a stark contrast to Hillary.
Posted by: nicole | February 29, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Wonder if Obama was a black woman, wo uld he have gone as far as he has? I doubt it. SHIRLEY CHISHOLM back in 1972 was a black candidate for President. If she were here today there is no way she would support Obama. She would tell him openly DON’T USE THE RACE CARD. I know it works, but it’s not playing fair.”:
Race card’s been played as ‘unifying’ but Hillary’s gender as ‘divisive’. Try throwing at Obama the abuse the media and everyone else has been throwing at Hillary. You’d be sued! It’s a hatred crime. But you can be a Sexist with impunity in this country.
Thanks for the article.
Posted by: Hillary for President | February 29, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
I would probably listen to Hillary if she hadn’t stayed with her man, Slick Willie. I hated the Clinton years, and have no desire to to re-visit them, and as for Obama, his wife called white people “white Oppressors”, and if he wins, his wife and his pastor will set race relations back a hundred years. I lived through the civil rights as a child in the 1960s, and have no desire to re-live them either.
I don’t plan on voting this time, the first time in my adult life that I haven’t. I don’t like McCain either. Huckabee would be my pick, but as they media are foisting McCain off on us, I just will sit out this time.
Posted by: madeline | February 29, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
Hillary just tried to play the Mexicans
against the blacks. Now she is gonna play women against men. Notice her
exact words
“It’s hard being a woman out there. It is obviously challenging with some of the things that are said that are not even personal to me so much as they are about women.”
Crying worked for Hillary before and she’s counting on arousing hostility in eenough women to help her now.
Ann Coulter is probably laughing right
now. She said that from the way women
were led like cattle by this stuff [crying and gender envy]- that she regretted women even having the vote.
Posted by: bob | February 29, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
The hateful comments here prove that US is not ready for a woman President, not even in the next 1000 years.
Posted by: Kay | February 29, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
Kay,
We’re ready for a woman president.
Just not Hillary Clinton.
Liberals and Feminists just don’t seem to get that.
Posted by: Hawksprings | February 29, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
THIS IS SOOOOO TRUE! I just made that remark on the other article blog on Political Punch.
THANK YOU, Jake Tapper, for printing articles on this subject to raise awareness about the fact that women DO NOT get paid the exact same wage for the same job done that men also do. Now Jake is a REAL MAN, because he tries to understand women’s issues……I can see it now……many men will get on here and deny what this article says, to the fullest. The fact that women get paid less for the same job done that men do WILL NOT BE FIXED IF YOU VOTE FOR BARAK OBAMA. HE SEEMS TO BE anti-woman. He has NOT said ANYTHING that he would do to address women’s issues. And then he goes and says that the American people need HIM because he will listen to them. N O T.
Posted by: Mrs. Clinton is RIGHT! | February 29, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
……AND……obama plays the RACE CARD, HILLARY has EVERY RIGHT to use that Gender Card. GOOOO Hillary!!!!!!
We’re behind you all the way, sending you money and more money!!!!
Posted by: Mrs. Clinton is RIGHT! | February 29, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
I can’t help but notice that many posts that are anti-Hillary keep getting deleted here. Anyone else noticing that? And that poor Hillary gets such a hard time from the media!
As a male conservative Thompson supporter (and still a McCain supporter), I can’t help but observe that it’s ridiculous to claim ABC has an awful pro-Clinton bias in an anti-Clinton article. There is plenty of evidence that supports the claim that ABC is biased; this is not part of it.
As a woman, the following information really disturbs me, however, ABC doesn’t want women to know about it, as it has been deleted 10 times.
The story you’re talking about doesn’t sound great in a soundbite. But upon reflection, I sure as hell wouldn’t want my defense lawyer or president to think that a man’s freedom for 20 years is not worth 15 minutes of hard questions to a young girl.
The fact that you never thought of that side of the story shows that sexism of the most egregious kind is not limited to men.
Posted by: ben | February 29, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Good God people, Hillary is behind because of one thing: She ran the worst campaign in recent American history. Mark Penn is an idiot. The democratic nomination was Hers. But her messages were cluttered and incoherent. She came off as calculating and disingenuous. She did not plan for a campaign past Feb 5. She had very poor grass roots organization ( which is why she loses caucus states). She blames the media for her poor press, not realizing that it’s her own doing. Her rallies have become schizophrenic, going from angry-Hillary to sarcastic-Hillary in 24 hours.
She began her campaign positioning herself for the general election. Even then her campaign was run as a incumbent style campaign like Bill Clinton’s 1996 campaign.
None of this has anything to do with her being woman. IF that mattered at all, she would not be in the place she is. She herself is a very compelling figure, she’s a terrific candidate. The fact that she still has a shot at the nomination ( albeit a long shot) at this point is credit to her as a candidate. Had her chief campaign advisers not been absolute morons, I think she would have had this locked up back on Feb 5.
Posted by: Matt | February 29, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
Listen to what she’s saying. Before 2007, nobody knew who Obama was, everyone knew who clinton was. She had the politican machinery, the necessary connections, the prior campaign experience, and the name. She was touted as inevitable and unbeatable. Until people actually started looking at her.
She is the whiniest, two-faced, snake I’ve ever seen, and the fact that ANYONE is buying the bull she’s pitching is embarrassing.
The reason she’s losing is because she is a horrible candidate and completely untrustworthy. Not because she’s a she. In fact, if she weren’t a women, she’d already be out of the race – the only thing keeping her in this race is the endless crying act.
Go home Hillary. And as a New Yorker, I want to make it very clear: your home is NOT New York.
Posted by: mike | February 29, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
PEOPLE JUST DO NOT LIKE HILLARY.AND IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH HER BEING A WOMAN.IT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH HER AS A PERSON AND HER ACTIONS!E.G.ALL OTHER CANDIDATES OPEN UP THEIR TAX RETURNS—SHE REFUSES.ALL DEM CANDIDATES AGREE THE FL/MICH DELEGATES WILL NOT COUNT—SHE WANTS TO SEAT THEM.
GET THE TREND IT IS ALL ABOUT HILLARY.MOST PEOPLE RECOGNIZE THAT POINT AND CANT STAND HER.TIME TO TURN THE PAGE AND GET RID OF HER .TBROWN
Posted by: TBROWN | February 29, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
American Lesbians and Feminists
for Hillary Clinton!
Posted by: GO HILLARY!!!! | February 29, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
So, Matt, how do you explain the smartest woman in the world surrounding herself with idiots? Not so smart, I’d say…
Posted by: sothere | February 29, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
So, Matt, how do you explain the smartest woman in the world surrounding herself with idiots? Not so smart, I’d say…
Posted by: sothere | February 29, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Well Ben, I can tell you something that I have noticed…any publicity is good publicity. I have seen Hillary’s picture plastered everywhere in the media. The story might be about polar bears, and, low and behold, there’s Hillary picture. Honestly though, any story about Hillary and Obama, whose picture is at the top of the page?
And since Hillary is running on the “I care about women and children more than anyone else” motto, then I think she should be called out on this. It’s not being sexist…it’s about ‘stealing someone else’s words’ when running on rhetoric, no?
Posted by: Really, Really | February 29, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Can’t she just stop whinning?
Posted by: ken | February 29, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
At least she is not pointing out that Barrack Hussein Obama’s first name is the mythical winged horse ridden by the prophet. Probably that weasel McCain or one of his surrogates will bring that up. He is running from his middle name and no one thinks to look at his first name, how ironic. It wouldn’t happen if he were a woman.
Posted by: Mo | February 29, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
GO HILLARY GO …….. GO HOME AND STAY THERE …. WHEREVER THAT REALLY IS
Posted by: BILL | February 29, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
westcoastmessenger, we get, you are voting for hill because you are a woman…
Posted by: rafael | February 29, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
westcoatsmessenger, we get it allright, women vote for hill because she’s a woman… that’s a good reason right? wrong!!! hey where does girl power comes from? Crying!!!
Posted by: rafael | February 29, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
the vast right wing “media” conspiracy…always someone else to blame,small states,caucus state,not enought women, the media is biased etc
IS THAT A STRONG WOMAN?
Posted by: RAFAEL | February 29, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
Hillary, the first, first lady to go in front of a Grand Jury. People don’t like her,not because she’s a woman, she is just a bad person who done bad things while she was in the white house..Travel gate…White Water…the list just goes on. People are feed up with this..She’s right about one thing, Time for a Change!
Posted by: George Reio | February 29, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
Poor, poor Hillary, finding it hard to be in this race as a woman! My four daughters, my daughter-in-law, my woman friends and I snort in disgust at her ‘poor me’ whine. If it’s that “hard”, Hilary, go home and bake cookies.
Posted by: Brown Owl | February 29, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
…..and as commander in chief she can tell an invading country……..”You can’t invade the U.S., I’m a female and you are taking advantage of me???”
Posted by: Tom | February 29, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Hilary Clinton is hardly the “liberated” women she is often made out to be. The whole point of feminism is that a woman doesn’t need a man to define her and to have some degree of self-sufficiency. Hilary has not only used Bill to define her, but has ridden on his coattails to political power.
This is in sharp contrast to Obama, who has struggled hard his whole life for his current position.
Posted by: curiousgemini | February 29, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
“BTW…the skit on SNL asking if they could get Obama a pillow, etc., didn’t come out of a vacuum. SNL has always been a savvy place for political satire.”
I forget…what’s the first line spouted out at the beginning of each SNL episode?
Oh yeah! “Live, from NY!”
Posted by: dave | February 29, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
Actually……….the question is.
IS THIS GROUP THE BEST WE CAN COME UP WITH.
AMERICA IS SICK OF HEARING ABOUT THE CLINTONS.
Hey people were talking about the President of the USA>
Posted by: GATE | February 29, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
If it was Condy Rice I would vote for her in a heartbeat. Not because she’s black, not because she’s a woman.
I would vote for her because of her wisdom, intellect and demeanor. She would be stellar candidate.
Clinton should stop whining.
Posted by: Wrokat | February 29, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
It’s very interesting that the Democrat Party which touts itself as the “Big Tent” party; the all inclusive party; the multi cultural party; the party which champions women’s rights; the party which promises the moon to African Americans, but never delivers – shows itself to be in reality an ugly racist sexist organization that has as at its only goal, power over the people.
Democrats, take a real look at your party. It stinks.
Posted by: Roberto Wu | February 29, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
Has she looked at Obama?
She knows he’s black, right?
I can’t believe that that is
not as big a hurtle as being a woman.
If she was not a woman, she would not be Bill Clinton’s wife and that is the only reason she has any stature.
She’s got the same ‘born on third base’ syndrome that George W has.
Posted by: pete | February 29, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
MommaKat, Lugar-Obama is boilerplate. There’s no REAL CHANGE in that legislation, strictly status quo fare. I also rather doubt Obama could make any national security points on or without Lugar. Does anyone reading this think Obama could have answered the Ohio debate question given to Hillary re Russia’s next president? I wish she would have written down the answer and then asked Obama to answer the question. That would have been a classic. I’m guessing jeans-creaming Obamaphile Tim Russert would have intervened on Obama’s behalf before anything got out of “control”. I’ve always voted for the Democratic candidate in presidential elections. If the Mulatto McGovern is heading the Democratic ticket, I’ll be voting for Nader, McCain, hell, is Lyndon LaRouche running? Anyone but Obambi. I’m voting against Obama because of his color. No, not because he is half-black, but because he is totally SPRING GREEN. The treachery of the media also factors in to my decision. A vote for anyone other than Obama in November, assuming spinless, idiotic superdelegates cave and give the Mulatto McGovern the nomination, is a vote for Hillary in 2012 as I figure it! Any other Democrats out there who, like me, will not vote for Obama for President in November 2008?
Posted by: ecog | February 29, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
Did Margaret Thatcher ever whine about an unlevel playing field? I knew Margaret Thatcher…Margaret Thatcher was my friend Hillary you are NO Margaret Thatcher…pick up your toys and go home now…your obviously not ready to play with the big boys.
Posted by: debbie | February 29, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
Hillary is a disgrace to women. She pulled the Tammy Wynnette card with Bill’s philandering. She cries when things aren’t going her way. She made a name for herself not with Hillary Rodham but Hillary Rodham CLINTON. She has ridden her husband’s coattails for years. This is not how women succeed.
I think a woman can be President. The late Jeanne Kirkpatrick would have been a wonderful President had she lived. She was intelligent, well-spoken, and had something HRC will never have – RESPECT.
Posted by: Chocoholic | February 29, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
They promise everything to everyone, tax hikes, tax cuts, health insurance. tuition for school and the list goes on and on.
SINCE WHEN DID THE PRESIDENT BEGAN TO MAKE LAWS.
BUNCH OF CRAP
Posted by: GATE | February 29, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
i think the real question is….. is she really a woman? … the closest thing to womanly i have ever seen her do was that fake cry in new hampshire … otherwise she is more manly than her husband ….. lets tell the ice queen to go home
Posted by: bill | February 29, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
Another woman who got her station in life through marriage.
Posted by: Steve456 | February 29, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
I love all the Hillary supporters who use terms like “Mulatto McGovern” or try to imply that he’s some sort of secret squirrel Muslim in order to deride Obama in their explanation of why they’re not voting for him. Can’t they just explain their reasoning behind supporting Hillary without resorting to racial epithets? It really demeans their argument against Obama. Not impressed.
Posted by: Lawsy_me! | February 29, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
She thinks she is going to lose in TX and OH so she is pulling out whatever she thinks it will take to win. Female sympathy vote or whatever will do it. And if she still can’t win, she’ll break out the lawsuits…
Posted by: john | February 29, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
hey “dave | Feb 29, 2008 3:49:26 PM,” i don’t know that obama has struggled his whole life to get where he is. he went to an ivy league school (who paid for it?) and hasn’t seemed to have done much to get where he is (e.g.; no resume). the statement of “struggling to get where he is” implies that he got there even though he’s black. i submit that he’s gotten where he is BECAUSE he’s black.
Posted by: Sam Spade | February 29, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
if her name wasn’t clinton she would know what an uneven playing field looked like.
in the famous words of Bill “give me a break”
Posted by: bob | February 29, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
Classic liberal politics – the politics of division! Now it’s supposed to be men against women…?
I don’t think so. I would gladly vote for a woman president, but I will NEVER vote for this woman – even if she were a man! THAT’S NOT SEXIST!
Posted by: NoShariaForMe | February 29, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
I completely agree with Hillary…
It takes for a woman more effort to be successful in live than it takes for a man.
I think woman like her is inspiring and deserves admiration.
Reading your comments actually proves this point.
A lot of you ready to vote for motivational speaker Obama, rather than promote woman to the Whitehouse…
Sad…
Posted by: julia | February 29, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
Most of my female friends are smarter and more intellectually stimulating than Hillary, whose moniker “the smartest woman in the world” is the polar opposite of who she really is. Workaday women and stay-at-home moms have accomplished far more than she has, and they keep this country going. Unlike her, they manage their homes, families, and good reputations. We don’t need her shrill, controlling, manipulative shenanigans solving problems that she perceives us to have. We’ll solve them ourselves, thank you.
Posted by: VT | February 29, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
There is no doubt that Hillary Clinton has had a much harder time as a woman (and a Clinton) than Obama has had as a black man. If anything, he has been given a free ride because he is a black man!!
From the get go, Hillary has gotten negative press while the media fell all over Obama, their media darling! He has not been vetted at all but if he is the nominee, he will be in for a rude awakening!
I am so proud of Hillary Clinton. She is the first woman who has gotten this far in the presidential race. First woman to win any presidential primary! But this fact was NEVER mentioned by the press at all!!
Hillary Clinton is the person America DESPERATELY NEEDS to be our president next year!!! I just pray that Americans will realize this before it’s too late!!!
Posted by: AlwaysforHillary | February 29, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
“it’s tougher for her to run as a woman than it is for her male opponent”
Yeah it probably is tougher for her to run as a woman than it is for Obama, cause unlike her, obama has a feminine side. Not meaning to discount obama in anyway, but seriously we need to check whats under this woman’s skirt
Posted by: jake | February 29, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
I’ve heard insults hear about a persons gender their age and their color.
Also about their experience or lack thereof. The congess and the senate are the ones who really decide how to waste the money they take from the working people. Without them signing off on legislation nothing happens.
There has not been one President that has accomplished anything good or bad without their approval.
The next President regardless of their gender race or age is going to change anything.
It’s business and their interests that influence policy and the policy makers.
We are just the disposable “mules” that make this country the country it is. We need to demand from everyone in a position to make and implement policy that they do it in a way that improves the life of all of us women, men, black, white, red or whatever we are.
As soon as we cut off the monetary influence that drives any and all of the elected officials then we might have a chance at saving our country and “WE THE PEOPLE”. Demand more from these people and get the pigs off the public trough.
Posted by: Phlebo | February 29, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Even playing field? How is an election not even? Is she not allowed to raise as much money as other canidates? Is she not allowed as much speaking time at debates? Is she not allowed all the airtime she can buy just like everyone else? How can the playing field be more even then it is? Think about it an election is as even as it comes. This has to be the dumbest statement I have ever heard from her.
Posted by: Bob | February 29, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Lawsy_me!, I voted for Jessie Jackson way back when, and I have no problem with Muslims. Louis Farrakahn is many times over the orator and intellect Obama is. “Mulatto McGovern” is more accurate than “Black McGovern” because, though he might not stress it too much during this race, Obama is half-”white”. As I said, I could care less about his skin color [or his plumbing], coffee, red, white, black, yellow, or Martian purple. I’m voting against him because he is UNTESTED, UNVETTED Spring Green. The mean, tent revivalist, anti-intellect speeches read from teleprompters in ersatz MLK tones are also very grating. The unfair anti-Hillary media tag team bias needs to be countered, too. Neither Obama nor any of his orgiastic supporters have conveyed an iota of a cogent point as to why he could be an effective president. Yes We Can BEEE-LIEVE Real Change are hollow slogans. Community organizer in Chicago? Do-nothing U.S. Senator? [:side-splitting laughter:] A vote for anyone other than Obama in November, assuming spinless, idiotic superdelegates cave and give the African-American/ Black McGovern the nomination, is a vote for Hillary in 2012 as I figure it! Any other Democrats out there who, like me, will NOT vote for Obama for President in November 2008?
Posted by: ecog | February 29, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
I’ve heard insults hear about a persons gender their age and their color.
Also about their experience or lack thereof. The congess and the senate are the ones who really decide how to waste the money they take from the working people. Without them signing off on legislation nothing happens.
There has not been one President that has accomplished anything good or bad without their approval.
The next President regardless of their gender race or age is going to change anything.
It’s business and their interests that influence policy and the policy makers.
We are just the disposable “mules” that make this country the country it is. We need to demand from everyone in a position to make and implement policy that they do it in a way that improves the life of all of us women, men, black, white, red or whatever we are.
As soon as we cut off the monetary influence that drives any and all of the elected officials then we might have a chance at saving our country and “WE THE PEOPLE”. Demand more from these people and get the pigs off the public trough.
Posted by: Phlebo | February 29, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
She made a huge tactical error in her arrogance that a young African American was cannon fodder! Now she is trying to recover by any means she can, but it’s too late. The most intelligent woman in the world? What a joke! No intelligent woman would have put up with Bill for the number of years she has. And her ads are idiotic too. Her by the phone at 3:00AM in the morning? Is she waiting for Bill to call in? Get out of the race before you humiliate yourself any and Party any further. It’s not because you’re a woman you’re losing. It’s because you’re unqualified, overmatched, and the biggest phony this country has ever seen.
Posted by: dr_quixotes | February 29, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Hillary’s problem turned out to largely be her husband and his mouth. If she cannot control him or manage her own campaign, then it is no one’s fault except HILLARY’s!
Posted by: jack | February 29, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
Hillary for Pres.? Some of you people are simply delusional for even contemplating this. Liberals?, dont think you can convert them. Liberals are a dying cult who will scorch as much earth as they can on their way out.
Posted by: Rick | February 29, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
Hillary–MAN UP! Is the poor little girl getting picked on by the mean old bullies–the media, the men, the VOTERS? Well guess what? Bin Laden, Putin, and other evil world leaders are big bad boys, too. You chose this fight. No one forced you into this race or pulled you into it kicking and screaming. And you created an uneven playing field for Monica, Juanita, Jennifer, Paula, Kathleen . . .
Posted by: V.T. | February 29, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
I wonder if Hillary is going to cry foul if other world leaders who don’t recognize women in leadreship roles ignore her. Is she going to boo hoo everytime she gets shunned because she is a woman? (which by way is debatable) If she can’t stand the heat and she is going to blame all her failures on the fact she is not treated the same because she is a woman then get out of the kitchen. Shut up already and quit your whinning. Better yet just go away and leave us alone.
Posted by: tmmt | February 29, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
if you want a QUALIFIED ex-first lady, then you need to enlist Nancy Reagan.
At least she was acting president for a couple of years there when ol’ Ronnie was checked out!
Posted by: km for Nancy Reagan | February 29, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
Three months ago she had a 20-point lead and $100 million in the bank. And all of it was due to her exemplary leadership in the senate and unparalleled legislative accomplishments? Please. I’m sure all back-bench senators wish they were so ill-treated. Forget her being Vice President, maybe she can rehabilitate her political career by marrying Obama.
Posted by: Fourth Stooge | February 29, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
I so called this. She sees herself losing and is now doing everything to regain her spot. Will she cry next time she loses a state primary? If it gets someone to change their mind probably. She has little to no shame and is now changing the focus of this election away from the issues that matter, like Iraq and the economy, and pointing it at herself. I may not be a woman but I do not want someone in the Oval Office that will so easily shift their campaign from the things that actually affect everyone in this country to making it solely about herself. The focus of this election should be about the future of the Middle East conflict and the US’ stagnating economy not about where someone keeps their reproductive organs.
Posted by: Chris | February 29, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
to phlebo: there was one president who got things done without the blessings of the congress he was ronald reagan… he took it to the people and told them to call their congressmen and they did and they (congress) knew they had no choice…. no one has done it since
Posted by: bill | February 29, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
hillary will never go quietly she will use a scorched earth approach to win this if necessary…. she doesnt know how to lose with dignity
Posted by: bill | February 29, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
She’s playing her last card. She’s saying that she doesn’t want sympathy, but then why is she talking about it? The Clintons do anything to win, such as recently releasing the photo of Barack Obama wearing the head dress. Beware of the amoral Clintons.
Posted by: CB | February 29, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
This is the same Hilary who thought nothing of ending the careers of 5 military officers and an entire radar room of enlisted when AF-1 was at Columbus AFB, MS. Flight of two aircraft one with a full blown emergency and AF-1 wanted to leave. The watch supervisor and the OIC directed that AF-1 hold its position until the T-37′S landed. Twice AF-1 demanded departure clearance, twice denied. Aircraft landed without incident and then 48 hours later all of the controllers in the tower/radar and the pilots of the planes lost their ratings and the pilots automatically were removed from training.
I wonder if Hillary wants to shed any tears or say she isnt manly enough. She shredded these people as all Clintons are wont to do.
I can hardly wait for Chelsea who is at 27 making 250,000 a year as a consultant.
250,000 a year and she doesnt like her company paid for healthcare insurance either. 100% covered and she aint happy with it.
All these people want to do is get back into power at all cost.
Posted by: M. Randolph Kruger | February 29, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
To paraphrase “Slick Willy” she is “whining like a stuck pig”…shut up!
Posted by: Melissa | February 29, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
Hillary is so pathetic. First we are told how strong she is, how experienced she is (e.g., at forgiving Bill for his many affairs, etc.) And now we are told that she is losing because she is a woman, being beaten by a black man? PATHETIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Typical whiny liberal Democrat.
Posted by: deathtosocialism | February 29, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
Uneven playing field…how about 4 kids under the age of 12, a husband who skipped town…working 2 jobs, 3 hours sleep per night…alot less uneven then riding your husbands coattails to the US Senate, being deemed the “inevitable” candidate for president, multi million dollar book deals, unknown millions from arab countries , should I keep going? And your too busy to release your tax records…give me a break…and you’re “allegedly” the voice of women and children…friends like you we don’t need…you have just set back the likelihood of a women becoming president years….please leave!
Posted by: Margaret | February 29, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
I find it appalling that such a “feminist” figure as Hillary Clinto would start playing the gender card, as though her ovaries are the reason her campaign is not succeeding. As a “feminist” myself, my advice would e leave gender out of it, suck it up, and fight on the playing field you are on instead of degrading all of us because you are grasping at straws. This is not behavior I’d want young women to idolize.
Posted by: Lauren | February 29, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
Great post Margaret! Hope all is well with you.
Posted by: Really, Really | February 29, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
i hope hillary gets to read this blog …. she is getting the same compassion she gives out …….SEND THE ICE QUEEN HOME ….. wherever that is?????
Posted by: bill | February 29, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
A good knowledge of math will direct
your path, towards doing the right thing. So lets use a little math logic and see what it will bring. The black woman is a member of both of the groups that have faced discrimination so she is best qualified to determine which type is worst. But it should be remembered that Martin Luther King was the one who started first… in the push for equality in civil rights. It appears that women (the majority of whom are white in the great U.S.A.) have benefitted, from the heroic struggle of Dr. King, just as much as blacks have.
Posted by: Roland Brad, Chicago, USA | February 29, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
I loving the fall and demise of these two rats the Clintons! I’m a Republican here in Texas and used my little one vote to vote for B. Hussein Obama. I’m absolutely loving it that we in the Great State of Texas my indeed be the house that finally falls on the Witch! But I cannot celebrate until her feet crumble and go underneath the house. There is a GOD!
Posted by: Rene' C. | February 29, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Folks; The people in Dhimmi land need to wake up to a hard fact….If Hillary should by some lucky chance get her party’s nomination, she’ll sink because of her and Slick’s baggage and the fact that most people find her distasteful…If it goes to Obama, you can look for the “Bradley Effect” to kick in when the liberals are alone in the voting booth and they start to realize “Omigawd! What have I been thinking?”! It’ll be the “Old Warrior” in the Oval office come ’08!!
Posted by: Sabre460 | February 29, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
Maybe it is hard for her because she is a positively awful candidate and thoroughly unsympathetic person. With all the campaign themes she has tried to employ, this is the most pathetic. Are we honestly supposed to think she will be “ready on day one” if her reaction to a “hard” task, job, etc. is to start playing the Damsel in Distress?
Posted by: William | February 29, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
It’s SUPPOSED to be hard. If it were easy, everyone would do it.
Posted by: Greg-USA | February 29, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
‘…I don’t expect any kind of, you know, allowances or special privileges, because I knew what I was getting myself into.’
You knew it was hard yet you complain how hard it is? More Clinton double speak.
Posted by: Greg-USA | February 29, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
Is there anyway if Hillery loses that we can deport the whole clan to Mexico City.
Posted by: 312 capri | February 29, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
Come on! What a joke! I’m sorry but I could give a rats butt what her gender is! And I think most people would agree her losses to Obama have NOTHING to do with her gender! People are just sick and tired of the Clinton “crap”! She can whine and cry and say its about gender all she wants, it won’t change the fact that people just don’t like her! She’s not a good person! It’s no surprise she’s using the gender card though…..the Clintons are used to lying to themselves…..so they can sleep at night!
Posted by: Jacob | February 29, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
Hard? Taking over the DNC with McAuliffe in 2000 who then front loaded the primary system to advantage YOU and in the process create havoc amongst the sates in the system? Hard? Having 120 million dollars to spend before Iowa? Hard? Being the fron runner since 1998 in every poll ever taken until recently? Hard? 20 debates to expose contrasts between you and your opponents? Hard? No Mrs Clinton, you were beaten fair and square. BTW, you can answer these questions after America responds next Tuesday!
Posted by: GoldMiner | February 29, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
Let’s see..until March 1998, straight men and black men occupied the bottom rung on the employment ladder. Females, regardless of race, have not occupied the lowest tiers of employment since 1973. Hillary, please spare us the feminist histrionic and passive aggressive behavior.
Posted by: RJLigier | February 29, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
So Hillary was in the White House for 8 years? Great. So was the pastry chef. She is a vile, unlikable, vindictive loser.
Posted by: zocko | February 29, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
Liberals are so hung up on race and gender that they cannot comprehend that a person might actually dislike a candidate, not because of their gender or race, but simply because THEY CAN’T STAND THEIR POLITICAL VIEWS and THEIR LACK OF CHARACTER!!!
Posted by: Hawksprings | February 29, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
How can anyone take Clinton seriously anymore? When she’s up, then she takes the attitude that she’s entitled to the Presidency. When she’s down, everything is everyone else’s fault, even to the extent of blaming all of us supposed sexists out here. I don’t like Hillary because…well…I don’t like Hillary. I’m sick of politicians who feel that campaigns chock full of cheap shots and lies are what people respond to. The American people simply aren’t as stupid as she and Bill seem to think we are, and I resent their assumtion that we’ll fall for this b.s., or any of the other b.s. they’ve tried to sell us for the past year or so. Please Hillary, just drop out of the race already.
Posted by: Sean | February 29, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
Hillary boasts that in addition to her “35 years experience” she “participated” in meetings while first lady….so did Monica Lewinsky…does that make her qualified to be president…the Clintons just don’t know WHEN TO LEAVE.
Posted by: joan | February 29, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
Hillary will settle for 80/20 playing field in favor of Obama. Right now, it looks like 95/5 for Obama.
When Hillary raises a question about Obama, MSNBC, CNN, and the rest of the media take it upon themselves to respond on his behalf.
When Obama raises question or attacks Hillary, the media goes into a frenzy on how effective Obama’s line of attack is. I don’t believe this has ever happened in politics before. Why? Is it because Hillary is a woman?
Posted by: SO | February 29, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
Sean: Hillary Clinton is the best candidate in this field. By far. She should never drop out of this race. It’s not over yet. Don’t believe the media. Come on Texas, Ohio and Rhode Island. Get out the vote. Help Hillary Clinton win the Democratic nomination and become our 44th president. I know many Women and Men who are supporting Hillary because she is Simply the Best!!! Go Hillary!
Posted by: Brooke | February 29, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
Hillary does not need to cry for us.
We will have the next four years to do that if either Obama or McCain wins. By the time either of them is through with us, we will all be crying “Uncle Barack Hussein Obama” or “Uncle John Sidney McCain”.
God deliver us from this madness.
Posted by: SO | February 29, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
Uneven playing field? Which other candidate had a wildly popular (among party faithful) ex-Pres for a spouse?Which other candidate had the huge name recognition at the outset? Which other candidate had a full blown (sorry for the words) political machine at the outset? Which other candidate had a Rolodex of big money Dem players to tap into and the biggest warchest when primary season began? ENOUGH!
Posted by: observer | February 29, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
Tax returns:
“I’m too busy right now. The demands on my time fighting to win this election is unbelievable. When I win and am the Democrat nominee, I will have time to release them.”
How long, really, does it take for a wealthy person like Hillary to really take to release her tax records. I’m sure she does not prepare her own tax return. So it would take a phone call to her tax accountant with orders, “Hey Priscilla, I want you to release my tax returns.” Less than 1 minute!
Posted by: Roberto Wu | February 29, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
Is she telling us that she is just not quite up to the task?? How in the world does she think our adversaries are going to treat her??? Used to think she was a pretty bright woman, but I am now just baffled at being so wrong!
The biggest thing Hillary has going for her is her own personal sense of ENTITLEMENT!
Posted by: jack | February 29, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
Hillary Clinton is a smart, hard-working woman with great qualifications and experience. I think some people (yes, both men and women)are very threatned by a powerful woman. I see it in business all the time.
Also, Hillary said in the interview,
“Every so often I just wish that it were a little more of an even playing field, but,you know, I play on whatever field is out there.” That spells fighter to me, not whiner. And the fact that nearly 70% of Americans polled, agree that the media has been negatively biased toward Hillary Clinton says a lot about the challenges she has had to face in this campaign as well as her tenacity.
Posted by: Kelsy | February 29, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
This election season is a joke.Obama’s delegate lead is based upon winning caucuses.Guess what?There won’t be a caucus on November 4th.Hillary is destroying him in the large states a Democrat absolutely must have.If Obama can’t beat her there,how is he going to beat McCain when everybody votes?This should be Hillary’s main thrust.
Posted by: Tom Dockery | February 29, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
Let me get this straight….being a former first lady, a US Senator representing a populous state, locking up all major democratic consultants months before announcing her candidacy, raising $120MM+ and having instant name recongnition is somehow not a level playing field? I guess I agree, she had a tremendous ADVANTAGE over EVERY male democratic candidate in the field!! She blew it and now she’s blaming it on sexism, way to set the women’s movemnet back 30 years Hill! Great job!
Posted by: JG | February 29, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
Why does poor HRC get treated so differently? Do other women get treated differently when they run for Senate… doesn’t seem so? Perhaps its because she is running for a higher office …. but I think its because she is a ‘cloak-and-dagger’ Clinton. She gives up on caucus states that do count, but runs to Florida to claim victory which did not count.
Posted by: David | February 29, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
of course i know that sexism exists, but i have been shocked by the level of sexism expressed in this primary election. (as evidenced in many of the comments here). ANY criticism of barack is immediately denounced as racist, but a steady stream of hateful, sexist attacks on hillary are blithely accepted. her treatment in the media and at the debates has been outrageous and the bias toward barack on cnn and msnbc may seem humorous in an SNL skit, but in reality i’m not laughing.
Posted by: el polacko | February 29, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
PLEASE HILLARY JUST GO HOME, IT’S TIME FOR YOU TO
EXIT WITH DIGNITY IF YOU AND BILL HAVE ON. WE USED TO LOVE YOU SO MUCH BUT UR TIME HAS PASSED
Posted by: ARSENE | February 29, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
Race trumps gender Hillary! Obama should get 15% of your elected and super delegates on the basis of affirmative action alone for starters. Aren’t you happy all those minority voters you signed up are giving Obama a level playing field?
Besides, at the end of the day, they are going to say “It’s your abrasive personality stupid!” Get your slavery reparations money ready Hillary!
Posted by: Dryden01 | February 29, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
I wonder how terrorists or any other US enemies would respond to hilary’s wish for an even playing field
Posted by: wallace | February 29, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
I’d prefer McCain or Obama at this point over Clinton. I mean she includes her time in the White House as a part of her political career. Sure the First Lady has to deal with politics but its like saying she was appointed to the position instead of just getting in with her husband when he was elected. She’s evasive with her tax returns, she’s an idiot when it comes to foreign policy, but she shares that with Obama, and now she’s complaining about how tough it is to run for the Presidency?! This isn’t an election to decide who becomes the Scoutmaster of some Girl Scout Troop this is an election to decide who will run our country for the next four years! If she’s complaining now how is she going to respond when the race between her and McCain starts? Cause its going to be a lot more vicious then it is currently. In my opinion we need someone that at least has an idea of foreign policy not someone thats willing to go against what has been American policy for over fifty years. No negotiating with the terrorists! They hate us plain and simple. So unless Obama gets smart about foreign policy, I say go McCain for the Presidency!
Posted by: Chris | February 29, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
I wonder whether Margaret Thatcher ever complained about a level playing field? Golda Meir?
Heads of State don’t whine. They take responsibility for their decisions and don’t make excuses for making bad ones or losing. The good ones are also principled.
Posted by: Kelly | February 29, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
She could pull the gender card crap in Turkey or Afghanistan where it wouldn’t be an equal playing field. But to say that here and now is just to show how weak she is.
Posted by: Tom | February 29, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
Do you know how many times I have been called a racist because I said I do not support Obama? This is absolutely ridiculous. You can’t say ANYTHING about the guy without the race card being thrown at you. I’m a CONSERVATIVE and I don’t like socialists. I don’t care if they are PURPLE.
Posted by: Jazzloversinc | February 29, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
I see that Obama is at it again. His response to Hillary’s new ringing phone-sleeping children campaign commercial was to plagiarize most of the video content and throw in the worn lines of his brilliance for having initially opposed the Iraq war. Does this guy have any ideas of his own? LOL
Are any Hillary supporters reading this going to vote for Nader or McCain as I am, if, heaven forfend, the SPRING GREEN Obambi, aka the Black McGovern, is the Democratic Party’s nominee?
Posted by: ecog | February 29, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
For the past 20 years either a Bush or a Clinton has been president. We are sick of both of them and don’t believe in a dynasty of any type! I can’t believe so many people can’t see through her superficialty. She has such a high negative rating, the Democratic Party must have a death wish if they nominate her. It’s plain to anyone who is not blinded by the Clinton aura that they will do and say anything to get what they want!
Posted by: JEREMIAH BOOZIKEE | February 29, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
Try imagining Golda Meir during the Yom Kippur War looking for a commiserative press on how “hard” the job was…the problem, Hillary, is we’ve known strong women, and you’re no strong woman…
Posted by: DB | February 29, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
Regardless of what happens, as a woman I am eternally grateful for what Hillary has done for the women in this country. She knew it was going to be tough, but she has kept on fighting. Every time there is a breakthrough in society someone has to step forward and get their nose bloodied for the sake of all those who will one day follow. What Hillary has done in her quest for the Presidency is make great things possible for those women who will follow her. This country’s representation of women in the government is a disgrace. Women make up half the country but only account for 14 percent of our elected officials. Out of 105 countries the United States ranks 55th in the percentage of women who hold government office. I find this sad in a civilized country that is supposed to be the leader of the free world. I say thank you Hillary for taking on this fight. I hope I live long enough to see the first female president. To all of you Hillary bashers my hope is that no one treats your wives, mothers, sisters, daughters, girlfriends with the same disrespect and hostility that you have thrown Hillary’s way.
Posted by: Firefighter | February 29, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
Its not just that Hillary and Obama know little about foreign policy at a time where not knowing could endanger this nation in the worst possible way but that a number of the things they’ve said can be compared to the infamous communists and fascists of both World War II. Clinton supports socialized health care in order to give everyone benefits. Does anyone else realize that with socialized healthcare you’re given a set amount of money and if you need more for a procedure then its just tough luck for you? All the candidates say give more money to the government or allow the government to make the decisions for you. Thats as good as making a totalitarian dictatorship with the veil of a democracy. This nation’s founders would role in their graves if they saw what became of it. In fact in the Bill of Rights itself there are a number of things that would declare stuff like income tax to be unconstitutional. Does anyone care anymore? Our civil liberties are being stripped one by one. Most of them weren’t even taken away intentionally. Does anyone in government at the moment think about changing it though? A number of laws enacted in the early 1930s for the New Deal should have been rescinded after our government got back on its economic feet but they’re still here. Heck a number of those laws weren’t even helpful then and are now just a drain on money. This country supposedly has a democratic republic in place as a government. I don’t know what we are now but the government was never supposed to have the type of control it has over people’s lives that it does now. If the politicians we have in office today had been around during the Revolution I have no doubt that had one of them been in the position George Washington had been following the war that they would not hesitate to become King John or King Barrack or even Queen Hillary. I doubt anyone today cares about what the Founding Fathers wanted for the nation but I doubt that they’d want it in its current condition.
Posted by: Chris | February 29, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
I’d vote for Boxer, Fienstien, or Napolitano for president before I would vote for Hillary Clinton. I might even vote for them over Obama. This playing field is about as level as you get, especially since all the white guys were knocked out of the race early by these two. Hillary just does not strike me as the right person to lead this country. Experience means nothing to me, I want to see DC be less emboldened to corporate America. That is more likely to happen with Obama than with Clinton – hands down.
Posted by: Dave | February 29, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
Of course it’s harder for women. Talk to some of your male friends and family member about their views on women. Sexism still exist? Yup.
I personally know a handful of guys who said they won’t vote for a woman for president. There are plenty out there.
I don’t know anyone who won’t vote for a male president.
Posted by: JJ | February 29, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
I am a woman. For Hillary Clinton to blame her failure on the fact she is a woman is very disgusting. She has failed because she is so phony that she is a horrible candidate. She is so incompetent she has run a disastrous campaign. She is so condescending she is detestable. She may not be a bad person,but she is not the kind of person most people like. For her to whine about being at a disadvantage in this election -it’s ridiculous. She has had so many special considerations, She has had so many passes. Without having been married to Bill, she would not be anywhere near being a candidate. She did not do it on her own. I live in Texas, I know a lot of people and I don’t know any who like Hillary. In fact I don’t dislike her as much as most of the other people I know. And by the way I’m talking about TX Dems not Republicans.
Posted by: JS | March 1, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am
She didn’t say she hasn’t won because she’s a woman. She said IT’S HARDER FOR WOMEN. As I said before, do a survey of your friends and family members. You’ll probably find a decent number of them are skeptical of women leaders.
As I said before, I know about a handful who say they don’t think a woman should be president.
I don’t know anyone who says a man shouldn’t be president. We don’t have that luxury.
Posted by: JJ | March 1, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am
what a crock! this woman has vast amounts of privilege, yet she’s complaining (falsely) about “it’s hard out here for a woman”??? she REALLY thinks we women are stupid! we may not all have a wellesley education, millions in the bank, and a former president for a husband, but STUPID we are not! that’s why so many of us are supporting OBAMA!
Posted by: ohbrother | March 1, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am
I don’t understand what’s so hard about this decision for the Democrats. You have a canadit that has a vision of a better America for everyone, not just because your are a man,female,black,white, ,brown,Dem or Rep Then you have a canadit who will say or do anything with no shame just for the sake of having power. I did’nt attach any canidits names to this for a reason,you decide who these descriptions fit.It’s not good enough to say because I’m a Black Man and I’ve suffered and only I can understand and repersent black people so because of that I deserve to be president and its not good enough to say because I am a woman that only I have womens issues at heart and because I have suffered that I deserve to be president. We need to get to the point where we see eachother as Americans first. I would hope that we are not selecting a president because someone is Black,white,male or female. I do hope and pray that we are going to elect a president because that president want’s to repersent all Americans and not just selected targeted groups because that is what is going to get them votes.Listen to your canidates, I’m sure if you put all these other wadge issues to the side you will make the right decision for America not just for Black people,White people,Woman,Men but for all people all Americans.
Posted by: Orlando Fremont,Ohio | March 1, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am
Will Hillary never stop blaming anyone but herself? She had the largest, most experienced political, fundraising, media operation to ever run a non-incumbent Presidential campaign. She had the most name recognition of probably any non-incumbent Presidential candidate since Washington. She easily outshined several more experienced candidates (Biden, Dodd, Richardson, etc.) and made them non-factors throughout the race. The only two post-Iowa competitors were a one-term Senator and failed VP candidate and a first-term minority Senator. She’s right, the field wasn’t level because it was tipped dramatically in her favor.
Posted by: Chris | March 1, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am
Chris, so are you saying she’s wrong, that it really isn’t harder for a woman? If that’s the case then please explain to me why we’ve had over 40 presidents and not a single one has been a woman.
Posted by: JJ | March 1, 2008, 2:09 am 2:09 am
Orlando, are you serious? Obama would make a terrible president. He lacks substance, and the things he has said have scared me. He said he wants to bomb Pakistan. He aslo said he wants to turn social security into a welfare program by removing the payroll tax cap. That would also, by the way, be the biggest tax increase in our country’s history.
Also, if Obama isn’t calculating, then why did one of his advisors tell Canadian officials not to worry about his anti-NAFTA speeches, that it was just empty rhetoric? Obama will say and do anything to get elected, and there are just enough stupid people for this to actually work.
Posted by: JJ | March 1, 2008, 2:14 am 2:14 am
Why doesn’t she release her tax returns? Is that too difficult? REALLY?
Common now. She’s a congenital liar, a cheat and a fake. She’s so easy to see through. Can’t you?
Posted by: Roberto Wu | March 1, 2008, 3:32 am 3:32 am
JJ: “Of course it’s harder for women. Talk to some of your male friends and family member about their views on women. Sexism still exist? Yup.”
Counterargument: Talk to some of your female friends and family members about their views on men. Sexism still exist? Yep.
Posted by: Dak | March 1, 2008, 7:49 am 7:49 am
Well, you have to admit it would be easier if she didnt have to deal with the distractions of her priapic, mullet headed, husband who has used her campaign as his personal quest to rebuild his legacy.
Posted by: KrepsNeklo | March 1, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Thatcher,in the UK,got voted in because
she stood for policies which all races and genders could equate to,she was not on the feminist ticket,there’s the difference between her and hillary.
Imagine a man running for the white house promising that men and children would come first,that women would be legislated against and surrounding himself with an inner circle of male only advisers.What chance would he stand?Politicians should be all things to all people and have clear policies
to help all people or at least to be as
even handed as possible and not to favour men or women or blacks.In the UK
no women mps admit to being out and out feminists until they get their feet under the table.
The american election looks like it is going to be very confrontational and dirty and unless the democrats get their house in order my bet is that there will be another republican in power.
Posted by: mike savell | March 1, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
Mike, I challenge you to name one female president of the US. Oh, THERE HAVEN’T BEEN ANY? I wonder why. Only a sexist bigot would act like sexism isn’t a factor in this.
Posted by: JJ | March 1, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Dak, I don’t know a women who say they won’t vote for a man for president. I know a number of men who say they won’t.
Check mate you irrational fool.
Posted by: JJ | March 1, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
JJ you are a fool. Gender and race stopped being a controlling force in the world a long time ago. So long ago the current generation hadn’t even been born yet. That is not to say that it doesn’t still exist but that it stopped controlling who became leaders of companies and political entities a long time ago. There hasn’t been a female president before because of one simple reason, no party nominated one. Not some grand scheme to get at women but solely because no party wanted to nominate one. You are acting irrationally in your arguments. Name one reason for there to be a female president. I think that a president should be selected based on their platform not based on their gender. You obviously do not. You can call foul and say how difficult it is for women to get by, but how is it any different for any other minority? These days Hispanics are looked down upon for the illegal immigration but you don’t see them whining. Progressivism is good but not without direction. Electing someone based solely on their race or gender is idiocy of the highest order. If the woman had a platform that I supported then I would support her but not at the cost of my beliefs.
Posted by: Chris | March 2, 2008, 4:19 am 4:19 am
I LOVE HILLARY AND IAM FROM TEXAS BUT IF OBAMA WINS MR.MCCAIN WILL GET MY VOTE IN NOV.OBAMA HAS A FEW IDEA’S BUT DOESN’T TELL US HOW HE WILL PAY FOR
THEM.
YES THE NEWS MEDIA HAS GIVEN OBAMA A FREE PASS EVERYBODY IS SCARED TO ATTACK HIM
Posted by: MS RELMA DAIGE | March 2, 2008, 5:13 am 5:13 am
JJ, you name me one black President and I’ll name you your female one. It’s just silly to say that a woman is somehow on a more uneven playing field than a black guy.
Posted by: Chris | March 3, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am
There is a certain amount of irony in Hillary being a candidate and having to face an opponent who is a black male because of the history of Hillary and because of he has been compared to JFK, who was white, but also because race relations, in addition to the war in Vietnam and Nixon’s impeachment was at the center of the 1960′s civil unrest, of which Hillary was there at inception both in her valedictory speech which put her on the Life Magazine cover, and because it seems to “turn back the clock” on issues that Hillary was fully engaged in then. Most assuredly like deja vu for her, it isn’t for Obama, but does represent how the Obama Presidency means different things to different people in 2008.
The unresolved status of women is not the least of these considerations given the long history of race relations and the number of KKK incidents and interracial rape cases that capitalized upon white female chastity as their reason for being.
So the sexism and racist challenge of the election is in no small part due to our unique history in both these areas as white males used antagonism and white females to justify their racism, and retain control of their accumulated white property, not the least of which were the white females of their household which black racism threatened to destroy, or tarnish.
The black rapes that have been the outcome of race relations is no small concern in their challenge to white females, and the hateful origins of those acts can be considered the backlash upon white males.
So, for white males, the question is whether they stand with their forebears and defend white female honor, or whether they are progressive to stand with black males and assert their right to insult, tarnish, impoverish, and torture all women, black and white together by asserting dominance and continuing oppression.
No doubt women will be watching to see how this imbrogglio develops, sinc it is sure to set the stage for gender relations and race relations for the next generation. The question of whether it is progress, however, is debateable, if not folly for all concerned.
Posted by: Pat | March 4, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
Read this again. She is not talking about sexism being the demise of her campaign. She is RESPONDING to a question that ASKED her why she guesses American women regard her campaign with sympathy. So she isn’t whining; she’s being forced to address gender issues, and she does so with restraint.
Posted by: duh | March 4, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
Love to see Hillary ridiculed and criticized; it shows she’s a big girl, can take, probably expects it, and doesn’t have to whine racism like Obama does when he is criticized.
Should men expect her to whine if it gets too tough? Absolutely; it wouldn’t be America without it but no more so than it should be for men to be rightly criticized. And fair’s fair; it works both ways, doesn’t it?
It’s especially good when Hillary is able to counter the cutting criticism of Stephanopoulos since he was once a White House insider for Bill, and ducked out early because of a conflict with Hillary, or so he said in the book he published afterward to capitalize upon the Clinton terms, among the many who did.
Posted by: Pat | March 13, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm
cONGRATS TO CHARLIE ON HIS BROADCASE WED. EVENING. THIS IS THE FIRST TIME I HAVE SEEN THE NEWS THAT WASN’T HOLDING BACK ON DISCLOSING THE TRUTH ABOUT THE CLINTONS. IT DID MY HEART GOOD TO SEE THE TRUTH. THE OTHER STATIONS DO NOT GET IT!!!. THANKS AND KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK. NICK BELL SAVANNAH, GA.
Posted by: NICK E. BELL | March 19, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
It is plain and simple, she is trying to get sympathy..again! Last time she donated publicly to her campaign more people started donating. The last time she whined that she was getting picked on by the media..they went negative against Obama. Again..she is injecting race and gender into the mix. I have never seen Obama use the “race” card. The Clintons and the media brought race into it. Now Hillary is doing the same thing by stating that “white people” support her more than Obama.lol She is losing and evidentally she has to play the race and gender card..Pretty pathetic and desperate to me and totally lacks class!
Posted by: Lene' | May 8, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm