By Ed O'Keefe

Feb 8, 2008 12:04pm

Let the Veepstakes Begin!

ABC News’ Ron Claiborne Reports: For the first time, Senator John McCain described the kind of person he would look for in a running mate if he wins the Republican nomination.

"The fundamental principle behind the selection of any running mate will be that person is fully prepared to take over, and shares your values, your principles, your philosophy and your priorities," McCain said on Friday in Norfolk, Virginia, in answer to a reporter’s question.

Until now, McCain had brushed off any veepstakes questions as premature.  Times have changed.

"Obviously, if I’m the nominee, we’ll start the process. And, again, I don’t want to discount the candidacy of Governor Huckabee. He’s in this race."

Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney, however, is no longer in the race (and we mean this race), prompting many political pundits, including former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, to confirm McCain is their man in 2008.

WATCH GINGRICH ON ‘GMA’ BY CLICKING HERE.

McCain said he would not necessarily seek geographical balance in selecting his number two.

"Former president Clinton and former vice president Gore showed that you don’t have to be regionally different," he said. "I think that America is such now that regional differences doesn’t play the role that maybe they did in earlier times."          

User Comments

Condi Rice would be a great choice if she would accept it.
Governor Rick Perry of Texas would be another great choice.

Posted by: reaganfan | February 8, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

Immaterial. I seriously doubt it will matter who McCain picks, for it’s profoundly unlikely that he’ll be the next president. America is sick to death of Republican incompetence and malfeasance, and will turn the page of history in November. The GOP is about to enter a richly deserved, very long stretch in the political wilderness.

Posted by: Mark | February 8, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

If Clinton wins the nomination, McCain will have the freedom of knowing the GOP base will be with him no matter what. My guess is he picks Lieberman. Out of the box? Sure, but you heard it hear first.
If Obama wins the nomination, McCain will be forced to pick someone the base already likes and trusts. I’m not sure that’s Huckabee as he represents one side of the tent more than others. Someone the ‘whole base’ already likes and trusts. Maybe Brownback?

Posted by: Paul | February 8, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

yuk yuk on any of the above

Posted by: dmsc | February 8, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

I cannot imagine Lieberman being picked at all. Maybe he might find a spot in a potential McCain cabinet, but never on the ticket. That would just cause too many problems. Huckabee would be a big favourite for the choice. I don’t quite know who else might b a suitable choice for McCain. Maybe a Chuck Hagel type figure?

Posted by: markymark | February 8, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

The media wants you to think this is over. It’s not. McCain has about 720 delegates, and needs almost 500 more. That’s a lot of states. Personally, I refuse to be told who to vote for by the media. My vote goes to Huckabee.

Posted by: Ben | February 8, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

I like Mike! At this point, veepstake isn’t my consern. A great President is. Q: why are we speaking who McCain would choose for VP, and not the other candidates?

Posted by: callenfallen | February 8, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

Pro-Huckabee comments made here are actually REMOVED? What have we come to?

Posted by: Ben | February 8, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

He can pick Santa Claus, if he thinks it’ll help. But it won’t … democrats are coming out in huge numbers to toss these crooked, incompetent republicans fools out of the white house and into the unemployment line.

Posted by: Ken | February 8, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

Condi Rice are you nuts . MAC ain’t that stupid and will not remind people of a failed Bush policy .
Duncan Hunter would be great .

Posted by: Don | February 8, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

I just love how the media is so set on McCain already having won his nomination. It’s not over yet, folks. He still has a lot of votes he needs to win. Huckabee is definitely still in the race, and with Romney out of it his chances have increased.
Don’t listen to the media.

Posted by: SuperHuck | February 8, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

The Republicans will be crushed this year. America is sick of what Bush and the GOP has done to ruin this country. America was a shining example for the world,now we’re despised across the globe. We’re becoming a torture loving, warmongering nation much like Nazi Germany was. Plus most Americans want to be out of Iraq,we’re going broke finacing this neverending war. China will soon own us if we continue unending wars forever.

Posted by: AJ | February 8, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

Who the #$!! decided to let McCain be a Republican anyway~??? Liberal to the bone, I have less than zero respect for his wife and their lives. Read about them, other than his 5 years as a POW and who knows what happened then, and form your own opinion.
Just let him do an abrupt about face, though he could never undo the harm he has done for years in D.C., and TRY to behave themselves so they at least don’t embarrass us in the White House. We had enough of that, and military negligence, with the Clintons.

Posted by: Laine | February 8, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Huckabee would have to win 83.3% of the rest of the delegates that are out there. Any race where he had a chance is already over. Get over people. Romney had a better chance than Huckabee and thanks to Huckabee the meglo-maniac we are stuck with McCain. Better him than Obama or Clinton, solely for the reason that he would appoint more conservative judges.

Posted by: BW | February 8, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

I congratulate Mitt Romney for a well managed campaign. He was strong with his efforts and his message. Although, I’m a little disappointed that the best candidate dropped from the race, I’m delighted in the humble and honorable way in which he did so. He proved today that he is, in fact, the republican with the most integrity and truly has America’s best interests at heart. I just hope that John McCain can step up to be the conservative that we need in this country — if not the democrats will win. I salute Romney for his valiant nature and hope he can continue to be an influence and a motivator in the republican party!!!

Posted by: lynn | February 8, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

Prediction: With McCain a shoo-in for the nomination… he will appease the NRA and the ditto-heads with his VP… Jeb Bush. Think not? Consider how McCain has ‘forgiven’ everything the Bush/Cheney/Rove express threw at him… and supports practically everything the current administration pushes. Here’s the scenario: the Bush camp (and by that I mean those who really run things… NOT Dubya) struck the deal with McCain. He secures the presidential nomination, provided he brings little brother Jebster along for the ride. One term and turn the reins over to the VP, who takes the party nod with no real challenge. Even more likely… McCain serves two years and one day, then resigns — concerns of health, possibly — and gives JB the keys, allowing him the chance to serve almost ten years as the Thief Executive.
I’m disappointed in McCain. I supported him in 2000, but he couldn’t fend off the Bush dirty tricks. Now he’s gung-ho for Iraq. What a shame.

Posted by: Great Caesar's Ghost | February 8, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

How bout Sam Brownback?

Posted by: magpie | February 8, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

How about Liddy Dole?

Posted by: zippo | February 8, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

I will stick with Huckabee as long as he is in the race.
If McCain wins he can’t carry enough of the south to win on his own or with another moderate as his VP.
Huckabee can win the south for him. Anyone else he loses.

Posted by: edjamgra | February 8, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

God help us….you people need a dose of reality….
Rommeny lost…he won less states than huck…and while it is a long shot do not count him out from running the tables he will take a lot of votes and you will again be surprised….
The country can not stand the hildabeast it would be …forget it….
McCain will not choose Jeb Bush He will pick Rudy or Huck…only two choices that make any sense…Rudy is out because I believe he wants a seat on the beanch….Rudy will play a real role in the general….
The dems will have blood in the streets..come convention time 1968 redux

Posted by: James C. Karmer | February 8, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

Yup, Lieberman.
Shares his philosophy. Pulled votes as an independent. Balances the ticket. Will get the right wingers anyway. Jewish vote. Delivers Connecticut, Massachusetts and puts New York and Florida in play. Ethical and honest. Name recognition. Could be president tomorrow. Holds the “radical center”.

Posted by: Gorgon '08 | February 9, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am

how about al sharpton?

Posted by: huh? | February 9, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am

Doesn’t matter. Mac doesn’t have a chance. The dems will win in 2008. Too bad the party couldn’t get behind the smartest guy just because he’s a Mormon. We deserve to live in the hell of Hillary’s reign. Let’s just pray that Romney will be back in 2012.

Posted by: Chuck | February 9, 2008, 2:31 am 2:31 am

Comments about the choices I’ve seen here:
Condi? NO CHANCE!!
Jeb Bush? Even less
Huck? I think people have had enough of god running the country.
Brownback? He’s more christian wacko than Huck.
Perry? He needs someone from another part of the country.
Lieberman already said no. I think he’s waiting for a seat in the admin.
Duncan Hunter? That’s a possibility because he’s from California.
I’m thinking the former Gov from New York… Patacki

Posted by: dk | February 9, 2008, 7:31 am 7:31 am

How about Alan Keyes to bring McCain the African American vote? Just kidding!

Posted by: gc | February 9, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am

Having Romney as the VP nomination would appease a block of voters that would otherwise be looking for a strong Independent candidate in the general election. Without Romney these voters would split between Republican, Democrat, and Independent. The Republican Party must have all of the Romney voters to win. A Huckabee VP would not hold this block of voters together. A Romney nomination for VP would appease me. Until then Romney supports should still be diligent in voting for Romney as long as he is on upcoming ballots.

Posted by: lorax_mbell | February 9, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

I respect Mike Huckabee a lot, but the very best, most qualified and trustworthy, experienced and brilliant choice for Vice President would be Newt Gingrich!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Lehrene Zeller | February 9, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Mike Bloomberg.
Adds maximum stregnth as a brilliant business/economic talent. Delivers New York with high popularity. Major source of funds. Balances McCain geographically. Could step in “in a heartbeat”. Would carve up VP competitor in debate. Ready to play traditional attack role in national campaign against fiscally irresponsible economic theories.

Posted by: Gorgon '08 | February 9, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

dk – I doubt any running mate could deliver New York for the Republicans, so I’m guessing not. Isn’t that a first criteria – be able to deliver your state?
But one thing I do remember from past cycles, if you aren’t on the inside, you don’t have a good sense of the likely short-list people. More times than not, the final choice isn’t one of the other former candidates for president.
It is fun trying to guess, though.

Posted by: Paul | February 9, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

It is not a foregone conlcusion that “if McCain wins, the GOP base will be with him no matter what.” Not so, mon ami. Four Republicans in our household will never vote for McCain. And if Hillary wins the Democratic nomination, then the four of us will sit on our hands at home and wait to see how the chips fall -that is unless McCain continues to clinch his teeth and to harp on bombing Iran and widening the war. In that case we will vote for the Democrat just to make certain McCain NEVER is elected. If the candidates are Obama and McCain, Obama gets all four of our ex-Republican votes. Republicans had a clear hope in Ron Paul, but they have blown any hope for real change and a real conservative and an honest man attaining to the Presidency.

Posted by: Karen | February 9, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

Not that it matters (he’ll not win) but, McCain will go for a Washington *outsider,* probably a governor, definitely more of a manager than a career politician. My guess (*if* he and McCain can swallow their mutual hard feelings) is ROMNEY.
There’s no hope for neocon Joey “Ego Joe” Lieberman (a former Democrat? McCain’s got enough trouble with the GOP base already) or Jebbie Bush (the Bush name Bush on any GOP ballot for the next two decades will be about as welcome as Charles Manson or Marilyn Manson).

Posted by: Mark | February 9, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

How can a pure blood conservative ever vote for Obama. I understand he is a crowd pleaser and he talks about bringing people together but every newb politician has said this before. Obama is a socialist and a bad one at that. He is careless and niave about the world and its politics. People who vote for Obama must either be under 25, black, or just retarded because a 46 yr has no business running the country without ANY experience leading a state government. No his state tenure does not count it was worthless if he was a senator for a full term I would say yes but but NO he is a neophyte and should not be voted for.

Posted by: Tim | February 9, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Two weeks ago, I thought Huckabee could be angling for the job. He helped McCain in the debates, his staying in pulled votes and states away from Romney on Super Tues. Huckabee would be palatable to the neo-cons and religious voters and likely cement the South for the Repubs. I don’t know who else who could offer more than that, though Newt is an inspired choice, I’m afraid the polarization thing would hamper the ticket. He’s an established and known target of the liberal voters. I don’t think anybody could pull Northeast states for the ticket. McCain is the maverick, so he can balance with an establishment choice. A woman on the ticket would look too much like a stunt this year, as would a minority choice. I personally would love to see Lieberman change his mind (but the neo-cons/religious voters would blow a gasket). Maybe Charlie Crist is owed a debt of gratitude.

Posted by: Kevin | February 9, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

I agree with Charlie Crist in order to hold on to Fl in the general election. I expect Guiliani is looking for a cabinet appointment. He might have to kiss up to the conservatives and pick Gingrich or Brownback. However, either one would mean disaster among centrists and independents.

Posted by: bill | February 9, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

I suggest since McCain wants to keep the wars going he choose General Norman Swartzkoff.

Posted by: rockdad50 | February 9, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

Tim, I find it interesting that you say that “a 46 yr has no business running the country without ANY experience leading a state government.”
I guess that means that:
John F. Kennedy should not have been President. After all, he was actually PRESIDENT before age 46 but his entire previous experience was in the US Congress.
And, since the Vice-President is just a “heartbeat away” the following individuals should have been disqualified from serving as Vice-President before age 46:
Dan Qualye (ok, I’ll agree with you there)
Richard Milhous Nixon
Al Gore
John C. Breckenridge (he was only 36!)
Aaron Burr
John C. Calhoun
Schuyler Colfax
That is 7 out of 46 VPs who should not have been Vice-President under your criteria. I’m sorry but NO ONE has ANY BUSINESS adding A PRIORI criteria to the Constitutional requirements for the office of President.

Posted by: Zagros | February 9, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

Posted by: James C. Karmer | Feb 8, 2008 11:53:11 PM
Yup, Lieberman.
Shares his philosophy. Pulled votes as an independent. Balances the ticket. Will get the right wingers anyway. Jewish vote. Delivers Connecticut, Massachusetts and puts New York and Florida in play. Ethical and honest. Name recognition. Could be president tomorrow. Holds the “radical center”.
MCCAIN WILL NOT TAKE MASSACHUSETTS…IT’S JUST NOT GOING TO HAPPEN…NEVER…Connecticut maybe florida maybe but no way mass and if its clinton no way new york

Posted by: micah | February 10, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am

McCain definitely needs a more conservative running mate to appeal to the diehards who think he’s more liberal than Obama or Clinton, which is absolutely ridiculous.
As for who, I think Huckabee might be a strong political choice for McCain. He’s certainly more conservative than McCain, and Huckabee can appeal to the conservative voting bloc, an area that McCain’s clearly lacking in.

Posted by: Brady | February 10, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

As a Brit and a European I am taking a particular interest in the 2008 campaign to see who will eventually assume the mantle of President and Leader of the Free World. After the disastrous foreign policies of Republican George W Bush and with America’s esteem at an all time low in the world, I think any Republican candidate, be it McCain or anyone else, will have a hard time convincing the broad American electorate to usher them into the White House this year, especially if the US economy continues to deteriorate. As for the Democrats they are spoilt for historical choice in either having a potential first female candidate for the presidency or a black American one. That choice, however, is increasingly proving to be a very painful one for the Democratic Party if one is guided by the delegate count so far. While Mrs Clinton’s personal abilities and experience as a NY Senator are not to be underestimated she does appear, however, to be a divisive figure among the electorate and in a general election she could conceivably hand the White House to the Republicans by default. From my own observations I believe a majority of Americans are looking for a fresh start after 8 yrs of George W Bush, not only to restore America’s esteem in the world but also make an effective start in dealing with the multitude of economic and domestic problems that are of pressing concern to most ordinary American voters. Finally,I must say its nonsense to suggest that a 46yo politician is any way less able to be an effective president than either a former First Lady or a Vietnam war veteran. Be bold in your choice America !

Posted by: Brian Tenwick | February 10, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

The far right wing of the Republican party is howling over the presumptive nomination of John McCain. If they do not turn down the rhetoric, and get behind the candidate, they will force him to look towards more moderate elements to support his run for the Presidency. He will pick a moderate to be his running mate, and the conservative wing of the Republican party will have only themselves to blame. If they want conservative planks in the platform, better start making nice to the candidate who will promote that platform. How about Greenspan as VP? this would allay fears about his own admission that he is not an expert on the economy – which, by the way, I find refreshing that a candidate does not pretend to know more than he does – no one can be an expert on ALL aspects of the complex position of President. Good that he knows where he needs expert help. More than can be said for many other candidates who seem to consider themselves to know what is best for all Americans, at all times, and in all areas.

Posted by: JohnThe Engineer | February 11, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am

JC Watts, if he could be convinced. Young, energetic, articulate, experienced, proven leader. Though he appears to be too smart to get back into the political arena.

Posted by: tom | February 14, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

It is interesting to see lots of anti-GOP comments that seem to overlook the fact that A) The presidential race is not over yet, with previous elections being incredibly close, it would be irrational to assume a Democrat victory. B) While I am not advocating that President Bush has the best track record, let me also remind everyone that the Democrat-run congress has an approval rating in the 20 percent range.
FYI: This comment comes from an independent who does not lean either way (right or left) and has yet to make up their mind on a presedential candidate.

Posted by: Joe | February 20, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

I don’t think we’re “sick to death” of Republicans. Maybe Bush. Not Republicans as a whole. Quite franklym I don’t think either Clinton or Obama takes an aggressive enough stance on ensuring the most important issue in America– national security. In this time of crisis, we don’t have time to whip out the band-aids and call it a day. We need to protect ourselves against future attack.
Possible Options:
1. Fred Thompson
1. Bolton

Posted by: Elle | February 20, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

Rob Portman
Delivers Ohio. Solid conservative reputation. Solid economic credentials. Experienced Washington operator – could easily run the relationship between the Executive Branch and Congress. Young enough to balance McCain’s maturity. Widely respected.

Posted by: John Campbell | February 21, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

The only logical choice for McCain is Gov. Mitt Romney. Look — he was the number 2 man directly behind McCain. Secondly, he exited the race with style, grace, and NOT stepping on McCain’s proverbial toes i.e., Huckabee. Thirdly, some say “McCain doesn’t like him!” Well, let’s let history be a guide shall we — FDR had what?? 3-4 different VP’s until deciding on Truman; Ike almost “dumped” Nixon in ’57 — save for the “Checker’s” speech; JFK ‘loved’ LBJ — NOT! — Reagan didn’t have any real ‘love’ for Bush 41; however, Reagan did (what McCain should do now!) what was good for the party and the 1980 election, selected the number #2 for the ticket. In this case, Gov Romney. If McCain does this — the conservatives will flock back to him. He can’t win without their support. Period. End of sentence.

Posted by: Frank Bromley | March 3, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

TO: John the Engineer — With all due respect, if your thesis is correct, McCain will LOOSE and LOOSE BIG! That is a fact! Look — conservatives will NOT surrender or capitulate their core/soul political beliefs at the alter of political expediency. Conservatives did NOT come out in large numbers for Jerry Ford in the 1976 election…It took Jimmy Carter (with 21% interest rates, and 13% inflation rate) to give us Reagan. It took “Hillarycare” in 1993 and Whitewater, Filegate, Troopergate, etc., to give us a GOP majority on Congress — first time in 40+ years. Did Newt and other conservatives forgo their beliefs at anytime?? The answer as you can see, is a firm — NO!

Posted by: Frank Bromley | March 3, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

lorax_mbell — on the contrary — have you forgotten that the “independent,” and “liberal” balance to a Mitt Romney vice-presidency, is McCain himself!!??!! Have you forgotten the “maverick” senator of the GOP or tag given him??? Bucking the trends of the establishment GOP??? Stopping George W from selecting conservative judges to the bench with his ‘gang of 14′ in the senate?? The list I have can go on and on….McCain “is” the liberal GOP candidate in this race. Pure and simple.

Posted by: Frank Bromley | March 3, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

lorax_mbell – that would also appease me and thousands of other conservatives as well! Don’t ya see — the Ann Coulters, the Rush Limbaughs, the Sean Hannity’s, the Hugh Hewitt’s, Lars Larsens’, etc., (regardless what you personnally think of these individuals, they have over several MILLION listeners everyday!!) WILL come back home — all will be forgiven — due to the single fact that McCain actually DID something that he honestly meant — to ensure that GOP conservative base voters come back to the fold. Hey, as I said before, it worked for Reagan with Bush 41 — and JFK and LBJ in 1960 — you don’t have to ‘like’ each other — you have to be ELECTED…i.e., the magic number — 270 electoral votes. Since the passing of the honorable Bill Buckley Jr., I wish everyone would re-read the National Review article on endorsements of GOP presidental candidates for 2008. It is worth revisiting.

Posted by: Frank Bromley | March 3, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

The only thing that will get our country back online is a dictator. A dictator with sound mind that can assume all control of the country that chooses the best advisors from all sides and listens to them. We need to stop sending aid overseas and start aiding our own citizens. I was against socialism for as long as I can remember however I am starting to favor limited socialism. We need a cowboy. Someone that’s not afraid to speak the truth. I would trust someone that I actually felt closer to and trusted like a neighbor over some slick suit.

Posted by: chaz | March 8, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

JC Watts would swing the conservative vote/ unify the race issue and besides this he will stand the scrutiny of the press and is a born leader.

Posted by: J. Sullivan | March 19, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

We need some one who will limit government control over education, ETC. we don’t want the Government telling us what to think. We are only given liberal candidates this year with McCain, Obama, or Hilary. Maybe we should consider voting for a Libertarian or Constitution Party candidate. Maybe if McCain picks up a conservative runner mate he may get their support, but the Republicans haven’t had a conservative for years. Reagan and Bushes were both for big Government and to much spending and were basically Democrats posing as Republicans. That’s why we are stuck with so much abortion, crime, teenage pregnancy, etc. because of loss of moral from leadership. McCain appears to be even more so a Democrat.

Posted by: nmman | April 5, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am

Newt! The only real choice.

Posted by: jfstrasse | April 11, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Newt! Regionality, balance, experience, notoriety, leadership and the ability to debate anyone well.

Posted by: jfstrasse | April 11, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.