By Jennifer Parker

Mar 18, 2008 2:04pm

Cliff’s Notes for Obama’s Race Speech

My the full dot-com write-up is HERE.

Or, if you prefer, here are some excerpts, organized as a narrative.

1. How we got here to this speech today

"On one end of the spectrum, we’ve heard the implication that my candidacy is somehow an exercise in affirmative action; that it’s based solely on the desire of wild and wide-eyed liberals to purchase racial reconciliation on the cheap. On the other end, we’ve heard my former pastor, Jeremiah Wright, use incendiary language to express views that have the potential not only to widen the racial divide, but views that denigrate both the greatness and the goodness of our nation; and that rightly offend white and black alike."

2. Wright is Wrong (and I’m Not Anti-Israel)

"But the remarks that have caused this recent firestorm weren’t simply controversial. They weren’t simply a religious leader’s effort to speak out against perceived injustice. Instead, they expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country – a view that sees white racism as endemic, and that elevates what is wrong with America above all that we know is right with America; a view that sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam."

3. Yes, I’ve Heard Some Controversial Stuff in the Pews

"For some, nagging questions remain. Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes. Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely."

4. But Disowning Him Would Be Like Disowning the Black Church Itself…or My Grandma

"The church contains in full the kindness and cruelty, the fierce intelligence and the shocking ignorance, the struggles and successes, the love and yes, the bitterness and biases that make up the black experience in America. And this helps explain, perhaps, my relationship with Reverend Wright. As imperfect as he may be, he has been like family to me. He strengthened my faith, officiated my wedding, and baptized my children. Not once in my conversations with him have I heard him talk about any ethnic group in derogatory terms, or treat whites with whom he interacted with anything but courtesy and respect. He contains within him the contradictions – the good and the bad – of the community that he has served diligently for so many years. I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community.

"I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother – a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed her by on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe. These people are part of me. And they are a part of America, this country that I love."

5. We Need to Talk About The "Racial Stalemate We’ve Been Stuck in for Years"

"Race is an issue that I believe this nation cannot afford to ignore right now. We would be making the same mistake that Reverend Wright made in his offending sermons about America – to simplify and stereotype and amplify the negative to the point that it distorts reality."

6. Why Wright and Blacks Are Angry

"For the men and women of Reverend Wright’s generation, the memories of humiliation and doubt and fear have not gone away; nor has the anger and the bitterness of those years. That anger may not get expressed in public, in front of white co-workers or white friends. But it does find voice in the barbershop or around the kitchen table. At times, that anger is exploited by politicians, to gin up votes along racial lines, or to make up for a politician’s own failings. And occasionally it finds voice in the church on Sunday morning, in the pulpit and in the pews. That anger is not always productive; indeed, all too often it distracts attention from solving real problems; it keeps us from squarely facing our own complicity in our condition."

7. Why Whites Are Angry

"A similar anger exists within segments of the white community. Most working- and middle-class white Americans don’t feel that they have been particularly privileged by their race. Their experience is the immigrant experience – as far as they’re concerned, no one handed them anything, they’ve built it from scratch. They worked hard all their lives, many times only to see their jobs shipped overseas or their pension dumped after a lifetime of labor. //when they hear an African American is getting an advantage in landing a good job or a spot in a good college because of an injustice that they themselves never committed; when they’re told that their fears about crime in urban neighborhoods are somehow prejudiced, resentment builds over time. Like the anger within the black community, these resentments aren’t always expressed in polite company. But they have helped shape the political landscape for at least a generation. Anger over welfare and affirmative action helped forge the Reagan Coalition."

8. I = America

"I am the son of a black man from Kenya and a white woman from Kansas. //I have brothers, sisters, nieces, nephews, uncles and cousins, of every race and every hue, scattered across three continents, and for as long as I live, I will never forget that in no other country on Earth is my story even possible. //it is a story that has seared into my genetic makeup the idea that this nation is more than the sum of its parts – that out of many, we are truly one."

9. America Can Change

"The profound mistake of Reverend Wright’s sermons is not that he spoke about racism in our society. It’s that he spoke as if our society was static; as if no progress had been made; as if this country – a country that has made it possible for one of his own members to run for the highest office in the land and build a coalition of white and black (APPLAUSE) Latino and Asian, rich, poor, young, old — is still irrevocably bound to a tragic past. But what we know — what we have seen – is that America can change. That is true genius of this nation. What we have already achieved gives us hope – the audacity to hope – for what we can and must achieve tomorrow."

10. What Blacks Can Do to Fix This Mess

"For the African-American community, that path means embracing the burdens of our past without becoming victims of our past. It means continuing to insist on a full measure of justice in every aspect of American life. But it also means binding our particular grievances – for better health care, and better schools, and better jobs – to the larger aspirations of all Americans — the white woman struggling to break the glass ceiling, the white man whose been laid off, the immigrant trying to feed his family. And it means also taking full responsibility for own lives

11. What Whites Can Do to Fix This Mess

"In the white community, the path to a more perfect union means acknowledging that what ails the African-American community does not just exist in the minds of black people; that the legacy of discrimination – and current incidents of discrimination, while less overt than in the past – that these things are real and must be addressed. Not just with words, but with deeds."

12. Stop Covering the Wright Controversy and Talk About Race and My Platform Instead

"We can play Reverend Wright’s sermons on every channel, every day and talk about them from now until the election, and make the only question in this campaign whether or not the American people think that I somehow believe or sympathize with his most offensive words. We can pounce on some gaffe by a Hillary supporter as evidence that she’s playing the race card, or we can speculate on whether white men will all flock to John McCain in the general election regardless of his policies. We can do that.

"But if we do, I can tell you that in the next election, we’ll be talking about some other distraction. And then another one. And then another one. And nothing will change. That is one option. Or, at this moment, in this election, we can come together and say, ‘Not this time.’…This time we want to talk about the fact that the real problem is not that someone who doesn’t look like you might take your job; it’s that the corporation you work for will ship it overseas for nothing more than a profit."

- jpt

User Comments

If he was a TRUE uniter who cares deeply about his friend, mentor or adviser, then he could’ve changed Wright’s views or at least convinced him to tone down his divisive speeches – as he himself admits that it is not helping the situation. Instead, he allowed this man to keep giving inflammatory speeches, cultivating more anger and animosity among African Americans. The only explanation I can think of is, he believes and feels the same way about America.
This issue has come into question his ability as a UNITER, his JUDGEMENT and INTEGRITY.

Posted by: Felicia | March 18, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

“Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.”
“All propaganda has to be popular and has to accommodate itself to the comprehension of the least intelligent of those whom it seeks to reach.”
“He alone, who owns the youth, gains the future.”
“It is always more difficult to fight against faith than against knowledge.”
“The victor will never be asked if he told the truth.”
- Adolf Hitler

Posted by: DCVoter | March 18, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

We dont hold the Germans of today responsible for Hitlers atrocities. Obama should not be holding the people of today responsible for the atrocities of its ancestors. Doing so keeps old wounds open and anger alive. This leads to separatist views and division. This is hardly a uniter philisophy that we need. He truly needs to accept himself before he can even begin to say he is not racist and ask everyone to move forward with him.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 18, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

How is a roughly 50/50 split between these two candidates being a “uniter?” What are his plans and policies for convincing the other half that we should believe in his message?

Posted by: LOM | March 18, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

Acknowledging that you Disagree is not enough for a man that wants people to
believe he can be the leader.
OK, you disagreed, all the 20 years.Then what have you done to change it? You stood there and let the things you believe so strongly that are wrong to continue. You know those comments were distorted views. then have you ever try to present a un-distorted view to your community? You are running for the president for the entire America, not just for black america.
Obama, I am increasingly disappointed in you. Your lack of actions shows your true belief.

Posted by: Amy | March 18, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

I believe the speech was honest, and excellent. I am not saying that you have to vote for Obama, though I did. But you are just not being honest if you cannot acknowledge that what he said is true about America’s history, black and white anger/resentment, and who the real winner is and has always been: corporations and the upper class. America is one of the few nations that does not have serious discussions about class either, except maybe during election season when politicians pretend to care about the “working class” or “middle class.” Why does it take 100M to run for president, again?
I believe that there are two honest people of character in this race: One is Obama, the other is McCain, who, not incidentally, has vouched for Obama’s patriotism and character on this Wright issue.

Posted by: June | March 18, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

So he can sit in the pew, week after week, and hear (but of course not agree with) preaching that would surely make that same white grandmother not just uncomfortable, but scared….and this didn’t bother him enough to leave that congregation. Did his mother or grandmother come to his wedding in that church? to the girls’ baptism?

Posted by: govtDr | March 18, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

For the sake of our party, drop out of the race now Obama.
Mr. Obama is arrogant and lacks the judgment and character to be POTUS.
As Rev. Wright has said on many ocassions, you should read James Cone. That is what Obama believes in (black theology). In Cone’s words, he believes that the only God that should be worshiped is the one who will empower the AA community and *destroy* the white community. If you think I am making this up, go read for yourself.

Posted by: kaffeen | March 18, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

June
We dont want Obama to show us the mirror. Everyone knows race and tensions exists. He has not distanced himself from Liberation Theology. Heck he threw his white grandma(who raised him) under the bus for Wright. This is what is sad about his speech.

Posted by: MattOhio | March 18, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

Now, Obama admitted he heard Wright’s speech in the pews. What did he say last Friday? He said he didn’t hear anything in the pews. Such a bug liar, Obama.
Did he know Rezko? He said he didn’t know any of his wrong doings at the beginning, then he said he knew, recently he said he accepted bigger donations from Rezko than the amount he admitted before.
Yesterday he said he is part of Irish. Today he said he is part of Chinese, part of his family is Chinese. He is black, he is also white.
Wow, such a complicated person. Who can trust?

Posted by: golfgirlusa | March 18, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

He still does not get my vote why is his white grandmother not around he does not add up .

Posted by: Bishop | March 18, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

I think the speech was good. What will he get out of it? I dont know. Well, actually I think he has calmed his base. They will embrace him again, but whether it has earned him any voters – I don’t know. But we will see.

Posted by: Joan | March 18, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

“…so just cut the nonsense.”
Yes, insulting us by saying that we have an IQ of 20 gets us to that point.

Posted by: LOM | March 18, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

What did Obama mean about the OJ trial? Great questions for him. Does Obama believe OJ is a murderer or not? Did Wright discuss OJ in any sermons?

Posted by: GEEVILL | March 18, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

June – the whole point is that this is not about the past. His premise in his campaign was supposed to be about the future yet his separatist teachings keep old wounds open as he is doing. It is likely it is his own failure to accept himself is what makes him look outward for a solution. The root of prejudice begins within and he clearly shows his own prejudice against non-whites in his treatment of his mother and the words of his sister. I agree with another poster that the office of the President is not where he needs to work out his issues.
The speech itself was horrible. He compared Ferraro (a civil rights activist) to Wright (a balck separatist). He dissed his own grandmother (not surprising since he wouldnt even be with his dying mother) and he is condescending to women in his behaviors and speech. He used the entire speech to play the race card when while burying his admission of lying to the American people about a significant issue.
The Wright issue is not about Wright. It is about Obama’s actions that show us his poor judgement, lack of credibility, and with this speech now his lack of character and integrity.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 18, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

I do not like or respect Obama and it
has nothing to do with his race.

Posted by: bob | March 18, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

Reverand Wright is entitled to his beliefs and to his freedom of speech. However, NO Presidential candidate can ever be elected by aligning him or herself with someone to militant and inflammatory. This will never fly in the white community. The great ‘unifier’ has now become more racially divisive. He did not denounce Mr. Wright. So now, the American people will denounce him. (Except for the kool-aid drinkers.)

Posted by: jd | March 18, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

At the end of the day, nothing changes. Obama skirted the issues that plague him and presented an optimistic scenario of reconciliation. The fact that he associated with divisive people who fight reconciliation tooth and nail warranted only a simple apology of sorts.
He’s still an empty suit who avoids real issues and realities. He talks at 30,000 feet but cannot get airborne.

Posted by: Surelock Homes | March 18, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

For the abilities, intelligency,and stunning political talents of Obama, I still believe its a golden chance to have him as a President.

Posted by: Peace | March 18, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

Obama skirted nothing and for the first time dealt with race head on. Even many Clinton supporters are stating the same thing all over the internet right now. You may dislike the man as a candidate but this issue needed to be dealt with and he did so.

Posted by: Sam | March 18, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

I can’t believe that Obama roundly condemned the remarks of his controversial pastor but also took several steps to explain why the Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr.’s incendiary rhetoric is still valid. “The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three-strike law and then wants us to sing ‘God Bless America.’ No, no, no, God damn America, that’s in the Bible for killing innocent people,” he said in a 2003 sermon. “God damn America for treating our citizens as less than human. God damn America for as long as she acts like she is God and she is supreme.”
In addition to damning America, he told his congregation on the Sunday after Sept. 11, 2001 that the United States had brought on al Qaeda’s attacks because of its own terrorism.
“We bombed Hiroshima, we bombed Nagasaki, and we nuked far more than the thousands in New York and the Pentagon, and we never batted an eye,” Rev. Wright said in a sermon on Sept. 16, 2001.
“We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back to our own front yards. America’s chickens are coming home to roost,” he told his congregation.
ABC has videos… and wait through to the end when you hear some of Wright’s worshipers defend the man. Can we call the influential pastor a radical’s radical?
Yes. We. Can.
Think for a minute about a guy, running for President, who consistently, willfully, repeatedly and apparently faithfully, exposes his young daughters to this kind of crap week in and week out… and then think that some deem him to be a man of sound mind and good judgment?

Posted by: Lexi | March 18, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

I would have respected a more noble speech from him if he had said,
“With regards to Pastor Wright, I was there, I heard what he said, and I believe some of it to be truth. I lied to the American people and for that I truly apologize. I never intended to divide this country along racial lines and I see that my own struggles to accept myself and forgive others for their prejudice born of the ignorant acts of our ancestors played a role. I have failed in my quest to unite America because I am still torn within. For the good of the party, the country, and the world, I am withdrawing from the race and fully endorse Senator Clinton for President of the United States.”
Only then would I believe that he could then begin to heal from all the brainwashing he has obviously endured over the past 20 years as a member of TUCC guided by a man with a distorted view of the world. Only then would I believe he could begin to show that he does not agree with Farrakhan and ethnic cleansing.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 18, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Another site we were accused as being low information people because we are backing Hillary. Drop out now obama you are a long way away from nomination
At least you will always have “the Math”

Posted by: toby | March 18, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

Sam-
this was about two things, race against the whites but the most important thing was how he was inspired by his spiritual mentor pastor that is an ANTI-AMERICAN. He just lied about not hearing the comments last week when interviewed and now he says that he did hear them?

Posted by: Lexi | March 18, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

That was an excellent speech.

Posted by: DKNY | March 18, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

GEEVILL,
If he said it in a 1995 sermon (as you quote), then by definition he said it after the trial.
I am going to assume you are simply young (and not up on the “history” of the 1990s), but then you SHOULD be capable og googling, checking Wikipedia, etc when you are short on facts.

Posted by: laughing | March 18, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Sam what sites would that be that a Hillary supporter is welcome. On the 3 sites I visit that is not the conversation.

Posted by: toby | March 18, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

He lied about knowingthat Wright held these views.He lied about hearing Wright preach incendiary sections of sermons. He lied!!!!! Words matter Senator Obama, the ones that are true and inspiring and the ones-like in this case-are not.
Your speech was eloquent and well written. But lying is lying, and lying is NOT good judgement!

Posted by: norm | March 18, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

Poor Obama….he had such a lousy grandmother. Always somebody to blame.

Posted by: no pasaran | March 18, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

Only a candidate from the majority community—-white can really unite the country.
If an African-American person be president, will he make the Hispanic people happy? Will the Chinese be happy? Will the Japanese be happy?
Becareful the risk.
Only Hillary or McCain really knows how to take care of the minority FAIRLY.

Posted by: golfgirlusa | March 18, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

The names of those that people want to justify on their beliefs are not running for President. The person running for President is Obama and was caught in lies with the Resko and know of his spiritual mentor pastor.

Posted by: Lexi | March 18, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

In fact most people on Hillary sites are furious that he would try to equate Ferraro with Wright. the nerve of him.

Posted by: toby | March 18, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

When the last time the US elected a President for giving a speech that criticised the US constitution??
Just wondering?

Posted by: s.b. | March 18, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

I am sure that if I am not swayed by Obama’s speech into believing he is our new Messiah, I will be called a racist. But I am not gullible enough to be moved bya a presidential candidate who says he has never heard Rev. Wright utter a racist statement. Every sentence in Wright’s screaming diatribes says “WHITE”! Are white people not entitled to be an offended racial group? He now admits that Wrights opinions were out of justified anger from a racist past in which he was brought up. So, why did Obama make him an official on his campaign staff? He never touched that issue.
Obama then goes on to represent Wright as a patriotic Marine, virtually an American hero! No, Barack, I will remember your hero’s words, “God damn America” and, as a veteran myself, think what a pitifully lowlife Marine he must have been.
New political Messiah? We may need one but it surely is not Barack Obama. Nice try but no cigar! It is no surprise that you didn’t close your speech with “God bless America”. That might have meant something.
I pray that voters will not be taken in by this attempt to gloss over your lies and deceptions. I pray that Reverend Wright will denounce his American citizenship and move to his place of choice in Africa.

Posted by: doofus | March 18, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

First they say that Bill Clinton was their first “Black” President; now their voting for their first “Anti-AMerican President”.
Nice way to go you Obama lovers!!!!!

Posted by: norm | March 18, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

This is the best distillation of the Obama speech that I’ve seen in the mainstream media. Excellent job.

Posted by: IJ | March 18, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

golfgirlusa- You got that right. I’m a Hispanic and voted for Hillary and if the Superdelagates nominate Obama, I will vote for McCain. I definately know that McCain or Hillary will unite the other minorities that have experienced the hate against us. We don’t whin about it and we surely don’t go around hating America!

Posted by: Lexi | March 18, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Adolf Hitler is extraordinarily good at speeches. What did he DO to this world?
Be careful on the person who is good at speeches!
Drop out of the campaign, Obama!
To avoid deeper damage to the party, to the country, to save moeny for the campaign!

Posted by: golfgirlusa | March 18, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

it seems to me, after burying his admission to lying Friday, his message is:
black people deserve to have a black president and if the country does not elect me then there will be a greater division in the races of this country… i think anyone should be able to become president but not by trying to guilt people into voting for them
some uniter eh? taking a page from Rove’s handbook? divide and conquer? we dont need a history lesson and we dont need to be guilted into atoning for the transgressions of our founders… does your church not have the serenity prayer? perhaps you should read it and realize that you have issues to work out and using this election to do it is not the right way… wounds that do not heal from within will fester open again when agitated… looking for healing through others is nothing more than a bandaid… look in the mirror Obama… face your failures and stop trying to have others fix your life

Posted by: DCVoter | March 18, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

In his speach today Obama admited that he heard hateful comments by Jeremiah Wright.

Posted by: Lexi | March 18, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Americans,
Start pressuring Superdelegates to switch to Hillary. Obama is creating an irreparable racial divide.

Posted by: MattOhio | March 18, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

What I heard Senator Obama say was that this country was founded by rascist cowards and despite the black man striving to escape, and somewhat succeeding, these racial boundries and struggles we are still a rascist country. White and immigrant people of this country are rascist because they don’t understand why black people deserve a special break, having not committed rascist acts against blacks, that they are not getting and while justified they just need to get over it. While admitting he did hear those remarks by the Rev. Wright, he never admitted lying about saying he had not, while he did say they were wrong, he said knew why he had said them; giving some credibilty to the statements. Overall I think it helped him because alot of people will think it was holding out a hand to people who are rascist and saying come to the other side… but it was a heartfelt lie.

Posted by: Dennis | March 18, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

It was really a concession speech calling all that do not vote for him racist. Clinton supporters and McCain voters. He is toast and he knows it.

Posted by: GEEVILL | March 18, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

Good speech as usual, but words are not enough! actions speak louder than BIG words. If Obama is so capable to produce change and unite people, what Obama has been doing this past 20 years other than dealing with Rezko and the politicians down in Springfield! Why he never rose like a true vocal leader to unify the people and was able to probably change his pastors views? why? maybe he always agreed with him.
Obama want to have it both ways! Why he never here in Chicago where everybody knows about that church and his Pastors incendiary comments, why he never tried to reconcile that division and sentiment of hate? Why not; because that was the same issues got him elected down in Illinois.
Why Obama’s arrogance to believe he is the only one and with the ONLY one in the position to close the bridge? Where has his been all those years? why he has not shown a true leadership while Illinois has been lagging in all fronts, from education, job and the politicians are corrupt! where has he been?
I hardly believe that what he says is true. Even this week, he first said he didn’t knew about those speeches and finally today admitted. Go figures!

Posted by: Tom_Chicago | March 18, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

The thing that stood out most in Obama’s speech today was when he proclaimed “Yes,” that he had heard controversial statements while sitting in church through the years. Didn’t he go on three cable news networks Friday night and proclaim “No,” he’d never heard such statements? Is anyone going to call him on this?

Posted by: Vnd | March 18, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

All Obama has tackled in his campaign is whinning about the attacks against him and playing the racial card when he is about to loose a state that he can’t win or he has.

Posted by: Lexi | March 18, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

we’re not supposed to compare obama to wright. we are supposed to hold hillary accountable for herself and bill though.

Posted by: american2 | March 18, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

For the sake of our party, drop out of the race now Obama.
Mr. Obama is arrogant and lacks the judgment and character to be POTUS.
Obama’s many speeches, books, and online posts reference and in many ocassions duplicate sermons, words, or books by the Rev. Wright.
Rev. Wright specifically endorses black theology and regularly quotes and/or references persons who are historical figures in black theology (this includes, James Cone).
As Rev. Wright has said on many ocassions, you should read James Cone. That is what Obama believes in (black theology). In Cone’s words, he believes that the only God that should be worshiped is the one who will empower the AA community and *destroy* the white community. If you think I am making this up, go read for yourself.

Posted by: kaffeen | March 18, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

Senator Obama said that he had not heard the PARTICULAR comments that have been playing on the news . . . he DID NOT say that he never heard Pastor Wright say anything offensive.
Please get your facts straight before you hate.
Thank you.

Posted by: Nobodys fool | March 18, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

vnc, Obama said he had heard CONTROVERSIAL statements before. Not the INCENDIARY statements ABC dug up.
Can you spot the difference?

Posted by: Tom J | March 18, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

I’m a Reagan Democrat, actually a “Reagan Independent”, who’s a late-comer supporter of Obama. Only after making the effort to learn what he’s done in the Senate, and read his positions, did I became a supporter.
I also follow closely the Conservative media and blogs. There’s very little reasoned, well-thought-out, analyses of his politics. Ad hominem attacks, some extremely vituperous, seem to predominate.
It strikes me as “curiouser and curiouser”…these attacks seem to fall into 3 categories:
1. Those who are not familiar with what he has done…ignorance
2. Those who are threatened by him…fear
3. Those intolerant of someone who is different…hate

Posted by: Latham | March 18, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

Obama ‘A More Perfect Union’: Help Bind The Racial Wounds Or Expose Him As Just Another Politician?

Senator Barack Obama’s speech at the Constitution Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania was either the most historic speech on race since the days of Dr. Martin Luther King – or a eloquently calculated attempt to staunch the firestorm sparked by the

Posted by: PAXALLES | March 18, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

If he manages to guilt enough people into voting for him to get the nomination, the Republicans will eat him for lunch. This speech provided all the nails for the coffin.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 18, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

Crisis within and beyond Great America! Wait, Wait, Wait, let me prepare my speech! Come on, What Americans want is judgement, not speech. Anyway, judgement is none as proven in the last 20 years.

Posted by: Substance | March 18, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

I was very much taken back by his remark pertaining to his wife. He said “My wife carries the blood of a slave and a slave owner.”
Is this suppose to make us white people feel guilty.
I did not find unity in his speech today. All I found was arrogance and his trying to make us “White Folks” still feel guilty 50 years later.
I love America and I believe we have come along way.
We are not in the 60′s, as Mr. Wright would want us to believe.

Posted by: norm | March 18, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

Obama must now turn his attention to the divide he has helped create within the democratic party. What will he do to win over Clinton supporters? Will he apologize for trying to smear the Clinton’s as race baiters? When will he ask Senator Clinton to be his running mate? The math is still on his side, but he should not underestimate how hard he will have to work to earn the votes of millions upon millions who voted for Clinton!

Posted by: steel | March 18, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

Maybe the problem is that some of the posters here are People Unclear on the Concept of ‘shades of gray’?

Posted by: Tom J | March 18, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

Obama is down…..he will be asked to step down…it will be the most unceremonious exit in the history of politics…..he fell further than Spitzer….Spitzer had the courage to admit the truth….Obama is always lying….playing the race card….NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR ANY SELF-RESPECTING AMERICAN

Posted by: MattOhio | March 18, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

we can still stop this nomination if everybody contacts their senators,congressman and women and DNC chairman Dean, they can either tell him to get out or have 8 more years of Bush,
we will not vote for Senator Obama

Posted by: christel | March 18, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Outstanding. Brave.
We’re at a turning point in the American discussion of race, and Obama is at the fulcrum. Here is a man and a president of vision.
Interesting that his solutions for Black people sound kind of conservative – reject victimhood – while also being liberal.

Posted by: Tungsten | March 18, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Not a bad speech, but for my money Reverend Wright gives a far better speech if only because he believes what he says. Plus the good reverend can get down and sing and dance and get others to dance with him. Regards to Obama, he only gave this speech because he got caught. He had the chance to stand up anytime during his twenty years and failed to do so. He could have chosen to stand up and call out the good reverend when he ran for the senate and he did not. Even now Obama chose to keep the good reverend in his world. Obama your actions speak louder than your words.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 18, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

MSNBC is now slobbering over him but CNN is worse! Every single person they have on as a guest is a avid Obama supporter. All we hear is most wonderful speech ever that will cure all ills and resolve all issues forever more.
What I heard was a good speech that was frank but filled with the right words for his voting base that he is losing ground in. Not much in there for people who are not already his supporters. In fact his closing part about vote for me or go down the wrong path was horrible.
The speech didn’t address the real issues with Barack Obama on these stories that are coming to light and finally getting long over due coverage. The issue is not his growing list of associates that could cause one to pause and raise an eyebrow but rather it is his avoidance to address hard questions at all. Senator Obamas usual first response is always a charming ambiguous answer. We do not like the fact that we have to count on the media to ask the same set of question 2 or 3 times before we get a answer that is clear and straight forward and not some charming ambiguous response.
He has had a rumored reputation of avoid hard questions and issues and he is proving that to be true. He really was gone during the hard vote or voted present on them. That is of more concern to me then the growing list of associates that raise your eyebrow, although that does concern me also but more for electable reasons then anything else.
In no way was this speech as good as the I have a dream speech, even though the people on MSNBC & CNN think so. Here is why, it was a political repair speech. The first part was good and had substance but then he quickly went to pandering for his support base. By the middle of the speech he was so busy hitting us with the right words to reaffirm his voting base to make it anything more then a self serving political press release. The ending was incredible selfish and horrible. For him to have the gall to basically say Vote for me or you will be choosing to go down the wrong path was a total self pandering statement. The convention speech was a victory for all people with no agenda needed or added.

Posted by: Roger | March 18, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Obama has a big problem with #3 of your Cliff Notes. He is admitting that he lied when he said last week that he had never heard such remarks when he was in the Church and would have left the church if he had. Yes, he heard those remarks, yes he stayed, and yes he stands behind Wright. For any other candidate that would be the lead for this speech and the campaign would be over. Does Obama get a free pass on this too?

Posted by: hopesprings52 | March 18, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Good speech. No sale. He knew for too long, did too little, and dissimulated at every opportunity. Obama never changes until he is confronted, and that is the hallmark of deceit in politics be it old school or new.
The bottom line is his credibility is gone and he fails the test of good judgement. Because there is little else on his resume to suggest he is the best candidate for the job, Dean and the DNC should get another plan and very quickly.
If the DNC manages to lose this election, Dean might want to consider Canada for permanent residency because he is ruined in the political system.

Posted by: len | March 18, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

For the sake of our party, drop out of the race now Obama.
Mr. Obama is arrogant and lacks the judgment and character to be POTUS.
Obama’s many speeches, books, and online posts reference and in many ocassions duplicate sermons, words, or books by the Rev. Wright.
Rev. Wright specifically endorses black theology and regularly quotes and/or references persons who are historical figures in black theology (this includes, James Cone).
As Rev. Wright has said on many ocassions, you should read James Cone. That is what Obama believes in (black theology). In Cone’s words, he believes that the only God that should be worshiped is the one who will empower the AA community and *destroy* the white community. If you think I am making this up, go read for yourself.

Posted by: kaffeen | March 18, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

WHY NOT START HEALING THIS NATION WITH HIS TWO DAUGHTERS? Here what Senator Obama will never be able to explain. He has two daughters. He accepted being present when Wright’s hate speeches were given—did he exposed both his two daughters to these hate speeches? If he purports to be the seaway between the future and the past, then, why exposed his two daughters to this rhetoric? There is a difference between words and actions and here a clear example.

Posted by: rUTH | March 18, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

Wow. Amazing that so many people can get so many differing opinions about the same speech. It makes it obvious that we all have a bias. This is what I got out of it( and I think all the candidates have more common sense than george Bush has in his pinky ). I thought this speech was historic, right up there with MLK’s “I have a dream” speech. He put his whole candidacy on the line to show us who he is. I see a unifying commander in chief. Someone who inspired me to understand the racial divides in tis country like I haven’t before. I am not one to throw the first stone. We are all sinners, we have all gotten “hot under the collar”. But, many of us won’t ever try to “walk in someone elses shoes” before spouting forth biased opinions- this comment goes to all races,colors, religions, genders, etc. . In Obama, I see him trying to (and successfully doing) take in all sides before forming opinions. Maybe that’s how he (and I ) got it right about Iraq. We took ourselves out of the emotion, and looked at the facts, not the inuendo, or the past. This is the guy I want to be my, and my children’s president.

Posted by: lbelle | March 18, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

Latham – if you look deeper at his so-called accomplishments in the Senate, you will see there are some experts who have provided real facts. Most of the bills he is credited as authoring or co-authoring are actually just ones he tacked an amendment onto. It is a fallacy of how they are catelogued in the Senate dB. Of the ones he actually introduced, many of the insiders have said he was “given” them by others to set him up to look accomplished. But either way, if you actually compare the number of accomplishments, non-legislative committees (active), legislative committees (actual work not just holding a title and not holding hearings), and the resumes including awards (without the First Lady years), you will see that Clinton is way more qualified and accomplished. No one gave her anything… she fought tooth and nail against the RNC and the sexist establishment to get where she is today in spite of her husband not because of him.
So I guess you wanna hire the guy who is least qualified? If this were a mediocre job go for it. But this is the most important, complex, and powerful job in the world with millions of lives depending on good judgment and character. He admits to lying on national TV and admits to defends a pastor and a church that teaches black separatism. Do you really believe he doesnt? 20 years of brainwashing is pretty difficult to combat.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 18, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

slick. he is slicker than bill. interesting how he can take the topic and move it away from him and his responsibility for collaborating with a known white hater and turn the whole thing into a need for the rest of us to look into ourselves. bull.
when a priest says something stupid, i walk out as a protest and i stop tithing.
obama is just another politician who will say and do anything to obtain personal power.

Posted by: ron | March 18, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

For the sake of our party, drop out of the race now Obama.
Mr. Obama is arrogant and lacks the judgment and character to be POTUS.
Obama’s many speeches, books, and online posts reference and in many ocassions duplicate sermons, words, or books by the Rev. Wright.
Rev. Wright specifically endorses black theology and regularly quotes and/or references persons who are historical figures in black theology (this includes, James Cone).
As Rev. Wright has said on many ocassions, you should read James Cone. That is what Obama believes in (black theology). In Cone’s words, he believes that the only God that should be worshiped is the one who will empower the AA community and *destroy* the white community. If you think I am making this up, go read for yourself.

Posted by: kaffeen | March 18, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

Obama continues to impress me more everyday. People try to characterize him and he takes it head-on. It’s no wonder he is leading and I for one will not be surprised when he trounces McMore-war in the fall. This country is ready for a real leader and people (the intelligent ones) are ready to take this country in a new direction by starting to clean up the mess of the bush-league years. Obama 2008.

Posted by: pt | March 18, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

My husband’s Native american mother was sent to boarding school had her long dark hair cut off was not able to speak her native language has had many hard things happen to her and her people His grandfather was a pastor and never spoke of the hate pastor wright does.

Posted by: Bishop | March 18, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

It is a moving speech. But I can no longer judge Obama on his words but on his action — what exactly has he done to unite this country, white, black, and other color. If it’s all in his speech. then i am not convinceced he is the right person. Yes, having a black president is historical, but not Obama at this time.
More in the speeach — Acknowledging that you Disagree is not enough for a man that wants people to believe he can be the leader.
OK, you disagreed, all the 20 years.Then what have you done to change it? You stood there and let the things you believe so strongly that are wrong to continue. You know those comments were distorted views. then have you ever try to present a un-distorted view to your community? You are running for the president for the entire America, not just for black america.
Obama, I am increasingly disappointed in you. Your lack of actions shows your true belief.

Posted by: Amy | March 18, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

This statement made from Obama today bothers a lot of us loyal Americans and no one seems to talk about it.
Quote…
Yes, I’ve heard Some Controversial Stuff in the Pews
“For some, nagging questions remain. Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes. Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely.”
But Disowning Him Would Be Like Disowning the Black Church Itself…or My Grandma
He came on last week Friday when interviewed and quote…
None of these statements were ones that I had heard myself personally in the pews.
My concern is that he continues to be caught in lies along with him not knowing Rezko but now claims that he does and is a friend of his. He surely flip flops and I’m tired of the media (except Fox News) not covering it. It’s very frustrating to me and especially to those that feels the same way!

Posted by: Lexi | March 18, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

Obama said today: Michelle carries the blood of a slave and a slave owner!!!!
I find this very unncessary for Mr. Obama to bring up to us Americans. Are we suppose to feel guilty. I thought we have overcome this divide a long time ago.

Posted by: stella | March 18, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

After listening to Obama I found myself actually admiring Reverend Wright, not for what he said, but for having the courage to stand for what he said and what he represents. Wright did not swing in the wind like Obama, nor change his tune to suit the moment, nor try and explain it away. At lest Wright was a stand up guy to the last sermon. Obama couldn’t even learn that lesson, instead he ran like a coward.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 18, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

I think we should make Axlerod the President. Afterall he writes great speeches.
Who cares about solving the problems. Just speeches will run the country.
Indeed Obama’s speech was good today. But what does that prove? It only proves that Obama can memorize and deliver a speech written by Axlerod and nothing else.
Oboma would have proved a lot of things if he had walked out of that church 19 years and 364 days ago. Or atleast after the 9/11 speech of Wright.

Posted by: Someone | March 18, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

Masterfully taking on the sometimes subtle, always troublesome issue of race in this country, Obama hits the nail on the head over and over again. Simple, well thought out, passionately spoken, acknowledging the complexity and divisiveness on both sides, and challenging us to rise to become the better angels of our nature, Senator Obama’s message is one that urges us all to work together, resisting the distractions that the media and political spin meisters will attempt to raise, and to make perfect this imperfect union our founding fathers began two centuries ago.
There are thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of Catholics around the world who practice birth control against the dictates of their church. For Obama to belong to a congregation where he sometimes disagrees with what the Pastor says isn’t terribly difficult to understand.

Posted by: Lisa L | March 18, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

He had an opportunity to separate his two daughters from this 1960′s hate speech but he took them with him, with Michele, Wright and the entire delegation. How can he claim the future when his own two beautiful daughters have heard all that hatrage?

Posted by: Doris | March 18, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

Questions:
1) What did he hear?
2) How often did he hear?
3) Did he raise any concerns before it went to public?

Posted by: questions | March 18, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

great cliff notes.
basically he wants us to realize he’s the only person who can save us and unite us and …. whatever! bunch of bs. the speech was really about – i got caught but make me president anyway. i’ll say whatever you want to hear. nothing new there.
koolaid drinkers and the mainstream media will compare him to mlk and start carving his face on mount rushmore. the rest of us just yawn and say, more of the same bs.

Posted by: so saddened | March 18, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Did Obama acknowledge the fact that he lied to the nation last Friday when he said with a straight face and eyes on the camera on AC360 in CNN that he never personally heard any of the racist/angry speech of his pastor until he started running for president? Now in his speech, he is saying that he did hear those coments while sitting in the pews of his church!!
What a liar!!!! What other lies hs he told so far? Any new confessions about his relationship with Rezko? this story is also changing quite often that I will not be surprised that he will have another confession soon.
He really believes that we are so stupid as to let him get away with this.

Posted by: lito_illinois | March 18, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Amy, you make valid point. However, I think you need to do some research to see the things Barack has been working on his whole life. People have been trying to tear this guy down and it’s come down to this: things that his pastor has said, and things that have been edited to suit their purpose. This will pass because in the end people will not be fooled. They will recognize Obama for the honest leader he is. Obama 2008!

Posted by: pt | March 18, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

What we witnessed today was Mr. Obama borrowing from William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar. Remember Mark Antony’s soliloquy “friends, Romans, lend me your ears I come to bury Caesar not to praise him”. He then goes on to do the very thing that he said he was not going to do and that is to praise his friend Ceasar. Thus it is with Mr. Obama, he spent 30 minutes or more not really condemning Rev. Wright he instead went down a list of why we should admire him. While that may be noble of a friend it is not wise for a politician. For all of his eloquent oratory he failed to go to the heart of his problem judgement. In his speech he now admits that he did hear him speak in contorversial terms. Yet a few days ago he said he had never heard him say anything that would have led him to beleive that he held such views. Then this begs the question why did you not seperate youself from him eariler? Do not look for the answer in his speech like the answers to so many questions concering Rev. Wright it is not there.
So in the end a speech that should have shed light on his relationship with Rev. Wright and the wrongs that he committed we are presented with all of the social ills that have plaqued america for more than 200 yrs. We we not unfortunately given a proper reason why he stil supports a man who continues to apply gasoline on the racial fires. No I am afraid that this speech with all its imagery and poetry will leave most working class americans asking the simple question, is he for him or is he against him?

Posted by: russell | March 18, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

Blah, blah, blah, blah
Same old, same old
Too little, too late
Step down obama – let the True Americans run in the presidendial election.
Step down now.

Posted by: Lou | March 18, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

This is yet another example of Obama’s usual insulting speeches that lump other pastors, priests and rabbis in the same category as Pastor Wright and to include Geraldine Ferraro in the same company is preposterous. As usual, he is shifting this problem around just like he does on the campaign with issues and Hillary Clinton. It is also insulting that he would suggest that white men voting for McCain do so because they are trapped in old resentments.
As usual, he uses race to the hilt to score political points on the campaign trail and suggests that by voting for him, the healing and bringing together of America will begin. And that he will redeem America. These are very racially charged statements and insinuations that are hyped and targeted to the mentality of the younger voters especially. This has definitely helped him early in his campaign but people are now realising the real person that he is.
I wish America would wake up to the reality that this man is a conventional and crafty politician who projects himself as a different agent of change, the Redeemer of America.

Posted by: Jane | March 18, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

I am still amazed at the implication that racism exists in the workplace and society in general. The stats clearly show black men make the same as white men. Affirmative Action has helped us achieve that and now it is causing a reverse racial disparity so even the Universities dont have to abide by it. I think it should remain in place though because women of all colors and other races still need balancing. Women still make 70 cents on the dollar – zero progress in 30 years. But Clinton cannot mention the gender-bias or she is being accused of whining.
It seems to me the divisive nature of the campaign came from Michelle’s “Black America will wake up” and “If you cant run your own house” statements. It is a well known statistic that women keep other women down more than men so I was not surprised. Her college paper blaming whites at Princeton for her troubles made me not surprised at the other statement.
Prior to the race-baiting in SC (even Rengel said this was not the Clintons fault), the black voting bloc results were not disproportional. After that it became clear there was a racial divide with the strong swing to improbable numbers for Obama. None of the other races including whites appear to be voting based on race. While we all know some people will vote based on “what we look like”, we also know some will vote based on “issues that matter to them”. The division in the democratic voters is clearly attributed to the black voting bloc. Sad thing is, that will not help Obama in the GE if he gets the nom. AA voters are 12% of the population. He cannot win without unity and it is clear to me that is not likely.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 18, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

Obama still refuses to condemn Wright for being the race-baiting, anti-American lunatic that he is. Once again, his actions and continued association with friends like his speak much louder than his words about his true character. History is full of mesmerizing speakers who have dazzled their audiences and led their countries into ruin.

Posted by: Joseph | March 18, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

Obama gave a good speech that would have had powerful effect if it had been given about a month ago. But he only gave this speech because he is faced with a scandalous threat to his campaign that won’t go away. His legal training has taught him how to use soaring language and “blame of societal ills” to forgive his pastor, but most especially to ask the jury to find Obama innocent. It’s sad because he’s turned out to be such a fraud. He never addressed the questions concerning his poor judgment, he revealed that he had lied, and he basically tried to hide his failingsw behind a soaring discussion of race in America. He’s a fraud.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | March 18, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Amy, les us not forget that at the beginning of the world there was-verb- all we do as human beings is to communicate. Nothing will happen without that communication, that communication of our ideas, our feelings, our dreams. Obama has done his part of the duty candidly and we can take it or leave it, but if we have to lift-up America, we will reflect on it and look at tomorrow, a tomorrow better than today, a tomorrow for a greater America in a better world.

Posted by: BKMC | March 18, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Lexi: You are right on the money. I feel same. In fact, the proof is becoming clear:
According to AP and other reports, momentum in the Pennsylvania Democratic primary battle has shifted back to New York Sen. Hillary Clinton, who now leads Illinois Sen. Barack Obama 53 – 41 percent among likely primary voters, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today. This compares to a 49 – 43 percent Clinton lead in a February 27 poll by the independent Quinnipiac University. In that survey, the momentum was with Obama who had narrowed a 52 – 36 percent gap from a February 14 poll.
Go Hillary …
Obama – you shamed America.

Posted by: Jannifer | March 18, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Mr Obama took “God Damn America” and turned it into race, issue.
*scratches Head*
He denounce the declaration of independence.
He Denounce every Union Soldier who fought and gave their lives.
He denounced all the work and progress that has been made over the past 145 years was invain.
——————
Every American has the same opportunities as every other American today.
What you do with your life is by choice.
School 1-12 grade is mandatory.
College and trade school if you want to go, It is choice and option, not given to anyone.(There is financial aide for every budget)Scholarships, grants and other programs. College is an elective not a given.
Jobs are out there. If you apply yourself you can find one.
The Government should not be supporting people. They can assist when needed, help out when needed, but not to live off of for long periods of time.
There are as many poor white, Spanish, Indian, Chinese etc people in the united states as their are black people. So when you say you want to work on social issues, include all.
Mr Obamas speech was more infuriating then the rev. Wrights. With Rev wright we know he is not running for president of our country, and we can fluff him off as being ignorant to to todays society.
Obama told us he standing over a fence.
He is not going to make any effort to tear down the fence, or get over it one way or another.
He lied about what he has heard in his church, between yesterday and today.
He has lied about his other friends, Rezko, Ayers, Fakaram.
Can’t we accept a public liar, whom the world has watched lie many times, to the people of the country, as our president?

Posted by: seah | March 18, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

To me, this speech was delivered in a smart, promising style as we have seen Sen. Obama do quite often. However, I found his speech to be much more political and damage control (even spin) than actually wanting to bring an end to focusing on race. First, how can we put an end to focusing on the racial issues that are surfacing during this election if we, as a nation, cannot openly talk about it? This conversation should not just happen at dinner tables but in the open and across all communities. But the one thing I’m left with more than anything from his speech today was towards the end when he said we need to quit pointing to one or two things in a presidential campaign because if we do not, then during the next election cycle, we will find small things that we focus on then as well. THE point of a campaign is to be hired for a job. Any job applicant has to be interviewed, have references checked, and analyzed for the best experiences and qualifications for what the job entails. Therefore, each election cycle, we as Americans, should do OUR jobs and pay close attention to these items.
I have and today’s speech, last week’s TV interviews, the entire campaign of Sen. Obama has made me feel like I cannot cast a vote for him as our next President. I am still waiting for him to get past telling us what we want to hear and telling us what is genuinely in his heart. I respect authenticity–even if one’s opinion is different than mine–more than just words that make people feel good.

Posted by: tired_democrat | March 18, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

There is this speech of Obama.
And, there are a lot of comments strikingly opposed to what Obama says..and most of them can be summerized as….I hate you no matter what.
I wish we could be colorblind till the election is over to give Obama a fair chance. I know my wish is fairy, but I can almost garuntee what woud entail if my wish were to come true….we would have much less of the “I hate you no matter what” as a result of the deeds of an unifier president like Obama.
Its a golden opportunity…will our sensitivites about color hold us back from cashing in on this opportunity?..Time will tell.

Posted by: moeen | March 18, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

while many people see the judgement problem that Obama had or has, I also see a more serious issue of lack of leadership and ability (or maybe willingness).
Sitting the pew for 20 years, listening to the hatred uttered toward the country he claims he loves, but doing nothing to help make change. He hasn’t done anything to help change how his community see the white America (even though he knows they had a distorted view), to tell his pastor that what was said, even out of good intension or understandable, is in fact doing harm to the black community and to the rest of this country. Yes, he said, “I disagreed”. Then what?
Obama hasn’t done anything in the past 20 years to make changes to his own community in this aspect, how can he deliver the changes he promises? He did nothing to help unify black and white in his church in the past 20 years, how can we believe he can do it now?

Posted by: Amy | March 18, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

DCVoter, it is very easy to say that it is black people fault, thank you for that statemtn. Hillary lover. But if you say that black people are voting for Obama are you not saying that white people are voting for Hillary. If you say that black people have brought race into the race, are you forgetting Bill Clinton’s statement in South Carolina. You have to support Hillary but do not denigrate a whole race. It is pity that Black people have done their best to save Clinton’s presidency from impeachment but today they are being punsihed because they have made a choice based on issues at hand, they want change and have chosen for Obama as the candidate for change, for that choice, they have to be pushed back to the plantations. Thank you DCVoter.

Posted by: BKMC | March 18, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Bill and Hillary are so loving this.

Posted by: megan | March 18, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

God Bless America.
God bless also those who responses to Obama’s speech can be summerized as “I hate you no matter what” to cleanse their minds of pure hatrate.

Posted by: afroza | March 18, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

This sums up Obama’s speech: ….Lets understand the feelings of my mentor of twenty years and why he is justified for spewing his anti-jewish, anti-white, anti-women (because they never suffered enough), and anti-America, inflammatory comments. So, I will continue associating with my mentor-pastor because he’s just my crazy uncle.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 18, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Maybe the only possibility for Dems to win over McCain is both Dems candidates team up….
If Obama is a true uniter, he should unite his rival and his rival’s supporters first in his own party…..
Both candidates got their own strength and weakness… if divided, Dems will be defeated…

Posted by: Truth | March 18, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

From Obama’s speech
“Even for those blacks who did make it, questions of race, and racism, continue to define their worldview in fundamental ways. For the men and women of Reverend Wright’s generation, the memories of humiliation and doubt and fear have not gone away; nor has the anger and the bitterness of those years. That anger may not get expressed in public, in front of white co-workers or white friends. But it does find voice in the barbershop or around the kitchen table. At times, that anger is exploited by politicians, to gin up votes along racial lines, or to make up for a politician’s own failings.”
Senator Obama himself has exploited that anger to “gin up votes along racial lines” to take African-American support from Senator Clinton. False charges of racism have been leveled against Senator Clinton’s campaign while Senator Obama claims to be above divisiveness. Senator Obama and his campaign have made a habit of making divisive remarks about Senator Clinton, of twisting her remarks and taking them out of context.

Posted by: mimi5 | March 18, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

People said: to change a country, you have to start by changing yourself, your family, your own environment…
No evidence to show Obama had done any to change the pastor, or at least not to subject his wife and children to the hatefully “inspirational” and spiritual education for decades.
He knew it for long, he just avoided dealing with it, to say the least. And he tried to lie about it a few days ago.
It is not new that he can give great speeches. But if the speech can stop people from looking at action and facts, can have the unconditional acceptance effect as before people, that would be very interesting.

Posted by: Victor | March 18, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Barack Obama is the real deal.
It’s so easy to go negative on someone speaking the truth to America… that we are all saddled with weaknesses but bound by greater strengths – that we are an imperfect union of far from perfect souls but that we can take all these truths together, for what they are worth, and begin to let go of the divisions that hold us back collectively and march on toward something better for our posterity – for our children – Mine and yours.
Barack Obama for President of the UNITED States of America.

Posted by: PulSamsara | March 18, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

If this speech had been given for the sake of race relations then maybe I could have respected the content more. The only reason he gave this speech was to save his run for office. He is no MLK, who gave his speeches to help people get the rights they deserve.He lied and used the race card to cover it up. Wright’s statements are not defendable no matter how well you can give a speech. It is time for the dems. to wake up before it’s too late, this man is racist and un-american which means unelectable. People will vote for anybody but him. Listen to the blogs!

Posted by: BOSTONO | March 18, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

After having read all the above comments, it is very clear that there will always be those who just simply have difficulty rising above the racial divide. Look, it is very important that in order to become a better people we will have to TRY to put behind us these differences. Nothing good ever came out of a people divided. LET US SIMPLY MOVE FORWARD IN PEACE AND HARMONY FOR THE COMMON GOOD OF OUR NATION.

Posted by: win | March 18, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Obama’s speech was the most articulate expression of race relations in the U.S. that has been heard in decades. It was more frank than many of us are used to hearing – and all true. It is somewhat surprising to see the amazement at black alienation. I guess most people either don’t know or choose to ignore the 300 years oppression of black people in the U.S. Pastor Wright’s views are shared by many in the black community and freely expressed. In a country where free speech is a cornerstone of our democracy, It hardly seems right that speech should disqualify one from being president.

Posted by: NJvoter | March 18, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Can someone tell me with this speech he gave this morning, what did he do in Illinois to further the cause of resolving this racial divide. He doesn’t have to wait to be president of the U.S. to start uniting everyone. What did he do to unite Illinois? I think its a very valid question. If an Obama supporter can respond that would be helpful.

Posted by: mona | March 18, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

I am sorry but why is Obama bringing this up now? My feeling is that he thinks it will help him in someway win the election. Why didn’t you bring that up when you found out about your pastor’s inflammatory remarks? And please we are smarter than what you think Obama, so no more lies, you knew before hand that Wright was rough on the edges but played it off as if we would never find out. The lies and the arrogance will sink you Obama. Either now or later. I rather it be now so we don’t go thru another 4 years of having an inexperienced president trying to figure what to do in the White House.

Posted by: PB | March 18, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

BKMC – I did not say it was black people’s fault. In case you dont remember, I have a international family of many races including AA – so please dont call me a racist.
I said Michelle started the divisiveness and his campaign has been ill-advised in their strategy. I blame Axelrod, Michelle, and Obama for opening the old wounds which opened the racial divide that was almost healed from within. Axelrod has always had a strategy to: grow the electorate by getting more young voters, lock in the black vote, and use the liberal dems’ money. The payback is obviously to the Kennedy Kerry clan.
Obama and Michelle both stated early on that if they can show Black America they can get whites, then they can get all the black support. In doing that, Obama then attempted to cut in to the democratic core supporters. It looked like it was working UNTIL he started being vetted, the Rezko trial began, and he dropped the race card a few times or got caught lying about campaign contributions and his involvement with Rezko. With this fiasco, we shall see if the tide has shifted permanently now that he admits to lying and refuses to remove his daughters from a separatist church with inappropriate hate speech in its sermons. I think he drove the wedge deeper with the racial statements against white voters today. It is unfortunate that he did not do the right thing and atone. He did not put his country before himself as any leader should have done. Spitzer is a more honorable man than he is.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 18, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

This was one of the most candid, beautiful, and bravest speeches I’ve ever seen in my life. I want Obama as our President.

Posted by: Stephanie Dray | March 18, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

How does claiming Geraldine Ferraro harbors “deep-seated racial bias” unite people?

Posted by: geevill | March 18, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

Obama did not “give” a speech, he “read” a speech written for him and transferred to cue cards he kept watching. He wouldn’t make any comments last night because his speech wasn’t written yet and he might have contradicted something the “writer” put in it. Obama has proven he is a hollow empty suit full of hot air. I hope everyone now votes for anyone BUT Barack Obama.

Posted by: Bess Cannon | March 18, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Nice try, but Obama’s magic tongue has lost it’s magic. And he refuses to “disown” Wright. That makes everything he said in the rest of the speech hypocrisy and therefore meaningless. You can’t continue to embrace the same things you denounce.

Posted by: KDH55 | March 18, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

one just can’t serve both God and the devil… speaking out of both sides of the mouth is not going to unify this country… the junior senator from illinois stated last week that if he had heard these incendiary remarks he would have quit the church… today he states that he has heard the pastors so called controversy remarks but didn’t agree with them, begs the question, at what point of the 20 plus years is/was obama going to quit the church and reject the hate and anti-american theme his church stands for??? not to mention the state of mind of his wife, michelle, stating that this is a mean country and for once in her adult life she is proud of this country, which alludes to the same mentality of this anti-american themed church… i like obama and have given obama the benefit of the doubt time and again, but i have more questions than answers… and a leader of this country should not be a part of an organization and/or religion that spews hate with anti-american views by any means… just doesn’t add up

Posted by: Cyclops | March 18, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Obama created this issue that wasn”t there 6 months ago. Obamas quest to solidify a monolithic African American vote in the South has come back to sting him and America. The man is dumber than Bush.
Now he wants to lecture the country about race so that he somehow looks presidential when in fact he created the issue during his campaign. Obama is worse than Bush. Shame!

Posted by: hhkeller | March 18, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

Enough of speeches! He will say anything and everything to get elected!
It is clear that the speech was well written by someone else.
Comparing Geraldine Ferraro to his pastor? Ferraro made racist remarks, but his pastor is beyond that.. his pastor is a racist, provocative, divisive and anti american.
There is no comparision.
I am surprised that obama still belives that he americans will vote for him. This shows how much he loves to grab the white house and the power so that he can execute what his pastor was screeming out in the church.
Think twice before you vote for this liar.
He lied about NAFTA, lied about Hillary, lied about McCain, about His religion, lied about his pastor’s remark and more lies yet to come.
Not so proud comments of his wife..
What does all this tells us! It tells us he is not a straight talker..
You can see his paid campaign is shouting out in the blogs portrait them as intelligent trying to be positive.. but my friends, its over for Obama!
God bless america and save americans from these kind of racists

Posted by: Jon | March 18, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

It is interesting that Obama refused to answer press questions on this matter yesterday deferring to his upcoming speach. He knows that his only chance to survive is to give another speach and again swoon the audience. He is very scarey. If you have been mentored by someone from your young adult age, you have acquired their values and worldview. Fancy speaches and words do not change who you are.

Posted by: Laurie | March 18, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

Why is it “black anger” and “white racism”? Racism is racism is racism.

Posted by: mimi5 | March 18, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

BKMC – the proof is in an interview Michelle had last year where she said “Black America will wake up”. Search for it… check the dates.
Time for work.
It is a sad day in the world when a candidate for the most diverse nation in the country uses his own race to divide it further even after admitting to being dishonorable.
“The race for President is all about character.” – JFK

Posted by: DCVoter | March 18, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

Bess Cannon:
So, I suppose you think Hillary writes all of her own speeches? Wow, you are deluded! I’d be really interested to see just how much of each candidates speeches they actually write themselves. I’ll wager a bet that Obama has a lot more control and influence over his speeches than Hillary. Obama ’08

Posted by: Geekmoid | March 18, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

Moe – I didn’t think of it that way. Yes, you choose your friends not your family.
Point well taken

Posted by: mona | March 18, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

What about Obama’s ageism? He touts his ability to get the vote of young people as if their vote is more important. All votes are equal.

Posted by: mimi5 | March 18, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

Just one more note for now:
Bill Clinton is not a candidate in case you have been living in the past and are obviously not up to date. Even Obama said this race should be about the future… but oh he lapses into the past too so I guess it is not your fault since you are following your leader.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 18, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

Can someone tell me with this speech he gave this morning, what did he do in Illinois to further the cause of resolving this racial divide. He doesn’t have to wait to be president of the U.S. to start uniting everyone. What did he do to unite Illinois? I think its a very valid question. If an Obama supporter can respond that would be helpful.

Posted by: mona | March 18, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

This is *not* change we can believe in. For the first time since the 60′s, we now have the most explosive race controversy and commentary in decades. This is not unity, this is division. To use Obama’s words, this is the old okey doke.
For the sake of our party, drop out of the race now Obama.
Mr. Obama is arrogant and lacks the judgment and character to be POTUS.
Obama’s many speeches, books, and online posts reference and in many ocassions duplicate sermons, words, or books by the Rev. Wright.
Rev. Wright specifically endorses black theology and regularly quotes and/or references persons who are historical figures in black theology (this includes, James Cone).
As Rev. Wright has said on many ocassions, you should read James Cone. That is what Obama believes in (black theology). In Cone’s words, he believes that the only God that should be worshiped is the one who will empower the AA community and *destroy* the white community. If you think I am making this up, go read for yourself.

Posted by: kaffeen | March 18, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

Obama may jave a cute smile a look younger than he is but he still voted to extend the war without strings.
He is just as self serivng a politician as Mitt Romney. Just cuter.

Posted by: hhkeller | March 18, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

Perhaps Obama could have listened to Robert Kennedy and learned something. Robert Kennedy said: “I have not come here to propose a set of specific remedies nor is there a single set. For a broad and adequate outline we know what must be done. When you teach a man to hate and fear his brother, when you teach that he is a lesser man because of his color or his beliefs or the policies he pursues, when you teach that those who differ from you threaten your freedom or your job or your family, then you also learn to confront others not as fellow citizens but as enemies, to be met not with cooperation but with conquest; to be subjugated and mastered.”

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 18, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

Throughout Obama’s campaign he has been accused of style without sustenance, and this speech is probably an example of that. I think if he was sincerely interested in the topic he would have made it an issue from the beginning, but you got to give Obama credit for his ability to address the situation in way that in intelligent and non-divisive while still bringing attention to the matter and not sweeping the issue “under the rug”. That Obama is able to pull off this save, I believe, is a good indicator of his ability to navigate tricky situations – an invaluable asset for the political arena.

Posted by: matt | March 18, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

Well, Obama sounded pretty presidential this morning.
He lied. That’s what they do, right?

Posted by: Belle | March 18, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

Moe:
Actually, Mr. Wright’s pronouncements about 9/11 and American foreign policy in many ways were correct. 9/11 was partially a result of bad American foriegn policy. And before you go and wrap yourself in a flag and call me a “blame America first liberal America hater,” get one thing straight: I love this country. I think it is the greatest country in the world, and I will do everything I can to defend it. That includes defending it from idiots like yourself, who seem to think that patriotism is blindly following everything that your leaders say and tell you. I love this country enough to admit that, while we have done a lot of good in this world, we have also done some bad. I love this country so much that I want to admit to our past mistakes, so that we can fix them in the future, and hopefully do even more good in the world, so that we can again be placed in a position of respect and reverence, and have it be well deserved.

Posted by: Geekmoid | March 18, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

Jon, America is about one man one vote, you can keep your vote for Hillary but millions are out there with their vote for Obama. OBAMA08.

Posted by: BKMC | March 18, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

Commander Guy
Glad you can offer some advice and glad to use it…..
But the irony is in Obama saying he is the embodiment of transparency, but in the same breath say he got money from Rezko.
The irony is Obama saying on Friday 03/14 that he dint hear Wright’s comments in church, but reversing today on 03/18 and saying that he did hear comments while in church…..It is called the credibility problem….he doesnt have any.
Sorry ….but you got ripped off!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: MattOhio | March 18, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

Ok Obama is now tied closely to an Anti-American Spewing Minister (if you can call him that), a terrorist, A slumlord, and just think this was all found out with the liberal media protecting him, so I wonder what else there is!
It explains why he does not wear the flag.
Why on Friday did he say he never heard the pastor speak like this? and know he is trying to tell everyone to stop reporting it, uh NO, Barrack Hussein Obama EXPLAIN YOURSELF or PULL OUT OF THE RACE!!!!

Posted by: Stopthe Libs | March 18, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

For the love of God Obama is not dividing this country, you ignorant Clinton people are just listen to yourselves! You are so blind but you choose not to see which is the shame in itself! Instead of continuing this negative commentary, why don’t you get off your lazy behinds and do something positive that really makes a difference! Oops, I am sooo sorry, I forgot you support Hillary, you know nothing of positivity. If anything, you are the divisive force of America! But don’t forget, she will need Obama supports to win in a general election!

Posted by: Past | March 18, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

Basically, all I got out of it is that it is everyone elses fault that they think the preacher is an anti-American racist. It is not the preacher’s fault that he is an anti-American racist. And even more important, it is not Obama’s fault that he bought into this preacher.
It is just silly to me that Obama claims he never knew of this venom spewed from the mouth of that ignorant fool.
I dont think the preacher’s comments reflect upon Obama’s personal beliefs, but I do believe he lies about not knowing the preachers reputation. (“I did not hear racist comments from that preacher.”)
Politics as usual. So much for change.

Posted by: Wright or right? | March 18, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

Geekmoid-Perhaps you can name the “bad American policy” that caused Saudi Arabians to kill themselves on 9/11. What bad American policy did America do to Saudi Arabia?

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 18, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

If people are looking for truth, or even journalist accuracy, find a copy of Obama’s speech. It’s all over the internet and it’s quite different than the soundbites offered by Political Punch. It is exactly the opposite of most of these postings – it is an attempt at honesty, empathy and reconciliation. Political Punch has a political agenda – and it is not to help elect Barack Obama.
He might not make it to the Presidency – which given the press bias, the lobby-which-cannot-be-mentioned-by-name, and the ruthless tactics of the Clintons, is likely. But it was a powerful and hopeful speech and I find it remarkable that Political Punch portrayed the speech as divisive and racist. Read the speech. The entire thing.

Posted by: Mara | March 18, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

On face value a nice speech.
But as someone who opposes Obama, I still do.
Typical Obama, he himself is ABOVE IT ALL! He mentioned EVERYBODY ELSES racist qualities, except himself.
But being the nice guy he is, he did out his White grandmother as a racist! She raised him and loved him and he just (figuratively) threw her under the bus for political considerations.

Posted by: hurricanefan | March 18, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Alison-
Of course Obama wrote the book himself but it was inspired by his ANTI-AMERICAN racial spiritual mentor pastor Rev. Wright.

Posted by: Lexi | March 18, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Obama says he cannot “disown” Wright. So be it. Obama is admitting he is unfit to be President.

Posted by: geevill | March 18, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

Nice speech — I’ll go as far to say very good speech
But Obama still hasn’t won me back to his side. He will not get this Democrat’s vote in November if he is the Nomination.
I really don’t know what Obama can say or do to ‘win’ my support back. I am not really sure if he can do anything to tell you the truth.
I just don’t trust him.

Posted by: chobie | March 18, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

I believe to various degrees We ALL have racist qualities. Obama is great at pointing out what the problems are in his speach….but he didnt mention that he had any of these qualities. And as always he tells us what the problems are in this country. I didnt learn anything I didnt already know. (except for his grandmother).
He has supported a racist (wright) spirtually, personally and finacially all these years! WHOM as of Friday HE DENIED that he ever heard any of this stuff until he started to run for President. Now today …OH YEAH he knew.
As far as comparing seperating himself from Wright is the same as seperating from his grandmother…..To me that is sad. His grandmother raised him under great duress to herself, and her love knew no bounds. Yet he sees the two as the same.
All very sad.

Posted by: mickeyfan | March 18, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

In Obama’s 20 years at his church he hasn’t changed the “tone”. How is he going to change the tone in Washington?

Posted by: mimi5 | March 18, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

Obama did not address the “judgment and character” issues that he’s running on.

Posted by: Lexi | March 18, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

Past: After listening to Rev. Wright’s sermons it is you conclusion that it is Clinton supporters who are devisive. Maybe you did not hear the same sermons that I heard. Then again are you going to beleive me or your lying eyes?

Posted by: russell | March 18, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

Obama’s association with Wright, who officiated his wedding, baptized his children and served as his spiritual adviser, is developing a potential damaging credibility problem for his campaign of hope and change. The direct political effects of the relationship remain unclear, but some telling clues showed Obama had a pastor problem.

Posted by: Lexi | March 18, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

geewil, who can disown his mother, his father, his brother, his sister, his uncle, etc. Having a crazy uncle home has never disqualified somebody to be president. OBAMA08

Posted by: BKMC | March 18, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Dogsoldier:
Some examples of poor American foriegn policy? OK, you brought it up. Let’s start with the U.S. funding the rebels in Afghanistan to fight the Russian occupation. How much money and weapons did the U.S. dump into funding and even training a “radical” group, whose leader, coincidentally, ended up being the leader of the group that caused 9-11? And when the Taliban took over, where was the U.S. then? We just left them high and dry. This is not Saudi Arabia, but events that occured there did have a major influence in shaping Arab opinions of America. I could go on with example after example, but I will give you a chance to concede the point gracefully.

Posted by: Geekmoid | March 18, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

I dont think the President or any politian can EVER solve racism in this country. I dont think they could even make a dent. They have way too many political allies etc to keep an eye out on. Politics, by design is even dirtier than racism!
The ONLY viable thing politians can do is to ensure the laws we have stay intact, and possible set some new ones.
I know we will have a better chance with Hillary, especially with our current economy. If the economy gets worse, racisim will get worse. I know she has a much better grasp on the economy.
Racism will not be solved in our lifetime. But I do believe that Religious leaders, teachers and even so much Hollywood products (movies/tv) can enlighten us and relieve the racial tension. This is one of those “Time will heal all wounds” kind of thing!

Posted by: Uniter not a Divider | March 18, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

Martin DeLorean,
Great speech! Very powerful!
While he denounced Rev.Wrights anti-American sermons. I still have questions.
How may men, women and children were in attendence and unlike Obama believe every word. I still feel Rev. Wright’s semons were dangerous and anyone who sit though them has to believe some of what he’s saying.
I know I would never sit and listen to these anti-American, Hate, Conspiracy sermons. God Forbid never would I want my Children or Grandchildren to hear such HATE.
Today he claimed he was in attendence at some of these sermons. Were his children also in attendence and if so how do you explain to you children some of the terrible things that GODS MINISTER has just said. I find so much of this very troubling.
I wonder what kind of a President Obama would be if for 20 years he said nothing sat back and listened. Yet now he speaks out about all the wrongs in politics.

Posted by: concerned | March 18, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

What was his side of the story? I didn’t get answers about why he is so close to this man. Okay maybe 30 years ago his preachings were different but its not like Obama didn’t see the change. He still calls the man uncle, he still had him baptize his child and he still financially supported the church in which this pastor spewed his hate. He never explained why he kept this relationship with this man, as an American and a registered voter thats what I wanted to know. I didn’t want to hear what he disagrees with, I wanted to hear what this man preaches now that he does agree with.

Posted by: just an average joe | March 18, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

As an African American woman it wasn’t enough for me. Oh his words are pretty, very well scripted. I was told today by my peers that I am too hard on Obama. I should demonstrate forgiveness. I am not perfect. No, I’m not! But, I also am not running for the position of President of the United States either. The highest position in the NATION representing ALL AMERICANS! Not just the ones you choose to represent. He should be scrutinized, raked over the coals, and whatever else it takes to fill that position. The position he is applying for is not an easy one, and he better suck it up if he plans to fill it. Because if he gets elected you can guarantee it will get a whole lot harder than this. Not just from America but around the world. Don’t think the Whole world is watching and making it’s own conclusions. What are we going to do than run to his defense, tell the world STOP IT he’s Obama our first black president don’t be so hard on him. HE SHOULD BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE for what his pastor. His pastor is the herder of the sheep the congregation. I grew up in a Christian household regardless of whatever the pastor was doing. Mama always said Pastor said this, Pastor said that. So don’t tell me not to hold him accountable! HE WILL BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THE WHOLE NATION if he should happen to fill the presidential position. Yeah and they all lie but, he himself presents this I’m the new change coming. I don’t see it!

Posted by: Mgck59 | March 18, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Every politician and religious figure that puts themselves above others falls.

Posted by: mimi5 | March 18, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Unifying the country on race is Obama’s day job. In the evenings and weekends he can let his hair down and hang with his separatist mentor and friends.

Posted by: no pasaran | March 18, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

There seemed to be a lot of flags around Mr. Obama strange for a man who refuses to wear one on his lapel. It appears that since Rev Wrights sermons hit the airwaves he has found an elusive concept, patriotism! Yesterday he end his rally by saying God Bless You and God Bless America! Maybe his wife and Rev Wright will be his converts too!

Posted by: russell | March 18, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

Obama wrote about what is wrong with his minister. Excuse me, but we don’t really care what and how the minister thinks. We care about the guy who wants to be President. For example; It bothers me that YOU OBAMA chose the church, YOU are behaving like it’s all about the minister. YOUR CHOICES/JUDGEMENT AND YOUR DESIRE TO BE PRESIDENT. It really bothers me that you may have chosen this church for political reasons, I’m sure rubbing elbows with Oprah showed you possibilities there as well and now you are allowing anger to be aimed at your minister. You gave an entire speech where you blame your grandma and your minister. What about YOU?

Posted by: irma | March 18, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

we all know the skeletons of McCain and Hillary.
You Obama lovers just can’t accept that many people now wouldn’t vote for him.

Posted by: Lexi | March 18, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

I meant let’s the blame rest on his minister.

Posted by: irma | March 18, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

Did he or did he not lie about him hearing those Pastor Wright’s sermon for the first time?
Did I also understand that to achieve a perfect union, eventually eliminating racism, America will have to elect him as president?
Eloquent but wrong speech. The question is why did Obama tolerate his pastor’s sermon and still does? Is it because Pastor Wright is bitter about America’s attitude towards race? So this is understandable and acceptable behavior?
What did Obama say that we don’t already know about race?
He is addressing the issue now because he was exposed. He is a politician after all.

Posted by: Sam1 | March 18, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

I persoannly would LOVE to elect a President that truly unifies the country and helps us meet the challenges of the future.
I don’t care if Obama is Purple, Pink or Green (well I’m not sure about Green – experience does count).
As for UNITY: he is attacking groups to win votes (slicing and dicing). He is attacking old people (agism) and wealthier people (not really “populism”)
As for CHANGE: he wants to move BACK to old policies. Ones that do not work.
Actually, I think it is rather sad who we have to selcted from (probably our own fault). What have any of the three really accomplished in the world: McCaim was a POW, H. Clinton was the wife of a Governor and President, and Obama was a community activist.

Posted by: Don't really care who wins | March 18, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

What We’ve Noticed About the Speech
By SusanUnPC
http://www.noquarterusa.net
Everything I wrote earlier today holds (here, here, and here) — a long speech notwithstanding. But there is more. Much more. (A NoQuarter regular sent me a terrific “rant” that I’ve added at the end — do not miss it!)
Obama LIED repeatedly in the weeks before today’s confession. Today, he said, “Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes. Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely …”
Obama told the Chicago Sun-Times on March 15, 2008, “But the sermons I’ve always hear were no different than the sermons you hear in many African-American churches. I had not heard him make such, what I consider to be objectionable remarks from the pulpit. Had I heard them while I was in church, I would have objected. Had that been the tenor of the church generally, I probably wouldn’t be a member of the church.”
On March 14, when CNN’s Anderson Cooper asked Obama if he ever heard from others about Rev. Wright’s controverisal remarks, Obama replied with a flat “No.”
Obama had the audacity to say this today: “….And the lack of basic services in so many urban black neighborhoods – parks for kids to play in, police walking the beat, regular garbage pick-up and building code enforcement – all helped create a cycle of violence, blight and neglect that continue to haunt us. This is the reality in which Reverend Wright and other African-Americans of his generation grew up.”
How dare he? With the hundreds of thousands of poor people (including thousands of black people) he ignored in Chicago — whose plight he claimed to be unaware of — while he cozied up with his pal Rezko? Read about The Forgotten People, whose stories will sicken you.
OBAMA LIED!

Posted by: USVet | March 18, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

How was this different from his other stump speeches? It addressed a new topic in the same way he’s draped everything he discusses, in generalities and hyperbole. Nowhere did I hear a suggestion of taking responsibility for supporting and even exposing his children to the divisive beliefs of Rev. Wright for 20 years. In a campaign he himself has framed around judgement he refuses to acknowledge how bad a decision it has been for him to stand by those who propagate radical racial views.
Sen Obama can preach about ending divisiveness all he likes now but his failure to address it in his life and with the congregation he spent most of his adult life in speaks volumes about how deep his convictions are. If he refused to tackle the very issue he claims to hold paramount to all others in his community why would anyone believe his speech today?
Sen Obama simply uses race and high ideals as tools to serve his political interests. This speech was just another creative use of playing the race card to meet the ends that benefit him.

Posted by: Bateman | March 18, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

Don’t really care who wins: I agree with you 100%. I could care less what color, gender, nationally you were just be for ALL the people. Don’t talk out both sides of your mouth. Talk one way for black folks, and another way for white folks….. Talk to the PEOPLE what is the agenda that you can’t be straight in the very beginning. Someone didn’t do their homework if they had it would have been realized that Pastor Wright was going to be a liability. If they didn’t that says a lot about whoever is running his campaign.

Posted by: Mgck59 | March 18, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

For every finger you point at someone…three comes back at you! I’m for Obama!

Posted by: VFJ | March 18, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

VFJ I don’t usually point the finger. But, I will at anyone who will have the position of making choices that effect my world. Everyone rip Bush apart (including me)when he made choices that we were not particularly in agreement about. The WORLD/OVERSEAS grouped us all as the cope rates. I had at that time and now have nothing to do with any of it. But, because Bush is the commander and chief when he makes those choices I then without any say became part of it. So, I will point the finger at Obama and anyone else that will have the job of making decisions on behalf of my life. This job isn’t one to be taken lightly, it controls all of our fates. Whether we are black, brown, blue,or green. I want to make sure the person going in understands that so they can put their personal views and opinions in their pockets.

Posted by: Mgck59 | March 18, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

Oh the irony is killing me!
Geraldine Ferraro was right all along.
If a white man would have been associated with an anti-American, racist, hate filled preacher for 20 YEARS, they would have been ousted IMMEDIATELY. No questions asked! Give an apology and see you in 4 to 8 years.
However, Senator Obama LIED (again) to the American people about what he knew and when he knew it. Back peddled for a minute and then is allowed to give a speech where he doesn’t even disavow this man?!?
He admits to lying a couple of days before and throws his Grandmother under the bus to boot!
It’s as if I’m in some bizarro world where everything Wright is right instead of wrong.
Mark my words, GOP 527 groups will destroy him if he takes the nomination. All you are going to see from convention to election are constant loops of
No, no, no, G*d D**m America! Among other things
P.S. If the Reverend gets a pass, why did he speak out against Don Imus?
Is reverse racism ok?

Posted by: Real_Talk | March 18, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

I’m in my 70′s now but in earlier times I spent 30+ years of my life as a contractor to the government living and working overseas, trying to promote America while at the same time working to thwart the designs of the USSR. I left when my daughter was 5, her mother was killed when she was 7 and I only found out about it long after she was buried and even then could not return home for almost 2 years. I only saw my daughter every year or two and sometimes 3 for the next 30 years. I spent 6 years in Southeast Asia and 25 in Africa, I retired and returned to the U.S. in 1998. I mention this so you have some idea of the commitment it took to do my job. I’m not looking for accolades, thank you’s or pity. This is the work I chose of my own free will and I accept the many short comings and negatives that went with it.
I can’t tell you how offended I was to hear and see Obama’s wife make the statement she made about being proud of America for the first time in her adult life. While this spoiled brat and her husband were enjoying the good life in the U.S. it was people like myself and thousands of others better than me that made it all possible.
It’s hard for me to believe that some one like Obama, a man who as a boy, while living in Hawaii and who had a friendship with and was indoctrinated by a man known to be a member of the Communist Party, is now running for president of the U.S. I believe this is possible because America’s youth have been conditioned to accept the Democrats and their preaching by the left, teaching in our schools that has taken place over the last 50 or so years. Obama refers to this association in his first book when he relates his intimate friendship with a man he identifies only as Frank, who in actuality was Frank Marshall Davis a journalist with far left tendencies. As I listened to Obama’s speech today it was reminiscent of the speeches I heard made by any number of Socialist, Communist or Marxist despots around the world who were always read to blame any one except themselves or their cohorts for the troubles that the country was in. And who always promised to change every thing if only they were elected

Posted by: Fred | March 19, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

I am glad for Obama’s Christian faith; will he now idenitfy the Islamic/Enlightenment sorcery of color and eliminate color racial references in the nations laws that continue to establish these toxic constructs in our society?

Posted by: Malulani | March 19, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am

Let’s compare what Obama has said in the past with what he said today. Several things do not match and others, taken together, cause even more questions than answers. Obama’s statement today did not satisfactorily address his relationship to Wright. Whatever his grandmother might have said, I doubt it could rise to the level of “God damn America” or “We asked for 9/11″ as shouted from the pulpit by Rev. Wright. Nor can Grand-Ma’s racist statements to a few people compare to the hundreds, possibly thousands of people over the years in Wright’s congregation who were subjected to his racist/hateful sermons. In the background of those recordings were the loud “amens” of his congregation; apparently in support of Wright’s ideology. While a member of that congregation Obama must have stood-up and cheered “Amen!” along with the rest of the congregation every week. It is a statistical marvel that over 20 years Obama has managed to never be present when any hateful/racist statements were made by Wright. Would Wright, with his strong unabashed “public” statements, not mention nor discuss any of them with Obama at the “personal” level, one-on-one? Obama likened Wright to be as close as a “family member.” He can’t have it both ways: Either he was “close” and so, had to have known of Wright’s ideology, or their friendship was so “distant” that he could not have recognized Wright’s ideology? It’s difficult to fathom how he could have made Wright the “religious compass” of his campaign without knowing of Wright’s statements. Most people change churches when the Pastor preaches the opposite of what they believe. Obama had to at some level agreed with the Pastor’s vile ideology, AND accepted it–otherwise, such a hateful/racist person as Wright would have repulsed any true “non-racist” person. We need a more complete understanding of Obama’s “real” core beliefs before we make him our President.

Posted by: SolidSkeptic | March 19, 2008, 3:46 am 3:46 am

Another speech?
Obama’s speech is happening because of one thing only – the truth about his pastor and his church, the truth that Obama has been trying to suppress since before the campaign started, has been exposed. Thankfully, some real reporting has started and his free pass days are over. His speech, just as his panicked rush of interviews last Friday, is a reaction to his attempt to keep the ugly racist and anti-American underbelly of people who he has been extremely close to for over 20 years (8,000 church members go a long way in a state senatorial district election) under wraps has failed.
It’s the result of
Obama’s own very poor judgment.
If the speech was so important, why did it take days of playing his pastor’s hateful rants on TV to get him to give it? It’s political desperation as he sees his image begin to crumble as he finds himself running against two strong candidates who never give up and are unwavering in their love for country and disdain for racism. His candidacy is based on transcending these race issues and on being different and transparent. Yet he has attempted to hide this from us and has (badly) attempted to brush it away as and then to talk his way out of it. He’s failed us and himself at every turn.
He’s just another highly ambitious politician who’s quite good at reading a scripted speech. No doubt, some adoring admirers will be bamboozled by yet another speech from the speech candidate.
Let’s see him answer questions.

Posted by: Alicia | March 19, 2008, 6:34 am 6:34 am

Can’t blame him for trying to gloss over his relationship with Rev. Wright but his speech didn’t upgrade his credibility with me in the least. However, his lame excuses may have caused many to pause from other serious questions about who the man really is and I give him credit for that.
Obama is the least qualified of any candidate or prior president I can remember. (Hillary also fits into that measurement.) Obama has never held an executive position in either business or public service, never authored or succeeded in adopting significant legislation, never served in the military and has no record of significant achievements in his life.
He has only visited 4 foreign countries in his lifetime, including trips to Africa to see his black grandmother. He wants us to rely on this depth of foreign policy experience? He says he is as qualified to be president as was Abraham Lincoln. EXCUSE ME! I knew Abraham Lincoln and Mr. Obama, you are no Abe Lincoln! (At least I am old enough to FEEL like I knew Lincoln.)
Barack Obama is no more than an eloquent, charismatic paper-hanger and we should think beyond what he says and look into what he is. Kinda empty in there isn’t it.

Posted by: doofus | March 19, 2008, 7:18 am 7:18 am

He could have made a difference. He could have stood up and been a leader and caused real change by standing up many years ago and saying what he said yesterday, but he chose to be silent and to not challenge an older man he clearly admires and loves as family even when that man was clearly wrong.
His speech was a good one to have been given many years ago. Instead, he sat and listened in this church and did nothing and let those words of his church and his pastor stand unchallenged until it was politically necessary for him to take action. Obama has been a member of this church for over 20 years; he contributed over $20,000 to the church; he was married in the church; the minister baptized his children and he has referred to the minister often as his inspiration. If he missed what was happening, what does that say about his perception, his awareness and his JUDGMENT!
He now eloquently “explains” with great understanding and compassion the basis of this hate speech that he originally said he didn’t hear. His conduct is characteristic with his absence from the senate during the “Iran Vote”; characteristic of his “missing in action” in the Illinois legislature; characteristic of voting present 130 times; characteristic of his “agreeing with Senator Clinton” after she has answered a complex question. How does Obama represent a strong leader when he failed to confront his own minister about his “hate language”; when he fails be present for the Iran vote; when under pressure he reveals bit by bit new information about his relationship with Rezko or his relationship with Rev. Wright? Following, not leading.
Should he be the President, he will always have the “first question” and he will have to stand up and be present and say what the country stands for. He didn’t have the right stuff in years past as he attended this church for 20 years and allowed these issues to brew and did not speak up. He doesn’t have the right stuff now to stand up and make difficult decisions on complex matters that may have devastating consequences and face those consequences, and yes, sometimes failures.

Posted by: AmazonTraveler | March 19, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

How many people close to Bill and Hillary went to jail?
Why is Sandy Berger Hillary’s foreign policy adviser? He was caught stealing government papers.
Why is Maggie Smith running Hillary’s campaign? She removed papers from Vince Fosters office…then lied.
Ask youself why the media want the Clintons back in the Whitehouse.
They can’t wait for all the juicy stories.
We’ll go thru one disgrace after another…just like before. Bill has not changed. Hillary is still an enabler.
A common President for a common American people.

Posted by: JB | March 19, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am

Am changing the subject. My concern with obama is his absolute support for Islam. Ppl.we are told if we say anything critical of islam we are speaking hate..yet isn’t it hate when muslims are taught in their koran that infidels(unbeleiver’s) should be beheaded and finger’s cut off.? Read the koran please and know what they are taught..read about the daily atrocities around the world about muslim’s torturing and killing christian’s. Just the other day 3 little girls on their way to their school were ambushed by muslim men and beheaded..just for being christian as well as girls. Before one declares islam to be peaceful..first research it..please..otherwise in america there may come a day when your daughter’s and wives and you will be tortured..raped.. killed as it is the duty for evry muslim to’ slay the infidels and to be ruthless to him’

Posted by: anna | September 22, 2010, 11:45 am 11:45 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.