Obama Fires Back at Clinton

Yes Mr. Obama, and you have give triple what Hillary has taken to buy your way into the White House with the Super Delegate vote. Why didn’t you mention or try to explain that.
Mr. Obama is a crooked Chicago Politician, and he can BS with the best of them. People are now becoming aware of how much he is a player.

Arrogance will backfire. Thanks for describing him as dismissive. That always works for a candidate!
ps: change does not include buying superdelegates. they are both the same.

Yes I agree Tony, Almighty King OBama slapping little Hillary’s bottom with a nice spanking and telling her to go sit in a corner for being bad.
What utter arrogance. This guy’s days are numbered . He talks a good game, but his words and his heart are speaking different languages.

And of course Janet, Mr. Obama is squeaky clean. He is a saint among politicians.

To be fair BJ Mr. OBama has been slamming Mrs. Clinton in every speech for weeks. No ones says anything is wrong with that. He can do no wrong.
He has been given a complete pass and has been the media darling since the beginning. It is about time Hillary took off the gloves and came out fighting. She is going to throttle him at the next debate.

$400,000,000 for NY? I thought you all said she has done nothing for NY?
Just bend the news to suit your tastes, and ignore anything that darkens the door step of your candidate.
Bravery in the upcoming New World. Can’t wait.

Jordan..no one is saying that Obama is a saint. It’s interesting though that all the Clinton campaign can throw at Obama is that he won’t debate in WI and his speeches aren’t specific enough for them. If they actually had dirt on him they would be using it. So Obama may not be “squeaky clean” but he sure has less to hide than Hillary.

The Clinton’s had their shot in the White House. Remember you got “two for the price of one” under Bill’s eight years. Now is the time for a new voice, new perspective, and new fresh ideas. Hillary’s tit-for-tat negative attacks when she’s perceived as not being the current front runner or lost the momementum are doing no favors for ANY democrats chance in November. Demos: remember the big picture. Losing the Whitehouse for another four years to more failed Bush policies- foreign and domestic would sink this country into further abyss. Obama has to repond to them. He can’t let the spin doctors of the Clinton political machine taint the facts.

Here’s a running list of Obama’s lobbyists and PAC people
As if he is pure, WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!
Donald Alexander (Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld)
John Buscher (Holland & Knight)
Kevin Chavous (Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal)
Tom Daschle (Alston & Bird)
Stan Fendley (Corning)
Elizabeth Fox (Jolly/Rissler)
Francis Grab (Washington Council Ernst & Young)
Tim Hannegan (Wexler & Walker Public Policy Associates)
Tom Jensen (Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal)
Broderick Johnson (Bryan Cave Strategies)
Mark Keam (Verizon)
Bob Maloney (Maloney Government Relations)
Marcus Mason (The Madison Group)
Andy Rosenberg (Ogilvy Government Relations)
Bobby Sepucha (Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal)
Jarvis Stewart (Stewart Partners)
Tom Walls (McGuireWoods)
Michael Williams (Credit Suisse)

and before everyone cries foul,
Check the data against the truth and see, for a change, that all is not as the media has put it. Before you attack and say it is lame, check to see if it is true first. Then attack if you can prove it wrong.
PAC and lobbyists work heavily for both candidates, not just one. Sorry to disappoint with facts. They are like that sometimes. Aggrevating and inescapable.

“Some people may think words are change. You and I know better. Words are cheap. You can’t just talk about the special interests. You have to take them on,” Hillary said. What a hypocrite! Hillary is the candidate who gets the most money from the ‘special interests.” Also, she managed not to show up to vote against a provision that grants immunity to the telecom companies of wiretapping this week. The telecom companies are one of the 5 most powerful lobbying forces in Washinton and she is backed by the telecom companies. Yes, Hillary you are right – “words are cheap.” You just proved it with your action – not to show up to vote against a special interest group.

b sure what u say obama all the way politics have been this way for years its time we stopped and that’s what he’s trying to do listen to the American people Clinton is complaining and firing any cring and c where I’m going with this

With all the Clinton attack on Obama. He has been vetted. The ideal that a republican attack will be less impacting on hillary than Obama is same old political trick. She has lunched all kinds of attack already in cohorts with republicans, they attacked his health care plan, call him a muslim, call him talker, false hopes and the list goes on. He is vetted and will do well with the Republican machine. If he can witstand the Clinton machine built on 3 decades, he has proved the cynics wrong.

Poll tracking by Real Clear Politics shows Obama beating McCain in the general election. It also shows that Hillary will either lose or come up short against McCain. Rasmussen Reports show Obama winning Nevada and Colorado from McCain, two red states, while Clinton does not.

if this pitifully weak attacking is all it takes to be considered vetted, then let’s allow teenagers to run for President. Why the age limit? Who needs to back up what they say with facts? Who needs to really have done a thing to prove what they are telling us?
This guy is vetted in dodging truth, accidentally voting wrong or not voting at all 130X. He is vetted in a lack of details. He is vetted in giving favors to donors. He is vetted attacking with Wal-Mart while his wife is connected to Wal-Mart via Treehouse. He is vetted in talking up Ethics Bills he didn’t write, introduce, edit, or sponsor IN ANY WAY.
He is not even prepared for what the Republicans are going to do to him. If he thinks he’s had it rough so far – just wait until they take Sinclair, and Exelon, and Rezko, and University of Chicago Hospital, and PAC and lobbyist denials, and 130 Present votes, and OOOPs votes in the state senate. They are going to reem him and then everyone is going to say its a plot to get the AA guy, when all along he is sort of dodging the fact he is only HALF black. We will be told we plotted to defeat the dream out of racism and stupidity, meanwhile none of the followers search outside his website for facts. They just keep quoting his own sites as facts without checking for bias.

The onus is on the Super delegates to tell the American people what is actually going on.
Obama, being relatively new and young, need more resources and convincing to do, than the status quo Hilary Clinton and Bill.
It is even mor pathetic for the Super delegates to even receive money from Obama, since he is not as rich as the Clintons.
The bottom line;The presidential nominee of the party shall and must be determine by the people’s choice and not those of the super delegates.
I STRONGLY BELIEVE 90.9% OF THE SUPER DELEGATES HAVE RECEIVED ONE FORM OR KIND OF GRATIFICATION FROM BILL CLINTON AND BY EXTENSION INDIRECTLY, FROM HILARY CLINTON TOO. OBAMA’S OWN IS PRAGMATICALLY INSIGNIFICANT COMPARED TO THE CLINTONS.
TRYING TO MAKE NOISE ABOUT THIS DEVELOPMENT IN OUT IF CONTEXT FASHION IS ANOTHER WAY OF INDIRECTLY FIGHTING AGAINST THE NOMINATION OF OBAMA!

Obama is young, but he did take more money from lobbyists last month and he sent more money to superdelegates. He can do anything he calculated to win,

The differences I see between Obama’s and Clinton’s health plans are choice. You can choose to keep the plan you have, get your own plan or enroll in his expanded plan. If you show up at the hospital and need care and don’t otherwise have insurance you get covered by the gov’t plan. Done. Or you can go with HRC and be required to enroll in a private plan, oddly enough this is supported by the insurance companies, with no regulation on the level of service they are required to provide, these are the same groups that want your doctor to tell them ways to limit your coverage. If my choice are to keep my freedom to choose, or to lose my freedom to choose, I’ll keep my freedom.

and he didn’t so much fire back as to address the fact that she is playing tactics rather than promoting herself.

Obama said in his speech that he won’t build the bridge to the 21st century but he would build the bridge to the future. He won’t play old politic as Clinton did. He is tired of old Washington. But, the true is, Obama received help from Ted Kennedy and Kerry. Ted Kennedy, Kerry are old politicians and they played old politic with Hillary to help Obama. Obama is a liar; he bridged with the 21st century people and also accepted the favors from what he is trying to run away from to get to the top.

Jordan – that ‘saint’ persona is something of a strawman you Clinton supporters created to argue against. Obama supporters, for the most part, understand he’s a politician, with warts and everything. He happens to be a very good one, and more authentic than most.

I’m wondering why Obama won’t use the “body count” to put Clintons down once for all? It is good story if they are true.

Hillary ideas are original and Obama seems to add each one to his agenda. A message of hope is not the answer. Hillary’s message is “Make It Happen”. More questions should be asked about Obama and the Rezko connection.

That’s so true Ironroof,
you seem to be the only openminded person on her without judgement on either side!
Hillary is loosing so now she wants to “Debate” when she was ahead she just praised, Honestly look at it Mr. Obama got votes from all over….I lived in Seattle, it’s only 4% African American, explain that, in Iowa it’s barely any African American’s there….Hillary thought she’ll win SC since her huband did good there when he ran there.

Why is it OK for Senator Clinton to “show confidence” by making false accusations, and taking an “any means necessary” attitude to get the nomination, but for Senator Obama, it is a sign of “arrogance and cockiness” when he does not get down in the mud with her?
There are no perfect candidates, so I want someone who can help to repair the damage that has already been inflicted upon the citizens of this country by an administration who have no idea how the real world operates. At this point, Mr. Obama has demonstrated that his character and integrity is more important than mudslinging.

When the Democrat wins, things will be changed regardless who the winner is. This country need a leader, who is down-to-earth, hand-on experience rather than vote for me because “I’m less evil than the other”.

My thoughts exactly Raul!
I think there’s a double standard there. Hill’s supporters want Obama to sell out his character as she has, so when he doesn’t do it they get angry. Most likely they’re enraged at the fact that Hillary has been forcefully challenged and not handed the nomination. It’s sad!

Obama received help from Ted Kennedy. Ted Kennedy, is an old politicians and he played old politic with Hillary to help Obama. Where is Obama’s integrity? Maybe people are tired of old politic but not Obama.

I am supporting Obama I am a middle class citizen who barely maken it, I work for a small company bush’s take more taxes out of my check I can afford to treat myself to anything it sad that Hillary is now talking about how she getting more votes from the upper Middle Class, I wondering how she feel about poor Middle Class Citizen who getting rip off with higher taxes to support the Iraq War that she supported, I cried last nite to see Poor family living in tents in New Orlean I wondering if American who hold Bush accountable for how Poor American taxes is being used for taxes not for American Poor family who need government assistant. CNN is the only new station who show American people the real story how poor people is treated in American, Hillary is not to be trusted just like Bush, It would be a outcry to see her elected president, We need to support Obama he is really for everyone I hope Obama will be elected president.

Hilary’s campaign is crumbling. Her supporters are likewise sinking deeper and deeper into despair in what has become comparable to an all-out war against Obama for having more charisma and a genuine character severely lacking in both Hilary and John McCain.
Despite all of these negative and arrogant commments by Hilary and her supporters fate has been chosen. Sink with grace.

Now, now people. Be nice. We don’t want to make Hillary cry. The mental zombiness of America showing its fear of the light is hilarious. For those who have been in a complacent position at work and have this sense of entitlement are always the ones to get looked over for promotion for the energetic and highly educated newcomer. This is a classic case of that. The ole battlewagon’s time has come. A couple more torpedos and that boat is sunk. ITS OVER PEOPLE. FACE REALITY!

I’m not trying to insult Democrats that are not wealthy or educated, but i think when people assess the facts, they will see that it is Hillary Clinton that is all talk and no action. Fact is that Obama has done more in the Senate than Hillary (see for yourself, this is public record). He has passed more bills and co-authored more bills than Hillary. He has made more personal sacrifices than she has, and i think her attacks are extremely dishonest. He came from more humble beginnings,a dn didn’t have the vaunted Clinton dynasty puffing him up. He has reduced her to her knees, and that shows his mettle. Is Obama a saint? Hell no! But Hillary is far worse than Obama. In fact, if she wins this nomination, i will not only vote for McCain, but i will donate the maximum amount allowable under the law.

JordonClinton (Post 1:21) Re Obama and both being ‘good politicians’. That being the case, I will STILL vote for Obama. Hillary, as I see it, is far too polarizing a figure. From the very beginning of the campaign, Obama has used unity words like ‘We” and ‘Us’. Hillary only began using his tone in the last 2 months. And more than that, I find her ‘I know what’s best for this country (and everyone in it????) attitude presumptuous.

Pinto? you’re so correct….
See thats someone that isnt a onesided snake for comment, I voted for the Clinton’s I lived in Little Rock and dated one of former Gov. Clinton’s staffers. The Clinton’s are good only when they’re winning in a race, when they’re loosing they are HELL!!!!

“Hillary’s healthplan is a much older plan, having existed LONG before Obama’s.”
Yup, and it went nowhere…just like Hillary. She’s in her desperate mode now, so there will be many more attacks…people may FINALLY see her for who she really is…d – e – s – p – e – r – a – t – e and willing to sell her soul to win.

CARL…..For the record: For all of Hillary’s “experience,” she sure makes the wrong calls. Her health care plan in ’93, NAFTA, her war vote, her campaign strategy(ies.) I don’t think she has her ear to the ground, but her backside will soon be. While she started her campaign talking about the Clinton years, she blindsided by the fact people don’t want to look back. Next was her experience (“Day 1!”) Then she tried to be the “change agent”- imagine that!- but her “experience” makes her the ultimate insider; hence no change. Now she’s talking about “solutions.” She’s playing “pin the tail on the campaign slogan” because she’s always been more interested in winning than in standing for something. If this is what you support, you deserve to go right down with the ship and allow the life raft to be used by those with “EXPERIENCED” critical thinking skills. Get back to me in November. You’re cooked right now.

Hillary is correct ones performance beats rhetoric any day, and if anyone wants to be honest Obama’s record in the Senate is POOR. So he can say what he wants and make light of what Senator Clinton has achieved but he still has nothing to show to the American public as to what he can or can not do. It is just amazing that some people are so caught up in the “feel good” crap that they are not seeing the bigger picture and acting as if the USA is some banana republic so any smooth talker can fill the shoes of the President.

Obama’s mocking of Hillary in his statement is so striking of his game plan in this race. Obama is betting on the win because Hillary is a woman. He play right into the mold that when fighting with a strong and capable woman, you mock and minimize her. Obama is nothing more then a used car salesman without a car to sell. His slogan of ‘changes you can believe in’ is nothing more then a focus group pick slogan for his presidential campaign. I urge all voters to research his senate and legislature records….and when you do, you’ll see that he has made none, zero, nado, zip the show call ‘changes we can belive in’. The salespitch is an empty one and he is betting on the idea that voters are just dumb enough to buy the image and the fascade without checking the facts. The rherorics is so overblown with the guy that it is now insulting to hear him speak…how can someone who voted to allow sex shop to be built next to schools stand up and speak of changes that will change this country and the world. How much courage does it take to vote ‘NO’ against having sex shop set up next to our childrens’ schools. Wake up voters, Obama is nothing more then a used car salesman.

And Carl, you will soon be admitted to the school of common sense. Your rhetoric is laughable at best. It’s fun antagonizing you clowns. Go play with your Army men or something. You’re boring me.

Did anybody catch this? Bill Clinton is calling in favors from when he was in office to gain more super delegates for Hillary. I’m sorry, but that Old boys club of favors in politics is exactly why I will not vote for a clinton. Obama has favors, but not near the amount Hillary will have to pay back when in office. I like the fact that Obama wants to discuss issues that affect the american people in a public forum, rather than closed door meetings.

The use cars salesman tried to get the Hispanic votes by supporting driver license for illegal immigrants. It means anybody can sneak in US, their status automatically become legal and applying for driver license and freely moving around the country. What’s a genius idea? Yet, the salesman also wanted to get the votes in Idaho, he said that he supported the right to bear arms. But he opposed it before. How many people shot real enemy in US a year and how many innocent people died in US under our own bullets? Thing was just happened in Illinois (a state supported Obama). What’s a wonderful leader? Where is Obama’s integrity?

Way to go, Barack. I love the way he responds in the right way. He has kept this entire campaign from spiraling into the destructive attacks the Clintons thrive in.

The good leader is the person know how to change the tactic to win. Hillary did that. Obama will be very stupid to hold on to his strategy if it does not work out for him.

o yeah i trust you, you been dreaming and hoping with barack? lol
I think I will read for myself and what the candidates have done in the past…
Asi I hope everone will than make a informed decision.
I myself have already voted in the primaries.
And whoever you stand for please go and vote in your primary. It is very inportant.

Can we all just get along?
OBAMA 08!

Unfortunately, US found no WMD when they are on the ground. That gave Obama a good leverage for his stand on the anti-war. If they found some WMD, I believed that Obama is chewing dirt now. Now one sure at that time, Obama even admitted that by the day that Bush hit Iraq, most people already tilted to support the war due to the overwhelming facts.

Sorry Bob, you must be reading someone else’s posts. I respect everyone right to support any candidate they choose. Please re read my posts. I am not demeaning or condescending to anyone. I show the exact same respect or lack of that other posters show me.
I only protest when I am treated like a piece of garbage for my views and opinions.

Obama strongly supported the right to bear arms to get votes in Idaho. Today, people questioned him about his stand when the shooting happened at Illinois University. He UTTERED the words “gun control” and “leave it to local authority”. Wow, what’s a flip-flopper?

Ironproof:
Actually, Obama is for gun control in regards to handguns, but in that speech you were talking about in your post, Obama stated that he doesn’t want to take away all guns because of all the people that enjoy hunting. Remember also that the constitution gives us the right to bear arms.
I don’t think that the problem is so much about gun control – I think it is today’s society of being too quick to put kids on meds. In the news, they are stating the shooter again had just stopped taking his meds. This is crazy. Ritalin (if it was that type of med) is a class II drug — you have to be off of it for a LONG time before the military will even take you.
for the record, I am a white, female, disillusioned Republican

Hilary has to have it! lol
Hilary Clinton just wants to spend quality time with a younger and more virile, positive and uplifting male; because Bill is old and crabby, and with a bad heart at that.
What else are we to conclude when they already had more than enough debates and Hilary wants more closeness to Obama?

Thanks, anyway “A. Concerned Citizen” but I’m sticking with Sen. Obama. I’ve done my homework about the issues so I know the facts, I’ve heard him speak and feel comfortable with my decision.
I won’t vote for Hillary (who is my NYS Senator) because she had a chance to show some leadership by not agreeing to Bushs’ war but showed no backbone. Now she’s trying to explain it all away but it all sounds lame to me.
Hillary had her time and now it’s over…..it’s time for her to go.

So Senator, its better politics to do personal insults by insinuating that Hillary Clinton is emotionally taking something out on you. Yet it is bad politics for Hillary to request a debate on issues? That logic seems extremely FLAWED.

Obama has made it clear that he wants to unite the people. So she wants to start another fight? Maybe she should get out a gun instead. Maybe we should send her to Iraq to fight in the war that she voted for.
In other news, anyone seen the newest polls for Texas? Hillary still leads, but the gap is closing, and fast. The same will happen in Ohio and Pa. The people of this country can see right through Hillary Clinton.

Wendi:
My point is that Obama had supported banning the manufacture, sale and possession of handguns. Now, he said that he has no intention to take away folks’ guns when he stumps for votes in Idaho. He is a flip-flop.
To your point, no matter how insane a person is under any circumstance, it is a big different between having a kitchen knife or a riffle or a grenade or a dirty bomb under his possession. If those weapons are out of our society, we save a lot of lives. If you don’t believe in it for any reason, why don’t we allow freely selling all kinds of weapons on the street and find the way to keep people from being insane? Which way is easier to control and eliminate?

Rubiconski:
Hillary also made it clear that she wants to unite people. She is not fighting with Obama. She brought up facts about Obama. For an example, a drug dealer can donate thousands of dollars to charities. But you need to bring up the fact is that he is a drug dealer. Whatever Obama said, Hillary brings up the facts behind it. If he sees this as a negative campaign, how he would deal with other world’s leaders, dictators, groups. Are they going to play nice with him when he is the president? It would be hundred times nastier. He gave people the dream of being united through his rhetoric. But do people know how much he can achieve? Or he already knew that he can unite only 1% of people at best and hiding the truth. Does anybody question him how he would change Washington? No, those Obama supporters are just blindly believe in what he said and dreaming that he will able to change Washington in a big way.
I discount the polls. The media plays dirty game and unfair. Let’s see the real number.

What’s Obama’s reason for launching attack ads. I know he claims to be better, and doesn’t need to, but have you ever really listened to him? His camp started the whole racist thing, and he tries to come out smelling like a rose, hopefully more people will see thru him soon. The ads I have seen from him in Ohio, have done nothing but attack Hillary. If this is his idea of change, I want no part of it.

Here’s the thing, I know the presidency is great responsibility to bear, but at the same time, success as the president is all about putting smart, competent, and experienced people around you. People act as if the president is doing research him/herself in order to come to conclusions and thats just plain wrong.
With that said, here is one reason why I’m leaning more towards obama right now… With all this convincing the American people that she is so experienced, I get a sense of false confidence from Clinton and in my mind, I don’t think i could trust her to put all the right people around her as president (much less listen to them). This is the same problem we’ve had with W. With her, its all about Hillary. And rhetoric or not, at least Obama is entertaining the fact that its not just him alone that can change things. Inexperience can be a pretty good reason to put the best around you.
Oh and also, I would like to see the Dems. get back in the white house. And nothing unifies republicans like Clinton. McCain is def. well-liked enough amongst Dems. to get all of the party members who can’t stand Hillary. I like Hillary, but it seems now that a vote for her in the primaries is an eventual vote for McCain.

Obama is even worse. He used his fake rhetoric to hide his old/hate politic and people are falling in his trap.

Obama: “gamesmanship is not what the American people are looking for.”
Obama’s own words, now then how about stopping with the games and speak out Sen Obama, afraid that when you do so on anything of substance, your rhetoric becomes completely empty?
Most Americans want answers and not stump speeches, not avoidance of answering questions completely, without statements like “we have disclosed moe than Clinton has” that isn’t transparency Obama, that is another excuse and they are getting real thin!
Why won’t Obama produce his State Senate Agenda for, hiding things he doesn’t want people to see, like his meetings with lobbyists, special interest groups and dirty money people?
Why is it on Rezko, it is only until he gets caught deeper into it he fesses up, but won’t do so before hand, is this transparency?
Why is it when asked about anything of substance on any matter what so ever, the common excuse to not answering is to shrug it off on Clinton for, is this being above board and for the people?
Why is it when asked by several media organizations to disclose the “budled money contributions” they go ignored, hiding behind a law implimented partly by Obama, after all who best to know how to skirt around an issue when the law was written by the user?
Bringing a new change to dirty campaigning is the only change will see from Obama!

If it’s specific policy guidance you seek from Barack Obama, then you should check his website to find strategy and detailed policies for over 24 facets of American life from Iraq to Iowa. Who would have thought of that? For the people who’ve had such a tough time trying to determine his policy and stance on issues, you really don’t need a college degree to exercise simple logic. If it’s experience you seek, let’s not forget that President George W. Bush, who spent five years as Governor of Texas, whose brother was Governor of Florida, whose father was Vice-President for eight years and President for four, who was President himself for four years, has in his last and final term shows us that in 2008 that choice to re-elect him has only made our country weaker and more divided, economically, politically, and socially than our generation has ever witnessed. Cleary, this wealth of experience has served the country well. And for those who would claim Hillary Clinton’s First Lady experience as experience, then you should nominate Monica Lewinsky because she has at least equal claim to that. Character and integrity are the most important virtues a President should posses. Give me a smart and experience person with no ethical roots and I’ll give you a disaster. Kenneth Lay, Richard Nixon, Resident Bush—I could go on and on. So if the Obamania “group think” idea is to change government to align it with serving to the benefit of all Americans and the World, then count me in that group and let Obamania and this rash of exuberance that individuals can make a difference when they stand together for what is right, flow over this country like a bucket of cold water waking us from a nightmare of apathy. A government that serves the poeople–who could’ve come up with that idea?

“There’s a debate coming up next Thursday in Ohio — after the 18 that we’ve already had,” he said, smiling broadly. “This is a distraction and I think people know that.”
I am not sure if I am taking this out of context, but how is a debate a distraction? Obama knows that he doesn’t have as much substance as Clinton.

Michelle, I understood Obama to mean that her negative TV ad was a distraction and not the debate she is desperately seeking. Please excuse me if I am wrong – I only speak and write English, and I am not in the habit of taking things out of context.

if this pitifully weak attacking is all it takes to be considered vetted, then let’s allow teenagers to run for President. Why the age limit? Who needs to back up what they say with facts? Who needs to really have done a thing to prove what they are telling us?
This guy is vetted in dodging truth, accidentally voting wrong or not voting at all 130X. He is vetted in a lack of details. He is vetted in giving favors to donors. He is vetted attacking with Wal-Mart while his wife is connected to Wal-Mart via Treehouse. He is vetted in talking up Ethics Bills he didn’t write, introduce, edit, or sponsor IN ANY WAY.
He is not even prepared for what the Republicans are going to do to him. If he thinks he’s had it rough so far – just wait until they take Sinclair, and Exelon, and Rezko, and University of Chicago Hospital, and PAC and lobbyist denials, and 130 Present votes, and OOOPs votes in the state senate. They are going to reem him and then everyone is going to say its a plot to get
the AA guy, when all along he is sort of dodging the fact he is only HALF black.
We will be told we plotted to defeat the dream out of racism and stupidity,
meanwhile none of the followers search outside his website for facts. They just keep quoting his own sites as facts without checking for bias

Dreams and hopes inspire people but conquering the reality is a much harder job to do. Obama gave people the dream that everybody will be united. Obama gave people the hope that he can change Washington. But he is not showing that he has that capability. He is not showing that what he would do to make that happen. On the other hand, Hillary is more pragmatic. She had the solutions to solve our today problems. I don’t dream to be on the moon when I don’t have enough food on the table; I’m going to loose my house tomorrow; my job will be chopped next week, etc…All of the Obama’s talks are based on dreams and hopes. It is not the good way to solve our current problems.
Obama came up with an economic aid package and he said that it would happen when we pull out of Iraq completely. This means that if for any reason we can not pull out of Iraq, his plan will fail. What’s a genius plan? It is the very good escape key for him.

This never-ending gibberish does nothing to help matters, people.
How can we answer all of the questions here? All one can do in this forum is get us farther from the truth.
How can we claim to know any one of these candidates? Even the Clintons, who have been through the ringer for most of their careers..we don’t know them.
Obama, we don’t know him. But, I’ll tell you what. The more I get to know him and what he could do with the presidency, the more I am for him.
I would love to have Hillary as president, but I think for the world, we need someone who can be a lightning rod for good throughout the world.
You know, Personally, I think, it’s more WE believing in ourselves. We daring to go out there and stand on the corner and vote with your actions and not just your ballot.
I think what Obama is telling us to do is for US to become active. We do see people stepping up to the plate time after time, but if it’s to do something that isn’t popular, or could hinder someone’s political aspirations, or a company’s ledger, it’s going to be fought tooth and nail and pen and ink.
THe reason, I think democrats don’t get anything done, as opposed to Republicans, is that republicans are for not doing ANYTHING. It is so easy to sit back and do nothing.
Like here we are, squabbling about lobby tripe and who’s meaner when we all could be deciding what things we could be doing to help our people, and ourselves.
This is the negative game. To make us all squabble and parse.
Take a moment, please, before we tear up our very hope for a better life through either of these candidates, and think about it. just sit and regard what I am saying.
We can either pick everything apart, or we can let the crap go and go on with the real substance.

The buying of delegates is old news, politicians have been doing it for years. The only one Clinton has to blame is here own over confidence the reason she didnt pay the delegates (as much as Obama but was still paying them) becasue she didnt feel she was going to need them. oops well i guess she screwed up.