By Jennifer Parker

Mar 21, 2008 4:22pm

Obama Attempts to Clarify “Typical White Person” and Which Offensive Comments He Heard at Church

At a press conference today, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, was asked to clarify just what he meant when he called his grandmother a "typical white person" (see yesterday’s blog post) as well as which controversial remarks he did hear in church.

His response, per ABC News’ Sunlen Miller:

"What I was trying to express is something I expressed in the speech, which is that we all harbor stereotypes. That doesn’t make us bad people. It’s simply pointing out that – and by the way, the context in which I stated that is the fear of young black men on the streets. That’s not even unique to white people. African-Americans have incorporated those stereotypes.

"Part of what the speech was about was the stereotypes that still linger in the body politic. The anger, the resentments, and the stereotypes that sometimes serve us publicly and sometimes serve us privately. They’re sometimes directed at African-Americans, but African-Americans harbor their own stereotypes, and that’s part of what was the failure of Rev. Wright’s sermons, was assuming a set of attitudes that weren’t necessarily accurate.

"So it was just a continuation of the broader point that I made. One clarification, because I’ve noticed some of the commentary about the speech – it’s been suggested by a number of conservative commentators, but even some that were favorably disposed towards the speech — that somehow there was a flip-flop or a contradiction between previous statements about not being aware of Rev. Wright’s statements and my statement in the speech that I was aware of controversial statements he’s made.

"There’s no contradiction there. So I want to be very clear. I was not aware that he had made some of most offensive statements that had been looping on the internet and on the television news.

"I wasn’t aware of the AIDS conspiracy statement, which I think is completely out of line and off the wall.

"I wasn’t aware of his statements, ‘God damn America’  Those statements were not ones that I knew about until the story broke a week and a half ago.

"The 9/11 statement I became aware of in the New York Times after I announced my candidacy. And as I said in my previous statement, the reason I did not decide to leave the church was because I saw Rev. Wright retiring.

"Now, I was aware of controversial statements. As I said, he has been a fierce critic on occasion of US foreign policy and domestic policy and in fact in my first book ‘Dreams of My Father,’ and in ‘The Audacity of Hope’ I quote him making a comment about racism that I think would be considered controversial but I didn’t think was beyond the pale.

"So that’s distinction that I would make. I just wanted to make sure people were clear – I know Joe Klein had column, for example, that suggested I had admitted something that I didn’t previously, but there’s no contradiction there. I just want to make that as clear as possible."

What do you think?

- jpt

User Comments

Liar….Obama when are you ever going to stand on your word?

Posted by: MattOhio | March 21, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

For someone who was branded as a great orater, he sure does a lot of clarifying…

Posted by: Haha | March 21, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

A 4 word response would have been much better. ” I am a Liar” …

Posted by: Jay | March 21, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

So the all-time greatest speech on race has Ammendments to its constitution? While we are at it we should probably try to have a budget session on it…..Is there no limit to Obama’s stupidity and arrogance?

Posted by: MattOhio | March 21, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Here’s my question: If Obama says we should have honest conversations about race, why did he insist on hounding Geraldine Ferraro for two days when she said something “honest” which he didn’t happen to agree with, about race? Does honest simply mean something acceptable to Obama?

Posted by: Confused in California | March 21, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

Mr. Obama, you stated yesterday that the sky is blue. Can you clarify that?
“Well, what I meant to say, so as not to be misconstrued that beyond a shadow of a doubt, that when referring to the sky, we have to understand what is meant by sky. Is it the atmosphere, the cumulus or nimbus cloud formations yadda, yadda yadda, yakitty schmakitty, blah blah, blah….etc..etc..”
This guy loves to hear himself talk.

Posted by: Jay | March 21, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

Jay…Awesome….all Hillary supporters have a great sense of humor!!!!!!
Jay said:
“Mr. Obama, you stated yesterday that the sky is blue. Can you clarify that?”

Posted by: MattOhio | March 21, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

With CNN and MSNBC giving him endless air time, he will always have time and opportunity to clarify one statement after another. I wonder how many other candidates have this luxury…

Posted by: Haha | March 21, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

Keep digging Obama.
SEND CONTRIBUTION TO HILLARY! I have been sending $10.00 a week. Take a peanut butter sandwich to work twice a week you will not miss the money. We can’t just talk we need action.

Posted by: Vi | March 21, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

It is matter of time that some documents come out showing he was there. Sad, but it is true

Posted by: Amy | March 21, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

When he uses race to slur, it’s “dialogue”. When you use it, your a “bigot”. Well, it’s easy to see who’s the HYPOCRITE here.

Posted by: Charles | March 21, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Obama Obama when are you going to stop coming up with more excuses, pointing fingers on others and trying to massage your own words? you should first answer the question of your leadership and ability to change people minds…if you are so great, how you kept silent for so many years, everyone from the ch8rch had access to Rev. Wright tapes, you were there, your friends were there, your wife was there, your daughters were there in many occassions and you now are saying you didn’t heard anything? is that leadership or political cover?
I don’t trust your judgment!

Posted by: Nancy,Chgo | March 21, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

This just keeps getting better and better. First, a speech to do damage control on the Wright race issue. Then a damage control for the damage control for throwing his grandmother under the bus. Now a damage control of the damage control of another damage control for “typical white people” and threw his grandmother under the bus for the second time. Poor, grandma. Tire tacks everywhere.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 21, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

Ok, I just think this is crazy. Just when I thought this controversy was dying out he has come out and re-fueled it. He really shouldn’t have done that. People will find it hard to believe he was unaware of all of this.

Posted by: Joan | March 21, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

Well said. Fine….let’s move on.

Posted by: michaelinphilly | March 21, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

Boooo Obama!

Posted by: LOM | March 21, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

The “all-time greatest speech on race” needs further explanation, qualification, clarification? Was it the calibre of “I Have a Dream?” Not even close. It left me with the firm conviction that Obama is a man still conflicted, still struggling with his own racial identity. His speech was really about that. It is presented under the guise of a call to arms for us to join him in this resolution and healing. I do sympathize with his struggle and find it interesting. However, how very narcisstic and egocentric. He reminds me of someone who has been in psychoanalysis too long.

Posted by: marie | March 21, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

Also, if he had not heard any of those comments or was unaware of them, then I would like to know how Sen. Obama knew that his pastor was a “fierce critic” of US policy. What “fierce” criticisms did he hear?

Posted by: Joan | March 21, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

He is playing us for fools. He was asked on TV last Friday night if he’d ever heard ANY controversial statements — he knew what they were asking and he said flat out “No.”

Posted by: Vnd | March 21, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

There is still a major contradiction here:
“Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely”
Why would you put someone with whom you disagree on MANY political views on an advisory committee on your campaign?
Can he clarify that for us?

Posted by: LOM | March 21, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Jake, I have to admit. I am not the brightest bulb in the Xmas tree, but I still cannot understand what it is that Obama is clarifying??
It is like some sort of endless loop of rhetoric without a beginning or an end. Someone with a higher IQ help me out here.

Posted by: Jay | March 21, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Obama just didn’t get it. The problem is not we think you are a racist as Wright, it is how on earth you don’t see the damage that Wright is doing to your own black community and the rest of the society.
Where is your judgement and where is your leadership?
“A 1990 poll taken by the New York Times/CBS found that 10 percent of blacks in New York City thought the AIDS virus was “deliberately created in a laboratory in order to infect black people,” while another 19 percent thought the theory might possibly be true, a finding that was confirmed in a similar poll by Newsweek/Gallup in March 1990. And the paranoia among blacks has only gotten worse, according to a 2005 study by Rand Corporation and Oregon State University, which showed that half of African Americans surveyed believed that AIDS is man-made, more than one quarter said it was created in a government lab, and 12 percent claimed that the virus was spread by the CIA.”
Thanks to Wright and Obama’s lack of action.

Posted by: Amy | March 21, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

“I want to made it very clear”.Well it
was very clear when you said “I was in
the pew the day Rev.WRIGHT say “GOD
DAMN AMERICA”.But lets forget for a moment he does’t wear the pin of the
flag,or,”LOUIS FARRAKHAN(natoin of
islam) got award from the same church,
or,he knew the SYRIAN slum lord etc.
THAT aside,WHAT father would subject
they DAUGHTERS to anti-AMERICA GOSPEL.
WAKE UP AMERICA and THINK,THINK HARD!!!

Posted by: baccarattwo | March 21, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

Dogsoldier — So true. Damage control for the damage control for the damage control. The man of “just words” is “just that.”

Posted by: LOM | March 21, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

Dogsoldier, Thanks for the laugh. Now, we’ll just have to wait for verification of Obama BEING aware of the “Wright” comments. This could be fun!

Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | March 21, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

How many times will he have to clarify his words when he’s on the world’s stage? He is not ready to be president.
Hillary 2008

Posted by: te | March 21, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Not another storm in a glass of milk-shake. Please, people, can we move on? So he thinks his grandma’ is the typical white person. So what? Maybe he is right, maybe he is wrong but there is definitely nothing wrong with expressing that opinion. Besides, on the right/wrong dimension, there are plenty of surveys and studies out there that would show his grandma’ did indeed hold the fears of a ‘typical white’ person. Of course, we won’t see that stuff analyzed in the news anytime soon because this kind of investigative approach to a story is something a ‘typical media’ person won’t even touch.

Posted by: Adr | March 21, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

“What I was trying to express is”…
How many times has this guy had to begin his sentences with this phrase for the past couple of days? How is he known to be eloquent at all when he needs constant damage control for what he says? How would this look on a President to keep coming back to the American people and say “what I meant was”….”what I was trying to say was…” ?

Posted by: Josh | March 21, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

Watch the 9/11 sermon in its full before judging rev. Wright.
In the short clip the media has shown, he is actually qouting form. US Ambassador to Iraq, Edward Peck!
The sermon is a speech against hatred.
Also, his other controversial statements look a lot less controversial when seen in context.
Go see for yourself. Google ‘Wright full sermon’.
This story had me doubting Obama’s credibility for a while. Now, after watching the sermons, I am seriously doubting the media’s ditto.

Posted by: Niels | March 21, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

We think that one American is being UNFAIRLY made to carry the entire cross of America’s centuries of racism, WHICH IS NOT OF HIS MAKING!
We also think that many many white men have ran for the Presidency of the US.
AND NONE OF THEM HAVE EVER BEEN ASKED TO BEAR THE ENTIRE BURDEN OF AMERICA’S CENTURIES OF RACISM OR EVEN A WEE BIT OF IT!
And guess who created racism in America?
President Barack Obama is doing MORE THAN his share to help heal America towards a more perfect union.
And a lot of lazy Americans, instead of pitching in, they waste time with divisiveness and the criticize a good, principled and decent human being!

Posted by: New Yorker | March 21, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

I am offended by you B.O. you insult me then you expect me to forgive you. when you call Hillary and Bill racist for saying something that is accurate you go on a frenzy, poor black me! You started it and now it is coming home to roost. what lies have you said today?

Posted by: D | March 21, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

Jay -
You don’t need to be the brightest bulb, because that is exactly what Obama does, just talks and talks and can’t help himself, but he really says nothing at all.

Posted by: mel | March 21, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

So, how many times does he have to step into the proverbial “POO POO” before he realizes he has a “JUDGEMENT” problem?

Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | March 21, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

One thing that Obama has made abundently clear is that he is just your typical politician. Backpedal, muddle the issue, change the subject, talk around the question. It goes on and on.

Posted by: J. Russell | March 21, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

Thanks Mel, I feel better now!
And New Yorker. Stop calling him President Obama, he is a Senator unless you are typing while dreaming.

Posted by: Jay | March 21, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

So the whole conspiracy theories about the passports are over now, lol. The Obama camp was hopping that will take the waves from his bigot Pastor. It wont work! even with all the free time on tv given to him by CNN and MSNBC!
Obama, actions speaks louder then fancy words!
I am waiting for Kerry or the press to ask Kerry to answer what he meant about he can change the Arabs and radical Muslims because he is black! Isn’t that the same stereotyping Obama is talking? Oh…wait..he only use the words when is convenient to him.

Posted by: Tom_Oregon | March 21, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

Obama failed to layout the ROADMAP to get us to a more perfect union. He simply listed all the things we could talk about, but no specific actionable plan to get us there. It was a good speech, but I feel no more assured that he really has a plan for his call to action to transcend race in this country.
If it wasn’t a damage control speech, I probably would be more willing to listen to his argument. However, it just came across as completely disingenuous and more of an attempt to cover his a$$.

Posted by: LOM | March 21, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

What about putting an end to the silly fights between Democrats here and elsewhere, since these fights are NEVER on the issues and problems we are facing in this country.
Why not invest all this energy and, if it need be, venom into questioning and attacking John McCain and the Republican agenda for America’s future?
If we don’t rally behind the Democrat who will take up the fight with the Republicans in the general election, we will be facing an even more dramatic and desastrous war in Iraq, who knows in Iran as well (leading us to the bankruptcy of our country), no universal health care, no relief for the middle classes and the poor, no restoration of our schools, etc. etc.
And let’s face the facts. This is what I just read in new article “The Clinton Myth” at Politico: “One important Clinton adviser estimated to Politico privately that she has no more than a 10 percent chance of winning her race against Barack Obama, an appraisal that was echoed by other operatives.
In other words: The notion of the Democratic contest being a dramatic cliffhanger is a game of make-believe.”
I as well think that all the indicators show now that Hillary can no longer, after a long a tough fight, and in no way win the nomination.
Many will very disappointed and even angry about that. But there’s no one to blame other than the majority of voters to this point. Even if we today count the results in FA and MI, Barack Obama still leads the popular vote (and he has an insurmountable pledged delegates lead). It is too late for Hillary to turn the tide.
So, what do we do, as Democrats? Are we going to make sense, as politically engaged people, and focus on what the Republicans are proposing for the years to come? My proposal would be to do just that. Why entertain the Bushes, Cheneys, Rumsfelds, Limbaugh and Coulters of this world with our bickering about a snippet from an interview? Have we lost our spirit?
Thank God I haven’t, nor is the Senator from Illinois who I support.

Posted by: Harriet | March 21, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

The empty suit keeps tripping on his words, but words matter don’t they?

Posted by: kitty | March 21, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

Ummm….what i really meant was….Obama 08 Liar in chief

Posted by: Daniel | March 21, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

I’m a pretty typical white woman, and I understood his intent perfectly well. Either a lot of people just like to have fun parsing Obama’s statements for any possible offense, or Americans truly do have a problem with reading comprehension.
On the other hand, when Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson blamed 9/11 on feminists, it was pretty easy to read between the lines there.

Posted by: KathyF | March 21, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

why title this an ‘attempt’ to clarify? he DID clarify. In fact, if you had listened to him earlier, i.e, Larry King last night, and in other interviews, he had ALREADY explained when he heard those statements and why he did not leave the church. It is only small minded people and the media who want to boost ratings that keep giving this a life. These tactics do not help us resolve our big problems – ecomony, war, health care, and becoming a truly united country. Give it a rest!

Posted by: bernadette | March 21, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

KathyF-Does the phrase “Are they just words” sound familiar to you?

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 21, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

So Obama thinks it’s fine to utter the phrase “typical white person” in a speech–
Yet I can’t help but wonder just how his campaign would have pounced had Hillary said “typical black person” in one of her speeches.
Think about it.

Posted by: BC | March 21, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

Ummm….what i really meant was….Obama 08 Liar in chief

Posted by: Daniel | March 21, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

I think Senator Obama has credibility problems.

Posted by: Jackie | March 21, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

Typical politician speak

Posted by: flyover | March 21, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

I don’t know about you guys, and ladies, but this article of Obama was as clear as mud. Stay tune, damage control to follow at regular intervals.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 21, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

He attended a racist church for 20 years, which means that he either agrees with their views or he’s a coward for not standing up and speaking out against those hateful sermons. Which one is it?

Posted by: Bye | March 21, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

Obama the great communicator… why does he have to keep explaining what he really meant?

Posted by: nick | March 21, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

“The 9/11 statement I became aware of in the New York Times after I announced my candidacy. And as I said in my previous statement, the reason I did not decide to leave the church was because I saw Rev. Wright retiring.”
Considering his pastor was member of the presidential campaign, Barack Obama should start writing letters of apology for those offended, specially the families of the innocent victims of the 9/11 attack.
If Obama wants people to believe him again and help mending some fences, Obama must admit knowing the pastor extremist views for a long time.
Barack Obama should use his friend Oprah Winfrey apology for initially defending James Frey, author of “A Million Little Pieces.”
Oprah said: “I made a mistake and I left the impression that the truth does not matter. And I am deeply sorry about that, because that is not what I believe. To everyone who has challenged me on this issue of truth, you are absolutely right.”

Posted by: Angel | March 21, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

I think Obama makes perfect sense in this case. Many people disagree with their pastors and pastors often say offensive things. How often do pastors make outlandish statements about gays or abortion and other issues and the parishoners role their eyes and do the opposite? I don’t agree with every single thing my rabbi says. I know many Catholics who are devout, but have serious disagreements with positions of their parish priest and the Catholic Church.
Further, as for those complaining about the “typical white woman” comments about his grandmother – he meant to say (as is obvious from anyone who listend to the context of the phrase) that his grandmother was a typical white woman of her generation, not raised in a racist environment and generally open minded. It is no different than saying that X family is a typical middle class family.
Further, he did not throw his grandmother under the bus. In fact, the story to which he refers is in his Dreams of my Father book – the story has been public record for more than a decade and was a foundational issue for Obama’s thinking about race.
Lastly, those who criticize Obama for choosing one side or the other are silly – if an anonymous Barack Obama was walking down the street, you’d have no way of knowing that he had one white parent. What you see is a black man. As a black man, he is treated as such and vulnerable to those prejudices. It is natural that he would identify as black even though he has one white parent. Similarly, I have a biracial friend raised by a single white mother who looks white. He self-identifies as white. He looks white and no one would think of him as anything but white. Your racial identity is partly a product of how the world reacts to you – race is a social construct and not a genetic one. The way people react to you is based on those external indicators, not the actual percentage of your genome that is white v. black or the color of the person who raised you.

Posted by: brownwoman | March 21, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

It’s their only hope. Keep throwing the mud no matter how ridiculous it looks. they will not go down in flames, but will bury themselves

Posted by: Thinking | March 21, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

So he did hear some of the comments from Wright. You went on national TV to give a speech about race and said u were never there for any of the comments. Liars don’t come better than that. You tried to fool Americans by pushing your agenda about race, but you lied to all of us.

Posted by: Persio | March 21, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

OBAMA LIES AGAIN. DECEIVING THE VOTERS AGAIN. YOUR ARROGANCE IS THE WORST I HAVE SEEN EVER.

Posted by: Persio | March 21, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

Obama and Clinton keep digging bigger holes for themselves. Neither can be believed. Both raise doubts about the integrity they would bring to the Whitehouse.
Think hard demos — you have a tough choice to make.

Posted by: Surelock Homes | March 21, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

I am a white guy and right now I am a typical white guy – one that is switching my support from BO to Hillary Clinton.
I dont want us to lose the white house in november but I will NEVER vote for this guy again.
He is a smooth talker that is for sure but it is all BS. He duped me before but NEVER again.
I hope all my typical white brothers join me in supporting Hillary.

Posted by: Drew | March 21, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

The Senator has been consistent with his comments and has been very clear. Unfortunately, the problem seems to be in the reading/comprehension skills of Americans.
Nothing speaks more highly of the failure of public schools than the comments posted on this blog. I believe functional illiteracy is of far greater danger to our country than terrorists. When people get their opinions, beliefs, and news from 10-30 second sound bites on some of these “news” organizations or You Tube, they do themselves a great disservice.
In summation, the Senator has to keep clarifying his remarks because people can’t seem to comprehend statments that use words of more than two syllables or contains a reading level above 6th grade.

Posted by: KP | March 21, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

If a white person of higher office said a “typical Black Man” You can bet Sharpton and others would jump down that white persons throat. But since its a Black man saying it against the whites Its considered Okay! I do not think so!! I would never vote for OBAMA I already do not trust him. To compare his grandmother to the Pastor and how he could not dis own her for saying bad things. Well I would hope not she is your blood the pastor is not and to practice there for 20 years and now decide its not good!! Why now!!

Posted by: LJ | March 21, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Barack Obama gave what could be deemed as an eloquent and courageous speech the other day on race and racial politics in reaction to the controversy over the comments by his spiritual advisor and pastor of twenty years Reverend Jeremiah Wright. When you get beyond the words and style of the speech, however, questions still remain.
Obama stated that he could not denounce or disavow his pastor any more than he could distance himself from his white grandmother who he says made comments that he found to be divisive or derogatory.
I would suspect that his grandmother has never stated words that rise to the level of blaming America for 9/11, that this is the US of KKK-America, that we should not say God Bless America but God Damn America, and that the US helped South Africa put Nelson Mandela in jail. Yet Barack Obama’s pastor, who he has called his spiritual advisor, whose sermon he used for a title of Obama’s own book, and who baptized his children, has publicly made these comments.
I would also remind Barack Obama that one cannot choose one’s family but he does have a choice as to which church to worship at and what sermonizing to allow one’s children to be exposed to. Barack Obama chose a church in Chicago where the pastor has stated that people live in “white America”, who has met with known anti-American foreign officials and sponsors of terrorism such as Libyan leader Muammar Qadhafi, and who honored Reverend Farrakhan.
Throughout his denials over the past week, Barack Obama has repeatedly denied ever having heard directly any of the controversial statements of this pastor; that when his campaign started he only heard about a couple of the statements and then only heard about the rest in the past few days. Then in his speech, he stated that he WAS there for some of these remarks, without stating specifically which ones, and he claimed that while he was bothered by some of these statements, he never discussed it with Pastor Wright. So, was Barack Obama lying when he stated he did not hear about these statements or is he lying now when he says he did? And if Barack Obama could not stand up to his Pastor when he released his anti-American vitriol, how can we count on Barack Obama to stand up to those blocking our withdrawal from the Iraq war, who are not for universal health care, and to those who wish to do harm to this country and their allies?
Notwithstanding a speech that most say was done well, this issue goes far beyond the delivery words. It’s about delivering integrity and sound judgment – on both Barack Obama has failed.

Posted by: Eric | March 21, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Obama is just a maker of words that don’t mean a thing. And after reading and listening to his words of wisdom, I have come away clearly understanding that I don’t understand him.
Obama’s words of nothing.

Posted by: Lou | March 21, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

In this interview he admitted that he had heard about 9/11 speech a year ago. Yet, if my memory serves me right, did he not deny that he had heard any incendiary speech?

Posted by: satish | March 21, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

So who’s going to pick up the ball and prove when this guy was in chuch, because I dont live anywhere near Chicago and I knew about these opinions and comments 6 months ago, except the more recent ones since then.
I have also know for some time about Rev wright’s trip to Lybia to visit Ghadafi in 1984.
Obama is still lying.
He’s also trying to say the Rev Wright is a “typical” black person.
Now how is that not offensive and wrong.

Posted by: s.b. | March 21, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

Akinyele, I think you are absolutly Wright!
Typical “Thinking” white guy, I know what he said. The question is really what he meant. And based on his 20 year affilliation with Rev. Wright what he meant is the question.
New Yorker, we who? Are “we” speaking for all of New York these days? All Americans bear the burden of our history, some by birth, others by choice of immigrating here. From what I can tell Barack Obama and his associatees are doing more to increase the racial divide among Americans than to close it.

Posted by: J. Russell | March 21, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

From the link posted below:
“So it seems that while Wright did believe American held some responsibility for 9/11, his views, which have been described as radically outside the political mainstream, were actually influenced by a career foreign policy official.”

Posted by: KathyF | March 21, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

218 years and counting…Caucasian American males occupying the office of the Presidency of the United State…218 years. “Four more years! Four more years!”
America the beautiful – “The great melting pot.”
“History is not false”

Posted by: Akinyele | March 21, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Why do we always have to have these discussions on WORM (What obama really meant). If its not him its his wife.

Posted by: toby | March 21, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

words….words….words…..

Posted by: catherine in nm | March 21, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

Lotta talk from Obama.
But he doesn’t explain “typical white person” – which is exactly what he said.
And he doesn’t explain 20 years. 20 years.

Posted by: Alicia | March 21, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

I have never crossed the street when I saw a group of young coming toward me, no matter what race they are, white, black, brown etc. Its true that both white and black people fear groups of young men as threating, but its not just white women. Obama needs to talk about the preduice in his own community, black people judge each other on the lightness or darknes of their skin colour. Its needs quite open discusions, not grand speeches. How many conference has Obama had on this topic with groups, sadly I guess none. He knew one year ago that this was going to happen, it was quite timely that this happened when there is this big break before the next primary, he gets all this air time, hmmmmmm was this timed prefectly me things so.

Posted by: Bridget | March 21, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

I found it offensive that because Obama is a black, electing him is “historic”.
Yes, electing the first black president is historic, but not Obama this time.
He lacks judgement and leadership.
“Sen. Obama claims to want to cross America’s racial divide and bring Americans, black and white, together, a theme he reiterated in Tuesday’s speech. But Trinity United Church of Christ’s vision statement is all about racial identity, promising “a congregation with a non-negotiable commitment to Africa” and “committed to the historical education of African people in Diaspora.” Sen. Obama cannot disown Rev. Wright’s disturbing words while remaining a member of an institution whose stated mission implies the promotion of a racist ideolog”.
Don’t tell me he knows nothing about the church’s mission.
How come electing the first female president not histric?????

Posted by: Amy | March 21, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

The reason Obama has to clarify is that a lot of you are apparently too dense to disect what he says the first time. So he has to break it down in very simplistic terms for you all!!

Posted by: Rick | March 21, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

Don’t tell me words don’t matter. Typical white people are just words, but words meant to divide, not unite. Obama is just another typical black person.

Posted by: Mike | March 21, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

Obama does just as so many of us, speaks as he has for all his life but now he is the one who has been calling everyone else’s remarks as being racist. He turns out to be the hypocrit.
Richardson has joined him and he is saying he is doing it in order to bring the democrats together. The Gov. should know enough about people that they hesitate to join a hypocrit who has sat for 20 years listing to a friend, mentor and advisor rant out messages of anti-race and anti-Country and did nothing. Now, Obama wants to be a person who brings change. I have to ask, “What kind of change?” The Clintons were very good to the Gov. so now with this action he has taken, I think about the old saying, “He’s anybody’s dog who will hunt with him.” Loyalty to people, loyalty to Country should mean more to people than it appears it does with the Obama’s and their supporters. I can’t turn aside the actions of Obama for 20 years and vote for him. My Country means far more to me than that. There is no way I can see how such a man can bring about change when he didn’t do anything for 20 years to bring about anything except sat for 20 years listening to the same old hate for Country and people. It sure didn’t help his Children to think any different about this Country or most of the people. If he had come out eariler with his history, I might could have had better thoughts on the other hand he wouldn’t be where he is.

Posted by: Mickey | March 21, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

If this speech was so well crafted and delivered why has he had issue clarifications ever since the speech? He obvioulsy said that he never heard Wright say anything controversial but in his speech he said he had. Now he is attempting to clarify after critics challenge his words. He did throw his grandmother under the bus in his speech. Yesterday he drove the bus over her by using a racially insinsitive remark that she is just a “typical white woman”. Again he is in damage control. Tonight he says that Hillary has character flaws. With the way he has handled the Wright story and now his clarifications I would submit that it is he who has a problem with character !

Posted by: That'snotwhatImeant | March 21, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

Typical White person = My grandmother was like every other white person and not a demagogue.
However there was the other side of my Grandmother that had stereotypes for others. There is nothing wrong with that, any person looking for further explanation should tell Americans how that explanation will solves Healthcare problems.

Posted by: Raymond Micheals | March 21, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

KathyF,
good to see that the gross misrepresentation of pastor Wrights words is finally making the way to the media. Huffington Post is a start.
Will abcnews and the rest of the mass media follow up on this?
—————————————
See Huffington Post:
‘Meet The (White) Man Who Inspired Wright’s Controversial Sermon’

Posted by: Niels | March 21, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

I think CNN, MSNBC and ABC have done its listeners a disservice. They probably have known about Obama’s 20 years relationship with the Rev. and did nothing because they have been campaigning for him day and night and they knew most of the people would care more for the Country than vote for him. If that had been Hillary and yes, any white man or woman, they would have had it front and center and would still be downing the person. They have gone along with his campaign people accusing everyone of being racist any time any remarks have been said by people who have never been racist. Now it turns out Obama and his campaign people and his supporters talk out of both sides of their mouth. Barbara Walters has always said she couldn’t be for or against anyone because news people have to be objective. That sure has gone out the window her and Diane have been pushing Obama on us for months. Now, she will have him on The View so that is why she has been doing her buttering up. ABC has had nothing but positive things about Obama on day and night and always bringing up something Hillary has done wrong or something wrong about Bill or about anyone who support them. Well, I think the news media and Obama and his campaign people have turned out to be more racist than anyone. I don’t think they care about what anyone says about this Country and most of its people.

Posted by: Mickey | March 21, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

Typical white grandmothers vote too!

Posted by: That'snotwhatImeant | March 21, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

“We have to encourage people to, at once, remember the past but also be open to a different future.” – Rebecca Walker
Unfortunately, from reading the posts on this site, I can clearly see that the baton will need to be passed to another generation of Americans, perhaps one several decades down the line. I have confidence that America will fulfill it’s destiny and become the embodiment of its’ ideals. Unfortunately, it appears that will only happen in the lifetimes of our heirs, after many of us have passed from this Earth.
“History is not false”

Posted by: Akinyele | March 21, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Again you are at it Obama. using your bad judgment and character to talk nonsense. I could just imagine how many time you would put your foot in your *** if you were elected as president. We can’t allow that to happen, we are a nation of leaders, lets not make the same mistake by putting a inexperience person to represent us. Let’s not put another Bush in the White House.

Posted by: Persio | March 21, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

The reason Obama always has to clarify what he says is because people deliberately distort every word that comes out of his mouth to make him look racist. If you’re not just trying to use his words to harm him, if you give it a fair listen, then what he says actually makes a lot of sense.
It’s amazing how three words – “typical white person” – can have been pounced on and distorted to such an extreme degree. Look, I’m white. K? And when Obama points out that typically, white people are afraid when they see young black men walking toward or behind them down the street, I think “yeah, he’s right.” He’s just cutting through the BS and telling the truth. The only thing is, people aren’t accustomed to politicians being this honest. They’re accustomed to little soundbites… as evidenced by the fact that only the words “typical white person” are criticized. The rest of the sentence is too long to manage.
And it’s so strange to keep hearing the words “under the bus” repeated – it makes me think everybody who uses them is getting them from the same source. It’s honestly as though they’re all mouthpieces for some propaganda machine. Which is it? HRC? Or Fox News?

Posted by: Ignorant. | March 21, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

so do typical black grandmothers

Posted by: LA Hussein in Indiana | March 21, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

La in Indiana: Today Obama released a picture of Bill Clinton with a courtesy handshake with Rev. Wright. I quess it is supposed to show that Rev. Wright is mainstream. If Obama is now saying it is ok to use a picture to smear someone then what would you say the picture of him in so called african grab tells us about Obama. What inferences can we draw?

Posted by: That'snotwhatImeant | March 21, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

The bigger problem I have for Mr. Obama is his pattern of saying one thing and then distancing himself from those words when the opposite is revealed at a later date. That is called “spin”, people. We have a need and right to know Senator Obama from every angle and what he believes when he talks of equality and a “vision” for America. To say that Clinton +/or Obama is at fault for the direction the Democratic campaign has headed, is ludicrous and short-sighted. America is a melting pot of races, genders, culture, etc. and we each have a personal interest in seeing “ourselves” in our President. With that connection comes passion and emotional investment. However, it also must be tempered with information about the candidates (good and bad, without negative “label” attached to said information) so that we can make informed choices, rather than only emotionally-driven ones. To Americans: try to take off the blinders of opinion polls, media spin, mud and excitement and remember what this race is really about: Hiring someone to do the toughest and,arguably, most important job on the planet. Being President of the US isn’t about speeches, promises and what-if’s – it is about who you believe will get up, everyday, and work their butt off for every hardworking American, because they have a track record of that already. That person is Senator Clinton. She has worked hard and diligently for all Americans, and spent years building strong relationships because she has a passionate vision of what America can be, not just because she’s running for President. Vetted, intelligent, tested and hardworking. Senator Clinton is the right choice for me in ’08

Posted by: Sunny Florida | March 21, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

There are only “typical white people” according to Obama. He did not mention black people but who am I to argue with you? You’re a black. I’m not. Guess that makes me a “typical Native America” by your standards.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 21, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

Is Obama gonna have to clarify statements again and again when he represents America all over the world. I think a ill thoughtout, mispoken statement by him could cause alot of problems overseas.

Posted by: glennmcgahee | March 21, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

This is Obama’s first real test and he’s crumbling before our eyes. “…we all harbor stereotypes”… speak for yourself Sen. Obama. This is getting embarrassing.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | March 21, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

This just keeps getting better and better. First, a speech to do damage control on the Wright race issue. Then a damage control for the damage control for throwing his grandmother under the bus. Now a damage control of the damage control of another damage control for “typical white people” and threw his grandmother under the bus for the second time. Poor, grandma. Tire tacks everywhere.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 21, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

Attempts to clarify is the right phrase to use in the Title for this post because that’s all it was: a lame attempt. He said what he said and he should just apologize for marginalizing white people and not spin any webs on top of his mistake.

Posted by: Stuck N Middle | March 21, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

Wow, this place is loaded with Republicans who are fed up with the mainstream media picking and choosing which stories to report and distorting the facts, and who don’t like double standards when it comes to the important issue of racism. They also don’t like being called “trolls” by people from the supposedly “open-minded” (as long as you agree with them) Democratic party, simply because they have different views.
Well, this middle aged, white, male conservative is voting for McCain. I’m sick and tired of what the liberals are trying to do to our nation’s security and to those of us who earn what we have.

Posted by: The Anti-Dave | March 21, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

I’m amazed by how some people are willing to advertise their ignorance and their narrow minds by referencing the Huffington Post. Better to reference one of the gossip mags at the checkout stand.

Posted by: Surelock Homes | March 21, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

Ignorant: By honest do you mean when he said that he had not heard any controversial statements but now he says that he did hear such statement.Is he being honest when he says that he never talked to Rezko about his house before he bought it then he says that he did indeed ask him for his adivce and actually took him on a tour. Was he just being honest when he tells us one thing and the canadians another. when he tells the British one thing about Iraq and us something else. Which honest Obama are you talking about?

Posted by: That'snotwhatImeant | March 21, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

So what he meant to say was “stereotypical white AND black people” are all racists. Well that makes more sense. I’m still offended, and even more concerned, because he must be drawing from some sort of personal experiance and feelings he harbors about black people and obviuously about white people. If only he had said “There are many people even today that still have fear of the unknown, the way my grandmother’s generation did. And often time they express it in a negative or racist way.” I know I’m no smarter than Senator Obama, could he not have expressed it this way? Or did he, as I suspect, leave it as still a negative rather than a positive on purpose? It shows either way that he is not ready to be president.

Posted by: Dennis | March 21, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

In all of this I feel like black people are being blamed for slavery and all of its many blessings. (Not) And who ever decided to use this for political fodder was wrong for doing so. This is an unresolved issue and an apology for slavery and lynchings would be nice so we can really move on and stop sweeping the issue under the rug.

Posted by: me | March 21, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Mike Huckabee on Rev. Jeremiah Wright, March 19,2008
“And one other thing I think we’ve got to remember: As easy as it is for those of us who are white to look back and say, “That’s a terrible statement,” I grew up in a very segregated South, and I think that you have to cut some slack. And I’m going to be probably the only conservative in America who’s going to say something like this, but I’m just telling you: We’ve got to cut some slack to people who grew up being called names, being told, “You have to sit in the balcony when you go to the movie. You have to go to the back door to go into the restaurant. And you can’t sit out there with everyone else. There’s a separate waiting room in the doctor’s office. Here’s where you sit on the bus.” And you know what? Sometimes people do have a chip on their shoulder and resentment. And you have to just say, I probably would too. I probably would too. In fact, I may have had a more, more of a chip on my shoulder had it been me.” – Mike Huckabee
“History is not false”

Posted by: Akinyele | March 21, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Reads like Obama’s Canidacy is “toast” … The more he tries to justify / rationalize a 20 year asociation with a church and its pastor, the worse it gets. The public just can’t believe that the incendiary rhetoric was not a dominant feature of this guy’s presentations; they also can’t believe that Obama could have been an active member of this congregation without knowing about this kind of inflammatory rhetoric. Now, many in the public will say “I don’t give a d**n” and accept that Obama doesn’t share those views; others will just not be able to get past the 20 year assoiation with that church and it’s pastor – even if he did not concur with those opinions, his continued association lent credence to those opinions. In the US, we strongly believe in publickly shunning people who make such wild statements. Failue to shun is to endorse. Obama should have realized this a long time ago. And that’s where his judgement clearly failed. His caidacy is now toast. Too bad. Sen Clinton is even more flawed. The Democrats shoud encourage both candidates to step down and let the convention pick a ticket from among the grownups left in the party.

Posted by: Grant | March 21, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

All I and other democrats who can’t back Obama want is a fair run but that is too late. Obama hasn’t played by the rules he tried to make everyone think he was playing by. He has played the racist thing more than anyone, he has intentionally deceived everyone about his close relationship with the Rev. and his church. His wife has never been proud to be an American until this year. Now tell me, is there anyway people would have voted for Hillary or any other person if all of that came out on them at the beginning of the primaries? No! I know, I will be called a racist. Some people just can’t take the truth. Pres. Clinton wasn’t being a racist when he made his comments, Geraldine wasn’t being a racist when she made her comments. But Obama and all the network made them into racist comments. We talked to and about Black people the same way we do white people. We compliment a man when we say he is clean cut and good looking but lord for forbid if we say that to a black man. Now, how can we get together if simple words of praise make people cringe and feel insulted? We say about a white man he speaks well and holds himself well but we can’t say that about a black man. If Hillary had said anything like that Diane would have her on GMA drilling her on what she said as she did to Ferrari. It just amazes me that people don’t think it is wrong for anyone, black or white to stay in a church for 20 years listening and joining in a ranting Rev. denouncing this Country and hating most of the people. You sure would hate Hillary if she had stayed in a church that long. Obama could have changed the Rev. more by leaving the church telling him why. But instead he joined him and is still with him. And deep in my heart I believe he is still the same person who clapped and said amen when the Rev. damn this Country and its people.

Posted by: Mickey | March 21, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

Akinyele-Mister history is not false. Perhaps you aught to mention some of your wisdom to the Arab population in the middle east and elsewhere. You know, there were no JEWS in Israel. No first temple and more goodies. They would love to hear from you.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 21, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

Why are white people just “white people”, but blacks are “African-Americans”. From now on I want to be known as a “German-French-Scottish-American”. My children are “Dutch-Indonesian-German-French-Scottish-Americans”.

Posted by: MominCA | March 21, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

It amazes me how little research people do on their own, as well as how easily they can be distracted by well-timed and well edited “controversies”. It’s half the media sensationalism, half the gullible public. Look at their real records and history, and listen to their words- Clinton is a proven liar, McCain is a senile elder who can’t decide what to think, and Obama is a bit less experienced, who happens to be half black. He hasn’t been contradicting himself if you reall pay attention and finish reading the text guys- he’s the most honest politician in my lifetime, and yes, I know about the Rezko land deal, and I’ve seen plenty of re-workings of Rev Wright’s sermons- that doesn’t take away from the fact that he’s the most trustworthy, intelligent, calm tempered candidate we have at this time. Plus CLINTON CAN’T WIN, so it’s basically over. Obama will beat McCain in the general election no doubt.

Posted by: Sean | March 21, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

If Obama did not know of all this material from Rev. Wright, after 20 years ,with all the video available, that means the man can’t connect the dots we will have another Bush in our hands. Bad judgement , forget about the speach he gave (which he took from Cheney , who had said the same thing, when he was with Bush senior), he is an idiot.

Posted by: David | March 21, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

If Obama did not know of all this material from Rev. Wright, after 20 years ,with all the video available, that means the man can’t connect the dots we will have another Bush in our hands. Bad judgement , forget about the speach he gave (which he took from Cheney , who had said the same thing, when he was with Bush senior), he is an idiot.

Posted by: David | March 21, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Mark-Wright is playing on Fox Wright now if you’d like to view. Nope. No white guy there.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 21, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

lol @ the notion that Barack “threw his grandmother under the bus.” lol also @ Barack Obama being compared to Jim Jones and the People’s Temple. I love these blogs. Have some more “Kool Aide” guys!

Posted by: KenJax | March 21, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

“We have to encourage people to, at once, remember the past but also be open to a different future.” – Rebecca Walker
Unfortunately, from reading the posts on this site, I can clearly see that the baton will need to be passed to another generation of Americans, perhaps one several decades down the line. I have confidence that America will fulfill it’s destiny and become the embodiment of its’ ideals. Unfortunately, it appears that will only happen in the lifetimes of our heirs, after many of us have passed from this Earth.
“History is not false”

Posted by: Akinyele | March 21, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

I am a Hillary supporter but am first and foremost a Democrat. I wanted to be OK with Obama if Hillary did not get the nomination. However, now that I am a “typical white person” I am not so sure I believe this messiah of change is the messenger who will represent me as an American.

Posted by: Caroline | March 21, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

Sean — read the polls and investigate the underlying demographics. Then, we’ll see how optimistic you are.

Posted by: Surelock Homes | March 21, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

David,
have you actually taken a look at ‘all the video available’?
Videos of rev. Wright’s FULL sermons show a completely different picture than the short clips the media have played over and over again.
Watch the full 9/11 sermon as well as the one with ‘God damn America’ and I bet your view of Wright will change.
Mine did.

Posted by: Niels | March 21, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

Obama dedicated his book…20 years of his church going life…and about 2,000$ a week to a hate spewing bigot….he calls “like a uncle to me”….
And I am supposed to be worried about Clintons judgement?
Blah Blah …Hope.. (hate)… Blah Blah… Change.. (same old thing)… Blah Blah … Hope and Change..( just another politician)… Blah!
This guy has no chance against McCain now and he and his wife have helped solidify the mistaken belief that liberals “hate” America.. Thanks Obamabots!!!
NOBAMA 2008 Hypocrisy Tour.
Featuring his #1 Hit
“Words Matter”

Posted by: Michelle | March 21, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

Michelle-Well said.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 21, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

Yeah god forbid if only blacks get an apology. Nevertheless if it will make everyone feel better then so be it.

Posted by: me | March 21, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Excuse me Sen. Obama but what controversial comments did you hear?
Please answer the question.

Posted by: Dawn McNeal | March 21, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

What do I think? That Obama said exactly what I thought he said. Not exactly rocket science.
The question I have is how some JORUNALISTS could have been confused. Surely their job requirements include having a strong grasp of the English language and being capable of understanding ‘nuances’ (which apparently now means the use of language above the elementary school level)? Or are some of them just overly sleep-deprived and not thinking clearly?
To refresh your memory (from Obama’s speech):
“But the remarks that have caused this recent firestorm weren’t simply controversial. They weren’t simply a religious leader’s effort to speak out against perceived injustice. Instead, they expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country….”

Posted by: Tom J | March 21, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

You guys are hilarious! His pastor is repeating what Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, Rod Paisley, John Hagee (John McCain’s “spiritual advisor”), and God knows how many other “fire and brimstone” preachers have said in the aftermath of 9/11. Are they bigots? What did Jeremiah Wright say that was racially insensitive? Maybe I missed something. Even his comment about Origins of AIDS isn’t as far fetched if you study history. Remember the Tuskeegee Experiments? I’m not saying he’s right but if it came out years from now that he was, I would’nt be surprised. Anyway, is being critical of the government the same as being critical of whites? People don’t like Obama, would never vote for Obama, and are looking for a reason, any reason too criticize the man.
You want to talk about lying? How about, “We can’t wait for a smoking gun. The smoking gun might come in the form of a mushroom cloud, right here in the United States of America.” Or, “We know where the weapons are, they’re right around this region” (Rumsfeld points to a map). Remember those lies? Those lies and many others just like them led to the Iraq War. 4,000 American dead, close to 30,000 injured and costs closing in on 1 trillion dollars. Last time I checked over a year ago, I read there was 8 billion dollars that was “missing” in Iraq. “Missing”? Yes, “missing”. Undocumented and unaccounted for. Sounds crazy doesn’t it.
Will any of the people that demand Obama answer their questions about someone else’s comments make the same demands of President Bush about his own actions? He’ll smirk, shrug his shoulders, laugh and just say, “So what” anyway. Focus people, focus.

Posted by: DLH | March 21, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

My fear now is that Obama’s candidacy will ironically end up widening the racial chasm and breaking apart the Democratic Party. He doesn’t fully understand it yet, but his candidacy is done. This issue will not go away and every utterance he makes on it and every picture of Bill Clinton with Rev. Wright he releases only makes him look worse.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | March 21, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

Just a general thought:
Why should Obama be chastised for having a spiritual (not political) advisor that said things that were politically controversial. Politics and Religion are two separate entities people, and Obama has never done anything that supports the idea that he shares the same political views as his minister. He has every right to keep his minister in his campaign as long as that man is solely there for spiritual guidance. It’s not like he’s going to help Obama write his foreign policy.
Also, if we are going to hold Obama accountable for the people he has supporting him, than we should hold Hillary accountable for the ignorance of Geraldine Ferraro, who disregarded the accomplishments of Obama in saying he is where he is because he’s black. If the notion is that Obama is guilty by association, of supporting Wright’s views, than one must think that Clinton shares Ferraro’s views since she never formally called for the resignation of Ferraro.
On the same token, should we condemn McCain for standing at the side of Reverend Hagee when he endorsed the senator. After all Hagee thinks the catholic church is a whore, that Katrina was brought on the city of New Orleans because of all their sins, and that all of Islam is out to destroy America. Since McCain took his endorsement wholeheartedly, he must share these views, right?
Do you see how stupid this argument is?
The point of Obama’s speech and this argument is that no one is perfect. People need to start looking at others the way they look at themselves, and realize that there is more to a person than a single comment, action, or associate. McCain, Clinton, and Obama have all made mistakes and had lapses of judgement, as has everyone else in the world. The idea that our President should be infallable is ridiculous, and if people continue to look for reasons NOT to elect someone, instead of reasons to believe in a candidate (whomever that may be), we will continue to sink into a life of cynicism and ignorance.

Posted by: Keith | March 21, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

I find it ironic that Obama would refer to his grandmother as a “typical white person” after he had confessed to the same concerns in his book:
Then I guess Barack must be a “typical white person” too because he confessed to the same concerns in his book:
– Barack Obama from ‘Dreams of My Father’,
“When his grandmother wants a ride to work because the day before, while awaiting the bus, she was threatened by a black panhandler, he is outraged — at his grandparents. . . Later, when he moves to the South Side of Chicago in 1984, he eventually discovers that, like his grandmother, he’s sometimes scared of black males on the street, too.”
And the concerns are shared by others:
– The Reverend Jesse Jackson, as quoted in US News, 3/10/96,
“There is nothing more painful to me … than to walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery, then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved. “

Posted by: tony | March 21, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

MominCA-
I totally agree- This “typical white” person wants to be called a ” Scottish Irish German American” and my children are Scottish Irish German English French Americans”.

Posted by: te | March 21, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

I am a Democrat ( yellow dog) and I can tell you I will not vote for this guy if he gets the nom…
I will just stay home or vote for Nader.
I could never bring myself to vote for Mccain.

Posted by: Michelle | March 21, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Ok so I read Huffingtonpost, so a white man said we brought 9/11 on ourselves by all the evile and terrible things we done in the past. Yes there were terrible things done in our countries name, some that we can not be proud of. The difference is you talk about these things, you don’t rant, you don’t shout hate, because Mr.Wright is an American too. America has done just as many wonderfull and good things. The minute you start screaming and ranting people only hear the hatefully words you use, most people dismiss a speaker like this as being irrational. So a white man said it first, it still WRONG, it doesn’t make it OK, not by along shot, no matter how much huffington hope it does, she is big Obama supporter. One wrong, two wrongs neither make it ok.Sorry

Posted by: Bridget | March 21, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

In all of this I feel like black people are being blamed for slavery and all of its many blessings. (Not) And who ever decided to use this for political fodder was wrong for doing so. This is an unresolved issue and an apology for slavery and lynchings would be nice so we can really move on and stop sweeping the issue under the rug.

Posted by: me | March 21, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

DLH: I won’t vote for anyone who has Fawell,Robinson,Oral Roberts and anyone of their like as their minsters are you kidding. That is the problem when religion crosses into politics. That is the reason the founders wanted it seperated.

Posted by: Bridget | March 21, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

218 years and counting…Caucasian American males occupying the office of the Presidency of the United State…218 years. “Four more years! Four more years!”
America the beautiful – “The great melting pot.”
“History is not false”

Posted by: Akinyele | March 21, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

Mike Huckabee on Rev. Jeremiah Wright, March 19,2008
“And one other thing I think we’ve got to remember: As easy as it is for those of us who are white to look back and say, “That’s a terrible statement,” I grew up in a very segregated South, and I think that you have to cut some slack. And I’m going to be probably the only conservative in America who’s going to say something like this, but I’m just telling you: We’ve got to cut some slack to people who grew up being called names, being told, “You have to sit in the balcony when you go to the movie. You have to go to the back door to go into the restaurant. And you can’t sit out there with everyone else. There’s a separate waiting room in the doctor’s office. Here’s where you sit on the bus.” And you know what? Sometimes people do have a chip on their shoulder and resentment. And you have to just say, I probably would too. I probably would too. In fact, I may have had a more, more of a chip on my shoulder had it been me.” – Mike Huckabee
“History is not false”

Posted by: Akinyele | March 21, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

I wish Obama would stop talking about race. From what i read on the comments here most people can’t handle a mature discussion on race. Any attempt to have honest discussion about race will make you racist in most people eyes Mr. obama.
Why don’t you just say there is no black america and there is no white america and ride the wave to the white house.

Posted by: alex | March 21, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

When are we going to get back to the real issues we face as americans today? Mr. Economy is turning blue in the face but we’re to busy trying to twist every word our politicians say and we’re too busy trying to make connections between our politicians policies/believes and the policies/believes of the people who support/endorse them. I believe most americans already know our canidates aren’t Anti American, racist, or any other assertion, so lets get back to THE REAL ISSUES!

Posted by: KenJax | March 21, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

If he was not aware of all those statements his pastor said so, he has NO SECURITY for his own church. Especially he has been attended to his church for 20 years.
How could he be aware if anything happen on this country?
He surely can’t .

Posted by: crisis08 | March 21, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

Interestingly, Fox anchor Wallace just went after the Fox crew for misrepresenting this quote during “two solid hours of Obama bashing”. Good for Wallace. I agree with Wallace, that when you read the whole quote it’s really not so bad.
But of course, this will get recycled endlessly. It’s interesting that the right wing loves to object to “political correctness”, but are now acting like a bunch of PC undergrads.

Posted by: Tungsten Hussein | March 21, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

Article 1, Section 2, Paragraph 3 of the United States Constitution…and I quote “three-fifths of all other person” – a reference to the counting of America’s slaves as 3/5 of a human being, in terms of the apportionnment of the representatives of Congress.
Excerpt from the Declaration of Independence…and I quote, “He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us” (slave revolts) “and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages”
America the beautiful…
“History is not false”

Posted by: Akinyele | March 21, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

Look I gotta say that Fox news is just brutal. I have problem with them not for their opinions and beliefs, but for the fact that they are biased to a fault. I have friends and relatives who trust Fox and believe everything they report, so I am always having to defend the truth around these folks because Fox misrepresents so much of the time.
Almost all of my friends who are “Fox News” junkies think that Obama and his former Pastor are evil sinners straight out of hell, wanting to turn the country over to terrorists… but none of them have taken the time to view the sermon in question or Obamas full speech…how do they know that Obama is evil? Fox news told them and because it’s on TV they believe it. That’s why this kind of journalism is so dangerous!! Obama is a great guy who would be a great President, let’s hope the truth comes out in time…

Posted by: Mark | March 21, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

Thomas Jefferson: “a contemptible hyprocrite” – Alexander Hamilton, January 16, 1800

Posted by: Akinyele | March 21, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

He’s a coward. Parsing words and making excuses just like he did for 20 years and in that speech. Obama wasn’t a stand up guy for 20 years and he still isn’t

Posted by: Holly | March 21, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

A good politician’s answer. Obama does himself no favors, though, by claiming that he wasn’t aware of Wright’s most controversial statements, because he probably was, and when that is proven, he’ll be called, justifiably, a liar.

Posted by: shellray | March 21, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

This is from a “Typical White Person”. I am so relieved that we have finally set the standard. It is now OK for me to point at a black hip-hop gangbanger and say, “That a “typical black person”. Obama has certainly added his version of healing to the dialog. One man’s racism is just another’s innocent comment, huh? The Audacity of Hate.

Posted by: Don | March 21, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

Thank you for this article. I had assumed this was the case with Obama–that he hadn’t heard the most outrageous comments by Wright before he saw them on the internet, and that there really wasn’t a contradiction, but it distressed me that so many pundits were jumping to the conclusion that he was lying. I do not understand why people are allowed to be journalists if what they do is jump to conclusions. I so appreciate the question being put to Obama so that he is given an opportunity to address this.

Posted by: Carol Wandrey | March 21, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

Obama stereotyped whites when he made the “typical white” comment. And now he’s whining about other people stereotyping?
Fifty bucks says Obama will throw Wright under the bus as soon as he figures out that “typical white people” are going to vote against him en masse. If you read his most recent comments he’s already inching in that direction. Just another typical politician.

Posted by: Eilis | March 21, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

Who appointed Obama our “race adviser in chief”? He seems to think that because he has a diverse ethnic background that he’s an expert on the subject of race relations. I hate to break the news to him, but most Americans have a diverse ethnic background.
And to the person who said “most people can’t handle a mature discussion on race” . I trust you include Obama himself in your statement – especially considering his immature comment about “typical white people”.

Posted by: Steve | March 21, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

Mr. Obama should stop using the word “all” when talking about the people of this country. I’m his age – 46 – and was taught from the moment I can remember that it’s wrong to stereotype any person.
I was therefore blown over by his “typical white person” comments. Where I come from, people our age and younger don’t think that way, so we certainly don’t talk that way. So IMO he’s just a dinosaur from the past in a 46-year-old’s body.

Posted by: Kelsie | March 21, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

How many “Frdiay clarifications” has BHO issued? Be it the illegal immigrant drivers license gate, $250K Rezko contribution gate, the Canadian NAFTA gate, the Powers Iraq gate, the Wright hate sermon attendance gate- there appears to be a pattern of lies and spin. Is this Change we can “believe” in?

Posted by: EV | March 21, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

As long as CNN and MSNBC keep blatantly promoting Obama, these race politics will keep going on. These networks need to stop glorifying Obama and do some responsible journalism instead.
Obama has polarized the country to a large extent. Before more damage is done, Obama should step-down to avoid all-out racial conflicts.

Posted by: MattOhio | March 21, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

Do you support child molestation?
Have all Catholics left the church and renounced the Pope and the priesthood? The Catholic Church has sheltered and protected the child molesters among the priesthood. Does this mean that Catholics approve of child molestation? Have all Catholic women had every possible conceivable (pun intended) child they could? Have Catholic women used birth control? Are all Catholics against birth control because the Church is? Have all Catholics had sex ONLY for procreation? Do all Catholics believe in sexual abstinence unless the sex is for making a baby? We can go on and on and not just about the Catholic Church.
Everyone picks and chooses which tenets of their church they will follow and ACTUALLY believe. Why is Barack Obama targeted because his church leader is (justifiably) angry about the racism Blacks have experienced?

Posted by: hlc | March 21, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

First it was Obama’s wife’s huge jump in salary that just happened to coincide with his election to the Senate.
Then it was Obama himself saying in 2005 that he’s not qualified to be president.
Then it was Rezko and the numerous updates regarding the amounted he donated to Obama.
Then it was Obama’s wife’s questionable comments about America, etc.
Then it was Wright and Obama’s other radical associates.
Now it’s Obama’s typical white people gaffe.
People WAKE UP. It’s only March and look what’s already come out about him. How bad do you think it’s going to be in October?

Posted by: Maielle | March 21, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

I’m a yellow dog democrat that will not vote in November if Obama is the nominee. The grandmother comment? His wife’s comments about not being proud of her country? A bigoted pastor? Rezko?
I just don’t see a man of great judgement here.

Posted by: katherine | March 21, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

To hlc: When was the FIRST AND LAST time we had a Catholic president? Hint: his initials were JFK and he died in 1963.
And considering we’ve had only one Catholic president, did it occur to you that maybe a candidate’s Catholicism may be a turn off for voters? So why then is it not okay for American’s be turned off of Obama because of his church?
And as long as we’re whining about the past – what about the discrimination the Irish experienced when they came to this country – BTW that was AFTER slavery was abolished. Do you see Irish pastor’s trashing America or other ethnic groups because of it? The answer is NO.

Posted by: Eilis | March 21, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

At this point I don’t know what to think.
Obama’s speech not only addressed issues almost all politicians avoid as being a third rail, but it was an inspiring, beautifully written speech that received, and deserved, rave reviews.
Now that I’ve read some of the comments posted here and elsewhere (including those by supposed ‘journalists’), I’m wondering if he would have been better off writing it in netglish (aka ‘internet english’ or ‘simple english’). So many people misunderstood so much of it. If they’re representative of Americans in general, I find that shocking. When I was in school, ‘reading comprehension’ was considered important. What happened?!

Posted by: Tom J | March 21, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

I feel sorry for poor Grandma. First Obama threw her under the bus, then he backed over her.

Posted by: Old Granny | March 21, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

“Obama’s speech not only addressed issues almost all politicians avoid as being a third rail”
And therein lies the problem….Obama’s not even smart enough to avoid the political third rail. Yet again another example of his poor judgment.

Posted by: Typical Cracker | March 21, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

For someone who is supposed to be about hope, He sure has caused a whole lot of hate and anger.

Posted by: Ken | March 21, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

The past is the past, right? According to Obama, Americans want to progress to a more perfect union. Why is he affiliated with a church that comforts its followers with the mindset that African Americans have been oppressed and continue to be so by “rich white people”? How is he going to be the “great uniter” if this is the kind of thinking he has followed for the past 20 years? I’m confused.

Posted by: Mike | March 22, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

Obama has repeatedly injected race into this campaign–pointing his finger at others for the slightest gaffe or transgression. It is amusing to watch him stumble with the impossible strictures of political correctness that he demands from others. I hope I am not alone in rejecting his double standard. If I’m a “typical white person,” he is a typical black politician playing his race for opportunistic advantage. This man and his wife have received every advantage from this country. They should be proud of it and their Ivy league degrees. But they aren’t, Obama won’t have my vote–EVER!
P.S. I used to like Obama, when I thought he stood for something hopeful. I actually donated $100 to his campaign. Anybody know how I can get it back?

Posted by: Nancy | March 22, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Obama knows his run for the presidency is over. Now he’s just making a last ditch effort to sell his books. He’ll suspend his campaign when his books start selling well again.
Look at this article – he mentions both books by name in this interview. He’s doing the same thing in most of his recent interviews.
Bye bye Obambi – and remember you heard it here first!

Posted by: Good Riddance | March 22, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am

Nancy,
I’ll donate $100 to the Clinton campaign in your honor. :)

Posted by: LOM | March 22, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

New Obama slogan:
“LIES YOU CAN BELIEVE IN”
1. Lied about Canada
2. Lied about Rezko amount of money
3. Lied about not knowing what Wright says in church
4. Lies about wanting to unite the country when he has been in public office for years and has no evidence to support any attempt to unite his own state
5. Lies about wanting to change politics in Washington…today’s proof – releasing a photo of Bill Clinton with Wright after slamming Hillary’s campaign just a few weeks ago about releasing his own photo in Somali clothes
I could go on and on and on but so many people already believe in his lies so appropriately vote for Obama:
” LIES YOU CAN BELIEVE IN”

Posted by: mona | March 22, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am

Clintons are the worst liars. The Clintons sordid past is an open book—the Travelgate, Pardongate, Chinagate, cattle-futures, Whitewater scandals; the using Marines as waiters; the IRS auditing of critics; the hiring of detectives to dig up dirt on women seduced by Bill; the Monica Lewsinki trysts in the rooms of the White House; the 50+ deaths by murder, suicide, accidents and sudden illnesses of people connected the Clinton regime; the Impeachment.
All that is bound to come out and derail the schemes of the Clintons machine to retake power.

Posted by: Mona | March 22, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am

I think that Hillary’s problems are her own and not due to Obama. She had everything to start with and she just could not manage or win this campaign. Just one simple example, she had no game plan post Super Tuesday. She had mismanaged her finance. She keeps changing her message and her themes, she keeps whining, crying and then trying to tell us all that she is strong at 3am….come on, Americans get confused…don’t they see that??? what a frustrating thing to watch such stupidity. Even, kindergarten kids will run a better campaign. She ain’t no good. Period. Nothing wins like winning…. and Hillary is a GUARANTEED LOSER….

Posted by: Good Riddance | March 22, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am

6 reasons why Dems should avoid Hillary:
1. Hillary is one of the most divisive figures in modern history. That is a fact.
2. More than half the nation is against Hillary. That is a fact.
3. Hillary brings less independents to support the Democratic party. That is a fact.
4. Hillary had her chance in the Whitehouse and she FAILED in Healthcare. That is a fact.
5. In all her 35 years of cooked up experience, Americans have difficulty finding even one single achivement. That is a fact.
6. Bill is a liar, a sex-addict and Hillary is a criminal – They are facts as well.

Posted by: MattOhio | March 22, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am

You are right Mona. Hillary has no instinct for what is right, because Clintons have no respect for moral values. America definitely deserves a better political leader for the 21st century. A time comes and a time goes. Clintons had their time. Its over. Turn the page folks. Hillary will be blunder for us in November.

Posted by: Nancy | March 22, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am

I am a woman and am all set to vote for Hillary. However, now I am reconsidering seriously my vote for her. I have faced problems and issues and crisis. Sometimes I cry, so what? However, I find it strange that a woman who is going to be Commander-in-Chief cries everytime, not so much for the country or issues, but because she cannot get the nomination as her cronies like Mark Penn and others predicted. Grow up Hillary, welcome to NFL. Nobody said this is going to be easy. And you said, “attacking Obama is going to be the Fun part…” American people do not like the nasty campaigns of the Republicans and also the Clintons. Period.

Posted by: Imposter_Alert!!! | March 22, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am

It needs a Clinton to clean up after the Bush…Hillary keeps repeating, as if Americans are stupid not to remember. Except for blue dress Bill Clinton and his bad character as a womanizer, America would not have had the second Bush in the first place. You got a Bush mess because of a Clinton mess. Don’t again vote for another Clinton, please. They create these endless polarizations and degradation for Americans. Hillary go away….don’t divide the party more!!!

Posted by: Imposter_Alert!!! | March 22, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

Clintons are corrupt to the core, and Americans still do not know how many more skeletons are in their closets. Their campaign strategy is to make Obama as dirty as them. I bet Republicans will capture the WhiteHouse, if the Democrats fail to come out of Hillary mess in time. Hitlary will ruin and divide the party!!!!

Posted by: Mona | March 22, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am

“Wright is angry because of the failed promises of America to the black race.” Obama spoke that as if he felt the same way. What about the failed promises to all the other races? We hear the lies too. We feel the pain too. We suffer too. You can make lemonade out of a lemon or you can suck on that lemon the rest of your life. Life is about decisions not hatred, not staying in the role of victim but in the role of an overcomer. Every creed has the option to rise or fall. It’s all up to the courage and determination of the individual no matter what their color. If you stay down once you’ve fallen because you want to don’t expect me to feel sorry for you or to give you the world. I’m struggling in mine. I’m not responsible for what someone else has done. At some point it becomes time to move on, to be better, to put the past behind. Racism lives and breathes because it’s in the hearts and on the lips of those who live on it and gain from it. It’s been turned into a suscessful business for many. The poor get poorer and those people get richer. Don’t cry foul to me. I’ve reason to be angry too… but I’ve moved on to be better because the role of a victim is no life to live.
Wright was his spiritual advisor. What was he going to advise him to do? Turn against Israel? Give the black race their own country which The New Black Panthers are demanding? Anyone that knows anything about the God of Abraham knows that the people of any nations that comes against Israel will be destroyed in a horrible way. My God doesn’t breed hatered. It’s pearlious times we are living in. The black value system which every member of that church has to adhere to is based on a book written by a human. It’s a church. It should be about Jesus Christ and the doctrine should be based on the word of God.

Posted by: Granny | March 22, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am

Dear Imposter_Alert!!!
Why do you think the “American people do not like the nasty campaigns of the Republicans and also the Clintons”?
Did I miss something? Was “Mr. Clean Campaign” John Kerry elected president? Who was US President from 1993 to 2001? Who is the ONLY two term Democratic president since 1953? How many two-term Republican presidents since 1953? Who is the current second term Democrat US senator from New York?
Get a grip and face reality.

Posted by: You're An Idiot | March 22, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am

lies, just lies.
avert, blame, clarify, distract, explain, fudge, gloss, hide, invent, justify, kvetch, lie, misstate, needle, obfuscate, pander, quarrel, restate, slander, twist, understate, vilify, whine, xerox, yield, zigzag.
the obama alphabet.

Posted by: so saddened | March 22, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am

Pretty amazing to see how fast you censor your comments criticizing your coverage.
When are you planning to report that the clip of Wright saying “America’s chickens are coming home to roost” is actually quoting Ronald Reagan’s deputy anti-terrorism task force lead, Ambassador Peck.
You never show the lead-in to Wright’s comments:
“I heard Ambassador Peck on an interview yesterday did anybody else see or hear him? He was on FOX News, this is a white man, and he was upsetting the FOX News commentators to no end, he pointed out, a white man, an ambassador, he pointed out that what Malcolm X said when he was silenced by Elijah Mohammad was in fact true, he said Americas chickens, are coming home to roost.”
Why is it you don’t show that, and then censor this out of comments while allowing all manner of hate speech to remain?

Posted by: John | March 22, 2008, 1:31 am 1:31 am

My Confession: I will no doubt be considered a typical white person for syaing this, but I didn’t realize that there was a nationwide racial division today. Of course, there are racists of every color, gender and age. From a micro perspective, there are some areas, cities, neighborhoods, streets where you find hateful bigotry. And that racism needs to be addressed and ended forever. But in the America I live in I see people of all colors and religions having the same opportunities — evidenced by a woman, african-american, and hispanic running for president. As a country, I didn’t know that we were all hating each other until Barack Obama told me (and Rev. Wright provided me with explicit detail). For months, I looked at Obama as being a possible, but somewhat inexperienced presidential candidate. Anybody I talked to was looking at the wonderful range of candidates that democrats had to choose from. Period. We didn’t talk about black, white, male, female. Now everyone’s talking making race a central issue.
Did it start with Pastor Wright? Did it start with Oprah making an endorsement saying “it was our time”? Did it start with Michelle Obama, the media? All I know is that it was validated by Obama himself this past week.
I guess we do have a race problem here in America now. Thanks for uniting us, Barack Obama.

Posted by: cappamore | March 22, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am

I agree with you MattOhio. CLINTONS ARE CORRUPT. Hillary will do anything and say anything just to get back to whitehouse. She forgot to steal all the furniture last time. Bill can’t wait to get his hands on the Interns. Who will monitor him? What a terror it will be, these two running again loose in Whitehouse. McCain 08!

Posted by: Imposter_Alert!!! | March 22, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am

How can you comment when you did not listen to the speech of Obama. Even if you did you would not comprehend it because you first have to take a course in reading comprehension.

Posted by: carmen | March 22, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am

Imposter_alert
Someone was posting using my screen name…..I think it is Jackie or you…
I am a Hillary supporter all the way…..

Posted by: MattOhio | March 22, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am

He’s not my candidate, neither is Hillary or Macaine. It’s all one big mess and we have three evils to choose from.

Posted by: Granny | March 22, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am

I grew up around some seriously bigoted people in the South. They had some pretty horrible opinions and I learned very early just not to discuss some things. When my father was laid up with a bad back right when our wheat crop was due to come in and my mother hadn’t a clue as to how she would get it in, a bunch of people showed up at our house with combines and trucks and got the crop in and to the grain elevator in about three days. So how do I turn my back on people like that? I really understand where Obama comes from.

Posted by: seagrove | March 22, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am

Hillary is the biggest Monster running around. She will break the democratic party very soon!!! Dems go to hell… Hillary will do the job for the Republicans. McCain 08!!!

Posted by: Mona | March 22, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am

A Politico analysis of campaign finance and court records found Rezko’s fundraising for Obama extended well beyond the confines of the initial list and overlapped with contributions prosecutors plan to highlight in Rezko’s trial in federal court in Chicago.
The review turned up donations previously unnoted by media and Obama’s campaign. And it found a pattern in which, on at least seven occasions, groups of five or more Rezko associates and workers would on the same day write big, often matching checks to Obama’s campaigns, starting with his failed 2000 congressional race. Barack Obama on Friday acknowledged that he had substantially underrepresented the cash raised for his earlier campaigns by indicted businessman Antoin “Tony” Rezko.
But Obama’s campaign said it could not donate to charity as much as $90,000 in newly acknowledged Rezko-linked contributions because the old campaign accounts were closed and the money spent.
Obama’s acknowledgment that Rezko raised as much as $250,000 for earlier campaigns, initially made in an interview with The Chicago Tribune and confirmed later to Politico, came after a year-and-a-half-long trickle of admissions about Rezko’s fundraising role and more than a month after Obama’s aides contended that they had identified and jettisoned all Rezko-linked cash. It also came as Rezko’s trial on corruption charges, underway in Chicago, brought increased scrutiny of Obama’s ties to the real estate developer, fast-food magnate and political insider.
The man is a lier,there are election finance laws he must record all donors and the amount so really just how hard could it have been for him to figure it out.

Posted by: girlinvt | March 22, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am

I will never vote for Hillary. She is the worst type of politician, who will say anything and do anything to get back to Whitehouse. FOX news said this evening that Monica was about to endorse Hillary, but Bill said, it can be handled in private.

Posted by: Steve | March 22, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am

OBAMA already knows he’s cooked, thats why he was given the endorsement on thursday by the “new black panthers”. OBAMA’s plan B is to become the next Jesse Jackson/Rev. KING . With this issue it gives him the credentials of “being held down by the white man/government” He’s from/been in the Black liberation church system. He will make more money (as Jesse has) at the top of the black leadership and make millions from corporations that fear being targeted.

Posted by: steve | March 22, 2008, 2:05 am 2:05 am

Now we see the true feelings of Obama toward whites. As you might have guessed from his long association with Rev. Wright, he feels the same way about the white man. He is a blatant racist. I am very afraid of what will happen when he is elected. He will attempt to effect black liberation theology in this country.

Posted by: Mallard Fillmoor | March 22, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am

girlinvt, looks like someone used your screenname for that zogby poll nonsense. has been happening to a lot of us hillary supporters. i guess the obamakids really are good with computers, when they’re not getting term papers off the net or whatever.

Posted by: so saddened | March 22, 2008, 2:13 am 2:13 am

mallard fillmore, you are right that obama believes in black liberation theology. but you fear for what will happen “when he is elected.” i continue to believe that americans will not be that stupid.
to those of you who try to con people with stuff from dailykos huffpo, or politico – please learn something about considering the source.

Posted by: so saddened | March 22, 2008, 2:18 am 2:18 am

The real plus for BHO getting the party nomination is that he will loose to Mccain, and the party would not run him again in future elections as the nominee.

Posted by: pp | March 22, 2008, 2:22 am 2:22 am

pp, you are so right about that. we dems know how to pick loser nominees, but we don’t run them twice. so the only good that could come out of nominating obama would be that we’d be rid of him forever. i’d still prefer, hillary, however.
preference 1 – hillary as nominee, hillary as president
preference 2 – obama as nominee, mccain as president
notice there’s no preference choice for obama as president? that’s right!

Posted by: so saddened | March 22, 2008, 2:32 am 2:32 am

Could someone please explain to me the difference between a Muslim imam preaching hate and destruction of his enemies in the name of religion, and a Christian minister preaching hate and destruction in the name of religion? I can’t see how the results will be much different. Now you have someone who is practically elected who follows one of these radicals. I admit I understand poorly the belief system of these men, but I don’t want them in power.

Posted by: Mallard Fillmoor | March 22, 2008, 3:04 am 3:04 am

The Obama supporters desperately need a history lesson. The left wing of the Democrat party has never picked a candidate who won the general election. That means the “Keith Olbermann” candidate is virtually certain to lose.
Since the 1950′s, every Democrat who won the presidential general election was either moderate or conservative.
Obama is the lefty candidate – history proves that’s a huge strike against him. His radical preacher is another strike. His “typical white person” gaffe is another strike. Rezko is another strike. Naftagate is another strike. And I’m certain they’ll be many more before November.

Posted by: Mary in Illinois | March 22, 2008, 3:24 am 3:24 am

To Mallard Fillmoor – I don’t think their is a difference. IMO preaching hate from the pulpit is wrong no matter what religion.

Posted by: Mary in Illinois | March 22, 2008, 3:38 am 3:38 am

Barack Obama’s racist comments gneralizing a “typical white person” show that he is not ready to be EVERYONE’s President. Or is this just a “typical black man” who is unable to admit his own bigotry?

Posted by: Mike | March 22, 2008, 8:28 am 8:28 am

He’s a liar and not even a good one. I cannot believe the willingness of the American people to swallow whole pretty much any idiotic thing that he says. He’s a phony and a poser, the way he tries (not very convincingly) to channel black preachers like MLK, Southern lilt included (wait, wasn’t he raised by typical white persons in the state Hawaii?). Am I the only one who finds that offensive? This whole episode is providing a very interesting window into contemporary American critical thought or the lack thereof, as well as our overall state of celebrity-driven lazy-mindedness. The man spins a bunch of not even very complex sentences and nonsensical lawyerese, and the people just step back and say “wow what an orator.” All I see is a weazely weakling of a want-to-be leader. I do not believe I could tolerate four days of his leadership, let alone four years. Hallelujah, I am fast becoming a Republican.

Posted by: Ms. Anderson | March 22, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

Wasn’t there another politician who tried to make things “clear” back in the 60′s or 70′s?
Oh, yeah!
Richard Nixon!
What a fitting parallel of words for Barak Obama!
What I find amazing is that initially Obama didn’t hear any of Jeremiah’s vicious and hateful statements.
Then, about four days later Obama’s story changed and he admitted to hearing some of the statements.
Now, Obama’s story is that he can pick out exactly which statements he did and didn’t hear!
Amazing!
Obama’s next statement should be, “I am not a crook.”

Posted by: Ken | March 22, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

I supported Bush in the last two elections because I found him to be a man of great conviction. I also think that McCain and Huckabee have a great deal of class especially in their responses to the Rev. Wrights sermons. I must say however I am very dissappointed with the lack of class and character being displayed by some of you in this blog. You don’t prove that racism and hatred is no longer a problem in this country by mocking those who actually want to do something to fix it.
True patriotism is to love and respect your country, not the land within its borders; but the PEOPLE of the land. If I were to take bits and pieces of the blogs that I have seen here today; some of you would come out looking pretty racist. However, I believe that it would take more than a few sentences on a blog to get to really know some of you. You guys seem to be so upset with Mr. Obama and Rev. Wright. How about trying show yourselves to be a little better than what you say they are.

Posted by: ddpwoman | March 22, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

It looks to me like the DNC has decided that Obama must be the nominee–largely for fear of alienating his core: young people, blacks, and the upper-class white liberals that are the movers and shakers in the party.
I suspect they think an Obama candidacy, whether he wins or loses, will help the Democratic “brand” with younger voters and hurt the GOP, which will be surely perceived as just as racist as the new Co-Grand Dragon, Bill and Hillary Clinton, racists extraordinaire.
But the problem, as many have pointed out, is that this is actually taking the party “brand” back to the old white, liberal elite + blacks. They will alienate the Blue Dogs, who tipped the 2006 election their way. They cannot win with the old Carter-Mondale-Dukakis coalition. Swing voters will swing hard for the GOP and probably stay there if the GOP remodels itself as a more centrist party under McCain.
In short, the DNC thinks it’s making a bold move to shore up the party for a generation, win or lose. As usual, they’re about to be done in by their own, classist, shortsightedness and hand the GOP an amazing victory and rebuilding opportunity.

Posted by: tiredin PA | March 22, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am

Can Obama release his attendance for the church so we can judge for ourselves if he was there or not? Why is his camp refusing to provide that information?
Because he would be caught in yet another LIE.

Posted by: Sam | March 22, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am

White people of his grandmothers generation – she was anything but typical – she welcomed her Black son-in-law and raised her half white grandson – and what does he do – under the bus – if a white politician would have said “typical Black” they would be done!! George Allen
Just words – all words and no leadership or JUDGMENT

Posted by: ohio typical WP | March 22, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am

Caroline said: “but am first and foremost a Democrat”.
This is sad. You should be first and foremost a human being, followed by a woman, followed by an American, etc.. Being a democrat should be well down the list. This is what is wrong; people identifying so strongly with a political party.

Posted by: J. Russell | March 22, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am

Sorry, I watched the videos and I listened to the Obama interviews. All smoke, mirror and lies!!

Posted by: Firefighter | March 22, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am

I find it so interesting that Obama is so willing to speak of his dead grandmother(who helped raise him) in such a negative light. I mean he did compare her basically to Wright during his race speech. Do you really want to vote for a candidate who would rather speak ill of the dead to do so of his pastor? Is this the courageous Obama we all speak of.

Posted by: Gonzalo | March 22, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am

I find it interesting that so many people are outraged that Obama discussed his WHITE grandmother recently. If she had been BLACK (or other NON-WHITE) would they have been so outraged? I think not. I think what is clearly happening is that white people identify with the white grandmother, and feel defensive about any suggestion about their own biases.
Bias is a part of the human experience. It’s not limited to race, but it includes race. It doesn’t have to be outright prejudicial, but we can’t eliminate bias and prejudice by stubbornly claiming that we “don’t see color” and never thinking about it. The only way to eliminate prejudice is to periodically reflect on one’s thoughts and actions and ask how one can be fairer and more just in one’s actions on a daily basis.

Posted by: Gene L | March 22, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

So now he’s clarifying what was to be a clarification of a comment he made in a speech? What a bunch of BS! I won’t stand for him claiming he didn’t know this or that for ONE MORE MINUTE! He has to have known the ideology of good old “Uncle Pastor” all these twenty years. Remember, he wasn’t just the pastor – Obama claims he was like an UNCLE to him!

Posted by: Anne | March 22, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Given that Obama has been able to call Jeremiah Wright a “good friend” even as he ignored publicly expressed views that are “completely unacceptable and inexcusable”, I truly believe that he is the only candidate that can befriend Ali Khamenei and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as well. Given his desire for dialog with Iran, we can only hope that he will do a better job influencing the religious leaders of Iran than he did influencing the religious leaders of his own presidential campaign.

Posted by: jd | March 22, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

“Can you imagine if Hillary Clinton said someone was a “typical black person?” ”
If Hillary’s mother were black, I bet I would say “She’s half-black so shut up”
I bet that’s what I would say. Just like I point out that Obama is half-white.
Newsflash: Obama’s mom and grandma are white. What does that mean? He is just as white as he is black.
Obama is HALF-WHITE!!!
End of story.

Posted by: Kate | March 22, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

I think Obama, being mixed, just doesn’t think of race as a big problem of course. That’s why he usually doesn’t talk about it & why should he. He’s both black & white. And that’s really what’s needed in an environment where the media is always trying to make mountains out of mole hills & tap racial divisions for dollars.
I don’t think Obama is a racist. I think he just made a stupid statement out of ignorance because he probably just hasn’t really given the subject as much consideration as all of the other “pure” blacks & whites have been forced to by the media in this country.
I considered him the best candidate this country has seen in decades before he made that statement, and it hurt him I think, but I’ll still swing-vote for him over McCain. I just wish that if someone who is white makes a stupid statement like that it change everyone’s minds about them either, but that’s not Obama’s fault.

Posted by: Dugese | March 22, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

What do I think? I think that if the majority of the comments in this post reflect the broader feelings of the electorate, than those people will get exactly the candidate they want.
I want to preface the rest of my comments by saying, I don’t think Obama is the perfect candidate. I disagree with some of his positions on certain issues. I think he should have exercised better judgment with the Rezcko land deal, and, because most people in this country can’t seem to separate politics from spirituality, he shouldn’t have put Rev. Wright on one of his committees, even if it was just an advisory role. Perception is everything in this country.
With that said, despite his imperfections, I still think he will be a great President. He doesn’t have the experience that McCain (not Hillary–sorry, no executive experience by osmosis for me), has, but I think that experience, does not automatically translate into good judgment; and the last seven years have been a perfect example of that. And personally, I don’t think any of the candidates have their hands clean when it comes to previous political/financial relationships and spiritual advisers. And I know we should be raising the bar, but if we honestly think we are going to find someone who hasn’t made mistakes in their lifetime, than we are all deluded, because such a person doesn’t exist. Except Jesus, and I doubt he will every run for the presidency.
However, in general, I feel that Obama is a man of integrity, and does want people to unite in this country so that we can move forward. As far as this whole race flap? I too, went back and did my own research with regards to Rev. Wright’s statement, and even though I still don’t agree with his conspiracy about AIDS and the government (though I understand the historical perspective with the Tuskegee experiment), or his divisive statements about race, I fail to see why this is such a big deal? Correction, now I understand exactly why this is a big deal. We are getting this story from the same news media that failed to conduct any meaningful inquiry into the legitimacy of war in Iraq. Why should I be surprised? If back then, people had the courage and foresight, to actually investigate, challenge, dissent, and report on meaningful stories, maybe things would be different five years later. But here we are again. With this race issue, some are trying to have an honest discussion about it, while others can’t resist a scandal or a soundbite and instead want to get people all riled up.
Personally, I think it is sad that Obama has to clarify anything. Not because I think he is trying to cover anything up, but because his comments were pretty obvious the first time he made them. He specifically said that his grandma was not a racist or harbored racial resentment but was influenced by the cultural and generational norms of her time, and for that she was a typical white person (I agree with this statement, and I feel comfortable with calling myself the typical black person from my cultural experiences and generation). From there, people picked up on “typical white person”, and completely ignored the rest of the statement. Now, we have people on this blog saying he threw his grandma under the bus, and he himself is a racist. Again, I would say that I am shocked that his comments were so easily distorted and misunderstood, but that would be a lie. As soon as he said it, I knew which part of his comments the media and others were going to leap on, and predictably they did. Obama has tried to talk honestly about a lot of things that have been said and unsaid about race in this country and for that, not only is he now the “race candidate,” but a racist himself. Nevermind that it defies logic, since he is both Black and white, or reason, since he too acknowledged harboring his own stereotypes and worked to move past them. It seems like a lot of people aren’t interested in those concepts, and for that reason, I no longer look forward to this election this November.

Posted by: Tanisha W | March 22, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

A’m I confused, Or a’m I the only one watching the WRIGHT CRAP.. This has to prove how angry OBOMA really is, It’s sad to say but its true, cause no matter how good he did , he was still black. why else would a father expose his young daughters to this extreme prodigies against a race which they are at least 25%.. Seems to me this would harder to deal with. Please let me now if I’m wrong or just confused.

Posted by: JAMES DRUMMOND | March 22, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

“mel” – you are either a liar or miseducated. Obama has never called Bill or Hillary a racist. I DARE you to prove otherwise.

Posted by: You will Salute President Obama | March 22, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

Obama is toast in the general. I think just about everybody except the Obama worshipers and MSM have already figured that out.
It’s not just the Wright problem, it’s also Rezko; the Florida and Michigan primaries problem; his lack of experience and substance; his arrogance, etc. And this is only March, there’s going to be plenty more dirt come out on him before November.

Posted by: Elise | March 22, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

The problem with his statement was that he said if a white person was walking down the street they would automatically be defensive. That’s bull and he knew it immediately becaused he paused knowing he misspoke. Today, he’s crafted a clever story to cover his blunder. He didn’t say in a bad neighborhood or at night. Honestly, I’d be afraid of any person passing me at night. I say to Obama, whatever, man.

Posted by: Dude | March 22, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

How many times does Obama lecture to use using the phrase, “I want to be very clear.” It makes me want to vomit everytime I hear it. Anyone else as tired of hearing that phrase?

Posted by: Parthen | March 22, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

I have no doubt that if he was not in the congregation on the day Pastor Wright made those comments, then he would have at least heard of them from other congregants of the church.
Let’s remember that his wife, children, and community also attend the same church – surely in 20 years, someone must have told him what kind of statements Pastor Wright was making?

Posted by: Angie | March 22, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

the issue really is that obama is cut slack by the media at every turn he makes. so-and-so was a typical black person. let’s see now, if hillary or geraldine ferraro said such a thing, good lord! they’d be crucified! if hillary’s mentor and spiritual advisor of 20 years said ‘god d*mn america’ because the country is sexist, one gender speech wouldn’t do anything. go ahead and nominate obama – he cannot win the swing states. he’ll even lose a couple of blue states. then we won’t have to listen to him or the rest of his glazed eyed minions anymore. welcome to the real world – it sucks sometimes, huh?

Posted by: ChrisSanDiego | March 23, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

gonzalo, what’s really sad is that she ISN’T dead. he trashed his living grandmother on national tv.

Posted by: so saddened | March 23, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am

so saddened…I think he threw the kitchen sink under there with her.

Posted by: RL in Illinois | March 23, 2008, 2:48 am 2:48 am

To so saddened: Excellent post. I was 18 when Reagan first got elected. My friends and I were shocked because we just couldn’t fathom that anybody would vote for “that old man”. And now the Obama youth are thinking the same thing about McCain. Boy are they in for a rude awakening.
I’m also ready to kiss off the Party over their latest elitist lefty savior. They just don’t seem to get it no matter how many times they lose.

Posted by: Marianna | March 23, 2008, 3:51 am 3:51 am

marianna, thanks for the feedback. sadly, i must admit that i was 18 when nixon first got elected. my reaction was the same – how can they vote for him? can’t they see how much better the dems are? this can’t be happening…., etc….. (in nixon’s case, we know how it worked out, but that doesn’t change the reality that we were fooling ourselves about how the country would agree with us).
obamaites have much to learn. sadly, we shall all pay for their education.

Posted by: so saddened | March 23, 2008, 4:12 am 4:12 am

I just have one thing to say about Obama and that is he has no religious conviction at all to go to a church where the pastor stands in the pulpit taking the Lord’s name in vain. Our country is in trouble if we elect a racist like Barack Obama.

Posted by: millermud | March 23, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am

WHO CARES? Do you know how much consumers are paying for chicken in Giant these days? HOW ABOUT THE ECONOMY? Sheezzz ENOUGH ALREADY

Posted by: dotheresearch | March 23, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

How is Obama or Rev Wright a racist? Provide one fact that shows either one is racist. Just one.

Posted by: dotheresearch | March 23, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

one last thing. . . .lolol (I am contributing to this madness). I found nothing offensive in Rev Wrights sermon. It was all true. His sermon pales against some of the ones preached by Jesus. Read the bible.
It isn’t always pretty but . . . truth is truth.

Posted by: dotheresearch | March 23, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

Hey dotheresearch…When you are on stage-you make the song your own.

Posted by: RL in Illinois | March 23, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Hey Dan from Pensacola — You said — If John McCain went to a church for twenty years, that openly proclaimed hatred for black people, he’d be run out of town.
My challenge to you — Provide proof on Obama or Rev Wright proclaiming hatred for any racial group.
Regarding the McCain statement – I will give you one name – you can do the research HAGEE. McCain seeked his support in this 2008 nomination. Look it up. I personally don’t hold McCain accountable for Hagee or any of his controversial supporters stances. To do so is completely irrational and unreasonable. But to respond to your statement — Hagee. That is just 1 individual. I am sure you will come across more on your own if you honestly do the research.
Blessings to all. I am out.

Posted by: dotheresearch | March 23, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

Hey RL from Illinois – I don’t have to stand on any stage and I am certainly not standing on my own. :-) I do appreciate your concern.
Research this stuff on your own (not sound bites 30 sec sound bites) the complete information. It doesn’t take much. Look it up, listen or read and draw your conclusions from there. Then make the decision to help move this country forward or be happy with status quo. Up to you.

Posted by: dotheresearch | March 23, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am

dotheresearch…Unfortunately I have listened to the whole thing. Do you read what you write? Doesn’t seem like you’re moving forward-and the Jesus comment was just plain out there. The stage reference was for Obama and his Reverend not you. I’m sorry you’re confused.

Posted by: RL in Illinois | March 23, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am

I believe the dilemma Obama finds himself in, is this stalemate he spoke about in his speech. The stalemate of attitudes and perceptions. Xenophobia, Racism and other types of hatreds exist in all people. But it’s the ability to act on these inate feelings that separates victim from victimizer. The victimizer is unlikely to acknowledge his/her deviate behavior. And the victim may ascribe all his/her problems and failures to the individuals and institutions which afflict him/her.
Concerning the dynamics of black/white relationships in America, you can find fault on both sides, and I think this is what Obama was trying to get at. But many White people don’t want to hear about their side – period. Because to do so is to give up a certain amount of power. There’s also a resistance among Blacks, but this has more to do with ego and moving outside one’s comfort zone, and accepting personal responsibility.

Posted by: chas0x01 | March 23, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

Hey dotheresearch — If Rev.Wright’s comments were not racist, reprehensible, hateful and incendiary, then why did Obama reject and repudiate them? Because they are hateful and disgusting and devised to separate, brainwash and anger his congregation… if not, they would not be called incendiary. Get it? Your fearless leader even thought they were out of line. This is the real problem here. You can NOT be on the Unity ticket and be anti-American and justify your idiotic, naive, hateful position as you are doing. By the way, Wright’s comments against Hillary and Bill were just as hateful and yes, racist. Too bad you are too naive not to know that.

Posted by: ginamc | March 24, 2008, 2:22 am 2:22 am

Uhhhhh, anybody ever notice that Rev Wright looks … rather pale?
Maybe racial confusion turns into rage the older you get?

Posted by: C | March 24, 2008, 2:43 am 2:43 am

B. Obama said – “The point I was making was not that my grandmother harbors any racial animosity, but that she is a typical white person. If she sees somebody on the street that she doesn’t know – there’s a reaction in her that’s been bred into our experiences that don’t go away and sometimes come out in the wrong way and that’s just the nature of race in our society.
B. Obama can explain it away however he wants but there is no “typical white person” other than the phantom white he has shrunk down and exists only in his own psyche. If his white family (or indeed he himself)is racist and/or ignorant that does not mean that racism is universal among the majority of whites. If B. Obama feels that he belongs to “one of the finest churches in Chicago”, even though hate, racial superiority, warped conspiracy theories and anarchy are preached there, that is his right – in turn it is the right of Americans to gauge his suitability to be our next president by the very same ideals.

Posted by: Liz in PA | March 24, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

Ah, first is anything Obama say the truth?
Anyone walking down a street and get harassed by an aggressive panhandle is going to get nervous! just like his grandmother.
Why is Obama bringing race into the mix, we now know he is a racist.
Please not there is an article where Rev Jesse Jackson made a comment that if he is walking down a street at nite in Washington and hears someone behind him he feels relief if it is a White person!
Obama is getting caught up with his lies!

Posted by: spock | March 24, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

I just wish that to justify his comment he would have left his grandmother, the woman who raised and supported him, out of it. He put her in danger. Recently a mob marched to her home and burned an effigy of her. Jesus! How could he have done that to her. She’s old, bedridden and now in danger. I feel so sorry for her.

Posted by: Trudy | March 24, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

I can tell by the comments made here that the majority of White People have hatred and resentment for anyone other than white in their DNA. You also have a problem reading and interpeting what you read.
I’m sure that most of these comments are made by people under the age of 35 yrars. So where does all that hatred and resentment come from?
Do most of you feel that you have not gotten a fare shake in this country. Do you not feel priviledge? Do you feel you should be richer than you are? What is your problem?
You seem to always take your frustrations out on other people as well as yourselves. Why are you so Angry?
PS When I say you, I mean you plural and not singular.

Posted by: Sally | March 27, 2008, 6:10 am 6:10 am

Upon READING the Barack Obama speech I was extremely moved and impressed. However, I understood (as I am sure he understood) the backlash that it would cause. He spoke candidly, sympathetically, and honestly to Blacks about the issues within the Black community. He challenged us to cast off mentalities of hopelessness AND anti-white sentiments that some may harbor. He attempted to explain to the Black community the feelings that the racial majority may feel when he says, “Most working- and middle-class white Americans don’t feel that they have been particularly privileged by their race.” He demanded that Blacks look at life through the eyes of White America as well as the African Diaspora that we are used to. He asked us, the Black Community to reach out to our “young men and, increasingly, young women who we see standing on street corners or languishing in our prisons, without hope or prospects for the future”, but he also reminds that often times the anger or negativity we harbor (due to racism & discrimination) is “not always productive; indeed, all too often it distracts attention from solving real problems; it keeps us from squarely facing our own complicity in our condition, and prevents the African-American community from forging the alliances it needs to bring about real change”. I am black, and I don’t think that the moral, spiritual, or political demands he posed to our community were unwarranted. And I don’t hear ANYONE saying that he was too hard on the Black Community. I don’t think anyone said he stereotyped Black America. No, there were no issues with those statements, so I can only assume that the majority of America had not problem when he told Black America to acknowledge their shortcomings. What he said about Blacks was considered accurate and correct. But when he ALSO asked the same of White America the overwhelming reaction seemed much different to me. A couple of my white coworkers were offended and immediately became defensive that Obama highlighted injustices and problems that they may contribute to (knowingly AND unknowingly). As I attempted to explain that he pointed out the flaws of BOTH minorities AND majorities in America I was reprimanded harshly. I just wish people were focusing on the true reason for his speech. To sum it up he was saying, “Race is STILL an issue that America ignores and downplays. We, as a nation, have not decided whether we are color-conscious OR color-blind. It is time to address the issues of the past in order to move forward. Racism STILL exist, and it’s not going away unless we all take a moment to introspect! It is time out for appearances of equality, and it it time that we get HONEST!” He said the things that Blacks, Whites, Latinos, Asians, and everyone else says when they don’t have to be politically correct. We, as Americans, claim we want an honest politician, but when we have a man stand up as address the very REAL discontentment felt by most of the minorities in this country HE is labeled a racist? If someone did not understand WHY he said the things he said they should have made it their duty to find someone who SHARED his views and try to UNDERSTAND the life experiences that birth these mentalities. At the same time you could express your point of view. This speech was given to encourage open and honest dialogue amongst and within racial and socio-econimic classes. Instead we have resorted to politics as usual. We continue to bash each other, degrade each other, and dismiss the emotions, opinions, and feelings that don’t line up with our own. In a country that claims to be tolerant enough to cherish free speech, it amazes me that we are not intelligent enough to accept words spoken freely.

Posted by: Tavaria | March 28, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

as for obama and hilliary i don’t trust neither canidates for presidency. their both liars and don’t back any of their words. now as for african americans, when asked where their from they can’t even tell you where. true africans can’t even stand american blacks. as for racism all of us that are born in america are consider americans not different races. if that is the case, i would be puerto rican american not the other way around. i was born in america not puerto rico thus making me american of latin descent not puerto rican american. wake up people, if you want to be called something else other than american than move out to the country you so proudly yell you are..

Posted by: Bryant | March 29, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

For all his ‘freshness & youth’, Obama is still a ‘typical’ politician; he makes speeches, watches how it affects people, then adjusts (clarifies) the meanings of his statements to get the more votes, watches for the reactions of his ‘clarifications’ and readjusts accordingly (A.K.A. ‘damage control’).
His wonderful, uplifting orations remind me (now that I’m catching on) of the ‘typical’ TV preacher who only wants your money for his own creature comforts and a few ‘token’ good works (this does not defame the genuine preachers, only the self-interested). The prize, in this case, is your vote for Obama.
His words of ‘change’ and ‘a united America’ are ‘typical’ also. How many times have those same words been used in political campaigns over the years? But some act like Obama has come up with this ‘new’ idea (Wow, why didn’t we think of this before?! How could we have missed it?!?!”)
As for why didn’t he leave the church earlier? Well, he seems to have missed most of the racist preaching (Obama says); either he seldom went or perhaps one padded pew is as good to sleep on as another. Or maybe he thought sermons are just words, after all; that ‘sticks & stones, words can never hurt you’ thing. And it seems he might have been confused & thinks Rev. Wright saved his soul instead of Jesus (Jesus doesn’t require you to have a sponser, Obama!). Jesus never preached like that! Jesus preached regarding our souls, not our race.
I will not vote for Hillery because she’s a woman and gosh, we’ve never had a woman president before. I will not vote for McCain because he’s white and we’ve always had white, male presidents. I will not vote for Obama because he’s black and, gosh, we’ve never had a black president before. Nor will my vote go to the Democrat just because I’m a Democrat or the Republican just because I’m a Republican. It will go to the one who I think will do the most good and/or the least harm to this country as a whole.
THIS IS NOT AMERICAN IDOL, PEOPLE. IT’S NOT ABOUT VOICE QUALITY, SONG CHOICE AND ‘CUTENESS’!!!
IT’S ABOUT THIS DAMN WAR IN IRAQ, THE ECONOMY AND TAXES (to name just 3 issues)…AND OUR COUNTRY!!!
Obama & Hillery both promise to ‘end the war in Iraq’ & to give us ‘universal health care’.
If either one of them yanks us out of Iraq as quickly as they ‘promise’, it will only make the present situation much, much worse in the long run. The war in Iraq seems to be the major thing they try to defame McCain with, “Oh, McCain is a Republican JUST LIKE BUSH, WHO SENT US INTO IRAQ. ANOTHER 4 YEARS OF BUSH!”. Bush should not have invaded Iraq but should have stayed focused on the Al-Qaida who, unfortunately for the Afghanis, were hiding in Afghanistan with the Taliban. This was Bush’s own choice; no one twisted HIS arm. Unfortunately, THAT Pandora’s box (Iraq) has already been opened; we have to deal with the present situation, not ‘what might have been’. We can’t just slam the box lid closed on this one (Which is what Obama & Hillery seem to be implying they can do).
Universal health care? And just who will pay for that? Why, the average taxpayer, of course; taxes, taxes, taxes! No offense, but the liberal Democrats in office seem to be so generous spending other people’s (we taxpayers) hard-earned dollars (Who cried the loudest against the elimination of earmarks???) but seem to give much less of their own money to deserving charities (unless they’re campaigning for office, that is.). And Obama is one of the most liberal Democrats there is (from what I’ve read…. & taken with a grain of salt… but actions speak louder than words.)
I urge you all to look beyond the pretty words, promises & ‘endorsements’. Pay attention to what’s said and what’s NOT said; there’s other words between them lines in many cases. Watch out for those smooth words meant to get your knee-jerk reaction (& vote), pay close attention to those ‘clarifications’ & vote for who YOU feel will do their best for our country.
IT’S NOT ABOUT RACE, IT’S ABOUT AMERICA!

Posted by: Untypical | March 29, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Sally.. I am a 60 year old W.F… and to answer your question; No I have not gotten a “Fair” shake in this country, for that reason.
With the Equal Rights bill, all my rights were taken away from me, and given to you and your people.
Yet you continue to complain and want more.
You have been given every opportunity to succeed, so if you fall short of success, look in the mirror. That is the only excuse you have.
I think I can safely say I am no angrier than you are.
And I do believe Obama is as big a racist as his preacher, and if elected, we will find that out after it’s too late. But I won’t be in the country if that happens.

Posted by: Sam | March 29, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

Obama and Hillary are both hypocrites and liars. I’m not too crazy about McCain either, but if chooses Mitt as his running Mate this country might just have a chance at survival!

Posted by: mjbauer24 | April 1, 2008, 5:13 am 5:13 am

Unfortunately, our country views politics and politicians as a pastime instead of looking at it as seriously as they should. Despite what any candidate says in speeches, we need to look at the reality of the situation.
My father and I had a conversation recently about this. He brought up Obama’s “typical white person” comment and said that he was worried that if Obama were president that white people would become second class citizens. I tried to explain why exactly this wouldn’t happen (checks and balances with congress and the supreme court, the, you know, bill of rights, which prevents anyone from being a literal “second class citizen” anymore, also in a more realistic sense, population density), but more or less there’s no changing views about candidates.
The reason we form such powerful views and ideas about our candidates is not necessarily because they’ll be in power or because we wonder whether or not they’ll be good for the country as leaders; they are celebrities. Politicians are consistently in the lime-light, giving speeches, shaking hands, etc. So, of course our celebrity-obsessed American spirits would be interested in digging up dirt on politicians, seeing them make mistakes, watching them fumble in speeches, etc., etc., etc.
Reason behind this: we want to know they’re human.
So, why don’t we disregard idle, stray comments and focus on the issues? The only reason any of our candidates feel the need to justify any comments they’ve made is because we force them to. I’m looking forward to this election, honestly, simply because more Americans will be participating this year. My age demographic (18-25) finally actually pulled itself out of its self imposed apathy and decided, “Hey, maybe I should try to make a difference.” So let’s not tarnish things before they start.

Posted by: Ryan | April 6, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.