By Jennifer Parker

Mar 12, 2008 5:44pm

‘Gerald’ Ferraro Equates Self with Obama

While we’re waiting for more information about former vice presidential nominee Geraldine Ferraro’s resignation from the Clinton campaign, there’s something I wanted to touch on.

On Good Morning America this a.m., Ferraro said she hadn’t meant any offense by her comment that Obama is only where he is because he’s black.

"I was talking about historic candidacies and what I started off by saying (was that) if you go back to 1984 and look at my historic candidacy, which I had just talked about all these things, in 1984 if my name was Gerard Ferraro instead of Geraldine Ferraro, I would have never been chosen as a vice presidential candidate," Ferraro said." "It had nothing to do with my qualification."

How can you compare being chosen as a VP nominee on a ticket that was stomped like a narc at a biker rally* (popular vote loss of roughly 17 million votes, final electoral score — 525 electoral votes for Reagan-Bush, 13 for Mondale-Ferraro) with Obama winning state after state after state and leading the Democratic presidential race?

This is not the same thing.

– jpt

* This is an old Dennis Miller joke.

User Comments

Well, Ferraro is terrible, clearly a racist (compare her Obama remarks with her Jesse Jackson remarks in ’88) but she stepped down and that’s a good thing for politics in this country. We need nor want racists around.
Hillary isn’t particularly lucky with the support she got from prominent women. Pelosi is against her, Ferraro revealed her true colors, and two world famous feminists enormously dislike her.
First their was Germain Greer who spoke about her as “bossy and cold and manipulative” and who stated: “I can’t see that Hillary would appeal to feminists because, why is she there? She is there because she is Bill’s wife.”
Now there’s America’s own Camille Paglia, who published an essay on Hillary Clinton online and it ain’t a recommendation.
I quote:
” Hillary, her shrill voice much improved and lowered through brutal overstrain, has certainly gained confidence and performance skill on the campaign trail, but I still don’t trust her. The arrogant, self-absorbed Clintons have shown their unscrupulous hand to all who have eyes to see. Yes, Hillary may know the labyrinthine flow chart of the Washington bureaucracy, but her peripheral experiences as a gallivanting first lady scarcely qualify her to be commander in chief. On the contrary, her constant resort to schmaltzy videos and cheap entertainment riffs (“The Sopranos,” “Saturday Night Live”) has been depressingly unpresidential. Is this how she would govern? All that canned “softening” of Hillary’s image would have been unnecessary had she had greater personal resources to begin with. Her cutesy campaign has set a bad precedent for future women candidates, who should stand on their own as proponents of public policy.
Would I want Hillary answering the red phone in the middle of the night? No, bloody not. The White House first responder should be a person of steady, consistent character and mood — which describes Obama more than Hillary.”
I as well btw think it’s time for Hillary to go home.

Posted by: Deirdre | March 12, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Deidre…I agree completely!

Posted by: Mary | March 12, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

No, Jake, it isn’t the same thing. Ms Ferraro is saying that her only qualification for being chosen as vice presidential candidate is because she was a woman. That she had no other qualification. OK. Fine.
But then she further lets it stand that Senator Obama is not qualified to be a presidential candidate but that African-Americans should be proud of him anyway because he is running and doing well.
The entire thing is so condesending but Ferraro doesn’t get it. She just refuses to see why anyone should be angry about this. No wonder she and Hillary are such good friends, neither one wants to admit to making a mistake.
However, Ferraro stated on Fox News that even if she is removed, she will continue to fundraise and support Clinton. So, I don’t see any big news over the supposed seperation. She will just continue her work in the background. It won’t make any difference to Hillary.

Posted by: Chip | March 12, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Sorry Deidre: Hillary is not going home just yet. Many of us feel it is time for Obama to slither back to Chicago at least 50% of us.
Mrs. Ferraro just spoke the truth, but St. Obama is not to be questioned in any way. He is coming off his high horse real soon, when there will new revelations in the Rezko trial.

Posted by: Jay | March 12, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

That would be true if
1. If you never had that weird mindset to make sue derogatory comment.
2. If yo achieved something education achievement as that of Obama.
3. If you started your life from as challenged and stigmatised a situation as what the black child grow up in this country
4. If you have the ability to draw as large a crowd by your speech regardless of race/color/religion..
5. If you achieved as much as Obama achieved after having raised by a struggling teenage single mom.
..I could go on. I will stop here since there are no more hope for you in this regard.

Posted by: moeen | March 12, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

All of these comments at the least just make her look dumb. She phrased it as if this were THE reason… and it WAS to discount all of his other qualifications.
I’ll give that it might be one of the attributes that adds up to what makes him a great candidate…but to say he wouldn’t be there for just the fact that what he is communicating is different than any other pol. Especially as one as young and connecting with the younger vote. Just dumb I think…and maybe she is not keyed into her own biases…that everyone has on one issue or anohter. But then apologize and walk away … if for nothing elseseeing that such a large section of the population thinks what she said was …”not cool.”

Posted by: dl | March 12, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

I struggle daily to “get it” It is tough for some boomers. I may not understand as much as I should but I am sure of one thing:
Geraldine does not “get it”

Posted by: flyover | March 12, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

This was long overdo. Her comments were offensive and ignorant. The fact she had to resign and not fired speaks volumes of Hillary Clinton. As an African American women I’m offend. Not for the reasons Mrs.Ferraro stated, because of Hillary’s behavior during this campiagn. I would LOVE to have a women president and also an African American. I was torn until the past couple of months. Hillary surrounds herself with the most bias supporters which makes me question her character and judgement. I will NEVER vote for Hillary. She’s not fit to run this country.

Posted by: Vanessa | March 12, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

What a change from that completely arrogant showing she made on GMA this morning! I am actually very surprised because I thought she was gonna stay the course. I understand that this may not change the role that she plays in Hillary’s campaign but it definitely will affect the perception of that role and as we all know…perception is everything sometimes.

Posted by: What.Say.Me... | March 12, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

The MSM looked the other way as obama campaigns before a black group with words as “bamboozle, Hoodwinked, Okedoke”. And nothing said about that but a Democratic figure words are twisted to appear racist, you just jump all over it as if its the first racist words youve ever heard.

Posted by: toby | March 12, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Arya: How dare you. I am a white man happily married for 20 years to a black woman, so are you calling me a racist you’re wrong. I am not filled with hate as you put it. I don’t like how Obama is playing the race card, and gets away with it. I think anyone who votes for him blindly should seek professional help. He said in his own book, he accepted his black side, but rejected and was very uncomfortable with his white heritage. Soon the truth will be know.

Posted by: Jay | March 12, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

A Ferraro flashback
“If Jesse Jackson were not black, he wouldn’t be in the race,” she said.
Really. The cite is an April 15, 1988 Washington Post story (byline: Howard Kurtz), available only on Nexis.
Here’s the full context:
Placid of demeanor but pointed in his rhetoric, Jackson struck out repeatedly today against those who suggest his race has been an asset in the campaign. President Reagan suggested Tuesday that people don’t ask Jackson tough questions because of his race. And former representative Geraldine A. Ferraro (D-N.Y.) said Wednesday that because of his “radical” views, “if Jesse Jackson were not black, he wouldn’t be in the race.”
Asked about this at a campaign stop in Buffalo, Jackson at first seemed ready to pounce fiercely on his critics. But then he stopped, took a breath, and said quietly, “Millions of Americans have a point of view different from” Ferraro’s.
Discussing the same point in Washington, Jackson said, “We campaigned across the South . . . without a single catcall or boo. It was not until we got North to New York that we began to hear this from Koch, President Reagan and then Mrs. Ferraro . . . . Some people are making hysteria while I’m making history.”
-by Ben Smith

Posted by: Nick | March 12, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

Obama really has a glass jaw. How many apologies has he demanded in this campaign so far, and he is not yet the nominee?! If he becomes President, everyone will be walking on egg shells, trying not to insult him. Geez- toughen up will ya?!! Sheesh!

Posted by: Toughen Up Man | March 12, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Jay, please illustrate how Obama has been using the ‘race card’? List examples. And, don’t forget to mention if there was a catalyst that initiated stated examples of using the ‘race card.’ Thank you in advance.

Posted by: Will | March 12, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Toby,
I’m curious how words as you’ve pointed out mean something to Black people? Bamboozle? Hoodwinked?
No, people had a problem with what she said because you didn’t have to decipher anything about the meaning…
“Obama is only where he is today because he was a Black man.”
Not sure how those things are the same but maybe you can share.

Posted by: What.Say.Me... | March 12, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

If democrats can’t unify and rise above race, we will fall on the knife of John McCain. Feminists: take note, we will lose Roe vs. Wade, and will be forced to live with another four years of bankrupt leadership & war. This is not the first time the Clinton campaign has used race as a wedge in this race. Really, people are sick of being pitted against one another.

Posted by: mel | March 12, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

Good grief! “Bamboozle, Hoodwinked, Okedoke” are black words? I am a white middle aged woman and have had those words in my lexicon since I heard by grandfather use them when I was a child. You are reaching so far that your arm is no longer attached to the rest of your body.

Posted by: Arya | March 12, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

Geraldine has succeeded in getting this bizarre affirmative action notion of Obama’s political ascension out. This is red meat to those scores of white blue and white collar PA workers and this is likely how the Clinton campaign designed this stunt. Despicable!

Posted by: Rialb58 | March 12, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

Maybe Mondale did select the congresswoman on the basis of her gender.
Little wonder he lost, it was obviously a dumb choice!
People should be selected for the good they can bring to the country AS A WHOLE!
Polarizing politics of one kind or another is killing off the American Dream for too many Americans.
Right now, Americans have taken their self-induced polarization to Washington on ideological differences, WHICH IS GUMMING UP WASHINGTON and preventing solutions to the nation’s innumerable problems.
Senator Obama IS THE ONLY CANDIDATE that recognizes the negative effect of partisan politics and have an effective and working strategy to neutralize it.
And that strategy is manifested in the form of the most successful grassroots in the history of American politics.

Posted by: New Yorker | March 12, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

As a Latino, I think Hussein Obama will have a tough time trying to convince the Hillary supporters that he can be the next President. His track record is nimble at best and his involvement with shady characters is evey more scary.
I was shocked after I read all the stuff about him online, Obama is not fit for my vote.
No mas

Posted by: CJ | March 12, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

I heard over the rasion this morning that >90% of the black people voted obama. Is it about issues or the benefit of the country?

Posted by: Sad | March 12, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

This whole mess could very well be something that someone in the Clinton camp namely Geraldine thought would be a good thing to say. It just keeps getting better!!!

Posted by: Ben Straub | March 12, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

Jay,
Give me ONE solid example of how OBAMA is playing the race card. Give me a quote of what he has said that indicates he is doing what you accuse him of.

Posted by: ayra | March 12, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

Did anyone see the polls in PA…
Clinton has a strong lead 18 points up… the funny thing is in the same poll
McCain is now beating the dems and beating Hillary worse than Barack.
We definitely need to make sure we fight this out… McCain needs all the help he can get.

Posted by: dl | March 12, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

I agree partically CJ. I think HILLARY will have a VERY HARD time persuading Obama supporters to vote for her. She will lose the black and young vote. Independents and several Republicans will vote for Republicans. The only main demographic she has a large margin in is the latino voters.

Posted by: Vanessa | March 12, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

It seems the entire Country is out of whack; I suppose that is to be expected after eight years of the Bush administration. Untill this election process, I never knew Americans were so mean spirited ,reading some of these comments show how low we have fallen. It IS possible to disagree with the politics of two seemingly qualified candidates and still converse civilily with each other. I am black and a Hillary supporter, simply because I don’t know anything about Obama and I simply refuse to vote based on my emotions: the stakes are too high. This much I believe to be true, if Obama wins, John McCain is our next president. Despite or in spite of the media fawning over Obama, the tides will change if he wins. Don’t be hoodwinked, we should all be asking more questions. When Hillary does it she is accused of being mean to Obama; it seems the media and his supporters believe she should allow him a learning curve, even at her expense.

Posted by: Shilohx7 | March 12, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

But Lynn sweet did report Obama playing the race card. Sweet quoted B. Hussein as saying “minority candidates have ‘a higher threshold in establishing themselves with voters.’” Well.
That is a laughable claim but a shrewd use of the race card to position Obama for future manipulation of the electoral process.
The truth is exactly the opposite. Obama is being “seriously” considered because he is a racial curiosity. No white man with his tepid professional accomplishments would be considered as a serious candidate for president or showered with the attention Obama receives.

Posted by: Jay | March 12, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

Nick, that’s amazing! Oh, that means that Ferraro has tried this tactic before, which means it’s not even unique to apply it to Obama: it is THE way to get a candidate’s run reduced to race. It means she just threw out a weapon that’s been used before.
She plagiarized herself–left-over criticisms are like form letters. They sound hollow.
Thanks for finding that–Nick and Ben Smith.

Posted by: Jerome | March 12, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

She was an embarrassment to the Clinton campaign (not that they needed much help on that front these days). The fact that she went out in a blaze of glory, issuing a completely remorseless, self-justifying letter, shows how little she learned from her stupid comments.
This is why — should Hillary wrest the nomination away from Obama — she’s going to lose a good deal of the party’s support. Her craven support of disgraced spokesmen like Ferraro (think Bill Clinton, Wolfson, Penn, Shaheen and Johnson) is no better than Bush’s “heckuva job, Brownie.”

Posted by: Howard B. | March 12, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

It seems to me that only the Clinton campaign can make such outlandish, untrue, and racist comments and then somehow it becomes Senator Obama’s fault. Everytime her bunch or she makes a major mistake, it is somehow Senator Obama’s fault. Now we have Ferraro saying that he is playing the race card. How is he playing the race card when she is the one making the racist statements? He is not the one that began this stuff. That joy belongs to Bill. And the words hoodwink, bamboozle, and okie-dokie are not some sort of code words. My folks are blindingly white and we use those words all the time. And Senator Obama did not ask for an apology. He knew that the “other” side would pull all this sort of stuff. He was prepared. However, I, for one, did not think the “other” side would be democrats.
I have seen a side to this party that really makes me sad. I am a life-long dem, but the kind of sleaze exhibited by many in this campaign certainly has made me upset. I thought we had risen above much of this obscene behavior. It seems I was wrong.

Posted by: Chip | March 12, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

I agree. Imagine if someone in the Obama campaign said “The only reason Hillary is in the race is she’s married to Bill Clinton”, there would be an UP-ROAR. Clinton campaign and supporters would call him sexist and the media would be outrage.
I happen to agree the only reason Hillary is a contender is she is married to Bill.

Posted by: Vanessa | March 12, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

There’s no similarity. She is history and he’s the current news. Look at this 1984 and 2008, you can’t equate that, can you? Good bye “old school”. She needs a SMOG test before she pollutes the democratic party.

Posted by: Chan | March 12, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

Jay,
Thanks for showing us the true color of your beliefs. By your own words, you have proven who you are.
The ACTUAL quote, since you seem to have not read it:
The 2008 presidential race is lurching center stage, Sen. Barack Obama–already polling second to Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton–said women and minorities have a higher hurdle to cross when it comes to winning the White House.
“You know, my sense is, whether it’s the African- American candidate running, a woman candidate running, if it’s a nontraditional candidate, there’s an additional threshold you have to meet,” Obama said. “I think you have to show people competence but once you do, I think people are willing to judge you on the merits. They’re willing to judge you as an individual. The key is getting known and getting people comfortable. And at that point, then I think they’re willing to look at the individual as opposed to look at their sex or their race. You know, I really think it comes down to the individual. And the people end up having the sense, will this person look at for the interests of all people? And if they’re able to show that and demonstrate that, then I think ultimately it won’t make a difference.”
I think that is an elegant statement that blankets the situation of both Hillary and Barack.

Posted by: Ayra | March 12, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

Obama is using the following lines from movies like Malcolm X,
“That’s what they do”
“They try to bamboozle you”
“Hoodwink ya”
“They try to hoodwink ya”

Posted by: toby | March 12, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

So then Arya, I guess you would call Professor Randall Jefferson a racist, since he is calling out Obama?

Posted by: Jay | March 12, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

Plus he only does in front of black crowds Miss. on monday, S.C in January.

Posted by: toby | March 12, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

Thanks for the quotes from Obama’s racist church. Actually Hillary has been called much worse things, and mostly by the Candidates of Peace, Hope, Love and Change nasty supporters.

Posted by: Jay | March 12, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

Jay,
This isn’t about the reverend, this is about you and your attempt to distort a valid, generous, encompassing statement, and did so with great sense of outrage that anyone would question your motives.
Well, I see you motives and the truth is apparent from your selective misquote from Lynn Sweet. And when caught trying to distor, you try to change the topic to something else so you don’t have to take a good long look at what you have been trying to do.
You are channeling Hillary Clinton. And the tactics you both use are the primary reason I would NEVER vote for Clinton. There is no honor to be found in her campaign, or in her supporters who use tricks to convince because the truth doesn’t support them.

Posted by: arya | March 12, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

quoting Shilohx7…
“I am black and a Hillary supporter, simply because I don’t know anything about Obama and I simply refuse to vote based on my emotions: the stakes are too high.”
I can totally respect you for having this as your reason for voting for HC. At least it’s not speculative as some of the other reasons I hear.
“This much I believe to be true, if Obama wins, John McCain is our next president.”
I believe this to be true but in the same way I am sure HC will lose to McCain. The nomination process is in that boiling over state. I have more reason now to vote against HC then at the start of the nomination.
“Despite or in spite of the media fawning over Obama, the tides will change if he wins. Don’t be hoodwinked, we should all be asking more questions. When Hillary does it she is accused of being mean to Obama; it seems the media and his supporters believe she should allow him a learning curve, even at her expense.”
It’s possible, the Obama supporters think the same of HC. She has managed to characterize the media as this one entity that is supportive of Obama. The Vast Media Conspiracy. I believe ou fail to realize, the Clintons were not liked by many. In the same way you said, you didnt know Obama well enough, many of us do research and KNOW a few things about Hillary. I know some women that are absolutely furious that Hillary took Bill back after monicagate. For them, they tie that into her judgement. Many people take issue with her and yet, they can’t express their outrage because of the Vast Media Conspiracy.

Posted by: Will | March 12, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

Arya: Please get over yourself. There are millions of us who will never vote for Obama either. He is a slimy and corrupt as they come. Give it a little more time to be uncovered. I stand by my statement, that have all been deleted. Mr. Obama plays the race card constantly, subtly, and when it is convenient for he. He is a master politician, I will give him that.

Posted by: Jay | March 12, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

BO has great speech.. if he was white, would that still get all the votes he has gotten with the lack of experience. He sounds good on a sunday morning on a pulpit, but just not ready for the podium. I really believe being Hillarys vp will give him the experience to then run for president. It is going to happen, rumors have this ticket already being talked about,Washington insiders are talking about a 16 year plan.

Posted by: D | March 12, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Jay,
The fact is that it is Clinton supporters like you that help give the Clinton campaign its bad name. You distort the truth in selectively channeling columns, twisting the truth out of them and then using them to try to support your very weak position.
I have asked you to give me one solid example of any time that Barack Obama stood at the podium and played the race card. Instead, you gave me a doctored column that refutes every word you said.
Then you invoke the great reverend who made the comment three months ago, along with a host of other negative Obama comments, and ask me to believe he was an innocent in search of candidate?
At least be honest about it and admit you really have not meritorious reason for not voting for Obama and stop the propaganda. Obama hasn’t played the race card, but it is the refrain the Clintons want us to believe because it gives them the cover they need to play it daily.

Posted by: arya | March 12, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

Toby, you are delusional. Most of us have never seen the movie “Malcolm X” since apparently some of us have lives outside the video store. AND Senator Obama has been using those words for years and not to just black crowds. Are you seriously saying that just hearing the words “bamboozle” or “hoodwink” is enough to make black americans run to the polls and vote without regard to the issues? Sir, you do black voters a huge disservice and you tend to disprove the argument that only white folks are smart enough to be CIC.

Posted by: Chip | March 12, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

This isn’t about Obama’s pastor, this is about your allegation that Barack Obama has openly and repeatedly made racist comments. I am still waiting for one single comment he made that can be verified.
Again, you are employing the bait and switch. You can’t support your argument so now you are trying to make me believe that words that come out of someone else’s mouth can be attributed to Barack Obama.
I’m not buying that one, either.

Posted by: ayra | March 12, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

In a battle between Judgement and Experience, I’ll pick judgement everytime!
Even though I don’t recognize HC as being more experienced then Obama. If experience was the leading reason for voting for a president, why didnt everyone…at least the HC fans, vote for Biden or Richardson? They could spin circles around HC with their resumes. This argument reminds me of a few people that were hired at my company. They showed up with these extensive resumes but were later fired because they had no wits about them. Padding your resume is not enough!

Posted by: Will | March 12, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

Obama’s perfect judgment in his own words in reference to Rezko, was ” a bonehead mistake”. Of course since you have all canonized him as a deity, he is not capable of ever making another mistake. All praise St. Obama…

Posted by: Jay | March 12, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

Ferraro was right. This is a guy who’s gotten outsize attention ever since he became the first editor of the Harvard Lar Review. That led to a book contract. How many white law review editors have gotten book deals while still in college for a memoir. And, in 2004, had he been a white STATE SENATOR he wouldn’t have been selected for the keynote address at the Democratic convention. So, her comments are reasonable and unlike Obama’s people, she didn’t resort to name calling.

Posted by: s. valenti | March 12, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

You don’t even know if I am an Obama supporter, do you? I might be for John McCain but simply can’t stand bigotry.
Obama made a mistake re the house and Rezko. Unless you walk on water and have never made a bad decision in your entire life, I suspect you are not in the position to judge the actions of someone else.
But if you read the material instead of simply mouthing the CLinton line, you will learn that Obama paid full value for his house. The home owners assert to that. He paid for it based on his proceeds from his book and took a mortgage. The area of controversy was a strip of land that he purchased from Mrs. Rezko when he wanted to expand the side yard. There was no indication that he was cut a deal as far as the price went. The controversy comes into play in questioning why Rezko bought the neighboring property but in fact Obama did not benefit from his relationship with Rezko in getting any kind of deal on the purchase price of the house and there has been NO indication that Obama did anything political as a kickback. There was no impropriety except in appearance.

Posted by: arya | March 12, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

I am very sadden that Mrs. Ferrara felt the need to quit Mrs. Clinton’s campaign.
It is unfortunate that in this country of free speech, that we cannot express our thoughts and feelings without being sent to the guillotine!
I know that there are lots of voters out there whom are also thinking the same, but afraid to say anything because they too would be called racist.
I have a question that I would like some of you bloggers to answer. If Obama was not on the ticket, would John Edwards (a white man) be in close contention or ahead of Hillary?
I say, all the three candidates had or have basically the same policies they are promoting in the democratic campaign.
But isn’t it ironic, that Edwards is out of the race, but Hillary and Barack are still in it.
And is it just coincidental that 9 out of 10 blacks are voting for Obama.
So how can anyone with a clear conscience say this race is not about color and sex!

Posted by: mary | March 12, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

A very intelligent post Mary. Even John Edwards has said, How can he compete with two celebrities? The Media from the begnning has crowned Mr. Obama the next President. Their bias is painfuily obvious to everyone. Plus Hillary’s name recognition has kept he close, even with the medias’ constant Hillary bashing. Mr. Edwards never was given a fair chance. It is the media who is the Kingmaker, and then the masses follow along. Now, that they have begun to vet Obama and he is losing some of his luster and shine, we are seeing a bit of change in how people perceive Mr. Obama. Yes, this election is sexist and racist, and mostly, that is due in part to the media coverage and slant.

Posted by: Jay | March 12, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

Then try Norman Hsu if you want recency.
But the point I believe Will was trying to make is that Obama made a bone-headed mistake. One mistake.
Hillary Clinton has a lifetime of mistakes.
Of course, that is part of the vetted process and we aren’t supposed to mention anything from the long string of legal and moral morasse that is the Clintons.

Posted by: Tosca | March 12, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

This isn’t about denial of free speech. No one says Ferraro should not be allowed to say these things if she wants, but I think most folks who are not biased against Mr Obama would have to say (especially with Ferraro’s history) that the comment smelled of racism–or at least paternalism.
But the key is that she was an official in Hillary’s campaign and therefore, when she speaks, fair or not, she is speaking as a representative of Hillary Clinton.
Now, if you are saying that it is alright for Hillary to be racist / paternalistic, the discussion stops immediately, because if you think racism is a good thing, then I certainly can’t reach you.
But this is a double-sided sword. The Clintons can continue to seed racial distrust because it benefits Hillary, and she is allowed to play the gender card because it benefits Hillary, but if Obama raises a note of protest, Hillary and her supporters jump all over him for playing the race card. I really don’t think that responding to this sort of spurious attack means he is, but of course Hillary’s supporters won’t see that. Just as they don’t see h er playing the gender card when it suits her campaign.
Just know this: Hillary Clinton is single-handedly destroying any possibility of any Democrat making it into the White House. So applaud her all you want, support her negative campaigning, agree with her when she gives the Republicans the attack strategy, but then don’t be surprised when neither Clinton nor Obama make it all the way.

Posted by: Kitty | March 12, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

Jake – there is an honest comparison to Ferraro and Obama , see her ticket won the dem primary also
why do people change the meaning of racism, they actually made it mean nothing now because they cry it evertime
By the way she is correct if he was a white male he would not be where he is, just look at Edwards

Posted by: spock | March 12, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

mary so right except for the jewish vote, they voted for Clinton and Gore even after Carter and Gore embrace of Arafat.

Posted by: spock | March 12, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

If you are correct that Obama will not win the nomination, please don’t blame it on anything other than the race card.
It is unfortunate that Hillary has such a superiority complex, that she cannot accept defeat. Therefore, she had to bring out the only card she knew would enrage the American people.
Hillary’s motto, “If I can’t have it, then nobody can.” Eff, the Democratic party!

Posted by: Jack | March 12, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

I have no doubt you are right, though not for all the reasons you cite. I think the biggest reason Obama doesn’t have a chance is that Hillary has been so divisive that she has turned too many people off to the entire election. She has kneecapped Obama and given McCain the ammunition he needs to defeat either of the Democrats. She has also played the gender card for all she is worth. By whining about how unfair the world is to women, she has managed to convince a lot of women that her fight is their fight, and her loss is their loss–and to consider voting for anyone other than a woman would be betrayal of all women.

Posted by: Kitty | March 12, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

As a black woman, I applaud Geraldine Ferraro standing by her truthful statememt. Sen. Obama is fortunate that he is a black man in this race because people, including the media, have been enamored with the idea of having an African American President and have given him a free ride as a result. The reality is that if Sen. Obama were a female state legislator, he would have never been asked to give the keynote speech at the Democratic convention. If he were a woman, or even a white man, running for President after 2 years in the Senate, he would not be a serious contender for President. Ferraro’s comments are right on and I think it is refreshing that somebody finally has the guts to speak the truth.

Posted by: Tracy | March 12, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

Ferraro ran as an explicitly ‘woman candidate’ – as she’s pointed out.
Obama is *not* running as a ‘black candidate’. He’s running as a 50-state candidate, an anti-partisan fighting candidate, a uniting candidate.
Someone should point out that important difference to Ferraro, becasue that’s why her comments are so idiotic. She just doesn’t get it.

Posted by: Tom J | March 12, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

Arya:
Obama does not use the race card in the first person. He has said repeatedly he does not want this race to be about race, religon or ethincy. But the problem is we never openly talk about race or gender bias and until it is openly discussed it never will be settled, its the elepahant in this election.
Travis Smiley recently received such a hard lesson when he openly critized Obama for not attending the Convention, Travis received death threats, his family received death threats for his critizing Obama, how many of you are even aware this happend. Travis has said he was very hurt and sadden by this. Guest what it was not Hillary’s people that threatened him and his family.

Posted by: Bridget | March 12, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

You can’t blame Obama for the Smiley problems. I am pretty sure no one in the Obama campaign is energizing death squads.
On the other hand, Tavis Smiley seemed off base in trying to trip into the guilt trip because Obama didn’t come to his Convention; in this, I think Tavis’s ego got in the way of good sense and he said some things that were over the line. Obama offered his wife — I suspect if Hillary had offered Bill Tavis would not have been so crude in rejecting the offer.
That said, there is NO justification for intimidation or threats in this campaign.

Posted by: Arya | March 12, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

yi001, You are very welcome. The hatred for Hillary on these blogs is amazing. I don’t hate Obama at all, I just don’t trust him yet.
I think I can stand 4 more years of McCain and wait for the 2012 Hillary run again. Mr. Obama and his wife stated, if he doesn’t make it this time, there will be no more campaigns for president. Of course , he also said in the Senate he would not consider a run until 2012. Imagine how smooth this election would be for Hillary , if Obama had kept his word. I wonder who the “real” spoiler is in this campaign?

Posted by: Jay | March 12, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

yIOO1 AND JAY:
I too will be voting for McCain if Obama wins the election.
I will be honest with you, since I am a catholic and have to vote according to my conscience, the only choice on the democratic ticket is HIllary, so I am glad that the two of you are on her side.
On CNN last week, they had a special on the catholic vote. That is where I saw the breakdown on how the catholics are voting. It said that 68% of the catholics are voting for HIllary Clinton and only 19% for Obama.
Most of the catholic vote is from the women, because basically it is the middle age and older women that are voting for HIllary Clinton. Their second choice and eminent choice, if Obama is the candidate, is McCain.
So yes, Obama will not get the catholic vote. In fact I believe there are no swing states inthis election, I truly believe it is the catholic vote.
As Alan Keyes had said”Jesus Would Not Vote for Barack Obama!

Posted by: mary | March 12, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

As a black man myself myself, I’m gonna keep this simple, my overwhelming response to Geraldine Ferraro’s comments are laughter. Barack Obama is lucky to be where he is because he’s black?! Just think about that concept and not even who said it. It’s truly funny. The only thing that could make it funnier was if Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson were in the room.

Posted by: Dominique | March 12, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

Hey Chip I’m AA myself and I know when you bring out those words its wink, wink Yeah we been hoodwinked. Dont tell me how those words are used. Im a 48 years old AA.

Posted by: toby | March 12, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

I am glad you mentioned the stomping that the democratic ticket took in 1984. You will get to see it again if Obama gets the nomination. This country has NEVER elected a far left candidate and they won’t start now. This is the very reason the super delegate system was put in place. To insure that the democratic nominee has a chance of winning. McCain is a moderate and will be tough to beat. The only chance the democrats have is running Hillary who is closer to the center. I hope the super delegates can figure this out. Oh, and Obama won’t need to worry about getting stomped at a biker rally. The motorcycle boots Obama hears coming up behind him will be worn by middle aged women. You know, the ones his supporters call dinosaurs.

Posted by: Firefighter | March 12, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

Bridget…
“Travis Smiley recently received such a hard lesson when he openly critized Obama for not attending the Convention, Travis received death threats, his family received death threats for his critizing Obama, how many of you are even aware this happend. Travis has said he was very hurt and sadden by this. Guest what it was not Hillary’s people that threatened him and his family.”
How many of you are aware, Obama received death threats when he announced he would be running for president. That’s why secret service was offered to him so early in the campaign.

Posted by: Will | March 12, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

Good for Ferraro! Her point is what many are talking about but the media never states. That if Obama were a white man with his experience,policy’s and rhetoric…NO ONE WOULD BE LISTENING. AND HE WOULD NOT HAVE MADE IT THIS FAR. Affirmative Action got him where he is today.
I am sick of people claiming racism today. What should whites say when a black man scores lower on the test to become a fireman, 5 white men that have higher scores get bumped and the position goes to the balck man. How is that fair. If we are all the same, and don’t want racism aroung, then the man with lower scores should not have been bumped up and hired first based on skin color. That is why racism in America remains today.
She(Ferraro) should stick to her guns, liberal america has become way too political sensitive and if americans keep whining and don’t toughen up then we will be weak all around the world. People should be able to say what they want and not be afraid to say what they feel is what they see as the truth!!!!

Posted by: Dean | March 12, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

I am amazed that Geraldine Ferraro would think people so obtuse as to not recognize the “race card” when it is played. First she says her statement about Barack Obama getting as far as he has in the presidential race because he is black was taken out of context. Then she exasperates the matter by saying she was simply making an analogy of her own vice presidential campaign in that she was chosen because she was a woman. She also said this choice was not based on her qualifications. Curiously I don’t remember this being a part of her campaign rhetoric at the time; nor have I heard much about the “I only got the nomination because I am woman” slant since.
If Mrs. Ferraro is interested in how demographic factors impact political careers she might take a closer look at her own candidate. A good part of Clinton’s 35 years of experience was spent being first lady of a state and nation. Somehow I suspect this helped her rather sudden entry into New York politics and the support she has received since. Mrs. Ferraro insists she is not a racist but hey who said you have to be racist to play the race card. Perhaps she thinks only Republicans should be prohibited from using this tactic. These types of comments along with other behaviors of the Clinton camp are more similar to what belongs in a sewer than in a presidential campaign.

Posted by: Leslie | March 12, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

If Obama were where he is only because he is black, there would be 34,000,000 people running for president right now (aa population according to censusscope.org).
For me, an all-white European watching from the sidelines, it is Obama’s Iraq stance that sticks out.
He spoke up against the war from the start. And now, when history has proven him right, he doesn’t just call for immediate withdrawal. Instead he says:
‘I want to be as careful getting out as we were careless getting in’.
This is the kind of stuff good presidents are made of.

Posted by: Niels | March 12, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

“Good for Ferraro! Her point is what many are talking about but the media never states. That if Obama were a white man with his experience,policy’s and rhetoric…NO ONE WOULD BE LISTENING. AND HE WOULD NOT HAVE MADE IT THIS FAR.”
“Affirmative Action got him where he is today.”
You obviously don’t know anything about him or affirmative action. By the very way he is running his campaign, he is proving he is quite capable. At least more so then Hillary or McCain.
“I am sick of people claiming racism today. What should whites say when a black man scores lower on the test to become a fireman, 5 white men that have higher scores get bumped and the position goes to the balck man. How is that fair. If we are all the same, and don’t want racism aroung, then the man with lower scores should not have been bumped up and hired first based on skin color. That is why racism in America remains today.”
And so it’s fair that a black man receives death threats for choosing to run for president. Is it fair, that a hypothetical black man is passed over jobs because the quota is already met? And since you have no clue what affirmative action is, you’d be surprised white women have benefited from affirmative action policies. BTW, you have an issue with logic i need to point out. You say in the first sentence, “I am sick of people claiming racism today.” Then in the last sentence you say, “That is why racism in America remains today.” You should think this over.
“She(Ferraro) should stick to her guns, liberal america has become way too political sensitive and if americans keep whining and don’t toughen up then we will be weak all around the world. People should be able to say what they want and not be afraid to say what they feel is what they see as the truth!!!!”
Finally, something I agree with you on. So, If I feel you are completely wrong and that it borders stupidity I should call you on it.

Posted by: Will | March 12, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

Niels:
Then we should probably be electing Mr. Obama’s speech writers.

Posted by: Jay | March 12, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

so much for my post, did I say something offensive?

Posted by: LA in Indiana | March 12, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

Jay…
or Hillary’s Husband.

Posted by: Will | March 12, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

LA in Indiana: I can understand and relate to your frustration. Those of us who support Hillary feel exactly the same as you do.
Hillary and Bill gave us a wonderful 8 years of prosperity, and Hillary got millions of kids insured when she was first lady, and now, she is a lying, cheating ,shrew who is worthless. So the value of both of our candidates has dropped to low levels as we get further along. Well, we need a solution, or you are correct. Hello President McCain.

Posted by: Jay | March 12, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

Toby, thanks! Sure glad you turned me on to that word thing. Seems that I never got the memo on that….nor did millions of others either I warrant.

Posted by: Chip | March 12, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

This entire fiasco was a very subtle appeal to the voters in PA. And knowing PA like I do, hillary is sure to win. The folks in PA will eat this up. This will be like stepping on all black people to them….trust me, I grew up there and definitely know the people. And they will feel good about their vote for hillary, feeling like they have accomplished a hit against “black progression”.
My question is, when Obama loses PA, is that the final straw for crowning hillary, or does she actually have to be ahead in ALL the numbers for the coronation to take place?

Posted by: LA in Indiana | March 12, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

Did I hear Ferraro correctly? Senator Obama doesn’t have any organizational and leadership skills. Nor anything that resembles inspiration for all Americans to reach out and make a stand for change. What about ones’ convictions after hearing the truth? What about having class (not in the racial context Ferraro) and having the fortitude and inner strength not to join “the same old folks saying the same old things”! How about being a stand up guy Ferraro? I know one thing and that is Senator Obama is standing very tall and proving that David can beat Goliath! Don’t forget at one time the confidence was Goliath will smash David; right, and who won the last super bowl against all the odds?
Senator Obama wouldn’t be in the position that he finds himself in because he is black? Listening to those profound observations I immediately asked myself, “what kind of change is Senator Clinton desiring”? Maybe the Clinton team doesn’t think much of the Obama team. True, the score is close; however, like in “The Longest Yard” Senator Obama has been making the plays and scoring despite the odds! Despite the road side bombs that the Clinton team has sent out (sadly across the world!) Senator Obama will win.
When a politico makes statements like “I was taken out of context”, it re-enforces the meaning of incompetence and the government’s hierarchy is the biggest contributor to the “Peter Principle”. Another statement that should never be taken out of context is “a dream, “where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character”. Stand tall Senator Obama!!!

Posted by: Frank Aguilera | March 12, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

LA in Indiana: Honestly, no ones know what the Super delegates and the heads of the Democratic Party will do. It is all a big dark secret, back room guessing game. They know that alone , either Hillary or Barack’s support will cancel out millions of votes in the general, my best guess is they will want them both to kiss and make up and run on the same ticket. Hillary already said in an interview today, she would hope if Barack is the nominee, her supporters would vote for him. He however made a statement that he is quite confident that his supporters will never vote for Hillary. So, it looks like she is throwing out a olive branch as of today. What is really going to happen? No one really knows.

Posted by: Jay | March 12, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

Did anyone really listen to what Ferraro said? She said that she was in no way referring to Obama’s abilities as a candidate nor as a potential President, but was speaking to the historicity of this particular candidacy, which included both a woman and a black, both of which are firsts for a presidential nomination. She was celebrating this as an indication of the forwardness of the party and of those doing the voting.
It is David Axlerod who is behind this spinning of the situation to try to take advantage of any opportunity to incite the black community against Hillary by accusing her or her supporters as being “racist”. I was pleased to hear Ferraro mention also how ridiculous it was that Bill Clinton’s comments about Jesse Jackson were spun to be racist. If there is any “bait and switch” going on here, it is on the Obama side, and although Obama claims to be above this kind of pettiness on the one hand, his comments over both situations insinuate otherwise.
To top it all off, you have the media acting like a bunch of wolves ready to pounce on anything which makes for endless hours of discussion and higher ratings, whether there is any substance to it or not. The more controversy, the better.
Why is it so easy for anyone to be called a racist who makes a negative comment against Obama, yet no one is accused of being chauvinistic for negative comments against Hillary?
I have been a Democrat for many years (a traditional Democrat, more of a Jimmy Carter type), but in light of this pettiness, I can understand why many have left the Democratic party and become either Independents or Republicans. I could never become a Republican, but I’m considering switching to Independent.
As to the media, I’ve learned there is but one thing to do: turn you OFF.

Posted by: David Parrish | March 12, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

Original post by SJ:
__________________________________________
No Gerri comments were not out of line and she is correct it’s time someone spoke up, there is a perception out there that you should not question anything about Obama, if you mention his past there are problems, use his middle name another problem, put a photo of him it has to be of a certain hue if its too dark you are playing the race card, at every turn there is some nonsensical issue over what you question or what you say about Obama. You have to all stay quiet or be blamed for stirring the race pot.
This man is running for the nominee of the POTUS, and every American black, white, blue or brown has a right to question anything that they are not comfortable with or speak about it. For years we have ridicule our own President called him all kind of names from idiot to dumb, he has been made fun of on every talk show, SNL , stand up comedy show, and we all sit back and get a kick out of it.
Now all of a sudden with Obama we must put on kid gloves not to offend him or the AA, nonsense. When AA comic ridicule Bush in their shows do anyone come out and say respect the man and his office? When Obama’s pastor as I saw on a clip tonight on FOX gesticulates a sexual action to show his congregation what Bill did to Monica and now he is doing the same thing to AA did anyone talk about it, was that not insulting and distasteful also? When Obama’s wife said Hillary cannot even hold he man how can she run the WH what that not an offensive statement that needed the same uproar from all the upright citizens of this land?
I am very happy that someone had the guts to call it as they see it, to say enough is enough. Look at all the comments about Hillary and what wrong is she committing? Should she have to take all that humiliation because she is running against a AA for the democrat nominee position, if she was running against Edwards would it be any different or the rhetoric softer? It is disgustful what is going on, and it sure does not show this election in a good light, if this is the tone that one will get once a AA is running for president, why in heavens name would anyone one to experience this kind of abuse again, or why would any voter want to witness what is going on here ever again.

Posted by: Jay | March 12, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

Here’s the script. First say Obama got where his is because he’s black. Then don’t back down and keep the story alive while Hillary is slow to react. Then equate him to you and admit you were only on the ticket because you were a woman. All designed to marginalize Senator Obama.
But these are not similes. Ferraro was hand picked by one man as part of a loosing campaign strategy. Obama, on the other hand has won the majority of the primaries, caucuses and popular votes cast by a record number of democrats that have participated. It’s like Senator Obama said in a debate, the Clintons are insinuating that every voter who voted for him and every newspaper that endorsed him are somehow delusional. It shows the level of contempt the Clintons have for the public.

Posted by: Larry | March 12, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

Mary…
“I am very sadden that Mrs. Ferrara felt the need to quit Mrs. Clinton’s campaign.”
Were you also saddened by the woman that left Obama’s campaign because she called Hillary a monster?
“It is unfortunate that in this country of free speech, that we cannot express our thoughts and feelings without being sent to the guillotine!”
No one says you can’t say whatever you want to say. She wasnt arrested. The government didnt attack her for what she said. However, people have a right to retaliate in words also. If she has a right to speak her mind then I have a right to reply. Fair is Fair!
“I know that there are lots of voters out there whom are also thinking the same, but afraid to say anything because they too would be called racist.”
I don’t believe what Mrs. Ferrara said was racist, but I do think it was flat out stupid. So for those that think Obama is only where he is because he is black, prove it? And prove it in the same way you would prove Hillary is not where she is because she is simply married to Bill.
“I have a question that I would like some of you bloggers to answer. If Obama was not on the ticket, would John Edwards (a white man) be in close contention or ahead of Hillary?”
You forget, Edwards ran as a presidential nominee before. and, for vice president as well. He lost in both instances. Though, I think he is a nice person that sincerely wants to help americans, he isnt without issues. His stance on the war early on being the biggest, His taking money from Lawyers for his campaign. His paying $400 or whatever the price for his haircut. This picture was pointed out very well. I doubt people said, hey it’s a white guy, we wont vote for him any more then some whites saying, hey there’s a black guy lets not vote for him. If Obama was not in the race, the issue of the war would be drawn differently to the public. Furthermore, Hillary would be lavishing herself with the issue of gender. Hillary would still lose support from the people that don’t like her. She wouldnt have made the mistakes regarding race so she probably would get the ‘black vote.’
“I say, all the three candidates had or have basically the same policies they are promoting in the democratic campaign.”
According to the Obama-bashers, he doesnt have the same policies. But, their policies which should really be the focus are different in some important ways. Healthcare: I don’t want to be forced to buy into a government healthcare plan. But, I guess we can debate this. There are other issues in that Obama’s stance is different then Hillarys enough to say, hey…maybe this guy knows what I would prefer. And, don’t forget, in a few debates, Edwards aligned himself with Obama. Even to an extent where Hillary/Supporters/Media claimed she was being ganged-up on.
“But isn’t it ironic, that Edwards is out of the race, but Hillary and Barack are still in it.”
No, I think it’s common to want to dwindle down to two choices. But, I think I mentioned above the concern with edwards, how many times will it take for him to run before he wins? Also, there is no doubt Edwards would have picked up some delegates in other locations but he couldnt argue against the numbers at the time. He lost his home state.
“And is it just coincidental that 9 out of 10 blacks are voting for Obama.”
As coincidental that whites voting for a white candidate is high. And namely older white ladies are voting for Hillary. If you look historically, blacks tend to vote cohesively for their candidate and has been loyal to the democratic party. It remains to be seen how in the future blacks will react considering they are being told they are not worthy since they are voting for the person they want.
“So how can anyone with a clear conscience say this race is not about color and sex!”
Very easily. I didnt vote for my candidate because of race or gender. Considering how personal a question this is, why did you vote for who you voted for? Another question, do you think there will ever be a time when someone doesnt notice the person running is a woman or is black? Do you think it’s possible, in previous years, someone hasnt said hey one guy is old, the other guy is young…im voting for the old guy? C’mon…be serious, the problem with change is that its easy to scrutinize. I just think Hillary and Obama should have had a talk early on. Look, I’ll support you later 100% if you do me this favor. Then we wouldnt be presented with two milestones at once. Whether those milestones are realized, we’ll see.

Posted by: Will | March 12, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

To the people who are saying that Obama is only where he is because he is African-American. Why no credit to the fact that he is politically talented, an inspiring speaker, a brilliant thinker? Let’s say for argument’s sake that he was asked to do the convention keynote in part bc he was African-American (though who’s to say that an up-and-coming white politician known for inspiring rhetoric wouldn’t be asked either?). The fact is that he knocked it out of the park. He’s here bc at every opportunity he’s had, he’s taken it and then some. Give the man some credit, for the love of God!

Posted by: drill | March 12, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

LA: I agree with you that the Ferrarro inferno is pure Rove. Geraldine has been at this for a week and the Clintons have made no attempt to distance themselves from her remarks – and their first response was to blame Obama. Pure Swift Boat – start a lie, give it fuel, get the right wing media going, and watch it burn. Meanwhile, the candidate (Hillary or Georgy) is pure and decent. The Clintons can’t play the race card, but Ferraro can and she isn’t going to stop until PA, WV, and KY are over. But does Mark Penn, who calls these voters JUGHEADS – decent, working class men like my Dad, have it right? I don’t think so. I do not believe they are stupid, and I don’t believe that they are any less tolerant than anyone else in the country. Maybe Mark Penn is the JUGHEAD.

Posted by: Mara | March 12, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

That is absolutely ridiculous Jack.
She was the first female presidential contender, and the first female VP nominee. Her candidacy was far more pioneering than Sen. Obama’s. Not that Sen. Obama isnt a great historic figure, but he has certainly gotten a free pass and Geraldine Ferraro has every right to compare her candidacy to his.
Just because she was a woman, doesnt mean her candidacy was any less pioneering. Not like by electingObama the AA issues are gonna disappear.

Posted by: Joan | March 12, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

David Parrish…
“Why is it so easy for anyone to be called a racist who makes a negative comment against Obama, yet no one is accused of being chauvinistic for negative comments against Hillary?”
Please list the name(s) of the people in Obama’s campaign that have said chauvinistic comments about Hillary. I’m sure you mean well, but please present tangible evidence, quotes, sources.
Believe it or not, there are women that support Obama that would not let him or supporters get away with the things Hillary obviously lets her supporters do. Can’t people make there point without bringing up his race or her gender? Is it possible to say, I don’t like the guy I want to vote for someone I know more about.
Also, I’m not certain you read the actual original quote. She wasnt celebrating the trailblazing event of having a black and a woman running for president. She said emphatically, given her perspective on his experience she can only say that he is where he is because he is black. The equivalent is saying, given my perspective of Hillary’s experience, she is where she is only because she is (woman)/(married to bill)/(an option other then black)…pick any one. Now, If you are offended by that, is it not possible that someone could find it equally offensive the other way around? Would I not be labeled sexist or at least stupid?
Not to mention, she said the same thing when Jesse Jackson ran for president. So you are telling me, everytime a black man runs for president, he’s there because he is black. I guess I didnt get the memo, blacks cant run for president.
Probably would be a good idea for blacks to switch to independent or maybe even republican. When blacks come to the realization that people are justifying nonsense comments like this, they may end up showing the democrats a thing or two about loyalty.

Posted by: Will | March 12, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

I find some of these post laughable that Barack Obama is playing the race card when people can’t site one example of him doing so. B.O. is trying to help bring this country together. From reading some of these closet bigoted post it is obviously some would hate for this country to come together. I’m glad Ferraro said what she said because it exposed her ignorance and the ignorance of some of the anti-Barack people. I honestly believe that there are “some” in this country who would rather cut their throats than vote for a African-American for president even if they knew deep down he was the best candidate.

Posted by: Kevin | March 12, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

Joan…
“Just because she was a woman, doesnt mean her candidacy was any less pioneering. Not like by electingObama the AA issues are gonna disappear.”
Quoting her, she said she was only picked as VP nominee because she was a woman. If you want the link I will certainly provide it.

Posted by: Will | March 12, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

Listen you all are still in protect the Clintons from the Republican mind set still…I have to think that…I don’t think that Grealdine Ferraro wants to put down black people…but I do think it belittled his abilities that you all don’t think exist I guess…
Try this maybe this will help you all understand…I say this to try and put it in perspective…
Do you all think it is okay if someone said “Hillary was only allowed to cry because she was a woman”? or that “she got where she was because some guys in congress found her attractive?”
or that she got where she was because “She wasn’t attractive so they took her seriously?”
I don’t believe anything like this…but imagine someone prominent said this…lets say Ted Kennedy. or these kind of comments (Not just someone calling another politician a monster) …were sadi over months period by various people…associated by the campaign.
and then a bunch of people who supported Obama got on blogs and started saying “what he is only saying the truth?!!” “he is only saying what everyone in America is thinking.” “Oh every woman thinks people are being sexist.”
Think. There are dots even if they are mistakes…You all would expect Obama to repudiate such sexist remarks and fire someone who made those comments from whatever committee they were on. You have to address them as a unifier…not …well, not the way it was done.

Posted by: dl | March 12, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

…and I think it really was about her attitude and second and third statements that made it so bad. “Reverse racism?!”
I’m white, what is she talking about.

Posted by: dl | March 12, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

Kevin – what about when someone says his middlename, what about when Bill said Obama’s stance was a fairytale! Obama’s response was playing the race card!
And dont say someelse responded it was Obama thru his surrogates.

Posted by: spock | March 12, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

Jay,
do you also have a link for this part of your comment:
‘He however made a statement that he is quite confident that his supporters will never vote for Hillary.’
?

Posted by: Niels | March 12, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

You see Will, belief and actual facts are two different things. What you believe about me is basically your opinion or determination. It has no bearing on who I really am or what I am about.
Same thing in politics. It is our perception of our preferred candidate’s that make up believe in them, and allow us to believe they are telling the truth and want what is best for us. Is it always accurate in reality? Probably not.

Posted by: Jay | March 12, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

I think obama said that he wasn’t sure that Hillary would get all the votes he would get…if she were the nominee but before she started attacking him in Ohio, etc… He would get her votes predominantly…
but I think the length of this campaign has put an end to that.
Good thing someone threw that kitchen sink, huh? No matter whether they had their own kitchen sinks staying against the wall… why is it Edwards people could have fought on and they didn’t? …I mean they could have fought and won maybe. I mean when he got out he still had a little money and what were they saying the odds were 30/70 he could do it…
That is a question I would love to see him asked.

Posted by: dl | March 12, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

1st: Geraldine Ferrero, like the Clintons, is not racist – they all have committed much of their work as Democrats to Civil Rights and helping minorities. Funny how opposing campaigns like to jump on quotes and take them out of the context of lifetimes, and make them racist.
Geraldine Ferraro is furiously angry at being accused of being racist.
She was not saying that race is the only reason why Barack is where he is – she was only noting how race has actually benefited Barack in being where he is.
It can benefit him with some Democrats -
it may not benefit him as much with some Republicans.
She was just observing reality.

Posted by: Lauren | March 12, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

I think also when Sen. Obama said that he was referring not so much to Democrats …he was referring to the fact he gets more independents and legitimate cross-overs (not the Rush kind)…
He said that in a general Dems would vote for either of them…until this got nasty…
Thank you kitchen sink.
Unfortunately now I can’t vote for someone whose campaign has been so seemingly about her attempt to wrestle the position from her own team. It would be hard for me to vote for the campaign it has become and the exact opposite of why I vote dem…because we are the good guys…not the republicans.
You can call me a wimp, getangry and say Obama was first to start this (which I highly refute), throw out all the reasons this statement isn’t fair…but it’s how I feel…and I started out helping the Clinton Campaign a year ago here in New Hampshire.

Posted by: dl | March 12, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

Jay…
“You see Will, belief and actual facts are two different things. What you believe about me is basically your opinion or determination. It has no bearing on who I really am or what I am about.”
First, thank you for providing this link. I needed the information in the original context as the statement you were making is misleading. Now, I don’t know what you are ranting on about above, I would hope you don’t blog for the purposes of getting acceptance as I am not one to give it. I’m merely pointing out the fact that you have managed to misrepresent Obama’s stance on topics. Namely this one. You say Hillary is extending an olive branch as if to say Obama has taken the stance not to offer Hillary a possible VP slot. He has maintained a stance on it being premature to talk about who’s going to be the VP as well as saying Hillary would be on anyones list for VP. However you want to paint a counter argument with a different quote in a different context. There are numbers that cannot be ignored. I do think it’s possible that more people have been engaged in politics because of the failed policies of the Bush administration. But there are people that are voting that have historically not participated in politics. Are you denying this? Is this not worth anything?
“Same thing in politics. It is our perception of our preferred candidate’s that make up believe in them, and allow us to believe they are telling the truth and want what is best for us. Is it always accurate in reality? Probably not.”
True.

Posted by: Will | March 12, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

Thanks, Jay. I agree with you on that one. Such comments only serve to divide.

Posted by: Niels | March 13, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

Jay, I’m interested in that quote from Obama too. If you have it, give it up. If you don’t – just admit it – you don’t have to go on the attack – nobody’s gonna arrest you.
And Spock? I don’t think there is anyone alive who believes that Mr. Bush has one of the most powerful minds in the world. I don’t even think Mr. Bush would believe that one. I don’t think Karl Rove is a genius, either. I just think he’s a completely ruthless pol, who helped to elect a President who has destroyed our economy and got us into a war that has cost us at least $2 Trillion dollars so we can help Iraq set up an Islamic government.
I also believe that people like Bush/Rove and Hillary/Penn pretend to be people like my family during election years – honest Americans who have worked all their lives and never had much to show for it. And I believe that they use decent Americans during election years. After the elections are over – the “jugheads” as Penn calls us are all forgotten, our kids are fighting to build Islamic states, we have no health care and our jobs are in India or in China. I’m ready for change. If you’re not, my guess is that you’re pretty comfortable and don’t have much to worry about.

Posted by: Mara | March 13, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am

From the looks of some of the comments on here, not to mention those of Miss Ferraro, we seem to be going back to the dark ages. Some posters actually agreed with Ferraro, while some others couldn’t figure out why what she said was wrong.
Maybe it is the fault of the education system in this country.
Then a poster said she knew nothing about Obama, but will vote for Clinton. In the age of the Internet it is hard to believe that ANYONE would choose to vote for someone that has a pending trial for Election fraud. Only escaped convictions on several very serious charges as first lady, because Witnesses kept coming up dead only days before they were to appear in court.
But you don’t have the time to check out Barack Obama? Watch the replay of his life story on MSNBC and use the Internet to do a little investigating.

Posted by: Rebecka | March 13, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

Anyway, political opinion is all semantics if anything Will.
I can show you 50 headline links where OBama says , I will not be Hillary’s VP, and then he tries to humiliate her on a tirade about how dare she even ask him when he is the front runner and he has more votes, states, and delegates. Mr. Obama’s ego will be the one thing that has the potential to bring him down.
You quite welcome Niels. I also agree with you. Obama is terribly divisive, he is just much more sneaky about it.

Posted by: Jay | March 13, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

I find Jay’s comment interesting. That “no white man with a tepid professional history would be seriously considered for president.” Take a look at your current president.

Posted by: Leslie | March 13, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

I would say yes…she is not a racist…and neither are the Clintons…but it is hard to either think they are …well, dumb for making the statements (and she was at an event drilling up support for Sen Clinton so i am hard pressed to believe the interview tonight where she said, I was praising the event of him being black and that he is the nominee on the FOX broadcast)…
It is either that or worse (and I am not one of those saying it is but if it is not plain old stupid then) it is tactical.
She did On Feb. 26, “If Barack Obama were a white man, would we be talking about this, as a potential real problem for Hillary? If he were a woman of any color, would he be in this position that he’s in? Absolutely not.”
She said absolutely not.
So she was discounting every other quality and saying the fact that he is black is the reason he is there…
I know I know black people are voting for him…do you think that is outweighed by the racism that exists in other voters?
If he were white and saying the message he has said, if he hadn’t been the freakiin President of the Harvard law review …not just the “first black President of the harvard Law review” but just the President of the Haravard Law review…hadn’t taught constituional law…hadn’t touched young people with the idea of hope that we could get rid of this negative politics…
His being black is an attribute which no doubt gives him an extra sense of the America that i do not know…
but he has 11 years in legislature…he gave up a huge opportunity to work with high powered attorney positions and firms and government to work for laid off workers in factory closings in chicago…
He’s a snappy dresser…he’s charming…
I think if he was white he may have done better.
That is the one thing that is getting lost in all this. Take him down on something but to say the biggest reason he has achieved this is because he is black…is from a simple mind…or a not-so-nice one.
I hope it is just simpleton stuff.

Posted by: dl | March 13, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Someone once identified himself with John F. Kennedy, to which another public servant replied: “I knew John F. Kennedy and you are not him.”
Ms. Ferraro, those of us who know Barack Obama can tell you to your face that you are not now, nor ever have been him. His message is one of hope. Yours is a message of divisiveness.
Yesterday was Ferraro.
Obama is Tomorrow.

Posted by: Robert Campbell | March 13, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

It was a comment I had quoted from someone else Leslie, but you got me there..lol

Posted by: Jay | March 13, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Jay,
I don’t doubt Obama rejecting the idea of campaigning for VP. I could probably find 100 links of that. But, that wasnt what you stated in a previous post. Im simply pointing out how you are confusing and misrepresenting Obama. At the very least, be fair with what you have to say. People may agree with you, but it doesnt help your argument if it is false.

Posted by: Will | March 13, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

I want our most qualified canidate, who is Hillary, and this is why:
I know many people who are college educated and with advanced degrees who support Hillary. I am one of them.
But I have also been an idealist more than a materialist, and now in this ecomony I am one of Americans who literally cannot financially afford to wait while such a new administration full of the unknown and inexperience gets it’s act together.
I want the most efficient administration possible.
I do want someone was involved in the last Clinton administration, and knows first-hand about all of the changes they made which helped the economy, to make it one of the most socio-economically successful we’ve ever had.
In the debates, it was obvious that Hillary is both the most knowledgeable and qualified. That is what I want.
Mara, Bill’s administration was the most socio-economically successful we have ever had.
It’s Bush, and his administration’s policies that have gotten us in this mess.

Posted by: Lauren | March 13, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Sorry Will, I don’t see where my opinion was false. I provided links as you requested, and I did not misrepresent them in my opinion. Of course you as a fervent Obama supporter can slant things any way you wish, the same with the Hillary supporters. I am just throwing this information out there for the sake of conversation. You sound more and more like someone who is a paid Obama staffer. Well, Are you?

Posted by: Jay | March 13, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Jay,
I see no grounds for calling Obama ‘terribly divisive’. When it comes to dividing, I’d have to give Clinton the edge after the last couple of weeks. But it takes two to tango.

Posted by: Niels | March 13, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

True Niels:
They both seem to have a big problem in that department.

Posted by: Jay | March 13, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Lauren, Bush – and his people have definitely gotten us into this financial mess. I don’t know that Hillary is going to be able to get us out, because a lot of that wealth was based on the dot.com bubble, but I think McCain, Clinton and Obama all have more sense than Bush – you can’t cut taxes and raise spending.
Jay – I saw your link, and Obama did say just what you said he did (that it was not clear that his supporters would follow Hillary). Thanks.

Posted by: Mara | March 13, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am

Ironically enough, it is Obama and the Obama campaign who have been strategically divisive from the start.
And I am sick of it.
Who is the only one campaigning who is not part of the “politics of the past”?
Obama. Isn’t that convenient for him?
I happen to want the most qualified candidate with national experience, someone who has proven they can actually do all the things Obama says.
Someone who deserves to be given credit for all her experience and qualifications, and would be give that credit if she were a man.
We are heading for our politics of the future. We are a progressive party. The Democratic party always has been the party of hope and change – most of our slogans throughout the years have been about hope and change. No one owns hope and change besides us.
I am happy Barack is in our national politics – he will be even more qualified after he has more national experience.
But he is not our most qualified candidate at this time.
We are all moving towards the politics of the future. Belittling our most qualified candidate as being part of the ‘politics of the past’ is just a substandard, dismissive strategy. Hillary started to organize to help children of migrant families when she was a teenager. She became involved in public service for the very reasons of hope, change, and unity. You can read about it in her Graduation speech from Vassar:
“We are, all of us. . . . searching for a more immediate, ecstatic, and penetrating mode of living. . . . for the integrity, the courage to be whole, living in relation to one another in the full poetry of existence. The struggle for an integrated life existing in an atmosphere of communal trust and respect is one with desperately important political and social consequences. . . .
That’s what she has been working for all her life. She is our most qualified candidate.

Posted by: Lauren | March 13, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

Jay I was beginning to think I’d be wrong about you. I was waiting for this response.
“Sorry Will, I don’t see where my opinion was false. I provided links as you requested, and I did not misrepresent them in my opinion. Of course you as a fervent Obama supporter can slant things any way you wish, the same with the Hillary supporters. I am just throwing this information out there for the sake of conversation. You sound more and more like someone who is a paid Obama staffer. Well, Are you?”
To answer your question, no I am not an Obama staffer, nor have I voted for him. Yet that is. I didnt vote in the Florida primaries as I was aware of the rules that were agreed upon before the election.
Now I have already pointed out how you misrepresented him in saying that Hillary was extending an olive branch by offering a joint ticket and saying Obama doesnt think his supporters will vote for her. To be accurate, Obama is not opposed to Hillary being the VP. Just like Hillary isnt opposed to having Obama as VP…or at least now for both of them. Your statement earlier was misleading as well as some of your other posts because it didnt represent the scenario you were presenting accurately. He doesnt believe Hillary will get his votes just like Hillary believes she will get more votes then him against McCain. See, I asked for the links because the context was important in trying to figure out why you were comparing Hillary talking about joint tickets vs Obama talking about his supporters votes. I don’t think I can convince you otherwise, so forget it.

Posted by: Will | March 13, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am

Well then, we can always agree to disagree. Good luck with the new Florida mail-in voting. Obama doesn’t have a prayer in the new Florida vote, but I respect your freedom of choice to vote for whomever you think is best.
I’ll stick with Hillary.

Posted by: Jay | March 13, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am

Hillary is not a MONSTER. Some in her campaign are. They destroy both Hillary and Obama. Howard Wolfson, Mark Penn are the other leading monsters. Soon, they will also be sent out by Clintons, for not helping Hillary to win. It’s just a matter of time…When you are in a quicksand swamp-whole, no matter how hard the head fights and shakes, you just sink more. That is the law of nature. Hillary is the loser.

Posted by: Mandy | March 13, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

Jay
“Well then, we can always agree to disagree. Good luck with the new Florida mail-in voting.”
I am positive Hillary wins Florida. I know Floridians very well. But, I am certain the results will work out well for Obama. At this point, I am willing to gamble that Obama wins the nomination. Though, I think the contention with Hillary supporters is so high that neither would win against McCain.
“Obama doesn’t have a prayer in the new Florida vote, but I respect your freedom of choice to vote for whomever you think is best.
I’ll stick with Hillary.”
Yeah I agree with you, I think I’ll be wearing some Hillary paraphernalia on the day the results come out. It’s a good thing for Obama that the delegates are awarded proportionally. Care to gamble that Obama’s vote count will be higher then last time?
I want to pass the same respect to you for at least being involve in the political process. To bad it has to be so contentious.

Posted by: Will | March 13, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am

I think Hillary deserves credit for failing on her number one priority which was to revamp heath care and we’re all lucky she did fail because her plan would have destroyed our health care system.
She also deserves credit for blowing her inevitable nomination and a huge stash of other people’s money. Apparently she was stunned to find out the campaign was broke despite getting weekly emails detailing the campaign’s financial status.
She also deserves credit for talking her husband out of settling with Paula Jones – which led to Bill’s impeachment.
And of course, it was Al Gore’s fault, hot Hillary’s that she didn’t even come close to delivering on her campaign promise to provide 200k jobs for NY.
Hillary does have a lot of experience and I hope the majority have the good sense to take a look at it.

Posted by: SuziQ | March 13, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am

SuzieQ. I appreciate someone who tried and doesn’t quit or give up. Hillary’s accomplishments outweigh her failures. Mr. Obama hasn’t made many mistakes because quite honestly, he really hasn’t done very much in his Senate job, well, except run for President. I admire Hillary for working hard every day of her life for the American people.

Posted by: Jay | March 13, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am

Do any of the Hillary supporters have the test questions for CIC Test(commander-in-chief test mentioned by that moron Howard Wolfson and hillary). We want to know first whether Hillary has the IQ to pass any of that test without cheating?

Posted by: Cortez | March 13, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am

Could you say specifically what Hillary has accomplished i.e raise the status of Arkansas in education from 49th to 39th by changing policies such as ………..
I really would like to hear exactly what she has done – things that aren’t disputed by others who were also involved like the Irish peace claims. I’m sure there must be some successes, I just don’t know what they are.

Posted by: SuziQ | March 13, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am

Ok Cortez, I know you’re just messing with us now, You don’t really believe the CIC test is a booklet like the college SAT’s OMG, please tell me you’re kidding.

Posted by: Jay | March 13, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am

In poker, no saying can be more true then,
“You gotta know when to hold ‘em, know when to fold ‘em!”
I respect someone with principals and acute understanding of the situation that they are in.
Stubbornness has it’s place except when it is self-serving. This especially the case in politics.

Posted by: Will | March 13, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am

SuzieQ: This is a short list, but you get the idea.
Her first cause was children, fighting abuse, and chairing the Children’s Defense Fund.
She began her career as a lawyer after graduating from Yale Law School in 1973.
following her career as a Congressional legal counsel; she was named the first female partner at Rose Law Firm in 1979 and was listed as one of the one hundred most influential lawyers in America in 1988 and 1991.
During 1974 she was a member of the Nixon impeachment inquiry staff in Washington D.C., advising the House Committee on the Judiciary during the Watergate scandal. She helped research procedures of impeachment and the historical grounds and standards for impeachment.
Hillary co-founded the Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families, a state-level alliance with the Children’s Defense Fund, in 1977.
In late 1977, President Jimmy Carter appointed her to the board of directors of the Legal Services Corporation.
She was the First Lady of Arkansas from 1979 to 1981 and 1983 to 1992, and was active in a number of organizations concerned with the welfare of children, and was on the board of Wal-Mart and several other corporate boards.
Bill Clinton appointed her chair of the Rural Health Advisory Committee where she successfully obtained federal funds to expand medical facilities in Arkansas’ poorest areas without affecting doctors’ fees.
One of the most important initiatives of the entire Clinton governorship, she fought a prolonged but ultimately successful battle against the Arkansas Education Association to put mandatory teacher testing as well as state standards for curriculum and classroom size in place.
She introduced Arkansas’ Home Instruction Program for Preschool Youth in 1985, a program that helps parents work with their children in preschool preparedness and literacy.
As First Lady of the United States she took a very prominent role in public policy.
She was the initial first lady to hold a post-graduate degree and to have her own professional career up to the time of entering the White House. She was also the initial first lady to take up an office in the West Wing of the White House.
She fought hard for Universal Health Care as First Lady, although it wasn’t successful, it’s something she learned from.
She visited over 80 countries as First Lady giving important speeches, about such controversial topics as human rights/women’s rights in China.
Her major initiative, the Clinton Health Care Plan, failed to gain approval by the Congress in 1994, but in 1997 she helped establish the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) and the Adoption and Safe Families Act.
As a Senator and after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, Hillary worked with her colleagues to secure the funds New York needed to recover and rebuild.
She fought to provide compensation to the families of the victims, grants for hard-hit small businesses, and health care for front line workers at Ground Zero.
She is the first New Yorker ever to serve on the Senate Armed Services Committee.
She has visited troops in Iraq and Afghanistan and in countless other locations, truly understanding the challenges facing our troops.
Hillary passed legislation to track the health status of our troops so that conditions like Gulf War Syndrome would no longer be misdiagnosed.
She is an original sponsor of legislation that expanded health benefits to members of the National Guard and Reserves and has been a strong critic of the Administration’s handling of Iraq.
She has introduced legislation to tie Congressional salary increases to an increase in the minimum wage.
She has supported a variety of middle-class tax cuts, including marriage penalty relief, property tax relief, and reduction in the Alternative Minimum Tax, and supports fiscally responsible pay-as-you-go budget rules.
She helped pass legislation that encouraged investment to create jobs in struggling communities through the Renewal Communities program.
She authored legislation that has been enacted to improve quality and lower the cost of prescription drugs and to protect our food supply from bioterrorism.
She sponsored legislation to increase America’s commitment to fighting the global HIV/AIDS crisis.
She has lead the fight for the expanded use of information technology in the health care system to decrease administrative costs, lower premiums, and reduce medical errors.
Clinton has successfully worked to ensure the safety of prescription drugs for children, with legislation now included in the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act.
She has also proposed expanding access to child care.
She has passed legislation that will bring more qualified teachers into classrooms and more outstanding principals to lead our schools.
Hillary is one of the original cosponsors of the Prevention First Act to increase access to family planning.
She fought with the Bush Administration and ensured that Plan B, an emergency contraceptive, will be available to millions of American women and will reduce the need for abortions.
She introduced the Count Every Vote Act of 2005 to ensure better protection of votes and to ensure that every vote is counted.

Posted by: Jay | March 13, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am

Ok, I looked at the link you sent to someone else. It didn’t mention that Hillary was one of 3 out of 100s of Watergate attorneys who was recommended at not for rehire by her supervisor, a Democrat, Jerry Zeiffman. He wrote a book about these events and Hillary is ethically challenged and lies.
So this link you had makes it look as though she had a big success there and she did not.

Posted by: SuziQ | March 13, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am

I just read the link to Hillary’s achievement: 1. Rodham Clinton was accused of involvement in a failed savings and loan in Arkansas, during a 1994 investigation. The Clintons had partnered with the savings and loan owners, Jim and Susan McDougal, in a real estate venture known as Whitewater, while Rodham Clinton worked for the Rose Law Firm. Hillary’s billing records were subpoenaed for auditing purposes, but went missing for two years until they were discovered in the first lady’s book room.
2. Death of Vince Foster, childhood friend of Bill Clinton’s, and Hillary’s former Rose Law Firm colleague, was investigated in conjunction with Whitewater. Deputy White House counsel Foster was found dead in a Virginia park on July 20, 1993, and a suicide note, torn into many pieces, was discovered in his briefcase. Foster had been murdered.
There are so many more Hillary failures and controversies from the hyperlink, this Hillary nut sent me to read. But enough, I did not even touch Lewinsky and all that Clintons crap. Just sick of those 90s. Turn the page on the old Clintons.

Posted by: Cortez | March 13, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am

n poker, no saying can be more true then,
“You gotta know when to hold ‘em, know when to fold ‘em!”
I respect someone with principals and acute understanding of the situation that they are in.
Stubbornness has it’s place except when it is self-serving. This especially the case in politics.
_______________________________________
Will, I am a professional poker player.
You also have to know when to bluff, and when you opponent is bluffing. You see, in poker, the best hand, is not necessarily the winning hand. Nerves of steel, calm under pressure etc… There are many more dimensions to poker. I have won and I have lost, but I NEVER quit until my last chip is played.
Great analogy btw….

Posted by: Jay | March 13, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am

Cortez, I am a Hillary supporter , not a nut. So stop with the name calling. I gave you the link to make sure all the info was there , good and bad, you didn’t mention, she was never convicted or found guilty or charged with anything from that era.
Hillary has her flaws, but at least I know exactly what they are. I can’t say the same for Mr. Obama yet.

Posted by: Jay | March 13, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am

I tend to think that she should stay a Senator where she can propose legislation for her favorite causes.
I think she has too many ethics problems and character flaws, including being very divisive, to be President. She likes to destroy those who don’t agree with her – for her that is “the fun part”.
What is the clincher for me…she led the attacks on the women her husband used and abused. Maybe she thinks what she did was justified because of her great cause….but I disagree.

Posted by: SuziQ | March 13, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am

SuzieQ. So Hillary is flawed. You don’t think Mr. Obama has his flaws? His racist church and minister who denounce white people, his association with William Ayers, Farrakhan, and slumlord and indicted criminal Tony Rezko. I think you will have to turn a blind eye to Mr.Obama if you think he is clean.

Posted by: Jay | March 13, 2008, 1:52 am 1:52 am

Will, I am a professional poker player.
You also have to know when to bluff, and when you opponent is bluffing. You see, in poker, the best hand, is not necessarily the winning hand. Nerves of steel, calm under pressure etc… There are many more dimensions to poker. I have won and I have lost, but I NEVER quit until my last chip is played.
Great analogy btw….
Uh Oh, I hope you arent the one that has been paying my rent all this time. I am very aware of all the tactics involved in playing poker, and winning plenty of money. Sure, you never quit. That mentality is necessary. But, setting yourself and your party to fail is a no no. It’s like showing the table you have a 7 – 2 offsuit, the other guy has a flush, no possible boat or straight flush showing, and you call an all-in because you think the dealer is going to muck the cards. Ok, I’ve seen that happen before but anyways. There willl be a point when Hillary has to back down. And I don’t think she gets any points for waiting til the last minute to do so.

Posted by: Will | March 13, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am

Will, with the same poker analogy, the game still isn’t over. Many cards have not been dealt yet, and if one candidate see’s even a slim chance of winning, why should he/she quit. This contest will be decided by delegates at the convention, so neither Hillary or Barack will have enough pledged delegates. Why should either quit just because the other one wants them to?
If you are a Hillary supporter Barack is pulling the party down, if you are an Obama supporter Hillary is pulling the party down. I think it should be played all the way out. Hillary has nothing to lose at this point. I wonder though, does OBama?

Posted by: Jay | March 13, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am

Hillary is a fighter, some say. I’d sure grant that. The problem is, she is a dumb fighter, she knows only to fight and fight with everyone around, including her own party, her fellow democrats and everyone. It ain’t getting you anywhere folks. She will bury us all in November with her attitude and approach that are seeped in old Washington politics.

Posted by: Cortez | March 13, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am


Ok, I looked at the link you sent to someone else. It didn’t mention that Hillary was one of 3 out of 100s of Watergate attorneys who was recommended at not for rehire by her supervisor, a Democrat, Jerry Zeiffman. He wrote a book about these events and Hillary is ethically challenged and lies.
So this link you had makes it look as though she had a big success there and she did not.

LOL @ “ethically challenged.”
Some people don’t realize that a persons integrity is a valid characteristic to be scrutinized when you are considering someone to be the president.
I’m sure, since she was one of three out of 100′s, that means there was a vast media conspiracy against her.

Posted by: Will | March 13, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am

Did you hear that this NY Governor Spitzer and Bill Clinton were together many a time, in the evenings? Wonder, what these two were doing together? Exchanging notes? Cable and local TVs were full of Lewinsky and Kristen images today…Getting tired of these Spitzer and Clintons. Turn the page folks…we don’t want the baggage of the 90s.

Posted by: Cortez | March 13, 2008, 2:09 am 2:09 am

You are correct Will, except for some darn reason, we are not allowed to scrutinize Obama’s integrity. Every time we do, we are called racists, and idiots, and nutjobs. He answers 8 questions on Rezko and runs away from reporters.
His integrity is one of the reasons I cannot ever vote for him. He is a Chicago politician, a wheeler-dealer and he is only out for himself. Why do I feel that way, because I was born and raised and lived in Chicago for 35 years. He did nothing to help the people of Illinois, the City of Chicago or his own district. He is not what he says he is. How is he going to change our country and the entire world in 4 years?
Google Obama/Rezko video.. see NBC’ Carol Marin video.

Posted by: Jay | March 13, 2008, 2:09 am 2:09 am

“Will, with the same poker analogy, the game still isn’t over. Many cards have not been dealt yet, and if one candidate see’s even a slim chance of winning, why should he/she quit. This contest will be decided by delegates at the convention, so neither Hillary or Barack will have enough pledged delegates. Why should either quit just because the other one wants them to?
If you are a Hillary supporter Barack is pulling the party down, if you are an Obama supporter Hillary is pulling the party down. I think it should be played all the way out. Hillary has nothing to lose at this point. I wonder though, does OBama?”
OK, I can respect this point of view. You make a great point here. But, Im not certain how you weigh the fact that this long drawn-out battle is proving to be a negative for the Democrats. The nomination is not as important as the General Election. And this drawn at process, at this point is hurting the Dems. I can agree, if tHillary was able to catch up in pledged delegates. Even by 1 point lead, then I’d say GO GET HIM! That is not the case. She can not beat him in pledged delegates. She will not. She will have to rely on the superdelegates. The argument will be that the superdelegates will have far more say then they should and that they should follow the will of the people. It will be a rain of fire. Look, I don’t want to take away anyones fire. I can’t say I don’t love a good fight, but when people who are supposed to be on the same team are scratching each others eyes out, somethings gotta give.

Posted by: Will | March 13, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am

Is there something special about 35 years? Hillary says she has 35 years of experience and this hillary nut (jay) also says he has 35 years of chicago experience. give me a break!!!!!!

Posted by: Cortez | March 13, 2008, 2:14 am 2:14 am

But Will , Mr. Obama will also have to rely on the super delegates to win this nomination. No matter how we see it, I do agree with you that this long, protracted fight will weaken both candidates and the party in the end, and everyone will be playing the blame game. Sad but so true.

Posted by: Jay | March 13, 2008, 2:14 am 2:14 am

i have yet to look at Obama in depth – regarding my perception of his character. I do think character counts as much as anything in a President. The person in the oval office can get tons of advisor and reports but in the end we’re trusting them to do the right thing. Hillary’s history tells me that Hillary will do the politically expedient thing…what’s best for her and the people who finance her. People who know her way better than I, plus a lot of research, confirms this.
I’ve written her off.

Posted by: SuziQ | March 13, 2008, 2:22 am 2:22 am

SuziQ: You are certainly entitled to your opinion. I certainly hope you do an in-depth research on Mr.Obama in the same way as you have vetted Hillary.
I have done the exact same research regarding Mr.Obama, as is the case. I have written him off.

Posted by: Jay | March 13, 2008, 2:27 am 2:27 am

Its so funny and at the same time sad to see that we democrats will be fighting like this between Obama and Hillary. One or the other has to give in. Once upon a time when M. Jordan was in Chicago Bulls, we used to feel great for the team. But now, we accept the fact and have moved on, without much worrying about why Bulls are not the winners. So too, for Hillary supporters, you know your candidate, your campaign and your stock is not doing well. Don’t join Hillary to go on the attack against other democrats. It will tear us apart. Who knows, if she can be pursuaded to give up gracefully, then she will keep the respect of the party and the Nation for the rest of her life. But if you all join her in tearing others out because of frustration, then we all will be the losers in November. Time to give up folks. Its not easy. Let the winner take it. And as it stands, don’t cheat the voters and steal the nomination for her. That is not right and we should never do it.

Posted by: Cortez | March 13, 2008, 2:30 am 2:30 am

“You are correct Will, except for some darn reason, we are not allowed to scrutinize Obama’s integrity.”
You most certainly can. I would hope it’s done fairly.
“Every time we do, we are called racists, and idiots, and nutjobs.”
I don’t know why Cortez keeps calling you a nut, but in terms of racists and idiots, I doubt people are calling you a racist or an idiot without some evidence.
“He answers 8 questions on Rezko and runs away from reporters.”
Think you can get more then 8 questions answered from Hillary about all of the many scandals she has been apart of? How about the scandals that are coming up? And I don’t mean that in a hypothetical. A few more scandals are going to be coming up that I’m sure she’s not going to answer in great length. You want the candidates to be subjected to an extensive line of questions regarding scandals? It will take much longer to go through Hillary’s.
“His integrity is one of the reasons I cannot ever vote for him.”
And yet, you can vote for Hillary because…
“He is a Chicago politician, a wheeler-dealer and he is only out for himself. Why do I feel that way, because I was born and raised and lived in Chicago for 35 years. He did nothing to help the people of Illinois, the City of Chicago or his own district. He is not what he says he is. How is he going to change our country and the entire world in 4 years?”
OK, this I can’t speak on because this is your own personal belief about him. I for one know there are some people that I harbor negative feelings to because I think they are not what they say or think they are. One being Hillary Clinton. So, I can respect that assessment from you.
“Google Obama/Rezko video.. see NBC’ Carol Marin video.”
Saw it, and you’re saying you want to ask him questions over and over about this? Are you suggesting he did something wrong?

Posted by: Will | March 13, 2008, 2:35 am 2:35 am

Jay,
You’re not the only one I’ve talked to who is from Chicago says negative things about Obama and that he isn’t what he seems. You sound like a reasonable and intelligent person and I appreciate your comments.
I am going look into Obama.
BTW, one candidate who has demonstrated a pretty good character is McCain. I understand there is a first in, first out rule in the military and the reason McCain refused to be released from the Hanoi Hilton when it was offered was because he wasn’t the first in and refused to jump the line ahead of his buddies. That was amazing, actually. It doesn’t make him perfect of course but that was a heck of a thing to do.

Posted by: SuziQ | March 13, 2008, 2:36 am 2:36 am

I have blogged a lot, written for Hillary a lot in the beginning, and then a lot for Obama now. Sometimes, I think, perhaps we are all wasting our precious time on endless arguing for nothing. Finally, it comes down to caring for our children and for our families no matter what happens to these candidates, great as Hillary or Obama may be. Lets take a step back from all these attacks and go back to the basics…So, Good night folks. nice talking to you all.

Posted by: Cortez | March 13, 2008, 2:39 am 2:39 am

Will: All I am suggesting is Obama did nothing when he could have stepped in an help those people in his district in the substandard housing bought by Rezko with grants Obama assisted in procuring. Maybe Mr.Obama was a little too busy getting ready to run for President. I lived on the south side, I know the area very well, and there are many bitter people when it comes to that Rezko/Obama building deal.

Posted by: Jay | March 13, 2008, 2:40 am 2:40 am

Cortez: I have to agree with you on this post. We all get heated up about our preferred candidate, but all we want is a stable and prosperous future for ourselves, our children and grand children. Is that too much to ask? I sincerely hope that who ever is elected President will try their best to fix all the wrongs in our country today. I am not expecting miracles just some honest progress.
Good night Will, SuzieQ & Cortez. It was great chatting with all of you.

Posted by: Jay | March 13, 2008, 2:44 am 2:44 am

Good Night Jay.

Posted by: Will | March 13, 2008, 2:48 am 2:48 am

Forgot to mention, I am from Chicago, born and raised here. My whole family, kith and kin live all around the North West suburbs of Chicago. Most of us have a very positive opinion about Mr. Obama and his character and integrity. Same is not shared in our circles about Hillary. We think, Clintons belonged to another time. And I am not black. Don’t minimize Obama’s achievment or his candidacy by all these speculations and racial tones. He will be a great President.

Posted by: Cortez | March 13, 2008, 2:49 am 2:49 am

I tend to not care that much about Obama’s pastor nor did I care that much about what Geraldine said – people get worked up …etc.
Yes, Obama’s pastor is going too far with the race thing..but then I don’t know what it’s like to be black.
My interest is how the candidates react to challenges in their life…and what choices they make.
Hillary reacts too frequently by cheating and lying and trying to destroy those she sees as her opposition. She doesn’t react well to dissent.
Not sure about Obama yet. He seems to be more reasonable. One thing for sure, he had to do a lot of self-reflection with his background and then got himself to be the editor of the Harvard Law Review. No small accomplishment. His campaign has been well run and so far has surprised everyone, especially Hillary.
McCain seems to want to work things out for
what’s best for everyone – I say that because of all his bi-partisan bills he’s sponsored, often with a political cost to him from his base. McCain is tough, he knows how to hang in there and has proven that over and over.

Posted by: SuziQ | March 13, 2008, 3:10 am 3:10 am

Ferraro went Kamikazi, she did’t say what ‘we were all thinking’ she said what’s her camp is thinking.. Geri Ferraro martyered herself in the name of Hillary Clinton. Clintonites a moment of silence.

Posted by: mims | March 13, 2008, 7:41 am 7:41 am

I don’t believe that Javier Barden is a pageboy wearing murderous thug, he just played the part. And I don’t think that Clinton or Ferraro are racists. Clinton is a ruthless pol with a war-room style of politics. She knows how to win the rural white vote in Pennsylvania at any cost. Her campaign wrote the ugly script and cast the part beautifully. Ferraro, a loyal pol willing to take one for the team, played the part…End of ugly story.
I think Senator Kenedy gives compelling reason to reject this war-room style of politics when he said, “With Barack Obama we will close the book on the old politics of race against race, gender against gender, ethnic group against ethnic group, and straight against gay,”

Posted by: Larry | March 13, 2008, 8:04 am 8:04 am

Lauren
With all of these comments…do you understand what adding Sen. Clinton to the mix does?
Doesn’t this campaign alone show you that this is the tone no matter where they go?
Politics is rough yes…but shouldn’t we be better people than this?
…and the traits of a “successful” President are not just about the qualities of efficiency, or fighting, or having seen the battles…
It is not only about judgement (although this really is pretty dang important obviously)
Inspiring the country is huge. You need the people behind you… and you can inspire through fear, through intimidation or you can inspire through telling people they are a good people…that all people are good in this nation.
You can belittle it all you want …but the Lincolns, the FDR’s, the JFK’s all inspired…
I disagree with people (even comdediennes) saying anger and aggressiveness can “get things done”. Anger and aggressiveness begets anger and aggressiveness.
as we have seen in the congress…as we have seen in this campaign… as we have seen in committees that are set up to accomplished things… “The my way or the highway and I will FIGHT to do this…has not worked.
There qualifications in administration and giving back are equivalent in the fact that she has the years and the prominence …he has the depth and the proximity.
What this country needs is a change in direction and tone. Unfortunately, Sen Obama was the one who was heading in that direction…and we are losing that battle.

Posted by: dl | March 13, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am

Thank goodness there is time for people in PA and around the country to finally learn who the real Obama is. The msm is in the tank for Obama, but the local media, National Enquirer, and concerned voters will be able to educate people about this fraud. Now someone is finally taking a look at the racist church he attends.

Posted by: geevill | March 13, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am

Will, you wrote: “…but in terms of racists and idiots, I doubt people are calling you a racist or an idiot without some evidence.”
If Sen. Obama is the Democratic Party’s nominee, during the general election ANY comment that is made about Sen. Obama by Sen. McCain will be labeled (not by Sen. Obama, but by the Left Wing 527s) as a negative comment and ultimately labeled as a racist comment. Thus race will play a huge — and very negative — part in the general election. That is unless Sen. McCain and the Republican Party can convince either Dr. Condoleezza Rice or Gen. Colin Powell to join him on the Republican ticket. By both political parties having an African-American on their ticket the experience should be mostly positive and could become a giant step toward’s fulfilling Dr. Martin Luther King’s dream.

Posted by: James Danley | March 13, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am

Wouldn’t really use Paglia as an objective perspective on anyone, especially Hillary. CP is well-known critic of everyone who isn’t in her sphere, which per Wikipedia, would be …
” Her views on the legalization of recreational drugs and prostitution, and on the relaxation of sexual consent laws, are more libertarian. She is a strong critic of much of the feminism that began with Betty Friedan’s 1962 The Feminine Mystique and compared feminists — whom she considered to be victim-centered — to the Unification Church. At the same time Paglia’s embrace of fetishism, pornography, prostitution and, most prominently, male homosexuality, puts her at odds with the “family values” of American social conservatives.[5]
Her supporters (for different reasons) include Andrew Sullivan, Christina Hoff Sommers, Rush Limbaugh, Bill Maher, Matt Drudge and her Yale mentor Harold Bloom. Elise Sutton, a dominatrix advocating female domination of males, describes Paglia as a female supremacist and a friend.[6]“

Posted by: Grace | March 13, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

Republicans really like Obama now…
Today Fox website has an article “Obama Attempts Damage Control, Fallout Over Pastor’s Sermons Unclear”
it says:
“Ari Fleischer, former press secretary for President Bush, suggested that the controversy and the timing of Obama’s disavowal show him to be little more than a shrewd politician.
“I think there’s a reason Republicans I talk to are increasingly looking forward to running against Barack Obama,” Fleischer said.”

Posted by: YD | March 16, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.