Feb 6, 2008 7:22pm

Clinton Senior Staff Goes Without Pay

ABC News’ Kate Snow Reports: Members of Senator Hillary Clinton’s senior campaign staff have agreed to work without pay for the month of February.  Communications Director Howard Wolfson called the move "a show of solidarity with Hillary Clinton".

Campaign Manager Patti Solis Doyle is one of those who will forego a paycheck for the month.  Solis Doyle told ABC News she offered the Senator her services for free.  She said she was not asked to take a pay cut.

Many of Clinton’s top staff, including Solis Doyle and others, have been with the Senator for more than a decade and are fiercely loyal to her.

The staff move to help the campaign save precious resources comes after a big media blitz preceding Super Tuesday — including a one hour televised interactive town hall meeting on the Hallmark Channel, which set the campaign back millions of dollars, and regular TV ads that totaled more than $8 million over a period of less than two weeks.

Recently, money managers within the Clinton campaign have said they were spending money as fast as they could raise it.

And today, it was revealed that there might have been a shortfall in January, but for a loan made by the candidate herself.

Senator Clinton reached into her own pockets to give the campaign a $5 million loan late last month.

She explained Wednesday that the loan was made out of necessity.

"I loaned the campaign $5 million from my money.  That’s where I got the money." Clinton said.  She emphasized the word "my" to make clear that the loan did not involve her husband, the former President. 

"I loaned it because I believe very strongly in this campaign.  We had a great month fundraising in January, broke all records, but my opponent was able to raise more money.  And we intended to be competitive, and we were.  And I think the results last night proved the wisdom of my investment," she said.

The Clinton campaign raised about $13 million in January, plus the $5 million loan from Senator Clinton.  The Obama campaign announced recently that it had raised $32 million last month.

With Super Tuesday behind them, the campaign faces the prospect of weeks of contests in multiple states — an unexpectedly expensive and drawn out nomination contest.

Clinton may have to consider another loan at some point.  That is not outside the realm of possibility.  Money Magazine estimated that the Clintons — Bill and Hillary — accumulated an estimated $35 million in wealth after leaving the White House.  Much of that money was earned through President Clinton’s speaking fees, book deals and other business ventures.

User Comments

How can a couple working on “government salaries” make $35 million?
Can someone please take a closer look and explain?

Posted by: Ann B. | February 6, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

Ann,
The $35 million comes after leaving office, so book deals, speaker’s fees, etc. add up quickly when you’re a former first couple.
But the money issue has to be a serious concern.
First Obama announces $32 million in January. Clinton camp is silent.
Next, Clinton meekly announces about $13 million for January, which has, by all accounts, been spent already.
Today, rumors that Clinton may loan the campaign personal money, even after Bill said in November that such tactics violate the spirit of democracy.
After the rumors surface, we find out that SURPRISE! Hillary has already loaned her campaign $5 million and may dump more money in.
Obama has a serious fundraising advantage on two counts – first, less than 3% of his donors are maxed out (Clinton’s percentage is significantly higher), and second, he’s just flat-out outraising her.
This is big trouble for her campaign, and explains why she’s clamoring for debates, even after there have been 17 to this point – they’re free media.

Posted by: Jake | February 6, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

I want to know if ALL of the donations of the Rezko guy to the Obama campaign were given back……last I heard, the Obama camp had said that they didn’t remember how much money Rezko had donated…..(how can you NOT know? Aren’t candidates required to keep strict records on this?). Apparently this Rezko guy gave money to other campaigns, too. All candidates’ campaign funds should be monitored by an objective, outside source, to also make sure that the candidates are not receiving PAC money, like from MoveOn.Org, and then the candidates go and say that they aren’t taking PAC/Special Interest Money. I don’t trust candidates with regard to money, no-how—-no matter WHO they are.

Posted by: Get America Back On Track | February 6, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

To Ann B.
Well Ann, in case you had not noticed one of them has not been a government employee since 2000. B. Clinton has been making a lot of money giving speeches around the world. A practice first perfected by Sen. Obama’s “transformative” R. Reagan after he left office. ($1.5+or- million for two speeches in Japan in 1989)
Both Clintons also wrote best selling books and cashed in. Two things #43 is not likely to accomplish. That is either “writing” or “selling books”. There is no question he will “cash in” with someone like Halliburton or Blackwater.
Actually, I’m sorry for the snarking tone, but I’m very weary of the current outbreak of Clinton Bashing. Brave young American soldiers continue to die, almost daily, and it seems to me the media and people are obsessed with creating controversy and not helping us solve problems.

Posted by: RMH | February 6, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

Utterly Amazed,
I have to say that I’m hurt by your characterization of my support for Obama as sexist. I’ve been a registered voter for ten years and have been proud to vote for women in local elections, for House, Senate, Governor, state offices, etc. I would be happy to vote for Hillary if I truly felt she were the best candidate, but that’s just not how I feel.
And if you’re going to make the argument that Obama won so-called Red States, note that Hillary herself tried to claim victory in Missouri (my home state) by claiming she won rural counties that were “pretty red” (her words, not mine), even though Obama won the state by carrying Democratic strongholds by better than a 2:1 margin. You can’t have your cake and eat it, too.
I personally like the prospect of record turnout in Red State areas, meaning that a broader coalition can be put together come November, as opposed to the Bush-like, 50%+1 strategy that Clinton seems to be running.

Posted by: Jake | February 6, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

Kudos to Hillary’s Senior staff!!! THAT is dedication and belief in Hillary, and is admirable. So many others believe in Hillary this way, too, and I believe they’ll come through for her. It’s NOT who has the most money, however—–money is nice, but MONEY DOES NOT BUY VOTES—else we’d be the “other” political party. “If you don’t stand for Hillary, you’ll fall for Obama”. We’ve got your back, Hillary—-GO FOR IT!

Posted by: Hillary for President | February 6, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

5 million to buy US Presidency, that is against democracy, anticonstitutional and against liberty. Nobody should buy the US Presidency, every US citizen deserve to be president with people’s voice but not with money. Now Hillary is in Romney’s column.

Posted by: BKMC | February 6, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

She calls the $5m a loan. So, she expects to have the money given back to her when the campaign gets some contribution? She also calls the money ‘my’ to indicate that Bill is not part of it. Are they not a married couple or is what they have a political arrangement? That $5.0m might have come from Kazakhstan, and she doesn’t want America to know.

Posted by: Kizeem | February 6, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

Hi Jake,
It’s nothing personal dude, but I stand by my assertion. If Hillary was a man, she’s be ahead by double digits. I know Obama has a lot of supporters (Men and Women) who have honestly and carefully chosen him based on the issues. Kudos to those folks. However, he also has a lot of other voters who are claiming to be “republicans” who are crossing over to vote for him. What they are really doing is voting against Clinton. Hey, I have men in my own family in this camp. They are really republicans, dude, and they are going to vote for McCain in the general. They don’t agree with Obama on one single issue. They are supporting Obama now to kill Clinton. Most of them are white males, who are just a little too afraid of Hillary.
Look, if Obama wins, and I think he will, I am on board. I will even put a sign in my yard. But I stand by my statement that it’s Clinton who is more electable.. if we’d get behind her. The fact is, she’s running against an awesome competitior like Obama (I like him a lot, nothing against him), the entire mainstream media, the far left talking heads, and the far right talking heads. The media has shown no mercy. I will go to my grave asserting that a big part of that is because of her gender. Men just don’t treat other men that way. Men respect other men. But it’s still okay to be a little chavenist and to put a woman down. Pay close attention to the media and you’ll see it. Even my republican husband agrees with me.. but I had to point it out to him.

Posted by: Utterly Amazed | February 6, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

What was Bill and Hillary doing taking photographs with Rezko if not that they are gaining something from him? Or is it because Rezko himself hasn’t said so. One day, someone who knows will expose Rezko’s deal with the Clintons. I can’t believe I used to love this couple even supporting them during Monica Lewinski and Paula Jones sagas. That was because I didn’t know how bad they are. They can do or say anything to win votes.
How many Monicas and Paulas do we expect to see in the Whitehouse if Bill Clinton becomes a jobless first man? I WONDER.

Posted by: Kizeem | February 6, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

NOW THE REPUBLICANS ARE IN DISAARRAY, but that will end if Hillary wins the Democratic nomination, which I pray she doesn’t. She is a polarizer and will DEFINITELY unite the Republicans for a Whitehouse win. It will be DISASTER FOR US. Trust me.

Posted by: Kizeem | February 6, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

DON’T BE SURPRISED SENATOR HILLARY CLINTON WILL WIN THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION! LOOK AT WHAT HAPPENED IN LOS ANGELES THEY HAVE A BIG EVENTS ON SENATOR OBAMA – ENDORSERS LIKE:OPRAH WINFREY, MARIA SHRIVER, CAROLINE KENNEDY, STEVE WONDER AND SO ON…. WELL, SHE WON IN CALIFORNIA EVEN THOUGH SHE PLAYING AGAINST ALL ODDS. SAME IN STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS – SENATOR TED KENNEDY, CAROLINE KENNEDY, PATRICK KENNEDY LOOK SHE WON AGAIN.. EVEN IN NEW JERSEY AND NEW YORK CITY. PEOPLE VOTE FOR HER FOR THEY KNOW SHE RUN OUR COUNTRY IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION AND SHE IS THE MOST QUALIFIED, SMART, TESTED LEADER AND GOOD EXPERIENCE! SENATOR OBAMA MAY HAVE ALL THE MONEY BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY THE VOTERS WILL DECIDE – FOR THEY CANNOT TAKE CHANCES TO ELECT A WRONG PRESIDENT AGAIN AND ON THE JOB TRAINING PRESIDENT AT THE RATE OUR COUNTRY PROBLEMS: ECONOMY, IRAQ WAR AND IMMIGRATION….OBAMA IS ALL BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH NO SUBSTANCE AND LACK EXPERIENCE.

Posted by: Sam Lim | February 6, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Sam Lim,
Clinton was ahead in California by nearly 20% for the past 7-8 months until late January.
She won because of early voting. She may have still won without that, but it would have been 2-3%. If Super Tueday was on Feb 10th she would have lost California and 3 other states.
You can’t spin that. You didn’t even know who Obama was last February, but you knew her, right?
She got owned. Now watch her shrink in these next few caucuses and primaries.
Oh, BTW, while she’s “loaning” her campaign $5 million, Obama has raised nearly $5 million on line just TODAY!!!

Posted by: dionysus | February 6, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

People are voting…with their hard earned $. The returns show that Obama represents the future while Clinton only the past. The Clinton campaign is in danger of imploding over the next few weeks while Obama has the money necessary to get his message out…stay tuned…good times.

Posted by: gMan | February 6, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

Dear Sam Lim,
What is experience without good judgment? So, a secretary in a law office has experience as a lawyer because he/she worked in that office for many years? Or a nurse can practice medicine after working with a doctor or in a hospital for years? Be careful what you ask for.
Experience is good, but has to be the right experience. First Lady has no access to the presidency more than a messenger in that Whitehouse. She did not even have security clearance for the eight years as first lady. Her experience is only pillow talk.
We all have to look before we leap or else we are doomed by our own making. To have a woman as president is very appealing, but let it be the one with good judgment. I don’t think Hillary is the one. Two times she voted to send us to war in Iraq. That war has cost us many lives, billions of dollars, and has caused the real war against terrorism to suffer.
Bin Laden is still somewhere in Afghanistan plotting against us – United States Of America, all because of those votes.

Posted by: Kizeem | February 6, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

Senator Clinton will win in November.
The thing we all need to remember is that America is fed up with the Republican administration which led us into such terrible straits. The bungling of Iraq and Afghanistan, their ignoring of Katrina victims, the view of America the rest of the world has now, and the crippling deficit can all be laid at the Republicans’ door. It’s not Hillary Clinton who can’t win. It’s John McCain.

Posted by: Cliffie4 | February 6, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Can’t manage the campaign or the economy I see…

Posted by: cba | February 6, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

Utterly Amazed,
Am I afraid of Clinton, yes certainly. She strike fear into my heart. As a republican, I will vote for Obama in the primary. Even in the worst case I won’t be pledging my allegiance to Hillary.

Posted by: Politically Frank | February 6, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

So now we are suppose to believe in the economic policies and then vote for a person who can’t manage her own campaign finances? I don’t think so. If Hillary Clinton has bankrupted her campaign then she has no business being our president and be given the opportunity to bankrupt our government!

Posted by: NvMe | February 6, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

Just as an update on the financial data. About 2 hours ago the Obama campaign sent out an email to supporters asking for donations to match Hillary’s 5 Million dollar check. It is now 10 o’clock, and Obama has managed to raise 5 million dollars since the polls closed last night. 5 Million in one day. (He could hit 6 Million before midnight)

Posted by: Paul F. | February 6, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

People look where Clinton’s “excellent” experience with economics got her. Sorry, if she can not run the finances of her campaign, she will bankrupt America too.
Obama is the future. Turn the page America.

Posted by: Yakov | February 6, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

This indicates Clinton is a poor economic manager. She was touted as the sure thing and had raised more than enough money even before the campaign started. These personals “loans” to the campaign should be watched closely. The question: Who wants this lack of responsibility leading the country?

Posted by: Bill | February 6, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

Hillary has no Mid-East money, sugar daddies like Resko, big contributors like Exelon, and big dollars. I wonder what Obama has done or will do for these contributions. Is this part of the “Yes We Can” movement?

Posted by: Mallory | February 6, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

$35 million in speaking fees? Yeah, right…

Posted by: Rob | February 6, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

Someone has to help our country to get back on track… No new commer for me… We can not take that risk!

Posted by: mark | February 6, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

The Clinton fortune is listed at between $10 and $50 million. Don’t anyone dare suggest to me that Hillary is supposed to be representing the little guy.
Sounds more like a Clinton-Romney ticket. Please.
To clarify: Obama “shattered previous monthly records” with donations from CITIZENS, not from The Indefatigable American Lobbying Machine.
Americans from all walks of life have donated $5.5 million to the Obama campaign on February 6th ALONE.
How you like THEM apples?

Posted by: Emlyn | February 6, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

Without this news report, we can’t understand how tough mission it is for HRC’s team. However, HRC should be more carefully to use these loan money for future campaign activities. The concept of COST DOWN should be considered. God luck for Hillary H. Cliton. Mabye it is good gift for her how to use small money to create BIG Victories with her and her team members.

Posted by: Sharon C | February 6, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

The sad part of this? These posts. We should be absolutely overjoyed with our Democratic candidates. Instead, we have a bunch of troublemakers doing all the can to rip each other down.
America has disappointed me this election. Even worse is that money may dictate who wins this election. Despite a clear support for Clinton from the largest class in America, it will be the upper-middle and upper classes that decide not with votes — but with the almighty dollar.
Politics as usual.

Posted by: Jack | February 6, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

Majority of Obama’s money comes from people donatimng $200 and under. Ever been to his website? Blog posts get 1,000+ responses all the time, with ppl posting how they donated a few bucks.
It is laughable to even suggest in todays political climate that Obama has more big money people that a former presidential couple.
Bottom line, the Clintons are sinking ships, and the money people are getting off……….while Obama is being hit with millions of sub $200 donations.
Billary are done, broke, losing momentum, supporters fleeing like they have the plague, and looking desperate by BEGGING for free debates.
Obama or McCain will take the White House.

Posted by: Me | February 6, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

Lending 5 million to the campaign? Does that mean she wants to be paid back with interest?
Great sense of fiscal responsibility if the money is used up by Super Tuesday. How do we expect her to manage a whole country with a deficit problem?????

Posted by: Sara | February 6, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

To those questioning Clinton’s abilities to run the economy based on this — grow up. Stop turning every small detail into a huge issue.
Clinton will have the money she needs, and this doesn’t speak to her ability to manage an economy because our economy isn’t run by one person. It’s dictated by a lot more than the President.
So grow up, learn how our country works, and stop turning a great race about the future into a tit-for-tat race that has been like every other Democratic race in the past 12 years.

Posted by: Jack | February 6, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Obama is using the playbook of Carl Rove. Promise change, unite, new direction and the other wonderful things people want to hear. Voters fell for this eight years ago and Carl Rove laughed all the way to the bank. Obama is a copycat and the voters are falling for the same ####, the only difference, Obama is a better speaker. Some people still believe that used car salesman are honest…

Posted by: Malcom | February 6, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

She raised 130 million already though?
She has blown through that already, and using Bill’s Kazakastan monies to finance this debacle now?
Earth to Billary and Romney; If people do not donate enough to let you run a campaign take that as a HINT!

Posted by: Beth | February 6, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

And a special note to “Me” — Obama and Clinton are virtually tied. This is far from over. Clinton is getting so many donations that her website is erroring for those trying to donate. She will have money to continue through to the end.
Stop this divisive, childish crap that Obama is supposed to be against.
And since when have debates been a bad thing? Who cares if they’re free advertisement, they’re free for both candidates.

Posted by: Jack | February 6, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

It’s amazing how wrong some of you are. Obama is getting Republican support–because a lot of Republicans like him!! I’m a Republican and think he’s amazing. For the first time in my life I’m inspired enough to donate money to a candidate. I don’t have a lot to give, but I’ve given 3 times now to Obama. I know LOTS of Republicans who support him because he’s the best hope for our country, not out of some effort to game the Democratic primary. If we wanted to get the best candidate to defeat, we’d be crossing lines to vote for Hillary.

Posted by: amy | February 6, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

Without OPRAH, OBAMA has no dinero. MAMA MIA!!!

Posted by: Very Independent | February 6, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

Why does OBAMA call himself the underdog???? To get pity votes. He is so slick. I hope that just because someone has more money, that shouldn’t mean he wins the nomination. I am turned off by how he is pouring money into ads and his so called well rehearsed stump speech.
HILLARY HAS SOLUTIONS.

Posted by: Maria | February 6, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

I’ve previously donated to Edwards, but now my meager help will go to Clinton. I am desperate to see a Democrat in the White House, and I am telling you, the Republicans will destroy Obama. The crazy rants of his pastor, Jeremiah Wright appear to be off limits as far as the Dems go, but the Republicans will tar Obama with his reverend’s brush. For every young wide eyed voter who comes out for Obama, the Republicans will round up 4 who will be terrified that Malcolm X is on the verge of becoming president. Is it fair? Doesn’t matter. They will do it, and it will work.

Posted by: Susan | February 6, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

Many, many people hate Hillary–not because she’s a woman, but because she’s partisan, fights dirty, and is a hypocrite. If the democrats want to win the general election they will support Obama.

Posted by: amy | February 6, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

Barrack Hussein Obama / Larry Sinclair what a great democrat ticket in November.

Posted by: carlson | February 6, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

I’m a die-hard New Yorker but it just makes me wonder… If she can’t $113 mil.
campaign, how is she going to be able to make the best decisions on the national budget. Well there’s another thing in her life that she can’t manage.

Posted by: Pat | February 6, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

Obama is the stronger candidate for the general election. Independents decide elections. Independents like him, and they don’t seem to like Clinton.
The Republicans are on the verge of nominating their most popular candidate with independents. If the Democrats don’t do the same, it will most likely be a disappointing election year.

Posted by: Paul | February 6, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

I don’t understand. How can she loan the money to her campaign. Does she get it back at the end with interest? If so, Mr. Mitt will be making out like a champ at the end of his campaign.

Posted by: tom | February 6, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

Give it a rest this has not played out yet. Hillary will take Bill as a VP. Yes she can the VP position is not a elected spot and not subject to the term limits. She will get in the Whitehouse as president, siz months later she will resign the position as the pressure is to much and Turn the office over to Bill. A legal 3rd term is established.

Posted by: ArmyRetiredSFC | February 6, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

I am crossing party lines to vote for Hillary. The Repubs will eat her alive.

Posted by: ArmyRetiredSFC | February 6, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

Someone above brought up the McCain comparison, and that’s a valid point. He was down and out, broke, laying off staff, etc. And now he’s back.
But its also important to note when that happened to McCain. It was long before the early states. McCain was able to come back because 1) there was no single or even two clear Republican frontrunners, 2) he could focus all his time and effort on innexpensive retail campaigning in a single state for an extended period of time, and 3) New Hampshire independents love him.
His situation contrasts with Clinton’s in that her financial problems are hitting now, when the campaign needs to be moving fast between multiple states, placing media buys, etc.
Of course, if her own financial resources are deep enough, it may not matter. She’s raised about a $100 million and spent that in 12 months, including the very slow early months. To maintain current structures and ad buy habits, she’d probably need at least $15 million a month for three months. More would be better, from her perspective, but I’m guessing she can make do with that (which is significantly more than Republicans will have to spend, by the way).
She can probably raise $30 million in the next three months, and maybe more. Raising that figure would mean she may want to kick in another $15 million of her own money. Maybe this is where the $20 million rumors came from, before we knew about the first $5 million.
It will be interesting to see if donors rush to help, or start seeing her as a lost cause.

Posted by: Paul | February 6, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

Perhaps Bill Clinton can ask his Dubai contacts to help out? He gets paid $300,000 for each speech he gives there – private income. And “When the library opened last year, a computer display in the exhibit halls included information on some, but not all, donors. The Saudi Royal Family and the governments of Dubai, Kuwait, and Qatar all gave $1 million or more.” No. Foreign governemnts or persons cannot contribute directly, please note directly, to a campaign. I would hope that Hillary Clinton is being wise enough to stay a barge pole’s length from any more dubious donors, i.e. Norman Hsu.

Posted by: tcnz | February 6, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

The good news about BO raising so much money today from little guys is that it’s an indicator that the little guys are doing great financially regardless of prevailing pessimism about the economy.
I also don’t know why HC is not appealing to her supporters to match BO’s January $32 million.

Posted by: Ed Vida | February 6, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

Mr. Obama has 750,000 individual contributors giving 10-50 dollars on his website. That is why he is raising so much money. This is one-third of his total fund raising. Hillary has only about 12 percent coming from small contributors. Her big contributors have maxed out the $2600 limit. Maybe Hillary can get money from Mitt Romney, he has millions and millions of his own. Looks like the common people are winning the battle against the Democratic machine. Hope Hillary can mangage the government better with our money, if she’s elected.

Posted by: boltzy3b | February 6, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

I admire Romney for one thing. He used his own money! You would give from your regular earnings when quote Bill Clinton “I never had a nickel to my name until I got out of the White House, and now I’m a millionaire, the most favored person for the Washington Republicans,” Clinton told a friendly audience in Kentucky last fall. “I get a tax cut every year, no matter what our needs are.” Indeed, the Clintons — who left the White House with an estimated $12 million in legal debts rung up during the Whitewater, campaign fundraising and Monica S. Lewinsky investigations –are worth an estimated $10 million to $50 million, according to Hillary Clinton’s most recent disclosure form. That is attributable primarily to the speaking fees and to the seven-figure book deals that both Clintons signed shortly after leaving the White House. The fortune they have amassed gives the Clintons a nest egg for the first time, and it allows them to tap into that wealth for a campaign.”

Posted by: tcnz | February 6, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

Hillary collected her money from special interests. Obama collected his money from individuals. Clinton will run out of steam soon.

Posted by: Vin | February 6, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

hhhmmm…well the obama grassroots has just outraised the bank of Clinton. My vote is with the people and not with the machine.
Also they both came into super Tuesday with the same amount of money. Why is she broke? Is she not good at managing money?
Hillary and Bill Clinton will remain in New York and Senator Obama and Michelle will be moving into the White House in less then a year.

Posted by: Heather | February 7, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

Obama hit $6 million before midnight. Small donors…lots of people…not the Bank of Clinton.

Posted by: Heather | February 7, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

The Clintons have plenty of cash! They left the White House deep in debt anywhere from $5 to $12 million in legal fees. Now, they are worth millions. Way to go! I am not buying into the we are poor story. Bill Clintons’ earnings to include speeches and Dubai speeches and deals are private income so they can dip into those funds! Google for yourselves and get educated instead of being so emotional! A lot of us want a female President, but not one who brings a lot of baggage with her. Bhutto had been PM twice already and she and her husband were two of the most corrupt individuals who existed. The UK had Margaret Thatcher who brought no past deeds with her – or husband’s name and Angela Merkel of Germany who likewise had no baggage or husband’s name. I want a woman who comes in on her own two feet from the get go!

Posted by: tcnz | February 7, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

I’m sorry George Orwelle isn’t here to enjoy this campaign. I’d love to read the novel he would be inspired to write from all this.

Posted by: Paul | February 7, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am

If I remember correctly, and I do, the last candidate to have senior staff members work for no pay was Rudy Giuliani. I’m sorry but it’s not a sign of unflapping loyalty. It’s an indicator that her campaign doesn’t have the support it used to. You can only live off of so many $2300 max donations. Sooner or later, the little people have to believe in you enough to monetarily support you. Most of those people are going to Obama.

Posted by: Andrew | February 7, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

How can anyone look at the situation abroad and feel confident putting the Clintons back in office? I’m as ashamed of Dubbya as the next American, but he wasn’t at the helm in the 90s when Bill failed to modernize the intelligence agencies as a response to Bin Laden’s escalating attacks. I don’t think there’s any difference between Bill’s policy of sweeping dirt under the rug and Bush’s arrogant, stubborn foreign policy. It’s time we had a pragmatic engaging President that we can be proud of and have confidence in. Hillary’s divisive tactics in the primary alone indicate that we’re in for another unproductive 8 years of partisan bickering. I for one will be looking for a 3rd party candidate if my options are McCain and Hilary. How is it in the most important election of my lifetime there could be 2 soiled, compromised, establishment candidates? We can’t let that happen. I hope people give Obama the opportunity to get us headed in the right direction.

Posted by: Thomas Payne | February 7, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Can you say fiscal responsibility?

Posted by: americanrefugee_eu | February 7, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

I’m a big Hillary supporter, and I’ll stay that way to end, but with that being said I wonder how long she can survive without any momentum going her way. She did well on tuesday to stall Obama, but she has to have some good news soon. Now that I’m finding out about this matter of Clinton loaning her campaign some money, it kind of concerns me. But this all seems like its been staged so well, with the negative media coverage of Clinton and all. It’s as if the media is anti-Clinton, every time I turn on the TV I see Obama. I mean I know he’s inspirational and all, but let’s be fair Hillary is in this race to.

Posted by: Ryan | February 7, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am

Wow, now I’m ‘utterly amazed’ that you’re so quick to conclude that, “If Hillary was a man, she’d be ahead by double digits…” Actually, (1) Hillary seems to be more of a man than a woman and her rabid followers are illogical and irrational folks such as yourself; and (2) Hillary would be UNKNOWN with ZERO digits were it not for the fact that she has exploited her status as a woman, showing young girls how the path to success is to shamelessly latch onto a “real catch” like her sleazy Bubba, then “hold on for the ride”, and finally claim all of his experience as your very own when you want something — yeah, you GO, girl!!!
“Hi Jake, It’s nothing personal dude, but I stand by my assertion. If Hillary was a man, she’s be ahead by double digits… Most of them are white males, who are just a little too afraid of Hillary…”
Posted by: Utterly Amazed | Feb 6, 2008 8:36:42 PM

Posted by: Rocky N. Roll | February 7, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

“Yes we can!!!!!!!!” Jeez, can’t you guys come up w/anything original — always leeching others’ slogans and ideas (crusty, uncreative status quo, go figure). Trust me, Billary does not need your money — they’re in the Romney class. Send your $50 to OBAMA and watch your investment pay HUGE DIVIDENDS!
—————————————
Tom said, “Hillary supporters!!! Please make a contribution to Hillary campaign at her website hillaryclinton.com. I just made a $50 contribution. Yes we can!!!!!!!!”

Posted by: Rocky N. Roll | February 7, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am

BTW, Rock N’ Roll so 6.7 million people who voted for Hillary are irrational? If so I find that interesting b/c that represents the popular vote in her favor moron!

Posted by: Ryan | February 7, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

All the hype about Ted Kennedy supporting Obama is Soooooooooo funny !!! Did you see Hillary wone his home state. dosen’t look to me like he has any power.& did you see Hillary won California.WHAT!!! One would think with Caroline Kennedy Maria & Opra being there on Sunday for Obama he could have pulled it off. guess they just aren’t as powerful as some like to believe.(love it) Hillary you go girl. OH!!! & some one needs to see how much money Opra is put up for Obama.

Posted by: mo | February 7, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am

Hillary’s financial squeeze is reminiscent of the problems faced by President Truman’s campaign against Dewery in 1948. Truman was forced to pass the hat at many a rally to hold his campaign together. As the torch bearer of the old line Democrats of yesteryear, Barack Obama, rakes in tens of millions from who knows where, the candidate of the little guy and gal, Hillary, soldiers on, underfinanced, and fighting the odds. Unlike Harry Truman and Hillary, The dirty little secret here is that Barack is for sale and he has a price. By the time all these pink cheeked internet kids who support his empty cheerleader rhetoric realize that Barick is a darn good huckster, it may be too late for Hillary. Given ‘em hell, Hillary!

Posted by: James | February 7, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

rock n roll: It is sad when the facts are present, the Obama supporters start with the name calling. I do not like hypocrites and Obama is a prime example. I believe a person should be truthful, Obama preaches “change” but in reality he is up to his eyeballs in dirty politics. Your assumption that I am for Hillary is incorrect. On the education, I have degree in accounting. “Just the facts”…

Posted by: leon | February 7, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am

Okay James
What exactly makes Hillary better than Edwards?
-35 years experience? Doing what?
- She’s up to her neck in corporate money, which is running out by the way.
- Less time in public office than Obama.
(Yes, he was a State Senator. See without a famous husband, you have to work your way up. Name someone else who has no public service record and no major private sector accomplishments and becomes a Senator.)
- She has no charisma.
- Half the country has an irrational hatred towards her.
- Other than being a woman, whats the hook? What makes her special?

Posted by: truth-2-power | February 7, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am

Obama was basically just elected to the senate he’s still relatively new. Why can’t he wait, he hasn’t even fufilled his promise to the people of Illinois, I’m sure he talked a good game in that election as well.

Posted by: Ryan | February 7, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am

Hillary supporters PLEASE name her accomplishments!!!
I can only think of 2
- Patriot Act
- Authorized Iraq War

Posted by: truth-2-power | February 7, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am

Hillary could possibly carry AR, VA, and FL.

Posted by: Ryan | February 7, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am

I have an idea, maybe Obama should be president of Kenya first and take care of their problems before taking on America’s problem. Frankly, I see Obama as nothing more than a motivational speaker like Deepak Chopra, Tim Tobbins, et. al. It’s big business here in the US, people telling you what you already know. A lot of people just wants to go on that Oprah couch for some much needed therapy.

Posted by: Felicia | February 7, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am

“Half the country has an irrational hatred towards her.”
Posted by: truth-2-power | Feb 7, 2008 1:19:20 AM
————————————–
Truth-2-power, I’m not so sure if (1) it’s hatred, really, or (2) if it IS hatred, that it’s all that irrational. It may be more of a visceral gut reaction (gag reflex) to her transparent superiority complex and cynical manipulation of the political system for purely personal gain, with any public good considered to be no more than a nice by-product, etc. The visceral animosity to Hillary Clinton extends to Bill Clinton, hence the two-headed monster “Billary” that we see on the campaign trail now, creating all kinds of drama and shenanigans that the American people would rather be without. There are so many REAL problems in this country that will go completely untouched with all of the inevitable drama, scandal, and constant defending of Billary against that “vast right-wing conspiracy, the Republican attack machine” (as Hillary constantly refers to the other HALF of Congress). No chance of healing for a torn country under Hillary, easily the most polarizing figure in modern politics.

Posted by: Rocky N. Roll | February 7, 2008, 1:31 am 1:31 am

• Extend period of unemployment assistance to victims of 9/11
• Pay for city projects in response to 9/11
• Assist landmine victims in other countries
• Assist family caregivers in accessing affordable respite care
• Designate part of the National Forest System in Puerto Rico as protected in the Wilderness Preservation System.
These are a few of Hillary’s accomplishments

Posted by: Ryan | February 7, 2008, 1:33 am 1:33 am

truth-2-power: A little education goes a long way. Just a sample of her accomplishments.
Hillary has been active in a number of organizations concerned with the welfare of children after law school —often worked for FREE and was the first female partner at Rose Law Firm in 1979 and was listed as one of the one hundred most influential lawyers in America in 1988 and 1991. Hillary advised the Children’s Defense Fund in Cambridge and joined the impeachment inquiry staff advising the Judiciary Committee of the House of Representatives.
President Jimmy Carter appointed her to the board of the Legal Services Corporation She chaired the Arkansas Educational Standards Committee, co-founded the Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families, and served on the boards of the Arkansas Children’s Hospital, Legal Services, and the Children’s Defense Fund.
Organizations:
Co-Founder, Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families
Board Member, Arkansas Children’s Hospital
Board Member, Children’s Defense Fund
Awards
-Humanitarian Award, Elie Wiesel Foundation
-Women Who Make A Difference Lifetime Achievement Award, Family Circle
-President’s Award, League of United Latin American Citizens
-International Women’s Philanthropy Award, Lion of Judah Conference of
Combined Jewish Philanthropies
-Distinguished Bridge Builder Award, Leon H. Sullivan Foundation
-Recognition, Military Order of the Purple Heart
-Distinguished Service Award, National Association of Elementary School Principals
-Bully Pulpit Award, National Council for Adoption
-Black Women of Courage Award, National Federation of Black Women Business Owners
-Martin Luther King Jr. Award, Progressive National Baptist Convention
- Secretary of Defense Medal for Outstanding Public Service
-Woman of Steel – Role Model of the Year, United Steel Workers of America
-Arkansas Woman of the Year-1983
-Arkansas Mother of the Year-1984
Hillary won many admirers for her staunch support for women around the world and her commitment to children’s issues.

Posted by: martha | February 7, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am

“Hillary could possibly carry AR, VA, and FL.”
Ryan
Arizona is McCain’s home state. Virginia is a Veteran strong-hold.
Florida will be too close to call.
Hillary can only win with a 50% +1 strategy.
That will lead to another 4 years of partisan warfare.
– Why would any young Republican congressman work with Hillary — whats the inscentive?
Its career suicide!

Posted by: truth-2-power | February 7, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am

Truth-2-power said, “Hillary supporters PLEASE name her accomplishments!!!
I can only think of 2
- Patriot Act
- Authorized Iraq War”
Truth, hopefully you’re joking to call either of these colossal legislative atrocities “accomplishments”. I assume you did this in jest. BTW, a third “accomplishment” springs forth to mind: Clinton’s WRONG vote giving Bush a blank check to go to war with Iran in Fall of 2007 (AGAINST which 19 bold Democrats, 2 bold Republicans, and 1 bold Independent voted) — five years after her WRONG vote giving Bush a blank check to go to war with Iraq in 2002 (OPPOSED by 21 bold Democrats, 1 bold Republican, and 1 bold Independent). Spineless, calculating Hillary Clinton voted for both and has never, ever even hinted that either disastrous and reckless votes was a mistake (her arrogance and “steadfastness” sounds like good old “Dubya”).

Posted by: Rocky N. Roll | February 7, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am

Let’s put things into perspective people. If you tally up all the people that have voted in this presidential election. Hillary is way, way…ahead.
That is why no one focuses on the real numbers.
Additionally whether the Obama people want to recognize it or not….Michigan and Florida ALSO broke records voting this year…with the huge majority voting for Hillary….even though neither of the candidates campaigned or placed ads…ooops sorry I forgot Obama did place ads in Florida.
Either way America has voted and the popular vote is on Hillary’s side and even after you add all the upcoming primaries…Hillary will still have the popular vote!

Posted by: ann | February 7, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am

I am amazed that these vocal Obama supporters have the audacity of bad-mouthing the Clinton presidency, the most successful democratic administration in recent history. It is one thing to like a candidate and promote him, it is another to do what the right-wing nuts have been doing for years. It is because of people like you that we got the last 7 years of Bush.

Posted by: John | February 7, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am

Rocky N. Roll
You used the right word to describe Hillary. SPINELESS
I’ve read the so-called accomplishments Hillary supporters posted, and one thing stands out….
When has she stood against popular opinion?????
“Inexperienced” Obama not only spoke out against the war when 89% of the nation was against him…
He also predicted exactly what would happen. (Warring sects, regional instability, quagmire)
Hillary voted for the war so she could look strong for her Presidential run, regardless of the massive loss of life.
Get Real People!!!

Posted by: truth-2-power | February 7, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am

truth-2-power: When Obama gets one forth of the accomplishments as Hillary, let us know. I suggest you investigate these awards and the organizations that presented these accomplishments to Hillary.

Posted by: martha | February 7, 2008, 2:03 am 2:03 am

It is a myth that Obama’s donations come from small donors. Less than 1/3 of his donors are the ones who donate $200. More than 1/3 are the ones who have maxed out — not exactly the little people. He also gets support from the rich and famous in the form of organizing fund-raisers to bring more of the rich contributors to donate. Obama is supported by the establishment, the big money donors, and the corporate media. Clinton is supported by people in the lower rungs of the economic ladder and she has managed to have more popular votes despite the one-sided media barrage that she has been subjected to and with much less financial resources.

Posted by: Catherine | February 7, 2008, 2:04 am 2:04 am

Talk about polarizing. Obama gets Ted Kennedy to endorse him, who gave that very polarizing speech as an endorsement. Ted Kennedy was/is the most polarizing member of the democratics party (remember when Carter beat him for the ’76 nominaation) and congress.

Posted by: Felicia | February 7, 2008, 2:04 am 2:04 am

The more I listen to Obama talk, the more he reminds me of some “rebel without a cause”, even worse “rebel without a clue”

Posted by: felicia | February 7, 2008, 2:08 am 2:08 am

Obama=David. Clinton=Golith. We have our work cut out for us, for sure, but we will prevail… we being the People, not the Establishment.

Posted by: Rocky N. Roll | February 7, 2008, 2:08 am 2:08 am

Ditto Utterly Amazed!

Posted by: Herstory | February 7, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am

Note: Spelling corrected to “Goliath”. Oops. Well, at least I caught it. lol :)

Posted by: Rocky N. Roll | February 7, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am

Whatever your politics, there is no question that Bill and Hillary Clinton are superbly smart and capable individuals. If they were in the private sector, they would have probably been billionaires by now. He has been a two-time US president, has written books, and has been a sought-after speaker, and must have had investments like most other professional people. For him and his wife to have a net worth of $10-50M is a surprise to you? Look at all other professional people who are of their caliber and see how much they are worth. For her to put almost half of their net worth into this campaign, speaks volumes of their courage and determination.

Posted by: maria | February 7, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am

Felicia
Kennedy v Carter
Actually that was 1980 and it’s relevant.

Posted by: truth-2-power | February 7, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am

Obama would make a great used car salesman. I would hire him in a hot atlanta minute. I would let him sell the “as is” specials only. Any man that can sell change to the people, with his background, has no conscience.

Posted by: sam | February 7, 2008, 2:24 am 2:24 am

Not that I was for Clinton, I’m Obama all the way, but to me, this reinforces everything. Why didn’t she have the forsite or at least a plan B? She knew how close the race was and should have at least laid out the possible results with her “people” and established what needed to be done for each. Unless it’s that she was just so arrogant to think there would be no other out come. That would be great for war strategy!
I don’t want a president who can’t even consider both out comes and how to be prepared to go forward, on her toes with strategic solutions. In other words, real planning that doesn’t involve making a loan to yourself.
So if she spends an entire budget on something as president, is she just going to slide some of her “own” in. A CEO does not run a business that way and neither should a presidential candidate. I understand that many people use their own money to run a campaign, Bloomberg for one. I’m talking about planning a head in the event of a negative outcome and having the kind of mind that’s open enough to never assume a slam dunk!
I think it says a lot when one of the candidates raised a large amount of money from the people of America with whatever they could afford. Obama knew he’d have to spend a ton as Clinton was the front runner. Seems he knows how to budget and expect the unexpectable. At the end of the day, Obama has a reserve and Clinton is now forced to be in debt to herself to survive.
Gee, I wonder who I want to be in charge????

Posted by: Sarah | February 7, 2008, 2:30 am 2:30 am

Whatever happened with a leader who can manage a budget?
A leader who is supposedly “Ready On Day One”, should not be executing a strategy that spends more than he/she has.
Common sense says that’s not a winning plan.
Since they’re not Governors, the only way we can truly determine how either Hillary or Barack would perform as the “CEO of the US Economy” is by how they manage and execute their individual campaigns and campaign-finances.
Basically, these are mini-$100M+ corporations.
Based upon what we’ve seen here, then one can predict how Hillary plans to manage and lead…
– Spend, Plan, Borrow, Spend, Borrow, Plan –
That’s like READY, FIRE, AIM, then ask someone for more bullets.
Regardless of the Iraq War Vote, or Universal Healthcare, or any other issue, that kind of fiscal management is not the type of experience that I want on the resume of the next President of the United States.
Someone who can’t even balance a budget.
IMHO, that’s a quick way to bankrupt a nation.
The common-man/woman does not spend more than they have in the bank or “spend the rent money before the rent is due”.
Period.
And before anyone starts talking about her being the “underdog” and forced to spend to “keep up” — Hillary had assembled over $100 MILLION in her campaign warchest before the NH Primary..
It’s not like somehow the remaining states after Super Tuesday just suddenly jumped onto the calendar.
That’s just poor planning.
Frankly, she’s getting out-campaigned and OUT-MANAGED.
It’s funny… the candidate who supposedly didn’t have enough experience has been able to assemble an impressive organization that has successfully competed with the incumbent nominee in every state in the nation… including concurrently during 22 states during Super Tuesday… and somehow found a way to leave “some in the tank” for upcoming events.
Again, whether or not you are for Hillary or Barack, I find that downright impressive.
Just something to think about…

Posted by: Tom | February 7, 2008, 2:34 am 2:34 am

The Clinton’s were almost broke when they left the White House, where did she get the five million? As board member of Wal Mart and other corporations that take advantage of the poor?
People please wake up! The Clintons think we are all stupid and that we will think that they care about us. Bill especially cares about wealth and power.

Posted by: dsano | February 7, 2008, 2:39 am 2:39 am

MARIA and JOSE -
Both Hillary and Barack have raised almost the same amount of money this primary season.
Over $120M, EACH.
One’s mismanaged that money, and thus is “running out”; the other has not.
Barack’s campaign is being financed by 100,000s of normal, everyday people, not special interest groups or lobbyists.

Posted by: Tom | February 7, 2008, 2:52 am 2:52 am

I can believe Obama as a used car salesman in the “lemon” lot. If you bought a “lemon” automobile from Obama, you would need Hillary, as she would be the mechanic that could fix the “lemon” automobile.

Posted by: miguel | February 7, 2008, 2:58 am 2:58 am

The right word to describe Hillary. SPINELESS
I’ve read the so-called accomplishments Hillary supporters posted, and one thing stands out….
When has she stood against popular opinion?????
“Inexperienced” Obama not only spoke out against the war when 89% of the nation was against him…
He also predicted exactly what would happen. (Warring sects, regional instability, quagmire)
Hillary voted for the war so she could look strong for her Presidential run, regardless of the massive loss of life.
Call a Spade a Spade!!

Posted by: truth-2-power | February 7, 2008, 3:01 am 3:01 am

antonio: would Obama make Kenya the 51st state. We could just move the troops from Irag to kenya…

Posted by: james | February 7, 2008, 3:04 am 3:04 am

Obama sounds like W in 2000. Remember that passionate conservatism? W talked of change, hope and also promised to work with people across the aisle. He is after all the most liberal in congress. For me, this is like a normal reaction. From one extreme (Bush far right) to another (Obama far left).

Posted by: felicia | February 7, 2008, 3:06 am 3:06 am

felicia
It was ‘compasionate conservatism’ and Bush promised and delivered change. lol
We had peace and prosperity and the people voted for change.
Hillary is incapable of leading the country, no Republican will work with her.
In other words, 4 more years of partisan warfare.

Posted by: truth-2-power | February 7, 2008, 3:12 am 3:12 am

We had change alright. Change for the worse. Economy is tanking, dollar is weak, gas prices are sky high, people are loosing their homes, republicans won’t even touch him with a 10-foot pole.
BTW, thanks for correcting me… ;)

Posted by: felicia | February 7, 2008, 3:20 am 3:20 am

for all the morons out there, the neo-conservatives (aka anti-Americans) also couldn’t work with Bill Clinton, yet, AS LEADER, he delivered on the promises he made when he was elected….last time I checked, a leader keeps his/her promises to the voters who gave them their job…..Senator Clinton will do the same, because she is the best qualified and best prepared candidate to get the job done. Period.

Posted by: chris | February 7, 2008, 3:23 am 3:23 am

Yeah, Hilary’s qualified and experienced to do the same old song and dance politics that has doomed us for the last few decades. I’m sure she’s hard working and will fight tooth and nail for what she believes in but I want a new way of doing politics in Washington. I want ethics reform, campaign finance reform, and a lot less corporate interest and lobbying. I doubt Hilary can deliver on those things because those are the things she used to get where she is.

Posted by: JT | February 7, 2008, 3:38 am 3:38 am

Some people are naive enough to consider the entire election is about Bush–every thing being the exact opposite of Bush will be linked to the word CHANGE. This is how we got Obama, whose CHANGE might be turning the entire country upside down-politically, culturally, and religiously. Are we really sure that is the CHANGE we want?

Posted by: Jerry Chui | February 7, 2008, 3:40 am 3:40 am

“How do we trust Obama, a beneficiafy of black racism to begin his political career with, with the job of being the leader of the western world. It is unimaginale.” Jerry Chui. ————— Just listen to one of his speeches. If you’re not moved, by it you’re not human. That’s how he got to where he is. If there’s a person who can inspire this country to make a comeback, it’s Obama.

Posted by: JT | February 7, 2008, 3:43 am 3:43 am

fact of the matter is that Senator Clinton has the best chance of any candidate to best serve the interests of our men and women in uniform….now, I don’t know about you, but I actually want what’s best for our soldiers, some of whom are good friends of ours…..

Posted by: chris | February 7, 2008, 3:47 am 3:47 am

that’s a great reason to choose the leader of the free world, because they are a great speaker (as opposed to having great ideas and has the ability to achieve those ideas)

Posted by: chris | February 7, 2008, 3:49 am 3:49 am

Talk is cheap, JT. We need substance. People who are greedy for money and power usually are good speakers, like Reagan, who managed to fool the entire nation into believing that he had done a lot, while he was the laziest president ever. Reagan and his wife had literately turned the WH into a circus Hollywood style, wth them being the clown and actors for 8 years. Many woman, children, and minority people are still suffering financially today because of Reagan.

Posted by: Jerry Chui | February 7, 2008, 3:50 am 3:50 am

I listened to one of his speeches. I felt like I was in an Amway meeting – or one of those pyramid schemes.

Posted by: felicia | February 7, 2008, 3:53 am 3:53 am

Exactly, felicia. We just can’t trust a rookie (If not worst) with the most important job in the free world just because he is a great SPEAKER.

Posted by: Jerry Chui | February 7, 2008, 4:01 am 4:01 am

Chris: You now assign military experience and genius to Hillary Clinton? What I want for our soldiers is that they come home in one piece. Now who is going to get us out of that quagmire of Iraq, with dignity and out of every other tinpot place they seem to be in? Yes, we need to protect ourselves but time to stop being the International Police Force and World Saviors. Some countries are just going to have to take destiny into their own hands!

Posted by: tcnz | February 7, 2008, 4:12 am 4:12 am

Listen to all the Obama haters. Your rationale is so Rovian. I always find it amusing that 7 years of legislative experience trumps 11 years and that proximity to the white house far outweighs community organizing. Wait…I get it ..you believe in monarchies and osmosis. What a fairytale that is.

Posted by: Coltrane | February 7, 2008, 4:18 am 4:18 am

Let’s see Hilary run a campaign without taking money from special interests. She barely has enough money taking money from them as it is. Another example of why Obama can inspire common Americans to help move this country in the right direction and why Hilary can’t.

Posted by: JT | February 7, 2008, 4:29 am 4:29 am

And another reason why words are powerful and political wheeling and dealing should be a thing of the past, if when want to give people their political voice back.

Posted by: JT | February 7, 2008, 4:32 am 4:32 am

Ann B – please read closer.
“Much of that money was earned through President Clinton’s speaking fees, book deals and other business ventures.”

Posted by: g77084 | February 7, 2008, 4:48 am 4:48 am

I wonder if Hillary CRIED when asked about her personal loan to her campaign……
*sniff*
*sniff*
You know…… I love my country so much, I had to use my own money… you realize of course…. I don’t want to be president for me… I don’t want my own air force one… I don’t want a helicopter landing on my lawn… I don’t want a presidential motorcade…. I don’t want to have to eat filet mignon and lobster every night in the white house on 200 year old china as a string quartet plays softly in the background…. I don’t want everyone in the world to kiss my feet and salute me as the world leader… all I want is to help the little people of america live their lives as comfortable as they can…
*sniff*
*sniff*
oh boo hooo hooo… booo hooo hooo… I feel so bad now… is my mascara running? Are you getting this on camera? Maybe a close up…… oh boo hooo hooo…. boo hoo hooo…

Posted by: Rubiconski | February 7, 2008, 5:37 am 5:37 am

I think this is a strategic move so that her campaign may get more supporters. I think its brilliant. Although I dont agree with all her views, experience counts. Obama just might be able to “speech” his way to the White House. I’m hearing from the news that he is drawing huge crowds. But I will definetly NOT vote for McCain. I think Hillary should be president. Thank you.

Posted by: Taxpayer | February 7, 2008, 5:38 am 5:38 am

Obama’s advantage is the Oprah factor….she has been raising money like crazy for Obama.
The majority of Hillary’s supporters are the working class….not the upper class that Obama attracts.
That is why the middle class and poor are for Hillary. Everytime they pay a credit card bill and see interest rates rising…..they think of Obama. After all it was his unwise decision to pick the credit card companies over the American credit card holders.

Posted by: ann | February 7, 2008, 5:42 am 5:42 am

I was bothered by Obama’s “present” votes in the state legislature but I just found out on the Iran resolution in the senate last year, he DID NOT vote. This guy never wants to take a position on anything. He should have voted NO but he just decided not to vote to cover himself no matter what happens. Now that is integrity and that is the kind of change we need!!!

Posted by: Allen | February 7, 2008, 6:04 am 6:04 am

Can someone explain why Obama is coming across as a “visionary” for saying he was against the war in Iraq from the beginning?
Considering the events that were going on in 2002, when those who were supposed to be in the know, including the majority of our respected leaders such as Collin Powell, stated that it was FACT that there were Chemical/Biological weapons in Irag, and strong evidence that Iraq was close to achieving Nuclear weapons, how can anyone justify not giving the President the authorization to force UN sanctioned inspectors back into Iraq, and providing the OPTION of military force if necessary.
Given the evidence available at the time of the vote in question, I question not only Obama’s judgement, but his courage to do what needs to be done to protect this country, if he still says that given the overwhelming evidence, he would have voted no.
Obama seems to have a good number of very intelligent people fooled into thinking that being a visionary, also made him clairvoyant back in 2002.
Remind people of this and I believe the $$’s that are flowing to Obama, will make an abrupt u-turn back into Hillary’s coffers.

Posted by: Tammy | February 7, 2008, 6:04 am 6:04 am

It’s sad to read so many racist and stupid comments from the so-called enlightened democrats. I was once a democrat, but became a Ron Paul supporter once I understood the issues. I am LMAO at the list of Hillary’s ‘accomplishments’, though in all fairness, she may have gotten legislation through to make flag burning illegal, which is an accomplishment on par with the other Constitutional restrictions she has imposed, like The Patriot Act.
If Hillary people would just admit their candidate is a Lobbyist Tool, and the only reason she ever had any influence was because of her husband, who will be the real president if she wins, then you could at least get props for honesty. Instead, you still try to paint her as this populist reformer, driven by her love of The Sixties Flower Power and the masses. This is based on the deep seated mental problem of denial you wallow in.
After the way the GOP has ripped off Ron Paul, I could vote for Obama or stay home, but I would definitely vote against Hillary for the Marc Rich Pardon alone.
Also,a comment like “I have an idea, maybe Obama should be president of Kenya first and take care of their problems before taking on America’s problem” ranks as the most inane thing I’ve ever read, and illustrates the vacuity of her sheeple, cult worshipping followers.

Posted by: jj | February 7, 2008, 6:21 am 6:21 am

I find this “surprise” announcement very suspicious. This is just a tactical move to make her seem like the underdog, get more donations and get more sympathy votes; we all know she is an expert at that. It is an excuse she can use for her probable defeat in upcoming primaries and caucuses.

Posted by: Nada | February 7, 2008, 6:27 am 6:27 am

Strapped for cash? All Hillary has to do is shed a few more tears and have Bill play the race card, again. Then, turn on the smoke machine and blow some more in the face of Hispanic voters!

Posted by: Allan J Krueger | February 7, 2008, 6:34 am 6:34 am

Hillary clearly has the support of lower income people. These are the people that this election is about! How sad that just because they don’t have the financial means to send in a check that the press and Obama camp think she has a problem. Now somehow we are to expect that AFTER the election Obama will support this same economic class. Keep hoping for “change”.

Posted by: UBS | February 7, 2008, 6:42 am 6:42 am

With all the money Hillary has, why won’t they pay their workers? Lower income folks like me are tired of rich people stiffing us. Send some of that Bo-Rhat money this way Hillary. We all know that Khazakhastani gave you 30 million for your Clinton Library, and yet you expect people to work for free. Spread the wealth, girlfriend, you’ll get it all back once you run the trough again.

Posted by: duane | February 7, 2008, 7:00 am 7:00 am

To me, one of two things has happened. The Clintons have lost support from Corporate America because the insurance policy they had in place in case a republican wouldn’t get elected doesn’t look so sure, in fact, it looks downright shaky. Or, they have pulled the plug on the sinking Clinton ship because they have much graver concerns right now, like keeping Wall Street and the economy afloat. If and when they manage to succeed in getting the big ship back on course, I’m sure money will start pouring into the candidate who most represents their agenda, come November.
Hillary’s last ditch effort to appeal to Hallmark’s viewers was another effort to appeal to basically the politically non-informed. Those who like night-time dramas and day time soaps with the hope and desperation of getting some support.

Posted by: alias | February 7, 2008, 7:01 am 7:01 am

Would the Clintons want me to donate $25 to Hillary’s campaign and then later my donation (along with thousands of others) would be given to Hillary as a repayment of her loan? She is worth millions even if she never was repayed this loan! Should her staff work free in February when she has a personal fortune worth millions? It sounds crazy and greedy to me! I fear the Clinton’s lust for money and power!

Posted by: Ben | February 7, 2008, 7:33 am 7:33 am

So she’s lending her campaign money- big deal- look at Romney! But Hillary has bigger problems than that, I’m afraid. Obama gets stronger each day. What worries me is that they might team up on the same ticket. I just can’t vote for HIllary, and won’t.

Posted by: Richard | February 7, 2008, 7:36 am 7:36 am

Voting present means, there are legal issues that are not clear and that they should be revised! By the way, if the Clintons can not run their financial campaign properly, how are they going to manage to run this country!!????

Posted by: carmen | February 7, 2008, 7:37 am 7:37 am

This is one low income person who does not support Hillary! How could I support someone who is worth millions and does not pay her staff so that she can save money! I have had enough of bosses who pay low wages or expect free hours of labor so that they can ‘save money’ and protect or increase their own fortune!

Posted by: Jeff | February 7, 2008, 7:42 am 7:42 am

Great! 3 million down and only 2 million to go! And then the campaign can repay Hillary the 5 million she loaned them. I hope all those ‘new donors’ don’t catch a glimpse of Hillary and Bill at the bank addding the 5 million back to their bank accounts of 30+ million!!!

Posted by: Brint | February 7, 2008, 7:50 am 7:50 am

Unfortunately, like it or not, it takes money to run an effective campaign. Hillary has to be able to counter his TV ads with her own. She has to be able to travel around the country meeting people and letting them know that she has what it takes to get this country back on track or one day we’re going to wake up and find ourselves behind the rest of the world. Obama is getting funded by the likes of Oprah and Dinero….please! I’ll be making a campaign contribution.

Posted by: Ricki | February 7, 2008, 7:52 am 7:52 am

President Barack Obama? You’ll be the laughing stock of the WORLD! Talk about enhancing the US image!

Posted by: nalasbang | February 7, 2008, 7:56 am 7:56 am

Ricki,
Hillary does not need your money! Give it to someone who needs it much more! She and Bill could use their personal fortune to finance the next months of her campaign. Don’t worry about them. They will easily replace the millions they have with new money from special interests and foreign governments in the years ahead.

Posted by: Edman | February 7, 2008, 7:59 am 7:59 am

Sure sign of a campaign in serious trouble. Next we will hear of staff layoffs and office closures. It is just a matter of time. The end will finally come to the Clinton era.

Posted by: Bob, DC | February 7, 2008, 8:01 am 8:01 am

Yet another calculated play on the American voter by the Clinton political machine?

Posted by: LongT | February 7, 2008, 8:04 am 8:04 am

The world is rooting for Barack Obama. There have been several polls published recently in Europe that show a preference for Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton.

Posted by: Bob, DC | February 7, 2008, 8:06 am 8:06 am

Does Bill Clinton ahve any comments on this? Haven’t heard from him lately.

Posted by: LongT | February 7, 2008, 8:06 am 8:06 am

She calls it a “loan” because legally it is made with the expectation of repayment. That’s why she came right out with it so there would be no question concerning it later. The question is who does she expect to pay her back?

Posted by: LongT | February 7, 2008, 8:09 am 8:09 am

Aword to you Hillary supporters; a fool an his money are soon parted.

Posted by: LongT | February 7, 2008, 8:15 am 8:15 am

To “utterly amazed” who is calling Jake sexist for not voting for Clinton–
Let’s get beyond gender and race shall we? How about a little analysis about policies and what’s best for our country?
I’m voting for Obama because I think he has the best chance of winning– and because I find him to have a more positive “vision” than Clinton. Neither are are progressive as I would like. I appreciate that Clinton wants to get in there are fight — but I think that approach, that strategy is very Bush-like– it’s time for a new approach. I love that Obama is turning out young people and marginalized voters. We need everybody to beat McCain!

Posted by: melissa | February 7, 2008, 8:16 am 8:16 am

My Money, so it can’t come from Bill’s speaking engagements. He is limited to the $2300 like all of us.
I smell scandal in the air….

Posted by: Lawrence | February 7, 2008, 8:22 am 8:22 am

People say Obama was so great when he spoke out against the war and won the election to become U.S. Senator.. Helloo, he was voting against Alan Keyes, who might as well be a black George Wallace!

Posted by: donn | February 7, 2008, 8:27 am 8:27 am

Obama is turning out Republican voters who are using their primary vote to cancel out Clinton. They will vote Republican in the general election. Even Obama’s wife has said that she’s not sure she can support Hillary if Obama fizzles. Oh yes, the Obama couple REALLY SUPPORT THEIR PARTY! IT’S MORE LIKE THEY ARE IN THIS FOR POWER AND FOR THEMSELVES. TAKE A CLOSER LOOK AT THE OBAMA COUPLE!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Michael | February 7, 2008, 8:27 am 8:27 am

Maybe if Hillary stopped spending so much money on false robo calls, false emails, and false flyers to every independent and democratic voter just days before the primary she would have money left. Hillary has run her campaign in the gutter and is trying to take the American people with her. The Obama supporters are contributing to his campaign as an investment in their future and the future of their children and grandchildren. Don’t be fooled ny the Clintons. They are trying to steal the United States from the American people.

Posted by: Janet | February 7, 2008, 8:31 am 8:31 am

Any moment now, we will hear of the Clinton’s Chinese connections coming to the rescue.
Talk about “outsourcing.” The Clinton’s are best at doing what they accuse others of doing.

Posted by: derf | February 7, 2008, 8:46 am 8:46 am

Im a 26 yr old female, working 40-50 hrs a week and barely scraping by. How exactly is Hillary going to help me in the next four years better my life? Oh wait…she won’t! My generation is the generation that Candidates forget. They say they want young voters, but never do they speak to the young voter. Obama does. When he speaks,it seems there is true sincerity in wanting the young people of America to stand up and be a huge part of making this country do a complete turn-around. He speaks with passsion, hope etc. Hillary makes me afraid. She makes me feel as tho if she were elected President, the middle class and poor will continue to be exactly that, with no hope of getting better. I dont want repeat performances in office. We had 2 Bush’s already, I dont think we need another Clinton. I feel that the lack of experiance Obama has is actually a huge factor for me. Hillary owes major companies many favors and that’s just from when her hubby was in office. Obama owes nobody anything. I truely feel he will bring new life to our government, bring the American people closer together, and most importantly, with him in office, it will make me and alot of other people feel as tho, he is a President FOR the people, rather than Hillary who is President FOR herself.

Posted by: Michelle | February 7, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am

Well if all her aides quit she can always break out the flying monkeys to do her bidding.

Posted by: ScubaGuy | February 7, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am

Obama has not expanded his support much beyond African-Americans and upscale, educated whites this has been confirmed on exit polls. He does best on caucuses..where liberals are. For the month of January Obama raised $32M but it wasn’t enough for him to win the big states! So who is giving him the money? Rezko?

Posted by: merryweather | February 7, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am

Michelle: Are you so young that you don’t realize that Obama most likely owes A TON OF PEOPLE. He is as sly and corrupt as they come. His message is inspirational. If he did not have the ability to ispire, he couldn’t get your vote or your money. He will do less to help you than an candidate running.

Posted by: Michael | February 7, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am

To Antonio….Um get your facts straight.Obama is American!! NOt foreign. You can not run for President if you are not a US Born citizen!!!!! (Reason why Arnold Schwarzenegger isn’t running!) Yes his father is Kenyan, but what does that have to do with being able to properly run the US? I dont care if a candidate has 3 eyes and is green. If that candidate has what it takes to ge tthe country back to right…they get my vote. Im not going to vote for Hillary due to her being a woman, just to have a woman President. Im not voting for Obabma due to the fact he’s black. Im voting for Obama because he gives me hope of a better future for myself and my family. Obama get’s me passionate about the issues with our country. Hillary scares the daylights outta me! She’s for Corporate America.

Posted by: Michelle | February 7, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am

Sorry,this does not fly. The
Clintons are loaded as are their
friends. These folks have
everyday living costs such as
mortgage payments, food, car
payments, etc. Almost all live
payday to payday. Something is
not right here.

Posted by: Beto | February 7, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am

Micheal: Ummm…I would rather have Obama in office who obviously has his ducks in a row finacially,then a woman who very clearly, has no clue what amount of money her campaigns brings in and what it spits out. So I should vote for her…why because she is horrible with money? Great, so I can look foward to being broker then I currently am. WONDERFUL!

Posted by: Michelle | February 7, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am

If Obama wins the Democratic nomination, may God have mercy on us. I pray that Mayor Bloomberg and Sam Nunn get into the election. I trust Bloomberg to bring the country out of impending recession and Sam Nunn to take care of our military. Majority of Americans (conservatives and moderates) will vote for Bloomberg and Sam Nunn

Posted by: Ben | February 7, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am

So what. Bo can’t buy the election; it must be won. And, he mouths the same nonsense time after time. Now, we are bombarded by this nonsense on TV. I know, I know, you say, “Well, turn off the TV.” I have turned the TV off and reading more. Works for me.

Posted by: benvictor | February 7, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am

An Obama candidacy will certainly provide the Republican Party and John McCain with all of the ammo which they’ll need to secure the White House again. While CNN and the rest of the US press have kept a lid on the Obama-Rezko releationship, the foreign press has not. “Rezkogate” is a certainty and the Democatric Party AND the press are going to look awfully ignorant in the eyes of the world when Obama’s “boneheaded” judgment and his relationship with this shady figure and his Syrian underworld cohort is plastered all over the fron pages of our newspapers. It’s coming as sure as nightfall.

Posted by: TexasDems | February 7, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am

This is looking serious and will probably get more serious. The next several states look favorable to Obama. It is very possible that Hillary will not win another state until March 4. By then it could be 26 states for Obama to Hillary’s 10. How can she get donors to donate with those kinds of numbers? Things do not look good in Clintonia this morning.

Posted by: Bob, DC | February 7, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

I see the anti-Obama forces have been busy last night.
The thing about Clinton that may eventually tip this tie in Obama’s favor is that her campaign always seems to have some drama going.
Will Bill go off script or won’t he? What’s the campaign message this week? What’s the candidate’s persona this week? Will this be a negative, “fun part” week or an above-the-fray week? Are they behind the dirty tricks against Obama or is it the Republicans?
Its been like that for a year now. The cleavage confrontation. The DoD confrontation. The media confrontation. Are surrogates saying pre-planned coordinated stuff, or just talking off the cuff?
And now the latest fundraising appeal, based on how underdog Hillary – aka inevitable Hillary with the early handicap in terms of super delegates – now has to fight uphill against a well-funded opponent.
Does drama fatigue begin to become an issue?

Posted by: Paul | February 7, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am

I saw a picture of Hillary, Bill, and that Rezko feller everyone is talking about, and I have it very good authority that Bill and Hillary only pose with people who give them money, thousands and thousands for a single photo. If Rezko is as bad as they make out, what the heck was Hillay doing posing with him and taking money from him? Also, Hillary has posed with many convicted felons, including a crack kingpin.

Posted by: alex | February 7, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

TexasDems – McCain is popular with independents. Independents decide elections. The obvious best move for the Democrats is to also nominate a candidate who also is favored by independents.

Posted by: Paul | February 7, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

I worry that Hillary is agian playing the sympathy card. Which appears to have worked incredibly well in New Hampshire. As well connected as the Clinton’s are, it is hard to believe the money has run out. Clearly Hilary loaned her campaign the money… ie. she plans to get it back. Do you actually have to report what you made or can you delay the recording until next month? It feels well planned out -publicly announcing the she didn’t raise much money, her staffer aren’t getting paid right now, and could we please have debates becuase I don’t have enough money. She has been the underdog even when she had a 20% lead in the country. I don’t get it. How can we know if this is real?

Posted by: DDK-NM | February 7, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am

My heart bleeds for people not getting paid to help put someone into office. The rank and file campaign workers do it all the time out of personal belief that the person should be elected. If Clinton needs people 24/7 they should be her personal staff and paid for out of her personal deep pockets.

Posted by: Publius | February 7, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am

Thank you Paul. I am glad to see you questioning the truthfulness of the need for Ms. Hilary to loan her campaign money from her own pocket. This is just a scam to make her appear to be the underdog and the underfinanced “damsel in distress”. It is designed to get the unthinking to react, “o mi gawd, Hilary needs money! I have to save her historic candidacy by sending her money!” It is a sad commentary on the level of intelligence of the average American that she gets away with this time and time again. It is also a sad commentary that so many women are willing to vote for her only because she is a woman. Please, Senator Obama, spare us from having to live with this woman for the next four years!!!!!!

Posted by: catfan | February 7, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am

I do not know what you all guys are smoking but it has already become a racist election. Dems have won so far because of African American votes, whom they deprived of decent life and unions who destroyed themselves. Hillary can not win because of morality issue haunting the clintons.
By the way, Clintons have not done anything for anybody except for themselves. The tech industry, Y2K, and internet made this country look good in the Clinton era. We were all spending money due to Y2k. Just remember what happened to NASDAQ stocks when our so called internet inventor & their greedy friends exposed themselves and took investors for a ride. Don’t believe what the media says. No body is going to do anything for you. They are all bunch of crooks. They are just spending your time & money.
To me it is just great entertainment, I am not going to give a red cent to these crooks. So enjoy but becareful and save your money. It will be very useful one day.

Posted by: JP | February 7, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

I wish campaigning in America didn’t cost so much, no wonder the media likes to stir the pot and keep us at each others throat, all the more revenue, but as an Obama supporter, this is good news to me. Now if only McCain staffers would have to go without pay . . .

Posted by: Sara B. | February 7, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

i really think that clinton should win the election because shes a really nice lady and i bet she will be a great president like her husband,i believe if she really wins she is really going to inspire me.
sincerely,
stephanie l
i hope you win clinton

Posted by: stephanie | February 7, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

Posted by: Get America Back On Track
“”I want to know if ALL of the donations of the Rezko guy to the Obama campaign were given back”"……
Oh it’s all been given back alright and guess who else gave some back recently? HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON! Haven’t heard about that? We get yourself on over to CNN before you put your foot in you mouth any further. The money was given back JUST LAST MONTH!
When you leave, go to Newsweek. They have a story of possible mis-conduct involving Bill and campaign contributor. Don’t forget to read the part about a business deal worth 100 million that they are rambling about.
Different day, same sh–.
Investigations from Day 1….

Posted by: Annabel | February 7, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

Ok so this is a loan, got it, understand. My question is: just how much of her OWN money is she willing to GIVE the campaign? After all, she is the one seeking office, is she not? You mean she can’t invest in her future? She can’t invest in this great historical moment?
If it were me and I had the money, I’d give especially given the circumstances…

Posted by: Joanna | February 7, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am

What interest rate will Hillary CLINTON pay her self back for $5 Million dollar loan? Does that $5 Million dollar loan get repaid by those who DONATE to Hillary? Shouldn’t Hillary DONATE that money as she has requested others to DONATE to her? And, is the interest rate being paid back to her for the loan she gave herself, coming out of the supporters pockets? How is that FAIR to the MIDDLE CLASS?

Posted by: Debulium | February 7, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

And what happens when the on-going fraud court case against the Clintons comes out later this month?

Posted by: helen | February 7, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

To: Kris in PA,
You are correct, Obama is no JKF.
However, you neglect the fact that,
Hillary Clinton is no Bill Clinton.

Posted by: Checkmate(Margie) | February 7, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Not only did Hillary vote for Iraq, she also voted to for Iran. When her husband signed NAFTA and outsourced the jobs to other countries, she stood by her man.
Her husband ran as The Man From Hope-meaningless platitude, but now Obama is mocked for being Hopeful. Horse face Hillary is The Hopeless Candidate. Take that tired nag to the glue factory.
Once in a while, one of Obama’s people (i’m not one) says something remotely witty or intelligent, but I swear, Hillary people are like drones around a Queen Bee. You just recite lies and feel good phrases.

Posted by: jj | February 7, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

“Super Tuesday Victory Generates More than $4 Million Online in Single Day”
Guess someone needs to point out that 1) Obama won more states and delegates on Tuesday, and 2) the voting results didn’t contribute to this fundraising total nearly as much as a direct plea via the argument that the campaign was financially strapped.

Posted by: Paul | February 7, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

TexasDems,
Don’t even kid yourself sir/ma’am, they will work to defeat the both of them. It is an understatement to say they hate or loathe Hillary & Bill. The simple fact of the matter is, eventhough they don’t want McCain, they want her even less.
My vote next month in the great city of Colleyville is going to Obama. Hillary is more of the same and more investigations. I can almost guarantee before the campaign season is out, they will be talking about some NEW investigation involving these people.
I don’t know about the rest of you, but I am done with the Right Wing consipracy talk. I’m done having them blame others to cover up their actions; thereby avoid taking responsibility. Thus, I’m done with them not accepting responsibility for what they do. I’m sick of them trying to reflect negative attention on people to cover their tracks. I’m sick of the hate and disgust they elict.
I am just sick of it all. I have no doubt she will win the nomination but that does not mean she will still get my vote. Hillary and McCain are one in the same, so I may as well vote for a true conservative Republican. Besides, if experience is the argument, he has more than she does! 35 years of what exactly? Please.
Good Day,
Mary Ann

Posted by: Mary Ann J. | February 7, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Hmmm, not sure Clinton is the candidate to beat McCain.
The Republicans are on the verge of doing the unthinkable – nominating a candidate independents like.
The Democrats better do the same, because independents will decide this like all national elections.

Posted by: Paul | February 7, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

I want the Democratic Dream-Team:
Clinton/Obama ’08
If Hillary is the nominee, this ticket is possible.
HILLARY is not only a woman,
SHE is THE WOMAN !!

Posted by: I want to win | February 7, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

Hillary was so worry that she was losing in New Hampshire she made up that fake cry. Not did she cry once she went and try it again, sorry it want wok this time. If she handle the pressure now how can she stand up too the plate and be the next President not so.

Posted by: Caral | February 8, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

I don’t want a President who can’t even manage the campaign budget. – This is really BAD. Forget it, I’m over Hillary. This looses all my credibility for her to run our national economy.

Posted by: Laura | February 9, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am

If Sen. Clinton is letting her campaign staff go without pay, is she also letting them go without health insurance? Does anybody know?

Posted by: David P. | February 10, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.