Youngest DNC Superdelegate Backing Obama
ABC News’ Karen Travers Reports: Marquette University junior Jason Rae had a personal breakfast with Chelsea Clinton and was wooed on the phone by Bill Clinton and Madeline Albright.
But after seeing the enthusiasm for Barack Obama in Wisconsin on Tuesday, Rae tells ABC News he is supporting the Illinois senator in the race for the Democratic presidential nomination.
At 21, Rae is the youngest DNC superdelegate, one of the 795 free agents who can back any candidate in the race for the Democratic nomination. He has never even voted in a presidential election because he turned 18 after Election Day in 2004.
"As I think about my role as a young DNC member and a young superdelegate, my generation clearly spoke on Tuesday saying Obama was their choice," Rae told ABC News. "I was inspired by him as well. He has inspired a new generation of voters to get active and energized in the political process."
Rae said the line at the polling place on campus at Marquette had a "constant line" from 9am until the polls closed. "I saw more students participating in the process for the first time that I could ever have imagined," he said.
In recent weeks, Rae has become a power broker of sorts, as both campaigns pushed hard to lock down the support of superdelegates. Rae met up with the former first daughter a week before the Wisconsin primary for breakfast at the student union at the University of Milwaukee and had a lengthy conversation on his cell phone with former President Clinton.
Rae was elected as a DNC member at the Wisconsin state party convention in June 2004. He was only 17 years old but there are no party rules that say a DNC member has to be of voting age. Rae ran against and defeated the president of the state firefighters’ union and a state legislator.
While the attention and flurry of activity around the Wisconsin primary was exciting, Rae is eager to get back to his routine as a college student.
"I got a little behind in my school work of late, which is okay, but I think things are going to calm down now," Rae said.
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Question? All five of my children are for Obama. All five have cell phones and no landline.
Are the new young voters (mainly for Obama) being polled?
Posted by: JB | February 21, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
“”I got a little behind in my school work of late, which is okay, but I think things are going to calm down now,” Rae said.”
That’s OK. You believe the “big picture” taught by your betters in the University. You vote blindly for Democrats. That’s all they want from you, so you’ll get an ‘A’ anyway.
Don’t sweat it.
Posted by: Good Lt | February 21, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
Seriously? You guys are ripping on this guy for his opinion, his right to represent his vote and that he’s getting behind in his school work because he believes in a cause unlike half the college students out there who are behind in schoolwork because they’re hung over from too much frathouse partying?
Jason, ignore these people. Negative attitudes like this is exactly what got the country to where it is right now. Good for you for taking a stand so early in your life. I wish you continued success!!
Posted by: GirlWIndy | February 21, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am
JB – No most polls do not factor in cell phones, and that has been a factor when the youth vote is widely split. Most primary polls also do not factor in independents. That is why you can see the polls often being way off (more than their stated margin of error) this political season. It’s getting harder and harder to determine “random” samples of a possible electorate, so pre-election polls are really more a measure of general sentiment than a reliable barometer.
Posted by: Kevin | February 21, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
Good judgment Jason, you are brave. You have acted the way your generation are doing. Its your future and the elders must help, if at all they are not greedy and love young generation.
Posted by: Peace | February 21, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
Careful what you ask for??? In Massachusetts, Deval Patrick ran an identical campaign for Governor and won. After 1 year in office, the shine of the campaign has not lasted. His performance has been sub par at best. People, we are about to elect the POTUS!
Posted by: billy | February 21, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
McCain on the “Hot Seat”, I wonder how it fills.
McCain’s best days are behind him.
Obama wins Texas and Ohio
Posted by: Lookup | February 21, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am
The Obama converts another with his uplifting rap of hope and change and future. Hey Jason, can you state anything that Obama stands for and will do as president? If you said bigger government control, higer taxes on the middle class and socialism, you are right. Er Left. Your new emperor wears no clothes. But like a good leftie, you don’t care.
Then again, Chelsea really cheaped out on you for breakfast. You should have taken her to Dream Dance.
Posted by: Spectreman | February 21, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am
JB, excellent observation. The polling methodology is obsolete and/or the methodology is biased. That is why polls indicated that Hillary was only 5 points behind Barrack in Wisconsin. Look what the results were. Texas is a near tie, according to the polls. In almost all the Dem primaries the polls have been wrong by anywhere from 10 to 20 points.
Posted by: BooMan | February 21, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am
This is a young kid who understand that our country needs a leader not hypocrite. Good choice Rae!!!
I hope the other super delegates will learn that lesson we the people have made our choice. If they wants us to turn out big in November they better respect our decisions and choices.
Posted by: change | February 21, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am
when did years of experience become so negative. This is fantasyland!
Posted by: billy | February 21, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am
For a six pack and a fun party most young voters will change their vote or not vote at all. Obama is a flash in the pan and a love affair from the Press. He is only a good speech giver with no substance.
Posted by: Superman | February 21, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am
i gotta give this kid credit for not being swindled. i mean breakfast with a first daughter? calls from madeleine albright? that’s pretty flattering. and he still has made up his own mind anyway. good for him.
Posted by: emmarose | February 21, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am
“But after seeing the enthusiasm for Barack Obama in Wisconsin on Tuesday, Rae tells ABC News he is supporting the Illinois senator in the race for the Democratic presidential nomination.”
So basically this superdelegate is not making an informed opinion, he’s just jumping on the bandwagon. We should have all of the primaries on the same day so people can vote from the heart instead of being biased by the preceeding results.
Posted by: angela | February 21, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am
“He is only a good speech giver with no substance.”
Yeah, well, it worked for Reagan.
Posted by: Sam | February 21, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am
Right on, Angela! “But after seeing the enthusiasm for Barack Obama in Wisconsin on Tuesday…” LOL That’s the main reason why so many young people are voting for Barry. They just wanna look “cool”. They wanna be part of the “in” crowd. Barry = The Rock Star..
Posted by: DMK | February 21, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Yeah right!
Posted by: Democracy at its Best | February 21, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am
Wait a second!! last week and the week before she denied meeting with superdelagates? Now they are not swayed by her? Did she realy meet them?
Posted by: Jim Rod | February 21, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am
You know, hearing all the Obama detractors out there rant and rave about how we have stars (or worse, spirals) in our eyes for Obama makes me sick.
I’m sorry you don’t, or CAN’T, believe in YOUR candidate the way we do. This is our time to get involved and try to make things better. Why do people have to trample on that? Attack the issues, not the supporters who are taking part in the process in record numbers…..even if it is intimidating
Posted by: jenny | February 21, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am
I AM SICK AND TIRED OF HILARY SUPPORTERS SAYING THAT OBAMA IS ALL TALK AND NO ACTION. AND THAT SHE HAS MORE EXPIERIENCE THAN HE DOES. WHO HAS BEEN A SENATOR LONGER? AND I DONT SEE HOW YOU CAN COUNT TIME SERVED AS A FIRST LADY AS EXPIERIENCE…WHAT DID SHE ACCOMPLISH AS FIRST LADY…2,000 PIECES OF LEGISLATIVE ACTION TO HER 20…AND YA’LL DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM WITH THAT….IF YOU WANT A BUILDING NAMED AFTER YOU VOTE FOR HILARY IF YOU WANT A SAFER AND MORE PRODUCTIVE NATION VOTE FOR OBAMA…AND ANOTHER THING..I AM SICK AND TIRED OF HEARING “WHERE IS HE GOING TO GET THE MONEY TO PAY FOR ALL THE THINGS HE IS PROMISING…US OF COURSE” NO @#$% !!!…AND WHERE DO YOU THINK HILARY WOULD HAVE GOTTEN THE MONEY TO DO THE THINGS THAT SHE SAID SHE WILL DO…YOU AND ME IDIOTS ..IT JUST DEPENDS ON WHAT YOU WANT YOUR MONEY USED FOR…WAKE UP AND SEE HER FOR WHAT SHE REALLY IS…A WEAK HUMAN BEING THAT DOES NOT REPRRESENT AN AMERICAN WOMAN IN MY EYES
Posted by: chris | February 21, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am
Superman,
Are you comparing Obama to Reagan? Good speech giver with no substance.
Posted by: Joe | February 21, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am
HOW ABOUT YOU NAME ONE THAT HILARY HAS ACCOMPLISHED WITH OUT THE WORD LIBRARY OR BRIDGE IN IT
Posted by: chris | February 21, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am
Oh boy,
Why America is so scared of change?
Posted by: change | February 21, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
DMK: What did Hillery Clinton accomplished as “First Lady”.
Posted by: Lookup | February 21, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
Chris: you say that Hillary doesn’t represent an American woman in your eyes. I bet Pam Anderson does! lol
Hillary is ONE of the strongest American women, you nut. She’s a fighter and a scrapper.
Posted by: DMK | February 21, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
Hey Joe,
Obama is a Senator not a Congressman. All you other Democratic bashers remember this the middle-class pays MORE per dollar than the rich. It’s high time the rich pay their share instead of running from their patriotic duty to fund roads, police stations, fire departments, etc. Could it possibly be that some of you right-wing whores are these very same wealthy shirking your patriotism while making money off of the Iraq War……………………..
Posted by: Frank | February 21, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
FIGHTER AND A SCRAPPER??? ARE YOU SERIOUS? YOU CAN HONESTLY RESPECT A WOMAN THAT WILL ALLOW HER HUSBAND TO CHEAT ON HER RATHER THAN STAND UP FOR HERSELF
Posted by: chris | February 21, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
This superdelegate mess blows. Are the Party leaders so worried that the people will not vote the way they want them to that they have to set up 795 superdelegates so the outcome of the primary can be controlled. And what quals does this youngman have that makes him a superdelegate?
Posted by: 1olegrzbar | February 21, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
JB, Kevin – they claim to factor in cell phone users, but I can’t figure out how.
I was making that cell phone argument all last year, without knowing what percentage of voters actually didn’t have landlines. Then in late fall, the Washington Post reported it was something like 18 percent of households that didn’t have landlines.
So it is a significant chunk of people. I only have a cell and don’t miss the landline at all.
Posted by: Paul | February 21, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
“I was inspired by him as well. He has inspired a new generation of voters to get active and energized in the political process.”
I think that he believed that by casting his vote for Obama, believing in him as well, but looking at it from the perspective of how motivated everyone was in Wisconsin, that that was the right choice. Super delegates matter… so he was doing probably what he felt was right, not only for his opinion, but for the opinion of his state.
Posted by: Beth | February 21, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
SHE WAS ALL FOR THE IRAQ WAR TILL IT WASN’T THE POPULAR POSISTION ANYMORE…REAL FIGHTER DMK
Posted by: chris | February 21, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Why does a 21-year-old college student have a vote that is the equivalent to some hundreds (if not thousands) of “regular” voters? I can understand the super delegate’s vote in the hands of elected officials. They have earned the legitimacy of such power, as they have been elected by the general public on at least one occasion. But this is only half the super delegates from what I have seen. The other 400+ could literally steal the election for either Obama or Clinton. They should not have such political power. Should the fate of a nation rest on this 21-year-old, and a handful of others?
Posted by: JRS | February 21, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
DMK – name a notable accomplishment for any presidential candidate, either party, past or present. Come on – no googling. Just whatever off the top of your head.
I’m drawing a blank, without going back more than half a century, to Eisenhower.
Posted by: Paul | February 21, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
DMK,
Tell me one thing that Hillary took a fight for you.
It is so amazing the other night Hillary said that UNION will have a place on her table. Is that the same Hillaary when she was working for Wal-Mart did her best to stop Wal-Mart employees from unionizes.
Hillary can run but she can’t hide she has so much baggage. Can someone tell me which president signed NAFTA?
Wait I guess i know who Bill Clinton. she really has 35 yrs of doing nothing for us the people.
Wake up people GO AN LEARN WHO IS THE REAL HILLARY CLINTON.
Posted by: change | February 21, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
Great news, smart young Superdelegate for Obama, thank you Jason Rae! Obama ’08!!!
Posted by: RuthieM | February 21, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
Should the fate of a nation rest on this 21-year-old, and a handful of others?
I don’t think a 21-year-old one should have a say in serious matters like this one. He’s still wet behind the ears.
Posted by: DMK | February 21, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
I DISAGREE I THINK WE NEED A REPRESENTATIVE FROM EVERY DEMOGRAPHIC NOT JUST THE OLD, SALTY, CRUSTY ONES
Posted by: chris | February 21, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
Frank,
I think you meant your response to be towards DMK and not myself.
Posted by: Joe | February 21, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
Barrack will beat Hillary and then all those on the fence, Clintonites and Republicans will vote McCain into office. Another chimp for 4 years. When will they ever learn????
Posted by: Doug | February 21, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
Change,
You said “Is that the same Hillaary when she was working for Wal-Mart did her best to stop Wal-Mart employees from unionizes” No, that was (and stil is) Michelle Obama working for U of C hospitals, known for overcharging patients with no insurance.
Posted by: DMK | February 21, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
Of course, Obama will win Ohio, and especially Texas. The Republicans will help him do so… not, in November, however.
Posted by: GoHillary08 | February 21, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
You said “Is that the same Hillaary when she was working for Wal-Mart did her best to stop Wal-Mart employees from unionizes” No, that was (and stil is) Michelle Obama working for U of C hospitals, known for overcharging patients with no insurance.
THAT WAS HER EXACT POSISTION ON THE UNION MATTER
Posted by: chris | February 21, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
Chris…..Once again and Obama supporter spewing nothing but more of the the same change rectoric. Obama is not going to to a D**N thing about this nation. He’s all talk, all sermon and all preacher! He has no real platform because and no experience. Do you honestly think America is going to put a wet behind the ears, no solutions bringing candidate in the Oval Office? Get real. This guy is not going in the white house so just keep on singing and chanting til November, then you will be just as disappointed as the Hillary supporters are now, because McCain crucify Obama in the General election.
Posted by: Justin | February 21, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
Chris…..Once again and Obama supporter spewing nothing but more of the the same change rectoric. Obama is not going to to a D**N thing about this nation. He’s all talk, all sermon and all preacher! He has no real platform because and no experience. Do you honestly think America is going to put a wet behind the (BIG) ears, no solutions bringing candidate in the Oval Office? Get real. This guy is not going in the white house so just keep on singing and chanting til November, then you will be just as disappointed as the Hillary supporters are now, because McCain crucify Obama in the General election. White America will never allow him in the White
SO YOU ARE GOING TO SIT THERE AND LIE TO YOURSELF THINKING THAT HILLARY HAS MORE EXPIERIENCE THAN HE DOES
Posted by: chris | February 21, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
You know, back in 1992, the Clintons weren’t complaining when Bill was on MTV and won the young vote based on MTV and playing a saxophone with rock bands.
As for experience–this is now thread 429,100 where Obama’s experience is criticized on behalf of Hillary Clinton’s, yet no one has stepped forward with what exactly Clinton has done other than be married to a governor and president as well her 1+ terms as NY senator (where she has sponsored limited significant legislation)
* *
Instead of looking at websites set up by pundits and shills, interested people should check out places such as Congressional Quarterly to find out more exact information.
And for those people using names like Obamassiah or McPain…that doesn’t do anything to convince others of your position. It is that level of hate and vitriol that have (thank God) given McCain and Obama their opportunity. Finally we can return to government based on consensus rather than partisan bickering.
Posted by: jim | February 21, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
Justin: John McCain wont be in any kind of postion of crucifing anybody once the Media get through with him.
McCain’s Best Days are Behine him
Obama wins Texas and Ohio
Posted by: Boyddollar | February 21, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
I really don’t know the age group here but I hope it is young folks. Historically the young voter has the worst voting record of any group for the last 4 decades. But that group is the most vocal when whining and bitching about things
Young people have the power in numbers to change things in the US but I think like in the past, they will avoid the voting polls finding drinking beer and toga parties to be more important.
I don’t give a damn who you vote for – just showup and vote.If you don’t vote you don’t have the right to bitch.
Posted by: Deep-Thought | February 21, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Obama worked with Feingold to eliminate gifts of travel on corporate jets by lobbiests and members of Congress. It was signed into law in Sept. 2007.
He sponsored bills with Charles Shumer to criminalize deceptive practices in Federal elections including fraudulant flyers.
Obama also co-sponsored the Secure America & Orderly Immigration Act. 2005.
Posted by: Mollie | February 21, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Shame on you people just like the personality or attribute- nothing else and no accomplishments. The young vote to ruin this country- Most of them get addicted so many other things too shouldn’t have voting privilege
——Its pathetic some of these people show up for vote with out knowing anything or hearing to some media and talk show hosts know how it works in media.
Posted by: david | February 21, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
David, that’s bullcrap.
The young ruin the country? How many people under 40 authorized Iraq, the doubling of the national debt, helped increase unemployment, have put social security into a hole?
Methinks that you should look at the ‘Me Generation’ for putting America on a declining course, not young people.
Posted by: jim | February 21, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
It cannot be overemphasized that the electability of a
particular candidate must take into account future
events like debates and cannot rely solely on recent
polls to predict a likely outcome.
The only argument that senator obama would do better
against john mccain than Senator Hillary Clinton would
is a 4-5 % difference in polls. Such an argument does
not take into account the fact that the eventual
nominees will debate at least a few times, where the
American voter will have a great chance to clearly
compare the candidates, and the significant impact
such debates and any additional factors would have on
this important decision facing the American people.
If there is one thing that this campaign season has
shown, it is that polls are not reliable predictors.
Polls predicted that Senator Clinton would be the
nominee by Super Tuesday, that she would lose New
Hampshire and that John McCain would be left out
again.
What makes them any more reliable now than they were
then?
Posted by: chris | February 21, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
I would go on, but, they only let you have so many letters here. By the way the Secure America Act was co-sponsored with McCain. But, I think you got the point.
Posted by: Mollie | February 21, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
hey David,
You wanna know why we are voting. We realize by raising our voice at every election every time we have the chance. We will fight for America a better. We will go to war for a reason. we will no go to war to put money in your pocket.
Posted by: Change | February 21, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
Delegates, super-delegates, electoral college… it’s all a farce to dilute your vote and my vote; to place the “power” in the hands of a few, elite, controlling party-empowered individuals, both Democrat and Republican. One person, one vote… tally them up in the primary and the winner takes the party. One person, one vote… tally the votes in the general election and the winner takes all.
Posted by: OpusRooster | February 21, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
Notoobama—What are you talking about? This superdelegate is a GUY. Not a “her”
Posted by: guest | February 21, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
It’s funny to watch Americans scream out loud about democracy being so important and then watch them squirm when the status quo crumbles. Hey, I loved Hillary. Put up with her when the Clintons moved to New York so she could be a senator. Put up with all her stumbles as she voted for the war, then backtracked so many times. Put up with her husband for, well, being Bill. Why? Because I believed in her like I believed in Bill. Believed in the charm and the promises. But for the past few months Hillary has been acting like the throne is hers, not because she thinks the people really want her there but because she thinks it is rightfully hers. Now she’s acting like a power hungry petulant princess. See, in a real democracy you can cry like a baby, you can play dirty, you can pull out all the stops and have your family battle for you and practically beg people to vote for you, but if that’s not what the people want then you are out. Obama is getting people out to vote in record numbers and they are voting for him. For so long Americans, including the Clintons, have trumpeted democracy as the most important thing there is. Thank you for reminding us about it’s importance Hillary. And Bill. And Chelsea. I’m going to take my one vote and give it to Obama when really I wanted to give it to you. Why? Because I don’t believe in you anymore. I believe in him. And I like him better. And I believe he has a better chance of helping this country recover from the Bush disease. Thank you for your service Bill and Hillary. You have done a lot of great works around the world and here at home. But in this campaign you and B.O. have reminded me how important my one vote is. Turns out democracy might actually work after all. All I ask is that you leave this campaign with your head high and not like Rudy. You are better than that.
Posted by: Rob MacKay | February 21, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
“Madeleine” is spelled wrong in this story.
Posted by: Lane | February 21, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
Watch the debate tonight on CNN. Hillary’s gonna make mince meat out of Barry. That’s because he’s good only with speeches. Is he gonna use a teleprompter? lol
Posted by: DMK | February 21, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
I HAVE VOTED MANY TIMES – OUR COUNTRY IS GOING DOWN THE TUBES – IT IS TIME TO BRING THE RESPECT TO THIS GREAT LAND OF OURS. WE DO NOT NEED ANOTHER CLINTON IN OFFICE – THINK BACK TO THE TRAVEL LODGE (DURING THE CLINTON’S), THE BOX OF FILES THAT WAS HIDDEN IN A CLOSET, NOT BRING OUT THE FILES FROM BILL CLINTON’S TERMS, AND IF WE DIDN’T HAVE A CONGRESS THAT STOP HILL IN HER TRACKS SHE WOULD HAVE A HEALTH PLAN IN EFFECT (AND SHE GOT PAID FOR WORKING ON THIS DURING HER HUSBAND’S 1ST TERM). PEOPLE THINK: WE NEED SOMEONE WHO IS GOING TO FIGHT FOR US – IF THEY DON’T – OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE (AFTER THEIR 1ST TERMS – AND SOMEONE ELSE WILL WORK FOR US. REMEMBER IT IS ONLY FOR 4 YEARS – DOESN’T HAVE TO BE 8 YEARS
Posted by: GRANDMOM | February 21, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
American’s are dissatisfied with the way partisan, bitter, dynastic polictics and policies. They are leaving the under 50 crowd feeling disenfranchised about a future of high taxes to pay for the boomer social security, high energy and food costs and a future not as prosperous as their parents.
The under 50 crowd will have to suffer and pay the bills of the boomers. Clinton offers a more dismal view of the future with micro adjustments of policy coming from Mama Clinton. Their rule is Mama knows best!
The solutions to the problems presented are not more of the same, but from the very citizens being governed. Clinton is not offering a vision of greatness and hope for the future. Just take some more of the same medicine and you will feel better. Its time to breakdown the wall of partisanship and dirty politics!
Most of all we need a visionary leader to inspire us to aspire to more! This time its more than the economy, stupid!
Posted by: scott jeffries | February 21, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
Rob MacKay— Well said.
Posted by: Guest | February 21, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
Hey Marie Sue Ann,
AS A HILLARY SUPPORTER YOU KNOW THE SLOGAN.
tHE SAME SLOGAN SHE HAD FOR IRAQ YOU CAN USE IT NOW.
“IF I KNOW NOW………………………………………….”
Posted by: change | February 21, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
Talk about poetic justice! Chelsea Clinton offered up by her parents as a “breakfast date” and now the super delegate is backing Obama! Obviously, the plan to offer up their daughter has backfired on the Clintons. Maybe Clinton should concentrate on what she has to offer-besides her daughter!!!
Posted by: terri | February 21, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
It’s easy to be a Liberal and/or a Democrat when you are still sponsored by mom and dad (or stuck in the swirling vortex, never to escape, of our county’s social welfare system). Start paying taxes, have a family get some real life experience and you will see the error of your ways.
Posted by: firsttimer01 | February 21, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
Hillary08: Look what happen to the “Great Country of Africa” after “White Rule”.
Obama wins Texas and Ohio
Posted by: Lookup | February 21, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
hey,
we know one more thing about the Clintons. PIMP, P-I-M-P
Posted by: change | February 21, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
to my friend Lookup-
Africa is a continent made up of several countries.
Maybe you should LOOK it UP ??
Posted by: free mcclain | February 21, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
Marie SueAnn,
All clinton has to say is I f i knew then what i know today i would never spent money like an idiot
Posted by: change | February 21, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
This is bad. Even Chelsea can’t get a break for her Mom. Almost time to pack it in Hillary/Chelsea. You ran a admirable campaign. Now its time to go home and think about 2012
Posted by: Bob | February 21, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
HILLARY HAS NOTHING NEW TO SAY TONIGHT! SHE IS OLD AND STALE, AND THESE TWO DEBATES WILL BE THE FINAL NAILS IN HER POLITICAL COFFIN!
Posted by: jacobs | February 21, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
Here is rhyme written by my mother, who is white, 87 years old, lives in AZ, earns less than $50,000 a year and does not have a college degree. How’s that for demographics!
Ethel’s Rhyme for the Day
——————————-
ELECT OBAMA
YOUNG,HONEST,SINCERE,AND VITAL
HE’S GOT THE GOODS.
THE QUALITY AND CHARISMA
TO GET THIS COUNTRY
OUT OF THE WOODS
***
For all those millions who have suffered in Iraq, for the hundreds of thousand who have died, for the suffering families of the American service men and women who have died in Iraq because Hillary Clinton and other leaders did not speak out, donate to the Obama campaign today. Obama is reaching a million donations, help him get there, so that we can give our country a fresh start and a new humanistic direction for the 21st Century.
Posted by: maddymappo | February 21, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
Obama wins Ohio and Texas. McCain becomes the next president of the US in November.
Posted by: DMK | February 21, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Hillary08:, free mcclain:, Don’t get mad. Look what happen to the “Great Continent of Africa” after “White Rule”.
My Bad
Obama wins Texas and Ohio
Posted by: Lookup | February 21, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
good luck with that DMK
Posted by: change | February 21, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Hillary-Obama
Whats the difference? It just proves Left-Wing radical socialism can take the form of any gender or race.
Posted by: BB | February 21, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
i am a hillary supporter and if obama is the nominee my vote goes to mccain
Posted by: jutenine | February 21, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
Hillary Clinton will never leave politics. One thing she has accomplished is being the first woman to go this far in a Prez election.
Don’t EVER dream the Clinton’s are down for the count. I’ve seen them get back up swinging so many times. I worked with them when Bill was our Governor.
The Pubs thought they had him so many times. He slipped through that impeachment charade. With almost no scarring or damage to his person.
one thing is for sure Bill and Hill ain’t never going away from public life.
I would bet that Chelsea (A fine young southern woman) will be running for President when she turns 35.
So shut up about it. They will NEVER go away.
I will vote for hillary in November. Every November she run’s for office.Then I will vote for Chelsea.
And my children will vote for her children.
THE CLINTON’S WILL NEVER GO AWAY…
Posted by: free mcclain | February 21, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
jutenine: Good luck with that
Posted by: Lookup | February 21, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
My vote goes to McCain too… There’s no way I am gonna vote for that “wet behind the years” man named Barry Hussein Obama.
Posted by: DMK | February 21, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
Edited Verion: Has anyone read the book by LtCol Robert Patterson, USAF Retired and titled “Dereliction of Duty?” Suggested quick glimse would be Chapter 3, page 59. Read it and then tell us you still want to vote for Clinton.
Posted by: JarHead100 | February 21, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
dear lookup-
thanks for your friendly spirit in these exchanges. I’m particularly stricken with the White’s House comment.
it is very thought provoking
It cuts to the bone.
Posted by: free mcclainf | February 21, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
obama makes me nauseaus its either clinton or mccain
Posted by: jutenine | February 21, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
To get back to the topic we are supposed to be discussing, Chelsea doesn’t seem to have helped her Mom at all. She couldn’t persuade someone this close to her own age, she went off to Hawaii, and that resulted in her mother losing 74% to 24%.
Posted by: Maria S | February 21, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Obama is not the cure he is part of the disease. He is part of the entitled generation. Remember, regardless of whether it is school, healthcare, money or jobs … you owe me. None of the candidates are perfect but the “give me” generation did not, have not, and will not work so you can have a better life. Because everyone owes them and that is all there is to it so don’t fool yourself. Only those who expect to get more vote foolishly those that work for what they have are not so free with their votes.
Also I’m tired of the Independents trying to run away with the democratic candidate position and threaten a revolt if the superdeligates don’t vote their way. Get your own party then you can make the rules.
Posted by: rab | February 21, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
hey Chris-
Maybe i’m playing devil’s advocate-
Maybe I’m flat out lying.
maybe you are an idiot who can’t recognize sartcasm.
Posted by: free mcclain | February 21, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
JAJAJA— . Texas has corners with more population, I mean after all Texas is her last stand. I would have voted for her because she is in touch with reality and the challenges that America faces unlike those republican old farts that would like to practice the same politics of the 60’s. BUT! I will vote for Obama for the simple fact that politics in Washington are not going to change unless the people are more involved. He brings people together and when that happens people start asking questions. Jason, My hats goes off to you, because when I saw the news that you were out on a breakfast with the former first daughter I said -”Disgusting! Politics as usual” You proved me wrong and I am glad you did I saw that as some type of lobbying.
Posted by: Yan Alexander | February 21, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
here by the way are her accomplishments…
1. Establish the Kate Mullany National Historic Site.
2. Support the goals and ideals of Better Hearing and Speech Month.
3. Recognize the Ellis Island Medal of Honor.
4. Name courthouse after Thurgood Marshall.
5. Name courthouse after James L. Watson.
6. Name post office after Jonn A. O’Shea.
7. Designate Aug. 7, 2003, as National Purple Heart Recognition Day.
8. Support the goals and ideals of National Purple Heart Recognition Day.
9. Honor the life and legacy of Alexander Hamilton on the bicentennial of his death.
10. Congratulate the Syracuse Univ. Orange Men’s Lacrosse Team on winning the championship.
11. Congratulate the Le Moyne College Dolphins Men’s Lacrosse Team on winning the championship.
12. Establish the 225th Anniversary of the American Revolution Commemorative Program.
13. Name post office after Sergeant Riayan A. Tejeda.
14. Honor Shirley Chisholm for her service to the nation and express condolences on her death.
15. Honor John J. Downing, Brian Fahey, and Harry Ford, firefighters who lost their lives on duty. Only five of Clinton’s bills are, more substantive.
16. Extend period of unemployment assistance to victims of 9/11.
17. Pay for city projects in response to 9/11
18. Assist landmine victims in other countries.
19. Assist family caregivers in accessing affordable respite care.
20. Designate part of the National Forest System in Puerto Rico as protected in the wilderness preservation system.
There you have it, the fact’s straight from the Senate Record.
Posted by: chris | February 21, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Chris,
Establish, support and recognize are either phone calls or write statements I HARDLY CALL THAT ACOMPLISHMENTS? By the way Barack opposed the war from ay one so i guess we can count that as a accomplishment. JAJAJAJAAAA
Posted by: Yan Alexander | February 21, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
no that is my argument …she has not done anything but that….i am with you
Posted by: chris | February 21, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
The election will not only be stolen by the teamsters but by republicans in crossing party lines to vote for their candidate. All the conservative talk shows are encouraging republican voters to vote for “O”. I think this is why there are super delegates.
Posted by: Ned | February 21, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
HEY YAN – OBAMA VOTED ‘PRESENT’ ON THE WAR VOTE THAN LATER ON WROTE A LETTER OPPOSING IT. READ UP MY FRIENDS – OBAMA VOTED “PRESENT OVER 130 TIMES” CHICKEN LITTLE OF A MAN
Posted by: Frank- South Hampton | February 21, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Yan,
Give the war opposition up. He didn’t get to vote. He was on the sidelines. It’s easy to say now, oh– I was so opposed to the war. He probably had a vision and then told someone else to make it happen or give me the words to express myself. He’s good at that it seems. By the way, copying or paraphrasing without giving credit IS plagairism, even if it’s from a friend. Which I highly suspect covered his Obama’s A__ once it all came out.
Posted by: Hank | February 21, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
YOU THINK THAT IS THE MAKE UP OF A STRONG WOMAN?!?…TO ME A STRONG WOMAN THINKS BETTER OF HER SELF THAN TO STAY WITH A MAN WHO IS WILLING TO THROW AWAY “ALL OF THE YEARS OF MARRIAGE, FIGHTS, LOVES, BAD TIMES, GOOD TIMES – ALL THEY WORKED FOR”…YOUR RIGHT THAT IS HER CHOICE BUT THAT ALSO SAYS SOMETHING ABOUT HER CHARACTER DEEP DOWN INSIDE HER…AND IF YOU ARE TO CLOSE MINDED TO SEE WHAT SHE WAS SAYING WHEN SHE SAID SHE WAS MORE PROUD OF HER COUNTRY THAN SHE EVER HAS BEEN BEFORE PLEASE VOTE FOR HILLARY WASTE YOUR VOTE…
Posted by: chris | February 21, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Remember! Politicians… they’re little more than promises and rhetoric. Here are the “official” stances as of February 1, 2008 (I’m assuming none of the three have flip-flopped as of late) for what it is worth:
Clinton, Obama and McCain oppose ANWR drilling.
All support capital punishment, stem cell research, amnesty & permanent legalization for ILLEGAL aliens & temporary legalization for ILLEGAL aliens, domestic partnerships, and the Patriot Act.
Clinton and Obama oppose educational vouchers, no child left behind and privatizing social security. They support environmental issues, gun control, minimum wage hikes, healthcare reforms, and withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq.
McCain supports educational vouchers, no child left behind and some privatization of social security. He opposes healthcare reform and withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq. He is wishy-washy on environmental issues, gun control, and minimum wage hikes.
Clinton and McCain support NAFTA & CAFTA. Obama is wishy-washy on NAFTA & CAFTA.
As one can tell from these issues, Clinton and Obama differ solely on the NAFTA & CAFTA due to the latter not clarifying his stance.
Posted by: OpusRooster | February 21, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
Brings them together to DO WHAT? That is the question.
Posted by: dc | February 21, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
DORIS…
I ask people the following questions when they say that the republicans are going to eat Obama in the fall.
Are they in position to debate fiscal responsibilities?
Health care?
Foreign Policy?
Inmigration?
Economy?
The republicans have been in power for seven years, has any of these things changed for the better? NO! And McCain wants to continue some of Bushes policy which 70% Americans disapprove SO TELL ME WHO IS GOING TO EAT WHO??? The only way that McCain can defeat Obama it with personal attacks but the American people are too smart for that.
Posted by: Yan Alexander | February 21, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
I am not surprised Barry is winning states… with unhinged supporters like you, everybody will be winning.. I can picture thousands of Obama cult members spending hours each day bashing Hillary and praising the All Mighty Barrack Hussein Obama. I wish we had similar movement for Kerry/Edwards… Well, I guess back then the young people didn’t care that much about voting.. Oprah wasn’t endorsing anyone (there was no one half black)… how sad.
Posted by: DMK | February 21, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
These are the last two paragraphs from George Will’s column today in the Washington Post regarding Hillary and experience.
“She is 60. She left Yale Law School at age 25. Evidently she considers everything she has done since school, from her years at Little Rock’s Rose Law Firm to her good fortune with cattle futures, as presidentially relevant experience.
“The president who came to office with the most glittering array of experiences had served 10 years in the House of Representatives, then became minister to Russia, then served 10 years in the Senate, then four years as secretary of state (during a war that enlarged the nation by 33 percent), then was minister to Britain. Then, in 1856, James Buchanan was elected president and in just one term secured a strong claim to being ranked as America’s worst president. Abraham Lincoln, the inexperienced former one-term congressman, had an easy act to follow.”
Posted by: Mike | February 21, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
DMK I am 22 years old. Young people werent in to politics because we were not hated around the world, our economy was strong and education was better before bushes no child left behind. Our liberties were not threaten. Like Ben Franklin said those who are willing to pay with their liberties for a little bit of security, dont deserve liberty nor security.
Our future is threaten because we are paying for social security which bush has drainned for his own personal agenda.
Is it hard to use common sense??
Posted by: Yan Alexander | February 21, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
I AM NOT SAYING THAT IT IS MY BUSINESS WHAT PEOPLE DO WITH THEIR CHEATING SPOUSES I AM JUST SAYING THAT THE DECISION THEY ULTIMATELY MAKE TELLS YOU ALOT ABOUT THEIR CHARACTER
Posted by: chris | February 21, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
WELL SAID YAN
Posted by: chris | February 21, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
Beware of the TROJAN horse. Have you noticied every politician that preaches “CHANGE” turns out to be a real failure. If you want proof, look at George “W” Bush. In this election there are two choices: Hillary or McCain. Actions do speak louder than words.
Posted by: leon | February 21, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Leon – how many candidates can you name who preach change? Is your observation named on a sample of one?
And not to be picky, but I don’t recall Bush neccesarily preaching change, at least not overtly, other than the line about ‘bringing dignity back to the office.’
Guess he kinda fell short on that one, but that’s a different conversation.
Can you name a single candidate who said, “I’m going to do everything exactly like the last guy did.” I can’t. I suppose that tag could be placed on H.W. Bush, who was running as VP to succeed his boss. But he had his own spin on things, too.
So I guess my point is this. On analysis, I don’t think I agree with the point you seem to be making.
Posted by: Paul | February 21, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
DMK – you really think those are our nation’s two biggest problems – fatness and an inclination to divorce for adulterous oral sex?
That’s an interesting take on things.
Posted by: Paul | February 21, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
I am surprised that the student was behind in his studies. Obama’s followers don’t care about studies, past performance, accomplishments or specifics. This Obama craze reminds me of the “PET ROCK” craze some years back. Every one had to have one of the pet rocks, but once they got the pet rock it was useless, a.k.a. Obama. No qulaifications, little experience, no military, no foreign relations, but a lot of talk…
Posted by: dalton | February 21, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
I AM A HAPPILY MARRIED MAN…AND ME AND MY WIFE BOTH AGREE THAT THAT IS THE ULTIMATE BETRAYAL IN A MARRIAGE…IF THEY DO IT ONCE IT WILL ALWAYS BE IN THE BACK OF YOUR MIND SO YOUR RELATIONSHIP WILL NEVER BE A TOTALLY TRUSTWORTHY RELATIONSHIP ….ANYONE WHO SAYS DIFFERENT IS LYING TO THEMSELVES OR THEY ARE IN AN OPEN RELATIONSHIP WHICH IS ALSO FINE IF BOTH PARTIES AGREE….THIS IS NOT A DISCUSSION OF CHEATING BUT IT IS ONE OF CHARACTER
Posted by: chris | February 21, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Leon… That’s right Experience and more experience. Putting the same players in different chairs won’t get you different results. Bush did not have the credentials to get in to the white house. The popular vote didn’t want him in the white house. Everyone was with him when he went to Afghanistan, Allot of people were still behind him when he went in to Iraq including Hillary! Where he went extremely wrong is when he couldn’t admit that he was wrong. Our support started going down for him, when we noticed that he was fulfilling his personal Oily agenda rather than the country’s best interest. IF EXPERIENCE IS WHAT SHOULD GET YOU ELECTED, WHEN DO WE VOTE FOR CHELSEA CLINTON? I MEAN AFTER ALL SHE’S GOT 27 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE. (Most of them as a first daughter, and just like the first lady that’s an unelected position which you actions don’t carry any consequences, but SHSHS!!! You didn’t hear that from me.)
Posted by: Yan Alexander | February 21, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
I SEE IT AS HER SEEING HER-SELF BEING WEAK WITHOUT HIM….WHICH SHE WOULD BE…
Posted by: chris | February 21, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
Yan: I guess you like a politician that has a 17 year relationship with an underworld figure, like Resko. What about his start in politics, thanks to Resko/mideast money. The very home Obama lives in, a gift from Resko, what a warm and fuzzy feeling. Maybe you like his words, oops, the words he stold from others. A man is as good as his word…
Posted by: leon | February 21, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
LEON:
Like I stated in the previous comment, the democrats are not perfect but they seem to be in touch with the 21st century. If you want to talk about the early stages of these politicians here we go. McCain graduated 5th from the bottom at Annapolis, His friends described him as a guy who was wreck less and couldn’t keep his d!ck inside his pants. Have you heard about the Keating 5? Although I am skeptical about the story in the New York Times I wouldn’t be surprised. He has criticized the cozy ties between lawmakers and lobbyists, but is relying on corporate lobbyists to donate their time running his presidential race and recently hired a lobbyist to run his Senate office. You cant make this $h!t up look at the facts make some phone calls. Government phone numbers are public. Obama is where he is because WE the people. And is he used Deval’s word. So what? no one remembers Kennedys writters who wrote the famous line “ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country.” and how many times has that phrase been used by other politicians? that was a desperate gasp for air by the clinton campaign.
Posted by: Yan Alexander | February 21, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Can you say Plagairism? It is wrong. Most people who quote JFK in official remarks GIVE him credit. Obama is big on words and speeches. It’s a hugh part of his appeal. To find out the words are not his, like we were led to believe, makes him less appealing to me.
Posted by: pc | February 21, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
holy crap thats a surprise.
ask him to unite the party , he has only split the dem party so wide that they have already lost the national election.
Posted by: Obamaslaba | February 21, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
I agree. I’m a young voter. You want to know some of the bills Barack’s sponsored that I like? Here:
-Coburn-Obama Government Transparency Act of 2006
-The Lugar-Obama Nuclear Non-proliferation and Conventional Weapons Threat Reduction Act
-The 2007 Government Ethics Bill
-The Protection Against Excessive Executive Compensation Bill
His positions have been given ad nauseum on a thousand message boards and yet people persist in claiming that he has no positions and that young people wouldn’t know what they were if he did. He does and we do know them. But whenever we list them we’re greeted with silence.
By the way, yes, the fact that he supports change and was smart enough to be against the Iraq War ARE a good enough reason for any discerning person to vote for him. You don’t have to, but you can’t persist in saying he’s all hot air and there’s no reason anyone likes him. If it hadn’t been for him having the judgement and guts to oppose the war he’d be NOWHERE right now.
Posted by: john | February 21, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
Abraham Lincoln had one term in Congress before he became President.
So let’s just forget the stupid “experience” argument, shall we?
Intelligence is more important. Obama is a Constitutional Law scholar. We could really use one of those right about now in the WH.
Posted by: rchrd_grace | February 21, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
Hillary wishes to be a “xerox” of Obama..? Hillary’s joke did not take off and you could see in her face that she was sorry that she said that. This type of details is what brings her down. “Xerox” will be the topic with Jay Leno tonight.
Posted by: glo | February 21, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
Chelsea was sent to convince the younger delegates. Worse is that there were no takers.
Chelsea might be the asset that Hillary needs so keeping her away from the press is a mistake…unless Chelsea speaks just like Bill.
Posted by: GLO | February 21, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
After seeing the debate, there are not too many differences between the two candidates. It is a matter of approach and results.
Hillary is intimidating, Obama is inspirational; Hillary is a “xerox” of the old establishment, Obama represents a the change. It is clear that Hillary will divide, Obama will unite the nation.
Obama makes sense for democrats in Texas, Pennsylvania and other states that still need to vote.
Posted by: GLO | February 21, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
YOU CAN SAY ALL THE NEGATIVE REMARKS YOU WANT ABOUT HILLARY BUT THE FACT REMAINS IF SHE IS NOT THE NOMINEE THERE GOES THE DEMOCRATS CHANCE FOR THE WHITE HOUSE, i CANNOT BELEIVE THAT SOMEONE LIKE JASON COULD BE A SUPERDELEGATE, THE WAY HE DESCRIBED HIS METHOD OF CHOOSING A CANDIDATE SHOWS HOW IMMATURE AND WET BEHIND THE EARS HE IS ANY SO MANY MORE OF YOU YOUNG PEOPLE GOING ALONG WITH HUSSEIN OBAMA BELEIVING ALL THIS CRAP ABOUT HIM, IT REMINDS OF SOME FOLLOWERS OF RAP STARS OR SOMEOTHER IDIOT ON A STAGE, WAKE UP YOUNG PEOPLE AND REALLY TAKE A SERIOUS MOMENT TO LOOK AT THE BIG PICTURE.
Posted by: ALFONSO | February 22, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
Everything that Obama claims to wants to do (his capablities are unproven as of yet), Hillary has already been doing for years and has the experience under her belt to do it better.
Give Obama some time and he’ll make some mistakes. He hasn’t even been around the block enough times to have mistakes under his belt. No battle scars. A rookie. First time out.
Why is it necessarily good to vote for someone just because they motivate young people to vote? I think the better logic would be to assess if someone can do the job.
This country is going through a classic 16-year-old crush. The presidency is not a soap opera or a romance novel. It is a job. Not a job for a rookie or an intern, but for a real pro like Hillary.
Posted by: David | February 23, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
If Hillary steals the Nomination, she will be on her way to the Presidency and America is in trouble. We will be suject to her constant whining, emotional hate-bate-ing, and shameless manipulations. Hillary is for Hillary. Right now, she is for whomever will vote on her. Her platform changes like the wind, according to whatever group she is trying to appease.
Don’t be surprised if we see Hillary with a hardhat on in one of her PA speeches, as she is now attempting to secure lunch-box, blue collar White voters, who she sometimes appeals to…Barack Obama having large/heavy support from middle-class and upper-middle class White voters.
Hillary has run a weak, pathetic campaign, which has been bankrupt not just in January, when she had to loan her own campaign money, but in so many ways, i.e. central message, agenda, motto, etc. How can a woman, who cannot manage her own pres. campaign be expected to run this great country and the U.S. economy? What a scary thought.
Hillary has put women back 20 years, by not focusing on the issues, or securing a solid message, but by cat-scratching at her opponent with frivolous straw-grabing allegations, that really in the sceme of things are fruitless. Not stable enough to fight squarely, she has resorted to crying, whining, temper tantrums, sarcastic comments. Everything that a woman should not display, if she is trying to convince America that she is strong enough to be President. The fact is, Hillary is not.
God help us if she is made Commander and Chief….foreign countries will see her as a very weak link. We need a President who is innately strong. This sometimes a strong/bully, sometimes a weak/victim/damsel in distress, that Hillary Clinton pulls frequently, is sickening!
Posted by: Mica | March 14, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm