Mar 28, 2008 8:45pm

Nader to Clinton: Stay In the Race!

Sometimes it’s as if those dudes from The Onion are writing this election.

On Ralph Nader’s blog:

"Senator Clinton:

"Just read where Senator Patrick Leahy is calling on you to drop out of the Presidential race.

"Believe me.

"I know something about this.

"Here’s my advice:

"Don’t listen to people when they tell you not to run anymore.

"That’s just political bigotry.

"Listen to your own inner citizen First Amendment voice.

"This is America…

"Just tell them —

"It’s democracy.

"Get used to it.

"Yours truly,

"Ralph Nader"

No, seriously, this is real.

- jpt

User Comments

Wow, if that isn’t a reverse endorsement, I don’t know what is. Whatever Ralph Nader says to do, any thinking Democrat would do the opposite.
“Here’s my advice, stay in the race and in a few election cycles you can be just like me! A marginalized egocentric hermit whose coterie shrinks every day!”

Posted by: Chris | March 28, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

I think Nader should bow out gracelessly.

Posted by: eliot | March 28, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

Ralph Nader is right about one thing; he never cheated anyone out of anything; the race never should have been that close against GW. He is so very right.
He has hutzpah, you have to admit and good for him!! (sp.?)!!!
Go Hillary!!!!!

Posted by: countallthevotes | March 28, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

1. As a life long hardcore democrat I want all states to be heard.
2. Hillary Clinton should stay in the race!
3. Push back the bully bitch Pelosi.
4. Pick the party nominee at the convention.
5. Email the DNC calling for Howard Dean resignation!

Posted by: Michigan Democratic Voter | March 28, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

Chris — angry words for someone who is meaningless…lol. I love it. Cant wait to cast my swing-state ballot for Nader! The Dems deserve political embarassment. And they are going to get it. LOL. What a joke of a party.

Posted by: tony | March 28, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

Have you noticed it is only people who back Obama that are telling her to get out. They are afraid she is going to win big in PA.
SEND CONTRIBUTIONS TO HILLARY CLINTON! I HAVE.

Posted by: Christine FL | March 28, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

Christine – right! They do not want embarassment. LOL. I think it’s good for them. If obama is the superstar they claim he is, then a little competition won’t hurt. the fact that the superdelegates have not all run to him means they are hoping clinton makes a comeback…or they know that upsetting her supporters means TROUBLE. but the obambi crowd doesnt get it.

Posted by: tony | March 28, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

Tony, even if I don’t like the next democratic nominee, I would not vote for that republican Cyborg. If you want to embarrass our party go ahead, you’ll just extend the war & destroy the economy. You’re a very patriotic American.

Posted by: Oretega M | March 28, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

You Obama people thing thar everyone should just bow out of the race. Hell yes everyone McCain,Hillary,Ralph should all bow out and let Obama have everything. Obama is weak and the free ride is over! Obama needs to stop whinning about everything and stop acting like a spoiled brat. Try and be a man as you are in the big league now!

Posted by: freedom20082009 | March 28, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

Ortega — LOL> Thanks for the patriotism lecture. Sometimes it’s best to stand up for deeper principles. Rather than support a party full of self-righteous hypocrites, I will vote against them. They totally deserve it. Every four years, these morons nominate a loser….except for Clinton twice. Lose lose lose lose. Nothing new. Supporting the losing Dems is not patriotic. It’s suicidal.

Posted by: tony | March 28, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

Nobody listens to Nader anymore. He had his 15 minutes.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 28, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

Well, one thing about Nader is that he is the real thing in that he is the only non-corporate candidate of the bunch. I think Nader is sincere in saying Hillary should stay in if she so chooses, I think Nader can appreciate the fact that she’s running against Obama, the media and the elitist and the far left of the Democratic party.
I have no doubt Nader would be happy to see some of the Clinton camp cast their vote for him too, so he’s probably doing a little shmoozing. I certainly don’t buy into the idea that Nader would be a spoiler this election. I totally agree with Nader that given today’s economy and the mess we have with Iraq that if this election isn’t a slam dunk for the Democrats, then the Democrats have bigger problems than Nader. But as usual, we can always count on the Democrats to put out as their nominee the least electable of the bunch and we have those two running right now. We have Clinton and her baggage and Obama now with the Wright baggage and with almost zip in foreign policy experience going up against a moderate, experienced McCain. If the Democrats lose this election than they deserve to for the stupid choices they make. I don’t think the problem though is Obama and Clinton but rather I think thing we need to oust the Kennedys, Kerrys, Daschles, Pelosi’s – they’ve too much influence for too long and Pelosi has been a joke.

Posted by: alpaig | March 28, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

What the Obama endorsers are saying is, “Voters of the 10 remaining primaries/states, we do not CARE to hear your opinion. Voters of Michigan & Florida, your votes do not matter. We want Obama. Dean/Pelosi want Obama. Wall Street wants Obama. We do not care what YOU want. Therefore, sit down, shut up and don’t forget to vote Democrat!”
Seriously, how is this UGLY tactic employed by Obama endorsers any different than BUSH’s arrogance & disregard for the American voice?
WE, THE PEOPLE, SHOULD DECIDE. NOT THE OBAMA ENDORSERS! It’s really OUTRAGEOUS when you think of it. Hillary Clinton in 2008. Ahead by 12 points in Pennsylvania!
Thanks Nader! A man who remembers what the word DEMOCRACY means!

Posted by: M. Santos | March 28, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

Harko – everyone knows that politicians lie. Obama said he would take public financing if his opponent won. OOOPs. Obama said that his team never met the Canadians. Oooops. Obama said that he had already disclosed all of his ties to Rezko. Ooops. So, I guess he is just like Nader and the rest. Ooops. No more Obama Lama. Now he’s just a man.

Posted by: tony | March 28, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

There’s an endorsement for ya! He’s probably looking for the 28% of you. I’ve been telling you to vote for the guy.

Posted by: Thinking | March 28, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

Harko- He hasn’t had too much good to say about Obama either.

Posted by: alpaig | March 28, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

Go Hillary.
Yeah, right.

Posted by: For Hillary | March 28, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

Alpaig – excellent analysis. The Dems deserve what they get. Another loss. Another four-years of the GOP. They may be bigots, but they know how to run a party. The Dems are closeted bigots and stink at running a party. No redeeming qualities whatsoever.

Posted by: tony | March 28, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

How nice of Ralph!
What would his motive be?
“She is a political coward,” Nader said about Hillary last year. “She goes around pandering to powerful interest groups on the one hand and flattering general audiences on the other. She doesn’t even have the minimal political fortitude of her husband.”

Posted by: Petra | March 28, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

Petra – like everyone else in politics — he wants votes. He knows that Clinton has some angry liberals who would rather support him than McCain. I predict he will get a surge – especially in Florida and Michigan. LOL. Too rich to be true! The losing Dems lose again! Better than any soap opera.

Posted by: tony | March 28, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

Nader had some unkind words for Al Gore, too. He doesn’t have to like Clinton to urge that she not succumb to the pressure of the party’s “leadership” — which won’t be its leadership a year from now, I’ll wager.

Posted by: shellray | March 28, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

Regardless of whether Ralph Nader ever has a realistic chance to be President, I have to give him credit for understanding democracy better than the likes of Pelosi, Richardson, Leahy, or Casey.
The DNC is dominated by political bigots who refuse to take responsibility for the mess they have created. Howard Dean, Donna Brazille, and the rest of the entire gang of entrenched liberals should resign immediately.
Voters in all states, including Michigan and Florida, and their delegates to the convention deserve to be heard. To do any less is to lower the political process of the United States Democratic party to that of a third world country.
The DNC thugs can ratchet up the rhetoric and whine all they want about the woes of the party. Voters deserve and demand the right to choose the candidate.

Posted by: Jayhawk | March 28, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

Shellray — to Obamakins, they have to find something to deal with the reality that Clinton’s supporters are defecting. So they are trying to get us by saying Nader doesnt like Clinton. Oh well, neither does Obambi and team of web-cronies and white boys in Congress. So let’s see…..
I’m voting for Clinton. If she’s not on the ballot – Nader! Stop Obama!

Posted by: tony | March 28, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

I love Hillary Clinton, but this is just too funny and crazy. Especially coming from a guy who she didnt want entering the race.

Posted by: Joan | March 28, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

If nothing else…this might make Gore step in because he likes Ralphy boy so much.
Tony …yeah …you are about as smart as the people who voted for Nader last time…they got Bush…war…deficit…home foreclosure…two more conservative judges… what else… a huge increase in people joining the terrorists movement and our overall drop in “likeability” anywhere in the world.
Not that McCain is as bad as Bush but… the people who voted for Nader were well you decide… and from your statements…you seem in the same league.

Posted by: dl | March 28, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

Here’s from a Ralph Nader letter to his supporters (do they exist?) in which we find a reflection on ‘Senator Clinton’ (couldn’t he at least have written ‘dear’) as well. The letter was posted in a forum on the Democratic Underground site.
“If Hillary Clinton is nominated in 2008 by the Democrats to run for president, they will support her.
They will support her even though she is a corporate Democrat who opposes us on the war in Iraq, on real universal health insurance, on the swollen, wasteful military and corporate welfare budgets, on a national living wage – on all the issues we care about.
They will abandon their principles, their constituents, and the lessons of history – and support her.”
What I like so much about all this: Ralph Nader had it WRONG. Hillary will, to his utter amazement, NOT be the nominee. Why is this so funny? Ralph can’t stand to be proven wrong in his analysis of American politics. And therefore Obama has already beaten Nader as well: he has made, by being the Dem insurmountable frontrunner, a fairly big fool of Ralph Nader. Thank you, Barack!

Posted by: Harko | March 28, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

Everytime you all say Obama can’t win the GE I wonder who you people are?
Because if your for Sen Clinton …have you seen her dropping numbers …no one with numbers of likeability that low gets elected…nobody.
and if your for McCain… well that’s a joke.

Posted by: dl | March 28, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

DL – I campaigned against Nader. LOL. Gore is not Obama. So stop the comparison. The Dems deserve to lose this time. Every year they make the dumbest decisions, but then expect reasonable people to back them. Sorry – your parade of horribles is just fear tactics. I care about the Court, the environment, civil rights, and many other progressive issues. The Dems do not care about these things. They just care about the appearance of equality. Demanding a woman to drop out when she is running so well is just a statement of evil to me. Sorry – this party is a bunch of whining hypocrites. McCain will slaughter Obama with or without Nader.

Posted by: tony | March 28, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

The Obama supporters are just annoying strong Hillary supporters. Currently 28% of Hillary supporters will vote for McCain, if OBama supporters keep annoying Hillary supporters the percentage of them voting for McCain is only going to increase.
So keep annoying us you Obama suckers. Lets see how you will win with out us…

Posted by: GS | March 28, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

Way to go Tony waste your vote and hand it to the Rep….good goin’

Posted by: honest | March 28, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

Honest:
I am not wasting my vote because I do not want Obama to be president. I value my own opinion, not Obambi’s. Sorry, he will not get my vote. That’s final. Dem of 40 years. Will not vote for him unless at gunpoint.

Posted by: tony | March 28, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

GS: apparently they think we are going to just instantly start worshipping him and chanting “yes we can.” lol…

Posted by: tony | March 28, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

A vote Against Obama is a Vote for America
Go Hillary

Posted by: seah | March 28, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

As a nineteen year old, I wouldn’t vote McCain to spite my party…i just wouldn’t vote.
i don’t want president obama sending me a check to jump start the economy.

Posted by: John | March 28, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

I’ve always wondered if Michigan and Florida had came in big for Obama…. would they be kept on the sidelines? Wouldn’t the failing leadership at the DNC(Dean) ignore the rules for Obama’s sake?

Posted by: John | March 28, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

Obama is trying his same Chicago tactics..eliminate everyone in a race but himself then have the race handed to him. Go away Obama you smell like a cheater and liar
Hillary ’08!!

Posted by: Vickie | March 28, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

People have a right to run, they also have a right to destroy their party. All the better, John McCain and the bomb Iran neo-Cons won’t mind a bit. They may even give Hilliary a cabinet position. Guess we know who Hilliary is really looking out for after all…

Posted by: cba | March 28, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

The Obama smugness and vile, hateful online community as opened my eyes. If Clinton does not win the nomination I will vote for Nader. He makes a hell of a lot more sense than Obama or McCain. My eyes have been opened to how biased the media really is about everything, print and TV. Nader is more honest than all than candidates combined. I can see now why he has not given up and keeps fighting. I will definitely go for him in the GE if Clinton in not on the ticket.

Posted by: lightning | March 28, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

CBA — keep it up. 28 percent and growing stronger! The defectors will keep Obambi out of the White House. LOL. The more you go after Clinton, the more her supporters become committed to the idea. But I guess that sugar-high from the Kool-Aid doesnt permit reasoned thinking.

Posted by: tony | March 28, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

obamaites keep telling us how horrible we’d be if we vote for mccain. guess what, folks, we think we’d be horrible if we voted for obama. we won’t. 28% is just the beginning.
obama and dean and all the rest think, or pretend to think, that we’ll come around to their side later. they’re wrong. what they’ve done is take lifelong dems and turn them into repub voters this year.
those with a memory know that the same thing happened with reagan. and many, if not most, of the folks who switched in 1980 never came back. some came back for clinton, but will leave again if obama is nominated.
we are tired of having the far left, radical, wing of our party push their nominee on us and expect us to just go along. no more. the end.

Posted by: so saddened | March 28, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

I’m sorry, but there is no why obama will beat mccain….the republicans are dying for him to be up against obama, so the ultra conservatives can loop the reverend tapes while mccain touts his patriotism.

Posted by: John | March 28, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

I am a loyal democrat of 36 years, never voted republican. however, i am so sickened by the smug,hateful attitudes of the bho supporters, that i will not simply not vote come november, i will vote for mccain to shut bho and supporters up. my dislike for bho far exceeds my ability to stomach mccain for 4 years…then hillary will be back, and bho long gone!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: fedup | March 28, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

@John:
Senator Obama could not win Michigan. Neither could Edwards or most democratic candidates – their names were not on the ballot. I understand your point that you feel Senator Obama is receiving preferential treatment from the DNC, but here in Michigan we all knew what was going on. It was stated over and over that the votes wouldn’t count but the state did this anyway. I remember some of the bigger democrats here saying that somehow they believed the delegates would be seated at the convention in spite of all of DNC rules.
Night after night, this comes up and is used as some sort of rallying cry for a point that I’m missing. Odds are that the state would have split between Clinton & Obama (and maybe Clinton wins in a relatively narrow margin). Nobody here wants to waste money we don’t have to rerun an election whose outcome won’t change things. We know the rules in Michigan and we play by the rules – the people complaining most vociferously about this are not in this state.

Posted by: MIguy | March 28, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

nader
disenfranchising
ultra liberal democratic nominee
sounds like a REPUBLICAN VICTORY.

Posted by: Don | March 28, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton is far better qualified to be the president of our country than any other candidate; Senator Barak Obama or Sen. McCain. Mrs. Clinton’s deep grasp of issues and policies makes her far more ready to take on the presidency than Mr. Obama and we’ve tried all what Sen. McCain prescribes, they are more or less same failed policies and solutions of George W. Bush and the Republicans. Mr. McCain is really an older, a fuzzier and more of a tempestuous version of Mr. Bush. While we spend on so much on foolish political misadventures overseas, United States is becoming a third world country domestically. Our economy is in shambles, dollar has declined so badly has never been before, lost our power and prestige around the world. US is crying out for a wise and prudent domestic and foreign policy. For example in infant mortality US is 40th in the world, our longevity is 41 in the world, not to mention, education, healthcare, infrastructure, and by all the universal standards of measurements, like it or not United States is quickly becoming a part of the third world. Spending money on the military cannot save us from the rapid decline. All you have to do is to take drive across the border to Canada to witness how badly American standards have deteriorated. US is increasingly becoming more like Mexico than Canada. Mr. McCain’s plan to continue the same ill conceived Bush-Republican policies such as to keep the war going in Iraq and make the tax cuts for the rich permanent would guarantee the further decline of American power, prestige and prosperity. Look, we don’t need Oprahsque wonderland phantasmagoria, feel good stuff that media people loves and stuff that Sen. Obama is all about. This was the same stuff that Sen. Obama’s carbon copy Massachusetts Governor Duval Patrick ran on and he had the same campaign manager David Axelrod. Find out what’s going on in Massachusetts right now, talking about failed policies! We need Hillary Clinton more than ever to be our president because she’s more experienced and competent than both of the men running. She will end this Republican nightmare; put our country back on track and restore our lost power and prosperity, just like Bill Clinton did─ believe me she’ll do even a better job than him. I think Chelsey is right-on!

Posted by: charleschaplin | March 28, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

It’s better late than never. Finally, Nader spoke as a voters’ advocate.

Posted by: esvida | March 28, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

Not all independents are for Obama. This one is definitely for Clinton then for McCain.

Posted by: esvida | March 28, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

as predicted, the obamaites are out in full force telling us that we’re terrible people for voting mccain instead of obama. too bad, so sad. we beg to differ.
btw, there’s another article about obama’s plans for raising income taxes, capital gains taxes, social security taxes, etc. those of you who fool yourselves (with lots of help from obama and the dnc, of course) into thinking he can make up for our votes by getting repub votes might want to rethink that. i’ve been a dem all my very long adult life and i’ve NEVER seen large numbers of repubs say oh yeah we like tax increases.

Posted by: so saddened | March 28, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

The system is the way it is, if anyone is to be blamed both camps going for the power of the party must share the responsibility. Both agreed to the DNC rules. If they didn’t like it, they should have said something before it was approved. Both camps wanted to keep FL and MI in line. Short of having a national primary, which neither the Republicans or Democrats want, the states are kept in line to prevent the primary season from being to long; each state wanting to move early to be more relevant. Voter fatigue does set in, peaking too early does happen.

Posted by: Thinking | March 28, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

Hi Jenny,
Please do not disappoint, I am truely democrate but I rather vote for McCain over Obama because I could not be a friend of a guy who hates and blames his country. If I vote for Obama, I feel I am stupid, Sorry.
Thank you,

Posted by: Kevin P | March 28, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

@ Mi Guy
it’s supposed to get Democrats excited in a state that always goes Republican in November.
I think it just gives people who lose the popular vote even more delegates than they deserve.

Posted by: John | March 28, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

MIguy, i’m no expert either. nor am i in the 1-5% group. and to date i haven’t been a repub. but dean, pelosi, obama, et al are increasing the odds that i will be. re taxes, seems that repubs generally and overwhelmingly vote against tax increasers in presidential elections, regardless of economic category. just my observation….
thanks again for the intelligent, non-name-calling discussion.

Posted by: so saddened | March 28, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

Nader has more sense and he is lloking for the good of America. He thinks Obama could not win and the p[eople now are waking up to vote for a landslide in favor of Hillary. so.. Hillary supporters.. tell everyone that you all neeed to motivate more insupporting Hillary. This is a cause now that everyone of us must fight . This campaign is to protect the White House from a phony pretender and for the welfare of the Americans.

Posted by: asd | March 28, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

@ Thinking
Partial Abortions?
Read what it is before you condemn Hillary for being against it.
I’m pro-choice for women, pro-life if i would be a woman, but i would never support Partial Abortions.

Posted by: John | March 29, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

@ thinking…
excuse me, I thought you were against Hillary for being against partial abortions.

Posted by: John | March 29, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

My God… some Hillary supporters (or Reps in disguise) are acting weirder and weirder here.
Folks, if you like it or not, Obama is the front runner in the Dem campaign. Blame the millions who voted for him if you need to blame someone (but why would you?).
Obama is not the front runner because FA and MI don’t count; if you add both states to the total results (even while BO was not on the MI ballot), Obama is STILL the frontruner, leading both in the delegate count and the popular vote.
So what’s the problem? Don’t you accept democracy? Is that it? The majority of Dem voters prefers Obama. Every contest has winners and losers, and yes, Hillary will be a loser in this contest. There’s no one to blame for this, there is no blame. Obama has been able to convince more people than Hillary that he is the best Dem candidate for the Presidency.
That’s all there’s to it, really. A big disappointment no doubt for Hillary supporters, but such is life and that’s how it is.

Posted by: deirdre | March 29, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

John
My point is she is not against partial birt abortion.
You read!

Posted by: Thinking | March 29, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

@so saddened:
I think we both agree that it will be an interesting general election. If I am reading your post correctly, you are pointing out that the premise that Senator Obama will bring republicans “into the fold” is false. I would agree with you there too. Ultimately, the general election will be decided by those Americans who choose to vote. If only half the eligible population is voting, it becomes very difficult to predict who will be the winner. I don’t pay much attention to polls in general, but Senators Obama and Clinton seem to be doing well against Senator McCain in spite of all the bashing they are giving each other.

Posted by: MIguy | March 29, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

One thing to note is that Hillary is a very strong she sure is not letting any belly aching cry baby men tell her what to do, she is fighting for every last vote.
So there loser men can cry on every show that gives them an air as to what is right for the democrat party, and cry that she needs to support Obama that will never happen, she is not dropping out and she is taking the fight to Obama weather he wants it or not.
So let them spend their days preaching to the public that now is the time for her to drop out, but she is not a weak woman and she will decide what is best for her.

Posted by: SJ | March 29, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

John,
I am glad we understand one another.
It is deplorable, but it seems that all politicians give lip service Democratic and Republican

Posted by: Thinking | March 29, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

Mary,
Please read the posts
Thanks

Posted by: Thinking | March 29, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

my advice for Pennsylvania voters is:
Voter for the candidate, who you think, based on whatever, will repair OUR economy.
your decision will affect all of us and it may also decide if Florida and Michigan have a revote.

Posted by: John | March 29, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

would you really want someone who wants to be president to cave into these pleas, and pressure?

Posted by: fedup | March 29, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

@Mary:
Sorry, didn’t get your point at first – I get it now. I agree, it’s up to Senator Clinton and Senator Obama to decide if they want to quit. I suppose if I were running and still thought I had a chance I would keep it going as long as the support was still there. I think a lot of this is driven by the media. It’s pretty clear Senator Clinton will win PA – if it’s a big victory (20 points), then I think that a lot of the people telling her to drop out will feel embarrassed. If it’s fairly close (5 points or less), I think the chorus will grow louder. But I don’t see this ending before the last vote is counted in Puerto Rico.
Senator Obama said today this is like watching a good movie that has gone on for 30 minutes longer than you thought. Actually, to me it’s like the last 30 seconds in a tight basketball game. It’s agonizing and painful and exciting to watch, but the game isn’t over and strange things happen. (this is my 2nd march madness analogy of the night for those keeping score at home..)

Posted by: MIguy | March 29, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

fedup, know what you mean. i’ve voted for mcgovern, dukakis, mondale, carter, bill clinton, gore, and kerry (have i forgotten any? every dem 1972 on). voting repub does not come easily.
however, when i voted for many of those earlier dems, even though i knew they weren’t spectacular candidates, and i knew they were all just politicians so far from perfect, i never had the gnawing doubts i have with regard to obama. i could – maybe – get over the personality characteristics i find so unpleasant – the arrogance, rudeness, misogyny, etc., as well as the differences of opinion on policy. but the lying is not just the typical political lying – it’s more fundamental and disturbing. then there’s the blatant abuse of racial issues to paint those who disagree with him as racist, the horrendous level of divisiveness, and the overt use of hillary-hating media types for his own purposes, no matter the cost to the party or the country. add to that the hate spewed by his supporters all over the internet, plus the “irregularities” (to put it kindly) in the caucuses (in texas, obama supporters grabbed boxes of hillary supporters’ sign in sheets and “lost” them, bullied hillary supporters, etc., plus out-of-staters came in and commandeered some of the caucus sites) – i firmly believe this was a well-planned and organized campaign tactic. there is just too much. and i believe there is much more to come. and that’s not even going into the totally inexperienced and unprepared issue. just too much.

Posted by: so saddened | March 29, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am

Oh and I think John McCain can convince people to stay in Iraq, if he says Bush messed up what is going in Iraq, because McCain is a war hero and if says he has a winning strategy will Americans doubt him?
He can be called a Harry Truman.

Posted by: John | March 29, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am

Abortion again:
On “partial-birth” abortion
As a senator, Clinton voted in 2003 against a bill than banned a late-term abortion procedure that opponents call “partial-birth” abortion.
The National Right to Life Committee, which opposes abortion rights, said Clinton never voted with the group’s interests in 2005 and 2006. Planned Parenthood, which supports abortion rights, said Clinton voted 100% of the time with the group’s interests in 2006.
http://asp.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/issues.aspx?i=9&c=2On “partial-birth” abortion

Posted by: Thinking | March 29, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am

The position that Republicans have used to pound Democrats is raising taxes. Or, perhaps the young and easily swayed Obamites do not remember the fate of Dukakis.
Any presidential candidate that promotes a tax increase on an economy that is already in recession is doomed before the general election is ever held.
Stay in the race, Senator Clinton. We cannot afford the tax increases of an Obama regime.

Posted by: Jayhawk | March 29, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am

MIguy, i’ve seen the polls too. but elections aren’t national, despite the national polling. the state-by-state electoral college analyses i’ve seen don’t look good for obama, which makes sense when one considers the characteristics of his supporters and applies those characteristics state by state.
also, polls in the spring are meaningless. in the spring of 04, kerry was way up – we know how that turned out.
it will indeed be interesting to follow.

Posted by: so saddened | March 29, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

@John:
It’s really become impossible to do a revote in Michigan. No time, no money, no political will here to do so.
Moreover, any primary-style revote would not allow democrats who voted in the GOP primary to revote. And, worse, republicans who didn’t vote in the GOP primary could vote in the revote. It would not come across as fair. Likewise, a caucus could be done (if money was there) but some believe this would favor Senator Obama. Honestly, those of us here aren’t very bothered by this – we knew the rules and we voted. We are not asking other states to revote their elections. So save the money wasted splitting the vote here and use it for the general election; or donate it to the state to pay salaries for firemen and policemen.
I’ve noted on other occasions that Michigan has been a blue state since 1992. Our economy is really in shambles and the party of the sitting president will lose this year. If it were John Kerry, we’d be a red state. With George Bush, it will be a blue state.

Posted by: MIguy | March 29, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am

Obama has lost his bragging rights that he can take Independents’ votes from John McCain. His campaign has disenfranchised voters, his supporters have marginzalized other main stream democrats and Obama’s affilliation with Wright does not sit well with moderates.

Posted by: felicia | March 29, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

Miguy & Others,
What annoys me is that Hillary won the big states, but EVERYONE in the media says, “oh it is no big deal a Democrat always wins those states in November.”
Ya, but would you say the same thing for Hillary if Obama won those states?

Posted by: John | March 29, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am

I think if Obama wins this nomination because of an early departure forced upon Clinton by party elders, I think Clinton is going to pack up her belongings, head out West to California, establish residency in the 8th congressional district, run against Pelosi in the next congressional race in 2010 and win (maybe there is still time to do it this year)!

Posted by: LOM | March 29, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

Mary – I think you are getting duped by the rightwing on the abortion issue. The Partial Birth law was vetoed by B. Clinton twice and the Supreme Court invalidated a Kansas version of the law that was virtually identical. O’Connor left the Court and was replaced by Alito; Rehnquist by Roberts. The Court upheld the Congressional version that Bush signed in to law. The law bans the partial birth procedure under certain circumstances — not all! The court had previously held that it was unconstitutional because it didn’t have an exception to protect the mother’s health. This is ridiculous and unsafe to women. Anyway, I am pretty sure both Clinton and Obama oppose this legislation as written.

Posted by: tony | March 29, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

No argument that polls this time of year are not good predictors of the fall outcome. I think the pollsters are having fun trying to pick apart the democratic party. But I also believe that a gracious concession speech by either candidate at the convention will be the antidote for the venom of the nominating process. I think that Democrats agree on so much this year, more than I can remember in a while, that this will take hold. It will be a new direction for this country, thankfully.
@Jayhawk: KU v Davidson? Who had that in their bracket?

Posted by: MIguy | March 29, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

Pelosi doesn’t want Hillary to be the first female president because that will overshadow pelosi’s own history as being the first female speaker of the house.
Pelosi is letting out her claws.

Posted by: John | March 29, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

MiGuy — no. If Hillary is such the liar and evil woman Obama supporters claim she is, why should we accept her unity with obambi?

Posted by: tony | March 29, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

Nader may no longer likeable or credible but he certainly is right regarding this issue. Based on caucuses vs primary elections alone, HRC has a right to question legitimacy of current situation. I caucused.
I replied below to a poster apparently knowing nothing of a caucus chiming in re what Obama had won.
“Friction” posted this questioning statement:
HRC claims she won Texas… but she only won the Primaries… the Caucuses are projected to go to Obama which would result in an overall Delegate advantage to him. The HRC campaign is making voting inconsistency claims in the counting of the Caucus votes to delay the impact of HRC losing Texas. Really … how long does it take to count the Caucus votes when they number one tenth or less of the Primary votes?
Reply:
6000 people are expected to participate in a “convention” tomorrow in El Paso county alone. Do not know the numbers for rest of Tx.
It has been an absolute mess. State Dem. party “quit” counting results weeks ago. will try to sort out things at “conventions”.
“Credentials committee” had so many complaints of irregularities they “gave up”, now call for each faction to question credentials of other at convention.
If one has not participated in a caucus, then they should not try to comment on the validity or non-validity of such.
I participated as an HRC supporter, had to vote, then go back that night to caucus. There is absolutely nothing democratic about a caucus. A caucus defies every premise of “one person – one vote. A caucus is merely and tragically “voter suppression” overseen by the Democratic party, supposedly giving it legitimacy.
I state this as a winner not a loser numbers-wise, my precinct had 15 delegates, we HRC supporters won 10, Obama’s 5. Same pattern throughout the county.
Yet I came away feeling like a loser Democracy wise, because of the process, and those it excludes for one reason or another. I would merely like to vote once, go home, watch the returns, and feel like every vote mattered equally. Mine and yours, regardless of our choices.
Every American should be able to do just that. With no party interference!

Posted by: MC | March 29, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am

Pelosi probably doesn’t want to become outranked by another woman. What she fails to recognize is that we are not rooting for cheerleader squad captain, we are trying to win back the White House!

Posted by: LOM | March 29, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am

Tony & Thinking:
I think Tony what we are trying to say, is that I understand the danger of a mother in delivering a late-term baby if her life is endanger; but there are woman whom have waited to the 4th or 5th month (and even sixth month pregnancy) and want to abort.
These mother’s lives are not endanger, but the mothers do not want these babies to live.
That is the great sadness and terrible procedure for these babies.

Posted by: mary | March 29, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am

Clinton/Nader 08 will take it all!

Posted by: Doc J | March 29, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am

Tony,
Please. I hardly see how holding a baby in the birth canal and drilling out it’s head is protecting the mother’s life. I seen 6 of my children being born and trust me two more pushes, and the child is out.
Seems to me that holding the baby in is more of a danger to the mother than giving the birth. It crap as an exuse. It just some more of that political double talk.
Some election we get to choose between folks who would have us blow up half the world and those who kill off our young.
Now their is a problem

Posted by: Thinking | March 29, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am

MIguy, you have a very positive attitude and i’m sure it serves you very well in life. it makes me happy to communicate with you.
however, i do not share your opinion that a nice concession speech will bring us all together. i know that hillary has been graciously saying that we should all support whoever the nominee is. and in past years, i’ve been one of those who supported the dem nominee even when he (always a he) was not the one i preferred. (and no, i’m not saying hillary should get votes because she’s a woman – i firmly believe she’s far superior to either of the other candidates).
this year, however, for the reasons discussed in my many posts, i cannot and will not support obama. and no lovely speeches can change that. i actually find that very disappointing, because i so looked forward to his one day being a candidate when i saw his 2004 speech. but the more i get to know of him, the more i am certain he is wrong for the country. and i firmly believe that mccain is preferable.

Posted by: so saddened | March 29, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am

Thinking:
Very well said!!!!!!

Posted by: mary | March 29, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am

@tony:
I’m sure some voters will be so turned off by the supporters of the opposite candidate that they won’t accept the victor, whoever that may end up being. It is everyone’s prerogative to vote in the manner they want. However, I think most rank and file democrats will vote democrat. Just my opinion and I could be wrong, but rancorous nomination processes have occurred before and the party somehow survives.

Posted by: MIguy | March 29, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am

doc j, now that would be a “dream” ticket!!!

Posted by: fedup | March 29, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

miguy,
who are you supporting?

Posted by: John | March 29, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

Obama started this divisiveness when he said that not all his supporters will support Clinton should she win the nomination. This was stated out of sheer arrogance and smugness. If this is the new poster boy for the DNC, then good riddance.

Posted by: echo | March 29, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

Mary,
I am happy we have come to some conclusion on this issue. I have been a life long Democrate at heart, but have voted Republican in the past over this issue, and I have come to relize that neither party cares. It is all about votes and who they think they can pander to.
My only hope is to elect the best possible candidate, closest to my political views, and then try and work the system on the abortion issue.
Personaly I don’t think I can do it, but I do not know what else to do.

Posted by: Thinking | March 29, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am

@so saddened:
Thank you for the kind words. Good for you for voting and voting your conscience in the fall. Ultimately, whoever wins (Democrat/Republican/Nader) will need our support to tackle the real issues. So, this is politics and everyone fights the good fight, but at the end of the day the country needs to move forward and I hope the people do not become so embittered that we lose sight of the fact that we are really one nation and Americans. When we demonize our politicians we ultimately demonize ourselves. As awful as 9/11 was, there was that moment when I think we all felt as one people. I don’t ever want to see 9/11 again, but those moments afterward convinced me that this country is a great nation and we are more alike than we sometimes admit.

Posted by: MIguy | March 29, 2008, 1:14 am 1:14 am

MIguy, very nice ending to my evening. off to bed for me. good night.

Posted by: so saddened | March 29, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am

@John: the winner of course! whoever that ends up being! :)
I think we all have a preference, but in the grand scheme of things the differences we try and find in our candidates tend to be trivial in my opinion. The President does not really have as much power as we ascribe; although a shepherd may lead, it is up to the sheep to follow.

Posted by: MIguy | March 29, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am

Goodnight so saddened and I will follow that lead as well. Thanks for the interesting and enlightening discussion.

Posted by: MIguy | March 29, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am

Bottom line I think Hillary has more negatives then Obama, ( my personal view); might be from watching her for years, and seeing the shifts and political maneuverings.
Whatever happens I must support the democratic candidate. I hope it to be Obama, but if not then Hillary.
I am really fedup with hearing if not Hillary then McCain.

Posted by: Thinking | March 29, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am

In electoral college terms…..
Alaska < Rhode Island
Alaska is less than Rhode Island

Posted by: John | March 29, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am

Mary,
I am not devote, but was raised Catholic. I understand your position, and may God help us both.
I think it is best to be honest in these situations, it is the only way to change things.
Who knows, Mary, this is only the primary, McCain may pull it off anyway.
Probably would not be all that bad, he maybe malleable

Posted by: Thinking | March 29, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am

I have been a voting Democrat for 46 years. I have never witnessed the party turn on itself like this. Or should I say turn on “me” like this.
This stance by the DNC so-called “elders” has become personal for me. It is in no way Democracy nor Democratic. I have never once heard of a part-primary, semi-primary, or such.
I found the book “Burning at the Grassroots: Inside the Dean Machine”, by Dana Duncan and read it. It stunned me, but certainly explained what has been happening.
I had felt that “the far-left” of the Democratic” party was becoming a mirror image of the “far-right Republicans. Yet, I had no idea who they were, where they came from, nor why.
Burning at the Grassroots became the best explanation I have found. What it exposes reads like a Karl Rove playbook, except that it is a Dean/MoveOn playbook.
It exposes everything from caucus strategy(even to legitimately stealing votes, if such could be legitimate), “schmoozing” the press, web attacks, “entrancing” youths, “neutralizing opposition”, even something called the “tar baby effect” ie creating a “strawman” argument against your opponent, hypothetically “race-baiting, and much more.
It reads exactly like a script for all that has transpired. Based on such tactics, this race should be over and Obama the winner. The only thing that has thwarted such are inured HRC supporters.
When HRC is forced out, I go also. I will gladly leave the Democratic party because it is no longer the party I have known, supported, and loved.
It is now the party of Dean and MoveOn. They will never miss me, but they may miss my vote, donations, and influence. Maybe not!

Posted by: MC | March 29, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am

MC
You just figuring this stuff out?
The whole Democratic Party is behind it.
You can’t single out one member, they all play the game, split the vote, try different strategies, You thought this whole process was democratic? Ha. The joke is on you. From the primary through the GE Republican and Democrat. the process is the same maximize my support, minimize my opponents.

Posted by: Thinking | March 29, 2008, 1:43 am 1:43 am

Mary,
Goodnight.

Posted by: Thinking | March 29, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am

Not fooled, Thinking! Never been naive about politics.
Just did not know “far-left existed in such numbers and were so organized. Had no idea where they came from, nor how they rose so Quickly. 4 yrs is a short time to build such a devious group.
Search the Duncan book, I think it will surprise anyone. Cetainly “sealed the deal for me”. Do not want to be a part of conspiracies left or right.
Not my style. So I am gone!

Posted by: MC | March 29, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am

I am going to guarantee you all this. The republican media is going to make a HUGE issue out of the fact the Liberal media BRAINWASHED Obama into the nomination.
This is a huge , powerfull swift boat. Its going to make the Clinton supporters WELL AWARE of the fact their candidate was literally BEATEN DOWN in the media where she couldnt win the nomination.
So no, the story with the clinton democrats does NOT end with Clinton and Obama making out on stage at the convention.
Obama in unelectable for several reasons.
-the Wright Scandal and tapes
-the media BIAS that got him the nomination in the first place

Posted by: tomdavie | March 29, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am

MC,
From my point of view Hillary is part of the far left, along with Obama. Hillary has made some speeches that move her to the right some, and voted for some issues that she knew wouldn’t pass but makes her look like she is a centrist
But it is not the case so we have a choice far left or far right, the whole damn political process is out of the hands of the moderates.
This is why we are polarized in this nation. Both Parties are duping us we need to wake up to the fact that we really have no choice in these elections. Well they are correct in one sense, there are stark differences, but do you really like either one?

Posted by: Thinking | March 29, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am

Thinking, I do have one choice in this election. Not the one I prefer, but one that no one can take from me.
As I stated further back, I can with-hold my vote. Have clean hands, a clear conscience, and feel that while I was basically robbed. I “kept my Valueables”(my vote and my integrity)!

Posted by: MC | March 29, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am

“When HRC is forced out, I go also. I will gladly leave the Democratic party because it is no longer the party I have known, supported, and loved.
It is now the party of Dean and MoveOn. They will never miss me, but they may miss my vote, donations, and influence. Maybe not!”
Count me in. I will aso leave the Democratic party if Clinton is forced out or does not run for President in the general election.
I am from FL and a month ago, I became a US citizen and immediately registered as a Democrat. Unfortunately the leadership decided that our voices don’t matter. Also, I am disappointed by the liberal left’s tactics against Sen Clinton.

Posted by: politicsIsdirty | March 29, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am

Anyone with a shred of intellectual honesty knows Hillary can’t win this. She’s too far behind in everything from the popular vote, delegates, number of states, etc. Her negatives are so high no republican (and very few independants) will vote for her (and some of those will be needed to win). If the roles were reversed EVERYONE would be insisting that Obama quit. It’s sad to watch the Clintons destroy the party for their egos and sense of entitlement.

Posted by: Seeker | March 29, 2008, 4:52 am 4:52 am

i have heard and seen alot of comments over the last week…..i appreciate them all, but i still love and support hillary….she brings dynamics back to the white hours…thank you

Posted by: carla sue | March 29, 2008, 4:54 am 4:54 am

right on MI voter….your voice needs to be heard and spoken for…….i cannot believe that anyone will ignore us….

Posted by: carla sue | March 29, 2008, 4:56 am 4:56 am

I’m sick of seeing newsclips tellign us how “steamed” Ms. Hesselbeck is over Rev. Wright. How many white elected members of Congress and the Senate over the years sat in the pews of racists preachers and NEVER publicly disowned anything they said!!! Think also of how they courted Robertson and Faldwell, and everyone knows the tissue of THEIR views!!! The hypocrisy in this matter is simply appalling!
A. M

Posted by: Adrian Millet | March 29, 2008, 5:29 am 5:29 am

you know guys, it really hurts as democrats, to see the right wing media portraying us as a bunch of liberal slobs. we are not that…….the democrats will win in november. you just watch

Posted by: carla sue | March 29, 2008, 6:05 am 6:05 am

hello eveyone once again….i am so against the race card….and the minority card….guess what, i am a white 50 year old lady grandmother of three, love people, life, and i don’t give a crap what color you ar either. please, let us stand up for the americans that have died for our country…..like my late father who rode the destroyer the uss brinkley bass in the korean war!!!!!!!!!! god bless america!!!!thank god for our veterans!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1N

Posted by: carla sue | March 29, 2008, 6:14 am 6:14 am

I have to laugh everytime someone said she is so behind in the popular vote. If you look on the frontpage of ABC’s website she is only behind approx. 103,000 votes. She can pick that up in PA alone.
We have hit a high of 4 million registerd voters this year, shouldn’t be too hard to do.

Posted by: J | March 29, 2008, 7:03 am 7:03 am

If Obama wins the Democratic presidential nomination, I will vote for McCain too.
There is no way I’m going to vote for a candidate, who admitted that he illegally abused cocaine, went to socialist conferences as a young adult, hung out with Frank Marshall Davis, a member of the Communist Party USA, associated with black power radicals, and followed Racist Pastor Jeramiah Wright for the last 20 years.
The far left is trying to take over the Democratic Party.
They may succeed, but if they do, they should not be surprised when millions of Democrats, like me, vote for John McCain in November.

Posted by: USmarine0331 | March 29, 2008, 7:36 am 7:36 am

One thing I have noticed about Obama fans – they all talk like he does – broad strokes…feel good words…..no depth…NO substance.
Please…..read his books – read Michelle’s Thesis, read the Newsweek article….How barry became barrack…………
Very few Obama fans respond to criticism of him intellecually – they all go for the jugular and reside in emotional based propoganda. Grow up!!!!!This is an important political year – we need to get the Republicans out of the White House and Congress.
Hillary Clinton IS THE ONLY DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE WHO CAN DO THIS………………You are lucky she has so much passion for this country and the issues she believes in – most of you don’t deserve her.

Posted by: Liberaljean | March 29, 2008, 7:47 am 7:47 am

The majority of the country does not want Obama for President.
Why are the high power democrats pushing for it?
Why are they telling the American People it is what we want, you do not count?
Where they bought, threatened, intimidated or brainwashed?
Will they gain personally or Carree r wise from it?
The DNC was given advance notice of the State of Florida changing their voting day. No excuse for not accepting it and adjusting to it. Unless they knew their candidate would not win there. So they refuse to accept the citizens of Florida’s votes.
Looking more and more Like a fixed Election.
Funny how public servants, who were voted in by the people, to be working for the people. Can careless about the people.
Go Hillary
God Bless America
Love it or leave it
A vote against Obama is a vote for America.

Posted by: seah | March 29, 2008, 7:58 am 7:58 am

Everybody should remember that in 2000 Nader has put WBush into office by cutting in Gore’s support, so if there is an advice from Nader to Hillary, she should runaway from it and just do the contrary. Hillary said that Nadre has cost the democrats a presidency. So Hilary has to know where her friends are and where the common enemy is. She has to accept that time has come for her to go and support the fight for the White House.God bless America and God bless Obama. OBAMA08.

Posted by: BKMC | March 29, 2008, 8:23 am 8:23 am

When are we going to see a preoccupation with Rev. Magee and the Catholic vote? Wlll McCain alienate or lose that vote through THAT association?

Posted by: Adrian Millet | March 29, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am

“When HRC is forced out, I go also. I will gladly leave the Democratic party because it is no longer the party I have known, supported, and loved.
It is now the party of Dean and MoveOn. They will never miss me, but they may miss my vote, donations, and influence. Maybe not!”
Count me in. I will aso leave the Democratic party if Clinton is forced out or does not run for President in the general election.
I am from FL and a month ago, I became a US citizen and immediately registered as a Democrat. Unfortunately the leadership decided that our voices don’t matter. Also, I am disappointed by the liberal left’s tactics against Sen Clinton.
=========
Please count me in also! There is too much arrogance in the democratic party at this time. The DNC leadership is a disgrace. Instead of celebrating their candidates they are using the Tonya Harding method to pull Hillary down. If Hillary is pulled down unfairly, I will not only vote for McCain but for all the republican candidates on our ballot and we are from Ohio. America is about fairness and equal opportunity for all.

Posted by: Voter | March 29, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am

It’s a sad day in America – but a chance for an emerging viable Independent Party. Just as the far-right religious faction has taken over the Republican party, we are now seeing the far-left liberal faction take over the Democratic party. They’re so eager to prove their sociological enlightenment by electing a black candidate that they’ve lost all sense of reason. So be it.
If Hillary doesn’t get the nomination, then I want her to run again in 2012 as an Independent on a Clinton/Edwards ticket. They can just go ahead and tell us from the very beginning that they’re a team who’s reaching out to those middle-of-the-roaders who have been disenfranchised by both parties. They can run on fiscal responsibility, safe and sane foreign policy, and health care as a right of every American.

Posted by: HoosierSue | March 29, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am

Nadar has it right! Obama & his supporters have successfully blocked 2 states of people that aren’t counted in the numbers for Hillary.
We of those states, will N-E-V-E-R support Obama. In fact, we will go so far as to support and campaign for McCain if that person is who the DEMS think they can stick down our throats.
Hillary, stay in the race. If for some reason Obama takes it run on a different party line and give us a choice. Please.

Posted by: John | March 29, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am

Go on Dean, Pelosi, and all the “OBAMA ZOMBIES” keep pushing the issue for Hillary to drop out! Go on , get us pissed off! I think I will make another contribution to Hillary today,and again next week, and so on. Nader’s a little flakey but I admire his love for his country and its constitution, no one can dispute that!

Posted by: Jim | March 29, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am

An empty suit, an old windbag or Ralph Nader. Those are my choices.
Go Nader!

Posted by: Turku Wren | March 29, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am

Obama is a speech
His Ideas, ideologies, and religious beliefs, personal flaws are something that will deter him making a good President.
He is a pacifist, who wants to sweet talk the world. Our Enemies are cheering for him to win. It will make their goals easier.
He is indebted to his church. He owes them. His loyalty and allegiance is to his church and Africa. Evident by his actions, deeds and what he says. (if they paid for his schooling he is indebted forever to them)
Obama is the front man, He is to use his power with words and speeches. That is all he has or knows. Who is the power behind him? Who will be running the country while he tries to talk the American people into things? His church? the black leaders? The Mob?
The Democrat party is destroying itself, by pushing him on to the American People. Do they want to destroy the country also? They must, because the people do not want obama.
Mr Obama has never ever taken responsibility for any of his actions, deeds or spoken words or lies. Never, not once. He has, cast blame, demanded apologizes, pointed fingers, mislead, Slung mud, and constantly pushing people, transferring blame, and accused others of things. That is the mainstay of his campaign.
Go Obama, take Michelle, rev wright and your crooked friends with you. We do not need you or want you as our president.
God Bless America
Love it or leave it
A Vote Against Obama is a Vote for America

Posted by: seah | March 29, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am

Pelosi, Dean, Leahy and the rest of these yahoos calling for her to quit obviously don’t support democracy to where all voices are heard. We can vote those people out of office and fire Dean.

Posted by: J | March 29, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am

Oh now Clinton is a moderate? Since when? The Democratic Party has been a far left wing party since the 70′s as the Republican Party has been far right.
There is no a hairsbreath of differance between Hillary and Obama
Most of you posters are Republicans anyway

Posted by: Thinking | March 29, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

Thinking,
I have been a democrat for 30 years. Hillary is our best chance of winning the White House.

Posted by: J | March 29, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

dl,
There is 102,000 + votes seperating them that is not a majority of the country. Add to that some states haven’t voted yet.

Posted by: J | March 29, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am

Obama wants to keep Florida and Michigan out which in terms of population is equal to keeping 20 states out ( like Arkansas, Kansas, Utah, Nevada, New Mexico, West Virginia, Nebraska, Idaho, Maine, New Hampshire, Hawaii, Rhode Island, Montana, Delaware, South Dakota, Alaska, North Dakota, Vermont, Washington DC and Wyoming). My 10 year old did the math and told me so
Shame on Obama and to the DNC for RIGGING the elections and not letting FLORIDA and MICHIGAN count.

Posted by: vs | March 29, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

Senator Clinton has lots of baggageand that is why most people don’t like her…
It is not all right wing conspiracy.
It’s not people not accepting a strong woman… it is a woman with lists of scandals…whom most of the country does not trust (and no matter what you all say…for good reason)…
You all have just blinded yourself with your only “hope” for the past 7 years because you were comparing it to Bush… The Clintons are not “the bar” to measure against and neither is GW.
#1 attribute of a President should be character.
#1 reason a President doesn’t get elected …because people don’t like them and/or trust them.
She can’t win …she might be able to win the nomination but she has to destroy the party … and you people think that is worth it?
If that was the case you get what you deserve.

Posted by: dl | March 29, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am

dl,
At least with Hillary her skeletons are out of the closet. Obama’s have yet to be unveiled. I’d rather go with Hillary at least I know she loves this country and will work hard to achieve things while in office.

Posted by: J | March 29, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

dem999
Sen. Clinton wanted to keep them out too.
What seems worse…when a group of state dems want to put their state ahead of the party…someone who says I understand the rules I will not count their votes for the sake of party unity…and then stands by what he said.
or
when a group of state dems want to put their state ahead of the party…someone who says I understand the rules I will not count their votes for the sake of party unity…but then when they are losing goes all over the airwaves proclaiming to count their votes and be fighting for the voter …when she just cares about the votes… everyone knows she would not be fighting for them if she was winning.
…and now has manipulated the situation so voters (even in those states believe)…there can’t be a fair election.
Everyone has seen the margins she won in those states existed in every state until they changed when people got to meet Obama in their state…he either passed her or got the margin to under 5% in most cases.
So she is the candidate of self-serving disengenuousness.
and obviously it has made an ex-volunteer like myself like her that much less… her campaign is not about the greatness of our country and our constitution… it is about her own political needs.

Posted by: dl | March 29, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

What an advice!!! that advice will be heeded by Hillary of course, they were in the same level , they both want to weaken the Dems Party LOL!!!!!! go Hillary… Nader-Hillary 2008LOL!!!!

Posted by: alexis compton | March 29, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

J
Her skeletons have not all been uncovered …lots of peeks…but go look them up…most of them were never resolved…just another one poked up and took focus off the one before.
and if they have been resolved it was by fine, or disbarrment, or a death of a witness, or a cleaned up office after a suicide…or her brother giving back the 400k for the pardons with no investigation becasue Bill was out of office or…the republicans found and focused on Bill’s lie to remove the president and didn’t focus on the others.. …or a censure or
you can go on and on…
It’s like the brother or sister that everyone keeps attacking and we keep defending as more crimes are committed.

Posted by: dl | March 29, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

The more people like Leahy, Dodd, Richardson, Pelosi, and others try to push Clinton out of the race, the more determined I think she should be to stay in as at least 50% of real Democrats prefer her to Obama. With one exception, I have voted Democratic. Guess who the exception was? George McGovern, who was the reason superdelegates were created to begin with. Now I see a similar situation, but looks like the superdelegates are being encouraged NOT to fulfill their purpose afterall, as that would not be politically correct this year. Why not just get rid of them after this year, and the ridiculous caucus system also. I agree that the Democratic Party is not what it used to be, it is rapidly becoming just the exact opposite of the Republican right, which is why so many real Democrats in the middle support HIllary Clinton. That is also the reason so many will never support Obama and will reluctantly support JOhn McCain, as he at least is closer to moderates in many issues than Barack Obama. Additionally, Obama is showing himself to be more and more of a hypocrite every day with this Wright thing, and a lot of average working class people have a serious problem with the constant and ever changing double speak about his real beliefs. Judgement, honesty, and character issues are just as relevant in his candidacy as they are in Clinton’s, maybe even more so as he was running his campaign early on based on his integrity and refusal to engage in the “same ole politics.” Guess what, he lied too.

Posted by: DWC | March 29, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

and remember if Tsongas and/or Kerrey stayed and fought like Hillary is fighting for this nomination… Bill would have still gotten the nomination and then lost the Presidency in 92.

Posted by: dl | March 29, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am

DWC
as far as WHY the superdelegates were created…rather than the spin from Clinton supporter Ferraro…why don’t you look at why the Hunt Commision was created…
This is from the Library of Congress… – but it can also be found in “Dictionary of Politics” —
The purpose of the “Hunt Commission” formed in 1980 -which created today’s superdelegate system…was and I quote,
“to streamline the delegate selection process to party conventions and to DEMOCRATIZE the party itself, broadening the base of political participation by increasing input into the process of selecting presidential candidates, to strengthen ACCOUNTABILITY of public officials and strengthen the party itself whose base was weakened by the vigorous activities of the the Republican Party.”
Speaker Pelosi’s situation is entirely correct… the purpose of changes made to the selection process including superdelegates were in the direct goal of “democratizing the party” and holding public officials “Accountable” (and it references “to the members of the party” later in the section)to the party and therefore it’s members/voters.

Posted by: dl | March 29, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

J
that is not true…
the clintons have been fined, disbarred, and everything else under the sun…
lots of money…lots of power…lots of attorneys…
and the cloak of the federal government to hide under.
I am not saying lies…look it up
They have been investigated…a lot…but look at the lists of thingas they have been investigated for…WHO has lists that long…name me one other public official…
with such a wide array of accusation, caught in lies, fined, disbarred, mysterious windfalls of cash…had to return moneys (she was so involved with the Presidency but she doesn’t know anything about why 2 men were pardoned that her brother received 400k dollars for?…) praising a dem fundraiser… not releasing the information related to any of the questions about who her backers are…
These aren’t lies …or spin…just because for years we as good dems were not allowed to speak of them.

Posted by: dl | March 29, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am

…and did you know that 1 in 4 of those 20 people that sent the letter threatening Pelosi stayed ion the lincoln bedroom while Bill was in office…and some of them are lobbyists and corporate investors in media comapnies (look at Bill Clintons record on that)…
C’mon people.

Posted by: dl | March 29, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

Okay it seems this race to the White House might be “fixed”. With only a spread of some 100,000 votes and Hillary Clinton will be in the lead after Pennsylvania why is some leaders urging her to leave the race. Why aren’t they urging Obama to leave the race. She will have more of the popular vote shortly. Is it that this nation cannot have a WOMAN as President? Is that the real issue and not RACE?

Posted by: Anne | March 29, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am

again…no Anne
look at 92 …if Tsongas and Kerrey had stuck it out and fought a campaign as ling and as hard as Hill… Bill would have still won the nomination but a high probability that he would have lost the Presidency.
Think about all the scandals that hit him during that race.

Posted by: dl | March 29, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

dl: Unlike Obama Clintons like McCain love their country! They did not start loving america because it is politically convenient!

Posted by: russell | March 29, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

Obama supporters are the ones putting party before America. Enough of this destroying the party garbage. If you all care so much about the party Obama should withdraw and Dean resign. Hillary Clinton is showing she is the true uniter.

Posted by: geevill | March 29, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

dl,
I should care why? I am voting for her regardless of your rants.

Posted by: J | March 29, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am

What’s Obama and the DNC afraid of if they are so strong why worry about letting the people vote! Let the people decide and not he people in the big Onion!

Posted by: russell | March 29, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

Hillary has every Wright to stay in the race!

Posted by: russell | March 29, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

really russell
the clinton’s love their country? is that the same people who cost us the congress in the 90′s…and pointed to the camera and lied to the american people and on the stand…
the clinton’s love the clinton’s first …and yes they love things when they are politically convenient…
she stands up for things when they work for both the voters and her… MI anf FL perfect examples or …the war for another…
She wasn’t so concerned about the voters when she signed on to not count their votes but when she might lose …boy oh boy…she is their soldier…disgusting… and when the polls go one way she is for the War when they are against she is like a crew member that jumped from a sinking ship blaming the captain while the rest of the crew says…uh we made a mistake.
and geevil
Clinton …a “uniter”? yeah … uh,I don’t think so.

Posted by: dl | March 29, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

National polls show Obama 50% to Hillary 42%. Maybe that’s why they want her to step aside, ya think

Posted by: ll | March 29, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am

anf J
exactly…why care about the party…or the war or the economy…
and why care about the facts…
I am just trying to get people to see the facts…we are so blinded to the Clintons because of all thsoe arguments with republicans for 15 years …that we hang on to the only thing that seems safe.
and like my dad if you throw facts in to the argument that he doesn’t like (like why we can’t bomb the whole middle east) …he loses it because he is so grounded in his argument.
Reason. Reason. reason.

Posted by: dl | March 29, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am

I hope she stays in and gets soundly defeated. That way maybe the Clintons will get out of our faces for a few years. Why don’t they just start a reality show so the public would no longer have to pay for it.

Posted by: J Robinson | March 29, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

dl: If you were a student of the times you would know that 90% of the Americian people were for the war! That the media was in-bed with the war, they never asked any questions, nither die we! We always want to blame others for our own failures. If a politician feels that the American people are overwhelming for something their are very few who show any profiles in courage. I think that Kerry,Rockerfeller,Dod,and most of the other democrats that now support Obama voted for the war. With 9/11 fresh in the minds of New Yorkers and given all the intelligence that was put out even by Colin Powell, I think that Hillary would have been hung in N.Y. if she had voted against the war!
Unlike Obama and his association with Rev. Wright, Hillary admitted that she had made a mistake and if she could vote again then she would! Yet Obama continues to make excuses for Wright from everything to he was taken out of context to he was just in a time warp. He even says now that if he had not quit as pastor that he would have left the church! That begs the question why was he associated with his campaign if he found what he said so offensive?
No Obama never apologizes for anything he just makes excuses!

Posted by: russell | March 29, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

Obama skeletons have not all been uncovered either. If we had know just a few things about obama that are out now he would not be winning now. the word went out sometime ago-to black people don’t say anything that might hurt the brother’ chance. I wish to supporters of Obama would spend their time attacking hillary with how much better he is on the issues-rather than all that old and sometimes cooked up stuff. but you know why they cannot use the issues (which is all that should matter) against her. because she is smarter and has solutions for this country. and he only copies her. He couldn’t ever come up with an original answer to her 3am ad. they have just copied her. If obama gets the nomination we the democrates are going to pay for it in nov. If he wins the white house-the american people will suffer. He does not have a clue on how to run this country. and the people backing him are counting on being able to run the country through him Kerry,dean,leahy,bradley,richardson and others could not win the white house our right-so they are going to try through him. and the sad thing in he is so not in the know about what to do-he will need to rely on them. It is going to be a mess.

Posted by: jgaw | March 29, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

Dear ll,
Here’s a REAL poll….
Rasmussen Tracking Obama 46, Clinton 44
And Closing.

Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | March 29, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am

sadstate of affairs
rasmussen you should know doesn’t do phone polling…and they are widely considered not the gold dtandard because of that…
that is why the only place you ever see them interviewed on…is Fox News.
so the clintons keep using the main pollster of FoxNews… that alone has to tell you something…about your own argument.

Posted by: dl | March 29, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am

dl: You see dl all of us who are supporting Hillary are on the right side when it comes to this election. It is ironic that Hillay is forced to defend what is a basic right in every democracy and that is the right to vote! If you and Mr. Obama what to debate the merits of not allowing the people the right to exercise their constitutinal right,then be my quest! How can someone who wants to put their hand and the Bible and swear to protect and defend the constiution of the U.S. now say lets stop the election?
You see dl there are too many young men and women who have died in Iraq, fighting for them to go to the polls for the first time in their lives! To let a few politicians in this country deny us the right to do what they are dying for is truly Ironic! The true Irony of Democracy is that we may not be Democratic after all!

Posted by: russell | March 29, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am

dl,
You aren’t stating facts, its BS that’s been investigated over and over and it’s old news. Get over your hatred of Clinton. I care about this country and the party which is why I am not supporting Obama.
I want somebody who I know loves this country and will work hard for solutions to our problems. Obama is nothing but a speechmaker with no real plans to do anything he has promised. If you look most of his stuff is either from Hillary or Edwards.
Maybe if the media would do their jobs and dig into Obama’s past people would wake up!

Posted by: J | March 29, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am

Russell
can’t you see you keep holding on to this wright thing… and I want a President that can listen to someone’s whacked anger from someone they care about…and can turn and preach the opposite.
I say this all the time…if reverend Wright was a vietnam vet who was angry at how his fellow vets were treated after the war…and watched them hooked on drugs and homeless and living substandard because of something that happened decades and a generation ago… but whose after effects could still be seen
and he said offensive things once in a while but yet he brought that experience in to his preaching…
I would not have left that church. I would tell him he was out of line for tearing down my greatest love (this country)… and I would not preach the same things…but I can tell you this
if it were that situation (and I am a white blue collar roots kinda guy who knows a lot of vets)… I want the person who is brave enough to not do the politically savvy thing and throw that minister under the bus.

Posted by: dl | March 29, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

dl: He had no problem throwing his white gradmother under the bus for Wright! But you failed to answer by rebuttal about the right to vote! I quess you answer what you want and ignore that which you want! That is what Mr. Obama does!

Posted by: russell | March 29, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

J it is the facts…google Clinton and anything practically, scandals, investigations, mistakes, ethics…
go to sites that are reputable (not Clinton supporter sites but general reference sites) and you will see all these investigations and vetting that you speak of… did not prove the Clintons innocent…
and Russell if you are so concerned about the vets
as i am…why would you not choose the candidate who got up in the middle of an election and said “don’t go to war.”
and russell

Posted by: dl | March 29, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

…and Russel
Obama is not saying stop this election …
he is stuck now that the Clintons have manipulated this image of them fighting for the voters…when she is really just fighting for the votes.

Posted by: dl | March 29, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am

I sure hope the Democratic “leadership” doesn’t expect the Clinton demographic to vote for Obama because it ain’t gonna happen. I believe Obama is stealing the nomination by intimidating the superdelegates to vote their state’s primary. Well, that means Kennedy, Kerry, Richardson and all the rest of the already committed Obama superdelegates from states that Clinton won have to switch their votes to make this argument logical.

Posted by: Beth | March 29, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

Unfortunately people like dl can’t respond to people, instead they just post things to bash the Clintons. Now you see why Obama has people hoodwinked, just look at the type of people he attracts.

Posted by: J | March 29, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am

If Hillary wanted the voters of Michigan and Florida to vote…why did she not say that when it counted?

Posted by: dl | March 29, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

and J
I think I responded to every thing you have said… if I missed something tell me what it is?
I asked quite a few things and stated a few things that you all can’t respond to.
so now you are like my dad… if I throw out facts that aren’t what you want …you say nasty things about me.
C’mon.

Posted by: dl | March 29, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

dl,
Obama wasn’t a Senator at the time so his stance on the war means nothing. He didn’t have the info that the Senators had so how can he have known how he would have voted.
Second thing, IF he is so adamantly against this war why has he voted to continually fund it? That’s right, he talks out both sides of his mouth, another reason I won’t vote for him.

Posted by: J | March 29, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am

unfortunately gotta go.
but Obama did not want to hurt the soldiers…that has always been his priority.

Posted by: dl | March 29, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

WOW Clinton has a few votes here,it is a vote for Mc Cain people wait and see if she get the nod.Nothing but lairs they are still under invesgation in Calf.Both of them.They are not good for this country ……..Any person that can sit in front of tv and lie to the people of this country is NO GOOD in my book.She is worse then he is.All her help while he was in office in these areas are untrue……She likes to think so makes her feel inpotant>>>>>>

Posted by: h | March 29, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am

No dl,
You went on one of your rants about the Clintons and how awful they are. You are a true Obamabot. Doesn’t it bother you that you have no idea what is in this man’s background? Doesn’t it bother you to vote for somebody just because they give pretty speeches? I won’t put my country into the hands of somebody I know nothing about.

Posted by: J | March 29, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

David Mamet wrote an excellent article on why he quit being a ‘brain-dead liberal’ in the Village Voice. Find it an read it. He explains “I took the liberal view for many decades, but I believe I have changed my mind. As a child of the ’60s, I accepted as an article of faith that government is corrupt, that business is exploitative, and that people are generally good at heart. These cherished precepts had, over the years, become ingrained as increasingly impracticable prejudices.”
Dean, Pelosi and MoveOn do not represent the Democratic Party any more than Reverend Wright, Michelle Obama and Black Liberation Theology represent the black faithful in America. They are both examples of extremism. We need competency in the white house, not another eight years of extremism. The infatuation with the minority view of extremists is how we got ourselves into this mess. More extremism is simply fighting in a burning house.
So for once, Nader is right. Fight on Hillary!

Posted by: len | March 29, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

This must make Hillary feel good now, she is supported by the fruit cake Nader.

Posted by: The Unshrub | March 29, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

Dl is like Obama, when the heat is on he scatters…lol

Posted by: J | March 29, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

Nader says it like it is. That is why I like the guy. He speaks truth much like Kucinich on the left and Ron Paul on the right. Hillary has every right to stay in and affect the discourse on issues.

Posted by: antenian | March 29, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Obama opposed the war because all his friends are Muslims.
Rezko, Farrakhan ….
Americans don’t get it

Posted by: tony | March 29, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am

tony – I don’t support Obama, Clinton or McCain, but I must disagree with your last posting. I hope Obama opposed the war because he knew much like Kucinich and Ron Paul along with some others that the war was a complete waste of lives and money. A war which has ruined our already tarnished image and destabilized the middle east. A war that has given Al-Qaeda a new foothold and has given Iran further influence. I hope Obama had this insight. Michael Scheuer who headed the Bin Laden unit has been quoted as saying that only Ron Paul understood the dangers, but I do believe Obama probably had some of this foresight as well.

Posted by: antenian | March 29, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

let’s not forget that it was Obama who refused to be run together as president/vice president with Clinton. Obama apparently think it was entirely ok for him to put his and his supporters’ interests/ambitions before his party’s.
Democrats should just blame Obama if they lose the election in November since Obama was unwilling to unite his party.

Posted by: yi001 | March 29, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

let’s not forget that it was Obama who refused to be run together as president/vice president with Clinton. Obama apparently think it was entirely ok for him to put his and his supporters’ interests/ambitions before his party’s.
Democrats should just blame Obama if they lose the election in November since Obama was unwilling to unite his party.

Posted by: yi001 | March 29, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

yi001 – Ah yes the dream democratic ticket. If Romney and McCain can come together after all of the bad blood, you would think that Clinton and Obama could as well. We’ll wait and see. It would be quite a diverse ticket. That would be a great thing.

Posted by: antenian | March 29, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

I think the upcoming election will be a good time for Nader and the Green Party to gain momentum. Afterall, if the polling statistics are any indicator with 18% of Obama and 28% of Clinton supporters not voting democratic in the presidential election, then he may catch record breaking Green Party votes. So of course, it’s to his advantage to encourage Clinton to stay in the race. The more divisive and lengthy the race remains, the more votes he gets.

Posted by: katrina | March 29, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

katrina – I hope he does get a fair number of votes. He is one of the candidates that says what he believes without reservation. There is no special interests holding his purse strings. I am more in the Ron Paul mold, but I would be happy if Kucinich, Paul, Gravel, and Nader won a significant amount of votes. We all complain about crooked politicians who are in bed with special interests and receive political action committee money, yet we continue to vote them into our leadership. This coming election will unfortunately be no different.

Posted by: antenian | March 29, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Some one once commented that Obama’s supporters were losers of previous elections themselves; well Nader is a LOSER and a SPOILER. Yes he difinitely knows something about being a spoiler,therefore misery loves company. He would give this kind of advice.
Obama 08 !

Posted by: merle7 | March 29, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

Beth,
I agree with you. The language, and physical gyrations of Rev. Wright are indelibly etched in my memory. The great uniter, who EMBRACED Wright for more than 20 years, has turned into the most divisive political figure in my lifetime. I have also read other black pastors supporting Wright’s profane/ ethnic-slurring/racist/paranoid rantings. They dismiss him as the “old uncle,” as does Obama, himself.
Correct me if I am wrong, Rev. Wright is a few years older than Hillary Clinton and younger than McCain.
I am amazed that black ministers support Wright, in this day and age. Perhaps this is much more pervasive that I want to believe.
Beth, please continue your posts. They are absolutely informative and appropriate.

Posted by: countallthevotes | March 29, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

dl The soldiers weren’t Obama’s priority once he got into the Senate. He said nothing about Iraq on the Senate floor about Iraq until he decided to run for President. He voted to undconditionally fund this was everytime along with Clinton and before you say “he needed to support troops”- voting to confirm Rice and Casey has nothing to do with supporting the troops- in fact a vote against would have been more about supporting the troops

Posted by: alpaig | March 29, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

Nader will appear on CNN’s “Lou Dobbs This Week,” Sat. March 29 and Sunday March 30 at 7 pm Eastern, 4 pm Pacific.
(Hope it’s okay to mention another media entity.)

Posted by: Navarro | March 29, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

alpaig – You are correct on the voting. It is very difficult to stand against the rest. Few politicians can do it because they politically calculate everything instead of doing what is right.

Posted by: antenian | March 29, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

Nader was not a spoiler. The 2000 election was Gore’s to lose and there is nobody to blame but him. He couldn’t carry his own state of Tennessee–if he had, he would have won.

Posted by: LOM | March 29, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

Look at all the Clinton professional bloggers in here.

Posted by: TexasRules | March 29, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Ralph Nader is right. Hillary has every right to stay in the race. Just the fact that it’s still a tight Democratic race confirms that there are alot of Obama doubters out there. Obama has not convinced a huge amount of voters especially within other etnic groups. Sen. Obama has a significant “Asian” and “Latino” problem.

Posted by: cloya | March 29, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

NORMAL : BOTH NADER and CLINTON are just SPOILERS. No chance to win but weaken the Democrat front runner.

Posted by: Mark Webb | March 29, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

On another note – Superdelegates – Bill Richardson has now changed his mind as to how the Superdelegates should vote. Just another one of those Obama deals, if it doesn’t benefit him let’s change. Based on the original plan supers would have to vote based on who won the state. I believe Pelosi said the same thing originally. Hillary won NM (Bill Richardson) and MA (Ted Kennedy, John Kerry). I think that’s kinda strange. So what’s the next step, let’s try to force Hillary to step down. I’ll be awfully disappointed if she does. Some of the people who voted for Obama before the Wright exposure wishes they could get their vote back.

Posted by: C Good | March 29, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

Vanessa if I remember correctly the majority of that poll was black voters. They can make a poll say or do anything they want. Depends on who they want the public to think is ahead. Polls are hogwash.

Posted by: C Good | March 29, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

Vanessa: you said that already in your Analysis….I am talking about how Obama will implode….with all his inconsistencies coming to the forefront very soon….it is coming….something as simple as an minor indictment from the Rezko trial will be enough…
that is the problem with Obama…even a minor scandal involving him will make him completely unelectable…

Posted by: MattOhio | March 29, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

C Good posted:
“I’m still ****** about all the racial crap being stirred again.”
Me too. I will never get over it.

Posted by: countallthevotes | March 29, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

and make it the “Black House”?

Posted by: MattOhio | March 29, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

“Professor” Obama should stop lying and misleading the voters on race and stop protecting Wright…..one doesnt expect an American President to sympathize with Muslim extremism over Israel and believe in theology that preaches that Christ is a Black man by ethnicity….

Posted by: MattOhio | March 29, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Any American that calls America a “Slave country” demanding reparations is living in the past, harboring really radical and hurtful feelings towards another race….that to me is very very dangerous and divisive

Posted by: MattOhio | March 29, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

Personally, I think Clinton should stay in the race because it shows how tough she really is. The calls that she is getting to quit the race are only from Obama supporters. If the situation was switched around and Clinton was the one who was in the delegate lead, would there be more pressure put on Obama to quit the race? Yes, there probably would be and most of those calls would be from Clinton supporters. The real question is: would Obama have the guts to keep going even after taking the intense pressure from these supporters, or would he drag this race until the actual convention in the summer?

Posted by: Shireen | March 29, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Vanessa,
I know you are very big on polls. Have you ever been polled?? I have not and know noone who has. I wonder who these people are and why doesn’t anyone call me or anyone I know.
Vanessa, let us say for the sake of argument that Obama does get the nomination. I still will not support him. I honestly cannot forget Rev. Wright’s racist/ethnic-slurring/anti-American/profane rantings. Obama embraced the man as his mentor for over 20 years. These paranoid rants are indelibly etched in my mind.
So, while I admire your tenacity and loyalty to your candidate, I think I reflect many Clinton suppoters. Her supporters will not flock to Obama. It is what it is. Perhaps Nader will pick up many or even McCain or many will just stay home.
At all times, Obama needs the Clinton supporters. So even if Obama gets the nomination, the GE is quite another thing.

Posted by: countallthevotes | March 29, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

no more come backs for hillary, she is done this time!

Posted by: jacobs | March 29, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

oh thats right ralphie, tell hillary to stay in the race so you can beat her later, as she is the weakest and he knows it!

Posted by: jacobs | March 29, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

To C GOOD,
You have nailed the truth in all of this. Clinton should stay in the race through April 23, so it is undoubtedly clear that she lost based on her own decisions. Hillary stay in the RACE! Keep you game going just long enough to realize once and for all the C game is over.
(The sad part in all of this and maybe it is exactly what was bound to happen, is that the Clintons will finally have to come to terms with the love lost, end of acceptance between they and their finally-got-smart-to-their-game supporters and politcal peers.)
Obama/Edwards ’08

Posted by: Gretta | March 29, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

countallthevotes -thanks- like I said the powers that be have changed everyday as to how they are going to let them vote.

Posted by: C Good | March 29, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

The only people calling on her to quit are Obama supporters. “Bite me” should be her response. Put it in the language of the common, classless bigots they are. Maybe they will get the message.

Posted by: Jill Mitchell | March 29, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

I’ll be back in November to gloat over Obama’s loss to McCain. Especially, with that 30% block of Clinton Democrats for McCain. Then in 4 years Hillary can finally be the historic first woman president and Obama will have climbed back into the “black” hole from whence he came!

Posted by: Tom | March 29, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Hillary needs to stay. the majority of the people want her for the nominee for President of the Democratic party.
The DNC Playing God and Political fixer is destroying the party. Denying the people their right to vote who they want is a travesty to democracy.
The DNC were given amble warning of the State of Florida and Michigan changing their voting days. Plenty of time to adjust, and accept. Instead they Had to Play God and throw their weight around. Strange for those, who are suppose to be working for the people. They showed their true colors, Greedy power mongers, who do not care about the right to vote, or the US Citizens.
The DNC and high power democrats, were they paid off? threatened? Intimidated? What? What will they gain? They sucking up or are they getting more out of it?
The DNC and the high power democrats are the ones tearing the party apart, and trying to destroy it. When they Deny the voters the right to vote. When they Bully and try to intimidate and pressure the candidates (one candidate). They have shown their true colors, They are Greedy, power mongers who careless about the American voters. evident by their actions, deeds and what they say. Shame on all of them.
The Majority of Democrats do not want Obama, but the DNC and high power democrats, continue to force feed him on us. They tell some us our votes do not count. Want others not to vote, or vote for someone they do not not want. They should step down, they should give up their positions. They are giving democracy a bad name. and destroying the democratic party. Maybe that is their goal.
The world is watching and laughing. The Republicans just shake their head in disbelief. The American people are the ones getting denied their right to vote, watching someone getting shoved at us we don’t want as president, and the DNC thinking they are Gods.
We the people want Hillary,

Posted by: seah | March 29, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

Keep trying to convince yourself Vanessa that the Clinton supporters will vote for Obama. I’m pissed that the Democrats (Pelosi, Reid) didn’t do what they said they would do to stop the war, so I’m only voting Democratic IF Clinton is the presidential nominee. AND ONLY if Obama ISN’T on the ticket as VP. So chew on that.

Posted by: Tom | March 29, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Thank you, Ralph Nader! I have respect for you for your honesty and integrity.
Go Hillary ’08
Stay in the race. The people of America needs to have their voides heard.
Iraq_vet

Posted by: Iraq_Vet | March 29, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

There are some BITTER Clintonistas that don’t know how to lose with class out there.
I feel sad for them, but it looks like their Cult leader is going to drag out their misery for a couple of months yet. In the end, it will not matter. They cannot catch Obama in the one thing that matters most over polls, states won or popular vote: Delegates.
It is what it is. This race is effectively over.

Posted by: Texas Voter | March 29, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

It just occurred to me that Patrick Leahy could be a male chauvinist. May be he is uanbel to digest to see a woman ascend the presidency.

Posted by: Roger Miller | March 29, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

AFTER DISENFRANCHISING THE VOTERS FROM MICHIGAN AND FLORIDA.
SENATOR CLINTON SHOULD STAY IN THE RACE. FOR AMERICA NEEDS HER FOR WE NEED A STRONG LEADER WHO DON’T EASILY GIVE UP FOR A FIGHT. FOR SHE HAS A PLAN THAT OFFERS SOLUTION AND SHE CAN DELIVER.
SHE IS THE STRONG CANDIDATE TO FACE OFF WITH SENATOR McCAIN IN THIS GENERAL ELECTION NOT SENATOR OBAMA. AT THE STAKE THE PROBLEM OF OUR COUNTRYS HAVING RIGHT NOW:ECONOMY, IRAQ WAR AND SO ON – AMERICA CANNOT AFFORD ANOTHER MISTAKE IN ELECTING A WRONG PRESIDENT AND HAVE AN ON THE JOB TRAINING PRESIDENT IN THE WHITE HOUSE; NOT NOW MAYBE NEXT TIME.
HOWEVER IF SENATOR CLINTON IS NOT THE NOMINEE IN THE PRIMARY THEN AMERICA IS BETTER OF WITH SENATOR McCAIN IN THE WHITE HOUSE AS PRESIDENT.
THE WAY I SEE SOME DELEGATE IS TRYING TO HAVE SENATOR CLINTON QUIT THE RACE FOR THEY DON’T WANT TO SHOW THE WEAKNESS OF SENATOR OBAMA THAT IS WHAT THEY ARE AFRAID OF THEY ARE TRYING TO COVER IT UP. HE IS ALL RHETORIC AND SPEECHES AND SAYING THAT HE IS A STRONG CANDIDATE THAT IS JUST A SUBLIMINAL ON HIS PART.
SENATOR CLINTON DON’T GIVE UP AND STAY IN THE RACE FOR AMERICA NEEDS YOU!!
AFTER THIS ELECTION THEY SHOULD FIRE DNC CHAIRMAN HOWARD DEAN FOR SCREWING THIS UP FOR DISENFRANCHISING THE VOTERS IN MICHIGAN AND FLORIDA – ITS THERE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS TO BE HEARD. NO PERSON ON EARTH CAN DISENFRANCHISE THE VOTERS IN AMERICA.
GOD BLESS AMERICA!

Posted by: Sam Lim | March 29, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

Thank you, Mr. Nader. I hope Clinton stays in until the end, which I hope will be Obama’s end. I will never vote for him. I’ve never voted Republican in my life, but I will in November if that corrupt, racist fraud Obama is the Democratic nominee. Pay attention, Democratic Party. If it’s not Clinton, then it’s McCain, and I know I’m not the only voter who believes this.

Posted by: Griffin | March 29, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

Thank you Mr.Nader. I will NEVER, I mean from the bottom of my heart, NEVER, vote Barack Hussein. Clinton, stay in the race! People I know who support Hillary will Never vote Hussein Obama. They are voting for McCain if Clinton loses.

Posted by: jas | March 29, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Thank you Mr.Nader. I will NEVER, I mean from the bottom of my heart, NEVER, vote Barack Hussein. Clinton, stay in the race! People I know who support Hillary will Never vote Hussein Obama. They are voting for McCain if Clinton loses.

Posted by: jas | March 29, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Hillary, You are going to be my president in 2009, there is no dropping out for you. That is stinking thinking.
I and all others who are over 81 should vote for you as well as those over 18.

Posted by: Bert Varner | March 29, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

Hillary, You are going to be my president in 2009, there is no dropping out for you. That is stinking thinking.
I and all others who are over 81 should vote for you as well as those over 18.

Posted by: Bert Varner | March 29, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

I am so tired of all this Hillary is tough and brave bs.
Hillary voted for the war so people wouldn’t think she was weak. She was the last Democratic presidential candidate to say that voting for the war was a mistake because to admit a mistake would have been a sign of weakness. She voted for Kyl Lieberman, giving GWB an excuse to invade Iran, so people wouldn’t think she was weak. She lied about dodging bullets in Bosnia to keep up her tough image, dishonesty I am sure John McCain would exploit in the general election. And just so that people wouldn’t question her patriotism, Hillary endorsed a flag-burning law.
I support Obama because I actually think it was pretty brave to oppose the war in Iraq from the start. It was brave to fight for ethics reform, and budget transparency in the Senate, when most of his Democratic colleagues weren’t in agreement with those things.
It is time for a candidate who will stand on principle, not a one who will take a misguided political position out of a sense of insecurity.

Posted by: JonnyG | March 29, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

YEAH OBAMA SEEMS TO CLAIM HE WAS OPPOSED TO THE WAR AND NEVER VOTED TO GO INTO IRAQ! HELLO! THIS LIAR OBAMA OFF COURSE NEVER VOTED TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ, HE WAS NOT A U.S. SENATOR UNTIL 2004, THE U.S. WENT INTO IRAQ DURING 2003. YEAH HE SAID HIS OPPOSED TO THE WAR, MAYBE IF EVERYTHING WENT CORRECTLY IN IRAQ MAYBE OBAMA MAY BE SAYING HE WAS FOR THE WAR….OBAMA IS THE BIGGEST HYPOCRIT AND LIAR OF ALL TIMES…

Posted by: MARINE4EVER | March 29, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

Make sense that Nader would be advising the Clintons. The devil is already on their side. lol
It goes to show how low the Clintons have descended.
That same Monica Clinton-Ralph Nader Twin Evil was greatly responsible for undermining the Dems in 2000 and enabling Bush.
This time around the Monica Clinton-Ralph Nader duo is even more brazen in their public partnership.
Will the Clintons reject and denounce the advise of the equally and extremely self-absorbed Ralph Nader?

Posted by: New Yorker | March 29, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Howdy Mr. Nader,
Thank you for your understanding of how America is supposed to work. Though you are running for President yourself, I am a strong advocate of a Clinton / Nader democratic/independent ticket for President and Vice President. I believe as Vice President you can continue the tradition started by Vice President Cheney of being a true working Vice President and contribute a great deal to our country in that capacity. I also believe that if you and Senator Clinton team up now before the remainder of the democratic primaries take place, your team will differentiate yourselves as the clear favorite of independents and all of whom want to see a real change take place.
Prior to your announcement that you were running for President I sent an e-mail to Senator Clinton’s campaign urging her to go to you and make an agreement to join forces for the betterment of our country. I am now urging you to go to her and open a dialog regarding the possibility of joining forces now to ensure your joint victory in November.
Sincerely,
American Vet

Posted by: Iraq_Vet | March 29, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

If there’s one thing Ralph Nader knows, it’s running troubled campaigns. He is a wealth of information on this subject, Hillary should bring him on as an adviser. Who else has this kind of experience?
Good point about the first amendment, at this point it is almost her duty to keep up the fight. Giving up when things look bad just because the public opinion polls are not 100% on your side would stifle important debate.

Posted by: Jennifer | March 29, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Hillary will NOT drop out because WE don’t want her to.. Face it Obama, more and more people dislike you! The more we know about you, the more there is NOT to like. No wonder you were so successful in Chicago type politics, it’s your nature and you seem to attract like “bully” minds, yet another reason to NEVER vote for you. Go Hillary.

Posted by: irma | March 29, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Obama does not have the youth vote.
I am nineteen and I support Hillary.
So stop lying Obama.
We are divide among the both of you, but I would never vote for now with all these attacks toward Hillary and her family.

Posted by: JOHN | March 29, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

This is hillarious. My fantasy is that Hillary will embrace Nader’s political advice and push Gore past the tipping point. It would be dumb but in character.

Posted by: Drew Rocker | March 29, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

You know, it will be great if after the desilution with the Democratic Party and the bias of several media, political persons and the influence created by the Republicans to force a win of Obama, since they know will be easy for them to win the election.
I propose a Hillary/Nader ticket for the independent party. I will assure you they will win in a heart beat.

Posted by: Miguel | March 29, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

It’s not surprising, a commentary from Ralph Nader asking Clinton to stay in the race. He’s making an Independent run for the Presidency this fall. He stands to fare better if she is the Democratic nominee.

Posted by: Ryan Jones | March 29, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

To Mr Dean in the DNC no nominee is acceptable without the Florida and Michigan delegates at the national convention. No deals either a re vote or the nominee are seated as they were elected per the people of Florida and Michigan.

Posted by: Antonn | March 29, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

Countallthevotes writes, “Vanessa, let us say for the sake of argument that Obama does get the nomination. I still will not support him. I honestly cannot forget Rev. Wright’s racist/ethnic-slurring/anti-American/profane rantings. Obama embraced the man as his mentor for over 20 years. These paranoid rants are indelibly etched in my mind.”
========
All I can say to that kind of logic is WOW! When I read comments like that the first thing I do is question the intellect of the person making them. The U.S. economy is bordering on a recession. We’re spending billions of dollars on a war with no attainable goal. Is this the “hot topic” that gets you so riled up you literally ignore the things that are affecting your DAILY lives? I’m sorry but that has to be one of the silliest things I’ve read on this board to date. America owes everybody money, the economy is tanking and you’re worried about the comments of a Black preacher on the south side of Chicago? If ever there was an attempt at he social elites to manipulate the so-called lower ladder of society this is definitely it. I haven’t decided which candidate will get my vote but I’ll you this…My vote SURELY won’t be obtained by giving me simple-minded “hot” topics in an effort to get me to ignore the fact that you really don’t have a legitimate plan of action to get us out of this mess we’re currently in….

Posted by: Dem | March 29, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Ryan Jones writes:
“It’s not surprising, a commentary from Ralph Nader asking Clinton to stay in the race. He’s making an Independent run for the Presidency this fall. He stands to fare better if she is the Democratic nominee.”

Posted by: Navarro | March 29, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

A Hillary Clinton / John Edwards combination would be unbeatable….. !!!!!

Posted by: PROUDAMERICAN | March 29, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

Ralph Nader is man of integrity and courage. He won’t allow anyone to shout him down from running in an election because that is his right as an American. To all the Nader haters out there you have to understand that in 2000 Al Gore was an extremely weak candidate. You can’t say that Nader cost Gor Florida. Polling shows that if Nader wasn’t in the race many Nader voters would have either stayed home or voted for Bush.
The only thing that Leahy’s idiotic statement encouraged me to do was donate more money to Hillary. Thanks Pat for the motivation you sucker!
I’m an independent and Hillary is my 1st choice! If the General Election is between Obama and Senator McCain – a true war hero – I’ll be voting for John McCain.

Posted by: Bearded Mark | March 29, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

Despite the Obama campaign’s aggressive spin and pressure, the RULES require super delegates to exercise their best independent judgment, and that is what they will do. Even Sen. Obama’s top strategist agrees they should. If not, then why don’t prominent Obama endorsers like Senators Kerry (MA) and Kennedy (MA), and Governors Patrick (MA), Napolitano (AZ) and Richardson (NM) follow the will of their constituents and switch their support to Hillary? After all, she won their states. And if this is truly about the “will of the people,” then Sen. Obama’s short-sighted tactic to run out the clock on a revote in Florida and Michigan accomplishes exactly two things: it disenfranchises Florida and Michigan’s voters; and it hurts Democrats in a general election. Apparently, for the Obama campaign, the “will of the people” is just words.

Posted by: ONEVOTE | March 29, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

Not surprising. Nader stands to gain more votes in the general because Hillary is more of a divisive figure.

Posted by: Ryan Jones | March 29, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

Ryan Jones writes:
“… Hillary is more of a divisive figure.”

Posted by: Navarro | March 29, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

Here’s my advice to Hillary. GO GIRL GO!!! AND SHOW THE Good Ol’ Boys that they are dead wrong and America loves and supports you each and every day.
Ann

Posted by: Iris Eddy | March 29, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

If Obama was not fighting the Michigan and Florida seating, Clinton would for sure win this race. The Democratic party needs to get their stuff together so everyone’s vote can count.
Rock the Vote!!!
Clinton –2008!!

Posted by: James | March 29, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

You go Girl they only want you to drop out because you have them running scared. Keep going Pennsylvania is behind you 110%
GO HILLARY GO STRAIGHT TO THE WHITE HOUSE

Posted by: Deborah | March 29, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

Just one minute
I’m not a conspiracy theorist. I’m just curious. I do enjoy the occasional Ludlum, Forsyth and well, most tension filled political and conspiracy novels. My curiosity though, does not stem from the pages of a novel. It comes from the current stand or atmosphere in Washington. I especially got extremely angry when Patrick Lehay asked Hilary Clinton to step aside because she was hurting Barack Obama. My first thought was, this fellows’ got some nerve. There is nothing that Hilary has done to hurt Barack that he himself has not done. Why is it that the men in Washington would rather settle for a lame wounded horse in a major race rather than sent in a battle tested, battle ready, strong and very competitive Amazon? Why are these men, joined by these so called Conservative Democratic Women, so threatened by Hilary Clinton that they are trying to force her out of the race? Are they so jealous that a second Clinton is going to be president that they can not stand it? Is Patrick Lehay an ignoramus? Why is he treating her like she is no more than a nuisance? How dare he? Does Patrick know something that he thinks the rest of us are ignorant to? Does he think that we all listen to the likes of MSNBC, CNN and ABC? Have they bought into their own delusion? “Give it up already?” I wonder where he got the nerve from.
Why are they so afraid of Hilary Clinton? Do they see in her an unimaginable potential that exceeds all of their capabilities? Could this be the only woman of our time with all of the real potential to be president and are we going to let the Washington bullies silence her? I hope not.
My only conclusion is that there is a conspiracy; but not the kind you think. Is it possible that knowing that Barack Obama has not a chance in Hell of defeating John McCain, that they would much rather have McCain in the Whitehouse than a Hilary Clinton??? I’m curious, is Barack Obama a part of this conspiracy or is he so brilliantly dumb that these simple facts escape him? Is the male dominated press in on this conspiracy? Why are the women in the press intimidated by these oppressors? Very few have dared to ask challenging questions of Obama while they join in with the male dominated press corp to discredit and humiliate Hilary Clinton. Do we not want to progress pass the 1800s? I thought we were in the 21st Century? Are men still so afraid of women in power that they would do anything to destroy and discredit them? I know that I have a lot of “Whys”. I would hope that by the end of this primary season, we would come close to figuring out what Patrick and his gang is hiding and what they are holding on to. I hope though, and sincerely so, that it would not be too late.

Posted by: Deeply concerned | March 29, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

If there’s one thing Ralph Nader knows, it’s running troubled campaigns. He is a wealth of information on this subject, Hillary should bring him on as an adviser. Who else has this kind of experience?
Good point about the first amendment, at this point it is almost her duty to keep up the fight. Giving up when things look bad just because the public opinion polls are not 100% on your side would stifle important debate.

Posted by: Jennifer | March 29, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

Thank you for your understanding of how America is supposed to work. Though you are running for President yourself, I am a strong advocate of a Clinton / Nader democratic/independent ticket for President and Vice President. I believe as Vice President you can continue the tradition started by Vice President Cheney of being a true working Vice President and contribute a great deal to our country in that capacity. I also believe that if you and Senator Clinton team up now before the remainder of the democratic primaries take place, your team will differentiate yourselves as the clear favorite of independents and all of whom want to see a real change take place.
Prior to your announcement that you were running for President I sent an e-mail to Senator Clinton’s campaign urging her to go to you and make an agreement to join forces for the betterment of our country. I am now urging you to go to her and open a dialog regarding the possibility of joining forces now to ensure your joint victory in November.

Posted by: PeggieC | March 29, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

Deeply concerned writes:
“Are men still so afraid of women in power that they would do anything to destroy and discredit them?”

Posted by: Navarro | March 29, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

James writes, “If Obama was not fighting the Michigan and Florida seating, Clinton would for sure win this race. The Democratic party needs to get their stuff together so everyone’s vote can count.”
=========
This is comical. Nothing like using the biases of certain people against them. First and foremost it’s an absolute lie to say Obama is against a “re-do” in Michigan and Florida by equating his “acceptance” of the rules of the Democratic Party. If the Democratic Party decides to do it all again tomorrow you won’t see him disagreeing with it. One more thing…What is up with this whole every vote count nonsense? I guess it boils down to how you “equate” things. Some of you folks, as sad as it is, equate having someone tell you it’s mathematically impossible for Hillary to win the nomination with depriving you of the right to vote. No offense but you really don’t need a college degree to see what’s really being said if your objectivity hasn’t been tainted by personal inadequacy.

Posted by: Dems | March 29, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

Obama supporters tirelessly state that HRC cannot win based on the math.
Yet they never state that NEITHER CAN OBAMA.
Based on the current “knowns”, though Obama leads, The above 2 statements are absolutely true. It will take quite a while and much more voting, along with much more mathematical recalculation to ever make a definitive statement in this matter.
Many “unknowns” are actually waiting to become “knowns” only when the process is complete. Then and only then can any statement regarding who can win have factual merit.
And ,at that point it will be a “case of who one”, not a hypothetical of “who can or cannot”!
We are all quilty of often playing such silly games re hypotheticals, “wishing” they were fact, due to our personal “wishes”.
I the case of constantly saying HRC cannot mathematically win. The Obama folks are the silly ones.

Posted by: MC | March 29, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

Sorry , in one segment “one” should read “won”. —-”I” should have an n following it …plus other typos.
Fingers have a hard time following my thoughts. Again, I apologize for any failures of coherancy or typing.

Posted by: MC | March 29, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Michigan: You said it right. Howard Dean and Pelosi are trouble. Dean needs to stop ordering the candidates what to do. There are primaries in June and the primaries have to come first before they choose a nominee for president. Hillary still has a chance if the superdelages pick her. Obama cannot run this country, it would be a total disaster and his voters would be kicking themselves.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | March 29, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

Howard Dean does not want to change the rules on MI and FL because Hillary would catch or pass Obama. He endorsed Obama monthes ago and Pelosi is for Obama but she is stay tight lipped. Dean should never have been Chairman of the DNC because he is hard boiled. If it benefits him then he would change the rules but since it benefited Hillary he won’t. They had to make those rules for a purpose however New Hampshire changed their primary date and did not get penalized. That is because Dean thought Obama was going to win that state and he got fooled.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | March 29, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

Is funny how in such a close race, someone can actually suggest the other competitor to quit. Is like telling someone after swimming half the distance that he/she won’t make it, therefore he/she should swim back.
I think for the next 8 years Americans better select the most qualitfy C in C and not just talk about changes without real solutions and compremises. Regardless who would win the other would be the VP and the Republican would not be in the White House for the next 8 years.

Posted by: Jaime | March 29, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Who cares if she bows out now or later.
The more money she wastes now will be less to use later! McCain will beat either Obama (racist pastor,etc.) or
Clinton(liar, nutcase) either way. They
spent too much money tearing each other down! The Republican machine wont have to dig very hard to find dirt; it has already been exposed by the Democrats!
This was the year the election would have been handed to them and they blew it. It really started with Howard Dean(remember the meltdown)eeeyyyaaahhhh…what a pitiful excuse for a DNC chairman. eeeyyyaaahhhh!! McCain ’08

Posted by: Ed | March 29, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

Mariane writes, “Howard Dean does not want to change the rules on MI and FL because Hillary would catch or pass Obama.”
==================
How much did it hurt to tell that lie? (lol) Hillary Clinton didn’t oppose the DNC’s position on MI or FL when she “thought” she had this race won. Low and behold she’s behind in EVERY category and now she wants to champion the rights of MI and FL voters now? I realize the political pundits make fun of high-school graduates and blue-collar workers on daily basis but SURELY you realize we’re capable of rational thought? What you’re doing is a telling an outright lie to sway less informed voters. Neither candidate will win the election outright via pledged delegates. Obama will finish with more pledged delegates, super-delegates as well as the popular vote. What Bill and Hillary are “hoping” for is a spike in the popular vote so that they can make an “argument” to ignore the fact that Obama has also won more states. The greatest irony of all is how folks like yourself preach “fairness” but see absolutely nothing wrong trying to get someone with fewer pledged delegates, states, votes and super-delegates into office. Are you sure you’re not a Republican?
He endorsed Obama monthes ago and Pelosi is for Obama but she is stay tight lipped. Dean should never have been Chairman of the DNC because he is hard boiled. If it benefits him then he would change the rules but since it benefited Hillary he won’t. They had to make those rules for a purpose however New Hampshire changed their primary date and did not get penalized. That is because Dean thought Obama was going to win that state and he got fooled.

Posted by: Dems | March 29, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

Thanks John: I agree with you words that:
Obama supporters tirelessly state that HRC cannot win based on the math.
Yet they never state that NEITHER CAN OBAMA.
Based on the current “knowns”, though Obama leads, The above 2 statements are absolutely true. It will take quite a while and much more voting, along with much more mathematical recalculation to ever make a definitive statement in this matter.
Many “unknowns” are actually waiting to become “knowns” only when the process is complete. Then and only then can any statement regarding who can win have factual merit.
And ,at that point it will be a “case of who one”, not a hypothetical of “who can or cannot”!
We are all quilty of often playing such silly games re hypotheticals, “wishing” they were fact, due to our personal “wishes”.
I the case of constantly saying HRC cannot mathematically win. The Obama folks are the silly ones.

Posted by: Meck | March 29, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

I could care less what someone´s pastor said or didn´t say. If everyone listened to their pastors we´d still believe the Universe revolved around a flat Earth. Those who hold Obama´s pastor against him should learn not to throw stones in glass houses since as we all have people in our lives who might be embarassing from time to time. Lastly, go ahead and vote for McCain just to spite Obama if Obama wins the nomination. You´ll only be screwing yourselves, your children, your pocketbook, and your country.

Posted by: George | March 29, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

I can tell you that many people wish they had their vote back from Obama. I an African American and will never vote for Obama….Iwpersonally will vote for McCain over Obama……Hillary should stay in the race until its over…What a conspiracy!..If HRC isn’t the nominee we should write in Hillary…..

Posted by: jfb | March 29, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

If Hillary does nt get the nomination i will stay home or vote for Ralph Nader, I don’t have not trust or faith in Obama being President.

Posted by: Darrell | March 30, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

Hillary, stay in the race.
Leahy has not right to tell her to quit. This is not a “good” lesson to teach our kids. Quit or give up because you are under pressure. We always tell our kids to follow their goals. Let people vote. I don’t know about Washington, but, I don’t think they like to listen to us. There are still other states that people want to vote for Hillary.
Hang in there, Hillary, we are behind you. This is America. If Mr. Leahy does not like it, he should quit!!!

Posted by: Agnes | March 30, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

We should all tell Senator Clinton that she should run as an independent, if the Democrats are stupid enough to choose Obama as their nominee. She has my vote, no matter what. Unless, of course, I am forced by circumstances to actually vote for McCain. One way or another, I will not vote for Obama.

Posted by: Griffin | March 30, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am

whoever thinks voting for obama will save their pocketbook is highly mistaken.
if you dont want to be heavly taxed you will be smart and vote for a republican, or moderate democrat.
obamas plans for giving 300 dollars to people here, and tax deducting those who make 100,000 a year is crazy. He needs to wake up and the smell the coffee. Poeple in New York who make over 100,000 a year are lower-middle class, yet he wont give them a break? Give me a break!

Posted by: chelsea | March 30, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

ditto to:MC, Darrell, Agnes and Griffin. the big wigs in the party keep saying we will embrace the nominee, but i can say with no doubt in my mind that i will NEVER vote for bho.

Posted by: fedup | March 30, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am

fedup, i’m with you – will never vote for obama, not this year, not in the future, not for president, not for vice president, not for dogcatcher.

Posted by: so saddened | March 30, 2008, 2:44 am 2:44 am

Did someone say that Sen Obama would stoop so low and say and do anything just to get the nommination? Oh, yes. HOW CAN A NORMAL THINKING PERSON IN HIS RIGHT MIND TELL HIS OPPONENT TO QUIT QUE GAME STILL IN THIRD QUARTER?
The hatred for Sen Clinton has reached new heights. First of all, the DNC MUST RESOLVE THE MI AND FL VOTES. Anything less is a recipe for disaster for the Dems in November. Senator Obama must show that WORDS MATTER. He said he is for empowering the people. Well, match those words with ACTION. Oh, remember, throughout his political career, HE HAS ALWAYS VOTED “PRESENT”. That is what he wants to do in MI and FL. It is now clear to me that Sen Clinton is a much stronger and better candidate because WITH ALL THE HATRED AND ATTACKS FROM BOTH THE PRESS AND THE LIKES OF LEHAY IN THE DEM PARTY, SEN CLINTON IS STILL STANDING JUST A MERE FEW VOTES BELOW. Had it not been for the MEDIA BIAS and the subtly orchestrated HATRED AGAINST SEN CLINTON FROM MEN WHO WOULD NOT WANT A WOMAN PRESIDENT, Sen Obama would be long gone out of the campaign.
If the DEMS FORCE SEN CLINTON OUT OF THE RACE, we already see through this and we will not reward them come Nov. John McCain will surely become next President. Third Bush Term for sure. But still better than rewarding such SHAMEFUL PUBLIC DISPLAY OF IGNORANCE, PREJUDICE AGAINST WOMEN, AND HATRED. Sen Obama talks about HEALING THE NATION, YET HE IS PART OF THE CONSPIRACY TO INTIMIDATE WOMEN AND DISEMFRANCHISING SO MANY VOTERS IN MI AND FL AND PA AND OTHER 10 STATES.
VOTE FOR HILLARY CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT. SHE IS A FIGHTER AND SHE WOULD NOT BE INTIMIDATED. GO HILLARY!!!!!!!

Posted by: Paix | March 30, 2008, 3:36 am 3:36 am

Ralph Nader may not be diplomatic but he has a resume for making real change happen a mile long — not hyperbole like Jr. Senator Obama.
Good for him recgnizing that Obama and all the news rooting on for Clinton to drop out is motivated by Cowardice and fear.
Hillary is the only Democrat for President with Courage, patience and steafastness.
Go HIllary — You will win! Obama is a light weight with an Old Boy network of has been backing him and swift boating you. People are onto Obama’s double talk and Good Cop Bad Cop Games.

Posted by: Steve | March 30, 2008, 4:00 am 4:00 am

i can hardly stomach the idea of michele obama being in the white house with all the contempt she has for this country.

Posted by: fedup | March 30, 2008, 4:05 am 4:05 am

I hope and pray Hillary Clinton remains in the race. I think it’s ludicrous that certain Dems are trying to convince her otherwise. The Dems best hope Clinton wins the nomination ’cause this is one Dem who’ll be voting Republican if Obama wins the nomination. There’s just NO WAY I’m going to vote for Obama!!

Posted by: RJ | March 30, 2008, 4:12 am 4:12 am

For the 8 years, democratic party is increasingly leaning towards the far left as the power and influence of organizations such as Moveon. It’s now time for the centrist democrats to say enough is enough! If not, the centrists are going to be further marginalized…

Posted by: Unashamed_Independent | March 30, 2008, 7:01 am 7:01 am

Leahy and Dean would never get elected in middle America or the South. Only in a far left state like Vermont. and don’t believe these polls that popped up all of a sudden. Very fishy. They do not relfect the reality we hear in our communities. remember Dean said things were being done to end the nomination process.

Posted by: geevill | March 30, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am

As a political analyst, I am quite convinced that the protracted rivalry within the Democratic presidential campaign, which has, for the most part, been instigated by Hilary Clinton’s insistence on “going all the way”, could only amount to political suicide for the Democratic Party. This, of course, in turn, would cost the Democrats not only the November election, but also would lead o the disenfranchisement of the next generation and those who feel neglected by history in this country. In this campaign, it has become obvious that Obama represents the voice of the youth and those who are tired of the old system and its politics of cronyism, and are craving real change in the political landscape in this country. On the other hand, Hilary Clinton represents mostly the working-class who nostalgically clings to the memories of the economic boom of the 90’s, the repeat of which, from an economic standpoint, is quite unlikely, given the gargantuan tasks ahead, such as, how to end the war in Iraq and Afghanistan (Which some people seem to have forgotten about. America has some 20,000 troops stationed there), and the existence of major international players such as China and India, whose demands for oil and other resources make the repeat of the 90’s nothing more than a just wishful thinking and a pipe dream. America needs an overhaul in its political scene, something that only a new voice that reflects the aspirations of the new generation can achieve. A personality whose charisma can rally people together and can bring about renewed hope. Of course, the word ‘Change’ can sometimes be frightening to some, simply because it might mean letting go of the old habits, which often die hard. However, judging by the state in which America has found itself, thanks to the current Administration’s abrasive policies, both home and overseas, change is inevitable and this can only lead to building a better and stronger America. America and Americans can not afford getting stuck in these political bickerings and divisive policies of ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ while countries like India and China are rising as the new politico- economic powerhouses.

Posted by: realist | March 30, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am

You folks who act like Obama is entitled to the presidency (as if it’s preordained, a second coming!!)and everyone else move out of the way – seem to have no clue about how the democratic process is supposed to work.

Posted by: Mary Lou | March 30, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

Mary Lou writes, “You folks who act like Obama is entitled to the presidency (as if it’s preordained, a second coming!!)and everyone else move out of the way – seem to have no clue about how the democratic process is supposed to work.
======================
Do Clinton supporters even know what the word “ironic” means? If ever there was a show of entitlement it’s without a doubt the belief Hillary is entitled because a) her husband was President and b) women feel she deserves something for having a husband who embarrassed her. Yeah, I know how sexist that sounds but the question is does it have merit? Sure looks like it. Talk about an entitlement mentality…sheesh.

Posted by: Dems | March 30, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am

Who ever heard in 2008 of nominating for the presidency some guy who hasn’t even held a national office for one full term? His problems have only begun to surface. If Governor Blagojevich is brought down here in Illinois because of his Rezko ties, Obama will be right behind him. Only in America, where the masses are mesmerized by American Idols and Terminators can we expect to see such a fiasco. Latte liberals and those blacks voting without engaging a thought process do not represent middle America, and therefore don’t represent the democratic party.
Let’s count all the states, including Michigan and Florida, and then see where we’re at. Let’s also take another look at some of the shenanigans that went on at the caucuses and reconsider counting those results; all caucus states should re vote in primaries. Let’s also see how many lawsuits there are against the media for their blatant interference in this entire process. And what about Oprah? I hope she didn’t exceed her allowed contribution amount!
Obama needs to step down, try to fulfill his senate term, which is why we sent him to D.C., and show us he has the maturity, patience, perseverance and work ethic to earn – not buy and cajole – his way to the top.

Posted by: doctorate | March 30, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

OBAMA WILL LOSE IN NOVEMBER: Obama has won the GOP states. He couldn’t win any of the big blue states or any of the BATTLE GROUDND STATES LIKE OHIO, MICHIGAN, and FLORIDA. Hillary has won all these states and she is going to win PENNSYLVANIA. John Kerry lost majority of the states now won by Obama. Hillary won all of the major blue states. So Obama and his cronies are working to suppress the voices of 70 million people yet to vote as well as to silence the voices of people in Florida and Michigan. They are trying to steal the election from Hillary just like George Bush stole from Gore in 2000. HILLARY, YOU SHOULD NEVER QUIT SUCCOMING TO THESE BULLIES

Posted by: Independent | March 30, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Typical men saying “honey you need to stop, people will start calling you bad names” are sooooo afraid if Hillary Clinton it makes them red faced mad. Nothin’ worse than a woman a man can’t control. Hillary’s been called every name in the book, taken heat from unlikely sources, betrayed by friends and allis and she just keeps on. Those are just the qualities in the leader of the free world we need.

Posted by: Texas Lil | March 30, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

Correction:
Oprah bought about a bilion dollars worth of the media. I left out the word dollars.

Posted by: sienna | March 30, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

The issue of Rezko will be big one for attack in November. The money Obama takes from lobbyists and then lies about are ridiculous. He knew about Rezko. Obama was “friendly” enough with him to take him to view his new million dollar plus house with him. Then what about the money from the nuclear industry re: leaks after he changed his input in the Senate?

Posted by: katherine | March 30, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

May they fight to the bitter end. This keeps McCain out of the news. There is no such thing as bad publicity. In the end tying McCain to Bush will ensure a Dem victory.

Posted by: slate | March 30, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

If the Obama supporters were confident that he is going to win they would not be calling for Hillary to get out. They would ignore her and continue campaigning they way McCain handled Huckabee. The fact is Hillary will win big in Pennsylvania and will win the majority of the remaining states. Depending on what negatives come forth on Obama and momentum, she could even win ALL remaining states. One Obama supporter on meet the press said the reason Hillary should bow out was not because she was weak but because she was strong and is expected to finish strong in the remaining elections. Another commentator said she may have only a 5% or 10% chance now but after everyone has voted and with a strong showing her chances will go up! Hang in there Hillary we will not give up!!

Posted by: Firefighter | March 30, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

Doctorate writes, “Who ever heard in 2008 of nominating for the presidency some guy who hasn’t even held a national office for one full term?”
====================================
First question. A doctorate in WHAT? I only ask because I’m sure you know Abraham Lincoln was a STATE legistlator (Illinois ironically) for (8) years. Don’t get angry. Just say THANKS for being ENLIGHTENED.

Posted by: Dems | March 30, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

Doctorate writes, “Who ever heard in 2008 of nominating for the presidency some guy who hasn’t even held a national office for one full term?”
====================================
First question. A doctorate in WHAT? I only ask because I’m sure you know Abraham Lincoln was a STATE legistlator (Illinois ironically) for (8) years. Don’t get angry. Just say THANKS for being ENLIGHTENED.

Posted by: Dems | March 30, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

By the way, where IS Michelle Obama? Is she still campaigning for her husband? I have not heard from or seen her for weeks.

Posted by: ellen | March 30, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

Firefighter writes, “If the Obama supporters were confident that he is going to win they would not be calling for Hillary to get out.”
============================
It seems you’re confused. Obama HASN’T asked or even SUGGESTED Hillary quit. Like a lot of folks you have MISTAKENLY (which is quite typical) equated the suggestion with being a Obama supporter. The writing is on the wall and they realize that the Democratic Party as we know it could be damaged for decades by having someone who lost the popular vote, pledged delegates and had fewer state wins “STEAL” the nomination via backroom deals.
Firefighter writes, “They would ignore her and continue campaigning they way McCain handled Huckabee. The fact is Hillary will win big in Pennsylvania and will win the majority of the remaining states.
==========================
Even if she “wins” PA it won’t be by much. Granted she should win big considering the Governor of PA basically said his constituents basically don’t vote for Black politicians. (lol) Go figure.
Firefighter writes, “Depending on what negatives come forth on Obama and momentum, she could even win ALL remaining states.
============================
Not only will this not happen but it won’t even be close.
Firefighter writes, “One Obama supporter on meet the press said the reason Hillary should bow out was not because she was weak but because she was strong and is expected to finish strong in the remaining elections.”
=======================
Funny how folks like yourself always talk about he said, she said and can never remember WHO said it. The odds that they would actually have ANYONE on Meet the Press provide such a silly statement are slim to none. Why do you folks persist in making stuff up? Were you in Bosnia as well? (lol)
Firefighter writes, “Another commentator said she may have only a 5% or 10% chance now but after everyone has voted and with a strong showing her chances will go up! Hang in there Hillary we will not give up!!”
==========================
In the words of Ronald Reagan, there you go again. He said, she said and the convenient memory lapse. Can’t remember WHO said it huh? Typical. That’s what happens when you make stuff up or even worse; don’t understand what is actually being said.

Posted by: Dems | March 31, 2008, 3:11 am 3:11 am

Off topic, but important:
Google a search for, RNA Movement Trinity Church Wright, you will see just how little the Wright matter has been explored.
The press is avoiding too much info. I have never seen one word anywhere about the RNA – Trinity Church – Muslim connection. If they will not delve into conflict, then individuals must.
The Republicans play full contact politics, as we all know. The connections mentioned above will be their “equipment”!
I stiil do not know how deeply Wright’s separatist movement is ingrained in Obama. But I certainly know that “Separatist” is opposite of “uniter” by Webster’s or any other definition.
I do not like militants nor fanatics of any ilk. White, black, or otherwise, and certainly do not want to be even inadvertantly furthering their cause.
I also know that like a tumor, it is foolish to say it is “benign” until one has done a complete “work-up and a biopsy”!
Only then shall we know for sure.

Posted by: mc | March 31, 2008, 4:41 am 4:41 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.