Mar 20, 2008 6:22pm

Michigan Do-Over Primary ‘Dead’

ABC News’ Teddy Davis and Talal Al-Khatib Report: Sen. Hillary Clinton’s, D-N.Y., path to the Democratic presidential nomination grew tougher on Thursday as Michigan’s Legislature adjourned without approving a re-vote.

"What I can tell you is that the idea of a state-run, privately funded primary is dead," said Liz Boyd, a spokeswoman for Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm who is supporting Clinton.

The former first lady was hoping to find support for a privately-financed, state-run primary because the state’s governor and legislative leaders had ruled out the possibility of using state taxpayer money to hold a second Democratic primary.

Now that the Michigan House and Senate have adjourned without approving a do-over Democratic primary, Clinton’s circle of advisers are hoping that an agreement can be reached to hold a party-run mail-in ballot that would not require legislative approval.

It’s hard, however, to see this approach being adopted.

"I don’t know logistically how it is possible," said Michigan Democratic Party spokeswoman Liz Kerr.

The Michigan Democratic Party has not definitively ruled out a party-run mail-in vote. But Kerr said the state party would find it very difficult to manage any kind of party-run contest regardless of whether it is a mail-in vote or a "firehouse primary" in which voters go in-person to party-run polling locations.

"Logistically, a mail-in ballot presents the same obstacles that it did when we started talking about it two weeks ago," said Kerr. "Three million pieces of paper is a lot to manage. We are state party, not a government body whose sole purpose is to administer elections."

A further obstacle facing Clinton is that the Michigan Democratic Party is not going to approve any re-vote plan that does not have the support of Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill. As the overall delegate leader nationally, Obama’s campaign has shown little interest behind the scenes in reaching an accommodation.
"It’s very clear to me that they perceive a re-do as not beneficial to them," said Matt Marsden, spokesman to Michigan Republican Leader Mike Bishop. "So without coming right out and saying it," he added, referring to Obama’s Democratic allies in Michigan’s Legislature. "They did everything in their power to avoid that contingency."

User Comments

Please help me understand why Michigan scheduled the early primary, and in the case of Florida, why the Floridians must lose their delegates because of the vote from their Republican legislature/governor that moved up both party primaries.

Posted by: donna | March 20, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

Good they knew well in advance if they held these the votes would NOT count.You can’t have it both ways,So all I can say is HILLBILLY suffer.

Posted by: h | March 20, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Easy take it to the floor of the convention.
Obama is bluffing. Telling his delegates to vote against seating Michigan and FLorida is political suicide.
He blocked redo primaires, now take it to the floor Hill!!!!

Posted by: s.b. | March 20, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

Donna-Does the name Dean ring a bell? The fact is the DNC under Dean is a third world effort that only Syria can do worse. Now the DNC is hopelessly paralyzed with fear of offending Obama. Al Sharpton has threatened to march if the DNC enter into a redo and Obama is cheering Sharpton on. Jessie Jackson has indicated the same. And if the super delegates decide for Hillary Sharpton threatened riots in the streets. Nice friends Obama has. But it works.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 20, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

Obama is just playing poker hoping to convince people that Hillary cant win. he has lsot this be tseveral times and will lose it again judgeing by recent polls in WV, PENN et all.
Stop trying for a redo Hillary. You don’t need one. YOu won these states already.
Take it to the floor. Let democrats face the music. They will seat MI and FL delegations. 100% guarenteed.
No more discussion. He blocked the redo’s. You gave him the chance. now take it to the floor.

Posted by: s.b. | March 20, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

MAIL IN VOTING IN LARGE SCALE, IN A STATE LAGGING BETWEEN OTHER THE EXPERIENCE HOW TO VERIFY THE SIGNATURES,
IS AN OPEN INVITATION FOR F R A U D !
There appears there is only one fair solution: OPEN CAUCUSES.
This would benefit Hillary, as vacation-absent student will not be able to vote,
but is disliked by her campaign because
allegedly many do not assist because of
the amount of time each voter must invest there ! (of course, it is difficult to see why this should affectany candidate in particular)
But if, as Hillary says, voters in Michigan are so adamant to make their voices heard, ABOVE EXCUSE IS NOT VALID !
The ALTERNATIVE: Michigan will have no delegates, which coincudentally, is the only really correct solution !!!
Caminito

Posted by: TOM WITTMANN | March 20, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

Michigan Do-Over Primary ‘Dead’
equals, for those who fail or do not want to notice:
Clinton Bid For The White House ‘Dead’
So thanks for trying and take care.

Posted by: Garf | March 20, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Howard Dean should be run out of convention on a rail.
That or thrown under a bus while everyone cheers.
That man is the most incompetent president of the DNC ever.
Kick his sorry behind out the door after the MI and FL delegations are seated.
He is a nightmare that should be nowhere near a general election.

Posted by: s.b. | March 20, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Tom-I’m a Clinton supporter and I think that’s a dumb idea.
S.B. I agree with you. Hillary just get on with PA and the rest of the states. Then take it to the floor and let it all hang out.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 20, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

If we need you we will call you Bye Bye!

Posted by: Vic | March 20, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

Actually I think this benefits CLinton and that Obama has just handed her the nomination.
He might have won MI. Now he never will. She didn’t just win MI and FL she won big. He could have changed that narrative. Now he can’t.
MI and Fl will be seated as is, with 40% uncommitted delegates ripe for poaching instead of many of them being Obama delegates.
Hillary gets to say she won all the big states, can use the arguements that superdelegates should vote for her because FL and MI havent been counted. Obama gets no votes in the MI primary to count towards the popular vote, and he has to argue against seating 8% of the democratic electorate at convention.
I think Obama blocking these two primaries just gave Hillary Clinton the nomination on the convention floor.

Posted by: s.b. | March 20, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Tom-Never, ever, caucuses! Never! There are no caucuses in the general and none needed now. Never! Get rid of those caucuses, period. One man one vote. That’s the American way. No mail in votes either. Hillary, do your thing and take it to the floor. If the democrats spit so be it! I’m on board for the ride. Hillary all the way. If necessary we write your name in, period!

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 20, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

Obama didn’t block the redo primaries, the two states did. Howard Dean offered the states a chance to do a re-vote, which was generous considering they broke the rule laid down by the DNC. The Clinton campaign agreed to those rules, but now that she hasn’t sown up the nomination, she wants to change those rules. Typical Clinton politics.

Posted by: Don | March 20, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

No caucus. No mail in. Obama has blocked real primaries. It’s over.
Take it to the floor Hill!
Call his bluff.

Posted by: s.b. | March 20, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

Obama blocked redo primaries in both states.
He is welcome to explain himself and his position to the Democratic National Convention.
Take it to the floor Hill!

Posted by: s.b. | March 20, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

Democratic win in the gen.- also “dead”
Because if Obama wins this nomination we all are going to suffer. When you are paying 7 dollars a gallon for gas in 4 years dont expect me to pity you.
If you dont vote for Hillary now after knowing who Obamas FAMILY is – McCain will win and we all will lose.

Posted by: Drew | March 20, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

Yeah, take it to the floor. And after a sleazy Clinton bid to steal the nomination, hello president McCain.

Posted by: Don | March 20, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

Hillary Clinton is like a Vampire that won’t die. Please go away. The Democratic Party knows that Sen Obama is the future of the party. Race is only an issue to the extent that the Clinton’s want to use it as a wedge issue. Do not let them do this. Sen obama is sincere in his efforts to have this issue discussed intelligently by the American public.

Posted by: DavidE | March 20, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

How did Obama block the Primaries? he did not move them up, he did not set the rules that said they did not count, he did not hold up wither process to set up re-votes. Neither state wanted to pay for a new process. In Michigan, it did not even get through the legislature to be considered. HRC herself said that shouldn’t count and would not matter, of course she said that before he was down in delegates. Those states scrwed themselves. If they wanted to change the order for primaries, they had 4 years to address the issue with the DNC. They knew what would happen and did it anyway.

Posted by: Louis | March 20, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

Remember Sen Clinton’s side didn’t want an open revote and that was the big issue…
Superdelegates aren’t as ignorant as the general public about why this revote didn’t happen …it was not all about Sen obama…his constituents in the Michigan senate argued that everyone who was disenfranchised the first time around needed to get to vote the second time around…
Sen. Clinton said no. ..and fought to get her way to the front of the pack…that just the people they wanted voting would vote again and not to worry about all the people who voted in a different direction or who were out of state and/or are still out of state or aren’t there now.
The superdelegates aren’t dumb and if you look at the papers in the state …they aren’t either.
You know it doesn’t look very sincere when someone comes in to the state with gobs of their backers carrying all the cash to redo the election…
That looks bad.
So …no …the supers aren’t going to bite on Obama ruined this…
They know if anyone is to blame it is the person who didn’t care about the votes not counting originally and then cared when it mattered to her. The supers want a candidate that stands up when it counts…with the voting and other issues.

Posted by: dl | March 20, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

It’s the party’s fault. If they wanted to break the rules and become irrelivant and disenfranchise the will of the voters, they shouldn’t of gone against the rules. However, don’t fret yet, I’m sure Hilliary’s pals at the DNC will find a way to give her what she wants anyway. Since when have rules ever stood in the way of the Democrat party, or the Clintons???

Posted by: cba | March 20, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Um steal what?? Clinton supports a redo Primary in both states. how is that stealing anything??
Obama has been given his chance. He rejected it. Now it is up to the delegates at convention.
Obama can argue his case to not seat the delegates,which will end his political career, or the delegates will be seated.
He is trying to get to cenventionwith enough of a delegate spread so that it wont matter. Unfortunately for him that doesnt look like its going to happen.
But it is the hand he is playing. He is bluffing.
Call his bluff Hillary!
Take it to the floor!

Posted by: s.b. | March 20, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

I can handle a President McCain but I cannot a President Obama and I expect you Obama lot feel the same of Clinton. Take it to the floor Hillary!

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 20, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

No one in ANY state is allowed to vote twice. It’s against the law and is fraud. I believe it is a felony crime.
Obama asking to let people vote twice and have their votes count in both the democratic and republican primaries is asking for people to be able to commit a felony, voting fraud.
Not surprising given his campaigns documented caucus behaviour, but not something the DNC could ever sanction legally.
Take it to the floor Hill!

Posted by: s.b. | March 20, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

Unfortunately for Obama, the Republicans nominated McCain, the least offensive of the Repubs and one who does not frighten Democrats like Romney or Huckabee would have. Therefore Democratic voters like me, who have never voted Republican in our lives, will very seriously consider voting for McCain after Obama’s trashing of both America and the right of 2 states to vote. I dislike McCain far less than I do Obama.

Posted by: LAGuy | March 20, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

DavidE-Wright David Clinton played the race card? Who gave the race speech and then threw HIS grandmother under the bus? How many times can Obama run over his grandmother in a week? Answer: Two . . . so far.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 20, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

Obama & DNC: ‘Yes, we CAN’T!’
Take it to the floor, Senator Clinton!

Posted by: laurie | March 20, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Shame on the DNC, shame on the candidate. The democrat didn’t deserve to win the election.
I don’t like the republican party and ready to hand my vote to the democrat. My guest is that they are not ready. I got to give it to McCain. At least, he have my respect.

Posted by: maleasiansmoker | March 20, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

I agree Dogsoldier — watching Obama stand up before America and call his supposedly beloved grandmother a racist for his own political gain, was one of the most offensive things I have ever witnessed.

Posted by: LAGuy | March 20, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

Obama is a bloody LIAR!
He said it was up to the DNC to decide but that was a lie! It is up to HIM.
His people and him are blocking the votes of MI and FL. I can not believe this!
What if this happened in South Carolina or Louisiana???????
Obama is a fraud and he is disenfranchising voters!

Posted by: Kurt | March 20, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

Really enough of this.
Let the campaigns make their case in front of the American people and then let the delegates at the convention decide.
If the democratic party is unwilling to seat 8% of the democratic electorate at it’s convention, then it will no doubt lose the election, as it should.
There are no more solutions. No one can unelect delegates overruling the voters of MI and FL, with some arbitrary apportionment of delegates.
Either the delegations are seated as is or they aren’t.
Take it to the floor! Call his bluff Hill!

Posted by: s.b. | March 20, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

During the campaign Obama will tell the voters of Michigan and Florida his racist grannie made him do it!

Posted by: LAGuy | March 20, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

Bye..bye Hillariosly

Posted by: DavidE | March 20, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

Bye..bye Hillariosly

Posted by: DavidE | March 20, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

So Obama doesn’t believe in the democracy on which American is founded then? Obviously not. No way is he the future of the democratic party: he is the death of it as far as the 2008 Election is concerned. He can wheel and deal with Rezko but for him to play with the right of ordinary American people to express their vote absolutely stinks. And people want this man to be President: you must be joking!

Posted by: Overland Trail | March 20, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

1. Everyone is bashing Obama on this issue, but what would Clinton do if she had a small lead and Obama was wanting a redo in big states that broke party rules that he had won? I don’t see any difference between them in this situation. They are both doing what favors them. 2.Why do the candidates get to decide if there is a redo? This is a disagreement between the national party and the state party. As long as they don’t change the rules set at the start, I don’t see why the candidates have a say.

Posted by: MikeMo1947 | March 20, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

As Chicago one sang…”She’s gone..oh I…oh I…I’d pay the devil to replace her…she’s gowne….”

Posted by: DavidE | March 20, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Obamaall theway-Do you even know what NAFTA is? OK. Then explain it to me.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 20, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

LAGuy-Honestly, Obama throwing his grandmother under the bus is the ONE thing that stood out in my mind the day after Obama’s race speech and it really angered me.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 20, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

Obama did not cause this mess!!!The DNC are morons, do we really need more morons in government???I think they all stink!!!

Posted by: david | March 20, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

Think about it! Clinton will have another chance and she can learn by her mistakes. I mean four years from now she’ll be much wiser and would have learned more tricks to use to fool the voters. She’s a fast learner, and by the time the next election comes around she be able to fool the best of us. She just has to learn to avoid putting anything on the record where the truth can come out.

Posted by: Randle Bate | March 20, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

s.b. I read some of your posts and laughed and laughed! Let me summarise for you: “It’s all big bad Obama’s fault”. No it isn’t. MI and FL will be seated if it makes no difference to the results of the nomination. If it does, they won’t be seated. In case your love for Hellary has blinded you, the lack of redo primaries is not Obama’s fault: there were legitimate concerns and the state legislatures in MI and FL would never have passed the legislation. WOuld YOU shoot yourself in the foot?

Posted by: Martin | March 20, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

Because the voters in both states havent gone out to the streets and said what are you doing.And Americans have not supparted them in the same way

Posted by: girlinvt | March 20, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

Ahhh, Dogsoldier, you cannot handle a President Obama? How unfortunate for you. But what do WE care?
But hey, there will be a lot of Hillary t-shirts, posters and buttons bargains soon, so buy some of that stuff, decorate your room in your parents’ home with it and don’t worry, be happy till 2016. At that time you’ll even be a grown up!

Posted by: Garf | March 20, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

Obama & DNC: ‘Yes, we CAN’T!’
Take it to the floor, Senator Clinton!

Posted by: laurie | March 20, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

If I lived in Michigan or Florida, I would want the heads of the Dem party members who decided to hold the early primaries KNOWING the DNC said they would not count. On a platter.

Posted by: Marilyn | March 20, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

If people in those states wish to be upset with somebody, blame your state’s representatives. They are the ones who moved the primary ahead AFTER they were told it would not count if they did. How does this not make sense to anyone? Again, they(your state) moved your primary with the full knowledge that it would not count. Both Hillary and Obama are on record opposing this move in the beginning of the cycle. Don’t confuse their current political posturing for ownership of the problem. That falls squarely on the leaders of your states!

Posted by: justme | March 20, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

Garf-Check the Gallup polls since brother Wright. The only one going DOWN is Obama. Today Obama said his grandmother is a “typical white person” which aught to play real well. And John Kerry said because Obama was a BLACK person he’d be good for America and the world. Ferraro come to mind here? Wow. Perhaps someone aught to tell Obama to stop digging when he’s in a hole. Down, baby, down!

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 20, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

How do all of your Obamalovers think putting a socialist in office who wants to tax the crap out of us, and ruin this economy for “carbon credits” think this is going to decrease the price of gas? Is Obama going to give OPEC bjs so they increase production?

Posted by: Hawk | March 20, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Donna,
The Democrats in Florida supported moving up the primary as well. When the DNC and RNC started balking, the democrats played lip service to opposing moving the primary. Do you really think they were powerless? It’d been all over the news if they filibustered or truly opposed. The problem is too many Dems in FL supported moving up the primary. And don’t forget, the RNC punished Michigan an FL too. They stripped half their delegates.

Posted by: Chuck | March 20, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

people should know better than to think florida doesn’t count – i am amazed that in spite of 2000 anyone misses that florida counts – florida could decide this election once again – what was that about ‘repeating history’ !

Posted by: scathinglybrilliant | March 20, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Seems yesterday’s anti-Obama line was “under the bus” and today’s is “take it to the floor”. Hillary is out. Live with it.

Posted by: Democrat for life | March 20, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

Marilyn-It was not the democrats in FL or MI who decide. It was the Republican Governor and the republican controlled house who moved the primary DESPITE democrats who asked differently. MI somewhat the same except they have a dem gov.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 20, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

One of the lessons we learn in kindergarten is that if you break the rules, you have to sit in time-out. It’s a shame that the leadership in Michigan and Florida decided to disenfranchise their citizens by making decisions that led to–essentially–a state-wide time-out.
We have a representative form of government and if the citizens of Michigan and Florida are unhappy with the decisions their leaders have made, then they are free to make their feelings known the next time those leaders are up for re-election.

Posted by: Jane | March 20, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

DavidE, That was Hall & Oates not Chicago,
and the real song is by Elton John…The Bitch is back, as a matter of fact…lol
Obama people don’t know rock & roll.

Posted by: Jay | March 20, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

If this contest is taken to the floor of the convention, it will be a bloody fight. Either way, it will be very ugly. I also don’t know why moving the primaries up became such an ugly move. So what if they’re early? Is it just me, or is it because the worst is yet to come? The votes from both of these states don’t count as far as the nomination goes? I smell a court fight.

Posted by: Adam Smith | March 20, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

I think caucuses are good for energizing voters, discussing issues, local campaigning, etc. But I dont think they reflect the will of the voters as primaries do. For the future, I think the new party rules should be for all states to allow caucusing and primaries but only primaries allocate delegates. Delegate allocation should be proportional to voter participation not registered democrats. Primaries should be closed to prevent GOP fixing. Superdelegates should be included to represent the party. If the voters dont want them to have more weight than delegates from the states then they need to get out and vote to prevent it. There are valid cases for the superdelegates and the RNC has them too for the same reasons. Latest poll shows 49% of Americans polled believe the superdelegates should vote for the most electable candidate based on their judgment.
As far as this election, the courts or the DNC credentials committee has to come up with a solution to seat the delegates at let everything be hashed out at the convention or those states voters have had their rights violated and will vote GOP out of anger. The latest polls also show 63% wanted new primaries. 19% wanted them counted based on January primaries. Only 15% say dont seat the delegates for MI & FL.
Obama made a bad move. I hope it gets Clinton the nomination. We will see what happens after the court decisions and in Auguest.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

Don’t blame Obama, the DNC or the voters from Michigan and Florida for this train wreck. The blame goes only in one direction and thats to the folks who voted to move the dates up, despite party rules and clear warnings that the delegates would not count. If the DNC folded under the pressure from Florida and Michigan what state would bother obeying party rules in 2012? As for Obama, he would be crazy to do a revote after everyone from Hillary to the mainstream news has already claimed her the winner of both states. It’s tainted the whole election process. If Michigan and Florida voters feel the need to vent their frustrations at the ballot box do so against the two moronic governors who are running the show there and effectively decided to give the middle finger to their party, the other states who obeyed the rules, and the DNC.

Posted by: Michael | March 20, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

If it were the lawmakers and the elite who were takeing the brunt of the punishement I would say serves them right, but its the common man and woman who is being punished for what their leaders did. Its undemocratic to disenfranchise the voters in these two states just because the DNC wants to prove a point. let them have their say or they will in Novemeber and it wont be pretty for the Democrats. As far as Obamas position he is stonewalling. he knows he will probably lose Florida and after the rev. Wright fiasco may lose Michigan as well. This is just another example of why we need not vote for Obama. The only side he is on is his own.

Posted by: roberincharlotte | March 20, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

Hillary supporters certainly show how biased they are and out of touch with the unfortunate but plain facts about FA and MI having their votes not counted. Obama has absolutely nothing to do with it. One just as easily blame Hillary, and that again would make no sense. I do think the folks responsable for the primary debacle in both states should to be told to look for another job. I suppose the disillusioned voters will do just that.

Posted by: Greta | March 20, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

Its time for Al Gore and John Edwards to stand up and endorse a candidate. Too many superdelegates continue to walk the fence while the Democratic nominees tear each other down, down, down (already below McCain).
At this point (when it is a virtual mathematical impossibiliy for Clinton to catch up with Obama), this fence-walking is not justifiable.
PA results wont change the situation, either. It seems that Ted Kennedy and John Kerry are the only ones showing any guts.

Posted by: Mike Denhof | March 20, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

SB,
I agree everything with you, I’m also Hillary’s supporter.
But there is something I know that about 2 weeks ago, Howard Dean appeared on tv when he gave a statement about the rule of Democrate party handle this election.
He said (I guess the words just slippedout of his mouth) , he think Super delegates know which candidate should win to the nomination.
He mentioned whoever won big states like Ohio, Texas, we know what American people want and when the reporter asked him again, will do re vote in MI and FL , he answered very quickly “YES”
I just don’t know what is happening now.
I’m so disappointed. I thought he is a wise guy but maybe somebody has treathened him.
This is just not fair.
It’s mafia works.

Posted by: crisis08 | March 20, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

Clintons failed in manipulating the race.

Posted by: brightofeyes | March 20, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

Michigan & Florida
We invite you in joining us by writing in Hillary Clinton on your November ballot if Obama does not drop out soon over his mentor and spiritual adviser.
Obama does nor want your vote now.
Don’t give Obama your vote ever.

Posted by: Alan | March 20, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

Yes Howard Dean’s head should be on a platter for the final convention wine and cheese.
His incompetence aside, Hillary does not need to do anything else. She won these these states.
They are either seated at convention or Obama’s candidacy is doomed as it has no legitimacy and he has lost two states off the bat, probably more.
Not only is his candidacy doomed if he argues against seating MI and FL at the convention in front of the American viewing public, his political career is over.
Call his bluff and take it to the floor Hill! You don’t have to do any thing else.
This goes to convention and I think Hillary has just won.

Posted by: s.b. | March 20, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

Well I live in Michigan and as far as I’m concerned, if the rest of the candidates running, names weren’t on the ballot, then Hillary’s name shouldn’t have been either! We were urged to vote “uncommited” if our candidate of choice name was not on the ballot. We were told that if we wrote in our candidate’s name that our vote wouldn’t count at all!
Hillary Clinton did not WIN the Michigan primary, she SCAMMED it!! So where’s the outrage on that? Where’s the constant news coverage on that? Hmm?
She does not deserve our delegates! I’d rather see them not seated at all, then given to that scam artist!

Posted by: Mrs. D | March 20, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

DCVoter-I disagree on the super delegate issue. No super delegates, ever. I believe each winner of any state needs to count 75% of total. The remaining spread according to vote. Let the people chose all the way. No exceptions.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 20, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

Being from Michigan and also being a republican, i can say that the divisive nature of the democratic party is whats going to win the election for the republicans……………

Posted by: higgens327 | March 20, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

What could possible show Obama’s true colors than his opposition to a revote in Michigan and Florida? Politics of change? Politics of Hope?
Gleeful Obama supporters should keep something in mind. This sets a precedence for denying the votes to 9% of the US electoral body in this nation during THE most important voting process any of us ever participate in. Next time it could be your voice silenced. It could be over an issue of tremendous importance to you. This is not about Hillary or Barack. This is about Democracy.
(And if you’re going to start crying about the rules, what do you have to say about the 4 other states that moved up the date of their primaries this year without losing delegates? The only persons you’re cheating is yourselves.)

Posted by: Torch | March 20, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

You have my support too Hillary.
First Obama trashes me to salvage his political career by comparing me to that racist bigot he supports and loves.
Now he doesn’t want votes in Florida and Michigan.
Love you!
White Grandma

Posted by: White Grandma | March 20, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

What’s meant to be is meant to be. No matter what HRC does she keeps hitting brick walls. She’ll do it as presdent too. Where Hillary goes DRAMA follows! Give it up Hillary. A new generation is taking over and we want OBAMA!

Posted by: New Mexico | March 20, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

Mike Denhof-Didn’t Clinton win Kerry and Kennedy’s state? Then according to Obama logic aren’t they supposed to vote for Clinton. Nah. You guys keep those two.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 20, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

For all of you that think McCain would be a better President? Remember that when you are pumping $5 per gallon gas and purchasing $6 a gallon milk and your house is in Forclosure. Because, this is what we recieved from the Republican Party. The dollar isn’t worth a box of Fruit Loops. We are engaged in an illegal war!!! It is time for a CHANGE in this country! We need to STOP THE RACIAL DIVISION. Or we will never see any changes in this country. Wake up and stop thinking in prehistoric times. These videos that continue to play. Only shows the fear that the Republican Party has. They are afraid of losing the election. But at the same time dividing this country….that is not acceptable! Black….White….Hispanics…Native Americans…we must stand together and let the Republican party know that they cannot minipulate our vote! Enough Rush and Sean Hannity!!! I challenge you to be the Christians that you claim to be!

Posted by: Torre | March 20, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

Florida has already said they will not put the name of the Democratic nominee on their ballot in Nov if their delegates aren’t seated at convention acording to the election they already held.
Florida legislators are unanimous, Democrats and Republicans that their delegates be reinstated as is. They aren’t going to take anything less.
Democratic donors in Florida are demanding their money back, big money.
This could get worse if Florida and Michigan aren’t seated, millions of dollars of donations will have to be returned to democrats in MI, FL and Clinton supporters elsewhere.
They have to be seated. Obama has blocked redo primaries in both states so they have to be reinstated as is.
Democrats aren’t that dumb.
Take it to the floor Hill!

Posted by: s.b. | March 20, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

New Mexico-You already got Obama and if the polls are correct then you’re going down with him. Cherrio!

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 20, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

Thank you Michigan and Florida!
HRC supporters…. please get an education and do some research. Your comments are grammatically incorrect and ignorant. Hillary CAN NOT win. Do the math. Where Hillary goes DRAMA, SCANDAL, and IMPROPRIETIES follow. Do you really want that in the White House? Her attempts to stop at nothing to win this election are pathetic and have completely destroyed the Democratic Party. Yet you continue to support her. A president can do NOTHING for you….its CONGRESS that can. A president “represents” a country. Do you really think Hillary will represent this country with intelligence, composure, and eloquence? She’s an aging woman who tries to control not only men but “any sheep willing to be led to the slaughter”. This makes her very unattractive. She has NO grace or “Womanliness” to her and no real experience (just regretful support for NAFTA, the Iraq war, etc. etc.) Yet she has the “self-righteous” nerve to point the finger at Obama. No wonder Bill cheated on her. Would you want to be married to that? Obama in his short time as a senator has accomplished much more than she has in all of her so called “years of experience”. It’s time for some of you Boomers (the under-educated, aging woman, and lesbians supporting Hillary) to LET IT GO! The Boomers time of “ruling this country” IS OVER! Thank you for valiant efforts but you need to relax and retire! A new generation is speaking and they want OBAMA!

Posted by: Alaska White LADY | March 20, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

This morning Sam Donalson said on tv If Democrate put Obama at the general election , Democrate party would be finished.

Posted by: crisis08 | March 20, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

Alaska White LADY-As Obama said today, “you’re a typical white person” and if the polls are correct you’re going down, lady! Cherrio!

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 20, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

Alaska White Lady,
Grammar includes paragraphs, just so you know.
As far as the math is concerned, Clinton is looking to take WV, Kent. Penn, and PR by 30% margins. She is also favoured to win Indiana and Oregon. She has pulled even in North Carolina.
There’s lots of math left.

Posted by: s.b. | March 20, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

Votes from Michigan and Florida will be counted else democratic party is going to loose the general election. Cannot imagine they not listening to 8% of American population. Its sad revote is not happening as with the momentum on Hillary’s side she would will be double digits in both states.
Florida – Delegates counted as voted as both Hillary and Obama were on the ballot.
Michigan – Delegates split 50/50 or according to national average
Super delegates from both states counted, Hillary has 80% of them on her side. (atleast 40 delegates)
Hillary will win big in PA, IN, WV and Porto Rico. Obama may win NC, MT, ND but only with a slim margin. Hillary could end up winning additional 60 – 70 delegates additionally in the next 10 elections.
Hillary should be able to get more super delegate support, as Obama is no longer a strong presidential candidate after his relationship with the pastor.
Hillary will be the nominee… Good Luck Obama.

Posted by: GS | March 20, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

Obama has no scruples. He tosses aside the voters of MI and FL, like they’re nobody, and is treating them like dirt.

Posted by: KDH55 | March 20, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

Alaska White LADY-Furthermore, are you distinguishing yourself from the Native Alaskan population? Isn’t that racist? Wright, I forgot, you support Obama so you can’t be racists, Wright?

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 20, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

Take it to the floor Hill! Obama cannot and will not win thanks to his association to The Racist Wright. So if the Dems want to have a chance to win the White House they better stick behind the only candidate that stands a FIGHTING chance!
YES SHE CAN!!!!

Posted by: brian | March 20, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

It’s time for democrats to take back their party and stand up to Obama and his Black Liberation Party! Let them threaten to riot. We the American people refuse to be intimidated by violence and threats to our communities. If Obama is truly a candidate of unity, he will speak out against any such activities on the part of the supporters. Maybe Hillary’s old white ladies should threaten to riot otherwise!

Posted by: rs | March 20, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

I think David Gergen sums it up rather well with a somewhat cooler mind than most here:
Efforts to blame Obama over the Florida fiasco seem entirely misplaced: The opprobrium belongs to Charlie Crist and the Republican legislature and remember, too, that both Clinton and Obama supporters in Congress and the state legislature didn’t like the re-do plan. In Michigan, it was a Democratic governor who supports Clinton who signed on to the early primary and helped to create this mess. Clinton can hardly claim clean hands here, either.
This is getting down in the weeds, but if you are a political junkie, bear with me for a moment. Even though her own supporters helped to create the Michigan mess, Clinton does have a good argument that Obama partisans are dragging their feet on a re-do there. But the Obama people have a legitimate rebuttal that people who voted for the GOP candidates earlier this year should not be banned from voting in a re-do in Michigan – that is only fair. If the Clinton folks would drop the ban, Obama folks should support the re-do – or face appropriate fire for standing in the way.

Posted by: Garf | March 20, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

Just to clarify, the facts are:
FL state democratic party asked for a date that was allowed. The GOP controlled legislature in FL moved the date against their wishes and the DNC. The case was heard in Federal Appeals court Monday and a ruling will be made in a month or so per the court. The claim is that the DNC failed to treat all states equally and violated the constitutional rights of the voters. I suspect we will see a similar lawsuit and defense filed for MI.
The DNC credentials committee meets in April and they can come up with a solution if they want to. However, the DNC is in the business of winning elections and feels, per Dean, it has no standing to interfere in campaigns or favor any candidate. So I would bet they take the easy way out and let the courts handle it. Per the party rules, unless they get brave, the courts could order a resolution.
I hope the end result will be seat the delegates based on the January results and let the uncommitted delegates cast their vote at the convention. For the posters who think Clinton would not want delegates seated if it was not in her favor, I disagree. I believe Clinton is a staunch Democrat and would want all the voters voices heard.
What would be funny is if Clinton takes the lead in pledged delegates without MI and FL, which is possible and becoming more probable based on polls over the last 3 days. (Argue all you want the numbers dont lie). What would Obama do then? Claim he wants the delegates seated since that would be his only chance to lobby the delegates to change up and vote for him? Would he then want the superdelegates to vote based on their judgment? I think he is not a true democrat so yes I think he would do that. LOL

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

White Lady,
Oh,,,you are so ****
Sorry I’m not the person like you…

Posted by: crisis08 | March 20, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

rs,
“Let them threaten to riot. We the American people refuse to be intimidated by violence and threats to our communities”
LOL. Find the contradiction, and after that grow up & stay cool.

Posted by: Garf | March 20, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

You know all you people are funny. All this Michigan/Florida nonsense is by design. Obama is shaken up because he brings up the race issue over some stupid comments his ex-pastor made and now he is being crucified for what he had no control over in the first place. What he probably should have said in his speech and probably would have been more accurate is he’s shaken up because he actually thought he might win and now he sees all those liberal minded followers are jumping ship like it’s on fire and he can’t win. (Those Liberal minded folk are worse than Republicans on a good day always under cover with their doings) Why do people think it took until now for someone (most likely a Black Person) who attended the church and had access to the recorded sermon(s) let them it get out to the media now when Hillbilly is trailing so badly and whining at every turn about voted she agreed would mot count months ago? Come on people wake up. Change in America? Are you kidding me? Nothing will change until racism is erased and that is not going to happen when it is perpetuated in peoples families each and everyday, it’s a learned behavior not an inherent one. Best hope we have for change, God is gonna have to end life as we know it and start over from scratch. Hard position to take but one I believe it what it will take to end all this I’m better than you because I am white nonsense.

Posted by: RM | March 20, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

Obama is a phony, Why is he afraid to hold revotes = because he knows he would lose those states! Take note Super delegates, take note!

Posted by: John in Cape May | March 20, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

Garf-Then I suggest you talk with Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson. Don’t quibble with rs over silliness. That’s exactly what Sharpton and Jackson stated. Deal with it and tell us if you agree with them.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 20, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

You can’t change the rules in the middle of the game. I was against the DNC’s decision not to seat Florida and Michigan from the start, but that was the decision they made and they can not change the rules now just because of political pressure. It’s not fair to the candidates (Barack’s name wasn’t even ON the Michigan ballot) and it’s certainly not fair to the voters of these states who were told not their votes would not count.

Posted by: Lisa | March 20, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

Yikes. I just heard Tom Daschle, an Obama surrogate on CNN say that the Obama campaign does not support a revote in Michigan. He said that Michigan voters will have the opportunity to vote in November for either more of the same from the McCain candidacy or they can vote for Mr. Obama in November. So much for Michigan having an opportunity to vote for the candidate that can prevail in November.
I used to be sympathetic to Daschle when the republicans turned their artillary against him. Now, I understand how they determined him to be so vulnerable. What a jerk!

Posted by: s. valenti | March 20, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

What kind of despicable person would call his own grandmother a racist in order to exonerate a real racist? I didn’t like Obama to begin with, but this is just too much for me…
I saw his soul in hs speech and I am disgusted.

Posted by: falsehope | March 20, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

RM – actually, I saw the RNC press release done by its opposition research (footer contained the paid for by RNC etc) last summer. It included information about TUCC, Farrakhan, etc. It was sourced by them to the press back then along with the Rezko stuff. The MSM chose not to vet Obama until the trial for Rezko began. That was simply the catalyst for the other vetting that lead to Wright being exposed and Obama lying to try to cover. Obama and Axelrod knew it was going to be an issue prior to announcing his run per a few news articles done back then. They failed to properly prepare and handle it. The MSM gave him a pass far too long most likely because the reporters were afraid of being called racists and lose their contracts like Imus did.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Can’t we all see the plain writing on the wall. No matter who’s fault it is or was….Obama is damaged. Mortal damage. We might as well give the Republicans everything they want…nominate Obama.

Posted by: roger king | March 20, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Lisa-At least you tried to understand and that’s the best us Clinton supporters can hope for I guess. I any case, Hillary better do her job in PA and other states and then see where things go.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 20, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

Obama says his Grandmother is a “typical white person.” Listen for yourself!
http://www.dailymotion.com/relevance/search/typical%2Bwhite%2Bperson/video/x4s45v_obama-typical-white-person_news

Posted by: BG | March 20, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

OBAMA HAS GOT TO FACE REALITY. THIS HAS HURT HIM AND HILLARY SHOULD WIN THE NEXT PRIMARIES EASILY. THEN HE WILL LOOK LIKE A BIGGER ASS WHEN HE WILL NEED ALSO TO HAVE THOSE VOTES. tHE FUNNY THING ABOUT THAT IS IT WILL BE TO LATE THEY WILL HAVE LEFT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY OR THEY WILL VOTE FOR CLINTON BECAUSE HE WAS A PINHEAD, AND THOUGHT SHORT TERM INSTEAD OF LONG TERM LIKE HILLARY.
OBAMA SUPPORTERS CAN’T STAND THE FACT THAT HILLARY IS REALLY SMARTER, STRONGER, AND PREPARED MORE THEN OBAMA.

Posted by: Melissa | March 20, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

OBAMA IS THE DOOMSDAY CANDIDATE.
DEMOCRATIC PARTY DOES NOT STAND A CHANCE WITH HIM IN NOV.
OBAMA SHOULD STEP DOWN OR JUST HAND THE ELECTION TO MCcAIN

Posted by: TJ | March 20, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

Listen up Melissa…there are great, intelligent supporters on both sides. The problem now is Obama cannot win in November.

Posted by: roger king | March 20, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

If Michigan and Florida don’t get seated or if it is not resolved until the convention it will be the death of the democratic party. Sorry, but it’s just typical white people.

Posted by: Steve | March 20, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

Dogsoldier… You sound like a decent person. But we all have our prejudices (and it may not have anything to do with race). If you say you don’t then you’re lying my friend. My predjudice is against under-educated people who try to make an argument against OBAMA and for Hillary based on emotion. They’re both on the same side!! But Hillary has gotten nothing done in “all her years of experience” while OBAMA in his short time HAS! BTW…. the Native Alaskan population we’re all one! We can distinguish our heritage because we’re all ALASKAN and 70% of us voted for OBAMA!

Posted by: Alaska White Lady | March 20, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

Obama compares his grandmother to Wright, who is a racist through and through. He then says his grandma is just a typical white person. Is he saying a typical white person is a racist?

Posted by: falsehope | March 20, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

Let me get this straight; Caucuses are undemocratic because Hillary always loses, but a primary with only one candidate on the ballot where no one is allowed to campaign, that is democratic, Sounds like the Soviet Union to me.

Posted by: Dennis | March 20, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

Which candidate stands for all Americans, and all constituents (including constituents in Michigan and Florida)? Senator Clinton stands for every and, all constituents.

Posted by: ramona | March 20, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

If the democrats can’t even design and execute an efficient process to select their nominee for President, how can they possibly convince people they’re organized enough to run a country?

Posted by: Mike | March 20, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

BG, I listened to the tape. It sounded like OJ to me. Scary.

Posted by: sarah | March 20, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

Come on Alaskan White Lady…if you are part of the Native Alaskan population like you said…you are not white. You are Indian.

Posted by: roger king | March 20, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

Obama lacks judgment by participating and supporting Rev. Wright’s congregation. He sat there and listens to those hateful messages for 20 years without opposition. He didn’t have enough common sense to just walk out and condemn that type of behavior. He lacks character by associating what his white grandmother told him in private to that of the public hateful messages of Rev. Wright as being equivalent. We don’t get to choose our Family but we get to choose our Pastors, churches and friends. Obama chose Rev. Wright to be part of his private life for the last 20 years. I have been a Democrat for over 30 years. If Obama were to get the nomination, I’ll be switching over to the Republican Party and voting for John McCain. Once switch I will not go back to the Democratic Party and the reason is simple, I love my country more then I love my party. Obama lacks judgment and character. Obama is not Wright for America.

Posted by: flex6100 | March 20, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

Play by the rules (for once) Hillary.
God, I can’t wait until your pipe dream of being president evaporates. Too bad that you are dragging the party down so far. I used to have respect for you. Wow, was I wrong about you and Bill.

Posted by: billy Smith | March 20, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

OBAMAMANIA IS OVER
AMERICA IS IN WITHDRAWAL
THE GRAFFITTI IS ALL GONE
THE MESSIAH HAS LEFT THE BUILDING!!
OBAMA STEP DOWN NOW!!!!
YOU ARE A MEDIA CREATION.
THE MEDIA CANT SAVE YOU NOW.

Posted by: TJ | March 20, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

Why was there a problem with moving the dates up for these two states anyway? Why does Iowa and New Hampshire get to vote in January but not these two states, and did the candidates have any choice other than to agree with the silly rule…anyone out there know the answer to that?

Posted by: Sharon | March 20, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

Good point Mike. This is embarrassing for Democrats. How can we govern if we can’t even sort out the nomination process. Our team (dems) sucks.
Obama/Bill Clinton

Posted by: billy smith | March 20, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

ACTUALLY I BELIEVE THE DNC BROKE THE CONSTITUTION.
IT CLEAR STATES EVERYONE HAS THE RIGHT TO VOTE, IT DOES NOT STATE THAT IOWA,AND NEW HAMPSHIRE GOES FIRST.
SO HOWARD DEAN AND NANCY (LOSER)PELOSI
BROKE THE CONSTITUTION JUST LIKE GEORGE BUSH.
IF OBAMA WINS THE NOMINATION AND THERE IS NO RE VOTES OR THE VOTES DON’T COUNT IT WILL NOT BE A LEGITIMATE ELECTION.
THERE ARE OVER 12 MILLION WHO WILL VOTE FOR CLINTON (ACTUALLY MORE WITH FL. MI)
AND WE ARE THE CORE OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY WE GO TO EVERY ELECTION, WE WILL EITHER NOT VOTE OR WE WILL VOTE FOR MCCAIN. IT WILL BE A STOLEN AND TAINTED
ELECTION JUST LIKE HIM. HIS CREDIBILITY REALLY BITES.

Posted by: Melissa | March 20, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

My apologies. This probably belongs on one of the other “threads” but… Now I’m listening to Roland Martin, again from CNN, defending Obama’s re-explanation of his grandmother’s so-called stereotypical feelings.
Let me share an encounter while on a business trip in Cincinnati back in 1978. In a nice hotel in the city, I entered an elevator where lo and behold two huge black men had already entered before me. Was I scared, did I want to escape the elevator? No, their size was daunting but, with the exuberance of relative youth and a natural curiosity, I moved past my normal reserve/shyness and asked “Are you guys football players?” It turned out they were members of the Bengals! I was thrilled. I only wish I’d had paper and pencil to get their autographs.

Posted by: s. valenti | March 20, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

Yeah, blame Obama for this. Blame Obama because the state was too boneheaded to follow the rules that 48 other states did. Blame Obama because the state’s leadership, including the governor who is a Clinton-backer, is too chinchy to pay for a redo, now that Clinton has done the math and decided that Michigan should in fact participate in the nominating process. Blame Obama because Michigan is now in the same select company as Florida. Florida — the state still figuring out how to vote.

Posted by: w_roos | March 20, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

Now we know the voice behind the curtain is yet another lying politican. There’s nothing special, unique or honorable about this false god.

Posted by: Mary | March 20, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

Alaska White Lady-I’m pulling your leg about your screen name only. But I do know what you meant? Nevertheless, it is nice to talk with you and I believe we can say we both agree to disagree. I do believe, correct me if I’m wrong, you all had 400 and change voters. I’m pushing one person one vote. No Caucuses. So we’ll disagree again. I can handle that. Once again, nice to talk with you even if I am on the opposite side it is good to see you here giving your opinion even if I do not agree.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 20, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

Alaska voting results:
302 votes Obama
103 votes Clinton
I hardly call that a significant 74%. Alaska is a red state and has very few people who vote dem. VEP in Alaska is 476,744.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

Wow! the Democratic Pary is disorgnized? Big news!
Come on, Will Rodgers said it 80 years ago:
“I don’t belong to an organized political party: I’m a Democrat.”
Obama doesn’t want a do over because he is in the lead and why risk it. Hillary doesn’t want a caucus because her campaign can’t figure out how to organize one. Everyone is operating in their own self interest and so nothing happens.

Posted by: Dennis | March 20, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

It should go to the Supreme Court if nothing else happens. Nancy Pelosi is bad news for her party…

Posted by: sharon | March 20, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

Take it to the floor Hill! If you don’t win the DNC then run as Independent. I’m sure a majority of American will vote for you. Just look at Joe Lieberman.

Posted by: flex6100 | March 20, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

Every vote should count, constituents count, we’re the voters, let’s make our vote count, vote Senator Clinton.

Posted by: ramona | March 20, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

I agree, let it be decided on the floor. Hillary has already won these states, superdelegates are beginning to recant their support of Obama, and he is bluffing. Tuesday, he opened up the race campaign and is now the ‘black’ candidate, today, on a radio talk show, he again put down white people, saying his grandmother’s reaction on seeing a black man was typical of a white person. He’s played the race card, and now, all those voters he led astray in the earlier caucus’ and primaries, will not vote for him, if he wins the nomination, in November. Obama, is a fake, a liar, and a deceiver. It’s not over yet, and I feel Hillary has a very good chance of winning the nomination now. All she has to do is let Obama and his camp continue the way they are, they winning it for her. By the way, Hillary released her itennerary, and is releasing her tax statements, why not Obama? What’s good for one is good for the other. The news media is beginning to crack in their support of this Obama bigot and I’m glad. The American public will not let Obama get away with his deception.

Posted by: david | March 20, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

Obama on his minister, “I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community.” Guess he’s not having much of a problem disowning the American citizens of Florida and Michigan though. The democrats have obviously resolved themselves to losing this election, why else would they isolate two states before the general even begins?

Posted by: Jeff | March 20, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

David-You are fire tonight. DCVoter great numbers as always. Can always count on you.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 20, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

Obama needs to step down…….independents and even many democrats will cross party lines to vote for McCain to keep him out. There is no excuse to wrap himself up in a large racist america hating church for 20 years. NONE

Posted by: creature4444 | March 20, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

Oh yeah, Obama has gotten alot done in his US Senate seat.
4 years. 1 bill. For the Congo. In Africa.
Wow.
8 years in Chicago. His district looked like 1970s Beirut. Drugs. Rape. Murder. Arson. No clean water. No electricity. 11 condemned buildings (Rezko Buildings no less). Crap streets. Garbage backed up. Filth. Disease. Broken Roads. Broken Bridges. Missing Signs. Dead Schools. No Health Clinics. Runaway Guns on teh Streets. Collapsing support structures. Pollution. Pornagraphy. Privation. Hunger. Prostitution. Aids. Homelessness.
All of these things were there when Obama arrived in office.
Every single one of them remained, exactly entact OR WORSE, on the day he left.
He did NOTHING IN CHICAGO accept take cash and influence, and headed for D.C.
I don’t know about you, but if he does for America what he did for his District, we are all going to look like Bosnia or Chad, long before we look like Paradise.

Posted by: 2009 | March 20, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

The rules state that MI and FL can bring a motion forward at convention to have their delgates reinstated.
Clinton has ALWAYS stated that she would ask her delegates to seat Michigan and Florida, even before they voted. She has never agreed with the sanctions. She merely abided by them.
Take it to the floor Hill!

Posted by: s.b. | March 20, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

I just don’t understand this at all. The harsh reality is that Obama cannot win the election in November. It simply won’t happen. Has pragmatism gone out the window? What exactly is the problem with Barack coming back in 4 or 8 years when he MAY win. I hope you guys wake up and go with Hillary or else its 4 more years of Bush…

Posted by: Mark | March 20, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

roger king….. once again you UNDER-EDUCATED Hillary supporters just prove my point!! Please do your research before responding. Most American Indian’s live in the lower 48. Alaska “Native people” are made up of many different origins including, Asian, Russian, Eskimo, Athabascan, and other cultural influences (too numerous to name). While we may have our different skin color, and eye structure we all call ourselves ALASKANS and we stick together when it matters. Again we overwhelmingly (by 70%) support OBAMA!

Posted by: Alaska White Lady | March 20, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

Any person willing to throw their living grandmother under the bus to protect a anti-American militant doesn’t deserve to serve our country in any way, shape or form. And poor grandmother got stuck having to raise this ingrate.

Posted by: A Grandma | March 20, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

You know, it is really odd. The Obama supporters keep saying that it doesn’t matter, “he was following the rules,” “it’s the states fault.”
Someone even said “we don’t need you.”
Now THAT is just patently stupid. HOW IN GOD”S NAME DO YOU EXPECT TO WIN THE ELECTION WITHOUT US, FL, and MI. God, sometimes people are really dense. Obama supporters, this is a no win situation for you. Hold your ground= lose.

Posted by: drae | March 20, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

TJ-The reason Iowa and N.H. go first is they have rules that say if anyone tries to schedule a primary before them, the will reschedule their primary and caucus so it is first again. When there was no rule, state kept trying to jump ahead of them so that the New Hampshire primary that once was in late February now takes place right after New Years. The DNC tried to stop this by the rule that kept Iowa and N.H. first so we don’t end up having primaries on Christmas.
It may be bad for Fla and Mich this year, but do you think they will try the same stunt in 4 years if they lose their delegates?

Posted by: Dennis | March 20, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

Oh my gosh, memories seem to be cascading this evening. Back in 1962, my parents took my brother and me to New York to see the sights. During a pit stop at our hotel, the Barbizon, I turned on the tv and got engrossed in some show (what can I say, I was a teenager.). When it came time to leave to see more sites (?sights), I opted to remain behind. My parents were furious but I got my way. At one point during the afternoon, I heard some jiggling of the lock to my parents room from the corridor (we had adjoining rooms.). I went to investigate and opened the door and was confronted by one tall black man and one very short hispanic man. I asked them what they wanted. Sheepishly, they asked if this was “so and so’s room”. “Nope” I said. “We’re the Smiths from Boston! Would you like to use the phone to call the desk to find your friends?” They declined and quickly left. I never told my parents because they always told me never to speak to strangers and I didn’t want to get in trouble.
What’s been so upsetting to me in Obama’s remarks is that his charges of racism have never resonated with me. I can honestly say that my middle class family had no prejudices.
I resent his strategy of using his bad judgement as a teaching moment for the rest of us. I don’t think I have anything to learn from him.

Posted by: s. valenti | March 20, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

2009,
Your missing a couple of very important things he did while in Chicago:
1- He voted present about 130 times to avoid taking a stand on any controversial issue
2- He did fundraising activities and was friendly with the Weather Underground founders, who bombed the NYC police headquarters, capital and pentagon in the late sixties and got away on a technicality (acc. to Foxnews & other sources)
These are a couple of accomplishments he can point out in the General Election if he gets there.

Posted by: Sharon | March 20, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

I called the DNC today, took me several times to get through to a person but was glad to at least be able to express my DEEP concerns for our party. As you can imagine, they were pretty defensive about their actions and lack of action.
I think we are seeing the beginning of a party meltdown. And this was supposed to be an easy win for the dems…

Posted by: Julia | March 20, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

Alaska White Lady-Just for the record would you be kind enough to state what is an “under-educated” Clinton supporter? Perhaps grade, college or professional level could help here so we all know where we fit. Me? I’m an engineer in the oil sector, and I happen to be Native American. So, where do I fit?

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 20, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

I just think he is racist its the white in him anyway John Edwards is going to be on Jay Leno tonight

Posted by: Bishop | March 20, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

Latest polls at RCP are showing Obama is unlikely to beat McCain in key states. It is also showing a loss of support for Obama in some of the states that he won with a shift to either McCain or Clinton. Even Rasmussen is now starting to show Clinton opening up the lead. It will be interesting to see tomorrow’s polls or even as late as Monday when the larger polls are completed. (The RCP Average appears to include stats all the way back to last year. Given the special circumstances of MI, FL, Wright, and the First Lady schedules, even the pollsters agree it is not a good indicator now. This is why they are all doing daily polls to gather better statistics for the upcoming contests.)

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

Got “New Politics”? Welcome to Obamacracy.

Posted by: JS | March 20, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

A Grandma-Well said. Obama throwing his grandmother under the bus, twice, was the point that really stuck in my mind. You don’t do that, ever!

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 20, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

Neither of these two deserve to be President ! First they must prove that they can lead and so far Hillary has Flip Flopped worse than a fish out of water. Now she wants to go against something else she supported not so long ago. For Obama he is proven that he can lie and deceive just like the rest of em. Maybe Hillary or Barack will choose the other as their running mate and we can have a real life DUMBER and DUMBEST. OOHHH the HYPOCRISY

Posted by: mcright | March 20, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

Obama is on Larry King. Gee, I’d like to have the flag concession from his campaign and his signage business. He’s so glib. He obviously wants to “change the channel” from discussion about his speech the other day.

Posted by: s. valenti | March 20, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

The Michigan Democratic Party should just hold caucuses.
Advantages:
No rickety old voting machines
No Baffling Provisional Ballots
No dastardly disappering electronic votes
No Hanging or any other type of chads
No Confounding TouchScreens
No Befuddling butterfly ballots.
No diabolical diebolds
No Legislative action needed at all.
The Party could pick a several locations around the State and the people can come and line up for a Head Count and be Counted.
Simple. Democratic. And should make Everyone Happy.
Oh and Duke is down by one to 15th seeded Belmont with 2 minutes left.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | March 20, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

Alaskan White Lady…I stand corrected. Thank you for the information. And, of course, you were right…I am under-educated regarding Alaska, but I can recognize damaged goods. Obama has suffered a mortal wound. By the way…I am a Hillary supporter :)

Posted by: roger king | March 20, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

Howard Dean did nothing wrong–the voters in MI and FL need to direct their anger to the correct people: The state democratic leaders who–knowing the rules–chose to break them and risk giving away the votes of the people in their states! Plain and simple–start the campaigns now to run those people out of office–THEY LET YOU DOWN!
The biggest problem with the fiasco in MI and FL is that there is no way for Americans to be guaranteed the elections would be fair and legal! The clintons will stoop to ANY level to get what they want, so a hastily thrown-together “PRIVATELY-FUNDED” primary would bring much, much bigger problems to the DNC. Because the clintons will stoop to ANY level to get what they want, American cannot trust that the election will be fair–the clintons have consistently and continuously proven that they are liars, cheaters and thieves. [Note to hillary: please bring back the china and the furniture you stole when you vacated the white house.}
What needs to happen is the MI and FL delegates need to be split 50/50 between the two nominees. The net of that is the current score remains the same, BUT the states can send their delegates to the convention! Alternatively, hillary clinton can continue down her vindictive and selfish path of personally ensuring the destruction and demise of the DNC… and ensuring a McCain win in November.
Give it up, misses clinton! You tried–and failed–to get your elitist friends to buy you your own personal election. If you are genuinely concerned about America and Americans, do the right thing–go home!

Posted by: Lee | March 20, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

I think with this “breach of passport” thing with Obama is just another ploy of his to try to keep distractions in the forefront to take the spotlight off his racist remarks. However, he continues to make these remarks…..what is it with this guy? Does he actually think the American public is that stupid? It seems as if he’s doing anything and everything, mostly negative, to keep his failing campaign bid alive. Hillary is beating the heck out of him now in the polls, and people watch these polls….they have a big infuence on their decisions…..added to the fact that Obama continues to push support away from him. He just needs to bow out now, while he has at least a shred of dignity left….just a shred.

Posted by: jack | March 20, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

Obama on his minister, “I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community.” Well I am a part of the Black Community…disown me please. Beleive me I won’t be mad at you Obama!

Posted by: Virginia in NC | March 20, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

Roger king-Isn’t it great being a Clinton supporter? We can admit mistakes and we know Hillary is not the messiah and we can live with that.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 20, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

Breaking News from CNN*** Someone has breached Obama’s passport records!!!! Who cares. It’s probably some minion from his campaign that wanted to check out his idol’s travel history. Does anyone else think he is just playing the victim card?

Posted by: s. valenti | March 20, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

CG – they still have a option of a firehouse primary but the state dem comm said no they cant handle it

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

DC Voter…. At least you’re trying to do some research. But the fact is… Most Alaskans are “Independent” (remember Gov. Wally Hickle). Yes we are a Red state… but if you do your research we keep electing “Democratic” Governors (except this year with our Beautiful “mom to be” Sarah Palin). We go for the best person! And I can guarantee it’ll either be McCain or Obama for us… IT WON’T be Hillary (too many young people here and a lot of men who’d rather live in twig houses than vote for Hillary)!
OBAMA/Edwards FOR AMERICA!

Posted by: Alaska White Lady | March 20, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

OBAMA STEALING DELEGATES
Now we know why Obama was against revote in Michigan and Florida. He wants to split the delegates evenly which Hillary won handily. What a hypocrite? It seems like his sense of fairness and judgment is no better than his anti-American pastor who preached racism and hatred. He wants to steal delegates from Hillary. Can we entrust this nation’s reign into the hands of someone who first tried to disfranchise millions of people in Florida and Michigan and then tries to steal delegates from Hillary. He wants to be the president by stealing delegates from Hillary just like Bush did in Florida in 2000. We all know what happened to this nation because of that. Do you want a repeat of history?

Posted by: skf | March 20, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

Lee – LOL the proposal was for a state tun redo that private citizens offered to pay for because the GOP controlled senate in MI said no to funding it. That has nothing to do with Clinton.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

It has been reported that:
“Breaking News from CNN*** Someone has breached Obama’s passport records!!!!”
Possibly holdover Clintonites that the Bushies failed to purge involved?

Posted by: The Commander Guy | March 20, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

I think Howard Dean can stand to take some of the responsiblity for this mess. He is the “leader” of the democratic party. He should have had enough forethought to realize when he entered into this pissing match with FL and MI that this would become an issue down the road and that it would alientate these two states in the general. A good leader can see beyond their own ego.

Posted by: Julia | March 20, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

One thing about this election process…no matter how it turns out, it’s not going to put anyone asleep. I hope the Hillary/Obama race is decided sooooon…I need some sleep. lol

Posted by: roger king | March 20, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

DCVoter, s.b. MattOhio, Joy, you are all over the place again, we call your push propaganda even Soialist Cba will not push to this extrem. Please, leave these polls alone, and be used to the idea that Bhillary will not be back in the WH. OBAMA08

Posted by: BKMC | March 20, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

Wow….BKMC…you are mentioning me even when I am not on….

Posted by: MattOhio | March 20, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

Alaska votes red because Alaskans get money for every barrel of oil piped out. Alaska has had GOP senators since 1981 and has one representative who is also GOP. Isnt your current governor Srah Palin also GOP? The Alaska legislature is GOP controlled. Am I missing something?

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

I think it would be a sad day in America if A president got elected because the DNC refused to count the votes in 2 of the largest states. There is no doubt they would have put Hillary in the popular vote lead. In the state primaries, the person who leads in the popular vote is declared the winner. Democrats are still wounded from the Gore loss, to Hillary supporters this is like tearing off their scabs. I know I will vote for McCain.

Posted by: rob | March 20, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

CG or perhaps the RNC machine working on Obama’s travel records? Spin spin spin.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

I agree with you…… rob
Obama is making this race into a very sad spectacle in American history

Posted by: MattOhio | March 20, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

“Breaking News from CNN*** Someone has breached Obama’s passport records!!!!”
Possibly the Obama campaign to keep themselves relevant in a losing battle.

Posted by: LOM | March 20, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

The passport breach thing is a big issue, but happened at the Office-level by Contractors…Supervisors dint report it up….It dint get as far as the State Dept until today…..It has been quickly contained….but there will be an investigation…..it is a non-political issue….
so lets continue our Obama-bashing

Posted by: MattOhio | March 20, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

Seriously, if the Democrats cannot run their own primaries as effective as the Republicans, and have been so ineffective with Bush after the last midterm elections, how am I to believe they will change anything?

Posted by: evie | March 20, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

Julia – I hardly think anyone considers Dean a good leader. It is my understanding he was put in charge of the DNC because of his innovative Internet campaign fundraising – stupid party move.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

Maybe someone trying to erase some travels with Wright.

Posted by: Haha | March 20, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

Another mccain voter here if o-bomb-a gets the nomination.

Posted by: sharon | March 20, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

I think Dean and Pelosi et al hoped the voters would declare a nominee without MI and FL so they could seat them anyway. Now the superdelegates have to make the decision and Dean and Pelosi look like fools along with Obama.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

MattOhio, DCVoter, Jay, Dogsoldier and rob, be used to the idea that Bhillary is finished, the game is over and the fight is between McCain and Obama and OBAMA IS THE WINNER.BHillary will not get the popular vote, not the pledge delegates count nor the superdelegates count. This is finished, let us focus on November. We need your help to beat McCain is a drum. Rob you are changing your party because BHillary has lost the nomination, come on, there are vision, leadership and honorable principles which democrats are fighting for and a 3rd term of WBush will destroy the American Dream, we all know that.OBAMA 08.

Posted by: BKMC | March 20, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

I was Obama’s supporter until 3 days ago but my heart no longer let me do that anymore. I lost faith on his slogan of bringing chnage in America while he could not even bring a small change within his own divisive church during the last 20 years of his active participations. He also claims him having a good judgment but insults his grandmother by labeling her as a racist. What a compassionate gift from a grandson to a grandmother who took care of him while he had no one to look after him.

Posted by: Shima | March 20, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

DCV – You saying the Bushies would misuse private records of US Citizens?
IDK, could still be a Clintonite mole from the olden days.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | March 20, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

Pelosi always looked like a fool…does she ever have a clue??????

Posted by: MattOhio | March 20, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

yes evie – it is disconcerting for all but you know Independents were only 26% of the electorate in 2004 and are now 44% even with increased registrations for the dems. Any party who is blind to that is stupid. No matter who gets the WH they have to have a cooperative Congress. Vote dem for congresional races so they get a filibuster proof majority or closer to it. Then vote the lesser of the evils for the WH. Clinton or McCain are moderates that will have some cooperation with Congress. Obama is a liberal and not well liked in Congress so without party unity he wouldnt have a chance in hell of getting anything done much less a chance to win in Nov

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

BKMC.
I will support Jesse Jackson or Sharpton if they run for President, because they make their intentions known always. I personally, will never ever support Obama, the most divisive figure in American history. Sorry about this…..but he himself proved why he is unelectable

Posted by: MattOhio | March 20, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

“BHillary will not get the popular vote, not the pledge delegates count nor the superdelegates count. This is finished, let us focus on November.”
Do you know that latest inclinations of all ~800 superdelegates? If they have decided, then why are we all still debating this? Oh that’s right, because it’s not over yet.

Posted by: LOM | March 20, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

I think you are right DC Voter about Dean and Pelosi. Neither one of them have shown a lick of leadership skills. Why does our party seem to continue to promote people to incompetence?

Posted by: Julia | March 20, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

CG if you think the RNC machine via Cheney would not spy on Obama you must be living on another planet lol

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

Perhars if Hillary had read the document she approved authorizing GW to take us to war, she may have voted against it. Oh, yeah, I forgot, she didn’t think he would do it. And maybe, if Hillary hadn’t been so sure she had the nomination sewed up, she would have paid more attention last year when she agreed to NOT seat the delegates from Fl or Mi. Oh, yeah, I forgot, she didn’t think then that she might lose. Seems to me she doesn’t think through her decisions too well. Ah, but at 3 am, she’ll be ready!!! I just hope she’s thinking!!

Posted by: just a thought | March 20, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

Julia – I think there just might be a party split or a new party of moderates emerge. WOuldnt it be something to see moderate reps and dems combine into a major party and let the conservatives and liberal hae their own minor parties? lol

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

DCVoter, let us beat McCain as a super drum, he has no chance of winning, he is talking about foreign experience and in Jordan he has to be corrected by his beloved friend Joe. He does not understand economy, does not understand education, this is a great opportunity for the democrats to take back the WH and the House and the Senate. OBAMA08

Posted by: BKMC | March 20, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

DC Voter: You are correct about our Senators and Congressman. However, I can’t keep up with the State legislature because so many of our GOP’s have been going to jail for improprieties. And, yes…. even our beloved Ted Stevens and Don Young are under investigation by the FBI. They they may be on their their way out too especially if THEIR FELLOW GOP Gov. Sarah Palin has anything to do with it. GOP politics here are like this current OBAMA/Hillary campaign.
Further Data for Gov voting:
Current-R
02-R
98-D
94-D
90-I
86-D
82-D
74-R
70-D ….Get the picture? We go both ways!
That’s all for me tonight.
OBAMA/Edwards!

Posted by: Alaska White Lady | March 20, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

Thanks for making the case Alaska – sleep well.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

IRAQ WAR AND OBAMA
Obama wants to fight the very mindsets that lead us into war. What is that mindset? A mindset that believes that might is right and not right is might; a mindset that believes that we are superior to others and that we can use others to satisfy our self-serving ego. There was a time when slaves and women were disfranchised for the same reasons. The mindset suppressed people’s right to counted and heard. The same right Obama trying to suppress in Florida and Michigan by trying to disfranchise millions of people so that he can steal the election from Hillary the same way Bush did in Florida in 2000. If Obama is the person he claims he is, why he is trying to disfranchise the voters in Florida and Michigan. If you are true leader, let the people exercise their right and have the courage to accept the outcome than trying to suppress the masses.

Posted by: Independent | March 20, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

MattOhio, you know that 50% of the Americans will never vote for Hillary. Obama is the only one who because of his personal history and his family history can unite America. Jessy and Al are from the old generations, Obama wants to move away from that division between white, black,latinos, asians, etc, “victims” and “victimisers” and get America together to address serious issues such as the Economy, Health Care, Education, Wars, and lead the world.OBAMA08

Posted by: BKMC | March 20, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

I have no problem with Clinton’s vote in 2002 or any of the other Senators who voted. If Murtha (most powerful Dem in Congress) who was most adamently against the war endorsed Clinton he must not have a problem with it either. Big blow for Pelosi and Obama. LOL

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

Photo ops dont equate with pseudofather son relationships. Nice try no cigar!

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

I’d be the first to sign on DCV. The majority of Americans are middle of the road. I’m so tired of both parties being run by the far left or right, they are the ones that are destroying politics. I don’t see much difference in the liberals or the conservatives – both have holier than tho attitudes and end up with egg on their hypocritical faces at some point.

Posted by: Julia | March 20, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

After the in-fight, Obama has become a lot stronger and a lot more prepared. Thanks to Clinton machine and her supporters!
Now, let’s talk about next step: winning WH for dems!

Posted by: catiger | March 20, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

Since there have not been many facts on this blog, I thought I would share a couple. Neither the National or state governments have laws as to how policial parties choose their candidates. The states make laws about how a person can get their name on the ballot and how the election is run. A primary is not an election. The two major parties control all the state governments so they use taxpayer money to have these big primaries to drive media attention. It is designed for free publicity and make it more difficult for third parties to compete for media attention.

Posted by: MikeMo1947 | March 20, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

I would too Julia! I am currently an Independent but I would join a moderate party with new blood at the helm.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

catiger – the numbers do not support your assertion

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

looks like this re-vote revival is going the way of her 90′s healthcare plan. Dang!

Posted by: ac | March 20, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

MikeMo – the green party has tried for years to get established. They ran Nader before so they could get matching campaign funding. The federal govt does not have oversight of the federal party campaigns but they do have the right to guarantee the voters constitutional rights are not violated. Court case ongoing. A dem party split might just change things this time.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

McCain, What’s his strength?
Strength: Experience and time spent on Capitol Hill and Clinton’s praise that he is more ready than Obama and Clinton? A strong-minded character. A fair-minded soul and a respected politician.
Weakness: Experience and time spent on Capitol Hill. Associated with GWB policy. Strong support to Iraq war. No idea about economy, therefore no idea how regular folks really live in this country.

Posted by: catiger | March 20, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

DCV -
IDK Bill42 looking to Chicago and the for spiritual guidance after the Famous indiscretion (or at least the one for which he got caught). I guess he needed the wright stuff.
oh and btw
Cheney is the VP.
His job is to carry around a warm bucket of spit and annoy the Media.
He is a Vice President after all. You sayin something different.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | March 20, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

Dogsoldier, happy to honor you, as I have said to DCVoter, Joy and MattOhio, coming from a mix family I understand what Obama is talking about and it is an honest assessment of things which are happening in a bi or tri racial family, you have to live that experience to be able to explain it. DCVoter could join Nader because BHillary are on their way out.OBAMA08.

Posted by: BKMC | March 20, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

Thanks Dogsoldier – Obama’s stereotyping of white voters today is driving the polls in Clinton’s favor for the dem race. I suspect more will be revealed in the vetting also. I doubt we will learn anything new or unexpected about Clinton and the polls seem to agree since the shift is significant. I find it interesting that he is losing support in some of the states he won.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

Of course the Michigan and Florida delegations were always going to be seated. Dean just never thought they would make a difference.
They will still be seated as is, with a vote from the floor.
The credentials committee wont seat them as it should because it gets three members per state controlled by the winner, so Obama will control it.
It will go to the floor and the delegations will be seated and it is Howard Deans fault.

Posted by: s.b. | March 20, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

AC-If the polls are correct (Gallup) then you and Obama are going down with the ship. Sorry, no more life jackets. Too many Obama supporters to save. Oh, heck, why not jump aboard. You’re not a bad guy just suffering from delusions. Heck, so is Obama.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 20, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

LOL No Cheney thinks he runs the fourth branch and is above the law. If he and Bush along with the RNC’s blessing will spy on all Americans they will certainly spy on Obama just like they are wathcing our posts. LOL

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

The man of Unity, not Divisiveness!!!
Liar, liar, pants on fire. You really care about the country, you want us all to come together and yet, you don’t want millions of votes to count, because you are afraid that you will lose and not be the nominee. This is all about you, Mr. Obama, screw the Democrats, and their hopes, because afterall, it is all about you. For all you Obamanites, who think this is a great idea–if, and I think it will be a big if, your candidate becomes the nominee, he will lose the general election because of this (another bonehead mistake).

Posted by: beachnan | March 20, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

Wow, there are some serious idiots out here…..
Obama didn’t call his grandmother a racist, but if it makes you feel better to spread those lies and all the other lies in here about Obama, then go for it
Obama blocked the Michigan vote because tthey weren’t allowing everybody to vote. If everybody was allowed to vote, then he would allow the revote. Obama would do well in Michigan. He didn’t block Florida, the Repubs did that…..they have control in the state.
You guys can keep talking but Obama is going to win the election. Clinton didn’t even care about Michigan and Florida until she lost 11 states in a row. She is doing everything she can to steal the nomination and yet it won’t happen
President Obama

Posted by: BK | March 20, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

DCV, well, the numbers have been lopsided on my side for about a whole month! It is people like you who have been rather delusional. You guys have been day-dreaming.
Look, let’s face it. Clinton has nothing else to offer to her disappointed supporters. She has to provide lead for day dreams to prevent the disappointed supporters from going crazy. She did a good job! Now, even she becomes convinced that she somehow has the miracle. That’s a bit scary!
Or, perhaps she cast a spell on you people?

Posted by: catiger | March 20, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

DCVoter-You got it my friend. BTW, you’re not a “typical white person” are you? Gotta check. Apparently Obama’s been seeing them everywhere. I think he lose one or something.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 20, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

DCVoter-You got it my friend. BTW, you’re not a “typical white person” are you? Gotta check. Apparently Obama’s been seeing them everywhere. I think he lost one or something.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 20, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

Obama told Cataldi that “The point I was making was not that my grandmother harbors any racial animosity, but that she is a typical white person. If she sees somebody on the street that she doesn’t know (pause) there’s a reaction in her that doesn’t go away and it comes out in the wrong way.”
THAT is stereotyping. newt Gingrich spoke a little while ago and really put Obama in his place. Clinton doesnt have to do it … the RNC is. The voters and the supers need to make Clinton the nominee because she can beat McCain. The polls already show McCain will wipe Obama out.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

I agree that Obama is unlikely to win now with the constant flurry of controversy. However, I don’t understand why Clinton supporters are so happy. Wait for the well timed republican commercial this fall when they show her emotional tears and broken voice as she sits with the NH women telling them how hard it is knowing that she might not win in NH. Then they will ask “Are you sure this is the person you want as commander and chief?” Or how about her famous “Shame on you Obama!” and shaking her finger. Wait till the republicans tie her toughness to dealing with terrorist. “Shame on you AlQida!” That’s what elections in America are all about – making the other person look foolish or untrustworthy. It has nothing to do with finding the best person to lead us. The best persons are too smart to try to run because smarts has nothing to do with it. It is all about having the best marketing plan and marketing plans don’t run on truth, but on perceptions.

Posted by: MikeMo1947 | March 20, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

DCV: “LOL No Cheney thinks he runs the fourth branch and is above the law. …”
That’s right. This is something we should talk about! Let’s move on, folks. Let’s focus on how to make sure our next president is a dem, not McCain.

Posted by: catiger | March 20, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

DCV – Fourth Branch of Govt? Now you are just making stuff up. I took civics and such.
Wonder if this Wright Character stayed in the Lincoln Bedroom?
Wright and Bill seam to be yucking it up in the photo.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | March 20, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

Why need a re-do? For changing the result? Then simply count them under Obama. Not for changing result? Then simply keep it is. Re-do may always gives different result. I bet you that a re-do in IA, senator Edwards will be the number one. Should we re-do it in IA?

Posted by: ppdirix | March 20, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

Why need a re-do? For changing the result? Then simply count them under Obama. Not for changing result? Then simply keep it is. Re-do may always gives different result. I bet you that a re-do in IA, senator Edwards will be the number one. Should we re-do it in IA?

Posted by: ppdirix | March 20, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

DCV: “newt Gingrich spoke a little while ago …”
Wow, wait, is this the Newt Gingrich who was impeached from house speakership or he resigned? Did he claim “republican moral leader”?
Hmmmm, you got your information from him. Interesting! How many Clinton supporters also support Newt Gingrich?

Posted by: catiger | March 20, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

Dogsoldier – I dont reveal my gender or race online because it taints conversation IMHO. I have an international family that includes many races including white and black. None of us are stereotypical. LOL But we are all very much aware of demographics and differences in culture. However, we vote based on issues and believe in the separation of church and state – which is why very few are Republican. The ones that are tell me they are going to become Independent because the Republicans are allowing too much right wing interference in policy.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

I am ready for a new party I wonder what Edwards will have to say tonight

Posted by: Bishop | March 20, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

Newt is a respected member of the Republican party I refer to as Repugs and he certainly has a failed past as Speaker and is a cheater. But, I dont think marital infidelity has anything to do with a persons ability to do their job unless they let it interfere. He is politically astute and has a vlid point with regards to Obama’s new challenges with voters. I do not support him but I always listen to what people have to say. If he were running, I would campaign against him.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

Sharpton is out on FOXNEWS saying that Wright is right…..and that Obama is indeed the savior of “Unchanged” America

Posted by: MattOhio | March 20, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

So–Hillary thinks that she should be awarded Mi. and FLA. because she is intitled????Sounds like a “Clinton” !!!

Posted by: Carolyn | March 20, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

ppdirix: “Re-do …”
Let’s re-do 2000 and 2004 elections :)
Why not? I am sure we can easily get somebody to pay for it. I am sure about half of the voters were unhappy. Given now, we seem to have more than 60% of people who are unhappy.
Why don’t we vote three times and the one who wins twice will be the winner. Oh,,,, wait, let’s vote for 5? 7? 9? 11? …. times?
What about just forget it and give it to Hillary? Is that a good idea?

Posted by: catiger | March 20, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

Carolyn
Yes the Clintons like to see all the 50 states in the nomination process….last time I heard voters in FL and MI also wanted that…..
Only whiny Obama is AFRAID of their votes!!!!!

Posted by: MattOhio | March 20, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

Isn’t political suicide fun?

Posted by: LOM | March 20, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

No surprise MattOhio. Sharpton and Jackson “predict” riots if Obama doesnt get the nom and threatened to sue the DNC if they seat MI and FL and “predict” the black voting bloc will become reps. Of course, their out in all this is to blame it on the “white courts” once the decision is made on seating so they dont have to sue.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

So is Anderson Cooper on Obama’s Media Campaign Team now?????

Posted by: MattOhio | March 20, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

MattOhio:
Let MI and FL folks talk to their own state officials. They can cast their votes next time to remove them from their office. They made that decision.
What are we afraid of? We are afraid of that you guys will never end! We are afraid of bunch of guys like you who do not understand that rules are made for everybody, including Clintons and yourself.

Posted by: catiger | March 20, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

MattOhio — What do you mean “now?” Anyone at CNN has been vying for Senator Obama’s BFF for quite some time.
I cannot even go on there site anymore because it is so blatantly biased.
You guys ever check out Dan Abrams “On Their Trail” at MSNBC? It’s the only MSNBC thing I will watch and he is an equal opportunity “basher” on both Clinton and Obama.

Posted by: LOM | March 20, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

Why need a re-do? For changing the result? Then simply count them under Obama. Not for changing result? Then simply keep it is. Re-do may always gives different result. I bet you that a re-do in IA, senator Edwards will be the number one. Should we re-do it in IA?

Posted by: ppdirix | March 20, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

“threatened to sue the DNC if they seat MI and FL”
You bet!! That is hell of illegal to seat those delegates without serious contests.
Have you guys lost your mind? Don’t you guys have any sense of fairness? This is one thing that I am truely afraid of Clintons and their supporters. They do anything to just get everything in their way. Very scary!!

Posted by: catiger | March 20, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

Dogsoldier – from my family to you:
“You think I’m an ignorant “savage” and you’ve been so many places; I guess it must be so, but still I cannot see if the savage one is me. How can there be so much that you don’t know? You don’t know.” – Pocahontas

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

DCV: Newt also made a lot of MORE comments about Clintons.

Posted by: catiger | March 20, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

LOM – I couldnt believe MCNBC has become so biased they cancelled Tucker and I didnt even like him. LOL But he always let his guests have their say unlike the others.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

“We are afraid of bunch of guys like you who do not understand that rules are made for everybody, including Clintons and yourself.”
A re-vote was within those same rules. There was nothing outside of the rules for anyone trying to champion their wishes to be seated at the convention.
Are you going to be one of the folks who cry when the superdelegates cast their votes using their independent judgment because that is the rules as well?

Posted by: LOM | March 20, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

catiger of course Newt did that… he is a repug.. nothing new there… the difference is he cant beat up on her and win… with Obama, newt is right

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

ppdirix – Clinton always advocated either count the votes as is or redo both primaries… she was being generous for MI… Obama shot himself in the foot for blocking his chance to gain more donot you think?

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

Man there sure a lot of Dittoheads here these days…
Don’t you dittoheads and freepers and otherwise idiotic bush-butt-wipers have anything better to do with your time than pretend to be Hillary supporters. really shouldn’t you be getting hopped up on oxycotin or viagra or poctures of MAnn Coulter.

Posted by: Chris M | March 20, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

DCV: He was speaking, most of the time, the truth about Clintons.

Posted by: catiger | March 20, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

MattOhio – did you see the other night when Anderson didnt want to cover the Wright story saying it distracts from the issues? LOL just like the Obamites here… they want to change the subject when it looks bad for Obama

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

It is also still in the rules for MI and FL to be seated without a revote. In those SAME rules, they can appeal to the DNC’s credentials committee. Why do you think it is possible to do a 50/50 split? They can appeal to do a 100/0 split if they wanted to. It doesn’t mean it would happen, but they can request it.

Posted by: LOM | March 20, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

We should ask Obama what stereotype do Kerry, Dodd, Craig, Pelosi, Dickk Morris, MacCaskill etc.. belong???
1. Typical White Person
2. Typical Moron
3. Typical DooDoo head
4. Typical Obamaton
5. Typical Foot-in-the-mouth
6. All of the above
If you picked option 6, you are really spending a lot of time here fighting the right fight
If you couldn’t any fitting option above, you need to pick Hillary, then you will realize and pick 6
If you think all the above options are unfair and want to argue, you probably have a valid argument that you can post on the KOS, Huffingtonpost and other sites

Posted by: MattOhio | March 20, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

Chris M: “… really shouldn’t you be getting hopped up on oxycotin or viagra or poctures of MAnn Coulter. …”
Huhuhuh… way to go!!

Posted by: catiger | March 20, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

thats your opinion catiger and you are entitled to it… i dont agree LOL just like you dont agree with my opinion on Obama… great country we have even if Obama and his associates dont think so

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

DCV
Just propaganda.
There are three branches of gov’t. Legislative makes laws.
Judiciary claims to interpret laws but mainly engages in activism. And the Executive Branch which enforces the laws, except in when authorized by congress to invade another country. And if authorized by congress to go to war, the Pres gets to do whatevah he wants, i.e., enforce, interpret AND make da laws.
Everybody knows this.
At least Hillary did when she voted to invade Irak.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | March 20, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

Yeah Anderson looks lost most of the times…starry-eyed when Obama’s picture comes on his screen and weak-kneed when he is near Obama…I did like his coverage during the Lebanon-Israel problem a while back

Posted by: MattOhio | March 20, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

Haven’t seen the Dan Abram’s show might check it out. Used to watch lots of MSNBC and really liked Matthews especially, I absolutely cannot stomach watching him anymore. I think a couple months down the road they are going to wake up and realize they have lost the majority of their old loyal viewers and the new ones (you know, the enthusiastic young ones with a five minute attention span or the educated, hip, I’m looking for the latest trend to make me happy and make me look like I’m better than everyone else kind) have moved on to something else and they’ll have no one. Hopefully in all of their spare time they’ll look back on their tapes from the past few months and see just how ridiculous they have become. On three different posts yesterday one Obama supporter referred to him as Christ-like, another one said he was a gift to America and America should be grateful for him, a thid one said it was the will of God that we elect him. I’m thinking they were posted by Matthews, Tucker and Olbermann but I can’t prove it. Okay maybe I’m joking about those three posting them but they were honest to God posts that I read.

Posted by: Julia | March 20, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

Dan Abrams repackaged his show to now what is called “The Verdict.” I guess he actually used to be the GM of MSNBC. His background is in law (so obviously you can’t trust him!).
He has a couple of entertaining segments. “On Their Trail” is a scorecard game of sorts where he and a panel of guests assess statements made by the candidates as “Fair Game”, “Missatement”, “Blunder”, “Cheapshot”, etc. Whomever has the most X’s at the end of the show is the night’s loser. I don’t know the running total, but it’s probably pretty even.
“Beat the Press” pokes fun at all of the folks of the MSM and points out their major gaffes of the day.

Posted by: LOM | March 20, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

Dan Abrams repackaged his show to now what is called “The Verdict.” I guess he actually used to be the GM of MSNBC. His background is in law (so obviously you can’t trust him!).
He has a couple of entertaining segments. “On Their Trail” is a scorecard game of sorts where he and a panel of guests assess statements made by the candidates as “Fair Game”, “Missatement”, “Blunder”, “Cheapshot”, etc. Whomever has the most X’s at the end of the show is the night’s loser. I don’t know the running total, but it’s probably pretty even.
“Beat the Press” pokes fun at all of the folks of the MSM and points out their major gaffes of the day.

Posted by: LOM | March 20, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

CG – it aint propaganda when the source was Cheney claiming he was not part of the executive branch LOL
Julia – there is certainly some scary posts praising Obama btw Tucker is a young repug who was actually saying positive things about Clinton before he got canned by MSNBC – of course he is a McCain supporter

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

The Obama campaign will now say that because of Hillary’s Iraq vote his passport got breached…..I am sure they will connect the dots and make the case…especially Axelrod….
Word around is that Obama b$%ch-slapped Axelrod for losing the Wright tapes…poor guy…doesnt even want to be on his campaign

Posted by: MattOhio | March 20, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

Obama never blocked the redo votes. He continuously stated that he would abide by whatever the DNC decided. That is not the same as blocking votes, even GWB could understand that (if it was written in crayon).
The fake Hillary-supporter-repubs sure are stupid if they think this kind of game-playing is going to help Old, Old, Old, Senile, I can’t tell Suni’s from Shia’s, John McCain win in November.
Personally I can’t wait until he falls asleep in a debate or forgets to wear his Grampers and craps himself on stage.
It’s gonna be a total laugh riot when he tries to debate Obama. Mccain’s senile dementia is really going to make for great skits on SNL. He’s about as astute and quick-witted as a dog turd.

Posted by: Chris M | March 20, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

I have literally seen posts where Obama is referred to as the Messiah. Scary.

Posted by: LOM | March 20, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

Obama is unelectable now. New poll out is Penn is showing Hilliary with 51% and obama 35%. Obama is nothing but a racist american hating jerk……perhaps Cuba will let him run there.

Posted by: creature4444 | March 20, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

Obama is unelectable now. New poll out in Penn is showing Hilliary with 51% and obama 35%. Obama is nothing but a racist american hating jerk……perhaps Cuba will let him run there.

Posted by: creature4444 | March 20, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

Chris M
Obama campaign dint want to go with the mail-in vote in MI that was approved by everyone except Obama…..that is why MI is not getting to re-vote…MI wont forget…

Posted by: MattOhio | March 20, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Westie finally has a good original Idea. But he backs my ideas on numerous occasions – so that be good.
You should just bow out. Show them so they know you mean business.
This is good. How bout some code pink-style sit ins too? These may help. But seriously withhold the power of the purse and follow Westie.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | March 20, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

where is this poll DC voter where is the source?

Posted by: Chris Maler | March 20, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

Clinton is the one who actually held things up in MI. The Obama campaign made it perfectly clear that they wanted a caucus.
Can anyone say transparent?

Posted by: LOM | March 20, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

I’m so tired of listening to Carl Bernstein on CNN. What a tired old man who is either trying to grab on to the so-called insurgent style of the Obama campaign – perhaps nostalgic for the good old days when he was a young reporter or, more darkly, still unable to move past the enmity of his messy personal life and mixing Hillary Clinton up with his incredibly talented ex wife (he does seem very misogynistic but maybe he’s entitled since he was royally skewered in Ephron’s “roman a clef”.

Posted by: s. valenti | March 20, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

Clinton is the one who actually held things up in MI. The Obama campaign made it perfectly clear that they wanted a caucus.
Can anyone say transparent?

Posted by: LOM | March 20, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

When even CNN polls show that Hillary is leading, I think it is time for Obama to BE NICE and BE GONE.
I put it politely..hope Obama notices

Posted by: MattOhio | March 20, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

Chris I am not sure what you are asking about but you can read a summary of the latest polls on the RCP site just click latest polls.
LOM may have a better source with the polling parameters by which you can validate the margin of error, spread, etc.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

DCV
It ain’t propaganda to say HRC was a chief enabler of the da war.
There are more than 3 Trillion reasons that back this up.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | March 20, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

Hillary should just let this go and let Michigan and FL be disenfranchised. Let the party deal with this. This is all she can do. Let them bear the brunt of what is about to happen. She tried to get those million plus votes to count. Concentrate on the races ahead. When FL and MI do not count at the convention, it will become obvious that this party killed any chance of winning the general election. The party leaders are willing to gamble away this election with an illegitimate candidate. It will at the same time nullify the claim that FL was disenfranchised in the 2000 election.

Posted by: Charles | March 20, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

Ya CG you like that dont you, you old repug you LOL
DNC funds pay to run elections not run campaigns just like RNC funds pay to run elections not McCain’s campaign. Oh let’s not mention McCain has failed to raise much?

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

CNN still salivating over the (unlikely) possibility of malevolent intent in the breaching of Obama’s passport records. They’re just playing into the desperate strategy being used by Obama to try to “change the channel” from the Wright fiasco. Anderson Cooper and Candie Crowley seem practically orgasmic.

Posted by: s. valenti | March 20, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

CNN still salivating over the (unlikely) possibility of malevolent intent in the breaching of Obama’s passport records. They’re just playing into the desperate strategy being used by Obama to try to “change the channel” from the Wright fiasco. Anderson Cooper and Candie Crowley seem practically orgasmic.

Posted by: s. valenti | March 20, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

I used to watch Tucker quite a bit and rarely heard him say something positive about Senator Clinton – once in a while but not often. I think he had more of a problem with Bill and took it out on Hillary. He obviously has hard feelings from the President Clinton days. It was the episode that Tucker said the Clintons owed him an apology that I stopped watching him. Just another big ego getting in the way of doing a good job I guess.

Posted by: Julia | March 20, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

Ya Charles but the candidates were asked for input. She said count them as is or redo the primaries. Obama said he will abide by what is decided even though he preferred caucuses. But lo and behold, he lied again.
She made sure the voters knew she wanted their votes to count. Now it is up to the courts since the appeals court in FL has already heard arguments Monday. The DNC has a chance to make a decision too at their upcoming meeting.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

On his last episode, Tucker did have a lot of good things about Hillary and trashed Obama.

Posted by: MattOhio | March 20, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

Team Clinton should hire Tucker as a political strategist. And Samantha Power as well.

Posted by: LOM | March 20, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

When Obama accepts a racist hate mongering minister as his good friend and a mentor for 20 years that is his good or bad judgment that he has to live with. But it is despicable for him to rationalize his mentor’s outrageous comments by comparing them whatever his grandmother told him during the private family discussion. It appears that he will do and say anything to get the nomination including not supporting MI, FL do over voting.

Posted by: Herm | March 20, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

When Obama accepts a racist hate mongering minister as his good friend and a mentor for 20 years that is his good or bad judgment that he has to live with. But it is despicable for him to rationalize his mentor’s outrageous comments by comparing them whatever his grandmother told him during the private family discussion. It appears that he will do and say anything to get the nomination including not supporting MI, FL do over voting.

Posted by: Herm | March 20, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

Julia- Yes he is very much “mr morality” which i find disgusting. After the media poll of its coverage showed the gender bias, he began a discussion that lead to him agreeing with the gender bias. I think he realized he had taken things out on Hillary like the others did. But I think he said nice things about her only in reference to comparing her to Obama which he does not like. Next thing I know his show is cancelled just when I thought he was starting to be fair… but then it figures since the prime time has gone gaga over Obama on that station.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

And Wright for religious advice….

Posted by: MattOhio | March 20, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

Did new polls come out today? I haven’t seen any, I don’t think. I just go to real clear politics since they aggregate many of the major polls there.
The CNN polling continues to be absurd, but I agree, if Clinton ever shows up ahead in one of those, that would be serious trouble for Obama.

Posted by: LOM | March 20, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

ok typist, here is all lower case just for you. the passport thing now is just a diversion from the wright issue and let us not forget the endorsement from the new black panther party that was removed from obama’s website.
just imagine america, if obama should miraculously win the nom, think of what the republican slobs will do to him in the advertising before november, and then, the general election. smart people like dc voter, dogsoldier, and wcm know exactly what i am talking about. hang in there hillary! you will win.

Posted by: carla sue | March 20, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

LOM I saw Powers on Colbert. She apologized profusely. I think she would be an asset to the Clinton camp and Tucker would be a fresh perspective for them.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

Just curious.
How come Pastor Wright does not have to apologize to white people for all his hate speech. How come Pastor Wright and his congregation, including Obama, do not have to apologize to America for all the unpatriotic rhetoric.
Why is it that only whites and the rest need to profusely apologize for remarks that are not even half as hateful.

Posted by: 4HC | March 20, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

Westie
Hit the delete Key extra hard when you give the DNC what it deserves.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | March 20, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

LOM CNN is showing Clinton ahead in one new one. Go to RCP and click latest polls tab.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

right on 4HC!!!!

Posted by: carla sue | March 20, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

Samantha Power is incredibly smart. She had a bad day and got caught. I don’t think she should have had to step down, but now that she is “unemployed” (although she probably is still advising to some degree), the Clinton camp should pick her up! I think she had some role in the Clinton administration at one point, didn’t she? I would google her, but I don’t trust that internet — it’s just never going to take off. :)

Posted by: LOM | March 20, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

DCvoter where does this or any other article say that Obama lied about abiding with what the DNC decided?
I haven’t seen any evidence to support that assumption. He obviously didn’t push to have the original vote counted as his name was not even on the ballot in Michigan. That is obviously not in the voter’s best interest. Bothe Hillary and Obama agreed that the two primaries were illegitimate and their delegates would not count. Only after losing to Obama did Hillary ever change her tune and say the delegates must be seated. Show me where this is untrue.

Posted by: Chris maler | March 20, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

When I heard Tucker was canceled, I figured MSNBC decided to totally “come out” and show themselves for just how liberal and biased they truly area. I will have to check out the Abrams show though. I do believe in being fair and can make a decision on my own much to Chris and Keith’s dismay.

Posted by: Julia | March 20, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

if obama cannot even defend his own country in church, how can he defend the great USA as president? What are world leaders thinking of this?

Posted by: carla sue | March 20, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

DCVoter, I know what your saying about input. It is clear now that she has tried everything to make the votes count. Fl, and MI are now disenfranchised. This is a fact. She was the only candidate fighting for these voters. Let me repeat. Fl and MI are now disenfranchised. How does that sound ? The Democratic Party must now deal with this issue. I would never have thought that this party would silence the votes of 1.6 million voters over a rule, a technicality. I think that’s why you see McCain doing very well now.

Posted by: Charles | March 20, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

Tired of hearing and seeing Obama plastered all over CNN the last few days. Mute the TV each time he appeared or else change channel. CNN has lost my respect.
Now watch CNN focus on the passport thing to help divert the problem of Pastor Wright.

Posted by: HC | March 20, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

DCV
Three Trillion Reason to suspect that HRC ain’t all what she claims.
But she did vote to make Bush da War Pres.
And then, thanks to da cover provided by HRC, Bush gets to do whatever he wanna do, i.e., enforce, interpret AND make da laws.
Everybody knows this. And Hillary had his back From Day One.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | March 20, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

Hillary Flip Flop when she think she can benifit from it. Just like she did with Bill and Monica.
Hillary supporter are just seeing Obama Color and reject the man within the skin.

Posted by: Darryl Arlington TX | March 20, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

This is a real shame. Not having the people of Michigan and Florida vote in these primaries is scandalous. Mr. Obama and friends should be ashamed of themselves for denying us of our rights. What kind of change is that ?

Posted by: Paulus | March 20, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

“For the life of me, I don’t understand why Senator Obama seems to be afraid of letting there be a re-vote in Michigan, you’ll have to ask him. He comes up with all these legalistic answers, the people of Michigan and their legislature made it very clear that they would proceed with a re-vote, unfortunately, Senator Obama’s campaign said no. Two out of the three of us said yes, you’ll have to ask him what he’s afraid of?”
Why won”t Obama let the people vote?
NOBAMA 08

Posted by: Jerry | March 20, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

This is a real shame. Not having the people of Michigan and Florida vote in these primaries is scandalous. Mr. Obama and friends should be ashamed of themselves for denying us of our rights. What kind of change is that ?

Posted by: Paulus | March 20, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

So the media and Obama wants Hillary’s schedule to see if she was in the White House during that “encounter”
Get a life, people !!

Posted by: HC | March 20, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

With all due respect, those of you outside of Michigan please stay out of our politics. We were not disenfranchised; we actually held two primaries and those of us who cared voted. But, EVERYONE here knew the votes didn’t count and WE are not the ones clamoring for a revote or to have our delegates seated. Do you folks who are arguing for a revote understand that the plan put forth for a revote would only allow Democrats who voted in the first Democratic primary, and Republicans/Independents who didn’t vote in the GOP primary, the “right” to vote? Do you think not allowing all Democrats to vote in a Democratic primary is fair? So, thanks for all the support and everything, but please mind your own business; vote in your own primary or caucus and leave the mess WE created to ourselves. And, don’t worry, Michigan’s economy is so bad that it will be a blue state in November no matter who is the nominee for the Democrats.

Posted by: MIguy | March 20, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

I can’t wait to see the next CNN headline: “Obama Makes Good on Promise…to Get Daughters a Puppy.”
Then we’ll have to hear about what great integrity he has because he keeps his word, etc.!

Posted by: LOM | March 20, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

Many in Obama’s camp are former Clinton people. What a lot of people dont know is, she loaned a lot of people over to him for his Senate run. She campaigned for him and served as his mentor in the Senate. He went to her for advisors also which is how a lot of those people ended up working for him. Only a few of them are disgruntled like Axelrod, Rice, and I forget the other guy’s name. Powers is a foreign policy scholar of Irish descent and has great respect for Clinton for work with women on the Northern Ireland peace accord. I dont think she ever worked for Clinton although she was one of Obama’s advisora back when he became a Senator.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has moved into a significant lead over Barack Obama among Democratic voters, according to a new Gallup poll.
The March 14-18 national survey of 1,209 Democratic and Democratic-leaning voters gave Clinton, a New York senator, a 49 percent to 42 percent edge over Obama, an Illinois senator
OBAMA”S CHICKENS ARE COMIN HOME TO ROOST!!
NOBAMA 08

Posted by: Jerry | March 20, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

DCVoter,
I’m not seeing any new poll from CNN. Their most recent one on there is from Wednesday. Are you perhaps referring to a different source?

Posted by: LOM | March 20, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

Chris M: He said he would abide by whatever the party decided. Then he refused to accept the agreement noted inthe article we are posting on. It was accepted by the party and Clinton. So that means he lied. What part of that is not clear?

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

who gives a poop where hillary was with the monica thing…..were YOU married to him?????? that is such old, old news…..get current, let’s deal with what is at hand, a slick-tongue obama with his court of ‘friends’ such as…..rattso, nbpp, farakhan, and wright……yeah, RIGHT!!!!!

Posted by: carla sue | March 20, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

“I understand MSNBC has suspended Mr. Imus,” Obama told ABC News, “but I would also say that there””s nobody on my staff who would still be working for me if they made a comment like that about anybody of any ethnic group. And I would hope that NBC ends up having that same attitude.”
Why’d you lie Obama? Obama why you lie?
NOBAMA 08

Posted by: Jerry | March 20, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

Carla Sue…You Go Girl!!!

Posted by: MattOhio | March 20, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

HC – I was really disgusted when I saw Brian Ross’ and other MSM folks focus on whether she was home when Bill cheated. WTH does that have to do with this election? He atoned – she accepted (which I would not have) but it is a private matter and I respect her decision. It certainly has not stopped her from doing lots of good work as a Senator and a humanitarian. These guys need to get their brain out of their pants.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

LOL Sogsoldier – I am certainly “Atypical”…
perhaps all those white people he lives around react negatively to the hatemongering people in his church that voted for him? Anger begets anger.
Anyone else notice Oprah and most of his political surrogates have gone mum?

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

For those that don’t live in DC, I’d suggest calling and e-mailing the DNC and letting them know your feelings on how they are handling/contributing to the demise of the democratic party.

Posted by: Jeff | March 20, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

chris maler – man you are way off base on the facts and way behind on the news – posting lies that have been debunked dont make a very good impression in the convo

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

ok chris, you may say that wright’s messages of peace and love are old news. but you are bringing up 1996-1998 news and events..?????? at least i am a little bit more closer to 2008 with wright’s slams about 9/11 and the kkk of a. how ’bout that?

Posted by: carla sue | March 20, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

“For the life of me, I don’t understand why Senator Obama seems to be afraid of letting there be a re-vote in Michigan, you’ll have to ask him. He comes up with all these legalistic answers, the people of Michigan and their legislature made it very clear that they would proceed with a re-vote, unfortunately, Senator Obama’s campaign said no. Two out of the three of us said yes, you’ll have to ask him what he’s afraid of?”
Why won”t Obama let the people vote?
NOBAMA 08

Posted by: Jerry | March 20, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

DCVoter,
One of the reasons why Hillary has my support. She has proven herself to be very strong … to be able to rise above such public humiliation, to be able to forgive him, to be able to save her family and continue with her public life as a US Senator and to do it so well. She won with 67% of the vote in New York, the second time around.
How many marriages would have survived that?
Remember she also had Ken Starr to deal with at that time.
When Chelsea said that there is noone she loves more than her mother, she was saying alot.
I care very much for the Clintons.

Posted by: HC | March 20, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

Way to play HC!!

Posted by: Jerry | March 20, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

Al most time for John Edwards on Jay Leno

Posted by: Bishop | March 20, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

I voted for Hillary in the primary but will not do so in the general if she does win the nomination…and I use the term win with tounge in cheek…based on what today has brought the 22 lie that has been exposed. She has finally ran me off with the NAFTA lies. She sold us out and down the river and now wants us to believe she won’t do it again if it is advantageous to her or her husband. I also notice the simular actions of she and Mr. Obama in regards to their actions. Mr. Obama stood by his pastor while Hillary stood by her man. One offered views that showed his feelings towards America and one showed total disrespect for the highest office in this land.
So long Hillary, I tried to stand firm but you dug a hole and I fell in.

Posted by: Larry | March 20, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

can anyone please tell me how obama is such a candidate of ‘unite’ when he wants to ‘divide’ florida and michigan from the democratic process of voting?

Posted by: carla sue | March 20, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

Who knows what’s going to happen with MI and Fl…it is obvious a mess for various reasons.
Something that is marginally better than a 50/50 split would be a 51/49 split (Clinton/Obama) for both states.
The difference in the pledged delegate count would be almost negligible, it would allow Obama to take the high road in acknowledging that Clinton arguably won the popular vote in both states, Clinton (and the democratic party) should be relieved that MI and FL have representation at the convention and not a penny more would be spent on the issue.
This solution is better than Dodd’s suggestion of 50/50 and could be a win-win for everyone. The superdelegates would be seated this way as well and both candidates can make their respective appeals to them.

Posted by: LOM | March 20, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

By the way, why don’t the superdelegates just grow a backbone and support one candidate or the other? Let them (anonymously if necessary) report their preference to the DNC by April 1st and then let Clinton and Obama battle it out in the remaining states. One of ‘em would then clearly win and no one could argue after-the-fact foul play.

Posted by: MIguy | March 20, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

Who is Sinbad?,…Is he the new pastor at Obama’s church?
NOBAMA 08

Posted by: Jerry | March 20, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

Obama should NEVER agree to a revote and based on the polls of Americans they have resoundly stated THEY did not feel MI opr FL deserved a re vote. Get rid of the politicians who dealt you this blow and stop blameing Obama LOL Your elected officals had already stated to ALL news channels YESTERDAY that they would not approve a revote yet you guys want to blame Obama…any idea how lame you sound? You defend Hillary when she is clearly wrong and even when she lies? Whats the new spin today to explain away her attending ALL those NAFTA meetings when she said she didn’t? Get use to it, a new day? A new lie from Hillary Clinton and you can yell and scream (like she does) all day long but guess what? IT WON’T CHANGE THE FACTS.

Posted by: Brian | March 20, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

I was at Arlington Cemetery today. Several new burials in progress. Many new sites being prepared. The emotions you feel when you are there are both pride and sadness. I also felt the full breadth of responsibility our Senators must have felt in making such a tough decision to try to protect our country by backing the President’s promise to allow the UN Inspectors to complete their mission. I then felt anger at the violations of our constitution and the lies to the American people and the world that Bush used to invade another country without justification. I am not ashamed to say it still brings tears.
If you have never been I encourage you to go and see the changing of the guards or simply walk the grounds and visit the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier. We need our troops home but we cannot leave troops and allies in harm’s way. President Hillary Clinton can bring them home with careful and responsible planning and implementation of the plans drawn by the Join Chiefs of Staff. In doing so, she will set this country on the path to peace and prosperity. She will ensure that we remain committed to our veterans for life. Let’s not let the stupid actions of the DNC, the RNC, and Obama lead to more loss of life and limb.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

Your candidate Clinton KNEW the rules when she agreed to them and it was ONLY AFTER she needed the votes ( for thinking ALL states did not matter) that she began to scream that all votes should count LOL Like to hear her take on it if Obama was behind.

Posted by: Brian | March 20, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

chris maler – the military personnel who were on the trip debunked that BS… Sinbad is just a comedian cracking a joke… no surprise he supports Obama… but i dont blame you for not knowing… the Obama camp loves to keep you in the dark about real truths

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

larry,
good for hillary standing by her man, as a lot of women would not. wonder if michelle would……also, how can you praise obama for ‘standing by his pastor’ who spews hatred for america, and blames the white race for HIV, kkk of a, etc. also, let us not forget……the rev. wright also stated and i quote “hillary has never been called a n*&^^%$!!!!! has the great rev. wright ever been called a c&*!??????

Posted by: carla sue | March 20, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

OK Westie. I’ll give you some positive reinforcement.
You actually have a good idea here. The Dean thing makes sense in jeffersonian type of way. Getting the Govt close to you and accountable to You makes sense, but it ain’t simple.
It is hard and takes continual work.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | March 20, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

For Hillary who AGREED to not let those same votes count when she THOUGHT she would win hands down. Guess this is what ya get for backing someone who can’t keep her lies straight………OBAMA 08

Posted by: Brian | March 20, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

MattOhio,
You are awesome! The guy from Michigan owes you one. We don’t want Michigan to have to take one for the team. I’m re-declaring myself as MichiganMessenger in his honor…
BOYCOTT the DNC for BAD MANAGEMENT
Count ALL the VOTES of ALL Democrats NOW!!

Posted by: MichiganMessenger | March 20, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

Actually I am a Florida voter, I voted for Edwards, but if there is a recount I’ll vote for Obama, so will most of my family who are now almost all in the Obama camp.
If Clinton wins the nomination, I’ll hold my nose and vote for her, but afterward I’m going back to the Reform party, because this godsdamned two-party system is a farce and a complete joke. With DINO’s like Debbie Wasserman-Shultz as my rep, being a Democrat in south Florida is unrewarding at best.

Posted by: chris maler | March 20, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

If the superdelegates have to be mindless and vote with the people, then why even have the concept of superdelegates?
Clinton is clearly more experienced. She is not just about “giving speeches”, she DELIVERs. She produces results … She is pragmatic and is a consensus-builder. She is a work horse.
She is intelligent and she does genuinely care about the working class.
I liken Obama to someone who wants to be conferred his PH.D by an insitution without having to do the 8 years of study.
The Oval Office is not a training camp, Obama.

Posted by: gobacktoIllinois | March 20, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

Hillary does not deserve to have any votes counted. Obama did not even have his name on the ballot but she is willing to sell the party down the road before she will let anyone beat her…and he will you know…..too many Washington insiders hate her and Bill and think that they will finally get to see their comupance……for treating the Oval office like a Motel 6

Posted by: Larry | March 20, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

@Brian | Mar 20, 2008 11:45:01 PM:
You’re absolutely right that she knew the rules the entire time which also INCLUDED a path for these states to be seated by:
a. They could hold second nominating contest
b. They can appeal to the DNC’s credentials committee
She is trying to champion the wish of 2.5M voters and give them the voice they have asked for.
Obama has decided to drag his feet rather than bring a real solution to the table. What kind of leadership is that?

Posted by: LOM | March 20, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

CLINTON LIED TO YOU/US ABOUT NAFTA…what do you NOT get about that and HOW can you just excuse it away?

Posted by: Brian | March 20, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

Brian-You want to disenfranchise FL and MI, correct? Then perhaps you can explain how Obama will win the general with no caucuses, Samantha Powers, Obama policy adviser, called the Ohio voters stupid for voting Clinton, and giving FL and MI to the republicans even before the general begins. Furthermore, now that Wright has damaged Obama why don’t you explain in detail how Obama will win this thing.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 20, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

Obama’s campaign did their best to get supporters to vote “Uncommitted” in MI,…He lost.

Posted by: Jerry | March 20, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

No…he is abiding by the RULES…remember THOSE? Clinton dosen’t. and apparently you don’t either.

Posted by: Brian | March 20, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

The AMERICAN PEOPLE deserve to have their votes counted no matter who you support!!

Posted by: Jerry | March 20, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

LOL Obama FOLLOWED THE RULES and removed his name while Clinton signed the paper to NOT allow those votes to count and now she wants them too? Are you so dense that you can no longer understand reasoning>?????? You sure sound like it…talk about drinking the kool aid…Obama 08

Posted by: Brian | March 20, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

The AMERICAN PEOPLE deserve to have their votes counted no matter who you support!!

Posted by: Jerry | March 20, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

Standing by her man who had 2 affairs that lasted over 12 years and then had 18 other documented affairs and you think that is something to be proud of? It’s called ENABLING hon…and it’s not a healthy way to live.

Posted by: Brian | March 20, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

MichiganMessenger — 50/50 is not fair. What are your thoughts on a 51/49 split (see my post above)?

Posted by: LOM | March 20, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

Other than women who chose the same path or men who have traveled that same path? Helathy people think she chose wrong but most? Think she stayed for this race only. Let her lose and see if she stays LOL

Posted by: Larry | March 20, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

Brian — Please produce the specific line in the rules that candidates had to remove their names from the ballot. You might want to lay off spiking your koolaid…you aren’t speaking coherently here.

Posted by: LOM | March 20, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

Sorry about the voters in FL and MI but they need to take it up with the people responsible for not following the rules when they KNEW what the price would be. This argument has no place in this race as Clinton is using it for political reasons ONLY and anyopne with a brain? KNOWS THAT.

Posted by: Brian | March 20, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

Michigan was warned what would happen if they held their primary too early. The Governor and the Democratic leaders of the state chose to disregard the rules and did it any way. Now Hillary is blaming Obama! The blame rests with Michigan and especially with Granholm. Sorry, no revotes. Vote the democratic idiots who caused this mess out of office. Don’t blame Obama. He played by the rules.

Posted by: April Campbell | March 20, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

@WCM: Exactly right. There were a lot of Democrats here though who voted in the GOP primary who wouldn’t be able to participate in the revote the way they were planning it. The 50-50 is crap, you are right. I think the best reason to avoid the revote, though, is that both campaigns would spend millions and end up in a draw (my guess is Clinton would win if only Democrats voted, but not by more than 10 points). So save time and money; here’s an idea, both camps can donate the 20 million or whatever they would spend here and that money could go to find jobs for people or provide some health insurance or something better than TV/radio ads.

Posted by: MIguy | March 20, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

I wonder why senator Obama with his sound judgement accepted not to participate in FL and MI primaries, and follow Mr. Dean and others, after all he is the one with the sound judgement. Part of senator Obama’s misjudgement is that he thinks he can win the general elections without FL and MI

Posted by: HK | March 20, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

The AMERICAN PEOPLE deserve to have their votes counted no matter who you support!!

Posted by: Jerry | March 20, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

Larry -
Do you know Obama has the exact same position on NAFTA as Clinton?
Do you know Obama claims it needs fixing but voted for an identical measure with Peru that Clinton voted against?
Do you know Obama wants to draft other agreements like it with Asian countries and other South American countries and African countries?
If he truly thinks it needs fixing why is he replicating it without fixing the details in the new agreements?
Clinton has never wavered on NAFTA even though the Obama camp and the RNC want you to think that.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 20, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

WRONG there was NO PATH offered for the votes. Peridod. Check it out as I HAVE. It clearly stated they would NOT be counted if they held the primary early and ALL candidates agreed. Those are the facts though Clinton has been lying about them. Check out the papers they signed, they are on the net.

Posted by: Brian | March 20, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

It was our Florida Democratic party that screwed us in the primary, not Howard Dean. The dems moved the primary up even though they were told they would forfeit their delegates. they chose to move anyway and got reamed by the repub majority in the fl. Congress. .
Again it was NOT the DNC that Screwed FL voters.
” Florida and Michigan’s Delegates
The states that hold the earliest primaries and caucuses have generally had disproportionate influence over the nomination process.
In 2007 the Florida legislature voted to move their primary date up to January 29 for the 2008 primaries. This set off a slew of moves by other states jockeying for position, and the national committees trying to establish order.
The new order set February 5 as the earliest date for primaries. With a few exceptions, any state holding a primary earlier would be penalized.
The Republican National Committee decided to penalize non-compliant states by seating only half their delegates. This compromise penalty was generally accepted, and the Republicans entered the primaries without controversy on this issue.
The Democratic National Committee, however, decided to penalize non-compliant states by stripping them of all of their delegates. Some Democrats in Florida attempted to amend the legislation they had passed, but the Florida Republicans blocked these amendments.
Michigan also decided to go ahead with a primary in January, despite the Democratic National Comittee’s declaration that it would not seat any of the delegates.
Democratic candidates were not allowed to campaign in these states, but they were allowed to raise money there. The Clinton and Obama campaigns have been accusing each other of campaigning in those states in violation of DNC rules.
Both candidates had their names on the ballot in Florida. In Michigan Barack Obama (like other leading candidates John Edwards, Joe Biden, and Bill Richardson) removed their names from the ballot, in support of the DNC ruling. Hillary Clinton kept her name on the ballot.
Clinton won 55% of the vote in Michigan. 40% voted “uncommitted,” as supporters of candidates not on the ballots were requested to do. Clinton won 50% of the vote in Florida, with Obama winning 33%.
After establishing a large lead in Michigan and Florida, Clinton began advocating reversing the DNC decision and allowing the delegates to be seated.
Democrats fear that the controversy will have two negative effects on the party. First, the conflict with the DNC might slightly shift some voters away from the Democrats. This could be particularly critical in Florida. Some Democrats hope that Floridians will blame the Florida Republicans for not allowing the state to amend its legislation. Second, Democrats fear that if the margin of victory for the winning candidate is less than the delegate total of Florida and Michigan, that the losing side will not feel that it lost the election fairly, and thus might feel less loyalty to the winner.”

Posted by: chris maler | March 21, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

Yesterday Obama gave a damage control speech about his hate mongering spiritual adviser. Today Obama had to do damage of damage control for throwing his grandmother under the bus during yesterday’s damage control speech. Tomorrow he will have to do damage control of damage control of damage control for calling his grandmother a “typical white person.” Wow. Who knew?

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 21, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

Clinton lies. For recent reference though there is a ton of it just check out her papers and her stand on SUPPORTING NAFTA and all the while she lied to the people in Ohio.

Posted by: Brian | March 21, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

brian, no offense, but 18 other ‘documented’ affairs? oh well, i wasn’t married to him, but i tell you what, when he was prez, this country was in a surplus, everyone had a ‘dollar to their name’ and this country was proud as ever……unlike michelle who claims to be for the first time in her life…..it is going to take hillary, a person of experience to clean up the white house after this bush as bill did after the first bush…..

Posted by: carla sue | March 21, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am

I guess he didn’t read any of that,..

Posted by: Jerry | March 21, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am

Someone, anyone, I want to piggyback on Donna’s question with; Weren’t there other states that changed their primary? Why is DEAN wanting to punish ANY voters eager to vote? How could you enforce these rules and yet allow Nancy Pelosi to speak against pre-planned SD rules? Maybe DEAN should clear up the rules by hitting all of the news outlets in order to clear things up.

Posted by: irma | March 21, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am

As a woman? I am ASHAMED that the first woman running for President is Hillary Clinton.
She did not do anything other than stay with Bill to get here. read any number of the books at the libary on her. Over 10 and they all say the same things about her. If they were wrong? She would have sued.

Posted by: Deanna | March 21, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

Brian — FL and MI have a way of being seated, according to the DNC rules. There is a path that these two states can take to be seated.
To be compliant with party rules:
a. They could hold second nominating contests
b. They can appeal to the DNC’s credentials committee

Posted by: LOM | March 21, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

The AMERICAN PEOPLE deserve to have their votes counted no matter who you support!!

Posted by: Jerry | March 21, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

The DNC did not make the choice to waste your vote you pinhead LOL The people YOU helped elect did. THEY knew the cost.

Posted by: Brian | March 21, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am

The AMERICAN PEOPLE deserve to have their votes counted no matter who you support!!
BOYCOTT the DNC for BAD MANAGEMENT !!!
Count ALL the VOTES
for ALL the Democrats NOW !!!!!

Posted by: Jerry | March 21, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am

Hillary signed papers saying she would not support Florida and Michigan if they broke the DNC rules.
On New Hampshire Public Radio, she even said these votes would not count.
I doubt if Hillary wants every future lawyer to be taught about Hillary pleading temporary insanity when she did these acts.
Hillary, you did not care about the voters in these states last year. If you were winning, we know you would never care about the voters in these states.

Posted by: Dan | March 21, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am

@WCM: Many of the Democrats here wanted a voice, so they voted in the primary that counted. Now, as for who they voted for and why, that is their own business. I agree that the DNC started the mess by not allowing MI and FL to move their primaries forward. I think this election, though, proves that it was silly to move the elections forward as we would have had more say if we just stayed where we were.

Posted by: MIguy | March 21, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am

Not FL and MI. IF they are allowed to vote now? The next election will be a nightmare and that is the price you guys have to pay now. Public opinion is not with you on this one. Only the people who support Hillary WHO AGREED TO NOT LET YOUR VOTES COUNT..and her minions.

Posted by: Brian | March 21, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

“Typical white person”?
HUH?
NOBAMA 08

Posted by: Jerry | March 21, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

Brian – the signed agreement was to not campaign… it had nothing to do with names on the ballot and nothing to do with whether they agreed with the DNC about not counting the votes… in fact both candidate said they expected the delegates to be seated at the convention… both said they would work hard to ensure every vote counted
as for “all the voters in MI revoting” you reap what you sow… peeps who intentionally declared themselves republicans to try to “fix” the republican primary by voting for Romney per KOS dont deserve to vote again… they are as bad as the reps who crossover into the dem primaries to try to “fix” their elections

Posted by: DCVoter | March 21, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

Florida and Michigan’s Delegates
The states that hold the earliest primaries and caucuses have generally had disproportionate influence over the nomination process.
In 2007 the Florida legislature voted to move their primary date up to January 29 for the 2008 primaries. This set off a slew of moves by other states jockeying for position, and the national committees trying to establish order.
The new order set February 5 as the earliest date for primaries. With a few exceptions, any state holding a primary earlier would be penalized.
The Republican National Committee decided to penalize non-compliant states by seating only half their delegates. This compromise penalty was generally accepted, and the Republicans entered the primaries without controversy on this issue.
The Democratic National Committee, however, decided to penalize non-compliant states by stripping them of all of their delegates. Some Democrats in Florida attempted to amend the legislation they had passed, but the Florida Republicans blocked these amendments.
Michigan also decided to go ahead with a primary in January, despite the Democratic National Comittee’s declaration that it would not seat any of the delegates.
Democratic candidates were not allowed to campaign in these states, but they were allowed to raise money there. The Clinton and Obama campaigns have been accusing each other of campaigning in those states in violation of DNC rules.
Both candidates had their names on the ballot in Florida. In Michigan Barack Obama (like other leading candidates John Edwards, Joe Biden, and Bill Richardson) removed their names from the ballot, in support of the DNC ruling. Hillary Clinton kept her name on the ballot.
Clinton won 55% of the vote in Michigan. 40% voted “uncommitted,” as supporters of candidates not on the ballots were requested to do. Clinton won 50% of the vote in Florida, with Obama winning 33%.
After establishing a large lead in Michigan and Florida, Clinton began advocating reversing the DNC decision and allowing the delegates to be seated.
Democrats fear that the controversy will have two negative effects on the party. First, the conflict with the DNC might slightly shift some voters away from the Democrats. This could be particularly critical in Florida. Some Democrats hope that Floridians will blame the Florida Republicans for not allowing the state to amend its legislation. Second, Democrats fear that if the margin of victory for the winning candidate is less than the delegate total of Florida and Michigan, that the losing side will not feel that it lost the election fairly, and thus might feel less loyalty to the winner.
This is one of two major controversies for the 2008 Democratic Primaries. The other involves the superdelegates (see related question).

Posted by: Chris Maler | March 21, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

Let’s not forget the Republican Governor,..At this point with the race so close,..
The AMERICAN PEOPLE deserve to have their votes counted no matter who you support!!

Posted by: Jerry | March 21, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

@Deanna | Mar 21, 2008 12:03:04 AM:
You should be ASHAMED of being a liar.
In 1872, Victoria Chaflin Woodhull became the first woman to run for president of the United States of America.

Posted by: LOM | March 21, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

The Primary race has to be conducted in a manner that is orderly and the powers that be in MI and FL decided to use your votes as a chip they were willing to bet. Get them out of office but do not blame someone who abided by the rules as Obama did. Heck he wasn’t even on the ballot in MI and Hillary thinks that is fair? I guess based on how she thinks it would be…NAFTA..lie to Ohio about it and then when it comes out? ignore it…..vote to not let the FL and MI votes count but when I get behind? Scream like a baby.

Posted by: Brian | March 21, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

@DCVoter: In Michigan, you don’t declare as R/D/I in the primary. You just choose the primary you want, get a ballot and vote. I’m not sure Romney won here because of the Democrat/Independent vote – he won mostly because his dad was a former governor.

Posted by: MIguy | March 21, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

DCvoter I am still waiting for a source for the debunking of the salon article about hillary’s bosnia trip

Posted by: chris Maler | March 21, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Obama was the only one who actually broke the agreement by purchasing cable blocks of advertising in Florida and saying that they had no choice because of the “package”,…lets not forget that!!

Posted by: Jerry | March 21, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

To what end? Too late to conduct a revote now and no way will the DNC allow the vote to stand. I would be all for a fair split but that would be all. No one is going to let it stand. Not the rules comm. or the DNC and Hillary won’t let them split the vote LOL SHE would rather you guys not be counted before she would do that!

Posted by: Brian | March 21, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Miguy: that’s a fact DCvoter will ignore.

Posted by: chris Maler | March 21, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Ah, I see you’re taking your cue right from the Obama playbook. Say something erroneous and then come back AFTERWARD to say what you really meant. Of course.

Posted by: LOM | March 21, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Dan-It is the people of FL and MI who voted, period. 1.5 million democrats voted. The people wanted to be counted in and that is their right in a democracy. 400 and change voted in Alaska and Obama got 70% of delegates. If you can’t figure out the number differential here then go ahead and give away FL and MI. Result: Republican win again. No one can escape that, no one!

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 21, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

He purchased NOTHING in FL. His National ads ran everywhere. Nothing was purchased in FL. Actually the facts speak for theirself. HILLARY held 3 fund raisers and one party the night of the election. Those are the facts. Next time you might want to make sure your not dealing with adults before you come on a blog and lie.

Posted by: Brian | March 21, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Much ado about nothing.

Posted by: kent | March 21, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Brian you apparently dont know what NAFTA is and are not comprehending the details. That is ok.. I dont blame you the student, I blame Obama the teacher.
FL voters were disenfranchised by the republican legislature who refused to use the date submitted by the FL state democratic party… this is well documented online… look it up… the DNC removing the delegates are violating the constitutional rights of FL voters and the federal appeals court heard arguments Monday. They expect to rule in the next month.
BOYCOTT THE DNC UNTIL THE DELEGATES ARE SEATED!!!!!!
For MI, I expect a similar case to be filed. The delegates can vote on the floor at the convention once the court orders them seated. The 40% that Clinton was willing to give Obama can now be free to vote how they want.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 21, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Brian — Hillary doesn’t need those votes like you all seem to think she does. When the superdelegates vote their independent judgement, they will vote for her because their other option is a huge politically liability and their role is to ensure a win this fall. How about those RULES?!

Posted by: LOM | March 21, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Obama did not purchase ads in Florida. His National ads ran everywhere.

Posted by: Sam | March 21, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

chirs maler watch the video.. i am not going to do your research for you

Posted by: DCVoter | March 21, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Obama’s campaign played dumb,…

Posted by: Jerry | March 21, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Fundraising is not campaigning, again, according to the rules. Big difference and legitimate.

Posted by: LOM | March 21, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

I just don’t understand how anybody who is American could ever not want votes to be counted,..there is no argument for it. It is the most un-American thing I could imagine!
The AMERICAN PEOPLE deserve to have their votes counted no matter who you support!!

Posted by: Jerry | March 21, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Deanna, Since when in America can politicians sue for libel? If that was the case, no media could survive. How many times has BUSH been called a lier or fraud or criminal in the media. He’d be an even richer man if he sued all of them. I think you argument lacks merit. Sorry.

Posted by: DownWithMSM | March 21, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN WAS ASKING OBAMA TO
PRESENT A COUNTERPROPOSAL.
But they were already told their objections:
- the Democrats which voted in January at the GOP primary barred from voting now
- closed primary instead of open.
- the prohibition for eirst time voters (mainly students) to vote by proxy, inspite the fact that in June many are out of state on vacations.
Of course, the proposal DISENFRANCHISED
(??) these 3 voters group, by sheer coincidence (!?)mainly GOP supporters!!
SO WHY CLINTON WAS ASKING OBAMA TO PRESENT A COUNTERPROPOSAL ?? SIMPLY AMMENDING HER OWN BY ELIMINATING ABOVE RESTRICTION WOULD DO THE TASK !!
CAMINITO

Posted by: TOM WITTMANN | March 21, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

The RULES will stand and Obama will win. You know your childish remarks like that do nothing to help your candidate it shows that you cannot answer the charges being leveled against her so you resort to childish remarks. How sad.

Posted by: Brian | March 21, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Call me a “Typical white person” but I believe,….
The AMERICAN PEOPLE deserve to have their votes counted no matter who you support!!

Posted by: Jerry | March 21, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

@Dogsoldier: Since 1992, Michigan has voted for the Democratic party candidate for president in the national election. Our economy has been in freefall for the last couple years; no sitting President’s party would win this state. This is going to remain a blue state this year no matter which of the Democrats wins the nomination. The UAW has avoided supporting either one because they feel that way too.

Posted by: MIguy | March 21, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

I don’t understand NAFTA? LOLOLOL I Understand that CLINTON lied about it…beyound that ? No one should care when it comes to who they vote for! Apparently you don’t have the intelligence to understand the basic concept of liars…how sad perhaps you need a teacher?

Posted by: Brian | March 21, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

MIGuy – VA voters also dont declare but to vote in the Rep primary you have to state or sign this stupid little card claiming you are voting republican or something… they tried to force peeps to sign something swearing they woudl vote rep in nov if they were allowed to vote in the rep primaries… that was disallowed by the SOS… if there is no way to track whether people voted in the rep primaries how would they know who voted already and who didnt? – there mustve been some method of identifying those who voted in the rep primary

Posted by: DCVoter | March 21, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Some of you saying, “Too bad, FL or MI…”, think of this… imagine that your state’s election-results don’t count; that after taking the time to learn about the candidates, you go out to vote in the hopes that, although your state was disqualified, the vote would likely be accepted by the DNC later (this was the general assumption in FL)… then imagine that the candidate you support wins big… but the results from your state is never accepted and plans for a re-vote are continually frustrated and opposed by the other candidate… Wouldn’t you be angry? Polls show that one in four democrat in FL will not vote democratic if their primary’s vote is not counted. FL and MI are two key, swing state and disqualifying their primary elections (or not allowing a re-vote) could really have a negative impact for democrats in the general elections!

Posted by: Landi | March 21, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Brian-If the polls are correct (Gallup) I urge you to stay with Obama. And he’s going down faster than I can type. Now Obama wasn’t satisfied running over his grandmother on Tuesday, he had to back up the bus and run over her again today. Wow! You can’t make this stuff up. It only gets better. Down, baby, down!

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 21, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

my heart goes out to the people of florida and michigan. just look at the number of jobs lost or sent overseas or to mexico because of that creep we have had in the white house for the last 8 years……everyone must be heard, everyone must be accounted for….especially in states like michigan, where the jobs have all but been lost, and in florida, all where the houses have all but been lost…we are on the verge… let these people be heard.

Posted by: carla sue | March 21, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

DCvoter:
there are lots of videos everywhere, could you be a bit more specific.
Do I just search for “video some kid made in his basement about clinton not lying about bosnia”?
If you want to be taken seriously and move your agenda forward, quote sources and references. Otherwise it’s all just hot air.

Posted by: chris Maler | March 21, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

Brian – buying national to get ads shown in SC is being questioned by the experts – either he made a stupid inefficient executive decision to buy very expensive air time for what was supposed to be a targeted state OR he was just using a legal way to get around the rules and campaign in FL – either way it looks bad on Obama… end result? his ads ran in FL… Clinton did not run ads in FL… the FL vote turnout was twice what it was in 2004… end analysis? the voters will was cast and Obama lost big… the court will decide that one

Posted by: DCVoter | March 21, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

MIguy-You are correct in the devastation in your state. Now, get this. I was angry about the NAFTA issue because we allow China and India to take our people’s jobs, plus we allow Japan to flood the market with vehicles while we can’t sell our vehicles in Japan because of high tariffs Japan uses against American vehicles. And no one talk about China, India, or Japan, why?

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 21, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

i would like to know why oprah and the out-spoken supers for obama are so quiet lately?

Posted by: carla sue | March 21, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

I bet their are a lot of people in other states that wish they could re-vote now!!

Posted by: Jerry | March 21, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

chris maler – oh i thought you were actually keeping up with the campaign… video was probably monday st patty’s day … press conference… 3/17/08 Clinton vs. Sinbad on Bosnia

Posted by: DCVoter | March 21, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

@DCVoter: In Michigan (at least where I voted), the election worker asked for your name then went down the list of registered voters until she found my name. Then she marked an “R” or a “D” next to each name to indicate which ballot they took. Party affiliation was not on the list, just names of registered voters. I appreciate why the revote was structured as it was, as my understanding is that DNC rules do not allow people to vote in both GOP and Democratic primaries. There’s no point then to a revote as the same result will occur – it’s just a waste of time and money. Any other “voting” solution gets much more complicated as there are good reasons people shouldn’t get a say in both primaries. So our state democratic leaders blew it. Life goes on and we’ll live with the good judgment of the rest of the country.

Posted by: MIguy | March 21, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

“The latest Gallup Poll Daily tracking shows Hillary Clinton with a five percentage point lead over Barack Obama in national Democratic voters’ nomination preferences, 48% to 43%.
This marks the second consecutive day of Gallup Poll Daily tracking showing Clinton with a statistically significant lead over Obama”

Posted by: LOM | March 21, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am

Call me a “Typical white person” but I believe,….
The AMERICAN PEOPLE deserve to have their votes counted no matter who you support!!

Posted by: Jerry | March 21, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

MIguy and everyone, do we still have the right to write in our votes? if we are not happy with who is on the ballot in november, i will let my pen run out of ink before i let obama or mccain get in the white house.

Posted by: carla sue | March 21, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

@Dogsoldier: I think that time and again, Americans have been proven as one of (if not the most) hardworking and productive people on the planet. Bad business decisions by the Big 3 (“Let’s rely on gas guzzlers and hope the price of oil/gas stays low”) combined with enormous health care costs have really hurt. But, things were bad in the early 80′s when Chrysler was bailed out and eventually rebounded. We’ll be back on our feet again, but the current administration’s policies are killing us.

Posted by: MIguy | March 21, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

Yep MIGuy that is what they do in VA but you just identified how they know which primary you vote in… but it is the law that prohibits voting in both primaries not the parties… no one can vote in both primaries in any state… but if the courts rule properly… the MI delegates will be seated with clinton’s delegates and 40% uncomitted… then those uncommitted who represent all those who did not vote for Clinton can cast for you at the convention… take it to the floor where it counts!!!!! You can get active and oust all those in MI responsible later
BOYCOTT THE DNC!!!

Posted by: DCVoter | March 21, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

carla sue – writeins are only counted for declared writeins… candidates who fail to get a party nom are not allowed to declare as a writin… i dont know if they can run under another party or not though… thats why i had to come to the conclusion that we need more dems in congress to get closer to a filibuster proof majority… with a Clinton win we get everything we wanted… with a McCain win we only get at least part of what we wanted and we keep him in check… Obama doesnt have a chance in hell of winning in nov

Posted by: DCVoter | March 21, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

@carla sue: I think it’s great that you are passionate, as are so many others here, about their candidate. It’s great that people care. I think that it really doesn’t matter whether Obama or Clinton wins the nomination at this point. They each have such a loyal following that they will have a powerful voice no matter if they are in the White House or Senate. In my opinion, a Senator is more powerful in the long run than any term-limited President.

Posted by: MIguy | March 21, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am

DCVoter — “Obama doesnt have a chance in hell of winning in nov”
Why are so many people in denial about this?

Posted by: LOM | March 21, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am

That’s right Dogsoldier,….Speak the truth brother!!
Call me a “Typical white person” but I believe,….
The AMERICAN PEOPLE deserve to have their votes counted no matter who you support!!

Posted by: Jerry | March 21, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

Interesting commentary in an LA Times blog titled ‘The Barack Obama edge: Is it eroding?’

Posted by: LOM | March 21, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

thanks dc and MIguy. i AM very passionate for hillary to win the election….many reasons. i am a middle class, single, white hard-working american woman that lives check to check. my own job here in missouri was on the brink of moving to mexico, where they pay them 3.25 an hour, that includes wages AND benefits. and that means very little benefits. i used to like obama, but i have always supported and voted for hillary. i said early in this contest that if obama wins, i will support him. i won’t anymore, not after the last two weeks of finally being faced with the truth.
we need our jobs to stay here in america. we need health care for everyone. we need national security….as we all as human beings have the need to feel ‘safe.’ i don’t believe at this point obama can do that for us. i believe hillary can.

Posted by: carla sue | March 21, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

LOM did you look at the latest polls tab? man it is clear that Obama is losing support in states he used to have good support in… i sure hope the trend continues as predicted by the pollsters last night

Posted by: DCVoter | March 21, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am

MIguy-In MI I think the big three need to redesign and retool to meet the needs of the 21st century. Plus they have to demand a level playing field with Japan. Furthermore, the big three need to sit down with government and come up with an agreement to manage the health care issue not just for the auto industry but for Americans as well. The auto industry cannot compete without the health issue being resolved. Then we need to get green jobs going in the state in the first year of a new administration.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 21, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am

Where’s Howard Dean? AAAAARGHHHHAAAAAA!!

Posted by: Jerry | March 21, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am

@carla sue: I respect your opinion. In my view they are all politicians. Senators Clinton and Obama are very close on the issues. I don’t know how we’ll pay for universal health care when we can’t afford Medicare, but I think we have to try to figure something out and I’m not hearing McCain talk about how to fix healthcare. Somebody needs to do something in Washington and the endless fighting over nonsense needs to stop. If it is Senator Clinton, then more power to her. If it’s Obama or McCain, then I wish them the same. But four more years of morass is something none of us is for. Whoever wins, they just need to work with the other party and get something done.

Posted by: MIguy | March 21, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am

I think that the North Carolina poll is very good news for Clinton — Obama’s lead was cut down to one percentage point. So, it is now a statistical tie in that state! This is a big turnaround from the bigger margin leads he had been enjoying over the past couple months.
He put NC going the distance in his March Madness bracket–maybe the folks there see the transparency of his pick.

Posted by: LOM | March 21, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am

@Dogsoldier: Agreed. Although the level playing field in Japan’s markets would help, Toyota/Honda/et (and now the German companies) are really tooling to make cars in the U.S. – I wonder how they get around the healthcare issue? My understanding is that one reason the the foreign companies are coming is that the dollar is so weak that pretty soon their cars will be unaffordable here!

Posted by: MIguy | March 21, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am

Hillary Clinton, Oct 11, 2007:
“It’s clear, this election they’re having [in Michigan] is not going to count for anything.”

Posted by: ratmach | March 21, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am

MIguy, thanks, but let’s do all we can to keep mccain out of the white house. he will have this war lasting forever, and that will mean more lives, jobs and futures lost for us all.
everyone here can best believe that i will be on the phone lines with the dnc starting next week (after easter) and letting them know what i think. i just hope to get the opportunity to speak with mr. dean himself. this entire country’s voice counts and that includes michigan and florida.

Posted by: carla sue | March 21, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am

Gotta got to work and get you people some oil, last night. Then seven off. We don’t pump you people don’t get gas, period!

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 21, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am

Quoting out of context is not helpful. I can post quotes of Obama saying the same sort of thing. The difference is, as she stated in her speech, she agreed not to campaign in MI and FL but did not agree with the DNC decision to not seat the delegates. She left her name on the ballot for that reason because every vote should count. Obama is not telling people he tried to remove his name in FL but the FL rules would not allow it. Shortly after, he did the national ad buy in question.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 21, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am

night Dogsoldier!

Posted by: DCVoter | March 21, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am

@carla sue: One thing is clear, next year President Bush is out. No matter what happens, I hope we are all not so embittered that we have four more years of stalemate.

Posted by: MIguy | March 21, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am

Have a good one Dogsoldier!!

Posted by: Jerry | March 21, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am

DCVoter — The new Fox News polls today are very interesting as well. The conservative leaning right media outlet has Senator Clinton beating Senator McCain by 3 percentage points (!!), but Senator Obama trails Senator McCain by 1 pp.

Posted by: LOM | March 21, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am

Yep I thought that was interesting as well as some of the state polls. We can see clear on some red and blue states but look at the ones that Obama lost strength in!

Posted by: DCVoter | March 21, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am

DCVoter — One more thing about the latest polls…what happened to Missouri for Obama? Ouch! Hmmm, buyer’s remorse?

Posted by: LOM | March 21, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

MIguy, thanks. and thank goodness bush will be out, but not soon enough. i am not, nor do i think most others on this blog, are embittered as we are disappointed and disheartened. from the get we were the party to be dealt with no matter who…..now look at what we face.
i must respect hillary for not engaging in this ‘wright’ matter, with the exception of the fact she is glad that obama gave his speech. that right there shows the mark of a true leader with their own mind…..not someone mislead by a spiritual advisor…..
i truly believe hillary will start bringing people together after one big collective sigh from everyone in the usa, knowing that someday this will all be overwith.

Posted by: carla sue | March 21, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am

DCVoter said: “She left her name on the ballot for that reason because every vote should count.”
Sorry, but that’s not exactly true. Here’s the rest of her quote:
“But I just personally did not want to set up a situation where the Republicans are going to be campaigning between now and whenever, and then after the nomination, we have to go in and repair the damage to be ready to win Michigan in 2008.”
See. She was just thinking about the general . . . she ASSUMED she was gonna be the easy nominee. In fact, there’s a quote of her saying something like, “Starting with Iowa and New Hampshire, we’re going to work hard this whole campaign, right up to Super Tuesday.” In other words, she ARROGANTLY assumed that, after Super Tuesday, she’d be crowned. Not too bright, I’m sure even she would admit.

Posted by: ratmach | March 21, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am

Yes, it seems he has lost some steam in the whole red state strategy. I couldn’t have predicted *that*.
BOYCOTT THE DNC UNTIL THE VOTES COUNT!!

Posted by: LOM | March 21, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am

LOM – I think the disparities in the red states also indicate some changes for Obama… this can be extrapolated for other states not polled or for indies not participating in primaries possibly

Posted by: DCVoter | March 21, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am

Oh guess what everyone a picture of Rev Wright with Bill Clinton in the Whitehouse has surfaced. And it was at a dinner the Clintons invited him to in 1998 which Hillary also attended. Afterwards they even sent a thank you letter thanking him for his prayers. Let me see invited him to dinner, pose for photo, and thanked him for prayers. Sounds like association to me. Those clintons should be ashamed of themselves. I’m pretty sure he had those same views in 1998 but yet he was invited to the Whitehouse. But I’m sure you Clintonian hypocrites don’t see anything wrong with inviting Wright to the Whitehouse do you. Just his association with Obama is offensive.

Posted by: common sense | March 21, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am

ratmach – i disagree, i see her as speaking from the party perspective not her campaign… but then i have faith in her, i have followed her career… and have seen her faith in the party… she is a staunch democrat… i was referring to her speech in MI this week.. you can watch the video of it here on the ABC site

Posted by: DCVoter | March 21, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am

ha! TX is two steppin away from Wright… they just moved his so called upcoming honor ceremony off the TCU campus.. they cite security as the reason but i know better… the TCU doesnt want to lose students and jobs

Posted by: DCVoter | March 21, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am

Yes, there is a GINORMOUS (I know, not a real word, but the statement above deserves an equally ridiculous response) correlation between an evening dinner with Rev. Wright and a 20 year commitment sitting in the pews listening to a man considered to be Senator Obama’s mentor. Yes, completely the same.
Since someone had the audacity to bring this up, however, check out the op-ed just out titled ‘The Speech: A Brilliant Fraud’ at the washingtonpost dot com.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/20/AR2008032003017.html?hpid=opinionsbox1

Posted by: LOM | March 21, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am

Call me a “Typical White Person” but I believe that,…
The AMERICAN PEOPLE deserve to have their votes counted no matter who you support!!
NOBAMA 08

Posted by: Jerry | March 21, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am

yes, we will make our voices heard by getting on the phones/faxes. just a fyi for all of my hillary/staunch-democratic friends out there. go to:
http://www.955klos.com and click on radio air personality jim ladd. perfect illustration/demonstration of how flooding phone lines REALLY WORK!!!!

Posted by: carla sue | March 21, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am

thanks LOM I actually watched him on the news commenting on the speech

Posted by: DCVoter | March 21, 2008, 1:31 am 1:31 am

LOM,..great article. Wow he nailed it!!

Posted by: Jerry | March 21, 2008, 1:31 am 1:31 am

WestCoastMessenger: Fine. But HOW to count the votes? I sure hope you’re not one of these people saying, “The original elections were fair. Just count those votes.” That’s totally laughable. So one option is a re-do of some type.
Just about everyone admits that a mail-in would have WAY too many risks of fraud involved. And at first a new regular primary sounded like an ok plan. But turns out that ANY kind of revote would disqualify any Democrat who took a Republican ballot in the original election. And who might those people be? I’d say they’d be the supporters of the candidate who was NOT on the ballot. That would be Obama.
So about the only fair way I can see to do it is to just make sure the delegates are seated. Use some kind of formula to divide them up. Maybe an average of the percentage of the original vote (with “uncommitted” going to Obama), combined with the current overall delegate numbers.

Posted by: ratmach | March 21, 2008, 1:31 am 1:31 am

DC voter what that photo says is despite Wrights views the Clintons still invited him to the Whitehouse. He was already displaying the same rhetoric that he displays now. Apparently since Bill was going through the monica situation they didn’t care. They wanted all the support they could get. You know its funny how Clinton supporters always say the same people they attack Obama for holds no bearing when it comes to the Clintons. It’s always just a photo. Wrong it was a private dinner of handpicked clerics. Thought was put into who attended that dinner. The Clintons wanted his support as well as all the others in attendance. But it was ok to support them in their trying times but shame on Obama. Get real.

Posted by: common sense | March 21, 2008, 1:33 am 1:33 am

rat mach – she and the party agreed to the redo.. Obama blocked it after saying he would agree with the party.. once again … HE LIED!!!!!

Posted by: DCVoter | March 21, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am

randle bate,
hillary is nothing but first class. obama is the one with low class and mccain has no class and bush is all a@#…

Posted by: carla sue | March 21, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am

ratmach — I can really appreciate you trying to put forth some solution. Very cool. Giving Obama the ‘uncommitted’ column is VERY generous, but I agree with that. I’m not sure that allocating any of those delegates based on the outcome of any other states would be entirely fair. I think there should be some attempts to allocate them based on the results of the respective states. No one has a good question as to how to do this and the Obama camp is screaming foul because their name wasn’t on the ballot.
Some consensus needs to be made. Not seating these very critical swing states will be political suicide for the party come general election. And if Obama is the nominee, no way in h*ll.
I’m still advocating for a 51/49 (Clinton/Obama) split and wonder if the Obama camp would accept. Not super fair, but better than 50/50. It’s better than doing nothing if all other options have been exhausted.

Posted by: LOM | March 21, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am

TO all the Obamatons:
We feel your pain. We know you are upset and undertandably so. You have been mislead by a man who is not who he professes to be. Mislead by a man who embraces black separatism which is classified as a hate group activity alongside white supremacy. Fret not! The Clinton camp welcomes all races, all genders, and all cultures not filled with hate for America. Together we can left each other up and walk the path as one to the White House.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 21, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am

No defending the sound byte of Reverend Wright. Do I think that he spews that garbage 24/7 for twenty years? No. My guess is that Senator Obama felt there were some other redeeming qualities of the man.
I remember a couple years back at a Smashing Pumpkins concert, Billy Corgan (the white lead singer) yelled out something to the same effect of Reverend Wright (actually, it was probably worse). While some idiots in the crowd cheered, I yelled back his same epithet except directed at him rather than this great country. I disagree with these stupid statements completely, but I wonder if they were said for effect at a particular moment to provoke thought in whomever was there. Anyway, I still listen to the Pumpkins even though they stink now and their lead singer is an idiot. I don’t know why – I’m probably an idiot too. But I love this country and I think that too many people here don’t appreciate the freedoms and opportunities we have.

Posted by: MIguy | March 21, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am

We don’t need Bill back in the White House. I heard it took Laura Bush over six months to get the stench out. Let the Ex-con stay in New York. He entered the White House as a broke hillbilly, now he’s a multi-millionaire; so is Hillary. Now they want more power and Bill wants more interns.

Posted by: Randle Bate | March 21, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am

if sen. obama had any class at all, he would drop out of the election, surrender his delegates to hillary, and then pledge to support her, and the american people, and a fair democracy. and that also includes, no hatred.

Posted by: carla sue | March 21, 2008, 1:43 am 1:43 am

MIguy — You’re now my new favorite poster. You found a way to bring the Smashing Pumpkins into the fold!
You’re not an idiot and good for you for standing up when you sensed something was not right. Common sense, really.

Posted by: LOM | March 21, 2008, 1:43 am 1:43 am

Does anyone think there is even going to be a “Democratic” party if these millions of people’s voices are not heard? Enough is enough! We can figure out a way to put a man on the moon, but we can’t figure out how to let these people vote? Can you people at the DNC walk and chew gum at the same time?

Posted by: Grammy Barb | March 21, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am

@carla sue: If Senator Obama did as you asked, Senator Clinton would have to disavow his support by the same ‘guilt-by-association’ tactic the Republicans will use. At some point, one of them is going to need an “Al Gore Moment” and stop the bleeding. Senator Obama won’t do it while he is leading and Senator Clinton won’t do it while she still thinks she has a chance.

Posted by: MIguy | March 21, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am

DCV — I agree to let the system work, but in the event that we are at a complete impasse and we have to decide if we want to risk losing MI and FL as swing states in the GE, there will have to be some consensus. If the 50/50 split is the only option the Obama camp is willing to entertain, I think the response should be 51/49. If he doesn’t accept that, then it would be blatantly obvious he cares more about himself than the American people.

Posted by: LOM | March 21, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am

Clinton is really getting frantic. She has told about every lie she can think of and still doesn’t have enough votes. Forgot she said the votes in Michigan “won’t count for anything.” Now she wants them to count. She is not two-faced though, maybe six on seven faced. Speaking of faces, have you seen hers lately? Really scary.

Posted by: Randle Bate | March 21, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am

The Wright Scandal always reminds me of something Abe Lincoln said when faced with racial division:
“I am not bound to win, but I am bound to be true. I am not bound to succeed, but I am bound to live by the light that I have. I must stand with anybody that stands right, and stand with him while he is right, and part with him when he goes wrong.”

Posted by: DCVoter | March 21, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am

randle, what planet did you come from to post a blog like that….this is supposed to be about intelligent conversation and politics. yes we have our personal views and sometimes lol remarks, but this is downright crude. who did you ‘i heard’ it from anyway about what laura bush said. if you can’t remember who you ‘i heard’ it from….and tell us….then you have ‘i heard’ disease….

Posted by: carla sue | March 21, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am

LOM: I’d think that even giving Clinton a little MORE might be fair. Maybe closer to 55/45. I know Obama would likely do better than that in any do-over, would possibly even win, but you never know. And anyway it’s sure a WHOLE lot fairer than Hillary’s original “Just seat them as they are” solution.

Posted by: ratmach | March 21, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am

At least Bill didn’t have “A wide stance”,…

Posted by: Jerry | March 21, 2008, 1:52 am 1:52 am

@LOM: Thanks – at their heart, I think most Obama supporters hope (and believe) that he actually told Reverend Wright that he was/is wrong after other inflammatory sermons he gave. I think the truth is muddled in politics. I wish I would hear Reverend Wright apologize for the comment, even if taken out of context. I am not so without sin to cast the first stone, though…

Posted by: MIguy | March 21, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am

All you simple minded people screaming boycott like a bunch of B#T&H*s. That doesn’t hurt are scare anyone. Regardless what you do Hillary has lost. If Obama loses to McCain fair and square in the General then oh well but voters aren’t going to let Hillary steal the nomination. She lost already so get over it. If the roles were reversed Obama would have accepted it. Then you keep screaming buyers remorse. Buyers remorse was proven when Hillary lost 11 straight. And for those that say they’ll vote for McCain go ahead. You act like you live in a different country. Anything he dishes out you will have to deal with just as well. All that I’m going to vote McCain stuff like you scaring somebody. Grow up

Posted by: common sense | March 21, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am

Say what you want about Bill Clinton. He has his baggage, sure, but he is a political genius. And yeah, that would be SO terrible to have some intelligence back in the White House.

Posted by: LOM | March 21, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am

MIguy…..thanks, i really think that if obama would concede now, hillary would re-unite the party/parties by moving forward. ‘guilty by association’ is one thing. guilty by direction, as obama has lived by the guidance of the rev. wright is another. we have all in our lifetimes met ‘lower walks-of-life’ if you will, past criminals, etc., but to remain true to them for a number of years is a whole different scenario. it is one thing to meet someone and know of them, it is another to know someone and live by them.

Posted by: carla sue | March 21, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am

Strange that the pundits are not pouncing on an obvious indicator:
Prior to the race-baiting statement by Michelle Obama “Black America will wake up”, there was no racial division in the voting between the candidates. After SC, the only race that appears to be voting based on race is the black voting bloc. Clearly, her black separatism message carried.
Ferraro was right, and Obama has the audacity to compare her observation about the statistical disparity being related to his race as it was related to her selection as VP to the rantings of a black separatist?
Oh and before I forget:
BOYCOTT THE DNC UNTIL THE DELEGATES ARE SEATED!!!!!

Posted by: DCVoter | March 21, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am

MIguy: There are several clips of Rev. Wright around the web. I mean clips that show not only his infamous words that we’ve been seeing 24/7, but a whole lot more…. and IN CONTEXT. The guy gets a little excited, and sometimes says outrageous things, but the rest of the time the stuff he says is pretty much RIGHT ON THE MARK as far as politics/history goes. Did you know that in the “GD America” sermon, he says a LOT of accurate (and I would say MORAL) things? In that same sermon, he even praises Bill Clinton and blasts George W. Bush!

Posted by: ratmach | March 21, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am

Watch “The hunting of the President” for the whole story,…

Posted by: Jerry | March 21, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am

common sense, you have none……

Posted by: carla sue | March 21, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am

You can’t steal a nomination if it never belonged to anyone. Nice spin though.

Posted by: LOM | March 21, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am

MIGuy – do we really want a President that chooses to continue to expose his children to hate speech and black separatism and sedition? Is that the judgment you admire? How can we be sure those influences in his life do not lead to his supporting Hezbollah and Hamas like the man his church honors as a great leader?

Posted by: DCVoter | March 21, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am

Wright gyrating against an imaginary Monica as he says Bill was riding dirty and did the same thing to black folks he did to Monica is your idea of complimenting Bill Clinton? This is a man using sexually inappropriate gestures and language in front of a church with children in the pews while the crowd roared like an audience at the Apollo not caring what their kids are exposed to? Was Obama there with his kids? Was Michelle there hottin and hollerin? Obama never did say what statements his denounced did he? This is what you call moral?

Posted by: DCVoter | March 21, 2008, 2:03 am 2:03 am

Obama, I might be another “typical white person”, but if you’re the nominee I will never vote for you in November for denying the people of Florida and Michigan their right to be counted. Are you opposed to a revote because you are so afraid that Hillary is going to trounce you again in Florida and Michigan? You’re trying to disrupt our democracy. You’re not a
unifier, you’re an ambitious impostor.

Posted by: VioletZ | March 21, 2008, 2:04 am 2:04 am

ratmach — I really don’t have a problem looking at Rev. Wright in his entire context. It’s just difficult to do that on the heels of the firestorm that ensued after Ferraro’s remarks. She has done a lot to serve her country, including being a civil rights and women’s rights activist.
Everyone was quick to pounce on her one statement and view her out of context. It’s a terrible double standard to be asked to do the same for Rev. Wright. Senator Obama set the bar. He set the rules and I just feel like he should live by them.
I’m sure Rev. Wright has done wonderful things for our country — I do not believe he is a racist or Anti-American — just as Ferraro has done, but words matter and Obama should live up to his words.

Posted by: LOM | March 21, 2008, 2:04 am 2:04 am

randle, doesn’t mean he ranted and raved about hating america and white people and blaming someone else or some other race for the past. by meeting people, and experiencing what they are and what they stand for, do we learn to stand by them or seperate ourselves. oprah separated herself from the great rev. wright years ago. so did bill clinton. get a clue.

Posted by: carla sue | March 21, 2008, 2:05 am 2:05 am

@carla sue: You’re right – if Reverend Wright is a hatemonger. I don’t know the man and have only a few second sound bytes. I think a lot of this boils down to whether one thinks Senator Obama is an honest and decent man. If one does, then his speech was enough. If not, then no speech will ever satisfy. On the other hand what I read in many of these posts is that Senator Obama’s supporters feel Senator Clinton is dishonest. One can say it’s a no-win situation, but someone will win and the Democrats will get over the acrimony and unite.

Posted by: MIguy | March 21, 2008, 2:05 am 2:05 am

CarlaSue: Before you call Jeremiah Wright a ‘lower walk-of-life’, you oughta spend a few minutes watching more of his sermons. You’ve seen, what, maybe 2 minutes of the stuff the guy has said his whole life? Well, I’ve just watched about 2 hours of parts of several of his sermons, and believe me, the guy is ANYTHING but a “lower walk-of-life’. In fact, after watching them, and reading about some of the charity work Wright has done over the years, I can TOTALLY understand why Barack Obama has stuck with him. If you’re gonna take the “true measure of the man” . . . then on balance, Jeremiah Wright appears to be a GOOD man! (BTW, I’m a white, middle-aged, middle-class man.)

Posted by: ratmach | March 21, 2008, 2:08 am 2:08 am

ratmach – i think most of the posters here have seen much more than a couple of sound bytes.. heck they have been online and in the news for a week… there are many many sermons with inappropriate hate speech, the website still touts black separatism, the church still supports Farrakhan as a great leader… if people are like me they look at more than just a few sound bytes… i advocated for a joint ticket until i started putting everything together… including finding hate groups on obama’s website long before they scrubbed them

Posted by: DCVoter | March 21, 2008, 2:12 am 2:12 am

G’night folks. Thanks for the lively discussion.

Posted by: MIguy | March 21, 2008, 2:13 am 2:13 am

ratmach — I challenge you to do the same exercise for Ferraro and see if you have the same conclusion. I suspect you will.
Thanks for the your relection on the Rev. Wright issue. Very thoughtful, indeed.

Posted by: LOM | March 21, 2008, 2:13 am 2:13 am

all, as far as trysts, extra-marital affairs, whatever encounters anyone has male or female, what counts is what they do in office, as long as we are not their spouse or partner, who cares. this type of activity goes back to the beginning of time as does human nature and needs. what we need to focus on is leadership and the ability to be commander-in-chief. what goes on behind closed doors in the bedroom is no one else’s business. what goes on in the oval office is everyone’s business.

Posted by: carla sue | March 21, 2008, 2:14 am 2:14 am

night MIguy

Posted by: DCVoter | March 21, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am

ratmatch:
I read you post and I admire you for your intelligence and insight. If everyone was judged by a few sentences they said out of their entire lifetime we would all look like idiots. I’m sure you know that those who do choose predicate their judgment on a few words out of a lifetime of work are prejudiced or ignorant.

Posted by: Randle Bate | March 21, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am

LOM: I agree with you about Gerry Ferraro. I think she’s a good person who has done a lot of good in her life. And I am NOT gonna hold her (somewhat overblown) comments against her. And I’m sorry she seemed to misunderstand the reference Obama made to her in his speech. He was, I thought, telling people NOT to look down on her, and saying that he knew she was NOT a racist like some had been calling her.

Posted by: ratmach | March 21, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am

carla,
“what goes on in the oval office is everyone’s business.”
i tend to agree, however, i believe there was a monica moment in the oval office. yikes.

Posted by: LOM | March 21, 2008, 2:17 am 2:17 am

“I understand MSNBC has suspended Mr. Imus,” Obama told ABC News, “but I would also say that there””s nobody on my staff who would still be working for me if they made a comment like that about anybody of any ethnic group. And I would hope that NBC ends up having that same attitude.”
Why you lie Obama? Obama why you lie?
NOBAMA 08

Posted by: Jerry | March 21, 2008, 2:19 am 2:19 am

randle, maybe ratmach is a nice guy, or whatever……but let us not forget about imus and obama’s call for termination immediately after for just three words. as far as the rev. wright is concerned, this type of controvercial rehtoric has been going on for years. obama even admitted that himself. i see a lot of hypocrocy here. a lot of double standard. and most of all hillary is handling all of this with class and poise……

Posted by: carla sue | March 21, 2008, 2:22 am 2:22 am

Hillary has resisted attacks from Republicans, public scorn, recently unfair attacks from some African Americans. Enough hassle to quit and enjoy life since she has the means to do it, however she continues to serve America with dedication, character and good judgment. The country is in bad shape thanks to the most corrupt administration I have ever witnessed and I think Senator Hillary Clinton is the right person to correct the way. Obama talks very nice but he wouldn’t have a chance in the general election and we cannot afford to have another Republican administration.

Posted by: RAUL | March 21, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am

If the DNC does not allow a revote in Michigan and Florida, I will vote for McCain! Now,after Pastorgate, Obama wants to wrap himself in the flag. Thanks ABC for reporting on Pastorgate! CNN,MSNBC and others will try to sweep this scandal under the carpet!

Posted by: AlanT5353 | March 21, 2008, 2:24 am 2:24 am

Randle: Thanks. Yeah, I know all about prejudice and ignorance …. and the fact that it exists big time in this country should be NO surprise. Didn’t about half the adult population of this country elected the slime that goes by the name George W. Bush … TWICE?!

Posted by: ratmach | March 21, 2008, 2:24 am 2:24 am

carla sue:
I would like to take the opinion you have of Hillary as being accurate. I have, however, seen how she has bent the truth in so many situation that she no longer has any credibility with me: Her 35 years of experience; her opposition to NAFTA from the beginning, her refusal to say Obama was not a Muslim, instead of: as far as I know, to name just a few. There are way to many instances of her devious character for me to find any sincerity; I see nothing but guile and a readyness to bend to bend the truth or outright lie in order to reach her goal.

Posted by: Randle Bate | March 21, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am

ratmach, i never said wright is lower than life. and i have heard more than two minutes of words to see that this is a man that depends on action of those he has taught anger and hate to, than to spread words of peace and love. if you are a leader of a church, and i don’t care what color you are or what kind of church you attend, you are to speak from the mouth of christ and share his love for all people. condemnation is not spread in the pulpit, not unless of course, you are a hypocrite.

Posted by: carla sue | March 21, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am

Let’s put that last statement into perspective. Senator Clinton and her husband are some of the richest people in the world. She could certainly choose to not put up with all the grief the public, this race, and the RNC give her. She does what she does because it is her life’s work. She has accomplished all that she has IN SPITE OF Bill, not because of him. She is not just about change, she can deliver solutions with measured response. Process improvements must happen incrementally if we are to measure their success or failure. Blanket change for the sake of change can be unpredictable with tragic results… we know that all too harsh reality. Unity for the sake of unity based on just words wont help us get there either… we have been trying that since the civil war. Clinton’s plans include unity through common causes and solutions that matter to all of us. She is a true humanitarian and our next President of the United States. She wants this election to be about us… we can lift each other up and walk together to the White House.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 21, 2008, 2:31 am 2:31 am

carlasue: From everything I’ve seen, the vast majority of this “controversial rhetoric” does NOT involve stuff like “GD America”, or “the government created AIDS”. The “controversial” stuff that Obama said he knew about and has witnessed is probably like the stuff I’ve been watching. What it mostly involves is talking about the wrongs this country (and some politicians) has done over the years. And he does NOT just talk about what’s been done to blacks. He also speaks of the evils done to immigrants, native Americans, “the poor” in general, the Japanese-Americans during WWII, etc. And he has a LOT of mean, nasty, “controversial” things to say about George W. Bush and Ronald Reagan. So I’d bet that THOSE are the kinds of “controversial” things that Obama has heard over the years. And if Barack Obama can sympathize with a lot of that kind of stuff …. well, it just makes me realize, even more, what a great president he’s gonna be!

Posted by: ratmach | March 21, 2008, 2:35 am 2:35 am

hi randle. thanks. i have been following this thing for a long time, and i will say hillary is going to fix nafta. it was a mistake from the start. hillary is going to fix the war. it was a mistake from the start. we all make mistakes. in the california debate, you can hear obama say ‘i need people in my administration who can stand up and be strong….as i may not always be right’……that said a lot there. that is when he won my respect anyway even tho i still vote for hillary. but after the last couple of weeks i am disappointed at his choice for guidance as far as religion is concerned. it is borderline if not hate. i am voting for the democrat with experience……with diplomats, foreign leaders, economics, educational, health care, children, and adult baby boomers with approaching health care situations and social security. obama is not there. hillary is.

Posted by: carla sue | March 21, 2008, 2:38 am 2:38 am

DCvoter:
The Clintons are multi-millionaire NOW. They were not before they entered the Whit House, they were just two poor hillbilly who lucked out.{After they got in office.}I think when Hillary finally releases her income tax returns you will see how they acquired some of those millions. Why do you think she is still refusing to release those returns. I believe there must be something she is hiding.

Posted by: Randle Bate | March 21, 2008, 2:39 am 2:39 am

If you judge Obama and not his pastor, then why cant you judge Clinton and not her husband?
If you want the rules of the party to be followed, then why do you criticise Clinton for encouraging the legal revotes proposed?
If rules are rules, then why does Obama object to superdelegates casting their vote according to the rules?
If Obama tells you he wants to rise above old politics, why does he spend 700K to buy the votes of superdelegates?
If you think Clinton is not honest, then how can you not apply the same scrutiny to a man who just admitted in his speech he has been lying for over a year about Wright’s sermons and his relationship with him?
the list goes on and on…
We the voters should not be hypocrits in how we judge the candidates should we?
OH!!!!!!
Before I forget…
LET THE DNC KNOW YOU WANT THE DELEGATES SEATED!!!!!!

Posted by: DCVoter | March 21, 2008, 2:40 am 2:40 am

Randle that is not true. Bill Clinton was governor of Arkansas for 12 years and had 2 years experience with the attorney general’s office. Hillary Clinton was an established successful attorney and had been appointed by President Carter to be an advocate for children. They were in the top 2% of the socioeconomic ladder before they entered the race for the WH in 1992. They have never hidden their wealth and have shared much of it with the less fortunate of all races here in America and around the world through fundraising and donations.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 21, 2008, 2:46 am 2:46 am

obama cannot possibly win in November with his hypocrisy and history

Posted by: chris | March 21, 2008, 2:46 am 2:46 am

p.s. if the DNC knows what’s best for them and America, they will find a way to let Florida’s and Michigan’s voters be heard……otherwise, they will probably go republican in the fall

Posted by: chris | March 21, 2008, 2:47 am 2:47 am

by the way, obama did air advertisements in florida, even though it was against the rules…..of course, he finagled his way around the rules because the ads were national, not local…..another example that he knows his way around politican loopholes to benefit his “character”…..

Posted by: chris | March 21, 2008, 2:50 am 2:50 am

by the way, obama did air advertisements in florida, even though it was against the rules…..of course, he finagled his way around the rules because the ads were national, not local…..another example that he knows his way around political loopholes to benefit his “character”…..

Posted by: chris | March 21, 2008, 2:50 am 2:50 am

There is no law that says she has to release her returns until after being elected President. She offered to release them April 15 or so because she has nothing to hide. Her financial disclosures have been available to the public for many many years. You can look at it yourself. When people are that wealthy with a joint return, it takes a while for the tax folks to divide things up that are related to the candidate. Why hasnt Obama released more than just one year of his? Why is he hiding the year that he bought the house? Why is he hiding a schedule and earmarks for 6 of the 8 years as state senator when he worked so closely with Rezko? Transparency works both ways. I dont think there will be any information that will be daming for Clinton… after all the RNC has been after her for 29 years now and she has always beaten them, even after 40 mill of our taxdollars were wasted… I do think the Obama returns and schedules will reveal serious questions in need of serious answers. He has shown a pattern of revealing only what he has to when he gets caught by the media.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 21, 2008, 2:53 am 2:53 am

chris, typical obama. but there is one thing we as democrats must realize. we cannot under any circumstance vote for mccain. my late father, who served in the korean war, and was a member of the teamsters union, led wildcat strikes for the betterment of the american worker, would roll over in his grave if i voted republican. that is why we as democrats must flood the phone lines of the dnc and let them know our voice and how we feel about this bullpoop. florida and michigan are two of the most hard hit states in the nation as far as the economy is concerned. let us not divide, but unite. hillary will do this.

Posted by: carla sue | March 21, 2008, 2:54 am 2:54 am

Why are we angry? Well,(if you don’t live in FL or MI)… Imagine that your state’s election-results don’t count; that after taking the time to learn about the candidates, you go out to vote in the hopes that, although your state was disqualified, the vote would likely be accepted by the DNC later (this was the general assumption in FL)… then imagine that the candidate you support wins big… but the results from your state are never accepted and plans for a re-vote are continually frustrated and opposed by the other candidate… Wouldn’t you be angry? Polls show that one in four Democrat in FL will not vote Democratic if their primary’s vote is not counted. FL and MI are two key, swing states and disqualifying their primary elections (or not allowing a re-vote) could really have a negative impact for Democrats in the general elections!

Posted by: Landi | March 21, 2008, 3:09 am 3:09 am

landi, this is why we need to flood the phone lines to the dnc and cry foul!!!!

Posted by: carla sue | March 21, 2008, 3:16 am 3:16 am

i agree with the common sense knowledge that either obama or Senator Clinton (who is the best candidate for the best interests of our children, our troops and America) would EASILY be better Presidents than mccain……however, denying Floridians and Michiganers(?) their voice will only anger them, and when people are really p1ssed off at someone, they might tend not to vote for that someone’s benefit

Posted by: chris | March 21, 2008, 3:28 am 3:28 am

chris, that is why we need to speak out for our democratic brothers and sisters in the states of florida and michigan.
this is truly a sad state of affairs when those voices who have been so hard hit by hard times cannot or will not be heard. make phone calls. flood the phone lines. it will work. just watch.

Posted by: carla sue | March 21, 2008, 3:32 am 3:32 am

DCvoter,
If you want to half way appear credible in your assertions, you may want to answer Charles’ questions before you continue with your yet to be substantiated accusations of Mr. Obama. Obviously you have as ax to grind because your vote didn’t count in DC.
Those of you who are still harping about the MI and FL votes, get a over it. Rules are rules and can’t be tailored to fit a losing candidate. Such is a democratic system that is run by the rule of law. Just out of curiosity, why didn’t you worry about the “dis-enfranchised” voter of the two states when the decision to not-count their votes was made before the primaries and with the agreement of “will-do-n-say-anything-to-be-nominated”.
It’s amazing how some people can loose their God-given common sense when faced with challenges! That’s what HRC and her supporters are doing.

Posted by: Christa | March 21, 2008, 3:38 am 3:38 am

very interesting indeed.

Posted by: carla sue | March 21, 2008, 3:38 am 3:38 am

christa, obviously you have just gotten on this blog, you haven’t read all the other posts by people with legitimate political concerns.
obama is the ‘i will say do anything at this point to be nominated candidate’ because he finally got caught after 20 years of hanging out with a socio-pathic freak who wants to call himself a minister. minister of what…..the devil himself. obama reeks now of nothing but hypocrocy, and i used to respect him. i don’t anymore. he spins and flips way too much for me, i don’t car ewhat color he is. go hillary

Posted by: carla sue | March 21, 2008, 3:43 am 3:43 am

Finally, this is over. Can’t wait for the Clinton’s to go back home to Arkansas. Another Clinton ploy to “steal” the election with her high rolling cronies. who does she think is so stupid as to buy the crapola that she cares about the people? Tell me, who would accept “private donors” to buy an election primary when they knew it was an illegal election in the first place? Tired of this underhanded politics – that is why we need to CHANGE Washington.
Tell me about all of the redactions she has on her Whitehouse papers… 4000 in all! Now that’s news!

Posted by: A Patriotic American | March 21, 2008, 3:47 am 3:47 am

LAguy, you are so right. i’ve never voted for a repub before (and i’ve been voting for almost 40 years), but this year it’s hillary or mccain. i am very appreciative that the repubs didn’t pick someone atrocious (cue the screaming obamaites here).
i think this whole mess is the fault of obama, dean, and pelosi, with assistance from kennedy and kerry, among others. i hope they all lose their jobs.
anyway, fl and mi had votes, regardless of whether the obamaites accept that (cue more screaming about rules, etc.). either seat the delegates based on those votes or have redo primaries. obama doesn’t want either, because fl and mi don’t want him. so we go to the supers and the convention.
either obama wins the nomination and we have president mccain or hillary wins the nomination and she’s the president. in many ways, the choice is in the hands of the obamaites. they think they have a choice of their guy being president, but that’s not going to happen. “typical white people” recognize prejudice against them when they hear it. and there are many millions of these “typical white people.”

Posted by: so saddened | March 21, 2008, 3:48 am 3:48 am

patriotic american….who are the cronies…..if the papers were such news as you claim, cnn abc msnbc fox would publish them. you must be a republican. the clintons are not going back to arkansas, they are going to washington. like it or not. you are talking about ‘illegal’ elections…..huh??? have you seen the news lately???

Posted by: carla sue | March 21, 2008, 3:51 am 3:51 am

things are slowing down on the blog. am going to call it a nite. everyone thanks for the participation and don’t forget to call the dnc starting next week. flood the phone lines. i will be back tomorrow nite to remind all of you and chat again with my friends, dc, MIguy, wcm, mattinohio, obama….yikes, and the rest of the go hillary gang. till then, take care, and god bless the great us of a.

Posted by: carla sue | March 21, 2008, 3:56 am 3:56 am

s.b.: You obviously buy all that junk the Clintons are pushing. Obama had nothing to do with this illegal vote in January. Both Clinton and Obama agreed that the votes wouldn’t count! Now Hillary wants them to count even though they were illegal – even though Barack’s name wasn’t on the ballot and Obama didn’t campaign in Florida – that liar is calling them fair. How can you vote for someone who would cause scandals and cheat to win? Do you have the money to make this re-vote count? Do you have the money to for all of the advertising for both candidates? NO? Then, in the words of Pat Buchanon, “Shut up!”

Posted by: A Patriotic American | March 21, 2008, 3:59 am 3:59 am

I FULLY agree with Carla Sue!
Wish SOMEONE would ask DR DEAN (Chairman of the DNC) – HOW he can call himself CHAIRMAN – when he has not even overseen (properly) – the vote status of MI and FL! (And furthermore, Pelosi has NO business – commenting about the MI & FL vote, our CHAIRMAN is supposed to have that job.)!! HOW can he logically (and FAIRLY – consider it is RIGHT and JUST to adhere to what HE considers his ABSOLUTE RULES – for State-count – when the DEM. party was NOT to blame for the FL Primary date to have been moved up – It was theREP POWER Congress there – who had swung that manipulative date plan — and they SURE were successful – at disrupting our stupid campaign, and Primary, huh! Since when is a DEAN ‘rule’ more important and overriding THOUSANDS of disinfranchised voters in those 2 state’s primaries?!! This is a TERRIBLE embarressment to our country – to portray to the world that these American voters had their Constitutional right of VOTING taken away — It is SOOO obvious, that Obama’s Camp is ‘stalling’ to ‘run-out-the-clock’ – as he KNOWS that Hillary rightfully – has recieved the majority of the delegates – in the strong, large, important states. SHE is CERTAINLY the ONLY one who can logically – “go up against McCain” – right now, with his strength zeroing in on Security – PLUS the fact that Obama Just arrogantly – ‘threw his OWN’ candidacy away – by refusing to ‘disown’ his ‘pastor’ (NOT his family member, as he was ‘comparing him to….)! — If he is TRULY running for Pres. — he should be ready to give his ALL – including his pride – and especially a so-called, long-time friend – when he would be OBVIOUSLY devisive in his run for the Presidency!!) If HE gets to STEAL this Candidacy in being our Party’s candidate — McCain will win!! SIMPLE as that!!!!!!

Posted by: G & G Conklin | March 21, 2008, 4:18 am 4:18 am

DCVoter,
Honestly, you’re the one that appears in pain because you have to constantly adjust a story to fit your argument. Besides, though many of us are disgusted with the dishonest and double standards of the Clinton supporters, we have no reason to feel desperate. As we speak, our candidate holds the lead both in the delegate and popular counts.
OBAMA
Pledged: 1413
Superdelegates: 208
Total: 1,621
CLINTON
Pledged: 1242
Superdelegates: 237
Total: 1,479
Unless you include money you hope to earn in the future to balance your bank accounts, you can’t possibly argue that HCR is winning the nomination. Even if Hillary steals the nomination with her sleazy manipulations, she will not win the election because she will not get the black vote–that’s the only constant the democratic party could count on for decades. Hillary has made an unwise decision when in her attempt to capitalize on the white vote, she used the double edge sword: the race card.

Posted by: Christa | March 21, 2008, 4:35 am 4:35 am

Just giving you HRC a good night news!
“By BARRY MASSEY Associated Press Writer
SANTA FE, N.M. Mar 21, 2008 (AP)
New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, the nation’s only Hispanic governor, is endorsing Sen. Barack Obama for president, calling him a “once-in-a- lifetime leader” who can unite the nation and restore America’s international leadership.’
I am sure Senator Clinton will consider this a a win. Right! My feeling is that HRC 30 years old dirty tricks are finally backfiring and the reasonable and fair delegates will silence their conscience for political reasons. I also and confident the American people is capable of discerning right form wrong and honorable from dishonorable.

Posted by: Christa | March 21, 2008, 4:52 am 4:52 am

Would someone PLEASE read Barack Obama’s Civil Rights Plan on his Website!! (It’s under “Issues”, “Civil Rights” at the bottom click on “Read The Plan”) You guys are just not getting it.

Posted by: Juli An | March 21, 2008, 4:57 am 4:57 am

Juli An – read his Civil Rights Plan. Big whop… nothing radically different here. Comments:
“Strengthen Civil Rights Enforcement” – OK fine.
“Combat Employment Discrimination – Obama will work to overturn the Supreme Court’s recent ruling that curtails racial minorities’ and women’s ability to challenge pay discrimination” – how exactly will he overturn Supreme Court rulings… I find it disturbing to think that a Constitutional Lawyer thinks that he can by fiat overturn a judicial ruling from the executive branch… this is like Huckabee’s plan of replacing the Constitution with the Bible.
“Expand Hate Crime Status” – basically hate crimes are thought crimes… why not punish bad people for doing bad things. Is it more heinous to kill a man because you think he has bad breath or because he is Asian, Black, or Gay? Is one worse than another… let’s get past race and all the other isms and punish people for criminal actions NOT thoughts.
“End Deceptive Voting Practices” – vague at best, merely hints at the 2000 fiasco. Where is his sense of voter empowerment with Michigan and Florida?
“End Racial Profiling” – so he wants to hamper local law enforcement now? Would you rather an innocent person is inconvenienced at an airport who has the profile of a terrorist – or for the sake of political correctness some bomber boards the plane unstopped because we ought to look past those things.
“Reduce Crime Recidivism by Providing Ex-Offender Support” – fine with me
“Eliminate Sentencing Disparities” – this has already been addressed by the Supreme Court in Kimbrough v. US . Funny, I thought he was a Constitutional Professor?
“Expand Use of Drug Courts” – fine with me.
OK… I’ve seen it and I’m not impressed. Where is his grand vision? He would be the first black president in history. Where is that urgent sense of now that he keeps harping about? I, at least, would think he would enter into a dialogue to address race in this country… but every time he has that opportunity, he says, “it’s not about race.”

Posted by: smartprimate | March 21, 2008, 5:54 am 5:54 am

How exactly does Obama plan to ask for the votes of those in FL and MI? When he refused to stand up for their right to be counted? Do any of the leftists in the democratic party think about this risk? Are they all that stupid?
Fact is, these politicians (Obama included) don’t give a flip about us. They ignore us at every turn. OUr right to vote is only precious when it benefits them. Ironically, Hillary is the one looking like a rebel, like a leader, like one standing up for the populace.. while Obama, looks like a bonified member of the old boys club, acting aloof, “let the DNC decide”.. way to stand up for the folks, there O. All the time, losers like Kerry, Dodd, Bradley, Kennedy and now Richardson pulling the strings to gain power. How utterly pathetic.

Posted by: An opinion | March 21, 2008, 7:33 am 7:33 am

hahaha, all you Hillary fans can scream all you want but unfortunately whether she takes it to the floor or not is not her PEROGATIVE, she doesn’t have the power. I know you people realise you are DOOMED AND WILL LOSE!! it’s a fact you are waking up slowly, hahhahahaha,
O’TRAIN about to move all aboard please.
You can vote for McSame for all you want, one thing is Hillary the greatest LIAR is done, Say hello to President OBAMA, you can choose to immigrate to IRAQ for all we care
OBAMA 08

Posted by: loving this | March 21, 2008, 7:45 am 7:45 am

Barrack Obama should be ashamed of himself. How could he want to be the President and not want his name on the MI ballot let alone not want a re vote in both Fl and MI. This is a true reflection of his patriotism. He states that the DNC rules must be upheld and not have MI and Fl votes count. However, he and his supporters do not feel the DNC rules must be upheld as it relates to Super Delagets and their responsibility to support the most electable candidate to represent the Democratic Party.

Posted by: J. Harvey | March 21, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am

Call me “A typical White person” but I say,..
Every American deserves to have their vot counted no matter who you support!!
NOBAM 08

Posted by: Jerry | March 21, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am

Obama is fighting to deny rather than defend the right of all Americans to participate in an election. Does he really think we will support him in a general election if he uses his political power to silence our voice in the primary?

Posted by: Life-long Democrat | March 21, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

IF OBAMA IS GOING TO BE FOR THE DEMOCRAT. I GOING TO VOTE FOR MC CAIN.

Posted by: none | March 21, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

IF OBAMA IS GOING TO BE FOR THE DEMOCRAT. I GOING TO VOTE FOR MC CAIN.

Posted by: none | March 21, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

Howard Dean and the National Democratic Party are responsible for this incredible debacle with two of the most important states in a general election, and they better find a way to resolve this conflict, aside from dividing the delegates equally between Clinton and Obama. Pundits and superdelegates say it would be terrible to overturn the pledged delegate vote. Well, it would be terrible to overturn the outcome of the Michigan and Florida primaries by an equal division of delegates that does not reflect the actual results. The short-sighted Dean has totally bungled what was sure to be a year for the Democrats. Unfortunately, he and the Democratic Party have handed the election to John McCain!!!

Posted by: dwilson | March 21, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

I really think Senator Clinton should gently pull out from the race, find a well known strong running mate, and run as an independent candidate for president. She may not win the race for Whitehouse but it would be a good starting point for creating a strong third party in America. The way she was treated by Democratic party leaders and sexist liberal news/medias, she has no reason to stay loyal to the party. I am sure her supporters will continue to stay behind her and only the strong leaders like Senator Clinton can help create a powerful third party in this country. Go girl.. you are really a leader that many of us feel so proud to follow for good of this nation.

Posted by: Herm | March 21, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

Obama needs to gently pull out of the race, there is no way he can win a general election. That judgment thing and change thing he has been running on has been totally debunked.

Posted by: Jeff | March 21, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

Thanks Fla Gal – you are a true American

Posted by: DCVoter | March 21, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

When you agree to play on the rules, than follow the rules, do not blame – agreed, you also was a ruler.
If you drive on Red, you should get the ticket, not a bonus check, right.
Florida and Michigan new, what would be the result. Do not expect the check than.
There is the way to sit deputies: according to final proportion between candidates.
Easy, cheap , respectable and reasonable. You want to sit – GET IT, get it the way this country runs.

Posted by: Linda,Fl | March 21, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

I totally agree, In life we must play by the rules except the Clinton are use to bending the rules. Speaking of the Clinton Hillary raised to much money why do she have over 10 million dollars in unpaid bills.
Have you seen Hillary lately and than look at Monica Lewinsky? and you ask Bill Clinton why did he cheat?
Bill Clinton had permission from Hillary and she said it was Okay…..

Posted by: Darryl, Arlington TX | March 21, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

I totally agree, In life we must play by the rules except the Clinton are use to bending the rules. Speaking of the Clinton Hillary raised to much money why do she have over 10 million dollars in unpaid bills.
Have you seen Hillary lately and than look at Monica Lewinsky? and you ask Bill Clinton why did he cheat?
Bill Clinton had permission from Hillary and she said it was Okay…..

Posted by: Darryl, Arlington TX | March 21, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

Jerry,
I’m with you. But I would go one step further and say I’m a typical American who feels every vote should count.
This may be a victory for Obama to win the Democratic nomination, but the General Election is going to prove that good people of all creeds do not like being called racists when they express dissenting opinion either on Obama’s “come together” speech or his campaign’s former religious advisor.

Posted by: OhioNative | March 21, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Richardson, one of the best politicians around, brilliant governor, in the camps of both Independents, Republicans and not to mention (obviously) Democrats, endorses Obama. WOW

Posted by: FB | March 21, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.