Optimistic Romney’s Realism
ABC News’ John Berman, Ursula Fahy, Matt Stuart: Mitt Romney is usually an optimistic guy. But in Denver, Colorado, on Friday the former Massachusetts governor suggested he would look at the results from the voting on Super Tuesday before deciding whether to move on.
When asked by ABC News if there was a minimum bar he would need to reach in order to stay in the race, he said, "There may be, I just don’t know what it is."
Romney noted he was hoping to do well and was ahead in some states, but that he "couldn’t possibly forecast at this stage what kind of numbers I’ll have coming out of Tuesday."
It was the most circumspect Romney has been about his chances to date. The relentless optimist sounded a bit tentative saying only "at this stage, I expect to keep battling."
He was also asked about the enormous personal donation he has made to his campaign: $35 million through December 31st, 2007.
Romney said simply, "You have to play the hand you are dealt."
Email
Santorum: Money Will Not Defeat Obama, Ideas Will
Rick Santorum's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
Take stock right now. Goodbye Mitt.
Posted by: crank | February 1, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
Reality check. Since when does the pursuit of private wealth count more than a lifetime of public service?
Which of these presidential giants (I’ll say “giants” rather than “greats” to avoid getting off the point) spent most of his life in the pursuit of riches?
Reagan? Washington? Lincoln? Kennedy? Theodore Roosevelt?
Answer: None. Granted, a few of these were born rich, just like Mitt; unlike Mitt, these men were satisfied with their inherited wealth and devoted their entire adult lives to public service.
Bottom line, I’m voting for a president and commander-in-chief, not a venture-capitalist-in-chief.
Posted by: Benson | February 1, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Mitt needs to step down so that Huckabee can take on McCain.
Posted by: Ben | February 1, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
Let me get this right: Romney has spent $35,000,000 of his own money to run an unsuccessful campaign? Kind of like Bush has spent billions upon billions of OUR tax dollars to the tune of a BILLION A MONTH to fight an unnecessary war. Romney is a Bush clone. Bush has depleted SS, we’re on the brink of a recession or worse, and Romney is the best they can come up with besides a 71 year old hawk who plans for America to be in Iraq for “100 years.” Look for a Democratic landslide, folks. Live with it. It’s gonna happen. And it’s about **** time.
Posted by: eric | February 1, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
My party is stupid. McCain, Rudy and Awnold on the same stage. Not one Republican in the bunch. If Mitt were Presbyterian he would be twenty points ahead. Mitt is by FAR the best man for the job.
Posted by: TWolf | February 1, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
If you want a real conservative, Ron Paul is your man. If you want to keep the wars, the bloodshed, and the crippling economy, pick any other. I hate how people think the war and the economy are NOT connected.
Posted by: Marty | February 1, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
Romney has more tact, knowledge, honesty and experience. He is a man that wants to change America for the better and doesn’t cross his lines of his party or change his views because it makes him look good with the Demos. Mitt Romney was born into a political family and actually worked to be a sucessful man for himself. I would rather vote for a man that is sucessful in the public and supports his family than others who have no experience.
Posted by: KC | February 1, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
Romney was born on third base where he was raised in privilege. He has paid and lied his way through his entire campaign. This man hasn’t an honest bone in his self-serving body and if elected he would continue to lie to, and disregard, the American public. In that respect, he is indeed a clone of Bush and likely to continue the policies of fantasy followed by the current administration. America, and even the Republicos, aren’t nearly as gullible as KC when it comes to choosing a candidate.
Posted by: Fran Martin | February 1, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
benson —- you ask “Since when does the pursuit of private wealth count more than a lifetime of public service?” answer: when your life experience in the private sector has ingrained in you a focus on performance and a sense of accountability. a fundamental difference between the private and public sector is accountability. you can pretty much keep your job in congress if you keep your hands to yourself and your focus in the men’s room, and you’re only called to account every 4-6 years and a political race has a neat way of obscuring matters of performance (eg. mccain 2008). in the private sector, management must perform against concrete, objective measures and has to account every year to stockholders (quarterly if a public co) and quarterly or monthly to the board. and you’re fired if you don’t perform. think about it. no wonder mccain was so confused at romney’s use of the terms milestones and timestables. those are foreign (and unwanted) concepts to a lifetime beltway bureaucrat.
Posted by: vtkajo | February 1, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
sounds like a little class envy to me. be honest. why do you and so many others have such a problem with another’s success and wealth? romney is very bright, hard working, a devoted family man, outright squeaky clean and, oh yeah, very wealthy – a handsome portion of which he’s willing to spend on a campaign that he believes strongly in. what seems to be the problem?
Posted by: vtkajo | February 1, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
Romney is the only candidate prepared to fix our economy!
His record for proof:
In 1990, Romney was CEO of Bain & Company, which was facing financial collapse. As CEO, within a year, he had led Bain & Company through a highly successful turnaround and returned the firm to profitability without layoffs or partner defections.
Romney served as president and CEO of the 2002 Olympic Winter Games held in Salt Lake City. Before he was called in, the event was running $379 million short of its revenue benchmarks. The Games ended up clearing a profit of $100 million.
In 2003, Romney was sworn in as Governor of Massachusetts— Upon entering office, Romney faced a projected $3 billion deficit, but by 2006 the state had a $700 million surplus and was able to cut taxes.
Romney graduated from a joint Juris Doctor/Master of Business Administration program coordinated between Harvard Law School and Harvard Business School. He graduated *** laude from the law school and was named a Baker Scholar for graduating in the top five percent of his business school class.
Romney knows how to help our economy!
Posted by: Go Romney! | February 1, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
Washington is not broke, we are as Americans! Until we put our differences aside, work hard, play fair and treat each other with the respect and dignity that we all deserve then progress will be made fron sea to shining sea. We have so much to learn and teach our children by setting strong examples of leadership. My president did not lay me off again from work on 11/9/2007 now did he? Mitt Romney knows what he’s talking about too and I’m in trouble in Massachusetts which has been a mess finding decent technological work but will not give up my search at any cost.
Posted by: Bill Toohey | February 1, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
If Romney is out, that’s sad, because it leaves the Republicans with a choice between another religious fanatic (like Bush) or someone who supports the occupation of Iraq (like Bush). I’ll bet the Democrats would LOVE to see Romney drop out; he’s the only sensible Republican candidate remaining.
Posted by: rmberryman | February 1, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
I just don’t see how anyone who watches John McCain speak can vote for him. Look at both Romney and McCain. You can see it in their eyes! Romney has my vote all the way.
Posted by: Paul | February 1, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
Huckabee will accumulate a few more delegates, BUT who will those delegates vote for at the convention? Most likely McCain. Then we will know for sure that Huckabee is NOT a true conservative. Don’t throw your vote away on Huckabee.
Posted by: Susan Bertalotto | February 1, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
To GO ROMNEY-Juris Doc, MBA, but how stupid! Trashing Amnesty when those that are now citizens, thanks to Reagan`s 86 Amnesty Law, now vote. Hope this dumb loser spends all his ill gotten gains selling his nonsense.
Posted by: luke | February 1, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
A vote for Huckabee is NOT thrown away. I just cast my absentee ballot for him. I’m in a state where it’s close and each vote really matters. It would be nice if Romney would step aside to allow Huckabee to easily beat McCain, but that won’t happen. I’m voting my conscience, come what may.
Posted by: Derek | February 1, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
I cannot understand how people can see what our economy is doing, and not vote for Romney. He is the only one that can fix this economy because of his experience. If McCain get in, we will have a war for the next 4-8 years, have illegal immigrants coming to America worse than it is now, and the economy will be much worse than it is now. It will be interesting to watch this country fall apart if we do not get someone that is NOT in Washington in the Whitehouse.
Posted by: jsewell | February 1, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
It’s interesting to see the Huckabee guys say, “Romney is in the way.” Romney would have a realistic chance if Huckabee would step aside. If Romney stepped aside, Huckabee would get destroyed. Huckabee has maxed out his possibilities (he hasn’t one a state since the religious bigots gave him the Iowa caucus), he has no new constituency to tap, and he’s about out of money. Hopefully Romney will get ENOUGH delegates and stay relevant enough to go on after Huckabee finally crashes and burns.
Posted by: Bryan R | February 1, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
Are you people serious, Can’t you see that McCain is the only republican that has a chance to beat Hillary. This far right bullshit has seen it’s days. It’s time for a president that can reach both sides and get something done.
Posted by: Tim | February 1, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
I was just listening to the Laura Ingraham show and she just played an audio of McCAIN stating that he would consider being on the TICKET as Vice President with his “good friend” JOHN CARRY in the last Presidential race in 2004. Can you imagine that!!!!! I could not believe my ears. The front runner for the Repubican nomination considered being the running mate with the biggest liberal in the country!!! on the Democrat ticket!! and now McCain says that he is the Reagan conservative in the Republican Party??? Totally mind boggling!!!
Please, ROMNEY is the real conservative!!! Laura also said that Michael Reagan said that McCain was not a Reagan conservative!!! From Reagan’s own son, what can you say!!
Let’s surprise these liberals who have hi-jacked the Republican party with a conservative SURGE of our own and vote for Mitt ROMNEY with “overwheming forse”!!!!
Posted by: Alabama Bob | February 1, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
Does Obama think Romney is a tougher opponent? Why else would he want McCain as the Republican candidate?
Posted by: Susan Bertalotto | February 1, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
Clinton vs. McCain would be a Dem vs. Dem race. No way the Republican base comes out to vote for McCain in November.
Posted by: McCain the Dem | February 1, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
if Huckabee wss out the race, Mitt would be spanking McCain.
Posted by: David | February 1, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
John McCain has spent the last 25 years spending our money and voting for war, and so has Hillary. Obama is a politician too, but at least he gives the impression of idealism.
Mitt Romney gets my vote. He looks honest and humble, even though he is a billionaire. McCain looks and acts like a stubborn old fool. Romney has worked and understands money. In the debate last week, McCain didn’t even understand Ron Paul’s question (regarding economics). I’d vote for Ron Paul too, but at this point I need to vote for someone that still has a chance of getting elected. Romney has a nice family too, and that says volumes. He won’t be another party boy Bush. Also – Beware of where your candidates stand on the global warming issues. We could pay with our very lives in taxes, before the next 8 years are up.
Vote for Romney.
Posted by: Pat | February 1, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
Bryan R,
Had Thompson not pulled votes away from Huckabee, S. Carolina would have gone to Huckabee. He just barely lost.
How quick you are to characterize the folks in Iowa as religous biggots…kind of bigotted on your part don’t you think?
Bottom-line, I vote for who I really want to win (fair tax was my big issue)… not my # 2 pick (Romney). If Romney supporters want compromise to beat McCain… let them be the ones to compromise and vote for Huckabee.
Posted by: Derek | February 1, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
The new mantra for Republicans may just well be… John McCain, I’m NOT YOUR FRIEND!!!!
Posted by: Russs | February 1, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
How could any moderates and liberals backs war monger McCain. McCain wants to bomb Iran and stay in Iraq for 100 years and promised for more wars. McCain says he wants interest rates to be ZERO out of complete ignorance for how interest rates affect the economy. I’d like to see him say that to retirees on a fixed income. McCain want 10 million illegal immigrants to stay permanently and legal immigrants who can vote do not support it. How could this country be secure if he is in power??? If McCain is nominee, as a republican I would rather vote Clinton than McCain. As least we know Clinton has some intelligence and lead the booming economic. McCain will lead this country to a total ruin with his lack of intelligence and no executive experience. Mitt Romney is an expert in economics and finance and is the man we need as president.
Posted by: linda | February 1, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
Romney Names New Advisor on Border Security and Illegal Immigration:
Dr. Kris Kobach, former White House fellow, Sr. Counsel at the
Immigration Reform Law Institute and Chairman of Kansas GOP named
advisor to Romney on Illegal Immigration and border security:
Posted by: Carol | February 1, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
Romney is done, would someone please shut off the lights on the way out? Thanks.
Posted by: Tom Canavan | February 1, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
Mitt Romney’s successful business experience, successful Olympic experience, and successful state governing success set him above all other candidates. His vision of using economic strength to combat terrorist and his Apollo plan for energy independence are also set him above all other candidates.
Romney is a real leader who can lead American to build a strong economic and therefore a strong nation!
Hope American people will elect Mitt Romney, the only competent candidate, to be our president.
The National Debt has continued to increase an average of $1.43 billion per day since September 29, 2006! In Fiscal Year 2006, the U. S. Government spent $406 Billion of your money on interest payments* to the holders of the National Debt. US is facing economic collapse if we do not have the economic genius Romney to fix it. Remember what happen to the Soviet Union when their economic collapse.
Wake up American people!
Posted by: linda | February 1, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
God help us if McCain wins. He will pick Huckabee as his running mate “Huckabee has been kissing McCain’s bu… from day one hoping to be V.P. because he knows he cannot will.” This will leave us with a dishonest loss cannon liberal in McCain and a religious bigot in Huckabee. You always know in life who is telling the truth by there actions not there word. An obvious liar is the one who is always TELLING people he is something. Example, John McCain running all his ads claiming to be the TRUE Reagan conservative and Huckabee claiming to be the great religions man. The most dishonest people I have ever met in life are the one who tell you how religious they are. We are a blessed country but I fear God’s reply if we elect one of these two men.
Posted by: God's Fear | February 1, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
I prefer a candidate who takes HUGE amounts of money from Lobbyists and entities who will demand favors later. Isn’t that preferable? GIVE ME A CANDIDATE THAT CAN BE BOUGHT! Not a Romney who can’t be bought!
Posted by: John Martin | February 1, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
Romney may be a fiscal conservative, but a social conservative??? Ha – give me a break. He says what he thinks people want to hear. Huckabee is CONSISTENT in his ideals and morals. He is also a great family man (see Romney note above) and has MORE executive level government experience that ANY OTHER candidate. I watched the democratic debate last night and even though I am a social & fiscal conservative I think if our party doesn’t get it together soon and give Huckabee the chance he deserves, the donkeys will have it come November.
Posted by: mgrabber | February 1, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
Fair tax will benefit people who would buy things such as big house overseas without pay any tax. With fair tax anything you buy, like cars and house, you pay 23% more. You ends up pay more tax with fair tax.
Posted by: linda | February 1, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
If anyone can rescue the economy at this point, it would have to be Mitt. The US is $53 trillion in debt, that is $400K per household. The dollar is becoming useless and the Euro is now becoming the credible currency. If we don’t have a good economy you can forget foreign policy, fighting wars, or healthcare, funding for top education. The economy needs to be front and center, not religion, steriotypes and other trivial things.
Posted by: linda | February 1, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
While Romney and Huckabee split votes, McCain gets a free pass.
We need to support ROMNEY before it is too late!!!
Sorry to say, the reality is that a vote for Huckabee is a vote for McCain.
Huckabee may go down in history as a spoiler in this election as Ross Perot did in 1992
Vote for ROMNEY!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Alabama | February 1, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
Huckabee has gotten votes from non-Evangelicals; and even if he didn’t his record of success with that group would help him mightily against McCain in both Texas and Ohio; the two most important States that vote after Super Tuesday.
Anyway, Huckabee has done very well in the only two States (Iowa and South Carolina) where he spent significant amounts of time and money in the run up to the vote.
If Romney doesn’t do overly good on Super Tuesday and decides to drop out, Huckabee is in the catbird seat so long as Conservative Hardliners are intelligent enough to see how small their differences with Huckabee are compared to their differences with McCain, who clearly desires to continue from the White House his well established policy of undercutting the Republican Party from within.
I’m not sure at this point if Romney has the political skills to beat McCain when McCain has, and I think we all know why, such a HUGE media head-wind (it’s all well and good to like CEOs better than politicians, but guess which usually wins Elections?). Whereas Huckabee, who has wisely made some noise lately about McCain-Feingold, almost certainly does have the required skills given how much he’s been able to do this election with so little resources and primarily relying on his personal appeal and political savvy.
Maybe Romney will surprise me though (we’ll find out soon enough on Tuesday).
Posted by: Bob Johnson | February 1, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
It’s time for the Romney camp to remind the public about the Keating 5. Here the banks are falling appart and the economy is going into recession and we want to reward a slime ball like McCain who was wrapped up with Charles Keating, the guy who tanked Lincoln Savings & Loan, driving a previous recession? Go figure. Given what this did to the economy in the early 90’s, McCain should have just taken a baseball bat to the knee caps of the American people. Mitt is too kind to this power hungry geriatric sellout!
Posted by: linda | February 1, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
I can’t wait to see McCain at the end of his 2nd term at 80 years old. Raising his fist, going on and on about never leaving Iraq.
Posted by: John Martin | February 1, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
Most Americans want us out of Iraq,wasting millions of dollars each week is ruining this country financially. No more tax breaks for the rich and corporations! We want a President and a Congress that’s for the average American. The Rush braindead followers should be banned from voting! Greed is not good! Warmongering is wrong! Ron Paul is right!
Posted by: AJ | February 2, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am
Mitt Romney would make a terrible President. What he fails to understand is that people do not want another George W. Bush. And that’s exactly what this election is about.
Posted by: Mr. Semaj | February 2, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am
Go Huckabee! Romney is hurting and can’t go on much longer.
Posted by: Thumb | February 2, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am
“people do not want another George W. Bush. And that’s exactly what this election is about.”
Exactly why we don’t need a McCain in office. Just the same old thing. As Mitt Romney said. “You can’t keep sending the same people back to Washington and sit them in different chairs.”
Posted by: John Martin | February 2, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am
“Go Huckabee! Romney is hurting and can’t go on much longer”
Hehe! Huckster has no money left!
Posted by: John Martin | February 2, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am
Super Bowl vs. Super Tuesday
There are two New England Patriots fighting for victory; The New England Patriots in the Super Bowl and Gov. Mitt Romney in Super Tuesday. Romney is a brilliant bold innovative visionary and a patriot. Romney has put his passion and his personal fortune into his dream for a stronger safer and more prosperous America. True Grit Mitt is America’s hope for a better future. I’m rootin’ for Romney!
Posted by: Niki | February 2, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am
If Mitt were out, his votes would go to Huckabee, if Huckabee were out his votes would likely go to Mitt. Personally, I don’t know why people think that Mitt is the more conservative of the two. He’s a flip flop, and blongs on the beach. I’m for abortion, oh wait, I’m against it… well, maybe I’m for it, no no I’m against it. I support gay marriage!… oh wait, no I don’t.. Yes it is true that he does have business experience, but will that really help us out? Honestly, our government has been running like a business for as long as I can remember. Where the government is our boss who makes sure they get their cut of all our hard work. Demanding more… more work, more money, more sacrifice from us for their gain. Why has everyone forgotten that the government is supposed to work for us not the other way around? I want someone who knows what it is like to be an employee not just a boss. I’ll take Huckabee, please.
Posted by: Jessi | February 2, 2008, 3:20 am 3:20 am
John Martin,
Huckabee had $1.9 Million in debt free cash on hand coming into this year and in January alone he pulled down more than $4.5 Million.
Once that wouldn’t have been much but now we have a situation where Romney’s only going to spend $3 Million between Florida and Super Tuesday and McCain only pulled down $7 Million in all of January in spite of his victories in NH and SC.
Partly due to his frugality, especially in terms of not throwing mountains of money at high cost Florida affiliates like Romney and to a lesser extent McCain did, Huckabee doesn’t have anything resembling the money disadvantage at this point that you’d think based on the (for whatever reason) highly biased reporting of the Media.
I’ll repeat, if Romney decides to drop out after Super Tuesday, Huckabee will have a substantial shot at getting the nomination over McCain.
Posted by: Bob Johnson | February 2, 2008, 3:54 am 3:54 am
Mike Huckabee is resurging and I like what I see. Stay on course, Mike, stay on course.
Posted by: Jim Flynt | February 2, 2008, 5:11 am 5:11 am
It’s clear that Huck wants to be Napolean’s VP. That’s why he’s still in this thing. Too bad Romney has been backed into a corner by the Liberal Media. It’s obvious that the uneducated, like many who are posting here, lack the common sense to look beyond Pravda polls and headlines to examine the issues and where these candidates stand. I can see it now, angry, old John McCain taking on the fresh-faced Obama in November. Can you say “Bob Dole”. The Dems will feast on this matchup. I can feel my taxes rising already!
Posted by: Ken | February 2, 2008, 6:59 am 6:59 am
Romney is the best candidate. He is poised and intelligent and obviously skilled at complex problem-solving. He has excellent communication skills. He has the experience, education, and good judgment needed for the job. He is a natural leader who can tackle tough problems. He accomplished more in a short time here in Massachusetts than most governors do in many more terms. while not taking a salary. He is a can-do person. He has a stable family and good values. Mitt is the one who should go the distance.
Posted by: Elizabeth | February 2, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am
Isn`t Mitt the guy that supports waterboarding, torture?
Posted by: luke | February 2, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
What America does’nt want in a candidate: No warmonger,no tax breaks for the rich and corporations,no catering to the Religious Right,and no one who has two way conversations with God. What Americans want in a candidate: honesty,competence,supporting the constitution,looking out for the middle class and the disadvantaged. And never starting wars for secret agendas.This leave out all the GOP candidates except for Ron Paul. All the others are just different versions of Bush.
Posted by: AJ | February 2, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am
Hey Obama has Obama Girl. It may be a big mistake not to let the Hooters Girls plug for Romney. Romney is ready to serve the nation and so are the Hooter Girls. Get real people! McCain has a plan for a sustained war in the Mid-East and no fiscal plan for the nation. McCain has has-beens for supporters that try to tout their past fantasy lives. McCain rides on his past military service that no longer fits the challenges of this era. He knows how to get things done the old way but hasn’t a clue or cognitive ability to manage a world economy or the diplomacy for brokering peace. He supports the surge in Iraq that delays or holds off its collapse because of his failed foreign policy ideology that led to the war in the first place. But he has not changed that ideology. We need a nominee that listens and can adjust the game plan to achieve long term goals for this nation. Call that flip flopping if you must. But having blinders on and having a determination to stick with bad foreign policy and bad economics will bring great harm to our nation.
Posted by: lorax_mbell | February 2, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am
Romney is dropping in the polls while Huckabee is surging. Go Huckabee!!!
Posted by: Thumb | February 2, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am
Mitt is just a poker player and America is not for sale.
Posted by: Frank | February 2, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Each American should be allowed to vote for whom they believe best fits the need of this country. A vote for the candidate you choose is your right as an American to vote for the values expressed by that candidate. Each of these candidates has starkly different views in one area or another. Research, research, research. Then vote your CONSCIENCE!
Posted by: Celeste | February 2, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
I am not understandiny how Romney thinks he could “spank” McCain if Huckabee stepped aside. Huckabee is leading in several southern states and tied for first in others. Romney is not anywhere close in those races. I am from the south and know the sentiment here. We would vote for McCain before we would vote for Romney. He has shown himself to be untrustworthy and is not electible. He could never win the South, and we all know that without the South, the democrats will win in November.
Huckabee is the best man for the job!
Also, how dare the Romney camp tell Huckabee supporters that they are “wasting their vote.” We take our votes very seriously. Many Americans have shed their precious blood to give us the right to vote. If you don’t vote your conscious then you are doing a dishonor to our veterans and soldiers!!!!!!
Posted by: Sherry | February 2, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
This nation cannot waste time to educate Huckabee on national and international affairs. His supporters need to get some fact checks on his ideas and policies from respectable economist and diplomats that know the reality of the world we live in. To think one can lead this country by the faith in the seat of your pants is absurd. We’ve had too much of that already.
Posted by: lorax_mbell | February 2, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
No one thinks Mike Huckabee is the best choice for President of the United States because of his religious faith! We KNOW he is the best choice because he has the most extensive gubernatorial experience (Time Magazine named him one of the Five Best Governors for a reason!), his brilliant eloquence (he may well be the best orator to come along since Ronald Reagan or Bill Clinton), his VERY sound ideas to improve the US economy, his excellent plan to FINALLY address the illegal immigrant problem in this country, and yes, his knowledge and expertise on foreign affairs. We know him to be a man of integrity. We know him to support the US Constitution, and that he will effect streamlined federal government and improve states’ rights. We know that this country needs to discard an outmoded, hopelessly complicated tax system that is punishing us all, most of all the poor- and that the FairTax will make US goods much more competitive in the marketplace, bring back trillions of dollars from offshore hiding places and into the US economy, force those who earn their livings illegally to pay tax (and discourage illegal immigration in the process!), and incentivize productivity and economic investment. Take your own advice and do some research before making such statements!
Posted by: Beth | February 2, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Mitt Romney just won the Maine caucus by a landslide but there’s been no real MSM coverage of it to speak of!! All they can talk about is Mitt’s attendance to a funeral for a man in his life he respects. Huckabee hit the cellar again – why is he still in the race? He cannot win past Iowa, which was swung by the evangelicals coaxed vote in for him in droves by their churches.
Posted by: Jeff | February 2, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
Huckabee should have dropped out of the GOP race after South Carolina. If he couldn’t win there or at least in Florida with all the evangelicals in these states, what are his chances of winning a mainstream campaign? His campaign is broke and he hasn’t a prayer of running on to the end without a lot of money. So why is he around?
Posted by: David | February 2, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
What’s this video of Romney disavowing Reagan? He either lied to the liberals to get elected or he is lying to us. It seem he is a fraud just like McCain opposed tax cuts and Huck wanting welfare/education for illegals.
Wake up people! Ron Paul led the Texas Reagan delegation in 1976. He is the real deal and has the guts to cut spending.
Posted by: Kris | February 2, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
John McCain will win if and only if Mike Huckabee stays in the race to take votes away from Mitt Romney. Mitt Romney has shown he can win when the independents are left out of the picture. NH would have been in his win column if the independents could not swing the race there for McCain. Mike Huckabee cannot win with such a poor showing in SC and FL so why does he continue? It looks like he’s after the VP job to me. Arkansas does not want him back!!
Posted by: Joy | February 2, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
Ron Paul is a joke. I can’t beleive that this clown is still hanging around when he has no chance WHATSOEVER of winning the GOP nomination. Guess he likes throwing other people’s money away. What a loser.
Posted by: Bill | February 2, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
I’m from Texas and there is NO WAY I’d ever vote for Ron Paul. This guy has been sucking on the goverment’s toe FOREVER and he’s done nothing signifant in the Congress in decades. He is a huge part of the problem and has no real solutions other than those fed to him by the Democrats. It’s time for him to go FOR GOOD.
Posted by: Ken | February 2, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
Mike Huckabee is a better Baptist preacher than he is a presidential candidate. His credentials may be okay in Arkansas but he’d fall flat in any other state where there are higher standards to obtain the right to lead. He talks a good game but it’s flawed when it comes to acting on what he says. He’s good at pandering to his base. I get nauseous when I see him at churches campaigning. Churches are no place to run campaigns!!
Posted by: Dee | February 2, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
After watching all of the debates, I’m convinced that Mitt Romney is the only Republican who can beat Hillary or Obama in November. He looks and acts more presidential than any other. More importantly, he clearly demonstrates the economic and gubernatorial savvy that McCain, Obama, or Clinton cannot because they lack that kind of experience. Huckabee and Paul should get out now unless they they really like Obama who seems to be coming on very strong at this point.
Posted by: Pat | February 2, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
I had to laugh at Mike Huckabee’s showing during the last debate. His economy skills are in the toilet. He wants to decide how our tax rebate is spent and his “highway” proposal benefits only those on the East coast?? This guy has got to be kidding. As usual, Ron Paul looked like the blithering idiot he is. If McCain wins, count on Hillary and Bill taking over the White House next January. That will be a sad day for America.
Posted by: Tim | February 2, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
FACT: A VOTE FOR HUCKABEE IS A VOTE FOR McCAIN. Chuck Huck and get on the Romney Bus. Stop wasting your votes on the HUCK!!
Posted by: CRC | February 2, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
Huckabee a religous bigot? He has done nothing but shown respect for everybodies personal beliefs or lack of. It’s amazing the hate for someone that has absolutes in their life that our country was founded on. Is it ingnorance or blinding hate or what I just don’t get it. I am supporting Huckabee on policy stance and 10 plus yrs very successful experience. He is definitely the most conservative in the race and I think he would tear Hilary up in the debates. The atlast Romney stratgy just might work.
Posted by: t parker | February 3, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am
Why should Huckabee drop out? He and Romney are neck-and-neck and he’s spent a tiny fraction of what Romney has! Let Huckabee and McCain fight it out.
The South was crucial to Republican victory in 2000 and 2004, as was the Evangelical and practicing Roman Catholic vote and now we are being slapped in the face and told, “Shut up and vote as you’re told.”
Posted by: TR | February 3, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am
Who are all of these Huckabee fans, what world do they live in? This is a two man race a vote for Huckabee is a wasted vote, he has no chance and he knows it. He is only staying in the race to spoil Romney’s chances. I wonder what favors he is trying to get from McCain?
Posted by: Steve | February 3, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am
Mitt will clean up against the Dems when going head to head. I would not trust McCain to argue with them, the way he handled himself in the last debate. He was like an ornery old man that gets something in his head and can’t shake it.
I guarantee that the donkeys will know their stuff when it comes to economics. They won’t listen to the P.O.W. response, and think that will make him a great economically sound President!
Posted by: N Davila | February 3, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am
The news media in this country is making certain that Senators’ Obama and Clinton will be up against McCain, who is sure to lose. While Mitt Romney has actually been honing his skills as a leader, in private business affairs, and governing our state (Mass.), not only did these three other candidates have the advantage of having Americans be familiar with them, prior to this race, but the media has made sure it stays that way.
My husband and I have raised our four children by the following motto, “everything you do, should be wise and good and true.” The problem is, in the past, most Americans were operating with that same motto as there guiding force, but unfortunately that is no longer true. I have to laugh at the Kennedy support of the social liberal , Obama. Wasn’t it JFK who said, “Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country.”
Unfortunately, so many Americans are guided by feelings and not an understanding of our precious constitution, the rule of law and the concepts of self-reliance and personal responsibility, which are what made this country great. Sadly, we are losing our greatness, and if the democrats have their way, individual Americans will just become increasingly less informed, and therefore further dependent of the “Government,” not unlike a family full of adult children
who never grew up and moved out of Mom and Dad’s house to make their own way. How pathetic!
Posted by: LIz from Massachusetts | February 3, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am
Allowing a corporate elitist to buy his way into the White House is un-American, anti-democratic and would surely be the death knell for the absolute majority of Americans economically. It will be an absolute pleasure to watch Mitt go down in flames this Super Tuesday! Good riddance Mitt!!!
Posted by: geddesman | February 3, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
I mean let’s not forget here people if not for his own money Mitt wouldn’t even be a topic of discussion, doesn’t that say everything? He’s outspending everyone in the race using his own money and still he can’t overtake a tired, old, penniless Washington insider like McCain! Hello!
Posted by: geddesman | February 3, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Romney is toast. John McCain is the real deal and is, by far, the Republican Party’s strongest candidate to field against the Democrats in the Fall. While I may not agree with Senator McCain, I can count on him to always tell me what I need to hear even if it isn’t what I’d like to hear. Furthermore, I can always count on him to put the interests of the entire country ahead of allegiance to party or ideology. That’s what most voters are looking for in their next president, not some hide-bound ideologue from the extreme right, as much as blowhards like Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter might wish otherwise.
Mitt Romney is an empty plastic suit, a shamelessly pandering BS-peddler with no sunstance whatsoever. The guy is gonna tell you whatever he needs to tell you to get your vote. He changes his positions more often than many people change their shoes. He is a complete phony. Only an idiot would vote for him.
Posted by: Dan | February 3, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Nothing says more about Romney’s appeal than that his advisors and supporters are putting so much emphasis on the “You HAVE to vote for Romney, no matter how distasteful it is, to stop John McCain” argument.
When your candidate is such that you’re forced to center your argument to voters on uninspiring strategic considerations, you clearly don’t have much of a candidate.
And believe you me, that kind of primarily negative message is not going to work for the Republicans in ’08, given that the general mood of swing voters is, unfortunately, more against the Republicans than otherwise.
The positive “I’m a nice guy who cares about regular people” message of Huckabee, or the 10,000 times more sinister for Conservatives “I’m the Liberal Media’s fellow enemy of Conservatives” message of McCain are the only two kinds of message that have a chance of working for us in this very tough upcoming election.
The trouble with giving McCain the nomination is that if elected he’d probably act strongly and consistently against the long term interests of the Conservative Movement, as he did with the Huckabee opposed McCain-Feingold travesty, while at the same time seeking to give control of the Party to the long dormant Liberal wing.
Huckabee, to his great credit, combines some possibility of winning the General Election with a history of never speaking or conspiring against the Conservative Movement.
Posted by: Bob Johnson | February 3, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm
Electing McCain or Huckabee would kill our economy and the Republican’s chance of winning elections for years to come!
Romney is the only candidate with the experience, education, wisdom, integrity and vision necessary to fix our economy.
Republicans would do well to sacrifice the election to the Democrats in November if either McCain or Huckabee(ha,ha) were to win the Republican nomination.
Posted by: Go Romney! | February 4, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am