By Jennifer Parker

Feb 12, 2008 5:13pm

Johnny Reid Edwards, Superman

Interesting story in The Nation about the coveted and hotly pursued endorsement of former Sen. John Edwards, D-NC, who seems torn between endorsing Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton. It’s said that Edwards worries that Obama isn’t tough enough for the nomination or the job, and worries that Clinton is too much a part of the problem.

Author John Nichols notes that on "Super Tuesday, 415,000 Democratic primary and caucus voters chose John Edwards as their candidate for president." While some had voted by early ballots "cast before the former senator from North Carolina withdrew from the race….hundreds of thousands of Democrats and independents who were motivated enough to go and vote on February 5 did so for Edwards, knowing full well that he was out of the running."

He won more than 10 percent of the vote in Oklahoma, 5 percent in Arizona. 4 percent in California and Tennessee.

"Does this matter? It did in Missouri, which gave Obama an essential win by just 9,997 votes. Edwards took 16,747 votes. Had the Edwards votes broken for Clinton, she might well have won another of the key battleground states on Super Tuesday….But both the Clinton and Obama camps have come to recognize that a nod from Edwards could influence a significant number of his former (and in some cases continuing) backers. And the remaining candidates know that in a close race for the nomination — after his Maine caucuses win on Sunday, Obama leads Clinton by 3 delegates — an endorsement could be definitional."

What do you say, folks? Would an Edwards endorsement make a difference? Should it?

- jpt

User Comments

I would say that an Edwards endorsement could very well have affected my vote. I, like Edwards himself, have had trouble deciding between Obama and Clinton for the reasons mentioned.
I heard no word from Edwards about his choice, nor did I hear any pledges that Edwards woud be included on a presidential ticket or in a future cabinet. Therefore, I cast my vote today in Virginia for the one candidate that I am sure of- John Edwards.

Posted by: Kirk G. | February 12, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

John Edwards is a really good guy. I like him a lot. I am hoping he supports Hillary. Looking over both records and ideas on to help people that really need it. John & Hillary agree.
I wish he would come right and say who (if any) he is going to support.

Posted by: ontherocks99 | February 12, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Well, I like John Edwards. He stands for the working class. I was raised by a single father with four children. He worked for General Motors all of his life. Although I am a teacher now, and far better off financially than my father, I will always be a Union Girl! I will always be “The working class” because I am proud to be. Therefore, Edwards’ endorsement of Hillary would be enthusiastically welcome. If his endorsement goes elsewhere, I will still like him, but I will vote for Hillary.

Posted by: Irma | February 12, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

I would say so, but Edwards supporters are a fiercely independent lot. His endorsement, which I hope does not come soon, will be one of several factors to weigh. I am one of the 4.5% of voters in the Tennessee Democratic primary that voted for Edwards. I voted for economic equity and against continued tax preferences, etc. for unearned and corporate income. Ordinary workers have taken it on the chin for several decades now. If that does not change, America is in real trouble. Our democracy is in real trouble.
Obama and Clinton will have to show me that they are serious about those issues and have specific plans to address them.
If I think Edwards’ pick does not have serious plans to remedy the economic problems as I see them, his endorsement will not sway me.

Posted by: Peri W. | February 12, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

Kirk G. Good for you. I worked as a volunteer for Edwards then Kerry Edwards. I understand your devotion. But I was a Clinton person long before I ever heard of Edwards. I looked up to Hillary when I was about 8 years. She was one of the lawyers on the Nixon hearings, and she stood out to me then (one young female among a mass of men).

Posted by: irma | February 12, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

The longer he waits the less it matters. After March 4th, it might help out in North Carolina, but that’s about it.

Posted by: s.b. | February 12, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

Well yes, it would matter. In one of the last debates they had, Edwards said something like going with Hillary would be maintaining the status quo……..so what choice will he make?
Sounds like by his own words he’s ready to settle for the status quo. Maybe its because of a position he’s been offered. But that kinda shoots his entire platform all to h*ll, don’t it?!
This ‘democratic’ process ain’t worth a hill of beans.

Posted by: LA in Indiana | February 12, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

I don’t think Edwards should endorse anyone unless and until he’s certain he really supports that candidate. If he’s torn, he can say that and not endorse either.
If that means his past supporters have to make up their minds for themselves – fine.

Posted by: Tom J | February 12, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

The blogger who references how Edwards endorsement might affect the North Carlina primary really explains why Edwards, if he wants to exercise optimal influence, has two only two options 1) endorse now or real soon or 2) preserve the Gore option to broker later. Edwards is not only irrelevant in his home state, he may be a liability there in that the reason he did not run for re-election to the Senate is that he would have never been re-elected – NCians don’t like it him. I’m an Obama supporter and as much as I would like to see him endorse Obama, if Edward’s a seriouss player he will assume the Gore role and wait for later when a real conscience in the Party is needed. My personal hunch is that his personal political ego prevails – despite the poverty talk – and he endorses Hillary, as that will give him more influence and attention in the short term.

Posted by: dan | February 12, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

Freakky deak—please enlighten me as to who that picture is of the guy on the Cuban flag that is hanging in Obama’s campaign office—–I honestly don’t know who it is…….I guess I can go out on the Internet and read who it is, but I am hoping a blogger (an honest one) can tell me who it is………..

Posted by: Illinois for Hillary | February 12, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

An Edwards endorsement for either of the two Dem candidates would indeed make a difference, but only if he gives it before the Ohio, Texas, and Pennsylvania primaries. By the time those primaries are over, either candidate may have such an advanatage over the other in the number of delegates that Edwards’ endorsement won’t matter. Additionally, the longer Sen. Edwards waits, the more it appears he’s trying to “hold out” to the highest bidder in return for some cabinet or other appointed position.

Posted by: chuck | February 13, 2008, 8:08 am 8:08 am

I am an Edwards supporter who has been looking over the two remaining candidates and though I am close to making a decision, I haven’t yet. I would certainly take into consideration what John Edwards says and in a very tight decision his choice might tip the balance for me.

Posted by: Katherine | February 13, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am

How can you not decide between the two. I’m glad he did drop out of the race he would not know whether to vote yes or no for a cause. If he was already undecisive about hillary to begin with then why endorse her. That lead me to believe everything he spoke of was false. he definetely cannot be a vice president. He will be a hillary yes mam man.

Posted by: april | February 13, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

How can you not decide between the two. I’m glad he did drop out of the race he would not know whether to vote yes or no for a cause. If he was already undecisive about hillary to begin with then why endorse her. That lead me to believe everything he spoke of was false. he definetely cannot be a vice president. He will be a hillary yes mam man.

Posted by: april | February 13, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

john edwards is a thoughtful and brilliant man. he is sincerely trying to do what is best for the country even after he pulled out of the race. he is trying to give his best answer to the question of who to endorse. i sure wish the masses would have been able to get to know him better. too bad for the media hype over history making candidates. whatever he decides, it will be his best effort and an intelligent decision. i think the people get what they deserve. if he is really feeling that much on the fence, let the people plot the course without his input. here’s to you, jre. thanks for being there.

Posted by: lori | February 13, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

I was an enthusiastic Edwards supporter, but I will not vote for Hillary Clinton even if he endorses her. I really believed Edwards message of “We need change in Washington” and Hillary is not the solution; she is part of the problem. If she gets the nomination, I will stay home in November. Go Obama!!!

Posted by: Sharon | February 14, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

i too cast my vote for edwards in maryland, but personally i hope that edwards does not endorse, at least not before the end of these primaries. it’s a guarentee that he’d earn the hatred of at least half of our party, either way. why do it? those two did nothing but attack him before, marginalizing him, they openly steal his platform, and still spread lies and rumors…their campaigns have been abysmal, and corrupt…i’m dreading to think of what either an obama or hillary white house will be like. why should he endorse? he will gain nothing, and our party has nothing left to lose…except the general election, but without edwards leading the ticket, that’s probably a given.

Posted by: kenshin | February 15, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am

The American nightmare continues with another diluted ,polluted administration simply because the media blocked out the very best candidate, Johnny Reid Edwards and the masses fell for it. I cannot beleve we are settling for one of the other two candidates. If all of the people had been studying the candidates on the internet, Edwards would have been the clear winner. Instead we have Bush four year war supporter, Hillary or the Pied Piper who leads the people nowhere, Obama. WE NEED A MIRACLE! JOHN EDWARDS FOR PRESIDENT ! ! !

Posted by: Elaine | February 21, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

This Edwards supporter is voting republican for the first time in her life. I’m voting for McCain because I believe that democrats care more about affirmative action for minorities than they do about electing the best person to run this country and because I’m tired of the ‘poor me’ mentality that democrats promote. I voted for Edwards in 2004 and looked forward to doing it again only to hear dems constantly say that they didn’t want to vote for another white male every time I tried to discuss issues with them. They didn’t vote for Obama or Hillary because they best represented them on policy issues, it was affirmative action only and that’s why I think we need more conservative judges. Affirmative action needs to go and I’m willing to give up my right to choose when it comes to my body as a woman as long as affirmative action becomes history. Democrats make superficial choices in their primaries and I actually like McCain.

Posted by: Mary | July 3, 2008, 7:42 am 7:42 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.