Clinton-backer Ferraro: Obama Where He Is Because He’s Black
Clinton campaign finance committee member, former vice presidential candidate, and former Rep. Geraldine Ferraro, D-NY, told the Daily Breeze of Torrance, Ca., that, "If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position. And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept."
Of Clinton, Ferraro said that the press "has been uniquely hard on her. It’s been a very sexist media. Some just don’t like her. The others have gotten caught up in the Obama campaign."
"I was reading an article that said young Republicans are out there campaigning for Obama because they believe he’s going to be able to put an end to partisanship. Dear God! Anyone that has worked in the Congress knows that for over 200 years this country has had partisanship – that’s the way our country is."
Yikes!
h/t to Mike Allen
- jpt
Email
Chrysler Super Bowl Ad Pro-Obama?
President Obama Tops Mitt Romney in New Poll
Ferraro can’t believe she would make this comment. For a hundred reasons.
The most of which is you could say he wouldn’t be there if he wasn’t as tall as he is…or because he grew up in Hawaii…. or his parents were from two different races…or that he went to Harvard…or that he marries Michelle… or because he was a community organizer…or that he gave that speech at the democratic convention…
Geraldine Ferraro is telling people they wouldn’t be where they were if it wasn’t for a physical characteristic?
ugh.
Posted by: dl | March 11, 2008, 7:43 am 7:43 am
Who cares if he’s black. Pathetic. Hillary had every possible advantage going in to this thing. Name recognition, campaing funds, her ‘exeprience’ as the first lady. Who cares!!!! She couldn’t beat him stop making excuses for Hillary.
Posted by: MIMS NJ | March 11, 2008, 7:43 am 7:43 am
Does she know her candidate was MRS. Clinton? It is not how you got there …it is what were your actions along the way, what is your judgement out of that…and perhaps your race or gender helped you in seeing the world in a more rounded viewpoint …or maybe it is part of the mix of what makes you a better leader…
So yeah that might be ONE of the attributes that makes Sen. Obama a great leader…just as I think Sen. Clinton being a woman brings something to the table. Not that it is better but that it is part of who they are.
Posted by: dl | March 11, 2008, 7:47 am 7:47 am
OH MY GOD! WHY DON’T WE ASK THIS QUESTION.
IF HILLARY CLINTON WASN’T THE FORMER FIRST LADY, SHE’D NEVER HAVE BEEN A SENATOR LET ALONE A CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT.
ANY DISPUTE?
Posted by: Mike | March 11, 2008, 7:47 am 7:47 am
Geraldine Ferraro is still bitter about only winning one state in the 1984 election. Let it go Geraldine.
Posted by: Enrique | March 11, 2008, 7:53 am 7:53 am
If she isn’t denounced and removed from any role in the campaign, then Hillary is a racist, too. This is far worse than the silly “Monster” comment that was only a burst of emotion and didn’t have any racism or sexism in it.
Posted by: jwk | March 11, 2008, 7:54 am 7:54 am
As a middle aged white woman I am deeply disturbed by the comment made by Ferraro. Hillary Clinton needs to denounce and reject this as soon as possible. This is adding more fuel to the fire in this incredibly deplorable campaign of hers. It’s amazing how people’s true colors are being revealed.
Posted by: Marie | March 11, 2008, 7:59 am 7:59 am
Marie, this is just like that Hispanic woman in Texas talking about how Obama’s problem was that he was a black man. As a Hispanic, I was ashamed and outraged by such a comment. Hillary did NOT reject or denounce that woman. I doubt she’ll do that to Geraldine.
Posted by: Enrique | March 11, 2008, 8:05 am 8:05 am
Geraldine Ferraro’s comment requires an immediate and personal apology by herself (not someone else) and Senator Clinton should immediately dismiss her from any dealings with this campaign. This kind of talk, including the comment about partisanship, is exactly why this country needs a Barack Obama and needs him now. Partisanship used to be a process to identify two sides to an argument to facilitate who whould be involved working out the compromise (instead of the recent past by both parties of my way or the hightway). Racial partisanship has only one side: bigotry.
Posted by: sty | March 11, 2008, 8:08 am 8:08 am
Subtract the racist african american vote..
So African American’s are racist because they don’t vote for Hillary? I guess the rest of Obama supporters are just plain old sexists then? African american’s make up what 12-13 percent of the total population but he leads by over 100 delegates? Your ignorance is in it’s full glory today. No excuses.
Posted by: mims | March 11, 2008, 8:14 am 8:14 am
Yes, it’s so much easier to be elected president as a black man than a white man. Just look at all those black presidents we’ve had already, and all those qualified white people who ran and lost solely because of the color of their skin.
And Wolfson’s only comment is: “We disagree with her?” No rejection? No denouncement? Glad to see that the Clintons don’t believe that the standards they demand of everyone else don’t apply to them.
Posted by: Fred App | March 11, 2008, 8:19 am 8:19 am
Reject and denounce, immediately!
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa!
Posted by: Jack | March 11, 2008, 8:24 am 8:24 am
This is really a very very sad and disturbing statement on so many levels. I also am a woman of Ms. Ferraro’s and Senator Clinton’s generation — and I also have worked in a male-dominated, testosterone-driven profession while raising two sons. Yes, it sometimes was hard and sometimes unfair, but I am so thrilled to have won the war. Young girls now feel no boundaries, in fact they beating young men at almost every level. It’s a pity Ms. Ferraro can’t let go of the old battles and understand she already has won. It’s really sad that she feels the need to put down others in order to get ahead. Very sad indeed. And embarrassing if you are a woman.
Posted by: Anne | March 11, 2008, 8:24 am 8:24 am
Ok – how racist is THAT comment by Ferraro?
It must be part of the kitchen sink strategy.
I’m frankly tired of the very hostile Hillary one moment, then the next moment it’s poor defenseless Hillary.
I doubt any man or woman of any color could go forward with Hillary’s history of dodging and deception.
Posted by: Angela | March 11, 2008, 8:25 am 8:25 am
Ferraro has the courage to say what everyone else is secretly thinking. She is stating the obvious about the 800 pound gorilla in the parlour. Kudos for your bravery.
Posted by: Mary Miles | March 11, 2008, 8:27 am 8:27 am
p.s. I’m a white middle-aged professional woman. I denounce and reject Ferraro’s comment.
It’s disgusting.
Posted by: Angela | March 11, 2008, 8:28 am 8:28 am
Angela, I just don’t understand why voters are letting her get away with this. Hillary throws her gender out there and wins votes for it. She then plays the racial card through her surrogates and gets away with it.
Posted by: Enrique | March 11, 2008, 8:28 am 8:28 am
I had thought, and have said on these forums, that if Ferraro had ever run for president I would certain have supported her over Clinton, whom I dislike intensely.
This comment from Ferraro just shows me how wrong I was.
I’ll stick with Obama.
Posted by: Not the color | March 11, 2008, 8:29 am 8:29 am
So by that logic billy, if Hillary had never been married to a president and was Hillary Rodham, she’d be a successful lawyer right now.
Posted by: Enrique | March 11, 2008, 8:31 am 8:31 am
I think you all missed what she was saying. She was saying that the little bit of national exposure he has had, if he were white, people would not be head over heels like they are now. It wouldn’t be a history making event.
Posted by: J | March 11, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am
Yes, well, Ms Ferraro, it’s obvious:
Black men have ALL the advantages when it comes to running for president.
Early Alzheimer’s?
Posted by: Not blinded | March 11, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am
Well said, Anne.
I too am “a woman of Ms. Ferraro’s and Senator Clinton’s generation — and I also have worked in a male-dominated, testosterone-driven profession…”
I only have this to say of that kind of feminism: it’s not. It’s reverse sexism. And stinks as much as sexism did, frankly.
Posted by: SE Croft | March 11, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am
angela and anne, you better grow some thicker skin because its going to get more contentious from here. Your candidate has had many opportunities to knock out Mrs. Clinton and he has failed to do it every time. To me, this is a foreshadowing of the type of president B.O. would be, WEAK!
Posted by: billy | March 11, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am
Oh, of course! If Barack Obama was a white male, he surely would not be where he is right now.
He’d be the nominee already.
Posted by: Andy | March 11, 2008, 8:35 am 8:35 am
As a 10 year old (in 1984), my mom taught me of the significance of Geraldine running to be the first female VP. After their loss, I had hoped that I’d see another woman run for office. Not only am I disappointed in the campaign that Hillary has run, I now have little respect for Geraldine.
Posted by: Enrique | March 11, 2008, 8:37 am 8:37 am
82 year old Ms Callejo in Mexico states an historical fact- Hispanics were hurt by the AA community- they were not helped- Hillary Clinton was in south Texas 35 years ago registering Hispanics to vote- Ms Callejo was swiftboated- She didn’t denigate AA’s. Billy Shaheen in NH stated a fact. The Republicans would use the self admitted cocaine use by Barack Obama against him. Somehow Obama’s campaign convinced us it was a racist slur-another case of swiftboating. Gloria Steinam said the same thing Ferraro said in an op-ed in the NY Times- If Obama were a woman (Ferraro added white male) with the small amount of experience that he has -there is no way Oprah, Spike Lee, Donna Brazille, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson et al would be supporting him and that the press would have made him the American Idol. At the 2004 Dem convention when he made such a splash-he talked only about his Kenyan father who left him when he was 2-not one word about the white mother who raised him. His campaign has been filled with unnoticed race baiting- See Race Man by Professor Sean Wilentz from Princeton: TNR
If Axelrod hadn’t done the same thing to the people of MA with Deval Patrick we would not have a model but we dol. AA candidate, good story, grand aspirations, good talker, just words speeches, change, community organizer running as an outsider. Guess what happens when reality hits the dream- It does not endure. We have had over a year of strife, rookie mistakes and inaction There is a good reason that even with Kennedy, Kerry and the governor -Obama lost by 15%- Can’t fool us twice.
Posted by: veritas | March 11, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am
Billy, if you think Obama is weak because he hasn’t knocked out Clinton yet, what does that say about YOUR candidate? She was the inevitable nominee, remember? And not only hasn’t she knocked out Obama, she can’t even beat him on points. There has not been a single day in this campaign when Clinton had more pledged delegates than Obama. Not a single day — not after her “combeback” victory in New Hampshire, not after her “comeback” victory in Ohio, never.
Talk about weak.
Posted by: Fred App | March 11, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am
If B.O. were a white man with his flimsy resume, we wouldn’t even be running for POTUS. This guy was created out of thin air. Think about it!
Posted by: billy | March 11, 2008, 8:39 am 8:39 am
I guess you can interpret Ms. Ferraro’s comment as in effect saying that affirmative action has been extended to the race for president. I wonder how many other Liberals agree with her?
Posted by: James Danley | March 11, 2008, 8:39 am 8:39 am
Fred, many things could be attributed to Mrs. Clinton’s personally and professionally but WEAK is certainly not one of them. It stands to reason that as each contest grew closer the polls would narrow. B.O. IS an exciting candidate and has run an impressive campaign but continually proves he is unable to provide the knock out punch. I would begin to prepare to let go of the idea of B.O. now. After Pennsylvania speaks, your candidate will no doubt be relegated to 2nd tier and lose this primary.
Posted by: billy | March 11, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am
Ms. Ferraro, shame on you. Disgusting and racist. But, on the other hand, maybe more of your ilk should come out as Hillary supporters. Perhaps that would reveal to the American public the type of politician supporting Ms. Clinton.
Posted by: Brenna | March 11, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am
Obviously alot of you don’t comprehend what you read. What she said was not racist.
“If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position. And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept.”
What she is saying is that with the little bit of national exposure he has had if he were a white man or a woman of any color people would not have fallen for him like they have. People would not find the above unique and new.
That is not racist.
Posted by: J | March 11, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am
Mrs. Ferraro’s comments are NOT racist. Anyone who denies that race or gender do not factor into this race are in deep denial of the factors at play in this election. Is it unfortunate, yes. The sitting president has done NOTHING to heal the divisions in this country. 8 Years without leadership in civil rights. Under President Clinton, civil rights were a priority, remember. We wouldnt be having this conversation if it werent for Bush/Cheney and the stolen election of 2000. C’mon democrats, don’t forget your history.
Posted by: billy | March 11, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am
So J, if Hillary were only Hillary Rodham, she’d be where she is today? Be honest now.
Posted by: Enrique | March 11, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am
If there is a concern about Obama’s resume, think about this:
John F. Kennedy was a senator from 1952-1960, when he won the presidental election. He was criticized for being Catholic and had to answer many questions – and was dogged about it.
In the national popular vote Kennedy led Nixon by just two-tenths of one percent (49.7% to 49.5%), while in the Electoral College he won 303 votes to Nixon’s 219 (269 were needed to win).
He was elected at the age of 44 – also young like Obama, and was challenging the old school candidate of the day, Nixon.
There are many other similarities. I wouldn’t discount Obama so quickly.
Posted by: Angela | March 11, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am
The way she has fought and worked hard throughout her life probably right where she is now, but without some of the baggage of Bill’s indiscrections.
Posted by: J | March 11, 2008, 8:54 am 8:54 am
Collin, there have actually been three African-American Senators since Reconstruction. You left out Edward William Brooke (R-MA) 1967-1979. He was the first African-American to be elected to the United States Senate by popular vote.
Posted by: James Danley | March 11, 2008, 8:54 am 8:54 am
In the company where I work, there are very, very, very few black woman, two tops that has managerial positions. However, there are many white woman who hold these positions.
Trust, it is the black factor, not the sex factor.
Trust!
Posted by: Jack | March 11, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am
Nice try J. Geraldine got where she did in 1984 through hard work. Most women in America work hard to make it. Not all women can just be married to the president and then assume that they too can win the presidency.
Posted by: Enrique | March 11, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am
Not only are her comments racist, they are also sexist. There is no room in this campaign for this blantant attempt to tie success for Senator Obama to his race. Senator Obama has a platform of Hope and Change. Something many americans hunger for and cannot get from either major candidate. I just hope that Senator Clinton will publicly admonish Ms. Ferraro for these blatantly inflamatory remarks and if she does not it is safe to assume that she directly endorses this perspective. How about you folks in the media asking Senator Clinton if this is her official position?
Posted by: Lou | March 11, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am
Do any Clinton backers have any problem with this statement by me?
“If Hillary was not a Clinton, she would not be in this position. And if she was a man (of any color) she would not be in this position. She happens to be very lucky to be who she is. And the country is caught up in the concept.”
Posted by: John, Las Vegas, NV | March 11, 2008, 9:01 am 9:01 am
Racist? No, that be would many of today’s primary voters. Who are voting for BHO based on his skin color. and all you Hillary haters should be ashamed of yourselves. Ferraro was picked as VP becuase she is a woman. She admits that and has earned the right to speak the truth about Obama.
Posted by: geevill | March 11, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am
sour grapes…
Posted by: bg | March 11, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am
Geraldine went down ‘cos of her Mafia connections.
Hillery will go down ‘cos of her Bill connections.
Posted by: Daley Carter | March 11, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am
for the sake of bringing the country together, i call for ms. ferraro’s IMMEDIATE RESIGNATION from the clinton campaign.
Posted by: ed | March 11, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am
It’s not racist if its the truth.
Posted by: toby | March 11, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am
Lou, just because YOU say her comments are racist and sexist does NOT make them sexist and racist. Qualify your statements man!
Posted by: billy | March 11, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am
How dare she make such a statement. If Hillary Clinton were not married to Bill Clinton… where would she be? White women always like to try and have it both ways! Geraldine Ferraro brought nothing to the Democratic Ticket when she ran except all of that empty white feminist rhetoric. When was the last time that you even saw a (white) woman trying to run for president? Shirley Chisolm ( a black woman) at least made an effort… She should have been put on that ticket long before Geraldine’s name even came up! Where have all of the white women been all of these years? Black men (Jessie/Al/ Alan Keyes) at least tried to make some kind of run. Heck they even had gays making an appearance… But where were the white women during all of those years? Do white women truly believe that they are just ENTITLED to get on somebody’s ticket because they are white women? Geraldine should go back into the hole that she has been in all these past years!
Posted by: yvette Collins | March 11, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am
for the sake of bringing the country together, i call for ms. ferraro’s IMMEDIATE RESIGNATION from the clinton campaign.
Posted by: ed | March 11, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am
The most arrogant, but hilarious comment yet! HRC is NOT qualified, and is in this position because of Bill’s position, and she is a female. Ferraro was not qualified to be a small town mayor. What hypocrites … but that is what we have come to expect from the Clinton campaign…every day.But what a great week….the HRC campaign looking like jack-asses;tricks backfiring; a WY win; and another MS win today.Bye, bye Hil….you are a joke.
Posted by: C.Myles | March 11, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am
Wow! the truth hurts doesn’t it.
Posted by: geevill | March 11, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am
The most arrogant, but hilarious comment yet! HRC is NOT qualified, and is in this position because of Bill’s position, and she is a female. Ferraro was not qualified to be a small town mayor. What hypocrites … but that is what we have come to expect from the Clinton campaign…every day.But what a great week….the HRC campaign looking like jack-asses;tricks backfiring; a WY win; and another MS win today.Bye, bye Hil….you are a joke.
Posted by: C.Myles | March 11, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am
For those questioning whether the comments are racist or not consider this: anytime you include race as a factor in anything there is a tinge of racism in it.
By declaring this, Ferraro is diminishing anything else that Obama is. This is the lowest card yet pulled by the Clinton Campaign and its members.
Just last night I was having a political discussion where I mentioned that it is amazing how little Obama’s campaign is about race, and here Clinton’s camp is demeaning us and him by declaring that it is all about race.
How dare they.
Welcome to a new low Clinton.
Posted by: JohnDinFlorida | March 11, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am
Get a life: She is suggesting that by looking at his record he wouldn’t even be considered as a candidate. Read the article in the times from Sunday and it clearly articulates his lack of accomplishments. And it also describes his go along to get along mentality.
Posted by: kenth | March 11, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am
There is truth is what she writes – in this country, it is OK for a black person to say, “I’m voting for Obama because he is black,” However, on the same token, if you were to say, “I am voting for Hillary because she is white,” there would be a big uproar. It is what it is.
Posted by: Brad | March 11, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am
She’s absolutely right. And if he were a woman she’d just be laughed at.
Not even JFK would have attempted a presidential run after one year inthe senate. he was a senator for 14 years and a war hero, and had grown up in the parliaments of europe.
No he’s where he is because black people are voting for him because he’s black and the press are going easy on hiim for fear of being accuse dof racism.
Sexism aok though.
She is 100% right!
Posted by: s.b. | March 11, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am
Its odd to me that everyone associated with this Clinton mess has such flawed logic that alone tells me they are not capable or running anything…that include there surrogates…..Ferraro wake up 45% of the country does not like Hillary!
Posted by: NoBillery | March 11, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am
“There is no room in this campaign for this blantant attempt to tie success for Senator Obama to his race. Senator Obama has a platform of Hope and Change”
sounds like someone oD’ed on Kool-Aid this morning.
Posted by: chasseur | March 11, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am
some of you beieve her comment was racist but I don’t think that way. What she said was the truth. The true racist is the way African American votes, more than 85% votes for him. I think that’s disgusting and racist. If you don’t accept this fact search it for yourself.
Posted by: art | March 11, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am
Surprisingly enough, she speaks the truth.
I’m not a fan of Geraldine Ferraro, but I actually agree with her on this one.
Posted by: John Bledsoe | March 11, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am
Why is there no cry for this woman to resign from the campaign as an adviser. If Hillary had any other last name ahe wouldn’t be where she is. She inly running on Slick Willy’s back.
Posted by: steve | March 11, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am
That is funny…so let’s turn the table a bit. If Clinton was a man, she wouldn’t be in this position. Or better yet, if Clinton didn’t married a former president, she wouldn’t be here as well. The fact of the matter is she is playing on prejudicial lines, either of race or sex. The point is to find a better president, who cares about the gender or the color of one’s skin. I find that analogy by Ms. Ferraro disgusting and ignorant. It seems that Clinton likes to play on racial lines, with Bill’s comment during his South Carolina trip, leaking of the Obama’s photo (that played on religious prejudice), and with this idiotic comment. As an Independent, if she steals the nomination from Obama, I will probably vote for Nadar. The DNC is a joke for letting her continue.
Posted by: Enrique | March 11, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am
I think he’s in this position now starting in Dec 83% favorable press, Oprah, 83% favorable press.
Posted by: toby | March 11, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am
She’s absolutely right, dont back down. its about time someone said it.
Posted by: s.b. | March 11, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am
Yes mam for once you are right about Obama but if Hillary wasn’t the wife a former pres. she wouldn’t even have been a senator much less a presidential nominee.
Posted by: woody | March 11, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am
People, we are electing a president not a televangelist. Talk about buyers remorse. Its like a bunch of kids playing adult games. Someone always gets hurt. To all the neophytes caught up in the concept of B.O.–this is NOT American Idol. Mrs. Ferraro’s comments reflect nothing more than a sociological dynamic at play. She is not the first or the last observer that will state this opinion.
Posted by: billy | March 11, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am
If Clinton were a man she would have been president 16 years ago.
Posted by: s.b. | March 11, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am
She has been saying things like this all along — I’ve heard her on various podcasts, etc. She’s acting like a rabid dog. Somebody needs to sideline her. Enough from this person.
Posted by: Glob | March 11, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am
Didn’t see that comment coming…duh. The one thing I know for sure, the Clinton machine has got a hundred others waiting in the wing with other cheap shots. Lets see…the chatter is winding down about the “dream team” so the next act is ran out (Geraldine) and tosses this attention grenade. And, of course, Clinton’s name is still tossed about by the gullable media (who think they’re helping Obama by giving Geraldine’s comments air time) and once again, McCain’s name is not mentioned as much, etc. Will someone please pass the popcorn?
Posted by: TxnByBrth | March 11, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am
Why is it OK to make slurrs against a women but we cannot metion the truth and say the word B word about Obama.
I think the media needs to back up and take a look at their reporting. If its sex or black thats all they report. What about the health problems, boys killed in Iraq do not get front page cover. Every time you turn in the TV it is the same old stuff.I’m tired of watchingEWH
Posted by: E W Harris | March 11, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am
It is true Obama would not be where he is if white. It is also true that Hillary would not be where she is if not marry to Bill.
It is also true that W would not have been president if his dad was not one.
It is also true that 90% of the blacks are voting for Obama, which is much more than the % of women or whites voting for Clinton.
Conclusion, the world is not color and gender blind.
Just remember that while we are picking the color and gender of our president the truth is that there is very little difference in the policies that he/she will bring.
When the vote will be in, the talk will die and in fact no one will withdraw from Iraq within months, no one will implement universal health care.
The situation W has taken us to does not give much us only one narrow path to walk on.
So please pick the color and pick the gender this all you can really decide. They are all the same and they are all better than W.
Posted by: eden | March 11, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am
I think your article touches on something true and real, being an Obama supporter myself I do recognize he may not be where he is without his physical characteristics… however the build-up to speculation about what he will or will not do is the problem with all of these psycho-analysis blogs. Maybe he does have the touch to bring us together, maybe he does have the ability to break partisan ways. I will tell you this, he has the best chance of the three… and taking the chance on voting for that hope is still better than what we had the past 7 years, so why not?!
Posted by: Eric | March 11, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am
first, she’s right. second, you people need to have a thicker skin and stop crying for people to resign when they say something that offends you. grow up.
Posted by: Andy Johnson | March 11, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am
I hear what folks are saying that Mrs. Ferraro is only suggesting Obama is where he is because as the first serious black candidate running for President he is not only a political wunderkind but also somewhat of an anomaly. BUT, how does she then explain out he has produced the most effective and organized campaign in our lifetimes? Ignoring that, is the unfortunate and maybe racist (considering her earlier comments) part.
Lest we forget, Hillary was up 30-40 points over Obama a few months before Iowa. Obama has trailed in every state where folks new who he was but hadn’t heard his platform. It is STATISTICALLY PROVEN that Obama gains huge ground in every state he campaigns in. This disproves all of Ferraro’s unfortunate suggestions. She may not be racist but she DEFINITELY is not too bright.
Posted by: Brando | March 11, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am
“Just last night I was having a political discussion where I mentioned that it is amazing how little Obama’s campaign is about race,”
Educate yourself please. Obama is playing the whole deck of race cards. In front of black crowds he talks about Popeye’s fried chicken for breakfast, uses words like bamboozle. He is extorting black superdelages to vote for him. He has a problem though in PA. He injected himself into the Phila mayor’s race, but his person lost. Now the black mayor will seek payback.
Posted by: geevill | March 11, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am
What? Where is hillary denouncing and rejecting this?
The clintons get all worked out because someone uses the word “pimping” and someone else describes her as a monster, but they don’t denounce this bigot and they don’t have comments when their supporter the ex prosecutor engages in illegal activities? Wow. What lame bunch of rats.
Posted by: Patricia A, Brooklyn | March 11, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am
Geraldine knows that if Obama was not of mixed race the Clinton machine would have already destroyed him. That is what she would say if she were not a politician.
Posted by: David Baker | March 11, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am
Geraldine Ferraro gets my vote to be a taxi cab driver. She is supposed to be a politician. She is supposed to have a clue. This spells big trouble for Hillary Clinton. If Clinton does not apologize for this, Bill will have to move out of Harlem. Stupid is as stupid does.
Posted by: Sean O'Brien | March 11, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am
She’s been repeating the same mantra for weeks now. She’s just too old to realize the world has changed. The fact is that he wouldn’t be getting such a large percentage of black votes if it wasn’t for the race baiting by Bill Clinton and the Clinton surrogates. It’s the message that is drawing people to his campaign and the divisiveness of the Clinton’s driving people away. This is just another example of that divisiveness. Who knew the first woman Vice Presidential candidate was an Archie Bunker.
Posted by: Brad | March 11, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am
I can’t let this go ,so now all the bk people got to where they r because there r bk.I would rather have a bk man in office then a DIRTY one woman.>>>If Obama said this abot ms cry baby all he– would break loose.Tis is something for a person to say esp. one that is supposed to b educated..
Posted by: h | March 11, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am
Wow, isn’t it the Dems always accusing conservatives of being racist? The most tolerant and accepting people on the planet are alway the first ones to notice color and gender.The media hasn’t been particularly hard on either of them.
Chris Matthews had said Hillary wouldn’t be where she is if it wasn’t who she was married to and that he was screwing around on her, he was then made to apologize.
Posted by: KC | March 11, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am
When I saw this article my first thought was HRC can no longer accuse the media of giving Obama a ‘free ride’. I expected to see posts supporting Ferraro’s ridiculous comment and obvious insult to Obama. Looks like the HRC supporters don’t want to touch this one, realizing that HRC should denounce and reject these statements by Ferraro just as Obama had to reject the ‘witch’ statement about her. The big question is will she??????
Posted by: phew! | March 11, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am
When I saw this article my first thought was HRC can no longer accuse the media of giving Obama a ‘free ride’. I expected to see posts supporting Ferraro’s ridiculous comment and obvious insult to Obama. Looks like the HRC supporters don’t want to touch this one, realizing that HRC should denounce and reject these statements by Ferraro just as Obama had to reject the ‘witch’ statement about her. The big question is will she??????
Posted by: phew! | March 11, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am
She is so right on this one. He has materialized out of nowhere. There were so many talented, experienced men running for the Democratic nomination and we end up with a 48 year old product of the Chicago machine. How did this happen?
It happened because the media likes a story and especially likes a fresh story. It also likes to seem sophisticated, open-minded, etc. so unfettered bias and support from the media, although further damaging their reputation for honesty, enhances their own shallow, parochial view of themselves.
Posted by: Jay | March 11, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am
Wow…and if Hilary was a man…where would she be? What if she was married to Bill Clinton?
What if GWB was a woman or a Black man?
What if Geraline was a man?
What if this? What if that?
What if she shut up.
Posted by: Farmer | March 11, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am
I like Obama – not because he is black.
But it is OBVIOUS that many people like the idea of him being President because he is black. She is speaking the truth. And the negative comments show that people can not handle the truth.
Posted by: RJP3 | March 11, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am
Hold on, isn’t Obama half-black and half-white?
Posted by: GI | March 11, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am
I am so tired of people saying that Hillary Clinton has so much experience and Obama doesn’t. Clinton’s 35 years experience is no better than Obama’s 20 years experience. At least Obama has 11 years of actual legislative experience. Clinton only has 8. And on another note…do people realize that one of our greatest Presidents, Abraham Lincoln, was a first term national legislator (after 8 years as an Illinois Senator)when he was elected President. Of course, Lincoln followed one of our worst Presidents, James Buchanan, who had the most “experience” of any elected Presidents. History says Hillary’s argument holds no water.
Posted by: Marie | March 11, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am
If it were based on resume’ we would be looking at a Richardson-Biden ticket, but that is not the way it works, especially for democrats (Mondale is probably the only “establishment’ candidate they have had in decades).
Posted by: dj | March 11, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am
And where would GW Bush and Jeb Bush be if their father wasn’t the President, and yadda, yadda, yadda.
The thing that distinguishes Hillary from BHO is that she has made her life’s work the causes that benefit the less fortunate. Compare that to BHO who could write his resume on a sheet of toilet paper.
The most attractive part of her candidacy is the fact that she is the one who the Republican right wing nuts hate the most, and I love it.
GO HRC
Posted by: Rich Hall | March 11, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am
Obama is only a cadidate because the “machine” wants to see how desperate thet American people are. A minority, a woman or any of the pi$$ poor democratic candidates who have already gone away for now. Obama is a tool, Clinton is a tool. The puppets the “machine” put into place are to divide and conquer the voters and to get the candidate they really want. Jhn McCain.
Posted by: bobknob | March 11, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am
Wow, another racist attack by the Clinton camp! This is amazing, he won in all white states people! He won Maine and Nebraska! Stop the race baiting. NO MORE CLINTONS!
OBAMA 08 for a better future!
Posted by: Indomable | March 11, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am
Wow!!! Geraldine Ferraro is exactly right and, as a conservative, I never thought I’d live to say that. Obama is where he’s at ONLY because of his race. Those who deny it are living in a state of denial.
Posted by: Gerald R. | March 11, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am
What Geraldine Ferrario Is saying Is true, I work with some black ladie’s and they tell me they are voting for Obama because he Is a black man, and they are saying I’ts about time a black man got It for President. never mind If he Is qualified or not. and I am just saying what they have told me.
Posted by: jeanette | March 11, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am
It is interesting to see the way people’s perceptions drift. Barack Obama is one of the best orators in memory… and that includes many of the great orators, such as Kennedy and Churchill. Hillary is not a great orator… and her message is not profound. There is tremendous substance in Obama’s message…. if you’re willing to listen to and think about what is being said. The reason Barack Obama is so popular, is because he is successfully interpreting the public mood… not because he is black. The country is stressed in a way that it hasn’t been for many years, and people want a new direction. Obama represents that, and of the remaining candidates, he is the one articulating the strongest message of a new and better direction. Yes… he is doing better than he would have otherwise with the black voter because he is black, so that is helping him…. just as Hillary’s automatic association with Bill Clinton is helping her. It’s a fair fight Geraldine…. and the better candidate is winning.
Posted by: jake | March 11, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am
Fire this woman, HRC people! Disgusting and classless. This is the kind of horrible person you want representing you? I’m sick of the viciousness of the Hillary campaign — the ugliness, the pettiness, the slime. Enough, enough, enough. Wise up, people. These folks are immoral. If she’s the nominee, I’m voting for McCain — as will many, many others I know.
Posted by: Righteous In | March 11, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am
Race, Race and more race. We are sick of it!!! Clinton as usual is waving a dirty hand.. and so are her accomplices. Obama is a very decent person who is not looking to defend every negative comment about himself. He can obviously see the big picture. So what if he is black? What does that have to do with the tea in China? This is why this country is so backwards!! Is Clinton accomplished because she is Bills wife?
Posted by: Pam | March 11, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am
I find Geraldine’s comments amusing. Would she have been picked as Mondale’s running mate if she weren’t a woman? Would her son have faced harsher punishment for drug dealing and using drugs if his mom weren’t connected? Would her husband face greater scrutiny in his real estate dealings if he weren’t married to her?
Geraldine’s complaints are spurious and silly, just like her
Posted by: cluelessinky | March 11, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am
Wow – The Obama camp attack machine is going after Ferraro. If what she said was not true would there be such an attack on her? I do not think so. The problem is the Obama camp want to play both sides fo the race card and make people think it’s all about “change”.
Posted by: Rob | March 11, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am
Yeah, yeah — If Obama was white, he would have long been declared the winner.
If Obama was white, Florida and Michigan will not be getting re-votes after both candidates signed pledges.
If Obama were white, experience will not be a topic of major discussion considering Bush has 8 more years of experience as CIC, but with a 29% approval ratings.
yeah, yeah, yeah….
Posted by: marmar02 | March 11, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am
In the wake of the Pennsylvania primary the Clinton campaign will start calling Obama a ‘boy’, not no accentuate his blackness of course, according to the blinded Hillbillies, but to accentuate his so called inexperience.
One certainly doesn’t have to be a PC paranoid to notice how the racist undertones of the Clinton campaign against Obama are gaining strength every week now. There is a clear pattern already, as will be reflected upon by many journalists and academics when this race is over.
The good thing about it is that all this won’t unnoticed in the headquarters of the Democratic Party; the Clinton Machine has started working against itself, as a negative and self-destructive force.
Yes, they will fail and they will fail miserably. And the Clintons wil not be missed.
Posted by: Malcolm | March 11, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am
Wow – The Obama camp attack machine is going after Ferraro. If what she said was not true would there be such an attack on her? I do not think so. The problem is the Obama camp want to play both sides fo the race card and make people think it’s all about “change”.
Posted by: Rob | March 11, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am
If Hillary wasn’t a woman she would still be a corporate lawyer.
If Hillary wasn’t ‘married’ to Bill she would be an ambulance chaser.
Posted by: Mac | March 11, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am
Geraldine, do you really believe that Hillary would be where she is right now if she had been a white male? Do you really think all these 50+ women would have voted for her? Of course not! And of course a lobbyist like Ferraro does not favour an end of parisanship. How would lobbyists make their money if we all got along?
Posted by: June | March 11, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am
For those of you who are oddly claiming that Ms. Ferraro’s statement was not racist, what exactly would be racist? She is expressly stating that Barack Obama is winning the nomination because of his race–not his talent, or his smarts, or his communications skills, or his charisma, or his leadership qualities, or his demeanor. No, just his race.
And those alluding to a thin resume–give me a break. He is 46 and was raised by a single mother in a firmly middle-class household, yet went on to graduate from Columbia College and Harvard Law (where he was President of the Law Review); and to serve for years as a state senator and now as a U.S. Senator. His resume is incredibly impressive by any measure. It is at least as impressive as his opponent’s for the nomination.
Posted by: MJ | March 11, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am
She’s absolutely right. Of course, she violated a basic rule of the politically correct era created and enforced by people like–well, people like Geraldine Ferraro; namely, that one must never say anything critical of a black person or suggest that being black could ever be anything other than a burden in our institutionally and covertly racist society (for confirmation see the sermons of one Rev. Jeremiah Wright).
Posted by: Nietzschean | March 11, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am
If Bill Clinton had been a white guy, he would never have been elected the first black President, either.
Posted by: RT | March 11, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am
Former Congresswoman Ferraro is correct. There is NO WAY any white man who had only served in the US Senate for 2 years would be encouraged to run for president, and the entire third year of Obama’s US Senate career has been spent campaigning. His career in the Illinois state senate was lackluster, with more non-votes on issues than with purposeful decisions made.
In addition, his “Monday morning quarterbacking” over Iraq IS a FAIRY TALE. It is VERY EASY to say that “I was against it from the beginning” because he believes this is what Americans want to hear. What if the war had gone smoothly, and we were done with it? Would he be saying he would’ve voted for it? This is a JOKE. The vote to go to war was taken in 2003, based on CIA evidence. No one knew at the time it was bogus. Obama didn’t show up in the US Senate until January 2005!!! The phrase hindsight is 20/20 does mean something, after all. Plus, Obama is no “uniter.” He has never crossed the aisle to work with a compromising majority on major Senate legislation. He stayed in the Democratic minority.
Talk is cheap and that is all he has done and it is all that he is–talk.
Senator Clinton has been disrespected. She has over 30 years of public service to this nation in many areas and at many levels. This campaign should be over ideas and positions and she has earned the right to have hers heard. All the media focuses on is how people “feel” about Obama.
And in case anyone thinks I am a Hillary supporter, I am not. I am voting for John McCain. In my opinion, Hillary is a socialist–high taxes with government solutions. However, she has earned the right to campaign and have the nomination through all her hard work. Obama has not–he has been able to use WHAT he is–a black man–to get where he is right now.
Admit the truth–any white man, let alone white woman, with Obama’s experience would have been laughed out of the race a year ago–treated by the media like Rep. Paul and former Sen. Gravel. That is a fact. Obama and his wife bemoan white America, and how they are “not proud” of it, yet they have used every ounce of historical “guilt” and affirmative action to go where they have been and to try to get where they want to be. They are hypocrites–they criticize the very system they have exploited.
Posted by: CZ | March 11, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am
OBAMA IS NOTHING AND THE MEDIA TELLS US THIS IS THE MAN WE SHOULD VOTE FOR. NO THANKS! IF I WANTED A TELEVANGELIST FOR PRESIDENT I WOULD HAVE NOMINATED JIM BAKER.
I AM SO SICK OF OBAMA AND THAT HORRIBLE SELFISH SPOILED UNGRATEFUL WIFE OF HIS. I HAVE EXCERISED MY RIGHT TO VOTE SINCE I WAS 18. I AM A 48 YEAR OLD WHITE EDUCATED PROFESSIONAL AND I WILL NOT VOTE IN THE GENERAL ELECTION WHEN OBAMA IS NOMINATED. I CAN NOT BRING MYSELF TO VOTE FOR HIM BECAUSE I FEEL HE IS SNOWING PEOPLE HIS EMPTY WORDS OF HOPE. I CAN’T BELIEVE THAT EDUCATED COLLEGE KIDS AND PROFESSIONAL HONESTLY BELIEVE THAT THIS GUY WILL WALK INTO THE OVAL OFFICE, END THE WAR, FUEL THE ECONOMY AND BRING THE WORLD TOGETHER. THIS IS A FAIRY TALE! OBAMA OR ANY OTHER PRESIDENT WILL HAVE TO DEAL WITH CONGRESS, THE SENATE, LOBBYIST, SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS. THE IDEA THAT EVERYONE IS GOING TO RALLY AROUND OBAMA ONCE HE IS IN OFFICE BECAUSE OF HIS ELOQUENT SPEECHES. I REALLY BELIEVE THIS COUNTRY IS IN SERIOUS TROUBLE AND WHEN NEED SOMEONE WHO IS BIT MORE GROUNDED THAN THIS JERK.
ALSO, I CAN NOT VOTE FOR MCCAIN EITHER. PEOPLE THINK THAT THE HRC SUPPORTERS WILL VOTE FOR OBAMA. THEY ARE SO WRONG. THEY EITHER WILL DO WHAT I AM DOING, NOT VOTING, OR VOTE FOR MCCAIN. OBAMA WILL BE DOOMED AS OUR COUNTRY WILL.
Posted by: Karl | March 11, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am
Always the establishment looking for other ways to justify why they’re losers.
It’s taking a Man of Color to bring this country together. Unfortunately, white men have failed America. The evidence is clear.
And stop being so racist and only voting for your past presidents because they were white. (SMILE) Sounds stupid huh? This is about the issues and not about the color of someone’s skin. It just so happens that people of color prefer a straight up approach to life instead of a doublespeak way of going through life.
Posted by: Joris | March 11, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am
In 2004, the DNC mantra was all votes should count. The DNC in 2008 want to exclude the votes in Florida and Michigan. It seems like the DNC only want votes to count when the benefit from them.
Posted by: Rob | March 11, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am
If Obama were Caucasian he would be Dennis Kucinich but without the administrative experience as a lousy mayor
Posted by: Dave | March 11, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am
Hillary will have to denounce and reject both her comments and support. Ferrero must also know as a fact that Hillary would not have come this far were her last name not Clinton…the so called experience card she is playing now is only because she is Bill’s wife-no more no less. What has Hillary achieved on her own merit without Bill?
Perhaps Ferrero would also explain to us why other past Black presidential candidates did not make it this far as Obama!
Well, Ferraro would not be saying what she is now saying and would never have attained whatever it is that she might have achieved in life, were she not a woman or white.
Posted by: Tony | March 11, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am
If you’re reading this, Ms. Ferraro: What on earth qualified Hillary Clinton to even run- much less win- a seat in the U.S. Senate from a state she hadn’t lived in? Oh yes… she was a cuckholded wife of a philanderer president. Some qualifications!
The punchline of this ridiculous tale? She wasn’t even cuckholded… she knew about Monica long before the public. The Clinton’s machine dissing of Obama, as if he were a child, a know-nothing,
a neophyte who could take the #2 spot and learn at Hillary’s feet, speaks volumes about them.
I meant the Clintons. Not Hillary’s feet. Ugh.
Posted by: Henriette Wayne | March 11, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am
The Democrats, it is always about race, gender, ad nasium.
Posted by: Dave | March 11, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am
If Hillary hadn’t married Bill, no one, and I mean no one, would’ve ever heard of Hillary Rodham.
Posted by: Paradigm | March 11, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am
Geraldine Ferraro is still alive??
Posted by: Jeff | March 11, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am
TAX RETURNS Hillery! TAX RETURNS! Let us see where all this money comes from! China? Saudi Arabia? TAX RETURNS are the real issue, not race baiting?
GO OBAMA 08 for a better future!
Posted by: Indo | March 11, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am
Obama is so popular because he is something DIFFERENT from the Bush/Clinton disaster that has been running the White House for the last 18+ years! There is nothing magical about him- he is a just a breath of FRESH air that gives us hope that SOMETHIGN will change from this disasterous path we have been on since Bush senior was at the helm. I couldn’t care less if he were white, yellow, female whatever. He is something DIFFERENT from the manure stream we have had so far. Nothing more, nothing less.
Posted by: Scott | March 11, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am
Folks, Ferraro has stated the nasty undertones that have been just under the service of this campaign ever since Bill attacked Obama in New Hampshire. That is, the message the Clintons have been promoting all along is Obama is “unqualified”, the media is scared to go after him because he is black, and his supporters only support him because he is black. Dangerous, dangerous territory for Democrats to go. My hope is that an Obama “supporter” would also state the obvious. Hillary Clinton is
only has the support she has because she is a woman, was married to an ex-President, and her supporters have nostalgia for the Clinton years. She is no more qualified to be president than Obama.
Posted by: John | March 11, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am
Now this is just dumb on Geraldine’s part. If she was not a white woman she would not have been on the ticket with Mondale. Goofy.
Posted by: Alox | March 11, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am
ferraro is out of line by making these statements about race and sex,but it deserves a few comments. Whites are where they are b\c of their race and that is how it has always been in america. White people are the majority so I understand that all presidents and most senators and congressman are white. Its sad that ferraro would try to belittle people who vote for barrack rather they be black,white or whomever. There is a sense of entitlement hillary feels and simply all americans feel so ferraro comments do not amaze me at all.
Posted by: mike | March 11, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am
Oh please,there is nothing wrong for voting base on race or gender, providing that other qualities are considered (intelligence, experience,ethics and judgement). This is America and many decisions are based on race and gender. So all of you stop acting as though it does not exist in this primary. However, it goes beyond race. Obama is also handsome and a smooth talker, just like media darling Bill Clinton was before he got caught with Monica.
Also most Americans are soooo…visual. Therefore, Hillary suffers from not being as good looking and not having the gift of gab like Obama or her husband. I can assure you, that if Hillary were as good looking as Sharon Stone and talk like the late Gov. Ann Ricards,bagage or no bagage, she would be a member of the media darling club.
Posted by: Evie | March 11, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am
I agree with Ms. Ferraro in that our country has always been steeped in partisanship. Why anyone would want a country without partisanship puzzles me. It shows a lack of forethought. A purely “vanilla” nation wherein all opinions are accepted, or no opinions are allowed, would spell disaster. Differences of opinion are actually the catalyst for progress. These varying positions force us to think things through and, hopefully, minimize the extent and severity of unintended consequences. Those who view partisanship in a bad light are likely those who are often crippled by the ridiculous and ever-increasing levels of political correctness and this is the primary cause of the dangerous character-softening taking place here in the USA.
Posted by: mstracka | March 11, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am
“On the 8th Day, our creator gave us politicians for entertainment”… – My Graduation Speaker
Posted by: List Free, Shop Smart, Save Gas | March 11, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am
What is truly sad about most of the comments here is the buying into the concept that “one drop of black blood” still labels one as black. Its undisguised racism that nearly everyone takes for granted. What a sad pathetic country we live in.
Posted by: scodoha | March 11, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
I personally as a white woman, would love to see advancement of women in politics. However, I am an Obama supporter, not because of race or gender bias, but because I have researched the candidates, and educated myself. Come November I will ultimately be voting democrat, who ever the candidate is, but I do think Obama is the most qualified and the most in line with my own political views.
Posted by: BSO | March 11, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
Geraldine Ferraro is a racist.
Posted by: Mark Rich | March 11, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
TO FERRARO I SAY:
IF HILLARY WASN’T MARRIED TO A FORMER PRESIDENT, SHE WOULDN’T EVEN BE A SENATOR.
CLINTON HAPPENS TO BE VERY LUCKY SHE REMAINED MARRIED TO A PRESIDENT THAT WAS IMPEACHED BECAUSE OF AN EXTRAMARITAL AFFAIR.
Posted by: PAT | March 11, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
Hillary Clinton is going to win this thing she just about has it tied up and when they revote in Fl. and MI. that will help even more and now tha we Know Obama does not want to be VP maybe we can get Edwards.Or even Ed Rendell
Posted by: Bishop | March 11, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
I bet most Obama followers have no clue who Geraldine Ferraro is.All they do is attack like a school of pirranha anytime someone dares speak of their leader.
Posted by: Bryan Shuy | March 11, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
Can a brother get a break? Hillary’s there because Bill was. Sure my Brother is catching a break because of his skin color. So what? If he’s smart enough to convince the majority of people that he’s black, and not half black, half white and make it work, he can run this country with ease. You people will believe anything.
Posted by: bob massachusetts | March 11, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am
If 90% of white vote for a white person. You would call that a race bias, Isn’t it? Look, Obama is just a half black, and he got 90% of all the black vote. Imagine if he is 100% black. Then he would get a 100% vote from all black. But, Hillary got about 2/3 of latino and 3/4 of asian vote. Then what make Obama so special that he would get 90% of all black vote. Is Obama that much better than Hillary? I don’t think so. He is what he is because of his race. Period.
Posted by: Alex Pilapandet | March 11, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am
I have a dream… That one day, political candidates will be judged not by the content of their characters, but by the color of their skin.
This also explains why Eliot Spitzer has not resigned his gubernatorial position. He’s a racist bigot who can’t stand the thought of his ‘colored’ Lt. Gov. as New York’s chief executive.
Posted by: Rev. Nitram Rehtul Gnik | March 11, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am
If Edwards had more delegates, and more popular votes than Clinton, would Hillary asked him to be her vice president? If Hillary has the gut to ask Obama to be her VP while she is behind, it is because he is Black.
Posted by: le Maire | March 11, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am
Yes. I was an Obama Precinct Captain in Central Texas. If it were not for African-American voters and there amazing support, he would not have done near as well in the caucuses. Oh, and by the way Obama won the most delegates in Texas, he won Texas. Hillary declared victory after only 2/3rd of the game had been played. But the African-Americans make up a relatively small portion of the population. This is over simplification and a method of scapegoating. Just face it Hillary, you can not match Obama’s message, presentation, and character. This was supposed to be your time but again life has shown it’s self to not be fair.
Posted by: Radmanaustin | March 11, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am
Ferraro can’t be labeled a racist because she is a liberal. Only conservatives can be labeled racist or sexist. If any prominent conservative would have said that, this would be THE top story for days on all mainstream media outlets. Also, that conservative would be censored and worse. The most racist comment I have heard is Hillary offering Obama the vice presidency. Luckily, she is a liberal too, so she also gets a free pass for the most part.
Posted by: tripleS | March 11, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am
Anyone think Hillary would be where she is if she wasn’t married to Bill? I don’t care about race, ethnicity, sex, etc., when voting for president. I care about the candidates’ past actions, stated policies, plans for the future, etc. For those reasons, I won’t vote for Hillary or Obama and will barely be able to vote for McCain.
Posted by: Mar | March 11, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am
What kind on nonsense is this? Obama is where he is because of education and hard work, yes he has charisma but that is a good thing in a leader. I am tired of people thinking that we owe Hillary the presidency – the Bush/Clinton dy”nasty” is over! This isn’t about a white woman vs black man it’s about the candidates and it’s time you stopped trying to peddle this crap to the American people. We like Obama – we are just a little tired of “slick” Willy and Hillary the Hun!
Posted by: White Mountain | March 11, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am
Hillary wouldn’t be a candidate if her husband had not had sexual relations with that woman: Ms. Lewinski.
Posted by: Juanita Broderick | March 11, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am
Don’t ya just love liberals/socialists? If they feel it, it is so. They are never wrong… global warming/global cooling/whatever… race, race, race. They are fun, for sure; I just don’t want them running anything. Do you?
Posted by: Jose Cuervo | March 11, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am
Folks, THIS IS THE TRUTH! Its affirmative action in the highest sense. But it’s allright, because he’s not all white.
Posted by: Erik M | March 11, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am
Hmmm. What if Hillary were a white man: a man whose chief qualifications were family connections and a mediocre term as Senator, in which he went back and forth on her beliefs to see what would play best. That “man” wouldn’t be her position either.
Posted by: Ken | March 11, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am
Geraldine, you racist ignorant pig… You got where you are because you were intelligent, competent and likable… Not because you were a women… So you now turn on another minority… What’s the problem… bad loser? You must apologize and admit you were on drugs or something when you made this most remarkable and racist remark… Pig. D.
Posted by: David G. | March 11, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am
Ferraro Dreams; If Only Obama Were White
Former VP candidate and Hillary backer Geraldine Ferraro has thrown down the race card with regard to Barack Obama. In this high stakes game of political poker Ferraro threw down the Ace of Spades by stating that if Obama were not black he would not b…
Posted by: Big Dogs Weblog | March 11, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am
Pat, was Hillary LUCKY or SMART?
Posted by: billy | March 11, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am
This is not a matter of race but of ideology. Both Obama and Hillary are communists with the goal of redistributing private property, which is the main goal of what used to be the Democrat Party. I would vote for Condoleeza Rice if she were running and she is a woman and an African American. She does not support redistribution of wealth or the destruction of t6raditional family values the way the Democrat candidates do. Once again the Democrats play the race and class warfare card to distract people from their real goals.
Posted by: Richard Z | March 11, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
The Clintons are so calculated. Some people consider PA two cities on each sides surrounded by rural Alabama…Hillary has to believe this is true…her father is from here. Plus it’s no coincidence that Gov. Rendell has already threw that out there….so this comment from Geraldine was calculated too…to stir up racial sentiment in PA and hopefully Mississippi too. Why do you think it took so long to respond? They hoped it made some noise yesterday but with Spitzers scandal it fell on deaf ears. That’s why they only said that they “disagree” yesterday. They will wait until it builds up enough coverage and then of course she will step down…that’s already planned…unless it is not covered in the media seriously. The point still remains…it is no more than race baiting….she already LOST the black vote what do she have to lose (Mark Penn’s mind)..However…this may be a miscalcuation…it depends on if White America will recognize this ploy and reject it. Hillary Clinton is hoping we wont…
Posted by: Steve from Philly | March 11, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
Ferraro, the old hag, is reading right out of the Democrat playbook using rule number one; If you can’t beat ‘em, ridicule or diminish them.
Hillary has done something major that most feminists would never do and that is she stayed with her philandering husband for 35 years just for the chance to run for President. Is that so 1950′s or what?
Posted by: Mike Times | March 11, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am
CZ, Maybe you need to read the biography of Abraham Lincoln a man of just words…Sadly, he would never be elected today because his words would be discarded as empty talk and determined to be “unqualified” because he lacked experience.
Posted by: John | March 11, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am
Let’s face it people. Obama is a nice guy and a great speaker. Tell me one thing…ONE thing he stands for. How many times do I have to sit and watch an interview with someone who went to an Obama rally and when asked “What did you like about the Senator?” answered “He’s sooooo charismatic” rather than “I like his position on Immigration.” When asked, “What was your favorite part of the speech?”, a woman replied “I don’t remember. Just sitting and listening to him speak was all I wanted to do”. Are you serious? The man has only..ONLY 4 years of federal office under his belt. He’s a junior senator who is the lowest on the totem pole of every committee he’s on (quick Obama camp….name a committee he’s on!) Listen, he’s a nice guy and a great speaker. He doesn’t have the experience and he will be eaten alive in the international community.
Hillary is just as bad. I agree with a lot of the previous posters in saying she is only where she is because of her husband. She has a little more experience in federal politics and I guess you can say she has more international experience (if you call sitting with Ms. Putin over coffee ‘international exposure’). At least Obama seems genuine when he speaks. Hillary seems like a robot when she speaks.
Posted by: Rick | March 11, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am
Republicans, traditional family values? Larry Craig? Foley? Vitter? Ted Haggert? Oh Man, I cannot wait for November!
Posted by: billy | March 11, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am
An earlier poster mentioned that Obama ‘race baits’ by using the word ‘bamboozle’ in front of black crowds.
Point 1) Though there are many black Americans in those crowds, who have up until now felt dissillusioned by the political process, there are plenty of white people who are in those crowds of enraptured suppprters.
Point 2) Since I was born and raised in South Carolina, I know that ‘bamboozled’ is a word that, in the South, is commonly used by black and white alike.
Posted by: Karsten T Brow | March 11, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am
What is it about the democrat party’s fixation about skin color???
Posted by: Consultofactus | March 11, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am
Huh. A Democrat making a blatantly racist remark with no repercussions whatsoever. What. A. Shock.
Posted by: Dave C | March 11, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am
If Obama was white, he’d be trading pork futures on the Chicago Merc, or peddling life insurance. If he was lucky.
And white OR black, if the Republicans hadn’t nominated a Republican playboy from Goldman Sachs with the sexual propriety and discretion of a Clinton or a Spitzer for the open Senate seat from Illinois, Bobambi wouldn’t even have reached Washington.
Posted by: Matamoros | March 11, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am
Geraldine Ferraro is dividing theparty with her racist comments.Up until now,I’ve always tried to defend her.She sounds like Rush Limbaugh.
Posted by: keith ponder | March 11, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am
Both Hillary and Obama got where they are by being Female and Black. Two incompetent People who get the Novelty Vote. Woe is Us if either of them get elected. Jimmy Carter all over again.
Posted by: Jasper | March 11, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am
And somewhere…John McCain is laughing.
Posted by: Rick | March 11, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am
end partisanship? these young people really have no clue — there is no partisanship in N. Korea, China, and likely in Russia, Venezuela. should we head to this direction? what a beautiful dream!
Posted by: nosense03 | March 11, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am
Obama mocks Hillary, Period! She is a superior politician and he has NO CHOICE but to XEROX nearly ever word she (and others)say. This is no longer a mystery but yet there are still some out there that believe he is supremely qualified to be president. Hillary is correct when she references the experience of J. McCain and dismisses Obambi.
Posted by: billy | March 11, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am
She’s right. Finally someone calling it like it is. He offers nothing but smoke and mirrors, has no experience leading anything, yet he is the golden child.
Posted by: Biffula | March 11, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am
To hell with all of them!
Posted by: Another American | March 11, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am
Sure… partisanship is here to stay, as it has to be. There are different points of view. What doesn’t have to stay is the notion that you must be mean spirited and abusive about it. It is unfortunate that the way political disagreement has developed in America has become so disrespectful in the last few decades. We are in this together, and it is possible to coexist without being as destructive as has been the case. While there might be a bit of perverse pleasure at seeing “our side” stick it to the other side… it is much better for the country to disagree and push for your own agenda from a position of strength in a way that you can hold your head high afterward. That is the message…. not the end of partisanship… just about what partisanship means.
Posted by: jake | March 11, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am
Hillary may be what she is, . McCain may be what he is .
But the one name that Obama has that neither of the other two has is this: ACCESSORY to MASS HOMICIDE. That’s right folks.
This is NOT a mudsling. THIS IS A FACT and ACCORDING TO US LAW. Research for yourself why Obama is a total souless sociopath. Here is the summary:
While state senator in Illinois, there was a law that was introduced. Obama actually voted in this one rather than saying “PRESENT”. The situation was this. Women were having abortions. Abortions were done. Pro Choice was and is satisfied. So, for all you pro-lifers out there, relax, the women’s right to choose was upheld.
However, a portion of those aborted in their late second trimester or early third trimester SURVIVED the abortion process. Now, in US LAW, those would be BIRTHS. They are no different than women having C-sectional births. Sadly though, these newly born children were put in closets, hampers, wherever and allowed to die in Illinois HOSPITALS. THEY were never given a chance to live, no efforts to save their lives. PEOPLE, THIS IS MURDER PREMEDITATED.
Now, going back to the Illinois proposed law, it would require hospital staff to provide care to those babies birthed through survived abortions. Fortunately, this law passed. But, your cult reverend VOTED AGAINST THIS LAW. How can ANY, ANY person espousing Christianity vote against this?
Hence, Obama, by the strictest sense of the law both by the state of Illinois and US Law, is AN ACCESSORY TO MASS HOMICIDE.
But, it’s allright, because Obama’s not all white. Right?
Posted by: Erik M | March 11, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am
Finally, the Clinton’s and their Race Baiting comes back at them ten-fold.
Posted by: Carl Williams | March 11, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am
“”"”I was reading an article that said young Republicans are out there campaigning for Obama because they believe he’s going to be able to put an end to partisanship. Dear God! Anyone that has worked in the Congress knows that for over 200 years this country has had partisanship – that’s the way our country is.”"”"
I love how these old hags, and party relics knock those of us who believe we dont have to have the “same old same old.”
Posted by: mikedee | March 11, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am
Richard Z….what qualified Condelezza Rice to run the Defense department or State Department? Running Stanford University? I have been totally un-impressed with her work in the Bush administration. You can have ideological discussions on who is better at governing, Democrats or Republicans. But when Republicans bring up Condelezza Rice as presidential material or VP material you lose me completely.
Posted by: John | March 11, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am
The truth hurts that boy’s supporters, but it is still the truth.
He really needs to get out of the election, he is not good for America. He is going to further divide this nation if he is elected.
Posted by: Jen | March 11, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am
Like it or not folks, Ferraro is right! And, like it or not folks, given the two choices the Democrats have, Obama will be the easiset to defeat. Why? Because he’s black! The Republicans will pick up those Democrats that are against a black candidate and that’s a vast majority, regardless of how you or I feel personally. If Hillary get the nomination McCain will gather all the Democrats that would have voted for Obama plus all the Democrats who don’t want a woman for Commander in Chief. It’s not more complicated than that.America is a racist nation and always has been The Media now have just about an equal number of blacks as whites on TV, but blacks only represent 12% of the population. It’s all a joke.
Posted by: Attilla | March 11, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am
There’s no such thing as presidential experience outside of the office itself. The quality we ought to seek, is leadership quality.
Posted by: James Baker | March 11, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am
How does Ferraro get away with her racist remarks. If I were to say publicly that a competitor for a job promotion got it because he or she was black, I’d be railroaded into oblivion. What she is saying is sanitized intellectually but no less racist than what Imus said.
Posted by: Joe | March 11, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am
Why is it when a white person makes a comment that seems negative about a black person he is a bigot or racist;, but when a black person votes for a black person just because he is black nothing is said about that.
Posted by: marjorie singer | March 11, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am
Interesting that alot of Democrats on the board are accusing Hillary and her supporters of acting like Republicans. When they are acting like they always have. It’s just once they started acting this way against fellow Democrats the truth is seen.
Democrats always act this way, they’ve just claimed in was a Republican tactic.
Posted by: Dave Fortay | March 11, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am
Whaddya mean Obama’s black? What? He is?
Darn, I already voted for him and no one told me!
FYI, people aren’t going to elect the Clintons because no one really believes in Hillary.
Posted by: George Marez | March 11, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am
Geraldine Ferraro is just a bitter loser, again, or still. She represents the same old crooked politics as Hillary. Time is fast passing them by. I hope they both keep talkin’ all the way to Denver.
Posted by: virgilT | March 11, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am
I’d like to give Ms. Ferraro the benefit of the doubt; while I wouldn’t exactly call her comments racist, I do think that they are short-sighted and minimize Obama’s undeniable talent, charisma and intelligence. I do think that in an election about change, then, yes, the fact that Obama is biracial does, help, to some degree, but it is definitely not the sole factor. Let’s not forget that Ms. Clinton was the front-runner for a whole year, and that African-Americans, like the millions of white, brown and yellow Americans who have voted for him, got to know Obama and realized that their initial support for Clinton was rooted in the past.
Ms. Ferraro also seems to discount the fact that there are many nuances to Obama’s success; he is a unique politician.
I also believe that Ms. Clinton’s lack of success,despite being a former First Lady and having establishment support, is attributed to bad advice that she has been given. The reason that Democratic voters (both male and female) are not supporting her in larger numbers has more to do with who she is and the inconsistent message of her campaign, not her gender. While she is an extremely intelligent and capable woman who could do the job, she is (not entirely her fault) also one of the most polarizing figures in politics.
It’s possible that any other qualified woman besides Ms. Clinton would have a better chance.
I would also like to point out that Sen. Obama does talk about his mother, Ann Dunham. In his book, Dreams from My Father, he says, “…everything that is good in me, I owe to her…” I am paraphrasing a bit. He also dedicated the Audacity of Hope to his mother and his grandmother. He writes, “To the women who raised me, my maternal grandmother, Tutu, who’s been a rock of stability throughout my life, and to my mother, whose loving spirit sustains me still.”
And in his keynote speech at the 2004 Democratic convention,Obama attributes his success to being the product of a man from Kenya and a white woman from Kansas. He always talks about his mother and his love for her.
I hope that clarifies some of the untrue statements people are making. Thank you.
Posted by: Brooke | March 11, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am
She is a racist? When 42% of the democratic support in Mississippi who for this man say that the number one reason for their support is that he is black then you are supported by racist. When all you speak of is change and the only thing that you have offered in details as real change is the color of your skin and your wife is alway talking about it, then you have to wonder who is racist.
Posted by: Michael | March 11, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am
Senator Obama is a great American but as a Republican I don’t share his political philosophies and would never vote for him based on our differing visions of America. I don’t care about his race or gender and hope the democrat party could some day field a candidate without obsessing over the person’s race/creed/etc/etc.
Posted by: Consultofactus | March 11, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am
“any white man, let alone white woman, with Obama’s experience would have been laughed out of the race a year ago–treated by the media like Rep. Paul and former Sen. Gravel.”
Hmm. Like John Edwards in 2004?
There are some seriously deluded folks in this country. There has never been a black man with this much of a chance to win the nomintion. Never. But somehow his race benefits him. Do people really believe he has had an easier time getting to where he is in life as a bi-racial man raised by a single mother in modest circumstances (at best)? That white men have it rougher?
Posted by: mj | March 11, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am
Neither a Clinton nor Obama supporter, Geraldine is right and saying something everyone knows but afraid to say. But lets look at Hillary as well. Why is she where she is? It’s because for so long the media has given her and her husband a pass. Where was the media during the Lewinsky scandal when the Clinton’s so successfully diverted the perjury and suborning the perjury during a SEXUAL HARASSMENT case? No, they took the lie of “everyone lies about sex” and ran with it. They carried Clinton’s water. Now, the Clintons are in the unfortunate situation to have another “Clinton” like candidate in Obama that is running against them. And now the media has fallen for the Obama rhetoric and for the fact that Obama is more liberal than Hilary.
But let’s not put aside that Hillary has run a HORRIBLE campaign. She is like Wile E. Coyote falling off a cliff and getting dinged by everything possible.
The real issue is that the democratic party – like the republican party – no longer have genuine candidates who are leaders. They are just egos who want to play with tax money.
Posted by: The Warden | March 11, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am
“If this is racism can someone tell me anyone else who hadn’t even served a full term in the NATIONAL Senate, and was actually considered truly Presidential material?
No, you can’t.”
Yes I can! John Edwards. He was only in the Senate for a couple of months before he started raising money to run.
Posted by: Krankcase | March 11, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am
And if Hillary Clinton was a man, he would be considered a viable presidential candidate?
Bwaaaa haaaa haaaa haaaaa haaaa haaaa
Posted by: NY resident | March 11, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am
This is sort of beyond comprehension. You know you’ve fallen down the rabbit hole when someone is actually saying that a Black candidate named Barack Hussein Obama is ‘lucky’ and is only where he is as a result of his race. I was inspired once by Geraldine Ferraro. Today, I am somewhat disgusted, and very disappointed. Obama should ask that Hillary denounce these offensive remarks, made by one of her chief campaign figures.
And while it may be true that two party politics is partisan by its very definition, there is a difference between partisan politics and extreme partisan rancor and ideology, the rule of majority + 1, which is what we have increasingly moved towards. So to say that politics today resembles politics for the past 200 years is so stupid it makes her look like an idiot – or just a shameless shill.
Posted by: Caseay | March 11, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am
For all the whiners who ask, “why is that a white man is a racist…” it’s because the last time I checked it was the white man that was racist. When you have a history that includes enslaving people you have to be more cautious and sensitive. The truth is, if Obama were a white man, he’d have already won. It’s only because this racist has come down to two areas where historically the group has been put down, that it’s even this close.
Posted by: Irishspacemonk | March 11, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am
I’m a white male and I’m voting for a white male!
Posted by: John | March 11, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am
Liberalism is a mental disorder!!!
Posted by: WScott | March 11, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am
Obama is all of what he is Duh! How does this flaky Ferraro woman think Hillary Clinton got where she is? If she hadn’t been married to Bill she wouldn’t be where she is either. She has never held executive office. She has been a senator for one and a half terms. She got there because of her marriage. The “experience” she likes to talk about is First Lady experience. My hubsand is an economist. He discusses economic issues with me all the time. Does that qualify me to run for president of the economist’s society? I’d be escorted out of the room to an asylum.
Posted by: Sarah | March 11, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am
I think there is a lot of truth in what she is saying . Obama is held to a slightly different standard than Clinton eg.Sharptons threat to boycott the elections if the blacks don’t have their way!However, Obama ‘s rhetoric is also in his favor.But itis traditional that everyone step ligtly when an afro-AMERICAN IS INVOLVED.
Posted by: ratdragon | March 11, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am
Of course Senator HRC owes a debt of gratitude to Gerry F for teaching her the benefits of strategic crying to feminize a slumping candidacy by pretending to be a hurting blonde overwhelmed by a mean black man. Gerry secretly envies Hillary’s chutzpa in siccing Bill on Obama to risk his “black president credentials” by ignoring shrewd Obama mau-mauing and racial solidarity crap to demand alleigance of negroes to the power of the Clinton poltical agenda for liberal race-voting blacks hopelesslt tied to the socialistic programs offered by the DNC and the Democratic-controlled congress.
Will there be a post-clinton era for American negroes and Blacks seeking financial and economic parity instead of government programs which transfer wealth to solve social and economic problems like health care? Are black eternally overwhelmed by the futility of dreaming about a “real black President” as if that will solve their problems?
Obama has made his mark in history: he opens the door with his submission to the Democratic Reality of the supremacy of the Clintons, the door will lead to freedom from politics and escape from the marital honeymoon suite by African-American fully-healed and aware of their adult options to vote for John McCain, a liberal Republican maverick very unlike George W. Bush. Blacks for McCain Movement will arrive after the knifing at the Democratic Convention in Denver 2008. When the smoke from the riots subsides, African-Americans will finally realize that their freedon lies off the plantation and into a two-Party system empowering the black vote they will go : never again to be a slavish plantation vote taken for granted as Dems like Bill and Hillary crush their obama dreams and start the fast break to the White House with the “I Beat Bob Dole -War-Hero Playbook from 2006.” Give Bush credit if he is wise enough to order Condoleeza Rice to man the number two position on the ticket to swing the door open for an era of empowered and respected black voters. Once and froever free from the Democratic “taken for granted-Plantation” indeed, Free at Last!
Ralph W. Conner
Posted by: Ralph W. Conner | March 11, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am
It is laughable that anyone would listen to Ferraro. The ultimate failed novelty candidate. Her cynical view is exactly why Obama’s message resonates. The Clinton camp would lie when the truth sounded better. The entire Clinton team can rant racial profiles, out right lies, convulted logic and absolute jibberish without being called to task. That is why she will lose. People see through her. She will probably pick up the Jerry Springer constituency. Maybe. Face the facts, Hill has NO credible Foreign Policy Experience, no “Day One” crisis leadership ability and no moral basis for the job. She is a corrupt, lying artifact of a dying political process. And she is vicious. If she can’t get Obama for the Veep maybe she should recruit someone with similar belief structures. I think Rosie O’Donnell is availble since she lost out for the Price is Right.
Posted by: Raven8 | March 11, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am
“If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position.” That much is self-evident. He would be treated like Dan Quayle if he were White.
Posted by: JLK | March 11, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am
This is ridiculous. Although I don’t agree with Obama politically, but his oratory skills are unmatched. I remember watching him during the 2004 DNC convention, and thinking to myself that this man will run for president soon, and his campaign will be formidable. He does have some advantage with the black community, but his Reagan like communication skills, combined with an opponent with a near 50% “I will never vote for her” baggage is what has propelled him to the eventual democratic nomination. Unfortunately, unlike Reagan, it’s only words.
Posted by: BlameHofmann | March 11, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am
All this talk about people being racist because they are voting for Obama….
how disingenuous people! Were black people racist when they voted overwhelmingly for Al Gore in 2000? Or how about when they voted overwhelmingly for Kerry in 2004?
It wasn’t an issue then, and shouldn’t be an issue now. And I believe most of the posters on this board are correct…would hillary even be in this race if she wasn’t married to bill??
There is no 35 yrs of experience. That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard.
It is truly sad because neither of them will win. Obama’s supporters will not vote for her, and hillary’s supporters will not vote for him. So who wins?
Not only that, but the poor folks in MI and FL….who are they blaming for the current issue??? Obama….they blame Obama. Why? because they can, and its easy. It will be his fault and hillary will win the nomination, and then she will lose to McCain.
Wake up people, this isn’t rocket science!
Posted by: LA in Indiana | March 11, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am
cmon people he’s just as much white as he is black !! half and half!
Posted by: dre | March 11, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am
Dear “Irish” – isn’t the very essence of racism founded in the practice of blaming an entire ethnic group for the sins of a few???
>>because the last time I checked it was the white man that was racist. When you have a history that includes enslaving people <<
Posted by: Consultofactus | March 11, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am
Just curious, but was Geraldine Ferraro the most qualified to run as VP back in 1984, or was it because she was a woman?
I actually didn’t think I’d be supporting Obama, but having seen how the Clintons have run this race has influenced me to vote for him.
Posted by: Tommie | March 11, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am
FERRARO FLAT OUT STATES THE ONLY REASON OBAMA IS A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE IS BECAUSE HE IS BLACK. CLEARLY A RACIST STATEMENT.
WILL THE MEDIA AND CLINTON’S CAMPAIGN HOLD HER ACCOUNTABLE??
Posted by: DSC | March 11, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am
Liberals are so amusing when at each other’s throats…
Posted by: Chris | March 11, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am
Something that we should all remember is that Hillary started out with a national poll showing that 42% of us felt negatively about her. That is a number that the delegates must be looking at before giving her a free ride.
Before she can do ANYTHING she must overcome these negative numbers. Obama had much, much smaller negatives.
Also never forget that it will not be Dems or Reps that elect the president. Independents are always the deciding factor!
Posted by: Ben Simmons | March 11, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am
So Obama is where his is because he is black, but Hillary isn’t where she is because she is a woman who is married to a former President?
Posted by: Tom | March 11, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am
This is ridiculous. Although I don’t agree with Obama politically, but his oratory skills are unmatched. I remember watching him during the 2004 DNC convention, and thinking to myself that this man will run for president soon, and his campaign will be formidable. He does have some advantage with the black community, but his Reagan like communication skills, combined with an opponent with a near 50% “I will never vote for her” baggage is what has propelled him to the eventual democratic nomination. Unfortunately, unlike Reagan, it’s only words.
Posted by: Blame | March 11, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am
Nor would he be named Obama if he were white. Face it America, like it or not, Barack is a extremely viable candidate for the Dems. People are really tired of the “Clinton Political Machine” in which if you make them upset, you can disappear. If it came down to Hillary or Barak, I’d take Barack.
Posted by: jim | March 11, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am
Didnt Hillary get where she is because of experience by her marriage. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.
Posted by: Alicia | March 11, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am
uhhh…any comparison between Abraham
Lincoln and Obama is a joke. And a bad
one at that. These are the facts she is where she is because Bill was president and because he screwed around. She has zero, i repeat, zero accomplish ments and has zero qualifications to be the commander in chief. she’s done a great job of cleaning up after her hus band. that’s it.
Posted by: John | March 11, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am
I still say put their resumes on a table without photos and then see who is really qualified to be at the helm of this country….bye Obama
Posted by: Gunder | March 11, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am
For Geraldine Ferraro to suggest somehow that Sen. Obama wouldn’t be where he is if he were white implies that he is there just because he’s an affirmative action candidate. That’s about the most racist comment yet to come out the Clinton camp so far.
What is wrong with these people?
and for Wolfson to say they don’t agree is lame. How about we denounce and reject.
Can these people get any stupider?
This is one of many reasons why Obama has such appeal-he doesn’t have to tear people down and spit out viperous remarks to win. He’s running a far more organized, well managed – and respecful and positive campaign, that doesn’t play the gutter tactics of the past.
The Clintons are so toast. Obama is the future.
Posted by: debbie G | March 11, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am
Josh, Read the biography of Abraham Lincoln. Read the biography of Teddy Roosevelt. Read the biography of John F. Kennedy. None of these people had much experience. It is a false argument to make. It is not who has experience but who will be an effective leader. Hillary supporters need to keep in mind this….They were elected in 1992 and set out to rehaul Health Care. That failed which led to losing Congress in 1994. If I remember correctly Democrats also lost congressional seats in 1996 and 1998. They were also a direct cause of Al Gore’s loss in the 2000 election which begat GWB. That is the issue I have with the Clintons….they are part of the problem..
Posted by: John | March 11, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am
Of what use is it to throw insults at people you disagree with? Does it make you feel better?
One of the reasons that John McCain, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama are the three remaining contenders for president, rather than any of us commenting on this article is because they are incredibly talented people. Somehow, the fact that what these people are doing is way beyond the capability of almost all the rest of us, gets lost in all the rhetoric. Any one of them would be a pretty good president. McCain, of the Republican bunch, has distinguished himself for years as a fair-minded individual who is willing to stand up for what he believes in. Campaign finance reform is a great example of someone “doing the right thing”. However, the Republican agenda has had too much attention and some of it was (extremely) misguided over the last few years, it’s time for attention to other priorities. Hillary Clinton has shown a lot of positive attributes in the policy positions she has put forward, and apparently in some of her previous work, although I have the impression that self-interest plays a larger role with her than I would find attractive. Obama has been involved in a number of positive initiatives, including the bill to make government spending searchable on the internet. He has spoken intelliently and respectfully about many of the issues of our time and I perceive him as being on the leading edge of a number of issues.
Hopefully the candidates can talk about the issues and do what’s right for the country.
Posted by: jake | March 11, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am
Liberals continue to make race and sex the issue. Republicans simply vote for the best and most qualified person. It is the Liberal mentality of entitlement that blurs their vision. Republicans believe in individual inner strength is what makes this country great.
Posted by: dst | March 11, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am
Sounds about right. Look at Edwards.
Posted by: Alex | March 11, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am
Everyone is missing the point here. Yes, HRC is where she is because of her philandering husband, but Ferraro is RIGHT about Obama!! Wake up people!
Posted by: shelly | March 11, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am
Something that we should all remember is that Hillary started out with a national poll showing that 42% of us felt negatively about her. That is a number that the delegates must be looking at before giving her a free ride.
Before she can do ANYTHING she must overcome these negative numbers. Obama had much, much smaller negatives.
Also never forget that it will not be Dems or Reps that elect the president. Independents are always the deciding factor!
Posted by: Ben Simmons | Mar 11, 2008 10:00:17 AM
This is false.
Obama’s built in negative ratins are INCREASING. His are now 43% to Hillary’s 46%; they have remained pretty much constant versus OBama’s increasing negatives.
Posted by: Josh | March 11, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am
When the President vetoes a bill barring torture, when fidelity means nothing, when the EPA doesn’t perform, when civil liberties are ignored, the candidate least touched by these stigma looks very good indeed. The threshold has been crossed and I support the candidate who best represents the values that made America great no matter if he were bright pink and covered in purple fur.
Posted by: Values | March 11, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am
This is just part of an ongoing theme leading up to the PA primary that transitions nicely into Rendell’s past comments regarding how some whites just can’t bring themselves to vote for a person of color. And some folks are shocked with Ms. Ferraro? Take it to the convention, Hillary!
Posted by: Paul Sloan | March 11, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am
I am a member of a younger generation and I am sick of the racial and gender politics.. It’s time to get rid of these dinosaurs.. You know what some conservatives are right. It is the old school Democrats and Republicans who are hung up on race. Thank God my generation sees beyond these foolish social constructs.
Posted by: Alicia | March 11, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am
Am I the only one thinking Obama’s oratory skills are pretentious and superficial? He sounds sweet but his message is completely empty. Listen closely and the message is the “Emperor has no clothes.” To think he will “heal” this country is laughable. He can’t even “heal” the Dimocratic party.
Obama says nothing of substance yet the seals continue to clap. Obama is simply the lib flavor of the day. When it takes none other than SNL to point this out, you know at least 50% of America is completely helpless and hopeless.
Posted by: Tex Taylor | March 11, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am
Posted by: sj7465
Do you honestly believe Baracks voters don’t know what he is, especially African Americans? Are you that nieve?
Posted by: E | March 11, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am
Reading between the lines of what Ferraro said, I sense she does not understand that there’s significant opposition to Hillary not because of her gender (which is what Ferraro is wrongly trying to imply) but because of her “steamroller” personality (she’s not very likable), her checkered past (amazing how Obama has held back bringing out all the skeletons in her closet), the association with Bill, and the general disfavor of the American people for “dynasties.”
In addition, if the MSM has given her a tough time (I don’t really see it), it’s because they are finally pushing back against the hardball the Clintons have employed against them for two decades. The MSM does have a memory and it is one which is not fond of the Spitzer-like tactics the Clintons have used against the MSM.
It sort of reminds me of the Biblical bit of wisdom: “he who lives by the sword, dies by the sword.”
Posted by: Jon | March 11, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am
Well said John.
Posted by: jake | March 11, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am
HRC and BHO are two of the biggest political LIGHTWEIGHTS I have seen in my lifetime. I have told my kids all their lives that a lie told often enough will become the truth to the person that does not think for themselves. These 2 are living breathing proof of that.
Posted by: Boyd | March 11, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am
This is just what the Clinton wanted!! To give a forum for this race baiting poison…….GOOD JOB GERALDINE!!
Posted by: STEVE | March 11, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am
Um, hasn’t Hillary also gotten a boost in the polls b/c she’s a woman?
Hillary and her surrogates have made a much bigger issue out of her gender–and for that matter Obama’s race–than the Obama campaign.
And no–this latest attack is still not enough for HRC to steal the nomination.
Posted by: Al | March 11, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am
SJ…Any Democrat get 92% of the black vote. Black Americans will not reach their full political potential if they keep squandering their votes on a party that has taken them for granted since the days of FDR.
Posted by: Consultofactus | March 11, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am
Well Geraldine, if Hillary weren’t a former first lady she wouldn’t be in a position to run either. As far as the press goes, when you act like the heir apparent and believe that you own the nomination prior to the first caucus vote in Iowa you deserve to lose.
Posted by: Stu in Des Moines | March 11, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am
And Clinton wouldn’t be where she was if it weren’t for her gender. It’s pretty evident that she’s been angling for women’s votes on the basis of being a woman and many are voting for her because she’s a woman.
Posted by: Publius | March 11, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am
If Hillary wasn’t Bill’s wife would she be where she is today? I don’t think so! So what we have is two unqualified people with no real experience.
Posted by: Bruce | March 11, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
The Obama campaign relies solely upon the competions inability to critique his positions and associations on the grounds doing so is somehow racist. This is the same tactic the clinton campaign was hoping to employ against the republicans except based on her gender. Oh the irony when shallow candidates and startegies collide.
Posted by: darren | March 11, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
I am white, female, 58 years old, former Republican in spite of my strong preferences for Pro-Choice …. and I am not really anti-war. I switched from Republican to Independant when I became so embarrassed and ashamed of GW Bush and I am supporting Obama with more gusto than I’ve supported anyone — It is really an insult to hear comments like the stand Ferraro has taken. No one candidate will please everyone all the way but Obama is making alot of sense and I am willing to announce my preferences and support in this bastion of conservative Republicans where I live in NE Florida.
Posted by: Lu | March 11, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
The Obama campaign relies solely upon the competions inability to critique his positions and associations on the grounds doing so is somehow racist. This is the same tactic the clinton campaign was hoping to employ against the republicans except based on her gender. Oh the irony when shallow candidates and startegies collide.
Posted by: darren | March 11, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
Wow.
Yeah, she’s right there are some double standards. Most people in Obama’s position would have already been called the winner and most candidates behaving like the many faces of Sybil and throwing the complete viscous crap against the wall that Clinton has would have been marginalized long ago.
For a woman who’s riding on her husband’s coattails, she sure whines a lot about unfair treatment.
Ask yourself…Hillary without Bill..would she be even in the running? NO.
Posted by: D | March 11, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
Coming from an African-American there is some truth to what Geraldine Ferraro has stated. I’m an Black man supporting Hillary Clinton and I’ve endured more reverse racism from the black community since acknowledging it than I could’ve ever imagined.
I have this question for any of Obama’s supporters who’d cared to answer??????
“If Barack Obama were an all white candidate running against Hillary Clinton, would he be receiving this much attention from the media and citizens?”
Posted by: Eric | March 11, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
I seenothing wrong with her comment, I actually believe it is true. I have heard constantly any time anything was said about Obama or he was questioned in any manner on any issue that the person questioning him must be a racist. No one wants to dispute him out of fear of being called a racist. His campiagn and supporters are the ones that have run on the race card, not Hillary.
Posted by: Danielle | March 11, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am
And if Hillary wasn’t Mrs. Bill, she’d be just another shrill feminist trying to get noticed. What credentials does she have except that she endured her husband’s indiscretions, completely bungled (or abused) every responsibility she never earned, and then was rewarded for keeping her mouth shut (and her papers hidden) by being coronated as a Senator representing a state she never even lived in.
Posted by: JR | March 11, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am
What a stupid thing to say! One could always claim she wouldn’t have been picked as running mate if she weren’t a woman. Many could defend an argument that HILLARY wouldn’t be in the running if she weren’t a woman. And how would her husband have done if he weren’t from the south?
And wait a second. Hasn’t the complaint been for so long that you HAVE to be a white man in order to become president?
Posted by: Tubby Szeckers | March 11, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am
CZ – Right on – you said it so well – hope you are writing letters to the editors all over the contry.
MJ – Resume? He has an okay resume, for a first term congressman – but not for President. (Not that Ms. Clinton’s is anything all that extraordinary – but it is much better than Obama’s) Goodness, there must be literally thousands of Americans whose resumes are as good – or better than his, wondering why they weren’t the ones running if the standards of expectaion were that low.
As far as resume’s go, McCain FAR SURPASSES either of them in service and experience!
And for anyone who wants to talk about prejudice – there are prejudicial attitudes against all three:
Obama – for his race
Clinton – for her gender
McCain – for his age
(and, when he was running – Huckaby – for his religion)
Its everywhere! And like it ir not, it exists in all of us in one form or another.
What Ferraro was trying to say, is that Mr. Obama has been given a FREE PASS and more FREE MEDIA by the American media, than any of the other candidates because of his race. They are afraid of being accused of racism. I do not agree with most of Clinton’s politics, but I do really feel she has been treated unfairly, while Obama has been treated like a rock star. Maybe its the Oprah factor. I don’t know – I see no real substance in him.
Posted by: DG | March 11, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am
I’m with John & Josh above.
The only “HOPE” Obama has is that no one figures out he’s a big NOTHING and the model for EMPTY SUITS ( John Edwards) everywhere. It is impossible to say ANYTHING NEGATIVE against him because you’ll IMMEDIATELY be labeled a bigot. He’s more a racist bigot than anyone on the right and his wife’s not far behind. Just ask their advisor’s Jesse Jackson. The Extortionist to the stars. It is really laughable.
Posted by: Rickster | March 11, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am
A vote for HRC because she is a woman is a SEXIST ACT. A vote for BHO because he is black is a RACIST ACT.
THINK ABOUT IT!
Posted by: Boyd | March 11, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Fact is, if Hillary wasn’t married to Bill Clinton,she wasn’t going to be neither a senator from New York nor a presidential candidate. Needless to say, after losing 11 contests in a row she was going to be forced to quit the presidential race. However,I predict that Hillary will steal the nomination from Obama and that will lose in a landslide in November-exactly like Ferraro did in 1984.
Posted by: Jason452 | March 11, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am
So if Hillary was not Bill’s wife where would she be in all this. Nowhere!
Posted by: Ken | March 11, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am
“At least Obama has 11 years of actual legislative experience.”
Obama had eight years of part time experience in Illinoios as a Sneator where he sued everyone off the ballot in his first run and rarely voted. He was in the Senate for two years when he declared his candidacy for President and has missed 40% of the votes and never votes on controversial or politically sensitive issues because he doesn’t want to have to explain them – he is afriad to take a stance because it may hurt him. There is no comparison to Hillary’s experience – Oh, yes, he did some connunity action for about 6 months – Hillary on the other hand has been fighting for chidlren and women’a rights and minotiry rights for the whole of her lifetime.
Posted by: Danielle | March 11, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
If it were not for Hill’s gender she would not be where she is at. Obama and Ms Clinton are both empty bottles.
Posted by: Eugene Boyanton | March 11, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am
Geraldine, do you mean if Obama WERE a white man… or if he WERE a woman?
Posted by: Elizabeth | March 11, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am
Divisive, divisive, divisive.
How immature and intentionally inflammatory.
When are politicians going to stop using race to divide the American people against each other? It seems to me that the only people perpetuating the concept of racism anymore are political groups who become wealthy and prominent from its existence.
Posted by: JR | March 11, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am
Do you want to talk about racism? What about all the pressure black supporters of Obama are putting on black superdelegates to vote for him.
Posted by: Donny | March 11, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am
You all are so very sad. I think we have three great candidates. The reason I am drawn to Barack Obama is because I do see a bright future with him and I truly believe he will look out for the best interest of “all” Americans.
For those of you who have been so negative, be careful what you say and how you treat others — what goes around comes around.
Posted by: Deborah | March 11, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am
If I may. Geraldine Ferraro is of the OLD school in her thinking… this is what Obama is all about change!, 545 people in Washington need to be changed by the people, starting at the top. If we dare to believe that this man stands for change, Then only 544 left to be changed by “WE THE PEOPLE” Starting with those (like Geraldine Ferraro) who hold this kind of view that Washington is the way it is and has been for 200 years with no way of changing.
dbh
Posted by: plug | March 11, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am
And where would MRS CLINTON be without her perverted husband, the former president? And were it not for Monica Lewinsky she wouldn’t be a US Senator let alone a presidential candidate. Whats her resume in foreign affairs, national security? Face it, her role in the White House was that of a traditional first lady…she did not have national security clearance, did not negotiate with heads of state, and did not “sit in” on meetings..
Posted by: donna | March 11, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
Ferraro IS an idiot. As someone just pointed out! WHO cares what she thinks anymore? Is she trying to tell us she has no class?
HONEY, I got your point, you have NO CLASS at all!
Posted by: Enrique S. | March 11, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
Of course this election is going to turn into a race issue. Do people not believe that blacks are voting for Obama because he is black? DUH! Republicans aren’t ignorant. There are vastly more whites that vote than blacks. That is why they want Obama to win the Democratic primary. Do the math! What is sad is that in this great country, all we can come up with for President are Hillary, Obama, and John. We are screwed.
Posted by: rick | March 11, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
There’s much truth to this article. I, like many, see much merit in the country finally having a black president. I also see where many are infatuated, or trying to cover guilt, with it to the extent they overlook the candidate’s qualifications.
Barrack is simple not a good candidate. I want a black president, for the sake of black people I want the first one to at least be good if not great. Barrack is not there.
Reality Check 1: He’s a divider, yes he’s the most liberal person in congress.
Reality Check 2: He says he was against the war but always voted to fund it??? And by the criteria he has listed in a debate for going to Iraq and being there, he would be there to if he were in charge?
Waiting for someone to see past the style and the speech and look at the substance. It scared me when I did. Severerly so. Every politician the last 100 years has campaigned change and hope, that’s nothing new folks. The questions we must always ask is – How will they bring that change about? And what have they actually done to substantiate they are capable of doing it?
In Barracks case its (suprise) nothing. We he is the head of the military oversight committee for Afghanistan, a place he says is instrumental and we should be active and vibrant in, what does he do? He doesn’t bother to hold one meeting, not one. Here he holds more ability than anyone except the President to influence policy on the very place he keeps emphasizing we should be doing things and what does he do? Nothing. Do I really need to say any more about why Barrack scares me? He’s just politics as usual. Only difference is this time with more speeches and less substance.
Posted by: Tim Norman | March 11, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
The fact that Geraldine Ferraro is a close personal friend and high ranking advisor to Hillary Clinton speaks volumes.
I am continually amazed by the level of ignorance displayed by the Clintons and members of their campaign. Clinton’s spokesman Howard Wolfson said “We disagree with her”.
Senator Clinton to date has not fired Ferraro. This is just another example of why people question her judgment,integrity and trust.
The sense of entitlement to the nomination by the Clintons is absolutely unbelievable. Hillary Clinton should bow out of the race and stop endorsing McCain.
Nor has Hillary Clinton spoke out against her friend,supporter, and super delegate Governor Elliot Spitzer “Client #9″ and called for his resignation for dealing with prostitutes.
Posted by: sissy | March 11, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
Danielle- You actually have to have an opinion and stand and vote to call it legislative experience. He effectively side steps controversial issues and stands for nothing. Read the NY Times article in Sunday’s paper and get a wake up call. He is a master politician like the rest. Nothing special just words:-)
Posted by: Amelia | March 11, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am
“John F. Kennedy was a senator from 1952-1960, when he won the presidental election.”
————————-
Quit trying to compare Obama to Lincoln and JFK there is no comparison. Not only was Lincoln from another time, Lincoln spent 4 terms in the Illinois House of Rep, had his own legal practice and spent one term in the US House of Reps, plus he was the leader of the Whig Party in Ill. Kennedy, besides his distinguished career in the Navy where he earned a Purple Heart, he was in the US House of Reps for 6 years, in the US Senate for 8 years and had a Pulitzer Prize.
Posted by: Danielle | March 11, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
Right on, Ferraro ! FINALLY, I love seeing someone who fully understands political dynamics take on how being black has benefitted Obama…..while the press treads lightly around it, at best. Another BRAVE woman !
Posted by: catherine in NM | March 11, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
OH PLEASE!!!!! This woman is so full of herself, its NASTY!!! She FAILS o mention the fact that Clinton would be OUT of the race by now if She was NOT a Woman. Considering the fact that women make up he majority (56%) of the democratic party, I’d say that her gender has carried her a long way in this race. Then, when you add the fact that she has constantly been playing THE SYMPATHY CARD and expects the rules to somehow NOT apply to her, you get a pretty good idea where her success comes from, barring the fact that her last name is Clinton.
Posted by: KnightCaptain | March 11, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
I’m a black male and I’m for Obama because I believe that he isn’t as corrupt as his competition. I believe that the longer you stay in politics the worse you become. Just look at how ridiculous some of these politicians are in their positions on gun control, abortion etc… They change with the weather going from moderate to extreme in a flash to pander for support. I’ve not seen much of this in Obama…yet. Also, I have noticed that both McCain and Clinton became “agents of change” when Obama’s message of change caught fire??. Third, McCain and Clinton said that it was a sign of inexperience to seek talks with Cuba, N.Korea, Iran and the like when both McCain and Clinton would offer praises to presidents Reagan and Kennedy whom did just that.??
Posted by: DD | March 11, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
“uhhh…any comparison between Abraham
Lincoln and Obama is a joke….
The two highest ranking black, male or female, appointees ever appointed by in a president are Condi Rice and C. Powell
they were appointed by a republican.”
John at 10:01:20 am Great post!
Of course, Obama is the affirmative action candidate. There is so much hatred of Hillary from both sides and the white libs are loaded with guilt and anxious to show they are not racists. In reality, a conservative would vote for someone of any color or gender if they had the right conservative philosophy and approach. Take JC Watts or Alan Keyes or Walter Williams or Condi Rice etc…
Posted by: ricardo maxwell | March 11, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
If Hillary were a man she would not have gotten into the Senate and wouldn’t be a Presidential candidate today. Her strongest base of support is women who want a woman to be President, and women make up the MAJORITY of Democratic voters.
Posted by: Tired of Divisions | March 11, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
I’m surprised we’re even having this discussion. Unless you’re very old or very stupid, mere skin color is not an issue anymore.
Here in DC they had a similar discussion about Fenty when he was running for mayor. Was he “black enough” to be mayor of a majority-black city? They weren’t talking about his skin tone. They were talking about his life experiences and the way he presented himself.
Like it or not, Obama and his wife are able to appeal to a broad sector of Americans in a way that someone like Jesse Jackson or Marion Barry never could. If either of those men, or anyone with a similar background, demeanor, or values, tried to run for president, they would never get past the primaries.
It’s not about color – it’s about culture.
Posted by: Bugs | March 11, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
This election is about color, but not about being black. It’s about being red. There will be more partianship with him as President not less. There will be much buyer remorse if he is elected.
Posted by: William | March 11, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
If Hillary wasn’t a married to an ex-president, she would not be in this position.
Posted by: Lester CA | March 11, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
I have always been a straight ticket voting republican and like many others I am leaning toward Obama.
If the Dems loses this election to the Republicans this year I will blame Hillary for not stepping down now. This Clinton sense of entitlement thing continues to make me ill. I could care less that she is a woman but rather that she is a Clinton.
Time to say our final goodbyes to the Bushes and the Clintons.
Posted by: johnny | March 11, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Yesterday, look how Obama is playing the race card in Mississippi; he is stilling the black voters that they should be very upset with Hillary for showing the picture on him in the muslin outfit. Why did he bring up this topic in Mississippi? Remember, he complains so much when it was released to the public several weeks ago. He is playing the race card to get the black voters work-up.
Posted by: sj7465 | March 11, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am
I suppose we should be referring to Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton. Now… I have nothing particularly negative to say about people with the middle name “Diane”, just as I have nothing negative to say about people with the middle name “Hussein”.
Isn’t it amazing how Obama is winning more states… more popular vote… and more delegates? For those who will allow race to affect their voting decision…he must seem like the worst possible human being to lead the country. He has an association with an old foe… being black… and a new foe… with his muslim sounding middle name.
It looks like a lot of people aren’t too concerned with those things… and are instead trying to hear what the candidates have to say about what they will do… and look for evidence that they can be trusted.
Obama is a very intelligent and capable man who seems to understand that a society that facilitates fair treatment and opportunity for all makes the society better for all it’s members. It’s a big old complicated world and this liberal philosophy has, of course, it’s potential pitfalls… but so does a conservative philosophy that ends up being unfair in other ways. Obama’s message is closer to “Not ask what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country” than anyone’s recently.
Trust Obama with your vote to give the country a boost toward fairness, sustainability, strength, and civility.
Posted by: jake | March 11, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Wonder why a racist such as Ferrano would bring about so many Republican posts in here??
Hmmmm….
Posted by: STEVE | March 11, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Danielle, Lincoln may have been from a different time, but those times were MORe TROUBLESOME with the nation at CIVIL war with itself. By comparison, this is a cakewalk for Obama.
Posted by: KnightCaptain | March 11, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Last week, on a Lehrer News Hour segment, Ms Ferrero stated incorrectly that back in January, she had wanted to campaign on behalf of Hillary Clinton in Florida, before the primary there.
Clinton, Ferraro stated emphatically, told her that she must not do that, because no one in the Clinton campaign was going near Florida before the election, since they would not break DNC rules.
It sounded good, except for the fact that Hillary herself (and Bill, too) attended several “fundraising events” in Florida in the last weeks leading up to the primary which she somehow distinguished from campaigning.
Simply put, Ferraro has joined the bandwagon: she is disseminating a series of blatant untruths about Senator Obama in order to demolish his campaign.
Posted by: Lynn | March 11, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am
200 years? Lady, there has been conflict since the beginning of time, it doesn’t mean politicians shouldn’t work towards amiable solutions. WTH was on your mind running for president if not uniting our country? Haven’t you heard “United We Stand and Divided We Fall”?
Anyone who seeks to divide and write-off members of our society to jusitify agendas is not someone worth voting for. It’s amazing to me that anyone can suggest readiness for office and foreign diplomacy when they have such disdain and hopelessness for their own countrymen.
Posted by: JR | March 11, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am
I love it. Keep chewing each other up.
Posted by: John Connor | March 11, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am
OUCH !! Jorvis hit a nerve. Apparently the older generations that built this great country and answered the call to fight for this country, should step aside and let some Starbuck junkies take over. Geraldine Ferraro is dead right. Furthermore, I believe that the Hollywood screen writers made Obama the big rock star that he is. That new persona has made him a “Pied Piper” who seems to be leading our young and our country over a cliff.
Posted by: Rich Hall | March 11, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am
So, where would HRC be if it were not for the fact that her husband just happened to be a President (or ex-President ?
It’s like a pot(us) calling the kettle black !
Posted by: Ben | March 11, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am
This comming from the party that is supposedly impartial to race! Give me a break. I would vote for any race, black or white, any sex, male or female, any orientation, gay or straight as long as their views and issues are strongly conservative based.
Posted by: Al Cabal | March 11, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am
Sole me get this straight, Blacks can be equal with whites in his country…. Just not President? The idea is simply unAmerican… Now I get it….
Posted by: KnightCaptain | March 11, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am
For anyone who wants to believe Ms. Ferraro, I offer you 2 words… Jimmy Carter.
Posted by: Brian | March 11, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am
Let’s not forget that Obama campaigned in Florida by airing television ads. This he excused by saying we paid for a package deal and that they couldn’t exclude Florida from the list. So don’t be pretentious and exclaim that he’s above the fray. He campaigned period and that was against the rules.
Posted by: Julio | March 11, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am
JR said: “And if Hillary wasn’t Mrs. Bill, she’d be just another shrill feminist trying to get noticed.”
Ever noticed that the adjective “shrill” is never applied to a man? Its typically used to describe a strong woman who isn’t afraid to express views that may displease others. In other words, its sexist. As far as Hillary being a “feminist,” that’s questionable, but I’ll leave it to the female bloggers to expand on that topic if they so choose.
Posted by: shellray | March 11, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am
We I no idea what the real issue with Obama and Rezeko is but am willing to bet as soon as he gets the nomination we will surly find out.
All that money that has gone unaccounted for, his influence on name picking for state boards, he wife sudden double increase in salary, his ties to all these odd people, the fund raiser that no one seems to know how much money was involved.
It will all come out and anyone of us that want to pretend that is will not has to be rather dumb indeed, the GOP is just sitting and waiting and watching the games between Obama and Hillary.
All you Obama supporters better be very sure that Obama is lily white as he is pretending to be, or it will all come crashing down faster than you can unfold your ballot to vote.
Posted by: SJ | March 11, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am
Ferraro’s comment is stupid.
Hillary would not be successful if not for being a woman & married to Bill.
It who she is. Just as being black is who Obama.
John Edwards might be still in the race if Hillary was a man.
And if Obama cries, he gets no extra votes.
Posted by: Right on Day1 | March 11, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am
It seems to me that the press has given Hillary a free pass for the seven years she has been a Senator (plus the sympathy “due” a wronged wife for the last 2 or 3 years her hubby was in the White House). In comparison to that, her current treatment by the press may seem rough, but in actuality, she is STILL not getting a “rough ride”.
In the interests of full disclosure, I happen to believe that Hillary is the most dishonest, unscrupulous, insincere politician on the national stage, so my viewpoints may be considered by most to be 100% accurate.
Posted by: Nick in Virginia | March 11, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am
Another Clinton-backing moron, with no sense of fairness and right and wrong. Somehow a black guy — a member of a race that’s had a pretty tough time overcoming stereotypes — has a harder time than a white woman? Where is her hard evidence? White women in business have more positions of authority than black men, are more affluent, tend to live in more crime-free areas, etc.
But what’s really great about this is it shows the hypocrisy of the democrats. They’ve always been supporters of affirmative action, yet here she admits or believes that “of course, no black man could ever get achieve this much on his merits.” The truth of the matter is that she has no more experience than he does.
Posted by: Cribble | March 11, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am
To 08-Independant, you are so out of touch with voters, and so is the auhor of tha article you posted. The VOTERS DO NOT CARE how much time Obama has spent in Washington. Race is not an issue here. Before the Iowas Caucuses, all of the democratic candidates made their case, and the voters liked Obama better. END OF STORY.
Posted by: KnightCaptain | March 11, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am
By the way… I’m not saying that I completely agree with Ferraro or the aticle’s position. I just thought you all might find this interesting to think about.
Posted by: 08_Independent | March 11, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
I don’t care if Obama is black, white or orange. I am against him because he is a inexperienced arrogant liberal.
Posted by: Michael | March 11, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
Hmmm… let’s see:
Maybe there is some truth to this comment but at no fault to Obama. Has the Hollywood elite glamorized Obama and made him into a rock-star? I have heard him speak myself, not sure I would agree with this.
I would say that his crack/cocaine use is not insiginificant, and the fact that some of his ideas are based is same form of socialism that France is just not trying to free itself from – i.e. high unemployment, high immigration, immigrant riots and murders against citizens.
Face it America: This election, it will be a choice between bad and worse.
Posted by: JR | March 11, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
It is exactly what they said about Clarence Thomas, isn’t it? Except Judge Thomas had a lot more experience. I think it is true though it is too bad Geraldine’s grammar is not correct. Dems get hoisted on their own petard.
Posted by: SRC | March 11, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am
Does Ferraro understand how racist she seems in these comments?
The woman has no clue. Obama’s appeal is not his race or his gender, it’s his populism. It’s his optimism. It’s his ability to stir up a crowd. It may have no real substance to it, but you can’t attribute it to the fact he’s a black man. A white woman, a black woman, or a white man who had the same personality attributes of Obama would be just as popular.
Posted by: JayBee | March 11, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am
Senator Obama has mentioned his mother on several occasions–especially when talking about his Healthcare plan. Also, when he campaigned in Kansas (His Mother’s home state). He talks about her moreso than his Father. Its obvious that you are getting your material from the anti-Obama rhetoric machine instead of listening to what he says or doing a little research.
Posted by: KnightCaptain | March 11, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am
I am Black and what Ms. Ferraro stated is absolutely true.
“If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position. And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept.”
For all you people making excuses for Obama, you had better vet him before the Republicans get a hold of him. Just a little dose of reality, he will not win Penn., Ohio, nor Florida in the general election. The little states he won during the primaries are all red states and if you think for a New York second he will carry any of those staes excepte Illinois you have engulf to much of the Kool Ade
Posted by: James | March 11, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
Actually, Ferraro makes two very good points. The first is Obama has gotten a complete pass from the media… at least up until the last few weeks. He speaks in platitudes about hope and change but the man has said nothing. She is also right about the partisanship point and that is exactly why Obama’s message is pointless. It doesn’t matter who wins the White House. The problems in our country aren’t at the White House, THEY ARE IN CONGRESS! Until Congress is fixed, term limits instituted and the people of this country take power back from the morons we foolishly elected, the president is irrelevent. You could put Charles Manson in the White House and it wouldn’t mean jack.
I could care less about Obama’s skin color or Hillary’s sex. I completely disagree with both of their agenda’s. Socialism is a terrible idea, wealth redistribution goes against everything this country was founded on. Having said that, McCain attacked the American people for not agreeing with his amnesty deal with the fat, drunken, sot Kennedy so he doesn’t deserve the job either.
Once again, We, the people, are left with a lessor of two evils in the general election. Neither of those evils (regardless of the liberal candidate) deserve the presidency but we are going to be stuck with one of them.
irishspacemonk – your post couldn’t be more pointless or wrong if you tried. There are racists, of all races/creeds in this country, just like in nearly every other country on the planet, but the vast majority of the population is not racist.
Posted by: DJH | March 11, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
What about the stereotypes that white men running for President have to face every time they campaign in predominately black areas? Republicans are demonized as being racists and dividers when it was the Republican party of Abraham Lincoln that ultimately ended slavery in this country.
AGAIN: If people are so stupid and lazy to listen to people like Ferraro who use racial descriptors to distract you from analyzing substance don’t complain when your tax rates are beyond 60% to support your socialist economy.
Anyone still wonder how fraudulent black leaders still exist when politicians like this run their mouths? These parasites offer nothing to Americans except to create animosity within our society which ultimately keeps them relevant.
Posted by: JR | March 11, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
Here’s former DEMOCRATIC Senator Bill Bradley talking to the UK Times about the Clinton Campaign:
“The bigger the lie, the better the chance they think they’ve got. That’s been their whole approach,” he said. “She’s going to lose a whole generation of people who got involved in politics believing it could be something different.”
It’s not a advertisement for American politics, is it? And who is to blame?
Posted by: Jeannette | March 11, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
I am a 38 year old Bi- racial male… White people said I was black when I was born , no choice back then! Black people accepted me as black. And never ever ever has being Bi racial, or black been a benifit to me as far as getting ahead. With my kinky hair and thick lips come all the negative stereotypes that are associated with a black male. For a white woman to say that a black man is where he is because he is black shows she knows nothing of what it means to be black. Good and bad! If you look at black society, you would see that it was the black woman that broke through the color barrier first in the american work place. Black men are still treated with suspicion. No matter how successful!! Does sexism exist? absolutly! I this a sexist issue with hillary? nope! People just hate her! not for much she did, but for everything Bill did! Let Obama stand on his own merit and stop trying to make an affermitive action case out of this!!!
Posted by: J. Maurer | March 11, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am
I am a 38 year old Bi- racial male… White people said I was black when I was born , no choice back then! Black people accepted me as black. And never ever ever has being Bi racial, or black been a benifit to me as far as getting ahead. With my kinky hair and thick lips come all the negative stereotypes that are associated with a black male. For a white woman to say that a black man is where he is because he is black shows she knows nothing of what it means to be black. Good and bad! If you look at black society, you would see that it was the black woman that broke through the color barrier first in the american work place. Black men are still treated with suspicion. No matter how successful!! Does sexism exist? absolutly! I this a sexist issue with hillary? nope! People just hate her! not for much she did, but for everything Bill did! Let Obama stand on his own merit and stop trying to make an affermitive action case out of this!!!
Posted by: J. Maurer | March 11, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am
Why is anyone surprised that the majority of black people are voting for a black running for President. why is this so hard to believe. How many times have whites voted for whites only because they are white. Lets see, Close to 200 years I guess. Maybe most of you are shocked but i see it as voting for your own in a way. If someone is jewish, Most jews vote for them. If they are hispanic , Most hispanics vote for them, and if they are white most whites vote for them. Until now. So why does it really matter what color he is or what gender Hillary is. Im also so tired of hearing about experience. Most people who are elected doesnt have that much experience anyway. Besides that. Look where experience has gotten us. Between Hillary and McCain they have over 30 years of so called experience and our country today is in the worst shape its been in a very long time. So maybe experience isnt all its cracked up to be.
Posted by: Tyson | March 11, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am
Imagine a Republican saying this – torch and pitchfork stocks would be going through the roof!
Posted by: c'est moi | March 11, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
The hypocrisy of the liberal Democrats laid bare for all to see.
Posted by: fowlowl | March 11, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
If the mayority of the people in this Blog are Democrats is diabolical insane to castigate themselves belonging to a Party that looks base on their opinions that is discriminating against Blacks Women and Old people like Mc Cain.You have two solutions form a new Party or this time, at list vote for Mc Cain.
Posted by: Martha | March 11, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
If the mayority of the people in this Blog are Democrats is diabolical insane to castigate themselves belonging to a Party that looks base on their opinions that is discriminating against Blacks Women and Old people like Mc Cain.You have two solutions form a new Party or this time, at list vote for Mc Cain.
Posted by: Martha | March 11, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
I thought Ms. Ferraro was a big supporter of affirmative action. Apparently……NOT!
Posted by: Elroy Jetson | March 11, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
No one on this post even commented about if he wasnt black would he be where he is?Tip toe all you want but the trueth is NO!Im in georgia and I have seen for myself the blacks coming out to vote for him because he is black!Even our Rep.Lewis had to change his vote because of pressure from the black caucus.He may have won alot of states now but most of those states are red.HRC is actually only one state behind in blue states.Sorry but blacks have carried him threw the southern red states!Which he will not win if he gets the nom!
Posted by: truelies | March 11, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
I AGREE WITH EVERY SINGLE WORD GERALDINE FERRARO SAID!!!! PEOPLE HAVE BEEN SAYING THIS ALL ALONG–IF OBAMA WERE A WOMAN WITH HIS/HER MEAGER RESUME, HE/SHE WOULD BE NOWHERE NEAR THE PRESIDENCY!!! CAN YOU IMAGINE A WOMAN IN THE SENATE ONE YEAR STARTING TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT??? SOUNDS HYSTERICAL – BUT THAT IS JUST WHAT OBAMA DID!!! I READ AN ARTICLE FROM PEOPLE WHO KNOW HIM IN THE SENATE AND THEY SAID AS MUCH AS HE WAS THERE JUST TO GET TO THE HIGHEST OFFICE; AND GOD KNOWS HE WASTED NO TIME!!!
HILLARY HAS BEEN TREATED TERRIBLY BY THE MEDIA WHO HAS BEEN TOTALLY SEXIST, AT THE SAME TIME THEY’VE BEEN FALLING ALL OVER OBAMA!!
IF OBAMA GETS THE NOMINATION, IT WILL BE THE BIGGEST TRAVESTY FOR THIS COUNTRY SINCE BUSH STOLE THE ELECTION IN 2000!!! NOW OBAMA WILL STEAL THE ELECTION FROM HILLARY – WHO IS THE QUALIFIED, EXPERIENCE CANDIDATE!!! OBAMA HAS NO EXPERIENCE!!!
Posted by: Anonymous | March 11, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am
How about the fact that Hillary failed the Bar exam twice. She only passed after Bill moved her to Arkansas (it has a much higher pass rate than DC). She only worked for the Children’s Defense Fund for one year. The haed of it Mariane Wright Edelman was not happy with the clinton presidency because she felt that they hurt low income Americans.
Posted by: Marie | March 11, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
I have always liked and admired Geraldine Ferrarro.
I applaud her statement that Barack Obama is where he is because he is black. She is also right the media has been vicious toward Hillary Clinton and very pro-Obama in its reporting. Her statement is the plain, unvarnished truth, and I know the Obamaniacs will howl, accuse, and attack her for it.
They are among the most vicious fans/partisans I have seen in politics.
Thank You for telling the truth, Mrs. Ferraro.
Posted by: randy | March 11, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
Obama is is a African-American, but not a true African-American in all sense of the words. His father was from Kenya and his mother born in USA. Neither of his parent came from slavery to American and had to fight for a place in America. Both parents were highly educated and lived well , whether in Hawaii or USA. He has ridden on the backs of real African- Americans to get where is is today. The only thing he has in common with the true African-American is the color of his skin.
Posted by: jp,michigan | March 11, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
Just to let you know I am a republican from South Carolina(a white reprublican) and I can say it without hesitation. I have NEVER voted Democrate and never will. Ok so a Republican has said it. Even thought most of you will still assume im a democrate. Watch and see who will be the first to call me a liar.
Posted by: Tyson | March 11, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
As dumb as it sounds I think there is some truth to this. The fact that he is not an old white man, HELPS HIM in this race. Hillary is a joke and every republican in the country can and will come out to vote against her if she got the nomination. And that has nothing to do with her being a woman. Simply the fact that a lot of people can’t stand her. If Hillary wins, McCain will be the next president simply due to the fact how many people can’t stand her or anything to do with another Clinton/Bush presidency. If Obama gets the nomination he’ll beat McCain hands down, unless he’s dumb enough to put Clinton on his ticket. Being black is helping him, it’s a nice change of pace, and as dumb as it sounds, some people will feel good just so they can say they voted for a black man.
Posted by: John | March 11, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
I think people are missing the point of Ferraro’s comments. She’s stating that if Obama was a white man, he would have been vetted more at this point in the process. Truth be told, Obama is very green when it comes to politics, yet the media has mostly been fawning over him like he was a rock star.
Questioning and probing is part of the media’s job when it comes to those who seek political office. Obama has been treated with kid gloves by the press. Their objectivity has been called into question but those calls were ignored until SNL got in on the act. I feel the media has been reluctant scrutinize Obama for fear of being labeled racists and other derogatory terms. Plus a touch of dislike for Hilary Clinton has to be part of this.
Don’t get me wrong, Clinton is nearly as green as Obama. Her political career is the direct result of her husband’s name, not her own strengths.
Oh..and before I get the ‘racist’ label myself, I never stated where I stand politically. And, I’m black myself. I guess I could be called “Uncle Tom,” but only by the ignorant. He was the hero of the book.
Posted by: wright1996 | March 11, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
Well Marc, seems to me that those tiny states you refer to, are part of the United States!!! Since when do we let only 4 or 5 “big” states out of the 50 that exists decide elections for us? Its un-American and Un-Democratic.
Posted by: KnightCaptain | March 11, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
I take back my previous statements saying I’d rather vote for Ferraro over Clinton. I don’t want either of them.
What the hell! Is it *okay* to demean black people because they aren’t as important as the “Sisterhood’s” needs? Is the entire DNC packed with racists?? And it looks like they are all Clinton supporters. It’s humiliating to me as a younger white woman, that instead of sticking together, they’ll divide instead.
We have got to to get a third party in this country. Seriously. Man has this election opened my eyes to how racist the Democrats are.
Posted by: repulsed | March 11, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
People always say the blacks have had it tough…I agree they have, but Irish and and German and Italians have had it tough, too. If you were Irish, you weren’t allowed in a lot of places when they came over here. Nobody cares, because they were white. The difference between the Irish and probably the majority of blacks is the Irish said, ok, we’re going to work hard and get ahead and change the views. The blacks say, you owe us because you persecuted us. If you are black and a hard worker, you are a sellout. Not logical, people.
Posted by: sancho | March 11, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
Ferraro is an idiot and the Clintons are all liars. Black or white, it is all pink on the inside.
Hillary is where she is only because she was married to Bill, and Barak is where he is because most of us can’t stand either Bill or Hillary.
Posted by: John | March 11, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
I love watching the Democrats self destruct. Your leaders are a bunch of hypocritical clowns.
Posted by: Foxy Wizard | March 11, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
Hillary wouldn’t be where she is if she wasn’t a woman.
Where is here foreign policy experience?
Accompanying your husband abroad doesn’t cut it.
Posted by: truth | March 11, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
Enrico,
I agree with you insofar as I recognize that Obama has a liberal philosophy (you called it socialist). And I agree that there are potential problems with that… because entitlements can be counterproductive.
But where I disagree with you is in the idea that no social programs at all is a better way to go. As much as we might like to think that there is some kind of magic in the idea that “if you work hard… no matter who you are… you will get ahead”, there are a lot of situations where there are built in advantages and disadvantages for different groups.
Your point is that creating an elaborate and expensive system that wastes (your) money (and probably discourages people from taking responsibility for themselves and pursuing opportunities to better their own situation) is unfair… to you… and all other “self-reliant responsible people”. On the other hand, not doing anything about the disadvantages that exist in society is also not fair (although you may not see it that way).
The important thing is to only take measures that truly are needed and are fair so as not to create new problems. The difficult dilema that a well-meaning politican has is in the perception about what is fair. There will always be those who perceive fair mostly from their own perspective… but by and large, most people understand that also trying to see the other’s perspective helps their own group in the long run as well.
Posted by: jake | March 11, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am
Video clips don’t lie so when you see interviews of AA voters on tv being asked the question who they support, the majority of them say Clinton was a good President, the Clinton’s were good to us through their years but…
So what is the but for, they are openly saying the befitted under a Clinton presidency, but as they have OBama a AA running now, a unknown with no track record they are willing to take a chance on him, not even caring if he can deliver to them or not.
To me that shows one thing they are supporting him because of his race and nothing more.
Posted by: SJ | March 11, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am
If Hillary wasn’t a woman, where would her executive experience be?! Oh yeah, she wouldn’t have any…get back to reality people.
Posted by: Brian | March 11, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am
With Obama’s success we know Affirmative Action has succeeded to equalize society. Time to end it.
Posted by: Jack | March 11, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am
The same goes for Hillary Geraldine baby: if she wasn’t Bills wife she wouldn’t have a leg to stand on. If she even was a senator she would not be a senator of any particular note nor would she think she could drum up popular opinion for herself. The entire democratic race is setting civil and womens rights back decades. It’s a circus show and because of that a crusty old codger like McCain will probably become president and I’ll have to borrow much more money to send my kids to school. Ron Paul ’08
Posted by: Don | March 11, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am
The racist part is that we are calling a man who is 1/2 white “black.”
Obama’s mother was white.
His father was Kenyan.
He was raised by white grandparents.
Barack is not the legacy of slavery.
Why do people insist on calling him black?
Posted by: Lila | March 11, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am
To JP,Michigan ————— And do you really believe that White America gives a rats ### what heritage that a man with bron skin has? I am speaking in general terms of course and am NOT saying that all of white America is racists. But surely, being an African American (true to the word), and looking like the rest of the African Americans in this country has granted him the same stereotyical labels and racist attitudes that others AA’s in this country enjoy.
Posted by: KnightCaptain | March 11, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am
There are tons of black people who would make fine presidents (Condi Rice). In addition, there are even some democrats I’d vote for (David Boren, current president of OU, for example).
Barak is a junior senator – not even the most qualified democrat. Thus, it is clearly his race that is giving him the edge.
Posted by: Bob | March 11, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Following the race these many weeks now, it’s clear that Hillary has no more experience than Obama (years does not count) and as far as the issues, their platforms are practically identical. So it boils down to character (as there is more to being a President than having the experience.) So, since Super Tuesday, look at Hillary’s character and of those she’s surrounded herself with and look at Obama’s. Which candidate would you want in the White House? As an Independent, if Hillary “steals” the nomination, I’m voting Third Party.
Posted by: CMP | March 11, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am
If Hillary were not Bill’s enabling wife, she would not be in this position. And if she was a man (of any color) she would not be in this position. She happens to be very lucky to be attached to who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept.
Posted by: Avanti | March 11, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Listen to these democrats and what they are saying. Talk about racist and sexist. The blacks in Mississippi are openly saying their reason for supporting Obama is he is black. Middle aged women are openly supporting Hillary because she is a woman. Tell you what. I am going to vote for McCain simply because he is the only WHITE MAN running. Now I am going to sit back and listen to the hypocrisy as liberals attack me for suggesting that being a white man is a good reason to vote for McCain. Can you hear it? Here comes the liberal hypocrisy,,,its coming,,,,
Posted by: Gene | March 11, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Challenge: Read Obama’s books.
Read Hillary’s books.
Look at the words, not skin color or
gender.
Make an intelligent decision.
I did.
Posted by: Jan | March 11, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
I agree with Geraldine Ferraro completely, and I think everything Obama and his camp – and many of his supporters, as well – have done confirms it: Hillary Clinton applauds President Johnson for signing the Civil Rights Act and Obama infers that she is trying to take that away from Martin Luther King; the photo of him in Kenyan garb – what’s the big deal? If people were coming out and voting for a white candidate because he or she was white – which has been acknowledged both in television interviews and even articles written by “journalists” – people would start talking about the klan. Prejudice and racism is not an exclusively white domain. What concerns me is what will happen if there’s a backlash against it. I have never been prejudiced in my life, but I can’t help but feeling resentful of Obama playing the race card. If I feel that resentment – which really bothers me – what about people who really are prejudiced for whatever reason?
Posted by: Traci | March 11, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
LOL, the truth hurts!
Posted by: Dave | March 11, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am
Seems to me Geraldine is just saying what many people feel is true, but I won’t be surprised to see liberals demanding an apology, and Clinton distancing herself from the comments.
The message of uniting the parties is bunk, if it means uniting behind the sort of socialist claptrap Obama stands for.
Obama for President! of Cuba, that is.
Posted by: Chris, NYC | March 11, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am
I say that Obama / Geraldine ticket would get the job done!
hehehe!
Posted by: glenn | March 11, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am
Politically, I despise Geraldine Ferraro and everything she stands for. But I have to say that she is the first and only democrat to speak the exact truth about Obama. The democratic voter’s desire to prove to themselves how non-racist they are may very well saddle the Nation with an utterly inept President. It is a monstrous gamble to take with our country and with world peace. Remember: The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Posted by: Doug W | March 11, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
ferraro’s comments are precisely the reason we need to elect Obama – to cleanse ourselves of divisive politics, especially those that try to divide us on the basis of ethnicity. just like ferraro, I’m an old white lady, but I don’t care what race (or gender or religion, for that matter) my candidate is. ferraro puts a nasty crack in the rock core principles of the democratic party. to paraphrase ferraro’s divisive candidate: shame on you, geraldine ferraro.
Posted by: marie burns | March 11, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
Everyone is afraid to state the obvious
but Ms Ferraro is right on the money….
before the advent of Barack Obama’s campaign, Senator Clinton was overwhelmingly popular in the black community; the truth is ,if everything were exactly the same, but Senator Obama was Caucasian, Hillary would be getting 90% of the black vote…………….
Posted by: Mike Roberts | March 11, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
Barack Obama is half-white. Why do people always forget this?
Posted by: John | March 11, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
It’s amazing to me that people actually buy the myth that the press has been harder on Hillary. Anything she says is bought into by her following herd of mindless sheep. Wake up and do some research and see what this ruthless demagogue is all about before it’s too late.
Posted by: Dale K | March 11, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am
Ms. Ferraro is correct that if Obama was white, he would be just another nice white boy. On the other hand, if Hillary was not Bill Clinton’s wife, she would be just another female lawyer in a pant suit with an inclination to get nasty. She has ridden Bill’s coat tails her whole adult life. She has no independent accomplishmnet or experience to justify her position as a Presidential candidate.
I live in Spokane Washington, my mayor, my police chief, my US Rep, both my US Senators and my Governor are all women who made it without their husband’s coat tails, unlike Hillary. Ferraro’s claim that a woman is at a disadvantage just because of her gender is still true, but just barely in general, and not at all in Hillary’s case.
Posted by: Tom Horne | March 11, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am
These deep thoughts from an individual hand-picked to run as the Democratic Vice Presidential nominee solely because she was a woman, and who managed to lose a staggering 49 states, the largest electoral defeat in US history, in the process. You might also notice that these comments reference another candidate who wouldn’t be anywhere near the position she’s in were it not for her politically brilliant and successful husband.
Obama isn’t winning because he’s black any more than Hillary is losing because she’s a woman – he’s winning because he’s the better candidate in almost every conceivable way. He’s also winning because he is running a more or less honest and ethical campaign; something the Clinton’s would know little to nothing about.
Posted by: Richard | March 11, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am
Why are people screaming sexist of Hillary losing? Don’t they realize people just can’t stand her???
Posted by: reggie | March 11, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am
And if Hillary were a white man, she would not be where she is either……Grow up Ferraro, we are who we are and we have to deal with it
Posted by: DCM | March 11, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Why is it that the people on this board NOT SEEING the real issue here? Clinton would NOT STILL BE IN THE RACE if she was a MAN. Women have carried her far in this election and have come out in droves to vote for her. SHE constantly pander to their sympathies to get votes. I find it distasteful and disturbing.
Posted by: KnightCaptain | March 11, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Ms. Ferraro is a prime example of why our country is not united. Her racial views are more mind bottling coming from a former Democratic Politician. The Democratic Party as well as Hilary Clinton who says she is a friend of African Americans should denounce these comments from her supporter.
Mr. Obama has more skills in his toes than many in politics today. His candidacy is about what he brings to the table and real change. This is why he is the front runner. Ms Clinton and it appears her prominent supporters continuously try to make this a race issue on behalf of the Clintons… Mr. Obama represents real change as an American. He does not merely speak what the people want to hear as his opponent does.
Furthermore white woman have benefited from affirmative action much more the African Americans. The proof is all around us and in the Federal Government. Clinton’s dirty politics and the use of others to do some of their dirty work are pathetic and the DNC should put a stop to it.
Posted by: Henry | March 11, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Ferraro ought to point that political acumen at Hillary. She would not be where she is if she weren’t Bill’s wife. Every candidate is a product of his or her background. No one would care about Ferraro if she wasn’t a woman either.
Posted by: TJK | March 11, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Rich Hall, And that is why she will lose to Republicans. Too many skeletons in her and Bill’s closet that Republicans will pick at. And if there is one thing we’ve learned about the Clintons there is always another scandal just around the corner. It’s time for a change.
Posted by: John | March 11, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am
Congress has a pathetic approval rating right now…like maybe 12% compared to an also dismal rating for President Bush which is in the low 30′s. And yet we, the voters, are insanely going to pick a winner (for President) from of a bunch of losers (the Senate). We somehow need to put term limits on all politicians which will take the white, black, brown, blue, green, yellow, etc., out of politics and give us choices of folks who believe more in “we” and “I”.
Posted by: DeaconAA | March 11, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am
FERRARO IS AN IDIOT
Posted by: PEED | March 11, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am
“Yikes?”
In Jack Nicholson’s Hillary commercial, he should have added “You can’t handle the truth!”
People have been so sideswiped by Bush’s Administration they are completely dulled down and blinded by reality. Everyone’s got post traumatic stress disorder. They’re voting blindly. Reacting.
Obama HAS had an easy ride. Clinton is hugely impressive given the fight she’s led. All Obama has to do is look pretty for the cameras and steal the United Farm Workers motto from 1972 and he’s golden.
Posted by: Brooke | March 11, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am
Equality and respect has to be earned. Not just through assumption do you deserve either.
Vote democract and become part of the quagmire of the population which is clueless unless it is reported my the leftist media..
The mind without proper knowledge and direction makes you vunerable to any fool who has a smooth talk without substance.
Obama and Clinton represents the destuction of the republic.
If you vote for Obama only because he is black. Read history and learn your oppression though the years has been under a democractic controled society.
If you believe in God? Remember it is the democracts who has taken prayer out of schools, removed the ten commandments ,wants sex education in kindergarden, passes out condons to elimentary schools childern, promotes the gay society to your children ect ect ect..
Let your conscious be your guide
Posted by: MacMan | March 11, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am
If Colin Powell annouced today….people wouldn’t be able to remember Obama’s name tomorrow !!!
Colin Powell is a “PROVEN” leader as well as a “PROVEN” COMMANDER IN CHIEF !!!
Posted by: Six Gun | March 11, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am
And if Hillary didnt marry Bill, she wouldnt be where she is today. NO WAY!
Posted by: dave weirick | March 11, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am
Wow, Ms. Ferraro, shame on you for playing the race card! I bet if Obama was a white guy with the same message he would be a shoe in. The issue is that, here is a black man running for president and playing by the rules and you, Hillary, and the other racists’ folks can’t take it.
Posted by: T. B. | March 11, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am
Scary, I used to respect Geraldine Ferrar. This is so discounting of a unique individual. Why did Barack make such a hit at the last convention… Had nothing to do with him being black and all to do with his refreshing message. I am white and was so excited about this new voice in politics, why do we belittle people.. I am just tired of this deceptive politics.. We are just ugly people when it comes to politics. Its about narrow mindedness this is why we have Bush in office.
Posted by: goodwins | March 11, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am
Um, so Hillary and her surrogates can scream sexism and that is OK, but Obama’s campaign can’t even hint that there is racism going on in this campaign.
Puhleeze. And somebody please remind Ferraro that Hillary is “lucky” (though I wouldn’t want to be so “lucky”) that she is even in the running… because she is Bill’s wife!
Posted by: Jill | March 11, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am
Ferraro is absolutely correct. If Obama were to be white he would not have been come this far. Also Clinton is trailing because of white men being sexist. They don’t want to vote for a woman president. It is disappointing people are still in the old age!! Grow up America. Indira Gandhi was very successful prime minister of India. Look at benzhir bhutto!! American white men need to come out of old age!!!
Posted by: Lakshmi MD | March 11, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
Both the Obama and Clinton supporters here are correct. Neither would be where they are without a certain physical status.
Fortunately, you can vote for an accomplished leader with a long record in the Senate – John McCain.
Posted by: Illini | March 11, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
So Hillary is a “monster” and Obama is “black.”
This campain is truly about “the issues.”
Posted by: -smm | March 11, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
When will the libs ever learn to engage their brain before running their mouths?
Here’s a poem for you, libs.
A wise old owl sat on an oak.
The more he saw the less he spoke.
The less he spoke, the more he heard.
Why can’ you all be like that wise old bird.
Keep doing what you’re doing, libs. I love watching the party self-destruct.
Posted by: foxtrot | March 11, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
Wow! More feet than mouths these days. Spitzer thinks very highly of the Clinton moral compass too!
Posted by: Dante | March 11, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am
This whole thing cracks me up.
What I love the most is how, instead of saying how what she said isn’t true, Obama supporters try to project the same comment on Clinton.
Not that I don’t agree that the same issue applies to her, but the issue is that it applies either of them. I think this just goes to show how weak the party is to have two potential candidates that have really no business running.
And I totally agree with the person that mentioned that if we said we were voting for McCain because he was a white male we would be crucified. I love how we let idiots set all these boundries on what is taboo and demand apologies everytime an honest comment is made.
Posted by: Gohbias | March 11, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am
knightcaptain – while you are correct in some of your information, the rest of your post is a leap of faith based solely on stereotype and conjecture, perpetuated largely by unscrupulous democrats who seek to cultivate the idea that republicans as a whole are racist. This is a ridiculous notion given all the evidence to the contrary and is completely disengenuous.
The roles of the rep and dem parties have switched, to some degree, but not the complete 180 you claim.
It is also true that some southern dem racists switched to the rep party in the late 40′s-early 70′s, but the cold hard truth is that time and again it is democrats who have shown a tendency toward racism. It is also dems who have, time and again, introduced legislation designed to keep ‘the back community’ dependent upon the government.
Your claim about Abraham Lincoln being a democrat today has absolutely no basis in fact and, is a flight of fancy as Lincoln espoused many of the same idea’s that the republican party is SUPPOSED to stand for today (limited government, opportunity, a fair hand, etc.).
You might want to take those blinders off and get the real facts instead of mixing truth, lie and opinion then presenting it as fact.
The real fact is neither party cares about any of us and anyone who believes otherwise is deluding themselves into supporting a party who would throw you or I under the bus for the sake of political expedience. Both parties have racists, it just so happens that the dems are far more open about it and the media gives them a pass on it.
Neither party does what they say they will, neither is good for this country and until we kick Congress to the curb, elect all new representatives and institute term limits, both parties will remain under the control of the fringe idiots who are seeking to change this country into something that it was never intended to be.
Posted by: DJH | March 11, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am
If I say my top six reasons for choosing Obama were:
1) He is a voice of change in a time when it’s needed.
2) His ethics reform bill helps me believe he would at least be honest with me even if I don’t like what he has to say.
3) Being a community organizer for very little money says a lot to me about his character and his passion.
4) He’s intelligent, charismatic, and shows a ton of leadership skills and judgement.
5) His campaign – the largest organization he’s ever run – has been almost flawless.
6) His ideas for new policies (healthcare, immigration, job creation), although I don’t 100% agree with all of them, seem well thought out and reasonable.
Now, if I say, I also happen to be black – many of you ignore all of my points above and say I only like him because he’s black. You guys that do that have no idea how much that insults my intelligence!! BTW, I am college educated and make over $50,000 a year.
Posted by: nik | March 11, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am
Who is voting for Obama?Lets see college kids and blacks.What about the other 70% of the people in this country?When it comes down to the real election most college kids wont wait in the real voting lines.Its a little different waiting a hour for the primary,but when it comes to waiting hours its a little different!
Posted by: truelies | March 11, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am
What Ferraro, Hillary and her gang fail to grasp is that the nation is hungry to be lead, not pushed. Deep in her heart Hillary knows only power based change. Hillary presents herself at the best manager running for President, but, displays that she is unable to manage her own political campaign. Hillary boasts of her Whitehouse experience, what has she learned? This is her third Presidential campaign and she’s making more mistakes that a wet behind the ears newcommer. Perhaps it is that Obama has a secret skill that has evaded Hillary throughout her adult life… listening. The famous “We are going to keep talking” comment was pure campaign baloney. Even the so-called debates had scripted questions from a carefully screened audience.
As a Republican I would prefer to face Hillary in the fall for Obama understands the difference between leadership and management.
Posted by: fly4vino | March 11, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am
TJK, what does ‘mind bottling’ mean? I’m not familiar with that term.
Posted by: Doug | March 11, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am
KnightCaptain, you are kidding right? If it hadn’t been for the Republicans, the 1964 Civil Rights Act would never have passed. It is worth noting that between 1933 and 1964 there were 26 major civil rights votes. Majority of Democrats OPPOSED these 80% of the time. Majority of the Republicans voted FOR these votes over 96% of the time.
The “hero” Democrats have done very little for African-Americans! The proof is in the results! Why are so many African-Americans still struggling? Why is the dropout rate so high? Why is the unemployment rate of African-Americans so high? Why are 70% of African-American children born out of wedlock? Why is the incarceration rate of African-American male adults so much higher than other races? Why is HIV-AIDS spreading faster now within the African-American community than other races? The “hero” Democrats have done such a fantastic job! If a CEO of any company had that kind of record he would have been fired.
The Democrats don’t want to solve the problems. Instead they want to be able to always use the issues to keep getting re-elected. They know that African-Americans vote FOR THEIR RHETORIC, instead of holding THEM accountable for their LACK OF RESULTS.
Posted by: James Danley | March 11, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am
I agree with both Ferarro and the black guy, head of some gov’t equal opportunity dept., in England a few weeks ago who said thet Obama is riding on white guilt. White people have been brainwashed for at least two generations now about how evil they are toward non-whites. This is their big chance to alleviate that guilt.
Obama, has never been the director, CEO, COO, manager of anything. Both his Illinois record and his federal record are dismal at best. As a matter of fact none of the front runners have ever done anything except be on the public dole. It is a reflection of how far the U.S. has fallen, that we can not find better people, in ability, ethics and maorality to govern this once great nation.
Posted by: LB | March 11, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am
Gene: You will not here one person attack you because you are voting for McCain because you are a white man and he is a white man…or regardless if you were a woman or a black man. That is your vote and you should use it the way you feel…No one should be single out for that. Blacks are also allowed to use their votes the way they choose too. Hillary Supporters cannot stand the fact that one, she is losing and they need someone to blame. So they figure it is because of black people. I honest feel she would be struggling regardless if she was running against a white man right now as well. I just think there are allot of emotional women out that feel it is her turn and she must have it…she deserves it. A woman needs to get it…
Posted by: Karen | March 11, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am
Oh and NEWS FLASH to FERRERO!!! The media HAS NOT been biased against Senator Clinton. Its called momentum you idiot!!! March 4, 2008 was The only election day during this ENTIRE PRIMARY SEASON that she won more delegates than her opponent. (EVEN though she won New Hampshire, they split the delegate count. Even though she won Nevada, he won more delegates). The reason that the press wasn’t reporting positive stories on her was because there were hardly NO POSITIVE SORIES!! YOU HAVE TO WIN elections to get the coverage…idiot! HER campaign mismanaged her campaign funds…. Not the media, her husband did the race baiting in S.C.—- Not the media, She lost 11 contests in a row, NOT THE MEDIA, she has made more political enemies and has put more skeletons in her closet for a lifetime, NOT THE media!!! Now, she is crying foul??? If Obama had lost 11 contests in a row, he wouldn’t still be a viable candidate for President. This is ridiculous!
Posted by: KnightCaptain | March 11, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am
Hillary’s only qualification is that if she’s elected, Bill gets a third term. If she had divorced Bill and married someone else, she wouldn’t stand a chance.
Obama’s only qualification is that voting for him provides guilty white liberals a means to achieve a cathartic assuaging of their guilt; they will finally get to prove to themselves that they’re not racists.
Posted by: Bob | March 11, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am
Obama and change? Personally, rather than continuously hearing that he can bring “change we can believe in” I want to know what those changes are. More taxes? More government programs? Would somebody please ask these questions? As far as Ferraro is concerned, Obama would not be in the race if he was not an African American and Clinton would not be there either if she was not married to Bill. What a sorry state of affairs for the Dems.
Posted by: Bob | March 11, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am
Democrats profess to want a color-blind society with equality between men and women… But if you look at the voting so far, blacks overwhelmingly are voting for Obama (because he’s black), and women are overwhelmingly voting for Clinton (because she’s a woman). Objectively, neither candidate has a shred of qualification to hold the office they seek… Clinton was married to an impeached President; Obama is purely a creature of the Party – there is utterly no substance, no coherence, just the bumper sticker phrase “CHANGE” which I have seen parroted time and time again by the mindless sheeple who like to think of themselves as “progressive.” Anyone who would vote for either of these two buffoons is too stupid to have the right to vote.
Posted by: gfm2008 | March 11, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am
Judging by some the comments it is obvious to me racism is alive and well in the US. Why Ferraro would open up these wounds is amazing to me.
Posted by: John | March 11, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am
If it’s ok to vote for Obama because he’s black, is it ok to vote against him for the same reason?
If it’s ok to vote for Hillary because she’s a woman, is it ok to vote against her for the same reason?
Please give at least ten seconds of thought before answering.
Posted by: wayne | March 11, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am
I wish you Obama supporters who know so much about the Clinton’s past would do the same research into Obama’s. Everytime he complains about Hillary, he has the same shame in his background. I’m not impressed with someone who contantly says look over there to avoid talking about his issues.
Even the race issue started in Obama’s ccamp and the media edited quotes to make the Clinton’s look as horrible as possible.
The whole Iraq war thing is a ruse too. His whole I was against the war before I supported it, doesn’t pass the smell test either. He has funded the war or supported it’s cheerleaders at every opportunity, including the Patriot Act. Which he should know as a community organizer hits the poor and minorities harder than the rest of us.
(Scroll down @ link for examples of pro war Obama)
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?ItemID=12687
Anyway, I will write-in Ron Paul because he is the only true anti-war candidate. Obama, Clinton and McCain will all still be in Iraq in four years, the Patriot Act will still be abused, the Constitution will still be in tatters, the economy will still be trillions in debt with no real plan to solve it, jobs will still be shipped overseas, and the entitlements will still devalue the dollar, stealing from each of you.
If only those Dubya lovers did any research before voting for him. They would have seen all the war mongers he was surrounding himself with. Have any of you done that research with Obama? Do you know who Zbig is? Do you know Zbig formed al Qaeda to take down a super power, without taking into account they might turn to the US after taking down the USSR? Does this sound like change or like this is a continuation of Dubya’s antagonism of Russia? It sounds like Obama is going to continue the arms race that Dubya started back up.
Wake up and do some research, Obama is the Pavlov’s politician. He stole MLKs tone….JFKs words….and Ceasar Chavez’ battle cry….and this is supposed to impress me? No thanks, I will not drool support just because he is taking the short cut with Americans.
Geez….if I used this much material from these great men in any homework assignment, my mother would have tore it up and gave me a talking to. This guy is running for President and can’t come up with inspirational words of his own? Sorry, I don’t need a lazy thinker or a President trying to exploit lazy thinkers. Much like Dubya has his whole career.
Posted by: Pro War Obama/Pavlov's politician | March 11, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am
To Doug et al…
It’s hilarious to read the comments. Really, Obama inept? And we haven’t had an inept president for the last 8 years??! I mean really, how much “experience” did Dubya have?
The only reason, Hillary is remotely viable right now is because America is nostalgic for Bill’s presidency. WAKE UP folks, we’re not getting Bill we’re getting his wife, who DOESN’T have experience running the free world. Her experience as a WIFE is not grounds for her to lead.
I mean think about, Is Miranda Gates experienced enough to run Bill’s empire simply because she’s his wife? I don’t think so.
To my knowledge, Obama hasn’t been playing a “race card” – the media, and his bi-polar opponent has.
I long for the day when we really look at candidates for their character & intellect. NOT race or gender.
Bottom line, Ferraro’s comments were unacceptable.
Posted by: Sasha | March 11, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
And furthermore, where is the
Bipartisan Party? I have never seen
the name anywhere. You either vote
Rep. or Dem., that’s it. And how come
no one is interviewing Barack’s family
in Hawaii?
Posted by: Joe, NJ | March 11, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
However you want to look at it, Ferraro is just plain wrong.
She was selected as vice president in 1984 because she was a woman. She only had 6 years of experience as a U.S. representative.
Hillary is in her current position because she is Bill Clinton’s wife. She couldn’t have been able to run for the new york senate seat without Bill’s connections. She only has 7 years of experience as a elected official.
Obama spent 8 years in Illinois senate, then 3 years in U.S. senate. His 11 years of experience is more than that of Ferraro and Hillary.
Ferraro’s comment is racist and mean-spirited. She should blame Hillary for squandering her decisive advantage at the start of the election. Obama has ran a better campaign and should be commended instead of the insults and racial innuendos being lobbed at him.
Ferraro’s comment is a case of the kettle calling the pot black. Since her token VP selection she has had no meaningful political accomplishment (lost 3 senatorial races).
Posted by: AfroBaby | March 11, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
What everyone fails to see is, why the media are supporting Obama.
The Clintons have made a career out of bulling, beating up on, and censoring the media, and the media is getting their payback upon the Clintons.
Posted by: Ron Nelson | March 11, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am
To make the statement Obama is as far as he is because he is black, is the biggest lie the Clinton campaign has fostered yet. Noted black candidates Jessie Jackson, Al Sharpton, ran and did not get off first base. In Wyoming where the black population is very small Obama won 61 % of the vote. The blacks are supporting this candidate because he is stable, down to earth, intelligent, dynamic, and charismatic. Those are the reasons people from every ethnic group are supporting Obama.
Posted by: Gawania | March 11, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am
The America press “is a very sexist media”? Has Ferraro checked lately the number of women in the media? If it is sexist I would say it is in the opposite direction, that is, pro-female. Just consider the years the media has been proping up and covering up for Hillary!
Posted by: J. Amoros | March 11, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am
This seems like a very strange comment for a liberal Democrat to be making. Surely she’s not complaining about the mainstream media giving preferential treatment to a minority! But oh wait… it’s not the right minority. Or they’re favoring one minority over another minority, that’s it. I love the ironies that abound in this year’s Democratic race. I can’t believe anyone wants to vote for these fools.
Posted by: gbj11 | March 11, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am
I’m voting for Obama. The more I hear these racist comments coming from my so called feminist foremothers, the more disgusted I become. The more angry I become, and concrete in my conviction to vote for him.
Then I will do my best after the election to encourage people to turn from the Democratic party, and go independent. The only way to stop the monster, is to bleed it dry. The Democratic party wants racism, fine, let them. The Democratic Party wants partisanship, fine, let them. We’ll take our young votes, our enthusiasm, and our donations somewhere else.
Shame on the Democratic Party.
Posted by: Angry | March 11, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am
wow, Mr. genius Knight Captain, I must have offended you badly. I must admit, I your humble idiot voter is seeking knowledge about your benevolent leader. This is what I know about his mother: A white woman from Kansas who met his father in college in Hawaii. Married him and he left when Barack was small. She later married an Indonesian named Lolo Soetoro and followed him to Indonesia and lived there for several years. This is what I know about his mother. Never saw his picture with his mother, but seen his pictures with a bunch of his half brothers and sisters in Kenya. Has seen his Kenyan grandma picture too. I have read about his support for his cousin Odinga too. Like you said I must have read all these in anti Obama source. Beyond these, I only know Obama was a local politician in Illinois and two years ago got elected as US Senator, Have never sponsored an important bill and considered to be the most liberal senator in the senate (more liberal than Ted Kennedy and John Kerry). One of his big fund raiser Tony Rezko is about to go on trial for bribery and how much his link to this man, who knows? Like I said, Mr. genius Knight Captain, these all I know about your leader. I do not hear much main stream media talked about his white heritage. If you know more beyond what I have written, please educate me further.
ps: you exhibited the behavior of a cult follower. Remember what happened to Jim Jones and David Koresh followers? They all perished.
Posted by: John Doer | March 11, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am
I am Black. Black people are voting for Barack because he is Black. And I am sure there are women voting for Hillary because she is a woman. Yes there are some who are voting because of their views, but for real, this simply comes down to a White woman versus a Black man. Also, why is Barack “Black” anyway? He is bi-racial. I’m tired of mixed people claiming to be Black when it is convenient for them to be so, and bi-racial in other situations. Why are we still so hung up on race?
Posted by: why | March 11, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Hooyah! Finally a surrogate who is not afraid to speak the truth. We are human and our actions and behaviors are influenced by our prejudices IF we do not face them and speak openly about them.
As an example: Obama supports claim Edwards has the same platform. Edwards has the experience and connections Obama lacks. Edwards has more of a proven track records and working relationships required to get things done than Obama. So why would people vote for Obama over Edwards? The black voting bloc and the liberal money behind Obama are the reason.
Edwards is too white and too southern for the liberal left wing and the black voting bloc. Prejudice comes in all forms and even the experts and the data support the assertion that we as a country are more sexist than we are racist. We should not be mum on these issues – we should work to combat it openly.
There is no doubt that the democratic primaries and caucuses have been tainted by racism and sexism just as the media coverage has. Prejudice is born of ignorance – only through educating each other will it die.
Posted by: DCVoter | March 11, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am
Ms. Ferraro is right on the money. Unfortunately, the same can be said for Hillary Clinton. If she were also a white man, she wouldn’t be where she’s at. Or if her name were just Hillary Rodham. She has made it where she is today by her husband’s last name, not by any accomplishment on her own. So in all honestly, every Democratic candidate is where they are today strictly by color or marriage affiliation. Not too promising for a future presidential candidate. Neither one is qualified!
Posted by: Kathleen | March 11, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am
Maybe time for people to re-read some Wittgenstein about the “alien will”. The world is as it is and individual actors are not going to be able to impose their will on it, however benevolent that will might be. It would be more than enough if he conformed to some image of Kant’s “Categorical Imperative” by simply choosing not to exemplify that partisanship, although he will certainly have to contribute to it in some way to get anything done. A leader who seeks to end partisanship is a leader who intends to sit at his desk most of the day waiting for phone-calls to be returned.
Posted by: Oblomov | March 11, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am
The statement may be offending for people but is true. People are still racist and sexist. If they were not then Obama wouldn’t have been in the lead. Men do not want a woman president hence most of them are voting for Obama. 90% of the African-American people are leading towards Obama. If the statemnt is not true why Hilary is trailing in African-American and votes from Men. Come out of the box and think. The statement may sound offending but it is the reality. People are still sexist and racist they need to come out of the old age. It needs broad minded people to do so. Truth is always bitter.
Posted by: MD | March 11, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am
smack talk from Ferraro who’s still bitter from losing 24 years ago. Hillary wouldn’t be where she is if she hadn’t ridden Bill’s coattails for 30 years. No one would take her any more seriously than they would Laura Bush or Nancy Reagan running for President, both of whom were married to a governor and First Lady. Come on people, wake up. She’s on a ego trip and has no business in the race except for Bill and the Dem establishment pushing for a return to power.
Posted by: no more bush/clinton | March 11, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am
John,
Typically, if you don’t know what you’re talking about, you should just keep your mouth shut. If you haven’t figured it out yet, that principle also applies to posting comments on the internet. Let’s see, Columbia, Harvard Law Review Editor-in-Chief, Constitutional Law Professor, State Legislator, U.S. Senator. Not qualified? Who would be by your standard? God or some other mythical being? Also, crazy how all those black voters showed up in Utah, Iowa Wyoming, Wisconsin – oh wait, they didn’t, those states are 95% white. What were Obama’s margins there? 20%-30%? Shut your face.
Posted by: Jeff | March 11, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am
I’m a white man who’ll be writing in Ambassador Alan Keyes for President. And his skin is much darker than B. Hussein Obama’s…
I feel so racist right now.
Posted by: Alan S. Key | March 11, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am
Bottom line neither Hillary or Obama have the experience to be President. McCain does and that is how the election is going to be decided.
Posted by: Michael | March 11, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am
If you can’t run a campaign properly or watch your money evaporate before a Tuesday primary or didn’t have the political machine ready for teh long haul then maybe you aren’t ready to become president. When you whine because everyone attacks you and blame it on being a women then maybe you aren’t ready for president.
Lets face it, while I don’t like Obama’s policy he is charismatic. The same can not be said for Hillary Clinton. Her failure and loss is her’s alone. She was the front runner and blew it. She said slighted Mississipi because she assumed the race would finished by now. Her husband was a political liability because of his temper (much worse than John McCain’s). Her campaign will be a textbook example of what not to do.
Obama is where he is because of who he is not what he is.
Posted by: Ronald | March 11, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am
Geraldine Ferraro needs to take her old behind and sit down and shut up. If Barack Obama were “white” he would have already won the democratic nomination. The hold up is stupid, narrow minded people like Geraldine who has sour grapes because her ‘I am a woman’ VP candidacy FAILED!!! Geraldine is a LOSER!!!!!!!
Posted by: Lisa Lloyd | March 11, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am
Obama sounds good, but he really doesn’t say all that much. He is a bit of a demagogue. That is the last thing we need.
Posted by: Steven A. Colantuoni | March 11, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am
Let’s keep history straight!
Whites have enslaved whites.
Blacks have enslaved blacks.
Whites have enslaved blacks.
I would certainly bet that blacks have enslaved whites also.
It’s only racism when it goes against a Clinton, no such thing when it is in their favor.
Posted by: Simple Mind | March 11, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am
I’m thinking Clinton wouldn’t be in this position without her beloved husband.
Posted by: Brent | March 11, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am
TO DJH and JAMES DANLEY—————— It seems that I offended some of you with my earlier post about the portrayal of the democratic and republican parties. I can understand how my post may have been misinterpreted as saying all republicans are racist. This IS NOT the case. The fact of the matter is that most racists consider themselves conservatives, which make up the base of the republican party. I am certainly not saying that all conservatives are racist— just that most racists are conservative. Furthermore, Racism is a “way of thinking”. YOU CAN NOT END RACISM BY PASSING A SERIES OF LAWS!!! You can not force people not to have a racist mentality. The only thing you can do is educate them. Yes democratic politicians have passed laws that make African Americans dependant on the government. But, after the way blacks in this country were treated, do you really believe they would have made it on their own, with No education, no money to pay for an eductation and NO way of being excepted into schools and getting jobs from people who still had racist ways of thinking—- not to mention still being bitter over the fact that Civil Rights Laws were being passed!!!
Posted by: KnightCaptain | March 11, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am
HER COMMENTS DO NOT STAND UP TO THE SCRUTINY OF SOUND LOGIC.
ANY THINKING DESK EDITOR SHOULD HAVE PLACED THIS STORY IN FILE 13
Posted by: justaseer | March 11, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am
Can anyone answer this question for me? Because to me it looks like Obama’s Mama commited welfare fraud.
She comes back and leaves Obama with his Grandparents in Hawaii. Who have enough money to send him to private school, while she goes off and completes her degree.
Sorry, but if the Grandparents are well off enough to live in Hawaii and send Obama to private school. And Obama’s Mama was only able to collect welfare because of being a single mother, but he isn’t with her.
Something stinks!
Posted by: Obama's Mama welfare fraud | March 11, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am
Another enlightened Hillary voter. She is where she is entirely because she was married to a great politician. She is only a senator because of this, and only has the infrastructure and support she has because of this. There is not one accomplishment that she has achieved independant of this.
To say Barack is only where he is because he is black, is silly. Of course he is! He also is only where he is today because he is a great politician, an inspirational figure, and a genuine person. All 3 things cannot be said for Hillary…
And if we really want to complain about this, how about Bush who is part of a lineage of aristocrats, including a former president.
It’s the typical logic free, racist, biased, and genuinely hurtful to the party comments that are typical of the Hillary-elite.
The media is unfair to Hillary, even though they are still treating her candidacy like it still exists, and not pointing out that the only possible way she can win at this point is to lie, cheat, and steal the nomination from the elected candidate and destroy her own party…
Posted by: Dan T | March 11, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am
Hmmmm. Does anyone else get a sinking feeling in their stomach when they read comments on the internet? I sincerely hope these capricious and emotionally fed points of view are not a portent of whats to come in the future. I believe it was Aristotle who said “It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain an idea without accepting it.” I am entertaining the idea that people don’t really automatically hate someone who has an opposing view point. I hope I can accept it some day, though it seems unlikely. If you don’t like Obama/Hillary/McCain, thats fine. But what makes you so special that everyone should think like you?
Posted by: sad comment reader | March 11, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am
Ferraro is an ‘old school’ Democrat just like the Clintons: entitled to make any racial, ethnic or personal attack against anyone who dares not acknowledge their supreme right to rulership. They are Terminators, remorseless career and reputation destroyers devoid of the simple attributes of guilt and shame. I’ll bet when Hillary, Geraldine and Bill are on the phone the n-word flies with abandon. THEY are the vast right-wing conspiracy!
Posted by: John Gault | March 11, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am
Ferraro hit the nail on the head! Is Obama a bright guy? Absolutely. He’s also a great politician who takes advantage of every possible resource at his disposal and that includes the race card that he and his supporters play everyday. (Without Oprah’s backing the nomination would have been decided long ago.) Bush spoke to the far right (their poster boy) and talked about bringing people together. Obama speaks to the far left (now they have a poster boy too) and talks about bringing people together. Clinton & McCain have baggage from both in & out of their parties, but they also actually have a history of working with the other party and really have brought people together, despite their baggage. Let’s stop the wild swings of the pendulum and have liberals for a real change, not just a fantasy.
Posted by: Salvatore | March 11, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am
I would like to address the comment as to why Obama is leading Hillary in African American votes. Americans have forgotten in the beginning of this race, how much African Americans supported the Clintons. We loved the Clintons, but then the Clintons showed their “true colors” with their remarks about King/Johnson, a fairy-tale, and now even against Mississippi. Senator Obama is not offending African Americans or any other Americans. That is a big DIFFERENCE. Hillary and Bill need to stop throwing stones at their supporters.
Posted by: Jasmine Black | March 11, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am
If he was a white man he wouldn’t be getting %90 of the African American vote. Therefore, you could say that this is correct…he wouldn’t be here.
Posted by: a | March 11, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am
Would Hillary be where she is without all those women voting for her in New Hampshire? I’m sick of feminists who think that minorities have it so easy and women have it so hard. As a female minority, I take major umbrage with it. Sexism and racism still both exist in different ways (apples and oranges) and the success of these candidates has to do with everything they have to offer – experience, policies, leadership skills, personality, height! It can never just come down to race or gender. Way to belittle all of us.
Posted by: HM | March 11, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am
The rationale of the Clinton camp seems to be “if you can’t beat him, insult him and destroy his character to the point that even when he wins the nomination he will loose to McCain. Geraldine Ferraro is using the race card because she can see what is obvious to just about everyone now, that Hillary Clinton can not win! What exactly is Ferraro’s claim to fame? That she was the first white female to be selected on a presidential ticket! These statements are being calculated by the Clinton camp to inject race into this election and it’s disgusting! Would that be fair? Of course not, I’m sorry but Ferraro’s statement is indeed racist and it suggests desperation on the part of the Clinton’s. Hillary is having her surrogates do her dirty work for her by coming out with these outrageous statements. This should be a headline story in the media right now.
Posted by: Lee | March 11, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
I’m an African-American and I’m supporting Hillary Clinton. I can’t begin to tell you the reverse racism I’ve received from other African Americans since I began supporting my candidate. I’ve been asked how can I vote for Hillary when I’m black. I was told I ought to be ashamed of myself by not voting for Barack. The majority of African Americans I know are voting for Barack Obama simply because he’s black, not that he has the experience or the qualifications to hold the office…..It’s really sad.
Posted by: Eric | March 11, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
What is it about politics that brings out the worse in people?
Posted by: What is it | March 11, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am
Notwithstanding all the other reasons I have little respect for Hillary as a leader, I find it hard to have respect for anyone that uses their first name on all of their signage and promotional materials.
Hillary for President?!!…Texans for Hillary?!!
You would think she is running for student body president.
Would a male candidate get away with:
John for President…
Barack for Commander in Chief…
Mitt for President?
I want a leader I can trust, not a prom queen trying to win a popularity contest.
Then again, the Hillary campaign is resorting to grade school tactics when it comes to trying to get an edge over Barack Obama.
I have great respect for anyone who earns it, be they women, African American, Latino, white, etc…
Key word is EARN.
Posted by: Jude | March 11, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am
at least someone speaks the truth out there – but besides that – obama can not close the deal – and winning in caucus’ means nothing when the general election is a primary – popular vote wins teh electoral votes…… and if he is the nominee a lot of votes will go republican just due to the experience issue
Posted by: sokica | March 11, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am
My only bias is on position. I believe that the feminist are the most sexist people in the country. I believe that activist blacks are the most racist people in the country. I am a conservative. I would vote for Condi but not Hillary. I would vote for JC Watts but not Obama. I would vote for Colin Powell, but not Obama. I don’t care about color or gender. I do care if the person wants to have big socialized government. I won’t vote for socialists, white, black, man or woman. I believe in self responsibility and equal opportunity, not shared responsibility and equal outcomes. I believe if you aren’t willing to work for it, you shouldn’t get it.
Posted by: Gene | March 11, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am
I think when us young republicans discuss ending partisanship, we mean the mindless objections to EVERYTHING that comes out of the opposing party’s mouth and the mean-spirited, win at all costs, divise Clintonian political tactics.
Posted by: Deuce | March 11, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am
It’s a dumb thing to say. No one is lucky how they were born. It just is. No luck involved. He could not have been a woman or a white man for he would then not be the person we see before us today.
Posted by: Dave | March 11, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am
Is Ferraro a racist? Her comments suggest she is. Does she understand that we wouldnt even be talking about Clinton if Ross Perot were not in the race in 1990. Bill Clinton was the accidental president who would not have otherwise been elected and she wouldn’t be the senator from NY and now a presdential candidate were she not a woman and not married to Bill. Them there are the facts. and ferraro would not have been the vp candidate either were she not a woman. She was trading on her sex but it was okay for her.
Posted by: sigmund fraud | March 11, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am
If the proof that men are sexist and blacks are racist is that they vote for Obama over HRC, then by the same logic, then all these white women voting for Hillary are both sexist and racist!!!
Whoa!!!!
Posted by: FAI | March 11, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am
I love people who are honest!!!!
Posted by: Cindy, Calfiornia | March 11, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am
I too am shocked at the way black vote turned out. Ferraro was absolutely right, a two term state senator and a two year veteran of US senate some how can bring change sounds rather dubious. Also white liberal guilt and GW major screw ups has more to do with Obama’s ascendency than anything else.
At the point in time Obama is the wrong candidate for the country. In fact, cold feet will push many to vote for McCain, if Obama were the nominee.
Elot Spitzer was Harvard Law Review editor too; look where it got him.
Posted by: Jay | March 11, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am
What I can’t understand is how is this ‘woman’ going to complain about the appeal of Obama just because he is a black candidate? Her response to his appeal could not be further from the truth and for some reason Hillary Clinton and her supporters are trying to make this Democratic race about ‘ethnic’ race. I guess that is the only thing they can grab onto and hope that the country finally realizes it, LOL. It’s an absurd comment and she will probably have to defend herself by the days end and then apologize, LOL. I guess she is not in the Senate because of the women that suffered before her and made it possible for a woman to even vote! Think about that Geraldine!
Posted by: tiger | March 11, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am
because a black man could not possibly be talented, intelligent and dedicated enough to successfully run for the office.
Posted by: Louis | March 11, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am
Obama went to private high school and college on scholarships based on need and merit. He paid for law school with student loans.
Posted by: JoAnne | March 11, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am
I love people who toss out such blanket statements and actually believe they are intelligent ones. I would beg to differ that most racists are conservative. That is another misconception embraced by the majority. Just look at Geraldine’s comments, they are racist. People get so high a mighty they forget to judge themselves first. Any decision, positive or negative that is based on race is racism. Therefore, majorities of whites and blacks etc are racist to some degree. We need to live in a world where race really does not matter. Voting for or against anyone based on race and not the issues is narrow minded and ultimately foolish.
Posted by: LJO MA | March 11, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
If this had been a republican, she would have been villified in the press and branded a racist
Posted by: R P Foster | March 11, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
Maybe Ms Ferraro could tell us where in the political heirarchy Hillary Rodham would find herself today if it wasn’t because she is married to Bill Jefferson Clinton. Hillary Rodham is where she is today because she carries the Clinton name.
Posted by: Marco | March 11, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am
To John Doer——————— Yeah, most of your informoation is from an anti Obama spin source. Its true that Obama called Odinga, before a New Hampshire speech. He called him to URGE him to to sit down and start a peace process. He tried to do the same with the Kenyan President, but he was unavailable. Also, THAT ELECTION WAS RIGGED!!! Most international observers agree that the election process had been severly tampered with. I am NOT condoning the violence that took place as a result, but do not distort the facts.
I have read almost every negative thing out there about Obama, as well as Clinton and McCain. I don’t buy hardly any of it. Obama speaks of his mother in almost every speech he gives. And besides, why is any of this important? Clinton does no speak of her parents. McCain, on the other hand has his Mom at some of his campaign events. I am sorry if I offended you, but I hate it when people post non-factual things and spread lies about a good person becuase they HATE how successful he or she has become.
Posted by: KnightCaptain | March 11, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Thank you Geraldine Ferraro!
Finally, it’s been said. I was wondering when it would happen. It’s time to stop dancing around it and finally have a frank national discussion regarding race. Ferraro brings up a good point… and there are others, though.
1. Why is this man so hypersensitive over his middle name and a photo op of him wearing funny garb? Why not just say that’s my middle name… “when in Rome”… instead of accusing the Clinton Camp of derogatory tactics?
2. If he is so “comfortable in his own skin” as I have heard people say like Daschle and Mahr, why do I not hear that from African Americans… Jessie Jackson is not the only one that questions his blackness.
3. Is he more qualified because he is black?
These and many more should be addressed… if he is to be our first Black President… then let him be on par with our first black Supreme Court Justice (Thurgood Marshall); the man who broke baseball’s color line (Jackie Robinson); and the pantheon of Blacks/Afrincan-Americans who have added to American discourse on race and society: Angelou, Douglas, Rice, Powell, Woods, King, Parks, Ali, and on and on…
Let’s have a grand discussion… and yes, let’s throw in sex and gender too. Let’s hash this all out so that when we vote for our President, the Leader of Our Country, it is because he or she is the best person for the job and not elected out of a sense of guilt or shame!
2.
Posted by: smartprimate | March 11, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am
There are a lot of people out there that know nothing at all about politics, the world situation, or anything that doesn’t involve their job, sex or entertainment TV. They think electing a President of the United States is just like electing the Student Body President in High School and think it is “time” to elect a black guy. In addition they have found a nominal black person who is half-white, half African and was raised either out of this country or in Hawaii. He represents American Black men like Barbie represents American White women. J.C. Watts would wipe the floor with him in any debate and is 10 times as qualified to be President. He is also an ACTUAL BLACK AMERICAN not a mannequin.
Posted by: moronpolitics | March 11, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am
Hillary is going to play “chicken” with the DNC and she will not flinch. Does Obama have the stomach to do the same?
Hillary figures if she tears down Obama enough the Supers will have no choice but to put her on the top of the ticket.
Obama inspires while Clinton mires. I hope Barry runs for gov of Illinois before accepting a VP spot on the ticket.
Posted by: TbT2 | March 11, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am
Who cares what Gender or Race the Candidate is, what is important for voters is what has he actually accomplished thru his experience done to merit a vote for the most important office in this world.
Posted by: Richard Bond | March 11, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am
The Real Question is:
Will Hillary reject and Renounce Geraldine?
Will she denounce and decry Gerry?
And as said below if a Republican said this type of thing you’d have a FIRESTORM.
Posted by: The Commander Guy | March 11, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am
As a black woman I find Obama offensive. He is so busy catering to the black voters as if he is only going to be their president. He is ashamed of his mother, the one who raised him, because he wants to identify with the Kenyan man who left HIM and his wife. Does anyone see the logic in that? He is not a man, but a coward.
Posted by: Delores Williams | March 11, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
it’s the media, stupid. Just google “Obama Clinton media bias”
Posted by: mvwdcool | March 11, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
Obama: Is hope for millions of people in America. Hope that they have never seen before. Hope for change.
Obama, is half white, raised by white parents & grand parents, raised in white america.
My dad is white so I know that some old school blacks would say he’s not black. I knew 3 black people growing up and they are far different than blacks that I ran while visiting cities in the 48 states.
Fact is this black and white, women or man thing doesn’t matter. He sounds good and everyone is tired of hearing the same old thing year after year.
I talked to people nothing has changed in poor black neighborhoods and poor white neighborhoods in 30 years. Bush, Clinton, Bush did not do anything for jobs in South East USA, Bush Alaska, Idaho, NJ, Long Island and etc…. What did they really do NOT a thing has changed for struggling people. OBAMA speeches sounds good people love that I love that! I am pro johnny mac myself but I would rather listen to OBAMA than hear Clinton or John speak.
Posted by: cayto | March 11, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Obama: Is hope for millions of people in America. Hope that they have never seen before. Hope for change.
Obama, is half white, raised by white parents & grand parents, raised in white america.
My dad is white so I know that some old school blacks would say he’s not black. I knew 3 black people growing up and they are far different than blacks that I ran while visiting cities in the 48 states.
Fact is this black and white, women or man thing doesn’t matter. He sounds good and everyone is tired of hearing the same old thing year after year.
I talked to people nothing has changed in poor black neighborhoods and poor white neighborhoods in 30 years. Bush, Clinton, Bush did not do anything for jobs in South East USA, Bush Alaska, Idaho, NJ, Long Island and etc…. What did they really do NOT a thing has changed for struggling people. OBAMA speeches sounds good people love that I love that! I am pro johnny mac myself but I would rather listen to OBAMA than hear Clinton or John speak.
Posted by: cayto | March 11, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Arguing about race and experience is really blinding voters from the big question. Neither candidate has any real plans to offer the American people. Sure they speak about universal health care and end the war in Iraq but neither has really drawn out a plan of how to carry these things out. Obama is probably the biggest offender choosing to stand merely on the platitudes of hope and change. Why should I be hoping? What change can I expect?
On a side note: As someone who has experience hiring, I’ve never listened really to what a person says they are going to do but rather focus on what they have accomplished. Words are nice but action is real.
Posted by: LIbertyCrisis | March 11, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Everyone shut up! Hillary is OWED the presidency because she put up with Bill for all these years. Plain and simple. We need a European socialist in the White House so we can be more like France! USA as we knew it is over! Just accept it. 8 more years of Bill and Hillary yea!!!!As a country ..it’s what we deserve.
Posted by: Snoop Dog | March 11, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
Her comments never shock me personally because we’re living in a country where some group of people believes they’re superior than any other group of people all because of their skin color. And that’s the reason why non of my family members will ever vote for clinton period and about Ferraro comments probably she need to know we’re not living in stone age anymore someone have to put that in her little brain “RACISM” is like cancer spread everywhere let end it we’ll definitely heal our nation.
Posted by: Abdul | March 11, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
Ms. Ferraro seems to forget that she was picked up as the VP running mate for Mondale ONLY because she was a WOMAN. She had no experience whatsoever. The Dems picked her up because they thought it would bring out the mommies to vote. NOTE: Mondale only took one state in that election — Minnesota (his home state).
Posted by: MichWolverine | March 11, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
OK, So Geraldine Ferraro was politically incorrect and said what should be unspoken?
How does a Senator with one year of service and some part time service as a State Senator suddenly become the most qualified person in the country to be President?
People, we need to think this through!
Posted by: A L | March 11, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
Now its time for Hillary to distance herself from these ignorant and ill-advised comments. Both Hillary and Geraldine wouldn’t be where they are if it wasn’t for the political status of they’re husbands. Grumpy old women nagging. That’s all this is.
Hillary? Do the right thing and fire Geraldine from your campaign just as Mr. Obama did when Samantha Powers lost her cool although we all know that Hillary truly is a monster.
Posted by: Joris | March 11, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
I wonder why my comment was deleted.
Posted by: ron.paul56 | March 11, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
GERALDINE FERRARO’S COMMENTS WERE RIDULOUS. WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME SOMEONE GOT SO FAR BECAUSE OF BEING BLACK. **WHEN DID WE NOT POLARIZE OUR VOTES AROUND WHITES WHEN MOST ELECTIONS ONLY CARRY THOSES CHOICES. EVEN WHEN ELECTIONS CARRY BLACK CANDIDATES THEY DO NOT NORMALLY GET THE MAJORITY BLACK VOTE. BLACKS DO NOT STICK TOGETHER BECAUSE OF THEIR BLACKNESS. THAT IS ONE OF THE ONGOING PROBLEMS OF OUR COMMUNITIES UNLIKE OTHER ETHNIC GROUPS. HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF THE CRAB MENTALITY? THE PREVIOUS BLACK CANDIDATES NEVER GOT OFF THE GROUND IN THE PRESIDENTIAL RACES. TO SAY OBAMA IS HERE BECAUSE OF THE BLACKS SUPPORT OTHER BLACKS IS NOT TRUE, HOWEVER BLACKS, WHITES, SOME HISPANICS, ASIANS, INDIANS, ARE SUPPORTING OBAMA
Posted by: Gawania | March 11, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
First play the race card. If it doesn’t work, play the gender card. If that doesn’t work, go back to the race card. Brilliant!!
O8AMA!!
Posted by: Richard | March 11, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Regardless of color, Obama is one hell of a candidate. Deal with it. Ferraro should resign. She and Hillary are not doing the party any service bad mouthing a fellow dem. These tactics will potentially backfire and the end result will be a McCain presidency. That’s fine if you want to continue down the same path.
Posted by: dan | March 11, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
What this country needs is a good biracial candidate who would be willing to admit it! You can bet that if B.H.O. were a Republican, the media and the DNC would reveal him to be biracial and depreciate his claimed racial purity.
Posted by: Jerry | March 11, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
“As a black woman I find Obama offensive. He is so busy catering to the black voters as if he is only going to be their president. He is ashamed of his mother, the one who raised him, because he wants to identify with the Kenyan man who left HIM and his wife. Does anyone see the logic in that? He is not a man, but a coward.”
First of all, if anyone believes this Delores character is a black woman, I’ve got a bridge to sell you. Secondly, where’s your evidence that Obama caters to a black audience? The overwhelming wins in Iowa, Wisconsin, and several other states that have a small black minority? Maybe the sea of white faces in the crowds at his rallies? Yeah, that proves it, I guess.
And finally, where do you come off with this ridiculous notion of his being ashamed of his mother? For someone ashamed of his mother, he sure talks about her a lot (his stump speech never fails to mention his mother was white).
Shame on you, “Delores.”
I won’t even touch on that other poster’s “Obama’s Mama on welfare” rant, except to say you’re doing Clinton no favors.
Posted by: Darrin | March 11, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
I think what Ferraro says may not be completely true but there is a lot of life in her statement. After all, Obama has been winning the African American vote by great margins and his campaign pulls the race card all the time. It is getting so ridiculous how it seems no one can say anything about what and who he really is. He is black, everyone can SEE that. He does have a middle name Hussein. Its the truth. Obama’s campaign is always trying to stir up the race card to their advantage and fortunately for them it always works.
Posted by: mona | March 11, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
I don’t care what you think about him being black, I just hope you liberal weiners screw it up for each other.
Posted by: Uncle | March 11, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
Vote for change. what change? What record? Lot of words without substance. What has this Obama done? what change and how does he get there?.He brings absolutely NOTHING to the table. Wake Up People…….
Posted by: tc | March 11, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
Vote for change. what change? What record? Lot of words without substance. What has this Obama done? what change and how does he get there?.He brings absolutely NOTHING to the table. Wake Up People…….
Posted by: tc | March 11, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
I’m ashamed of you Geraldine for making these remarks. I wonder if you have ever thought about why so many WHITE men have been in so many positions of authority? For each one, I bet you will find that there are a myriad of reasons which are not likely associated with sheer character. When you ran for president, you got as far as you did very likely because of the fact that you are a woman and many women voted for you believing that you would see their point of view. Many blacks and whites alike have voted for Barack Obama, all with their own reasons. Whether those reasons involve race or the freshness and hope of change- is really up to the individual voter. I am an Obama supporter and am also Black. My reasons for voting for Obama have very little to do with race. As a matter of fact, I was, at one time, a Hillary supporter. Geraldine- You villify Obama because of race. Why not call to question some of the White male leaders- Did you vote for them only because they were White? Will you not vote for Obama only because he is Black? Did people vote for you because you are a woman? Or did they refuse to do so for that reason? I had no idea how small minded you are until reading this article. Playing the race card is not appealing, Geraldine.
Posted by: Nicki | March 11, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
I can’t say that I ever thought much of Ferraro…but she is right. If Obama was white, he would just be another smooth talking white guy. Black America would be supporting Hillary, and This dude would have pretty much lost most if not all the primaries (since he would not own the black vote.) Thems the facts folks.
Posted by: dilbert | March 11, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
And the only reason Hillary is where she is is because she is Bill Clinton’s wife.
Posted by: Warren | March 11, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Gerry and the Mondales . . . where have you been?
We need another sexist racist comment like yours to keep race baiting alive and well in the ole US of the Affended.
Don’t anyone believe Obama thinks he is white. The hate filled rhetoric that has been espoused from his minister’s altar have been nothing short of anti white and anti America. Do a google search and listen for your self. The half white don’t like my type and he is a leftist. Makes Ms. Rotten smell almost tolerable. Not quite though!
Gerry, can you imagine if, say, Newt had made that comment . . . holy cow! Sharpton, Jesse and the rest of the black kkk would have a coronary.
Folks, wake up, he real racists, haters and stiflers of achievement today are in the Democratic party. The enemy within . . . . !
Posted by: Hans | March 11, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
Mrs.Ferraro is 100% correct.
The US Media is biased with a woman but not with man.
Media is not pampering or gives any importance to Obama-Rezko relationship,Canadian NAFTA isssue, Mrs.Powers/Obama double take on Iraq.
As per the Media Obama is a nice guy but in real there are lof ot hidden things which media is failing to bring out.
POOR MEDIA. NOBAMA PLEASE.
Posted by: johnyeng | March 11, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
affirmative action at work.
Posted by: Jason | March 11, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
Feminists are in a snit because Obama is able to use his skin color as a ticket to the big dance. They overlook and should be offended by the fact that Hillary’s ticket was minted and franked by her husband. Face it, she is no more qualifed to be president than Obama is–she is where she is because of her husband! One uses his skin color, the other uses her husband.
Posted by: Drake | March 11, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
OOOH, Im on the internet, posting my ideas, as if ANYONE REALLY CARES. BLAH BLAH BLAH, yak, yak, yak, yadda yadda yadda. Im important, people listen to what I write and I have enemies who call me names. But in my pompous self agrandizing way, I am now the spokesperson for all people either liberal or conservative. POLITICS IS SOOOO BOOORRRRINNNG!!
Posted by: John Q Idiot | March 11, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
(I AM RE-POSTING THIS COMMENT, BECAUSE THE ORIGINAL COMMENT APPARENTLY WAS EDITED.)
RUSH LIMBAUGH IS FIRED BY ESPN BECAUSE HE SUGGESTED THAT THE MEDIA WANTED A MINORITY QUARTERBACK TO SUCCEED.
FERRARO FLAT OUT STATES THAT THE ONLY REASON OBAMA IS A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE IS BECAUSE HE IS BLACK. CLEARLY A RACIST STATEMENT.
WILL THE MEDIA AND CLINTON’S CAMPAIGN HOLD HER ACCOUNTABLE??
(WHY WAS THE FIRST PARAGRAPH EDITED FROM MY ORIGINAL STATEMENT?)
Posted by: PAT | March 11, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
Senator Clinton has not accomplished the things she has because of Bill Clinton but in spite of Bill Clinton. Personally, I would have divorced him long ago, but just as his sexual escapades had no bearing on his ability to be one of the greatest Presidents in history, neither does her decision to remaind married to him have any bearing on her abilities as Senator or to be President.
Posted by: DCVoter | March 11, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
HILLARY CLINTON’S EXPERIENCE FOUND!!!
It is well known, for example, that she led the failed effort to pass universal health insurance. There is no reason to believe, however, that she was a key player in foreign policy at any time during the Clinton Administration. She did not sit in on National Security Council meetings. She did not have a security clearance. She did not attend meetings in the Situation Room. She did not manage any part of the national security bureaucracy, nor did she have her own national security staff. She did not do any heavy-lifting with foreign governments, whether they were friendly or not. She never managed a foreign policy crisis, and there is no evidence to suggest that she participated in the decision-making that occurred in connection with any such crisis. As far as the record shows, Senator Clinton never answered the phone either to make a decision on any pressing national security issue — not at 3 AM or at any other time of day.
Just a grumpy ole Grandma boosting cookies and muffins as her own when she purchased them from a bakery. WHAT SUCKAS!
Posted by: Joris | March 11, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
I heard Barack Obama is going to change the name of the White House to just “House.”
Posted by: Bob | March 11, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
I thought you Democratic folks liked affirmative action. So what’s the beef if Obama gets ahead? Or do you think gender is supposed to trump race? In any event, I am enjoying the spectacle.
Posted by: SamuelBerry08 | March 11, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
If it wasn’t for playing the race card, Her Royal Clinton’s campaign would have folded long ago. Every ploy the Clintonistas use is merely their way of whispering, “Beware. He’s black.”
Posted by: Len | March 11, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
I love it someone mentioned JFK.”Now John dont go wasting money on votes you dont need to buy” Joe Kennedy.I lived in Mass for 18 years and the Kennedys are the biggest crooks!Ya keep on comparing them,everything JFK touched he messed up.Ya Cuban missle crisis was a good one and the Bay of Pigs.I guess you could compare them,thats the problem with youth and inexperience.
Posted by: lossofsight | March 11, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
What’s the matter, Geraldine? Why can’t you get past the color of his skin? Is it that offensive to you? Sorry you lost your bid back in the 80′s, but racism isn’t as rampant as it was back then. So you can take you and your dinosaur ramblings back to wherever it is that you came from. It’s time for the Old Guard to step down, and you and Hillary are both part of the Old Guard.
Posted by: Dave | March 11, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
I used to think that Democrats just hated Rebublicans. Now, I see that they just hate.
Posted by: Stewart | March 11, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
Geraldine just wants to cash in on a nice sinecure in the Clinton II Whitehouse. No doubt she has purchased a mansion for one of her grandchildren.
Posted by: Bruce Josloff | March 11, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
thank you, geraldine ! finally someone has the cojones to speak the plain truth. barack is not qualified to be the president and has been getting a free ride from folks who either support him because he is (half) black or because they think it makes them cool to have a (half) black ‘friend’.
should he become the candidate, there is going to be a lot of buyer’s remorse in the democratic party when it loses big again.
Posted by: el polacko | March 11, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
Gerladine is Governor Rendel in drag.
Posted by: Bart Simpson | March 11, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
Finally, a party luminary who has enough backbone to call the situation as is. If the black vote were split %60-40 Obama-Clinton, Democrats would not have this quandary. If only about %30 of black vote for Clinton today in MS, it will be a miracle.
Posted by: esvida | March 11, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
She should know.Why does she think she was on the ticket? Also, Whaaaa! about the press coverage. Perhaps she could switch parties for a minute and see what bias is all about.
Posted by: tommyp | March 11, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
People, look at the big picture. Electing a black man with an African father and a Muslim name sends an important message to the world (and ourselves) that electing a white woman on the basis that she was a former president’s wife cannot.
That message is, “We get it. We’re real sorry about how we’ve behaved the last eight years and, by the way, we’re well on the way to transcending our sordid racist past. We’re ready to talk to you and work with you instead of exploiting your resources and squashing you like a bug if we don’t like you.”
Now how is electing Hillary going to do that? And yes, Hillary is “shrill” when she’s not being pompous or shedding tears or droning off an endless list of empty promises. Just like she’s being racist when her ads and her surrogates do their damnedest to stoke America’s not-so-latent phobias about blacks and Muslims.
Take a look at the editorial in today’s NYT. Did you see any black kids in that “3:00 AM phone call” ad? Did you hear her denounce the rumors that Barack is a Muslim (not that it would matter)? She is a sleazy fearmonger who will stoop to anything in her quest for power, power she thinks is hers regardless of what voters have to say.
Posted by: JR | March 11, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
Would we have ever heard of Hillary had she not married President Clinton? She might be running for Town Council somewhere, but that’s about all!
Posted by: Craig | March 11, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
Ferraro is an embarrassment to the female race. She’s a total moron and wouldn’t be where she is if it wasn’t for her husband.
Obama is where he is because he has charisma, charm and is just plain likeable.
Hillary is just the opposite; she’s crass, talks down to people, etc.
Months ago Karl Rove put it best when he stated she’s a flawed candidate and will be beaten.
Posted by: Chevy | March 11, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
Hillary or Barak? It doesnt matter. Both are liberals who, if elected, will increase your taxes, increase the size of government, turn to socialism, squash free enterprise, reduce individual rights, promote ‘victimization’, promote class envy and class warfare, promote isolationism versus globalization, and continue to deny domestic oil drilling, nuclear power and hydroelectric power plants… among other things. SOCIALISM DOES NOT WORK! Hillary says she will take ‘BIG OIL’ profits from them because they are too large…if this were to happen, why would ANY business STAY in business?? THEY WOULDN’T! There is no incentive to work hard and make money, if you’re just going to have to give it to the government. But of course, Hillary and Barak know better than we do what to do with our money – we are too stupid and helpless to think for ourselves. Both of them needs to take an Economics 101 class…God help us if either of them are elected president!
Posted by: USA hosed if Dems win | March 11, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
Rush Limbaugh was fired for suggesting a black man received favorable treatment because of his race.
However, the most hypocritical item here is that Ferraro uses the race issue to suggest Obama is gaining favoritism but still uses the old tired liberal whine that a woman is losing ground due to her gender. Am I the only one who screams every time a lib breaks out the squiggly line for their own personal benefit?
Posted by: Steve | March 11, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
Again, Geraldine Ferraro reminds the US why she isn’t taken seriously.
Posted by: Mike, Fredericksburg VA | March 11, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Obama is a Harvard Law educated politician with more time in elected office than Hillary Rodham Clinton. He worked his way up to his position by being a successful community organizer, successful congressman, and successful senator. Hillary is where she is because she is the abused wife of a compulsive. She is not a leader – well documented, is a congenital liar – well documented, and failed at producing changed – well documented with her health policy.
I am ashamed that Geraldine Ferraro would step up to do a calculated hit on any political figure. Shame on her.
Posted by: disambiguates | March 11, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Eric, it does surprise me that you are receiving reverse racism in spite of supporting a Liberal Democrat. Usually Republican African-Americans are the target of the reverse racism. That is why so few Republican African-Americans run for public office — it’s certainly not for a lack of potential candidates.
KnightCaptain, I was not offended. I just wanted to point out the misconception that has dogged the Republican Party for decades. It is frustrating to see the Democrats reap rewards in spite of their lack of results. Yet, Republican accomplishments are totally dismissed. I hope Sen. McCain selects Dr. Condoleezza Rice to be his running mate. But the real battle will be to convince Dr. Rice to accept the nomination. Eric thinks he is receiving reverse racism, the Liberals will come after Dr. Rice with everything they have. Ironically, they will get away with it. But the Republicans will be called racists for any comment directed at Sen. Obama should he receive the nomination.
Posted by: James Danley | March 11, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
John wrote “Barack Obama is half-white. Why do people always forget this?”
Is this like the glass being half full or half empty? and this is an example of the type of voters we have in America.
Posted by: Rob | March 11, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
THANK YOU GERALDINE!
Thanks for displaying the callous disregard of the fact that Hillary is really desperate. Thank you for exposing the ignorance of the Hillary campaign and the “throwing the kitchen sink” to get what you want. You’re really a great truth saber in exposing one of many deficiencies not only in Hillary’s campaign, but in your insecurity in being truthful. Do you remember when you were on the ticket and had no experience? Do you remember when Mondale picked you just to capture the “woman” vote? Do you remember being used as a pawn for no real gain? I know, it hurts, and both you and Hillary are tired of being used by the Man.
I got two tickets to Girls Night Out with an All African American revue to get your insecurities reduced to a minimum. How bout it?
Posted by: Joris | March 11, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
If Geraldine WERE educated, I might take her opinions seriously.
Posted by: Dave | March 11, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
I am a non-black minority, a Dean democrat in 2004 against the war, and a professional woman who holds managerial positions throughout my career. I can tell you the media does not dare to take racism blame because of the loud voice Al Sharpton and other African American pundits (the media do not want any critics or embarrassment what so ever). I have experienced often sexism, reverse discrimination and discrimination at Corp America. I agree with Ms. Ferraro completely and hold nothing against Obama, but thinks he is too green and I have seen enough his type at Corp America. Dream needs to be realized with thought plan and long mundane process with all kinds of obstacles or risk factors. He is not ready but with HOPE!!!
I respect several African American leaders: Colin Powell, Condie Rice, Bill Cosby, Oprah and Jessy Jackson. They earned their respects, but Obama pursuaded his circle with inspiring words from youth and with clever mentor/mentee sincerity from Old Boy club of Ted Kennedy, John Kerry and Tom Daschle.
Posted by: MediaBashOnBothSides | March 11, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Just a reminder John Abraham Lincoln was Republican!
Posted by: Rob | March 11, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
Wait a sec…wait a sec…
Am I reading this right that the Clinton campaign just succeeded in a form of race baiting, and they are not being called on it?
Let’s put this in perspective – what would the “debate” be if one of McCain’s friends or advisors made the same statement about Obama?
Apparently only Democrats have “free” speech.
Unbelievable. Mark my words – watch how the “debate” changes once it is a Rep vs Dem contest.
Posted by: HoosierMomma | March 11, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
Unfortunate timing for Clinton, what with Mississippi voting today. With friends like these….
Posted by: Tom J | March 11, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
Why didn’t Alan Keys, Jessie Jackson or Al Sharpton get as far as Barack- They are all black? Ferrerro and the rest of the white feminist are really showing their true feelings against Black people. Her logic is full of crap. John Edwards (white man), an equally qualified candidate for president was unfortunately rejected by the democratic voters. Was he rejected because he was white or because he was a MALE? Or was he rejected because democratic voters thought he represented the past and they wanted someone fresh and new. I am so sick and tired of these so called liberal white women feminist complaining about sexism and biased against Clinton when they have expressed twice the sexism, bias, and racism against Barack Obama because he is BLACK! Not because he is a man, but because he is BLACK period. The problem with Hillary is Hillary. People don’t like her, not because she is a woman, but because they just don’t like this particular human being who just happen to be a woman. You white feminist just backed the wrong woman.
BTW, Ferrerro you and Mondale were a joke when you ran and got the crap beat out of you from an old white man named Ronald Reagan. Folks just didn’t LIKE or want you or Mondale-a white male and a white woman. White folks rejected YOU! Was it because Mondale was a man or because you were a woman or was it because they just didn’t accept the message you and Mondale had presented to the American people. Barack is accepted not because he is a Man or Black, but because he represent something new and exciting to the Ameican People, PERIOD. And he is extending his arms to all people even tightwad racist socialist feminist like you!
Posted by: Tennessee | March 11, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
Geraldine Ferraro, what a clever old bat you are!
Because, sure, running as a black guy named Barack Hussein Obama is soooo easy!
Not way to compete with that for such a poor and unknown third rate lawyer as Hillary Rodham. Her father wasn’t even from Kenya!
Posted by: Greta | March 11, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
The Democrats are going to be in for a rude awakening this November. First of all, neither Hillary or Barack are qualified to be President.
Secondly, the blacks are only voting for Barack because he is black. If he loses the nomination, the blacks will either stay at home in protest or possibly vote for McCain in protest.
Moreover, the women are only voting for Hillary because she is a woman. She has virtually no experience except for riding on the coat tails of her husband. If Hillary loses the nomination, women will vote for McCain. I am sure of this because so many have told me so.
As usual, the Democrats are standing in a circle shooting each other. They have blown a perfect opportunity to take back the White House.
Posted by: Richard | March 11, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
Geraldine who??? What an embarrassment to people who actually think critically. Please go back to your shell and read a little more about the dangers of dismissing people based on their physical characteristics. Hitler made similar comments. What a shame.
Posted by: Frank Jackson | March 11, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
DOES MSSSS. FERRARO ET. AL. REALLY BELIEVE THAT?? IS SHE SPEAKING FOR THE ENTIRE CLINTON CAMPAIGN? CAN ANYONE IMAGINE IF A REPUBLICAN SAID ANYTHIHG SIMILIAR TO HER STATEMENT?
GERALDINE, PLEASE, FOR THE RECORD TELL US HOW YOU FEEL ABOUT CONDI RICE, OR PERHAPS GEN. POWELL,..HOW ABOUT MRS.OBAMA??SAME WAY?? JUSTICE C. THOMAS(NO NOT THOAMAS WE ALREADY KNOW YOUR ‘TRUE’ ANSWER.
SO YOU SUPPORT LAWS THAT ALLOW FOR SET ASIDES BASED ON COLOR..AND THEN YOU CLUB THEM OVER THE HEAD WHEN THEY SUCCEED???TRUE DEMOCRAT PARTY HYPOCRACY…KEEP TALKING GERRY,KEEP TALKING.
Posted by: Sam Russo | March 11, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
This is appalling. They fault Obama for the color of his skin? I was an ardent Clinton supporter but this vitriol has turned my stomach. Using third parties to spout this kind of racist garbage is beyond despicable. I, for one, do not want these kinds of bigots running the White House.
Posted by: Jim | March 11, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
Awwwwww Lou! Are you a grumpy ole white man afraid of truth? Need more lies, more war? How about $5 dollar a gallon gas? Let’s get your job outsourced so you can go cut a few yards to make ends meet. Oh, still not enough? How about a vote for Mr. Obama then??? You know what they say………
Once you go bi-racial, errr, raaa, black, you never go back.
Posted by: Joris | March 11, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
Geraldine who?
Posted by: Lara | March 11, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
I think Hillary has a broader support than Obama.
She appeals to every voting demographics including the African Americans.
Obama’s base of support is limited to African Americans and the young voters (high school seniors and college kids).
If Obama becomes the nominee, the chance of loosing the presidency to the Republicans is very high. One possibility is the Latino voters (15% of the U.S population) prefer to vote for McCain than Obama because of several reasons.
First, McCain has introduced the Immigration Reform Bill to the Senate though it did not pass. That is why the Latino community looks favorably to McCain. Secondly, people try to minimize the differences between the African American community and the Latino Community. The reality is different (on the grounds of urban areas in LA, New York, Miami, etc.). Because of these confrontations the majority of them prefer to vote for John McCain than to Obama.
If Democrats want to win the White House, their best bet is to nominate Hillary Clinton not Barrack Obama. Hillary Clinton not only has the experience to become the U.S. President, she can also stand toe –to- toe with the Republican nominee, John McCain and she can bring all the democrats together.
Hillary ’08!
Posted by: AL | March 11, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
I think Hillary has a broader support than Obama.
She appeals to every voting demographics including the African Americans.
Obama’s base of support is limited to African Americans and the young voters (high school seniors and college kids).
If Obama becomes the nominee, the chance of loosing the presidency to the Republicans is very high. One possibility is the Latino voters (15% of the U.S population) prefer to vote for McCain than Obama because of several reasons.
First, McCain has introduced the Immigration Reform Bill to the Senate though it did not pass. That is why the Latino community looks favorably to McCain. Secondly, people try to minimize the differences between the African American community and the Latino Community. The reality is different (on the grounds of urban areas in LA, New York, Miami, etc.). Because of these confrontations the majority of them prefer to vote for John McCain than to Obama.
If Democrats want to win the White House, their best bet is to nominate Hillary Clinton not Barrack Obama. Hillary Clinton not only has the experience to become the U.S. President, she can also stand toe –to- toe with the Republican nominee, John McCain and she can bring all the democrats together.
Hillary ’08!
Posted by: AL | March 11, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
Please vote for Obama – America’s first affirmative action president
Posted by: Ellen | March 11, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
Geraldine must think it’s 1984 all over again and she’s in high cotton!
Maybe she can also add: If Hillary weren’t a woman she wouldn’t be where she is today. Maybe if Hillary was not married to a past president and ect.
Posted by: kennedyrj10 | March 11, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
“It’s been a very sexist media. Some just don’t like her.”
Why is it that if the media doesn’t like Hillary, then they’re sexist. First of all, I disagree that the media doesn’t like Hillary, but that’s not really my point.
I don’t like Hillary, but I’m not sexist. I love my wife, daughter and mom, have many female friends and co-workers.
I don’t like Obama, but I have several African-American family members who I love, and African-American friends.
Just because those individuals may not be liked by certain people doesn’t make those people sexist or racist.
Posted by: B (MD) | March 11, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
Keep dreamin Al. You must be a baby boomer stuck in the dark with your wrap around goggle shades on. You gotta put the bottle down during lunch time. You’d have a more realistic understanding of this election and the electability of both candidates. FYI…..Hillary is unelectable. Don’t take my word for it. YOU’LL SEE IN JANUARY. It won’t be Hillary taking that oath with Bill in the background. Believe that.
Posted by: Joris | March 11, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
I have often said Oprah would not have endorsed Obama – if he had every credential he has now – but the color of his skin was white. Sorry, but it’s true. Ask yourself this – if Obama’s name were Steve and he was a white man but had the exact same experience that Obama has – would he receive the support he is getting? Makes you think.
Posted by: Cw | March 11, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
white women trump black men in the
liberal political world – every time.
Hillary obviously holds the same view
,that Obama is where he is, “only because he is black” … she hasn’t said it in so many words …she is much craftierthan ferraro … but it’s obvious she has the same resentments.
Hillary, Ferraro and their left wing
ideologue compatriots – truly believe
that black people need white leadership
and that is their only “salvation”. Blacks are great as voters for white liberals but they are not capable of being “leaders” of white people.
White liberals like Clinton have been very deft at telling blacks that white
republicans are racists and that white liberals are their salvation .. but when it comes time … the mask is pulled back to reveal that liberals are
more racist than even the dreaded white conservative.
Same thing happened with the last Democratic speaker election where Kwesi
Enfume thought that he had the experience and “time – in – grade ” to be the next speaker. The liberals quashed that quickly and put Nancy Pelosi in. Liberals figure that blacks won’t risk the loss of ‘government cheese’. It is a strategy that has worked – raise the boogey man of Republicans stealing the government cheese – use that to win elections – but never….never.. actually allow blacks to wield real political power over the white establishment of the left.
Posted by: bob | March 11, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
Is this country suffering from a lack of intellectual judgment? Moral responsibilty? The ability to lead?
The very thing wrong with the Clinton campaign will tbe the very thing wrong with this country. Put that in the think tank!
Posted by: kennedyrj10 | March 11, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
Let’s go with this idea that Obama has ‘no’ experience. So what. Maybe some of us are sick and tired of all these ‘very’ experienced candidates and their corrupt ways. Maybe we are sick of people thinking that we are all stupid and do not see the reall way Washington operates (favors for favors). Why should I care that Clinton ran into NY (a state I love and grew up in) and some how mesmerized people to be voted in as Senator. Help me out here- how as her election into NY Senator any different. It’s nice to sit around and bash, after all it is easy to do. The hard thing is to look deep and find what matters. NEITHER CANDIDATE HAS EFFECTIVELY PRODUCED ANYTHING AS A SENATOR THAT REALLY HELPED US. So they both start at ground zero (no pun intented). Geraldine made a good pt, Obama would not be in this position if he were white. I agree – he would have been the chosen candidate by all of his current critics. Many of you do not want to support him because he is black. Fact is, many of our former presidents had rather shallow resumes – but they made it- but then they were white. Had Obama not been in the campaing it would have been Kerry and all of you (except the feminist) would be for him. Women who vote for Clinto because she is a woman are falling into the trap; and the same goes for blacks who vote for Obama because he is black. There is a reason why most politicans are former lawyers. They are a heck of a lot smarter that most of us and are better at manipulating and twisting things. Keep in mind both Candidates are lawyers. You know all those lawyers jokes everyone is fond of repeating. For me, the bottom line is, Clinton is no better than Obama and for decades we have been voting for the lesser of the two evils. Why be different now. Obama seems a lot less evil than Clinton aka Cruella de Vil. Besides everyone who says Obama has no experience and Clinton has more – I wonder how do you really know. You only spue what you have heard and read – but you reall do not know the depths of their experiences. Stop being so gullable. I respect anyone who says Clinton because the positions she holds are similar to theirs and they believe in her type of politics – rather than Obama has no experience. That is a cop out answer and has no substance. Get real! Vote on the issue not on the person! Had we done that 8 years ago – we would not be here today.
Posted by: Kay | March 11, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
Let’s go with this idea that Obama has ‘no’ experience. So what. Maybe some of us are sick and tired of all these ‘very’ experienced candidates and their corrupt ways. Maybe we are sick of people thinking that we are all stupid and do not see the reall way Washington operates (favors for favors). Why should I care that Clinton ran into NY (a state I love and grew up in) and some how mesmerized people to be voted in as Senator. Help me out here- how as her election into NY Senator any different. It’s nice to sit around and bash, after all it is easy to do. The hard thing is to look deep and find what matters. NEITHER CANDIDATE HAS EFFECTIVELY PRODUCED ANYTHING AS A SENATOR THAT REALLY HELPED US. So they both start at ground zero (no pun intented). Geraldine made a good pt, Obama would not be in this position if he were white. I agree – he would have been the chosen candidate by all of his current critics. Many of you do not want to support him because he is black. Fact is, many of our former presidents had rather shallow resumes – but they made it- but then they were white. Had Obama not been in the campaing it would have been Kerry and all of you (except the feminist) would be for him. Women who vote for Clinto because she is a woman are falling into the trap; and the same goes for blacks who vote for Obama because he is black. There is a reason why most politicans are former lawyers. They are a heck of a lot smarter that most of us and are better at manipulating and twisting things. Keep in mind both Candidates are lawyers. You know all those lawyers jokes everyone is fond of repeating. For me, the bottom line is, Clinton is no better than Obama and for decades we have been voting for the lesser of the two evils. Why be different now. Obama seems a lot less evil than Clinton aka Cruella de Vil. Besides everyone who says Obama has no experience and Clinton has more – I wonder how do you really know. You only spue what you have heard and read – but you reall do not know the depths of their experiences. Stop being so gullable. I respect anyone who says Clinton because the positions she holds are similar to theirs and they believe in her type of politics – rather than Obama has no experience. That is a cop out answer and has no substance. Get real! Vote on the issue not on the person! Had we done that 8 years ago – we would not be here today.
Posted by: Kay | March 11, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
If you don’t like McCain then you are a
?geriatricist?
Posted by: ChuckB | March 11, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
How true her statement is. Senator Obama is nothing more than a slick talker with very little substance. And if he were white, he would be just another Chris Dodd or Joe Biden. Hopefully it isn’t too late for the electorate to see thru his double talk of no solutions.
Posted by: joe | March 11, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
Does she really think that if her name was Gerald Ferraro, instead of Geraldine, that she would have been on anyone’s list of vice presidential candidates in 1984?
Talk about the pot calling the kettle, er, black.
Posted by: ej | March 11, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
To think that this is the state of affairs in twenty-first century America. When schools teach American history, how will this time as a nation will we be viewed. I was taught that “we the people”, an “in God we trust”, not what party I may support. As we close in on electing our next president, I think the biggest problem they my face may be “explaining the divide that remains in America”. For some reason one can’t be proud to be an American, unless at the same time, you’re proud to be a white American. The world community is watching as we watch this example of democracy unfold. The bandages will hurt as they are ripped from the injury we have substained in our fight to live up to the founding fathers dream. As a people we have to understand, that live is short, and you can hide from the truth or face it head on. I support OBama simply because he is the only candidate that seems to ask the question,” how do we see ourselves as a nation in the 21st century. Don’t kid yourself, Senator OBama has said this will be a tough race, but at the same time take a good look at the leaders that you’ve known in your lifetime. Some of the statements made concerning OBama are coming from the people that we democrat have admired, and it’s really bad that the true meaning of their vision come out late in there life. Man does not live by bread alone, don’t try to minimize the vision of a person that will enrich the democratic party, and lay the cornerstone for a nation trying so hard to remove the slither from its eye. Everything that America stand for and try’s to represent is on display, and the world is watching. See you in Denver.
Posted by: Rickey D Dallas | March 11, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
Al…apparently you didn’t see the results from VA and MD. Obama won every group, black, white, latino, young, old, men, women. And he won in VT, CT, NE, ID, ME, WY, and WI where there are mostly white people and I’m pretty sure they are not all young. I’m a 47 year old white female and I voted for Obama. So did my 53 year old white husband.
Posted by: JoAnne | March 11, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
The Clintons are being so incredibly racist. Saying she would allow Obama to be her Vice-President is disgusting. It sounds like she giving him permission to ride in the back of the bus. Now sending out others to be racists.
Clinton only beats Obama after she’s done the “poor me” routine. Then she comes out bashing him. Is she bipolar? How can Democratics allow such racism in their presidental candidate?
Posted by: agramof4 | March 11, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
All people, black, white, yellow, who love our country would elect her out of the office soon. She don’t deserve public service at all.
Posted by: brightofeyes | March 11, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
Wow! I can’t believe what I am reading!!!! Has anyone considered that Hillary would not be where she was without the Clinton political machine put in place by Bill? Do you think any woman could have waltzed into a NY state senatorship without holding an office before and less than 7 years later announce she will be the next president, regardless of her qualifications???? She’s had 5 years less in office than Obama. As for Obama getting where he is because of his skin color, dream on. He’s captured our imagination with his intelligence, eloquence and demeanor, and he’s the best we’ve seen since the Kennedy era, and he is the only candidate who has the potential to raise up our nation in a spiritual way.
Posted by: Eileen | March 11, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
Wow! I can’t believe what I am reading!!!! Has anyone considered that Hillary would not be where she was without the Clinton political machine put in place by Bill? Do you think any woman could have waltzed into a NY state senatorship without holding an office before and less than 7 years later announce she will be the next president, regardless of her qualifications???? She’s had 5 years less in office than Obama. As for Obama getting where he is because of his skin color, dream on. He’s captured our imagination with his intelligence, eloquence and demeanor, and he’s the best we’ve seen since the Kennedy era, and he is the only candidate who has the potential to raise up our nation in a spiritual way.
Posted by: Eileen | March 11, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
Add Ferraro to the list of Democratic politicians who have burned their credibility in this campaign, now that their true colors can be seen by all.
The Dems are thisclose to losing a generation of voters, including this black male. If Hillary is nominated, there officially won’t be any difference between the two parties, and no amount of convincing will prove otherwise. At this point, it’s chips all in for me. If I were McCain right now, I’d be measuring drapes.
Posted by: LA | March 11, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
Hillary has no experience that I like. Obama has experience I like and some ideas I like better than Hillary’s. The way she has conducted her campaign, expecially in the past weeks has made me go from, “well, I can support her if she wins” to I will have a horrible choice in November if she wins. Signed, a white aging feminist, married professional woman.
Posted by: rain39 | March 11, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
Way to go, Geraldine. Nice comment. For those of you too young to remember, while running with Walter Mondale she promised she and her husband would release their tax returns, then tried to backtrack from the statement. It eventually came out that her husband was a tax cheat. All the while her son was being arrested at Middlebury College for selling coke.
Nice family.
Pillars of the community.
Clinton supporters.
Posted by: Vast Right Wing Conspirator | March 11, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
Well let’s look at the truth of the matter. The white democrats are voting for the so-called white candidate and the black democrats are voting for the half-white, half-black democrat. The two contenders for the dem nomination are racists by definition. Get used to it.
Posted by: Richard | March 11, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
That is a funny comment considering nobody would have heard of Hillary if she hadn’t been married to a president.
Posted by: mike | March 11, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
Is she wrong? Be honest!
Right or wrong our race (black, white or other) is part of who we are and effects everything we do and more importantly effects how people view us.
Posted by: Big Tuna | March 11, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
Lets see…..we have the most revered national politician by africans americans (Clintons) vs. Obama. Obama 90% to Clinton 10%. That must just be a coincidence! Im not saying he is not qualified, but must we all just live in denial?
Posted by: FloridaWho? | March 11, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Of course she’s completely correct. The man has a weak political record. He started running for pres the second he got into the US senate. He’s a good speaker – but why else would he be in this position if not for the color of his skin?
Posted by: JCC | March 11, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Of course she’s completely correct. The man has a weak political record. He started running for pres the second he got into the US senate. He’s a good speaker – but why else would he be in this position if not for the color of his skin?
Posted by: JCC | March 11, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Hillary or Barak? It doesnt matter. Both are liberals who, if elected, will increase your taxes, increase the size of government, turn to socialism, squash free enterprise, reduce individual rights, promote ‘victimization’, promote class envy and class warfare, promote isolationism versus globalization, and continue to deny domestic oil drilling, nuclear power and hydroelectric power plants… among other things. SOCIALISM DOES NOT WORK! Hillary says she will take ‘BIG OIL’ profits from them because they are too large…if this were to happen, why would ANY business STAY in business?? THEY WOULDN’T! There is no incentive to work hard and make money, if you’re just going to have to give it to the government. But of course, Hillary and Barak know better than we do what to do with our money – we are too stupid and helpless to think for ourselves. Both of them needs to take an Economics 101 class…God help us if either of them are elected president!
Posted by: USA hosed if Dems win | March 11, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Of course she’s completely correct. The man has a weak political record. He started running for pres the second he got into the US senate. He’s a good speaker – but why else would he be in this position if not for the color of his skin?
Posted by: JCC | March 11, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Hang on, is Ferraro actually suggesting that Barack Obama has benefitted from being born black in America? That being black catapults a candidate to the White House?
Let’s see, we’ve never had a black president before, so that kind of suggests that blackness isn’t the huge advantage she claims it is.
Oh yeah, and the Governor of Pennsylvania (a Clinton endorser) has openly said that Pennsylvania is full of racists who would never vote for a black man. Typically one doesn’t see an elected official accusing his constituents of being racists. Anyhow, it sure sounds like he doesn’t think being black is much of an advantage.
I’m curious, exactly what advantage does Ms. Ferraro believe that blackness confers?
Maybe she means that her own immigrant ancestors had to pay their passage by ship to America, and black people’s ancestors got to come for free? That white immigrants had to find jobs when they got here, and black people arriving in the new world were set up with jobs the minute they stepped off the boat? Is that it? Is that the advantage she believes blackness conveys in America? Maybe that explains why African-Americans are all so rich and educated.
Please, Ferraro, cut the nonsense.
Posted by: fjfjdvdv | March 11, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
We need leaders who are culturally competent. Clearly Ms. Ferraro and Candidate Clinton are not.
This does not reflect well on either of these two women, and is the sort of tactic that is repugnant no matter who engages in it.
I am voting for Barack Obama because he is the candidate whose BEHAVIOR demonstrates respect for voters and the cultural competance to lead our nation, both within our borders, and among other nations in the world.
Hillary Clinton will not be getting my vote under any circumstances, now or in the future, nor will any candidate who is enabling this kind of thinking and behavior. This isn’t the “kitchen sink” it’s the residue in the cesspool and these two need better filters.
Posted by: Jennifer Markens | March 11, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
This is really an amazing and quite shocking comment. Because it sounds like she is saying he is getting this because of Affirmitive Action. When everyone knows that the people who have benefitted from that the most and the best is people who look she and Hilary. Which is still amazing too me how you can split the majority population and make one half a minority.
I think that the true Clinton’s have really come out. I do know this as an African-American I have decided that I am no longer a Democrat. I will start listening to the person and making the decision from there.
Because seeing the way the Clinton’s, Ferraro, the governor from PA, and all the other people that are backing her how they are reacting towards this black man would never have been done towards a white man. And maybe there is a reason for it they lived through segreation and feel that they should have the best because they are white. And it shows the racisim in their hearts. I am going to make it my duty to go out and convince black people not to just so freely continue to vote for Democrats.
Posted by: bridgette | March 11, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
I am continually amazed at how stupid Hillary thinks we are by trying to convince us of such riduculous concepts. I hope Obama continues to make this evident. His surrogates need to use stronger language than “monster”!!!
Posted by: JMR | March 11, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
I wonder if Hillary is going to denounce Ferraro’s dumb ‘A’ comments and remove her from her campaign? Probably not! Ferraro comes across as a racist, and if Hillary sits back and does nothing, then one must think she supports those types of comments. Hillary’s true colors will come out on this one.
Posted by: whcjr | March 11, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
I agree with Ferraro…but I also say if it weren’t for Hillary’s association with Bill Clinton…she’d just be another nutty liberal…NOT a presidential candidate.
They’re both very boring and their feel good garbage is for the weak minded misfits that watch too much disney.
Posted by: Jim | March 11, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
I agree with Ferraro…but I also say if it weren’t for Hillary’s association with Bill Clinton…she’d just be another nutty liberal…NOT a presidential candidate.
They’re both very boring and their feel good garbage is for the weak minded misfits that watch too much disney.
Posted by: Jim | March 11, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
By the same token, it can be said that Geraldine would never have been on the ticket with Fritz Mondale if she wasn’t female. They were supposed to be the first liberal “dream team.”
Lost in a landslide…
Posted by: Vast Right Wing Conspirator | March 11, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
Gee, maybe Geraldine Ferraro should be Hillary Clinton’s VP. Then they could work together to hide their husbands’ tax returns. Here’s a quote from Wikipedia:
“In July 1984, [Ferraro] said she would release both her and her husband’s tax returns. Yet a month later she backtracked and said she would release only her returns. Then she backtracked again, saying her husband would release “a financial — a tax statement” on August 20. But she must not have consulted her husband, because Zaccaro initially refused.”
Posted by: fjfjdvdv | March 11, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
It’s….if Obama “were” a white man, not “was” a white man. Where did she go to school? Must have flunked English 101. And she wanted to be V.P. of the United States?
Posted by: Dante | March 11, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
It’s….if Obama “were” a white man, not “was” a white man. Where did she go to school? Must have flunked English 101. And she wanted to be V.P. of the United States?
Posted by: Dante | March 11, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
I completely disagree with Ferraro’s politics, but I think she makes a good point here, and it has nothing to do with racism. Obama’s popularity is, at least to a degree, being driven by his racial/ethnic makeup, although his public speaking skills are a big part of this as well (to his credit). Obama is not offering anything different than other Democrat candidates have offered. He’s a far left-wing politician who will not hesistate to turn the U.S. into a feckless socialistic country like France. The media has helped make Obama successful, because they love liberal minorities (although they despise conservative minorities). Finally, for those who stated that if Obama were white he would already be declared the nominee, that is pure bunk. Obama has a slight lead over Hillary with a lot of time left. Plus, Hillary was the presumptive nominee all along. Nobody is going to eliminate her very quickly. This has nothing to do with race and everything to do with politics.
Posted by: tommy john | March 11, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
Ms/ Ferraro,
you’r an idiot, and your a racist. you lost your electionn because youfailed to look beyoun the ceiling you set for yourself. you should be more respectful of the opportuninity no matter the outcome, to change the political lanscape of America. if folks bought into your negitivism we would not be on the precifice of change. Yes we Can…Geraldine. Don’t hate appreciate!!!!
Posted by: karentheadvocate | March 11, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
Ferraro is right when she says “If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position.”, because any white man that is a member of a white-only, Euro-Centric church would not have made it out of the gate – and rightfully so. Why then are we then considering a black man who has pledged his allegiance to a black-only Afro-centric church and befriended a socialist minister with friendly ties to the likes of Farrakhan??
Posted by: Tom | March 11, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
If Geraldine Farrarro and Hillary Clinto and Gloria Steinem truly believe that it is easier in America to be a black man than it is to be a white woman than they are truly delusional.
How may white woman got lynched or brutalized by the police in the last 10 years (yes, the do still lynch). Let’s make it easier. How many white women got left standing on the corner by 10 empty yellow cabs and stopped by police for DRIVING WHILE WHITE WOME.
HELLO WALLS…SAY SOMETHING SOMEBODY.
Posted by: shelgirl | March 11, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
Hillary Clinton wouldn’t be in the position she is now, IF she hadn’t been lucky enough to marry William Jefferson Clinton. Hillary, wouldn’t be in this position now, if Bill Clinton didn’t abuse his power of the presidency to grant pardons for votes in Hillary’s senate run. Hillary Clinton wouldn’t be in this position had Bill ended up divorcing her for one of his little chickadees. So Hillary should be thanking the GODS that Gennifer Flowers, or one of Bills other bimbo’s didn’t steal him away. Can you imagine…Gennifer Flowers really has about that same experience as Hillary Clinton does. After all she put in 12 yrs into a relationship with Bill also!
Posted by: DonnaInMichigan | March 11, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
That is like saying that that if Hillary where black that she would be voted for more because she would be breaking the norm in two different forms I just want someone thats gonna get something done and appeals to my needs as a citizen not a color or just because they are a man.
Posted by: joe | March 11, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
EILEEN… Thank you! I should also like to add…from the exit polls…that Sen Obama is consistently bringing in the most votes from those with a college education compared to the Hillary camp where her largest segment of voter’s do not have any college. Yes, white educated men and women are voting for Sen Obama too! YES WE CAN!
Posted by: kennedyrj10 | March 11, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
Well there goes, if her campaign sticks to a “we disagree”, Hillary’s last black voter. How about Maggie Williams btw.? Would she have been hired by Hillary had she not been black? How comfortable would she with such remarks?
One thing is for sure. In the extremely unlikely case that Hillary would become the nominee, black Americans will not vote for her but veto her.
And I would agree with them.
Let’s vote for Obama!
Let’s veto Clinton!
Posted by: Minister | March 11, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
When the gates of the Clinton plantation were opened, their subjects fled like a swarm of bees.
Posted by: Dr. Ron | March 11, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
Geraldine Ferraro won’t be Hillary’s choice for VP. She was hoping to get Obama but, since it has come out that Eliott Spitzer cheated on his wife, hired prostitutes, may be impeached and possibly disbarred, she’s decided that he fits into her campaign better.
Birds of a feather.
Posted by: Vast Right Wing Conspirator | March 11, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
Oh, and I also completely agree that, if Ferraro were a Republican she’d be toast right now. Republicans are NEVER allowed to speak their minds when it comes to race, gender, ethnicity–not if they want to keep their jobs or achieve political success. The media in this country will not allow it. Conservatives have been asked to step aside for saying far less controversial things than Ferraro did, and my bet is she won’t suffer for it much at all.
Posted by: tommy john | March 11, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
Ms.Ferraro has said something publicly which everyone knows. Mr.Obama is an affirmative action presidential candidate who wants to bump off a better qualified candidate because of his race. A Caucasian man or woman with such a thin resume would have been dismissed long time ago.
Also the people who are crying hoarse that Hillary is there where she is because she was married to Bill Clinton. So what??? Ferraro or for that matter any sane person wouldn’t deny this at all.
But the fact remains that Mr.Obama is an affirmative action applicant for the job. Highly unqualified and undeserving candidate for the job.
Posted by: dem | March 11, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
This is a very dissapointing slip of the tongue from a pioneering woman in politics. I’m sure that given the chance, she’ll explain or repudiate these comments.
Posted by: FerraroFan | March 11, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Um hello? Duh. This is politics. Of course it has everything to do with the things mentioned in this article. Aside from everything else, it’s also a beauty pageant. Remember JFK? The ladies loved him. So did the men. We vote with our hearts. Ferrraro should be congratulated for stating the obvious!
Posted by: Jay | March 11, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
So, is the Clinton’s team latest strategy to accuse White America of reverse, reverse discrimination in yet another TRANSPARENT ATTEMPT TO MARGINALIZE OBAMA AS THE BLACK CANDIDATE.
To all you voters who have no formal education beyond High School. Is it alright with you that Clinton and her people assume you are dumb just because you are not formally educated? Do you really think this blue blood woman relates to you. Please, Barack was raised by a grandfather and single mom who were you. Clinton was raised a blue blood republican who thought it was romantic to rebel against her parents 1950′s Ike traditions by running off with Bill (a boy of questionable background)and extolling McGovern to the consternation of her parents and plusher of a girl whose ego always demanded too much attention.
Posted by: shelgirl | March 11, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
So, is the Clinton’s team latest strategy to accuse White America of reverse, reverse discrimination in yet another TRANSPARENT ATTEMPT TO MARGINALIZE OBAMA AS THE BLACK CANDIDATE.
To all you voters who have no formal education beyond High School. Is it alright with you that Clinton and her people assume you are dumb just because you are not formally educated? Do you really think this blue blood woman relates to you. Please, Barack was raised by a grandfather and single mom who were you. Clinton was raised a blue blood republican who thought it was romantic to rebel against her parents 1950′s Ike traditions by running off with Bill (a boy of questionable background)and extolling McGovern to the consternation of her parents and plusher of a girl whose ego always demanded too much attention.
Posted by: shelgirl | March 11, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Oratory skills my foot.Obama is not that great of a speaker unless of course you count his ability to rehash the same old tired speech that he has mastered and repeats at every stop.
If you listen carefully the fool speaks about three words,four at the most and pauses to search his empty brain for three or four more words.The ineptness of his approach in speaking has apparently rubbed off on his wife as she displays the same broken thought process.Just telling it like it is.
The media and others who praise his approach use it as a way to say something good about him when in fact it is the only good thing they can find to say about him.
You can always tell when obama is about to say something that he has not previously rehashed over and over again.As he always uses the word UNDERSTAND prior to saying anything that has not been rehearsed and rehashed.
How is that a man who claims to have chosen to help the unfortunate people in Chicago by not taking a high paying job can now afford a $1.6 million dollar dream home on the low pay of a state senators income and now that of a U.S. Senator???
The math does not add up no matter how you try and figure it.The guy has been caught with his hand in the cookie jar and is obviously complicit to some degree with Rezko in obtaining his dream home.
Geraldine is correct in her observation.
Posted by: Mike | March 11, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
That’s a load of bull. Sen. Obama is one of the most charismatic politicians to be seen in a long time and his success has nothing to do with race. If that’s the case, Hillary has only got this far because she’s a woman! See the flawed logic? If we take candidates based on race or sex then we turn our country’s elections into high school popularity contests. Soon we’ll be picking presidents on looks or whose better at basketball
This is a sign that Clinton is getting desperate and is starting to pull out the dirty stuff.
OBAMA ’08!!!!
Posted by: DOTMW | March 11, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
I think this political correctness has gone too far. Geraldine Ferraro’s statement is correct. All you have to do is look at the exit polls of the primary states. If blacks had not voted overwhelmingly for Obama he would have only won Illinois, Vermont, Wisconsin, New Mexico and Virginia. Stating a verifiable fact is not racism.
Posted by: Satish | March 11, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
This is what I would expect from the Clintons we can’t bring gender into the race unless it is convenient but they will happily inject race. Since when is it a plus to be a black man in america? This is just plain sad. This nomination will be decided by the super delegates and the party will steal the nomination from Obama despite him having won the most states and the popular vote. They are now trying to go back and redo teh vote in Fl after they didn’t follow the clearly established rules. So shame on them Fl already screwed up one election and here we go again. We are witnessing the beginning of the end for the party. If Hillary is given the nomination Mcain gets my vote. For the first time ever I will actually vote Republican. I’m sure many others feel the same way. It will be a cold day before the Clinton brothers get my vote and I’ve always toed the party line up to this point. Congrats for destroying the party Hillary just quit already!
Posted by: Gary | March 11, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
I’ve got news for you. The Clintons are not just now showing their true colors. They are doing exactly the same thing to Obama that they’ve been doing to anyone who ever got in their way. The difference is that now you are paying attention, and not looking down your noses at their victims. They are nasty vicious people who will stop at nothing to get what they want–always have been and always will be. They have an incredible sense of entitlement, and for once the majority of people are seeing them for what they really are. You still wouldn’t be paying attention, however, if their victim was a Republican or a conservative instead of Obama. Although I disagree with almost everything Obama says, I have the greatest respect for him because he refuses to roll in the gutter with the Clintons and their ilk.
Posted by: Glenda | March 11, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
The last time I checked, Obama is just as White as he is Black. It would be interesting to hear (from him) why he feels it necessary to be identified as an African-American. Couldn’t be that it affords him some degree of protection from criticism, could it….?
Posted by: Randy | March 11, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
First of all, the argument that partisanship will never die misses the point. Barack isn’t claiming he will end partisanship–he’s claiming he’ll end the stalemate of partisanship. He thinks he can convince enough Republicans and Democrats to join forces to enact real and lasting change. For anyone who thinks that’s impossible, see what Reagan did 30 years ago with a Democratic congress.
Second of all, the claim that the media has been unfair to Clinton is bogus. Clinton was the undisputed front-runner for TWO YEARS–and very often referred to as the “inevitable” nominee (talk about “fairy tale”!!). Given her nearly nil chances at an honest victory now, the press continues to position her as a viable candidate. The fact is, the press is always a bit biased in one way or another. But the argument that there’s an institutional bias against Hillary, permanently? Please.
You can’t pretend to be a fearless leader and play the victim all in the same breath. I like Hillary–she had my vote for quite a while–but it’s over for her.
Democrats! It’s time to gather ’round our nominee! Barack Obama ’08!!!
Posted by: dougfan | March 11, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
The Amazing thing about this campaign is that it has Brought all of the
closet racists in the Democrat Party
into the Sunlight!
It is Not and Has Not been Barack Obama who has continually brought race into
this campaign it is and has been the supporters of Hillary Clinton and the former president himself!
They cannot beat Obama fairly and squarely so they continue their litany of insults at him and his supporters!
We’re still waiting to here from
Mr KKK, Senator Robert C Byrd!
Come on Bobby join your racist buddies,
Ferraro, the Clintons etc!
Posted by: reaganfan | March 11, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
That might have been one of the most ignorant remarks ever. If whites had not voted for Hilary then she would not be in this position. Get over it.
Posted by: Ted | March 11, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
After Ferraro’s idiotic comments, Bill Clinton’s Jesse Jackson comments, Hillary Clinton’s MLK comments, I hope people realize that the democratic party is the party of closet racists. It is fine as long as blacks stay in their place and ride along without rocking the boat.
Posted by: joes | March 11, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
Why is it that when someone is half black and half something else,they’re considered and consider themselves as black? Why is this,if the color of your skin or racial background isn’t important?
Posted by: jpk | March 11, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
Obama has said he is qualified to handle Foreign Affairs because he has lived abroad. (M.m.m. well I guess that then makes thousands of us qualified to deal with the intricacies of international diplomacy and Foreign Affairs.) If a white politician had gotten up and said that he wouldn’t even be considered as a serious candidate. In other words, Obama is getting special treatment because he is playing the black card. Good affirmative action doesn’t mean a lessening of standards which, unfortunately, is what seems be happening in this case. I am not a supporter of Condolezza Rice but had she stood as a candidate she would have had more realistic foreign policy experience than what Obama has. Then, you could have argued with her on the issue of policy not the appalling lack of solid experience that Obama has.
Posted by: Overland Trail | March 11, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
To say that “If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position. And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept.” is NOT a verifiable fact.
It’s true that blacks have voted for Obama, women have voted for Clinton, and that some white and latino people probably didn’t vote for Obama because he was black.
There are a lot of competing things going on… but don’t forget the most important one… that Obama has a compelling message that speaks to what a large part of the population is concerned about. Any interpretation of events that pretends that last important fact doesn’t exist (such as the Ferraro statement) misses the point.
Posted by: jake | March 11, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
Racism in America is diminished when blacks do NOT vote for a black candidate because he or she is NOT qualified.
Sexism in America is diminished when women do NOT vote for a woman candidate because she is NOT qualified.
An Affirmative Action President diminishes us all. Terrorists won’t give you a pass for being female. The economy doesn’t grade you easier for being Black. World leaders won’t reduce the bell-curve because you are a minority. HOWEVER, our enemies will seize upon any perceived indication of weakness.
We need to get this right. The presidency is not a consolation prize for past wrongs!
Posted by: smartprimate | March 11, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
This is one of the most disgusting claims I have ever read in my life. The day it is beneficial to be a black man in America is the day I die. and for the poster who said that the exit poll data from wisconsin, vermont… shows that he is winning because he resonates with black people should also see that he resonates with young people, meaning that he benefits unfairly from being younger than clinton, which is another crazy claim. also, the media is taking it as easy as they can on clinton. here is why.
1. If obama had lost 14 of the last 17, everyone would tell him to drop out.
2. if clinton had an insurmountable lead, everyone would tell him to drop out.
3. every major poll shows obama beating mccain, but mccain beating clinton… thats because clinton will never have a chance with independents
4. the billing of super tuesday as do or die was all her strategy… remember how she said that would be when the nominee was decided.
her divisive and at times downright disgusting brand of politics NEEDS to end for the good of this country. i want obama picking up the phone at 3 am, not clinton and her lack of experience.
Posted by: George | March 11, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
Ms Ferraro’s comments show Democrats for who the really are…racists. Your reporter reports the story very matter of factly. If this was a Republican making such a ludicrous statement, your reporter would be outraged.
Posted by: Angelo | March 11, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
I’m so enjoying this primary season. As somebody who believes that the Democrat party is the most dysfunctional party in the history of American politics. Anyway, I love how the tables have turned. Remember when the Democrats just loved black people. They wanted to take care of them and protect them from the evil racist America. Well, I am loving the fact that now that an intelligent black man is challenging the white establishment within the party, everyone is freaking out. Just goes to show that Democrats do love black people – When they’re in their place at the back of the bus.
Go Obama!!!!!!!
Posted by: Grimace | March 11, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
Uhhh, He is as much white as he is black. And both sides are socialist, nuff said. Quit whining!
Posted by: marine 43 | March 11, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
She’s right about what she’s saying. The funny thing is that if someone other than a democratic socialist like her said this (such as a republican – who are also mostly socialists) that person would have a lynch mob at his/her DC office door. The only thing Obama is good for is getting rid of the Clintons once and for all and I hope they don’t steal the nomination from him. Either way we’re going to get one of three scumbags as our next president, I would just prefer it not be Mrs. Clinton.
Posted by: Joe | March 11, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
Yeehaw! It about time the Democratic party showed it true red neck colors and called a spade a spade. Too bad it took an eyetalian female, but we can’t be choosey.
She just said what all good Democrats are thinking: Whats the fun in giving blacks a hand up if they don’t know their place. When a Democrat white man or white woman want something, the blacks have to step aside and step back.
Posted by: Proud White Democrat Members | March 11, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Gary,
Have you ever thought that MAYBE blacks are voting for Obama because they LIKE the fact that he’s not mean and nasty like Hillary NOT because he’s half black? Your statement is an assumption that all blacks are racist. I agree with most of the posts, that this little episode has brought out the TRUE racists in America, OLD WHITE DEMOCRATS!
People are sick of the Clinton’s attack machine. Hillary coined the phrase “scorched earth policy” which is what she will do to anyone that gets in her way. The American public is sick and tired of it. They want someone who can get along and work WITH others not constantly AGAINST others. No more “Us and Them”!
Posted by: CGP | March 11, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Hmmm….divisive, race baiting, unprofesional, desperate…YEP..sound like the Clinton campaign.
Give me a break Hillary….where are those tax returns, presidential papers listing your work in North Ireland as a CHRISTMAS TREE lighter and guest to a tea party….NOT a peace negotiatot.
Posted by: Sarah | March 11, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Tom,
Not only did Romney (White man from Eurocentrc Church) make it out the door; he made it to the edge of the throne and is a shoe in.
Yes, blame it on Affirmative Action. The escape hatch of every inadequate, underperforming white person. No Negro could possibly beat me if only he went toe to toe with me no matter what his qualifications and no matter how many I lacked.
If Barack Obama was a white man it is true he would not be in this position.
He would be the Nominee because he would have won New Hampshire and the sucessful race baiting that the Clinton’s used their to incite the “Affirmative Action it to blame for all my woes” Whites would have never come out to vote against him.
THAT’S RIGHT..FERRARO AND CLINTON AND ALL OF YOU HERE ARE FINDING AND PROMOTING THE REASON WHY YOU SHOULD VOTE AGAINST OBAMA BECAUSE HE IS A WHITE MAN.
AND THE CONSERVATIVES SAY ALL KINDS OF CRAP AND I LISTEN TO IT ALL THE TIME BECAUSE I WANT TO KNOW WHAT MY ENEMY IS THINKING. THEY ARE THE PEOPLE WHO WON ME OVER TO THE “RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS” CAMP. I BELIEVE IT IS TOO DANGEROUS FOR ANY BLACK, MEXICAN, ASIAN OR OTHER MINORITY TO RUN AROUND THIS COUNTRY UNARMED BECAUSE IT IS FAR TOO MANY WHITES LIKE FERRARRO AND THE OTHERS HERE WHO SUPPORT HER WORDS AS WELL AS THOSE WHO BELIEVE IN CONSERVATIVE TALK RADIO’S AGENDA AND DEPENDING ON A POLICE FORCE THAT MAKES UP A GOOD PERCENTAGE OF THIS DANGEROUS GROUP FOR PROTECTION IS …WELL….STUPID!
Posted by: shelgirl | March 11, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
And if Hillary wasn’t a woman she’d … she’d …. HEY ! Is she really a…. Oh never mind, I THINK YOU GET THE POINT ! I think Geraldine’s gone senile…..
Posted by: JIMMY LIMO | March 11, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
It’s definitely a mindset issue. If Obama doesn’t get the Dem nom, I’ll write his name in for the general election.
Posted by: Debbie | March 11, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
Since Ferraro is on Clinton’s finance committee, let’s see if she removes Ferraro for making the derogatory comment like Obama did with his economic advisor who called Clinton a monster.
Overland trail: You are taking obama’s comment out of context. He mentioned living overseas as his ‘experience’ in response to Clinton talking about her ‘experience’–traveling abroad as first lady and how that made her better able to deal with leaders. Context is important.
Posted by: jim | March 11, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
it’s true people…B.O. happens to be nothing more than a fad at best…
Posted by: jay | March 11, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
Come on, we all know he wouldn’t have gotten the easy treatment by the press, the media lovefest if he weren’t black. Remember what they did to Dan Quayle??? Rick Lazio?? There is definitely some reverse discrimination going on, but it comes down to voters, and if they are fooled by a snake oil salesman of any color, then that is the way it is.
Posted by: Karen | March 11, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
Karen and Jay,
Why is it so hard for you to believe that he may have gotten preferential treatment from the press because they LIKE him? they like his MESSAGE? For you to assume it’s because he’s black shows YOUR racism. Geez, the guy has a message that resonates with people. Why is that so hard to understand? Is it because YOU like the nasty, scummy fighting?
Posted by: CGP | March 11, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Satish said :
Ferraro’s statement is correct. All you have to do is look at the exit polls of the primary states. If blacks had not voted overwhelmingly for Obama he would have only won Illinois, Vermont, Wisconsin, New Mexico and Virginia. Stating a verifiable fact is not racism.”
Yep he also won the overwhelming black population in
Alaska
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Hawaii
Idaho
Iowa
Kansas
Louisiana
Maine
Minnesota
Nebraska
Utah
Vermont
Washington
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Posted by: Alicia | March 11, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Great Orator ? That’s it ? So were Democratic presidential candidates William Jennings Bryant and Adlai Stevenson. By the way, both from Illinois, and both much more accomplished than BHO. Both lost.
If we wanted a great orator, then Joe Biden should have gotten the nod. I heard him speak to the 1984 NJ Democratic Convention in Atlantic City, and I haven’t heard a more inspiring speech since. At least we would have someone with experience and savvy.
If the candidate has to be black, then why not draft Julian Bond. He’s a much better speaker, and much more accomplished.
If our candidate has to be a rock star, then why not draft P.Diddy?
Geraldine Ferraro is on the mark. I don’t see it as a racial slur, but rather a dose of truth.
If this guy was white and with a name like Smith, the Hollywood image makers wouldn’t give him the time of day if they had a watch in every pocket.
If the strategy is to run against both Clinton’s, (to wit recent Monica comments,) then I would ask they question, who has done more for the well being of our minorities here and around the world, than the Clinton’s When was the last time BHO raised billions for fighting disease in Africa or millions to help storm ravaged victims in New Orleans.
Somewhere,(probably under a rock), Karl Rove is smiling from ear to ear. We Democrats are about to do it again.
Posted by: Rich Hall | March 11, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Don’t repudiate it …IT IS TRUE – live with it face it ……. and while you r at it look at the other black politicians that would be a better choice than Obama – Andrew Young, Harold Ford, Colin Powell etc etc etc ..
Posted by: jimbo | March 11, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Hillary wouldn’t be where she is right now if her last name wasn’t “Clinton”. Why else do you think she put up with Bill’s infidelity other than to advance her political career?
In all fairness, Geraldine is right though. If Obama was white, he wouldn’t be where he is right now b/c the race would be over and he’d have already won.
Posted by: JoeFriday | March 11, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Part of the Obama phnomenon is due to his color – that is correct. How else can you explain a man with NO qualifications to be President doing so well in the primaries? You can’t! However, if he didn’t have a likeable personality, or give charismatic speaches, then it wouldn’t matter if he were purple, he wouldn’t be where he is today.
The fact of the matter is, if he gets elected, then every person who voted for him needs to be held accountable for putting him in office when he really starts screwing things up – and he will, if he gets in the WH.
I just hope that all those that support him will wake up and see the reality of his lack of experience, and judgement in my view, and do the right thing before it’s too late.
McCain is the lesser of 3 evils by far. He will not be great for our country/security, but I absolutely DREAD what will happen to us if Obama or Clinton get elected.
Posted by: Ferraro Is Partly Right | March 11, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
I am a Republican but after Huck was defeated I just can not vote for McCain. Or rather McPain.
So I look on the democratic ticket, and I can’t vote for Hillary either, I really dislike her personality.
Obama however, I like his personality, don’t like all his views but I don’t think that will effect me that much because I don’t think he or any other president will actually be able to change things that much. So I’m voting for Obama at this time.
Posted by: Michael | March 11, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
APPARENTLY, IT IS ACCEPTABLE TO BE A RACIST, AS LONG AS YOU ARE A DEMOCRAT.
WHAT AN UNBELIEVABLY IGNORANT STATEMENT!
Posted by: RINGO | March 11, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
Hillary would not be in this position if she hadn’t been married to a former white male president.
ferraro? can’t we get some comments from someone relevant in the past 20 years.
Ferraro’d never have been chosen if SHE were a man either… she was an Affirmative Action nominee…
and her husband was a crook… this time i mean Ferraro again.
Posted by: Gordon | March 11, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Rich Hall,
That great speech Biden gave? Are you sure he didn’t steal it from a Brit?
Posted by: CGP | March 11, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
After all that has happened over a 3 month period, it’s clear that Hillary Clinton’s campaign has been the most disastrous. From changing themes 5 or six times to resignations of high level staff members to lack or organization and money to now resorting to third party comments because she can’t do it herself. It all comes back to her everytime, although she pretends to distance herself from them.
She’s an incompetent manager.
She lies
She cheats
She cries
She’s behind
She can’t overcome the delgate lead
The DNC knows she’s not electable
It’s over
She will fail in her bid to become the first female president.
Check back in 8 years. At 70, she might have the experience needed to be honest with the American people.
Posted by: Joris | March 11, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Relax, people. People are voting for Obama because he is a Democrat. Makes them partisans. They vote for him because he is black. Are they then racists? No one is voting for him because of his ideas, get real. The only thing going for him is that he will most likely be facing a Republican, if he can get past the Convention.
Posted by: Steve | March 11, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
If ANY democrat can read Michael’s post and NOT vote for Obama, they are crazy! THe Republicans and the Independents will vote for Obama over McCain. IF Hillary is the nominee, the claws will come out of GOP’ers and Indies like you have never seen, and she will lose. Periood. End of discussion. Why are you so stubborn that you can’t see it?
Posted by: CGP | March 11, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
Stop with the identity politics.. Cant we follow the lead of young people. My generation is past this race thing why cant you be..
Posted by: Alicia | March 11, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
It may be true that Obama would not be where he is today if he wasn’t an eloquent black man, but doesn’t that door swing both ways. For all the Feminist BS that seems to swim around Hillary isn’t she just riding her husbands coattails. She rode them into the senate against laughable opposition in a state she didn’t live in. Do you honestly believe that if she wasn’t a woman, and wasn’t a former first lady with name recognition that anyone without severer head trauma would even consider the junior senator from New York as a possible presidential candidate?
Posted by: QuestionEvil | March 11, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
Oh yeah! Hillary _________? Does anybody think Hillary would be where she is without the last name? What a joke. I think this business about her being ready is joke. Maybe she was ready to hand the phone to Bill at three am!
Posted by: Kurt W | March 11, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
“The fact of the matter is, if he gets elected, then every person who voted for him needs to be held accountable for putting him in office when he really starts screwing things up – and he will, if he gets in the WH.”
Yeah, he might send us to an unnecessary war without reading the intelligence estimate. Oh, wait…
Posted by: Darrin Bell | March 11, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
POSITION FOR HILLARY IN OBAMA’s ADMINISTRATION!!!!!
Secretary of NAG griculture. This would be a good start in getting experience in being honest with America’s farmers. She’s good a shovelling it.
Posted by: Joris | March 11, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
Hello everyone,
I am so happy that Obama will win so I can watch the US fall from grace! anyone who votes for Obama is assured a Mcain win! and that means bankrupt country, endless wars, who know we might become the next third world. You see there is no way! no how! Obama can compete against Mcain, he has years of experience, Obama may have the elegance and words but no experience! all those of you who are in buisness would you hire an inexpereinced apprentice or someone who has years experience. Logical to hire the experienced no matter how we look at it words or elegance is not going to get the job done. The media has not begun to hunt Mr.Obama, the last they did he got frazzled. At least Hillary would go toe to toe both have experienced and it would be a great match. You can’t put a light weight fighter with a heavy weight fighter. you gotta put two equal fighters! no matter what happens US is going down, Moveover US the next superpower is about to show it’s ugly head.
Posted by: arenter | March 11, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
I’m troubled by Ms. Ferraro’s suggestion that sexism is the culprit in Clinton’s failures. I supported Ms. Ferraro for elected office because I felt her to be honest, sincere and principled. I oppose Sen. Clinton because she’s none of those.
Posted by: CHarris | March 11, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
There wouldn’t be a democrat in the race if we had a respectable media base that repoeted without bios
Posted by: Doug | March 11, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
Hillary or Barak? It doesnt matter. Both are liberals who, if elected, will increase your taxes, increase the size of government, turn to socialism, squash free enterprise, reduce individual rights, promote ‘victimization’, promote class envy and class warfare, promote isolationism versus globalization, and continue to deny domestic oil drilling, nuclear power and hydroelectric power plants… among other things. SOCIALISM DOES NOT WORK! Hillary says she will take ‘BIG OIL’ profits from them because they are too large…if this were to happen, why would ANY business STAY in business?? THEY WOULDN’T! There is no incentive to work hard and make money, if you’re just going to have to give it to the government. But of course, Hillary and Barak know better than we do what to do with our money – we are too stupid and helpless to think for ourselves. Both of them needs to take an Economics 101 class…God help us if either of them are elected president!
Posted by: USA hosed if Dems win | March 11, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
Go Geraldine Ferraro!!! You are the Woman!! Thank you for having the courage to stand up to the racist pandering and ugly sexism that has been going on throughout this primary! The Press has been falling all over themselves to avoid any of the tough issues surrounding the Obama campaign! Thank you for having the backbone to bring to light the most obvious issues … not even a white guy could pull off being a “play it safe” state senator for 7 out of 9 years, and play a “minor role” as a US Senator for two years in which one of those two years spent running for President!) and become President of the U.S. … and regarding Obama’s oratory skills — we haven’t forgotten about his preaching — we are all sick of the TELEVANGELIST!! Get off the campaign trail and go find a church!
Posted by: Merry Jaine | March 11, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
Its perfectly legit that they’re both there because of their physical characteristics. After all, “its not the content of one’s character but the color of one’s skin (or gender) that counts!” -MLK
Posted by: DNC LVR | March 11, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
Let’s face it…there is NO ONE on EITHER side of the Aisle who has what this country needs. Hillary Can’t Do It, even though she is a woman. Obama Can’t Do It, even though he is black. McCain Can’t Do It, even though he is old and a vet.
We need to start OVER again…and that means the people need to finally take back what those in Washington have stolen from us: our liberty, our money and our rights.
A $3 Trillion Budget? Does that make ANYONE out there sick? Does it make anyone out there terribly afraid of the future of this great nation?
No control over our borders? No control over who enters this nation and uses the very services we pay pay for? does that not ANGER anyone? No one but U.S. Citizens should have their education, health care, food, rent or anything else subsidized by me or any other citizen with our hard earned tax dollars.
Tax Breaks for the Middle Class? Sorry to burst the bubble here, but I am middle class and I barely pay anything. I have always been refunded the vast majority of what was withheld. The people who make the money, invest the money, start businesses need the break. One of those people pays my salary! He loses his so-called “break” and I may lose my job…get real people and start focusing on the heart of the matter: this nation spends too much on all the things that do nothing to advance our standard of living, our place in the world and any sense of personal responsibility. Obama, Clinton and McCain will simply continue this charade until we are broke and 3rd world.
Posted by: Kurt- Richmond, Va | March 11, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
Wait….so she’s saying that “white guilt”, not strong judgement, clear leadership and the ability to inspire record numbers of voters to become involved with politics for the first time in decades is behind Obama’s success – but meanwhile, sexist bigotry is behind Hillary’s struggles, not her negative camapigning, deceitful claims, seemingly multiple personalities, etc etc? I mean if she can’t even control her campaign well enough to tie down a supposedly “inevitable” nomination, then how can she expect to lead the country as our President?
And for me, as a 35 year old, middle-class white male, how is it that my supposedly inherent racism has led me to support Obama, while my supposedly inherent sexism has led me to oppose Clinton?
Why can’t Clinton’s campaign stick to a positive portrayal of her stance on her strengths? Oh yeah, because her strengths have been based on false claims of “experience”. Can’t lean too hard on lies or they’ll be exposed.
Posted by: Sean | March 11, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
Glass house. If Hillary hadn’t been married to the president she definitely wouldn’t be there. Being a president’s wife is way more effective for helping yourself out than being black.
Being black hurts your chances significantly. Otherwise black men would be over-represented in Congress, which definitely is not true.
Posted by: salamander | March 11, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
The insanity of Liberalism: Guess what? Racism and sexism will NEVER be eliminated. It is a pipe dream to imagine that they could be. People have evolved to make JUDGMENTS, to make DISTINCTIONS, to DISCRIMINATE between various options. Everything comes into play, including race, including sex, including height and weight. It’s just like libs to constantly dream up new ways to point fingers at one another and cluck their tongues. OF COURSE FERRARO IS RIGHT! Obama is a nobody! Clinton is a nobody! The only reason they are where they are today is that they are a) Democrats and b) belong to so-called “protected” classes. Which classes the liberals dreamed up in the first place. Just what we need, an affirmative-action President. Let’s hire a real man for the job, even if it’s only John McCain. DUH!
Posted by: gfm2008 | March 11, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
The Democrats are airing there dirty laundry in this election. Their party is essence a coalition of single issue “victim” groups based on race, gender, sex, and evironment woven together by an underlying Socialist ideology. The Obama-Rodham Clinton is just a clash between two of the groups that are “entitled” to the nomination based on past collective greivances.
On another note, I am sick of the ridiculous demands for apologies. Both campaigns have made statements in the past and those statments should be measured by the voters. As a voter, I don’t want the PC police telling me what to think, and “forcing” the violators to “submit” for their sins. At least Geraldin Ferraro is honest.
Posted by: Tony | March 11, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
“The fact of the matter is, if he gets elected, then every person who voted for him needs to be held accountable for putting him in office when he really starts screwing things up – and he will, if he gets in the WH.”
Hillarious you voted Jed Clampet Bush into the white house. Even if he screws up royally he will still be 1000 times better than Bush. Talk about no experience look at what the republicans brought to the table for the last 8 years. Hillary is no more qualified by that logic we should should have Nancy Reagan running on the republican ticket.
Posted by: Gary | March 11, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
A number of writers have said that Obama is the “affirmative action candidate”.
How can that be? The voters who have given him a lead in the popular vote, delegates, and states won have absolutely no obligation to exercise affirmative action.
He’s getting the votes because he is the better politician and has the better message. He is saying what people want to hear and, from his past and current behavior has convinced people he can be trusted.
btw…. which population would you rather have “on your side”…. women at more than 55% of the democratic party…. or blacks at something considerably less?
This idea that Mr. Obama gets an “unfair advantage” by being black is no more true than the idea that Mrs. Clinton gets an “unfair advantage” by being a woman. He is a first rate thinker and politician who happens to be black. Are blacks a strong part of his constituency? Yes. Can they elect him as the nominee? No. Women theoretically could elect Mrs. Clinton to be the nominee. The effect Geraldine Ferraro identifies is actually much in favor of her candidate… not to mention the effect of having the popular former president as a full supporter even to the point of the implication that a vote for her is effectively a vote for a third term in some people’s minds. Given these effects, what Obama has accomplished is very impressive.
Go Obama. The country needs fresh thinking and strong visionary leadership.
Posted by: jake | March 11, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
And the last time the majority of blacks in this country even botehred to vote en masse was???? Ask most of them what Barack Obama stands for and they will give you a blank stare. It is a race measured by race, pure and simple.
Posted by: jr | March 11, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
Obama is all about change. What change? How will he do it? Isn’t this what all Presidential Candidates are about? What newness would BHO bring to the table? IMHO all BHO brings is the talk of Hope, but to be honest, with a Congress as misguided as we now see all anybody can Hope for from BHO is just a new face only with color. As MLK said “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.”
It’s evident we’re not there yet.
Posted by: Tim | March 11, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
What could be better for Obama than for an old has been like Ferraro to belittle him and get the spotlite off other more important issues, like his long term association with Rezco. He would, if elected, be the most liberal socialist president this country has ever seen. The possibility that he could radicalize the supreme court ala the Warren court should bring every conservative and moderate voter out of the woodwork to see that this doesn’t happen. Black white or any color in between this guy is not the answer to the problems we face. It’s just a risk that we don’t have to take to rectify some perceived guilt from the past that no one alive today had anything at all to do with.
Posted by: Jim from KC | March 11, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
We should hope Obama gets elected, if he does, There can be no more excuses of the MAN holding down the black man. Racism in our country as we know it will no longer have anything to stand on. You can’t have the President of the United States be black and say we are a racist country. The excuse will be gone.
By the way, the most powerful person in entertainment is a black woman. hmmm!!
Posted by: mark | March 11, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
We should hope Obama gets elected, if he does, There can be no more excuses of the MAN holding down the black man. Racism in our country as we know it will no longer have anything to stand on. You can’t have the President of the United States be black and say we are a racist country. The excuse will be gone.
By the way, the most powerful person in entertainment is a black woman. hmmm!!
Posted by: mark | March 11, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
The illogical and inconsistent statements Clinton supporters make to discredit Obama is mind boggling. A few weeks ago (2/12/08 Ed Rendell, PA’s governor and Clinton supporter), said that Obama is probably unelectable in PA because of his race; other Clinton supporters have brought up Obama’s race as a negative. Now they are saying he wouldn’t have gotten the votes he has and be where he is because of his race? Get it straight guys; you are beginning to sound like the Bush administration spokesmen in its run up to war, i.e., say anything to get what you want, damned the inconsistencies. My, my, Dr. King would have been so proud of your race baiting. So what if it were true? Instead of citing this as just one of those sad facts of life, you should be speaking out against it in righteous indignation. Is this how the last 150 years of blood, sweat and tears of the civil rights movement to end, with the party carrying that mantle to not nominate a black man because of the fear that a bunch of bigoted rednecks will not vote for him? John Brown went to the gallows because he rolled the dice against insurmountable odds; he swung, but his soul kept marching on.
Posted by: ChucikB | March 11, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
Most of us wouldn’t be where were are today if we werent who we were. And feel lucky about it too!!!!
Buckaroo Banzai couldnt have said it better than Geraldine.
Get On With It, Geraldine and say something at least somewhat relevant!!!!
Posted by: Allen | March 11, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Oratory skills my foot.Obama is not that great of a speaker unless of course you count his ability to rehash the same old tired speech that he has mastered and repeats at every stop.
If you listen carefully the fool speaks about three words,four at the most and pauses to search his empty brain for three or four more words.The ineptness of his approach in speaking has apparently rubbed off on his wife as she displays the same broken thought process.Just telling it like it is.
The media and others who praise his approach use it as a way to say something good about him when in fact it is the only good thing they can find to say about him.
You can always tell when obama is about to say something that he has not previously rehashed over and over again.As he always uses the word UNDERSTAND prior to saying anything that has not been rehearsed and rehashed.
How is that a man who claims to have chosen to help the unfortunate people in Chicago by not taking a high paying job can now afford a $1.6 million dollar dream home on the low pay of a state senators income and now that of a U.S. Senator???
The math does not add up no matter how you try and figure it.The guy has been caught with his hand in the cookie jar and is obviously complicit to some degree with Rezko in obtaining his dream home.
Geraldine is correct in her observation.
Posted by: mike | March 11, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Pure unadulterated racism.
The Clinton wing of the Democratic party ought to be ashamed of themselves but of course we must remember they have no shame or scruples.
I hope African Americans and we non-racist white folks in this country will root out not so subtle racism exibited by of all people Geraldine Ferraro this time in the name of feminism? Give me a break. SHAME ON YOU!
Nathan
Columbus, Ohio
Posted by: Nathan | March 11, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
I really hope that Clinton steals the Democrat nomination. I can’t wait to see the stupified faces of all the new, young and independent voters when they realize thier voice does not matter to the Democrat political machine.
Then McCain can tell these poor lost sheep that he will listen and care for them. Ha, ha, ha, ha …. it’s all so predictable. I love the Clintons and thier unmasking and destruction of the Democratic party.
Posted by: Republican McGee | March 11, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Spot on Geraldine—-beyond “the race thing”? Are you serious? Case in point Keith Ellison – MN. Because people (Minnesota Liberal-Wannabees) were “so angry” about the war they elected a Muslim…pure and simply a race/ethnic motivated decision. Obama? He’s black, no experience, no plan and let me mention one other Minnesota political failure brought on by the “19 year old vote” of an unqualified but exciting individual….Jesse Ventura.
Posted by: RS | March 11, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
OMG: Can it be true? Finally, all you Dems out there are really showing your true light. You ARE RACISTS and always have been. It’s so clear now. Hahahaha. What a bunch of Hypocrites. The Democrats are racists.
Posted by: mark | March 11, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
I’m a white male, originally from Europe. I’ve lived in America for over 10yrs, and have grown to love the US.
However, the one thing I can’t stand is the leave of sick overt racism that exist here.
The fact that Obama’s skin color, for many still super seeds the fact that he has galvanized a normally apathetic electorate like no other since JFK… Is hailed by those that lectured him at Harvard as a genius, is a master orator etc… Is of no consequence to many, it only fuels there hate.
All 3 Obama, Clinton,or McCann would make excellent Presidents, but this transparent racism makes me sick!! clearly experience isn’t the issue here.
When Bush ran, I heard no charges of inexperience leveled against him, well founded as they would have been…. Around the world Bush is seen as a buffoon, thats just the plain truth!!
But many here, would prefer a white male buffoon to be the leader of the free world, than a black genius!!
Such a sadness.
Posted by: danny James | March 11, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Gary:
“Hillarious [sic.] you idiots voted Jed Clampet Bush into the white house…Talk about no experience look at what the republicans brought to the table for the last 8 years.”
It seems to me that George Bush has performed his most solemn duty with great success: he has prevented dozens of terrorist attacks on American soil after 9/11. And, as we all know, the planning, training and test-runs were all conducted right under the nose of the Clinton administration.
So you may find it “hillarious,” but at least we finally have a President who takes threats to our country seriously, which Democrats obviously do not, if they are even thinking about voting for either of their two top clown candidates.
Posted by: gfm2008 | March 11, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
And, Mrs. Ferraro, Hillary wouldn’t be where SHE is if her last name weren’t Clinton.
Posted by: Ejay | March 11, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
CGP
I’ts possible that he did steal the speech, however, the deliver left an auditorium in silence,tears,followed by a loud standing ovation. You had to be there to understand.
Posted by: Rich Hall | March 11, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
Ferraro is right. If Obama were a white male who started running for president the FIRST YEAR OF HIS FIRST TERM in office he would have been laughed out of the race in three days.
Posted by: helmann | March 11, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
Look at me an Obama supporter and tell me if Obama’s movement is real?
I’m a white, Rush Limbaugh listening to, life-long pro-life Republican who has never voted for a Democrat.
HELLO ESTABLISHMENT???!!! People are fed up with you corporate politicians on both sides that couldn’t give a damn about the middle class much less the underclass.
Sue us for wanting to believe just one more time, that we may have a true change agent, that is not as rotten to the core as old worn-out corporate politicians like the Clintons. At least McCain is honorable, but he’s still part of the problem. Obama gives us Hope. And we will win, because I believe that Hope and Love will cast off Fear and Hatred.
Grow up! America is ready. And Obama is going to be the next President of the United States. If Hillary is successful in stealing it from Obama, it will create a revolution even bigger.
Sincerely,
Nathan
Columbus, Ohio
Posted by: Nathan | March 11, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
I’t acceptable for a black to say they’re voting for Obama because he’s black….it’s acceptable for a woman to say she’s voting for Hillary because she’s a woman. But let a white man say he’s voting for McCain because he’s a white man & you’ll be labeled the biggest racist on the face of the earth. Why the double(or triple) standarsd???
Posted by: M Derosa | March 11, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Why doesn’t Hillary and her ilk get lost?? Hillary cannot win at this point as it’s mathematically impossible and she knows it.
You lost Hillary so step aside so the party can unite and plan strategy to defeat McCain.
So what if you win PA, Obama wins N. Carolina and you gain nothing.
Hillary – Your end has come, the public rebukes you so scram!!
Chevy
Posted by: Chevy | March 11, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
Well it’s the truth, Obama has 90% of the black vote, black racism at it’s best.
Posted by: Democrats 08 | March 11, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
McCain..may God be with us all…will win the election. The open primaries have the republicans voting him in so that the they will have an easier win!
Posted by: Just Me | March 11, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
“I’ts possible that he did steal the speech, however, the deliver left an auditorium in silence,tears,followed by a loud standing ovation. You had to be there to understand.”
Spoken like a true believer – circa 1932 Germany. Sure, and I came away from a Led Zep concert thinking that Jimmy Page should be our next President. God, how stupid you have to be if you really make decisions this way…
Posted by: gfm2008 | March 11, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
Danny,
You’re nuts. If a continent is Racist, surly it’s Europe. France and Germany especially, but Spain and the Basques, England and the East Indians, all over eastern Europe. Who has been elected prime Minister or President in Europe that was a person of Color? We’ve got someone with a real chance in only 230 years or so. How many centuries have you had a chance to do it. Take a hike with your we’re worse than you because we’re not.
Posted by: Mark | March 11, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
I love it when liberals get caught in their own web of liberalism. Enjoy!!!!!
Posted by: RC | March 11, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Talk about hypocrisy! Geraldine Ferraro was an undistinguished House member with a crooked husband in 1984. Is there any doubt that if Geraldine Ferraro had been Gerald Ferraro she never would have been put on the Democratic ticket? THE ONLY REASON PEOPLE HAVE EVEN HEARD OF FERRARO IS BECAUSE OF HER GENDER!!!!!
Posted by: Jack Ryan | March 11, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
“Ferraro is right. If Obama were a white male who started running for president the FIRST YEAR OF HIS FIRST TERM in office he would have been laughed out of the race in three days.”
HuckaBurger ran and he was laughed off the stage as well. As was Rube Paul – now there’s experience at its best.
Posted by: Chevy | March 11, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
ALLEN , Sorry they got to you and you now live every day of your life in fear of basic criminals . You have more to fear from illegal immigrants than you do from anyone else .If you give up liberty for security then you deserve neither . As for Geraldine , she is still on the feminist movement and we knew the big guns would show up near closing time to bad mouth . IMO I woud have voted for Mickey Mouse rather than McCain , Clinton or Obama , but I know where McCain is headed (UGH) I know where Clinton is coming from ( UGH UGH ) and since Mickey is not on the ballot that only leaves one , Obama . You dolts should have gotten on the Paul bandwagon , now suffer .
Posted by: bob graham | March 11, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
“Well it’s the truth, Obama has 90% of the black vote, black racism at it’s best.”
Actually, for whatever illogical reason, blacks traditionally vote about 90% for Democrats. I know, it makes no sense whatsoever, since liberalism has only held black people down since the advent of affirmative action.
Posted by: gfm2008 | March 11, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Good Lord…this woman is a racist. She could have been the Veep. Disgraceful
Posted by: LT | March 11, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
THE ONLY REASON PEOPLE EVER HEARD OF FERARRO IS BECAUSE OF HER GENDER!!! Does anyone really beleive Mondale would have selected her as his running mate if she were Gerald Ferarro? She was just an undistinguished House member with a con artist husband. Now she is questioning Obama’s accomplishments? What a hypocrite!
Posted by: Jack Ryan | March 11, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Aren’t you forgetting the states Obama won in which there were so few African-Americans that they all could have carpooled to the polls?
I’m a white, middle-aged baby boomer and I’m voting for Obama. Maybe then, the Clinton’s and their nasty polictics will disappear from the public arena. I’m sick of it.
Posted by: Mary | March 11, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
Hillary should be careful! Her true red neck abilitlies are starting to surface!….You know, “birds of a feather, flock together”
She has not commented on these remarks because she is in agreement with them.
Posted by: Collette | March 11, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
I actually am surprised when a Democrat tells the truth.
Posted by: Gerry | March 11, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
People crack me up when they say BO wouldn’t even be able to run if he was white because of his resume. Huh?? Have you heard of John Edwards?? Edwards barely served one term in the Senate and was second in the running for the nomination in 2004. Edwards didn’t even have as much legislative experience as BO when he ran for POTUS.
So…please spare me that BO wouldn’t have been able to get this much traction if he wasn’t black.
Posted by: clarence | March 11, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
You know, if everyone would stop freaking out for ONE SECOND they’d realize that it’s true. She’s 100% right. The only reason she’s known as well as she is, is because she was the first female vice presidential candidate. No one in this chat room, including me, remembers more about her than that. And the only reason Barack has been as stratespheric is because he’s a succesful black man. But he’s not a presidential-qualified successful person and that’s what will lead to Hillary getting the nomination. Everyone stop saying: “stop it, yuck, you’re mean Geraldine” and ask yourself if it could be true for a moment. He wouldn’t be where he is right now if he were white. End of story.
Posted by: Holy Cow! What if It's True? | March 11, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
To Danny James, the European, in particular:
As unfortunate as it is, race = politics in America. Many blacks will vote for, or defend, another black no matter what the circumstances. Marion Barry was re-elected Mayor of Washington DC even after being caught doing crack cocaine. OJ Simpson was acquitted of murdering his wife and her friend by a black jury despite overwhelming evidence of his guilt.
You are not American, and you don’t understand the realities. Obama is a very good speaker, but he has accomplished nothing. I will not vote for him because I am not a tax-and-spend liberal. I believe in limited government, and Obama offers the same tired, rehashed 60s liberalism. If a conservative black were running, I’d vote for him/her. So please keep your self-righteousness to yourself. I am not a racist and you should not presume to know my heart.
Posted by: Victoria | March 11, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
And what’s also true is: if Hillary WERE A BLACK WOMAN, she wouldn’t be in the position she is in either. She is not the first woman to seek national office.
Posted by: idiot loser femi's | March 11, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
The delicious irony here is that Hillary is supposed to represent the crown jewel of feminism yet she would be nothing more than a frustrated, old, liberal spinster had she not hitched her wagon to Hurricane Bill.
Posted by: Drake | March 11, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
I don’t see a “black man” when I look at Obama.
I see someone, like me, who grew up poor. Who didn’t have a dad around, who’s mother may not have been totally capable of raising kids on her own, who had to go out on their own to get where they are. Who had to be on public assistance at times when he was little.
All these things happened to me too – doesn’t matter that I’m a white female, and he’s a black male. I see myself. So when he’s up there making speeches, we don’t think of ‘words’, we just imagine what’s it would be like to have a government that doesn’t screw around for 8 years at a time!
That’s the difference between my generation and Ferraro/Clinton’s generation. We see people, they see demographics. We look to the future, they live in the past. Clear them out of the Party, if it wants to survive.
Posted by: Ari | March 11, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
I am so sick of people saying Bush is stupid. Do you people understand how the Media is controlling you.
Dem’s are ripping the Clintons a new one now, and you don’t even realize that it is because of the Media! Satuday Night Live shows Dem’s as lovable, and the Republicans are always shown as idiots or evil. Jay Leno, Jon Stewart, and every other talk show host has always told us how stupid republicans are. It’s called brain-washing!
The Media has decided that Obama is the new “American Idol”. You know they give the Idol contestants the words they sing, too. I think it is time to vote him off the show!
Years ago, I yelled “Yes We Can!”during a baseball play-off game at the Aneheim Angels stadium. Obama did not say it first!
What is this “hope” crap, they keep shoveling out. Wishing and Hoping gets you nothing. “I hope I get a good grade.” Unless you study, then don’t count on it. You will not better yourself unless you work hard.
Wake up!
Posted by: EmmaLee3 | March 11, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
IS OBAMA ASHAMED THAT HE IS BLACK? I DONT UNDERSTAND WHAT THE BIG DEAL IS,UNLESS HE REALLY IS ASHAMED.
Posted by: JOHN | March 11, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
Democrats and Republicans are both wrong! Regardless of who wins it will be business as usual – “We have the best government money can buy” Corrupton galore on both sides!!!
We are NEVER going to get change until we vote in a 3rd party nominee.
WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Mark Farrin | March 11, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
“I am a 53 year old, white woman, highly educated, with a mind of my own. ”
Sorry Kasha F. But, you do fall in Obama’s demographics. He gets the “highly educated” vote.
Posted by: clarence | March 11, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
Hello, does anyone recall that in the first half of the primaries obama was grasping at the black vote, he only had white men,femms, and a very small portion of black vote, he had to reorganizie and take a whole new path to imcompass them. Hilary, she might as well be a rouge republican flying by the genetically modified seed of her own pants!
Posted by: Katz | March 11, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
“Chevy: it is also a mathematical impossibility that obama can win….”
This is exactly my point. The Hillary ilk machine have lost as it’s mathemattically impossible for those markists to surpass Obama’s lead yet they refuse to step aside and think they will win by fiat. These ilk don’t believe in a representative govenment.
Unfortuneately for them we live in a democracy supported bt a representative government.
Had to laugh when Obama make light of him being her VP. He reminded her who was winning and who was losing.
True, Obama lacks experience but what’s more startling is the country prefers him over her and that really speaks to what a terrible candidate Hillary is.
Karl Rove was right. He stated long before this started Hillary would be rebuked by America because she’s a flawed candidate.
Rove was so right!!
Chevy
Posted by: Chevy | March 11, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
Why would anyone vote Democrat after witnessing the primaries? This is the biggest mess in election history. And some of you want them running your health care, the oil companies and retail. They can’t even run a simple campaign. How can they possibly run a country? Think about it!!!!
Posted by: EAGLE35 | March 11, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Danny James, if you never heard criticisms of Bush’s experience you weren’t listening very hard. They were all over the place, but people voted for him because he was “the guy they wanted to have a beer with”, instead of voting for the intelligent, experienced Al Gore. Barack Obama is the same as W except liberal. Just as inexperienced, just as wrong for the presidency.
Posted by: Chris | March 11, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
I FEEL PLAYING THIS RACE CARD IS WRONG.I DON’T CARE IF HE /SHE IS WHITE BLACK RED GREEN. IT SEEMS LIKE THIS ELECTION IS RUNNING ON RACE AND NOT ON WHO IS THE BEST CANIDATE FOR THE PRESIDENT . AND IF PEOPLE WANT FACTS: OBAMA IS JUST AS MUCH WHITE AS HE IS BLACK CONSIDERING HE IS 50% OF BOTH . HE IS MIXED BUT IN THE MEDIA HE IS ONLY BLACK AND YOU ONLY SEE HIS BLACK SIDE OF THE FAMILY AND NOT THE WHITE. WHY / ( WHO’S PLAYING THE RACE CARD) THINK ABOUT.
Posted by: DONNA | March 11, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
Can someone please tell me what Obama is about? I know – Hope and Change. But can someone please tell me what he is going to do. How is he going to accomplish what it is he is going to do?
If you’re looking for a revolution, look for Ron Paul (he’s technically Republican but he might as well be a Libertarian) or Ralph Nader. A third party. Sorry but supporting a major party candidate is by no means a revolution.
Posted by: LIbertyCrisis | March 11, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
Ms Ferraro,
You forgot to mention that if Hillary’s last name was not Clinton, she would not even be considered for president.
Posted by: bobg | March 11, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
And Geraldine Ferraro wouldn’t have been selected as the Vice Presidential candidate in 1984 if she hadn’t been a woman?
Moreover, the press has been pretty sofy on Hillary Clinton. We haven’t heard one word about Whitewater, Travelgate, the Rose Law Firm Records, the ’93-94 Health Care Task Force, Monica, Gennifer, Kathleen, or any other bimbo eruptions. And if you think the Republicans aren’t going to mention this in the fall, you’re naive.
Posted by: Sam Kepfield | March 11, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
Sorry, Ms. Ferraro, I am a 58-year old white woman who has voted Republican all my adult life. I voted for Senator Obama in both the Texas primary and caucus, and will vote for him in the general election because I am tired of the old politics of my generation. People like Ms. Ferrari are too jaded. It’s better to hope for a change for the better, even if we might end up being disappointed, than to accept an untenable status quo.
I want a better future for my children.
Posted by: Linda Griffin | March 11, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Rich Hall, So the delivery is the most important thing? If you were there and were so moved by that speech, only to find out it was plagerised, didn’t you feel a little duped? Geez, are you that shallow? That’s the problem with radical liberals – EMOTION RULES THE DAY – forget logic, forget morality – it just FELT good – that’s all that matters. kum ba yah
Posted by: CGP | March 11, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
Does the possibility of hope come from Obama because he says so and many of you beleive what he says or does it come from his experience, which he has absolutely none? God help us all if either democrat candidate wins. Neither has much experience at all and their socalist views are not good for the USA.
Posted by: Awkins | March 11, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
Obama is a liar. He claims to want unity but voted AGAINST making English the official language of the United States of America. He said that we should have 2 classes of citizens in the US – when talking about ILLEGAL ALIENS!!! They aren’t citizens in the first place! He’s a nightmare and he will make our country weaker and worse off.
Posted by: Dave | March 11, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
Of course Ferraro is correct. What white man so lacking a record in congress could run for president. People are being fooled by a black man whose claim to fame is he can conjugate verbs. Of course she should have also said without Bill fooling around with every skirt Hillary would never have become a senator and wouldn’t be running for president either.
Posted by: Dan | March 11, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
Of course Ferraro is correct. What white man so lacking a record in congress could run for president. People are being fooled by a black man whose claim to fame is he can conjugate verbs. Of course she should have also said without Bill fooling around with every skirt Hillary would never have become a senator and wouldn’t be running for president either.
Posted by: Dan | March 11, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
It is a tragety that free speech is now a thing of the past im America. If the debating teams of Harvard and Yale were to compete in a debate concerning this issue raised by Ferraro it would make for compelling theatre. I can say that if all things were equal and barack were caucasion he would not have 80%-90% of the black vote, especially againsed the once beloeved Clinton’s. This simple reality alone would have changed the primary vote in many states against Obama. The bottom line is that statements concerning race and gender are completly off limits and the Fist Amendment is toast. Welcome to the world of making cartoons about a religious group a killing offense.
Posted by: shelly | March 11, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
GOD BLESS AMERICA ON THIS ONE.+
Not a bad statement.
Posted by: Kay Mason | March 11, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
SO if iam to play along with this moron game , Hillary wouldn’t be here without BILL Clinton.
Bill Clinton would be that big name actor or producer.. who got their wife foot in the door.last i check barack came up from scratch with no rich family.The real women are your barbara boxer, Clair MCcaskill, Condi Rice.last i check these women did it without help of a former president.
Posted by: Cindy | March 11, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
Maybe Miss Queen Geraldine should ask herself “If Hillary were a (MAN) would she be in this situation?” Hell no! The bottom line is, the only reason why Obama, Hillary and McCain even have a shot in hell to win the White House is because of George Bush, and he has lowered the bar so low that anyone running for president now will look good. If it wasn’t for George Bush than the only other thing McCain, Hillary and Obama could get elected to other than being corrupt politicians is an insurance salesman, real estate agent or used car salesman, same mentality.
Posted by: Doug | March 11, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
Geraldine who?
I think I remember reading about her in my ancient history class.
Posted by: Politically aroused | March 11, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
well if obama was white he wouldn’t be pulling in 90% of the black vote. which is whats putting him over the edge.
Posted by: RICK | March 11, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
It’s not just race!
There are a number of ways you can say the weather sucks but Obama says it with flair. Obama doesn’t speak like he’s addressing the senior home.
Obama can be black, white, yellow, red, white and blue and he’s still delivering a positive, hyped, and exciting message. Obama identifies with people!
Hilary dull! John unexciting! Why do people listen to Obama he’s not boring. I may judge what he is saying later but I listen and it makes people feel good. Remove your head, we love feel good stuff as seen on TV.
I believe in Johnny MAC’s (John M.) messages but the guy just puts me to sleep. MONOTONE!
Plus we just don’t like the idea of Bush, Clinton, Bush and back to Clinton. John gives us someone new also. The smartest guy in my office is ignored because he’s boring and boring never wins over anyone!
Posted by: cayto | March 11, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
Obama’s lucky he is who he is? Is this old hag serious or comatose? The “monster” is lucky she is who she is. Cheez, I hate using the word “is” so many times in one sentence because it is what it is and it is a woman who is losing. Geraldine, you your son and your husband are lucky you are who you are or two out of three would be in the slammer. Lucky!
Posted by: MikeinOhio | March 11, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
For decades up here in Mass. we have seen the same Democratic attitude..GIVE ME YOUR VOTE AND THEN SEE YA LATER. WHILE BLACKS NOW HAVE HEAR THAT THERE ACTUALLY WAS A BLACK STATEWIDE OFFICE HOLDER IN MASS AND A BLACK US SENATOR WHAT THE FOLKS LEARNED WAS HE WAS A REPUBLICAN..AND GREATLY ADMIRED BY ALL..HE WON IN MASS AS A REPUBLICAN AND GAINED LARGE MAJORITIES OF VOTES ..MS. FERRARO IS JUST SAYING WHAT DEMOCRATS REALLY THINK..YOU CAN VOTE BUT YOU CANNOT RUN. LAST YEAR MASS GOT ITS FIRST BLACK GOV..DEMOCRAT..AND HE GOT ELECTED WHILE THE DEMOCRAT SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE WAS IN COURT FOR DISENFRANCHISING BLACK VOTERS! NOW WE HAVE A GOVERNOR WHO WAS INDEED NOT READY AND FOR YEARS THE DEMOCRATS PREVENTED TRULY “TALENTED” AND “READY” FOLKS FROM RUNNING FOR THAT AND MANY OTHER POSITIONS..SAYING..”YOUR NOT READY”, “IT’S NOT YOUR TIME”, ETC…Democrats are SO MAD THAT ONE OF THEIR NEEDY CONSTITUENTS ..FROM THE DOWNTRODDEN MASSES HAS ACTUALLY MADE IT THAT THEY ARE NOW SOUNDING RACIST. SADLY, IF THEY CONTINUE ACTING THIS WAY THEY WILL NEED TO SEEK OUT A NEW CONSTITUENCY. in the meantime, I am having a lot of laughs at these HOLIER THEN THOU, MORE CARING, HELPING THE CHILDREN, HELPING THE NEEDY…DEMOCRATS… THEY ARE SOUNDING LIKE KINDERGARTEN CHILDREN..NONE ARE FIT TO RUN FOR DOG CATCHER!
Posted by: cARON | March 11, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Ferraro was a joke when she was on the ticket for VP and she is a joke now.
Posted by: DOUG S | March 11, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
Obama is where he is today because of the racism of black voters. Black voters are judging Obama based on the color of his skin, and not on the content of his character.
MLK is rolling over in his grave to see that blacks have become even more racist than the Souther Democrats who overwhelmingly voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Posted by: Monroe | March 11, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
Hey Doug! Why is it that you expect whites to vote for non-white candidates, and if they don’t they’re racist – while blacks and other non-whites who vote ONLY for their own, whether in the US, Europe or their own lands are not racist? Typical brainwashed PC junk.
Posted by: mlj | March 11, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
Only a democrat can play the race card and not get Al and Jessie in their face.
Posted by: DOUG S | March 11, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
It’s sad, when a well-respected liberal makes such an obnoxious, racist remark. It reminds us that racism pervades our culture.
Posted by: Digger | March 11, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
well iot is true.
any first term senator running for president has a sense of entitlement. hillary clinton has that flaw also.
no qualification for president from either one.
the bombastic mccain is even worse.
we’ll be iraq for 100years but can he count that high?
i don’t know anything about the economy. well we know that.
Posted by: deroy | March 11, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
“Everytime he complains about Hillary, he has the same shame in his background.”
Really? He has viewed hundreds of fbi files of political enemies? Been involved in the campaign fraud resulting in millions of dollars of funds from defrauded investors? Hundreds of thousands from a dry cleaner? Pardon for money scandal involving his brother? Cattle futures scheme? His right hand woman removed files from a dead cohort’s office during an investigation? Is know running his campaign? Rose law firm billing issues and schemes? His right hand man smuggled classified documents out of the national archives and destroyed them only to be arrested and convicted of a felony and then hired by his campaign as an adviser?
Say what you will about Obama. Socialist? YES. Inexperienced and unqualified to be President of the United States? Without doubt. But Hillary, who is also a socialist who lacks qualifications to be President, has something Obama does not. A track record of attacking and destroying enemies, lying, obstructing justice, slash and burn politics, and doing whatever it takes to obtain more power. She is more of the same divisive red state vs. blue state slash and burn politics.
Posted by: Jay PS | March 11, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
“Everytime he complains about Hillary, he has the same shame in his background.”
Really? He has viewed hundreds of fbi files of political enemies? Been involved in the campaign fraud resulting in millions of dollars of funds from defrauded investors? Hundreds of thousands from a dry cleaner? Pardon for money scandal involving his brother? Cattle futures scheme? His right hand woman removed files from a dead cohort’s office during an investigation? Is know running his campaign? Rose law firm billing issues and schemes? His right hand man smuggled classified documents out of the national archives and destroyed them only to be arrested and convicted of a felony and then hired by his campaign as an adviser?
Say what you will about Obama. Socialist? YES. Inexperienced and unqualified to be President of the United States? Without doubt. But Hillary, who is also a socialist who lacks qualifications to be President, has something Obama does not. A track record of attacking and destroying enemies, lying, obstructing justice, slash and burn politics, and doing whatever it takes to obtain more power. She is more of the same divisive red state vs. blue state slash and burn politics.
Posted by: Jay PS | March 11, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
I for one cannot believe it has taken this long for someone to brooch this subject.I as a non american having spoken tomany other non americans came to the same thought long ago.
Mr.obama has really said less of anything signifigant in all his rhetoric than Mr Edwards did in one week.
Where is Mr. Edwards??
Mr. obama has lots of charisma, but so did Pierre Eliot Trudeau [former Canadian P.M] and Adolph Hitler, LOTS of charisma but no substance.
Using the race card against anything factual or negative may play well @ home
but I doubt anywhere else
Remember the Clinton Years ,High dollar value, low unemployment, Americans
traveling abroad did not need to put
Canadian flags on their luggage or backpacks. Yep those Clintons were sure awful.
Posted by: Al | March 11, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Geraldine Farrero is neither racist nor stupid. Voters who feel this way aren’t either. I am a liberal who wants someone who has worked! for a while at their respective job before getting a promotion. I am not voting on ideology which, to my regret, many others liberals are doing. It is this spoiled mentality characteristic of American behavior that one should get anything they want at any time they want it. Obama hasn’t earned presidental qualifications
but that doesn’t matter to selfish, self serving, fanatic brats with Degrees who think progress means voting for a Black Man. We all need to gow up in this country- All of us, and soon.
Posted by: Frank | March 11, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Hillary continues to let surrogates spout racist comments while she stays clean as a whistle. Typical.
Posted by: TV Diva | March 11, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
Sorry Digger, facts are not racist. Can Democrats ever engage in debate w/o playing the race card?
Please tell us what qualities Obama has that got him where he is today. Would over 90% of blacks be voting for him if he was white?
What a tool
Posted by: Monroe | March 11, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
Geraldine Farrero is neither racist nor stupid. Voters who feel this way aren’t either. I am a liberal who wants someone who has worked! for a while at their respective job before getting a promotion. I am not voting on ideology which, to my regret, many others liberals are doing. It is this spoiled mentality characteristic of American behavior that one should get anything they want at any time they want it. Obama hasn’t earned presidental qualifications
but that doesn’t matter to selfish, self serving, fanatic brats with Degrees who think progress means voting for a Black Man. We all need to gow up in this country- All of us, and soon.
Posted by: Frank | March 11, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
I Hillary were a white male she too would be no where on the political horizon. These two make Dan Quail look great.
What losers, both of them, full of sound and fury but no substance.
Posted by: ray jablonski | March 11, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
Barack Obama might be where he is simply because he is the right person at the right time, who is able to restore our vision of ourselves as Americans. Ronald Reagan had that rather rare quality. His candidacy is certainly helped by the fact that Hillary Clinton is carrying none of the experience she claims, but is lugging around a lot of baggage created by herself and her husband, the former president. Political pundits have for months analyzed why Clinton is having so much trouble uniting the Democratic base behind her. Could it be simply because she is who she is, and there’s nothing sexist about it? I think voters are indeed ready for a female president. Unfortunately, it is unlikely Clinton would be able to beat John McCain in November, while Obama stands a good chance at bringing home the prize.
Posted by: Curt | March 11, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
Hillary may be a monster, but at least she’s not the Antichrist!
(Neither is Obama, as far as I know.)
Posted by: Bobarian | March 11, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
I though it to be impossible for enlightened liberals to see anything in terms of color.
Posted by: killerbee | March 11, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
Linda G:
“It’s better to hope for a change for the better, even if we might end up being disappointed…”
Spoken like a true liberal. Don’t worry about their positions on the issues, don’t worry about their experience (or lack thereof), don’t concern yourself with the enormous strategic risks this country faces… Just “hope for the better.”
The politics of hope. Hoping that the Democrats are sincere when they offer you free healthcare, an end to war, no more disease, an end to suffering…
This is called “magical thinking.” It is the depth of thought that characterizes a child. And it’s frightening to think that almost half the country is so arrested in their development that they actually live in this kind of fantasy world. God save us if either of these clueless fools gets elected.
Posted by: gfm2008 | March 11, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
this statement may not be racist, but it is extremely condescending and belittling to what Obama has accomplished. When she ran as VP she definitely was selected only because she was a woman…so if anything…she’s probably jealous. Obama has run a masterful campaign and reguardless of what you think about his politics we should be proud as americans for that. But for her to say he is only where he is because he is Black is just sad. If the republicans were smart they would pounce on this so if Obama doesn’t get the nomination people may look to the republicans. Obama is a true american success story…leave it to the liberals to stomp on it.
Posted by: James | March 11, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
Democratic Party SHOULD repeal caucus VOTING. confusion, CHEAT, foul and rotten social conditions
Posted by: dan | March 11, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
In the first 5 months since Obama anounced his candidacy, 95% of the stories in the media mentioned the color of his skin. Why is that? What percentage of artivles mentioned the color of Hillary’s skin? McCain’s skin? Anyone else’s skin? ZERO
Obama is the Affirmative Action candidate, and he is where he is solely because of the color of his skin.
Only fools would argue otherwise.
Posted by: Monroe | March 11, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
All I can say is this election is truly bringing out
anti-black sentiment in this country. I can’t wait forr the comments that come out when he is the nominee, No wonder Obama has has had secret service detail since last September.
Posted by: Sharon Joseph | March 11, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
whine…whine…whine…
That is all I ever hear out of any Obama or Hilary supporters! ‘Oh…she said that…how hurtful’… GIMME A BREAK! It is OKAY for someone to say what Geraldine said…why? BECAUSE THIS IS THE USA!!! It is called freedom of speech you yardbirds! AND…Obama is running for POTUS, so he best have some thick skin when it comes to these things…
I am so tired of hearing “how disgusting”…and…”I denounce that”…just grow some more layers of skin…on your backbones preferably.
Posted by: Brian | March 11, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
I am a 52 year old man, who has always voted Democrat, but not this year, I will vote Republican because I can neither trust a liar (Hillary Rodham Clinton) nor a completly inexperienced man (Barak Hussein Obama)whose rethoric is scary and full of empty hope.
Damn with the color of their skins, they both are just BAD. (oh, btw, aren’t you guys tired of people who say they belong to one party but will vote for the other one?)
Posted by: Vic | March 11, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Clinton “has all the solutions”.
Obama gives people hope.
Clinton “is ready on day one”.
Obama give people hope.
Clinton “has thity-five years of experience”‘
Obama gives people hope.
Clinton HAS ALL THE ANSWERS and is ready to RULE on day one.
Obama is ready to LISTEN to the people.
Posted by: joes | March 11, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
Why can’t we openly discuss race without venom being heaped upon the discussion by supposedly color-blind liberals (not color-blind when it comes to affirmative action or denying that Obama may have been helped by the circumstance of his race)?
For those of you hollering that Ferraro is a racist, please back it up with reasoned arguments that support the position that Obama would be in the same position were he a white male with absolutely no experience. If you cannot do so, or if it is at least open to a lively debate, Ferraro has made a point worth discussing.
One of the pillars that our country was built upon was the belief that ideas should be openly discussed and that the marketplace of ideas would anoint a fully-vetted way forward for America. This environment of repression of freedom of speech under the guise of political correctness distorts the marketplace for ideas and frankly makes me sick.
Posted by: Publicus | March 11, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
This is great! Denver ’08 is going to make Chicago ’68 look like an old ladies’ tea party.
I just hope that John McCain has the courage to choose Condi Rice as his running mate.
Posted by: Bobarian | March 11, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Obama is where he is today because of the racism of black voters. Black voters are judging Obama based on the color of his skin, and not on the content of his character.
****************************************
Oh really!! So when BLACKS came out and vote in droves for the Kennedy’s how you explain that.have it ever occure to you that Obama is the best candidate.
And if you want to go there then explain why so many white women especially the older ones is voting for Hillary.a wide contrast to males.ya see we may not like the answers.
Posted by: alan | March 11, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
America is asleep. Of course Ms. Ferraro is correct! Obama has got zero qualifications to be president! He talks about hope & change ? Hope FOR what and change TO what ? ” Hope And Change ” is nothing more than a bad MTV slogan. And who says this guy is charismatic ??? Compared to what or whom ??? He is way too liberal, way to leftist. He is so liberal he is the type of person Arnold would call a Girly Man.
Besides, I know many ” Union ” people who would never in a million years vote for either Hillary or Obama. A Clinton- Obama/Obama-Clinton ticket is a sure loser. Don’t believe those polls out there either. They are ask in such a way as to favor either Clinton or Obama against McCain. America, do your homework !!!
Posted by: Edie | March 11, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Hey, come on guys. Ferraro was on a ticket that won 1/50 states and 40.5% of the popular vote in the 1984 election. She clearly knows how to win a campaign.
Obama has the support of the young vote – people who grew up under different circumstances and really don’t care what color someone is. Maybe some of Ferraro’s friends and advisers feel the need to make reparations, but I don’t. I support Obama because I think he is vastly superior to Clinton. All you need to do is see how Clinton has botched this primary campaign to see how she would perform in office.
If she can’t choose the right advisers to help her manage what should have been a simple campaign, how can I expect her to choose the right advisers to help lead the country?
Posted by: MH | March 11, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
If Hillary Clinton was a white man she wouldn’t be in this position either. A marginally successful, white, male, liberal senator that had utterly failed at the largest government task undertaken would have resigned the contest with Joe Biden and Chris Dodd. If Hillary was a white, male senator she couldn’t play the victim card over an unfaithful spouse or survive the campaign finance feau paux that have continued in your campaign. Name the last white male senator whose spouse recieved a $10,000,000 advance for her memoirs or received $10,000,000 making speeches all over the world to help finance their campaign.
Geraldine, you are selling yourself short sweetie, you earned your place on the ticket honey, you didn’t marry into it!!!!
Posted by: Jim Roach | March 11, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
Blacks are judging Obama based on the color of their skin, and not on the content of his character.
Black voters have defecated on MLK’s Dream.
Show me one Democrat primary candidate that more blacks have voted for? EVER
The truth really does hurt. Democrats are in denial.
I noticed that as you were attacking me, you “forgot” to say why Obama is so qualified?
Posted by: Monroe | March 11, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
If Obama was white, this would have been over a whole ago, with him the winner. What a nut job for Ferrarro saying he’s lucky to be where he is due to “who he is”. Is that Black? “Sexist media, some just don’t like her”? Hey, her is a tip, when you run for President, don’t try and manipulate, influence, screw the media, maybe, just maybe they will treat you like crap, and then you seem like you are a baby whining about it. Good plan Hillary camp. I have had enough of that couple. Done like toast. Obama no matter how inexpreienced he is he will be 10 times the Pres that this idiot Bush has been.
Posted by: John | March 11, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
I for one am offended as young republican of his comments. I’m a 23 white female and my husband is a 23 white male and we believe that Obama will help unite our two major parties, Ferraro basically clarifies the problem to me, he and Clinton cannot see a problem meaning she cannot fix the problem. Every ten minutes you hear Clinton talk about the democractic party and the democractic nomination. Obama sees past his party and sees the American people, I’m not niave, I know that he understands politics and is a politician but he also sees that Americans are sick of this trivial bickering of parties and the get nothing done congress.
Posted by: Heidi | March 11, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
Heidi, you are naive, as you say. Obama has a record as far to the left as you can get. There will be no uniting America, but more dividing. Unless you call uniting Americans into a huge tax increase good. In the 2 years he has been in Congress, he has not voted once with anyone who is remotely moderate, much less conservative. If you support a woman’s right to murder her baby and the government’s right to take your money and give it to someone who doesn’t work, then go ahead and vote for him.
Posted by: Enrico | March 11, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
Oratory skills my foot.Obama is not that great of a speaker unless of course you count his ability to rehash the same old tired speech that he has mastered and repeats at every stop.
If you listen carefully the fool speaks about three words,four at the most and pauses to search his empty brain for three or four more words.The ineptness of his approach in speaking has apparently rubbed off on his wife as she displays the same broken thought process.Just telling it like it is.
The media and others who praise his approach use it as a way to say something good about him when in fact it is the only good thing they can find to say about him.
You can always tell when obama is about to say something that he has not previously rehashed over and over again.As he always uses the word UNDERSTAND prior to saying anything that has not been rehearsed and rehashed.
How is that a man who claims to have chosen to help the unfortunate people in Chicago by not taking a high paying job can now afford a $1.6 million dollar dream home on the low pay of a state senators income and now that of a U.S. Senator???
The math does not add up no matter how you try and figure it.The guy has been caught with his hand in the cookie jar and is obviously complicit to some degree with Rezko in obtaining his dream home.
Geraldine is correct in her observation.
Posted by: mike | March 11, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
The last thing I want is a president who will get things done. The only things they accomplish is wasting more money and turning this country into more of a police state. What we need is some good old fashioned deadlock between congress and the executive so that they quit spending us into bankruptcy.
Posted by: Joe | March 11, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
If Geraldine were black she wouldn’t be where she is. If Hillary were black she wouldn’t be where she is. If McCain were a woman…well as well as all of us. What the hell?? If my uncle was a woman he’d be my aunt! We are all very lucky as well as all of us are unlucky. For a person of her stature to say something that ignorant, she must have another agenda.
Posted by: RickB | March 11, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
If it weren’t for the “black” vote in 1991 Bill and Hillary Clinton wouldn’t be where they are today.
If it weren’t for his white mother and grandparents who stuck by him, Barack Obama wouldn’t be where he is today.
If it weren’t for the contributions of all races, America wouldn’t be what it is today.
Posted by: Politically aroused | March 11, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
Enrico,
Okay, I just want clarify how I feel about the issues you brought up, first of all I believe strongy that abortion should be illegal but unless ALL of congress wants to vote for a ban on abortion (which is not happening in the next 8 years) then the only power Obama has is electing the Supreme Court Judges. I doubt many of those will be changing in the next 4 years. I don’t want this to turn into a War conversation, I do not believe that we should police the world and I do not believe we should be in Iraq. I feel strongly that McCain or any americans can dispute the money that Obama wants to spend on government programs when he wants to continue to run us into debt with this war. Not saying I agree with every program Obama wants to put through (most of them are good ideas, but alas so was social security and now it is a mess), just like you probably wont agree with everything McCain does.
Posted by: Heidi | March 11, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
We are facing a national nightmare,if Al Sharpton and his mail order reverend
certificate in hand ,is indeed our next vice president,God help us as we slip into a civil war !!!!!!!
Posted by: Concerned Citizen | March 11, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
“For those of you hollering that Ferraro is a racist, please back it up with reasoned arguments that support the position that Obama would be in the same position were he a white male with absolutely no experience.”
John Freakin Edwards!!!
He had no experience…finished second was nominated for VP. There’s your argument right there.
BTW Blacks were with Bill Clinton…a majority of them never cared for Hillary..research it! But you know blacks so much!!!!
Posted by: clarence | March 11, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
Clarence,
Obama is not now in the same position as John Edwards- Obama is likely to win the primary. Your vitriolic reaction proves my point that the mere mention of race has become so taboo that the health and vitality of public discourse has suffered.
Posted by: Publicus | March 11, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
I can see that the people will have to have the well run dry before they realize their mistakes in voting in this up coming election. to put a no experience in that position is tantamount to being on a fringe that is destructive to say the least. would someone in the audience ask him a straight up question and lets see how he answers that , its going to happen if he is the choice because McCain will ask some pretty hard things of him and I wonder if Obama can come off of the same ole same ole and ask McCain some hard questions also . we will see when the vote is counted and when either one that wins it, we will see if they have the salt to run this great country . But remember your choice is there for four or more years and we have to live with it , Impeachment is out of the question that is harder to do then you think
Posted by: Ken Roberts | March 11, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
After reading countless comments here, it looks as if our country is in serious trouble. We need to choose a leader who knows how to lead, who is moral, who is above enticing people with the empty rhetoric of “change” and “hope”–empty that is of any operational definition. And we need to look beyond such craziness as skin pigment in selecting a U.S. President. May God have mercy on our country this election year. The Democratic candidates have exposed their rival’s many flaws. That leaves McCain standing (Ron Paul did not have the support of large numbers of people). I hope McCain will bring what this country needs. Kyrie Eleison. LORD, have mercy upon these United States.
Posted by: Rik | March 11, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
Sen. Obama is the best nominee for the McCain campaign. He is the weakest candidate the Democrats could possibly nominate. Obamamania will start to peter out as Americans find out more about Chicago politics. Sen. Clinton would be a lot harder to beat because she knows how to use hatred and envy better than anybody else, except for her husband.
Posted by: P | March 11, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
Its quite notable that all of these democratic big-wigs who are alleged champions of racial equality are ever so subtly rearing their racist heads.
If the Clinton mafia steals the nomination, an entire generation of idealistic young white voters will be completely disillusioned with the democratic party and a huge plurality of African Americans will feel disenfranchised because a former First Lady, who made a mess of her Health Care legislation in 1993 and who carpet – bagged her way to the Senate and has served 6.5 years “pork barreling” is deemed by the White big wigs to be the “Great Veteran of National crisis.”
Posted by: Matt Cornish | March 11, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
Has anyone really inquired as to what made the Arkansas Grifter/Governor so qualified to be President of the United States in 1992? When you compare his then experience with that of President George Herbert Walker Bush’s experience at that time, there was absolutely no contest. Billy Jeff had been a governor of a Hillbilly state whose primary export was and is Chicken manure and who cornerstone business is Wal-Mart, and whose involvement with various schemes stink of scandal. Indeed, Billy Jeff was unknown until he gave a tedious speech at the democratic convention in 1988.
Posted by: Dan Workman | March 11, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
When Ferraro ran for VP she was very sensitive about being singled out for scrutiny because of her Italian ancestry, especially when it came to an investigation of her campaign finances.
Funny, Hillary still hasn’t released her financial statement has she?
Is it because he is black that Mr. Obama has no trouble raising millions over the internet and can be transparent about his finances?
No, it is because he is a true leader.
Is it because there is indeed a latent racism in the Clinton campaign that Mrs. Clinton cannot only officially disavow and repudiate Mrs. Ferraro’s comments but also distance herself from Mrs. Ferraro completely?
Perhaps.
Posted by: Robert Campbell | March 11, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
Obama gives people hope! How can a man turn hope in to a trivial argument into a burden. Synics laugh and say “he talks about fairytales of hope” they say it as if hope is a bad thing these are the real fools. I say if you think hope is a joke…the jokes on you…to hope is American! Barack obama for change for hope in 08′
Posted by: dragonberry | March 12, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am
I have been for Barack Obama only since January when I began to compare what he is offering compared to what Clinton is offering. I started to see the same old divisive rhetoric and a real inability to connect with people except when she was feeling sorry for herself (crying at the diner because it’s just so tough).
What I see in Obama that I really like is his consistent behavior (no one’s perfect) and his slowness to anger. He doesn’t react–he thinks about consequences before he opens his mouth. I see self-centeredness in Clinton’s campaign and a willingness to sacrifice the national good for her own aggrandizement.
That Geraldine Ferraro (who I once admired) would make such statements–not just a slip but a complete line of reasoning by her–is almost inexcusable for a person of her standing and supposed understanding of how her statements will be taken. I say “almost inexcusable” because I’d like to see her apologize.
Posted by: rationalpsychic | March 12, 2008, 3:13 am 3:13 am
What garbage?
Obama is where he is…because of his intelligence and ability to bring groups together that have very different interests.
Posted by: Jordan Mardan | March 12, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am
Wow! Being a black man is a plus now? I didn’t get the memo.
Posted by: djapee | March 12, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am
Mrs. Ferraro is out of touch with the public. Otherwise she would not make such a belittling statement.
Posted by: Algis | March 12, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am
rationalpsychic, I agree with you. That is precisely why there so many folks always are looking for 3rd party candidates. I suspect if Blomberg decided to run he would probably do at least as well as Perot did in 1992. Heck, if Perot can garner 18% of the vote any reasonable 3rd party candidate could do much better. I think the majority of Americans are tired of the Democrats vs. Republicans nasty campaigns. And Hillary\Bill vs. Republicans would be the epitome of nasty campaigns demonstrated by her tactics recently. It will turn people completely off.
Posted by: John | March 12, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
When Ms. Ferraro says “Barack Obama is only in this position because he is black” or “Jesse Jackson is only running because he is black” (back a few years ago) she is NOT “simply stating a fact”.
It IS a fact that these two candidates (in different election cycles) DID benefit from the black vote. But there are a lot of other big factors at play. Obama is disadvantaged by not being married to a former president and by not being a woman, and by not being white in this race.
The fact Ms. Ferraro is that Obama’s success is primarily due to his intelligence, character and political skills in interpreting the public mood.
Geraldine Ferraro’s comments yesterday and today are the most blatant kind of cynical race baiting. She is simply engaging in a carefully calculated strategy to bring the campaign down to the lowest level without directly publicly involving Clinton because of the Clinton campaign’s belief that it will work to their advantage. They believe that they can appeal to an underlying racial resentment within the remaining non-black primary voters. They are trying to convince people who aren’t racist that they “play the fool” by allowing the blacks to take advantage of them somehow, and thereby convince them to vote for Clinton instead. So far, the democratic voter has been, for the most part, immune to this very unfortunate retrogressive message.
Just consider Ferraro’s comments as though they have come directly from Bill and Hillary Clinton and you will have the accurate picture.
Clinton supporters have been quick to paint the Mississippi win as “defined by race”. This is exactly the same thing Bill Clinton did immediately after the South Carolina win. To try to denigrate, belittle, and dismiss.
In fact, it is like there are two elections going on simultaneously. Obviously Obama is benefiting from overwhelming black support…. and in those states with a large black Democratic population, the vote is strongly affected by race. But to emphasize that point and pretend… therefore… that Obama is just winning because of race… is totally ridiculous. He was won many almost completely white states by larger margins than he has won largely black states and has he done very well in the largest states where the proportion of blacks is relatively small.
The Clinton campaign is proudly and unapologetically using any and all sly tricks, no matter how dirty and misleading, to try to mold public perception. Apparently to them this is “just politics” and to them the ends justify the means.
Sadly, as this type of thinking has become more the norm, the country is worse off for it because it works against productively dealing with the issues of concern to the public. It would seem … for those who enthusiastically engage in such tactics… that “the issues of concern for the public” are not that big a priority.
Posted by: jake | March 12, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
Ms. Ferraroh, What was the purpose of your remarks? What good do you think would come from them? You were oki-doked into the mud slinging the Clintons promised. If you are mad you should take your anger out on the Hilary because she is using you to help salvage her faltering presidential campaign. Your comment on race and gender are in bad taste and is helping destroy the unity of the Democratic Party. If you are a true Democrat, then you should apologize to those you offended, and help stop the party implosion, which you have precipitated, much to Senator McCain’s pleasure
Posted by: Jim" Stop the Implosion | March 12, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am
So, I just want to be clear: has Hillary “rejected and denounced” Geraldine Ferraro yet?
Posted by: Mary T. | March 12, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Has BHO ever even mentioned his white roots…you know, his entire youth when his white mother raised him?
Posted by: pp | March 12, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
The democrats never yelled racism when 75-80% of “Black” people supported Bill Clinton and other “Democratic Canidates”. Bill Clinton would have never been elected President in the 92 and 96 elections if not for the “Black” support. In both he got greater than 80% of the vote. From my perspective “Blacks” have been and remains the unifying force in several areas of our society. That is why I am suprise that the Clintons and their surrogates are attempting to make the “What” in this election seasons the fact that Seanator “Obama” happens to be considered a “Black” man. I suspect that “Blacks” are supporting him for the same reason that I am. Simply stated he is a man for the the times we are living in to help make the world a better place. He demonstrates wisdom beyond his years. This is clearly why he has not taken the bait and attacked the Senator on several of the key issues she attacks him on. He knows they are attempting to create a racial backlash. You are indeed wise Senator Obama. Keep the high ground and “God” will get you home.
Posted by: murl41 | March 12, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
There is no way I think the majority of black voters know what Obama’s plateform is.
Posted by: pp | March 12, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
If Obama were white, he would not be viewed as the “symbol” of hope all of his supporters bragged about. That is precisely what his skin color has provided some people. If he were white, it would have been okay to go into his record with fervor, but any attack is turned into being “bamboozled” or “racist”. He’s got that extra angle and he and Axelrod flash that card everytime they can whether it’s ridiculous or not, just throw the accusation out there because some will buy it. The media definitely will run it, that’s how they get an audience.
Posted by: irma | March 12, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
My favorite Ferraro comment; “This has made me more commited to raising money (for Hillary). Yeah! I know what you mean sister!
Posted by: irma | March 12, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
I agree with Ferraro 100% – also voted for her way back in the good old days… when will women wake up and stand together for change!
Posted by: Kat | March 12, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
Barack Obama has dedicated his life to public service as a community organizer, civil rights attorney, and leader in the Illinois state Senate. Obama now continues his fight for working families following his recent election to the United States Senate.
Sworn into office January 4, 2005, Senator Obama serves on the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, which oversees our nation’s health care, schools, employment, and retirement programs. He is a member of the Foreign Relations Committee, which plays a vital role in shaping American policy around the world, including our policy in Iraq. And Senator Obama serves on the Veterans’ Affairs Committee, which is focused on providing our brave veterans with the care and services they deserve. In 2005 and 2006, he served on the Environment and Public Works Committee, which safeguards our environment and provides funding for our highways.
During his eight years in the Illinois state Senate, Obama worked with both Democrats and Republicans to help working families get ahead by creating programs like the state Earned Income Tax Credit, which in three years provided over $100 million in tax cuts to families across the state. Obama also pushed through an expansion of early childhood education, and after a number of inmates on death row were found innocent, Senator Obama enlisted the support of law enforcement officials to draft legislation requiring the videotaping of interrogations and confessions in all capital cases.
so 8 years in Illinois Senate and just about 5 years in US Senate.In 1991, Obama graduated from Harvard Law School where he was the first African American president of the Harvard Law Review.
yeah, he’s totally not qualified to be President. Just like Kennedy wasn’t qualified when he won or Abe Lincoln.
Ferraro wants gender to trump race in the hierarchy of oppression, well I have one better for her I’m black AND female so take that!Or did she forget that not all blacks are male and not all females are white?
Posted by: Simone | March 12, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
now…let’s look at how qualified and experienced Bush was…
George Walker Bush born July 6, 1946) is the forty-third and current President of the United States of America. He previously served as the forty-sixth Governor of Texas from 1995 to 2000 and is the eldest son of former United States President George Herbert Walker Bush. He was inaugurated as President on January 20, 2001 and his current term is scheduled to end at noon on January 20, 2009.[4]
Posted by: SIMONE | March 12, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
and H. Clinton…help me understand her 35 yrs. of experience oh wiat she gts credit for the debate team in college, sitting on her momma’s lap at a civil rights meeting…wait no…they were repubs…first lady of Arkansas working on numerous initiatives, first lady of US and her failed Healthcare plan, 6 years in US Senate
that about sums it up
Posted by: simone | March 12, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
I subscribe to the Daily Breeze and read her entire interview — what she said is true. Liberals give blacks a pass because they are afraid of being called racists, yet when blacks or other minorities say the same thing about whites, nothing is said. Ferraro is a liberal who has the guts to speak the truth, just as Bill Cosby is a black with the guts to speak the truth — and both get slammed for it.
Posted by: BJC | March 12, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
I subscribe to the Daily Breeze and read her entire interview — what she said is true. Liberals give blacks a pass because they are afraid of being called racists, yet when blacks or other minorities say the same thing about whites, nothing is said. Ferraro is a liberal who has the guts to speak the truth, just as Bill Cosby is a black with the guts to speak the truth — and both get slammed for it.
Posted by: BJC | March 12, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
What is with all the women supporting Hillary to the bitter end? Don’t any of them even realize how many women the Clintons have destroyed over the years? When Bill was done using a woman or got one that said no it was Hillary’s job to destroy that woman’s reputation and career and smear her in the press and Hillary always went at it with gusto. If you’re going to be mad at someone for mistreating women, get mad at Hillary. At the very least she enabled Bill Clinton, for goodness’ sake don’t enable her. “Sister” my eye. The women who think Hillary is all that are getting used.
Posted by: Jersey Dave | March 12, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
Geraldine Ferraro’s comments were uncalled for regardless if it’s true or not. Sen. Obama has gotten this far due to his accomplishments,hard work, helpers, etc. Why would you make a racial based comment when your complaining of sexism toward H Clinton? A perfeshional being televised knows that there are just some things you shouldn’t say out loud.
Posted by: Emmanuel Lewis | March 12, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Ms. Ferraro,
I am terribly disappointed. Your recent suggestion that Mr. Obamas’ success happened only because he is black is especially painful. To think that being black in America is a lucky thing strikes me as being inconsiderate.
I am a black person born the same year as Mr. Obamas’ wife 1964, and I can tell you at no time in my life was being black a lucky thing, or are you unaware of the sad and continuing legacy of American race relations. You disregard Mr. Obamas’ legitimate and laudable accomplishments by attributing them to one thing, and it’s the one thing Mr. Obama tries least to be – a man of race. Mr. Obama is a child of God, a husband, a father, a university graduate and a lawyer. Mr. Obama has been a stellar state representative of Illinois and he is currently a United States Senator, and great American. Somewhere probably in the high teens of the list of things Mr. Obama is would be black man.
The statements you have made and defend amount to making his race his primary attribute. You are playing the race card in a manner that is insulting, and quite frankly would be more expected from the kind of reactionary people America has hopefully outgrown.
In 1984 I was a student at the University of Southern California an institution with a traditionally conservative bent. I remember campaigning for and ardently defending a certain congressperson from New York as being more than just a woman, but a person regardless of gender worthy to potentially lead this country. I’m sorry to know now that I was wrong, and all the time any Gerard really would have sufficed.
Posted by: Albert Johnson Jr | March 12, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
Ferraro is just another goon for The Clinton Campaign. They are trying to pull out reverse psychology here on the media too in yet another attempt to play the refs. Ferraro is hurt and appalled?…by comments that SHE made!!! The Obama Camp are trying to distract voters from issues with the race card?…SHE brought up the issue of race. You can’t say “play fair and focus on the issues” in front of the camera, but take a cheap shot aimed at race as soon as the camera is off. We saw Samsntha Power resign for a comment much less offensive than this, yet Clinton simply “disagrees” with Ferraro’s comments; much like an unknown “staffer” circulated a photo of Obama in African garb to try and convince voters he is Muslim, which according to the Clinton Camp is a bad thing; and, much like The Republican John McCain would make a better president than Obama.
What more does Clinton need to do to fall out of grace with Democrats and be portrayed in a more negative light? People keep waiting for Obama to slip up, yet it is the Clinton Camp that has slipped up 3 times now with the photo, the McCain comment, and now Ferraro. She is dividing the Democratic Party in order to convince people that she should be given an election that she has clearly lost.
This is hurting the Democratic Party and she needs to be stopped before she destroys it for her own benefit. Blacks make up a large portion of the party, and she is refusing to disown a comment that claims that it’s easier to run for president being black than it is being white. How does she say now that Obama should be her VP when she has associated herself a comment that suggest that Obama’s only qualifications are his speeches and his race? How does she win black votes now if she was to steal the nomination? How does she get anybody to endorse her with her message of racial division?
She is killing the Democratic Party by using the very thing that the party is against, racism. She needs to be stopped here, and the only thing that can stop her before she destroys the party is an endorsement from major party leaders in an attempt to re-unify the party. Al Gore, John Edwards, and Bill Richardson need to come out and endorse Obama and reject these comments and reject the tactics taken up by the Clinton Campaign or this party will be destroyed.
Posted by: Anthony | March 12, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
Okay. Geraldine. I’ll take you up on your hypothesis. Let’s do a portrait of an imaginary white guy, running for president, a young guy with not a lot of years of political experience in comparison to the stalwarts running his party. He is one of the more intelligent people in the race. He does have a lot of experience , but not the same kind as his opponents in the race for his party’s nomination. He is a great orator and has developed almost a cult following.He connects with people with a simple message, but underlying that message is a broader understanding of his generation and where the country needs to go at home and abroad.
Yep..no doubt about it, the guy is going to lose. Wait! I forgot, I am so wrong. We’ve already elected that white guy-his name was John Fitzgerald Kennedy. Oh… right. No..I guess I was wrong. He only won because he was Irish-Catholic. I forgot.
And what will you say. You’ll say “I knew John Kennedy and Barack Obama is no John Kennedy.” And again your right. Barack would be better.
Posted by: Bob Long | March 12, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
Ferraro’s comment was not a racist one; it was an objective one. The fact is that a significant portion of Obama’s support is derived from his message of “hope,” which is inextricably tied to his own ability to have pulled himself up by the bootstraps in spite of his race. Obama is receiving an overwhelming amount of the black popular vote; I do not believe for one moment that 90% of black Americans in Mississippi firmly believe that Barack Obama is the best candidate regardless of race. They believe he is the best candidate, at least in significant part, specifically because of his race.
I do not want to discredit Obama’s accomplishments. As a social worker, I firmly support his work as a community organizer and have a great deal of respect for that. However, being a community organizer and working in public defense does not mean that Obama is ready to lead our country in the White House, nor does it provide a better resume than his competitor’s.
Senator Clinton has significantly more experience than Obama, and she has a history of fighting for the constituents of the Democratic party. I think this campaign just goes to show that sexism is as strong as ever in our country, and unfortunately the policy of affirmative action is playing out in the unfair way its opponents proclaim that it does. Obama is receiving a hand-up over Hillary Clinton, in spite of clear evidence that she is significantly more qualified to lead our country.
Posted by: Mary Ann | March 15, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
If anyone can relate to Barack Obama’s position, it should be Geraldine Ferraro whose own vice-presidential campaign was clearly hurt by the fact that she was a woman (as she perhaps hints at with the comment, ‘he wouldn’t be in this position…if he was a woman.’). As we can all see from his speech yesterday, Obama is taking the right approach to these comments of questionable integrity. Obama supporters should applaud Clinton’s camp for using such questionable tactics; they’re only going to help Barack in the end.
Posted by: Bryce | March 19, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
This just goes to show we are not ready to really discuss race in this country. JFK is a silly comparison, he was rich and groomed in politics by a political family. Sexism is the real issue in this campaign. Maureen Dowd’s op-ed piece in the NY Times about Clinton’s “emotionalism” was perhaps the most sexist article ever published outside of fringe far-right publications. If a man had written that article it would never have been published. Ferraro was wrong, the country is not ready for this level of discussion, she should have known that as a white person she could not say what she said without being swiftboated.
Posted by: Kimberly Clark | March 24, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
Geraldine is right but the media is not interested in truth. What white man could take 90% of the black vote in southern states against a Clinton, whose husband was called the first black president. Note that Obama does not win the working peoples vote.
Note also that the states he wins generally vote republican in the national elections. Isn’t it ironic that republican states are trying to choose the democrat nominee.
Posted by: j.A.Laukaitis | March 28, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
Obama for Vice President in 2008!
Posted by: Agitator | April 19, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
I think this says it all: “Geraldine Ferraro’s comments were uncalled for regardless if it’s true or not.”
Yes, don’t speak the truth if it’s politically incorrect. However people don’t vote for political correctness, and they can scream “racism” when he loses. Suit yourself.
Posted by: Howya Doin | April 25, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm