Clinton Surrogate Hits Oprah

I can’t believe Hillary is so unoriginal that she stole Obama’s campaign slogan…how shameful!
Obama 08!
The “Real” Jordan Clinton

Be critical all you want Hillary you and your staff now figure you can go negative all the way to the White House.
Barack Obama as the son of an immigrant father who left his family when he was two years old has overcome incredible odds. He is a man of obvious intellect and integrity. A fresh breeze to do away with the sixteen years of stank in the White House we have suffered through. Yes the Clinton years were better than the Bush ones but should we be proud of Bill? He left and the democrats lost the House of Representatives, the Senate and of course the White House. Not so great a legacy verdad?
Vote for Obama and our country will be viewed with respect again around the world and we will use our treasure for good like education, health care, and Americas infrastructure.
We are spilling blood daily and spending our hard owned cash in massive amounts for a war that should never have been fought. I am a Cuban American U.S. Army Vietnam veteran, my grandfather fought in WW1 and my son fought in Iraq. Barack Obama has it right that our enemies were right were we needed them in Afghanistan and we let them get away and now they are getting stronger regardless of what George W. And his surge b.s. tell you. Guns vs butter plain and simple. We need to vote for change before we are totally broke both financially and morally.
From a mixed racial background to President of the Harvard law review, to community organizer, to U.S. Senator, to President of the United States. This story is the American Dream in real life. Latinos vote for someone of mixed race born to a teen mother who took this start and made all of us immigrant children proud. SI SE PUEDE CON BARACK OBAMA SI SE PUEDE!! YES WE CAN INDEED!!
These are my opinions and I am sticking to them!
RAUL DEJESUS PEDRAZA A Latino who got on the bandwagon way early.

…. She then began chanting, “Yes, we will,” to the crowd? Come on!! Obama does not chant “Yes We Can” to the crowds– the people spontaneously break out in that and he has to wait for them to stop to continue.
Good grief, Hillary! Could you be any more clueless???

This is a contest for your votes Mr. Jordan Clinton, what’s wrong with YES , WE WILL….. Is that out of limits ….What about Yes we should…..or Yes we could…. or better….Yes we better had….or the real clincher…..YES WE MUST….elect the best candidate for President.
P.S. Obama wins the award for the best showman on the campaign trail.but….
The award for the best person with the most publicised and credible solutions for US today is Hillary, no doubt.

It’s funny how people who follow Obama are being labelled “cult followers”. It’s almost like Clintonistas have nothing left but bitterness and slander to drive them. Oh wait. That is all that’s left in the tank.

Do you make fun of the supervisor, or the woman, within your employ, that’s above you.
I am referring to the men feel when they may sense a woman might be the Commander in Chief, or Head of their department.

Tim Burton and Micheal Plouffe are the biggest mind game players I have ever seen . They will surely win the ‘Joseph Gobbells’ award for national propoganda.
Can you imagine it being 2008, and the american public can be HYPED into voting a forrest gump with 2 years of national experience as a junior senator in being PRESIDENT of the most dangerous country in the world?

There are two Jordan Clinton’s? Well I agree with the one on another site. Not the one who claims to be; The “real” Jordan Clinton. I mean not at allllll.

I cannot believe that the Clinton’s can’t say a single thing about Obama but the media and everyone else slams Hillary for every imagined thing she may have said that goes for Bill also. You people need to look and see what is going on here. The media wants Obama to win do bad that they have thrown ethics out the window. Doesn’t anyone else wonder about this?

Check your facts Obama was willing to agree to only accept public campaign funds if others would do the same. No one did not even McCain. Dont distort the facts…Obama08

I’m for Hillary all the way. If Obama takes the nomination, I won’t vote for him. He’s an up and coming crook. His people are trying to strong arm superdelgs and that is not a sign of an honest man.

All you Obama’s. Most of you weren’t around when Jimmie Carter was elected and did s horrible job..Watch out for whom you vote for. Obama will be worse than Jimmie Carter was– Oprah is a show person and not qualified to vouch for Obama-Oh I forgot- All you need is MONEY and Oprah has plenty of it and publiclly stated she would finance Obama Look out voters,NC will be the DC
of the US

Funny, Oprah is a billionaire, while Hillary spent $120 Million & ran out of money.
I know which one I’d trust to manager anything I own & her company starts with an H(arpo), but not her name.

can’t obama and his speech writer’s be more original-yes we can=si se puede which was originally ceasar chavez and the united farm workers union slogan.

“It comes down to choice. Under HRC you have to have health insurance or you can have your wages garnished. Under Obama, you can keep the plan you have, enroll in the govt plan or choose not to have coverage. If you choose no coverage and then need it, you can enroll in the govt plan.”
Well then Obama’s plan sounds better. I’ll play the “take a chance” game. I can quit paying $500 insurance premiums a month and just wait for one of my family members to get sick or in an accident and then sign up. It sounds like the perfect plan for me. Will save me hundreds. Of couse, it will cost the tax payers millions becuase they will have to pay for my hospital/doctor fees because I initially will have no insurance. Isn’t that how things work now???? Where’s the CHANGE????

“Obama’s (economic) plan. is the most shameless piece of potential plagiarism that I have ever seen. He basically took Clinton’s words and Clinton’s policies and called them his own. If I were a professor I’d give him an F and try to get him kicked out of school,” said Kevin Hassett, Sen. John McCain’s economic advisor and the Director of Economic Policy Studies at the American Enterprise Institute.

tHINK ABOUT THIS IF OBAMA IS SO SMART HOW COME HE CAN NOT EVEN VOTE WITH OUT HITTING THE WRONG BUTTON??? wHAT IF HE HITS THE WRONG BUTTON WHEN HE IS IN THE WHITE HOUSE (WHICH I HEARD HE WANTS TO CHANGE TO THE HOUSE OF COLOR) If he hits the wrong button there he might start a nuclear war. We cannot afford his ignorance and inexperience. He wants the farmers in this country to solve their own problems with gas prices by inventing other means of energy. How novel is that Hillary has plans for the american farmer which will actuzlly help farming today to keep american food source flowing and affordable.

Sure, Jacko, Obama gives good speeches. That’s what candidates are supposed to do. And of course Clinton is criticizing Obama for giving speeches during her own… speeches.
I really am hoping the Clinton camp, since it doesn’t seem to want to drop out and unify the party, will at least prep Obama for the general election better.
Attacks along the lines of being “afraid” to debate for a 21st time and giving campaign speeches aren’t going to do it, I don’t think.

2009 Where Are You – You really see a turning of the tide?
Obama picked up two important labor unions, and the backing of the governor in San Juan. He also picked up a couple super delegates from Clinton, plus a few previously uncommitted ones.
Meanwhile, its becomming increasingly clear the national party leadership is suggesting to Clinton its time to drop.
Clinton still has a shot, but basically she would need to overcome Obama’s pledged delegate lead. There’s 17 contests left and a deficit somewhere above 130 delegates.
Even if she wins Texas and Ohio by projected amounts, that will only net her about 30 delegates or so. Let’s say 40. And let’s give her another 15 for Pennsylvania and say she gets a couple more in Wisconsin. That still leaves a deficit of well over 70 delegates to make up in 13 smaller states – some of which ought to be very good for Obama.
And this seems to be best case. After Wisconsin and Hawaii, Obama will have a couple weeks to further their organizations in Ohio and Texas. When they’ve had time, they’ve been effective. They might be able to really mitigate the net delegates Clinton can win.
Party leaders are looking at this and thinking its over. At least that’s my guess. I think what they were hoping to avoid is Clinton coming to the same realization after winning Ohio and Texas, but not by enough. That might be awkward for her supporters to accept – the candidate dropping after two big wins. Anyway, like I said, that’s my guess.

Democrats must unite!
All this division is playing into the hands of Karl Rove…no, he didn’t resign from the White House to write books. He slithered back into private life to do what he did for GW. WIN THE WHITE HOUSE. If he could win it for GW, all the easier for McCain. First, you divide the Democrats. Second, get them to nominate the weakest for the slaughter. Please, don’t let this happen. The Republicans want Obama to win. The Rove machine will have the time of its life defining Obama their way. Obama will go into defensive mode and will never get his message out (if he has one). Talk of change WILL NOT get him elected in November! If we unite as a Democratic Party and work together, we could control the White House for the next 16 years. Hillary Clinton – President, Barack Obama – Vice President, John Edwards – Attorney General (even better Supreme Court Judge), Bill Richardson – Secretary of State or Ambassador at large (we need someone to clean up this mess in the Middle East that’s been created by the White House Neocon’s). In eight years Barack will have the experience to be President.
We stand at the crossroads…will we look to the future of America and the future of our party, or do we play into the hands of the Rove machine. You better believe it’s cranking in the background and when it starts spewing forth all its disinformation, half truths, and outright lies we better have the strongest candidate to face it head on. That person is Hillary Clinton.

yeah, I have that disease too, sorry :)
I think you are right about momentum. I think you are right Cat Scratch about Tyson and Monsanto.
I also think I am right, when you look at the absolutely, equally dishonest misrepresentations and out and out fabrications concerning PAC, Present votes, Oops votes, Exelon Nuclear Bills, UoC Hospital corruption, greed, and mistreatment and billing of AA patients vs whites. I think I have a point when I say that the Ethics Bill was not hard to pass, because it wasn’t, and that he didn’t sponsor, introduce, edit, co-sponsor or adjust that bill, cause he didn’t. He makes cracks about old association with Wal-Mart and his wife has a much newer association with Wal-Mart. It is this arrogance that is just so tough to take. He is pure as the driven snow – on the side of the Belt Parkway. At least fact check SOMETHING. PLEASE.
I know Hill is a mess. I know. I know. I have been listening to all these folks talk about forgetting the past because its all about the future. But their only defense of Obama is by heading straight to the past, so they don’t have to face today or tomorrow. McCain and the Republicans are going to turn a lot of minds against Obama, because they don’t give a DAMN about running negative ads. It got Regan, Bush, and Babbling Bush elected easily. That is 20 years of Bush based on negative, EFFECTIVE ads. And all the Messianic praise in the world is not going to prevent some of the ugliest hateful ads on Planet Earth from dumping down from the sky. No, you won’t believe the ads, but a lot of back water folks, with their deep seeded distrust of AA, they will believe it. And they make HUGE numbers. You think Obama is going to win Utah, Idaho, ND, Colorado, Montana, Alaska, based on a DEMOCRATIC contest? I mean you have to be amaturish at best to think this. No way he is going to win them, nor is Hillzilla. Never ever. And he is not going to OK, nor Arkansas, or Kansas, or Nebraksa or South Dakota. You have GOT to wake up to HISTORY. The past tells you something.
You keep using it as a weapon. Well I hate to tell you this but it is going to come back and destroy this man in November. And all the hate that you guys are pushing against other Democrats, implying they are stupid, old, blind . . . makes those of us who have now been fighting back so hard and so ugly NEVER want to support your candidate.
And when we find facts. You talk the past. When we find truth, you bring up old lies. When we find connections and filth, you dig up old treaties and conferneces. But you won’t face your own dirt.
In November, the Republicans are going to make you face your own dirt, whether you like it or not. Hill has already HAD all the dirt thrown in her face. 16 years they have tossed and tossed and shoveled it on. But it didn’t work. Hillzilla is still tramping down those power lines. Hillzilla is still swiping those aircraft out of the skies. And they know this. They can’t think of what else to do to destroy her. They have tried it all. So what they have done is found another Uniter Not A Divider to again divide us and conquer. And you are buying to fork, plate, and table. Even if we sided with Obama, he doesn’t have enough votes to win. You will see this too late. But you will see it.

PS Cat Scratch – I like your name!
Sounds VERY educated and classy and I mean that (signed name too). I always wonder how people get their clever nicknames. Mine is just a desperation for it to be over, one way or the other. And face defeat, one way or another. Just like you said, you cannot vote for THAT person. I feel I cannot vote for THIS person either. I have been trying to steer clear of Obama.com and Hillary.com. Huff post is just like Obama.com. The Facts.com is just like HC.com.
Here is a point that can’t be denied, and you must ask yourself the question WHY?
My wife and I found an LA TIMES story, with dates, votes, excuses, whatever. It was not vulgar. It was not too long. It was not dishonest. It was not hostile. It was just true. And we posted it for a night and then into the morning. Our comments BETWEEN the posts were there. But the story was removed, 28 times, by this news agency. 28 times. And then we began to piece it up. Paragraph or two at a time, in between other peoples posts, and our new, commentary posts. EACH AND EVERY PARAGRAPH that had the story in it was selectively and deliberately removed. Then the we tried the link, to let OTHERS draw their OWN conclusions upon reading it. It was removed each and every time.
There is a deliberate desperate need to block articles with dates and votes and facts, when they are not pretty toward Obama. Can someone explain, despite their affiliations, why this is a good thing?

No one knows everything. Oprah and media should continue focus working their TV show and leave Hillary Clinton alone. For sure, when making a critical decision Senator Clinton will be better than the young and in-experience Senator Obama who only has 3 years experience in the public work A good talker does not implies a good leader. America is in big trouble now, don’t expect anyone can solve this mess overnight.

2009 Where Are You, I agree completely that Obama is no messiah and that he is flawed. I don’t think his supporters are entirely deluded to this fact (well, maybe a few are, but let’s not generalize and drag us thinking supporters down with the blind kool-aid drinkers, shall we?). Like you, I am aware of my candidate’s failings. But I have compared his character, campaign, strengths and history with that of HRC, and have chosen to support him, because I do believe he will be the better president of the two, just as I’m sure you feel that way about Hilary.
I am simply re-posting that open letter about Hilary because I feel that it’s something important about a woman who so strongly claims she’s all about health care and the working class people. If a Clinton supporters posted something truthful about Obama along those lines (none of that non-substantial sex and drugs in limo crap that has so little credibility that the mainstream media won’t even touch with a 10 foot pole despite the story having been around for months), I would read it too and judge accordingly based on the facts.
I think we all know our candidates are imperfect and yet we have reasons for supporting them. But at the same time, I believe it’s important that we stay informed. I do not discredit all negative Obama stories just because they speak ill of him, just like I’m sure mature, thinking Clinton supporters receive new negative information and look at the facts themselves. When I post here, it’s not with the intention of bickering or stirring up drama, but with the intention of sharing information. I am also open to being corrected by anyone with validated facts, who doesn’t resort to name-calling or childish accusations like someone named Mary did on another post, which I found more ridiculous than insulting, to be honest. Alas, I chose not to take the high road in that incident. It was too amusing to play along. ;) However, if a Clinton supporter chooses to engage me in discourse in a rational, civil manner, I am happy to respond.
When others post their researched information, whether it is pro-Clinton or pro-Obama, I enjoy reading it too. While I do support Obama, I have also complimented Clinton on this site when I felt it was deserving. I haven’t drunk THAT much koolaid. ;)
By the way, 2009 Where Are You?, your links were not the only ones deleted, so I don’t believe it’s some pro-Obama conspiracy. I have, in the past week, also posted links and info to an article that did not depict Clinton in a flattering light, and had the comments and links removed.
I understand your nickname, and figured as much when I first saw it. =) I can’t wait for it all to be over too. I support Obama for now and won’t deny I much prefer him to HRC, but whatever the case, I will get behind the democratic nominee chosen.
My nickname comes from the lyrics of a musical I enjoy. Also, my boyfriend tells me I’m like a cat – docile, lazy and languid most of the time, but not without alert watchfulness and claws when the situation calls for it (claws here should not be taken in a sexist way… I sure as hell didn’t). =)

p/s 2009 Where Are You?, I would also like to add that I cannot speak for all Obama supporters, but I have done some Hillary fact checks myself in the past and corrected myself of a few misconceptions. I hope that you and other Hillary supporters will do the same with negative Obama stories. As for the Jefferson Jackson dinner speech, I did watch it – several times in fact! I admit it was not his best showing, but I attribute it to exhaustion because I, and many other Obama supporters, have seen him give speeches and talk for more than 45 minutes WITHOUT a teleprompter OR cue cards OR notes. And he was an amazing orator even then. I have, in the past, had to give many speeches and participate in debates at a college level. I can assure you that even the best have their bad days, and Obama had one of his at the JJ dinner. I’m sure even you cannot deny that when he is on form, he is tops.
I do understand where his detractors are coming from when they say he doesn’t talk enough about issues, but unlike a lot of Clinton supporters, I know it’s not because he has no substance and no plans. They’re all there on his website, and have been there even before Hillary’s had hers up. In fact, one of the criticisms of Obama at the beginning was that he talked too much about issues in his speeches! Later, he switched to the more inspirational rhetoric we are familiar with, but I guess either way, you can’t win everybody. On one hand, I agree that he should talk a bit more about issues because he needs to reach out to those without the internet (few though they may be in this day and age), and the apathetic who can’t be bothered to go to his website themselves. But at the same time, in big, rally scenarios, I also understand his need to keep the audience’s attention. He often attracts a lot of youth and keeping youth attention is a lot trickier. Go on and on too much about nothing but facts and issues and you’re going to lose them or put them to sleep. His method seems to be to get them fired up, inspired and involved, and have them go home to read up on his issues on their own time. Considering his demographic includes a lot of the highly educated, it’s no surprise that these are the kind of folk who WILL go back home and research his plans and issues. Pros and cons either way, I admit but the candidate must figure out the best way to reach out to their audience. Hilary is not too inspirational or charismatic, but she talks a lot about facts and issues which holds the attention of the older crowd which she tends to attract.
My point basically is that many Obama supporters DO research as many facts as their time permits. They don’t just see the good and ignore the bad in Obama’s campaign. We are critical of it, just as we are critical of Hilary’s. While Hillary supporters are frustrated that comments here often seem to reflect that Obama supporters are dodging issues and ignoring their candidate’s flaws, they should also realize that Obama supporters feel the same way about Hillary’s. It also seems to us that Hillary supporters come here just to trash Obama while ignoring their candidate’s flaws and electability issues. Even the argument, “we know Hil is flawed, but we’re here to bitch about Obama because his supporters think he’s jesus’ holds no water. Wake up, Hillraisers! Obama supporters are not blind and deaf. We know his flaws too, and support him IN SPITE of them, but that won’t stop us from pointing out Hillary’s, just like Hil supporters know her flaws, but won’t stop pointing out Obama’s either. It’s nothing more than an exchange of information so long as it doesn’t get ugly (which it shouldn’t have to). There can be disagreements without nasty divisiveness.
At the end of the day, I believe that a true democrat will get behind whoever is the democratic nominee. Those saying, “if Obama/Clinton wins, I’ll vote McCain” obviously don’t truly believe in the democratic party anyway. Please register as an independent, thanks.
Another point to consider is that the ABC site doesn’t exactly facilitate intelligent, rational discussion. Information comes and goes too fast, and there are too many users to keep track of comments and discussion flow. As such, it often just degenerates into backers of each candidate shouting over one another to get heard, therefore giving the impression that each thinks their nominee is a god (or goddess), and being out to do nothing but smear the other candidate.
When I actually want to participate and listen to discourse and rational comments, I go to a site with less users, such as Talking Points Memo (which is liberal and has its fair share of Obama and Clinton supporters – sometimes one more than the other, depending on the week… This site is not quite recommended for intelligent Republican discourse!)
I mainly come to ABC to read news from a more mainstream source.

Real Jordan
“Yes we can” was stolen from the United Farm Workers movement of the 60′s, so Obama can’t lay claim to the slogan. Obama’s speech writer also dates back to the 60′s as he wrote speeches for JFK. All of Obama’s ideas have been stolen from other Democrats. There is nothing real about Obama. That is why his followers all point to his website when asked what he stands for. No doubt Obama himself has to check the website to see where he stands on the issues. This is why he doesn’t do well in the debates. Obama is nothing without his speeches and teleprompter and his foolish followers who have mistaken the presidential election with a high school football rally.

Come on Rachel. You are trying to say her 8 years in the White House as first lady count for nothing. Get real. They are going to have to show Obama when the Little Boys Room is for the first 30 days if he gets elected…lol

Reading these posts, the level of vitriol is palpable.. so much for obama’s message of uniter and hope!

I really believe people want someone like President Kennedy back in the White House. I am an independent and always vote after I have listened and read. Obama’s hands will be tied…no matter what. By the time he figures out who the players are and what they are playing for, we will be back with the Bush people…which is what they want.
The memories of a time gone long ago; the Kennedy years, will not return..not even with Caroline’s endorsement. If your eally want new, get rid of Ted Kennedy’s endorsement..he’s old hat.
It is sad that we have a chance to bring about real change in the Health care system and in the educational system, and we are being led by emotion rather than brains.!!!
Wake up..the new people who are now voting are new voters, with little past involvement in the political scenery.

Jordan Clinton- “Yes We Can” was the rally cry of Latino immigrant farm work Caesar Chavez who worked with Sen. Bobby Kennedy to reform farm workers rights. FYI- Caesar Chavez’s grandson and Bobby Kennedy Jr both endorse HILLARY..Soooo the facts are: Obama ripped off Caesar’s rally cry.

Here’s the truth. No candidate is without sin. Clinton’s scandals and Obama’s suspect “friends” to include: Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, Al Sharpton, Jessie Jackson, Tony Rezko, Louis Farrakan. What will these people demand in return. Politics is about what can you do for me. So at some point the price will be paid. Clinton’s paid hers and now Obama will have to pay his.

Bill Clinton is innocent of lying. When he said ” I never had sex with that woman” he thought the question was referring to Hillary not Monica.

Can you get hip surgery so you can wear a dress? Tell Mrs. Pantsuits

Historically, the candidates who had been elected as the president of America at their forty’s made the superb
and the best president like JFK and Bill Clinton. I have the deep down believe, Barack Obama in his forty make him a legendary president.
He will win the nomination fight and can easily defeat the old, the so-called
the best security and safety specialist Mr. Mccain in Nov 2008. The best secured places in the world are jails. Mccain will walk the every step his toddlers boss Mr. Bush stumbled in his two terms and can turn the country a huge jail curtailing the civil liberty. He can fight the war against terrorism for hundreds but never can win it following the foot-steps of Mr.
Bush.
The name ‘Barack’ of Barack Obama
means blessing. He will, God willing
, be the blessing for the USA and the whole world. He can win the war of terror in 6 months I believe. He is the agent of change, the agent of unification, the agent of reconciliation between people and people from east and west, from north and west, the agent of peace,
prosperity and progress.
He is the fresh and formidable force of positive change which the people of America and the world around are aspiring so avidly.
Hillary can’t do that job because she is the candidate of choice of
Mr. Bush as once Mr.Bush remarked about
Hillary that she can make a good pre
sident from democratic side.
She has been faking now as the harsh critique of Bushite policies while her track records show she had always said Yeah to every major steps including giving Bush the blank check for waging
the pre-emptive war.
She has 36 years of experience she brags
, a too long experience to keep one
in the job and that too long experience warrants her retirement and pension. She said people want change and she is the change agent and furtherrd the claim
saying that the biggest change will be that first time in American history the nation will have a woman president.
But I believe, people want the real change in polices, not the mere
gender change. The gender change is not a big thing, just a surgery is enough but change in the trend and direction of politics is the humongous job, the hardest challenge.

Has anyone ever seen the Queen of England cry in front of her people. Mrs. Clinton is a complaining cry baby when she loses or if she does not get her way. She does not deserve to represent the US as our President. She needs to go home and take care of Bill. That is the only thing in my opinion that she does well.

Obama stole “Yes We Can” from the 1960′s Democrats in Texas. Democrats have been using the “Yes We Can” “Si Se Puede” slogan in Texas for decades. Sí se puede (Spanish for “Yes, It can be done!”) is the motto of the United Farm Workers. it was originally coined in 1972, during Cesar Chavez’s 25 day fast. —————– Both Hillary and Bill Clinton used that slogan while registering Latino voters in the Rio Grande Valley as young Democrats. ———- Obama has never had an original idea —– If he wants change so bad he should start with the dim bulb in his head. ————————

rob: The only thing that McCain knows about politics is “WAR” because he spent several years in vietnam and is a ware hero. Bill Clinton can buy and sell John McCain when it comes to politics and so can Hillary. Where have you been all this time. Obama lacks everything needed to become a president of this country and he really should not be campaigning. He is part Kenyan not a true blue American black. I would not vote for him even if Hillary wasn’t running. I do not cater to candidates that are not all American and are not born in the US and Obama is one of them.

The writing is on the wall, Yes Obama will win the nomination and it’s time for Hillary and her supporters to admit this fact. Hillary is too polarizing, she has time in service yet Obama has done more than she has in his first year. This may be a clear indication about how hard Hillary will really work for everyone. There are too many questions about Hillary’s past and that past seems to be troubling; so troubling that she may be too distracted by her personal legal matters to serve the people of the United States. There is no way that anyone, who can think logically, can believe that Hillary will be a better president than Barack. If you believe this then fiction over-rides facts, and your brain is too filled with bias to process information fairly. The people who support Hillary are likely the same individuals who supported Bush, and this explains the illogical thinking. Obama does deliver a good speech, he has more experience than Hillary (despite her claims), Barack has demonstrated that he genuinely care about people and he has shown this by helping people in his community. Barack is no God but even if he was I fear that some of you would side with the Devil to get your way. Try reading something before you post comments to discredit a person and if you wish to follow Hillary down her road of deception, it is you who will be sorry.

Well said, Liwai. I couldn’t have made a better argument myself.

Hello Americans how is it that you all dont notice how Hillary and even Maccain….all stealing Obama …words and campaign slogans …..if you all cant see it the whole world is looking at you …
Why cant Hillary sell herself without putting negative words?….She is damaging democracy acroos the world especially those areas of the world that are learning it or trying to consider it…
Let the USA not be very backward and undemocratic in bringing in FL and MIC through the back door, after Obama has simply respected their rullings as to those states …..if they do it will not only damage the DEMS but also the standing of the USAand the cuase of democracy.
Is it that Hillary and her group have no shames to want to gain from some thing done without respecting others rulling to which I understand they signed to?…
Oh she really wants to win by all means.

To learn about the details of Obama’s proposals, do two things: First, listen to his speeches since February 15. He has established firmly in the minds of the electorate his vision for the future of US politics, the country and the world and knows its now time to get specific. Second, his website, like Clinton’s website, is comprehensive in its details about his many policy proposals. And remember, both Obama and Clinton have publicly observed that 95% of their policy suggestions are the same. The question now is who can build the broad base of support that it takes, and has always taken, to get policies passed. It matters a great deal that whereas Clinton often refers to being able to “fight” McCain and the Republicans, Obama speaks about “debates” he can win against them. Clinton was socialized in the kind of politics where it was Us against Them, a politics where few things get done. Obama is rather like Reagan, except he’s progressive instead of conservative, in speaking across the false divisions of race, party, religion, and region in order to create transformational change. If you want to do more than talk about health care, immigration, war, and other reforms, support Obama. He knows what he’s doing.

When Republicans actually prefer running against Hillary to Obama, what does that say about Hillary as a candidate or competitor?
By saying she’s vetted, tested and battle-scarred— she’s admits to being a “punch drunk” boxer ready to take the next barrage of blows from the Republicans. A bloodied face, blurred vision and wobbly legs is no virtue in the ring.
Obama on the other hand, is disorienting to both Hillary and the Republicans. He’s a south paw boxer, able to land blows on his opponents who have grossly miscalculated his speed and agility.

To;Stock Craft–I’ll leave Hillary alone —-so alone– that I won’t vote for her Carolyn

It’s really quite simple: how can anyone who is incapable of puttint together the right personnel to run a small presidential primaries campaign successfully, without running it into bankruptcy, possibly lead the United States and turn the economy around. The Clinton campaign started out way ahead, flush with funds, name recognition, huge rollodex, and clout. In a matter of weeks all that unravelled due to bad management, poor strategy, and mediocrity. The campaign went into bankruptcy, prompting her to loan it a whopping $5m to tide over. It lost its huge national lead, lost 20 primaries and caucuses in 10 days, and had to fire its manager and deputy manager. If that happens with our ailing economy while we are at war, you can see for yourself what mess we’ll all end up in. The Clinton campaign may still win Wisconsin on tomorrow, but so far Senator Clinton has given us a fair idea of what her administration will look like: incompetent, confused, and lacking in foresight and good strategy. For a nation at war with an economy in recession, that’s a good sign of disaster ahead.

Obama stating that words count is a joke.He sited others speeches what he failed to say was that they didn’t say them over and over and over.

Bravo to the note above Posted by: UGOCHUKWU | Feb 18, 2008 1:10:37 PM. He is right on the money!
That is exactly the Republicans are doing. None of the states that Obama won such as South Carolina, Kansas, Virginia and others will vote for a Democrate! These states are very INDEED REPUBLICAN STRONHOLDS.

It is amazing that Hillary would criticize Obama on anything relative to celebrity endorsers. Do you think for one minute if the Clintons could have gotten Caroline Kennedy or Oprah Winfrey they would have done anything but do the Snoopy dance behind close doors?
With regard to NAFTA (NORTH NMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT)it is the last thing the Clintons should bring up. NAFTA is the no. one reason good paying American jobs have gone overseas and layoffs in record numbers have been occurring in almost every area of production. Clinton I believe in his 1st or 2nd year in office signed off on the most devastating trade agreement to face this country and we have still have not seen the end of its destruction.
Did you know that Arkansas has more billionaires than any state in the Union? Think about that.

Does anyone proofread these articles? It had the grammar of a text message.

Black Americans, who are supporting Obama on the sole basis that it is time for us to have a black president, will be in for a very rude awakening and disappointment when they discover that, as president, Obama can not and will not be an advocate for their causes: He will not and can not be a Race Leader.
Hilary Clinton is more likely and in a better position to be a champion for the issues that plague Black Americans in this country than Obama can or ever will be.
As an African-American woman, who supports Obama and is a pledged delegate, I resent what Mellanson said. I don’t support Obama because I think it’s time for a black man to be president. I support Obama because I want change in Washington. How dare you say that African-Americans in this country only supports those who are black or “it’s our turn” thinking. There are African-Americans in this country that are educated and can choose who they think will represent us in the White House. What has Hillary done for African-American lately? I love Hillary. I do, and last year, I had made up in my mind I wasn’t going to vote in this election because I had three people who I adore running for the Presidency. John, Barack, and Hillary. As the months went by, my support was still for John and Barack, but Hillary was acting too much like this was going to be easy for her. Like she had African-Americans in her pocket. Not that I’m bashing Hillary, but since she has become Senator and Presidential candidate, Hillary comes to the African-American community when she sees fit. She goes to the Latino community when she sees fit. To me, she’s one of those “I’ll ignore you until I need you.” people. When has Barack done that? I’ll have you to know in 2005, in Eatonville, FL, the home of Zora Neale Hurston, Sen. Obama came with Sen Bill Nelson for a town hall meeting. And this was after an election year.
Many people may think that I am crazy, but I’m not. I just know that it’s time that I see some real change. Not just the same old same old. It’s time that I be proud of the fact that I’m from the USA. I need change. My daughters need change.

During the last debate, Clinton said that she and Obama had so much in common…now Hillary is comparing Obama to George Bush? Hillary has to make up her mind as to what she says…either her thought process needs help or her writers are not servicing her right.
The comparison between Bush and Obama made by Hillary was a desperate move on her part. Instead of remaining on the issues, she is trying to trash her opponent.Trying to look good by putting the opponent down… that is not Presidential!!! Hillary represents an outdated way of negative, conflict-ridden, divisive campaigning. Though I did not vote for Obama, I can see that Hillary is not presidential. Will Hillary behave the same in the international arena? Of course!
In the Democratic party, Obama is a better choice. In the Republican party, mediocre McCain seems to be the likely nominee.

Oprah who?