By Dotcomabc

Feb 17, 2008 2:08pm

Clinton’s New Anti-Obama Mailer

"Barack Obama, Which of These People Don’t Deserve Health Care?" asks a new campaign mailer in Wisconsin for Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, with a picture of seven voters — a diverse group, as if Benetton also made clothes for retirees.

You can read the mailer HERE.

"Barack Obama’s Health Care Plan Leaves 15 Million Americans Without Coverage," says the second page. Then, ominously: "Will It Be You?"

The mailer says "Obama’s Plan Says ‘No We Can’t'" … and also accuses the plan of "wast(ing) billions, costing taxpayers $1700 more per newly covered person," accuses Obama of having "launched ‘Harry and Louise’ type attacks on Hillary’s plan … using Republican and insurance company talking points…"

And also, comes the obligatory critical quote from New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, a strong critic of Obama, who accused Obama in one column of "unscrupulous demagoguery." Another side of the mailer provides more of the Krugman quote.

We will provide a more thorough fact check of the mailer in a bit …

On first blush, the main charge seems misleading, since what leaves people uninsured under Obama’s plan is the lack of a mandate requiring them to sign up for health insurance with the threat of a penalty. So it’s the people themselves who will decided if they’re left out — not Obama.

But more later…

– jpt

UPDATE: We took a more thorough look at the mailer HERE.

User Comments

I think the term for what Clinton’s campaign is doing is a preview of what is to come the rest of the primary season — ROVIAN DEMOCRATS!
Lies, Lies, and damn lies….anything to smear an opponent!

Posted by: Curtis Walker | February 17, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

Hi Jake,
I’ve heard Mrs. Clinton say that garnisment of wages is the penalty for not buying healthcare. My question is: if you do not have wages to garnish, then what?
o Small business people, consultants and others independently employed?
o What is the penalty if you are fined and don’t pay?
o Lawsuits by the gov’t?
o Jail time?
o Bankruptcy?
Honestly, I don’t know but I’ve been wondering about this..
If you don’t pay your fines for not being able to afford the healthcare that Hilary mandates that you buy, will she be entitled to take your home away?
Even if you did pay couldn’t it well be the straw that breaks the camel’s back and puts your family Outdoors? Statistically, I’d think that is inevitable to happen in some cases.
If garnishment is the path for the non-compliant, I would like to know: “What comes after that fails?”.
-thanks!
-chris
-chris

Posted by: Chris Blask | February 17, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

Once again, Hillary resorting to smears, distortions and lies. It is so sad to watch, but very scary for America if she was ever president.
Hillary fails to mention in her attack mailing that she has publicly said that people’s WAGES MAY BE GARNISHED, under her mandated plan, if they do not have insurance. Where will these funds go?
Americans are smarter than this garbage!!
DOWN w/ attack politics and bi-partisan politics!!
You do not see Obama sending mailers out about Hillary’s FAILED attempt to reform health care, behind closed doors with the insurance companies and her cronies…
Turn the page America, just turn the page.

Posted by: Sarah | February 17, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

A VOTE FOR HILLARY IN THE PRIMARIES IS A VOTE FOR McCAIN IN THE GENERAL ELECTIONs BECAUSE HILLARY WILL NEVER BE A US PRESIDENT AND I WILL MAKE SURE I KNOCK AS MANY DOORS AS I CAN FOR THAT MATTER!

Posted by: Clinton Fatigue | February 17, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Mrs. Clinton seems to have no problem with becoming Karl Rove, redux. *Just* what our nation needs right now (*cough*).
I’ll just leave this quote from the 1950s McCarthy hearings. I know that there’s a huge difference in scale here. But not in kind.
“You’ve done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last? Have you left no sense of decency?”

Posted by: Elise in NH | February 17, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

Everytime Hillary starts losing she lays out attacks these political campaigns are exactly what we don’t WANT!! Hillary stop talking smack because we all know that your “universal healthcare plan” is more like a healthcare tax.
We need change.

Posted by: John | February 17, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

Obama has a questionable flyer out too:
From the Fact Check Desk: Despite Obama Claim, Clinton Never Called NAFTA a “Boon”
All these guys are the same. Clinton, Obama, McCain…they will do whatever it takes to win. Why are people so gullible.

Posted by: JJ | February 17, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

I think this is just ridiculous. She’s misleading voters ONCE AGAIN. I actually looked up Paul Krugman’s original editorial and he says this in between “its just grotesque” etc.
“The Clinton plan does every bit as much to ensure affordability as the Obama plan.”
I find it interesting that she cherry picks EVERY SINGLE THING that is said negatively about Obama. She keeps telling the world that he isn’t offering Universal Healthcare but it seems pretty obvious to me…if anyone in America can qualify for it – its UNIVERSAL.
I agree with the first person’s comments – if by some way she steals this election from Obama…I’m voting for McCain. Because integrity and trust does matter in the White House. In order to push through meaningful legislation – its going to take working together with the other party…Clinton simply isn’t willing or able to do that. She’s not the best presidential candidate….she’s not even the best democratic candidate.

Posted by: Daniel - San Antonio, TX | February 17, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

Having been a healthcare professional for 37+ years, Clinton’s plan simply does not help most people. Mandating is not the solution especially when she received more lobbyist money from pharmaceutical companies etc. than anyone else. This will not work for those who do not have their healthcare paid by employers nor for small businesses as I work for paying $550 per month with $5000 deductible. Clinton is so far from reality, it’s sad.

Posted by: linda | February 17, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Preaching hope, inspiration, change, no substance, no specifics, no media challenge, and media fawning, Obama is instructive of how demagogues rise to power to inflict horrors on humanity.
It is a moral right for every American to have health coverage. Fifteen million people without health coverage, by choice or otherwise, is more of the same status quo – there is no real change in having no health coverage. Universal health coverage from Hillary Clinton’s specific solution to our healthcare crisis is REAL CHANGE.

Posted by: crat3 | February 17, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

The Clintons will say and do whatever it takes to return to power. The first and second time around they came to power making boat load of promises to all kinds of constituencies only to abandon them. They have no credibility on health care.
The fact is that the Obama plan will cover more people without garnishing their wages. More importantly, the focus of the Obama plan is not just to cover the uncovered but also to lower cost for everyone.
Promises are cheap as we found out during their eight years in power.

Posted by: nmben | February 17, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

So what is this health care anyway. Is it comprehensive? Is it on par with the insurance congress gets? Does it cover all doctors and hospitals? what is the deductible and co-pay? Is it bigger than a breadbox? Etc.
A lot of talk and no substance. What’s being touted isn’t defined. It’s just jibber-jabber aimed at the uninformed by both candidates who don’t have a clue about what the mystery coverage will be.
And then, there’s the issue of whether illegals are covered and whether they and their legal counterparts will have their wages garnished if they don’t play the game. Such BS!
Bring back intelligence testing for would-be voters!

Posted by: Surelock Homes | February 17, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

How can the nation be gripped in the Obama madness – like he is a rock star! The man is all talk, granted a wonderful speaker, but if he wins the Presidency it will be run by people behind the scenes, just as in the case of george w. bush!! Obama is NOT qualified, he just talks a good game. After all Oprah is for Obama, and can Oprah be wrong about anything? All her money is buying herself a President now.

Posted by: Barbara | February 17, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

ChangeWhat,
Obama’s concrete plans have been available, in writing, for a long time. This idea that there’s no substance behind his message is simply a fairy tale.

Posted by: Gabe Small | February 17, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

Hillary will win the General Election, and be the next President.. All you people that don’t like the idea of a Women in the White House, can move to Iran, or Iraq.. you will find their Politics more to you liking.

Posted by: J.Murphy, CA. | February 17, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

It looks like Obama needs to debate Hillary just on the medical insurance alone to explain the differences fully and clearly. Only then can he let the voters see what the differences are and what the alternatives for doing nothing or too little are. Soundbites and distortions on his rhetorical speech making are not enough. Let him bring Ted Kennedy with him if he needs someone to whisper in his ear. If he will not debate the issues, it appears that mailers are one way to get the truth out. Hillary is the most knowledgeable, the most substantive, and the most experienced candidate to talk about any of the issues thus far. Think, Americans, this election is more important than many realize.
Geonm

Posted by: georgia | February 17, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

The fact that his plan isn’t universal health care drives the cost up. Which still leaves people unable to afford it. If people don’t have health care because they can’t afford it, that is NOT them choosing not to have it.
When there are uninsured people that get sick and get care at a hospital, it drives the prices up for everyone. This is why Hillary’s plan will create cheaper health care so that everyone can afford it.

Posted by: Bridgette | February 17, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

I never had sex with that woman. Or were we talking about what is the meaning of “is”?

Posted by: Shades of Billy Bob | February 17, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

Who is suprised by her mailer???? Hillary has few options left to win this nomination fair and square. She has to resort to half-truth campaigning.
If this doesn’t work she will have to bite the bullet and try her hand at stealing the nomination at the convention.
Either way… she’ll do whatever it takes to win.

Posted by: marge | February 17, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

Who is suprised by her mailer???? Hillary has few options left to win this nomination fair and square. She has to resort to half-truth campaigning.
If this doesn’t work she will have to bite the bullet and try her hand at stealing the nomination at the convention.
Either way… she’ll do whatever it takes to win.

Posted by: marge | February 17, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

The real fiasco would be Hillary Clinton’s plan which will garnish the paychecks of hard-working Americans. It is this backwards line of thinking that resulted in Hillary’s failed universal health care attempt in 1993. I have the insight of living in Massachusetts, where a Hillary-type mandate is in place. The enforcement mechanism is completely inane and will likely be deemed unconstitutional by the state very soon. Barack Obama’s health care plan is hands down the more sensible one.

Posted by: Margaret Williams | February 17, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

When a candidate for President won’t debate and people say that bringing up the issues and comparing positions is mud slinging, I think we need information to make a decision on. Sound bit politics is what got us George W. Bush. If Obama can’t handle the debate of the primaries among his own party how will he be able to handle a tough cookie like McCain. In New York, a republican state Hillary was re-elected with over 65% of the vote. She will bring us together – with real plans not flowery promises

Posted by: MarcelMendoza6 | February 17, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

and i suppose Obama is full of truth and angel wings, ooh wait hes a man,, just looked at that healthcare flyer,, no worse than some of his that our hitting the households,, so why is everyone making a big deal,, or is it shhh darn it someone in the media is not swayed on Obama reaching the white house as a saint,,,,,,we already know he uses everyones quotes and speech topics ,, whats new plagerism will be in with all the young adults,,,, soon,, so when these young adults are expelled from a class will it be unjust if the future of American can use it,, with out as long as it sways voters his way, are Americans that desperate to believe in everything he says,,, we are in trouble,,,,

Posted by: vimed | February 17, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

two simple things from the mailer first taking “yes we can” from Obama and use it for herself make her that she never come up with her own but copy it from others. second the mailer said Obama’s plan would leave people uncoverd and then it contradict itself by puting in #1 in the list that he will by using tax money to cover new.

Posted by: chonbe | February 17, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

No more Atwater-Rove politics! I hope and expect people in Wisconsin will pay more attention to the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel editorial endorsement (Obama: Change for the good) than to that ridiculous mailer. “The Obama campaign has been derisively and incorrectly described as more rock tour than political campaign and his supporters as more starry-eyed groupies than thoughtful voters. If detractors in either party want to continue characterizing the Obama campaign this way, they will have seriously underestimated both the electorate’s hunger for meaningful change in how the nation is governed and the candidate himself. In an interview with the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Editorial Board on Wednesday, the first-term senator proved himself adept at detail and vision. They are not mutually exclusive.”

Posted by: Tom J | February 17, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

What is most noticeable about this mailer is that every charge is completely true, particularly the vile Harry and Louise mailer than Obama sent out. Perhaps Mr. Obama would be well advised to stop twisting his positions up into a pretzel of illogic and instead offer something that works. That would come across much better than constant lies about Hillary’s positions.

Posted by: Linda B | February 17, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

What shocks me, is that nobody in the media said one word about the NASTY (healthcare industry-funded) flyer that the Obama campaign sent out against Hillary’s plan. Apparently, the media likes Obama’s plan that doesn’t cover EVERYONE. It’s about time Hillary starts responding to these things. After all, they ARE what matters to voters.

Posted by: Danny Campbell | February 17, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

Learning from experience is more important than having it.
Masachussets already has the healthcare mandates similar to what Senator Clinton is proposing for the whole country. A teacher there says:
“We are FORCED to pay for privatized health insurance, yet there are no provisions for caps with the companies. One year after the bill was passed health insurance skyrocketed 10-25% in costs. Myself – I pay $23 a week for insurance that maxes out at $7500 a year! That’s criminal! If I have one hospital stay I could be in serious debt.”
Bill Clinton’s own labor secratary says that Obama’s plan will cover more people than Senator Clinton’s. This is because millions of consumers would rather pay the penalty for not complying with the mandate than pay for the coverage. To prevent this, Senator Clinton has said she would garnish wages. Congress (republicans) will never allow this, nor will some democrats. Nor will Clinton be able to get price controls passed. If she fails again, she will not be able to bring it back up for vote.
The key difference in the Obama plan (but a critical one) is that it plans to achieve Universal Health Care in achievable steps, not in a moon-shot. Obama is the only candidate running who was successful at passing a healthcare reform in Illinois. Although he was a charismatic social activist in a poor, black area of Chicago, as an Illinois state legislator in Springfield Obama knew when to cut deals with power brokers. In 2003, he passed a bill that offered health-care coverage to an additional 150,000 people—but only after an attempt to push a bigger, universal health-care proposal stalled.
Frankly, any plan from Obama has a better chance of passage in Congress (even Hillary’s) because he has more support among Republicans and Independents.

Posted by: Young Atheart | February 17, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Hillary is a Rovian Democrat.
(that is, in the spirit of Karl Rove.)

Posted by: Nikki | February 17, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

Neither has any real foreign policy experience. That requires actually having lived abroad, to see the world through other’s eyes, not just having made a couple of trips abroad as a first lady or a senator, where everything is arranged for soundbites (believe me, I saw one President come through while posted overseas and it was very clear he had NO IDEA what was going on in that country’s daily life – but ultimately, he didn’t need to: foreign policy is an extension of domestic policy). The last candidate with anything approaching a real worldview was Kerry, and that was used against him – and the electorate gave us Bush.

Posted by: CT | February 17, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Tell me again how Hillary’s plan succeeded under Bill…

Posted by: DH | February 17, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

How is forcing people to purchase health insurance better than a voluntary plan?
Sen. Clinton has said that she would garnish your wages if you broke her law and didn’t buy Hillarycare 2.0. That kind of system is patently un-American.
It’s no wonder that the insurance companies are supporting her candidacy.

Posted by: Matt | February 17, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Clinton cannot twist this one!! Her healthcare plan will be financed by the worker. She stated that in order for her hc plan to take effect she will garnish people’s wages. What kind of plan is that!!! At least Sen. Obama has a plan in place that will reduce the average yearly cost of coverage. His plan WON”T be attacking the pockets of the working class like HRC’s is designed to do. Again, she is protecting her lobbyist friends.

Posted by: ski | February 17, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

Hillary is NOT a witch and Barack is NOT full of hot air. They are both great in their own ways. THEY BOTH SENT OUT DECEPTIVE FEAR-MONGERING HEALTHCARE FLIERS. What seems to be largely missed is that Barack did it first; odd for someone who is supposedly about a “new kind of politics.” He’s also had TV ads that make it sound like his plan is universal when it’s not. In debates, he gave vague answers to Hillary’s challenges about his plan. Yes, he’s run a pretty high integrity campaign but he’s been deceptive and sneaky on this one very critical issue that is likely to sway a lot of voters. Maybe he reserved his deception for a key issue knowing that it wouldn’t get noticed in the gaga atmosphere he’s created with his finer qualities and generally above board approach.

Posted by: Peter D | February 17, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

I think it is worrisome the way the Clinton campaign twists the facts around. The health care issue is really a prime example of this. The Clintons have been down this road before and they count on the fact that the majority of voters do not study the facts for themselves. They are swayed by mailings and negative ads, half-truths and downright lies. They use emotions, primarily fear, to sway voters in their direction. They count on you to be uninformed. This campaign will get very ugly before it’s over because that is what they do.
I think its important that each one of you goes to the candidates’ websites and read about their plans for health care yourself. Don’t just read the candidates’ fliers! If that’s what you are basing your vote on, don’t complain when you lose your current health coverage and are forced to pay for one of the government’s choosing. Bill Clinton’s own labor secratary says that Obama’s plan will cover more people than Senator Clinton’s, and he is the only candidate running who was successful at passing a healthcare reform in his home state. Clinton certainly has not achieved that in NY.
And anyone who says they will vote republican if their candidate isn’t nominated cannot possibly be voting on the issues. Don’t come crying when your 10 year old is in Iraq 8 years from now.

Posted by: ld | February 17, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

As Americans we live in a shareholder value society, there is not way that the republicans will allow mandatory health care purchasing – this is why Obama’s plan is much better – it is pragmatic.

Posted by: Berkeley Democrat | February 17, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

I’m tired of the Democrats stealing my money and raising my taxes so they can buy votes and get elected. They want everybody to feel as if they are victims. No more Democrats for me…ever!

Posted by: targa | February 17, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

Hillary Clinton’s plan is not good at all, This morning I received a copy of the flyers her campaign sent out to people in wisconsin, I went to Senator’s Obama’s campaign web site and read his plan for health care and he has the best health care for all americans unlike hillary clinton’s plan which wont cover all americans, hillary clinton is turning to lies and deceptive ads to sway voters, the american people want change and not the same lies and destortion which hillary clinton has turned to

Posted by: Kennedy | February 17, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

“unscrupulous demagoguery.”
Did Hillary forget who her target demographic is? What a waste of money to try to sell that to her demographic. And if she’s trying to sell that to the educated folks, who actually do read the fact checks, it’s just silly.

Posted by: Robert | February 17, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

I commend Clinton for taking it to Obama. By and large, Obama has been the most deceitful of the two in the race; he uses talking points borrowed from past politicians; he uses mass-controlling psychology without substance; then when does talk about the issues, he has to read from a paper because he’s in unfamiliary territory. He stole her economic plan to create five million green jobs. His policys are crafting to be try to appeal to as many groups as possible to win the election, just like giving out drivers licenses to illegal aliens in an attempt to win the lation vote. Then when in front on black crowds he says “our time has come,” in order to send a message to them about their time to have a black president for them. This man is the biggest phony to run a presidential campaign in a long time.
If Obama becomes the nominee, I will not vote in the election, plain and simple. I fear giving such authority to such an unknown variable. And McCain is downright dangerous to our country.

Posted by: JasoninPa | February 18, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am

Dear Hillary,
You cram insurance down the throats of every American while offering no counterpart to regulating an industry that has grown so rich and powerful that they build monumnets to themselves while their customers need lawyers to get services. It is as UNAMERICAN as it comes. You are a corporate democrat disguised as John Edwards. I want freedom. I want to decide whether or not to buy insurance and I want reasonable choices offered and I want to take it with me wherever I go and I want lower prices. PS – I’ll go to jail before you garnish my wages over this, girlfriend. It’s called civil disobedience. (Actually, I know her plan has zero chance of being passed so all this was to prove a point so those of you who were smitten with her plan need to ask her how she’s going to get passed).

Posted by: SE Croft | February 18, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am

HC turns away many, just can not believe nor trust her, especially, since she campaigned in Florida, while the other opponents kept their word.

Posted by: Gaby | February 18, 2008, 1:14 am 1:14 am

Why would anyone believe Hillary. She even sells out her supporters. She sold her supporter’s addresses and information to a bulk mailer for a cheap 8,000. What a phoney behind sheeps clothing.

Posted by: morrisen | February 18, 2008, 4:07 am 4:07 am

I LOVE HOW THE OBAMA CULT COMES OUT ON THESE BLOGS. UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE MEANS EVERYONE! YOU ARE VERY DUMB! YOU ARE THE SAME PEOPLE THAT BUY HIS PLAGERISED SPEECHES ON CHANGE VS IM BRAINWASHED AND NEED HOPE TO SURVIVE. UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE MEANS EVERYONE MUST HAVE HEALTHCARE, YOU MUST HAVE CAR INSURANCE YOU MUST TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR YOUR OWN WELL BEING! I AM TIRED OF PAYING FOR SOME IDIOT THAT HAS NO HEALTH INSURANCE AND GETS ON HIS DIRT BIKE BREAKS HIS NECK AND 6 MONTHS LATER WITH MILLIONS OF DOLLERS OF HEALTH CARE COST RAISES MY PRICES FOR A DAMN ASPERIN! VOTE FOR SUBSTANCE AND VOTE FOR DETAILS PEOPLE OF THE COOL AID CLAN!WHO WOULD YOU FEE CONFIDENT WITH TO DO HEART SURGERY ON YOUR KID? OBAMA, SPEECH TALKER OR HILLARY CLINTON A DETAILED SPECIFIC PERSON. JUST ASKING.

Posted by: Tammy | February 18, 2008, 5:18 am 5:18 am

Preaching hope, inspiration, change, no substance, no specifics, no media challenge, and media fawning, Obama is instructive of how demagogues rise to power to inflict horrors on humanity.
It is a moral right for every American to have health coverage. Fifteen million people without health coverage, by choice or otherwise, is more of the same status quo – there is no real change in having no health coverage. Universal health coverage from Hillary Clinton’s specific solution to our healthcare crisis is REAL CHANGE.

Posted by: will | February 18, 2008, 5:21 am 5:21 am

I commend Clinton for taking it to Obama. By and large, Obama has been the most deceitful of the two in the race; he uses talking points borrowed from past politicians; he uses mass-controlling psychology without substance; then when does talk about the issues, he has to read from a paper because he’s in unfamiliary territory. He stole her economic plan to create five million green jobs. His policys are crafting to be try to appeal to as many groups as possible to win the election, just like giving out drivers licenses to illegal aliens in an attempt to win the lation vote. Then when in front on black crowds he says “our time has come,” in order to send a message to them about their time to have a black president for them. This man is the biggest phony to run a presidential campaign in a long time.
If Obama becomes the nominee, I will not vote in the election, plain and simple. I fear giving such authority to such an unknown variable. And McCain is downright dangerous to our country.

Posted by: JasoninPa | February 18, 2008, 5:23 am 5:23 am

Obama is the right person for American at this moment of America problem. if American vote for race this time and chose Hilary. American international respect and reputation is in crisis.

Posted by: andrew williams | February 18, 2008, 6:02 am 6:02 am

Danny Campbell
Your right about the Obama flyer. His lies never got any attention in the media. God forbid if the truth came out about Obama. He leaves 15 million out in his insurance plan and he calls that real coverage. Give me a break. He is just passing the cost along to all of us. Like we are paying now.
Everyone out there that loves Obama so much and pays through the roof for your health insurance plan why do you think that is? It is because of people like Obama would don’t care if people pay their own way in life. We pay now for everyone who doesn’t have insurance. That would for nearly 50 million people. Do you Obama people understand what you are doing by voting this guy in. Obama is the status quo. He will change nothing. It will be the same as now. Makes me ill to think about it.

Posted by: C DEPP | February 18, 2008, 6:28 am 6:28 am

Curtis Walker
From what I hear Rove is working behind the scenes for Obama. The race baiting Obama has done has Rove all over it.

Posted by: C DEPP | February 18, 2008, 6:31 am 6:31 am

andrew williams
(Obama is the right person for American at this moment of America problem. if American vote for race this time and chose Hillary. American international respect and reputation is in crisis.)
Obama pulled the race card after NH and beat the Clinton’s over the head with it. He should be throw out of the race and the party for that. Obama is trying to split the DEM party into. Obama, his staff and people like J. Jackson Jr. are calling super delegates and telling them if they don’t vote for Obama they will be keeping a a fellow black person down. That is race baiting. Research it online. Obama makes me sick with his lies and using race to try to get into the WH. If he gets in this way then he stole the WH. And I am not the only person who is saying this. He will be not only a cousin to Bush (and Cheney) but be remembered for stealing the WH just the same.
If Obama were to get in the world would laugh at us. The Americans let another liar in chief take the WH. Again.
And Obama would not be the right person if he was the last person on earth.

Posted by: C DEPP | February 18, 2008, 6:48 am 6:48 am

I’d sooner vote for John McCain than Hillary Clinton. Atleast at 72, he will probably be a one term president.

Posted by: MaryK | February 18, 2008, 8:00 am 8:00 am

What it comes down to Hill-lair-y negative attacks, makes us annoyed most of first time votes and independent minded. If she gets nomination most of us will vote Republican. I am 100% sure that I DO NOT want to see the 90’s gridlock and partisan politics, so I will vote for McCain is Hill-lair-y.

Posted by: John Elias | February 18, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am

morrsion
Obama is selling his donors lists as I am typing. He needs the money for court cases and to run all those lies about Hillary. No rest for the non deserving.

Posted by: C DEPP | February 18, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am

How can you be independent minded and be a cult member at the same time?

Posted by: C DEPP | February 18, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am

THERE IS NO CHANGES WITH OBAMA EXCEPT THE MEDIAS HELP AT HIDING HIS RECORD OF SUPPORTING THE WAR AND BUSH. WHAT OBAMA SUPPORTERS ARE AFRAID TO REALIZE. Obamas record shows he supports the war, voted twice in 2006 against bringing America’s troops back home. He voted for war appropriations giving our money to Halliburton and Blackwater. His latest bit of posturing S 433 allows the Bush Administration to suspend any troop withdrawal!!!!if not suspended, still keeps the troops in Iraq for a long time to come? Obama when faced with tough choices always gave in to pressure from the Bush administration or corporate lobbyists. Such as Obama voted for Bush’s energy bill, sending more than $13 billion in subsidies and tax breaks to oil, coal, and nuclear companies. Obama voted with Republicans to allow credit card companies to raise interest rates over 30 percent, INCREASING STUDENT LOANS RATES AND FEES increasing hardship for families. Obama voted for one of Bush’s top priorities – expanding Nafta to South America – even as President Bush obstructed all the top Democratic priorities. Obama voted with Bush to make it harder for ordinary people to hold big corporations accountable when they do things like sell toxic toys, poisonous pet food, or just plain rip you off. Obama was the Senate’s biggest Democratic advocate of subsidies for liquid coal, even though liquid coal produces twice the global warming pollution of the crude oil it’s meant to replace and voted for increased subsidies, albeit with conditions.Obama, a Hamiltonian believer in free trade and supporters of globalization has lent his support to the “Hamilton Project formed by corporate-neoliberal Citigroup chair Robert Rubin and other ‘Wall Street Democrats’ to counter populist rebellion against corporate tendencies within the Democratic Party. Obama provided assistance to pro-war candidates (such as Joe Lieberman). Obama voted for “business-friendly ‘tort reform’ bill that rolls back working peoples’ ability to obtain reasonable redress and compensation…from corporations!!! Obama considers single payer universal health care too socialist and has stated that he prefers voluntary solutions. **He voted against requiring medical care for aborted fetuses who survive. Abortion opponents see Obama’s vote on medical care for aborted fetuses as a refusal to protect the helpless. Some have even accused him of supporting infanticide. He supported allowing retired police officers to carry concealed weapons, but opposed allowing people to use banned handguns to defend against intruders in their homes. And the list of sensitive topics goes on. With only a slim, two-year record in the U.S. Senate, Obama doesn’t have many controversial congressional votes which political opponents can frame into attack ads. But his eight years as an Illinois state senator are sprinkled with potentially explosive land mines, such as his abortion and gun control votes. recent land purchase from a political supporter who is facing charges in an unrelated kickback scheme involving investment firms seeking state business. Obama has no substance. He has provided no solutions.

Posted by: Davey | February 18, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am

I chosse not to be dumb by this political figures.
Hilary stated that the ealier states she lost were not important, she has not been able to disprove the fact she voted for the Iraqi war, she has not disclosed her income statement, her character and demeanor has been selfish, she has cried to woo votes, there is a circulating financial scaldal with Ron Paul’s issue. Her voice for health care are empty because she had 8 years to move the health care plan and has consistently failed, now pulling attack ads against hope and inspiration, firing her campaign manager and deputy, has not been able to push off media issues about her contradictory stands. We decide who is the best candidate, not her. History shows intimidation from this campaign and this family. If this woman has soft pedaled and shown remorse, I would have voted for her, someone like this IS NOT GOOD for the White House.

Posted by: Kunle | February 18, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am

I see a lot of Clintons loyals on this blog. It shows how desperate they have been worked to get any information even if it is a lie, out to the public. She will lose Wisconsin, Hawai, Ohio. She will Win Pensylvania and tie Texas.
Then she will look at the super delegates for help, most of whom are shying away from her – knowing what they know now.
Obama is not perfect as he is as human as us as he has stated several times, Hilary states she is not human and she is a workaholic for the American people. All I need in the White House is a human as noraml as myself that can inspire me.

Posted by: Dave MC | February 18, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am

The comments on this thread are full of falicous and misleading statements about Obama. I realize that you clinton supporters are upset by his recent surge in opinion polls and his winning streak…. but come on to just flat out lie about his record or make up crazy accusations out of thin air, shame on all of you. Neither Obama nor Hillary want to bring about the destruction of America. And neither Obama nor Clinton are perfect by any means. The fact is no one in America or the world for that matter is “perfect”. You people need to lighten up and let this campaign run its course.

Posted by: Charles Kushner | February 18, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

From Middle East:
Nothing said here will affect the ways the votes goes, but the idea of having a woman as my commander-in-chief with all the heck she has pulled is very worrisome to me. Nothing against women, but this one is one of a kind -kinda negative and desperate.

Posted by: Bruce Mkain | February 18, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am

I have been waiting for this…
Obama never put out an Ad until Clinton sent out one and he responded, not reacted. That angered Clinton and she went all out hell on him including getting a boxing glove. All Obama needed to do in the ring was throw her an upper cut and she would have been out, instead he responded again, laid out economic polices and gave an outstanding speech. She could not compare….
Guys, let’s face it. She is the old generation whose time has come and gone. None of the she did this or he did that matters, like someone posted earlier, – once a generation is over, change is irriversible.

Posted by: Rosie | February 18, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

Hey everyone, ever notice the large responses from Hillary supporters. Also, they always seem to come bunched together. I wonder if campaign insiders are flooding forums like this in a lame way of protecting their candidate. Hillary lost my vote and my family’s vote. I am taking 5 days off to work in OHIO. Hillary is a scumbag…
OBAMA 08

Posted by: Anthony Pace | February 18, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am

It is a well known thing amongst the democrtas now that – Employee within the Clinton camps have been told, you had better do all this or you are fired. When asked to do what here was the answer.” Use all media information available to damage Obama”. An employee in Ohio a friend of mine had sworn to vote Obama from the darkness in this campaign. When Camera was with her in the plane, she was shown to be servicing snacks to employee. When cameras disappear, they were warned to complete attack ads before tasting the snacks. Kinda sad for her, but she needs the money so she needs to work there. On March 4th, she and her colleages are voting Obama.

Posted by: Adam | February 18, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am

The Clintons go on the attack. It’s weird that they see political self-interest as more important than the outcome for the country.

Posted by: Jim | February 18, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

I am a woman and would like to see a woman president. I have been following the whole campaign and from what I have seen, I would have voted Hilary, but for her last name: CLINTON, just sends shivers down my spine.

Posted by: Cremp Tomlin | February 18, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

GO OBAMA 08′

Posted by: hm | February 18, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

Poor Poor Obama:(
So a mailer has caused this much fury in Obamacin land?
What happens when the republicans begin to expose him and tear him down??
If he cant handle a mailer he sure as heck cant beat the republicans.

Posted by: Becky | February 18, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Everyone seems to forget that Senator Clinton had a Health Care Package when Hubby was President and the two of them could not get it passed.
So soon we forget…..how can she do it now????????????

Posted by: Sane Person | February 18, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

Let’s just stop and think. Senator Hillary Clinton and Senator Barack Obama are candidates for the Democrat nomination to run for US President.
JFK was never a governor, Regan never had Foreign Policy experience, Nixon was an expert on Foreign policy but not on National issues.
Bubba our current Pres had never traveled out of the USA until he became Prez, and quite frankly is an ace shy of a full deck, his baseball team was a failure. (lack of leadership)
Now we all know about Condileeza who shows no knowledge in foreign policy, the one brain they had was Colin Powell and he did not suck up so they dismissed him.
McCann is really mentally deficient if he thinks we can keep troops in Iraq for 100 years, that should turn off Repugnants. The Democrats have two viable candidates one from the past who is sure to have a husband out of control, and one form the present who is well educated, articulate, knowledgeable and wise enough to surround himself with smart people. Bush went back and got his daddy’s people, and clinton will go back and get her Husbands people. THe same old Washington.
I am tired of the old white haired aging leadership that have nothing to lose because they have one foot in the grave and the other on a banana peeling.
Give me a man with young children, that is brilliant and will look out for their future which means he will look out for mine.
Forget color and sex, Senator Obama can sit with Iranians, Africans, Europeans and yes Cubans and talk and represent and protect America. This is our last chance to gain the ground we lost under Regan and Bush….remember what happens tin America. Now is not the time to be devisive and dumb. We need to stick together and Unite for a better America, not a White American or a Black America.

Posted by: Divine One | February 18, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

If we are all gullible Obama will sweep the country based on copy cat speeches previously given by the Governor of Massachusetts and his campaign manager John Walsh.
At least with Hillary you get what you see and hear and not some make believe candidate…..

Posted by: dee | February 18, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

Hillary’s plan couldn’t get passed before, so why would it now?
Obama’s plan will cost the rest of us with health insurance with another tax, or fee, or whatever they want to call it.
National healthcare is not what it’s cracked up to be. Let’s just hope they both aren’t including illegal aliens in this plan just to get their vote. They already crawl across the border to have their babies here just to collect welfare. If we didn’t have to pay for all these millions of illegals, maybe healthcare could be affordable for the rest of us.
Good jobs here in America with healthcare plans would help a lot more than either one of their plans.
I’m voting for John McCain to keep our taxes down and make the current tax cuts permanent. By the way, this current President is giving us this tax break and to some families, a tax rebate. I don’t see either Democrat announcing anything like that. Obama and Hillary want to tax us more if you are a working American.

Posted by: reeter12 | February 18, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

The Clinton campaign didn’t have a healthcare plan before it felled and they don’t have one now. Well to be honest, if everyone is a goverment employee, then the Clinton healthcare plan will work for everyone. Unfortunately some are self employed, independent contractors or work for private employors or small business. Under the Clinton healthcare plan these people would be penalized if they don’t pay for their healthcare. This means that most of your family members and friends will have their paychecks garnished. We all know that it doesn’t stop there if it is a goverment enforcement. There will be fines and then misdemeanors which is a criminal offense defined as less serious than a felony. Why did Ms. Clinton decide on this approach? It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure this out. Big business, big Corporation call it what you will, they want their money back and in order for Ms. Clinton to get their support in her race to presidency she is giving victory to one side (the healthcare providers) by promising to them that she will have the poeople wages garnished if they continue to give healthcare. Thus allowing her to shout the words “UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE” This is a shady tactic and makes fools out of every american that falls for this trick. The Obama healthcare plan is for the people. Poor people, middle class and rich people can rest assured that there is no tricks or penalties in the Obama healthcare plan. VOTE OBAMA

Posted by: Press Release | February 18, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

EXPERIENCE IS WHAT MAKES CHANGE! WE DON’T NEED A TRAINEE IN THE WHITEHOUSE WE NEED SOMEONE THAT IS READY TO FIGHT FOR US. SOMEONE THAT KNOWS THE ROPES. A WOMEN WITH A HEART. NOT SOME CULT LEADER. ANYONE CAN BE A GOOD SPEAKER IN PUBLIC BUT NOT EVERYONE CAN RUN THE WHITE HOUSE.

Posted by: RINA | February 21, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

it is shameful that obama is using these attack ads to demonize universal (government-mandated) healthcare. healthcare should be a human right and it should be automatically available to every citizen. even more shameful is how obama responds to clinton’s criticism. basically, obama has deflected attention away from the policies by saying that clinton’s attack is only because of campaign politics. newsflash:it was only because of campaign politics that obama found it within himself to demonize the cause of universal health care. obama is trying to ride a wave without any substance. shame on obama for using these distortionary tactics. clinton is absolutely right to vigorously reject obama’s trashy politics on healthcare.

Posted by: jack jackson | February 24, 2008, 7:29 am 7:29 am

I am SHOCKED that it took over a month for Senator Obama to finally say something about his pastor. This is the same pastor that Senator Obama supports through his regular tithing! The Senator family donates thousand of dollars to this church annually. That means he support his pastor”s RACIAL overtones and revolutionary statements of overthrowing America. Who does Senator Obama think he’s trying to fool and what is he trying to hide? Why is he openly, freely, and devotedly donated all that money to a cause if he doesn”t believe in it? Why is Senator Obama lying to America? This is as bad as Senator Obama still accepting all that money from his crooked land developer that he supposedly hasn’t seen nor talked to in years? Sure doesn”t sound like a real devoted Christian man to me? Wonder who he and Michelle are praying to everynight?

Posted by: Visnovsky | March 14, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

Since Obama is virtually buying the Presidency of the United States, Has anybody actully investigated the origin of Obama’s hundreds of millions of dollars? We are told that it’s coming from individual’s small donations via the internet, but how do we know it’s not origianally coming from radical sources, or even from overseas interests?

Posted by: Gina | June 25, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

BUYING THE PRESIDENCY OF THE U.S. …
How many of the 1.5 people who sent $200 to Obama’s campaign were black? Is it possible that a group which comprises about 15% of the population in America could rule the other 85% simply by buying the election via contributions from 1.5 million people, in a country of 300 million people?

Posted by: Gina | June 26, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.