MoveOn.org v. the Clinton Fat Cats

I think you will see that this is true — all those small donors who gave to Obama are now waiting to see who is the nominee — I know I am one of them.

MoveOn may have sent this mailing — this is a REAL story, right? :^\ — only to correspondents who favored the endorsement of Obama (I usually get their mailings, but don’t have THIS one).

i seriously hope that should move on and pelosi get their way and fl and mi arnt counted that the funding dries up and obama gets blown out by mcain,this lifelong democrat will be lol.

MoveOn. org. getting involved in the mess in the Democratic party? They’ve lost credibility. There is little difference between the two candidates in regards to positions so why would they get involved in this. MoveOn needs to MoveOut and prepare for the general election. Disgusting. Is this true David Axelrod is tied to MoveOn? Even worse yet. Get lost MoveOn you have zero credibility anymore.

Who wants the dirty politics of Chicago brought to Washington with Obama? Yes, it will be a different kind of politics in Washington but, though hard to imagine, it could actually be a worse kind.

The Hill’s big fat cats want to spend some nights in the White House and the hotel manager Bill Clinton will take care of them. That is the ritual they hve been missing for 8 years of WBush: the Lincoln bedroom. But they have to understand that if anybody could buy the presidency, Mit Romney would be in the White House today. God bless Nancy a real strong woman, God bless America, and God bless Obama. OBAMA08.

Andy,
Your argument is flawed. You are spinning the number to justify what you want to represent.
Obama HAS won many more STATES, DELEGATES, and LEADS IN THE POPULAR VOTE. Hillary cannot overtake him without taking 2/3rds of all voters in the next primaries. Basically, she hasn’t got a prayer. Penn is really her last bastion.
She has serious general election flaws. All those great young voters won’t come out for her and the black vote will likely just stay home as well. She would lose the general election. Why else would Limbaugh have all his supporters voting for her?
Get a grip on your penchant for tallying numbers to suit your own interests and look at this realistically. Hillary can’t win in a general election. Her criticism of Wright just killed her general election chances.
She can’t win on just the few biggest states populations of Catholics and old women. It won’t happen. McCain will win everybody else.

To BKMC
Guests in the Lincoln bedroom, other than personal friends of the Clintons, were DNC donors, WJC did not need donors. He was already President!
The donors benefitted the DNC alone. The same DNC that backs your idol Obama!
And….Before you spout off, ck Bush Whitehouse logs. I know personally 3 republican couples from Texas that have
stayed there, 1 of them 6 times.

MoveOn should stay out. They do not represent the people – they represent “people like us.” It is viturally impossible for a regaulr citizen to get a MoveOn representative on the phone – which you can do for any candidate, and rep, or most of the revolting people who signed that letter to Pelosi.

Is thier any one else the media , republicans, and the whole democrat old guard would like to run against Hillary she is one strong woman to still be standing .

the hilary machine is at it again. oh woe is me…give it up and get a life.

MC:
Didn’t anyone in the Democratic Party (DNC, Dean) realize that Barack Obama had considerable baggage? (Rezko, Rev. Wright, etc.)

As I mentioned in the earlier post re MoveOn/Howrd Dean’s grassroots movement.
This coalition has been in place since Dean was forced to drop out in 2004. They have been lokking for “their candidate”, tried to get Bill Bradley at some point. He would not run but “hooked up with them”.
Their plan means having a controllable candidate like Bush has been for Repub far-right.
The far-left MoveOn/Dean know they cannot control HRC, so they put all money on Obama. Axelrod is the campaign master, Dean will be their Cheney in the background.
I know this sounds like “a conspiracy theory”, and yes it actually is! Elements of the media such as MSNBC is staffed by so many MoveOn/Dean/Kos affiliated writers that they have made na impact.
Based on the game plan as exposed in Dana Duncan’s Book: Burning at the Grassroots: Inside the Dean Machine, this primary should already be over and Obama the winner.
The only thing that has thwarted them is a few adept and impartial journalists, defiant Hillary supporters and donors, and the fact that Americans are awakening.
Were it not for the Wright stumbling block, that they thought would not occur, the awakening might not have occured at all.

I understand that the liberals and Democrats want to end this thing now to preserve their favored candidate. What they fail to grasp is that this became a lost cause long ago.
Fact: Obama does better in caucases than in private voting. America will be voting privately in November.
Fact: Obama maintains his core supporters, but Republicans have pulled away and Independents are in a holding pattern awaiting more info to make up their minds.
Fact: Shoud Obama get the nomination, once the Republicans and 527s are done with him, the independents will desert him also. That number, added to the number of Hillary supporters and disenfranchised FL/MI voters who go with McCain, will cost Obama, the Dems, and MoveOn the election they pushed for so dearly.
Fact: Obama will be forever tarnished as a candidate.
Prediction: Hillary wins it in 2012.

The Democrats can always find a way to to lose an election. This long primary race has cause Obama supporters to hate Clinton and Clinton supporters to hate Obama. Meanwhile, McCain remains survive unscathed.

Andy,
Obama has a pledged delegate lead that is insurmountable unless “the skies open up, the sun shines down…” and a miracle occurs in the form of 67% of the remaining delegates supporting her. In your comment, you gloss over the differentiation between pledged and super delegates. Pledged delegates are awarded based on the proportionate share of the people’s vote. Super delegates are party insiders who supposedly have superpowers that entitle them, as individuals exactly like you and me except that they’re more ‘powerful’, to a say in the process that is worth exponentially more than the regular person.
The popular vote and the pledged delegates are what represent the will of the people. The superdelegates, as the Clinton campaign repeatedly points out, are not bound by anything other than their own decision making ability. Neither candidate will achieve the ‘magic number’ without the superdelegates, and it would be absolutely silly – especially when going up against the Clintons – to employ a strategy that involves ignoring these people altogether. To the people who say that if Obama thinks that the superdelegates should follow the will of the people of their states then Kennedy and the others should have to vote for Clinton – SURE. If that rule were in effect, then the Ted Kennedy and any other superdelegate committed to Obama from a state that Hillary carried could be bound to support Hillary, but then EVERY SINGLE SUPERDELEGATE that is committed to Hillary from the (twice as many) states that Obama carried has to support him. He still wins.
Anyway, the popular vote, in the end, will favor Obama. The FL and MI “elections” will not be included in this total, but even if they were it won’t change the fact that Obama will end up with a greater percentage of the overall popular vote. The pledged delegates, split proportionately based solely on the popular vote and the results of the caucuses, will also be in Obama’s favor. If the Clintons convince enough super delegates to ignore these factors and support her at the convention, then that is the very definition of overturning the will of the people.
The argument that Obama is making (supported by Pelosi and the unofficial position of the vast majority of the remaining uncommitted superdelegates) is that once everything is done, and the pledged delegates and popular vote (minus the Castro-style one-choice election in Michigan and the random straw poll in which people like myself didn’t vote in reasonable reliance on the fact that the DNC and the candidates would keep their word that the FL delegates wouldn’t be included) are examined, the superdelegates should put their commitments aside and vote en masse for the candidate who has been selected by the people.
The reason that the superdelegate system is even in place is so that, in the event that the people are silly enough to select someone who is entirely unelectable, the more politically astute elders can step in and reverse that decision. Putting aside the lunacy of the system if it works as it is supposed to, it simply isn’t like that anymore.
The only reason that Hillary even has a lead in the superdelegates is that she collected their endorsements long before they or anyone else had a clear picture of what the race would look like. If you look at the superdelegate endorsements, Obama has been collecting them at a far greater pace than she has. She just started with a lead long before anyone even knew who was running or what the race would look like. A bunch of veteran politicians committing to support the candidate that they thought was the inevitable nominee – in an effort to advance their own standing within the party once she “inevitably” won, is certainly not what the people who crafted this ridiculous system had in mind.

Vanessa,
Do this! Try holding your breath until Obama is the nominee.
Please start now! It ain’t gonna happen.
If HRC does not “blow him out of the water”, he and his past will do it!
Long time from now until August, nad if Hillary were forced out, the GE would be a walk for McCain. See todays NBC/WSJ poll. We the 28% plus ain’t joking!

Wait a minute. The letter was addressed to Nancy Pelosi, not the MSM or the American people. They didn’t need to pick up a phone, they wrote a letter directly to her. The only one to blame for making this matter public is Nancy Pelosi herself.

MoveOn.org, through its “polled” membership, ENDORSED Obama ’08. Get a Grip!
Hill’s “fat cats” need to move on!

I whole heartedly agree Move On. I went on line and donate $100.00 to Democratic Party today and left blogs in lots of places encouraging others to do the same. When they send the email acknowledgment,you can sent a reply that they promise to read and can use that to tell them that you’re donating to replace fat cats threat. Obama campaign has proven that lots of people who give a little can outdo a few people who give a lot and without the threats, arm twisting, favors owed and strings attached. That old top down is falling in the face of grass roots people who take responsibility for their own party. The grandma who gave $3.09 and a Bible verse is every bit as much a partner as the person who can afford to give the maximum. We can effect change for the better if we work together. Yes We Can.

Tim: You are so right. Wright, Farrakhan, Ayers and Rezko would be coming to dinner at the white house. I read Obama’s bio in the New York Times and what a background. His mother was married three times, his father four times and there are 8 children involved. All from different mothers and fathers. Obama had severe ties to Rezko and it states it on his taxes. He knew what he was doing when he chose friends like Farrakhan, Ayers, Rezko and Wright. If Rezko had dirty dealings that would include Obama too because he was his attorney. Now he wants to turn his back on him? If he was president of this country there would be a disaster like never before. And I believe he can be dictorial when he wants to be.

More on Michelle Obama!
Its been three weeks in which several polls show that Clinton has a lead on McCain in the general election and Obama loses by a large margin. While that would only be the starting base for the general election campaign, the Obama advocates should really stop showing their uninformed bias by claiming he is the only one that could beat McCain. Shouting among yourselves does nothing to make it true.
His involvement with the lunetic racist Rev. Wright is enough to make most American throw up!

In The Wrath of Kahn the infinitely wise Spock said, “The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.” “Or the one,” added Kirk.
Listening to Clinton’s playground bullying supporters gives the painting “The Scream” a shrill voice, and it’s giving me a headache. I applaud MoveOn and its effort to end the shrill scream boiling up around the Clintons.

Moveon.org is the farthest left wing of the party. Clinton democrats HATE them as well as all the republicans obviously.
28% of clinton supporters voting for Mc Cain. Only 19% of Obama supporters voting for Mc Cain.
Get over it. Obama is unelectable. No liberal media spin can save him now. Just polarize more of the Democratic party.

latest rassmussen report.
Clinton 47 obama 42
March 27 2008
Obama getting crushed even MORE in the general election
Obama 222 Mc Cain 301
Clinton 246 Mc Cain 248 -tie
The numbers dont lie
Obama is unelectable.

steve thinks only HE can think independently. Only someone who is DEAD BOLT stupid thinks this.
the numbers dont lie Steve. Obama is unelectable.

Gallup reports todayVoters’ preferences in two hypothetical November general election matchups remain close, with John McCain at 47% to Clinton’s 44%, and McCain’s 45% to Obama’s 44%. The difference between McCain’s 3-point advantage over Clinton as opposed to his 1-point advantage over Obama is not statistically significant, but marks one of the few times when the two races have not had either identical gaps or gaps only a point different.

Barack Obama Volunteer Says ‘Data Entry Error’ Caused Request for Clinton Delegate to Cast Vote for Obama in Texas.
Ann Althouse provides an update on some possibly shady dealings regarding Obama campaign efforts to get Clinton pledged delegates to switch to Obama. She says that she and her son Chris Cohen received the following e-mail from a supposed Obama camp volunteer, in an attempt to explain away the situation:

Attention Superdelegates,
Which presidential candidate is making sure that Florida and Michigan will be sufficiently disenfranchised come the fall election?
Clue: His name rhymes with drama!
=======================================
Obama = $250,000 from Rezko, Rezko gets jail time (I’m sure Obama hopes to be able to pardon his buddy)
=======================================

MoveOn + Obama = A Dream Team?

MC: “If your idol is the nominee, he and the DNC will sorely need their Cash!”
Actually MC, it looks like you’ve completely missed this campaign. Obama has raised incredible record breaking funds from small donors, way past Senator Clinton, way past any Democrat or Republican in history, and he did it with the support of 1 million grassroots donors, not from “Big Boss” big money political dealers. Whether or not you like him or not, it’s a political upset of astounding proportions and a real demonstration of Obama’s political mastery. It’s to the point where McCain is begging Obama to agree to use public campaign funds, because he can’t compete with Obama’s grassroots fundraising force.
By the way, I believe that your kind of sentiment, that we have to put up with economic elites calling the shots because we can’t elect a candidate without them, is the exact kind of cynicism that will doom us in the long run, and it’s where I think the Clinton campaign has ultimately failed. Of course she can’t do anything but believe in it, she’s been indebted to big money ever since she ran for Senate.
It’s incredible that Clinton is the biggest receiver of healthcare lobbyists money when she was once the champion of healthcare reform. A sad tale for America really, but one we can bring to and end.

I am listening to Senator Obama on ABC News. He is wrong.
He will NEVER get enough of Senator Clinton’s supporters to win in November. He is the knee capper. He is dishonest and dangerous to the Democratic party. The party will be gutted if he is the candidate. The general election will be a referendum on the Democratic party. It will be a mass walk out. The WSJ and MSNBC poll released today has been manipulated to mislead the public.
The legacy of November will be bitter and ugly. And the heeling will take years and years. During that time capable, minority candidates of every ethnic background and with stories significantly more compelling than a one term senator from Illinois will be set back all in the name of a huge ego. I wish it were not going to be so.
I have not left the Democratic party. It is leaving me.

ExRepublican:
Considering that Sen. Obama has received $1.18 million from subprime lenders and has taken more campaign contributions from the top ten issuers of subprime loans that attack rings hollow as just words. Sen. Obama has a record of talking about standing up to special interests and then caving to their demands. Hillary has a 35-year record of standing up to special interests and delivering results.
Obama has taken $1,180,103 from the top issuers of subprime loans. [cq.com]
Obama received $266,907 from Lehman. [Cq.com]
Obama received $5395 from GMAC. [Cq.com]
Obama received $150,850 from CS First Boston . [Cq.com]
Obama received $11,250 from Countrywide. [Cq.com]
Obama received $9052 from Washington Mutual. [Cq.com]
Obama received $161,850 from Citigroup. [Cq.com]
Obama received $4600 from CBASS. [Cq.com]
Obama received $170,050 from Morgan Stanley. [Cq.com]
Obama received $1150 from Centex. [Cq.com]
Obama received $351,900 from Goldman Sachs. [Cq.com]
“Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts.”
Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan

tomdavie,
you write: “The numbers dont lie. Obama is unelectable.”
Do you ever check the latest polls at realclearpolitics?
Just have a look. I hope you got a strong heart.

Obama Is Only One To Safely Trust
At this point in campaign ’08, it should be apparent that of the three major candidates, Barack Obama is the one you can safely trust. If you have been watching the news of late, you would realize that Hillary Clinton either has a terrible problem with memory, or is at odds with the truth. It seems to me that to trust Clinton with greater responsibility of the public welfare than she currently has, is nothing short of a departure from sanity. She is in this race for Hillary Clinton, not for you and me.
Barack Obama is the candidate who, after college, went to Chicago’s southside to help Chicago’s urban poor, while Hillary took a high salaried position with a law firm. People make choices, and it has been Obama’s choices that clearly set him apart from Ms. Clinton. He chose and still chooses to remain a congregant of Trinity United Church of Christ. The former pastor, Rev. Wright, made comments, which, when viewed out of context, could seem unsettling. There has been much learned discussion from blacks and whites concerning his remarks. These discussions have shed a greater light of understanding on them. Bottom line, Barack Obama is not the summation of his church, nor the church the summation of Barack Obama.
Click to learn more…
As for Sen. McCain, I have always had a bit of respect for the guy, but the recent reports concerning cozy relationships with a wide range of lobbyists have left a dark cloud over his candidacy. I just wish the media would pay a bit more attention to these relationships, because as I often suspect, “where there’s smoke, there’s fire.” If the majority of voters desire a government less influenced by lobbyists and special interests, and more influenced by the wishes of the majority, then a vote for McCain is a vote to be mired in the past. This “more of the same” includes the standard fear mongering that was seen as successful in 2004. Both McCain and Clinton have played and will continue to play this card in an appeal to this most basic of instincts. If we continue policies based on fear, either real or perceived, I think we will lose opportunities to truly change the direction of this country and change lives for the better.
Barack Obama is setting the bar much higher than we have seen in a long time. He combines a lofty, yet attainable, vision with concrete plans and goals to reach that vision. Clinton and McCain offer no vision, and plans that are more of the same. I don’t know about you, but the last seven-year nightmare tells me that a new vision for this country is long overdue.

Obama’s vision is to bring people together….Yes, he just nearly brought half of Dems together…
Obama’s hope for change: yes the change of owner of W.H. to his name but will be surronding by the same old politicans (Kerry, Ted, etc — SOSO
His plans are simply written by his diligent advisers and his job is just to read them to public…
Anything esle, probably that is all about him…

Do you all understand that she had a low ceiling of electability to begon with…now she has trashed that with her numbers already…but you still are trying to say that she is better than Obama…
you people are crazy and have been duped by these people for 15 years…
do you all realize that if Tsongas or Kerrey did what Hillary is doing now …if they did it (and they could have with similar numbers) back in 1992… and they didn’t have an ex-president/husband campaigning for them 24/7…
Bill would have never been President.

…and beebop that’s right the people on wall street who work for those firms are giving (relatively small contributions compared with the rest of his numbers from the internet) because they know who can solve the financial situation that we are in…
those contributions are predominantly from individuals who have a brain when it comes to economics…
as the New York times has backed Obama’s economic plan…
stop with the spin

West Coast Messenger: First, Michigan voters have a right to vote, even if the party leadership made a mistake. But the Clinton proposal was a sham. Did you read it? And the backers of that proposal were not the people of Michigan – they were the some of the same filthy rich donors who wrote the letter to Pelosi, have funded the Clinton campaigns for years and given literally millions of dollars to the Clinton library. One donor to the Michigan sham-primary, Fred Eychaner, has given over FOUR MILLION DOLLARS to the Clinton Library alone. (Foundation Directory). How can you honestly believe that these people care about working people – here’s an idea – give them a call. Their numbers aren’t hard to find. I did it yesterday. See what kind of people they are.
Right now, Rezko has not been convicted of anything, although he doesn’t look like a great guy. But he sure gives me an opportunity to bring up the trials of the Clinton supporters. It’s hard to know where to start if you want to talk about Clinton politics and convicted felons, but a good place would be Norman Hsu, who gave $850K to Hillary Clinton (SF Gate, 9/07). Bernard Schwatrz, who supported the Michigan sham, has given $750K to the Clinton Library and has contributed to their campaigns for years, was convicted of selling missile secrets to the Chinese (Fine: $14MILLION; NYT 2002). Bill Clinton has been disbarred from ever practicing law in this country. The list goes on and on and on.

MattOhio
did you just say Obama is begging for money?
yeah… sorry but I just gave another $25
and I am like the million or so other people who give often…because I love my country and my party and what they stand for…not the Clintons….they are everything wrong with this party…with politics for that matter.
I think Hill might be the one begging…cause 70% of the country …uh…does NOT LIKE HER.

dl:
Somebody “officiating” this website is on your side … my comment about spinning the “smart” economic guys from Wall Street who watched the housing industry sink into foreclosure being smart when it comes to Senator Obama disappeared … and yet, your comments remain unchallenged!
“Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts.”
Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan

BeBopp: I apologize for the error. However, I am not supporting anyone for a co-presidency who has been disbarred from practicing law – for one year or more. I am not supporting anyone for co-presidency and that is what the Clintons are seeking.
Second, I am not part of the Obama campaign, and am an independent voter.
Third, I do not consider anyone who spoke these words to be either a Democratic or American hero:
“It depends on what the meaning of the words ‘is’ is.” Bill Clinton (BBC 1998)

Boy:
I certainly know how Hillary Clinton feels …. I put up comments, the moderators read into them and take them down …. I don’t swear …. or repost the same four lines …
MARA:
How do you feel about liars? Have a problem with people who lie?

Every time I read comments by Clinton supporters – usually negative and fact-twisting, like their leader – I am motivated. I’ve never donated to a political campaign in my life before this. I have the Clintonites. Everytime their mudslinging negativity and fact-twisting pisses me off, I just send out another $25 to the Obama Campaign. I used to think the Clintons were misunderstood and that the Republican attack dogs were just rabid. I happily voted for Bill twice! Now I can see that dishonesty is their way of life, and personal ambition comes before all else. It’s a let down, but that’s life. I’m proud of the way that Obama acts with dignity and respect for all people – even Hillary. That’s the kind of America I want to see prevail.

BeBop: i do have a problem with liars when they are the president of the united states of america and they are lying to me as an american citizen. especially if they are running for a co-presidency.
(clinton 1/28/98)

Tina D.
It’s funny that you say you would hate to see Rev.Wright in the Lincoln Bedroom because those individuals (you know the ones who were either lobbyists or corporate execs whose bbest interests were served by with the Clintons in office) the ones who wrote that letter to Speaker Pelosi …1 in 4 of them stayed in the Lincoln Bedroom (seriously you can look it up) while Bill was in office.
Those same people who must not have read this (from the Library of Congress):
This is from the Library of Congress… – but it can also be found in “Dictionary of Politics” —
The purpose of the “Hunt Commission” formed in 1980 -which created today’s superdelegate system…was and I quote,
“to streamline the delegate selection process to party conventions and to DEMOCRATIZE the party itself, broadening the base of political participation by increasing input into the process of selecting presidential candidates, to strengthen ACCOUNTABILITY of public officials and strengthen the party itself whose base was weakened by the vigorous activities of the the Republican Party.”
Speaker Pelosi’s situation is entirely correct… the purpose of changes made to the selection process including superdelegates were in the direct goal of “democratizing the party” and holding public officials “Accountable” (and it references “to the members of the party” later in the section)to the party and therefore it’s members/voters.
so really I think this is almost done.

The ‘big DCCC donors’ believe in entitlement programs. For themselves.
Was the letter clumsy? Of course. But then all the Team Clinton attacks on Obama have been clumsy. Birds of a feather….

This is yet another lie that the Obama supporter are doing. Here is the truth:
1. Neither Obama and Clinton satisfies the required delegates to officially win the nomination under the current rule.
2. Both candidates are making their case using some various methods such as big states, small states, popular votes, pledged or super delegates, etc…
3. Superdelegates are not bound by anything but ‘using their independent judgment” to make their choice. That is the current rule.
Pelosi, as a party leader, must show leadership by playing by the rules also. To tell superdelegates that they should not follow the current rule ‘of independent judgment’ and make their vote an automatic vote tying to the popular vote is changing the rule in the middle of the game. That is called cheating or stealing the nomination!
Clinton’s supporters have every right to call Pelosi out for this lack of leadership and underhand tactic.
Let these candidates make their case to everyone, including the super delegates.
Obama and his supporters such as Pelosi or Moveon, have a double standard. They are whining that Clinton is ‘stealing’ their nomination when it is them who is doing it.
It is this type of behaviors such as Pelosi that will certainly motivate Clinton’s supporters to vote for McCain.

I agree with Idaho Potato. I was so disappointed with both Hillary and Bill. I thought they had to get crazy to deal with the Republican attack machine. Democrats should not fight like Republicans with each other.
Their constant drumbeat when they attack around the facts, claim to have support they don’t, or send the ragin’ Cajun after Bill Richardson…I feel like I was standing by a bunch of craven self interest hacks from 1992 to 2000. At some point Democrats have to pull together even when we want to tar and feather the other side.
1 out 5 people have taken this so seriously that the Democratic candidate will lose the disenchanted in the fall. How can that be? We have suffered under Cheney Bush for 8 years. You remember Gore’s Willie Horton playing against Dukakis by George H.W. Bush. What kinds of attacks will the Democratic candidate have to face because of this primary? It sucks.

I guess Nancy Pelosi isn’t bothered at all by being called garlic nose or blamed for crucifying Jesus by Obama’s favorite uncle pastor.

Andy 5:07:30 PM, Just like your candidate you to turn facts upside down.
“And also remember that pledged delegates in most states are not pledged” – Hillary Clinton -
Since when was Hillary’s intension to override the will of the voter a myth?

Hey Tim …
How do you think Obama , my bro. is getting all this financial support?
Do you think Barack is running a community or grassroots organisation?
This is a fullscale corporation with FATCATS.. waiting to cash in just like any other successful campaign. You don’t believe me …just move the curtain a little bit and you will see standing in the corner, Billionaire John Kerry….hmmm..endorsement for free you think.?…E
verybody has their fatcats.

I hear the Gov. of Puerto Rico has been indicted and he is a superdelegate supporting Obama. What else is new. Wasn’t Obama an attorney for a crooked businessman? One knows another. And didn’t Obama wheel and deal while he was attorney. Rezko gave Obama 350,000 to purchase a house on the Southside and gave his campaign 250,000 which Obama still has 100,000 of that money. Now Obama has turned his back on Rezko. That’s what friends are for?

Mac: Pelosi doesn’t care about the Italian’s she is only interested in herself and what people can do for her. Pelosi is a cut throat like Dean and Reid. Hillary should not drop out of the race there are still states to campaign in and the superdelegates should have a say so. Just because Obama won the popular vote and is ahead in delegates does not mean he is the best candidate to run the country. The superdelegates have the right to choose who they think is the best. And I don’t believe Obama can run this country without extensive help from others. After all he uses other president’s speeches and he used the word hope from RFK speech when he was campaigning for president. He is hopeless.

Tom: The letter was the right thing to do to Nancy Pelosi. She should take care of matters the right way like a professional would do. And loud mouth Howard Dean should step aside. He is the cause of the DNC falling apart. Pelosi is afraid of Hillary becoming president because Hillary would have a higher position than her and she doesn’t want that. Dean is an Obama supporter that’s why he doesn’t want MI and FL to seat their delegates because she would be ahead of Obama. Should she drop out. Heck no!! Obama cannot win those states in a general election because he would have won them instead of her. They do not want him as the nominee or they would have voted for him.

The naivete of far left liberals at MoveOn.org is breathtaking. They say they are going to obviate the Democratic fat cats by out-raising money themselves. How stupid! By alienating those fat cats, where do MoveOn.org radicals think that money from those fat cats are going to go? To the Republicans! It is this kind of leftist hubris that is going to sink Obama candidacy in the end.