Huckabee: Romney ‘Arrogant and Presumptuous’
Sunday, Sunday, Sunday…Those who couldn’t make the Monster Truck rally today or the fights last night, there’s always the spectacle of politics.
Today on CNN’s "Late Edition," while suggesting that "everybody has every right to stay in this race to the very end," Mitt Romney also suggested that, since John McCain and he "came in number one and number two, very close, and he (Mike Huckabee) came in a distant fourth…most people around the country have said, ‘OK, it’s been narrowed to a two-person race.’"
He also suggested that, as long as Huckabee is in the race, he takes more votes away from him, not from McCain. "We split the more conservative side of the party. Sen. McCain is able to combine the more liberal side of our party." He added, "I would never suggest to Mike Huckabee that he get out. That’s for him to decide."
But in Macon, Ga., Huckabee — clearly itchin’ for a fight — said Romney had suggested "that maybe I should pull out of the race."
Per ABC News’ Kevin "Chupkabee" Chupka, Huckabee said, "I thought it was pretty arrogant and presumptuous the other night for him to suggest that, if Ronald Reagan were voting, that he’d be voting for Mitt Romney, and even more arrogant and presumptuous for him to assume that, if people were not voting for me, that they’d be voting for him, and the idea that my voters would go to him is nonsense.
"My voters are voting for me because I have a consistent pro-life record, he doesn’t. They are voting for me because I’m strong on the 2nd amendment, and he isn’t. … My voters aren’t people who would necessarily gravitate to him, so he needs me to stay in this race, because quite frankly, I’m not sure he’s going to get many of the voters who vote for me."
Huckabee added, "For him to suggest that I need to drop out of the race, almost makes it sound like he thinks I’m some troubled company that he can buy and sell, like he did at Bain Capitol. I want to make it real clear he may think he can buy the election, but he doesn’t got enough money to buy me, and he certainly doesn’t have enough money to do a leveraged buy-out out of my campaign. All he’s doing is firing me up and getting me more determined, and I think he’s fired up my supporters more than anything has."
He also said that “Mr. Romney has spent about a $100 million to have basically the same number of delegates as I have, and I’ve spent about 7 million. You know, with the business background he has, you’d think by this point, with his Harvard-educated MBA, he’d come to the conclusion that he’s not selling his soap very well, if it takes that kind of money to have no more market share than I’ve got for about a fifteenth of the expenditure. So, I’ve got a suggestion, Mr. Romney, rather than me drop out, why don’t you give it up, and go back to Boston!”
Hoots and hollers! The crowd clapped and laughed and whooped it up.
(Of course … Romney didn’t suggest that Huckabee drop out. But no matter…)
Per ABC News’ ace cub reporter Matt Stuart, Romney, this evening in St. Louis, was asked about Huckabee’s comments.
"I don’t have any particular reaction to that," Romney said. "It sounds a little extreme, I think, at this stage. He’s a fine person. I never suggest anybody get out of the race. That’s their own decision."
– jpt
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
If you want a man of integrity running our country vote for Mitt Romney! He is the only republican candidate that has not resorted to name calling. Even when pressed to respond to attacks Romney takes the high road.
Romney for President!
Posted by: MK in Arizona | February 3, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
Huck is on fire and is ready to take on the establishment. Romney is running scared. He knows people are finding that he is even more liberal than McCain and Huck is the only consistent conservative left with a longer record to prove it!! Go Huck!!
Posted by: Chris | February 3, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
Huckabee is the one whose been cited for ethics violations as Governor. Huckabee is the one who received hundreds of thousands of dollars in “GIFTS”as Governor. I’m sure Huckabee will use his new found fame for profit after this election.
Romney donated his salary as Governor to charity. There is a real character difference.
Posted by: Louie P | February 3, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
Mike Huckabee pardoned 12 convicted MURDERERS as governor. As someone who has spent much of my life in Law Enforcement that makes me SICK!
Posted by: maria | February 3, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
I’m very impressed with how Romney maintains his composure and doesn’t personally attack those who attack him. Interesting how Huckabee would put words in Romney’s mouth about Huckabee’s departure. Huckabee is good at the innocent preacher act, but his other side often shows through.
Posted by: katrina | February 3, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
Mitt has no integrity. He has been doing robo-calls in all the Super Tuesday states saying it is a “Two man’s Race”. I’ve been volunteering for Mike and many people in the South say “Oh, Huck is still in it. I got a call from Romney saying it was a two man’s race between him and McCain. Yeah I’m glad Mike is still in it. He has my vote!” So you see, Mitt is stealing this election with dirty tricks. Trying to make it look like Huck is out so Huck supporters have to chose between him and McCain.
Posted by: anne | February 3, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
Romney will not be nominated much less
elected.
Huckabee gets my primary vote and
McCain-Huckabee my general election vote.
Romney will then retire to a sentence or two on some dusty page in an obscure
history book.
Posted by: brennus | February 3, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
CAN YOU BELIEVE the audacity of Huckabee. What a low life to say what he said about a comment that was never made. He doesn’t cease to amaze me. He is a wolf in sheeps…or should I say..preacher’s clothing.
What a candidate.
Vote smart.
Vote Mitt.
Posted by: JD in Ohio | February 3, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
Just for the record, Huckabee has my vote, and if he were not in the race, my vote would go to McCain, so perhaps Romney should be glad Huckabee is in it, because Huckabee is splitting the vote away from McCain. Romney is no conservative. He ran in a liberal state as a liberal, pro-abortion, pro-gay marriage candidate. Under his tenure, gay marriage gained legal recognition by the state. Huckabee on the other hand, pushed through an ammendment to Arkansas’ constitution defining marriage as between a man and a woman, and has staunchly protected the rights of the unborn. I could never trust a flip-flopper like Romney. His financial interest in the broadcasting companies have bought him some pro-Romney, anti-opponent propaganda, but it has not, and never will buy my vote. My vote is not for sale.
Posted by: Joyce | February 3, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
Conservatives will not surrender to McCain. This weekend Romney wins in Maine with 51%, despite McCain’s backing by the liberal media.
Why do conservatives dislike McCain so much?
Posted by: Bart for Freedom | February 3, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
Romney has the right stuff on immigration, marriage, abortion, taxes, economy, defense…. Romney is the total package. The Puke Politics of the lib media is disgusting as they go goo-goo ga-ga over McCain and try to tamper with the election by bashing Romney at every opportunity. Based on the contemptable lack of coverge of the Romney win in Maine yesterday, the media tampering and steering appears to be Election Racketeering or the very least, Election Fraud.
Posted by: Bill | February 3, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
Huckabee is the most ethics-challenged candidate out there. And if he has anything to do with a GOP presidential campaign after Super Tuesday, the Democrats are going to show how easy he has had it up to now.
They have been holding their fire, waiting to make the most of an easy kill. And this summer when the moment seems just right, they’ll start off with his sellout to the tobacco industry and all of his ethics violations and his misuse of public office for personal greed.
The “wedding” gift registry he used to shake people down after leaving the governor’s office won’t seem like a big deal at first.
But Democrats will expand on the picture of greed, bringing up the Jonesboro school shooting and how Huckabee promised survivors no one would profit from it, only to cut a book deal a few days later and reject pleas to share the proceeds in the form of scholarships.
Use of another Huckabee book will start establishing his dishonesty along with his greed, when Democrats start having fun with what they’ll portray as his pretense that dieting took 110 pounds off him, rather than bariatric surgery or some similar procedure.
At this point some fringe blog will use public doubt about Huckabee’s character to seek traction for a charge that will attract heavy web site traffic when played correctly: the dog torture incident.
Everyone knows there is something seriously wrong in a family when a teen old enough to be a Boy Scout counselor tortures or helps torture a dog: It was hung by a wire, stoned and had its throat slit.
Democrats will say it is especially wrong when the crime is minimized and the father steps between the son and a state police investigation, then fires the guy who would not immediately back off. The guy who says he suffered the injustice loves an audience and liberal mainstream media will be only too happy to provide him one at the perfect time. Juicy!
Then they will take Huckabee to task for granting convicted criminals 1,033 pardons and commutations of sentence – about twice as many acts of amnesty as his three predecessors in the governors office combined.
After Huckabee pressured a parole board to release a sex offender early, the rapist went on to murder a mother in Missouri. And people who don’t have a special loyalty to Huckabee are going to be outraged by this as it gets more and more attention.
He pardoned or commuted the sentences of 669 criminals, including 11 murderers. And this time instead of media playing down the evangelical connection, it is going to be played up.
The way Democrats will portray it, criminals who said they were saved will have used pastors to get special consideration from Huckabee. And you know they’ll ask if the pastors and Huckabee got anything in return, and they’ll ask in a way that implies corruption. (Remember all the ethics violations and gift demands?)
Liberal mainstream media may wait for fringe blogs to raise these subjects, but then they’ll report on what the blogs have been saying with glee. It won’t be pretty.
Posted by: WakeWashington | February 3, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
Mitt Romney is arrogant and a liberal. He will say anything to win despite the truth.
Posted by: Eric | February 3, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
Here are examples of Romney’s actual conservative record:
1. In the four balanced budgets he signed into law, Governor Romney used the line-item veto or program reduction power to cut spending by nearly $1 Billion. Over the course of four budgets, Governor Romney made over 300 line-item reductions, 350 line-item eliminations and struck language 150 times.
2. When Gov Romney took office in Massachusetts, he inherited a $2 billion deficit. While in office, he turned the $2 billion into a surplus—-WITHOUT raising taxes.
3. Gov Romney solved the health care crisis in Massachusetts—-and his plans are still used today. He did this by using the free market and competition—and without raising taxes.
4. Gov. Romney was instrumental in passing a bill abolishing a retroactive capital gains tax in the state that would have forced nearly 50,000 taxpayers to pay an additional $200 million in state taxes and fees
5. 4 years ago — before the illegals marched in our streets — Romney opposed a bill that would have allowed illegal aliens to get driver’s licenses. “Those who are here illegally should not receive tacit support from our government that gives an indication of legitimacy,” the governor said.(Scott S. Greenberger, “Romney Stand Dims Chances Of License For Undocumented,” The Boston Globe, 10/28/03)
6. Romney vetoed a bill in 2004 that would have permitted illegal aliens to pay the same in-state tuition rate paid by citizens at public colleges and universities in Massachusetts.
7. Romney vetoed the bill providing state funding for human embryonic stem cell research
8. Romney vetoed a bill that provided for the “morning after pill” without a prescription because it is an abortifacient and would have been available to minors without parental notification and consent
9. He vetoed legislation which would have redefined Massachusetts longstanding definition of the beginning of human life from fertilization to implantation
10. Governor Romney strongly supported a successful ballot initiative that replaced the state’s bilingual program with English immersion.(Romney Vows to Protect English Immersion Law, May 1, 2003)
11. Governor Romney demonstrated his commitment to school-choice by vetoing a bill that would have canceled funding for Massachusetts’ charter-school program.(Romney to Veto Charter School Moratorium, June 23, 2004)
12. He supported parental notification laws and opposed efforts to weaken parental involvement
13. He fought to promote abstinence education in public school classrooms with a program offered by faith-based Boston group Healthy Futures to middle school students.
14. Governor Romney filed and signed into law the most significant expansion of military benefits in recent years. The new law reduced to zero the cost members of the Massachusetts National Guard must pay to attend public colleges and universities, increased twenty-fold the death benefit paid to families of members killed in the line of duty, created a new annuity benefit for Gold Star spouses and boosted the amount paid to Gold Star parents.(Romney Signs Legislation Expanding Military Benefits, November 11, 2005)
Posted by: John S | February 3, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
I am sick of Huckabee blatantly lying to the population about his white house bid. This man is obviously not running against McCain, but solely running to beat down Romney, a Mormon. Huckabee is obvously trying to paint Romney and thus in his eyes, Mormons as men without integrity. Show me one person who personally knows Mr. Romney that thinks he lacks integrity. His policies have been consistent except in regards to abortion. They have not changed. Period.
If Huckabee truly thinks McCain is better then Romney then step aside and let the American people decide. If Huck really wants to win this thing, then he should start running against the frontrunner, John McCain. I cannot understand their alliance, as they ideologically are very different. Get out or be in, but stop this absolute dishonesty against Romney. Time and time again I had heard from Romney supporters that Huck was their second choice, as he was mine. Now that is not the case. I would vote Ron Paul or Obama before these two lairs. (I these guys could loss Utah in the general if they keep this up. Wouldn’t that be something!)
Posted by: Eric | February 3, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
Willard Mittens Romney deadpans to the media his slick, easy style while spending a personal fortune of millions attacking Huckabee and McCain in the media. Romney may not have said “Get out…” but he certainly implied it- and it’s quite arrogant to presume that he and McCain have the right to the party leadership. Huckabee tells the truth, stands up for what he believes in, and is supported at the grassroots level by many supporters who see him a strong conservative. I am not an evangelical… just someone who has found a man of candor and integrity in Mike Huckabee. He, and then McCain have my vote- but Romney? Not a chance.
Posted by: Mike | February 3, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
Huckabee: wants to amend the constitution of the United States to fit his view of religion and marriage. That is a VIOLATION of the very first Amendment of the Ten Amendments known as the Bill of Rights: ‘CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW RESPECTING AN ESTABLISHMENT OF RELIGION…’ That is not a suggestion, but a law. The founding fathers knew that people like Huckabee would change the Constitution to have their religion control the government and the people.
Posted by: Angel | February 3, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
Mitt is not stealing the race. The Media is. The Media wants McCain to be nominated by the republicans to assure a democrat gets in office. Look what happened when Dole was nominated!! Don’t let it happen again!!
Look at Eric’s posts to this article and google for info on all the candidates yourself.
I think there will be a democrat in the White House next year, and economically, all of us will suffer. The middle class will pay for it all as usual.
Posted by: Pat | February 3, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
Eric-
You need to do a little more Bible study. How about checking into the chronology. The Bible is not all in chronilogical order and John actually wrote the Book of Revelations before he even wrote the book of John! Does that mean the Book of John is not scripture? No. There are also similar scriptures in Dueteronomy 12:32 and 4:2, and Proverbs 30: 5-6. The scripture clearly means that God has commanded us not to add to his word, or take away from it- alter it. It doesn’t mean that he has shut is mouth and will never speak again. In that light, isn’t it interesting to think about how many different versions of the Bible there are. Talk about adding to and taking away from. No wonder there are so many christian religions that all claim to be teaching the truth, but all teach different doctrines. Only one can be true.
Bottom line- Your argument holds no water- and none of your Anti-Mormon arguments ever will.
Posted by: Stephanie | February 3, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
Huckabee is wasting the time and resources of his supporters. It’s shameful. I don’t say that because he doesn’t drop out of the race, I say that because he doesn’t campaign against the frontrunner. It’s dishonest to keep attacking Mitt Romney and then play footsies with John McCain under the table. If I were a Huckabee supporter, I’d tell him to either get in the fight for real or leave with a trace of dignity.
Posted by: Jen | February 3, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
Romney is receiving an impressive number of endorsements in congress, talk show hosts, columnists… a long list. And for good reason- he is by far the best candidate. He is poised and stable, intelligent, and experienced with solving complex problems. He accomplished more here in Massachusetts than most governors do in longer terms. He is a very capable person and will be an outstanding president. Vote Romney on Super Tuesday!
Posted by: Elizabeth | February 3, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
Huck has zero chance of winning. The vast majority of his votes would go to Romney. He appears to want McAmnesty to win. This show a lack of class. Don’t forget his hate filled Mormon diatribe.
Posted by: matt | February 3, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
Let’s face it Romney is an empty suit
I am not voting for Mitt romney because his career in the private sector makes Gordon Gecko from the movie Wall Street look like a nice guy – how many american jobs did he ship overseas re-organizing companies?
another reason is he states he is against immigration yet every week one happens to sneak on his lawn and cut his grass for him
Posted by: Troy | February 3, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
Willard (Mitt) Romney cannot buy the presidency. Most Americans can see that he lacks core values – as evidenced by changing from pro-gay and pro-choice to faux Reagan conservative in a short period of time. We’re not buying it, Mitt.
Posted by: Petee | February 3, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
CNN reports that after today’s Maine win, Romney has 92 delegates to Huckabee’s 29. He placed fourth in Florida. His flash in the pan in Iowa is a distant memory. He’s the Republican Howard Dean. He is clearly staying in the race to play spoiler to Romney. The arrogance and bitterness of Huckabee is the story!
Posted by: ComeOn | February 3, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
My condolences to “the Huckster”. He will never be the man of integrity that Mitt Romney is. It is sad to see someone that was so close to the Lord, move so far away and be so filled with hate. Isn’t there some commandment about bearing false witness? My, how soon they forget. I think there just might be another about
By their fruits you will know them. Well, Huckabee’s fruits are listed above. Then of course, Mitt Romney donates HIS Governor salary to charity, returns his Olympics salary, provides
thousands of jobs for people – I don’t know – you decide. For me, I am voting for Mitt.
Posted by: Cindi | February 3, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
Tonight, Feb 3, Mitt Romney was interviewed by Brett Baier. Mitt Romney was asked if he had suggested Mike Huckabee leave the race (after playing a clip of Governor Huckabee stating such) to which Mitt Romney stated emphatically he had not….apparently Mitten’s is flipflopping again
Associated Press – February 3, 2008 8:54 PM ET
Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney is calling on Mike Huckabee to drop out of the race.
Romney has recently expressed concern that Huckabee will peel off enough conservatives to deprive him of victory over John McCain in Super Tuesday’s Republican nomination contests in 21 states.
Huckabee, appearing on CNN, says the suggestion was “ludicrous,” noting that only a fraction of the delegates needed to win the Republican presidential nomination had been apportioned thus far.
hmmmmm….sounds like Mittens DID ask Huck to take a leap….kind of looks like Romney is a liar…but then we all knew that anyway
Posted by: dd | February 3, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
Without marriage being protected there will be no more United States. Why commit national suicide?
What’s wrong with trying to protect America from a wrong idea about freedom.
Posted by: Chris | February 3, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
To Bad for Mitt that some of us
know how to read,His past positions
are very different from his current one’s.
Sorry Mitt but mid 50′s conversions are
just a little suspicious
Get real stop trying to fool voters
although some are pretty easy
Posted by: troy | February 3, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
Remember, those who have to continually tell you how honest, religious, ect they are, are almost always the most dishonest and hypocritical. For a preacher it is amazing how hateful Huckabee is.
Posted by: God's Fear | February 3, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
I am so sick of the tag team of Mike Huckabee and John McCain!!! Today Mike Huckabee says that Mitt Romney can’t buy him out of the race – the problem for him is that Mitt Romney NEVER told him to get out of the race! Once again Huckabee tries to paint Mitt Romney as an arrogant, rich guy. Why don’t his supporters question why it is that Huck never goes after McCain?? It is so obvious that he is staying in this race to take away from Romney – because he’s rich, because he’s smart, because he’s good looking and truth be known I’ll bet it’s mostly because he’s Mormon! He lost my respect when he pretended not to know what Mormons believe after having been the keynote speaker at the Southern Baptist convention in SLC – designed to “witness” to the Mormons. What a liar this man is! He doesn’t care about the direction of this country – he only cares about defeating Mitt Romney. Huckabee supporters apparently don’t mind that he has a few ethical problems and no integrity whatsoever – please wake up and vote for a man who, when you google his ethics violations you get nothing! Vote Mitt Romney!
Posted by: TJCinTexas | February 3, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
The old argument that my candidate is “perfect” and your candidate is not is a bad argument. You got to go deeper than that to prove your point.
Posted by: Bob | February 3, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
The Maine thing Mitt needs to do
is drop out.Hey has anyone seen my empty suit.
Posted by: Troy | February 3, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
I’m someone who is for stopping the lie that Huckabee is hating people.
Oh come on, is Huckabee really hating people or is it that you just disagree with him.
Posted by: Chris | February 3, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm
Do you honestly believe that the conservative talking heads hate America so much that they would undermine the candidates they truly thought were the best for the job?
Poor Huck actually thinks he has a shot at VP? I assure you, after the dirty tricks in FL and the timely Crist endorsement, that baby has already been sealed. McCain is using Huckabee and Huckabee, thru his own desparation is falling for it lock, stock and barrel. What a waste. But we all get to make our choices– we just don’t always get to choose the consequences
Posted by: CM in VA | February 3, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
Romney is pro abortion and pro gay marriage. He was instrumental in Mass. legalizing same sex marriages. He changes his mind like most of us change clothes. Face it folks, Mitt Romney is the Republican version of John Kerry.
Posted by: Mark in Missouri | February 3, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
What will Huckabee do when the race is over? His only chance is to play spoiler to Romney and pray for favors from McCain. He won’t say anything bad about McCain, a clearly liberal Republican and clearly the frontrunner at the moment. All his energy is focused on Romney. Hmmm, I wonder why…
Posted by: ComeOn | February 3, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
Ron Paul will be there in Nov….one way or another as the only Republican in the race for president…
Posted by: arthall33 | February 3, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
MIke Huckabee: nice guy, a lot of fun-not the sharpest pencil in the drawer. Some of his answers on foreign policy and the economy are scary. He could propel us into a depression. Is that the legacy you want to leave your children and grandchildren? (Romney was valedictorian, and has a joint MBA/JD from Harvard. He launched Staples and Dominos. He eats economics for breakfast).
McCain: thank-you for your service in the war, and we have compassion for your horrendous experiences in it. But the Presidency? This would be another very scary choice because:
1. McCain has a violent temper. He has screamed the “F” word frequently at his fellow congressmen. By his own admission, he loses it…a lot. Some feel that there is residual psychological damage from his years spent as a POW. One congressman put it this way “You don’t want that guy anywhere near a trigger” (that includes nuclear triggers of the Presidential kind)
2. McCain admits he know almost nothing about the economy. With our country teetering, we need a savvy, sharp, economocally brilliant President. Asia is at the door. A depression is not out of the question. We don’t have time to mess around with bigotry. We need someone who can turn this economy around-fast.
3. McCain and Hilary are very good friends. They went to Estonia together as Senators and held a drinking contest. This level of maturity is reserved for the immature, not people who want to run the (currently) most powerful country on the earth.
We no longer have time for high school popularity contests. We desperately need a real leader with serious intelligence.
We have friends who know the Romney family well. They really are wholesome. They will not bring scandal to the White House. They will keep it “white”. Mitt is not in this for the fame or power. He didn’t take a salary in Masachusetts, he won’t as President. He simply wants to help, and he knows how.
The smartest thing we could do for our posterity is to vote for Mitt and encourage others to do the same.
Posted by: midge | February 3, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
Mitt (“the chameleon”) Romney is a great pretender. He runs for office in Massachusetts and goes to the liberal voters there and says that he’s never been part of the Reagan Republican crowd (it’s on video tape). Now he comes to the Repuplican electorate and pretends that the mantle of Reagan Republicanism is upon him. Mitt, you can’t be trusted and you’ll never make it be president.
Posted by: Petee | February 3, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
Heather said: “If Romney is citing the Florida results for Huckabee to drop out, why didn’t he drop out after SC?”
_______________________________________
Romney has won Wyoming, Michigan, Wyoming, Nevada, and Main. Huckabee has won Iowa. Do the math. Romney has 92 delgates, Huckabee 29. That’s better than 3 to 1. How can conservative voters continue to vote for Huckabee when it will assure a liberal McCain a win? I don’t get it.
Posted by: ComeOn | February 3, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
That’s right Romney was a Liberal
or is a liberal
or is a conservative
or was a conservative
or was a Liberal
or is was is was is
In Romney cas
I guess it depends on the meaning
of the word is, is
Wow I’m confused
Just Imagine How old Mitty feels
Posted by: Troy | February 3, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
Man, it seems a lot of people are picking on Mike Huckabee. He must be the right candidate then. He did the best at the Reagan Library debate. What gives?
Posted by: Chris | February 3, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
Do we really want a man with a hair trigger temper (McCain) with his hand on the nuclear button?
Posted by: ComeOn | February 3, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
Every ones afraid of Mike Huckabee, because they know real change is coming. Oh, Ya…Go Mike…!
Posted by: Chris | February 3, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
I’d rather have Johnny Mac’s finger on the trigger, Than have Mitty asking his lawers for advice on how to handle the situation
Posted by: Troy | February 3, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
Huckabee is arrogant to pretend he’s still a contender in this race.
Posted by: ComeOn | February 3, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
Mitt was clearly the best candidate. Any other election this assertion may have been debatable, but since the concession of Fred, it is undeniable. Mitt Romney is the only candidate that attempts to unite the three core factions: social, economic, and foreign policy conservatives. This union has been key to edging out narrow victories for Republicans since Reagan. With McCain we compromise our platform on taxation, family values, and free speech. With Huckabee we compromise our values on spending, taxation, and crime. Mitt Romney is the only candidate that prevented the impeding republican schism of the three factions. This fact is plain to insiders such a Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, and Ann Coulter who have directly or indirectly endorsed Mitt.
If Mitt is the clear candidate, then we must wonder why he has done so poorly. Some say creditability. However, if creditability was an issue then, then why is it not an issue for McCain who has changed his mind on numerous social and economic issues, a man that has reportedly considered switching parties or running as VP with John Kerry? The reason Mitt’s “flip-flopper” status sticks, is the subject of a famous poll from Vanderbilt. This survey shows that 26 percent of those who accuse Romney of flip-flopping also indicate that Mormonism, not flip-flopping, is their problem with Mitt. Another widely published gallop poll showed that 27% of republicans would not vote for a qualified Mormon candidate based on his religion, this was a number much greater then for women or African Americans. This makes Mormons the most discriminated minority in America.
Some Mormons claim that we can not hold Huckabee or McCain accountable for the prejudices of America. In response, I point out that Huck’s official blog, whose comments are edited by campaign staff, allows remarks such as: if we elect Mitt “we might as well elect a witch…” Huck continues to refer to himself as a “Christian leader” (implying that Mitt is not) and refusing to classify Mormons as Christians. Huck, a knowledgeable Bapitist Minister, but plays ignorant about his anti-Mormon remarks concerning Christ’s brother. Not to mention Huck’s supporters participating in push-polling, anti-Mormon Christmas cards, and spam emails. Even now when Huck has no chance of winning, he continues to campaign in order to whittle away Mitt’s social conservatives. Every time Huckabee is asked about the frontrunner McCain he twists the question into an attack on Mitt. Ultimately, the Baptist Minister would rather have a social liberal in the White House rather then a Mormon. In the case of McCain, as already pointed out above, he is not a conservative. Ann Coulter has recently taken it a step further and claims that she will vote of Hilary, because on some issues she is more conservative then McCain.
Posted by: dave | February 3, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
It’s the pot calling the kettle black. They are both religious delusionals and unfit to hold any office. Think twice before voting for ANOTHER religious delusional. RELIGION POISONS EVERYTHING!
Posted by: Ronin | February 3, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
Do we really want a man who took bribes in the worst savings and loan scandal in history (McCain)? Look up Keating Five! McCain has no integrity
Posted by: ComeOn | February 3, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
For the record:
“Religion” is man’s attempt to climb a ladder to God.
Christianity is God reaching out to man.
Posted by: Bob | February 3, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
Troy, I thought you were going to bed. Face it, Huckabee’s bid ended after Iowa. That was his victory. Perhaps there is a church in Arkansas that can use another preacher.
Posted by: ComeOn | February 3, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
My name is Romney Robot…my views are programmable. What shall I believe in today, my Dark Lord?
Posted by: Romney Robot | February 3, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
If Huckabee doesn’t change his views, how many murderers would he pardon if he were President?
Posted by: ComeOn | February 3, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
Joyce:
Regarding your comment:
“Under [Romney's] tenure, gay marriage gained legal recognition by the state. Huckabee on the other hand, pushed through an ammendment to Arkansas’ constitution defining marriage as between a man and a woman….”
You sound like your blaming Romney for what happened. He had nothing to do with the decision to legalize same sex marriage in Massachussets. It was a court decision (Goodridge v. Department of Public Health if you care to educate yourself.) Romney also tried an amendment to define marriage as between a man and a woman but the legislature refused to allow it to go forward for public approval.
In clarification Romney has been pro-life since 2004 and has never been pro-gay. Anyone who says otherwise is either ill informed or selling something.
Posted by: J. Ash | February 3, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
Does it seem to anyone else that everybody’s stealing Obama’s lines this campaign season? From “change” to “fired up” to the zinger about Romney’s business acumen…
I coulda swore I felt this deja vu before…
Posted by: Creamy Goodness | February 3, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
Troy – you said ‘without protecting marriage there will be no more United States’ as if it were a fact. I challenge that statement – exactly how would allowing gay marriage be ‘national suicide’? You probably said the same thing about interracial marriage; allowing African-Americans to serve in combat units; and allowing women to vote. Seems like the country’s doing just fine with those. If you want to live in a reactionary, repressive country, you’re welcome to move to Zimbabwe.
Posted by: Tom | February 3, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm
The stakes are high on Super Tuesday for the republican parties’ presidential contenders, but it could not be higher for them than it is for America.
It is very important for the voter to do some homework this weekend so that we as a nation do not end up with a severe case of buyers’ remorse on Wednesday morning. We must be true to our roots and not allow the wolves in sheep’s clothing to rob us blind, and deprive us of who we are, and what we represent as a people once enlightened with the vision of Abraham Lincoln, Ronald Reagan, and George Bush.
There are wolves and they have been running a well coordinated attack, and have already taken some of our associates down. These wolves have us on the run and have begun to strategically divide us, and scatter us in preparation for the final move, the destruction of liberty. They want to chase us down the dark road too socialism. We need to rally around our core principles and adhere to them. We must ensure the safety, and success of our parties’ great but now endangered legacy. We need to rise up with a united voice and cast our vote this coming Tuesday, to the only conservative out there; that man is Mitt Romney. Vote Mitt Romney President of the United States of America in 2008.
http://libertysfront.blogspot.com/
Posted by: Travis Gollaher | February 3, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
So far our classy Baptist Minister Mr. Huckabee has called Romney “arrogant,” a “liar” and said Romney is still “going through political puberty.”
When Romney talks about Huckabee he sticks to the issues. Romney has NEVER called Huckabee a name like a “liar” or “arrogant” NEVER.
When Huckabee talks about Romney he resorts to namecalling and mean attacks.
Then at the end of the day, Huckabee pats himself on the back and says, “I am proud because I ran an honorable campaign.” Ok, Romney won’t say it but I will–what an arrogant two faced hypocrite.
Posted by: DLounsbury | February 3, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
LOOK AT ROMNEY’S RECORD – it’s virtually flawless! The guy is an economic/business genius! Any business school in the nation knows and lauds his work for American jobs and job growth.
You people that are voting for Huck and McCain disgust me. Do a little research. Stop deciding who to vote for based on user feedback from Youtube. Get smarter, research the facts. Do you really want an economic recession to ruin the next 10 years??? McCain/Huck are likely to destroy what little we have left. McCain admits he knows nothing about the economy and Huck thinks building roads in Florida will bring more jobs from China… WTF!?
Don’t be fooled…
VOTE SMART, VOTE MITT!
Posted by: CP from NYC | February 4, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am
For purposes of full disclosure, how many of the above pro-Romney posts were written by Mormons? Why is disclosure necessary? The overwhelming majority of Mormons blindly support Romney no matter the issue or on his merits. Most have this blind loyalty b/c they want a Mormon president and it is in the nature of their religion. Look at the Nevada caucus – 95% of Mormons supported Romney – 95%!! What other religious sect’s members provide that kind of support for one particular candidate. The evangelicals do not for a former baptist preacher, or catholics for John McCain. That 95% says a lot, and my guess is most of these poster are Mormons. No doubt a Mormon will argue why does religion matter, how dare this poster raise the issue. Well, look at the 95% figure, that makes Mormonism and its religious influence on this election an issue.
Posted by: Mike | February 4, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am
Romney may not himself have suggested that Huckabee drop out, but his camp certainly has. In fact, they are asking Romney’s influential supporters to pressure Huckabee’s campaign through various tactics to exit the race. As such, it is just the same, whether Romney suggests it himself publicly or not.
Posted by: Thomas | February 4, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am
“Vote smart. Vote Romney!”
Posted by: Petee | February 4, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am
Mike, are you suggesting that the 95% of Mormons “blindly support” Harry Reid because he’s Mormon, too? What a stupid statement. The polls say 39% of evangelicals would never vote for a Mormon, simply because they don’t like Mormons. What a terrible statement. Incidentally, I believe the vast majority of Mormons voted for the evangelical George W. Bush in the last two elections.
Posted by: ComeOn | February 4, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am
People say: “It takes a Carter to get us a Reagan.”
Do we have to go through that again?
Romney is the best! MaCain is just Bob Dole 2.0. Huckabee is running #2 spot.
It’s hard for me to understand why so many so called conservatives just don’t get it.
If Romney fail to get the nomination, it probably makes sense for me to vote for B/O or H/C.
Posted by: E-Z | February 4, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am
Wow, Huckabee is even more of an idiot than I imagined!
FELLOW CONSERVATIVES: IT IS TIME TO RALLY TO ROMNEY!!! Let’s show the media and all the pundits and all the entrenched politicians that we have the power, not them!!
All Huckabee supporters, please consider very carefully what you will be doing if you vote for Huckabee! He has no chance of winning. He is only staying in the race to pull votes away from Romney so McCain can win. He wants to be McCain’s running mate. It is more than suspicious, it is ridiculously obvious. And the funny thing is, I don’t think McCain would pick him as a running mate; there are other choices that would be more to his advantage. He is playing Mike Huckabee just as he’s playing a whole lot of other people. If you vote for Huckabee, you would be splitting the conservative vote and allowing McCain to win a majority. Who would you rather have? McCain or Romney? Those are your choices. Please vote for one of them and don’t waste your vote on Huckabee.
Romney is the clear choice if you are a conservative who cares about the state of the economy, keeping taxes low, ending illegal immigration, appointing conservative judges, saving families, and on top of all these- having a decent, honorable, proven leader in the white house!
Go Mitt!
Posted by: DMH | February 4, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am
The Huckster’s at it again. This guy has to resort to personal attacks because that’s all he has. If anyone thinks Huckleberry is honorable, then I am a green space martian. He is deceitful and he is an opportunist. He only won one state – Iowa – and that’s because he ran a smear campaign against Romney suggesting that he himself was the Christian choice. Then, all these people try to make an issue out of Romney’s faith. First, that has nothing to do with this. If it did, then we ought to bring Huckster’s religion under as much scrutiny as the press has brought Romney’s. If you want religious tolerance, you don’t want the Huckster.
Posted by: Peter Smith | February 4, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am
Romney is always a class act even when he’s attacked savagely by McCain and childishly by Huckabee he responds with grace and dignity.
He has more intellect and talent than both of them put together and it would be a shame if the Republicans don’t select him.
Go Mitt!
Posted by: Alex | February 4, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am
Associated Press – February 3, 2008 8:54 PM ET
Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney is calling on Mike Huckabee to drop out of the race.
Romney has recently expressed concern that Huckabee will peel off enough conservatives to deprive him of victory over John McCain in Super Tuesday’s Republican nomination contests in 21 states.
Posted by: Sam | February 4, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am
I agree. (Of course … Romney didn’t suggest that Huckabee drop out. But no matter…) Of course Romney and his camp are suggesting Mike drop out of the race, and that it what Huckabee is responding too.
Posted by: Pito | February 4, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am
Petee, don’t mock what you don’t understand. Grow up!
And for Mike, for purposes of full disclosure, many LDS support Romney because of his conservative approach. I for one, want someone with a proven record. Someone who can run this country like a business and not a country club. The only one that can do that is Mitt. GO MITT!
Posted by: Jerry | February 4, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am
The reason Huckbee is still in this is that he’s working on getting a job with McCain….. maybe VP?
If he isn’t campaigning, what does he have to go back to in Arkansas? Preaching??
Posted by: Kris in AL | February 4, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am
We’re certainly are very sorry that Mike Huckabee is standing in the way of Mitt’s presidential ambitions. Maybe it’s because Mike Huckabee stands for something more than appearing to be a conservative like Mitt. Mitt supporters – posturing and posing is not the same thing as standing. Mike stands for something. Mitt on the other hand does a lot of posturing and posing.
Posted by: Petee | February 4, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am
I received a phone call from Mitt Romney two nights ago that stated there was a choice between two running for the Presidential office as a Republican.
I wondered if Mitt was calling everyone in 22 states, or is he always recorded?
I wouldn’t vote for a man that can’t count to three.
Posted by: d | February 4, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am
Huckabee supporters, can anyone of you please answer this simple question:
HOW CAN HUCKABEE WIN THE RACE WITHOUT ATTACHING THE FRONTRUNNER WHEN HE IS ALREADY WAY BEHIND??!!
Are you guys really that dumb to believe him?
Posted by: E-Z | February 4, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am
Two questions for the Romniacs: 1, Name a single major issue that Mitt has been consistently conservative on. 2, Since it’s unlikely that we will keep all of the states President Bush carried, which blue state does Mitt turn red. Fred Barnes is right. Conservatives (and I am one) need to grow up. McCain is not perfect but he is great on the war and solidly pro-life. I will support Mitt if he’s the nominee but he will be torched. I’m not willing to drink the Hugh Hewitt Kool-Aid and follow Rush and Hannity off the cliff. Romney is not electable.
Posted by: Bill Graham | February 4, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am
Have any of you Mitt suppporter seen the national polls or current delegate count? Mitt and Huck are 4% points apart nationally in most polls. In fact, the delgate count between the two are not that disparate. In the states McCain is not winning, Huckabee is out performing Romney for the most part.
Posted by: Timmy | February 4, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am
So, Huck was actually a pastor at a church? I find him to be a petty, jealous twit. I hope all pastors are not like him.
Posted by: amle | February 4, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am
Something like 10% of Republicans have had a chance to vote for the Republican nominee up to this point. Despite his chameleon-like flip-flopping on important issues to conservative Republicans, the major conservative punditry in our land have convinced (i.e., deluded) themselves into believing that Mitt is “truly” a conservative. Nice try Rush, et al, but we’re not buying it. Mitt, you can spend all of your millions trying to convince people, but you don’t have enough to buy yourself the election. Sorry.
Posted by: petee | February 4, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am
Huck is planning on becoming a VP or the white house cleric for the AMNESTy McCain admistration.However that will never be for the conservatives will never vote for McCain and he will lose the national election and will Go back to Ark.
Posted by: ted bertrand | February 4, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am
All Romney Supporters:
Consider the disparity b/w 100 million dollars versus 7 millions dollars? Yet, Romney and Huck have nearly the same number of delegates. Doesn’t that suggest there is something wrong with Mitt’s electibility? What do you think it is that is not registering with voters? Mitt spent a year in Iowa and NH, spent millions, had organization in every PRECINCT, yet still managed to lose. This says something about his electibility. Think about it, then do what is best for the GOP.
Posted by: Miriana | February 4, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am
“By their fruits you will know them.” That’s exactly how we should judge people’s character — look at their life, family, how to treat other people, etc.
-Unlike all other candidates, Romney has no scandal;
-Unlike most other candidates, Romney is a faithful husband to his first and only wife;
-Unlike many other candidates, Romney’s children (5) love him so much they even gave up full time jobs to campaign for him;
-Coming from a well-off family, he would not have made so many accomplishments without strong values;
-Coming from a well-off family, his children would not have all been higher achievers without getting strong values from the family;
-He gave his salaries to charities for his jobs at Olympic and as a governor;
-Unlike his opponents, he only attacks his opponents on issues;
-He is extremely smart, yet still very humble.
Just think about it!
Posted by: E-Z | February 4, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am
If Huckabee really made those comments, than he’s a phony just like McCain. resorting to personal attacks rather than just stick to issue differences like Romney is doing. They all hate him because Romney won’t stoop to their level by making personal attacks–he’s always respectful toward his opponents. but he will point out differences in issues he has from his opponents. He’s exactly the kind of leader we need in Washington. a conservative we can be proud of. I hope conservatives will rise to this challenge of our time. don’t let a liberal be nominated to represent Republicans. he will not fight for our conservative values. we need to rally around Mitt Romney. Please vote Mitt Romney on Tuesday!!!
Posted by: freddie | February 4, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am
E-Z
Ask the thousands of employess laid off by Romney about “fruits.” Bain capital is a ruthless venture capitalist firm that uses offshore tax havens to raise capital to buy out corporations. These corps are bought in order to break them up and sell off the assests for profit. Jobs are being lost, not created. In full disclosure, there are a small majority of businesses Romney did turn around. So, using tax havens and laying off workers simply for profit are not the “fruits” I am looking for in a president.
Posted by: JFrank | February 4, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am
Huckabee’s followers are almost universally ignorant of his record as a big-government, pro-amnesty, corrupt politician in Arkansas. I’m an evangelical homeschooler like a good chuck of his supporters, yet I did my homework and found the truth. Huckabee would destroy the National GOP like he did the Arkansas GOP. He is the primary reason AR lags behind the rest of the south (even LOUISIANA now!) in turning Republican. Go Mitt!
Posted by: Daniel Davies | February 4, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am
How does “Hello. This is Governor Mitt Romney. The race of the Republican nomination for President is now a two person race.” in Romney’s own voice not the same thing as, “Huckabee really should drop out.”?
Huckabee has every right to push back at Romney over this.
Posted by: JK | February 4, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am
“Consider the disparity b/w 100 million dollars versus 7 millions dollars? Yet, Romney and Huck have nearly the same number of delegates. Doesn’t that suggest there is something wrong with Mitt’s electibility?”
No, it suggests that Huckabee has gotten millions of dollars in free publicity from the media, and has a gained a powerful organizing advantage from certain influential pastors and members of evangelical churches.
Posted by: Jack | February 4, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am
Freddie wrote “don’t let a liberal be nominated to represent Republicans.” You mean like a former pro-choice, gay right and Brady Bill supporter, who only change his “lifelong” positions since running for election. Lets all be sure not to vote for a liberal like that.
Posted by: Bill | February 4, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am
Funny how Evengelicals have such a high divorce rate,how’s that saving a family? Most Evengelicals are hyprocrites,bigots,and live in the twelveth century. All they care about is their twisted little agenda. Any candidate who believes in the Rapure or that the earth is six thousand years old is unfit to be president. No more holy roller Presidents ever! Look what Bush has done to this country. Enough said.
Posted by: AJ | February 4, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am
Conservative Republicans, wake up!!! Romney is the hope of the party! Huckabee is not Christlike, and therefore unchristian. He was a minister for Filthy Lucre. Romney was an LDS bishop which is similar to a minister, but he did it without pay! That is the way the early Christian church was run. Did Peter, James and John get paid to preach? Who is the real Christian? Not Huckabee! I am sick of people voting for Huckabee, cause he was a minister, he is not qualified to run the largest and most important organiziation in the world, the government of the United States! Romney is the only conservative still in the race! A vote for Huckabee is a vote for a liberal government! Wake up people! The economy is gonna get worse, before it gets better! Who is going to balance to budget, reduce taxes, and keep American safe from our enemies, only Romney!
Posted by: terryk9725 | February 4, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am
terryk9725: As you point out, Mitt was an LDS bishop. So, of course he believes, as most good Mormons do, that he will one day be a god and have his own planet to rule (standard Mormon theology). Question: Does becoming president of the U.S. help him become a god faster or does it hinder him. We certainly wouldn’t want to hinder Mitt in becoming a god.
Posted by: petee | February 4, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am
“How does ‘Hello. This is Governor Mitt Romney. The race of the Republican nomination for President is now a two person race.’ in Romney’s own voice not the same thing as, ‘Huckabee really should drop out.’?”
Jesus, if you don’t know, no one can tell you. It’s not the same thing because it’s not the same thing. They are two completely different statements. God help us.
Posted by: Jack | February 4, 2008, 1:33 am 1:33 am
Miriana:
You said: “Consider the disparity b/w 100 million dollars versus 7 millions dollars? Yet, Romney and Huck have nearly the same number of delegates…”
Here is the latest delegate counts:
McCain 97
Romney 92
Huckabee 29
Paul 6
Do you know that 92 and 29 are not ‘nearly the same’? The order you write really matters:-)
Do you know how many 100s of millions dollars worth of free coverage were given to McCain by the MSM?
Do you know Romney was fighting an uphill battle because of the anti-Mormon sentiments among a faction of conservatives?
Romney’s chance of winning the nomination 40% vs Huckabee’s 0%.
Do you know 40%/0% is infinitely bigger than 100m/7m?
Posted by: E-Z | February 4, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am
Huckabee has the best plan for the economy…it’s called Fair Tax! Get the book, Fair Tax by Neal Boortz & Congressman John Linder and you will be enlightened. Everyone else’s plan is a temporary fix. Huckabee has a bold and sensible plan. I’m an Independent voter who registered Republican to vote for a sensible plan…Fair Tax. Otherwise I would vote for Hillary Clinton. VOTE HUCKABEE ON SUPER TUESDAY AND BEYOND!!!
Posted by: lee | February 4, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am
Jack, Romney’s campaign is suggesting Huck drop out of the race by coalescing influential Romney supporters to pressure Huck to exit the race making the argument that Huck is taking away Romney supporters. In pratical terms the message sent to Huck is the same whether it is publicly spoken by Romney or ther former as described. Huck is calling Romney “Arrogant and Presumptuous” b/c the buck stops there.
Posted by: George | February 4, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am
This blog entry is totally based on a false idea that Romney hasn’t said explicitly or implicitly that Huckabee is out of the race. Maybe Romney didn’t listen to his own voice when he recorded a campaign phone call calling the Republication nomination for president a two-person race. Like the time he adamantly denied that his TV advertisements (which he supposedly approved) never called McCain’s immigration bill “Amnesty.” Did Romney ever apologize to McCain for pretty much calling this war hero a liar to his face on national TV?
Posted by: KJ | February 4, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am
I am voting for Romney because of the 3 major issues I care about, the economy, illegal immigration, and health care, he is the only candidate whose views I can agree with.
GW Bush never ran a business successfully. Most of the businesses he ran went bankrupt. Now, look at the state of our economy. Romney is the only candidate who has been successful in business–I believe he is the only candidate who’d have a chance at saving our economy.
Posted by: EmmaC | February 4, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am
JFrank:
You said “Ask the thousands of employess laid off by Romney about ‘fruits.’…”
How come you think like an democrat? Companies lay off employees in order to survive. It’s better than everyone losing their jobs!! Otherwise why not make it a new federal law that allows no company to layoff its employee under any circumstance? Do you know how many jobs were created by saving companies like Staples, Domino, Sports Authority, etc?
Some people even complaint about Romney being too rich. He made his own fortune! That’s a qualification for the job he is applying. Any republican thinks otherwise should really rethink about his/her party affiliation.
Posted by: E-Z | February 4, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am
I can’t believe any of you still continue to back Huckabee. I used to really like him, but after the hundredth time of him dodging a serious question with another joke or ah shucks soundbite, i realized he is not a serious candidate for this country. And now over the last few weeks, i have really lost all respect for the guy. He whined all through the last debate. Is that presidential? Do you idiots actually think Putin or other leaders in the world will respond to a huckabee temper tantrum during critical foreign negotiations. Here is someone who clearly isn’t running for president but VP. He hasn’t attacked Mccain on the trail at all, and actually goes out of his way to attack Romney. How do you run for President and not attack or even work to differentiate yourself from the so called liberal media Front runner. In order to help secure that, Huckabee is willing to sell out his own party, his once conservative ideals and ultimately put this great country’s future at risk, by supporting Mccain simply for his own gain. He is putting his own ambitions, in front of everything else. What a hypocrit. He has sold his soul to the devil, and his name is John Mccain. They really do deserve each other. But they don’t deserve to run this great and noble country. I’m for Romney now. He is the only one who is acting like a president in this race.
Posted by: abrann harris | February 4, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am
Lets talk about illegal immigration for a minute! True stories: My friend’s upper middle class wife and mother in law were pulling up to park at a restaurant on a Saturday night to eat with their family, when a hispanic illegal alien runs up to their Yukon with a gun and demands they get out. They lock the doors and drive off, but not before he shot the mother in law in the face. Turns out he had already murdered the manager of the restaurant and shot several others in the restaurant. Turns out he was high on Meth! I love hispanic people that are here legally, and follow the proper process of being here legally. We need to build the damn fence and protect our citizens!
Posted by: terryk9725 | February 4, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am
As for Huckabee, I dislike the IRS like everyone else–do I think we should go a flat tax in order to create an even greater underground market? Heck, no.
Also, quite frankly, Romney and his family (including 5 sons) is scandal free. No one can say that about McCain or Huckabee. Didn’t Huckabee’s son hang an innocent dog for the heck of it? Didn’t Huckabee’s son bring a loaded gun through an airport (thankfully caught and arrested)? What about McCain and how he cheated on his first wife with numerous affairs and divorced her while she undergoing medical treatment? We also know McCain’s second wife is a former drug addict.
And let’s not forget McCain using the word “gooks” which is a derogatory word against Asians. If he had called blacks the “n” word the media would’ve crucified him–but I guess the media doesn’t care as much about Asians. And this man, McCain, is going to lead a global economy and deal with China?
Posted by: EmmaC | February 4, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am
terryk9725,
Which governor was tougher on meth pushers and users?
That’s right. It wasn’t not Romney, even though he claimed he was tough in a “constrast ad.” In Huckabee’s tenure as governor, the prison sentences for meth pushers actually went up. Romney just worked on a bill which stalled eventually. That’s Romney toughness for you.
Posted by: JK | February 4, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am
McCain came back from being a POW and proceeded to have several affairs on his wife who kept his family and kids together while he was a POW. Then he went to Hawaii where he met a young girl willing to date a married man. McCain dumped his wife for a younger model. I don’t want her as first lady and McCain is not a straight shooter. He lied to his first wife when he made promises of fidelity when he married her. What a filthy immoral man! At least Romney’s kids still respect him, and he’s good to his first and only wife.
Posted by: emily | February 4, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am
Romney’s arrogant and stupid comment that he’s in a two man race with McCain, is fuel for Huckabee supporters to fervently back their candidate. More comments like that from Romney will invigorate Huckabee’s base. GET OUT THE VOTE FOR HUCKABEE!!!
Posted by: lee | February 4, 2008, 2:03 am 2:03 am
“Jack, Romney’s campaign is suggesting Huck drop out of the race by coalescing influential Romney supporters to pressure Huck to exit the race making the argument that Huck is taking away Romney supporters. In pratical terms the message sent to Huck is the same whether it is publicly spoken by Romney or ther former as described. Huck is calling Romney “Arrogant and Presumptuous” b/c the buck stops there.”
First, it is a lie, a mis-charaterization, to say that Romney is asking Huckabee to drop out of the race. That is something he would never do. If some of Romney’s supporters are asking influential people to pressure Huckabee to get out of the race, then Huckabee should say THAT (and provide evidence), but not attack Romney personally. If influential people are pressing Huckabee, it is they who are doing it. And what is so wrong about asking someone who has little chance to do that? It’s phony outrage to react like that. It is political posturing. What a baby.
Posted by: Jack | February 4, 2008, 2:03 am 2:03 am
Another true story: A family of 6 was driving home on Christmas eve after performing a Dickens play, and were driving through an intersection when their car was hit by and Illegal Alien whose blood alcohol content was 3 times over the legal limit. He was doing 70 in a 45. This man was a neighbor of mine, his wife and 2 of his children were killed. The Illegal had no insurance and attempted to flee the scene. The mans life is ruined and has $200,000 dollars of medical bills that he cant pay for. Who is going to put a stop Illegal Immigration? McAmnesty, Huckaletemstay? Hell no! Its Romney! How are these true stories different than suicide bombers in Isreal? Isreal put up a fence and suicide bombings stopped. Romney will put up the fence! No one else will!!!!! Vote Romney and protect your loved ones!!!
Posted by: terryk9725 | February 4, 2008, 2:05 am 2:05 am
For those who aren’t aware…there is a difference between Flat Tax and Fair Tax. The two are very different. Get an education and read about Fair Tax online at fairtax.org Huckabee does NOT support Flat Tax, he supports FAIR TAX.
Posted by: lee | February 4, 2008, 2:07 am 2:07 am
EmmaC says that “Mitt’s family is scandal free”. Sorry, but that’s not quite true. Mitt’s great-grandfather, Miles Park Romney, married his fifth wife in 1897 – which was more than six years after Mormon leaders banned polygamy and more than three decades after a federal law barred the practice.
Posted by: petee | February 4, 2008, 2:08 am 2:08 am
terryk9725,
Your stories about illegal immigrants being rampant meth addicts and drunks is rather stupid. You can tell the same stories about white red-blooded American politicians. Though lamentable, it’s a terrible argument against illegal immigration. It certainly doesn’t do Mitt Romney any good for you to continue spouting such nonsense.
Posted by: JK | February 4, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am
Saying it’s a two-man’s race is speaking about reality; telling someone to get out of the race is a request. Please don’t confuse the two. I believe Romney said it was a two-man’s race but never directly asked Huckabee to quit. You can call it a hint, but it’s well justified one, because Huckabee is not even aiming at the front runner, he has no business staying.
I used to think Romney should pick Huckabee as VP. I’ve lost my respect for him lately.
Posted by: E-Z | February 4, 2008, 2:19 am 2:19 am
I have more respect for Huckabee than ever because of his tenacity to fight the fight and to not give up. Anyone who follows politics knows that polls have been notorious in not producing accurate results. Time and time again polling has historically been proven wrong in many cases.
Posted by: Lee | February 4, 2008, 2:26 am 2:26 am
JK?
I would love to hear your theory about how Peter, James and John were paid to preach the message of Jesus Christ? Who paid them? How and why would they do it for money? Religion 101 for you JK, they didnt do it for money! Funny thing was the early Christians were also considered a Heretic Cult by the mainstream religions of the day! Something you hear about Mormons today! Saul, later named Paul, relished in persecuting the Christians and was involved in murdering them. JK, find a topic you understand, cause the bible isnt one of them apparently!
Posted by: terryk9725 | February 4, 2008, 2:27 am 2:27 am
Jack,
The difference between “Huckabee should drop out” and “the Republican nomination for President is a two-person race” is that the former is a suggestion and the latter is untrue. The former is actually a more charitable interpretation for Romney than “Ignore Huckabee because he doesn’t matter any more” which is the direct implication of the literal understanding of “a two-person race.”
Posted by: JK | February 4, 2008, 2:29 am 2:29 am
E-Z: The claim that Mitt’s family is scandal-free is so far from the truth it’s rediculous. FACT: Mitt’s dad, George Romney, was born in Chihuahua, Mexico because his family had fled there so that they could continue to practice polygamy after it was banned in the U.S.. FACT: The first Mormon believer in Mitt’s family, Parsley Pratt (brother of Orson Pratt who defended polygamy as a direct revelation from God) had 12 wives. Multiple wives has been more than a minor sideline in the Romney clan. Interesting that the media doesn’t find it worthy of mention. But the Romneys are scandal-free, righhhht!
Posted by: petee | February 4, 2008, 2:51 am 2:51 am
The fact that I used to like Mike Huckabee makes me sick. Time and time again Huck attacks the character of Governor Romney, yet Romney responds by saying he’s sure Huckabee is a good man. Romney has more intelligence, class, and experience than Huckabee. We don’t need any more dirty trick politicians in DC, it’s time we bring real accountability to our Nation’s Capital. Vote Mitt Romney!
Posted by: Ray | February 4, 2008, 2:52 am 2:52 am
terryk9725,
I think I said explicitly they didn’t preach for money. But they did receive money for their work. Barnabas sells a field and gives it to the apostles (Acts 4). Ananias and Sapphira sells land and give some of the proceeds to Peter (and die immediately because they lied about it.) (Acts 5). People from Antioch sent “gifts” to the elders in Jerusalem with Barnabas and Saul/Paul (Acts 11). And so on…
As for Paul, he tells the church to not neglect the (financial) needs of its rightful teachers. “Anyone who receives instruction in the word must share all good things with his instructor.” (Gal 6).
By the way, I hadn’t even mentioned Mormonism.
Posted by: JK | February 4, 2008, 2:54 am 2:54 am
I vote for Huckabee truly is a vote for McCain. I love how the Huckabee supporters say they respect Huckabee so much because of his tenacity to fight the fight no matter what the polls say. If Huckabee was really out there to “fight” for the nomination than why hasn’t he used one ounce of energy to take the fight to the front runner John McCain? Huckabee knows he doesn’t have a chance, he just wants the VP spot, and he’s willing to sacrifice the entire Republican Party to get it.
Posted by: Conservative | February 4, 2008, 2:57 am 2:57 am
As a Christian, I must say, Huckabee embarrasses me. He’s certainly twisted Romney’s comments around, as pointed out, “clearly looking for a fight.” Huckabee and McCain have cut a deal, and even though Huckabee has no chance of winning, he’ll stick around waiting to be rewarded by McCain.
Jesus would be very embarrassed by how Huckabee has behaved and used his name. He’s a typical huckster.
Sharon
Posted by: Sharon | February 4, 2008, 3:07 am 3:07 am
Huckabee doesn’t need to attack McCain. His supporters are an entirely different base. I can guarantee that if Huckabee is out of the race, I’m voting Hillary. McCain does not support FAIR TAX, Huckabee does. Huckabee supporters support him for very specific reasons. They will not abondon the cause because of polls. Believe it or not, Huckabee does pull from some Independents…I happen to be one of them. GO HUCKABEE!!!
Posted by: Lee | February 4, 2008, 3:08 am 3:08 am
You know, to be fair… Romney’s
“scandals” mentioned so far are not downstream. His lineage contains some polygamists, but how can he help that?
But…
Romney still is an ambitious political opportunist. His positions on issues change for every election, and that show a man lacking solid principles. He may be orthodox when it comes to fiscal issues, but he’s unstable in everything else. He is wealthy. He is good-looking. He is hard-working. But he has a history of being very sincere about the wrong positions on too many critical issues.
Posted by: Bob | February 4, 2008, 3:20 am 3:20 am
There are closet voters out their who elect not to participate in polling. Most of my family and friends do not participate in polls. Wait for super Tuesday and beyond, YOU may be surprised. GO HUCKABEE!
Posted by: lee | February 4, 2008, 3:24 am 3:24 am
Huckleberry is lying!!!!!!!!!!!!!!He will not get out until his buddy McCain has the votes he needs and then he gets out. Cute huh? But, it will not work as a Democrat will stomp the crook McCain(keating deal)
Posted by: rockychance | February 4, 2008, 3:44 am 3:44 am
Bob, I think you at least were trying to make a sincere argument, not like many Huck supporters here. So I’d like to follow up with you.
Now regarding changing of positions, I believe all politicians have to do that from time to time just to survive the harsh political environment (Please examine every other candidate). Therefore I don’t just take their words but instead try to look at how they live their lives to figure out what they REALLY believe. From what I can find, I have no doubt Romney has to be a true conservative in his heart because that’s what he demonstrated in his private life. I can feel his strong sense of responsibility through his actions. He did run for the governor’s position in one of the most liberal state in the country and did take less conservative stands during the campaign that can now be used against him. Some people ask, which version of Romney do you believe? Well, it has to be the conservative one.
I believe he has strong conservative core values, and on top of that, he is super bright with tremendous understanding of the economy. That’s enough to get my vote.
Also, things are not always black and white. People do change their positions when they grow older. I was totally pro-choice many years ago and now a pro-lifer, and I am not running for any office, probably never will in the future.
Posted by: E-Z | February 4, 2008, 5:10 am 5:10 am
Obviously the intended implication of Romney’s statement was that Huckabee should drop out of the race because, according to Romney (who in a ODD coincidence is a rival of Huckabee for the presidential nomination of the Republican Party), nobody thinks Huckabee has a chance anymore.
If that WASN’T the point of his statement, what other possible purpose did it have? And the fact that Romney slickly contradicted the point of his own words with the incredibly two-faced statement that he’s “not telling Huckabee to drop out of the race”, just underscores how stupid he really thinks people are.
It’s like if you said to your co-worker: “You really have no chance of getting that promotion, none of the higher ups I’ve talked to are considering you, and if you try it would just be a waste of time” and then tacked on at the end: “I’m not telling you what to do”.
Romney is the kind of man who’d stab you in the back and then tell you what a great guy he thinks you are.
Posted by: Bob Johnson | February 4, 2008, 5:33 am 5:33 am
Hi E-Z,
I certainly agree with you that all politicians have to change their positions from time to time, that’s a part of reality. In the case of Romney though, I think what’s hurt him is that when he ran to Governor of Massachusetts, he was much more demonstrative than he ought to have been, at least in hindsight, in asserting his support of Roe vs. Wade.
Of course, after he made the unfortunate decision to run in Mass. as opposed to Michigan, he had no choice but to position himself as at least somewhat Pro-Choice to have any chance of election. However, it really didn’t make him look good that he said that quote on Roe v. Wade which ended with: “And you will not see me waver on that.”
Personally, I agree with you that given how he’s lived his life Romney has probably always been a Conservative when you get down to it. But the problem is that if he has always been, that means he deceived many Pro-Choice people in Massachusetts and caused them to think they were voting their convictions on abortion when in fact they were not.
This is a problem for Romney because even most conservative voters aren’t quite so down on the people of Massachusetts and Liberals that they find the idea of someone blatantly tricking voters (of any stripe) anything but extremely distasteful.
For this reason Romney can’t just come out and say he was always Pro-Life, and thus he was forced to craft a conversion narrative which has failed to survive serious scrutiny (for instance there’s that tape of him supporting Abortion Rights even after his claimed conversion).
The failure of his narrative to convince many people outside perhaps his supporters has hurt Romney badly by making him appear unusually untrustworthy; and to be honest even though it’s a shame in some ways I don’t see how he could overcome the perception of untrustworthiness that has come to becloud him in a General Election.
Believe you me, the Liberal Media and/or groups funded by the Democrats would run the footage of Romney saying he supports Abortion Rights and will not waver on it and that he would support Gay Rights better than Ted Kennedy ALL OVER the airwaves before the vote in November, which would serve the dual strategic purpose of powerfully demotivating Conservative types from bothering to vote for him, and making him look like a guy you can’t trust to the Independent Voters.
Romney may have lived an admirable life overall, and he certainly is a high IQ fellow; but neither of those things changes the harsh truth that there’s no future in him at this point.
Now if he ran for Governor of Michigan against the unpopular Democrat Governor and won, and then proceeded to turn around the American Auto Industry; that would be big enough for this Country as to be a game changer for Romney.
He can’t do that in time for 2008 though…
Posted by: Bob Johnson | February 4, 2008, 6:29 am 6:29 am
Hey, Bob Johnson,thanks much for spamming up the comment board with your multiple,identical, sycophantic Huckabee pablum. Huckabee is dangerously ignorant on foreign affairs given his own incredible multiple screw ups on everything from the NIA report on Iran to Pakistani immigration. He clearly has no grasp of either finance or economics given his tortured,convoluted responses when asked any questions relating to these issues. Huckabubba probabally thinks Adam Smith is a brand of beer. Further, he is incapabable of answering a question in a straightforward manner. Any questions about his time as Governor of Arkansas that would seem to be directly at odds with his current positions (given his actions as Gov.) are circuitously avoided at all costs. Watching him verbally wallowing all over the stage to escape anything that resembled an answer to the specific query has been great fun (if frustrating). Forget about his non-stop preaching and smug “I am more religous than my competition, and therefore I am the most conservative” strategy is really comically pathetic to use as the main criteria to select the most powerfull leader in the world.
Huckabee is an embarrasment. I can just imagine how he is seen to the rest of the world, and, unfortunately he is seen for what he is. A modern day snake oil salesman with a second rate intellect and first rate appetite for power.
Posted by: Harris Pilton | February 4, 2008, 6:29 am 6:29 am
Honey bunny, have you seen the popcorn popper? I lucked into a freshly killed squirrel on the way home to the mansion…
Huckabubba is in the same class as Webster Hubbel, Jim Guy Tucker, and we can’t forget Slick Willie. All grads of the Arkansas political swamp with nearly indistguishable M.O.’s
Give it a rest Bob. You are sounding a lot like a Clinton supporter.
Paul is clearly the best choice on experience, character, motivation, and just plain brains and decency. It’s also refreshing to not be beaten over the head for a change by a Republican with a Bible.
That said, Romney seems to be the lesser of all evils (that goes for both parties) and likely to do less damage than any of the others.
Posted by: Harris Pilton | February 4, 2008, 6:46 am 6:46 am
Let’s see…. So many Romney supporters just “know” that Mike Huckabee has “cut a deal” with John McCain or is shooting for a VP spot on a McCain ticket. These same omniscient Romney supporters are just reflecting the arrogance of their illustrious leader. Question: If Mike Huckabee doesn’t stand up for himself and his right to be heard as a presidential candidate, who will? The conservative pundits like Rush Limbaugh who have tried to tar Mike using the “L word” – dishonestly portraying Mike as a liberal? If that’s the case (that Mike’s a liberal) how is it that he’s now splitting the conservative vote? You can’t have it both ways you lying hypocrites. Or maybe Mike can get his common sense message out to the people through the the liberal media that has trashed him so much that Mike once said “If I believed half of what they say about me, I wouldn’t even vote for me”. Let’s face it, Mike hasn’t been given a fair shake by the conservative or liberal media and especially not by the underhanded Mitt – who, by the way, has been the major beneficiary of all of this .
Posted by: petee | February 4, 2008, 6:50 am 6:50 am
Imagine Jimmy Carter 100lbs heavier and toting around a dead squirrel instead of a bag of peanuts…
We’ve done this one before folks.
Posted by: Harris Pilton | February 4, 2008, 6:58 am 6:58 am
Let’s see… a presidential candidate who’s been elected governor, with a strong business backgroud, and is the son of well-known polical family… George Bush? No, Willard (Mitt) Romney! Been there, done that.
Posted by: petee | February 4, 2008, 7:10 am 7:10 am
E-Z:
Romney: “a life-long hunter” “The republican nomination for president is a two-person race.” “marched with Martin Luther King, Jr.” “My approved political [hit piece] never said McCain’s immigration was amnesty.” “I am pro life.” “Who let the dogs out?” “I am pro-2nd-amendment.” “I consider Mike Huckabee and John McCain friends.” “saw my father march with Martin Luther King, Jr.” “Don’t characterize my position.” (as if he didn’t spend millions doing exactly that for his fellow Republican rivals). “No lobbyists run my campaign.” “Absolutely… Ronald Reagan would endorse me.” “You got some bling-bling here.” “Pharmaceutical companies aren’t the bad guys.”
Admittedly some of these “quotes” are paraphrases, but they’re true to what he actually said in the last year. But, speaking of core-values: Romney just doesn’t pass the He-can-even-fake-a-conscience litmus test let alone the He-actually-has-a-conscience requirement.
People do change their views on things from time to time, but his claim that he hadn’t though the whole When-does-human-life-start until he was in his 50′s is a little unbelievable. The two things that Romney’s views haven’t changed are on money and religion. I’ll give him that, which I think is the “core-values” you’re taking about. Maybe that qualifies him for being a conservative, but his words and actions in the last year have done very little to convince me that he has an decency that money can’t buy.
Posted by: JK | February 4, 2008, 8:20 am 8:20 am
Someone said “voting for Romney is the lesser of the two evils”.
What kind of sense does that make? Think positive! Vote for Huckabee, he’s running on good ideas,morals has actually had a “real Job”. Romney campained in Florida he had a job in the real economy. Was he a dishwasher or mechanic? A lawn service guy or a city worker? Romney cannot relate to the average American and with all his money can’t buy our trust.
Posted by: JB | February 4, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am
I can’t understand how ANYone could support either Romney OR McCain. They are BOTH liberals.
Mike Huckabee is the ONLY Conservative left….
Posted by: gander | February 4, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am
The only reason Huckabee is in this race because he was able to join the forces of the most bigoted and self righteous right in the country!
Don’t listen to him. He lies through a fake smile.
Posted by: Mark | February 4, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am
Listen up Evangelicals ,ONLY a vote FOR MITT ROMNEY in Republican primaries is a vote AGAINST MCCAIN, a loser that is being aggressively imposed on us by the establishment and the “mainstream” media. By casting your vote for ANY OTHER candidate you will be HELPING McCain to win the Republican nomination.
Posted by: JonS | February 4, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am
Those that care about people more than money should vote for Mike Huckabee. If all you care about is yourself, follow your leader and vote for Mitt Romney.
Posted by: Dan | February 4, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
Hey Mark, now that you’ve unloaded on Mike Huckabee by calling him a bigoted, self-righteous liar, would you mind telling us what you’re referring to? Is it the fact that he wants to define marriage the way it’s been defined in the wetsern world for thousands of years – as between one man and one woman. How utterly bigoted of him!
Posted by: petee | February 4, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am
Those that LOVE their money more than this country will vote for the flip-flop.
Mike Huckabee is the ONLY Conservative candidate left (after Thompson and Hunter).
Posted by: gander | February 4, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am
JB,
That would be me JB that saw Romney as the lesser of the evils. I leave Ron Paul out of that camp as he does not have a viable shot at the nomination.
Since you chose to take my comment completly out of context, I will remind you to look at Huckabee’s record. You know, these are the things one actually does, as opposed to what they say they are about.
You seem about as honest as your canidate. Go back and reread my whole post if you care to respond, or don’t if it is going to cause you disillusionment with your so called “conservative” flim flam man.
Less Cool Aid, more reading.
Posted by: Harris Pilton | February 4, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am
John McCain endorses Mitt Romney… so who’s the flip-flopper now?
Posted by: the clear choice | February 4, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Romney = man of integrity? Seriously, I’m supposed to buy that? He’s a snake in the grass. I would wash my hand if I was ever forced to shake his just to get the stain of him off of me. How can everyone be so blind to the mans character (or lack of it.) He is as shallow and insincere as the Clintons. I feel nauseous just thinking of him in the White House. Ugh…
Posted by: mb | February 4, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am
My family has known Mitt Romney and his family for more than 40 years. He is as honest and as sincere as a politician will ever be in America. My wife once served as the Romney Family Housekeeper, and if there was any kind of inapproapriate behavior from any member of his family, we would be the first to spread it all over the media. Fortunately for Mitt Romney, all we can say is that he and his family have inspired my family to be better.
It is a terrible thing of just how gulible people are when they listen to the liberal media. After a while they end up sounding like them. Telling us all that he is a “flip-flopper” when he is seen as “open-minded.” I think the only problem the majority of his opponents have with him is that he is a Mormon.
Mike Huckabee, former president of the Southern Baptist Convention has long been a hater of the Mormon faith because he does not like the loss of revenues from Mormon Converts. He even brought the Southern Baptist Convention to Salt Lake City a few years ago to try to upstage the religion. Now, it appears that his war with Mormons are continuing in this election cycle in the form of politics. The only reason McCain attacks Romney is because of the religious thing also. They have both established a religious test for the presidency contrary to the United States Constitution.
Yes, I am a Mormon. But, that should be irrelevent to wheather a person should be president. Harry Reid (Democrat Senate Majority Leader from Nevada) is also a Mormon. But, there is no way I would support him should he run for president.
Posted by: David | February 4, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Huckabee is a freakin joke, has absolutley no chance, knows he has no chance..but continues to slick willy his way around and resort to name calling like most evangelicals..
Posted by: Jim | February 4, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am
ok reality check people, Huckabee only won one state, McCain won 3 and Romney won the rest, Huckabee came in fourth in the rest, Romney came in second in the rest.
In NH the libs voted for McCain to give him a boost, since he is the easiest to beat in the general and even if he is not he is just like one of the libs!
The bill McCain wanted to pas and still does since he has not answered the question straight yet is proof!
Truthfully Huckabee should pull out, the reason he is not is for the VP slot. He does not attack McCain even thou McCain has been called the frontrunner, when have you ever heard someone not attack the frontrunner before?
Just look at Huckabees record and that will show you he is a liberal, he is throwing out the Fairtax comment, but there is no way to get it without repealing the 16th amendment, and he gives no plan on how he will. Just not all the Republican support a different ta proposal.
McCain keeps talking about Iraq, we get it he supports the surge that was the idea of Gen Petreaus and Pres. Bush as does all Republicans!
Is McCain strong on the War on Terror? No, he wants to bring the terrorists here for trial, which was never before done! He wants us not to interrogate the terrorists because France does not like it!
What did McCain do for the military during the 8 years Clinton cut it? Nothing.
The only Candidate that was running that did not think the presidencey was owed to him was Thompson, but since the press ignored him andhe pulled out the only choice left is Romney.
Come on Republicans lets show the Dem that we look past the Religion and color of an individual!
Both McCain and Huckabee attacked Romneys religion.
The only candidate running a clean campaign is Romney on both sides of the aisle.
Huckabee has raised taxes by far the most! then the rest!
McCain will be the republican Kerry!!
Posted by: spock | February 4, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am
Personally, I feel Mitt is the Republican Hillary: every word carefully planned, no stance ever too strongly taken, no honest or unguarded word ever uttered. I also can’t help but feel he would be swayed by Salt Lake City… one needs only look at how their church is structured to note the degree of control their leaders insist on. I’ll be the first to admit that I have a had a bad experience with Mormonism. Maybe that’s being narrow-minded of me, but based on my personal experiences, I could never for the man.
Posted by: Aaron in CA | February 4, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am
Huckabee is a moron. It is so obvious that he and McCain have a deal. A cozy cabinet position perhaps, or maybe even a VP bid? It irks me that he is so kniving and slimy… No wonder he’s on the list of the ten most corrupt politicians.
Posted by: Shay | February 4, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am
David,
That was refreshing. Thank you. I am not a Romney supporter, but he would get my vote based on his skill set, unique in this crowd. As far as I am concerned he is arguably the best in terms of qualifications. No I really don’t consider a lifetime of government service as suitable for growing anything more than government. Governments do not grow economies, they hinder them. Given how dire our current fiscal situation has become, and our politicians proclivity for writing checks to foreign countries effectively stealing tax dollars for something they were never intended,
Ron Paul is the only logical choice. Unfortunately he is unelectable as this current two party system is strangling this great country. Ron Paul is running the cleanest campaign I have ever seen and yet he is continually snubbed and derided by his so called fellow Republican collegues, Fox News (fair and balanced my ass) and the rest of the MSM. In 2040 when we can no longer pay for anything other than Social Security and Medicare (this is directly from the Comptroller of the currency that has served in at least 4 administrations dem & rep). We will not be able to pay for any other item in the federal budget. This is reality. Check the facts, do some research.
Anyway, thanks for the post David
Posted by: Harris Pilton | February 4, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
“Mike Huckabee, former president of the Southern Baptist Convention has long been a hater of the Mormon faith because he does not like the loss of revenues from Mormon Converts”
(1) Mike Huckabee was never the president of SBC. Since the premise of your character assassination is wrong, everything about your claim falls apart.
(2) “[Huckabee] as long been a hater of the Mormon faith because he does not like the loss of revenues from Mormon converts.” Are you kidding me? You definitely must have Huckabee confused with someone else.
Posted by: JK | February 4, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am
Huckabee surrogates complained that Thompson was a spoiler, now Huckabee says Romney is arrogant for saying less about him. His hypocrisies seem to never end.
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/19/592725.aspx
As for Huckabee being a conservative, that is as dishonest as most of his other claims:
http://www.clubforgrowth.org/2007/11/updated_huckabee_white_paper.php
http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/30309.html
http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Huckabee_Falsely_Claiming_To_Have_Theology_Degree
Romney is the most conservative candidate in the race.
Posted by: a_reader | February 4, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am
Will McCain Make a POW out of the USA?
Will McCain surrender the borders to Mexico through his Amnesty
Program? Will McCain surrender your wallet to special interest
groups and entitlements for illegal aliens? Will McCain surrender
your First Amendment Right? Will McCain surrender Pro-Life views
and RoevsWade to liberals and partial birth abortions?
Will you surrender your vote to McCain this coming Tuesday?
Posted by: Peter | February 4, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Tapper wrote:
“(Of course … Romney didn’t suggest that Huckabee drop out. But no matter…)”
Um, of course Romney *did* suggest exactly that. He just found a way to do so without explicitly saying the words “Drop out now, Huck.”
I mean really – what other purpose could this statement have possibly had?
Posted by: spencer | February 4, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Huck can’t count – he says that he’s got as many delegates as Romney…
As of Monday Feb. 4 (from CNN)
McCain: 97
Romney: 92
Huck: 29
What is he talking about?
He is full of h@te. The good news is the GOP will have four years to think about how important Je5us is in their politics…Because apparantly they forgot what HE did…
I don’t understand why Huck doesn’t go after the front runner…He must not be playing to win…
Posted by: ClubbieTim | February 4, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
“Huck can’t count – he says that he’s got as many delegates as Romney…”
He did NOT say that. You put words in his mouth and then call him a liar. YOU are the liar.
MIKE HUCKABEE is the ONLY Conservative candidate left.
Posted by: gander | February 4, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
Anyone reading the comments posted can see that most are motivated by hate, anger or prejudice rather than logic. LOOK AT THE CANDIDATES RECORDS! Look at McCain’s past: untrue to his first wife, untrue to conservatives in their attempts to pass conservative measures in the Senate (read Senate leaders Hasterd, Santorem an Delay’s comments), pushed amnesty legislation, opposed tax cuts! (Don’t you just love his sneers and smears–so unpresidential?) Also remember his notorious temper. Do you want someone who can’t control their mouth in control of our nuclear weapons? Look at Huckabees record: pardoned murderers, destroyed hard drives when he left office, (ask yourself why), says he runs a positive campaign and yet slams Mitt even showing an ad he isn’t going to show. (real honesty?)It really shows his character. He repeatedly lies insisting many times he was leading nationwide polls which was always blatantly untrue! In fact many of his statements are fabricated. Does he stay in the race just to enjoy the limelight or for a pomised position? Look at Romney’s past: he rescued the Salt Lake Olympics, etc. A comment already posted lists his whole record. How on earth could Mitt save failing companies without layoffs? Only salvaged companies can hire people! Use a little logic and intelligence when you vote!! Wake your brain up!!
Posted by: Al Wrathall | February 4, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
All you Huckabee supporter out there who said he is conservative and full of integrity, explain why he has so many (14 total) ethical violations brought against him as a Governor, most of them relating to his own personal financial gain? Explain why there are so many criminals pardoned by this man, 1033 of them? Numerous violent criminals and rapists, all because they found religion in prison? Why does this Arkansas Governor had to destroy 83 computer hard drives and 4 servers when he left office? What was he trying to hide? Explain why Huckabee was named one of the ten most crooked politicians? Explain how you would trust someone who has a 2.5 year religious degree as the only higher education to run the biggest economy in the world? Explain how working as a Baptist minister, whose job is to sell people his philosophy with sweet talking to make a living, can revive the economy? Keep in mind he has let go staffers and asking other to work for free at this point.
Mitt Romney had changed his position on pro-life. He is a Mormon. He has a lot of money to shell out for his campaign. That’s about all the negatives you can say about him. He has no ethical violation in all of his records, in business and government. He turned around failing companies into long term successes. He turned a scandal ridden and financially failing Olympic into a world class success without taking the pay. He led a big democratic state as a governor and got very positive results, again did not take the pay check. He’s got an MBA and JD of law from Harvard. He is married to the same wife for 38 years. His sons are all married with their own children and have strong family value. THAT’S WHY I AM FOR ROMNEY.
Posted by: Alan Crane | February 4, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
WHOA!!! Calm down Mr. Huck!
Sounds like someone is getting “all fired up” because he is losing.
Posted by: Robert | February 4, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
If Mitt Romney is so wonderful, why doesn’t he believe in basic scientific facts, like the fact that native americans are not “lamanites” or transplanted jews but are from Asia?
Posted by: Conrad | February 4, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
Huckabee Supporters:
You need to watch this short clip. It is not about Huckabee or Romney. it is about Barack Obama. Obama is stating that his positions on immigration are the same as McCain’s.
Since Huckabee is not really running for president anymore you may wish to be familiar with McCain’s policy positions….
Posted by: Sean | February 4, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
This is for all devout, evangelical, Huckabee supporters out there.
I have found it rather amusing that the media is quick to point out how credentialed Huckabee is by extolling that he’s been a Baptist minister, yet almost completely ignoring that Romney was also a minister – a Bishop – to his local congregation for several years, and served an additional 9 years after that as “stake president”, overseeing about a dozen Mormon congregations in the Boston area.
Besides holding a “regular” job, I can tell you that a Mormon Bishop, completely unpaid, wears his life out serving his congregation (I’d guess it’s about a 30-hour-a-week calling).
I do happen to believe that a vote for Huckabee is in-reality (at this stage anyway) a vote for McCain. The horse race is now between McCain and Romney. Romney’s an unusually good man.
Posted by: Peter | February 4, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
(Of course … Romney didn’t suggest that Huckabee drop out. But no matter…)
I’m guessing you have trouble with the concept of irony.
Romney was absolutely suggesting that Huckabee should drop out.
Posted by: Jinchi | February 4, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
Huck ROCKS.
Willard “MITT” Romney thinks he can buy an election and pay off the competition.
But elections shouldn’t work that way. And Huck is saying people have a choice. It is a choice between a say anything / do anything politician and a honest fellow that tells it as it is.
GO Huck GO.
Posted by: The Commander Guy | February 4, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
katrina -
Huckabee didn’t pardon 12 convicted murderers. He granted them clemency (which means they weren’t killed). They were still locked up.
Don’t be fooled by some of Romney’s commercials. Huckabee carried out the executions of 16 criminals – something Romney never did. Huckabee is tough on crime.
Posted by: jason | February 4, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
This is not a three man race, it is a four man race. Ron Paul will outlast them all.
Posted by: David Robertson | February 4, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
Even if Huckabee wanted to be McCains VP nominee, he doesn’t want Romney to win the race either, he doesn’t like him, so would do this for that reason alone.
But I think the truth is, that if everyone hadn’t decided it was a two person race, Huckabee would have as equal a shot as Romney does now, and I don’t think Romney will beat McCain either (I don’t think either can win). Huckabee, before the McCain surge, was leading in the national polls (and was second behind Giuliani in the California polls), and is set to win more states on Super Tuesday than Romney. When McCain surged, people wanted to turn it into a two person race under the idea Romney was the anti-McCain candidate, and that turning it into a two person race could help them win. So, even though Huckabee had been doing better than Romney in national polls, and in CA, which has no evangelical base, they tried to repeat the argument that he could only win evangelicals to kill his candidacy.
Its true Romney refrained from telling Huckabee to drop out, but many Romney supporters have told him to drop out, and Huckabee, could have quite honestly interpreted the Romney campaigns pressing the idea repeatedly its a ‘two person race’ as politely suggesting that. Why not? A lot of posters here took the same implication that Huckabee did. Romney might protest, as is his right, and only he knows what he believed, but who are you to say Huckabee is being any more dishonest than any of the commenters here who believe the Romney camp is trying to imply that?
Posted by: redfish | February 4, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
To whoever said the media talks up Huckabee having been a pastor; if you think they’re doing that to help him, you are very naive.
The Media loves to maximize the percentage of their Huckabee mentions that are focused on religion because they are making an effort to scare non-religious voters off of him.
The other reason is so they can dismiss Huckabee’s success, which is VERY unusual for someone with so little money spent compared to his competitors, as this religious thing that for some reason doesn’t really count.
And the Media is doing this for the very simple reason that they are afraid of Huckabee; and I noticed from their reporting that they really got afraid of him after he picked up and accepted the endorsement of the Minutemen founder (the Minutemen, of course, being perhaps the single group most feared and hated by the Mainstream Media).
Of course, a lot of people in the media don’t like Romney for running rather far to the right on Immigration either; but the differences are that Romney is perceived as a fellow elite by the media elite (which makes them think he’s less dangerous to their narrow interests) and more importantly that, rightly or wrongly, they are clearly certain in their hearts that Romney would have no chance of winning a General Election anyway given his reputation for insincerity and the simple fact that there aren’t enough Mormons in this Country to make up for the meaningfully large block of voters who will vote against Romney simply on account of his religion.
As for the media not mentioning Romney being a bishop in the Mormon Church; Mitt should be thankful for that, when you get down to it, because unfortunately there’s a lot of distrust of Mormons in the American Electorate that goes back to the 19th Century.
Even old Mitt himself understands this fact, even if some of his supporters don’t, which explains why Romney avoids talking about his years as a Bishop.
Posted by: Bob Johnson | February 4, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
Bob,
I don’t think the media is intentionally trying to bring up Huckabee being a Pastor to hurt him, but because they think its the most significant thing about his campaign.
They also think he only ever appealed to evangelicals, even though as I said, he was before the McCain surge, no. 1 nationally, and no. 2 in California, a non-evangelical state. Huckabee was also doing well at that time in general election polls pitting him against Hillary or Obama, getting numbers like 44 vs 47 percent.At that time, Bill Kristol wrote a commentary saying Huckabee, contrary to perceptions, might be the Republican’s best candidate, and has a broad appeal to people concerned about the economy and bipartisanship.
Huckabee’s broader support has narrowed to an evangelical base as soon as people started to want to paint this as a two man race, between Romney and McCain. But that was somewhat helped by the media, who always ignored Huckabee’s lead in the national polls and broad support, never believing that a pastor who appealed to evangelicals could ever appeal to anybody more than evangelicals, and ignored every sign to the contrary.
Posted by: redfish | February 4, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
Mitt Romney is just arrogant.
There is no other way to describe him.
Posted by: Sally | February 4, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
I AM GLAD HE SAID THAT. HUCKABEE SUPPORTERS HAVE EVERY RIGHT FOR HIM TO STAY IN.
Posted by: kim | February 4, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
The title of this article has a couple of punctuation errors. It should have read…
Huckabee, Romney: Arrogant and Presumptuous
The ONLY conservative left in this race is Ron Paul. He’s the only one with the record to back up his platform. If you think you can, prove me wrong.
Posted by: Briman | February 5, 2008, 4:49 am 4:49 am