Obama to Clinton: Release Your Tax Returns
ABC News’ David Wright Sen. Barack Obama called on his rival Sen. Hillary Clinton to release her recent income tax returns - a move the Clintons have long resisted.
Watch the VIDEO HERE.
Strapped for campaign cash, Clinton announced this week that she loaned her presidential committee $5 million of her own personal funds, but it was not immediately clear how she came by that much money.
"I’ve released my tax returns," Obama said today on his campaign plane, noting that Presidential candidates have a duty to be transparent and accountable.
He said, "The American people deserve to know where you get your income from."
Back when Bill Clinton was an office-holder, Hillary Clinton’s business dealings were often a source of controversy. Remember the Whitewater land deal and all the scrutiny given to her client list at the Rose Law Firm?
Now that she is running for President,. Bill Clinton’s finances are attracting attention.
He has cashed in since leaving the Oval Office – raking in a small fortune in speaking fees, as well as consulting for private clients and foreign governments. Fundraising for his Presidential library has also come under scrutiny.
In one recent controversy, he reportedly consulted with businessmen connected with the repressive government of Khazakstan. Some have criticized him for selling his credibility and, in the process, undercutting US foreign policy and his wife’s public pronouncements.
Should Hillary Clinton use the former President’s windfall to fund her own bid for the Presidency, it would inevitably become a campaign issue.
And, for her, there’s another sensitivity. Given that she is making the case that she is an independent career woman, dipping into a rich husband’s assets might undercut that image.
Nonetheless the Clintons have resisted frequent calls to open the library’s books or release their income tax returns.
Pressed by reporters for his thoughts, Obama said "I don’t have enough money to drop $5 million on a campaign."
Asked by email for reaction, Clinton campaign spokesman Howard Wolfson emailed back: "Senator Clinton discloses the sources of her income every year."
Clinton does file annual financial disclosure forms in connection with her job at the US Senate, but they are far less detailed than a joint tax return.
Wolfson added: "When will Senator Obama release the complete details of his relationship with Tony Rezko?"
Rezko, a Chicago businessman currently under indictment and facing trial later this month, was involved in a deal allowing Obama to purchase land adjacent to his house at below market value. Obama has, in retrospect, acknowledged the deal was "bone-headed."
Obama also recently returned some $150 thousand in campaign contributions from donors connected with Rezko.
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
I think if Hillary or Bill are contributing to her campaign then she should release her income tax documents!
As far as Rezko, how much has he contributed to Bill Clinton in any way shape or form?
As far as the number of debates, why not have a caucus in Michigan and in Florida and then the delegates can be seated fairly at the convention??
Posted by: paulet | February 7, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
I think releasing your tax returns is a simple enough request to complete that could only build more credibility…if you have nothing to hide. Not to mention, you’re asking for my vote for Democratic nominee for the POTUS. You’re practically asking to live under a microscope..as you should when given so much power. Surely you’re not offended by this request.
It sure sounds like she’s a little defensive when she throws Rezko back out there…
Posted by: whatsayyou | February 7, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
Can you media crop write something meaningful? The country is in trouble with economy plunging, european laughing at us on our $$ devaluation. Bin Laden is thinking about next move to suck up our economy and nation standing in the world to lower five notches. Do you have a head to talk about substance? How do the candidates handle the crisis? NO, NO, NO, NO. All you are talking and writing are bunch of crap. Wake up and be a real citizen care about your country, not just meaningless subject and stories.
Posted by: MediaBashOnBothSides | February 7, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
Hello? Wolfson? Anyone home?
Do you actually think the Clintons can win a contest with Obama over who has shadier friends, or who has shadier finances?
Rezko was a scumbag. He helped raise a lot of money for Obama. Obama should have had nothing to do with him. All granted. Now, let’s see Clinton’s tax returns.
Posted by: Fight can't be won | February 7, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
Why is Hillary hiding from releasing her tax returns? Something really going on in her campaign…They all come across as a bunch of crooks who will do anything and say anything to get Hillary elected. Hillary go away!!!
Posted by: Cortez | February 7, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
GOOD!
I’d love to see transparency in campaign and politics when dealing with tax money!!!
Bravo!!!
Posted by: truth4ever | February 7, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
Kinda reminds you of Nixon’s refusal to release the Watergate tapes, doesn’t it?
Re the nonrelease of her tax info: Must be a reason somewhere…and it’s probably not good. The Clintons never do anything unless it’s favorable to their political ambitions.
Posted by: somethings fishy | February 7, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
Geez, obama needs to quit sniveling so much he is really showing his age he is still a child, and as for the money hey it’s polotics they all cheat and scam. so go hillary take your place in history and after that obama will have had time to progress in traing to run our country.
Posted by: lisa | February 7, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
Geez, obama needs to quit sniveling so much he is really showing his age he is still a child, and as for the money hey it’s polotics they all cheat and scam. so go hillary take your place in history and after that obama will have had time to progress in traing to run our country.
Posted by: lisa | February 7, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
America to Obama
Tell us why you are afraid to debate Hillary.
Tell us the details of your deal with Rezko.
Tell us some examples of how you have united Washington since taking office.
Tell us details instead of offering America a bunch of Hallmark greeting card stump speeches.
Posted by: Joe | February 7, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
This is positively Nixonian/Bush-League. Clintons — release those damn papers and records, NOW!
These are PRECISELY the kind of sleight-of-hand shenanigans that are driving Dems in ever-increasing numbers to Obama!
Posted by: Mark | February 7, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
Clinton won’t release her tax records for the same reason she asked for a extension to divulge her campaign’s financial records to the FEC. She has $10 million listed on her latest divulged campaign records under “transfers.” Interestingly, there is some questions about the Clinton Presidential Library funding. And her supporters say the media favor Obama. C’mon people. This IS the Clinton’s we’re dealing with here. Those of us who are questioning her are clearly not her supporters who, not so coincidentally, are older, less educated, needier people who believe what she says because they don’t have access to information that would suggest they do otherwise. Give me a break!
Posted by: bobbie | February 7, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
Something is very *amiss* — as in FISHY — with all the secrecy surrounding the Clintons and their hinky dealings. Their relentless secrecy reminds me disturbingly of Bush and Cheney.
Posted by: Mark | February 7, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
If she cant release something as simple as a ta return she absolutely cannot be trusted. They have the ausacity to bring up Rezko? Are you serious? He’s not accused by anyone of doing anything wrong in connection to Rezko and there dozens of riduculously and obviously shady dealings the Clintons have going. They are lucky Obama is pulling his punches!!!!
Posted by: James | February 7, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
Khazakistan uranium deal is a new news, the 35 years of experience is sealed and the list of contributors to the Clinton library itself is sealed. Simple answer to a simple question from Obama: make available to the media info re taxes.
Posted by: BKMC | February 7, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
Wow the more Obama opens his mouth the more he sounds like old school Washington politician. No wonder he is afraid to debate Hillary. His only position is to CHANGE the topic when people think they deserve answers from him.
Not seeing much change in this guy.
He should talk to his good friend John Kerry about tax returns and lending money to campaigns. The more I hear from Obama the more he is exposed as a bright but empty package.
Posted by: Bill | February 7, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
I don’t think it is unreasonable. She has not released her Campaign finance records and won’t release her income taxes to show where the $5 million came from, which she did not initially release that she had loaned her campaign but when it was found out, confirmed it. Then she asks us to trust her.
Posted by: Louis | February 7, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
Did some one see the pictuer where Rizko was standing between the Clintons?
Mr. Wolfson should ans. the question
and then raise another question.
It’s very obvious and embarasing to stand against transparency when you run for the highest office in the USA to avoid TRANSPARANCY as if you are running for an office in a third world like un DEMOCRATIC Country.
Posted by: S. Mengesha | February 7, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
It’s not Senator Clinton’s fault that she has more personal finances than the Senator from Illinois. Her tax returns are of no interest to me. Let’s see the Bush or Cheney or Rumsfeld tax returns. I’m much more interested in hearing a clear sentence come from Obama rather than his speaking in parables and trying to channel Dr. King. The fact is, the Clintons have been vetted by Republicans for years. If this is all Obama has to focus on these days, I’d say he’s in for a long, and ultimately, unsuccessful bid.
Posted by: Julia | February 7, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
OK Clintonites, enlighten the rest of us:
1) WHY won’t she release all of these records and emails and assorted documents?
2) Do YOU PERSONALLY approve of her secrecy?
3) How do YOU think she’ll fare when McCain NAILS HER on it at debate after debate, and in his relentless commercials?
Posted by: Mark | February 7, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
Everyone knows that if Hillary had nothing to hide – something potentially damaging to her campaign – she would not have loosed the leash off of Wolfson to attack Obama for making a genuine request on behalf of the American people. The fact is we do need to know where the $5 Million came from. We do know, however, that the American people did not give it to her to boost her campaign as they have done in Obama’s case. We also know that Bill and Hillary will try to do anything to get back to the White House. So, Hillary, if you’re worthy of any vote you need to disclose your tax returns.
Posted by: Kensing | February 7, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
Hillary keeps telling everyone she is running on her record… so why won’t she release the documents pertaining to it?
What’s in those returns?
Posted by: Bob Loblaw | February 7, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
“remember whitewater”
Ohh, how clever…you’re drudging up the past in which Republicans spent hundreds of millions to investigate the Clintons, and it was found they DID NOTHING WRONG!!!! Aside from a blue dress, “remember whitewater” should be a stain on the republicans forever and ever!
ABC PLEASE!
Posted by: Josh | February 7, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
Clinton should just release her tax records. At least that would put this angle to rest, assuming there’s nothing surprising in there. By not doing it, well, it just reinforces her secretive perception with many voters.
I really doubt her income includes anything really embarrassing. Maybe its bigger than most of us are thinking, but nothing too bad. So to not release them strikes me as kinda dumb.
Posted by: Paul | February 7, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
I think someone is afraid of another Clinton. Hillary Clinton is in control and will make a great president.
Posted by: thinkaboutit | February 7, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
To all of you smitten with Obama mania: will you support Hillary if she is the nominee? Of course not…since you are actually REPUBs in Obama clothing..ha,ha,ha
Posted by: Norris | February 7, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
Paul, I think you’re absolutely correct: no minds are being “changed” here, and we’re all just kind of venting I guess.
As for the sock-puppeting, that’s disturbing to hear. Once again, there’s something almost Nixonian in the implied paranoia — the idea of actually paying staffers to cruise and to propagandize these meaningless boards, while looking for “enemies” to crush….
Posted by: Mark | February 7, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
Norris, I can’t speak for the rest here, but I’m not a Republican. I’m an independent. And, nope, just can’t support Clinton if she’s the nominee. Just don’t think she has the character.
I understand others see it differently.
Posted by: Paul | February 7, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
REF: OBAMA RAISING $32 MILLION
HOW MUCH WAS OPRAH’s CONTRIBUTION ?
Posted by: NELL | February 7, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
Let’s face it, if the Clintons haven’t found any better dirt on Obama than what this 2009 poster has to share, and believe me, the Clintons play as dirty as the Republicans, I’m pretty confident that there isn’t anything out there on Obama. But while Hillary keeps saying that she has been “fully vetted” new suspicious facts about her and her husband arise daily. Is it possible that an asian dictator is indirectly funding Hillary’s campaign? Release the returns!
Posted by: Paul | February 7, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
TELL OBAMA TO RELEASE HIS TAX RETURNS, ESPECIALLY THOSE FOR THE YEARS WHEN HE WAS 30 TO AGE 33.
I READ HIS BOOK AND IT AIN’T PRETTY! HE IS ALMOST 50 YEARS OLD, WHAT DID HE DO BEFORE HE JUST POPPED UP ON THE SCENE?
PEOPLE YOU BETTER INVESTIGATE AND KNOW YOUR CANDIDATES.
OBAMA IS AN UNKNOWN, NON-SUBSTANCE PERSONALITY WHO WILL BE TORN TO BITS BY THE REPUBLICANS, AND I WILL BE SMILING ALL THE WAY TO THE REPUBLICAN INAUGRATION BECAUSE YOU UN-INFORMED PEOPLE PUT UP SOMEONE WHO HAS A LOT OF NEGATIVES.
AS FAR AS SENATOR H. RODHAM-CLINTON, SHE IS AMERICAN BORN, AMERICAN RAISED AND STEEPED IN AMERICAN POLITICS. SHE IS A KNOWN COMMODITY! NO FLY BY NIGHT HERE.
SHE HAS PROVEN HER GRACE UNDER FIRE AND I DON’T BELIEVE SHE WILL JUMP SHIP, OR QUIT!
As a woman, I am for her, but as a Voter, I am for her even more. She has been investigated, and investigated, and investigated, and the worst the Republicans can do is to keep going back to the fact that she had a cheating husband. Well that just puts her in the majority of the married women in the world. I CAN IDENTIFY WITH HER THERE AND SO CAN MILLIONS OF OTHER WOMEN!!!
HEY PEOPLE, MEN CHEAT AND WOMEN ARE NOT TO BLAME FOR IT!!!!ALL THE MORE REASON FOR WOMEN TO STICK TOGETHER!!!
BY THE WAY, IS OBAMA WITHOUT CHEATING SIN??? I BET NOT!!! SOME LITTLE OLE GAL OUT THERE CAN TELL YOU A THING OR TWO!!!
McKay
Posted by: McKay | February 7, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
Obama needs to stick to the issues at hand…THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!!!!!THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!!!!!THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!!!!!THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!!!!!
Posted by: Cindy, Calfiornia | February 7, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
It would appear that Hillary was not able to budget her finances in this race ,since she has to borrow . I therfore wonder how she will handle the finances of the American People
Posted by: phillip | February 7, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Norris, Hillary must earn the nomination *legitimately* and with no “ticking bombs” (i.e. scandals) under the floorboards. If she’s got skeletons and things to hide, I expect her to get them sll out in the open NOW, not in September or October, once we’re stuck with her (if indeed she is the nominee, which is far from certain) as we run agaisnt McCain.
Playing all coy and cutesy with the truth just ain’t gonna cut it 2008! Voters are demanding truth and authenticity, and will severely punish those they decide lack them.
Posted by: Mark | February 7, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
2009, you are supporting a person who, when making a speech, had to look at her notes to see who the people were that were most important to her (super tuesday night speech). Hillary is so fake. I would not be suprised if this whole $5 million loan is a farce to counter Obama publicity.
Posted by: Jason | February 7, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
Are the Clinton supporters naive enough to think that there is some mud on Barack Obama that hasn’t already been thrown by the Clinton machine? There isn’t!That’s why Hillary has to stoop to the false flyers and robo calls right before a primary. She has to make things up in order to beat him. The woman is a disgrace as well as unethical and the American people should be smart enough to see that!
Posted by: Janet | February 7, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
Before the Dems nominate Obama, they better due some due diligence. I just can’t believe he is that squeaky clean. And if you are going to pick on her spouse, let’s do some Michelle bashing. She has already stated that if Hillary gets the nomination she won’t campaign for her but I bet Bill will campaign for Obama.
Posted by: KMW | February 7, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
Paul: Once again, you’ve hit it right on the head re the Clintons and their willingness to “go dirty” to win. Sad but true.
And my fellow Democrats, we fail to heed independent-voter Paul’s concerns at our peril, as we’ll need good folks like him to win in November — particularly now that McCain’s going to be the GOP’s standard bearer.
Posted by: Mark | February 7, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
“Are the Clinton supporters naive enough to think that there is some mud on Barack Obama that hasn’t already been thrown by the Clinton machine?”
YES CHECK THESE OUT:
*Nuclear and obama<— opps did i miss something
*Obama and his kenyan cousin <— genocide?
*Obama attends a racist church<– Oh no , he never played the race card.
*Obama Likes single payer insurance? <—- Oh no he didn't
*Obama lies about guns<— Is he for or against it , we will never know???
*Obama and Resko<——How did he get his house again?
*Obama Was A Constitutional Law Professor<– no you weren't you are just registered as a speaker.
*Obama's record on choice is less than 50%. He pretends to be pro-choice while voting for anti-choice justices who have vowed to end choice. Obama even voted for cloture on Priscilla Owen, a justice Alberto Gonzales felt was too far to the right
*Obama's pretense at being anti-war is a fraud on the American people. His actions are fully pro-war. He has voted anti-choice and to keep the USA-PATRIOT Act. A win for Obama will be a win for the neo-con agenda. An Obama nomination is a guaranteed loss for the American people who would have no major candidates to support in 2008.
What do you really know about Obama, seems to me , not much!
Posted by: danw | February 7, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
If OBAMA HAS NOTHING TO HIDE THEN WHY DOESNT HE DEBATE?
GOD IF HE CANT BEAT HILLARY IN A DEBATE < HE SURE AS HELL CANT BEAT MCCAIN
Posted by: Eleven22 | February 7, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
Apparently, with Rezko, they just continue to beat a dead horse, and when you’re done, then try creating another horse, dead or alive, at this stage it doesn’t even matter.
This issue with Rezko was already all over the news, already investigated, and they found nothing illegal on Obama. But hey, since we didn’t really like the answers from the investigation, because there just HAD to be something more to it, we’ll just keeping making it an issue.
What a way to attempt to beat your opponent…slickwillie style!
Posted by: LA in Indiana | February 7, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
oh my, danw must be the only person that has truthful, legitimate information on obama. no one else knows anything about obama except danw. danw, ask yourself this, do you think Barack Obama would be a US Senator if all this information you are ‘bringing to light’ wasn’t already investigated?
that is why it is so interesting to hear hillary talk about the vetting process hahahahaha she truly IS funny, and a Senator to boot.
Posted by: LA in Indiana | February 7, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
Obama is getting really good at avoiding having to talk about the issues. Unfortunately, he know that he can not win on the issues, so he has to divert the attention to non-issue related matters.
Obama:DEBATE. It’s how people get to know the candidates. Are you afraid? Are you just sure you’ll lose?
Posted by: Jason C D | February 7, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
Jason, how many more debates do you think they should have after 18??
Posted by: LA in Indiana | February 7, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
What do you have to hide? Release the tax returns like everyone else.
Posted by: JT | February 7, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
There we go again, left winged populist leaders who think politics is about taking from the rich to give to poor, at that´s about that.
Obama´s showed his populist colours.
Posted by: Ana, Shanghai | February 7, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
Listening to you people it pains me to know that your great party is divided by bickering and innuendos, this is all the republicans will need to to be back in the White House in January 2009 — whoever wins should take on the other as his/her running mate!!!
Posted by: Sammy D | February 7, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
Obama will debate Hillary again but at this point another debate is pointless. Are you deaf or what? Every debate covers the same issues and they make the same points time and time again. Further, Hillary has mastered the art of presenting the B.S., which many have translated as wit.
You can read every bill they have sponsored or cosponsored. You will find that as Peter posted previously, she has not done anything substantive since being in the US Senate. Obama’s record is far more impressive. The facts speak to this and not Clinton machine can change that truth.
Posted by: L Smith | February 7, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
Howard Wolfson and Mcauliff are members of the Hillary Clinton campaign I find so repulsive. They tell tales a lot. They never answer any question straight. They call blue white and red yellow. They are true representatives of Hillary. Birds of the same feather, goes a saying, flock together.
WHY WON’T HILLARY CLINTON RELEASE HER TAX RETURNS if she knows the $5.0 million she ‘loaned’ to her campaign is not from Kazakhstan.
Is she afraid of another whitewater gate?
Posted by: Kizeem | February 7, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
Control information.
Control audience questions.
Control sources of income.
Control tax returns.
Control white house papers.
Control Sandy Berger’s underwear.
Control public perception.
Control the DNC.
Control Villarigosa.
Control Florida and Michigan.
The wheels are coming off on the Clinton machine. A nick here, a leak there. Defections, money issues, Bill’s racist card, the end of inevitability, Barack’s momentum, the power of the internet, youth on the march.
The Times They Are A Changin’.
Posted by: Gorgon '08 | February 7, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
The media is only after another story and Obama is so dumb he is playing right into their hands. He does not deserve to be the next president.NO EXPERIENCE!!!!!!!
Posted by: Al Smith | February 7, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
Comparing bills authored, passed and signed by George Bush with sponsored bills is like comparing grains of salt and oceans. I would HOPE you would CHANGE the politics of distortion and spin…sponsoring is not writing and speaking on the floor is not getting Bush to sign a bill. Clinton extended healthcare to 6 million uninsured kids with SCHIP…in a republican congress…Obama brags about getting coverage to 150,000 people in a democratic state with a democratic congress and governor. That’s 40 times as many kids….and it takes a lot of experience and know how to accomplish that surrounded by republicans…
Posted by: kris | February 7, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
Hillarys campaine will be DOA when
McCain gets ahold of her, Theres talk that they already have enough to put one of the Clintons away and are just waiting for dem nomination.HMMM- can you leagally put Obama back when that happens?
Posted by: sean wigley | February 7, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
How many debates are necessary when the candidates have already stated their positions and platforms many times over now. Hillary is, understandably, trying to get some additional free exposure because her campaign funds were dwindling. Also tired of hearing all this rhetoric about “experience”…both candidates have more than adequate experience…that simply doesn’t wash as an edge in this case. The resistance to release joint returns is another matter though. Hoping Hillary will see the light on that one…otherwise, she’ll give the impression that she has something to hide. Given the Clintons’ old school methods of operation and campaign strategies, there may be some substance to the concern that they’re afraid will be exploited. When all the nonsense settles, this senior is voting for Obama because I like the way he thinks, pulls people together to reach a consensu, and I believe he is honest.
Posted by: Bill Stanfield | February 7, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
Why Hilary wants to hide everything if she has nothing to hide?
She is most vetted, most experienced, ready to lead from day one – why she do not show how truthful she is?
She cries for the love of our country, or love of her power?
Clintons love power! They build all these propaganda machines in 90′s thinking they will be back again!
America ruled by 2 dynasties for last 20 years. Hilary thought it will be a cake-walk and its her birth-right to be president from day one!
Hillary bring memories of scandals, Monica saga, watergate, failed healthcare – she still live with her infidel man! If not power hungry, what is Hilary?
Posted by: Cohen | February 7, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
You have to be kidding me. Look up Clinton fundraiser Peter Paul. Trust me on this, if you look this up you will see the truth.
Posted by: Aaron | February 7, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
Obama is beginning to sound like one of those professional male athletes who are finding themselves behind in the game. wah wah wah that isn’t fair. I think I’ll fake an injury so I can sit on the bench and whine, wah wah wah
Posted by: r | February 7, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
Romney sets a good example for Obama, get in line, and stop damaging the party and the voters. Everyone is tired and exhausted, and the real fight has not even started yet… If the republican wins in the fall, he will be the blame, and becomes the greatest joke in history for offering the republican party the white house…
The democractic party is kind of stupid, —compare to the Republicans.
Posted by: jamie | February 7, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
VPNNathan:
By the way, Hillary Clinton is not running against Brittany Spears…..Brittany is being treated as an American idol…huh….
Senator Obama is qualified to be president, and It does not matter how or what you feel otherwise….He will be elected.
Posted by: tony | February 7, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
You don’t get it! The mud the republicans will throw isn’t about stuff they haven’t found yet. It’s about the stuff we know and how they’ll use it against him. Here’s an example:
A POW verses a cocaine user
A conservative against the nations most liberal senator (conservatives strongly dislike liberals)
A man with ties to Louis Farrakan (it doesn’t matter how remote)
A man with a middle name that sounds like a terrorist.
A man who worships in a denomination not highly recognized by evangelicals.
These are known aspects about Obama but how they will create videos, banners, ads that make people step back and think is the real mud. You’re so passionate right now that you think the enemy is Hillary Clinton when the enemy is the Rove political machine. WAKE UP!
Posted by: Jeff | February 7, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
Hillary is so much smarter than B.O. he should follow her lead and take advantage of getting as much free air space as possible with the debates since it is way over priced anyway. He shouldn’t be scared to debate her again, we all already know that he has no platform to stand on but he could take advantage of some free air time, he could use some air time to blow all of that hot air that he’s been blowing. That’s just another reason why she will make the better President because she knows how to get the most of what’s available.
GO HILLARY! GO HILLARY! GO HILLARY!
Posted by: Jamey | February 7, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
Who cares what Bill did with that other female. Our countries best presidents have been unfaithful to their wives, it releases all those pent up hormones, In referrence to this, Obama won’t be able to hold a candle to JFK, tired of hearing that someone thinks they’re similar. They are as similar as black and white, and in regards to MLK, I have a dream too, it is to see Hillary elected in October.
Posted by: r | February 7, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
oh, obama, let’s see your accounting of your campaign fund records, then——candidates should be transparent, you know——-I want to see that you’ve given back every cent of that $100,000 campaign donation money that your “friend of 17 years” Rezko gave you—you know, he’s the guy in Chicago that has been arrested and charges with corruption, and he has been sent money from some rich Iraqi Arab…….
Posted by: Anonymous | February 7, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
Hillary should not release her tax returns because it is no ones business how much financeil she has. If Obama wants to release his then let him do it. He doesn’t need to know where Hillary got the money or what she did with it. The Clinton’s happen to be political millionaires and Obama only has about 1.5 million. He couldn’t write out a check for 5 million because he doesn’t have that kind of money. A candidate can use their own money, Romney used his. Obama can’t do that.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | February 7, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
r:
Dr. King was more than a dreamer…..He was a doer. So, since your dream is to elect Clinton, then less dreaming, make it happen…
but, it won’t, because senator Obama will be elected the 44th president of the United States……..
Posted by: tony | February 7, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
Obama is just calling foul that Hillary has her own money and that she didn’t give him any.
Posted by: r | February 7, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
Jamie:
Senator Obama has confessed his faith. Have you ever heard of being born again? You can find scripture reference in St. John 3. Even if senator Obama were a Muslim in his early years, SO WHAT??? Muslims turn to Isa al-Masih (Jesus the Messiah.
People from various ethnic backgrounds and religions have turned to Christ. The largest local church is in South Korea…..Christianity is worldwide as Jesus intended….So, will you back off senator Obama’s faith……If he confesses Jesus as Savior, then you should leave that alone…….just be sure you confess Christ as your Savior.
Posted by: tony | February 7, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
All these Obama lovers calling for the psychological warfare .
Senator Obama has LOTS of things for the Republicans to ‘swift boat’ . The worse the country gets, the more people look to real solutions rather than utopia.
No doubt the war is going to go magically well by the republican media, and torn apart by the democratic media.
While obama tries to get his JFK shine on, he will have forgotten one thing.
Unless he is hundreds of delegates ahead by the convention – which the odds are slim to none – the Clinton backed Democratic party will hand the nomination to her via super delegates.
The main backing of the party is behind Bill and Hillary Clinton.
There are no ‘youth vote’ or ‘independent’ super delegates
Posted by: tom | February 7, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
r:
I gotta go, but at least I chuckled at your little comment about Clinton not giving Obama any money…..cute; but silly.
Posted by: tony | February 7, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
Hello Wolfson? Are you there?
You want to talk about Rezko? How about the photo of Mr. and Mrs. Clinton with Rezko? Clintons don’t go where they don’t gain. It is true Hillary denied knowing anything about the photo. We also know that SHE DENIED SO MANY THINGS THAT ARE TRUE.
LET US TALK ABOUT WHITEWATER GATE
1. Hillary Clinton’s Former Campaign Finance Director Indicted.
Let’s talk about David Rosen
2. Hillary Clinton Donor Hsu Indicted in New York
Let’s talk about Norman Hsu
3. Another Hillary Clinton donor fraud gets busted
Let’s talk about Mauricio Celis’ four indictments:
a. falsely holding oneself as a lawyer
b. impersonating a public servant
c. state jail felony theft
d. aggravated perjury
4. Let us talk about Richard “Dickie” Scruggs
5. Let’s talk about the ‘Clintons’ Multi-Million Dollar Dubai Conflict –of-Interest
Bill’s $20 million payoff from the United Arab Emirate
6. Let’s talk about drug dealer Jorge Cabrera,
7. Let us talk about Chinese arms dealer Wang Jun
8. Let us talk about Grigory Lutchansky, whose company, Nordex was Bill Clinton’s CIA list and was denied entry to Canada because he failed background check, yet he met with Clinton.
9. Let us talk about the Pakistani immigrant, Abdul Rehman Jinnah
PRO-CLINTON ‘DIRTY CASH’ MAN FLEES
A Pakistani immigrant is wanted by federal authorities on charges he channeled $30,000 in illegal contributions to Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s presidential war chest.
10. Judicial Watch Monitors Hillary Clinton’s Campaign for Election
The first time Hillary Clinton campaigned for the Senate in New York, she violated campaign finance laws by failing to report almost $2 million in contributions.
LET’S TALK ABOUT THEM, BABY
LET’S TALK ABOUT ALL THE BAD THINGS ABOUT HILLARY
LET’S TALK ABOUT THEM
Posted by: Kizeem | February 7, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
Peter:
unless there’s another Tony on this site, I’m not sure what you are referring to….
take care
Posted by: tony | February 7, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
When will Barak stop sniping at Hillary. He’s going to lose this contest if he doesn’t start understanding that we’re all on the same side.
Posted by: Ron Johnson | February 7, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
i havent made my mind up with whom im vote for. but this is little childish to me. as long as she not cheating so who care where she getting her money from. i dont care if mr. bush giving it to her.–if she want to make her taxes public let her or anyone do it at their own will
Posted by: mike | February 7, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm
Okay fellows:
Can we all just get along?–Rodney King.
Seriously, the end result in Novemeber will more than likely be a team effort to win the White House with senators Obama and Clinton. They are both appreciated for their service by millions of people. They will probably team up. Senator Obama will get the nomination and more than likely pick sen. Clinton as his running mate.
So, please stop this gender and race war….Thank the Lord for Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964….Thank the Lord for the dream of Dr. King being realized in America. No more fighting, okay my friends?
Shalom
Posted by: tony | February 7, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
Hmmmm…some of us old Republican guard can hardly wait to see what skeletons will be drug out on Hillary. Just as she has been building her campaign since before Bill left office, Republicans have built their files.
I am supporting Obama because I have 3 small grandchildren and I want a better future for them…a better America for God’s sake. With Hillary, you democrats will get more of the same. But you sure won’t get any of us cross-over voters and you will lose a lot of independents.
I will vote “Republican anything” if her name is anywhere on the ticket. So will a lot of others.
Posted by: An Ex Republican Voter | February 7, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
if she cant come clean about the five million she contriubated to her own camp? then she cant be my president. obama released his.what does the clintons have to hide huh?
Posted by: clemmonsanthony | February 7, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
Obama – schedule a debate – clarify your policies. In other words focus on something the American people care abbout.
Posted by: UBS | February 7, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm
Did you watch the abc7news yesterday Dan Ashley mentioned that barack obama spent his childhood in indonesia,what can you say people. Do you know that in my opinion some republican are funding barack, if the general election in november all the whites will vote for mccain, do you want that to happened, republican are trying to psychologize the democratic voters so another republican will be in WH again.
Posted by: gerry | February 7, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
It is not so much any single item that calls into question Hillary Clinton’s honesty and integrity–it is the long (and growing longer) string that seems to be unraveling. I understand her supporters are vested emotionally (more than intellectually, for the tone of the emails) and so are in denial; that much is simple human nature. It is also human nature to attack when threatened, which is why so many of these folks make such absurd comments about Barack Obama. The facts are self-evident that Clinton has a checkered past. She could assuage a heck of a lot of doubts NOW if she would simple unseal the Presidential records and release her tax records. I think this is a small price to pay to establish herself as a truthful and above board candidate.
But even if she does that, there is still much for her to answer to. Though she excels in the debate forum (which is why she is desperately pushing for more), her record as a senator is dismal: she did nothing original and failed to accomplish anything of note. She had six years and yet seemed incapable of introducing and sustaining successful legislation. And on a subject as critical to our future as invading Iraq, she simple didn’t do any required homework, and excuses that by saying if she knew then what she knows now….but she didn’t know ANYTHING then because she didn’t even bother to read the report. How does that translate into successful candidacy.
Final thought: I am a woman of a certain age and I am absolutely disgusted by the idea that so many women are voting for Hillary simply because she is a woman and these people feel it is time to correct a wrong. The worst possible reason to vote is revenge, and that is what you are doing: taking revenge on the American people for denying you a role model for so long.
Posted by: Deb | February 7, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
Good job, Peter. Also, if you read the article, Obama was responding to a question as to whether she should release her tax returns. His answer was, “I have released mine. I think it’s important for the American people to know this.” He didn’t bring it up, the press did. He merely answered truthfully, as always. All this outrage here is indicative of the fear that there is scandal ahead, that cannot be prevented, even by Clinton Network News. They are mired in scandals, from the past and from now. If they won’t be transparent in their own financial dealings, how do they expect to bring transparency to government? It’s the same old hypocritical nonsense we must clean out of Washington – for good. Why shouldn’t we know? The government can get ahold of our IRS records anytime they want. Is she above the average citizen?
Posted by: jonnie rae | February 7, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
Let’s not forget that Hillary is campaigning on all her White House “experience”, meanwhile she and Bill refuse to release any White House papers that include her to the public until 2012. I wonder what kind of experience she has?
Posted by: JLKnSC | February 7, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
Hillary should definitely release her income tax records. She should also release her medical records; both for the last 30 years.
Also, I hope someone will ask her to explain her actions when she was a member of the Nixon impeachment committee. It appears she committed unethical actions concerning stealing files and making money for said files. Does anyone see a pattern that started in her mid-twenties? Lie, cheat, steal, hide evidence and manage to make lots of money doing it. Her obsession with power and money is an example of poor character. Our country doesn’t deserve to be punished with the Clintons back in the White House!
Posted by: Don'sRight | February 7, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
Obama tell the truth about Rezko.
Posted by: dirty harry | February 7, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
I think it is telling that the only real item the folks have to hit Obama on is Rezko.
If only Clinton were a one hit wonder, we wouldn’t be having this debate now, would we?
Instead, she is a serial offending, with questions about her conduct going back to the days when she was a Goldwater groupie (yes, you supporters, if you trace all the way back she started off very much in the heart of the republican machinery).
So, all of you who clamor for scalp, I think you need to look at the candidate who has the longest history of missteps, misjudgment, questionable activity, suspect financials, and who, for whatever reason, refuses to reveal what should be public documents–and in case you can’t figure it out, that candidate is Hillary Clinton.
Posted by: Kira | February 7, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
I’m 63 and old enough to completely remember Bill’s terms, and the pandering, secrecy, slandering, smearing politics that went with them. I’m also white and a US military retiree. I remember JFK’s promises of hope and new directions with little substantive words. Today, I’m an ardent Obama supporter, because he presents the potential to change the way politics are conducted in our nation. Ms. Clinton has demonstrated that although she’d be a good president, she’d continue her husband’s legacy as well as George W.’s, as to how the ‘game’ is played. I’m fed up with ‘tell them whatever is needed to get their vote then do what you want afterwards’ crap. I’m fed up with swift boat slandering. I’m also fed up with folks who can’t (or won’t) look through the façade that old school pol’s seem to think they can get away with. Obama has not played that game at any point yet, no matter what smoke screen ardent Clinton folks want to throw out. I don’t think he will, and I’m actually believing he’ll be that kind of President as well. So why can’t the Clinton’s be that way too? Duh! It ain’t in the homeboy, and isn’t in her.
Posted by: Walt | February 7, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
The reason some of us keep bringing up Resko is simply this. Obama has stated time after time that his judgement trumps his lack of experience. He toots his own horn by saying how he has superior judgement and would make the right decisions in office. He himself said his land deal was boneheaded and shows a lack of good judgement. It also shows his lack of judgement in picking friends. Hey if Obamas campaign can continually bring up people in her past why cant we look at Obamas gaffs and shortcomeings? Its only fair.
Posted by: robert kellogg | February 7, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
The debate issue is the dying gasp of the Cllintonites, and Obama is again showing wisdom, maturity, and judgment in not falling into the trap the Clintons are trying to set.
Hillary is a champion debater; it doesn’t mean she is a better leader, has better ideas, has better judgment, is smarter, etc.; it simply means she is a better debater. I fail to see where this decision works agains Obama.
Also, a debate gives Clinton free publicity–why would Obama want to do that? Again, this is a good call on his part.
It takes days away from the campaign to prepare for debates. Obama needs to have boots on the ground rather than face behind a podium. Good call.
Finally, he has already agreed to at least two debates. How many do you Clintonites want?
You are just upset because he’s playing the game smart and not falling for your ‘team’s'nonsense.
Posted by: Deb | February 7, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
BO needs to be careful. We know about Rezko but nothing on favors, if any, for the money received. Chicago papers had reported his Rezko relationship. Is there more to come? As a Senator, Hillary makes disclosures. So, what pray tell may BO be up to? And after this should he succeed, does he believe democrats would vote for him? Better give this some thought.
Posted by: benvictor | February 7, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
It seems Barack Obama only does well in Caucuses. Unfortunately, the general election is not going to be a caucus.
The true test of how the election will look like is by looking at the various contests where primary have taken place.
Clinton is more electable – plain and simple. Republicans are using reverse phsycology by suggesting that HRC is easier to beat. The truth is, they are scared to death of HC.
Despite the importance the media placed on the Ted Kennedy,Caroline Kennedy, Maria Schriver, and Oprah endorsements, Clinton still ended up winning the states that matter. The more the media bashes HRC, the more backlash they are going to enlicit from the women and commonsensical people and the blue collars.
We the people will make the decision who we will vote for. Get it?
Posted by: SamO | February 7, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
Give me a break. The Rezko incident has been overblown by the Clintons (people on her staff have taken money from the guy!). Obama apparently has given the money he accepted from the guy to charity. The other bits and pieces of the relationship apparently don’t rise to anything more serious than conjecture.
But if you want to play tit for tat, then I’ll see ONE mistake in judgment (which I don’t necessary agree rises to that level) against the mountain of documents that indicate Hillary’s 35 years of experience came at the cost of integrity and honesty.
Posted by: Kira | February 7, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
Obama keeps saying he’s the next JFK?
Well, I remember JFK. His bedroom antics with everyone in a skirt made Bill Clinton look like a choir boy.
Is this what you Obama-ites want?
No wonder the republicans are laughing to themselves, if Obama wins the nomination, McCain gets the White House!!!
Wake up, it’s now, or never.
Posted by: Real PA Voter | February 7, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
On what basis do you claim Hillary is more electable? Based on everything I’ve seen, read, and heard, her primary group of supporters are old women (and yes, I be one), uneducated people, and Latinos. Seems to me that leaves a lot of folks out there who would not agree with you that she is the most electable.
Posted by: deb | February 7, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
Obama, quit your sniveling and trying the “dirty laubdry” tactics – it won’t help! You will win the black votes for obvious reasons; you are going to lose anyway though. Take it like a man, and get used to saying, “yes Mrs. President”.
Posted by: mike b. | February 7, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
This is another political ploy by Obama to try and cause conflict. He needs to shut up and discuss something of substance like the issues affecting America. The only thing I’ve heard from him since Super Tuesday is how great and wonderful he think he is (he will keep all the people that voted for him but he does not think Hillary can. He can rake in more money than Hillary. He is the only one that can beat the Republicans.) Sounds more like a arrogant, egotistical kid rather than a Presidential candidate!!!
Posted by: d | February 7, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
Poll taken showing Obama more electible are wrong. They were taken before anyone knew Obama. Clinton has been in the spotight for over a year now/ If you believe polls taken today.
Posted by: dirty harry | February 7, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
Fear mongering and innuendo doesn’t work if you have a brain–so sorry to inform you. And if you think the references to JFK have to do with his bedroom antics, you might want to head to the nearest store to see if they have a spare one on sale.
But I’ll explain it simply so even you can understand. The inspiration that got folks to sign up for the peace corps and made people think of Camelot may have, in hindsight, been a bit wispy, but the feeling of optimism and hope and possibilities inherent in the Kennedy campaign is what informs many of us who are hoping to support Obama all the way to the WH. Sometimes all it takes is a change in mindset to make the most impossible things happen.
Posted by: kira | February 7, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
CHILL. Seems God has spoken and the followers are demanding his will be done. I guess Obama’s tax preparer got his done before Clinton’s finished hers and he couldn’t wait to get his out so he could make demands. Has anyone heard Clinton say she would not release hers. Chill out, they will be released in due time.
Posted by: Oldgaman | February 7, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm
I’m not sure why it would be a big deal to release tax returns, UNLESS you had something you want to hide. It does make you wonder how they came up with 5 million with such ease. Even if they have a huge net worth, how do you have that much cash on hand??
Posted by: Sue Times | February 7, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
She got 8 million dollars for her book deal and I heard Barack got about the same..
Posted by: Jenny411 | February 7, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
Yep, Hillary has been on the trail for over a year and half and in that time has seen her insurmountable lead (at one time, double-digits) crumble to a statistical dead heat with Obama. It is wishful thinking to continue to say she is the only candidate who can win for the Democrats: if you look at the trend lines, it isn’t even clear she can win the Democratic nomination without pulling string!
Posted by: kira | February 7, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
Hillary Clinton strongly resisted debates until her campaign became short of Cash.
Why isn’t she DONATING the $5 million? She is allowed to as it is her campaign.
Why should others DONATE and she should only LOAN (at high interest rates)to her campaign.
Her income tax statements should be a mattter of public record.
The Clintons continued engagement in bad judgement, shady schemes and ellusive behavior does little to encourage intelligent citizens to consider her as presidential material.
Posted by: Older White Female PhD | February 7, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
Well ladies and gentlemen, I have never heard or read so muck nonsensicsl arguments. Our school system is being betrayed. No wonder Barack is talking in a tongue that only 3 words are remembered “yes we can”. Obama is a fraud, at least he trying to win a campaign by using tested Republican tactics.
Did anyone ask Obama where and who gave him 7 million in 24 hours, or was that a lie to show he has support?
You won’r believe it but , while Hillary would like to select Obama as her VP,,his connections are politically suspicious. Forget about the history of the money..if its dirty from either side time will reveal it. Obama supporters , neither of you can debate ONE of Barack’s proposals. But you know all of Hillary’s because she would not let US forget why we are ALL important to the success of this Great Country .
Hillary will be competing with MCCain. While Obama will be crying foul.
Posted by: Andy | February 7, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
Hello Obamites are you out there. You people are rehashing debunked republican investigation material. 60 million dollars of tax payer money was spent by kenneth starr to investigate the Clintons and nothing was found but a family matter of the Clintons. (60 million) If you dont believe me look it up. This tid bit was given by Air America. Hillary is ahead in the popular vote and the delegate count. It was the big media that snuffed out Edwards and it is the same big media that has given Obama legs. I personally dont understand why Edwards supporters would slide to the Obamites based soley on this issue. In regards to the Clinton Walmart issue. It is common knowledge that she worked there when they bought and pushed for american made products. After she left they started more and more purchasing Chinese. In regards to the war. Hillary authorized force only if it was proven that Hussien had connections to Al qaida or if he would not allow inspectors. There was no connection between the two and he was allowing inspectors in. Bush lied to get us in. Lastly those of you who are so against the Clintons are either repubs or you have stepped directly into there trap to divide the democrats. I will personally do everything I can to expose this. All above is true look it up. Oh and dont do your research on fox news.
Posted by: richard | February 7, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
Andy,
Talk is cheap, especially on an anonymous forum. You made a LOT of charges here and lots of unfounded accusations. Please provide some evidence of any of the claims you make against Obama. Here’s your chance to educate all of us and win your point. I’ll be waiting for clarification for at least the next five minutes. Let it rip, give us all you got, convince us we have been blinded by the light.
But if you cannot back your words up, then you have admitted to one and all that you are empty wind blowing desparately against the truth.
Posted by: Deb | February 7, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
You see, u can never trust the Clinton’S.They claim they dont know Tony Rezko.But we saw a picture of them with Tony Rezko.
Posted by: Ajojo | February 7, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
If you want more of the same….like George Bush, please vote for Obama. He stutters like Bush, gone to Harvard like Bush, inexperience like Bush, talks about change like Bush did in 2000, irresponsible and naive like Bush, has no foreign policy experience, his cult-like followers what to have a beer with him like Bush, Obama is fake like Bush…fake, fake, fake.
Posted by: Ken | February 7, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
Older white female:
Stop the female hating, you have a Phd and that is your analysis, on a serious political question. Why did’nt we ask MCCain how came to move from zero dollars to the nominee. You are an American, think sensible…. like an educated gal…
Lets have a good talk so other people will believe Doctors are smart all the time.
Posted by: Andy | February 7, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
A true leader must be sincere and transparant.Noting to hide what so ever,I don’t see this qualities in the clinton’s. How can we vote them into power again.
Posted by: Ajojo | February 7, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
Dab why is the onus on me to provde with you with info. I claim that as an Obama supportter you cannot retain his proposals on the issues. Don’t accusse me of anything. Hey look at the message online ..now
Posted by: Andy | February 7, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
As in impartial observer I’d just note that the title of this post “Obama to Clinton: Release Your Tax Returns” is intentionally sensational and totally inaccurate. The video clearly shows that a reporter raised the question of tax returns and attempted to bait Obama into calling on the Clintons to release theirs. Instead of doing this, he appropriately (i.e., well-executed politically) demurred and said that he would ONLY say that he had released his tax returns and went on to explain why that is important. A honest, straightforward answer that makes the political point without appearing to attack the opponent (well done!). Further, pressed by the reporters (undoubtedly hoping to generate some controversy), he eventually says “I think I’ve answered the question.” So, even though he didn’t take the bait, the title of this blog suggests that this “demand” for the Clinton’s to release originated with Obama rather than as a question from a reporter. Aren’t journalists trained to report the news, not make it up?
Posted by: mikey | February 7, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
Experience, Experience, Experience. Those who continue to spout off that Senator Obama does not have the experience to become president have not looked at the other candidates. I do not see an incumbent in this race. The frontrunners on both sides are senators. The work that they’ve done in Washington has been in senate chambers. For the other candidates to tout their experience over Senator Obama’s experience is ridiculous. In one main area, Senator Obama is ahead of them. He knows the constitution. He taught constitutional law for ten years.
Every job or position has a position description. Within that position description are requirements. After all the hopula from the naysayers about Senator Obama’s lack of experience, I deceided to look up the requirements to become president. Well, what do you know, there are only three simple requirements.
35 years old, natural born citizen, and living 14 years in the United States, that is if you were born oversees to American parents.
S0, my fellow Americans, what does Senator Obama lack? Let’s put what we think is Senator Obama’s lack of experience to bed and find something else to talk about.
Posted by: Charlotte Johnson | February 7, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
The stupidity of the Obama Sheeple never ceases to amaze me.
Sinister origins for the $5 million Hillary Clinton lent her campaign.
Perhaps some of you Sheeple can have your mommies read you the story of how Hillary received an $8 million advance on her BOOK.
We of the great unwashed, non wine sipping brie eating masses can even do that arithmetic calculation… lets see, $8 million minus $5 million leaves Hillary with $3 million left over.
Now I am sure that the IRS has taken its pound of flesh out of that $8 million. But then again, I am sure that Hillary has made money on investments and her salary as Senator for eight years now while Bill has provided the finances for the family.
So the bottom line is that Obama and his Sheeple are raising false flags of suspicion as to the origin of the $5 million Hillary easily has in her possession while totally ignoring the 153 people who lost their jobs in a town of 1500 because Board of Directors member Michelle Obama helped to close their plant, while Barack is organizing a boycott against that plant’s major cusomer WALMART, as well as ignoring that Obama’s wife is Vice President of a hospital that has been cited by HHS for “patient dumping” of poor Black patients as well as charging poor Blacks without health insurance 5 1/2 times as much as Whites with health insurance for medicines. Not to mention that this supposed NOT FOR PROFIT hospital made over $103 MILLION in PROFIRS last year.
Yes, that is who I want for President, a man with a wife that puts minority workers out of their jobs while she collects over %50,000 a year for board meetings and tosses sick Blacks into the street…
My Hero!!!
Posted by: ShyGuy | February 7, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
First, Obama is not in the poor house. In fact, that Rezko house he bought was listed for 1.6 million dollars. I don’t think too many of us can afford that. Second, individuals are allowed to use their own money. Romney did it, McCain had to take out a personal loan & Bloomberg (if he were to run) would largely use his own funds. Bill Clinton is one of the most popular people on the planet & he has raised more money for poor & sick people worldwide then any person I can think of – he has a right to make a good living. Third, it isn’t his money or her money – it’s their money. Most people in a committed relationship – share. Fourth, why is this the issue? With all the problems -this is what he is talking about – how mature. Is it becuase there has not been any negative press for 1 hour & his non-stop Obamafest with the Media was stopped with the results of Super Tuesday? Why won’t he agree to debate her on the issues? Both candidates will be in Maine on Saturday – Clinton offered to meet Obama in a town hall so the people of Maine could see them & hear their answers to REAL questions. The response from Obama – no thank you. He’s “talked to her enough”. Really? The people of Ohio, Washington, the beltway & Texas want to see them debate. There has only been one – one on one debate. What is the problem? Can’t talk about real issues – so this is what he comes up with. Give me a break – who is talking, acting like a politician now?
Posted by: From Maine | February 7, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
Obama,
Are you getting desperate to win?
Please win by your own merits …
Not by digging up what you hope is “dirt” of your opponent.
Do you not have anything good about yourself to brag about?
Posted by: HillaryAllTheWay | February 7, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
Um the Clintons have probably taken pictures with over a million people. That is what people request when the meet famous people. It has already been reported that Rezko has no affiliation to the Clintons and has not given any donations to them. This Rezko issue has legs and is not old news in the majority of the USA. Do the research google rezko illinois and you will be enlightened.
Posted by: richard | February 7, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
Hey Shyguy. Maybe Clinton can get 8 mil, use 5 and have 3 remaining. The rest of us would make 8 have the tax man take 4 and leave us with 4. Get your mommy to teach you about reality. And please, hillary supporters, stop claiming O is afraid to debate. He has done 18. I am tired of hearing from both of them and this point and the questions (as well as the anwers) have grown stale.
Posted by: notsoshy | February 7, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
Why is the Clinton campaign being so defensive about something as simple as filing her joint tax returns to the public? This should be a mandate for everybody running for office these days.
Release them, now, or everybody has very good reason to think something fishy is up.
Posted by: Ry | February 7, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
Who does this guy think he is? His “holier than thou” attitude is laughable and at the same time dangerous because he seems to have many; far too many, people fooled into thinking he is the “big answer” to all our country’s problems. Whoever his “spin doctor” is really knows how to slice the baloney. President Lincoln said “you can fool some of the people some of the time, but not all the people all the time”. I sure hope he was right about that.
Posted by: therockofages | February 7, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
When Bush was re-elected in 2004, a British newspaper’s headlines screamed: “How can 52 million people be so stupid!”. Most of these posts are a sad reminder of the inherent stupidity that made Bush a reality.
Posted by: Sarah | February 7, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
Andy,
As your comments are incoherrent it is difficult to understand what you are attempting to ask about. As for my PhD, it is in International Finance, and I also come with strong credentials in International relations,which is why after careful consideration of all the candidates I have decided that I could never support Ms. Clinton as I did not support Mr. Bush.
Regarding the campaign funds of Mr. McCain, you may find a complete record of his campaign contributions at his website. While I disagree with many of Mr. McCain’s positions, and would prefer not to vote for him,I respect his general truthfulness.
Having met Ms. Clinton and her husband personally on several occasions (Democratic fundraising dinners)has only strengthened my knowledge that they are fundamentally untrustworthy individuals.
Regarding the “female hating” please stop advertising your overt hatred of others. I am a female who has worked her way up and through the “glass ceiling”, a ground-breaker in my area of expertise. I am highly regarded as a person who helps others, male and female, to succeed and who respects others who deserve respect.
Sorry that I won’t be “hanging around” to read your response but it is late here and I am meeting with some of my graduate students at 8 AM. Have fun!
Posted by: Older White Female PhD | February 7, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
I think the major issue is obviously electability. In this regard, the latest poll from TIME Magazine shows a large difference of Clinton vs. McCain (tie) and Obama vs. McCain (+7). It seems like a no-brainer given the minuscule difference in policy between the two. If you want a democrat in office in 2008, go with Obama. If you want uncertainty about who it might be go with Clinton. I prefer the former and will go with Obama to ensure that we can win back the Whitehouse.
Posted by: herman | February 7, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
Hey Obama release the following document please:
- Your Columbia University Transcripts. (has refused so far)
- A list of your friends, roommates and bosses during your time in New York. By the way this is required for a security clearance. (has refused so far)
- The documents concerning your house purchase and the purchase of the lot next door and the subsequent purchase of part of that lot by you.
- A document showing how you handled the “gift” from Rezcko on your house purchase. (If not on your taxe return during the year you purchased your house then you have violated federal law?
- A list of the people who have bundled your contributions, including any money from overseas sources.
- A transcript of the conversations that you had with Railla Odinga while hhe was running for presidency of Kenya.
- An explanation of your wherabouts during the period Nov 3 through Nov 8, 1999, while a State Senator from Illinois.
Posted by: Colonel Ray | February 7, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
Obama says he doesn’t have Hillary’s money to contribute to his campaign. I say Hillary doesn’t have Oprah’s financial backing either. Perhaps he should run on the issues and not bullying and antagonism. A real gentleman wouldn’t resort to these tactics. Why won’t he debate her weekly??? He has nothing of relevance to contribute to straightening out the mess our country is in–that’s why!
Posted by: melissa schneider | February 7, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
Herman,
With all due respect, in the polls I have seen, Hillary has earned a higher percentage over McCain than Obama. Due some fact checking and you will see I am correct. Also, do you recall the 2000 general election where Gore won the popular vote, but not the electoral college?? It will be a carbon copy of this in the primaries only Obama will be your new Gore and Hillary will win more delegates over Obama.
Posted by: melissa schneider | February 7, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
From Judicial Watch — ‘Senator Barack Obama (D-IL): A “Dishonorable Mention” last year, Senator Obama moves onto the “ten most wanted” list in 2007. In 2006, it was discovered that Obama was involved in a suspicious real estate deal with an indicted political fundraiser, Antoin “Tony” Rezko. In 2007, more reports surfaced of deeper and suspicious business and political connections It was reported that just two months after he joined the Senate, Obama purchased $50,000 worth of stock in speculative companies whose major investors were his biggest campaign contributors. One of the companies was a biotech concern that benefited from legislation Obama pushed just two weeks after the senator purchased $5,000 of the company’s shares. Obama was also nabbed conducting campaign business in his Senate office, a violation of federal law.’
Neither candidate has the upper hand on ethics it seems. Can we pleqase just stick to who has the best plans on the issues.
Posted by: Kris | February 7, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
Inane would be your commentary on my opinion which is factual. Furthermore, I was having difficulty posting my comment, which is why it appeared five times. . However, like a good person that I am, I will just ignore you.
Posted by: melissa schneider | February 7, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
Somebody on here tell me why we cannot put Zogby in jail or his purposeful manipulation of the polls before super Tuesday? I may be wrong but this guy had Romney’s totals off by a swing of 20 points and Hillary’s off by a swing of 26 points. A lot of media outlets printed this garbage and it no doubt affected a lot of votes. Could it be that this pollster who happens to be Muslim wanted to help Romney who was seen as a weaker Republican Candidate in the general election and to directly try and help Obama for some unknown reason??
Posted by: Colonel Ray | February 7, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
Dear Mr. Obama,
Yesterday, Thousands of women like myself, networked over phones and through e-mails with friends and family members to make sure Hillary recieved the contributions necessary to forge ahead. As Ms. Clinton said so beautifully, it takes a village. Her village is growing by the minute. You should ask her to join too.
Posted by: melissa schneider | February 7, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
Colonel Ray
Wouldn’t suprise me. Hey Media you need to dig deeper into Barack Obama’s life to discern fact from fiction. Clinton was right, sounds like a fairy tale to me.
Posted by: melissa schneider | February 7, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
they are rules for campaign donation,when you see someone whip out 5 mil ,of course antennas have to go up,if the Clintons are so honest then disclose the financial statement.
And i find it odd there is alot of text calling for obama to debate, no question thats her volunteers begging on her behalf so they can save money on commercials.BTW.. hillary supporters watch your tone, because without Obama and his supporters, you are not beating McCain.
Posted by: mike weir | February 7, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
Why won’t Obama release his records from his time in the Illinois state Senate? Journalists have been asking for them for some time.
Saying he “lost” them doesn’t satisfy those of us who can actually think.
Posted by: cliffie4 | February 7, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
Sorry to see you leave, Ms “older white female”. You found my comment incoherent, but was able to respond eloquently to my points raised. I guess your higher I.Q. made it possible for you to read between the lines.. of my comments..thanks for helping the masses unravel my incoherency.
You , by the way gave your personal , childish appraisal of the Clintons at a fundraiser, as a means of deciding their political acumen.
Posted by: Andy | February 7, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm
Mr. Weir,
The rules as you mentioned lately seem to apply only to Mrs. Clinton because she is of the female persuasion. As for fund raising, she collected millions from online contributions last night,just like she did last year. With respect to debating, that is the only REAL way we get to know each candidate’s true preparedness for the role of PRESIDENT. Debates are a part of our history. Commercials are just wasteful and often slanderous to either party. Sounds to me like Obama scared and frozen, reminds me of Bush’s reaction to 911
Posted by: melissa schneider | February 7, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm
With all the things going on in this world and domestically. Obama is worrying about Hillarys tax returns at this time in the game. How immature and incompetent. He needs to be studying what it takes to be a president especially with 2 wars going on…housing crisis, people losing their jobs and no health care. He scares us
Posted by: cynta | February 7, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm
You are so right @mike without Obama she is toast.she needs him more than he needs her.
Posted by: james t | February 7, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
Cliffie,
That’s amazing insight. Like I said, the rules only apply to Hillary because she is female.
Posted by: melissa schneider | February 7, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
First of all Obama is the ONLY candidate who ran TV ads in Florida. The Florida primary date was chosen by the Florida legislature which is Republican controlled. The week before Florida Obama won his big victory in South Carolina the Kennedys came out in support of Obama and the media basically annointed Obama the new Kennedy. Yet in the primary 1.6 million democrats came out and voted overwhelmingly for Hillary. Obama knew he would lose Florida so he hides behind the DNC. Obama knew he would lose Michigan so he took his name off the ballot. (His choice by the way).
Currently Hillary would be up by around 500,000 if we get to count the democrats who went to the polls just like all other democrats in other states and cast their ballots. Seems like there has been a plan all along to try and let Obama who by the way seems somehow to win all the “caucuses” and who is perfectly willing to disenfranchise over 2 million democrat voters from having their voices heard.
If by any chance that happens you can kiss Michigan and Florida good by in November. Throw in New York, Texas and New Jersey and probably Massechusists, plus all red states in the Western U.S. and this will over before it even starts and we get McCain, which is four more years of Bush……..Senator Obama you have a choice to prove your a real american and stand up like a man and allow these 2 million voices to be heard.
Posted by: Colonel Ray | February 8, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am
jamest
We don’t want Obama, he has behaved in a grossly arrogant and distasteful manner, which does not befit a statesman. We are pushing for a Clinton Edwards ’08 ticket.
Posted by: melissa schneider | February 8, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am
Billary have a lot to hide.If she gets the nomination,come November,all this will be uncovered.The press give them a free pass and seem intimidated by them.
35 years of experience shrouded in mystery.Very fishy.
Posted by: Philippa | February 8, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am
Obama’s stupidity in making that real estate deal with Rezko — knowing that Rezko already has been the subject of investigation as written about in the Illonois papers — so he could save money on the real estate transaction…
… and maintaining a long-term relationship with Rezko…
will burst into the open late this month, when the case against Rezko goes to trial.
Then we then probably will know the real Obama, warts and all, when the media, including the mainstream press — which has been pretty lax on him — begin to feast on him like a vulture.
We all will then realize that it had all been nothing but a very ambitious, too-early-too-soon, presidential candidacy that relied so much on empty promises and misdirected eloquence.
Posted by: Otillap | February 8, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am
Mike weir:
The wiser older Americans will eventually figure out and connect the dots on Barack. The youths will all run home to ask mommy and pappy about what they think, of their Pied Piper messiah. Then they too will get the message and spill the beans. The Obama supporters are insufficient to make a dent on the radar. So Obama supporters can love themselves over their love for our country. we will se where that leaves them.
I know America, that we have been embarrassed by the backward and self serving leadership of George Bush, and we want something or someone at the top, that gives us a positive and refreshing outlook , with experience and hope. But Obama is not the guy.
Posted by: Andy | February 8, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am
Talk about the ANTI-clinton voters, On conservative talk radio, callers was saying they couldn’t stand Bill smirk if they got in the whitehouse, so if its Hillary vs mcCain’ they will hold their nose and vote mcCain, and if its McCain vs Obama, they will stay away or vote third party.So with the anti-Hillary votes.. MINUS the independents that supports Obama she is done ,unless she adds Obama as VP,then his voters can offset some of the anti-Hillary votes.But will he take it?.. we will see.
Posted by: mike w | February 8, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am
I’m a liberal and I will NEVER vote for Barack Obama for president.
Posted by: Arius | February 8, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am
The Democratic ticket will be Clinton / Webb. Senator James Webb, senator from Virginia, who beat the former governor in the last election, best selling author, former Secretary of the Navy, silver star in Vietnam, son serving in Iraq. A good ticket………….
Posted by: Colonel Ray | February 8, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am
andy i hate to break it to you, Obama voters made up of the other candidates that drop out e.g edwards, they are voters that hate the elitism of hillary, and he also carries sprited first time voters plus the independents and fringe reps votes, why you think he clean up all those states,hillary was and is hanging on for dear life.
Posted by: internal_fighting | February 8, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am
this is such a transparent attempt by mr i’m so above normal politics look at me to play the oldest political game in the book, to say something and let others assume there’s something sinister back there somewhere. and then to act like she’s old school politics and he’s so holy. puleeze! and the media, of course, love to play this game. and the sheep follow along.
Posted by: so saddened | February 8, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am
Arius:
That’s your perogative…..vote for whoever ya want to dude…..Your vote, or lack thereof, will not stop senator Obama from becoming president.
Posted by: tony | February 8, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am
It amazes me that people are actually asking if Clinton can win. Of course she will! Are we Democrats so blinded by what Republicans are supposedly thinking about the Clintons that we have forgotten what we – and the majority of Americans- think about Bush and the Republicans ??
We’ve had 8 years of a Republican administration which bungled Afghanistan and Iraq, created a huge deficit, mismanaged Katrina relief efforts, and damaged our reputation and standing in the world. Do you honestly think Americans as a whole will suddenly forget all that in November and put the republican party back in charge for another 4-8 years, under a president who wants to continue the Iraq war and who admits he knows too little about economics?
Think, people. There is no way Republicans will retain power in this country. We all know who put us in this mess.
It’s McCain and the Republican party who can’t win.
Senator Clinton will be our next president.
Posted by: cliffie4 | February 8, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am
It seems lots of folks make judgment without researhing information first. Senator Clinton made lots of money on her book…and is still recieving royalties. She was paid over 8 million and certainly has other resources. The deal with the uranium mine…if you had done your research..would have shown President Clinton said ..no..to any involvment. That is the part the press doesnt tell. Check out Media Matters. I dont think most of Hillary’s supporters realized she was short of money…and once they knew…the donations came in. Senator Obama asks for donations all the time. Senator Clinton and her husband never recieved any money from Rezko. Senator Obama’s main contributor from the beginning of his career has been Rezko. Rezko also has close ties with Auchi…who has been found guilty by of deals relating to nuclear plants in Iraq. That makes Obama three times removed from that situation. Auchi is the reason Rezko is in jail now…due to flight risk. Check sites out about Rezko. Rezko also contributed funds to George W Bush. You can say…well…Clintons’ had Hue. Some differences….Hue got his money from big investors. Obama got his money from misuse of taxpayers funds. Rezko said he couldnt pay for the heat in the buildings in Chicago. People going without heat in a Chicago winter? Chicago gets cold. During that time…Rezko gives a thousand dollars to Obama for his political career. I find it hard to believe that Obama didnt know about these conditions in his district…when the City Of Chicago was taking Rezko to court for this. Obama wrote a letter of recommendation for Rezko to get funding for his housing. Those letters are available to see at a website …taylor marsh. They have government heading on them. You cant tell me that Obama didnt know that Rezko was under federal investigation when he go a deal with him to buy his house. Check it out. Senator Obama hasnt been that honest about all of this.
Posted by: anniesmiles | February 8, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am
Dont understand what the big deal? I dont want my tax return to the public, it no body bussiness except mind!!!!!
Posted by: John | February 8, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am
Have anyone noticed “the vast right wing conspiracy” is very prevalent in the comments listed.
As I sit here typing I am wondering if there is another woman, on this Planet, that evokes so much animosity from the ruling class, their party and supporters . But strangely none of them cannot consistently defend why the dislike her.
Posted by: Andy | February 8, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am
Hillary is in trouble is she gets it, because mcCain is liberal and will get those independents and some DEMS, if it was Romney then she doesn’t need Obama or his voters.Obama could care less one way or the other, if she doesn’t pick him, he will head back to Chi-town, watch her get beat, then come back to take on mcCain in 4 years.if he gets VP they win ,then he has to wait 8 years.HMMM
Posted by: simon lane | February 8, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am
Let’s see. They have faked going into debt yesterday to raise fast cash today; Bill did race baiting and mischaracterization of Obama’s policy on the war; She cried to rally sympathy – twice; They tried to disenfranchise the vote in Vegas; Attacked him on the “slum lord” – a person who they also had as a donor; And want delegates added from not only states where they signed a pledge to not campaign but a state where Obama wasn’t even on the ballot. How’s that?
Posted by: Jack | February 8, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am
As far as the number of debates, why not have a caucus in Michigan and in Florida and then the delegates can be seated fairly at the convention??
HEY PAULETTE. As far a Florida voters are concerned we don’t need a caucus we had our primary. end of conversation. The DNC decided to disenfrancise the voters so be it .delegates and. Super delegates don’t have to cast their vote for the voters choice. How unamerican is that. florida has been disenfrancised twice. What is the big deal. The dnc has been duped by florida republicans again.
Posted by: Carol | February 8, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am
I think Obama should tell us who sold him cocaine. You can’t use it without buying it from someone. He shouldn’t be allowed a pass by saying it was a “boneheaded mistake.” It’s against the law. How much do we know about this dude?
He’s looking more like Dubbya every day: gets a pass on substance abuse, has paltry experience in government service, has a cult-like following of unquestioning admirers who chant “Yes We Can” on cue. Fairy tale? or Nightmare?
Posted by: lisa | February 8, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am
Given their past with all sorts of shady campaign contributors, and the fact that she is personally pumping lots of money into the campaign, I think it is perfectly legitimate to ask for their tax returns as well as the records of the Clinton library. If she is clean, she should welcome the opportunity to put an end to this issue.
Posted by: ian | February 8, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am
If Obama is allowed to cheat and not count two million democrat voters in Florida and Michigan and win on the strength of his fake election caucuses, here is what will happen..large percentages of the following groups of democrats all over the country will vote for McCain: Jewish, Hispanic,Older White Females, Older White Males, Blue Dogs in the South, and Veterans, Soldiers and their families……..John McCain will be president.
Posted by: Colonel Ray | February 8, 2008, 1:14 am 1:14 am
Tax returns are someone’s personal information. When Hillary is submitting her tax returns every year, why is Obama curious to see her Tax returns? If Hilalry is playing anything foul, it is upto IRS to take acre of it. It is none of our business.
Just because Obama has made his Tax returns, it doesn’t mean that whole world has to disclose.
This si similar to someone is making their private life public and asking every one else as well to disclose. It doesn’t make sense at all.
If you want to disclose something your personal information, do it by all means. Not a single soul in this world cares a damn about it. BUT DON’T TRY TO ENFORCE ON OTHERS
Posted by: Jack | February 8, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am
2008.02.08 Politics and National Defense Roundup
This post will grow as the day goes on. Don’t forget to check back later. Worth clicking today: Berkeley Mayor Apologizes To Marines Over Recruiting Center Flap Judge Upholds Arizona’s Strict Anti-Illegal Immigrant Hiring Law Congress sends stimulus bi…
Posted by: Bill's Bites | February 8, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am
Instead of having debates, put all the candidates in a boxing ring and whoever comes out the winner is the president. Agony for the American people over with. Or split America in half put Dumocrats on one side and Republicans on the either side and see which side is the most prosperous.
Posted by: James | February 8, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am
@Colonel_chicken!! Ya mean hillary will cry for those delegates in florida and michigan when it all gets tight, knowing it was all window shopping,Strict rules told the candidates not to participate, everyone chill except hillary.And thats funny mcCain would win against Obama,Hillary is hated within her own rankin file, if she wasnt.. Obama should have been buried a long time ago.
Posted by: iron palm | February 8, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am
Hey Obama please release the following documents please:
- Your Columbia University Transcripts. (has refused so far)
- A list of your friends, roommates and bosses during your time in New York. By the way this is required for a security clearance. (has refused so far)
- Documents regarding your time in the Illinois Senate. (Obama refused and now says the documents were lost)
- The documents concerning your house purchase and the purchase of the lot next door and the subsequent purchase of part of that lot by you.
- A document showing how you handled the “gift” from Rezcko on your house purchase. (If not on your tax return during the year you purchased your house then you have violated federal law?
- A list of the people who have bundled your contributions, including any money from overseas sources.
- A transcript of the conversations that you had as a sitting U.S. Senator with Railla Odinga while he was running for the presidency of foreign government( Kenya).
- An explanation of your wherabouts during the period Nov 3 through Nov 8, 1999, while a State Senator from Illinois.
Posted by: Colonel Ray | February 8, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am
Jack i hate to break it to you, but people in public office often times must show their financial records , its a public trust thing.. you dont want any funny business.
Posted by: brian | February 8, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am
@COL r .. most of those ballots that hillary won on in florida, was cast weeks before the kennedy endorsement and his rise , even voters said after, Had they know what they know with the caroline endorsement they would change their vote.Always risky when you cast your vote early.
Posted by: ryan | February 8, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am
Poor answer there Ryan. In California the Kennedy clan came out in mass including the Governors wife and even had Oprah in tow had polls all over the place touting the “risen one” Obama and Obama lost by 10 percentage points.
Posted by: Colonel Ray | February 8, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am
When we get the tax returns of Bush, Cheney, John Kerry, etc., we will then ask Senator Clinton for her tax returns. Just because Obama (in his 40′s) has a smaller net worth than the Clintons does not qualify him to be president.
Let’s ask Obama to explain whay he has refused to do his duty and vote on controversial issues in the office. I am not talking about the state legislature but even last year he refused to vote on the IRAN bill before the senate. Let’s ask Obama to explain his refusal to do his job rather than showing me his net worth.
Posted by: John | February 8, 2008, 2:21 am 2:21 am
Colonel Ray…:
I have read comments on this debate site that continously make the point that the writer is a as Democrat, but would not support Hillary if she is nominated, over Barack. They even suggest they would vote for McCain.
It is only in the USA , you get to select your party as if its a date for the Prom.
A political Party is a class institution representing class economic and political interests. The Lincoln’s Republican Party has morphed into the institution of the wealthy and the Upper Class, whose service is directed to the millionaires and billionaires, at the expense of the rest of society. Their outlook is based on acute indivdualism. The Democratic Party’s outlook is about service to all,each helping each other to succeed.
They are expected to represent the middle s and lower classes. If you do not have a certain or realistic aspirations to reach the “glass ceiling”, and do not earn the income to support a millionaire’s lifestyle, you are middle class at best,your allegiance is to the community of your income peers .
So you can’t threaten to support the party outside your class because your membership chose a candidate, the ruling class party naturally condemns. That’s some kind of treachery..isn’t that correct. An allegiance is based on , outlook , service to your peers and fellow class members and committment.
So if you are committed to the principles of the democratic Party, yes you can turn your coat, and vote for Bush, Cheney and McCain. You won’t be missed. But don’t place the blame on Hillary.
what do you think Colonel??
Posted by: Andy | February 8, 2008, 2:25 am 2:25 am
Obama did not bring up tax returns, he answered a question. You say it’s playing into the media’s hands, but it’s a question he answered. I’d rather have him answer the question than dodge it.
More debates? Neither candidate has said anything different to warrant another debate. They’ve already had too many.
Posted by: rachel | February 8, 2008, 2:26 am 2:26 am
I think that this bickering between the supporters of Clinton and Obama should stop. This division amongst the Democrats will pay a price comes November. If the Democrats wants to win the White house there should be a consensus from Clinton and Obama. The DNC should intervene before large numbers of Democrats start to get disappointed and get tired of this back and forth squabbling from the candidates and may ended up voting for McCain.
Posted by: pokwango4 | February 8, 2008, 2:58 am 2:58 am
For all ya’ll calling for Bush/Cheney’s financials/IRS returns, I’ll just let you know that they’ve consistently released them to the public every year. Cheney even released his from the years he was in the public sector.
Republicans have released their tax returns going back to Nixon and beyond, I think some of you would do well to examine why recent Dems: Clinton, Gore, Kerry, Clinton have refused to release their tax returns.
Good luck with your primary, Dems, looks like you’re going to need it. Come November, you’ll be wishing you hadn’t run off some of the more solid candidates in favor of your ultimate race versus gender game.
Posted by: Jason | February 8, 2008, 3:07 am 3:07 am
The above should have read:
Cheney even released his from the years he wasn’t in the public sector.
PIMF
Posted by: Jason | February 8, 2008, 3:09 am 3:09 am
I’m not an American but have been keeping close tab to the presidential election fever in US. One thing for sure, you have with you an outstanding candidate and the best in recent time in the form of Barack Obama. Do not lose him!
Posted by: Anak Bapa | February 8, 2008, 3:10 am 3:10 am
Ian wrote:
“If Obama is allowed to cheat and not count two million democrat voters in Florida and Michigan and win on the strength of his fake election caucuses, here is what will happen..large percentages of the following groups of democrats all over the country will vote for McCain: Jewish, Hispanic,Older White Females, Older White Males, Blue Dogs in the South, and Veterans, Soldiers and their families……..John McCain will be president.”
I felt a chill when I read your post. I’m a liberal democrat, born and bred. I’m a 52 yo white female who just voted for Hillary. But I’ve been thinking lately that if Obama gets the nomination, I’ll consider voting for McCain. As much as I want us to leave Iraq, I also fear what will happen to an untested Obama when he has to deal with Iran, Russia, North Korea, as well as domestic policies and congress. McCain can govern- not the way I’d like- but I right now, I’d prefer him over Barack.
Posted by: january20 | February 8, 2008, 3:11 am 3:11 am
Our country is in serious peril.The economy is in a mess.The housing crisis isn’t over yet and several more people are going to lose their homes.The other shoe is ready to drop with an impending credit crunch or the mortgage insurers going down.The budget deificit is setting us back decades and we are being bailed up by the Chinese and the Arabs.We have a health care crisis and 50 million and counting without coverage.There is a an unnecessary war going on while there are jihadists waiting to strike.The environment is going to the dogs.GWB does not care.Do any of you care or you think an american idol would do the job.For crying out loud, this is not a beauty pagent.This is the race for presidency of the US and the free world and the toughest job in the world. We are in a crisis.Elect Hillary or go bust.This is no time to take a chance.Don’t waste time on pettiness.Elect someone who knows, is strong and will get the job done.Go Hillary
Posted by: VPNNathan | February 8, 2008, 3:48 am 3:48 am
hillary is the author of two best-selling books… nonetheless, being rich doesn’t diminish in any way her credentials and experience.
Posted by: mae | February 8, 2008, 4:42 am 4:42 am
Obama has been bragging about wanting to be bring the democratic party together.Now he comes up with this to stir trouble. People better open up their eyes and see what he is doing.
Obama where’s the beef!
Posted by: ca4hillary | February 8, 2008, 6:07 am 6:07 am
Hillary Clinton probably thought she’d heard the last on her ties to Wal-Mart courtesy the Brian Ross Unit. Here’s a brief detail that didn’t get fleshed out in the Good Morning America segment last week: While publicly distancing herself from the company, Clinton has involved two Wal-Mart lobbyists in her campaign.
Clinton named two Wal-Mart lobbyists to her Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Steering Committee last June. Ingrid Duran and Catherine Pino, the “D” and “P” of D & P Creative Strategies, are registered to lobby Senate offices on behalf of the Arkansas-based megaretailer.
While Clinton returned $5,000 she received from Wal-Mart’s political action committee in 2005, she has held on to roughly $20,000 she was given last year by Wal-Mart executives and lobbyists, as Brian noted in last week’s piece. More than half of that money came from Duran, Pino, and a third Wal-Mart lobbyist, Tony Podesta, according to campaign finance records.
Posted by: Dave Peck | February 8, 2008, 7:03 am 7:03 am
For purposes of transparency and accountability, the Clintons owe it to this great country to disclose their detalied tax returns even without prompting, as Obama has done. I do recall vividly, Hillary calling Tony Rezko names; but it has now turned out to be that she is also a beneficiary of tony’s largess and she is yet to even acknowledge that undisputed fact. She should also disclose to the public where all her campaign fincances are coming from. Same goes with Bill Clinton since he is such a prominent figure in this campaign. Without these, how can the american public trust them with their votes. Make no mistake about it, this is mighty important and relevant.
Posted by: Festus | February 8, 2008, 7:34 am 7:34 am
TO HILLARY SUPPORTERS.
Please stick to the point in question.
Obama said he released the tax details period.
Now as AN AMERICAN TAX PAYER I DEMAND THAT HILLARY RELEASES HER TAXING DETAILS TOO.
And please don’t turn to the the smear games instead of answering a simple question from the american people.
RELEASE THE TAX RETURNS NOW!
Posted by: Isaacjay | February 8, 2008, 7:48 am 7:48 am
Come on Dems elect hillary she’s the candidate that we can beat. McCain will evicerate her on the war. Give us the “You voted for the war, before you were against it” candidate. That worked great for us last time and this time we’ve got a WAR HERO to make it.
Give us the scandal, the dislikeability. Give us the candidate that independents hate as well as republicans and some democrats. Please democrats show us how stupid you really are and vote for the only candidate that gives us a chance to take back Congress.
Come on Hillary don’t turn over those records to Obama. We’ll need that scandel with John “get money out of politics” McCain. GO HILLARY!!!!
Posted by: newagegop | February 8, 2008, 8:07 am 8:07 am
Let’s see. This guy has been talking “swift boating”, yet has never served in the U.S. Navy. On day 1, he said the word “change” and has repeated himself ad nauseum every day since. He is touted by Teddy as the first black Kennedy, but he spouts only Obamaisms. He comes to Virginia and Maryland, yet Bobby Kennedy’s children had the sense to endorse the first woman for President of the U.S. of America. Surely, he will win the District of Columbia which will follow SC and GA. But, Virginia and Maryland vote too. And, we ask him, “Where’s the beef?”
Posted by: benvictor | February 8, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am
Federal Income tax returns are legally
not due until October 15 of the next year with extensions, so I don’t understand what all the hoopla is about.
How come has no one questioned that Mr.
Obama is doing his constituents in
Illinois a severe disservice by this campaign. They elected him to the US Senate, and he barely found out where the Capitol Men’s Room was when he announced his run for President. He made a six (6) year commitment to the Illinois voters, not a six week commitment. That is disgusting.
As for the indicted Tony Rezko, he donated, or was responsible for over $ 150,000 in campaign funds to Mr. Obama.
That fact, plus the real estate deal puts him in a position where he is not just a casual acquaintance. This Arab
terrorist is best friends with Obama.
That coupled with Obama’s militant MMuslim sister and brother, militant Muslim father and stepfather. Also, MMichelle Obama has a history of being aa member of militant black groups.
II believe that “birds of a feather flock together”
There’s more here than Mr. Obama is telling us.
Posted by: REal PA Voter | February 8, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am
To tell the truth you Democrats, if Hillary wins the nomination, the Republicans will eat her alive. Not to mention that the independent and ex-republican voters will sway back to McCain. Let’s be smart. According to Super Tuesday, Obama is liked across the whole country and Hillary is not. Are you willing to take that chance with Hillary?
Posted by: Nothing But THe Truth | February 8, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am
Come on people. If the politicians have been showing there tax returns then why say Hillary shouldn’t? With having something to hide, it seems that not only is Hillary dishonest but also her supporters.
Posted by: Nothing But THe Truth | February 8, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am
Dear Mrs. Clinton,
Why won’t you reveal to the public the tax returns belonging to you and your husband? Did your personal fortune come from shady deals with kazakhstan or fundraising for your husband’s library? If you can’t be completely transparent, then how can I vote for you in good conscience? How will you be able to stand up against the republican dirt machine? And why would you bring up Rezko in response to a simple request? Rezko contributed to your campaign for many years too. Did you give back all that money? If this isn’t resolved, I will not vote for you if you are the democratic nominee. I will be forced to vote for McCain. Like Michael Moore said… It is against my moral authority to vote for someone who consistently lies and covers up the wrong decisions. Our occupation in Iraq has been evil. Also, if you can’t budget for your own campaign, how on earth can we trust you to bring us universal health care that we so desperately need? How can you balance the budget? I think this might be another example of poor judgement on your part.
Respectfully,
Elizabeth T.
Posted by: Elizabeth | February 8, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am
Doesn’t surprise me , republicans voting for Obama, republicans spent millions (tax and private money) investigating the Clintons. Obama acting like a republican!
Posted by: tony johnson | February 8, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
Does anyone know if Hillary, Barack, or McCain can golf? How can we have a president that doesn’t know how to golf?
Posted by: Mike | February 8, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am
Wow, the forces of Clintonism have been busy overnight.
Posted by: Paul | February 8, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
Enough of the debates. Its old already. We already know where they stand on the issues. Obama should not agree to any more debates until she releases her tax returns. I can’t believe people are stupid enough not to see the Clintons for the slims they really are.
Posted by: Lisa Hampton | February 8, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am
Enough, Already.
Obama HAS released ALL of the information that you seek, BEFORE he declared for the Presidency and why you want any MORE information is only a tribute to your lack of reading skill.
But, Hillary needs to disclose her tax returns as ALL private citizens have to do in order to get a BANK LOAN!!
Posted by: Maurice B Thomas | February 8, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am
For those who dont know or havent researched presidents history, when Dwight D. Eisenhower told JFK, he was too inexperienced and should wait there’s plenty of time, in the years to come for him to be president. After that JFK was president, tell me what job trains your to be president? Just because Hillary’s husband was president dont make her qualified. A doctor, football player, or construction working bricklayer…it doesnt say their wives are qualified to follow that.
Posted by: Just Sceptic | February 8, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am
How did BO raise 7 million dollars so fast ??? Did Oprah bring her check book …….
Grow up BO stop the arrogance, and childish antics and worry about the important issues of the country and not stupid items like a tax return
Posted by: Lee | February 8, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
By all means Clintons should release their tax returns. Give me a break, she wants to be president of the United States but still she wants to be secretive about it all. Release the tax returns and become transparent, or stop running for president! And, why is it the media isn’t all over the fact that she made a national appearance crying that she loaned herself $5Million and in the next breath they raised $6Million? HA! Release where it came from and release your tax returns or get off the candidate train!!!
Posted by: RuthieM | February 8, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
And history showed us that Ike was right on that one.
Kennedy was loved for sure, but as a president, as for accomplishments, he’s not in the top tier at all.
The fact that he was assassinated doesn’t make his presidency great, it just disguises the disaster that Kennedy’s presidency was.
Posted by: Jason | February 8, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am
Obama is the answer to the GOP’s prayers. He is becoming just what they want – a polarizing figure driving the Dem party apart. The Dems, Ind, and disgusted Repubs will get to the point that neither Dem candidate will look good and go Republican. Obama is playing right into the GOP’s hands – no wonder they think he is so great – he is doing their work for them. How can an educated man like him be so stupid – is he one of those educated fools?
Posted by: Ron | February 8, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
I think that hilary should release all her tax returns, everything in this race for the top office should be above board. (don’t take us back to the bush era!)
Posted by: larry-pgh | February 8, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am
Obama has proven he is only transparent when he is caught! How many times did people have to point out how much money Rezko et al gave him, before he returned it? 4 times was it?
Now Obama hides his dirty money intake behind bundlers, thinking he is fooling people! Who does this guy take thinking Americans for?
Speaking of his returning the money, how come people who put money up for Obama’s Presidential campaign are paying for his prior dirty money taking?
Obama made it thus far in politics on the back of dirty money, and now we are supposed to believe he is clean and transparent, give me a break!
If it weren’t for Obama’s dirty money, he would still just be a junior lawyer for his friend Rezko et al, quietly living in his mansion bought with the aide of dirty money! How stupid does this man Obama take Americans to be?
Unlike MLK who got his hands dirty by living in the Chicago slums to shed light on the plight of the peoples suffering, Obama in contrast got his hands dirty by counting all the dirty money he got for living in his mansion a mile away from the slums and to fund his political career!
Why doesn’t the media focus on the truth about this guy instead of painting him as the second coming!
It has become tiring hearing “it was a mistake” by Obama all the time, and he expects people to believe he will “get it right on day 1″? Give me a break!
Posted by: me | February 8, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am
Releasing her tax returns is a simple request. If Hilary had dirt on Obama you best believe she would release that with the quickness. The people for her should know where the money came from. Did she get it from Bill? We know of words of change from Obama, but we want to know the tax returns of Hilary. If you all voted for Bush and we have been in Iraq for 8 years then you can vote for “Change”. Hilay may be more experienced after learning from Bill, but Obama is a clear leader that has yet to become distorted like the previous presidents. Watch Hilary may start crying again. We don’t want to see tears we want the tax returns. When you talk dirt don’t have any of your own.
Posted by: Audra | February 8, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am
I remember that when the Clintons
brought their home in NY. they had to have someone co-sign for them.
Rumor has it that there is a house on their property for the Secret Service,
they are charging what their mortgage
payment is.
Posted by: wlm | February 8, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am
Hello People: Both of them (The Clintons)are best selling Authors. They have made enormous amounts of money. Also, Bill is making a fortune on speaking engagements. Get Over It. Go Hillary! Go back to the Senate Obama! I’m tired of your catch lines.
Posted by: Chris | February 8, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am
wow, you people are ridiculous. misleading mailers, robocalls, the lack of transparency…are all gross and just make me feel disgusted with the system. and the fact that you Clinton supporters are now resorting to calling Obama a ‘cult leader’ because he is 1000000x more of a leader than Hillary Clinton will ever be is just SAD. take out all of the goodness and hope left in people and inject unethical behavior and corruption, force people to think that’s the only kind of politics we are ever going to see.
try to compare Obama with Hillary Clinton in the sense that one mistake he made with Rezko puts him on that low bar with the Clintons. why can’t you supporters be fair? is it too much to ask for you all to just shut up and let us hear the politicians and make up our own minds when we vote?
may the best (wo)man win.
Posted by: Tatiana | February 8, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am
The reason Obama won’t debate Clinton is because his speechwriter is elderly and most likely can’t produce sufficient “spin” in a timely fashion.
The “talking head” cannot speak for himself, as he has demonstrated all too well.
As far as Clinton’s tax returns – here we go again. The minute things go in her direction, the old “bait and switch” strategy swings into action.
Stick to the issues Barack
Posted by: Laura Wilson | February 8, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
Well, Obama, we certainly don’t need any “bone-headed” persons in the white house; not after 8 years of Bush. All your ripping off and worker exploitation in Illinois, were bone headed too, weren’t they?
Posted by: PC | February 8, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
All candidates for public office should be forced to release their tax returns. We just know there’s going to be no shadier set than those produced by the grifters from Arkansas. Someone send those two back to the trailer park they came from.
Posted by: Jason | February 8, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
VERY BAD numbers for Clinton, demonstrating once more that Obama may be the Dems’ only hope.
Here it is folks, straight from Rasmussen just today:
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows John McCain (R) leading Hillary Clinton (D) 46% to 43%. Barack Obama (D) leads McCain 47% to 42%.
Despite much commentary about McCain’s challenge in uniting the Republican Party, the Arizona Senator’s support from Republicans is just as solid as Obama and Clinton’s support from Democrats. Obama leads McCain among voters not affiliated with either major political party. McCain leads Clinton among the unaffiliateds.
Posted by: Mark | February 8, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
Obama is getting frantic since he knows after being shown by California that we logical Democrats are not buying into his cult like operation. So now he will attack Hillary on all fronts.
That’s fine now we all know he is getting hysterical, it will make him more transparent so we can see him for the inexperienced, sexist, ego driven little person that he is.
Beautiful words do not cover up his sexists, bias.
Once people step back and look at his actions and lack of any basic experience to run the country they will realize his cult like activities are not what we need in a President. I have also heard that he is associates with the nut case, Louis Farakan.
Wow can you see Farakan dining at the white House?
In his state of IL, in the City of Chicago has one of the worst education systems in the nation. Maybe Obama and Oprah could take her book club, educate the Chicago and clean up his own back yard before attempting to clean up the nation.
California did not signed Obama’s line of BS!
California did NOT by it- Bye Bye Obama and Oprah
Posted by: J. Rae | February 8, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
They didn’t call Bill Clinton, “Slick Willy” for nothing!
The office of the President and the stature of the country suffered immensely under Bill Clinton.
But,
For some reason, the American People elected him twice!
AND, he almost balanced the budget.
It took a Rep Pres to avenge the murders at the Marine Corps Barracks.
Posted by: Anthony B. Bernice | February 8, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
You cannot play down skill nor play up being a novice! Hillary is compassionate, Obama is elitist. Moreover, his entire, basic message is dishonest. It all starts from Illinois, if you’d like to know more …
“Even amid Chicago’s storied reputation for corruption, this has been an unusually significant and far-reaching investigation involving 30 indictments and 23 convictions. Those charged have included a top official at the mayor’s office of intergovernmental affairs and the former deputy water commissioner, who pleaded guilty to taking bribes, shaking down companies for political contributions, and rigging hiring. With a number of cooperating witnesses, including the water czar, the investigation is far from over.”
“What’s remarkable is that for the first time, Mayor Richard M. Daley seems politically vulnerable. His approval ratings are the lowest since he was elected in 1989. Beneath the apparent cynicism over corruption, many Chicagoans seem genuinely to care about the finding and don’t accept his repeated statements that he has nothing to do with hiring.” -CS Monitor.
Posted by: PC | February 8, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
It’s quite simple, really.
If Clinton’s the nominee, with the loss of independents/unaffiliateds, the Dems lose to McCain.
If Obama’s the nominee, with the support of independents/unaffiliateds, the Dems defeat McCain.
Make up your minds as to whether you chose to win or lose in November, my fellow Democrats. And do so QUICKLY….
RASMUSSEN, Fe. 8. 2008:
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows John McCain (R) leading Hillary Clinton (D) 46% to 43%. Barack Obama (D) leads McCain 47% to 42%.
Despite much commentary about McCain’s challenge in uniting the Republican Party, the Arizona Senator’s support from Republicans is just as solid as Obama and Clinton’s support from Democrats. Obama leads McCain among voters not affiliated with either major political party. McCain leads Clinton among the unaffiliateds.
Posted by: Mark | February 8, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
Why everyone worry about another debate how many do you need to get the message across. It sure sound like the Clinton’s is very worry about Obama, let stick to the issuse not a debate after debate. If this was me she will 0 debate enough is a enough. And before anyone start complaing about experience remember when you got youe first job did you have any experience.
Posted by: Caral | February 8, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
You cannot play down skill nor play up being a novice! Hillary is compassionate, Obama is elitist. Moreover, his entire, basic message is dishonest. It all starts from Illinois, if you’d like to know more …
“Even amid Chicago’s storied reputation for corruption, this has been an unusually significant and far-reaching investigation involving 30 indictments and 23 convictions. Those charged have included a top official at the mayor’s office of intergovernmental affairs and the former deputy water commissioner, who pleaded guilty to taking bribes, shaking down companies for political contributions, and rigging hiring. With a number of cooperating witnesses, including the water czar, the investigation is far from over.”
“What’s remarkable is that for the first time, Mayor Richard M. Daley seems politically vulnerable. His approval ratings are the lowest since he was elected in 1989. Beneath the apparent cynicism over corruption, many Chicagoans seem genuinely to care about the finding and don’t accept his repeated statements that he has nothing to do with hiring.” -CS Monitor.
Posted by: PC | February 8, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
To all of you smitten with Obama mania: will you support Hillary if she is the nominee? Of course not…since you are actually REPUBs in Obama clothing..ha,ha,ha
Did u forget we can be independent
Posted by: Peter King | February 8, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
If the democratic nominee, Obama will unite the republicans around his amature effort, while Hillary would divide them through her nearer-right positions. But this is just the beginning, Obama would also unite the republican party around his strong muslim background, the muslim middle name he hides; and all the extra, hidden information they have access to. Obama is totally leftist, at least Hillary is to the right to a limited extent. The republicans have a better shot at winning, if they face Obama, because then they will have a full party to use toward winning the election.
Posted by: PC | February 8, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
LET’S SEE SHE CAN’T MANAGE HER OWN MONEY OR ACCOUNT FOR IT, BUT SHE WANTS TO HANDLE THE AMERICAN ECONOMY. I DON’T THINK SO… NO MORE CLINTON DRAMA PLEASE… it is so 90′s
Posted by: antiprocrastination | February 8, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
thinkaboutit: Whether you call me Republican, whatever, Hil-Liar-y will never get my vote if she gets the nomination. She is phony! Hil-Liar-y has refused to disclose tax returns until after the nomination yet touts campaign transparency…what kind of transparency is this?
Posted by: John | February 8, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
so has anyone seen the tax returns yet?
Posted by: chk1 | February 8, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
@Jay Rae!! Hate to break it to you, Hillary had a 30 plus point lead in Cali, and she held on for dear life, he close it to 10 and under ,and BTW.. most of those voters cast their ballots weeks early, before Obama rise.. they hold that vote today on EVEN ground and the Hillary LOSE.
Posted by: eric green | February 8, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
Amazing how the Clintons made so many million ,who knew on a president salary it can net you that many millions,last i saw, Bill is worth more than 52 mill it might even be more , and please dont insult me by saying he got it from writing a book.These people are no different for the bush/Cheney’s and haliburtons.
Posted by: sick-politics | February 8, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
Why didn’t Obama serve in the military? He could havve been a JAG officer in the Army or Navy. He could still be a JAG officer in the Army National Guard.
Posted by: Jon | February 8, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
I’m an independent and am very excited about Obama’s campaign. Hillary Clinton is not electable, you have to remember that now more than ever it is we the independents that decide elections. Those that so adamantly support Hillary Clinton are already declared Democrats, while those that Obama attracts come from both camps. Just think about it, John McCain is a moderate republican who is taking a lot of heat from his party for his lack of a far right ideology. This attracts us independent voters. If you nominate Hillary Clinton, she will get liberal voters, but McCain will claim the independents and conservatives. If you elect Obama he will atleast compete for these independent voters as well as carry the liberal voters who will vote for whomever the Democratic party nominates. Democrats need to understand that Obama is more appealing to the ever important middle than Hillary will ever be. You can also bet that Republicans will attack the Clinton finances the same way that Democrats have fought for disclosure against many Republicans. This will only help to alienate the middle.
Posted by: Adrian | February 8, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
Obama ONLY became demanding after learning about the Hillary loan for $5 million and also stated that he couldn’t plop down that kind of money.
How did Obama get by without ANY records to show for when he was in the SENATE? It’s just politics to get people to think untrustworthiness. They both have flaws…GET WITH THE ISSUES NOT WITH CHARISMATIC SPEECHES!
Posted by: Dar | February 8, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
First of all!
obama didnt ask Clinton for her tax returns, he was ask on the plane will he exclose his tax return by a reporter then he said I have no problem! So the media turned it around saying that Obama wants Clinton to exclose her tax returns! Get your facts straight!
Posted by: Just Sceptic | February 8, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
So what if Clinton received a lot of money on the speech circuit and supports his wife’s candidacy.
McCain’s wife is worth about $20 million and probably supports him too.
Posted by: Camille | February 8, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
Joe and Bob Why should Senator Obama debate Senator Clinton at her whim. She wants to use her funding for Ohio and Texas and therefore looking to get free national press which is what would happen in a debate. her mgr even asked to have a debate this upcoming Sunday, why Sunday so she could use the free press to help her in the primaries coming up in VA, MD and DC. How coniving and calculating can she get? I hope Senator Obama continues to steer clear of her less than subtle tactics
Posted by: rle | February 8, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
I would bet anything the republican party is major supporter of Senator Obam’s campaign, The republicans are very afrain of Senator clinton are trying to get the attention off her, because they know Senator Obama is not strong enought to be the republicans and he is only being used. Debates are to show the difference if Candidates, what are you so afraid of. Senator Obama was the first one to get snotty and nasty not Senator Clinton. Electing Senator Obama would be like re-relecting President Carter
Posted by: cheri | February 8, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
cheri If you were intereste din knowing the truth you would go back and research when the race became nasty it was when both Hillary and Bill made subtle remarks trying to incite race into the campaign which in my opinion was a desperate move for desperate people. Senator Obama and Senator Clinton have debated what five times how many more times are they going to debate the same issues. The issues haven’t change and neither has Obama’s position so why waste time debating again. Again I’ll tell you why Hillary wants free press. Hopefully Obama won’t fall for the tactics.
Posted by: rle | February 8, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
Hillary Clinton will release her tax returns and her First Lady papers after
the election!
Unfortunately for her she won’t be
one of the candidates! LOL!
Posted by: reaganfan | February 8, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
America to Hillary.
Tell us the real reason you want 6 debates with Obama…maybe because a) your support is faltering b) you are running out of money c) debates will cost you nothing.
Tell us the details of your tax returns.
Tell us some examples of how you have united Washington since taking office.
Tell us details instead of offering America a bunch of Hallmark greeting card stump speeches.
Posted by: Disenchanted Hillary Fan | February 8, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
Hillary should definitely show where the $5 million came from and show their tax returns. This directly impacts her ability to lead without having any debts to rich people. And with Bill earning so much money since leaving office, $31 million in just speaking fees as well as undiclosed millions from being an advisor, the American public needs to know who overpaid that much for Bill’s friendship.
Posted by: Lydia | February 8, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
Hillary is a devisive, calculating,
money grubbing, scumbag and so is her husband! Her tax records will prove it!
!
Posted by: Jack Clavey | February 8, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
Hillary Clinton: the republicans hope for November.
Former Gov. Jim Edgar, a Republican stalwart in Illinois, says he likes Democrat Barack Obama and believes talk about indicted businessman Antoin “Tony” Rezko’s dealings with the presidential candidate has been overblown.
Yet Edgar says he’d rather see Hillary Clinton as the Democratic standard-bearer. That’s because, in Edgar’s view, Clinton is a polarizing figure whose nomination would bring Republicans together with the common goal of defeating her. He says putting Obama at the top of the Democratic ticket might tempt a few of the GOP faithful to stray.
“I think the world of him, and I think he’s done a great job, but I have to tell you, I’m for Sen. Clinton (as the Democratic nominee) because I’m a Republican,” Edgar said today, pausing for laughter at a Springfield forum sponsored by the University of Illinois. “I believe our best chance in the fall is to run against Sen. Clinton. There is nobody who will unite the Republican Party more in November than Sen. Clinton.”
Edgar, who had endorsed Republican Rudy Giuliani before he dropped out of the race, is now backing U.S. Sen. John McCain.
“Sen. Obama has done an impressive job of coming from nowhere against one of the most effective political machines in our time, and that’s the Clintons,” Edgar said.
Clinton has criticized Obama for his association with Rezko, who is set for trial next month over corruption allegations linked to the administration of Gov. Rod Blagojevich. Edgar says he doesn’t see Obama’s relationship with Rezko, which includes now-returned campaign donations and a real estate deal, as a significant campaign issue.
“I haven’t seen anything yet I would consider as a smoking gun with that,” Edgar says. “I took campaign contributions from Tony Rezko and, I don’t know, I don’t remember him ever asking for anything. He was one of those guys that liked to be involved.”
The former governor says he believes Rezko’s relationship with Blagojevich is a greater cause for concern than the Rezko ties to Obama.
“With Rod Blagojevich, he got to play a role where he actually was involved in policy decisions, which I think you’ve got to step back and say, ‘Was that appropriate?’ “
Posted by: Julio | February 8, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
The Clintons sure have their nerves to bring back Tony Rezco in the campaign, after it’s been revealedthat he has also contributed to their finances.
CHARLESTON, S.C.–A photo has surfaced that shows Hillary and Bill Clinton posing with Chicago developer Tony Rezko, a Barack Obama contributor whom Hillary Clinton condemned as a “slum landlord” supporter of the Illinois senator earlier this week.
Clinton was shown the photo during an interview on NBC’s Today Show this morning but told host Matt Lauer she did not remember meeting Rezko.
“No, I don’t,” Clinton told Lauer. “You know, I probably have taken hundreds of thousands of pictures.”
“I don’t know the man. I wouldn’t know him if he walked in the door. I don’t have a 17-year relationship with him,” Clinton added.
During a presidential debate Monday evening, Clinton blasted Obama for his relationship with Rezko, telling Obama she had fought Republican policies as first lady during the 1990s while “you were practicing law and representing your contributor, Rezko, in his slum landlord business in inner-city Chicago.”
The photo is undated but Lauer said NBC News believes it was taken during Bill Clinton’s presidency.
According to a database of campaign contributions maintained by the non-partisan Center for Responsive Politics, Rezko made a $15,000 contribution to the Democratic National Committee in March 2000, the last year of the Clinton presidency. Rezko also made a $1,250 contribution during the Clinton re-election campaign in 1996 to a Democratic party account that funded activities in Illinois to help win the election.
As the leader of the party, President Clinton and the first lady were active fundraisers for the Democratic National Committee during his presidency. They frequently hosted events for signicant contributors and party fundraisers that often included a chance to be photographed with the first couple.
At the time, “soft-money” contributions to the party were not limited in the same way that contributions are to federal political candidates. The Clintons, drew heavily on contributions to the party to support the Clinton re-election campaign and later the Al Gore presidential campaign, just as Republican presidential candidates did with contributions to the GOP.
Lauer asked Clinton “if there’s no such thing as ever being able to fully vet who you come in contact with, is it appropriate to make this kind of an attack on your opponent?”
But Clinton responded by pointing to the extensive relationship Rezko forged with Obama.
“There’s a big difference between standing somewhere, taking a picture with someone you don’t know and haven’t seen since, and having a relationship that, you know, the newspapers in Chicago have been exploring,” Clinton said
Obama Communications Director Robert Gibbs said the photo of the Clintons and Rezko “reflects the fact that Mr. Rezko was clearly involved in a wide range of fund raising for both Democrats and Republicans.”
Clinton spokesman Phil Singer noted that Rezko had not made contributions to any of Hillary Clinton’s campaigns nor did he donate to Bill Clinton’s presidential campaign.
“Tony Rezko has never contributed a dime to Hillary or Bill Clinton. They have no relationship with Tony Rezko,” Singer said.
For years after Rezko befriended Obama in the early 1990s, he helped bankroll the politician’s campaigns. Then, after Obama’s election to the U.S. Senate, Rezko engaged him in private financial deals to improve their adjoining South Side properties. Those arrangements became a source of lingering controversy after the Tribune first reported them in November 2006.
Obama publicly apologized for his 2005 property deal with Rezko, calling it “boneheaded” because Rezko was widely reported to be under grand jury investigation at the time. Rezko has since been indicted on corruption charges unrelated to his relationship with Obama and is scheduled to go on trial on Feb. 25.
Obama has given to charities $85,000 in Rezko-linked campaign contributions, including $40,035 last weekend following a published report suggesting that Rezko funneled a $10,000 donation to Obama through a business associate. Aides to Obama say the senator had no knowledge of any such scheme.
Obama has been accused of no wrongdoing involving Rezko and has insisted that he never used his office to benefit Rezko.
Thus far, there is little in the public record to suggest otherwise, and the few exceptions that have come to light appear minor. On Capitol Hill, Obama once gave a summer internship to the son of a Rezko business associate on Rezko’s recommendation. Earlier, as a state senator, Obama was one of several South Side political and community leaders who wrote state and city officials urging approval of public funding for a senior housing project involving Rezko.
But when Rezko pushed for passage in Springfield of a major gambling measure, Obama vocally opposed it.
Posted by: Julio | February 8, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
Obama whines too much! He has nothing to fear with the King Maker, his fairy godmother — Oprah on his side. O has more than enough money funding tricks, private jets, and fancy friends that he is guaranteed the nomination. Maybe it’s time for mama O to change his political diapers. Shut-up and win like a man.
Posted by: GRLVOTE | February 8, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
whether clinton or mcain obama is an unstoppable movement. change is very much in the air. go america!
Posted by: sam | February 8, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
C’mon Hillary release those tax returns. We want to know how much money Bill made from Bush’s oil buddies.
Posted by: Philip M | February 8, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
Good luck- some of us are still waiting for her husband’s medical records (which were always considered a formality before his tenior). More of the same-more of the same-more of the same-more of the same…
Posted by: Anthony | February 8, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
Mariann Pepitone:
The Clintons are Crooks!
Google Hsu and Johnny Chung!
Posted by: reaganfan | February 8, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
Don’t worry – just keep checking the coffee table – that stuff will show up sooner or later. And her husband is just arrogant and stupid enough to try funneling HIS money through the back door to the campaign – Let’s face it – he’s the one who REALLY wants to win.
Posted by: William R. Deitrick | February 8, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
The privacy act should be just that, private! Personal holdings are nobody’s business! If she was using campaign funds or other sources that th public donated, then it would need to be accessable for public record, but nothing else! Politicians have a private life too and when the American public learns to appreciate that, maybe others like Britney Spears and celebrities like her, will get better!
Posted by: lukout09 | February 9, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am
Remember. It was only a few years ago. The records were missing for two years. The first lady was subpoened. For what? To show her records as the attorney from Rose Law FIrm that represented the McDougals who ran the S&L that went down when all the people were swindled out of their money for the fraudulant Whitewater deal. Hillary could not come up with the records. Then they mysteriously showed up on the table in the first lady’s office. A cleaning lady found them. Sitting right there. The McDougal’s went to prison.Remember Vince Foster who had worked with Hillary at Rose Law Firm was her White House attorney. He killed himself just days before he had to testify to the Grand Jury on Whitewater. Remember. Bill Clinton was impeached. He was not removed because it was at the end of his term and the Country had been through too much. But he was impeached and he did do it. He squirmed, the famous “I did not have sex”…and then the famous “I did have….” Where was the leader Hillary? Remember what she said when all of those women came forward? “It’s the vast right wing conspiracy”…Remember. Remember Travelgate, remember Troopergate. Remember the intimidation Juanita Broderick went through. She didn’t dare accuse the then Governor of rape. But it was aired on 60 minutes. I believed her story, and if more Americans dared to remember, they would admit that America did go through enough.
A leader comes around once every 40 years who is electrifying. He is capable of healing us. Unifying is a good place to start. Vote your gut.
Posted by: Jeanie | February 9, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am
Obama & Rezko – $160,000
Clinton & Kazakhstan- $31,000,000
who’s in who’s pocket?
Posted by: michelle | February 9, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am
I had to stop reading the comments of this board because of the stupidity that abounds from people. People get so passionate that some of the most idiotic and naive statements are written and posted. Most of the attacks on both candidates are weak and Democrats should be happy to know that two impressive candidates are running for office. The only attack on Obama that bugs me is his lack of experience. You want to know a scary secret. Some of the greatest Presidents have had the same or less experience than Obama. Let me name drop, Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, FDR, and JFK. Some of the most experienced have turned into terrible Presidents, Nixon, Hoover, Taft to name a few. So please stop with the experience argument. It is irrelevant. Also, Hillary, release your stupid tax form…I want to see how rich you really are.
Posted by: C | February 9, 2008, 2:04 am 2:04 am
Well there is no end to the political surprises that greet us. And Now the Hills wants 5 plus debates with Obama. Yes and you can bet, she has an ulterior motive. First it is free advertising. Secondly she is not that great a debater, just that as a talkative female who tries to shout out like a man, she rudely interrupts Obama and hogs the floor. He is too much of a gentleman to do likewise. But watch out for a tear jerker scene put on at one of these debates. Did anyone notice that before the New Hampshire primary, she used the tear strategy and the media posted shots of her every 5 minutes on Monday and all day during the tuesday election. Why oh why can’t politics be honest and true. We need Obama, so hang in there Senator and just say no to the Hills on debates. Just turned 80 and I thought I had seen it all!!!!!
Posted by: The Moo | February 9, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am
Here is what I would like to know from Sen. Obama: are any of your present or former staffers or others in your employ or your associates, members or supporters of the Nation of Islam? Tell us Sen. Obama please.
Posted by: debbie | February 9, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
You’re happy to defend them on every level, no matter what they do. Obama has been honest and open about everything, including all of his finances. Clintons need to do the same. They squawk loudly about everyone else. So, they need to allow themselves to be vetted. ALL of them. If you stand by your favored candidate and believe in her, then you shouldn’t be worried about her accounting for her funding finances.
Posted by: Ritz | February 9, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Why doesn’t Obama release his tax records back to 1990 when he first hooked up with Syrian national Antoin Rezko. We have the Clintons from that time I believe, so why doesn’t Obama ante up his own, we would like to see the charities he has accepted and or given money to, too! Also I recently read that a key member of Obama’s own Senate staff, a Syrian, is somehow linked to the late Yasar Arafat, how strange is that!
Posted by: Militarywifemom | February 9, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
Correction to your story of Feb. 4, 5:24 PM:
Both Chicago daily papers reported that Obama bought his house from a doctor for well below the asking price. He was reportedly careful to pay FULL PRICE for one-sixth of the adjacent lot owned by Rezko’s wife. When this news hit the street, as you report,”Obama has, in retrospect, acknowledged the deal was ‘bone-headed.’ “
Posted by: Joan | February 10, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am
She is not obligated legally to “release” her tax return forms to the public anymore than any other U.S. citizen. Those forms are filed to the IRS but not for public eyes to see. Obama is just trying to pull a public relations stunt here. How would you feel if he made a law to make all public workers or civil servants to “release” their forms to the public in the name of transparency. Listen I believe in transparency too but the line has to be drawn. Obama is so liberal that he will not be able to beat the republicans. Here’s a scenario for you. Obama against McCain…Republicans and Conservative Independents will vote for McCain. Hillary vs. McCain. Republicans will vote for McCain but many of their wives will secretly vote for the white woman vs. a black liberal and give Hillary the vote. Sure women too complain about Hillary but many long to see a woman in power compared to Republican Establishment. Whereas, although many youth and blacks would love to see an intelligent and charismatic black man in power, most of white and non black America is not ready for it and will not vote for for him in the General Election. Sorry but THIS HAS ALWAYS BEEN A RACE OF GENDER AND RACE, AND WILL BECOME MORE SO EVEN IN THE GENERAL ELECTION. America will elect Obama in 2016 but his wife has already stated that’s it now or never, so you guess what’s going to happen.
Posted by: Liberal | February 10, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
I think the media has given a hall pass to Obama from Day one. He seems to think he can bully his way into the whitehouse or “buy” his way into the white house. Hillary has had to spend more money to neutralize the media’s all out assault on her. She can take a shot …can he?
Posted by: kelly | February 10, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
YOU SILLY people, you are feeding the real opponents with enough information to potentially kill any winner of this contest.What if they should become running mates, now stop the assassination of your candidates you STUPID,STUPID PEOPLE.
Posted by: Desi | February 10, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
I do not believe the short memory the american people have. The clintons did nothting but lie to the nation when they were in the white house befor what makes you think they have changed.
They are only in it for them selves not the american people
WE DO NOT NEED BILL FOR ANOTHER 8 YEARS
Posted by: buster | February 10, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
Transparency… hahaha…. honesty… hahaha … integrity… hahaha … get the picture? Government for the people, by the people, of the people … hahaha! Enough said… hahaha.
Posted by: gzusambassador | February 10, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
HILARY…Please release your tax returns, Please be transparent to the public. Hilary, please be up on current euphemism, and not hand write letters, and allow free speech, to get out of television debates. FYI… if super delagates save your soul, the Devil owns yours…
Posted by: Mark | February 10, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
If (and that’s a big if) Hillary has nothing shady going on with her $5 million loan, she should fully disclose how she got the money.
Like Richard Nixon said, “You [the American people] have a right to know your president is not a crook . . .”
Posted by: Loose Cannon | February 11, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am
Nothing is wrong with this request for Hillary to disclose his Tax Return and source of incomes.
Posted by: mo | February 11, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
The national media needs to stay on Hillary for the refusal to release tax returns AND refusal to release her papers from the Clinton library!!! Does anyone else see a blatant lack of transpancy???
Posted by: DC | February 12, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
All this is a bunch of hooey.. Obama builds excitement! Pure and simple. The rest of you losers, stop making excuses. The Clintons are manipulators who have no respect for the law. To them, only perception matters. We don’t need them.
Posted by: Garg | February 12, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
This is for Liberal, who argues that Obama can’t win. Stop kidding yourself: a warmonger and hardliner, who will have to bring back the draft to staff his adventurism, vs. a moderate, intelligent, gutsy man who said NO to Iraq on Day 1? McCain will lose by a huge landslide. Obama will be so strong, he will carry the Congress with him. What man in his right mind would vote for the draft? That’s all Obama has to say.
Posted by: Garg | February 12, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
I definitely support Hillary Clinton when it comes to healthcare. I believe universal healthcare will be paid for through hard working American income. I personally pay enough in taxes and medicare, now an added deduction will come with universal healthcare. I am a healthy American at this time and I don’t want more of my money deducted for healthcare universally. I’d rather choose my own plan and pay for it as it suites my family, ESPECIALLY IF IT IS MORE AFFORDABLE. I also agree with parents providing coverage for their children until the age of 35, because most young adults dont take their health seriously. Also, in the other countries that have universal healthcare, they are not as sick as the average American. We are at the top for being overweight and suffer from several diseases that are related to obesity, (MEANING MORE COST FOR TREATMENT). Preventive medicine is nothing new, it just have not worked much, because people dont care.
Barrack will say anything to be elected, universal healthcare will be deducted from everyones income, because IT HAS TO BE PAID FOR.IT WOULD BE CATASTROPHIC TO THE AVERAGE AMERICAN.
Posted by: GINA | February 13, 2008, 7:18 am 7:18 am
I think that all or most Michelle Obama Barrack SUPPORTTERS ARE HAVING A KIND OF FOIBIA OR FEAR FROM REAL CHANGE. THEY MUST CHANGE THEIR WAY IN THINKING .THEY MUST THINK OUT OF THIER OLD FASHION BOXES. WAKE UP AMERICA.
Posted by: Garg | February 13, 2008, 7:21 am 7:21 am
You people expect the Clinton’s to be any different today. They were always liers. Only difference is now days they’ve even got them selves convinced their telling the truth.
The day they change lord help us.
She says she will release her tax records when she is nominated. That’s because at that time if any wrong doing she can give herself a pardon. This way she’ll never see the dark she deserves.
Posted by: Bev Wing | February 29, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
I am an Independent Hillary supporter since 2004 who has been so alienated by the liberal medias treatment of her campaign that I will NEVER vote for Barack Obama. I predict that the media has alienated so many
Hillary supporters that if he wins the nomination, they will either turn their votes over to Ralph Nader,
John McCain, or not vote at all. The liberal media will have succeeded in screwing up the presidential election again.
Posted by: Bill martin | March 2, 2008, 3:07 am 3:07 am
1. I read that Bill Clinton did not release his tax returns when running for office in 1992. Is this correct? If he did not, why? Bob Dole released 30 years of his tax returns? Will Bill release these returns now?
2. Until this past week I would agree the media was smitten with Obama but I think that has changed.
3. Saturday Night Live seems to be in love with Hillary. The Obama cartoon featuring Sharpton and Jackson was terribly unfair to Mr. Obama.
Posted by: Jackie | March 6, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
This is smelling more and more like some kind of TaxGate for the Clintons.
Posted by: Jim | March 7, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am
Obama lied.
It took until today, March 25 for his to release his tax returns. He had only released ONE tax return as of February 7, the date of the original story.
Posted by: TomPaine | March 25, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm