By Jaketapper

Mar 22, 2008 10:58am

Carville Equates Richardson With Judas

In the New York Times today, Clintonista James Carville calls Bill Richardson’s endorsement of Obama "an act of betrayal."

“Mr. Richardson’s endorsement came right around the anniversary of the day when Judas sold out for 30 pieces of silver, so I think the timing is appropriate, if ironic,” Carville said.

So in Mr. Carville’s view on this Easter weeend, Richardson is Judas Iscariot, Obama is Caiaphas, and Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, is …..?

- jpt

User Comments

Awesome Carville…..yes Richardson became Judas….for VP spot
Obama campaign is defensive…that is why they started talking about Clinton’s character…..
Vanessa…you know better….dont you

Posted by: MattOhio-MI-FL-Messenger | March 22, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

Wow — I finally agree with something Carville said!

Posted by: Surelock Homes | March 22, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am

Oh baby, it’s on. The civil war just started and you can thank Bill Richardson for shooting the first shot. Hillary Clinton is leading in the national polls and is about to blow Obama out in Pennsylvania and she needs to get out of the race according to Richardson ? He wants to unify the party by stabbing the Clintons in the back.
I say hell no. This game is not over. This war has just begun. The Clintons have done enormous good for this party and this is the way they get paid back. I don’t think so. This just went from a political race to a bar brawl. My money is on the Clintons.

Posted by: Charles | March 22, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

I would never vote for a campaign this gross…Carville, Bill, all of them …
The establishment…old “boys’ network (and yes, Hillary is part of that network)… of the party needs to be removed. This regime has to pass… it has been 15 years of their crap and their self-serving choices and values putting us here against the Republicans.
…and they need to go for good.

Posted by: dl | March 22, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am

HAHAHA…this is coming from the guy who told the republicans that kerry was going to concede.
umm…i also thought hillary’s position on superdelegates was that they should exercise their own judgment. LOLLLL

Posted by: justin | March 22, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

Gotta love James!

Posted by: Nina | March 22, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

Interesting how Obama’s campaign has gone so negative during Easter week, turned a lot of people off. Once the speech was over, he hasn’t exactly had his campaign preach love and unity this week with the personal attacks on Sen. Clinton. And yes, Carville just pointed out what had already struck a lot of people about Judas….just bad timing on Richardson’s part I guess. I think he will regret doing this endorsement later, even if Obama does get the nomination.

Posted by: DWC | March 22, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

I think those going against Hillary and Bill now are just disgusting! Shows their real character–”two-faced” and “users”! It’s obvious they are wishing for a high level position should Mr. Obama win the nomination for the Democrats. Shame on them!
Go James Carville!!!

Posted by: barbara | March 22, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

I wish people like Carville here would stop confusing “coincidence” with “ironic”.
They just make themselves appear extremely uneducated.

Posted by: BC | March 22, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

Judas?
That’s funny
Uhm, which candidate is selling us out to the republicans? Which candidate referred to McCain as passing the threshold and which candidate inferred McCain was more patiotic than the leading candidate in their own party.
This is about the Clinton’s not caring about anything that doesn’t advance the Clintons
I am disgusted by Carville’s comments.

Posted by: dl | March 22, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Carville hit this one right on. The O camp is wishing, but it’s not over by a long shot.

Posted by: Boomer | March 22, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

I love it the childish wanna be’s are showing their true colors! Don’t vote for the best candidate or go with the will of the people VOTE FOR YOUR FRIENDS ..POLITICS AS USUAL in the Clinton Camp!

Posted by: Sam | March 22, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am

I question about Richardson’s royalty
and judgement.

Posted by: Ted | March 22, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

Obama throwing people under the bus? ROTFLMAO After the 3 Clinton lies of just yesterday you want to talk about throwing someone under the bus???? HILLARY THREW ALL OF HER SUPPORTERS UNDER THE BUS WHEN SHE LIED TO THEM AND THE AMERICAN PUBLIC!

Posted by: Sam | March 22, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

I would have thought Carville would have saved the comparison for when Gore ends up endorsing Obama. What is he going to use then?

Posted by: MMMMom | March 22, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

Richardson can vote for whomever he wants. Carville is just another bitter Clinton supporter, much like MattOhio.

Posted by: EastInlandMessenger | March 22, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

And Clinton sold us out when he could not keep his pecker in his pants. When having an orgasm is more important than the business of the country, you get back exactly what you sow (does that sound familiar?).

Posted by: crank | March 22, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

Dream on about Fox and McCain…you guys will be lucky if McCain REMEMBERS there an election in November :)

Posted by: Sam | March 22, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am

nana m. – I don’t think McCain can pull it off. His 100 year in Iraq comment will be played over and over superimposed with all of the amputees, brain-injured soldiers, dead soldiers, and dead Iraqis. The simple fact that Obama stood against this intervention will propel him easily past McCain. Just my prediction. I personally will vote for that antiwar fiscal conservative Ron Paul, but if Obama can get his socialized-spending platform under control, I won’t mind him getting the top job.

Posted by: eastinlandmessenger | March 22, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am

McCain cannot even travel alone as he has very real issues with age and memory. Without Joe to hold him the last week he would have become a laughing stock on the world stage and it’s a long time to November folks and McCain is aging as we speak. Beat a young candidate that the party will get behind? Not happening. Heck the majority of Republicans didn’t want McCain LOL WHY would a majority?

Posted by: Brian | March 22, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am

So much for the Hillary camp respecting the basic principles of democracy, such as the freedom of political preferences and the right to choose.

Posted by: John Z | March 22, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

Awesome nana.m!!!! well said

Posted by: MattOhio-MI-FL-Messenger | March 22, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am

MattOhio-MI-FL-Messenger – First of all we like Richardson out here in NM, and he has represented our country well on the world stage so Carville is, I repeat, a bitter Clinton supporter.
I do agree that Obama has collected some rubbish. If Ted Kennedy came to support me, I would tell him to get lost.

Posted by: eastinlandmessenger | March 22, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am

bill stated that his wife and McCain loved America, not Obama.. that’s nuts hillary does not love America or she wouldn’t be doing what she is doing in this campaign. hillary only love is for her own HUGE ego.

Posted by: anniec | March 22, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am

The rest of Hillary’s 2008 race is a myth, deception and revenge. Unfortunately, that is not what Party politics is all about. Even if there were re-votes in FL and MI, she would not have won the nomination. She currently needs at least 64% of the remaining pledged delegates. It is an insurmountable task to achieve. She has never won 5 races in a row. She is expected to LOSE in NC and Oregon but WIN in West Virginia, PA and Kentucky.
In terms of popular votes, she is 700,000 votes shy. The highest popular votes she has so far received were in New York and Arkansas. Even if she had the most popular votes, it would not matter. The first tie-breaker in the nomination process is the number of pledged delegates. Unless a candidate is caught with under garments down or dies, the Super delegates will simply award nomination to the candidate who has the most pledged delegates. Nancy Pelosi, the 2008 DNC Convention Chair has recently re-emphasized this point. What else does she need to know?
Hillary is not staying in the race because she is a fighter but to repay her financial losses and to vent out her anger against a wrong party which is her own. At the end of February, her debts were nearly $9 million. As a result, she has nearly doubled the volume of e-mail solicitations, showcases her Web site more at events and intensified online advertisements asking for small contributions.
Hillary needs to have an exit strategy after the PA primary especially, if she fails to win by 64%. Her current strategy is not good for her personally or her party. She has so far ruined the possibility for a Dream team. And she is diminishing possibilities for future presidential runs. She needs to blame the Republican Party which over the years has ruined her public image and creditability. Mostly it is a payback for her departure from the Republican Party, in her early political life.
She is in serious need of help to overcome her nomination failure. This is where her peers including Bill Clinton are to step in and offer confidential counseling to heal her wounds and boost her morale. Bill should give precedence to the party that gave him presidency twice than the selfish ego of his wife. Hillary is seasoned politician but she has recently been very reckless in her trade. The cause of Hillary’s failure is not her gender, the Democratic Party or Barack Obama but her lifetime political involvement that created a major machinery against Hillary.

Posted by: jesse | March 22, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am

Go James, go Hillary, take it to the floor.

Posted by: Jacko | March 22, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

What a sellout!! This is the reason majority of Americans don’t trust Democrats with the presidency. They will sell out their own in a heart beat if there’s something in it for them.
BTW, I am a democrat leaning independent but will vote for McCain if Obama is the nominee.

Posted by: Mahesh | March 22, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

Bill Richardson stood up for positivity and America’s promise. He stood up finally for the way this pastor crap has been thrown around…
He stood up for Barack because that is the America he wants to live in. No more games carville…no more Clinton twists and scandals…no more Republican scare tactics…. no more twisting what America really stands for…
What is more American than someone can sit through Sunday services and come out still and take the good without the bad. Across America the proudest moments of what this country is…
The conservative catholic person understanding that gay people are not an abomination.
The woman in a church that subtly reinforces women should be second who goes out and marches for women’s rights.
The parish that understands their Vietnam Vet pastor’s anger when he swears at his country for not taking care of their heroes.
The parent that accepts their child or their child’s spouse in the face of their own childhood teachings.
America needs to stand up and be the America that we dream about… America needs to get out from behind the people who have been driving us down this road for so long.
It is time to change… it is time for us to overcome these tactics.

Posted by: dl | March 22, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

Again you don’t get it people. It won’t go to the floor. What do you think Clinton is soing at home this week end? Get ready for an anouncement. Even if she continues it won’t go to the floor. The Dems won’t let that happen. What kool aid are you drinking? That would be handing it to McCain and everyone except Hillary knows it.

Posted by: Brian | March 22, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am

nana – You need to take the focus off the pastor and put it on the fact that Clinton is in bed with all of the special interests. Clinton can not govern in an impartial way that will be best for the people of this country. To make policy based on who gives you the most money is a conflict of interest that will be extremely detrimental. Obama’s pastor has no bearing on what policies Obama would foster. Obama is his own man, and can make his own grownup decisions on what is best. He has denounced many of his pastor’s views, and that is good enough for me.

Posted by: eastinlandmessenger | March 22, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am

Can anybody tell me any significant difference between Obama and Clinton on any *REAL* issue. Seems to me that their fanatics are basing everything on promise and emotion and don’t have a clue about distinctions in policy.
Don’t you wonder whether, if elected, they would have a different policy from Bush regarding the Palestinians, the North Koreans, Venezuela? What are the specific details in their differences in NAFTA? Etc? You dems are getting agitated about mush!
Two peas in a pod.

Posted by: Surelock Homes | March 22, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am

I have to agree with Vanessa. If Bill Richardson’s endorsement of Obama is so insignificant why does it sting so much that Carvelle has to characterize him as Judas.
I have been paying close interest in the campaign. It is so interesting that many of Hillary Clinton’s supporters have confessed indebted to the Clintons because of personal friendships or career growth opportunity; yet they confess that Obama is very appealing and seems poised to move America forward in significant ways. Bill Richardson like congressman John Lewis of Georgia have expressed how gut wrenching their decision making had been. I takes great courage and fortitude to make such a decision. It is that type of inner strength that places the interest of the nation above personal that bodes well for the United States. It is quite cynical to think that there was some personal quid pro quo in this endorsement.

Posted by: Euclid | March 22, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

pastor, pastor, pastor…. past HER!

Posted by: J Robinson | March 22, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

eastinlandmessenger
you miss the point always….it is not about educated people….it is about calling people uneducated….it is not right…it is not decent…..
yeah PhD is admirable of course….

Posted by: MattOhio-MI-FL-Messenger | March 22, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

I lve you James!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Right as usual.

Posted by: fedup | March 22, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

Eastie
here is a piece of junk that you wrote….is it facts or your paranoia?
what happened to the $250,000 that Obama got from Rezko? Would that count as special interest? Do you read the news? Can you impartially judge Obama flip-flops?
Eastie said:
“You need to take the focus off the pastor and put it on the fact that Clinton is in bed with all of the special interests. Clinton can not govern in an impartial way that will be best for the people of this country. ”
BTW…I am employed by a big corporation legally……are you paid by Obama?

Posted by: MattOhio-MI-FL-Messenger | March 22, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

I hope Richardson will demand a public apology from Carville. He is a christian, therefore comparing him explicitly to Judas is a grave insult.
After Penn’s hypocrisy in dismissing the importance of the Richardson endorsement (that has been BEGGED for by both Clintons till a week ago) and after Carville’s low life insult, it tell American something about the spirit of the Clinton campaign.

Posted by: Harriet | March 22, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

The only good thing about BHO winning the nomination and loosing, as he will, in November, is that we would be DONE WITH HIM. The party would not run a looser from one election in the next election cycle.

Posted by: fedup | March 22, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

Obama loses more ground today. The new Rasmussen poll is out. Hillary is up +2. Richardson was a wash. Not even a blip. She has gained +6 in one week. How’s that !

Posted by: Charles | March 22, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

eastinlandmessenger-What in the world do you think the media and BHO people have done relentlessly and venemously since day one of her candidacy? The nasty diatribes regarding her and Bill,are horrendous. It has been a cake walk for BHO.

Posted by: fedup | March 22, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

MattOhio-MI-FL-Messenger – I don’t think what I wrote is off the mark. I am also not employed by the Obama campaign. I work at a national laboratory doing things that would be inappropriate for me to talk about. I have a Ron Paul sign in my yard, and I ran for a delegate position out here in NM. All of what I have said is an honest reflection of what I believe. I write nothing in order to deceive. Since I am a Paul supporter, I do not take a rabid interest on who wins between Clinton or Obama. I just think Clinton has always been corrupt, and I don’t believe that she is to be trusted. Like I said if Obama becomes more fiscally conservative, he could be an excellent president.

Posted by: eastinlandmessenger | March 22, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

First we have Mr. Obama throwing his gradmonther under the bus to protect his racist and american hating preacher now we are surprised that his new friend Richardson would do the same thing to Bill Clinton. No if Obama is willing to sacrifice his own grandmother should we be surprised that Richardson would wait and see which way the political winds are blowing and throw Bill Clinton under the bus for his life long dream to be VP. Like Truman said if you want a friend in Washington get yourself a dog.

Posted by: That'snotwhatImeant | March 22, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

fedup – I agree the media has been harsh on Clinton, but not without reason. They were harsh on my candidate too.

Posted by: eastinlandmessenger | March 22, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

Carville’s likening Richardson to Judas Iscariot is outrageous, and frankly, sacriligious. Perhaps he thought he was making a clever comparison, but he showed his own contempt for a principled politician’s decision. Richardson should press for an apology, as should the people of New Mexico. Carville stepped in it, and I hope this comes back on him hard.

Posted by: jon in maryland | March 22, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

I REPEAT:
The only good thing about BHO winning the nomination and loosing, as he will, in November, is that we would be DONE WITH HIM. The party would not run a looser from one election in the next election cycle.

Posted by: fedup | March 22, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Just brilliant, James Carville. I have been saying all along that the Clintons value loyalty and blind obedience above all else, just like the Shrub currently occupying the White House does. Thank you for so openly demonstrating my point.
Just say no to arrogance in government. Just say no to political dynasties. Just say no to Hillary.

Posted by: Jill | March 22, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

jon in Maryland,
I agree about the sacrilege. I’d really like to know which one of the two horrors named Clinton he’s comparing to Jesus.

Posted by: Jill | March 22, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

Seems like Obama has promised the VP spot to an awful lot of people.

Posted by: s.b. | March 22, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

yeah, felicia, because loyalty over doing what you think is right is better?? Haven’t we had enough of that with Bush/Cheney/Scooter/Brownie?

Posted by: Jill | March 22, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

I was thinking how to desceibe Ricardson.
Carville put it right.
Bill Richardson = Judas

Posted by: Jkan | March 22, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

Carville is not helping Hillary by calling other people names. Instead he is sinking her.
The rest of the undecided delegates do not like to this happening in the Party.
Remember Sir Carville, there is no favor for unwanted attacks.

Posted by: Peace | March 22, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Richardson did not follow the choice of his constituents. A member of the OL BOYS CLUB, like Jake.

Posted by: maria | March 22, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

I think that Richardson is the only man with guts and integrity to stand up and do what is best for the Democratic Party.
It was very hard to “go against the grain”
and endorse Obama, even though the Clintons helped him in office.
If we had more politicians who were willing to do that, regardless of personal favors we might have a lot more integrity in government.

Posted by: TRA | March 22, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

So if its ok for BR to go against his states vote than BO supporters should have no problem when states that BO won are turned over by the super delagates right?
You cant have it both ways guys if BR and others can vote at will so can the supers

Posted by: Betty | March 22, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Kerry and Kennedy did not follow their constituents either.

Posted by: fedup | March 22, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

CARVILLE is a LOSER and so is Hillary. She is embarassing herself by staying in the race. She has no self respect.

Posted by: Chris | March 22, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

TRA-going against the grain????? The media has been telling Clinton to stop running…BR just joined the grain.

Posted by: fedup | March 22, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

James Carville calls Bill Richardson “Judas.”
I call him Benedict Bill.

Posted by: Ken | March 22, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

To those of whom object to the comparison to “Judas”, take a look at thisfrom McPeak, Obama’s current campaign co-chair:
Tony McPeak, a retired Air Force general and current co-chair of Obama’s presidential campaign, compared former President Bill Clinton to Joseph McCarthy Friday in response to comments Clinton made earlier in the day that appeared to question Obama’s patriotism.
“It sounds more like McCarthy,” McPeak said. “I grew up, I was going to college when Joe McCarthy was accusing good Americans of being traitors, so I’ve had enough of it.”

Posted by: marie | March 22, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

dl
It’s not only about his pastor, it shows Obama for what he is an idiot. I do not think it takes a rocket scientist to figure out that if you are running for President, that he had to get away from that minister like a bat out of hell. Now he is telling us to talk about race, that will divide the country more.

Posted by: David | March 22, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

Since all the Obama supporters are Ok with Richardsons edorsement then they should be ok if Hillary chooses not to endorse Obama. Remember he said he could get her people but she could not get his. Well lets see him get working class voters in OH,PA, this fall. After the way they continue to beat up on Bill and Hillary calling them racist to McCarthy I have decided to do something I have never done my entire life and that is to vote for John McCain. Like Popeye says ” I stands all me can stands and me can’t stands no more.” This is one democract that Obama will not get this November and I don’t think that I will be alone!

Posted by: That'snotwhatImeant | March 22, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

Why should Hillary stop running? She has EVERY right to stay in the race to make sure she would pick up the pieces while Obama campaign keeps self-destructing and eventually implodes. She is a fighter and by winning Pennsilvania and moving ahead in the polls against Obama and McCain, she would prove superdelegates Obama IS NOT the right nominee for GE.
Give ‘em hell Hillary!

Posted by: Josh | March 22, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

Done with the Dems wrote:
McGoven…Carter…Kenneday…Mondale…Dukakis…Gore…Kerry…Obama/BR.
Q: What do these idiots all have in common?
TOUCHE!! LOL

Posted by: marie | March 22, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

I absolutely agree with Josh here. Why the heck should Hillary pull out? Obama is sinking because of Rev. Wright, especially with the blue collar/working class voter. Rezko is far from over!! No matter what position you take on Hillary now, if Obama goes down the tubes, she is our ace in the hole against the Republicans. Just from a strategic standpoint as a Democrat, you need her as a safeguard. She should stay in the race for as long as she can.

Posted by: marie | March 22, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Hmm, 30 pieces of silver! How much is that in today’s money?

Posted by: donbier44 | March 22, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Ron, do you really want to go there?? Two words:
LARRY SINCLAIR
I thought I would never utter them.
See how silly this can get??

Posted by: marie | March 22, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

donbier44:
30 pieces of silver in today’s market equals Richardson’s half million dollar campaign debt.

Posted by: marie | March 22, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Marie: I second that! Bill Clinton led this party out of the political wilderness now Obama and Kennedy, Kerry and company what to lead us back in. Sorry this time I will not follow. This party is becoming the party of the intelectual elite and the radical left and that is the party that McGovern led and now Obama. Like Regan once said I did not leave the Democratic party the party left me. I am tired of belonging to a party that associates itself with the hate america first and government will solve all your problems.

Posted by: That'snotwhatImeant | March 22, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Ron,
That is a patently false statement. Carville is a man rich beyond our comparison. The last campaign he supported was the 1992 campaign, where he established himself as a legend. I would be careful attempting to trample on Carville’s name. The allegiances with the party’s base run deep. Richardson has managed to affiliate himself with the likes of John Kerry and Chris Dodd, both wannabes who are actually trying to suck up to Obama for future appointment positioning. Sorry, as much as I like Richardson, he made a bad call.
========================================
COUNT Michigan and Florida!!
If you don’t, then don’t count on them!!
========================================

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 22, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Signing off for the Weekend. To those who celebrate Easter, Happy Easter. To those who do not, take a break; enjoy your friends and family. Try not to talk politics.

Posted by: marie | March 22, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

First I was a bit disappointed by Bill Richardson’s decision, but now that I heard Mr. Carville’s great insult to a brave and very respectable hispanic politician, I will no longer support Hillary’s campaign . Instead I will follow Richardson, and I’m very sure that many Latinos will do the same after this insult that is very grave for catholic people.
There is something very wrong with the people Hillary surrounded herself in this campaign, and I’m afraid now that would be same should she become President. Why are they so rude and so stupid? And hasn’t Hillary immediately condemned this insult?

Posted by: Rosa | March 22, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

Rev. Wrights’ comments were all over the news this morning. This story is not going away, because there are more videos out there. The problem that Obama has with Rev. Wright is that he did not have the judgement to dis-associate himself from this church. He obviously knew that there was a problem with Rev. Wright, since he dis-invited him from his opening of his campaign in Springfield, IL in 2007. Once these videos were reported on, Obama went on MSNBC, FOX and CNN on Friday, 3/14 and stated that he did not know about these sermons, that he had not been in the pew when these sermons were given, and had he known about these sermons, he would have left the church. Then in his speech he changed his position. So, did he lie on 3/14 when he went on three separate cable news channels and stated that he did not know, and was not in the pews? Obama does give a good speech. Everybody knows (even so called un-intelligent working class people that Obama’s people are always attacking) that it is much easier to give a speech when you’ve worked on it for four days, than it is to answer questions in an interview (or in a debate). What is the subject with many voters is Obama’s judgment. He has shown his poor judgment with his association with Rev. Wright and with REZKO.

Posted by: svsolis | March 22, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

Well, I guess we are calling this a “betrayal” but what about other Clinton superdelegates defecting to Obama? Are they Judases too?
I’ll tell you this: if Richardson’s endorsement was so “insignificant” and “late” and “powerless” then no one would be upset–he wouldn’t be a Judas.
The hubbub only proves the significance of BR’s choice to support Obama. They were counting on Richardson and would have lauded him for giving his support. You don’t hear any bellyaching from Obama because of the many black supporters of Clinton–though they are having a tough time deciding.
And as you are reporting, Jake, Clinton is wooing the superdelegates on a platform of whether Obama can win or not–she is playing to their fears. She doesn’t care about loyalty when people are loyal to someone else–why should she fret when one of hers has been wooed away?

Posted by: Jerome | March 22, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

I’m really surprised by all the anti-Obama posts. The speech he gave is historical. Race is still a divisive issue in this country. Just look at the disproportionate amount of blacks in our prison system. My grandfather and father were from the south and blamed blacks for everything going wrong. Communities are still segregated though not by law. I had a white friend tell me she was afraid to go to Montgomery, Alabama because of all the blacks there. Obama happens to be white and black. He grew up in a white family. His grandparents basically raised him while his white mother was in Indonesia doing micro credit for poor people. Wright’s sermons need to be watched in their full context, not the snippets being shown. I happen to agree with him that our foreign policy has certainly not made us many friends. Violence begets violence. Richardson is just doing what many did in Jesus’ time; seeing truth and following it.

Posted by: Cindy | March 22, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

No, Hillary Clinton will not give up. The Democratic nominee will most likely be decided in August unless Obama drops out.
Or, perhaps American voters will see Senator Clinton and Senator Obama still running against John McCain and Ralph Nader in November.
At any rate, the Judas move by Bill Richardson against the will of New Mexico Democrats should not surprise anyone.
The same disregard for voter preference has characterized much of the Obama support including the most liberal of liberals Ted Kennedy and John Kerry.
Richardson represents just one more illegitimate part of Barak Obama’s campaign to seize the Democratic nomination.
No one should be surprised.

Posted by: Ken | March 22, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

Felicia,
OK, but to call it a betrayal?
Anyway, I disagree with you about endorsements dividing the party. At this point, Hillary can’t make up the difference in vote and elected delegates. Everybody who has analyzed the math of it knows that Hillary would have to win by huge margins all remaining contests just to break even. Obama will end up with more elected delegates and likely more popular vote, too.
So what is left is for the party to either embrace Obama, who is in the lead with voters, or get behind Hillary and say she’s more electable if that’s what they think. I really don’t think the superdelegates will get behind Hillary if she hasn’t won the vote and the delegates. THAT would divide the party, no matter how much Hillary supporters, who demand she get the nomination even without winning the delegates, claim they will run to John McCain. If they want to vote against their economic self-interest, then they will get the president they deserve. But somehow I don’t see all those Rust Belt blue collar types running to John “Free Trade” McCain.

Posted by: Jill | March 22, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

The effect of Obama and his surrogates to get out of the race or its over is to inevitably tick the people off in states yet to vote that haven’t been able to have their votes matter in a nomination in decades. They like having their votes matter.
The more Richardson tells Clinton she should get out of the race, the more voters she gets in Pennsylvania.

Posted by: s.b. | March 22, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

Clintons to the White House.
Obamas to the Wright House.

Posted by: Ken | March 22, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

God Bless you Mr. Carville. You are so right. I agree with you 100%. I have been a life long democrat but will not vote for Obama. He has run a dirty, mean-spirited nasty, un-American campaign, which shows his true character. The Kennedy’s, Pelosi’s, Richardsons, Kerry’s, Dashcle’s, media (who are secretly helping the Republicans by propping up Obama), etc. are so dumb to hook up with such a person. Hillary was the best candidate and they have taken it away from her and they will pay for their stupidness, as I will either vote for McCain or not vote at all if Obama is the nominee

Posted by: Doreen, Buffalo Grove, IL | March 22, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Sorry the effect of Obama and his surrogates telling Clinton to get out of the race…….

Posted by: s.b. | March 22, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Hillary won his state. He said super-delegates should vote the way their state voted. If Bill Clinton had not given him the opportunity to serve in his cabinet Bill Richardson would not be the N.M. Gov. I would say he is a Judas.

Posted by: Tina D | March 22, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

Let Bill Richardson answer in his own words please:
Gov. Bill Richardson told the New York Times in February that a superdelegate’s vote “should reflect the vote of my state, it should represent the vote of my constituency. It shouldn’t be because you’re a fund-raiser or a big-shot delegate. Superdelegates should reflect their state or constituency. If superdelegates decide this nomination, it’s going to look like big-shot politicians and fat-cats decided who should be president.”

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 22, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

Note to James Carvile and “the Clinton’s”:
The world does not revolve around you. This election is about AMERICA, not you and your “feelings”. Please get over yourself.

Posted by: Nobodys fool | March 22, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

Who is Larry Sinclair?

Posted by: Tina D | March 22, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Stacy-Wright Stacy. Bill Richardson is no Judas. Judas for his wrongs at least had the decency to HANG himself.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 22, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

I think James Carville’s point was that Bill Richardson has materially and politically benefited because of the Clinton’s. Bill Richardson served at the pleasure of Bill Clinton.
Bill Richardson’s endorsement of Obama is a manifestation of disloyalty towards a family that, right or wrong, has provided him with many opportunities.
In the end, I suspect that Bill Richardson will end up more like Pontius Pilot — just another despised Governor in a remote land.

Posted by: Disenfranchised | March 22, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Do you feel Barack is not qualified to run for president? Should he be our next USA President? Ask yourself do you have the qualifications to run? If so, why don’t you make a difference for your country? You still have time as it’s never too late to run as an Independent. Or why can’t you encourage a more respective candidate to run? If Hillary has 35 years of experience, what is the problem? Why do you all have to degrade yourself to promote her credential. If she has this superb record, I doubt little Barack Obama should have any affect on her candidacy. Why is she behind in the polls, delegates, mis-managed campaign funds? Some people just continue to blame their mistakes on others. Misery loves company!!! That is a fact, just from reading all these excuses from Hillary’s supporters.

Posted by: valerie | March 22, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

I completelly agree, Richardson has no values, he is an opportunistic person. shame!
As a Latina, I will never vote for Obama, I don’t care if Richardson endorsed him.

Posted by: pat | March 22, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

Nobodys fool-Who gave the race speech on Tuesday to do damage control over the Wright race issue? Wednesday-damage control to the damage control for throwing his grandmother under the bus. Thursday-damage control of the damage control of the damages control for calling grandma a “typical white person” and threw gramda under the bus for a second time. It ain’t Clinton with the hurt feelings, it’s GRANDMA.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 22, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

Calling him Judas seems to confirm Richardson’s complaint that the Clintons are waging a sometimes negative campaign.
I know many of us bloggers take pride in our ability to slam each other, and I admit I’ve done some of that myself (I confess an admiration for Carville’s clever Judas jab)and I’ll probably do more of it in the future. But sometimes I get online and it feels like we’re all stuck in traffic somewhere, really frustrated about something and taking it out on each other.
I think we are seeing that many Americans are drawn to something else, and are signaling through their support of Barack Obama that they want to identify with a campaign that can shed more light than heat. I know I’ve been personally inspired by Obama to try to be more positive.
There certainly is a little thrill in seen an opponent belittled, but I’m willing to give that up for the vision of an America led by someone who has firm convictions, unwilting determination and a clear mind, without the meanness.

Posted by: Paul M. | March 22, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

Dogsoldier,
I’ll stand shoulder to shoulder in any fight to fight for what is right. It is wrong for a cult to try to seize power in a Democracy.
=======================================
Count Michigan and Florida!!
Clinton stands up for Michigan and Florida!!
=======================================

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 22, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

Richardson and all the democratic party bosses want Hillary out now, for no other reason than to cover the DNC bottom. If Hillary drops out, the whole FL & MI vote problem will go away.
…..And if she did do that…..The whole Obama “Race” issue will also be dropped.
The Race thing is a deflection for the REAL problem. For God sake it was ONLY a week ago The Pastor videos were nationally exposed, and now all of the sudden we have a “RACE ISSUE”!!!!

Posted by: Disenfranchised | March 22, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

Richardson’s endorsement, calling Obama a “great guy” is the all boys club in action. His comments about how tough the phone call was to Sen. Clinton intimates that she was tough with him. Apparently, it is ok for a male candidate to do whatever it takes to get elected (like discounting the voters of Fla and Mich) – but when a female candidate fights the good fight – it is considered a character flaw. He developed a rapport with Obama over the last year – a rapport he obviously didn’t feel with Hillary (he watched the superbowl with Bill, not Hill) – despite 15 years of a beneficial relationship he had with the Clintons.

Posted by: Lisa | March 22, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

Dogsoldier,
Thanks sincerely for your comment. It’s obviously a challenge for all of us to see the other side’s view, and I really appreciate your help.
Paul M.

Posted by: Paul M. | March 22, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

Wow Carville, You outdo yourself. Just because you have blind loyalty to the Clinton machine, does not mean anyone else is prevented from thinking for themselves. I think Bill Richardson, like so many of us who used to support the Clinton wholeheartedly, has been turned off their ugly, dangerous win-at-all-costs, desperate strategy. They don’t care if they help the Republicans win in November, as long as Hillary is the Democratic nomination. What is the real reason they are so desperate?
I guess there are lots of us Judases around.

Posted by: Sarah | March 22, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

I used to a big James Carville fan, back in the “Wag the Dog” days. Now, he just comes off like a sore loser. Hey James, you want a clue on how to handle losing? Look at your old buddy Paul Begala. Learn to laugh it off buddy, before you find yourself way out in the cold of the new Democratic party.

Posted by: Space | March 22, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

The more I read and think about the Richadson endorsement, the more I believe that the DNC is trying to use him to fix their disenfranchisement of Michigan and Florida voters.
The hope of Howard Dean, Donna Brazile, and a host of other DNC brass is to try to fix the Florida/Michigan mess by forcing Senator Clinton to concede the nomination before August.
There is just one problem here-Senator Clinton has virtually as much support as Obama and has gained momentum.
Senator Clinton will not give up anything to Barak Obama regardless of what illusion the DNC tries to create.
The Clinton and Obama battle will go as far as it takes to send Obama back to his seat in Jeremiah Wright’s church.

Posted by: Ken | March 22, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

Obama and Richardson fed into Carville’s comments by having this endorsement on Good Friday. I continue to maintain that people in the Obama campaign seem to be completely oblivious to the fact that this is Easter weekend. There are articles on his website about Persian New Year, Happy Purim, and so on, and not yet a word about what is to Christians the holiest week of the year. If Obama wanted to salvage his image as a Christian, preening around like a peacock on Good Friday with a Catholic governor at his side did nothing to help. Will he be in the pews at Trinity this Easter Sunday morning? Apparently not. I’m surprised no one in his campaign is savvy enough to point out to him he needed to salvage the Christian vote, particularly after the Wright mess. So Carville’s point is well taken. Obama and Richardson chose the timing.

Posted by: floridian | March 22, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Leave Clinton and her surrogates enough rope and they hang themselves.
Whether it’s Bill questioning Obama’s patriotism, or Carville making an insulting stupid remark.
hey James,
It’s the election…..stupid!

Posted by: mark | March 22, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Blind loyalty is not a good thing. But loyalty is an admirable quality. In political terms, Richardson stabbed Hillary in the back, particularly considering his state of New Mexico went for her and the way his career was advanced by the Clintons. It shows that Bill Richardson is not a man of political good faith, but is an opportunist. It will hurt his career in the long run. Also whatever happened to Obama’s wish that superdelegates should honor the will of their electorate? And whatever happened to Obama’s call to listen to the will of the voters (who he is fighting to shut down in FLA and Michigan)?

Posted by: hopesprings52 | March 22, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

I wish people would quit whining about FL & MI. Noone forced them to move up their primaries “illegally”. Let’s get on with this election. Hillary needs to bow out now so that Barack can concentrate on beating McMore-war this Fall. Obama 2008!

Posted by: pt | March 22, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

Carville’s never been one for understatement, but you’ve got to give him credit — the metaphor is well timed.

Posted by: shellray | March 22, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

So according to the betrayal concept Hillary’s campaign is pushing, Richardson is supposed to support Hillary for President because her husband did some favors for him.
Loyalty and bribery should take precedence over independent thinking. Great.

Posted by: Danny | March 22, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

Carville go on the Oprah Show to explain your insulting remark.
clue:
you won’t be rising again in three days.

Posted by: mark | March 22, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

Bill Richardson is one of the farther-left Democrats. Who did you EXPECT him to endorse?! Hillary Clinton is a moderate compared to either Richardson or BHO, and these days, moderates cannot get elected. If you’re not far left or far right, forget it!
But what’s the big deal with endorsements, anyway? It’s only one person’s opinion, just like mine or yours. My opinion is worth “1 point”; why is Bill Richardson’s or Oprah Winfrey’s “worth” more?

Posted by: Rhys | March 22, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

If Richardson had endorsed Clinton it would have been the greatest endorsement of all time, but he didn’t so now it’s the worst traitorous act of all time.
Now picture Clinton as comparing herself to Jesus on Easter weekend. Great; just great, I got to tell you.
When is her campaign going to start to be real?

Posted by: Thinking | March 22, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

“Serpent Head” Carville’s Unholy Easter Vigil-antism

Carville equates Richardson with Judas from Poltiical Punch reports that Clinton supporter James Carville, in a statement of Biblical proprtional hyperbole, compared Governor Bill Richardson to Judas Iscariot for endorsing Senator Barack Obama rather t…

Posted by: PAXALLES | March 22, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

The outspoken James Carville makes a point, much the same as Geraldine Ferraro, that is basically true. Naturally, he is going take flak for it.

Posted by: Scott Hansen | March 22, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

As Obama has said, most Americans have realized the old politics don’t work and they’re ready to try something new.
The whole concept of ‘beholden interests’, whether PAC groups or politicians handing out jobs as patronage ‘favors’, is what’s TOAST. Why doesn’t anyone on Team Clinton get it?!?!
Anyway, I remember when Richardson made a comment earlier about how he was grateful to the Clintons for the jobs he was appointed to, but he said that debt was paid by doing A GOOD JOB. Yet another concept the Clintons are unclear on.
Carville, just do us all a favor and get out of the way of progress. You’re embarrassing yourself and the Democratic Party.

Posted by: Tom J | March 22, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

obama may pull out the nomination but only because his “laundry” didn’t come out earlier…he will NEVER win the general.

Posted by: anne | March 22, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

Good point, Anne… BHO’s “dirty laundry” may have been “hung out” too late to save Hillary’s campaign, but Old Man McCain now has a better chance of being elected than he has EVER had. The Democratic Party, instead of taking advantage of Republican disunity, is engaged in an orgy of self-destruction. So, thanks to Obama’s supporters, we will be in for four more years of Bush’s War instead of intelligent leadership under Hillary Clinton. I don’t especially LIKE Hillary Clinton, but she is by far the best bet for America’s future among the worst choices in at least a half-century. Bill Richardson just helped sink the Democratic Party for this year.

Posted by: Rhys | March 22, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

oh, and by the way…i think richardson is disgusting….he not only stabbed the clintons in the back but he also stabbed the voters of his state in the back.

Posted by: anne | March 22, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

Why is Obama being Judge on his Pastor Sermons and Statement? Obama is running for President not his former Pastor. Obama Should be Judge for his own Personal Statements, Actions and Deeds. Obama is not perfect He who has no friends and acquaintances that say things and do things you don’t agree with let them cast the first stone. The media has smeared a man that has inspired a nation to hope and come together. It seems there is a conspiracy in the media to smear Obama at any cost. For What Reason? And Who Would Gain the Most From this Smear Campaign? Who would have thought that a presidential candidate would be judged by his former Pastor Statements or for that matter what anyone that he knows might have said or didn’t say. Why hasn’t the Media Focus on the Clinton’s Past, and Present questionable Dealings of Corruption which reveals their Character and Judgment?

Posted by: Another Ron | March 22, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

The point is that Obama has shown VERY POOR JUDGEMENT in having Rev. Wright as his pastor. The reverend is entitled to his beliefs, and he is free to speak as he wants, this is the beauty of the US. Obama does not just “know” Rev. Wright, he chose his church in Chicago over 17 years ago, he was married by him, had his daughters baptized by him, etc. This is not a casual aquaintance. He is not related to him. Yes, we all run into people in our lives with whom we disagree with, generally speaking, people with judgement do not value these relationships, and end them. Obama did not have the judgement to do this. The SAME LACK OF JUDGEMENT shows in Obama’s relationship with REZKO. Obama lacks the judgement to be the democratic candidate.

Posted by: svsolis | March 22, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Somehow I am sure that the Obamabots will also ignore the fact that it was an Obama operative responsible for the passport breach. This guy DOES walk on water in their eyes! Wake up Obamabots and face it, your hero is not what you believed. He’s the dirtiest of politicians and you fell for it.

Posted by: PaseoDelMar | March 22, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

to “another ron”….he is being judged by his pastors remarks because his pastor has been a mentor and close spiritual advisor with an obvious amount of influence in obama’s life. this is all fine unless you are running for PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES>

Posted by: anne | March 22, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

He’s the governor of a state that voted for HILLARY. He HIMSELF said that he would go the way his state goes. Then he betrays his own word and throws in with Obama to try to stop the bleeding. He’s such a goofball. I am sure his constituents are pissed about that one. His endorsement doesn’t mean squat. Gee, haven’t seen the Kennedy girls on Obama’s stage since the black separatist church thing blew up. Just how does a separatist become the great uniter anyway? How’s that gonna fly?
He’s done more to damage race relations than anyone in recent memory if you ask me, but I am just a “typical white person” what do I know. He is so arrogant it is unbelievable.

Posted by: PaseoDelMar | March 22, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

LOL Carville calling Richardson a Judas-just another example of Clinton Campaign projection.
It was Carville (as portrayed on page 344 of Woodward’s book) who early in the morning following the ’04 election, who set in motion the betrayal of the Democratic Party by providing his wife, Mary Matalin, Kerry strategy regarding 250,000 outstanding ballots in Ohio. Carville tipped off Bush and as MJ Rosenberg of TPM says…
“the rest is history”.

Posted by: Dorri Steinhoff | March 22, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

ann,
we in america have currency with the faces of five american president who once owned slaves. Our government has chosen to honor those men for their achievements rather than their flaws. I have chosen to honor those men. They are celebrated in our schools. We celebrate their birthday’s we honor them as great contributors to this nation. If we, as citizens of the United States, can accept the images of men who owned slaves, and PROUDLY call them PATRIOTS. Why please tell me why, it is so difficult to understand that a man like Mr. Obama could over look the flaws of a man who didn’t own slaves. Why should we consider Mr. Obama any less patriotic because of his loyalty to a man he vehemently disagreed with. Why should Oboma throw Rev. Wright “under the bus” if we as a nation, don’t deem it necessary to discard of the photo’s of former slave owners on our nations currency? CAN SOMEONE OUT THERE EXPLAIN THIS TO ME IN TERMS THAT I CAN UNDERSTAND?

Posted by: ddpwoman | March 22, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

I find it funny/disturbing that the media can be all over Obama for religious comments that he didn’t even make, and on a U.S. General for saying that Bill Clinton was like Joe McCarthy, yet James Carville, cleary part of this Clinton Campaign Out Of Control can liken the Clinton name to Jesus and Bill Richardson to Judas and no one says a damn thing.

Posted by: Anthony | March 22, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

to ddpwoman,
clearly we look for different things when considering a candidate for presidency. by the way, it’s a little curious that obama runs as the unifying candidate yet idolizes a pastor who preaches complete divisiveness.

Posted by: anne | March 22, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

PaseoDelMar,
first of all let me say thank you for responding I thought I was by myself. Secondly, It was not a black SEPARATIST group there were white people in the congregation when he was talking. Thirdly, with all dew respect, you still haven’t answered my question.

Posted by: ddpwoman | March 22, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

PaseoDelMar,
first of all let me say thank you for responding I thought I was by myself. Secondly, It was not a black SEPARATIST group there were white people in the congregation when he was talking. Thirdly, with all due respect, you still haven’t answered my question.

Posted by: ddpwoman | March 22, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

ddpwoman:
If Barack Obama really “vehemently disagreed” with the views of his pastor then explain to most Americans, why he stayed there listening to his sermons for 20 YEARS? How many times would you go and pay to watch a movie that you hated?

Posted by: Bryan | March 22, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

Oh yes, the cobsistent application of McCarthyism by Hillary and her old Boys Club. One has to be dumb to not see McCarthyism being revived.
America should remember the days of Joseph McCarthy whose over-the-board hate, superficial patriotism and insanity caused so many good Americans to be defamed and banished. It was an era in which some of the best American creative minds were lost to other nations, such as Switzerland, France and England. It was an era when true American Democracy was secretly being destroyed by McCarthyism. Let us not bring ourselves back to that dark era of American history. It’s time decent Americans stop McCarthyism from mushrooming in this modern age!
So what, Obama sat in that Church for 20 years. He has turned out to be a fine young man that America is proud to have and for Americans to be proud to associate. At least, his Church is not one of those that turn out pedophiles, rapists, murderers or those who drop out of school. Let us not assume that America is a nation of gullible citizens who have little intelligence to see right or wrong and are so easily brainwashed by everything a pastor says… unless of course, those who believe so must, themselves, attend Churches whose congregations comprise of illiterates and naive folks, so easily brainwashed to believe everything their church leaders tell them.

Posted by: Bilbo893 | March 22, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

Bryan,
I appreciate you brother but I am still looking for an answer to my previous question.

Posted by: ddpwoman | March 22, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

For all of you that keep mentioning the Fla/Mi vote as if Obama had something to do with their votes not counting:
Florida and Michigan had the choice of adhereing to DNC rules or not. They chose not to and now face the consequences. I didn’t hear anything about Clinton fighting for their votes then. If Obama decided that those votes should count now after he wasn’t even on the ballot at the time (in MI), I wouldn’t feel comfortable with him as a candidate. Because that would be stupid. Now if they were to have the vote again, a large group of people that would probably have voted for him are not going to be able to vote again in the do over vote. Why would he agree to that? That’s like saying let’s have a race and I’ll give you a 20 yard head start. What about that sounds fair?

Posted by: James | March 22, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

Bilbo893,
I think you get me.

Posted by: ddpwoman | March 22, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

James,
you make a very good point.

Posted by: ddpwoman | March 22, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

Someone needs to slap a muzzle on James ‘Nosferatu’ Carville! He’s another political has-been whose political fortunes have always been tied to the Clintons. Is this idiot now comparing Hillary to Jesus Christ? Sure must be, if he’s comparing Richardson to Judas. I’ve had enough of Carville during Kerry’s loss in 2004. Go away, Jim, just go the heck away and shut your flyhole! Where were you when the Clintons needed you most…namely, washing out that blue dress!

Posted by: George | March 22, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

ddpwoman
The founding fathers are on our currency…because they are founding fathers….hope you understand that currency has got nothing to do with slavery…..the dollar has been a dollar for ages now…..we dint change the dollar to slaveless-dollar after slavery was abolished……

Posted by: MattOhio-MI-FL-Messenger | March 22, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

here is a strange coincidence…the head of the firm that contracted employees who breached the passports…. is an obama advisor???

Posted by: anne | March 22, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

MattOhio-MI-FL-Messenger,
what’s your point?

Posted by: ddpwoman | March 22, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

I guess in Mr Carville and Jacob’s scenario Hillary is playing the part of Jesus Christ. Now, if she can just rise from the dead and win the nomination AND the election, we will all have to think about believing in HER ! Me, I do not believe in her or in Jewish zombies who are their own fathers coming back from the dead.But, I guess I could be wrong. We shall see .

Posted by: jesusrodhamclinton | March 22, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

ddpwoman
we dint change the dollar to slaveless-dollar after slavery was abolished……
so that is why our founding fathers are still on the dollar….does it make sense now???? or should i draw pictures?

Posted by: MattOhio-MI-FL-Messenger | March 22, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

MattOhio-Fl-Mi messenger…VERY good point…interesting way of putting it…

Posted by: Russell | March 22, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

MattOhio-MI-FL-Messenger,
no I don’t need you to draw me a picture. Thank you for the offer. The picture is already on the our money. I want to know why it is more accetable to us for slave owners to be on the bills of our great nations currency, than it is for a man to preach admittedly a very, very bad sermon? Should I conclude that if they haven’t removed the images of slavemasters off our currency that they agree with slavery? I don’t think so.

Posted by: ddpwoman | March 22, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

There is none so blind as he who will not see! NOBAMA for me!!!! I am a Latina. I was upset that Obama mentioned Latinos in his speech the other day. Reverand Wright nor Obama, nor Richardson speak for me. Richardson is an idiot for allowing himself to be used. Look beyond the smooth…..really listen to what Obama says, it’s all part of who he is. His training and work experience taught him to say exactly what people want to hear.

Posted by: Military Mom and Auntie | March 22, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

NO! You just got it wrong again. Obama was the man being crucified this good Friday. SOLD by (hill Clintons camp) (Judas) in same party dipped in the dish. DENIED by some of his followers, HELP by Bill Richardson the (Siberian) and was crucified by republicans…..Lets see the resurrection.

Posted by: SHEDROCK | March 22, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

For most of us in Michigan it’s pretty clear that our state party leaders broke the rules (because of a long-standing feud with Iowa and New Hampshire) and that the primary fell apart because of that. That wasn’t the fault of Hillary or Barack.
If you want to hassle Barack you can say he should have been calling for a new primary. If you want to hassle Hillary you can be outraged that she said the vote was fair even though it wasn’t.
If you support McCain, of course, you can hassle either Democrat about any of their shortcomings and hope to keep Democrats arguing amongst themselves.
Paul M.

Posted by: Paul M. | March 22, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

Russell
Can you believe ddpwoman…..she is saying we have to support Obama, after removing pictures of the Founding fathers from the dollar because they were slave-owners…..Obama supporters are simply out of control…

Posted by: MattOhio-MI-FL-Messenger | March 22, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

MattOhio-MI-FL-Messenger,
I don’t want you to vote for Obama. I just want an honest answer to my question. Does anybody out there have an honest non-biased answer to my question?

Posted by: ddpwoman | March 22, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

Right on, James Carville!!! Obama should be careful what he asks for given the stunning lack of loyalty shown by Bill Richardson. Why would anyone in his right mind want this guy in his camp? Richardson certainly has a right to cast his personal vote for anyone he wants but his superdelegate vote should go to Clinton because his state voted for her and, if he couldn’t endorse Clinton he should have stayed out of it. If it weren’t for the Clintons no one would know Bill Richardson’s name – he owes them something for that.
Obama is collecting disloyals by the boatload. During the Clinton presidency, Ted Kennedy faced a tough challenger for his Senate seat and the Clintons campaigned tirelessly for him. Look what that got them. I thought it was interesting that Bobby Kennedy’s kids supported Clinton – Bobby must have taught his kids loyalty, something that is sorely lacking in this campaign.
One more thing – Obama wanted Imus fired but he supports his racist, bigot, separatist pastor? What’s up with that?

Posted by: Rose | March 22, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

ddpwoman
our founding fathers were also against abortion, interracial dating and other controversial concepts…
we are not to cynosure them for any of those concepts either…they are on the dollar because of their pioneering efforts in engineering the birth of this country…hope this helps

Posted by: MattOhio-MI-FL-Messenger | March 22, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Can anyone answer my question? The News today that the employee who works for The Analysis Corporation and is still with the company is the employee who breached Obama’s passport record. The firm is headed by John O. Brennan, an Obama adviser. As far as I know, the only way to breach the record is to do something to the record, not merely look at the record. Was something changed or deleted in Obama’s records?

Posted by: Anne | March 22, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

MattOhio-MI-FL-Messenger,
“…they are on the dollar because of their pioneering efforts in engineering the birth of this country…hope this helps”
THANK YOU that is exactly, the answer that I was looking for. We honor our founding fathers for the good that they did, inspite of the hurtful practices of racism and slavery. We didn’t “throw out the baby with the bath water” How wise are we.
Thank you MattOhio-MI-FL-Messenger,
Donna

Posted by: ddpwoman | March 22, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

Sure Donna…my pleasure

Posted by: MattOhio-MI-FL-Messenger | March 22, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

No,
The procedure at the State Department is that if anyone makes an unauthorized viewing of a high profile person’s application file. It’s an automatic flag, and is pretty much standard in the industry. That’s how that LA Hospital knew who and when people peeked at Britney’s mental health file.
So sorry, noone was helping hide Obama’s “real” birthplace of Afghanistan or something.
Also note that McCain and Clinton’s files were breached as well, Clinton’s by the same contractor firm. That’s only the people they are bothering to tell us about.

Posted by: To Anne | March 22, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

MattOhio-MI-FL-Messenger,
“…they are on the dollar because of their pioneering efforts in engineering the birth of this country…hope this helps”
THANK YOU that is exactly, the answer that I was looking for. We honor our founding fathers for the good that they did, inspite of the hurtful practices of racism and slavery. We didn’t “throw out the baby with the bath water” How wise are we.
Thank you MattOhio-MI-FL-Messenger,
Donna

Posted by: ddpwoman | March 22, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

MattOhio-MI-FL-Messenger,
I don’t have a problem with Hillary. I think that you are absolutely right. Heck, when Bill was in office I actually had some money in my pocket.

Posted by: ddpwoman | March 22, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

MattOhio-MI-FL-Messenger,
Don’t assume that just because I support Oboma, that I am a Clinton hater.

Posted by: ddpwoman | March 22, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

Donna
I apologize if I was rude earlier about the “pictures” remark…I am not blogging to change anyone’s vote…everyone has to vote their conscience….it is just that everyone should do it responsibly and with the right information instead of being carried away in the hype and the hoopla…

Posted by: MattOhio-MI-FL-Messenger | March 22, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

Funny, I thought Richardson was the one who said that he beleived Superdelegates had too much influence and they should support the will of the voters in his/her state. Think he may be looking for a job?

Posted by: glennmcgahee | March 22, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

MattOhio-MI-FL-Messenger,
I feel ya. I am a former Bush supporter. Please, don’t hate me.
I crossed over to the Dems., because you guy’s were making HISTORY! You still can. It’s not too late to come together again. The republicans, I am ashamed to say, is making a joke out of the Dems. right now. But, if we come together we can wipe the smiles right off their smug little faces.
What do you say to that?

Posted by: ddpwoman | March 22, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

It seems that Richardson is related to the highly reported little girl on Sen. Hillary Clinton’s ad. As for Judas, at least he started with ethics and not being an opportunist.
If one listens to the prime time news, one hears about the important child that was on the Clinton ad that supports the Senator from Illinois. I am sure that this now young adult’s improved career had little to do with her decision to profit from both events. I just don’t happen to believe that this highly reported American news network news is news worthy of being reported.

Posted by: Dr. Rene, USAF Retired, Recently | March 22, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

Donna
No one hates you here….also just cuz Bush messed up, it doesnt mean that McCain will mess up….for me atleast Hillary is a more level-headed candidate who will push people to their limits for getting the right things done….Obama is still trying to find and fight for his racial identity….
Hillary vs McCain would be right, because if America messes up on one, the other is still good….in my opinion..

Posted by: MattOhio-MI-FL-Messenger | March 22, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

Blogarama – While I am loath to defend the Clinton Camp, Judas is equated with traitors (e.g. Benedict Arnold). He is not necessarily equated with Jews in general. I’m sure it was the last thing on their minds to denigrate Jews, since they are trying to intimate that Sen Obama is anti-Israel.
Actually Carvelle probably got his idea from reading the blogs… yesterday there were so many references to Judas… most of them in Spanish “Judas Iscariote”.
If Richardson is going to be the VEEP, watch out for Obama ads in Spanish with BR on them. Richardson has a huge problem with recognition in the Hispanic community – when he ran, many in Californians did not knew his ethnicity. It will be a dual campaign to boost Obama and explain BR’s ethnicity. But given the loyalty of Latino’s to the Clintons, this will be a tough nut to crack.

Posted by: smartprimate | March 22, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

This is the biggest irony of them all.
If Richardson is Judas, then the comment by Carville implied that Hillary (or Bill) is Christ.
First of all, Hillary is running for President and not Bill so we cannot equate Richardson’s support for Obama as a Judas move. Since the Clinton campaign has said the move to be so, it clearly shows that all along Hillary is using Bill Clinton’s resume as her own. This statement by Carville proved everything beyond doubt.
Secondly, Jesus is not a liar like Bill and Hill.

Posted by: maxd | March 22, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

maxd – nice try …..When you call someone Judas, it means you are calling them a traitor….stop inciting ethnic wars..

Posted by: MattOhio-MI-FL-Messenger | March 22, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

MattOhio-MI-FL-Messenger,
Obama’s not the only one fighting that fight. America is. With her multitude of children in all their diversities how will America love her babies. How can she rid her children of jealousy. How can she convince them that she loves them all equally. America the beautiful.
I only have three kids myself; and that is one tough job.
Peace,
Donna

Posted by: ddpwoman | March 22, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

Now, Hillary is Christ? Talk about cults.
I don’t think so.
Hillary lies.
In her March 17th speech she said she ran under sniper fire to the waiting vehicles.
Brave, brave First Lady. Braver than Bill.
But, It did not happen.
According to the reports, according to the videos, according to the press reports Hillary was met on the tarmack by a group of people not bullets. No running from an eight year old girl giving her flowers.
Check it out: Tuzia, Bosnia
March 25 1996
Do you really want another president that lies?
Isn’t that how we go into Iraq?

Posted by: JB | March 22, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Carville is right…Richardson’s glee at being in front of the crowd of Obama worshippers was sickening.

Posted by: Ann | March 22, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Donna
Raising kids is the toughest thing…knowingly or unknowingly you will still love them equally…
Frankly speaking we shouldnt be judging Obama. But since he is vying to be the person who might be responsible for our future, we need to be sure of him.
In the 2 months that I have been observing Obama, he seems to have a good grip in politics, oratory and making people come together.
He needs to understand that a President needs to be tough, ruthless and accountable. I find him lacking in these areas because of his inability to take a stance.
His campaign has turned increasingly negative inspite of promising on the stump that it wouldn’t. The promises and the actions are not adding up. That is why I think he needs more time to understand the pulse of the people.
Heck, if he wanted to change the world, he should start from Chicago….because people still call it a dirty politics city

Posted by: MattOhio-MI-FL-Messenger | March 22, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

So MattOhio,
Which person is Bill Richardson a traitor to? Is it Bill or Hill? Answer that for me.
I am a foreigner just looking into the American election. I have seen your comments all over the place on this topic and I think most of your comments are nonsense and plain stupid reasoning.
On another topic, if you dig more on the net, you’ll be able to find the video of the full sermon by Rev Wright on which Faux news got their story from. It was nothing like the few seconds of clips Faux news used.
One of the reason ordinary Americans have become so out of touch with reality is because your MSM’s twist of the truth. What this breeds is an uninformed populace and this is very very dangerous.

Posted by: maxd | March 22, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

maxd – since you are a foreign kid, I would advise that you goto each candidate’s website and reason for yourself……and try to be more classy when talking to bloggers….I am going to give you a pass on this gaffe….
Also, Richardson is a traitor…to Hillary to New Mexico and to all Hispanics…..since you wanted to know

Posted by: MattOhio-MI-FL-Messenger | March 22, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

None of this really matters. It is now coming out that the “idle curiosity” of those who spied on the passports found that Barack is technically an illegal alien and cannot assume the presidency.

Posted by: Game Over | March 22, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

Fredo

Posted by: chris | March 22, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

don’t think anyone could explain it as well as Obama , this is the America we live in right at this moment..anger, separation,confusion..fear, frustration. We need an honest voice of truth..Obama is the only one (running for office) not afraid to speak truth..bruises & all. I know that when I vote for president I need someone with a voice to inspire the nation, to help change the attitude of the American people who actually don’t believe that we are one nation under God..The people who would never want to be “one” with anyone else. People who couldn’t unite with even their next door neighbor if he happened to be a different color than himself or a different political party or anyone he just didn’t like,for that matter. We need someone to change that mentality. If you truly listen to what he says..you realize that he is speaking from truth… He understands why people feel this separation..how they arrived at their perception..he is never speaking from only a ‘black “point of view or a “white” point of view..he speaks from a human one..as an observer..open minded, with compassion,without judgement..ready to help talk it out..ready for the blows that may come, steady until it is resolved & until there is change…..isn’t that what we intrinsically need? That’s what we need as children.. isn’t that what we need as a nation.. Isn’t that the man he is? All I know is that I want somebody with that kind of statue to lead the country for my children & make a difference. As for Hillary camp’s latest desparate move to undermine Obama’s integrity & drive a wedge between races….would you ever want to be held liable for someone elses words.. especially when they were venting frustration? Anyone who would let this deter them from voting ,never believed in him anyway so …………..TIME FOR CHANGE ..YES WE CAN , OBAMA is a LIGHT in this DARKNESS that we’re facing ….Let him SHINE!!

Posted by: SHEDROCK | March 22, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Shedrock: Well said.

Posted by: malthusian77 | March 22, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

I love James Carville!
Hillary is ahead in the electoral votes 263 to Obama 202. Obama can’t win the 2025 to clinch this race either. She’s won all of the critical states needed to win in November. She wins primaries (last time I looked these include way more people that the caucuses. When you look at the BIG picture (November 2008) the MATH is in her favor.

Posted by: yodampls | March 22, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

Such a traitor after Clinton gave him a chance to be the first Hispanic to hold an office and one of the the highest member in the president’s cabinet back in the 90′s. Not a good example for young generation. God knows Bill Richardson is a traitor same as Judas.

Posted by: so independent | March 22, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

Such a traitor after Clinton gave him a chance to be the first Hispanic to hold an office and one of the the highest member in the president’s cabinet back in the 90′s. Not a good example for young generation. God knows Bill Richardson is a traitor same as Judas.

Posted by: So independent | March 22, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

MattOhio,
I have been to the three candidates website and studied them all.
As a foreign kid, I can tell you this. We foreigners have a far better grasp of reality than US citizens.
On the traitor issue, Bill Richardson wasn’t working for Hillary while serving under Bill’s presidency.
Your stupidity is mindboggling.

Posted by: maxd | March 22, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

I love James Carville!
Hillary is ahead in the electoral votes 263 to Obama 202. Obama can’t win the 2025 to clinch this race either. She’s won all of the critical states needed to win in November. She wins primaries (last time I looked these include way more people that the caucuses. When you look at the BIG picture (November 2008) the MATH is in her favor.
Richardson is a transparent sellout of the worse kind. Enjoy your lowly rank in the good ole boys club. Good luck competing with Rev. Wright for VP.

Posted by: yodampls | March 22, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

It is true that it was a betrayal. But in politics I don’t believe anyone is deserved anything and Bill Richardson is allowed to choose whomever he wants. But i find it very interesting that Richardson can say the reason for backing Obama is for his “historic candidacy”, but that is not racist unlike when Ferraro said it. Senator obama has a serious problem going on here with credibilty, calling Hillary’s character “flawed”. Mr. Obama this is politics as usual and not the REAL CHANGE and UNITY that both u and Bill Richardson are calling for.

Posted by: Mike | March 22, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

Did Richardson endorse him? I thought they were jut having an affirmitive action celebration. As in, “We did it Bro’”!
Us Govt. regulations re “affirmative action” allow one to CHOOSE ones race, as Obama did, as Bill Richardson did.
Do not know if either did it for that reason, however, it certainly does give one “a leg up”/advantage re employment and college acceptance. I do support affirmative action, though it has never benefited me. Believe it necessary to “even out” past inequities.
But, do not agree with one’s choosing the more advantaged “half” for political or affimative action purposes.
I am a white “mongrel”, I am some of everyone, yet definitely have 1/16th Cherokee in my lineage (great, great, grandmother full-blood) and could obtain tribal membership through “Dawes Role” means. Yet, Federal laws re scholarships require enrollment in a federally recognized tribe as well as a Certificate of Degree of Indian Blood card showing at least a one-quarter Native American descent.
Higher standard for Native Americans than any other racial or ethnic minority. But, I could say, “I am black!”, no problem. Go figure.

Posted by: Mike in Texas | March 22, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

Carville was right on. Richardson
betrayed a friendship for percieved
political gain.

Posted by: Ima | March 22, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

So was Richardson a Judas when he himself was running for President? I found Carville’s comments quite pathetic. Anyone who voted for or worked for or had anything to do with Bill Clinton has to back Hillary? Patheitic reasoning. Is that the kind of blind loyalty the Clinton’s expect? No wonder so many people dislike them if that is the case.

Posted by: markymark | March 22, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

Say what you will about Carville, but his book with Begalia, Take it Back, was brilliant.

Posted by: fedup | March 22, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

i see a lot of hillary campaign deadbeats with nothing to do today.
and soon, just plain nothing to do.

Posted by: kravitz | March 22, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

marykymark:
Gov Richardson betrayed the voters of New Mexico too. Hillary Clinton won that state. He must be hanging out with Kerry and Kennedy too much.

Posted by: Megan | March 22, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Carville and the Clintonistas,
“If you want a friend in Washington, buy a dog.”

Posted by: mark | March 22, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

This is funny.
You have some foul-mouthed idiot basically saying that Richardson’s endorsement is the SAME as selling Christ to the Romans to be crucified.
Please.
What happens if Edwards comes out for Obama – Carville’s already gone for the big New Testament Baddie. He’ll have to go to the OT. Say….Edwards is David, sending poor Uriah (Hillary) to her doom, just to have oBamasheba in the Palace.
If he does that, I called it!
What was that old McCarthy era quote? “Have you no shame sir…..?”
Laughably stupid analogy.

Posted by: LadyVoter | March 22, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

So was Richardson a Judas when he himself was running for President? I found Carville’s comments quite pathetic. Anyone who voted for or worked for or had anything to do with Bill Clinton has to back Hillary? Patheitic reasoning. Is that the kind of blind loyalty the Clinton’s expect? No wonder so many people dislike them if that is the case.
Posted by: markymark
2 Questions, 2 Answers for markymark:
1. No, he had not yet stabbed the Clinton’s in the back while he was running for president.
2. That is the kind of “blind loyalty” that I expect from my friends that I have spent years helping out. Unless I have killed one of them, or someone else. Otherwise, cover your eyes, or leave them uncovered, you still better support me when I am in a jam.

Posted by: Mike in Texas | March 22, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

Obama sat in the pews at Trinity church for 20 years listening to his spiritual advisor Reverend Wright deliver sermons riddled with hate and racist comments. Then he masterfully delivers a speech on race and once again manipulated many (including Richardson) into believing he disagreed with his spiritual advisor and he and we need “change” this way of thinking and unite the country- (no kidding? thank you for opening our eyes oh self-righteous one)
I wonder what Obama’s been waiting for for the last 20 years. Lets elect him now so he can finally start Walking the Change Talk and HEAL us all because in his eyes we need it. How egomaniacal and arrogant of any politician to to be telling us that we need to be untied and healed by HIM.
The next day he throws his grandmother under the bus by referring to her as a “typical white woman.”
2-3 days later Richardson endorses him.
And we’re suppose to be impressed by Richardson? This is all the more reason why Hillary should not quit this race.

Posted by: reader | March 22, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

Get your facts people. Obama has been less than honest with the american people. He misrepresented(read lied) about his connections to Resko and the fund raising, he misrepresented(read lied) about his knowledge of Rev Wright’s sermons and racist beliefs,and he misrepresented (read lied)about his stance on Irag, after his speeach denoucing the war when asked to denouce Sen Kerry’s vote for the war, he refused saying he didn’t know how he would have voted, after seeing the Iragi people gleefully pulling down Saddam’s statue after the first push , he said maybe he was wrong, and in 2004 he gave an interview to the Chicago Tribune and is quoted as saying, at this point my views (on the war) are not very different from George w Bush. Look it up it is all there. People see and hear what they want without checking the facts. Now the head of a government contract firm being investigated for wrong doing is an advisor to his campaign. Remember everyone who is close to him and working for him and with him will be in the White House if he becomes the president.

Posted by: Mary in Tampa | March 22, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

Posted by: yodampls
Hillary is ahead in the electoral votes 263 to Obama 202. Obama can’t win the 2025 to clinch this race either. She’s won all of the critical states needed to win in November. She wins primaries (last time I looked these include way more people that the caucuses. When you look at the BIG picture (November 2008) the MATH is in her favor.
…….
Hello??? This is like saying that the Lakers would beat the Boston Red Sox because the Lakers score more points. Primaries do have more voters and yet Obama has more of the popular vote. To say that HRC winning in CA means Obama won’t in the Fall is ridiculous…go take a poli-sci course in the fall…you’re analysis needs some work.

Posted by: jan43 | March 22, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

Well said! Anna-Marie, Amen to that!
and…
To LadyVoter, your comment was very clever,
However as to the McCarthy schtick, you have either been watching too much Keith Obamamann as he tries to play Edward R. Murrow, or… you are as old as I am and saw McCarthy as a child.
Which?

Posted by: Mike in Texas | March 22, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

I would suggest that people should see for themselves the ful video of Rev Wright’s sermon which Faux news used clips from to misinform the people of America. The full sermon is nothing like the clips Faux news used.
If foreigners like me can google the full sermon and watch the entire sermon, I don’t know why Americans who have access to the net (including those commenting here) cannot do the same.
No wonder America is so fcuked up nowadays.

Posted by: maxd | March 22, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

Does Carville think Richardson is being paid, then? Come on. Bill Richardson, who WAS the most qualified and best candidate running, is endorsing the candidate he sees as the best leader, pure and simple. Carville is just upset because it’s basically impossible for Hillary to get enough delegates to win the nomination. Obama-Richardson ’08!

Posted by: Mitch | March 22, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

Why is Carville belly-aching now? This thing is over, maybe he got from the change/xerox box of stupid one liners. Clinton can begin to prepare her run for 2016…by then she’ll be able to divorce Bill and have a shot at winning the nomination. This is a Change Election. No more Bush, Clinton, Bush…didn’t we overthrow the monarchy in 1783?

Posted by: jan43 | March 22, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

James Carville rules. What an intelligent and inciteful man.
Bill Richardson is indeed the reincarnation of Judas Iscariot, he has sold Hillary and all of us in the hispanic community down the river he should be ashamed of himself. What a TRAITOR!! the hispanic community and Clintons will not forget this.

Posted by: Jose, TX | March 22, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

Richardson doesn’t have the sway with Hispanics that everyone thinks – we are not two faced and will not betray the Hillary and Bill the way that fat opportunist has.

Posted by: Carmen, NV | March 22, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

Bill Richardson sat in the fence for a long while and may have seen in his mind’s eye where the wind, arguably, is blowing and chose to side with the “likely” Democratic nominee.
This is a person, though, who doesn’t value loyalty as a measure of a person’s character and worth, and will ditch long-time friends for purely selfish ends. This is pretty obvious based on the timing of his Obama endorsement.
But I respect and admire people like James Carville, who know and understand what friendship and loyalty mean. I don’t know this guy personally, but this is a man of character.
As for Richardson, he will realize the folly of his ways a few months from now as we see Hillary, helped by an awakened electorate, overcome the odds.

Posted by: Ottile | March 22, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

maxd:
Exactly what country are you from?

Posted by: Sean | March 22, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

The Presidency of the United States is no place for Affirmative Action. We need to elect the person with the most experience, the person who has been tested over and over again, the person who can best lead this nation forward through a more and more complex global struggle, the person who has meaningful plans for even the least among us. That person is Hillary Clinton. Barack Obama gives a great speech.

Posted by: Grammy Barb | March 22, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

RobertCampbell – betrayal is betrayal regardless whether it’s with the son of God or the only hope America has of a fantastic President – Hillary.
Obama believes he is the second coming he is as delusional as his Pastor.
Richardson will live to regret this politically.

Posted by: Miguel, NM | March 22, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Couldn’t have put it better myself Miguel. I was a supporter of Bill Richardson not any more he has shown his true Duplicitous, Deceitful, false-hearted and disloyal traits not traits that hispanic people admire. I’m very dissapointed in you Gov Richardson as are many people I know in the community.

Posted by: Rico, NM | March 22, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

Sean,
I’m from the Fiji Islands (between New Zealand and Hawaii).

Posted by: maxd | March 22, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

Wait. I am confused.
The Clinton People say Richardson’s endorsement is unimportant.
Now the same Clinton people are apoplectic that Richardson endorsed the candidate he felt was more qualified.
It can’t be both can it?

Posted by: The Commander Guy | March 22, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

Gov Richardson I so dissapointed in you. You betray all Hispanic people with endorsement of anti american obama he is a liar and now I think you are also.

Posted by: Maria, NM | March 22, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

Bill Richardson you will now forever be known around the great USA as – JUDAS RICHARDSON.
I hope that 30 pieces of silver was worth it you fat JUDAS!!
“judas de mentira untrustworthy, gordos”

Posted by: Salvador, CA | March 22, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

To Kravitz, to one deadbeat to another.

Posted by: Ken | March 22, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

I think that the rest of the Democratic party needs to fall in line with everybody else and support Barack Obama If not we will all be complaining for another 4 years while the war in Iraq wages on, and important domestic issues remain unfixed.
Barack Obama ’08’12

Posted by: SB411 | March 22, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

The truth does not stop being the truth just because it’s not pleasant for one to hear!

Posted by: Parker | March 22, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

Why do people care about this traitor?
He has proved that you better not turn your back or you will be as viciously attacked as though you had sat through a Wright sermon.
When he is back in the gutter (where his “friends” found him) leave him there.

Posted by: Mark David | March 22, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

I think he wants something in return from the Obama camp. They are all politicians. If Obame gets the nomination, I will be voting Republican for the first time.

Posted by: ken | March 22, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

Richardson is a traitor, not doubt about it, Carville is right.
Obama is a disaster for the Democratic Party; he will divide the party for years to come. He will lose to McCain in November and Clintons will be blamed as usual. In four years he will be forced on us again with the same disastrous results.
I sure hope it’s not too late for Hillary, she would be a terrific president, but it looks like the Democrats are determined to lose again, even after all these years of horror with Bush.
The primary rules have to change and the democratic leadership has to change. Nancy Pelosy is enjoying her speakership way too much; I don’t think she wants another female to eclipse her. There is no point of having superdelegates if they have to confirm (according to Nancy) the electoral results. I sure would love to see Nancy, and Teddy, and Kerry, and Richardson, and all the rest of these idiots vote for Hillary to confirm their respective state’s primary results.

Posted by: LL | March 22, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

As I recall, Obama stated the super delegates should support the will of the people in their state, so to mean whom ever got the most vote that’s who the super delegate should go to . Well Hillary won , Richardson state, she also won Kennedy’s and Kerry’s and California for the other Kenney’S. Obama , as usual will say , well that’s not what I meant. Hillary do not quit take it to Denver!

Posted by: jp,michigan | March 22, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

Both Obama and Clinton were hot and heavy trying to get Richardson’s backing. Am I the only one that saw Bill Clinton, with Richardson, watching the Super Bowl together? Well, Richardson appeared to be watching, Clinton had the look of someone, not inhaling.

Posted by: Sharon | March 22, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

It’s ludicrous to call a superdelegate a ‘Judas’ for endorsing their candidate of choice.
I think the reaction to the endorsement is quite indicative of a certain sense of entitlement in the Clinton camp though.

Posted by: Aengil | March 22, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

Judas Richardson why did you ever ever
endorse Barack Obama? Will it be Obama-Richardson or Obama-Wright? I have
been a democrate for 20 years but will vote for McCain if you and Obama are on the ticket. How could you have been so
disloy to the Clintons?

Posted by: Anne | March 22, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

Its too bad that James Carvelle is not only physically frightening but it would appear that he has an ugly heart to match. His comment equating Governor Richardson’s decision to endorse Senator Obama as a Judas betrayal was appallingly disgusting and shameful. Frankly, this is the type of politics that Senator Obama is trying to change- it is the old Politics of tearing each other down.
I would like to remind Mr. Carvelle that Governor Richardson has not switched party allegiance – he is still a committed member of the Democratic Party.
The Clintons and their surrogates would do well to remember that it is the Republicans who are their foes and not Senator Obama. Perhaps the old GOP roots in Mrs Clinton has sprung new life and over-taken her Democratic Party ideals. That would explain the peculiar alliance we see being put forth with John McCain, at Obama’s expense. I urge all democrats to take note of this- we need to elect a leader who will put party before self and who is 100% committed to our brand. I for one, as a lifelong party loyalist am having second thoughts about the Clintons sincerity.

Posted by: eyes wide open | March 22, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

Its too bad that James Carvelle is not only physically frightening but it would appear that he has an ugly heart to match. His comment equating Governor Richardson’s decision to endorse Senator Obama as a Judas betrayal was appallingly disgusting and shameful. Frankly, this is the type of politics that Senator Obama is trying to change- it is the old Politics of tearing each other down.
I would like to remind Mr. Carvelle that Governor Richardson has not switched party allegiance – he is still a committed member of the Democratic Party.
The Clintons and their surrogates would do well to remember that it is the Republicans who are their foes and not Senator Obama. Perhaps the old GOP roots in Mrs Clinton has sprung new life and over-taken her Democratic Party ideals. That would explain the peculiar alliance we see being put forth with John McCain, at Obama’s expense. I urge all democrats to take note of this- we need to elect a leader who will put party before self and who is 100% committed to our brand. I for one, as a lifelong party loyalist am having second thoughts about the Clintons sincerity.

Posted by: eyes wide open | March 22, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

Amen, Amen, Amen Brother Carville. Actually, Judas is probably to nice a term. He’d be nothing without the Clinton’s. I hope he enjoys his one minute of fame because when Obama loses that plush appointment he promised you goes BYE, BYE. Who really believes he did it for the good of the democratic party? He’s an arse!!!

Posted by: James | March 22, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

Its too bad that James Carville is not only physically frightening but it would appear that he has an ugly heart to match. His comment equating Governor Richardson’s decision to endorse Senator Obama as a Judas betrayal was appallingly disgusting and shameful. Frankly, this is the type of politics that Senator Obama is trying to change- it is the old Politics of tearing each other down.
I would like to remind Mr. Carville that Governor Richardson has not switched party allegiance – he is still a committed member of the Democratic Party. The Clintons and their surrogates would do well to remember that it is the Republicans who are their foes and not Senator Obama.
Perhaps the GOP roots in Mrs Clinton has sprung new life and over taken her Democratic Party ideals. That would explain the peculiar alliance we see being put forth with John McCain. I urge all democrats to take note of this-
we need to elect a leader who will put party before self and who is 100% committed to our brand. I for one, as a lifelong party loyalist am having second thoughts about the Clintons sincerity.

Posted by: Carmensita | March 22, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

GOVERNOR RICHARDSON IS PATRIOTIC!
Clintons are not for the best interest of America or even the Democratic Party.
Richardson is for the best interest of America.
This is something that the self-absorbed Clintons and their apologists do not understand — PATRIOTISM.
Richardson recognize that the divisive Clintons will ruin the Democratic Party and ruin America; because they are self-centered and obsessed with their personal ambitions.
Shouldn’t a governor be concerned about his constituency, his people?

Posted by: New Yorker | March 22, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

I think that Richardson’s endorsement just makes him look like a traitor. If there’s something most people don’t like – it’s disloyalty.
Also, consider that New Mexico went for Clinton. I would just sum up Richardson as someone who is looking for a vp seat or his own political advantage in some way.

Posted by: Angie | March 22, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

All Richardson did was stab her in the back. Today he said it was Obama’s international experience-his judgement-and his speech about race that got the endorsement. Keep on doing it. For the politicians who are personally getting something out of this and for the ones who still think Obama would have won the primaries AFTER the Jeremiah Wright stuff came out YOU are the ones hurting Democrats in the general election. He is fast losing votes from men. Women are already sick of it-read the March 17 issue of Newsweek magazine “PUSH US AROUND AT YOUR PERIL”-go Tina Fey. Hispanics are very loyal and won’t fall for HIS KITCHEN SINK SPEECH. The rest of us are secretly boiling.

Posted by: RL in Illinois | March 22, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

Carville quoting scripture is hilarious. He’s the last person in politics who I would expect to find Jesus. I’m waiting for lightening to strike.
And actually, before the Clinton campaign had its little breakdown, I didn’t think the endorsement meant much at all anyway.

Posted by: Mara | March 22, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

although I am a Hillary supporter-and I am an African American woman. It is so sad to see what has happened to Mr. Obama-1st of all Mr. Obama was not preparing to run for president yet (maybe, he had thought about it in the future,but he did not think he was ready yet, he said so) so what happened
Axelrod,Dashele(?)Bill Bradley, Kerry,
and Dean ( yes is is the leader of the DNC but I think he and his “Movement”
have a personal Vendetta against the Clintons) they all put Obama up to be the spoiler against Hillary-and it was a dumb move-why would you in the same year put a Black person and a Woman-the two groups that had to fight to get the right to vote-Why would you now pit them against each other?) This whole mess I lay at Dean and the DNC door.
so now Richardson has indorsed obama-now everyone KNOWS obama is not ready yet.and why are these guys indorsing him? not for the good of the country-but all because of personal hate toward Hillary-Hillary is smarter, and can articulate better that all these guys.
So they do not really care about the country-not the way they claim-when you think about change-as is one of Obama’ slogans-What kind of change will he bring over the next four years?-Look at the change they have caused this country during this campaign already-I do not want his kind of change-Obama is not the nominee or president and he is already lying to us-I just heard a speech he made-where he had to say yes to some of the things he previously said no to. Now you know all of this already.-but beside that-try to find some of the footage of him in debate with hillary-he is good at making speeches-but do not ask him a question directly and expect him to answer-he stumble-(this is just the way Geo Bush was and is-we need a president who can think on their feet about the issues.
Mccain and Obama cannot do that-hillary can-Pa, NC. WVa, Indiana,and all other states left to vote-Hillary is in a battle already trying to help us-the american citizens-I know some of you would never believe-that Hillary would be the underdog-since you think they are so powerful-actually I believe when people say they are so powerful-what they are really saying is they are so smart. and they are-and no matter how much the “sour grape” dems-Dean, Kerry,
Richardson, Dashele,Bradley and co try to undermine these people-they will always be current in any market-because they are smart-Do any of you remember-how everyone said they wanted The clintons to just disappear-and when they got on with doing whatever they were doing ( which was nothing but good-most of my black brothers and sister and whites, Latino and others have been helped by The work that Bill Clinton Has done since he was out of office. Actually-Bill Clinton has done more good for this country since he has been out of office-that Bush has being in offfice. After 911-all the journalist want to talk with Bill Clinton-to find out what he was thinking the country should do-Why. Because they are smart-ever the people on the “right” wanted to hear from Bill Clinton (even if it was to tear down what he had to say)because everyone knows what an empty vessel our current president has been-and If we elect Obama-he will be an empty vessel-beholding to Bradley,Kerry,
Axelrod,and co-and what happens when you have a president who cannot think on their feet, is not strong on the issues,-you get someone who you own everything to-and it will be at the expense of we the american people-remember brownie-and all the other incompetents-that is what we will ge if Obama ends up as President. so I believe richardson did this-for some favor down the road-and not for the american people-which makes that whole group-not about change-but worst than the same old thing. They can call it The Clinton Machine-But I think obama has handlers has managed to build a pretty dastardly machine themselves.-but the thing about it-he will only serve one term-because this country is buckeling under the weight of the bush administration-and it will collapse if obama get in-If you think times are looking bleak now-hold on-we are in for a ruff 4year if mccain or obama get into office-neither of them are smart enough to steer us through the trouble ahead-If we do not get universal healthcare for ALL this time around-after the conversation has been so front and center on the national scene-oh boy-the insurance companies are really going to stick it to us-I am a retired nurse-and I will tell you first hand-our healthcare system is headed for collapse. The student loan problem is going to get worst-and we know about the war. Now Obama has promised all of this-but he and his group have just copied Hillary-that is why their plans are so alike-(they have not had one original idea-well “vote for change”and you see where that has gotten us.) But the thing about winning by copying someone else-is they will get to a point where she is off the scene-they will wonder “What do we do now”- He is not a visionary-he is a copy cat-and wait and see-Richardson will be rewarded in the future for his indorsement. Sad state of affairs.

Posted by: jgaw | March 22, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

From “Sitting on the Fence” To Jumping on OBama’s “Bandwagon”
Does Governor Bill Richardson passionately believe that his late endorsement decisively bring an end to the process of the democratic nomination in favor of Barack Obama? Does Richardson think that Obama will choose him as his running mate if nominated? Does Obama-Richardson ticket help the Democratic Party to win the presidency next November if this happens? Alternatively, is Governor Richardson aspiring for a position in his perception that Obama will be the winner? Can he significantly influence the Latinos vote in favor of Obama? Whatever motive he may have in mind, he has clearly demonstrated that his endorsement is purely for political expediency or political opportunism. The practice of abandoning in reality some important political principles that were previously held, in the process of trying to increase one’s political power and influence amounts to political expediency. The Governor’s staged action and his response to the press interview are a clear manifestation of political motivation designed to undermine the political aspiration of Senator Hillary Clinton and not to keep the unity of the Democratic Party as falsely claimed by the Governor to justify his action.
Governor Richardson has passionately campaigned for the presidency for more than a year on his diplomatic resume and as a Governor. During the debates, he was strongly claiming that he is the most qualified and experienced candidate to be president of the United States. This was his judgment on the campaign trail and now he has a different view about who should lead America. He said, “The 1990s is a decade of peace and prosperity because the competent and enlightened leadership of the Clinton Administration, but it is now time for a new generation of leadership to lead America forward.” If Richardson believes that a new generation of leadership without experience is the ultimate solution for the complex domestic and global problems America is facing, why did he, in the first place, decide to run for the president of the United States? Is he ready to relinquish his governorship to a young person regardless of experience? The only person who can provide us with answers to these questions is Governor Richardson alone. But we can also provide some possible answers. Why did he bother himself to mention about Hillary Clinton and President Clinton in his closing speech? Isn’t it clear that he unequivocally wavered about his long years of friendship with the Clinton family? Although Governor Richardson and Hillary Clinton are of the same age, is he, in his sound sense, consider her in another generation of leadership not able to lead America forward? Why did the Governor mention both Senator Hillary Clinton and President Clinton in his closing speech? Hillary is a candidate to the presidency and Bill Clinton is not. We should not expect such a behavior from a true friend. His years of experience should have helped him to make a proper judgment rather then seeking immediate political advantage with little regard for ultimate consequences. Democracy is a process that should not be interrupted without achieving the end result.
No matter what political opportunists say or do, Senator Hillary Clinton will continue to fight for us to bring real change that will turn the economy around, strengthen national security, improve the environment, and restore American credibility and leadership both at home and abroad. While endorsing Obama, the Governor said, “You understand the security challenge of the 21st century, and you will be an outstanding Commander in Chief.” He attempted to lay down a new model for being Commander in Chief and did not define it. Where is the litmus test? So far we have been repeatedly told that Obama did not support the war in Iraq. Like so many other Americans, he did not support the war but the speech alone does neither make Obama an extraordinary leader nor a person who would always make a sound judgment. Senator Obama has been a member of the church for nearly 20 years where his pastor made objectionable preaches from the pulpit and he has never uttered a word about any of the incidents until recently. Obama’s financier and close political support is now on trial. Do these major incidents make Obama a leader with a sound judgment? I very much doubt.
When considering these incidents, it is proper to question his credibility and judgment. It should be clear that judgment is a capacity to assess situations or circumstances objectively and to draw sound conclusions. This implies the imagination of possibilities and the scrutiny of their possible consequences, both negative and positive outcomes.
Does the Governor know that senator Obama failed to recognize the achievements registered during Bill Clinton’s Administration and instead praised the Republican political agenda of the 1980s? The Governor told Barack Obama, “You are an extraordinary leader who has shown courage, sound judgment and wisdom throughout your career.” Where is the evidence? Without substantiating evidence, the authenticity of the endorser’s claim as well as Obama’s eloquent speech does not make him an outstanding Commander in Chief from day one.
A political motivation that aims to increase one’s political influence at almost any price, or a political style which involves seizing every and any opportunity to extend one’s political influence, whenever such opportunities arise amounts to shifting positions for political expediency or political opportunism.
While the Governor has the right to support or endorse any candidate of his choice, the timing and the manner in which he has done and the way he mockingly treated the Clintons are absolutely unethical and objectionable. He mentioned their names as a footnote. He said that Obama has more delegates and the democrats have to stop the fighting and get prepared for the general election to face off the Republican nominee. Does the governor understand the concept of democracy? Hillary is not yet defeated and she is leading an effective campaign and there are millions of Americans who have not yet caste their votes. In Pennsylvania alone, poll trends indicate that Hillary is leading Obama by 17%. Does the Governor see this as a sign of defeat? While I was watching cnn, I observed that the Governor was so elated and too happy about his endorsement and have also shamefully disclosed to the press that the Clintons had approached and requested him for endorsement. He has also disclosed his intention to endorse Hillary Clinton and later changed his mind. Why is he passionately talking about it? Sadly, it appears that he drew some satisfaction from his shifting position of political expediency.
No matter what happens, Senator Hillary Clinton will continue fighting for us to make our lives better. She will also continue to demand that the voters of Michigan and Florida should not be disenfranchised. Hillary has an unshakable trust in all her supporters that they will stay with her and eventually march with her to the final victory. Those who sit on the political fence should, however, have some patience rather than hasty personal conclusion to jump into the opposite political camp.
As a democrat, Senator Hillary Clinton does not hold any bitterness against anybody for not supporting her or expressing views different from her own. While she appreciates the wide public support she has for her plan of action when she takes office in January 2009, there is no doubt she will serve all Americans regardless of political affiliation. She will be the president of all Americans and consider herself as being hired by all Americans for this important job.
Let us continue supporting Senator Hillary Clinton so that she fights for us!
Getahun Leta

Posted by: Getahun Leta | March 22, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

to getahun leta…..spot on with your commentary! excellent!

Posted by: anne | March 22, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

As a Superdelegate he Betrayed His State of New Mexico that went for Hillary and the Hispanic Vote which he claims to represent. JUDAS is Correct Mr Carville.

Posted by: TOM | March 22, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

No one says it better than Carville. At least he speaks his mind…
Now let’s hope we can get rid of Obama and his flock….
It makes me sick of him saying as your Future President…he aint there yet….So Mr. Obama please stop assuming you will win in November. Many Voters have not been heard.

Posted by: Logic | March 22, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

If Richardson is angling for a vp spot he may have just shot himself in the foot. If Barack Obama becomes the nominee he’s going to have to do some serious reaching out to the half of the Democratic electorate that passionately supports Hillary. Picking a turncoat like Bill Richardson as his running mate would be a disastrous mistake. So Bill’s not going to be on an Obama ticket, and he sure as hell won’t be on a Hillary ticket. Here’s hoping his opportuistic gambit gathers him a handful of dust.

Posted by: shellray | March 22, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

Wow, it’s hard to say whether it’s ignorance or just blind advocacy that’s behind the poor reasoning evident in many of these comments. Either way, it’s alarming and depressing.
To Clinton supporters: Her campaign’s adamant position has been that superdelegates ought to vote for whoever they think is the best candidate, irrespective of who’s ahead in pledged delegates and how their respective district or state voted.
So by her own interpretation of superdelegate rules, Richardson has every right to select Obama.
Similarly, it’s therefore immaterial that Clinton won NM by 1706 votes. (Especially with irregularities such as 3 Rio Arriba ballot boxes and 1 Sandoval County ballot box being kept overnight, uncounted and unreported, in the homes of polling place managers, some Clinton endorsers, for no good reason.)
And is the Clinton camp arguing “blind loyalty”? That because Bill Clinton gave Richardson positions in his administration, therefore Richardson “owes” them?
First, I thought Hillary was running, not Bill. Why does Richardson owe Hillary anything?
Secondly, it’s precisely this practice of patronage that has plagued her campaign (read about Penn, Solis Doyle and the rest of the backstabbing crew in WaPo, “Even in Victory, Clinton Camp is Battling Itself,” 3/6/08 and also in NYT, “Sniping by Aides Hurt Clinton’s Image as Manager,” 3/10/08). It’s precisely this practice of patronage that has sullied Washington insider politics and has generated cynicism in the electorate.
I for one do not want my elected officials acting on the basis of favors owed and collected, and I commend Richardson for getting off the fence and declaring his support.
BTW, it’s reasonable to assume that Bill Clinton valued Richardson’s ability and judgment during his administration, so why is Richardson not allowed to exercise that judgment now?
Lastly, the Clinton camp has been vigorously pursuing Richardson’s endorsement ever since he dropped out; clearly they valued his support. But in addition to the obnoxious Carville comment, here’s another reaction from their camp.
“Look, I think that everyone has their endorsers,” said senior Clinton strategist Mark Penn, adding — with a little huff — “I think New Mexico is a state that, actually, we won.”
“The time that he could have been effective has long since passed,” he continued. “I don’t think it is a significant endorsement in this environment.”
Wow, again—how demeaning to Richardson, though it is in keeping with the Clinton campaign’s ungracious and unattractive dismissal of all states and apparently people that have not gone their way.
What sour grapes. What sour people. No, thanks.

Posted by: CommonSense | March 22, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

For goodness sake, Bill Richardson cannot be equated with Judas because he wasn’t working for Hillary, the first lady, under Bill’s Presidency. The first lady and the President are two totally different positions.

Posted by: maxd | March 22, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

One lie that Barack Obama may have told…”Sen. Clinton and I were friends before the elections and we will be friends after the elections”. It seems that she and her team have done all they can to nullify that statement.
Mr Richardson has shown good judgment in departing from the old politics at this most crucial time in our country’s history. We need hope and unity, not fear, division and trickery.

Posted by: USA1 | March 22, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

In your heart of hearts, we all know Obama is not ready to be president-and I am afraid of Mccain-anyone who says we will be in iraq for the next 50-100 years-is scary. Mccain say he didn’t know much about the economy-so who is the best package-with a good command of all issues-Hillary. I know we have a lot of republicans on this blog-talking up obama-because they believe mccain can beat him in the general. Sorry,time for snl

Posted by: jgaw | March 22, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

Just one more reason why we need CHANGE in DC politics.

Posted by: Roberto | March 23, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am

REPLY TO jgaw | Mar 22, 2008 11:30:46 PM
No, in my heart of hearts, on this Easter Eve, I know that Obama is the one who has not only the intelligence and judgment but the character and integrity to lead our country in a better direction—with help from an informed and involved electorate. If we the people want Washington to be responsive to us, we need to be involved. Obama has always said he could not do it alone: no president can.
So, in my heart of hearts, I wholeheartedly support his candidacy.
(One little snark: Sorry, SNL is lame; it hasn’t been funny in eons :-)

Posted by: None-So-Blind | March 23, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am

What kind of Change? Hillary is the change we need for the issues that face us today. We should not cut off our nose to spite our face. Hillary is more qualified than obama and mccain.
The Issues:
ending this war
economy
Healthcare
Student Loans
and now add the conversation of race.
yes this country has needed for a long time to have the conversation about race. but not have it started after listening to the vile of Rev. wright.
since we have been a divided nation-yes we do need a uniter-but The obama uniter has divided us more than ever and at one of the worst times in our recent history. after all of this-what will he do if he becomes president-Say now I am President-lets all unite.
I do not think that will happen. snl is not funny to me.

Posted by: jgaw | March 23, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

let’s see. richardson was a nobody. bill made him ambassador to the un and secretary of energy. so richardson was then able to become a governor. plus, richardson said the superdelegates (like him) should go with what their state’s voters said, which would mean he would go with hillary.
sounds like carville got it right. but didn’t go far enough. ungracious, ungrateful, and most importantly un-reelectable.

Posted by: so saddened | March 23, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

jacinto,
Just because some of you want to(for no good reason, because none of us know her personally) ignore the good work Hillary clinton has done durnig her public service to this country-ever since she got out of college-will not erase it. The good work Hillary Clinton has done for this country will not be erased from the history books-and her record of having worked to help the Latino population in texas will never be undone.(when no one was looking-and she wasn’t running for anything) This woman has prepared her whole life to be a public servant-and you know what she prepared herself well-that shows because in spite of all the unkind words towards this woman-she has a good public service record. and talking about everything except the issues before us will not change that. I wish one person could tell us how their will be better seeing Hillary Clintons past tax records. But benefitting from her healthcare plan will help. the voters in this country have been wrong before-and we are paying for it now-as I have said before
the well off do not care who is president-but for the working class and poor-Obama and his intangible-hope,vision,change speeches will do nothing for them-that is why he is running of such talk-He (and again it is not him-but his backers-do not have a clue of how to really get this country up and going) and it is to
bad,
Obama is not a uniter-not with the people who support him-saying they will riot, and will not back Hillary if she became the nominee-(they haven’t really been listening to his speeches) what kind of unity is that?
Obama’ political career is still to close to its infancy for him to need to backpeddle on so many issues.Obama
Lack of experience+beholding to a lot of people+already backpeddling and trying to explain/or clarify issues=disaster down the road for us
Axelrod is the Dems Karl Rove
and he is using Black people the way Rove and Bush used the evangelicals.
But Hillary’s service to this country will stand-and be there for all to see, and you know what-I’ll be she will continue to do good.And what will some of us do-continue to stay on these blogs or tell anyone who will listen blaming her for every shooting since Lincoln-and not raise one finger to
do anything for any one else.
Hillary is smart and she has a good public service record-and guess what ladies-there is not another female to match hillary on the horizion to run for president. so all you people that say you hate hillary so much-you should go and really check out the good she has done. but be prepared to spend a while-her record is long.
and I am done with these blogs.

Posted by: jgaw | March 23, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am

I have always respected James Carville for his insightful commentary. I have also been around the Great Game of Politics long enough to recognize abject desperation when I see it. Only a few days ago, James was calling for civility in the Democratic Party primary, rebuking the candidates for giving McCain ammunition for the general election. I thought he had that right. When James counterattacked the hypocrisy of Ken Starr, I thought it was a bit over the top but only a bit. But now James portrays Governor Richardson as Judas Iscariot. If veteran Senators Leahy, Kennedy or Dodd, all of whom have endorsed inexperienced Senator Obama, were to jump ship and endorse Hillary, what would James call them? I doubt that James’s entirely transparent disingenuousness will work with even the more impressionable and naive Obama supporters. But it certainly won’t float with those of us who have been around a lot longer and have seen a lot more. Bill Richardson as Judas Iscariot? Come on, James, that’s beneath you. Way far beneath you.

Posted by: Bathroom Sage | March 23, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am

wow! The Clinton camp has some abilty for double standards..
and yes! if his endorsement does not matter then why call him names..
and again..is this what the Clintons give their friends for having a a political difference of opinion..well then , the rest should know what they are in for incase they beg to differ at any given time.

Posted by: Taruna | March 23, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am

WoW Hillary supporters are becoming as repulsive as her campaign!

Posted by: Maria | March 23, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am

Jacinto, Sorry just one more time. Can you name a bill that Barack himself has EVER passed?

Posted by: RL in Illinois | March 23, 2008, 2:18 am 2:18 am

OK RL: 1st and very simple Senate pork bill something that probably bothers Hillary and I as I understood it he will attend the same church just will be a new pastor since the previous was retiring. Next RL: Again ask not what or why unless you can answer what or why Hillary has not done the same especially since I asked first. Sounds like a typical debate non answer IMHO! Third jgaw: You never answered my question what has she or Bill for that matter done for the Latino community? I can remember Elian Gonzalez but that did not help us in anyway or them . There were some issues in Panama if I am not mistaken but we won’t talk about those either. Last but not least will be a positive note sort of! Thanks for your honest commentary and not led to the corral like a flock sheep response. I too had a great respect for Mr. Carville even though I knew where he was leaning I always believed from hearing him speak that if all else the party came first. I never thought this low was where he could go. In the immortals words of your god James, “Shame on you James Carville, Shame on You!” G-Nite all and have a pleasant morrow. God Bless and Happy Easter – politics aside…

Posted by: Jacinto | March 23, 2008, 2:46 am 2:46 am

The last part of my commentary was meant for Bathroom Sage forgot to put the name in. Thanks

Posted by: Jacinto | March 23, 2008, 2:49 am 2:49 am

Jacinto Jacinto…My church question was for None-So-Blind. Guess you didn’t see that. You didn’t answer the OTHER questions. Guess you didn’t see those either. You answered like a politician. My question was did he himself EVER pass ANY legislation-for ANYBODY? Your tirade on Hillary describes just about EVERY politician out there. Look around. They ALL just want your votes. You just better hope that what you want fits into their plans and that they know what their doing enough to pull it off. Pull up the Newsweek 3/17 article and read the media scrutiny Hillary(there are statistics) has had to take. Read the WHOLE thing-several sections. Obama’s lucky, he’s only had to take it since Rev.Wright. As far as Rezko, I wouldn’t speak too soon. He has changed his story a bit so far.

Posted by: RL in Illinois | March 23, 2008, 4:10 am 4:10 am

That’s what i like about Mr. Carville – He is always honest and always truthful about things. He is right, Richardson is Judas and he betrayed Sen. Clinton afterall the things they’ve done for him. He sold his master for 30 pieces of silver. WHat a joke Mr. Richardson!

Posted by: James Recto, Independent | March 23, 2008, 4:14 am 4:14 am

None of you above answered the question in the article. It asked what Hillary was supposed to be and the answer is Jesus Christ. Hmm.. Hillary now being compared to Jesus Christ by her aides, we really have to stop the show now and shove that woman out of the race. Otherwise, she will soon claim to be the Third Coming herself. With this person in charge, we will be heading for The Third World War. Even Bush wasn’t that reckless.

Posted by: NotoHillary | March 23, 2008, 5:10 am 5:10 am

Its not 30 pieces of silver but 30 pieces of gold and Obama has plenty of that. What promises were made for that endorsment,?

Posted by: PJM | March 23, 2008, 7:37 am 7:37 am

Can you belive this stuff? The employees who were fired for going through the passport files worked for a company owned by an Obama advisor, John O. Brennan(who donated the maximum to his campaign.
What was Obama looking for in Clinton’s and McCain’s passport files? They looked at his (Obama) passport file only to keep it from looking suspicious.
This Obama campaign gets worse by the minute.

Posted by: Mark David | March 23, 2008, 7:50 am 7:50 am

Carville is absolutely right. Bill Richardson built his career out of his friendship with the Clintons and this is how he repays them. He has gone out of the way to publicly attack his former friends in a despicable way.
Obama’s true sentiments about this country is questionable based on the kind of people he mixes with: Michele (un-proud American), Rev. Wright, Louis Farakhan and now he gets a bona fide back-stabber to join the flock, Bill Richardson. Birds of a feather.

Posted by: Paul St. Paul | March 23, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am

Q Pulpit
Hillary supporters think they are countering your comments but they are simply validating what you have suggested. Look at the comments of Jason from MI. Hillary’s “policies” are 360 degrees different from McCain, but yet McCain will get his vote after Hillary. How can you support Hillary’s proposed policies and vote for McCain? Simple. Like many Hillary supporters and Hillary herself, they care more about her candidacy then the issues and problems that plague this country. Like you said Hillary and her campaign touts McCain as a better option than a fellow Democrat Obama. Who has a healthcare plan, opposes the war in Iraq and has an agressive economic plan. But it is McCain, who has “NO” healthcare plan, wants to stay in Iraq for unlimited years, and has no clue about economic issues, that she touts as a better option than Obama. She became emotional in New Hampshire about the “country falling backwards”. It seems her concern was more personal because touting McCain who has promised to continue the Bush policies is a tremendous step backwards.

Posted by: Greg from Md. | March 23, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am

Just to prove my point. Look at their comments about concerning Richardson. Their logic is he should support “NOT” the person he thinks is the best candidate, the person who has won more states, votes and pledged delegates but his support should be based out of friendship. Ignoring what he thinks is best for the country they claim to love. Seems they love Hillary more. Sounds like “Bush Logic”. Where friendships trumps competence and blind loyality trumps morality.

Posted by: Greg from Md. | March 23, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am

Well Jake, trying to answer you question is tough. In a normal situation, the answer would be Jesus.
In the scenario, Richardson actually betrayed Bill Clinton. So, Bill Clinton gets the Jesus roll here. Since Jesus never had a wife, I guess Hillary’s roll, back to being the first serious female candidate for President of the United States.
I miss Carville, he sure knows how to make party lively!

Posted by: Erin | March 23, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am

Erin, I guess you never heard of the Grail or read Davinci Code. Hillary would be Mary Magdaline.
I think the true analogy is Carville as the serpent in the garden. The Clintons were idealists who bit the apple that is Washington. Now they are trying to stop the next idealist, Obama.

Posted by: Right on Day1 | March 23, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

Hey Q Pulpit…You sound like Jeremiah Wright practicing for today’s sermon. You can take Wright out of the pulpit but you can’t get the pulpit out of Wright and You can’t get Wright out of Obama. Right? Keep reminding everyone.

Posted by: RL in Illinois | March 23, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am

ah….the fair weather friend…Carville and the Clintons are one and the same….when people are with them they are their best friend; when they are against them, everything changes. Before the endorsement they eagerly seeked his endorsement. After he goes with Obama it wasn’t that important. When will everyone realize that for the Clintons it is all about winning AT ANY COST…they need this for their ego and insecurity that they have yet to understand. If they cannot win they will burn the house down…or maybe a cross.

Posted by: ed | March 23, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

Tell me OLDHARLEY, what is “your” candidate’s agenda?

Posted by: Greg from Md. | March 23, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

I guess that makes Tapper the Easter Bunny. Someone has to drop rotten eggs on the DNC!

Posted by: Tapper the Easter Bunny? | March 23, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am

I would rather to say to Bill Richardson:
That is okay to me you endorse anybody you like even you betray your close friend.
Just don’t say anything that seems you want to defends your self.
Anyway we don’t need friend like you.
Especially on this Easter Sunday.
Happy Easter Every Body.
God Bless America

Posted by: crisis08 | March 23, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Hillary is Herod. But you know, everyone who endorses Obama ends up getting slammed in an ugly manner by the Clinton campaign – so Bill would have seen that coming anyway.

Posted by: Jay | March 23, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am

Greg from Md.
I HAVE NO CANDIDATE YET. BUT I MAY BE CHOOSING BETWEEN BETWEEN “NOTHING YET” AND “MORE OF THE SAME”. IT
IS REALLY A VERY DIFFICULT CHOICE. I SOMETIMES WISH THAT I AWOKE EVERY MORNING IN THE FOOL’S PARADISE THAT SOME PEOPLE CURRENTLY RESIDE.

Posted by: OLDHARLEYGUY | March 23, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

So Carville thinks Hillary is Jesus by that argument? That explains why her “disciples” are so fundamentalist. Also by calling Richardson a Judas does that mean Carville equates anyone who betrays his Messiah Hillary as being a traitorous Jew? If Hillary gets in even a devout Atheist like me might start believing in the New World Order and the anti-Christ. She, and her cronies, appear more evil by the day.

Posted by: Martin | March 23, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am

Now wouldn’t it be funny if every single bridge the Clinton’s burnt in this dogged determination to stay in the race, beyond all reason or good for the Democratic party, stayed burnt?
Hillary must be really good friends with McCain, because not only does she endorse him over her fellow Democrat she is helping him considerably.
I don’t know what kind of fools the Clinton’s take the American people for, or is it simply a level of arrogance so far removed from reality? I don’t know.
In any case, if by some miracle she becomes the next President of the United States, can you keep her at home please? The rest of the world has been watching her antics and gee – well – we’ve come to the conclusion that she kinda sucks.

Posted by: Jay | March 23, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

Charles which poll have you been looking at lately. For your information, Obama is back on top. Sorry. Hillary is toast.
And stop whinig about voting for McCain. Regardless of what you do, what will be will be, and you and the other sore losers, will not be in a position to do anything about it. If it is part of God’s plan that Obama will be President, he will be. If not, God’s will be done.
I’ll not lose sleep over who becomes President in November. Afterall, they are all the same. May God continue to bless and protect the USA.

Posted by: alagbon | March 23, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

Barack Obama is unelectable. The best endorsement they could BUY to show he still has support is Bill Richardson? The guy said :
- endorsements dont mean much
- He would endorse who won his state
I understand why Richardson thinks Obama is going to be the nominee, but after the initial shock wears off, and you ask what this endorsement is for, it really looks backwards.

Posted by: tomdavie | March 23, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

Richardson and the Obama camp think Pennysvania, Michigan, Florida and other states dont matter apparently.
Why?
Its further proof Obama is not electable.
No wonder there is all this propoganda saying ‘hillary cant win’ .
Where was this 2 weeks ago? 3 weeks ago? Why now all of a sudden?
I know, Obamas reputation is getting hurt dramatically. If he is the real winner, why is he losing all the major primaries?
If he is the democrats choice, why cant he win the major democratic states? Why?
Because he is unelectable.

Posted by: tomdavie | March 23, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

Hyperbole Much, Boys?

“Obama adviser likens Bill Clinton’s comments to McCarthy’s”, the Boston Globe reports. Meanwhile, Jake Tapper notes that “Carville Equates Richardson With Judas”:In the New York Times today, Clintonista James Carville calls Bill Richardson’s endorseme…

Posted by: Ed Driscoll.com | March 23, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

by the way….james carville is “spot on” (like always)!

Posted by: tina | March 23, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

jacinto….you REALLY don’t have a clue, do you?

Posted by: tina | March 23, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

To compare a man who searched his heart and made his own decision with a man who sold out Christ the Lord, ESPECIALLY during the holy week of Easter really ticks me off. I have not always agreed with Carville, but I respected him. That ended today.

Posted by: Ann | March 23, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

James Carville is Right. I totally agree. Instead of the 30 gold coins – now it is one of the President men.
Pelosi – next Judas

Posted by: Indus | March 23, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

Oh Great, as if America doesn’t have enough problems now we have Vice President Security Breach Richardson saying that at least have ov America should shut up and elect Barack (mr. Denounce it) Obama. Richie, did you have something to do with snuffing out the votes of FLA and MI too? Talk about same old politics, the last I remember, Hillary is being very careful to not offend Mr. Obama, and yet you dirty politicians of “change” and “unity” are making sport of beating Hillary over the head with any here-say reason you can find.
Richardson is purposely adding a new level of unneeded and destructive complexity to the American decision making process, and for his own selfish end of being Obama’s new whitehouse pet.
Shame on Obama and Richardson for trying to cut so many voters out of the election process. Go have a party, and caucus for each other, and leave America alone, she has more important matters to attend.

Posted by: Oh Great | March 23, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

Bill Richardson was irrelevant while campaigning for the nomination, was irrelevant when he endorsed Obama, and will continue to be irrelevant when Hillary Clinton wins the nomination. I hope he gets kicked out of New Mexico too. I wonder who is he gonna sell his soul to next?

Posted by: Persio | March 23, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

I’m a Hillary supporter, but for a slimeball like Carville to call a great American like Richardson a Judas, makes me sick. Richardson has negotiated face to face with Saddam Hussein for the successful release of American hostages and he has been nominated for the Nobel Peeace Prize. Carville isn’t fit to shine Richardson’s shoes. And Richardson was in Congress for 14 years beforee Clinton even appointed him to anything.
The Clintons do not own Richardson or anybody else.

Posted by: Nancy | March 23, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Bill Richarderson endorsed Obama for President, I can not believe he would do this given the type of Church and Pastor he has been associated for the last 20yrs, Now I question where is Richarderson loyalty and integrity, you know what I believe Obama has made a deal with Richarderson, If he gives his endorse to him, Obama may give him the Vice Presidency position. Now I said that to say this, Hispanics are people of color as well, I see a race war coming between the Blacks, Whites and Hispanics, now that Richardeson endorsed Obama, this country is going to be even more divided between the races, I hope this thing backs fire on Obama and Richarderson, because Richarderson is a traitor, to the Clintons, he stabbed them in the back, for a man he does not know compared to the Clintons that he had a relationship for years it proves that there are not true friends in politics, only betrayal and backstabbing when it comes to people like Richarderson, Ted Kennedy, and John Kerry, I hope Jhon Edwards is not included , We shall wait and see.
I can not believe that Richarderson has falling for Obama’s deceptive speeches, Obama reminds me of an occult leader like Jim Jones of the Jonestown incident of the early 1970′s, where this man was so charismatic speeches that was able to get masses of people to drink tainted kool-aid, which brought to their deaths, Obama has that same aura that follows him, no matter what Obama does, says, or negatively involved in; brainwashed, gullible people who would still follow and support him.
After Clinton has made this man one of his Ambassadors, this is what thanks he get, like I said earlier people have no sense of locality and integrity towards one another, people will stab you in the back, at any opportune time, if they think it would benefit them in the long-term in some shape or form, next I will be looking for Obama to announce that Richarderson will be his Vice Presidential running mate.
What I do not understand Richarderson thinking processes, How can Obama bring this country back together knowing that he belonged to an African Based church that has a Pastor who Preaches Anti-Americanism, Separatism , Racism, and Bigotry? This truly blows my mind, well if Obama becomes the nominee, I hope all Hillary Supporters and Independent voters switch to, or stick with Hillary, how can we put a man in office such as this? If Hillary is not the nominee, I will try and put up a Ralph Nader Blog and encourage all Hillary supporters and Independents to vote for Nader in very large masse in order to block Obama from the Presidency, and if John McCain or Ralph Nader gets the Presidency, so be it, I will be finished supporting the Democratic Party, and I hope other people who believe in my position, do the same, we can not have a person like Obama be our Commander and Chief, Obama is not be trusted.
I see that Bill Richardson is not a man of high moral character, and integrity for endorsing a person like Obama either , He also lacks sound judgment to make good decisions, Well Obama has not only have some average voters spell bound and brainwashed but some of our politicians as well, and I guess John Edwards will follow next endorsing a man one just came on the scene like he’s the Great White Hope, I’m a Black American who is saying that Obama his suckered all of the voters and endorsers who chose that deceiver and “Johnny Come Lately” to be Our President, and who is associated and crooks and other racist, Well, I see were our and loyalty, sound judgment, and integrity has gone street out the window fro a man we don’t really no about or what he is going to do in office.

Posted by: Darrell | March 23, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Wow…so much negativity on such a good endorsement. Carville shouldn’t call anyone names…not Carville the king of dirty politics.
Clearly, the Clintons would have LOVED TO HAVE RICHARDSON ENDORSE HILLARY. Apparently, they tried to shame Richardson into doing it. Does anyone remember the photo of Bill and Bill watching the Super Bowl game? Which Bill wasn’t happy…I know…Bill Clinton.
I think then he knew or strongly suspected Richardson wasn’t going to endorse Hillary. Richardson’s dropped more hints than a B52 dropped bombs in press conferences on his perspective of how the campaign was being conducted. If you were paying attention, Richardson pointed out that Clinton only beat Obama by 1% in his state.
In the end, Super Delegates will vote the way they are going to vote. I have faith it won’t be from Clinton’s strong armed tactics but that they take into consideration what the American voter is saying. I have faith they will also consider that Republicans started voting for Hillary AFTER the Republican nominee was confirmed. As a former Republican voter, I know they are playing games with votes for Hillary. My friends have done that very thing in Texas knowing McCain had sealed the Republican nomination.

Posted by: Texas Voter | March 23, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Karen, you know well that James is as beautiful as his comments. Do not worry about him that much. He can continue to be the Clinton’s slave if he wants to. But thinking that a honorable Anmerican like Bill Richardson has to become a slave for the good work he has done as part of the Bill Clinton government has no place in politics. Bill Richardson is a very proud American son. He has served his country and will continue to do so as a governor of the great New Mexico. James has never run a Rumshop in his life. OBAMA08

Posted by: BKMC | March 23, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

3996 dead
30,000 wounded
the only betrayal was Clinton’s laziness in failing to read the intelligence reports before voting for the war.

Posted by: Ann | March 23, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

I know James is upset However if they had gotten Richardsons endorsement, they would have used it to their advantage. It all depends if you’re pitching or catching.

Posted by: John | March 23, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

You are totally wrong Enrico. Hillary can’t win the nomination. Even if she wins all of the remaining primaries by large margins, she will still lag Obama in delegates. So why is she still in the race making negative attacks? It’s getting to the point where both Democratic candidates will be damaged by November, and that only helps McCain.
Richardson’s endorsement is not about the Hispanic vote, as most Hispanics have already voted. It’s about the superdelegates and about party unity. Richardson doesn’t want the Democrats too damaged to win in November. He’s putting the country first.
The people calling Richardson a traitor, as if he owes Hillary his endorsement because he worked in her husband’s administration, don’t understand how our government works. Richardson is not a ‘peon’ and Hillary is not his ‘patron.’

Posted by: Carrie | March 23, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

Wow–it amazes me how split the party has become this election. I was excited for us to finally have to candidates that are getting more people to be involved in the process…that aside in response to Carville’s Judas statements–I have to refer to Richardson’s statement that he basically paid back Bill Clinton by doing his job well. The problem with the Clinton campaign seems to be that it has been run by cronies instead of the best people for the job.
As for the people STILL stuck on the Wright/Obama ‘nontroversy’ be more open-minded than the FOX news crew. Find out more about Jeremiah Wright and his 36 year ministry, listen to the ENTIRE sermons, not just the soundbites. I thought Democrats were supposed to be more open-minded before making a judgement about something. Guess I was wrong.

Posted by: MrsJones | March 23, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Sorry for the double post. Bad form!
It was unintentional, but crass.
Again, my apologies to other posters.

Posted by: Mike in Texas | March 23, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

Sen. Barack Obama is a gifted and eloquent speaker. His Tuesday speech on race relations was a beautiful example of his style. It was not a “speech for the ages.” Rather, it was a politically expedient attempt to divert attention from the real issue, which is not race relations at all, but rather Sen. Obama’s judgment, or the lack thereof, with respect to the inflammatory and polemical views expressed by his pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.
Sen. Obama has made a touchstone of his campaign for the presidency that it is not so much experience that counts, but rather judgment. While experience is much more important than he would have the electorate believe, he is right to focus on judgment as a critical factor in the determination as to whom should be our next president.
If Sen. Obama is the Democratic nominee, as he very well may be, then voters in November should ask themselves not how good his speech was, but rather what kind of judgment has he actually exhibited with respect to the deeply divisive views of the Rev. Wright.

Posted by: Jeremy | March 24, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am

Richardson’s State supported Hillary Clinton! Richardson thinks Obama will win because THE DNC WON’T LET THE PEOPLE OF FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN COUNT; therefore, he’s jumping on the ‘safe’ bandwagon! Richardson is a “typical” politician who is looking out for himself—not for the American people.
Then there’s the other “typical” politician, Obama. His entire campaign has been based on lies! What will the DNC do about a candidate with ties to terrorists, crooks and a radical, Anti-American ‘friend/mentor’ who spews hatred. While he can’t be responsible for what they said or did, he is responsible for lying about it.
THE PEOPLE WHO VOTED IN JANUARY AND FEBRUARY DIDN’T KNOW ABOUT OBAMA’S LIES. I’ll bet they would like a “re-vote”!
OBAMA BROUGHT THIS ON HIMSELF. HE HAS DIVIDED THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.
OBAMA AND RICHARDSON WILL OPEN THE SOUTHERN BORDER AND WE AMERICANS WILL LOSE OUR JOBS TO ILLEGALS!
ALL AMERICAN CITIZENS NEED TO WAKE UP!! CALL YOUR SENATORS AND MEMBERS OF CONGRESS===NOW!

Posted by: proudamerican2008 | March 24, 2008, 2:13 am 2:13 am

My words go hand-in-hand with my conscience! My integrity is very important to me. Whatever I advocate for others, I demand of myself.
Apparently none of the above traits apply to Richardson when political opportunity presents itself.
Richardson said within the last few weeks that “delegates should respect the wishes of the voters in their states.” HRC won NM
Kennedy and Kerry said the same thing before HRC won Mass.
So you tell me? Does he have a conscience, integrity, or any veracity at all? NOPE!
Same holds true for K and K, and many others.

Posted by: Mike in Texas | March 24, 2008, 2:24 am 2:24 am

You go James Carville!!!
Obama should be careful—Richardson betrayed his friend, Hillary, on Good Friday.

Posted by: proudamerican2008 | March 24, 2008, 2:49 am 2:49 am

Nancy said it best:
I’m a Hillary supporter, but for a slimeball like Carville to call a great American like Richardson a Judas, makes me sick. Richardson has negotiated face to face with Saddam Hussein for the successful release of American hostages and he has been nominated for the Nobel Peeace Prize. Carville isn’t fit to shine Richardson’s shoes. And Richardson was in Congress for 14 years beforee Clinton even appointed him to anything.
The Clintons do not own Richardson or anybody else.

Posted by: hubbs | March 24, 2008, 2:58 am 2:58 am

Too bad for the Clintons. Governor Richardson is not one they can corrupt with their money and promise of high-appointments.
As far as as Carville is concerned, he has been barking like a crazy dog since John Kerry’s run for Presidency. He’s no Democrat… perhaps, he’s being so hen-pecked by his Republican wife at home and can only blow off steam, out of her presence.

Posted by: Bilbo983 | March 24, 2008, 7:10 am 7:10 am

When Obama the President will try to pass any of his promissed hope and change legislation through congress., their answer will be. Sorry we’re fresh out of Hope but we have change though.
All the boys who helped carry him there would want to get paid first before lifting a spoon. It’s called the elevator effect.
Boy! Isn’t his finger gonna hurt pushing the botton for everyone.
Where do you want to go? top floor. the movers & shakers floor.
What do we get? Change if any, more like bubckus.
You students, I would not count on those $4000 just yet. it would have to pass through congress and by that time and if it passes you would have by then graduated and maybe with children already.

Posted by: ruthmatters | March 24, 2008, 7:21 am 7:21 am

Richardson has done some very good things for this country. But, I do not think he had this country’s best interests in mind when he endorsed Obama. I consider his actions here to be all about BR.
It certainly taints his image when Richardson asks others to believe his words, and then suddenly seems not to believe his own words. Then is untrue to his words, and refuses to follow his own dictates.
Richardson said within the last few weeks that “delegates should respect the wishes of the voters in their states.”(*See Tapper’s Article Archives.) HRC won NM! So where is any basis for trusting or believing Richardson at this point?
Kennedy and Kerry said the same thing before HRC won Mass. Both K & K, plus D. Patrick/Obamas alter ego would be honor bound to vote for HRC, if they had any honor. Strictly on the basis of their own “words”!
Maybe some of y’all just do not like the Biblical aspects. Probably would have been more palatable if Carville had called him Benedict Arnold.

Posted by: Mike in Texas | March 24, 2008, 7:40 am 7:40 am

I would not have used the term “judas”, however, Richardson’s endorsement of Obama is a big disappointment and will only add to the split in the Democratic party. It is unbelievable that so many Obama supporters have no problem with disenfranchising Florida and Michigan voters. If they thought it would benefit their candidate against Hillary Clinton or against a Republican, they would be screaming louder than Rev Wright to protect the right of those folks to vote. Why don’t they support the right of every citizens right to vote ? Those voters weren’t polled about the decision to hold the primaries early and they shouldn’t be held as responsible. This is America where “We the people” should mean something. The divide will just widen and many Democratic voters will either not vote in the General election of will vote Republican because of outrage about the treatment of Florida and Michigan. Have we forgotten how we felt about the “hanging chads” and Al Gore’s so-called “loss” in Florida ?

Posted by: Kayakroller99 | March 24, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am

3996 dead
30,000 wounded
the only betrayal was Clinton’s laziness in failing to read the intelligence reports before voting for the war.
—————————————–
ann-same goes for biden and dodd.

Posted by: tina | March 24, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am

Listen Up all you confussed mis-guided people. Also, for all those who post at the end of their rant that they are black person, STOP Lying. True Black People can read your post and know if you are Black or not. So let me continue. Its over for Hillary C. She can’t muster enough delegate votes to win the nominee. So get over it and come to the reality that Obama will be the next democratic nominee. For those who want to jump ship, JUMP. you were never a true democrat from the beginning. We don’t need your fake vote. So if you can call Bill
Richardson a Judas for supporting Obama than you are one as well if you don’t suppor the Democratic Nominee. Were is your loyality? But if you are a real democrat and whats to see the democratic take the White House. Get behind the party and leave your bigot view at the door. and lets support Obama to be the next Great President of these United States of America. Obama 08

Posted by: Chuck | March 24, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

Obama is nothing new, nothing different. He uses dirty politics, personal attacks and to me, is clearly divisive, no matter how he snows the average person. Further, he is a typical politician–Rezko (lied), NAFTA (played both sides), voted to continue in Iraq despite his big SPEECH against it–in truth, if he had an actual decision to make on that, and was privy to the same info as those who had to take a real (not theoretical) stance, he might have voted for it…a speech is just a speech (very safe).
Tell me, just how is he so different?

Posted by: anon | March 24, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am

Carville is and has been in love with the sound of his own voice and a firm believer in what he thinks passes for wit for a VERY long time.
He’s as snarky as a Bush.

Posted by: pati | March 24, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

Carville comment just tells you that Richarson has led them to believe that he was in their corner and then switched at the last moment. But then Bill Richarson, is all about Richarson and Big Oil! He,s neither for Obama or Hillary he is part of the overall problem with the Democrat party when it comes to self interest.He snuggled up to Clinton to advance his career and now he snuggling up to Obama. I suggest he go back to New Mexico and spend some of those big profits he making from Big Oil and start helping those latinos who are down and out instead of kissing up to another typical Chicago corrupt politician. By the way, why don,t you show were the Obama charm has worked in his own district. Didn,t see no big crowds their when he was in Chicago and by looking at who he represented, they didn,t think he was all that great. So you see the fraud is complete with Obama, He is a Oprah hip hop hype Iconoclastic fraud. The only differents is all those people that are the bad people of were he comes from, are behind him and out of sight. They were the ones that brought race after they lost N.H. Get real people!He,s done more drugs then George Bush! We don,t need to go from an Alcoholic to an Addict! Wake up and smell the coffee!

Posted by: Karen | March 24, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

While I don’t agree with Pastor Wright’s statements, Senator Obama asked America to try an see these statements thru the prism of a man where the defining moments of his life were dominated by racism.
For him and and many black American’s of his generation this simmering anger has never gone away. For instance, can you imagine having a family member drag out of his house because it was perceived that he broke some Jim Crow law. He may have been beaten, whipped or God forbid, lynched and burned. Many of those whose family members were treated so badly in this country are still alive and remember those times. There is no peace when people have suffered in such a vicious manner and no justice to answer these crimes. I know that many Americans feel that Black America should just “get over it”. But how does one get over such bitterness and pain.
Recently two women were killed in this country…young women who had promising lives, but there lives were snuffed out in an instance. Should the families of these two women just “get over it” as time passes. I would no more dismiss there pain and anger as I would any other person he has being thru a tramautic experience in their life.
As American’s we must begin to demonstrate empathy to one another and gain a better understanding of our past as we press on to our future.

Posted by: Gary | March 24, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

Chuck,
You can vote as you wish, the fact that you think “Obama knows nothing about the Black experience because he never lived it, he grew up in a upper middle class family leaving in Hawaii and Indonesia,…” is irrelevant. This kind of talk benefits no one and indeed shows your limited thinking.
Many American’s are voting for this Senator Obama (and likewise Senator Clinton) because they believe their candidates issues are relevant to them
The fact that he happens to be black says that we have come a long way on displaying to all that a citzen of this great country can run for the highest office in the land despite his color.

Posted by: Gary | March 24, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

I am completely disillusioned about Richardson. Until he dropped out I supported his presidential campaign, even contributed money twice. When he dropped out I moved to Clinton. I hoped that Richardson would be Clinton’s VP. Now he supports Obama? It’s got to be because he thinks Obama is going to win and wants to be on the winning ticket. I will never support Richardson again. I’m an Oregonian and I will vote for Clinton and pray that others wake up before it’s too late.

Posted by: Betrayed | March 24, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

Carville and the other senior advisers are consultants that are fearful that the millions of dollars in future fees to be earned in other campaigns are going down the drain. They viewed this election as a Slam-Dunk” until the upstart Obama caught fire. These smart guys did not have a post-super Tuesday strategy and have resorted to every trick, innuendo and thin rationale to save a futile campaign.

Posted by: LPeterson | March 24, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Tiger Woods is the most exciting golfer in decades… but that doesn’t qualify him to be president of the PGA.
Obama is the most exciting orator in decades… but that doesn’t qualify him to be president of the USA.

Posted by: steve-o | March 24, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

LPeterson: Carville has nothing to fear. The country has if Obama became president. Do you want another disaster worse than Bush. Get a grip. Obama did not form that speech, he had a woman form it who copied from other speeches. When is he going to learn to do something himself. How could he run the country? You better wake up to reality and think before you vote.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | March 24, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

The reason why Mr Carville and the Clintons are so upset about the Richardson endorsement is because Hillary may loose more super delegates. The Clinton campaign has become desparate and will use anyone and anything to discredit Mr Obama at the expensive of the entire party. Hillary needs to wake from her dream of becoming President. Maybe she should consider running for Vice President. In retrospect, maybe not … she has even fewer chances of winning the VP race than the presidential nomination.

Posted by: James - Atlanta | March 24, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

Tiger Woods is the most exciting golfer in decades… but that doesn’t qualify him to be president of the PGA.
Obama is the most exciting orator in decades… but that doesn’t qualify him to be president of the USA.
Nice observation Steve-O, but who ever said it does? Come up with something better than a straw man assertion please.

Posted by: J | March 24, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

dl:I am not disgusted with Carville’s remarks. Obama is a Judas for betraying the Clinton’s. Are you telling me that your believe it was right for Judas to betray Jesus? You don’t bite the hand that feeds you. He owed Clinton the endorsement, because if Clinton didn’t pick him for his administration he would not have the experience he has today. And for the record, you are aware what happened to Judas after betraying Jesus?

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | March 24, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

Carville’s statement works on the presumption that Richardson’s loyalties should be to the Clinton’s first and the American people second. An endorsement should not be about ‘you scratched my back, let me scratch yours’ – it should be about what (or who) is in the best interest of our nation.
To disagree with the man’s opinion on who should be President is fine but to call him Judas as if he has an obligation to support the Clinton’s is completely irresponsible and just further actuates the notion that the Clinton camp feels the White House is owed to them (By the way it isn’t).

Posted by: J | March 24, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

He’s just brown-nosing to be veep otherwise he wouldn’t have said it.His proposal came on a double edged knife stating if he wouldn’t support if he wasn’t on the ticket.Then the proposition would have changed to the Clintons.

Posted by: J.P. | March 24, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

Well Jesus was the Chosen One, and if Richardson is Judas then Hillary is….Wait, should I feel disenfranchised since the Democratic nomination is the Clinton’s birthright and all the votes for Obama are a minor hitch?

Posted by: J | March 24, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

In response To Chuck:
Obama is not the right Black Man, Like I said before, he can’t identify with me he knows nothing about the Black Experience, he was not raise in the Black Experience and yes this is relevant as far as I’m concerned, because he could get in office and not do noting to help Black get ahead in this country. I don’t trust this particular Black man.
I’m not going to jump ship form the Clintons who I do know about,and vote for a Man, Woman, White or Black who just came out of no where preaching hope and change,this what the Anti-Christ is going to do and decieve millions of people, he’s going to look good sound good, and come to people preaching a new thing, and all the time he’s preaching lie s and deception, that remainds of Obama, Obama is so persausive, cunning and decieving in his speech tha tanything he does is alright with the gullible people he brainwashed to vote for him, and he uses speeches to kepp them in line as well, Black people are looking for some great White Hope to change and unify this country, well that will be easier siad then done, Obama and his pastor has caused more divison between the races than Bush has so far.
Obama just until now stood behind The American Flag, Obama is fake and cosmetic, I see right through him< not a bit decieved by his earth shattering speeches, I do admit Obama is a great speaker, but I would not trust or confidence in him enouhg to be President of this country,like I said earlier, Obama is the wrong Black to be nominated for the Presidency.
By the way, my thinking is very broad and diverse, I do my research on the candidates , Have you?, or you just another one of those people who voted for Obama just because he's Black. Many my race of people, are not loyal at all, we as a race of people on a whole; don't know what it is to be loyal and dependable, as soon as they think the grass looks greener on the other, they leap over into it without counting up the long-term cost for making that leap, we made such a leap on a candidate based 99% on his race without even digging into the man's background to discover whether or not he deserves to be the Frist Black President.
We Black people should require a higher standard and criteria for picking a Black President other than because he's Black and a good speaker, you know us Blacks folks gets very excited and emotional over good preaching, teaching, and speaking, Obama was able to to play that race card very well by sounding like a fire and brimstone preacher when speaking on the campaign stump, I admit he's good at it, that's because he's a member of a church who had a Pastor who preached like that, so the Black people and some Whites as well; postively responded to Obama's style of speaking, but we must always remember, Obama is a politician too, and they tend to lie and decieve people to get your vote, being a member of a church does not make one's mouth a prayer book.
Obama has mislead, lied, and did things in this campaign that's very un-becoming of a true Christan, true Christan's would not try and bittle his or her opponent like Obama does, and then hides his hand like he's done nothing wrong, and when Hillary responds back, he cries foul, and play the race card again. I as an Black American; would not want Obama to win the Presidency being known only as the Black President, but the President of All the United States.
What I see and read about Obama's political and personal background he will not be the President of all the people, not even his own race, Obama will be sending a lot of our tax dollars over to Kenya and failto tackle and fix the problems made by the Republican Party here at home. Obama is just using Black folks to get in office, and if and when he succeeds, he's not even going to recgonize or know the Black communities who helped put him in the Oval Office, because not only is he inexperienced, he's very arrogant and cocky as well, and he does not really respect women, so don't be decived, if Obama becomes the Nominee, he will have a very hard time beating the Republican's; because thery're going to pull all the covers back on him and expose who and what he's really all about, and I'm very afraid it will not be pretty. I telling a warning, this not the right Black man you want to be President of the United States, When Bush was running I said the same thing in many blogs like these, people laughed and thought I was crazy, but look at what mess Bush have this country in, I feel vindicated, because what I predicted and was warning people about Bush doing that time period came out to be true. So my fellow Black Brother and Sisters, You have been for-warned and if Obama becomes President, and he does not live up to your expectations, don't cry impeachment then, when you had a chance to stop prevent him from being President from the start.

Posted by: Darrell | March 24, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

In response to Darrell
You speak of loyalty as if it equates to intelligence. There are a lot of folks in this country that were loyal to President Bush and look at the mess where in. People should vote for the person whos is best qualified to unify Americans and resolve the nations problems. Politician, including Hillary, are loyal to their supporters which may result in policies that we the voting public may not necessarily agree with. Special interest have trumped the American peoples loyalties everytime. Why do you think it will be any different this time?

Posted by: James - Atlanta | March 24, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

In response to Kayak Roller99:
You hit the nail on the head, when things are not going their way in the Obma camp they cry foul and no fair in many instances, but it’s true what you said about Michigan and Florida, the Obama camp should want know one or state left out, but since it may not benefit them they’re remaining quite on the issues.
where is that so called Christan Obama?
If he was for right, he would also demand that these two state’s primaries count, and let the chips fall where they may, and if he loses or wins, at least he would have his Christan dignity still in tack knowing that he did everything he could possibly do to make the race have some appeareance of being fair and balanced by making sure that all voices where heard even when it was a political risk his Presdency to do so, that’s the Christian and honorable thing to do, but I see Obama is only a Christain in word; but deed or action, he’s a hypocrite and using the title when convienant as a cover up to win this election.

Posted by: Darrell | March 24, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Judas tried to stop something; Bill Richardson is trying to help something start. Carville needs to quit calling people names! Bill Richardson has done more for this country than Carville could only dream he had.

Posted by: rjeinc | March 24, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

In Response to James in Atlanta
Know that’s not what I’m saying, My race of people are not loyal to anyone or thing when they think the grass is greener on the other side, The Clintons where good to us minorties in the 90′s, Hillary thought she could depende on the Black community who she though had here back, and then, what we do, we stab her in the back, and jump ship, just because we have a black candidate running of who really don’t know about him or what he’s all about,o rwhat he’s going to truly do in office.
Obama talking about change and hope and unity all is this just words of hope and no true action is going to be put forward if Obama gets in office. Obama is feeding his supporters a bunch of bologna, but this Black man is not falling for the ookie dook, I don’t trust this particualr Black person to be my President.
Yes, Obama is very intelligent, many people in this world are, but that does not mean they would make a good President, Obama is not there yet. Just because he’s Black does not automatically entitles him to my Black vote.

Posted by: Darrell | March 24, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

In Response to James in Atlanta
Know that’s not what I’m saying, My race of people are not loyal to anyone or thing when they think the grass is greener on the other side, The Clintons where good to us minorties in the 90′s, Hillary thought she could depende on the Black community who she though had here back, and then, what we do, we stab her in the back, and jump ship, just because we have a black candidate running of who really don’t know about him or what he’s all about,o rwhat he’s going to truly do in office.
Obama talking about change and hope and unity all is this just words of hope and no true action is going to be put forward if Obama gets in office. Obama is feeding his supporters a bunch of bologna, but this Black man is not falling for the ookie dook, I don’t trust this particualr Black person to be my President.
Yes, Obama is very intelligent, many people in this world are, but that does not mean they would make a good President, Obama is not there yet. Just because he’s Black does not automatically entitles him to my Black vote.

Posted by: Darrell | March 24, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

Very bad PR move. The “boy’s club”-Kerry, Kennedy etc…(everbody saw how far their endorsements went in Cal.& Mass.)figure they can publicly humiliate Hillary into dropping out by getting Richardson to endorse Obama. This has been going on behind the scenes for a long long time. It was done now because they didn’t think they needed him before Texas. Huge problem for them because Obama with all his money and hype COULD NOT PUT HER AWAY. Huge problem not counting Florida and Michigan votes. Do they think we are too stupid not to know what fixing an election is? Huge problem with Rev. Wright. Huge problem that there is a growing belief that they KNEW about the Rev. BEFORE the primaries and the voters didn’t find out until AFTER. Huge problem for them because THIS- not Hillary Clinton-has sent politics straight back to the 60′s. THIS is what will destroy the party. For those of us that did our share of protesting then-this is bringing it all back and the fire is still there. So bring it on kids. We blazed the trail for you.

Posted by: RL in Illinois | March 24, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

Hillary Clinton is not her husband, And she certanily isnt Jesus.
To say that anyone that endorses her is Judas is just wrong and unchristian like.
We owe Hillary Clinton nothing.Because it was her husband not her that ran this country for 8 years. Stop allowing her to use his Presidency as the reason she feels qualified to run this country. Thats like sayinh
I’m looking for a president that can get by own there own merits, Not there last name.

Posted by: Jesus deserves better. | March 24, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

Reponse to Darrell
Black people are not voting for Obama just because he’s Black. Many of us switched because we believe he’s offering an opportunity for positive change and because he has a uniqued ability to unify people of all races, genders, and cultures. People outside of the United States like him also because of he has a unifying appeal. Black people have been promised a lot by past nominees and presidents with little to show for it. Obama is not just offering hope. He is offering change which gives us hope. Without change we have no hope.

Posted by: James - Atlanta | March 24, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Fear is what I smell. Ya’ll really want Obama to be seen as the anti-Christ.
You realize what he will do to McCain once it becomes a one on one battle.
It scares you that this black men is destined to do great things for this country. So you take our pastors words and use them to demonize him. You discount all the good Reverend Wright and the church have done in the last 36 years.
You say that a man who served his country in the military is Anti-American. When all he did was point out the flaws and sins of this nation.
Something pastors(both black and white)do every Sunday all across this nation
Obama is the only candidate that will be able to go to the United Nations and tell them we made a mistake by invading Iraq, and that we can not end this war without there support. (That people is the true way this war will end,America has never won a war alone.)
He is the only person that will be able to rebuild the bridges with the leaders across this world, that Bush has destroyed.
You allow Hillary Clinton to not be held responsible for her actions. She helped cause all this chaos our nation is going thru.
Wake up America. Don’t be fooled.

Posted by: Wright Supporter | March 24, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

Great points Dennis In florida.
But your preaching to the choir. Hillary could give a speech wearing a grand dragon robe, and then say she was duped into it and her supporters would forgive her.
They dont hold her accountable for her actions. They see her as perfect. There even comparing her trials to the trials of our lord and savior Jesus Christ..

Posted by: Wright Supporter | March 24, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

Bill Clinton invited himself over for Super Bowl Sunday at Bill Richardson’s house just 2 days before Super Tuesday. What a bully. Maybe Bill Richardson just got tired of this kind of “implied” endorsements and hints of “indebtedness” from the Clinton Camp and just decided to follow his own heart. Maybe he did all he could to respect them by at least holding off until after the TX vote. A hugely thoughtful consideration, actually.
When people who know someone personally well choose someone otherwise, it should cause those of us who don’t know any of these people personally to take pause.
Bill Richardson is a gentleman. He decided to support another gentleman rather than a deceptive career politician and his smiling rogue of a wife.
Hillary is using women and Latinos just as Bill used African Americans– to deliver a dynasty to her family by pretending she can feel your pain.
Even if that woman wins, the country loses because she will get nothing accomplished. She has lost the respect of many of her Democratic colleagues who recognize a “turncoat” and she will have no Republican friends for having beaten McCain, no doubt eventually by the same nasty tricks.
The rest of the world must look at us and laugh. The Clintons embarassed the country before, and through this election process, with our permission, they are doing it again.
The more I see of those two people the more I wish they would go away and take their noise and nastiness with them.

Posted by: NjT | March 24, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

The democrats are getting a little desperate!

Posted by: RON JOSSENDAL | March 24, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

In Response To James Atlanta:
I’m sorry to disagree with you, Obama is not a true change agent, telling this man is snowing you. What kind of change do you think Obama can offer?
This man sat under a Anti-American, bigot, and racist Pastor, Obama has that mess in him also, and you will find that out in due time as well.
Obama is offering change alright, all change is not good, I see Obama has my many people in race brainwashed like Jim Jones brainwashed his people to death. And you’re also going to find out that Obama is Politics as usual, this is a slogan he uses to snow people who are gullible enough to believe him, no real change and unity, Obama want’s to ride on the backs of Blacks who lived the civil right s movenment, well he’s not accepted with me, because he never experienced what Blacks had to go through, he lived a privileged life, so he cannot relat e to me as an Black man, Obama would not no how to address the issues that affect the Black community, for example,does Katrina, dar4 come to mind? he said nothing when thes e issues where going on, Obama even stated this was not an racial issue, where have Obama been, in the Katrina incident, if this had of been a rich state that was populated by mostly White folk and was in trouble like those Blacks in Louisana was, Bush would have done more to get those people stabilized, but the difference was that these people that where in a crisis was mostly Black, therefore it was not a top priority to Bush, where was Obama?, No where to be found, Obama was too busy thinking about running for President and thought it would hurt his White House campaign run. Where was Obama doing the “State Of The Black Union Forum?” Obama used Campaigning as an excuse not to show up, Travis Smiley and others who attended covered for him so that it would not look so bad, but that was noticed by many people who watched that fourm, here’s a black man for President who was invited to attend this forum to discuss his platform and he turns down the invitiation, no Obama can’t be my President, he would do things similar like this to the Black community quite often if hte Black community hewlp to make him President, Obama is cosmetic and will turn his back on us once he has our vote.
Hillary did show to the forum, even though her motive may have been to woo the Black vote, Obama already won the primaries in that state, so he felt no drive or pressure to go there for a fourm, knowing that he already got there votes, he did not have to prove nothing to them anymore until the general election if he becomes the nominee, Obama moved on and did not look back. Obama used them in Louisana to get the Black vote and did not have the decency to return the favor. But for whatever reason Hillary attended the fourm, the point is she still showed up and that spoke volumes to me, this let me know that Obama is not going to put nothing aside to reach out to us Black folks, remember Obama is mixed and raised and educated in a privileged environment, so I know he never experienced the true Black experience, so he can not effectivley relate to me, but Bill and Hillary tried over the years to help Black folk along with White folk and others the way it should be, because we’re all Americans, Obama has not earned my trust or credibillity in this area,because everytime something comes up controverserial when it comes to Black race-related issues, Obama runs and hide, the only reason he gave that race-relation’s speech last week, was because he was doing damage control to his campaign, and when people begin to take a second look at him after it was revealed that he was associated and mentored by a bigoted, Anti-American, racist, Pastor for over two decades, Obama also did this because he wanted to get his wavering brainwashed gullible followers in control and back line like little tin soldiers in a trance due to his deceptive mesmerizing mind-control speeches.
I’m saying this again and again, Obama is not the right Black President, I don’t care how intelligent he is, Obama’s not going to agrressively and effectively try and address the issues that so negatively affect the Black community if elected to the Oval Office, Yes change is what you’re going to get, but may not be the type of change you really wanted in the long-term. Obama going to show his supporters something and they are not going to like it in the end.
All Obama is a good speaker who has the gift of gab and able to use it successfully to decieve, hoodwink, and brainwash guillble people who are willing to listen to his deception. Obama is not the right President needed to turn this country in the right and positive direction, he’s just all eloquent talk.

Posted by: Darrell | March 24, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

In Response to NJT:
Could you give me some facts and examples of what the Clinton’s done so much that you hate them so much?
I think Bill was a very good President, minus the sex rondevu in the White House with an aid, what else did he do.
What did Hillary do to deserve not to be President? What make you think Obama will do a better job as President? You know nothing about Obama, because he just cam eon the national scene two or three years ago, he has very little expereince at the national level, In my opinion, Obama is not ready to take on the Presidency, he a good speaker and that’s just about it, it takes more than being a good speaker to effectively run the White House and this country, this country has challenges that it’s going to take someone with a little more experience at the national level to tackle and fix the mess Bush will leave behind in 2009, I don’t trust Obama to do the job right.

Posted by: Darrell | March 24, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

In response to Wright Supporter:
It scares me that whe’re going to elect a man who does not know what he doing.
He can’t bring unity to the Part y or this country, Obama and his Pastro made sure of that. Obama is not to be trusted, and Ihope this country will not unify behind this man Obama this would be a grave mistake.

Posted by: Darrell | March 24, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

Wright Supporter: If you such a christian why are you a supporter of racist Wright? Are you as phony as a three dollar bill like Obama who I believe to be racial himself and is using the white people for votes. All Obama is after is to make history as the first black president. Let me go on record to advise you he is not black or white, he is MULATTO. We don’t have an American black whose parents are black and all are born and raised in this country. Richardson is a phony, and a Judas like Carville said. He turned his back on the Clinton’s and if he does that what else would he do. I hope the Latino’s do not give Obama votes. We are not ready for him in the white house.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | March 24, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

Edwards is playing the waiting game. He is waiting to see who will win the nomination then he will campaign for that candidate to get a job in the white house like Judas Richardson. Carville hit it on the head and he was right. I hope the Lantino’s say goodby to Richardson and don’t elect him in office again if Obama doesn’t get the nomination or win the presidency.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | March 24, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

Obama Supporter: Your are so wrong and Darrell is right. Obama would put this country in a disaster worse than what Bush has done. First of all, he is racial or he would not go to that church, secondly, he does not have the intelligence to run for president. He is being schooled by different people about how to handle the white house. He has to copy every speech from others and then he adds some of his own words. Hillary did learn plenty of experience being the first lady for 8 years. What experience has Obama had. Only experience with crooks and a racist pastor. Get a grip on life.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | March 24, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

Chuck: Why would anyone in their right mind want to support a candidate that has been going to a racist church for 20 years if he is not racial himself. Of course he had all the white voters fooled in MN and WI but he does not fool me one bit. His word hope came from an RFK speech when he was campaigning for president. And he talks about unity? How can you unite people when you listen to pastor Write and his racial remarks. And he did not use good judgment in choosing friends. Rezko, Ayers, Farrakhan and Pastor Wright. Obama has no sense whatsoever, how would he run this country? Get a grip. He is the worst candidate we ever had running for the presidency with the worst background. And what he said about his grandmother who raised him for ten years as a typical white woman. Now there is a new pastor at that church you should hear him.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | March 24, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

Obama cannot be trusted, we know nothing about this man but he feel-good speeches, he just rose up out of no where, like the Anit-Christ preachingf hope and unity. Obama is not the right one to be our President, he has race issues , and a divider of this country. Richarderson made a grave mistake by endorsing the man, Igues he thinks he’s going to be Vice President that’s why he endorsed an inexperienced candidate.
If Obama getr’s the nomnation I will not be voting, if I do I will be voting for Ralph Nader, I hope othe rstrong Hillary supporters do the same, so that
If Hillary supporters are reading this blog, if Hillary is not the nominee, I will be starting a NAder Blog and encourage former Hillary supporters not to stay home, but vote for Nader instead, We should not rally behind a man like Obama who has divided this country even furhter when it was revealed that Obama sat under a racist Anti-American Pastor for over 20yrs.
We should refuse to unite this party behind Obama who has used his race sneakly and cunnally to win the nomination at the expense of Hillary who was treated biasly and unfair by the media through- out this campaign.
Richarderson was on the TV today talking about bringing the paerty together, he must have fell and bumped his head, he has no trust or crdeibility with me either, I believe he made a backroom deal with Obama for the vice presidency or some other high position in the Obama Administration. Richarderson is a back-stabber and traitor, Obama better watch his back, because Richarderson may backstab him as well later on down the road.
No I’m soory but I hope Hillary supports go to Nader if she quits the race, we will just have an divided party so be it, the males in this campaign caused it , by trying to prevent Hillary a woman candidate from breaking the glass ceiling, Men has always been President let a woman have it for a change, but these gender-biased males don’t want a woman leading this country period, they rather gave it to a Black man then a woman, and if Obama was not a Black man, I beleive Hillary would be beating him now, Obama shrewd, because Ted Kennedy convinced him that he better run for President now because a woman is running and this is heis best chance to become President over a woman, that’s why Obama ran for the White House now.
Also, Obama is winning so far, because the media sat on the pastor Wright story until they where sure that Obama was in a better position of winning the nomination, that’s why all Hillary suporters should stay home or better yet, vote for Nader to try and Block Obama from being President, which would prevent him from sending our tax dollars overseas to Kenya and prevent Bill Richarderson from becoming Vice President by stabbing his so-called loyal friend in the back to get there, and if McCain get the Presidency so bet it, the media and Obama should have been more fairer to Hillary throughout this campaign process, we will get what we deserve, because we reap what we sow.

Posted by: Darrell | March 24, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

Scotty: I give you credit for your comments. I say the same thing. Michelle has run of the mouth and Obama attends a racist church and probably is racial himself in disguise. All he wants to do is make history from the white people who gave him the wins in IA, MN, WI and SC. I do not know what those white people were thinking when they voted for him. A liar, fake and copies the words of other candidates that ran for president. And Richardson is a Judas. Carville said it right. Making a comment about his grandmother being a typical white women should wake the white people up as to what he thinks about them.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | March 24, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

Scotty: I give you credit for your comments. I say the same thing. Michelle has run of the mouth and Obama attends a racist church and probably is racial himself in disguise. All he wants to do is make history from the white people who gave him the wins in IA, MN, WI and SC. I do not know what those white people were thinking when they voted for him. A liar, fake and copies the words of other candidates that ran for president. And Richardson is a Judas. Carville said it right. Making a comment about his grandmother being a typical white women should wake the white people up as to what he thinks about them.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | March 24, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

Sam: If Obama doesn’t win the nomination then America might be lucky if he throws himself under the bus and Richardson with him, so we can rid ourselves of both of them. Judas and his racial candidate. You talk about Hillary lying? Give me a break. Obama has lied about Rezko, Farrakhan and now he has a racist pastor and stated he didn’t wasn’t in church when the pastor said thos words, but pictures showed he was. So let’s not make a god out of Obama.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | March 24, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

Obama is finished and Richardson simply tried to bail him out!
Noone will take those words back!
Obama is set to loose with doble digits at PA, NC, WV, KT,IN,

Posted by: Sam | March 24, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

I think James Carville is right.
Richardson betrayed his friend, Hillary Clinton on Good Friday. Richardson’s State of New Mexico supported Hillary Clinton! Richardson betrayed the people who put him in office.
Richardson thinks Obama will win because THE DNC WON’T LET THE PEOPLE OF FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN COUNT; therefore, he’s jumping on the ‘safe’ bandwagon! He didn’t endorse Obama because he thought he would be the best president. He’s a “typical” opportunistic politician who wants to be on the ticket of Obama as Vice President, so he can pursue his ambition for US Presidency in the next election. Richardson is looking out for himself—not for the American people.
Then there’s the other “typical” politician, Obama. His entire campaign has been based on lies! What will the DNC do about a candidate with ties to terrorists, crooks and a radical, Anti-American ‘friend/mentor’ who spews hatred. Granted, he can’t be held liable for what they said or did, but he should be held accountable for lying about it (and other things).
THE PEOPLE WHO VOTED IN JANUARY AND FEBRUARY DIDN’T KNOW ABOUT OBAMA’S LIES.
OBAMA BROUGHT THIS ON HIMSELF. HE HAS DIVIDED THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.
ALL AMERICAN CITIZENS NEED TO WAKE UP!! CALL YOUR SENATORS AND MEMBERS OF CONGRESS===NOW!

Posted by: proudamerican2008 | March 24, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

According to Carville’s logic, ANYONE who EVER worked for BILL Clinton MUST support Hillary. WTF??? If you want the “Friends and Family Program,” call your cell phone company. We don’t select our President simply because they’re married to a former President. No doubt a lot of people owe Bill Clinton favors. (Especially all those he pardoned from prison his last day in office.) Richardson did what the “Super Delegates” are supposed to do — he voted the will of the PEOPLE. The will of the people means ALL of the people, in the entire country. He looked at all the numbers: Who’s won the most states, who’s ahead in the popular vote, who has the most delegates, and the he went the way the super delegates are supposed to go. I, for one, am glad to see that there are super delegates who will vote the will of the people instead of “personal favors.”

Posted by: Terri | March 24, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

I do think Richardson betrayed his friend. However, I think his ambition to be VP made him move to Obama, because the DNC won’t count the people of Michigan and Florida, which gives Obama an edge. Personally, I am not influenced by who endorses Obama. I think for myself. Governor Richardson’s endorsement for Obama, will have very little impact on the voters. He may have gained a few Hispanic votes, but they’re not stupid–—they know what he’s doing. I am confident that they (the voters) will decide for themselves who will best serve our country. Hillary ’08!

Posted by: CONCERNED AMERICAN | March 24, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

Gosh! All the pro-Hillary comments come in almost on top of each other. It’s almost as if her campaign has a network set up to immediately respond to anti-Hillary comments in the “Shock & Awe” fashion.
The Clintonites clearly believe that Hillary is entitled to the second round of presidency. That was obvious before she left Bill’s white house.
It was obvious that she’d lock in the senate job, and wouldn’t risk losing it by running for President until her second term when the election would take place mid-term so she did’t lose both jobs.
Hillary has yet to prove that she’s up to the job of being a President.

Posted by: Anonymous | March 25, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am

Carville can’t even persuade his own wife to take his name or influence her political choice.

Posted by: Jeff | March 25, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am

Why does GMA continue to have Mr. Carvelle on their show speaking for Ms. Clinton? He is the ugliest of politcs personified.

Posted by: Linda Oakley | March 25, 2008, 7:20 am 7:20 am

Governor Bill Richardson (or Benedict Bill as he is known to some) has sexual misconduct accusations waiting to be brought out for national public scrutiny.
The charges relate to his personal conduct with Lieutenant Governor Denish (a woman).
Good choice, Obama campaign.

Posted by: Jayhawk | March 25, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am

The Rezko trial is proceeding as the wheels of justice turn slowly.
In the mold of Jeremiah Wright, another minister of hate invokes lynching as an Easter Sunday message.
Exhibiting Bush-like behavior, Barack Hussein Obama and family vacation in the Caribbean while the campaign work continues.
So, why would anyone be surprised when the DNC and the Obama campaign produce a Richardson betrayal and welcome the NM Governor with open arms?

Posted by: Jayhawk | March 25, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am

I vote for both!!!!

Posted by: mindy | March 25, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

In Response to Linda:
This is not about the man’s looks, the man can’t help how God made him, just like we can’t God how God made us, some people just look worst or better than others’ that’s God’s business not ours, now back to the subject at hand, I just had to check you first for that statement.
Carville was right, Richarderson is like a Judas, he betrayed his friends the Clintons for his own selfish ambitions, he did not care so much about Obama , it’s what Obama had to offer him, it was the Vice Presidency and in return he would try to deliver Obama the Latino vote, but one thing that Richarderson did not take into account is that his State voted for Hillary during its primaries, Obama and Richarderson are both hypocrites, because they have said earlier; let the will of the people decide the election in the individual States, and then on the otherhand, Obama accepts the endorsement from a Governor of a State that went against the will of the people of his State, so both Obama and Richarderson are talking out of the both sides of their mouths, saying one thing and doing another, in order to scracth each other back’s for personal gain.

Posted by: Darrell | March 25, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

Jayhawk… Are you seriously supporting a Clinton by bringing up sexual misconduct accusations against RICHARDSON? TOO funny.
Clinton, Obama, McCain. Except for Iraq, all the same.

Posted by: Lawler | March 25, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

I find it odd that when asked why he chose Barack over Hillary, Richardson said that Hillary is competent, exercises good judgment, and has the experience, however, he went with Obama because “he has something special” “there’s something about him that he can’t quite put his finger on”. I’m surprised that Obama has so many endorsements based on “he gives a good speech’ or “inspires hope” or the silliness of “he’s like a rock star”, I have yet to hear anyone endorse him because his SPECIFIC/CONCRETE plans on economy, health care, education, and foreign policy are better when compared to Clinton’s plans. (the few differences they do have were denounced by his own advisers).

Posted by: Jen Michelle | March 25, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

Odrama’s gonna be in for a real shock when PA votes!
GO HILLARY!!

Posted by: DanPA | March 25, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

I believe there still is a lot of dirt on Obama that hasn’t come out yet. His background of chosen friends proves that. Carville is right about Richardson. He is a traitor like Judas and you know what happened to Judas. Watch Richardson’s reaction if Hillary wins the nomination. And Hillary should turn her back on him if that happens. He might not even get elected as governor of New Mexico again.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | March 25, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

Linda: Carville’ looks does not matter when it comes to intelligence. He made the right statement at the right time. Furthermore don’t think highly of Richrdson. I just read where he had a sex encounter himself. So we shouldn’t talk about Bill Clinton. I hope that encounter comes out in the wash.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | March 25, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

i’m sick of my country always putting establishment candidates up to get voted into major offices. To all of the people who rip on Obama, Hillary has been around too long, she’s from last generation, the baby boomers need to let go, look at where they have gotten our country so far while they were in power…Anyone that thinks Hillary is the best hope for our country has been living with their eyes and ears closed. I am 22 and I WILL NOT vote for Hillary, she is not the winner, there is about a 5% chance that she will be the winner, and she’d gonna have to grovel for every single vote that she gets from here on out. She continually stoops lower and lower as she and her campaign realize how dire the odds are for her to win the Dem. nomination. Stop dividing democrats, I promise that if the Democrats put Hillary out there as the candidate for 2008 it will come back to bite them in the rear for years to come, I will not soon forget how they shunned my candidate and neither will my friends. Good luck on beating us, it’s our country now.

Posted by: Josh | March 25, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

I think James Carville’s remarks were witty. I can’t believe the posting they have motivated, so they must have hit the target.
The timing of Bill Richardson’s endorsement sort of invited that sort of response from anyone clever enough to see the connection. He should have gone to church instead and picked another week.

Posted by: Mary OK | March 25, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

WOW…LOOKS LIKE WE DEMOCRATS HAVE TWO CHOICES IN THE DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY, A WOMAN WHO WOULD RATHER LIE THAN TELL THE TRUTH AND A MAN WHO ATTENDS A BLACK CHURCH THAT HATES THE WHITE DEVIL…LOL…WELL…MAYBE JUST WAIT UNTIL THE GENERAL ELECTION AND SEE WHAT COMES UP

Posted by: STEVE | March 25, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

In Response to Josh: From a Black American Male.
I’m a baby boomer for Hillary Clinton, what do you say about that Sir?
Obama is not ready to be my President, he’s lying, brainwashing, and decieving you, he’s not a true change agent or uniter,Obama’s cosmetic, this is evident since it’s been revealed that he blonged to an African American Racist-based curch for over 20yrs. Yes you’re right it’s time for change, but not Obama, he would have this country more divided than it already is.
If this the Wright incident had of came out earlier before people voted for him in the primaries, he would not have gotten this far in the race, Hillary would be leadinghim and probably had the nomination wrap-up by now, but the media sat on it until they where sure Obama was closer to winning the nomination over Hillary, but she still has a chance, don’t count her out just yet. I beleive some more negative things are going to come out about him soon, are you going to still back him then? or are you going to remain gullible to his deceptive speeches and lies?
Brainwashed people are made to believe whatever the Brainwasher is able to ingrain what they want them to believe about them or something their minds.
Obama carries the aura of occult leader JIm Jones of he Jonestown Masscure during the early 1970′s, Jone’s speeches sound so charisamatic and inspirational to his followers that he was able to get them to drink tainted kool-aid, which lead to their deaths by the thousands.
Obama has that same Jim Jones aura because he’s got so many people wrapped up in him that he can use speeches with no substance to keep people if they even waver a little in line to vote for him, this was done when gave a Race Relation’s speech to do damage control, because of the Wright incident that was having a negative impact on his run for the Presidency.
no matter what Obama does or says wrong it’s alright with them; because no matter what, Obama will get their votes, because they have been brainwashed to do so through his eloquent speeches of mind control, lies, and deception.

Posted by: Darrell | March 25, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

Darrell what evidence do you have besides Obama’s pastor to go on about him being a liar? Please share, because I’ll be the first one to switch sides. Guess what A Bush or Clinton has been running this country for the last 20 years and I’m sick of it, as is most of my generation. Hillary has been caught in many more false statements than Barack, and you know this is true. Part of this is because she has been around longer than him, but the larger reason is that she will do anything to become president. She wants to make history, she wants to be the first woman ever to be president and she is so close she can taste it. This is her lifelong ambition, and so now that she is so close, even though she is not close enough to actually get the nomination, she will do whatever it takes to finish the job. If you believe that she has fewer ulterior motives than Obama than you are the one who is gullible. Do you not remember that the Clinton’s wallets are padded with Wal-Mart dollars? Wal-Mart makes more in a day than Rezko could ever hope to make. How much help could he even offer Obama. There is no dirt because Obama actually wants to be proud to be an American again and he will work harder to get us there. Hillary will work harder to be the first woman who was commander-in-chief, even if it wasn’t legit.

Posted by: Josh | March 25, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

Obama on Iraq: U.S. Senate Record
11 months after joining Senate, Sen. Obama delivers first speech devoted to Iraq, says ‘US forces are sill part of the solution.’ “[T]he level of his criticism lowered when he arrived in Washington. In his first year in the Senate, he delivered one speech on Iraq, calling for a phased withdrawal by the end of 2006. But last November, Mr. Obama revised that time frame, saying the drawdown should begin in four to six months.” Obama’s Senate web site lists his address to the Chicago Council on Foreign Relations on November 22, 2005, 11 months after entering the U.S. Senate. Obama said, “I believe that U.S. forces are still a part of the solution in Iraq.” [New York Times, 2/12/07; obama.senate.gov]
18 months after joining Senate, Sen. Obama gives first floor statement devoted to Iraq, opposes timeline for withdrawal. “…But having visited Iraq, I am also acutely aware that a precipitous withdrawal of our troops, driven by congressional edict rather than the realities on the ground, will not undo the mistakes made by this administration. It could compound them.” [obama.senate.gov]
Upon arriving in the Senate, Sen. Obama supported every funding bill for Iraq, some $300 billion….until he started running for President. [2005 Vote # 117, HR1268, 5/10/05; 2005 Vote # 326, S1042, 11/15/05; 2006 Vote # 112, HR4939, 5/4/06; 2006 Vote # 239; 2006 Vote # 186, S2766, 6/22/06; HR5631, 9/7/06]
As a Senate candidate in November 2003, Sen. Obama said he would have ‘unequivocally’ voted against war funding because it was the only way to oppose Bush on Iraq. “Just this week, when I was asked, would I have voted for the $87 billion dollars, I said ‘no.’ I said no unequivocally because, at a certain point, we have to say no to George Bush. If we keep on getting steamrolled, we are not going to stand a chance.” [Obama remarks, New Trier Democratic Organization forum, 11/16/03; Video]
Since Obama entered the U.S. Senate, his record on Iraq is identical to Hillary’s, with one exception. ABC News reported that, “In fact, Obama’s Senate voting record on Iraq is nearly identical to Clinton’s. Over the two years Obama has been in the Senate, the only Iraq-related vote on which they differed was the confirmation earlier this year of General George Casey to be Chief of Staff of the Army, which Obama voted for and Clinton voted against.” [ABC, 5/17/07; senate.gov; see chart]
Top Obama advisor says, as president, Sen. Obama will ‘not rely upon some plan that he’s crafted as a presidential candidate or as a US senator.’ Samantha Powers, who has subsequently resigned her position, also described Sen. Obama’s Iraq plan as a “best case scenario.” [BBC, 3/6/07]

Posted by: Mary | March 25, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

The more I hear Carville talk trash, the more I know Governor Richardson made the right decision.

Posted by: Shel | March 25, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

The thing I find here that is the most worrisome is the vitriolic condemnation of the ‘other’ candidate. I hope that is more a function of people with ‘extreme’ views being willing (eager) to have their say, while the more moderate majority (I hope) remain silent.

Posted by: pyg | March 25, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

What is wrong with some of you people? Reading some of the postings from Clinton supports has convinced me that we truly need education reform. Did Richardson ever say he was supporting Clinton then change his mind? No. Should Hillary’s husband call her a betrayer because she claims not to support his NAFTA bill anymore? She changed her mind about the bill (in essence second guessing her husbands judgment just like Richardson changed his mind about her.
Honestly, we all have changed our minds about someone. Think about it.

Posted by: JDM | March 26, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am

Let me just say, I think the comment about comparing Richardson to Judas is a bit ridiculous. I am a Hillary supporter and Bill Richardson can vote for whomever his chooses. The problem I have with him is the way he did it. I knew a long time ago from a previous interview when he didn’t endorse Hillary right away, his support was going to be for Obama. I don’t think he ever intented on supporting Hillary. Richardson rode the wave and then made his endorsement announcement when it felt it would be a detriment to Hillary. I feel base don his relationship with Hillary as portrayed by the media, he owed her the common courtesy to tell her where his support was going to be along time ago. My opinion, he thinks something is comming for him from Obama if obama is the nominee but, let me assure you, he’s will be sadly mistaken in the end. One last comment. Richardson made a previous comment where he states the superdelegates should go with the will of the people of the state, with that being said Why is he not supporting Hillary, afterall, she won the New Mexico, is he not the governor. With friends like Richardson, Hillary sure doesn’t need any enemies! ENOUGH SAID!!

Posted by: C-Monster | March 26, 2008, 3:56 am 3:56 am

Hillary intentionally, deliberately broke the law – a law she voted for – the Stolen Valor Act. Why isn’t she indicted for falsely claiming she was under sniper fire? Her comments were precise & in great detail, repeated again & again. It is insulting for her to expect us to believe she “simply misspoke” or “made a mistake” as she now claims. Her criminal lies were intended to boost her image for personal gain – the EXACT reason the law was enacted. Other US citizens are criminally charged for making similar comments – all of whom regret “making a mistake”. Her comments were illegal, disrespectful, & cheapen the actions & sacrifice of every serviceman who has lived through hearing shots fired in anger. This proves again the Clintons will say & do ANYTHING in their thirst for personal power. Sid Zeller, Farrar, Iowa, US Marine

Posted by: Sid Zeller | March 26, 2008, 8:30 am 8:30 am

she is white and that’s alright.hillary does not need any minority group to win especially these judas who sneek into our country who are pretending to be white (YOU ARE NOT!!)We will wipe the smile off your face in Pennsylvania.

Posted by: k23 | March 26, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

I have to turn the station whenever Carville speaks. He never makes sense to me.
Delegates want to be loyal to those who elected them, but Hillary is asking that they switch and vote for her. Isn’t that asking them to be disloyal?
Hillary-Bosnia faux paux, divert topic to Obama pastor to get attention off of her, etc. Wait until she submits her tax returns for the past several years. There will be portions missing, I am sure, and to submit them 3 days before the April 22nd election. That could definitely be in Obama and McCain’s favor! And the information will be fresh on people’s minds when they head to the polls. Time for a change – Obama or McCain.

Posted by: Patricia | March 26, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

no candidate will win with only the white vote. Numbers don’t lie, bottom line, Hillary is behind in popular vote and pledged delegates. She has to win by 20 percent in Penn. to even still have a shot. Even then, she still will have a slim to none margin of getting the nomination. It is fine if people who support Hillary won’t vote for Obama, because they are more likely fair weather supporters who will flip over to the republicans side when the going gets tough anyway. Also, Obama doesn’t support the way now, and he has been opposed to it for longer than Hill. I would be much more willing to support Hillary if she would at least say in public that she made a mistake instead of attributing her voting “error” to lack of information. She is not very accountable and she is not very forthcoming. With Hillary it is her way or no way. Why can’t her supporters see this? Why do they insist on electing another micro-managing regime into the oval office? Please see common sense and support someone else. How can anyone possibly argue that the Obama campaign has been more negative? That is absolutely false.

Posted by: Josh | March 26, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am

In Response To Josh:
I’m a Young Black American who is not supporting Obama, I don’t trust him, and if he get’s the nomination, I still want vote him, I can’t rally behind a candidate I don’t have no faith or trust in, well, the party will just have to stay divided, I hope other people especially Hillary supporter’s follow my lead and stay home or vote for an Independent candidate if either candidate is not worthy of the Presidency, and if McCain get’s to be President so be it, I know I’m not voting Republican under any circumstances, they are the cause of allowing Bush to mess this country up for the last 8yrs.
Obama is not the right Black man to be our President, and Josh you’re going to find this out when it’s too late to do something about it, Obama is running a game on us young people who some has voted for the first time in there lives and this a real shame.
If Obama becomes our nominee, we may as well let Bush turn the keys over to McCain, because he will be our next President, the Republican swiftboat machine is going to politically eat Obama alive, like I said in earlier blogs, more negative things are going to come out about Obama and it’s not going to be pretty, the people who still insist on voting for this man who just cam eon the scene preaching hope and change is going to be very sorry they did.
And if Hillary is found out for sure that she’s purposely padding her resume to get the nomination, I will not be supporting her either, I’m for right here, I will not vote for a candidate who’s carrying around a lot of dirty laundry, and I hope you and other Obama supporters feel the same way I do about your candidate, don’t keep supporting this man as well if more negative things come out about him, that’s what you call having moral integrity, dignity, and honesty.

Posted by: Darrell | March 26, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

In response to Patricia:
You make get the change you are asking for if Obama get’s to be President, but, it may not be the you hope for, all you will be geting is just another usual politician with a lot of mouth and no action, but his speeches will keep you in line if you start to find out what Obama is really all about, he sound good to you do he? well everything that’s sounds or looks good is not always good for you in the longe-term, and you will find that out more and more about Obama in due season.

Posted by: Darrell | March 26, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

In Response to K23:
I’m a Black American believes you may have a point, minus the racist like connetation, my race of people have jumped ship to a Black man who just came out of no where preaching hope and change, this is what the Anti-Christ will do,come out of nowhere preaching good tidings and peace, etc, he’s going to sound so good and convincing and have a lot of people willing to follow him, but this is really deception of the devil at work.
How can we support a man that his sat under a racist and Anti-Americanist Pastro for over 20yrs, and did not know or cared what his Pastor was teaching, there’s noway Obama can convience me he did not hear his Pastro preach like this before, and if he did, why did he continue to have a relationship with his Pastor knowing what he believes and teaches his congregation, Obama is lying, he agreed with this man, if he didn’t Obama would have cut all tie s with Pastor Wright, he was also the Obama’s mentorm, come people wak-up and called a spade a spade, Obama is a racist, Anti-Americanist and Bigot in disguise, because Obama’s behavior he exhibited concerning this issue makes me believe that, the Bible also backs me up when it stated, how can two wlak to gether accept they agree, meaning Obama was in agreement wiht his Pastor, he would have left the church and Pastor alone, but he didn’t, so he guilty by association.
nad Finally, I believe Hillary can win Penn, without the majority of the Black vote, she did it in Ohio, Texas, and Rhode Island. Nad It’s a shame Obama has this party and country so divided among racial lines, if he was such a uniter and change agent, this would not be, so he has no trust or credibility in this area for me as well.

Posted by: Darrell | March 26, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

That is good someone knows where he belongs.

Posted by: k23 | March 26, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

In Response To K23:
What was that remark suppose to mean? I hope it’s not a racist remark, be a man and explain yourself and make it plain to me, what did your comment meant?

Posted by: darrell | March 26, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

You said it yourself you did not jump the ship meaning supposedly knowing where you belong….don’t try to twist my tongue

Posted by: k23 | March 26, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

K23,
You’re not making yourself plain here, what was the underlying meaning of your first statement?, all you had to say is this was not racist in nature, and let me explain fully what I meant, but since you can’t be clear on this I take it that a was sort of racist.
I’m staying with Hillary Clinton because she has worked on civil rights issues for years for the betterment of all races, but my race of people don’t seem to be loyal and can be depended on doing crunch time, they rather vote for a man because he’s Black and not on the substance of the issues, Obama is not going to bring no more change or unity then the Congress let’s him, so he needs to be honest with the American people on that, and the way it looks, the party is going to be divdied racially beyond the election.
How can Obama be credible and trudtworthy to unite the country when he blelonged to a Racist, Anti-Americanist church for over 20yrs, and also mentored by a Pastor like this as well? I don’t trust Obama, he not being truthful about the right incident, the only reason he conducted that Race realtions speech, because he tried to do damage control to his campaign, if he was truly genuine about this, he would hav broke ties with that church years ago, but instead he remained there, and even had Wright on his campaign staff, so Obama is comestic and a hyopcrite, a true Christian would have disassociated himself from Wright and his church in all capacities, a racist or Anti American could not have been my Pastor or Mentor, racism, and bigotry is against God’s Word, God teaches Unity and Love for your fellowman no matter what race or creed they may be, because we are all God’s creation and he’s our Father, so that makes us all Brothers and Sisters in his eyesight, this is one of the major attributes a true christian must live by.
So Obama and his Pastor is lacking in this area, but Obama is disguising his racism and Anti Americanist attitude underwraps, because he’s trying to be President, and I see right through his clueshay, waiting to see if he makes President before he reveals his true self where it’s too late for people to do something about it short of Impreachment from office.

Posted by: Darrell | March 26, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

I don’t think anyone could explain it as well as Obama , this is the America we live in right at this moment..anger, separation,confusion..fear, frustration. We need an honest voice of truth..Obama is the only one (running for office) not afraid to speak truth..bruises & all. I know that when I vote for president I need someone with a voice to inspire the nation, to help change the attitude of the American people who actually don’t believe that we are one nation under God..The people who would never want to be “one” with anyone else. People who couldn’t unite with even their next door neighbor if he happened to be a different color than himself or a different political party or anyone he just didn’t like,for that matter. We need someone to change that mentality. If you truly listen to what he says..you realize that he is speaking from truth… He understands why people feel this separation..how they arrived at their perception..he is never speaking from only a ‘black “point of view or a “white” point of view..he speaks from a human one..as an observer..open minded, with compassion,without judgement..ready to help talk it out..ready for the blows that may come, steady until it is resolved & until there is change…..isn’t that what we intrinsically need? That’s what we need as children.. isn’t that what we need as a nation.. Isn’t that the man he is? All I know is that I want somebody with that kind of statue to lead the country for my children & make a difference. As for Hillary camp’s latest desparate move to undermine Obama’s integrity & drive a wedge between races….would you ever want to be held liable for someone elses words.. especially when they were venting frustration? Anyone who would let this deter them from voting ,never believed in him anyway so …………..TIME FOR CHANGE ..YES WE CAN , OBAMA is a LIGHT in this DARKNESS that we’re facing ….Let him SHINE!!

Posted by: shedrock | March 26, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

In response to SheDrock:
This Black American is not in agrement with your statement about Obama, if Obama was so truthful, he would have left that church he was in for 20yrs, if Obama was so truthful he would have not waited until he was in politcal trouble to bring fourth a race relation’s speech, which is not credible im my eyesight.
Obama is comestic and not to be trusted, and whenever he gets in political heat, all he has to do is give one of his speeches in order to bring people back in line who may be questioning his Anti-Americanist racist background for being associated and mentored by a Racist and Anit-Americanist Pastro for over 20yrs. Obama is fake. He’s just waiting to give our tax dollars to Kenys and fail to tak ecare of the black community here at home, Katrina is an example of that, also he’s going to let more immigrants in our country to the Black community’s jobs, I just don’t trust this man to be my President

Posted by: Darrell | March 26, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

To all Hillary Supporters:
Write Hillary a letter on her campaign website and encourage not to ever never give-up and quit this race until all voter”s voices have been heard in every State she needs your support in every way, and she needs to know all the people who are standing with her, I sent a letter to her already giving her my support until the last day of the voting process. You know their is power and strength in numbers.
Darrell

Posted by: Darrell | March 27, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

I think you are not remembering correctly. You said Katrina is an example of how Barack Obama will not give money to help black people in this country. That was George Bush, George Bush was the one who did not help the people that were hurt by Hurricane Katrina as quickly as he needed to. Barack Obama was still a junior senator at that time, he had very little sway over the emergency response time to Katrina. Barack still visited people displaced by the disaster, he did just as much as Hillary Clinton.

Posted by: josh | March 27, 2008, 8:27 am 8:27 am

Also,
People are free to attend whatever church they want to, and just because Barack Obama attends a church with a pastor who makes inflammatory remarks, that does not mean that Barack believes absolutely everything he says. If the general public just believed that all of the candidates believe in every ignorant and racist remark that anyone they have ever been associated with has said, then all of the candidates would be considered racist, ignorant people who are unfit to run this country. You know this is not the case. Darrell, there are militant white people and there are militant black people, but they are the minority of those races. You know this is true and just because Barack attended that church, that does not mean he is anti-american or racist. You have no real empirical evidence to back up any one of your ridiculous claims that Obama is “cosmetic” or “not to be trusted”. Please, if you are going to argue, at least use real, sensible evidence that can be proven, not just what you think because you don’t like him personally or because you are upset, that just weakens your argument.

Posted by: josh | March 27, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am

In response to Darrell
You are a republican and you are not African American you are fake you are with the rush Limbaugh crew who are saying( keep her in it so we can win it). am for Obama don’t matter what anyone says. If Hillary gets the nomination we will rally with her for the sake of the party and for what matters for real democrats. Sorry republican will not get my vote. We know your trick….Darrell

Posted by: Cath | March 27, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am

In response to Cath:
Lady you don’t know what you’re talking about here, You must have a Crystal Ball telling you that I’m a Republican, well, I’m sorry to disappoint you, I’m definitely not a Republican, not by far,I would not vote for a Republican under any circumstances, I’m a very strong Black American male Democrat for Hillary Clinton and for Hillary only, So you got it all wrong madam your Crystal Ball definitely decieved you, I suggest you throw it away, and let God show you what party affiliation I am, I bet he will show you that I’m a strong Democrat for Hillary. I want Hillary to win this race not John McCain or Obama, because in my opinion, Hillary is better qualified to fix this mess Bush will leave behind in 09, not Obama, and if she’s not the nominee,I still will not be for him, because I don’t trust Obama to be my President, Obama is cosmetic and full of deception, he’s not who you think he is.
Republicans are the ones who got this country messed up the way it is, why in the world I would be a Republican?, you are definitely decieved here if you think I’m a Republican, because I’m not voting for Obama, I see that Obama’s speeches have you more brainwashed and decieved than I thought. So don’t fool yourself into thinking I’m a Republican because I support Hillary a 100%, and no other candidate in this race.

Posted by: Darrell | March 27, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am

In response to Josh:
You made my point a Obama just being a Jr Senator when Katrina occured, Obama lacks the national experience to be a President, but Obama could have made a lot more noise in his party and the whole Congrees to do something more about helping those people overcome their tragedy, Martin Luther King was not even in Public office and did more for his race of people than Obama who was in a better position to rally his collegues to effectively come to the aid of his race of people, Obama has no excuse, he run’s and hid from issues that negatively affects the Black community, the recent State of the Black Union hosted by Tavis Smiley is another example of Obama ducking and hiding from issues that negatively affect my race of people, he thought campaigning was more important than atteding that fourm in Louisana last month, whatever motive Hillary had she did at least attend, that’s why I respect her more than Obama, Obama is cosmetic, he’s not going to really address issues that negatively affect the Black Community if elected President, because his actions is speaking louder than his words, it’s not what Obama says, it’s what he does or have done is what conviences me whether or not he would address and tackle my race of people’s negative issues, so far, Obama has failed the test in my book and he’s not even President yet.

Posted by: Darrell | March 27, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

wait wait wait, Darrel, what are you doing? So first you say Obama is “anti-americanist” and “racist” because of the church he belongs to. Then you say he didn’t do enough to help his race during Katrina. Well buddy, which is it? Again, you don’t know what you are talking about much. You accuse him of being two opposite things. He’s not allowed to belong to a large black church in Chicago, but he still has to lay his neck on the line whenever anything bad happens to anyone black? Are you serious? Also, you never seemed to be able to clear up whether you are a baby boomer or a young black male, because as I said before, the two are mutually exclusive, it is not possible to be both a baby boomer and a young person. Do you understand? Just because you call yourself a Hillblazer, that doesn’t mean you are really young, I’m sorry.

Posted by: josh | March 28, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

Wright… Yes, we can…
Rezko… Yes, we can…
Farrakhan… Yes, we can…
“Tell me your friends are and I tell you who you are.”
OBAMA is a snake in suit…
Snakes are lethal be careful folks…

Posted by: Kikz | April 2, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am

Richardson is worse than Judas Iscariot under no circumstances will I vote for Obama.
When Clinton was President my pockets were full and the national debt was paid.

Posted by: Rudy Mancilla | April 2, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

Unlike the Obama woman I have always been proud to be an American !!!!
I fear the Obamas and their cabal will disgrace America !

Posted by: Rudy Mancilla | April 2, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

I wonder if Mr. Carvile has used the “J” word (Judas) to descrbe Mark Penn? It would seem that a leader in the Clinton campaign who contrary to his candidate’s position, engages in financial activity at variance with the one whom he is supporting might be a candidate for Mr. Carvile’s name-calling. But, it could be the season for using the “J” name has passed.

Posted by: Gil | April 11, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

The Clintons are gonna lose and so it’s bye bye for Chelsea’s dreams of becoming Prez.

Posted by: John John | April 24, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

If the Clintons do not win and Obama wins the Democratic nomination….. McCain will win the White House.
The Clinton supporters will vote for McCain before they let Obama in The White House.

Posted by: Seterina | April 26, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

you will like for gift to get new coupon

Posted by: Anefsallan | December 22, 2011, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.