By Jennifer Parker

Mar 28, 2008 9:46am

Obama-Backing Senator Calls for Clinton to Drop Out

Sen. Pat Leahy, D-Vermont, the chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and a high-profile supporter of Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, has called for Obama’s opponent to drop out of the race.

In an interview on Vermont Public Radio, said "There is no way that Senator Clinton is going to win enough delegates to get the nomination. She ought to withdraw and she ought to be backing Senator Obama. Now, obviously that’s a decision that only she can make frankly I feel that she would have a tremendous career in the Senate."

Listen to a clip from the interview HERE.

Leahy said he was fretting about the impact of the protracted Democratic race.

"I am very concerned," he said. "John McCain, who has been making one gaffe after another, is getting a free ride on it because Senator Obama and Senator Clinton have to fight with each other. I think that her criticism is hurting him more than anything John McCain has said. I think that’s unfortunate."

Campaigning in Mishawaka, Indiana Friday, Clinton didn’t specifically address Leahy’s comments, reports ABC News’ Eloise Harper.

But Clinton did say, "There are some people who are saying, you know, we really ought to end this primary, we ought to shut it down."

"No!" the crowd shouted.

"There was a poll the other day that said 22 percent of democrats want me to drop out and 22 percent  want Senator Obama to drop out and 62 percent said let people vote," Clinton said. "One thing you know about me when I tell you I will fight for you I will get up every day and that’s exactly what I will do."

Watch the VIDEO HERE.

Clinton also suggested working for the American people is her calling.

"I believe going to work for you is what I am  called to do," she said.

- jpt

User Comments

that is the most sane move to be adopted by Clinton.

Posted by: alexis compton | March 28, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am

I don’t think that Hillary should quit because some old liberals like Leahy, Kennedy, Kerry, etc. think so. She didn’t ask them before entering and she certainly shouldn’t leave because these liberal elites want their affirmative action dream to complete.

Posted by: American | March 28, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am

I think Hillary will bow out before July 1 to back up Obama against McCain. Yesterday she asked her supporters NOT to vote for McCain if she wouldn’t become the nominee, but to strengthen a unified Dem Party instead.
At Politico there’s news about Dean pointing out July 1 as a deadline for the SD’s decision:
“Harry Smith asked if after the nominating contests end with the South Dakota and Montana primaries on June 3, “Do you want the superdelegates to have some sort of vote immediately so that you’ll know months in advance of the convention what the outcome is?”
Dean replied: “Well, I think the superdelegates have already been weighing in. I think that there’s 800 of them and 450 of them have already said who they’re for. I’d like the other 350 to say who they’re at some point between now and the first of July so we don’t have to take this into the convention.””

Posted by: Greta | March 28, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

I would like to see her do it, but that ain’t going to happen. Not yet.

Posted by: Thinking | March 28, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

Why should she quit? she is a fighter and that is what we need in Washington. I believe that though Obama might get the nomination, but comes in Nov, the Republicans will have a field day with him. Besides without the revote in FL & MI, I don’t see how the democrats are going to carry those swing states.

Posted by: ken | March 28, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

Leahy is exactly right. For the good of the party Clinton should drop out immediately. Obama is the right leader at the right time.

Posted by: pt | March 28, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am

Best thing she could do for this country. She won’t mark my word, they want power so bad it hurts.Nothing would please me anymore then see Billy boy out of the lime light He is a big black hole in this countrys history…
She is NOT capeable of running this country.All her big help in Billys reign were in her head ,she was hoping.I read now Irland, was to do a little plot in a park. Now tell me does that give her the right to say she was part of this settlement.NO

Posted by: h | March 28, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

It is about the country and what is best for the country…
Who puts the country and the party first?
If Paul Tsongas and/or Kerrey had continued an extended battle for the nomination in 1992 (which would have been their right…and probably would have had similar numbers to Sen Clinton as others dropped out) …chances are Bill Clinton would not have won.

Posted by: dl | March 28, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

Why is everybody urging hillary to drop out right now??? Could it be because they’re afraid of the results in Pen?
If Obama loses there by double digits it should give the superdelegates something to think about.

Posted by: Missmadeleine2002 | March 28, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

i am sending my resignation to the dnc today,and i am going to email sen clinton to ask her to run as a independant and will support her financially if she does,i ask all of you who support her online to ask her to do the same thing and spread the word online,the heck with the dnc and the far left.

Posted by: don tufts | March 28, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

Senator Leahy is correct and I am grateful to him for speaking up. Yes, Hillary will likely win PA and a couple other states but Obama will win the majority of the remaining states and delegates. The super delegates are clearly moving to him. He is the right candidate for this moment in our history. For all her good work over the years, we do not need another Clinton era in the White House. Hillary would make a great Senate Majority Leader or cabinet member.

Posted by: Ruth | March 28, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

This Leahy Fella sounds quite reasonable.
Maybe if more of his friends would get off the fence and chime in as well….

Posted by: The Commander Guy | March 28, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

Can Obama win enough delegates to win the nomination? No. Should he drop out because of that?
Come on. To these old liberals, Obama is a baby who needs to be protected. But
the truth is that, the longer the race
goes, the worse Obama will look like.
Let the voters vote.

Posted by: Jim | March 28, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

Good news for Obama again:
Pennsylvania Senator Bob Casey is endorsing Obama today. Democrats are wondering if this could signal the beginning of a “bandwagon effect” that began last week with the endorsement by New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson.
This is a big break for Obama, who has substantial disadvantages going into the April 22 Pennsylvania primary. Gov. Edward G. Rendell has endorsed Clinton, and the Keystone State is full of the white, blue-collar voters who have turned out strongly for her.
The endorsement also will help Obama with Roman Catholic voters. Casey is one of the state’s leading Catholics, and graduated from the Catholic University law school.

Posted by: Jenn | March 28, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

don tufts says:
|”i am sending my resignation to the dnc today,and i am going to email sen clinton to ask her to run as a independant and will support her financially if she does”|
She can’t even win half of the Democratic vote, why would she run as an indy? She would lose her own stature and all of her seats in the US Senate.
If you want 4 more years of Bush-McCain, I can see your point.
I can’t stand people who call themselves Democrats or progressives and vow not to vote for either Obama or Clinton if they win.
It’s sour grapes and shows a lack of intelligence character.

Posted by: Dave Dial | March 28, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Senator Leahy should resign immediately since he clearly does not believe in the democratic ideal that everyone should be able to vote and have their voice heard. Why are so many of Obama’s supporters anti-democratic?

Posted by: Ron | March 28, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Bob Casey endorses Obama? That is the fourth Superdelegate going his way in the last few days, though we don’t hear a lot about that at ABC, don’t know why.

Posted by: Greta | March 28, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Jenn: I think thats what they said about Kennedy! He could not even deliver his home state. Working class people are not going to vote for Obama now or in November. If Hillary is forced out of this race then it will only serve to hardened the resole or her supporters like me to vote for McCain! So go ahead and do like Leahy who represent a left wing state and force her out and we will never forget!

Posted by: russell | March 28, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

ANOTHER WHITE MAN ASKS HILLARY TO STEP ASIDE. LOL. LET IT GO, GUYS.

Posted by: tony | March 28, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

Dear Senator Patrick Leahy,
I am a Senator Hillary Clinton supporter and I find it disturbing and rather annoying that you are requesting that she drop out of the race.
Take note, Senator Hillary Clinton is a far better candidate to run this great country than Senator Obama will ever be in my opinion. She is a fighter and she will stay until the bitter end of this campaign, has my unconditional support.
Perhapse you need mind your own affairs and but out!
T. C.
CA

Posted by: Tom Carnesi | March 28, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

I AM VERY MUCH ASHAMED, THE WAY YOU TREAT EACH OTHER ON THE WEB.
IT IS GOOD TO LOVE A CANDIDAT/ BEING A HUMAN SHE/ HE CAN FAIL. LOOK AT THE MESSAGE HE IS BRINGING TO HELP THE COUNTRY. SOME DO NOT LIKE OBAMA BECAUSE OF HIS COLOUR AND SOME LIKE HILLARY BECAUSE OF HER GENDER THAT IS NOT MATURITY

Posted by: TABET | March 28, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

obamma is tryonig to sell the nomination by not allowing Michigan and Florida a voice if their voice was heard he would be sucking hind teet so why does Leahy think Obamma is the shoe in If the democratic party does not count all votes and let all voices be heard they will loose the election to Mcain Obamma is a liar he lied about Selma he lied about being a professor he lied about his patriotic ideals His wife is a black supremist as evidenced by her paper she wrote for he thesis in school and they both attend a church that hates Americans that are white we do not need a president who has muslem connections and hates whites I feel the news media is running this election and they need to let the voters decide not some politco senator who has his own issues As far as the super delegates what hippocrates are Kerry and Kennedy Howard Dean is not representing the party he is only bending to the race issue and that is just a small fraction of the party WE ARE ALL IMPORTANT So why is Obamma getting to steal the nomination from the voters from all 50 states

Posted by: daddywontsellthefarm | March 28, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

I don’t know why the superdelegates are waiting to make a decision. There’s approximately 79 that have not endorsed anyone even though their state has already held a primary/caucus. Senator Leahy is correct about McCain. The longer this thing is drawn out the easier it is for McCain. Superdelegates make a decision since that’s the only way for the Dems to get a nominee. Don’t wait until June or worse August! Stand for something now.

Posted by: OneAmerica | March 28, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

lol so now Obama is the affirmative action dream. lololol
It is so sad this is STILL a racist nation. Even if Obama is the nominee, he won’t win because we have too many racists (a whole bunch in PA) that won’t vote for him because his skin is slightly brown. Even though he has been identified as a white man in brown face, people still can’t get pass the color. Truly sad.
hellary doesn’t have to drop out. She should continue with her slash and burn political run. That way, when she attempts to run again in 2012, we won’t forget how her lies and distortions ruined this election.

Posted by: LA in Indiana | March 28, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

Obama should drop out today. He’s hateful Rev Wright, his American loathing spouse, his Rezko problem, his throwing his grandmother under the bus…
he can’t be elected.
He puts himself above the Party and above America.
Please for once Mr. Obama, do something for your country, DROP OUT

Posted by: Typical White Person (except I'm not | March 28, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

As a lifelong Democrat, I find Leahy’s remarks to be way out of line and undemocratic. How dare he even suggest that Hillary drop out of the race! What a bunch of BS!
Pretty obvious what Leahy and folks like Pelosi and Dean are up to. They want Hillary to drop out before she defeats Obama by huge margins in PA and before those PA exit polls show that Obama has lost all the white vote.
Well, Senator Leahy, Dean, Pelosi, and any other folks that want Hillary to drop put, she is not going to drop out of the race. She has over 1 million more democrat votes than does Obama. The Democratic Party voters support her by a much larger margin. Hillary is going to clean Obama’s clock in PA and it will only get worse for BO. Obama is UNELECTABLE.
We’re not playing a game, we’re hiring a President. And Hillary Clinton is the best candidate for the job! Period.

Posted by: US Vet | March 28, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

To the Clinton supporters:
It’s over. We know you love Hillary. We, the Obama supporters, would have had a hard time with this part too — the breakup. But it’s time to begin to come to terms with it. McCain is not the answer. He’s a terrible candidate, and deep down you know it. When Hillary is standing side-by-side with Barack at the convention and all this fall and asking for your support for Obama, we hope you will listen.
We’re sorry things did not work out better. Hillary was a strong campaigner. But she has lost. The longer she puts off dropping out, the worse off for our party — your party — and you, her supporters, should not want that.
We love you and we want you to have a voice in the Obama campaign. Please come back to the Democratic party and help us win the White House in November. We need you.
signed,
your Obama friends

Posted by: dan | March 28, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

I am miffed at the fact, that all the Hillary Clinton supporters say she is a fighter, I agree with that… But it is absurd to think that OBAMA is not a fighter, HELL!!! this guys father left him at 2 years old and no money, raised by his mother and grandmother, fought hard to get his grades, graduate from Law School, fight for south Chicago, I’m from Indiana, Gary IND. is a tough place just south of Chicago. It’s simple!!! Obama brings not only this country but the whole world a Huge Opportunity to UNITE and become a better place to live. Unfortunately Hillary brings the same old stuff BUSH1, Clinton1, BUSH2, Clinton2 it just does not add up in these difficult times. Please elect OBAMA, he is truly our FIGHTING CHANCE!!!

Posted by: Dennis | March 28, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

Looks like the DNC is afraid of whats coming in PA,WV,KY,IN,PR. Well all the pundits have written her off so many times they have lost all credibility! Nither one of them will have the delegates to get the nomination without the help of superdelegates. So MSM let’s do like Bill Clinton said and saddle up because this ride is not over!

Posted by: russell | March 28, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

It’s ironic, but the bitterness in many of the posts on this blog is precisely why Senator Leahy has called for Clinton to withdraw.
He is, however, correct. She needs two-thirds of the delegates remaining, which translates to 75%+ in the vote, due to the way delegates are split up. To make it simple, that’s the reason she only picked up +9 in Ohio despite a 10% win.

Posted by: James | March 28, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am

Dennis: Is that the same grandmother that he threw under the bus for his friend Rev. Wright!

Posted by: russell | March 28, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

ANOTHER WHITE MAN ASKS THE MOST POWERFUL WOMAN DEMOCRAT TO DROP OUT. LOL. TOO BAD SHE ISN’T ONE-HALF MALE, THEN MAYBE SHE COULD BE IN THE BOYZ CLUB LIKE OBAMA.

Posted by: tony | March 28, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

Let the Voters decide.
I find it disturbing that the Obama supporters are for suppressing voters.
I heard Obama say that he wasn’t afraid of any man or any women…then why is he afraid to have the voters of Michigan and Florida vote.

Posted by: Kathy Corey | March 28, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

I tell you one thing if she does drop out of the race McCain WILL win. There are two many people who will not support Obama for president. Too much baggage, and two many of Clinton supporters have been bashed by Obama supporters to switch. I have NEVER voted Republican for president but I will not support Obama. Mark my words he will not win.

Posted by: Tracy | March 28, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

James: It’s winner take all in November and Hillary has won where we need to win! If McCain wins Ohio,and PA game over, and the way things look now thats going to be the outcome! So why not give the nomination to someone who has a shot at these states. I know we are not supposed to pick the canidate who has the best chance!

Posted by: russell | March 28, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am

Barack Obama is the Woulda, Coulda, Shoulda candidate
Obama is getting creamed by the Rev. Wright revelations and the latest is that Obama is now claiming that he was going to leave the church if his Uncle jeremiah had not retired, which BTW, is not effective until March 31, 2008.
Obviously, Obama watched what Clinton did a couple of days ago when she stated that she would have left the church if Wright had been her pastor and had such such hate speech from the pulpit. So now Obama has decided to play a very simple game. It’s called Follow the Leader.
Oh, and for you Obama fans, your guy isn’t the one leading. Because after sitting in the pews of Trinity for 20 years, admitting he’d heard some of Wright’s screeds, after he said he didn’t, Barack Obama still couldn’t figure out the right thing to do until Clinton demonstrated it for him a couple of days ago.
So if you’re one of those people buying his latest “Had the reverend not retired, and had he not acknowledged that what he had said had deeply offended people and were inappropriate and mischaracterized what I believe is the greatness of this country, for all its flaws, then I wouldn’t have felt comfortable staying at the church,” well, then I’ve got a country you can buy cheap. It’s on sale for suckers.
Obama is UNELECTABLE! Nobody is buying his BS anymore.
The people are going to support Hillary Clinton in record numbers in PA and that trend will continue. Obama is VERY desperate now, as are his surrogates. Leahy calling on Hillary to quit is unconscionable. This only strengthens Hillary’s suport!
Go Hillary!!

Posted by: VoteNow | March 28, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

russell Do you need a calculator? Can you tell me how you get a delegate lead out of the remaining states, in which OBAMA will carry most of? This race is over!!! Interpretation of throwing someones family member under the bus, does and should not get reactions just from print. If we want to down this road then How about about Whitewater!!! Talk about people getting thrown off the bus, Hell some of them are now underground.

Posted by: DJW | March 28, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

What a crock this party is! Obama supporters asking Hillary to step down after blocking 2 states from voting and knowing that she has the momentum! This party is the most crooked I’ve ever seen.
They & Obama have done everything to disrupt the democratic process. And to see so called party leaders doing this makes me sick.
I will never vote for Obama because of what HE stands for even if Hillary Clinton says vote 4 him. It’s insane.

Posted by: John | March 28, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

Leahy only has what’s best for Hillary at heart.
If she drops out and goes back to the Senate still can still have a wonderful and productive career.
But if she keeps buring bridges…this would be bad not only for her party but for her career.
Thank You Pat Leahy for looking out for Hillary.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | March 28, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

Tracy: I second that! I have never voted republican in my life but I would never vote for a canidate who could not seperate himself from a man like Rev.Wright! I don’t agree with McCain on every issue but like Bill Clinton said “he has given everything a man can give to his country,except for dying”! Well to working class america John McCain looks a whole lot better than Obama!

Posted by: russell | March 28, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Pile on Hillary time. The party brass is putting the screws to her. This will only embolden her, scrappy fighter that she is. Its effect on her supporters is less clear, but if the posts on this blog are any indication, the sentiment will be: “Fight on Hillary”!

Posted by: shellray | March 28, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Senator Patrick Leahy
Can we kick you out in the senate every time we have enough vote to pass the bill. Don’t you want to vote and show where you stand. Just shut up and wait, I want to vote and show who i am supporting.

Posted by: steve | March 28, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

What a crock this party is! Obama supporters asking Hillary to step down after blocking 2 states from voting and knowing that she has the momentum! This party is the most crooked I’ve ever seen.
They & Obama have done everything to disrupt the democratic process. And to see so called party leaders doing this makes me sick.
I will never vote for Obama because of what HE stands for even if Hillary Clinton says vote 4 him. It’s insane.

Posted by: John | March 28, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Obama won’t have the delegates either.
It’s calls like this that push Clinton’s voters closer to casting that vote to McCain. The powers that be just don’t get it. Clinton supporters want their candidate to stay in at least until these upcoming primaries are done and it’s not the sniping between the two candidates (this is politics after all) that’s turning us off to the Democratic party rather it’s the Democratic party’s willingness to throw half of their party, in particular the women and blue collar vote, under the bus. This is a split party and Obama won’t win the general without us, in particular if we go McCain, so If I were the powers that be I would just back off and let the process takes it course. If Obama wins, which is most likely he will, then so be it. At least all states and voters, which should include both MI and Fla, will have had a voice.

Posted by: alpaig | March 28, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

YOU ARE RIGHT FOR SAYING THIS! IT IS ALL ABOUT PUBLIC RELATIONS. BUT DONT THEY KNOW THEY NEED HILLARY TO CAMPAIGN FOR THIS MAN? LOL. HE CANNOT WIN WITHOUT HER SUPPORTERS VOTING FOR HIM….
“As a lifelong Democrat, I find Leahy’s remarks to be way out of line and undemocratic. How dare he even suggest that Hillary drop out of the race! What a bunch of BS!
Pretty obvious what Leahy and folks like Pelosi and Dean are up to. They want Hillary to drop out before she defeats Obama by huge margins in PA and before those PA exit polls show that Obama has lost all the white vote.”

Posted by: tony | March 28, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

I keep seeing hillary supporters calling for Obama to drop out.
Now he leads in the popular vote, number of states won, delegates…but you continue to call on him to drop out….so SHE, the one trailing in all numbers….so she can have the nomination.
If the situation were reversed….well damn, what would you all be saying then? The same crap you’re saying now, only louder.
Oh yeah….I see the fairness in the call for the leader to step down. Makes so much sense in the white world in which we live.

Posted by: LA in Indiana | March 28, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

US VET posted:
“As a lifelong Democrat, I find Leahy’s remarks to be way out of line and undemocratic. . .
Pretty obvious what Leahy and folks like Pelosi and Dean are up to. They want Hillary to drop out before she defeats Obama by huge margins in PA and before those PA exit polls show that Obama has lost all the white vote.”
I absolutely agree. Also, hidden in all the MSM reports, and ignored by Leahey:
1. Hillary received more registered Democratic votes than Obama in the primaries; the registered Democrats will vote Democrat in the GE;
2. If FL and MI votes are counted Hillary and OBAMA have exactly the same number of pledged delegates;
3. There is definite buyer’s remourse, post Rev. Wright. Many who voted for Obama in primaries, are now adamantly opposed to him as the nominee;
4. Rezko trial is just beginning.
5. Superdelegates are supposed to vote independent of the popular vote in their locale.

Posted by: countallthevotes | March 28, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

“We love you and we want you to have a voice in the Obama campaign. Please come back to the Democratic party and help us win the White House in November. We need you.
signed,
your Obama friends”
I have no Obama friends! I am sick and tired of all you Obama supporters trying to push Hillary out. Shut up and count the votes. Half the damn country that voted for Obama now regret it face it he can’t win. I liked him to begin with and would have supported him However all these calls to quit and his preacher screaming hate has changed all that.

Posted by: Tracy | March 28, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am

LA IN INDY: I DONT WANT OBAMA TO DROP OUT. AND ASK YOURSELF THE SAME QUESTION – IF HE TRAILED BY 100 DELEGATES AND HAD WON MICH/FL, YOU WOULD WANT HIM TO STAY IN AND SOME DEAL STRUCK WITH THOSE STATES….OH, AND YOU WOULD BE SAYING THE SUPERDELEGATES SHOULD PLAY BY THE ESTABLISHED RULES AND VOTE INDEPENDENTLY.

Posted by: tony | March 28, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am

How do the Clintons expect to win the majority of the votes when Bill is praising McCain in every of his speeches these days?
Yes, we know the Clintons and the McCains are fond of each other. But if want McCain and the war and US bankruptcy by a ‘borrow and tax cut” economy, we’ll vote McCain. If we don’t, we’ll vote for his strongest and most outspoken adversary, Obama.
What do we need the Clintons for? We don’t want a Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton oligarchy in our democratic republic anyway.

Posted by: Hank | March 28, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am

My opinion is that Obama should drop out.
Are you people insane? His believes are the same as his pastor, or he wouldn’t of kept going to that church! I would not trust this man to run our country. I will vote for McCain, as much as I hate to say that.
Clinton is the one person who has the most experience. She has done a wonderful job as senator in New York State!

Posted by: Julie | March 28, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am

TheCommanderGuy: No matter what she will always win in NY! If she is forced out none of her supporters will forget! Why are you and Leahy afraid of letting the people vote? I know america can’t stand anymore democracy. Well thats an insult to all those young men and women who are fighting and dying in Iraq. If we are denied the right to vote what does that say about their sacrifice?

Posted by: russell | March 28, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am

I think its sad that it has become so divisive, but the claim that Obama (who leads in every meaningful metric) is being told he is unelectable by a candidate with a 37% favorable rating and less than 50% who believe she is trustworthy is laughable. By the way, the 20 millionaires she has threatening the DCCC (made up of Superdelegates) was pretty smart, Obama has gained 3 superdelegates since Wednesday.

Posted by: jaded hussein | March 28, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am

YOU’RE RIGHT. THE MORE THEY COME AFTER HER, THE TOUGHER WE GET. THEY ARE ABSOLUTELY STUPID.
Pile on Hillary time. The party brass is putting the screws to her. This will only embolden her, scrappy fighter that she is. Its effect on her supporters is less clear, but if the posts on this blog are any indication, the sentiment will be: “Fight on Hillary”!

Posted by: tony | March 28, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

The commander guy- They should have Obama’s interests at heart also. If he gets the nomination, which most likely he will, and loses the general election
after the Republicans play harder ball with him then what he’s experiencing with Clinton, then his shot at a future Presidential run will be over. He’s a young man, if he went back and acquired the expertise and experience he won’t have when coming up against McCain then I have no doubt if he were to run again that he wouldn’t be going into the election with a divided party and he would be a sure bet for the Presidency.

Posted by: alpaig | March 28, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

So now Obama has somehow “blocked” the voting in MI and FL??
Now blocking the vote is blocking the change of rules in the middle of the game. Yeah, that seems fair.
You guys are wrong as rain, and its so sad. Unbelievable how you now think the rules should be changed to benefit the white woman.
Now there’s a surprise! lol typical!

Posted by: LA in Indiana | March 28, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

The commander guy- They should have Obama’s interests at heart also. If he gets the nomination, which most likely he will, and loses the general election
after the Republicans play harder ball with him then what he’s experiencing with Clinton, then his shot at a future Presidential run will be over. He’s a young man, if he went back and acquired the expertise and experience he won’t have when coming up against McCain then I have no doubt if he were to run again that he wouldn’t be going into the election with a divided party and he would be a sure bet for the Presidency.

Posted by: alpaig | March 28, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am

No one ever asked Jesse Jackson to get out of the presidential race when he was running against Bill Clinton, he took his campaign all the way to the convention and no one force him out!

Posted by: russell | March 28, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am

Obama supporters, don’t fret. When his campaign started, cynics continuously said what he couldn’t do; What WE couldn’t do. Obsticle after obsticle, he achieves. Challenge after challenge, he takes it head on and overcomes. Almost 2 million donors later, cynics are still whining and pointing fingers.
Just so you know, where there is progress, there is always a cynic stating what can’t be done instead of contributing to a solution. Where there’s fruit, there’s always a fly or two.
Just remember that and don’t get all worked up from those who are riding camels totally nude when that same fly is getting ready to land on that camel and you know how the ole saying goes, BROKE THE CAMELS BACK.
Hillary’s done. Barack will be the nominee and on to being the next President of the United States. Everything else is circumstantial.

Posted by: Joris | March 28, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

wow…we need to somehow figure out how to get Obama ‘first lady’ experience so he can THEN be qualified to run next time.

Posted by: LA in Indiana | March 28, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

la in indy: obama didnt cause fl/mich. if someone said that they are wrong. BUT the states and the dnc said no revotes unless all candidates approved. which one didnt? let me guess…
also – obama wants the superdelegate rules changed. his fans also want politics to look like kindergarten. for a black man. give me a break. typical.

Posted by: tony | March 28, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

La in Indiana: If Obama needed those delegates he and Al Sharpton,and Jesse Jackson would be in the streets demanding that every vote be counted!

Posted by: russell | March 28, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

Hillary is perfectly entitled to run.
She is perfectly entitled to keep lying about her record on NAFTA and Iraq and Bosnia and the Michigan and Florida delegates, just as any voter is perfectly entitled to point out that she is being deceptive.
Where she should just stop is in her efforts to distort Senator Obama’s record. That is the damage she is doing, and it is taking so long to point out her deceptions and smears that John McCain is getting pass on his lack of economic plans or inability to distinguish Al Qaeda from the Shiites they are murdering to this day.

Posted by: Drew | March 28, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

It is time for her to drop out. She won’t catch up in pledge delegates, popular vote, nor states.
She may win Penn, but Obama is likely to win NC and by a much larger margin.
Many analyst have said, whomever win NC will win the nomination.
It time Hillary. You are no longer the inevitable nominee.

Posted by: Yes Yes Yes | March 28, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am

There are nine people in my Democratic family and we are all voting for John McCain if Obama is the Dem nominee. Three of us were devoted Deaniacs.
Barack Obama is the worst thing that ever happened to the Democratic Party. He lies with the same ease as George W. Bush.
God help our party.

Posted by: Jean Thompson | March 28, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am

DO YOU HAVE A COLLECTION PLATE TO GO WITH THIS OBAMA-SERMON? LOL….IF OBAMA IS SO GREAT, THEN WHY ARE HIS SUPPORTERS BEGGING CLINTON TO GET OUT OF THE RACE? LOL. OBAMA THE GREAT SHOULDNT NEED HER TO GET OUT. DID JESUS KILL HIS OPPONENTS. NO – IT WAS THE OTHER WAY AROUND. LOL. WHAT A JOKE.
“Obama supporters, don’t fret. When his campaign started, cynics continuously said what he couldn’t do; What WE couldn’t do. Obsticle after obsticle, he achieves. Challenge after challenge, he takes it head on and overcomes. Almost 2 million donors later, cynics are still whining and pointing fingers.”

Posted by: tony | March 28, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am

Please those quoting that new poll need to go to MSNBC that poll was slanted by their own admission. They purposely over used the African American population because of the questions they were asking. They even said that in the article. So keep dreaming of the White House cause it will not happen.

Posted by: Tracy | March 28, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

yeah, Hillary should drop out of the race for her own good, financially. She could be a good ambassador to Bosnia.

Posted by: alexis compton | March 28, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Barack Obama will never become president of the United States. And if you think Hillary is done, you don’t know much about politics.She was done in Iowa, done in New Hampshire, done in Texas & Ohio, done in PA, and yet, she is still standing and growing stronger and getting financial support from those whop believe in her. Obama cannot win the general, and if the Dems are too ignorant to see that, they deserve to go down in flames for another 4 years.

Posted by: Jay | March 28, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Joris: thank you for those kinds words of encouragement. I too urge Obama supporters to stay the course, thick and thin. We shall overcome.

Posted by: Jack | March 28, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Joris: Well because of his good friend the Rev Wright Obama is like a turkey you can stick a fork in him he is done! He even makes Kerry look like a winner and thats saying a lot!

Posted by: russell | March 28, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

That’s quite alright Jean.
And you can take those numbers and multiply them by any where between 5 and 10….and those are the numbers of Obama supporters who will either vote McCain or just stay home.
You hillary sheeple still don’t get it. Over half the country, over half the democrats, do not want the clintons back in the white house.

Posted by: LA in Indiana | March 28, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

The time has come, Senator Clinton. Please listen to Leahy. There isn’t a single Democrat I know that is not disgusted with you. We can’t bring ourselves to vote McCain – but we will stay home.

Posted by: Jill | March 28, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

Now we see how NBC got the numbers they wanted. This is what they call a purely scientific polling sample. No what they did was cook the books to get the answer they desired. That’s not a scientific poll that’s what you call a push poll, but don’t take my word for it this is how Chuck Todd reported the make up of the poll today in his blog First Read: “The poll was conducted Monday thru Tuesday this week by Hart-McIntoff and surveyed 700 registered voters, which gives the poll a margin of error or +/-3.7%. In addition, we oversampled African Americans in order to get a reliable cross-tab on many of the questions we asked in this poll regarding Sen.Obama’s speech on race and overall response to last week’s Rev. Jeremiah Wright dust up.

Posted by: russell | March 28, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am

It’s pretty where the DNC stands on Obama versus Clinton, isn’t it? So, imagine what will happen to Hillary if she’d decide to take the fight to the floor in Denver. It would devastating and humiliating for her, and it might be the end of her political career and affiliation with the DNC. Well, good for her, her supporters might say now, but all of you know very that it will NOT be. Is is for that reason that even senators who support her advice her to bow out in June or July, just to save her skin and her position as a NY senator. The bottom line is, I think, that people who really care about her and about her job as a US senator, try to convince her she’d better leave the lost race before she lost all her appeal to the party that would ensure her future political career.

Posted by: Greta | March 28, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

I believe that Sen. Lahey – and others – are legitimately concerned about the well-being of the Dem party and its chance of success in Nov. and therefore have every reason to voice their opinion. And I doubt those voices would be raised asking Sen. Clinton to drop out now (when she still has significant support even though it’s almost impossible for her to win) IF she weren’t damaging the likely candidate and the party in the way she is conducting her campaign. — Do you think having donors threaten the party is helping anything? Or having someone in Obama’s own party make criticisms of him that even the Republicans don’t – and won’t (like questioning his religious decisions)? Or having someone in his own party say that McCain is more ready to be commander in chief or is more patriotic than Obama? It’s not being thin-skinned to be upset at these things: every time she opens her mouth victory in November becomes a little bit harder for the Dems. If she were being tenacious but civil, like Mike Huckabee did, no one would be asking her to drop out. I agree that she SHOULDN’T have to – and shouldn’t be asked, as a general matter, but when someone is tearing down the party and its likely nominee, what are people who care about a Democratic victory supposed to do? Just sit there and let her be a destructive bully? — And she’s not just hurting the party; she’s ruining her own standing, in the party and in the nation, by this behavior.

Posted by: Elizabeth | March 28, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

Jay: Nice try, but your assertions just aren’t supported by the facts. Your comments don’t even qualify as white-lies or half-truths…sad.

Posted by: Jack | March 28, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am

The Democratic party is a joke. First, they disenfranchise Florida and Michigan voters, then they use the politics of pile-on to force Hillary out.
And you think we won’t support McCain for all you have done to kill Hillary’s presidential bid?
We won’t forget and you’d pay a price for this in November.

Posted by: Jason | March 28, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am

“And you can take those numbers and
You hillary sheeple still don’t get it. Over half the country, over half the democrats, do not want the clintons back in the white house.”
That right there is why I will never support Obama!

Posted by: Tracy | March 28, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am

There is a lot of anti Obama sentiment on this post, so I got to stand up for my man! He is going to take the nomination, and Senator Leahy is right. I have lived in vermont for 20 years, and he is a very great man and a great power in the party. He is extremely honest and cannot be bought! This is such a bunch of nonsense about Rev. Wright on the internet. This is not obama saying these things. this has nothing to do with his politics. What ever happened to freedom of religion and freedom of speech? We all already know all the dirt on Hillary…We need a great leader like Barack!

Posted by: lenotra | March 28, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am

Obama and his supporters are worried that they will start losing the primaries now on and want to shut down the process.
They blocked Florida and Michigan and now want Hillary to drop out.
If Hillary is not the nominee, we will not just vote against Obama, we will vote against every democrat.

Posted by: Roger Miller | March 28, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

Barack Obama expressed anti-white sentiments in his first book – Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance. He chose to adopt the world view and doctrines of Rev. Jeremiah Wright, James Cone, and Black Liberation Theology. Americans were shocked when they watched videos of Rev. Wright. Rev. Wright’s preaching is a reflection of his world view and the teaching of James Cone.
Barack Obama spent 20 years listening to sermons and gave significant amounts of money to support Rev. Wright’s preaching. Rev. Wright gave a lifetime achievement award to the anti-white, anti-Semitic, and anti-Catholic Nation of Islam Minister Louis Farrakhan. Barack Obama exposed his daughters to anti-American and anti-white preaching. Barack Obama said he was not in church when Rev. Wright made his unpatriotic and incendiary remarks. That does not matter. He understands the world view expressed by his spiritual advisor and mentor, Rev. Wright.
Rev. Wright and his congregation should be commended for establishing ministries that help people with a variety of needs. However, nearly all churches have ministries that help people with a variety of needs. The good works Rev. Wright has done does not excuse his unpatriotic, vitriolic rhetoric and vulgar actions (imitating a sex act) while he was preaching.
Why did Barack Obama choose a spiritual advisor and mentor who agrees with the teaching of James Cone and Black Liberation Theology? He could have chosen a spiritual advisor and mentor who agrees with the teaching of Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. Rev. King warned against “drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred.”
Barack Obama should work to change the anti-American and anti-white preaching in his own church before he has the audacity to hope for our votes. Can you imagine what the Republican attack machine would do to Barack Obama in the general election? Many voters are feeling buyer’s remorse. Barack Obama is unelectable.

Posted by: ConcernedCitizen731 | March 28, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

YEAH, RIGHT. THEY ARE CONCERNED WITH THEM HAVING POWER THAT OBAMBI HAS PROMISED THEM. DONT TRY TO DRESS IT UP. WHEN OBAMBI WAS GOING AROUND SAYING THAT CLINTON IS EXPERIENCED BUT UNFIT, THAT THE REPUBS HAVE A DUMPTRUCK OF DIRT ON HER, THAT SHE IS MORE OF THE SAME (I.E., OLD), THEY WERE NOT JUMPING IN TO SAVE THE PARTY. SORRY, THEY ARE A BUNCH OF HYPOCRITES. I APPRECIATE WHAT LEAHY HAS DONE ON THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, BUT HE IS CLEARLY BIASED FOR ONE CANDIDATE – JUST LIKE EVERYONE ELSE.
“I believe that Sen. Lahey – and others – are legitimately concerned about the well-being of the Dem party and its chance of success in Nov. and therefore have every reason to voice their opinion.”

Posted by: tony | March 28, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

tony, what is it about ‘she can’t win’ that the hillary supporters don’t understand?!?!?!
The numbers she needs….how can she accomplish 65 or 70%? Has she beaten Obama with those numbers in other states? You must have a plan to turn all Obama supporters into stone prior to the election. Upon completion of the voting, will she be ahead in all the numbers then? If she’s still behind, which the estimate is that she will be….you expect the superdelegates to still choose her as the nominee based on her being white. That has to be it….she’s the only one that can get the white vote.
And then I guess the republicans will just lie down and let hillary win.
whewwww!

Posted by: LA in Indiana | March 28, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

According to the New York Times, Obama’s lawyers succeeded in stopping re-do primaries in Florida and Michigan. Obama supporters want Clinton to drop out. Why are folks in Obama’s camp so afraid of allowing the will of the people to play out?

Posted by: hopesprings52 | March 28, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

This is a quote from Jay at the very beginning of this comment section
“She was done in Iowa, done in New Hampshire, done in Texas & Ohio, done in PA, and yet, she is still standing and growing stronger and getting financial support from those whop believe in her. ”
There is just one problem with that statement PA has not happened yet and will not happen until April 22nd and other then this I agree with you she was counted out wrongly in all of those other states
On another note I think the only way she should stay in After PA is if she gets at least 20% of the vote to help catch up in delegates and popular vote if she loses PA , which I will be honest probably won’t happen based on all I have watched/read on the news, she should drop out because of the impossibility of even coming close to Obama’s delegate lead and popular vote lead. to stay competitive she will have to win states after PA which is going to be hard for her

Posted by: Kevin K | March 28, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

NBC oversampled blacks and they call the poll ligitimate! If you oversample whites then I am sure you would get a different results. Garbage in Garbage out! Talking about a biased poll!

Posted by: russell | March 28, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

Hillary cant win the nomination – pure and simple. Obama has the most delegates and majority vote. Hence, the super delegates will vote for Obama. Isn’t it funny that the Democrats wanted the electoral college eliminated after Gore and Kerry lost in favor of popular vote and now that Hillary is losing, they want the superdelegates (electoral college) to be the standard! The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy has been totally vindicated! Hillary has proven herself to be a liar and a loser!

Posted by: Dave | March 28, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

to dave dial,excuse me ,lack of caracture,talk about calling the kettle black.OBAMA HAS COSISTANTLY LIED,HE IS A CLOSET RACIST AND MARXIST ,HIS WIFE HATES THE US AND YOU HAVE THE UTTER GAUL TO SAY I LACK CARACTURE.GOOD LUCK BECAUSE IF SHE DOESNT GET THE NOMINATION OR RUN AS A INDEPENDANT THE COUNTRY IS IN BIG TROUBLE.I WOULDNT AND I BELEIVE A LOT OF OTHER MODERATES WOULDNT VOTE FOR OBAMA FOR DOGCATCHER.

Posted by: don tufts | March 28, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

OBAMA CANNOT WIN WITHOUT HILLARY’S SUPPORT. SO YOU MAY WANT TO CALM DOWN A BIT. THE MORE AND MORE YOU GUYS SPEW AGAINST HILLARY, THE MORE AND MORE LIKELY HER SUPPORTERS WILL OPT OUT IN NOVEMBER. SO KEEP IT UP. BRILLIANT WORK!
“Hillary cant win the nomination – pure and simple. Obama has the most delegates and majority vote. Hence, the super delegates will vote for Obama. Isn’t it funny that the Democrats wanted the electoral college eliminated after Gore and Kerry lost in favor of popular vote and now that Hillary is losing, they want the superdelegates (electoral college) to be the standard! The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy has been totally vindicated! Hillary has proven herself to be a liar and a loser!”

Posted by: tony | March 28, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

People, including P. Leahey, should review the 1980 democratic convention in which Ted Kennedy entered with merely 1,225 delegates to Carter’s 1,981 and 122 uncommitted, and no states were disenfranchised. In 1980, Ted Kennedy argued that he was the agent of change and the delegate count should be set aside. Note, Kennedy was not even close to Carter’s delegate count.
The superdelegates were created after the bitter Jimmy Carter-Ted Kennedy convention-floor fight in 1980. Elected officials, who had to endure the fallout from the presidential race but had no role in choosing a nominee, felt disenfranchised. As Louisiana Rep. Gillis Long, the chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, argued before a DNC reform commission in 1981, “We in the House, as the last vestige of Democratic control at the national level, believe we have a special responsibility to develop new innovative approaches that respond to our party’s constituencies.” (Elaine Kamarck, a lecturer at Harvard’s Kennedy School and a current superdelegate, has posted online a highly useful history of these unpledged electors drawn from her 1986 doctoral dissertation). And so we have Ted Kennedy as the originator os the superdelegate and their independence.

Posted by: countallthevotes | March 28, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am

It’s Obama’s fault there is no re-vote in MI and FL…mind you, rules he did not make.
And bill clinton is still out there praising McCain while his wife is telling the party to come together.
Only in America!

Posted by: LA in Indiana | March 28, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am

30 percent of white Democrats — a group Clinton needs in order to win the remaining primaries — regard her as a “phony.”

Posted by: Brittany | March 28, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am

Those of you who keep posting about Wright really have nothing else to hit Obama on. And, you are showing yourselves to be closet racist bigots. The truth is Wright said and wrote those words, not Obama. In order for Obama to hate white people he would have to hate half his family and that is simply not true. Oh, let me guess, you’re going to talk about his comments regarding his grandmother next? You can’t stand that he is calling attention to the reality in the US, that we remain an ignorant society in which color of skin or ethnicity calls into question the worth of a human being. Please, stop your fear-mongering and support a new generation of voters who seek to move past the ignorance of the past. Obama will be the next president and only good will come of this. Good will come to the US when the world sees we are ready to be beacons of unity again.

Posted by: Jack | March 28, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am

THEY ARE COUNTING ON PEOPLE NOT KNOWING ABOUT HISTORY. JESSE RAN ALL THE WAY EVEN THOUGH IT WAS ABUNDANTLY CLEAR HE WOULD NOT WIN. I GUESS YOU NEED A PEN!S TO RUN ALL THE WAY, EVEN THOUGH YOU WILL PROBABLY LOSE.
“People, including P. Leahey, should review the 1980 democratic convention in which Ted Kennedy entered with merely 1,225 delegates to Carter’s 1,981 and 122 uncommitted, and no states were disenfranchised. In 1980, Ted Kennedy argued that he was the agent of change and the delegate count should be set aside. Note, Kennedy was not even close to Carter’s delegate count. “

Posted by: tony | March 28, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am

A Bloomberg/Los Angeles Times poll conducted Feb. 21-25 found registered voters thought Senator John McCain, 71, the presumed Republican nominee, “has more honesty and integrity” than Clinton by a margin of 45 percent to 31 percent. Obama rated equally with McCain on those qualities.

Posted by: Brittany | March 28, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am

HILLARY WILL HAVE TO COME KNOCK ON MY DOOR AND CAMPAIGN FOR OBAMBI. LOL.
“If she doesn’t get the nomination, she and WE will backup Obama in his fight against McCain, a third Bush term, against the most desastrous policy the USA has seen in many decades. An illegal and very deadly war, senseless destruction, a rise of terrorism and hatred of America, an economy that is almost knock out, and no health care for 50 million Americans…”

Posted by: tony | March 28, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Senator Leahy… I PROMISE that my wife and I will vote for Hillary Clinton if she is still in the running in November. I also PROMISE we will vote for Old Man McCain if Hillary is not the Democratic nominee. Guaranteed.

Posted by: Rhys | March 28, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am

Leahy is an old veteran, and of course, he would prefer to see his man, Obama, unchallenged. But Obama is not on path to having a majority of delegates either. In the old days, that happened quite a bit and the nomination was settled at the convention. When all is said and done, I will look at the popular vote, simply who got more votes — isn’t that what democracy’s all about. Leahy says: “McCain…is getting a free ride on it because Senator Obama and Senator Clinton have to fight with each other. I think that her criticism is hurting him more than anything John McCain has said.” Again, this is blaming Clinton for Obama’s vulnerabilities, which will certainly be exploited by McCain during the general election.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | March 28, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

Did anyone see the piece on CNN where the Iraqi people are following the US election closely?
The Iraqi soliders are supporting Hillary Clinton. They asked Hillaty Clinton to send books on how democracy works to help their leaders and the people. Excellent interview.

Posted by: Kevin | March 28, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

OMG….Kurt is the ONLY hillary supporter I have seen on these boards that has said this.
Kurt, I respect you for your honesty.
Damn….there ARE some intelligent people voting for her.
Kurt’s response has lowered (slightly) my contempt for her.

Posted by: LA in Indiana | March 28, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

Patrick Leahy needs to go back and learn how the process works, as well as take a couple more math lessons. I am glad he is pushing “his” version of the rules on us–again, I find it odd that there are folks out there who want to disenfranchise the votes of so many more people of states that have yet to participate.

Posted by: LOM | March 28, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

CHECK OUT THE POLLS THAT SHOW OBAMA LOSING TO MCCAIN AND HIM LOSING 1/3 OF CLINTON’S SUPPORTERS. THAT’S A POLL TO WORRY ABOUT….NOT SOME LA TIMES POLL FROM A MONTH AGO. LIVE IN THE NOW.
“A Bloomberg/Los Angeles Times poll conducted Feb. 21-25 found registered voters thought Senator John McCain, 71, the presumed Republican nominee, “has more honesty and integrity” than Clinton by a margin of 45 percent to 31 percent. Obama rated equally with McCain on those qualities”

Posted by: tony | March 28, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

Joris… NO GLOBAL WARMING PLAN?! Horrors! I’ll bet the dinosaurs would have liked their “government” to have stopped that darned asteroid, too! Global Warming is REAL. Global Warming is a NATURAL cycle! Even the New Messiah (Obama) cannot stop it, as much as you’d like to believe it.

Posted by: Rhys | March 28, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

[Hillary] embraced Suha Arafat in November 1999 after a speech in which the late Palestinian leader’s wife, in Arabic, accused Israel of using toxic gas on Palestinians.

Posted by: Brittany | March 28, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am

GREAT…KEEP PUSHING HER SUPPORTERS AWAY…LOL.
“Damn….there ARE some intelligent people voting for her.”

Posted by: tony | March 28, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am

(The following is adapted from “Structure as Strategy: Presidential Nominating Politics Since Reform,” a doctoral dissertation submitted to the political science department of the University of California, Berkeley in 1986, by Elaine Kamarck, now a superdelegate.)

Posted by: countallthevotes | March 28, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am

Jay, I hope you’re correct about John Edwards “giving” his delegates to Hillary, but it just doesn’t make sense. Edwards is FAR left, like Obama… Hillary Clinton is a moderate; why would Edwards support her?

Posted by: Rhys | March 28, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

As a Barack Supporter, I couldnt agree with Tony more in this regard.
Fl and Mi should be counted. However, I do think that both camps Clinton and Obama need to go through a seperate party to come up with a conclusion..They’ll never agree with the current process. Besides, the person we ALL should be angry with is Howard Dean. He stripped them of there delegates….not BO..He’s only playin by the rules layed out. The same Rules HRC agreed and signed to uphold.
Also, as a BO supporter, I say this very easily. If somehow he loses, I will vote for Hillary. Even if it means, holding my nose closing my eyes and crossing my fingers, you best believe she’ll have a friend in me. One can only hope that those who say otherwise, with respect to there canidate are only sayin this in frustration. Is 4 more yrs of Bush really worth it b/c BO made a comment that was taken out of context?? When did we as democrats place such a heavy emphasis on religon? I thought that was a Right-Wing thing?
For those who consider BO a racist,did you all forget the FACT that BO is half WHITE??? And, the reason he was trailing in the polls amongst AA at the begining of this was many in the AA community felt he wasnt Black enough.
Bottom line, I dont think as democrats, sayin that you’ll cross the party lines is very loyal. We need Bush, and all those who wanna be like him GONE. I to am also an ex-vet, and I know that this is a war that needs to be ended.

Posted by: eric | March 28, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am

It really is sad to see Clinton supporters relying on Florida and Michigan in their calculations. LMAO. You guys are really getting desperate.

Posted by: Jack | March 28, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

Another example of the Clinton campaign’s dirty lies: Obama would NOT have been a ‘Law Professor’.
Here the University response -
As the first in a bill of particulars titled “Just Embellished Words: Senator Obama’s Record of Exaggerations & Misstatements,” the Clinton campaign charged earlier this week: “Sen. Obama consistently and falsely claims that he was a law professor. The Sun-Times reported that, ‘Several direct-mail pieces issued for Obama’s primary [Senate] campaign said he was a law professor at the University of Chicago. He is not. He is a senior lecturer (now on leave) at the school. In academia, there is a vast difference between the two titles. Details matter.’ In academia, there’s a significant difference: professors have tenure while lecturers do not. [Hotline Blog, 4/9/07; Chicago Sun-Times, 8/8/04].”
But the University of Chicago Law School has now posted a statement declaring his claims semantically sound: “The Law School has received many media requests about Barack Obama, especially about his status as ‘Senior Lecturer.’ From 1992 until his election to the U.S. Senate in 2004, Barack Obama served as a professor in the Law School. He was a Lecturer from 1992 to 1996. He was a Senior Lecturer from 1996 to 2004, during which time he taught three courses per year. Senior Lecturers are considered to be members of the Law School faculty and are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure-track. The title of Senior Lecturer is distinct from the title of Lecturer, which signifies adjunct status. Like Obama, each of the Law School’s Senior Lecturers have high-demand careers in politics or public service, which prevent full-time teaching. Several times during his 12 years as a professor in the Law School, Obama was invited to join the faculty in a full-time tenure-track position, but he declined.”

Posted by: Greta | March 28, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

Even though I am a Hillary supporter, I’d rather see her lose FAIRLY than have the voters in two states disenfranchised by party bosses. Florida and Michigan voters DESERVE a REAL primary election WITHOUT interference from party big-wigs in their “smoke-filled rooms” (closed-door sessions). America does not “punish” voters by disenfranchising them! This is WRONG!

Posted by: Rhys | March 28, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

The great myth is that anyone who is not for Obama is a racist! The five page memos from the Obama campaign branding Hillary and Bill and many of their supporters as racist started in South Carolina.
The idea that Obama did not understand the false teachings in his own church and never stood up or changed them has been going on for 20 years.

Posted by: Jackie | March 28, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

Several of the posts here indicate Barack Obama has been a closet racist and marxist. I believe he is neither.
Obama has been an open member of a church with an openly hateful and racist leader, Jeremiah Wright. Obama continues to be a member of the church without reservation.
Also, Obama has openly embraced leaders (such as Frank Marshall Davis, Carl Marx Shier, and more) with socialist and communist ideals in his past and present political activity.
Some may choose to ignore the real Barack Obama and concentrate on his feel good rhetoric, but his extremist positions and past are available for any who can handle the truth.

Posted by: Jayhawk | March 28, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

Ignoring all other aspects of this primary competition, the letter from the rich donors to Nancy Pelosi on bahalf of the Clinton campaign – literally trying to buy the election process – puts the Clintons on a par with the Juan and Eva Peron or Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos.
Out Constitution was not written to accommodate such persons. Hillary should bow out now.

Posted by: Sara | March 28, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am

All Washington insiders drop out. We want change. Yes we can.
Uncle Sam is the past. Uncle Wright is the future.

Posted by: jy2008 | March 28, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am

I am glad to see some movements towards pressuring Hilary to drop out. Chris Dodd weighed in this morning too. Hilary is great, but she needs think about the consequences of mutual-destructive fight. They will both go down – THIRD BUSH TERM starts on Jan 2009.
Look what is happening in Iraq last four days. It is easy to see that how fragile the so-called surge gains. The key to peace is on the hands of the Al Sadr and other militias. They can start any time they want.

Posted by: Manal06 | March 28, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am

Jay: I’m totally okay with it…and so was Hillary…until she started losing that is. Clinton is evil genius epitomized. She has got her supporters brainwashed and rinsed.

Posted by: Jack | March 28, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am

If the campaign had a civil tone, that would be one thing. But Hillary increasingly spends all her time attacking Obama, and Obama defending himself. They aren’t discussing the issues I care about. Hillary has to go ASAP.

Posted by: Drew Rocker | March 28, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

Senator Clinton should leave the race – her negative, ill-run campaign, the ugly, racist, spiritually corrupt nastiness of TOO MANY of her supporters is something beyond belief at this point in our history. If my fellow “white” people really believe that Senator Obama is unelectable because of his skin color, the spirtually right thing to do would be to support him with every ounce of your being so that we can put an end to this RACIST garbage once and for all. Finally, this average white male will NOT vote for Hillary Clinton, not because she is a woman, not because she is married to Bill, but because her ethics and honesty have ALWAYS been questionable to me – and I believe the last thing this country needs is another leader who exhibits those qualities. Finally, for those of you with all this hatred and nastiness, remember, “our children are watching us, they put their trust in us, they’re going to be like us”.

Posted by: Rob Sherwood | March 28, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

To the Hillary supporters,
We get it. You are angry. It is understandable. You prefer Hillary to Barack. This is fair, and you are entitled to your opinions and votes.
But the time has come to embrace reality. She has no path to the nomination that doesn’t destroy the party. Every pundit, every media organization, every poll confirms this. It’s not a conspiracy against you. It’s the cold, hard math. He has won too many contests and has too many supporters. Hillary cannot win.
Obama supporters do not hate you, even if you hate us. We know that Hillary and Barack are nearly identical on 99% of their policy positions. We would have voted for Hillary; you should consider Barack.
But mainly, you should think about your party. You should think about whether or not it is worth tearing your party apart and creating a third Bush term just because your favorite cannot win. Hillary herself has said you should NOT vote for McCain.
Obama supporters are your friends and neighbors. We’re not crazy. We want a progressive direction for this country. We’ll need your help, and Hillary’s, to get there. Please try to move beyond cynicism and sarcasm. Hillary’s run was a good one, but she will come up short. Obama will be our nominee. He’ll need your support to win.
sincerely,
your Obama friends

Posted by: dan | March 28, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

Sen. Leahy is right it is time to unite.
If Hillary loves this party she will do what is best for it . She needs to exit while she still has a chance to save some of her career.

Posted by: Lauenpow | March 28, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

I am amazed of how haters can never grow and accept the facts this is the twenty first century, and the entire world should move beyond race and ethnic background. What Obama did thus far gave me hope about the future, but still there are some voices spell ignorance and hate which I do not understand, move up people, grow-up, and join the new atmosphere of hope and support Obama.

Posted by: tarigag | March 28, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Wow, Leahy thinks Hillary should drop out and we should all lock step behind a guy who TODAY AGAIN defended his racist religious advisor? What’s he smoking?

Posted by: An Opinion | March 28, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Apparently Senator Leahy does not understand how the delegate/superdelegate system of the Democratic party works.
Calling for any candidate to drop out before the primaries, convention, and elections are finished when the race is this close is pathetic.
Until their votes are cast at the convention(of which there may be several), there are no “committed delegates.”
The members of DNC have failed the party miserably resulting in the disenfranchising of several states’ voters and a party that is in total disarray.
As such, the members of the DNC, not any presidential candidate, are the ones that should step down.
Senator Clinton is the only viable, electoral candidate of the Democratic party and needs to remain as a candidate until the last vote is counted in the general election.

Posted by: Jayhawk | March 28, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

oh tony…I’m sorry. I’m not trying to push hillary supporters away, really I’m not. I think we all just want this crazy race to be over.
And I sincerely apologize to you and any other hillary supporter offended by my words.
I DID support hillary because just like other AA’s (since thats the way we’re now referred) I didn’t think Obama had a chance, because of his skin color. It didn’t matter what he had to offer, or how intelligent he was. His skin is brown and that is already a strike.
After I listened to him, and I mean really listened to him, I became interested enough to research him.
At the same time I was leaning towards him, hillary started distorting some facts and the campaign started its nasty downward spiral, and yes, that made me angry.
So I’m not trying to push you away, we should all be in this together. Can we stop with the negative personal attacks?

Posted by: LA in Indiana | March 28, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am

i don’t like obama! He should get toasted in Kentucky and West Virginia

Posted by: Ohio_John | March 28, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am

Jayhawk-I suppose you also like the idea of pulling a Tonya Harding!? Wake up and smell the coffee. Don’t hand this election to McCain, which is exactly what you are suggesting.

Posted by: JT | March 28, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am

Hillary trails Obama by every measure, and it’s obvious to everyone that she has virtually no hope of winning the nomination.
Yet the former first lady trudges on in some phantom contest oblivious to the sea of doubt around her.
She is completely unwilling to accept the cruel truth that she has been rejected by her own party.
She was first lady, for cryin’ out loud! She is the queen of this party!
No one she trusts has the courage to tell her she’s done, much less force her into the car to take her home.
So on we march, scandal after scandal, contest after contest, hoping with each one that she finally accepts what everyone else began realizing long ago.
And the certainty with which she recalled all that sniper fire raining down on her as she ran out after landing in Bosnia 12 years ago convinced others that she’s nearly gone out of her mind.
She has become disassociated from reality leading many to believe she’s staying in the race only to damage Obama so badly that he can’t win in November, thus leaving the Democratic ticket open for her to run again in 2012.

Posted by: jock | March 28, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

It’s the Leahys that are creating the controversy because they keep weighing in with their OPINION. They should back off and let the voters who HAVE NOT VOTED YET to make their voices heard. What is Leahy, Kennedy, Kerry, Richardson and all the other Obama supporters afraid of? There will be PLENTY of time to swift boat McCain but they run the REAL risk of disenfranchising the very voters they will need in November. SO STUPID!

Posted by: Sam | March 28, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

Rhys and Jay, you talk about disenfranchisement of Florida and Michigan by Obama? Don’t be rediculous. These are states that Clinton signed to disenfranchise until she was losing and then suddenly made 180. Be honest to yourselves, you think Hilary is fighting for Michigan and Florida because she really cares about those state? If you think so then I am forced to conclude there must be something wrong with you two as well.

Posted by: Kool | March 28, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

Sen. Pat Leahy, is absolutely right. all clinton is doing is showing she cares more about winning the nomination than what is good for our country or what the American people are saying. If she drops out now and supports Sen. Obama, Sen. Obama WILL WIN the white house and the American people will win.
hillary, do the right thing for our country.

Posted by: TomUlcak | March 28, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

Could hillary….or maybe I should ask, is hillary qualified to be a supreme court justice?

Posted by: LA in Indiana | March 28, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

it is over hillary –obama has won it. besides, hillary would never win in the south and therefore wouldn’t win the presidency either — for the sake of our country, for the sake of our party….GO AWAY HILLARY!!

Posted by: jasonborne | March 28, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

Senator Clinton is Toast!

Posted by: Lookup | March 28, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Honestly and in all fairness, unless Ms. Clinton would win at least 60% of the remaining states (there are only 10 left?), there’s no way she’ll win. Her hopes are pinned on a total collapse of Obama’s campaign, so the personal destruction campaign she’s endorsing against him is her only hope of winning.
It’s like when you invite someone over for a visit over coffee and then they stay and stay and stay. They don’t know wwhen to go. This is that same feeling.
It’s not the “vast right wing conspiracy” that’s been her downfall. It’s her campaign that’s been the problem. Her staff did not check the news footage of her trips abroad and compare them to her prepared remarks, her campaign accepted special interest and PAC money. She assumed she would win greatly in the Iowa caucuses and did not. The rest of the campaign time has been spent trying to catch up with all the lost votes. She has a high negative rating with the voters, also a high not-trustworth rank too. She is not the Democrats best or most solid candidate for the Fall. For our problems to be solved and prevent a 3rd term for the same old course, we need to have a candidate that can win.
Barack Obama has won more states, more caucuses (Texas will announce his win there tomorrow), more popular vote, raised more money through grassroots, etc.
Superdelegates have the information they need to make a judgeement and they should take action.

Posted by: David S | March 28, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am

Given the closeness of the race, it stands to reason, that neither will reach the delegate votes. Leahy is speaking from his bully’s pulpit and proclaiming HRC can’t win the needed delegate votes, disregarding the obvious and same predicament for Obama. He’s presenting quite a double standard for the candidates in alleging Clinton needs to step down.

Posted by: katrina | March 28, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am

Hillary only said you should not for McCain because if she continued with that the Supers would flee her like rats off a sinking ship. She still feels that the nomination belongs to her. She needs to be Gracious and step aside.

Posted by: Lauenpow | March 28, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am

Contrary to his rhetoric, Barack Obama’s campaign has criticized Hillary Clinton’s character in a manner inconsistent with his campaign’s promise to change the tone of American politics.
In reality, Barack Obama preaches about hope and unity to cult-like crowds while his campaign staffers and aides relentlessly assault Hillary Clinton.
Rather than working to build up Obama’s credentials on the economy and national security, the Obama campaign continues to employ tactics designed to tear Sen. Clinton down.
This is not change but simply the bait-and-switch campaign of a Chicago-style politician with a socialist flavor.

Posted by: Jayhawk | March 28, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am

To clarify the math: she would need to win each of the remaining states by 60% in order to have more wins, states and votes.
Do the math – it’s impossible.

Posted by: David S | March 28, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am

Don’t worry Leahy, Obama is doing enough to disgust the voters without Clinton staying in the race. Those who see him for the racist, anti-American charlatan will NEVER vote for him. I will be voting for the Senate and House races but will leave the presidential vote unmarked if Obama wins the nomination. I can’t in good conscience vote for McCain. Maybe voters like us can write-in for Gore to make our displeasure known.

Posted by: Beth | March 28, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am

Pennsylvania can help the situation by voting for Obama and thereby hinting Hillary to quit the race. Go Penn Go.

Posted by: silkwool | March 28, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

Jayhawk,
This race is not any close. You Hillary supporters make it appear closer than it is. There is huge delegate, popular vote, and states won gap between Obama and Hillary and all the math points to the fact that she can never catchup in any of them. Then how is this vote close?

Posted by: Kool | March 28, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

James, there was no campaigning in Florida and Michigan, and Obama’s name wasn’t even on the ballot in Michigan. Those results mean NOTHING. Obama trailed by 20 points or more in almost every state before he arrived there because Clinton is a household name.
And please explain how Hillary staying in this is for the good of the people? She has no chance of winning and she is handing this race to John McCain.

Posted by: Steve | March 28, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

Obama supporters, don’t fret. When his campaign started, cynics continuously said what he couldn’t do; What WE couldn’t do. Obsticle after obsticle, he achieves. Challenge after challenge, he takes it head on and overcomes. Almost 2 million donors later, cynics are still whining and pointing fingers.
Just so you know, where there is progress, there is always a cynic stating what can’t be done instead of contributing to a solution. Where there’s fruit, there’s always a fly or two.
Just remember that and don’t get all worked up from those who are riding camels totally nude when that same fly is getting ready to land on that camel and you know how the ole saying goes, BROKE THE CAMELS BACK.
Hillary’s done. Barack will be the nominee and on to being the next President of the United States. Everything else is circumstantial.

Posted by: Democratic Supporter | March 28, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

Please Hillary, give up the fight. It would be best to back the Candidate that has the most delegate count to win the Presidential seat next Fall. If you don’t the Republican’s will control the house. You will be known as the Dem gone Republican in US History.

Posted by: Teresa | March 28, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am

jasonborne,
Yeah, im in Tx. at the moment, and was stationed in FL, with family in LA. I can say this with the utmost certainty, neither BO or HRC will emerge from the South with to many states in there pockets.
To the BO supporters..I cant say this enough. You have got to count MI and FL. Even if you hold a special election after PR, you have to count them. Remember what happened to Gore b/c of Fl?? Mi has one of the lowest unemployment rates in the country, not to mention that Detroit is atop the nation in city’s people are defecting from.

Posted by: eric | March 28, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am

Drop out? Come on…how can you guys run the Democratic Party like a mafia? 1st you ignore Obama’s weaknesses which are many…then ignore his corruption, and corrupt friends…then the party ignores Michigan and florida….how ’bout McCain! You guys drop out..

Posted by: Pete in TEXAS | March 28, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am

YES, WE CAN… WRIGHT…
YES, WE CAN… WRIGHT…
YES, WE CAN… WRIGHT…
BARACK HUSSIEN OBAMA IS A SNAKE GUISING IN A SUIT…
SNAKES ARE LETHAL…BE CAREFUL FOLKS…

Posted by: ronald | March 28, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am

I urge all those who have commented above to write to their State superdelegates to urge them to pledge their support behind their candidate. Real action speaks louder than wordy opinion.

Posted by: small fish in big pond | March 28, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

Teresa: I don’t care if the republicans win the election as long as Obama is not the president of this country. And who is Senator Leahy to make statements like that. There is still several states ahead. He is just afraid that McCain will win. Obama cannot win the big states and if she doesn’t win the nomination her supporters should not give their votes to Obama give them to McCain and let him win.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | March 28, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

As a lifelong Democrat, I regret having to say that Chris Dodd and Howard Dean both should just shut up. I am very tired of Barry Obama’s preaching-style oratory and even more sick of the Chris Dodd’s and Bill Richardson’s of the world jumping on what they think is the gravy train. And I am rather shocked by the continual Clinton blunders. Nevertheless, Barry needs complete his freshman year before he runs for student council president. We just don’t again need someone in the White House who will need a seven-plus year learning curve. We just don’t have that much time any more.

Posted by: Art | March 28, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

Once I heard someone close to the Clinton campaign make note that very few of the pledged delegates were legally legally bound to vote for their candidate, I realised the race is completely over. The only thing that keeps it going is the Clinton camp’s refusal to bend to the onslaught of reality. Clinton may be a fighter, but that is a very different thing from a winner.

Posted by: UrbanHillbilly | March 28, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

As a political analyst, I am quite convinced that the protracted rivalry within the Democratic presidential campaign, which has, for the most part, been instigated by Hilary Clinton’s insistence on “going all the way”, could only amount to political suicide for the Democratic Party. This, of course, in turn, would cost the Democrats not only the November election, but also would lead o the disenfranchisement of the next generation and those who feel neglected by history in this country. In this campaign, it has become obvious that Obama represents the voice of the youth and those who are tired of the old system and its politics of cronyism, and are craving real change in the political landscape in this country. On the other hand, Hilary Clinton represents mostly the working-class who nostalgically clings to the memories of the economic boom of the 90’s, the repeat of which, from an economic standpoint, is quite unlikely, given the gargantuan tasks ahead, such as, how to end the war in Iraq and Afghanistan (Which some people seem to have forgotten about. America has some 20,000 troops stationed there), and the existence of major international players such as China and India, whose demands for oil and other resources make the repeat of the 90’s nothing more than a just wishful thinking and a pipe dream. America needs an overhaul in its political scene, something that only a new voice that reflects the aspirations of the new generation can achieve. A personality whose charisma can rally people together and can bring about renewed hope. Of course, the word ‘Change’ can sometimes be frightening to some, simply because it might mean letting go of the old habits, which often die hard. However, judging by the state in which America has found itself, thanks to the current Administration’s abrasive policies, both home and overseas, change is inevitable and this can only lead to building a better and stronger America. America and Americans can not afford getting stuck in these political bickerings and divisive policies of ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ while countries like India and China are rising as the new politico- economic powerhouses.

Posted by: Realist | March 28, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

Hillary should drop out because there is “no way” she can win enough delegates to win?
Ehem, there are plenty ways she can.
In fact, it’s time for Obama to drop out. High time.

Posted by: Mark | March 28, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am

Senator Clinton and her family withstood the assault of the Republican led Congress and Ken Starr for a lot longer than a few months.
The months that remain between now and the general elections will allow for the truth about the Obamas to surface via the Rezko trial, Jeremiah Wright, and other.
If the best that Obamites can do is call for their opponent to quit, perhaps they need to consider an arena of engagement that is less demanding. Feel good Obama speeches contain no substance and are worthless.
Concentrate on the obvious. The Obama caucus club cannot win the electoral college in November. Senator Clinton will be there regardless of how intense the whining and crying of Obama supporters and the DNC escalates.
Get used to it.

Posted by: Jayhawk | March 28, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am

Has anyone done the general election state delegate count between the two candidates? Does Clinton come any closer? Let’s be realistic about counting the red states that Obama will definitely lose in light of his racist pastor? Has any polling been done in those red states since the racist, African-centric remarks made by Obama’s pastor? The only ones sacrificing the Democrats chances in November are the Obama supporters that refuse to believe race will not be an issue by then. Every Republican mailer will have Wright’s screaming God D**m America! And those Republicans are such patriotic folks!

Posted by: Tom | March 28, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

It isn’t a matter of “blaming Clinton for Obama’s vulnerabilities, which will certainly be exploited by McCain during the general election.” This is Clinton giving McCain whole new, powerful weapons to use. For example: “Even leaders in his own party believe I’m better suited to be Commander in Chief.” That’s something that McCain could never say without ‘help’ from Hillary. —— Also, I remember when Jesse Jackson went all the way to the convention, and I thought it was great! And others before him. BUT Jackson wasn’t trashing the party and his opposition in the process. Big difference. —- It’s Hillary Clinton’s own behavior that is leading to these calls for her to drop out. And she has gotten a lot of deference, even so. If the facts were reversed – if Obama had almost no chance to win but was trashing and exhausting the likely nominee and dividing the party, then he would have been FORCED out long before now. I think we all know that. I agree that she should get some deference, because of her long history and achievements, but she shouldn’t be able to ruin the next 4 to 8 years for her party and the whole country!! Get YOUR candidate to stop using the kitchen sink and simply concentrate on selling herself and her ideas and I think you’d hear fewer suggestions like Sen. Leahy’s.

Posted by: Elizabeth | March 28, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am

Hillary should stay in the race IF she can avoid kneecapping Obama. Think about it folks, if O. and H. are really so close on policy positions, she’s actually delivering Obama’s message to people who otherwise wouldn’t listen. In the general election, those blue-collar country folks will be hearing from Obama something close to what they heard from Hillary in the primary. That’ll help O.

Posted by: JTS | March 28, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am

Hillary & Co. has all but loss this election – FAIR & SQUARE – but she and her supportes are determined to destroy the entire Democratic Party’s chance at the White House if she is not nominated.
It is pathetically obvious that nothing in the way of honorable and formal appeal to the American public on the platform of various issues has worked or will work for her.
It’s also clear that even the strength (or lack thereof) of her personality or gender has or will carry her thru.
That’s why her campaign, early on, lowered itself to ‘gutter politics’; to fling bombs of personal destruction and other such drive-by-shootings, race & gender baiting, and the latest veiled threat to hyjack and damage the entire Party if she is not handed the nomination.
How can any conscientious and fair-mind voter support such a candidacy??
The elderly, cancer-bittened, war dog McCain might win the election by default because of the ongoing, fruitless & futile, kitchen-sink throwing campaigning Hillary & Co. can’t get enough of.
>> Mr. J.

Posted by: Mr. J. | March 28, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

OBAMA IS A TOAST. HE WILL NEVER WIN THE NOMINATION AND THE GENERAL ELECTION. IT’S HIS DESTINY NOT TO WIN.

Posted by: MsBurger | March 28, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

It is shocking to see so much hatred being expressed in the Democrat party. Doesn’t this violate every etho we have?Everyone engaged in this is an utter hypocrate.
Please, vote for McCain if Hillary doesn’t win. You do not belong in our party…you do not deserve to call yourself a democrat. Good riddance.

Posted by: nic | March 28, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

In 2003, Software engineer Judy Shaw learned that her entire unit of more than 30 workers at Cutler-Hammer, a Pittsburgh division of Cleveland-based Eaton Corp. was to be terminated by year’s end. The company announced that TATA Consultancy Services (TCS), one of the largest of the Indian staffing and contracting companies, would be taking over her team’s projects. A senior company executive announced the contract, adding that it would save $1 million a year. TATA, which has more than 50 offices in the United States, also has a key supporter in Sen. Hillary Clinton who claimed credit for encouraging TATA to open a new office in Buffalo, NY. Asked about the company’s practice of replacing U.S. workers, Clinton’s office provided statements from the company promising to provide jobs in the Buffalo region. TATA is the largest user of L-1 visas, which allow them to “transfer” Indian nationals into the U.S. with no immigration caps and very little regulation. TATA wined and dined HILLARY CLINTON. They brought 10 jobs to Buffalo while costing us thousands of jobs. Hillary sold out American I.T. workers. VOTE OUR JOBS AWAY, VOTE HILLARY.
Posted by:
Jest_Faks 4:50 Mark As Violation

Posted by: Lauenpow | March 28, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

Yeah, that’s it james4hill, let’s ignore the states that have caucuses, and have for decades, and include states that broke the rules and knew what they were doing. Yeah, come to think of it that makes alot of sense!

Posted by: JT | March 28, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am

It seems strange to me that obama, his team his surrogates, and supporters-do not practice what he preaches-
They all know they cannot beat Hillary on the issues before us-so all they can do is try to tear her down in other ways.
Believe me-Obama wants more than anyone
to keep the conversation off of the issues. because he has not got a clue on how to solve the country’ problems
Al Gore was the smartest and most capable to be president and his opponent suckered the people then-
and Hillary is the smartest and most capable of the two now. But we the american people are the ones who will suffer in the wallet the most. the working class.
I thought healthcare, affordable education etc was a concern for all working americans. but reading you obama supporters comments I guess not
you all are doing pretty good.
thats great.

Posted by: jgaw | March 28, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am

I WILL support Obama if he is the nominee. Until then I will support the best candidate: Hillary. Why is that a problem?

Posted by: Maltymum | March 28, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

The entire of a presidential nominee should be the candidate that can win the electoral college.
Baseless, feel-good rhetoric does not win presidential elections as Democrats found out with Stevenson, Goldwater, McGovern, Dukakis, and Kerry.
Senator Clinton can and will win the electoral college in November.
Caucus Obama cannot.

Posted by: Jayhawk | March 28, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am

Hillary is my choice until she drops out. It’s not looking good for her right now. Hillary stated in very clear terms yesterday that there is a huge difference between McCain and either her or Obama, and that she doesn’t want any of her current supporters considering McCain. I will vote for the Democrat in November. There is too much at stake to give in to sour feelings left over from the primary contests. The negative people on this thread don’t sound at all like Democrats to me. Just rabble rousers.

Posted by: yeshir rabin | March 28, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

There are 10 states left ,not forgetting Michigan and Florida.Why does Obama,his Senate friends and the media want to end the primary.I think that he cannot keep up with Hillary and they know that she will win…They need to let the primary continues.

Posted by: shelley | March 28, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Ruth,
I agree with you. I’d rather see Hillary run as independent. DNC is ganging up on her. She’s a lot better than Obama, the crook. He’s just gonna pile up more cronies if he becomes the president. He’s got more serious and dangerous issues than Hillary.

Posted by: MsBurger | March 28, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Sen. Obama has won more states, more pledged delegates and has more of the popular votes than Sen. Clinton so far. The rules state that whomever has the most pledged delegates wins the nomination.
It is mathematically impossible for Sen. Clinton to catch or pass Sen. Obama unless she wins 70% of the vote in the next remaining 10 contests, which is highly unlikely. My guess is if after the primaries in Penn., N.C. and Indiana are over and Sen. Obama is still leading in all three of the above categories, then the super delegates will throw their support behind Sen. Obama in order for him to reach the 2025 number of delegates needed to win the nomination.
Sen. Clinton was the favorite going into this race and yet in the 41 contests held so far, the people have chosed Sen. Obama. That is a fact that cannot be denied. Regardless if she has won the states with larger populations, the fact remains Sen. Clinton was leading in the polls in just about every contest so far and still lost 27 out of 41 contests. Sen. Obama can probably win states in the general election that Sen. Clinton could not, even the big states like California, New York and Pennsylvania.
There are also house and senate races to be held in November, and the Dems want to not only win the White House, but they also want to have a majority in the House and Senate. The powers that be in the Democratic party are also looking to see which candidate can have the longest “coat tails” in November. Not to mention the possibility of choosing a Supreme Court justice or two.
That choice may very well be Sen. Obama. And if supporters of Sen. Clinton don’t like that choice and want to vote for Sen. McCain, they if Sen. McCain wins, this country will have four more years of the same old mess.
Think long and hard about that.

Posted by: Michael | March 28, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

pt: Obama couldn’t lead a parade let alone this country. He doesn’t have the brains to think that’s why he uses other president’s speeches. College did nothing for him. He needs to go back. I believe Hillary will win in PA and hopefully IN and KY but NC probably will go to Obama. I can’t understand why the white people in this country don’t vote for their own people like the blacks do. I agree with the superdelegates they should have a say so in who would be the best candidate to run this country. Obama would run it in the ground worse than Bush.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | March 28, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

Gee Steve,
Did you ever consider that people in Fl and MI voted for Clinton becuase they WANTED TO. But if you are so confident in obama why does he refuse to back a revote?

Posted by: geevill | March 28, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

Hillary won’t run as an independent because she can’t win.

Posted by: maryland | March 28, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

Talk about divisive politics! By calling for a candidate to step down when the race is still this close, you only create more animosity.

Posted by: mhhunt | March 28, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

The only people calling for Hillary to drop out are those who have already voted go to Pa. or NC or WV they want thier say and they should have it.

Posted by: Bishop | March 28, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

I just watched Barack on the veiw. He is a wonderful caring highly intellegent person .I love how he just said i know i am not always right ,I can and do listen to others.
Obama 08

Posted by: Lauenpow | March 28, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

It’s high time for Clinton to do her party a favor and get lost!

Posted by: Jack | March 28, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

Senator Clinton, the hand writing is on the wall! Leave the race, don’t let them take you out balling, kicking and scraming!

Posted by: Lookup | March 28, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

For all you Obama whiners, including Leahy, please just let the primary elections run it’s course. If Obama still has the lead I’m sure there will not be any more damage than if Clinton dropped out now. FL and MI are already upset about the new RULES. Why can’t you just let PA and the remaining states have their say? The convention was scheduled for August and there’s enough time between the last primary and then to smooth over the party squabbles.

Posted by: Terry | March 28, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Think about it in these terms: the problems with the financial markets, mortgages, jobs, and NAFTA (Clinton is on record supporting NAFTA – Prs Clinton signed off), the tax cuts for the rich, and of course the war in Iraq (draining our economy) all are problems that need to be dealt with. The only party able to do so and full of solutions is the Democratic party.
Large numbers of voters, grassroot support, engagement of previously frustrated voters (like me) – all of these things are happening because of the excitement about Barack Obama and his involvement with us in this process.
Had this election been Clinton vs. anyone else there is no way the turnout would be what is is this year.
The average middle-class family (me and mine) want change. The Clintons do not represent change and as is readily apparent, they are mean spirited and polorizing. That does not get the needed legislation passed.

Posted by: David S | March 28, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am

If the DNC want to they can have a re vote why dont they just have one why should Obama have a saythey should just go ahead and have the damm re-do

Posted by: Bishop | March 28, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am

Maltymum,
There is absolutely nothing wrong with that! It’s great you’re keeping an open mind…I plan on doing the same if the cards play out the other way, despite my passion for an Obama presidency.
What I think is frustrating for a lot of us is the militant one-sidedness of the Hillary supporters who are playing a zero-sum game right now.

Posted by: nic | March 28, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

Michael: The big states did not vote for Obama because they don’t want him as the president of this country. Wake up and smell the coffee. He won more nickel and dime states that’s why he has more delegates and the popular vote. But that doesn’t mean he is the best candidate to run this country. The superdelegates should have the opportunity to appoint who they think would be the best one. Get a grip. Obama is no Hillary Clinton or John McCain. Would you want to see this country in a disaster if he was president. And Rezko, Farrakhan, Wright and Ayers coming to the white house for dinner. That’s what would happen plus his relatives from Kenya? I don’t think so!! He would make the worst president ever and the white people that voted for him are as bad as him.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | March 28, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

And why would the press want to harm America. That doesn’t make any sense.

Posted by: moe | March 28, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

I WILL support Obama if he is the nominee. Until then I will support the best candidate: Hillary. Why is that a problem?
No . Thats your right to support anyone of your chosing.
Thank you not to many feel or think that way.

Posted by: Lauenpow | March 28, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Good news for Obama, the senator of Pen has endorsed him, a big win and an open door for the catholic vote for him. The final minutes of the match Hill-BO are close, the writing is on the wall. God bless America and God bless Obama. OBAMA08.

Posted by: BKMC | March 28, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

Hillary Clinton SHOULD have been asked to drop out months ago. The fact that she has been allowed to remain in the race is the CHANGE voters most desire- A CHANGE FROM A POLITICAL SYSTEM OF SPECIAL INTERESTS, PERSONAL AGENDAS, & DISHONESTY.
Some Americans pretend to be offended by 30 second speech snippets ( taken out of context) of Senator Obama’s pastor NOT Sentor OBAMA but make no mention that HILLARY CONTINUALLY LIES. SHE lied about Bosnia, she lied about Peter Paul, she lied about Whitewater… It is amazing that the DNC has not mentioned the ETHICS of this candidate…oh that’s right…she has that whole “First Lady” thing working for her. Guess she did make good use of her time while her husband was in the White House.

Posted by: Hey Hey Hey...Goodbye! | March 28, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

All of this talk about Clinton dropping out…….. give it a rest……. They will have to call security at the Convention to drag her out. Clinton has no shame. She is also suffering from insomnia, she really doesn’t understand where she is and she is being propped up by her supporters hanging on to the back of her neck so she doesn’t fall over. I would bet that if all the superdelegates backed Obama tomorrow, she would still find a reason to stay in this race. The Huckabee factor. She attacks Obama on his economic speech as being “just words” and with the same breath says he stole the ideas from her. So which is it ?

Posted by: Ron | March 28, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

Consideration of both Michigan and Florida indicates just why Senator Clinton must not drop out of the race.
Should the DNC consider not seating delegates from all states at the Democratic convention, legal challenges will imply illegitimacy on the presidential candidate, no matter who that may be.
Trying to defeat the Republican ticket, which is looking like McCain/Romney, will be next to impossible for a party/candidate that cannot even claim legitimacy for their presidential ticket.
Count all the votes.

Posted by: Jayhawk | March 28, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

The magic word here is “obama supporter”! the answer from a Hillary supporter is NO WAY! Obama folks are really scared of the fact that MANY have noot voted. And the Super Delegates should be VERY concerned about two things
1) the right of ALL to vote
2) the electability of Obama in a GENERAL election which is just about nill.

Posted by: PMC | March 28, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

Bye long-term democrat be sure to take all those other “TRUE DEMOCRATS” with you!!!!!!

Posted by: JT | March 28, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

I hope Clinton doesn’t drop out against the NO RECORD Obama! I get an uneasy feeling about him, and I trust him about the same as I trust Bush, and I detest Bush and his incompetent, moronic, lying administration!

Posted by: PHVT | March 28, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

I think Obama Supporters are afraid of Clinton they know once she wins more blue states she will be very close in to close for either to call it a win.

Posted by: Bishop | March 28, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

Mariann Pepitone: So you are a Black American, are you a voting Black American?

Posted by: Lookup | March 28, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

Obama should drop out and NOW! NOONE with his viewpoint should be allowed the nomination of the democrat party for President. Obama, drop out and save the democrat party!

Posted by: PMC | March 28, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

You’re right Bishop I am very afraid of having the Clintons back in the white house. Time to move forward not backward

Posted by: maryland | March 28, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

Clinton is not going to drop out she has millions of supporters millions and millions and millions. Maybe you all should stop watching so much TV you would not be so confused on how every one gets to vote ask Ted Kennedy and Carter thsy know how this works.

Posted by: Bishop | March 28, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

What I really want to see is how Hillary and Obama will perform without interference from high ranking democrats, media, cable talk shows, republican right wing conspirators, extreme campaign supporters, etc. Let them play out till the end of primary and caucus including Michigan and Florida delegates. Then we can truly see what people want. Is not that what democracy is all about? Why settle now? Every votes count!!
noreasontoend

Posted by: jkm | March 28, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

Who does Sen.Leahy think he Is Hillary can stay In the race, there are a lot of people voteing for her. that’s a dumd stupid thing for him to say anyway. he’s not a very bright person. Why should she get out of the race? she’s a fighter, and she has proven It by not listning to stupid people like him.

Posted by: Jeanette | March 28, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

Duh,
Obama can not mathematically win the election w/o the unelected super-delegates. Neither can Hillry.
If the contest was whoever has the most pledged delegates at the end of the primaries wins – there would not be any super-delegates. Super-delegates specific role is to pick the best candidate.
Thus, everyone who says one candidate or the other should drop out is a dope. Ever heard the phrase “thats why they play the game” – it is because the favorite or the leader at halftime – does not always win.
So cut the silly, so & so s/ drop out nonsense and let the 10 final states vote.
Geez, one would think Barry O is a scaredy cat – afraid to count all the votes, afraid even to have some votes (FL & OH). Whats up with that?
What happened to the FL 2000 count all the votes mantra?

Posted by: Bill | March 28, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

HAS JOHN McCAIN THANKED HILARY OR BARACK YET FOR GIVING HIM THE WHITEHOUSE. ALL McCAIN HAS TO DO IS MAKE COMMERCIALS OF HILARYS AND OBAMAS COMMENTS AND RUN THEM EVERY DAY UP TO THE GENERAL ELECTION…HE CAN’T LOSE.
THANKS A LOT GUYS FOR ANOTHER 4 YEARS OF GEORGE BUSH.

Posted by: BOO-HOO | March 28, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

To the Hillary supporters,
Barack Obama will end the primary season, whenever that is, with more delegates than Hillary. Not that it matters, but he’ll have more popular vote, states won, etc., too. Upcoming primaries will not change that. FL and MI will not change that. She is simply too far behind, and the rules are the rules. She knew them as well as he did, and she will lose. He is extremely popular, though you wouldn’t know it from reading the angry posts on this board.
What does this mean for you?
You have a choice. You can continue to support Hillary. That is your right. If you support not just Hillary the candidate but also her policies, and those of the Democratic party, then you will try your best to support her in a way that does not tear down Obama (like smearing him personally, calling him names, etc.).
Or you can begin to pivot from “I support Hillary” to “I support the Democrat”, which will be Obama.
No one is trying to deny you your right to have your voices heard. But many in the party and the country now see the writing on the wall. There is a big difference between attacking John McCain as a united party from April – November and only doing it from September – November. Which do you think helps your party more?
Once again, there are many in the Obama camp who are not bitter, not angry at you. We understand that you deeply believe that Hillary would be a stronger candidate and/or a better president. But regardless, she will not be the Democratic nominee.
The time is coming for you to decide if you will follow your party — and Hillary’s advice not to vote for McCain — or if you have convinced yourself that Barack Obama is such a terrible candidate that you’ll vote for a third Bush term.
sincerely,
your Obama friends

Posted by: Dan | March 28, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

Yeah, well it is my idea that obama along with “Senator” Lehey should be the two that drop out.
Obama, his supporters and his followers have done a through job of dividing the Democrats which is why John McCain will be elected.
Obama was finished when it finally came out about his relationship with the “esteemed” wright.
Everyone in the Senate, Congress and Speakers think they all know the right answers, not on how to save the economy, the war, homeland security, but what should be done in politics, especially where it concerns Hillary Clinton. Clinton has a load of very powerful people who don’t want her to drop out.
Look what politics has done to the United States of America. We are no longer a united country. We are split in many ways and I fear we will never unite again.
So sad for the good ol’ USA.

Posted by: Lou | March 28, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

james4Hill: Sound like you are a follower of Jerry Falwell and Pat Robinson, are you a follower? Just curious.

Posted by: Lookup | March 28, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

As a “yellow-dog “democrat that has voted for democrats in city, county ,state and national for 49 years I will change my party to Republican if Obama gets nomination and will vote against ALL
democrats.

Posted by: Cathy in Indiana | March 28, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

The one should drop is Obama.
He should NOT have run the campaign. If his pastor’s video was posted at the beginning, he would have already lost.
Obama has been too negative to Hillary. For example:
1) When Hillary’s first lady schedule is released, Obama never looked at the positive accomplishments from Hillary, he always looked her mistakes.
2) He was too negative on Hillary’s personality. Obama says too high on himself. He really thinks he is that likeable? No, I don’t like Obama at all, I even hate him. He is too bold, too aggressive, too risky, not earnest, not hard working, trying to take chance, he tries all the means in order to win–he brought his pastor to the campaign. We know, pastors should be neutral in politics, but he wants to win, he USED pastor.

Posted by: golfgirlusa | March 28, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Excellent post, Mark.
The reality of having to finish a contest seems to frighten the Obama crowd.
The reality of not winning terrifies them.
It’s all about the electoral college, Obamites.

Posted by: Jayhawk | March 28, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

I think the first Woman President is a move forward. And like i said count all votes.

Posted by: Bishop | March 28, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

Bye long-term democrat be sure to take all those other “TRUE DEMOCRATS” with you!!!!!!========
Sure, keep posting like this and ensure a McCain presidency. The latest polls show 28% of Hillary supporters promising to desert the party. A.H like you will only grow this number.
At a minimum, (1) all the states, and PR should be allowed to vote PRE-EMPTIVE DISENFRACNCHISEMENT as desire by morons like Leahy should be rejected (2) Votes of FL and MI should be counted with or without revotes.
If Obama is given the nomination without 1 and 2, Hillary supporters should vote their consceince and solidly go McCain.
After all McCain is a moderate, some one who loves the country and spent his
precious 5 years in a prison for this country.

Posted by: long-term democrat | March 28, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

Hillary supporters should be asking for Obama to drop out.I agree, Hillary should not quit.
ll

Posted by: laurie | March 28, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

Dan — You apparently don’t know the rules, so don’t say the rules are the rules. The math is very simple: whomever gets 2,024 delegates will win the nomination. How does Obama do that? The EXACT same way Hillary does — with superdelegates. So, if you’re really “our friends” and are looking to be united, you may also want to ask the same of yourself because this contest can still go either way and Hillary will need your support as well in the general election.

Posted by: LOM | March 28, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

I used to love Hillary Clinton . It was not just her vote for the war that turned me off . It`s the way she handles it . Telling me if she knew then what she knows now is the kind of insult to my intelligence that I would expect from Karl Rove . If I`m that stupid , then she really is that incompetent . I certainly dont think she is stupid or incompetent . But to rely on a statement like that tells me that she has studied the Karl Rove playbook . That kind of statement pits liberals against one an other . It speaks volumes about her Character . She should give up and support Obama . And my opinion has nothing to do with her gender .

Posted by: GR | March 28, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

We hillary supporters should prepare, what if Obama really wins the nomination. I will vote for McCain. Obama NO WAY!

Posted by: golfgirlusa | March 28, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Greta: Dean should step down as chairman and let someone that knows what their doing take the job. Dean is a supporter of Obama and that’s why he wont seat the MI and FL delegates. So is Nancy Pelosi and she needs to take a long trip. New Hampshire changed their primary date and never got penalized because Dean thought Obama was going to win that state and he got fooled. Pelosi is a supporter of Obama because she doesn’t want Hillary as president. Hillary would be above her then. Obama got his speeches and ideas from JFK and RFK and the word hope he uses is from the speech of RFK. How could he run this country if he is so dumb he cannot create anything himself. And Howard Dean has no business telling the candidate’s what to do. The convention is not here yet and its too soon.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | March 28, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

I strongly agree with Sen. Pat Leahy. Sen. Hillary should drop out of the race and support Barack Obama. Democrats need time to unite the party and not allow the Republicans to win the election.

Posted by: Will | March 28, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Yes Hillary supporters , vote McCain !
We have to stop this Racist , Anti -American from getting in the White House.
God help America if he does .

Posted by: Cathy in Indiana | March 28, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

Hillary should not drop out, I just saw McCain ad and all I can say is WOW!!!!, there is not way Obama can beat McCain.
That ad was touching, honest and sticks to the heart of all true loving Americans, Obama better drop out because the McCain train is getting ready to roll.

Posted by: SJ | March 28, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

Hillary is a fundamentally dishonest person who has shown herself to be much too desperate to be top dog in the party — regardless of what the voters say. That’s the scary part. When the voters don’t back her, she insults them and implies that they are insignificant, and will freely change her position to whatever’s most convenient for her (like her 180 on Florida and Michigan.) Not cool. Perhaps most alarmingly, she even has the audacity to bully the Democratic Party as a whole, threatening to tear it down before the general election and actively pushing her supporters towards McCain — McCain! — if SHE can’t win. What a baby.
But Dems shouldn’t be *too* discouraged by all the whiney “I’m voting for McCain if Obama wins!” moo-mooing (and he will; that’s been clear to everyone but Hillary devotees for weeks now.) Luckily, *most* of that noise is just GOP shills trying to stir the hornet’s nest on the web. Just like GOP shills are crossing party lines in some states to vote for Hillary just because they think she’ll be easier to beat (a point that they’re probably right about) and/or realize that the prolonged in-fighting hurts both Dem candidates. (Yes, these people apparently have nothing better to do with their time than try to cheat the American system and encourage divisive partisanship — thanks, fellow citizens!) But what’s more troubling is that it doesn’t seem to bother Hillary’s camp in the slightest, as long as it helps HER win — which is all they care about at this point, even though it’s been clear for some time that that ain’t happening. It’s amazing to watch the same Dems who raised a ruckus about what happened in 2000 (with Gore winning the popular vote but losing the general election) now defend that same proposition for Hillary. Not that that’s going to happen either, unless Clinton is blackmailing people or something.
Let’s get it together people. Wake up and smell the coffee. Obama will change this country for the better. Early on I figured Hillary would win, and though she wasn’t my choice, I could deal with it. What we don’t want is McCain. McCain will mean World War III with Iran, No End In Sight for Iraq, no relief for the mortgage crisis, a furthering of the anti-abortion agenda, and God knows what else. If you’re for Clinton and you vote for McCain after she loses the nomination (and she will) — just remember that vote every time another nineteen year old American kid get slaughtered fighting for him in Iraq.

Posted by: brad | March 28, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

While Barack Obama claims to not be concentrating on radicalism and racism in his politics, the truth about the candidate and his background is much, much different.
Establishing membership in a church pastored by one such as Jeremiah Wright suggests an embrace of racist ideals. Maintaining and defending that membership of over 20 years confirms the racism as a defining characteristic.
The associations, writings, books, and speeches of both Obama and his wife Michelle emerge to present a clear picture of how radicalism and racism have molded and would emerge to be the prevailing consideration of the direction embraced through Obama leadership.

Posted by: Jayhawk | March 28, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

no one should drop out until the last states votes and MI and Fl. have been counted

Posted by: Bishop | March 28, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

Leahy, should take his old tail and resign, who does he think he is?

Posted by: Kim | March 28, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

To LOM,
I would happily support Hillary if she were the nominee. In a heartbeat. I would never vote for John McCain, which would be like voting for a third Bush term.
The rules I speak of are the rules of apportionment, which will make it impossible for Hillary to win enough delegates to overtake Obama in pledged delegates. These rules also guarantee that he will not win enough delegates to win the nomination outright. Each will need the additional support of superdelegates to win the nomination.
Since Super Tuesday, Barack Obama has won the support of several dozen superdelegates while only a handful have stated support for Hillary. Several have actually switched from Hillary to Obama. Many are publicly and privately fretting that the nasty tone of the race helps McCain and hurts the Democratic party — and them, and others who will be on the ballot in November.
Hillary Clinton would forever be remembered as a gracious and self-sacrificing individual if she put party and principle before her own desire to win and suspended her campaign now. She could stop short of dropping out of the race in case an enormous crisis erupted that engulfed Obama. She could leave the public eye and allow Obama to attack McCain directly.
Her remaining in the race hurts our chances in November. There is no other way to look at it.
As a Hillary supporter, I would invite you to take a fresh look at Barack Obama. Try to cut through the spin and caricatures that have been painted by the media. He’s a hard worker, very smart, and favors policies almost identical to Hillary’s.
We’ll need your support to win. When you’re ready to get behind him, we’ll be ready to work with you to put a Democrat back in the White House.
sincerely,
your Obama friends

Posted by: Dan | March 28, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

Brad — Nice post. You did not say even ONE positive thing about your candidate. Hard to persuade folks to change their vote if you don’t provide any reasons why you are. You only provided reasons to not vote for someone. I think you forgot to understand the “not” part in “not tearing people down” in Obama’s campaign message.

Posted by: LOM | March 28, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Ciao Ciao Bambina
!)6 1/2 yrs of undistinguished elected public service.
2)8 yrspost-white house 40mm net worth (70+ mm pre tax earned) How
Stonewalling tax returns and Bill’s donor list
3)17 yrs as fulltime corporate lawyer
4) Shamed by a flawed, disgraced very popular Pres/husband. Not strong enough to leave him but still used name and victim status to win office
5) The old baggage will come up – the old gang many in jail,dead or disavowing her candidacy.
She tries to bring Obama to her mud-slinging level and when she loses she will make sure McCain has enough help to beat him- and she can comeback in 2012.

Posted by: die profundis | March 28, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

The nomination included pledged and unpledged delegates. Nice try though. Tell me again, how does Barack win it with pledged delegates alone? He can’t.

Posted by: LOM | March 28, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

TO your Obama friends:
I have no Obama friends , All my friends are for Hillary and will be voting for McCain if Obama steals nomination..
I will diligently work for Mccain and Republican Party if he”s nominee

Posted by: Cathy in Indiana | March 28, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

just so we are clear.. DNC make way for McCain in ’08..
if you believe for one second that Hillary supporters are going to vote for Obama just because Hillary says so you are clearly mistaken. Hillary supporters are voting for her because they know her policies and support her in what she wants to accomplish for the USA. Obama not vetted and he lies without making it seem like he did while claiming to want to change the system, which is VERY deceptive. He speaks well but honestly doesn’t understand how things get done. The USA needs to get things done to achieve the stability and prosperity it once had not a social and political experiment.
Americans will vote for the lesser of two evils.

Posted by: Alan | March 28, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

“The one should drop is Obama.
He should NOT have run the campaign.”
See, that is that silly ‘Hillary entitled to win’ idea again.
The fact is that she will NOT win because she cannot any longer (if she ever had a serious chance against someone of Obama’s rare stature).
I even predict that Hillary, when she drops out, will use the opportunity to express her sincere and great admiration for Barack Obama. She actually feels honored to compete with him in this historical campaign, and Hillary being an political animal knows fully well that Obama will make history as a great American President.
She’s a lot more clever than her so called followers (who are NOT prepared to follow her by answering her request yesterday to backup Obama would HE fight mcCain) in these blogs.

Posted by: Greta | March 28, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

How exactly would Obama steal the nomination

Posted by: maryland | March 28, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

Hey, long term and all you other fairweather democrats. I will vote for HRC if given no other choice b/c I can not allow McCain to give Dumbya 3 terms. That is what a TRUE DEMOCRAT would do. A TRUE DEMOCRAT would not abandon the party and principles b/c they did not get their way. You are over 5 years old aren’t you, if you are not then that would justify your behavior and position.

Posted by: JT | March 28, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

Dan,
Don’t call us your Obama friends. You can pander to us for our votes only when you let this process play itself out and when the votes in Florida and Michigan are counted.
I don’t believe for a moment that you would have the same argument about MI and FL if Obama was behind and needed those votes. You would have cried to heavens over all kinds of conspiracy theories and dirty politics of the Clintons.
That’s why I don’t by your argument. Either there is a FL and MI do-over or you are “stealing” the nomination. Period.

Posted by: Jason | March 28, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

free to speak………I think you’re talking about Hillary supporters.

Posted by: jj | March 28, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

Sen. Pat Leahy said that “there is no way that Senator Clinton is going to win enough delegates to get the nomination”. Well, this is true for Obama as well. He too can not reach the required 2024 delegates to cinch the nomination. Leahy’s call for Hillary to quit is a backroom deal. It is nasty and irresponsible given that there are still 10 states that need to vote.
BOTH candidates need the SDs to win so let the natural democratic process evolve. Back-off Obama supporters.

Posted by: macondo | March 28, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Well I guess we can thank the Hillary supporters for us being in Iraq another 100 years, there goes universal healthcare too. I wonder how our troops will feel when you tell them you voted to keep them over there. And your votes will allow more to be killed. What will you say to these families.

Posted by: maryland | March 28, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Wouldn’t Hillary Sell her soul to be the next US president for just one day? Hence the now popular saying” Hillary will do anything to be elected”.
I hope she will declare her taxes before too long. That would be a mark of statesmanship, as it were.

Posted by: Katheru | March 28, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

Why is it that the Obama people don’t want the votes of all Americans to be heard? Do they want these people to realize Obama isn’t who he is advertising before Novemeber so they have time to realize he is a phony?
Nobody should drop out. Obama has more than enough right to lose this fair and square.

Posted by: kelly | March 28, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

I like Clinton but I am not to pround to put my noney on smear campaign against Obama. The guy is unelectable.

Posted by: James | March 28, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

The only people destroying the Democratic party are Sen. Obama and people like him. It’s the people who came up with the rules for the primaries. No one can hardly understand them. If there had been straight forward rules allowing everyone a chance to vote, Hillary would be ahead. If Obama had been up front with his past history with Rev. Wright, Hillary would be a head. These democratic elected officials have to realize not everyone is going to swallow Obama’s excuses and even lies about his being by the Rev. Wright’s side for 20 years and he never heard any anti-Country rants. He said on The View he had never heard those things even though the Church has it on its DVD that they sell. All these cover up things and excuses he gives doesn’t make sense. Now we Democrats alone with Sen. Hillary are being forced to go alone with Obama and his Rev. I will become an Independent first. I will write in Hillary’s name and that may not help but at least I will be putting my Country first and my loyalty. Loyalty can’t be something you put on and take off at my party’s convenience. TheDemocratic party has proven they have enough of those kind of people, i.e. This Senator Leahy, Gov. Richardson, etc. Obama has received a free ride. He has been as racist and negative as Hillary but people close their minds and deny such. On The View this morning, Sherri practically swooned over Obama and swallowed everything he said and Joy and Whoopi tried to make everything the Rev. has said isn’t any part of Obama. Everyone has the same type past. Get Real! Rev. Wright is a racist, anti-American and he has always been that way and he has stated so in more sermons than Obama will admit. The church members love to hear him spew his hate for the Country and most of the people or he would not have been their pastor for 20 years. A pastor is not hired for a life time. The members can vote them out anytime unlike the Pope who Joy and Whoopi like to bring up. But, I can honestly say I have not heard any preacher as anti-race and anti-Country as Rev. Wright so if Sen. Leahy approves of that association then he can do so but this Democrat will never support anyone who says that association was on the up and up. I will never support someone who has gotten a free ride from high party officials and the press. I can’t believe this party has turned into such a hypocrit type party. Country first!

Posted by: Mickey | March 28, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

I stil don’t see how you get past Obama’s friends like NBP,Wright I don’t think it is going to go away If I as a democrat am not sure how are you going to get independents to buy it we will give the white house to MCcain

Posted by: Bishop | March 28, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

WINNER TAKE ALL is the method that was used by Republicans for their primary elections.
That has been the method used by the Democrats in the past. That is the method used in the General Elections since 1776 and is blessed by our forefathers when they wrote the constitution. The current method used by Democrats where proportionate method is being used in a micky mouse fashion is totally illogical and results in infighting and is weakening our party. In addition the Caucus approach causes 2% of the eligible voters (inexperienced voters plus independents + Cross voting by Republicans) to select a winner in a state. For example in Texas, Hillary won by 100000 votes yet Obama got 6 more delegates than Hillary. This kind of approach has never been used in any country throughout history. THUS WE ARE USING A METHOD WORSE THAN ANY BANANA REPUBLIC. The whole world is laughing at us specially the Al Quida and the Iranians who see B. Hussein Obama leading in an
Illegitimate fashion using the results from a faulty election process where Florida & Michigan results will not even be counted. If we had used the WINNER TAKE ALL method , Hillary would have been declared Democrat nominee by now. Let us see whether it is true.
USING THIS METHOD HILLARY WILL HAVE 1427 PLEDGED DELEGATES AND Obama will have 1260 pledged delegates. Hillary has 246 super delegates and Obama has 210 super delegates resulting in 1673 total delegates for Hillary & 1470 for B. Hussein.
Now let us assume that Hillary wins, PA, WV, IN, KY, PR and Obama gets NC, SD, MT and may be OR, and also assume the remaining superdelegates are split in the same manner as upto now, Hillary will have 2234 delegates and B. Hussein will have 1828 total delegates. NOW YOU GUYS & GALS TELL ME WHO SHOULD BE ON TOP OF THE TICKET? Mind you I did not include FL & MI in this calculation otherwise Hillary will be leading B. Hussein by 2501 to 1914.
DNC members and both pledged and super delegates , you can still change your vote based upon the momentum and electability of the candidate . Using any criteria, Hillary should be the nominee and we should have the DREAM TICKET. GOD BLESS AMERICA not a MILLION TIMES BUT HUNDRED BILLION TIMES

Posted by: larry996 | March 28, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Dan posted:
I hope you won’t blame one candidate for the “unfortunate situation in these two states.” We’ll certainly need their support in November to win back the White House.
Dan, what an understatement!! Disenfranchisement of millions of voters from two pivotal states is more than “unfortunate.” It is not democratic in the true sense of the word. While Hillary and Obama certainly did not make the rules leading to the disenfranchisement. Obama did everything in his power to insure MI and FL voters would not count.

Posted by: countallthevotes | March 28, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

It is the media that keeps this dead race alive by publicizing every ridiculous claim made by Hillary Clinton, who lost this race in February!

Posted by: John Apata | March 28, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

THIS IS ONLY FAIR
Cuurently Clinton has 267 electoral votes and Obama has 202 electoral votes using the same method as used in the General Election . Assume that Hillary wins PA, WV, Indiana, KY
and Obama gets SD, NC , OR , MT , Clinton will have 318 electoral votes and Obama will have 220 Electoral votes. Let us not include MI & FL for Clinton. Even then Hillary beats B. Hussein by 274 to 220— winning by 25% of the total electoral votes. Do not blame me. Electoral vote method has been used since 1776. It is in the constitution and was designed to eliminate strife at the end of the election. Thus again Hillary will be the winner. Obama thinks by winning 28 small states mostly caucus states , he needs to brag at every rally that he is the presumptive winner because of winning so many states most of which will be won by Republicans in the General Election and ignoring the wishes of people of FL & MI. These phony victories have gone to his head and he has started imagining himself to be the PRESIDENT of this great nation.
LET US WAKE HIM UP IN THE NEXT TWO MONTHS TO SHOW HIM WHO SHOULD BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT OF THE USA.

Posted by: larry996 | March 28, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

Everyone beats up Hillary clinton for lies about Bosnia when Obama lied about Wright and benefited in the vote from it. On the Other hand, those involved in the trip to Bosnia, including sinbad, were on Larry King and spoke very highly of her trip there and clarified exactly what happened. After hearing the truth I think AMERICA OWES HER AN APOLOGY.

Posted by: Kelly | March 28, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

Reading the posts of so many ardent Hillaryites one can hardly fail to conclude that they are of the opinion that the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy has now admitted a certain Illinois Senator and his cronies to its ranks. I wasn’t previously aware that extreme self-delusion and paranoia were communicable conditions.

Posted by: Corndog | March 28, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

Yesterday, a Pennsylvania editorial board asked Sen. Clinton how she would have “responded if [her] pastor had said some of the things that Rev. Wright said?” In response, she said Rev. Wright would not have been her pastor, an honest view shared by many Americans.The Obama campaign’s response? Attack Sen. Clinton and accuse her of trying to divert attention from the Bosnia trip story and her record of foreign policy experience. Sen. Clinton’s response was sincere. The Obama attack was disingenuous.We are happy to discuss Sen. Clinton’s foreign policy experience and her record overall. Unfortunately, the Obama campaign doesn’t want to discuss its candidate’s record and prefers personal attacks instead. Sen. Obama knows that if he focused on his experience, he’d get questions about the shortcomings in his record and the efforts he has made to embellish it. He’d have to deal with the fallout from this week’s Washington Post report on his gross exaggeration of his role on immigration reform and housing policy. Sen. Obama would have to explain why the New York Times reported that he claims credit for passing nuclear leak legislation that never got out of committee. He’d have to confront reports from FactCheck.org and other independent organizations that say his claims of providing a universal health care plan are based on selective, embellished and out-of-context quotes from newspapers. He’d have to discuss the LA Times story that reported on how his fellow organizers say he took too much credit for his community organizing efforts. He’d have to explain why he regularly claims he was a law professor when in fact he held no such title.Sen. Obama seems to think disingenuous attacks on Sen. Clinton will address the concerns voters have about his record and readiness to be the Commander-in-Chief and the steward of our economy. They won’t. In the end, Sen. Obama’s words cannot erase Hillary’s 35-year record of action because when all is said and done, words aren’t action. They are just words.

Posted by: larry996 | March 28, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

Obama is clearly the slickest politician and the most charmin’ rascal on the world stage today.
This does not necessarily make him the best candidate for president of the USA. A number of other orators of great skill have led their nations to ruin.
If Obama was 20 years old, I wouldn’t let him within 2 miles of my teenage daughters. He is that good… and dangerous.
He seduced you, didn’t he?

Posted by: Lance | March 28, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

It’s evident that the two candidates aren’t the ones ruining the Democratic party…it’s the Superdelegates and the party heads! How dare he!
It’s not up to YOU, Senator! It’s up to the people and up to Senator Clinton! If this unfairness keeps up, those of us whose voices don’t matter will be crossing the party line. Howard Dean says he doesn’t want to stir up angry voters?? He’s kind of late…WE’RE ALREADY ANGRY!!

Posted by: Deb in RI | March 28, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

free to speak,
you write “For months they have been throwing nasty insults at us and Clinton in these blogs, but now that they see their guy might lose, they want to make nice. ”
“now that they see their guy might lose”????
Do you and Hillary supporters live in some toppsy turvy universe? It’s looking better than ever for Obama at this moment, and the MSM is buzzing with reports on the Clinton campaign on the brink of collapse. Why would that be, you think? And check the desperate attempt at damage control at the official Hillary site’s blog… Simply read the 1001 signs on the wall for a change.
Wake up in reality! Reality is great!

Posted by: Tula | March 28, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Countless Americans, without specific number, don’t believe Sen. Obama has any intention of renegotiating the free trade agreements (NAFTA) as indicated by the follow-up to the debate in Ohio. After he had told the American people that he would renegoiate NAFTA, he tried to placate Canadian fears by allowing one of his advisors to tell Canadian officials that it was just “political posturing.” And you expect to win Ohio in the general elction!
Fellow Americans, we face an enemy that has repeatedly attacked us and remains committed to killing Americans and the destruction of our most cherished values. This election is about who is best prepared to lead and defend our nation and its international allies as Commander-in-Chief from day one. This election is about MAKING SURE we have the experienced leadership to guide us to victory in this war, protect the nation against future terrorist attacks, and support our troops and first responders who are on the frontlines of the war.
We ALL like Sen. Obama, BUT we have the United States of America to govern in a very difficult time of Islamic jihad, the economy, health care, housing crisis, Iraq, nuclear weapons and our image abroad; the OVERWHELMING challenges confronting us in the 21st century. The stakes in this election are so very high, and it will take a leader with Hillary Clinton’s strength, will, resolve, determination and experience to tackle the challenges we face.If Hillary should succeed, America and the world would be changed forever and for the better, FOREVER.
Not only is she the best qualified candidate, Hillary Rodham Clinton will win in November, take back the White House, and deliver real tangible and VALID results for America and globally by creating a strong, secure, prosperous and globally respected America, AGAIN.
About Sen. Obama: I am saying, DON’T WE ALREADY have ENOUGH WARNING SIGNS?
Fellow Americans, there will be a clear choice November 2008, and I strongly believe that Hillary Clinton’s life has prepared her to lead our country, the country we love so very much in the transcendent challenge of the 21st century. God bless Hillary Clinton, OUR NEXT President for a secure, strong, prosperous and globally respected America. God Bless America.

Posted by: larry996 | March 28, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

larry996 and mickey:
The present rules were adopted because of the 1980 debacle in which Ted Kennedy lost the nomination to Jimmy Carter. See my prior post here:
People, including P. Leahey, should review the 1980 democratic convention in which Ted Kennedy entered with merely 1,225 delegates to Carter’s 1,981 and 122 uncommitted, and no states were disenfranchised. In 1980, Ted Kennedy argued that he was the agent of change and the delegate count should be set aside. Note, Kennedy was not even close to Carter’s delegate count.
The superdelegates were created after the bitter Jimmy Carter-Ted Kennedy convention-floor fight in 1980. Elected officials, who had to endure the fallout from the presidential race but had no role in choosing a nominee, felt disenfranchised. As Louisiana Rep. Gillis Long, the chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, argued before a DNC reform commission in 1981, “We in the House, as the last vestige of Democratic control at the national level, believe we have a special responsibility to develop new innovative approaches that respond to our party’s constituencies.” And so we have Ted Kennedy as the originator of the superdelegate and their independence, and the power of pledged delegates to change their vote.

Posted by: countallthevotes | March 28, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

The article leaves out the following VERY important comment by Senator Leahy:
“Senator Clinton has every right, but not a very good reason, to remain a candidate for as long as she wants to. As far as the delegate count and the interests of a Democratic victory in November go, there is not a very good reason for drawing this out.”
To this, I can only add a hearty “AMEN!”

Posted by: Raf | March 28, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Here’s a bit of logic for all the Hillary supporters planning on voting for McCain:
Hillary’s biggest claim (and most of yours) against Obama’s electibility is his lack of experience. Well, McCain has a huge record…most of it contrary to Hillary’s. Kind of an absurd idea to vote for him, if you have ever used the experience argument, huh?
So, exactly what is your reason for not backing Obama? Clearly it has nothing to do with Clinton’s fundamental argument…maybe it’s just a nasty little thing called spite. And what do decisions made out of spite bring you?

Posted by: nic | March 28, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Senator Leahy also said:
“Senator Clinton has every right, but not a very good reason, to remain a candidate for as long as she wants to. As far as the delegate count and the interests of a Democratic victory in November go, there is not a very good reason for drawing this out.
To this, I can only add a hearty “Amen!”

Posted by: raflin | March 28, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

HILLARY ANNOUNCES HER RETREAT FROM THE DEM CAMPAIGN
Fellow Americans, a long national nightmare is over.

Posted by: Jeehive | March 28, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

Unfortunately, Clinton isnt too big on logic and reasoning.
She is clearly big on relentless pursuit of personal glory (out of a sense of entitlement).
I hope she comes to a reasonable decision, but I would not predict it.

Posted by: Mike Denhof | March 28, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

This is the reason why people think the democrats are a bunch of sissies. They want their candidates to fold withtout a fight. I must say that Clinton’s resolve to fight on shows she has more guts than any of the DNC officials like Leahy, Pelosi and Dean. For Clinton supporters, there will be legitimacy issues for Obama if DNC forces Hillary to drop out. Count on that 28% to grow.

Posted by: echo | March 28, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

For gods sake Obama won Utah… Utah is always red and will always be red. If John Mccain picks Romney as his Potential VP. Who will win in Utah, Idaho, Wyoming and Most likely colorado?Mccain/Romney will
We need Hillary Clinton to hasve chance. she knows she won’t win Utah and so on.. She didn’t waste her time there. She understands how to really win an election. She has done it more than once like Obama. And has done a national election where Obama has never been on this national stage. Many of Obamas staff had never even been involved in political campaigns before Obama. He is not a professional politician. Professional politicians don’t go to controversial churches where the say GD AMERICA..
Excperience matters folks. If not just in washington but along the campaign trail too. If Obama divides people in america over his pastors remarks how is he going to unite us with Russia and Iran, Iraq, Cuba and so on and so on???
I’m sure one of his advisors will tell the Iranians one thing and he’ll tell us something different and then the Iranians will think they are beiong lied to and the we get a mushroom cloud in Washington DC..
This guy is as big of an idot (or bigger)than GW Bush..
I say we impeach him now for being too questionable.

Posted by: Larry | March 28, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

There’s only two reasons we are even considering Hillary’s arguments for staying in the race at this point … its either because she’s a woman or because he’s black or both.
I can’t imagine were hillary to be the nominee and face McCain she could argue … having lost the popular vote the numberof states and the electoral colledge … that somehow or another she should still be the president.

Posted by: beaupritchard | March 28, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

What I find interesting is that Obama who claims to be the great unifier and a possible president for all americans wants to disenfranchise the Michigan and Florida voters!

Posted by: RossiMas | March 28, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

Since the voters are divided, the SDs have to make a choice. Staying in will not solve the problem when the delagates are split according to %. It would just prolong the fight.Voters by now have made up their minds,they are split between the two candidates. The people who are not going to vote for Hillary or Obama will not do so no matter what. It just we enjoy mud slinging. This does not make for a strong party just a divided one.

Posted by: merle7 | March 28, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

Hillary lied AGAIN… about Obama NOT being a law professor at the University of Chicago. The UC sent out a statement he actually earned the ‘professor’ status.
And he appears to have been a beloved and popular one as well.
A Sun-Times review of student evaluations from Obama’s 10 years of teaching part-time at the University of Chicago Law School shows that students almost always rated Obama as one of their top instructors, except for one quarter in 1997.
“Those are tremendous ratings, especially for someone who had a day job,” Professor Cass Sunstein said. “We wanted him to join the faculty full-time at various different junctures. That’s not a trivial fact. . . . If we want to hire someone, the faculty has to think they’re tremendous. But he liked political life.”
While a state senator, Obama held classes early on Monday and late on Friday during legislative sessions, running right through the school’s popular Friday evening wine-and-cheese hour. Obama was so popular, students signed up for his class anyway.
“We’d be in class and get messages that he would come in 45 minutes late and everyone would wait for him,” said former student Andrew Janis, now a New York lawyer.

Posted by: Professor | March 28, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

What does it take to realize that many Hillary supporters are very dedicated as are many Obama supporters. Flinging insults at one another isn’t going to change anybody’s mind.
Seems like alot of people are very interested in a tooth and nail fight – well why not let it be over something that will benefit us instead of these stupid personal side story bashings.
Why not demand we hear both of them propose energy independence solutions, how we can move away from our blood debt with the Middle East. If that’s too controversial I would love to hear more about how we end our country’s credit binge with China.

Posted by: vmcgreen | March 28, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

What’s Hillary and her followers have in common? Racism.
If the white snake doesn’t win they’ll vote for the other white snake.

Posted by: ralph | March 28, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Maryland:
Sorry.. better the troops stay there than have a international standoff after the USA decides to legitimize Iran’s, North Korea’s, and Burma’s leadership thereby starting problems elsewhere. That is what will happen after if the USA sits down to talk without preconditions to its enemies. After all the other Western allies have stood by us we will simply “change” to try some experiment that is full of “hope”. Obama believes that he can appeal to better side of Iran, North Korea, and Burma??? I am sure they that that brand of “change” is quite appealing to SOME Americans but the rest of the world isn’t going to buy it.
This is a plain and simple argument for the American standing in the democratic international community.

Posted by: Alan | March 28, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

To Obama supporters,
Don’t ever dream of Hillary will drop out the race because of some jerks out there try hard to change the voters’ minds. Hillary is a fighter and so are her supporters! She will keep going until the bitter end. Those ones sitting in the senate seem like don’t have a glue of how much damage Obama has done since his stupid pastor story broke down. Want to say about Hillary in Bosnia? At least she was there in the war zone for the good cause, not like Obama, who has been sitting in the pulpit to listen the hate speech toward Americans and the Jews from his UNCLE Wright for the past 20 years! Vote for Obama is vote for Racist person! A vote for terist!

Posted by: Lena, Dallas | March 28, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

Ian:
That’s politics..
Do you think John Mccain will care who is voting for him when he is kicking Obamas *** in the fall?
Probably not

Posted by: Hot200 | March 28, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

Hot 200, the only killing will be in Iraq because you so called dems will vote for McCain and another 100 years there. I want our troops home and I am appalled at people like you.

Posted by: maryland | March 28, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

“What I find interesting is that Obama who claims to be the great unifier and a possible president for all americans wants to disenfranchise the Michigan and Florida voters!”

even more interesting might be the fact that your statement is a plain lie. Didn’t you read what happenend in MI last week? Obama has nothing to do with it. FA and MI messed this thing up for themselves, way before Obama became a frontrunner in the Dem campaign.

Posted by: greg | March 28, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

I see a lot more Obama supporters sling insults than I do Clinton supporters. IIt’s pretty obvious that Obama team is getting scared and the only way they can still get votes is by making people feel stupid or uneducated if the vote for clinton. I make a lot of money, I am 32 straight, white male, with a graduate degree and I support Hillary clinton all the way. Rather trying to convince people on here why they should vote for Clinton. It’s by far more entertaining explaining to Obama supporters why he will lose the general if he does get the nomination.

Posted by: Kelly | March 28, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

I made a mistake on my last post. I meant to say there is a time when people must put the Country first. A party which denies any American any of their given rights should never be allowed to do so and when they do, then Country comes first. Country comes first when someone is running to be president and has a past of close association with an anti-American and a bigot who spews hate. I have to wonder about people who can’t see how wrong that is but if it was Hillary or anyone else with such a past, they wouldn’t have a chance. Why then does Obama get the free pass? Is it color? Is it a gender thing? Is it that some of these Democrats care more for party than they do for this Country? Leahy and others made these stupid rules and ways for democrats to elect someone and by doing so, now they want for us to just go alone with whom ever they say go alone with. Just as long as the party doesn’t suffer. Obama and his bunch want to deny millions the right to vote. In the caucuses people were deny the right to vote by the way they were arranged. Hillary has had the deck stacked against her from the beginning. Sen. Leahy step aside and give us the right to see out candidate run as long as she care to. If all things had been equal, she would be the nominee by now.

Posted by: Mickey | March 28, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

“Professor”:
there is a difference between being a professor and lecturer. A professor is a full time employee of the institution. And a lecturer is paid on a class by class basis. The lecturer is not fully affiliated with the school and it doesn’t carry the same prestige as being a professor.
So it wasn’t a lie. He wasn’t a professor. He was a lecturer.

Posted by: Alan | March 28, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

Howard Dean and Leahy wants Clinton to drop out, because, they say, that longer the race goes, it will split the party.
Hey1 they are forgetting the fact the party is already split. It got split when the party leaders (Kennedy, Kerry, Dean, Leahy etc, supported Obama when even couple of primaries were hardly completed. It appeared they hate Clinton and wanted to do everything so she loses.
What they forgot, that just like them, Clinton also is party leader and she (and President Clinton) has tremendous influence in the party. Their wing of the party will never forget what Kennedy et tal. did to hurt Clinton.
They will never support their candidate even that means staying home on Election day.
Democratic party will be better of, it gets rid of Kennedy/Kerry extreme liberalism, which has hurt us so badly.
And the party should know that Obama just cannot win the Presidency. Just now it is too radical for the country.
SJG

Posted by: Shashi Gude | March 28, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Yes, Obama “seduced” me, too. He has brains. Brains. Oh, and a soul – the kind that really glows with compassion and sincerity. I can’t remember the last time a politician ever inspired me. I can remember teachers and writers who have – and Obama possesses that exact same quality. He very much reminds me of the kind of teacher that makes me feel as if my IQ and self esteem have jumped through the roof.
Obama isn’t a saint – He’s PART of a movement. This country is hungry for someone who can reflect back what we all have in our hearts — We want someone who will represent our best selves.
We – Americans who care about creating real and lasting progressive change – are the ones creating this movement. It’s not Obama – it’s those who are supporting him that are the soul and backbone behind this new movement.

Posted by: Ginger M. | March 28, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Alan – This is what the UC Law School itself has to say about it: “Senior Lecturers are considered to be members of the Law School faculty and are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure-track. The title of Senior Lecturer is distinct from the title of Lecturer, which signifies adjunct status. Like Obama, each of the Law School’s Senior Lecturers have high-demand careers in politics or public service, which prevent full-time teaching. Several times during his 12 years as a professor in the Law School, Obama was invited to join the faculty in a full-time tenure-track position, but he declined.”

Posted by: jock59801 | March 28, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Howard Dean and Leahy wants Clinton to drop out, because, they say, that longer the race goes, it will split the party.
Hey1 they are forgetting the fact the party is already split. It got split when the party leaders (Kennedy, Kerry, Dean, Leahy etc, supported Obama when even couple of primaries were hardly completed. It appeared they hate Clinton and wanted to do everything so she loses.
What they forgot, that just like them, Clinton also is party leader and she (and President Clinton) has tremendous influence in the party. Their wing of the party will never forget what Kennedy et tal. did to hurt Clinton.
They will never support their candidate even that means staying home on Election day.
Democratic party will be better of, it gets rid of Kennedy/Kerry extreme liberalism, which has hurt us so badly.
And the party should know that Obama just cannot win the Presidency. Just now it is too radical for the country.
SJG

Posted by: Shashi Gude | March 28, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

I really get sick of people like Leahy, Dodd and Kerry who think that half of the democrat voters don’t matter. I think they are so afraid she may make a big come back in PA. Let them fight it out and lets see who the voters want.

Posted by: Christine FL | March 28, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

To Ian,
“What really makes me laugh about Hillary supporters is that Hillary gets her votes from the elderly and the uneducated….”
The survey number will not speak for the whole. We are a large group of educated Asian living in Dallas came out to vote for Hillary on March 4. Does it make you laugh? How about 90% of the Blacks came out to vote for Obama, do you think most of them are educated?? sit down and think about that! It’s a joke, isn’t it?

Posted by: Sue, Texas | March 28, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

Barack Obama is not going to have enough delegates at the end also, so why doesn’t he drop out, why doesn’t he want Florida and Michigan to be heard, what is he so afraid of? It’s comments like this that are pushing democrats to support McCain, why won’t the Obama supporters just support their canidate and leave Hillary alone. There are more states that haven’t had their say yet. This is the first time in a long while that the primaries actually matter and so many people are getting involved as long as the attacks stop who is this hurting, this is free press for the democrats. If Obama is not happy then he should quit but no one should tell Sen. Clinton what to do.

Posted by: Kardasia_Prime | March 28, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

Sen. Leahy is right. At this point, the only way Hillary could be nominated is through maneuvers that would destroy the party and make the nomination worthless. The time has come for people who want change and progress to unite and elect Barack Obama to the presidency.

Posted by: TKD | March 28, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

I do not think that Hillary should drop out of the race, but I do think that all this sniping and fingerpointing is making the Democratic Party look like fools. We need to work together to make sure we don’t get another corrupt warmongering Rebuplican in the White House this time around!

Posted by: Brian, Decatur, GA | March 28, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

To those who say Obama is the right leader for this time. Have we sunk so low that we are willing to just dimiss his past just because of his pretty words after the facts. He has made so many different statements about the Rev. Wright. He still says he didn’t hear him preach his anti-American hate yet it is on the Church’s literature and on the dvd the Church sells. His excuse, he doesn’t read the literature and hasn’t listened to the dvd. He wants people to believe he sat there in close association with the Rev. Wright for 20 years and the Rev. only preached his hate when Obama wasn’t there. Yet, Obama also said he was there many times when the Rev. preached things he didn’t like. For a man who says he wants to bring change, he sure didn’t want it for those 20 years. There is no way the Rev. Wright just preached the hate messages a few times. Preachers pretty much preach like sermons quite often especially the ones who bring hate for Country and hate for people into the pulpit. So you people who think this is the right time to ignore such hate for this Country, vote for Obama but don’t expect everyone to close their mind to such hate. White or black or any color should leave the politics and their hate for the Country and other races out of the Church. Again, Country first.

Posted by: Mickey | March 28, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

Hillary has every right to fight for this nomination. The way the media (MSNBC, NPR, CNN, FOX, NBC, Newsweek, Politico) and the Liberal wing of the Democratic Party have treated her in this campaign is unforgiveable.
Women in this Country will be set back another 200 years before they can be considered for the presidency. Hillary is the best shot they have. She is the most qualified candidate in the field and they know it.
As aan independent that always votes democrat, I have decided not to vote for any democrat from here on because of the injustice being done to Hillary. I use to think that the Democratic party was always fair until this election.

Posted by: SO | March 28, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

“I really get sick of people like Leahy, Dodd and Kerry who think that half of the democrat voters don’t matter.”
Awww, Christine… Sweetheart, don’t feel bad… …NONE of the democrats matter.
Now put on your happy face and let the real Americans do what they have to do.

Posted by: Snoop Diggity-DANG-Dawg | March 28, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

Ginger M.:
I understand that Obama makes people feel good about themselves, however that doesn’t provide solutions for the real problems people are facing. Americans do NOT need a motivational speaker. They want some one to fix the things that are broken without causing more harm. Things are tough and people need to get things done. We need a doer not sayer. I rather have a someone that can fix the economy than someone who clams they can “change” Washington. Most Americans frankly don’t care what happens in Washington and how things get done. They just want things done. Period.
So to that movement I say cheers because it is either McCain or Hillary in ’08.

Posted by: Alan | March 28, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

Hillary Clinton is a corrupt politician, and John McCain a warmonger – like Bush. I understand that this is insulting to their supporters but it’s the truth. No one with a shred of integrity would vote for either of these politicians.

Posted by: Jack | March 28, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

No matter how much or how often Hillary asks that we vote for Obama, I among others will never vote for him. His agenda is way beyond the presidency.
The idea being floated of a third candidate being chosen by the super delegates — Al Gore, for example, with Obama possibly as VP (to quell the race riots, I guess) might get my vote. But Obama president, never.
Why old men like Leahy, Dodd, Kennedy and Kerry drool over Obama makes me wonder if they are not too old for their jobs.

Posted by: Milo, MA | March 28, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

@Kelly | Mar 28, 2008 1:29:10 PM:
Are you single and live in the NW? Just kidding.
I’m in the same boat as you and love how Hillary supporters are always categorized as uneducated and brainwashed. There are many Obama supporters who are trying to spin the math such that the rules are dependent on pledged delegates only. Keep spinning–the only reason they are saying this is because there is a probability that EITHER candidate can win the nomination.

Posted by: LOM | March 28, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

Leontra, please tell me what part of hate has a right in Churches? Why would anyone chose to sit in a church whose pastor preached hate for different people and hate for this Country. Obama must have agreed with the pastor. What would keep him in his close association with the Rev. if he didn’t have the same sentiments and ideas as the Rev.? Leahy may be an honest man but that doesn’t mean he can make a good decision and a decision that takes away people’s rights to vote for their candidate isn’t a good decision. He and anyone who denies States their right to elect our next president can’t be that honest or that concerned about our form of government. And anyone who condones a person who denounces this Country and spews such hate can’t be thinking in the best interest of this Country. I know you have heard that we are judged by the friends we have. We are judged by the words we speak, by the life we lead and by the way we treat others. If I had associated with the Rev. Wright in the manner that Obama has done, I nor anyone else would have a chance of even thinking of becoming the president of the USA

Posted by: Mickey | March 28, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

1 count all the votes
2 let Hillary stay in until the end we
might need her.
3 Get ready for MCcain to be our next
President because the republicans are
not going to forget who Obama’s
friends are.

Posted by: Bishop | March 28, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

Obama’s camp is desperate. He was wounded by the Wright affair, and his campaign knows that the wound will fester. He can overcome this danage if the Democrats act now to crown him the nominee, and if Hillary throws her support to him. Left on his own to fight both Hillary and McCain he will only get weaker and weaker. If, as expected, Hillary shows strength in the next few primaries the Obama campaign could fade.
Rather than let matters take their course, and see who emerges as the strongest candidate is, Leahy would rather get Hillary out of the race. He is essentially advocating that the Democrats prop up a wounded and weakening candidate.

Posted by: David H | March 28, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

Lets see
Neither candidate can get 2024 delegates.
One has 53% of the pledged delegates so far and the other one 47%
One has 48.3 % of the vote -the other has 46%
And you DEMAND the other one drops out?
Wow. How democratic can you get.
If Obama was a shoe in to get 2024 delegates , she should drop out. If he had a petition with 150 more super delegates on it , then he could make a case.
If Clinton gets a 250 super delegate petition, should Obama drop out?
If party insiders try to force clinton out, the party itself will self destruct. This is a sure way for mc Cain to win.
Dont blame Clinton if Obama is being riddled with scandals and his electability is in question.
She never forced him to goto that church.

Posted by: tomdavie | March 28, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

Why? Why all the vicious, blind hatred for our own?
In some ways, it’s the voters fault. There is less than 3% between Obama and Clinton, and if you count FL and MI, which THEY MUST, then it’s 0.4%. So, even if the DNC hadn’t screwed that up, it would be an even closer election.
I just don’t see how they’re going to settle this mess. Honestly, they’re so darn close no one’s going to fall on their sword with that kind of minuscule difference, and with the FL/MI nightmare it’s just going to drag this out longer. This could go on FOR ANOTHER SIX MONTHS! The horror!
I think one thing WE as democrats could do is start agreeing to disagree for Pete’s sake. The majority of us have voted already anyway, so what’s the point of all this nasty, vicious feuding? We’re doing it, and the media is fueling it – their ratings are through the roof because of this primary. This is better for them than anything Britney, Lindsay, or Anna Nicole ever did. They stir the pot of slime, and we jump in with both feet.
As for the candidates, well what are they thinking? I think BOTH of them are so much more effective at getting votes when the focus on the issues anyway.
I’m thinking of re-registering as an independent and starting over. Let the extremists keep the party. I used to think I was a pretty extreme liberal, but I’m not totally intolerant of other views. It’s gotten to the point that any democrat who lines up with either of them becomes the sworn enemy of the other side, and not even on principles for Pete’s sake – the candidates have identical platforms on 95% of the issues, yet the party is bitterly split into two factions ready to go postal on each other at any moment over petty innuendo and childish name-calling. I keep hearing that kid from Poltergeist in my head, “What’s happening!”
Gore, Biden, and Edwards were brilliant in hindsight to stay the heck out of it. Democrats are eating their own in ways so gory and frightening, I’m not sure anyone will be left standing to populate the party, much less run against McCain FOR THE PRESIDENCY!
So, what’s this all about? I don’t understand. Can’t we call a truce, for the sake of common sense and reason?
And I swear, don’t a one of you comment on this piece by saying “He/She started it,” I’M CALLING YOUR MOM!

Posted by: Teri B. | March 28, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

TO tomedavies – Your quote “She never forced him to goto that church.
My response – he never forced her to stay with bubba either.
She commented that you can pick your church & the flip side to that is that you pick your spouse – her choice was flawed & she has chosen to stay with him only for her own benefit to claw her way to the highest office in the land. An office that he did not deserve & she doesn’t wither.

Posted by: kathy | March 28, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

Professor:
To imply that Clinton was lying would mean he was in fact a professor. Obama said he was a professor. He never was. Go to any school and you will see in the faculty listings that they do differentiate between all three of them.

Posted by: Alan | March 28, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

If the democrats losse to the republicans in 08, after going through, the “worst” administration in reacent history, then doesn’t that make them the “worst” opponents in reacent history. If the repubs win 08 then their score card will be 7-3. If that happens my voice will be better herd as an Independant with the republican party. Although the idea of having to deal with all the crazy “neo-cons” is not my idea of a good time. My goal will be to become a thron in the republican’s side within there own party. This is so I can manipulate their platform, even if it is only a little, it will be a little more then what I will get with the lossers.
COME ON DEMS! WE CAN DO IT!

Posted by: youthvote08 | March 28, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

Leahy, Kennedy, Kerry, Casey, McCaskill, Pelosi, Dean and their ILK should all just keep their mouths closed. THIS Democrat will NOT vote for Obama after all the misogynist CRAP I’m seeing from the Dem Party and I just emailed Leahy and told him so.
I know 15 people right now who are Hillary supporters and ALL of them are voting for Nader if Mr. Hope is appointed by the DC elites. I’m finished. They’re finished with this horrendous, gutless party. Way to go Mr. Hope…..

Posted by: Vickie | March 28, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

The VT senor should just shut up. He’s afraid more things about Obama will be discovered. Like his leftist radical endorsements. If Obama and his supporters can’t handle the minor attacks in the mostly anti-Clinton media he and his followers should drop out. He definitely can’t handle attacks from foreign countries if he can’t handle attacks from a mere woman!!!!

Posted by: msblog | March 28, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Senator,
Who are you to say Hilary to drop out? We people need to decide who will be our next president?.

Posted by: Who is he?? | March 28, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

All the Obama supporters are calling for Hillary to quit now. Why are they so scared??? Because the longer this campaign goes the more we will learn everything about the REAL Obama. The more the American people will be turned off by him and in the end the Super Delegates will choose Clinton. He is now saying he would have quit the church if Wright did not retire and if he did not acknowledge what he said was wrong….give me a break. He is just saying that now. I do believe with all my heart that he agrees with the Black liberal theology that the church is preaching. That is their main doctrine. Why would he stay if he does not believe that? HILLARY CLINTON FOR WHAT IT’S WORTH IS WILLING TO FIGHT UNTIL THE END OF THIS CAMPAIGN FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. THEY WOULD NOT WANT THE COUNTRY TO END UP IN THE WRONG HANDS. We have a $3 thrillion deficit right now…Who are we going to trust to turn this around? Mccain (who will check with his economic advisors what to do with the economy?), Obama who obviously copies everything Clinton has in her platform except for the health insurance issue or Clinton who have been talking about these issues from the get go.

Posted by: bpatz3 | March 28, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

Pat Leahy should drop out of the Senate!

Posted by: esvida | March 28, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

Typical Clinton supporter. Take something someone says and lie about it. I didn’t ask her to pull out. I asked the Super Delegates to step in and call this thing before someone get’s seriously hurt. Read the article.

Posted by: Ken | March 28, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

This has to play out. The DNC created the system with the Superdelegates after the Democratic voters didn’t pick the DNC’s choice. ie McGovern and Carter. The DNC did this in order to disenfranchise its own constituents. Couple this with the Fiasco in Florida and Michigan and the DNC only has themselves to blame for this primary season bloodbath!

Posted by: voter | March 28, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

The Democratic Party leaders threw Hillary Clinton under the bus early on. It was clear who they wanted. The media overwhelmingly supported their choice as shown by their completely biased news coverage. But now their chosen on is on the hot seat. He is getting some well deserved criticism. The Rev. Wright story just keeps getting more traction. New revelations and comments are stilling being revealed.
But now they want Hillary Clinton to drop out for the good of the Party. Who cares what they want? Did they care about Hillary Clinton? No. Well I think most Democratic voters know what is good for the party and they don’t want to see this end. They want all votes counted,including FL and MI — unlike the DNC and the Obama campaign. They want the next 10 states to be able to vote. If it has to go to the convention, then so be it.

Posted by: Theresa | March 28, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

I think maybe the Clintons have bullied their way throughout the years and the rest of the party is sick of it. That’s probably why they want her out. There’s speculation that’s why Richardson endorsed Obama.

Posted by: lisa | March 28, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

“There was a poll the other day that said 22 percent of democrats want me to drop out and 22 percent want Senator Obama to drop out and 62 percent said let people vote,” Clinton said.
106%… I’m guessing math education isn’t part of Clinton’s agenda ;)

Posted by: Joe | March 28, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

Hey Dan
As a Hillary supporter everytime I look and hear obama I get the feeling of bush-redux.

Posted by: toby | March 28, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

Whomever you support – LISTEN UP.
Read whatever you want into this article but remember this. Those that are reaching out to us are indeed those who work with both obama and clinton.
In case you have any compassion for hillary, this message of “drop out” can be also seen as a “caring” message.
Some of us can see the end, some of us know it’s been the end for a while. Some of us know that all votes haven’t been counted an NO one is telling you not to vote. Instead, maybe there are enough people who care about clinton and see that (from a caring position) that she is doing herself harm. OKAY. Did you hear the message – THEY CARE and they’d like our support to stop her. That’s all.
Sometimes we can’t stop people from self destructing. Those that see the writing on the wall are trying to help. That’s all. I’d hope if I was her and my public display, my credibility, my actions, my judgement, etc. were just as hers and bills are today, I would hope that someone would do something for me. That’s all.

Posted by: CARINGFOR SOMEONE | March 28, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

Why should she quit. This thing is far from over. Ms. Clinton is a fighter and she will take this thing all the way and turn this country around. Their is dirt on both candidates, so don’t hand me any of your song and dance about saint Obama. We’ll see after Penn.

Posted by: Kurt | March 28, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Obama and Clinton have antagonized their rival’s supporters to the point they CANNOT win in November. They should both desist ans agree jontly on an alternative. In order…
1.Gore If only for sheer name & momentum
2.Bloomberg The independants & economy
3.Richardson Merging Blacks and Mex.
4.Dean For REALLY opposing the War
5. Total Unknown As pure “Not McCain!”
Pierre JC Allard

Posted by: Pierre JC Allard | March 28, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

Dan wrote “We would urge all of you, Hillary supporters, to try to get past the spin and the spears to see what a great Democratic and progressive leader Barack Obama could be. He will need your support. Will you take another look?” —- And this was after Dan went on a long ramble about Hillary Clinton’s tactics & behavior. Well Dan the behavior of Obama is screaming so loudly that I cannot hear a word that you are saying. Obama has used terms like character gap, dishonest, misleading, etc. repeatedly to describe Hillary Clinton & the Wright controversy was not an invention by the right wing. The right wing did not put those racist words into his mouth & the right wing did not make Obama hire him or spend 20 years listening to that filth. The right wing did not make Obama institute a double standard when Obama demanded that Don Imus be fired for a far lesser offense than Wright’s. So until Obama embraces Imus & pays his back wages don’t come talking to me about Obama the great uniter & race healer. He’s just a race baiting opportunist that declared himself a race candidate in an attempt at damage control. Obama told America one thing on NAFTA while telling the Canadians another. He promised Americans one thing on Iraq while his foreign policy adviser told Europe another story. Cannot vote for him because the more I look the less I like him!

Posted by: phil | March 28, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

Many posts here seem to imply that if a Hillary supporter does not support Obama if he were to become the Dem nominee that “we” will destroy the party. I beg your pardon. I think a great many of us are more concerned about destroying our country. Handing the WH over to an extreme bleeding heart liberal is just as damaging as handing it over to a Neo-Con.
I for one will not, even if encouraged to by Hillary, vote for Obama. He is a walking contradiction and his lifelong associates have no doubt formed his philosophical ideology. And that, as has been demonstrated by his associates is NOT GOOD for our country. Many of us have been around or have known people like Obama. Highly educated, smooth, charismatic, motivational, charming, good looking, eloquent, pathalogical con men. You don’t walk away from these types…….you RUN.

Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | March 28, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

your Obama friends:
While you yourself may not have been bashing on Hillary or her supporters you can’t claim the same about others in your camp. Obama and his supporters paint every word out of their rivals mouth to either to be racist or “divisive”. Divisive has become a common word to use from the Obama camp when things get a little heated and by simply using the word causes a disconnect in the Democrat party.
There has always been a divide. Republicans versus Democrats. Is there not a divide there? Hasn’t there always been one? The two parties simply do not agree on how the country should be run. There is one country and it is divided along many lines. Yes, the country can come together when it needs to, however this race is about what each person feels is best for their own individual interests and people will vote accordingly. For Obama to claim he can magically fix this all without a plan (because he hasn’t presented one as yet) is deceptive. If you noticed in my other posts I called his agenda an experiment because that is what it is plain and simple.
The DNC and Republicans take this to be about party politics.. I for one do not believe in voting along party lines if it isnt in my interest. Hillary is for truly universal health care, will withdraw troops from Iraq, will fix the economy, and will not legitimize oppressive regimes. I care most about how the USA is portrayed in the world community. Obama’s approach is down right irresponsible when it comes to foreign policy.
So to all those that feel some obligation to the either the Democrats or the Republicans do what is right for your agenda otherwise you will be left out in the cold.

Posted by: Alan | March 28, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

Leahy is the guy that talked a big line but supported the credit card industry 100% in their shafting of the consumers. Getting an endorsement from Leahy is just another very good reason not to vote for Obama. If Obama had any brains he would reject that endorsement.

Posted by: phil | March 28, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

I am sure the the Obama surrogate wants to end the nomination race. He and other surrogates (including members of the media) have been airing this line since before the texas/ohio primaries. I guess the remainder of the states look bleak for Obama to win. So he doesn’t want to limp into the convention without the momentum.
I am sorry that Sen Leahy does not believe in democracy and should be controled by the expediancy of the situation. I feel so much better with him in the senate(sarcasm).

Posted by: Bill | March 28, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

To Phil,
I share your frustration with the nasty tone the campaign has taken. Both sides should do better. We are all Democrats who want to see a better future for the country, want an end to the obscene Bush administration and want progressive choices to guide our policies. I would vote for Hillary to do this if she were the nominee. I think Obama will also be a great president. I would hope you could be as open-minded in return.
Sadstateofaffairs — you are of course free to support Hillary but then vote for John McCain if you like. But his policy positions are nothing like Hillary’s. Obama’s are like Hillary’s. Every four years during the primary process we hear from many Democrats who wish to be president, and who would govern in slightly different ways. Obama and Hillary are extremely similar in policy and positions. To say one is a bleeding heart liberal is unfair; they are nearly identical. If you believe otherwise you need to research their positions further.

Posted by: dan | March 28, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

If she goes, I go and so does my husband and the rest of our family – all lifelong Democrats and none of us have ever voted Republican before. But we are committed to McCain if she is out. I won’t sit it out and I won’t vote for Nader because I don’t want to waste my vote. I will actively work and donate to keep him out of ofice.
I live in middle America and in a state that Obama has to win – Missouri and there ain’t no way he’s going to do it. She could and would win because people don’t see her as a left wing nut case like many of the other elite Dems – Kerry (oh he went over really big here) Gore (likewise) and let’s see how did Dukakis fare in Mo?
I say go ahead Dems, give your latest “savior” the nomination and watch your party go down in flames but I’m not going to help it again. I’ve registered as an independent and plan to stay that way until the Democratic Party decides they have a head on their shoulders and some common sense.

Posted by: Sue | March 28, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

Just as I think that perhaps the DNC can be effective working behind the scenes, another Obama supporter comes forward telling Clinton to drop out. Why should she. Because she’s a woman? and that’s what women do so well, sidelining their careers in favor of a man’s. I don’t think so.
What this is telling me is that either the DNC is being heavyhanded in their blind lovefest with Obama (who can’t win)or Obama is straying from the DNC “reservation” i.e., not on board with DNC calls for respectful treatment of each other. We Clinton supporters are digging in our heels. A copy of my change in party affiliation is “in the mail”. I’m really put off by the DNC’s sneaky tactics or their ineffectiveness in dealing with the Obama campaign.
Remember: Bill Clinton is the only Democrat to be re-elected to a full presidential term in nearly 50 years. Neither Clinton deserves to be treated like this.

Posted by: morningside | March 28, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

Just as I think that perhaps the DNC can be effective working behind the scenes, another Obama supporter comes forward telling Clinton to drop out. Why should she. Because she’s a woman? and that’s what women do so well, sidelining their careers in favor of a man’s. I don’t think so.
What this is telling me is that either the DNC is being heavyhanded in their blind lovefest with Obama (who can’t win)or Obama is straying from the DNC “reservation” i.e., not on board with DNC calls for respectful treatment of each other. We Clinton supporters are digging in our heels. A copy of my change in party affiliation is “in the mail”. I’m really put off by the DNC’s sneaky tactics or their ineffectiveness in dealing with the Obama campaign.
Remember: Bill Clinton is the only Democrat to be re-elected to a full presidential term in nearly 50 years. Neither Clinton deserves to be treated like this.

Posted by: morningside | March 28, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

In response to his call for Clinton to drop out, I would repeat to Senator Leahy the famous words that Vice President Cheney said to him.

Posted by: Mac | March 28, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

Sue,
Barack Obama defeated Hillary Clinton in the Missouri primary. I agree that it’s an important state in the general election. Are you so fervent in your support of Hillary that you would sooner elect McCain — a Bush third term — before Obama?
I hope you’ll reconsider before November. Democrats need to think long and hard about what matters to them in the midst of this divisive contest.

Posted by: dan | March 28, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

She should drop out, not because she is a woman, but because she has lost the election, her credibility, and the hearts and minds of the American people! The race is NOT close as some would want to believe–it is over! By not dropping out, but rather “dragging out” the process to feed her own ego, she continues to demonstrate her indifference to the electoral process, and to her lack of goodwill to the party which represents the majority of left-of-center and Independent constituency, not just her single-issue shills.

Posted by: Justinteim | March 28, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

As each State goes to their legislative district and County caucuses/conventions, another round of voting occurs.
Iowa went first . . . remember? The results of this were that Obama gained nine delegates: 8 from Edwards and 1 from Clinton. Clinton lost a delegate.
These little changes around the margins are possibly significant as we look at the ever decreasing pool of delegates up for grabs in each remaining State. It’s part of the “endgame” of the Primary.
While the Clinton campaign announced the other day that it would be going after elected delegates, they seem to have been unable to gain any so far. If the Congressional District/County conventions continue to trend towards Obama, and it becomes even more remote that Clinton could close the delegate gap, then would she support Obama as we head to the General election?

Posted by: elizabeth campbell | March 28, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

What, really, is Mrs. Clinton doing? She is having the worst case of cognitive dissonance in the history of modern politics. She cannot come up with a credible, realistic path to the nomination. She can’t trace the line from “this moment’s difficulties” to “my triumphant end.” But she cannot admit to herself that she can lose. Because Clintons don’t lose. She can’t figure out how to win, and she can’t accept the idea of not winning. She cannot accept that this nobody from nowhere could have beaten her, quietly and silently, every day. (She cannot accept that she still doesn’t know how he did it!)

Posted by: sheisalreadypacking | March 28, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

If I could survive an eight year stint with Bush as President, I can live with John McCain for 4 years. He has integrity and if there is a significant number of democrats with similar intentions, he may just be able to shake those right wing, evangelicals from the Republican Party.
However, I’m still hopeful that the DNC will wake up and let the voters decide. Whoever the candidate is who is way ahead in the popular vote should get the support of the superdelegates. One caveat though: If the Obama campaign continues to marginalize Clinton in the ways they have been doing and we see her support falling in those states she is expected to carry, then I’ll have no problem moving over to John McCain.

Posted by: morningside | March 28, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

If I could survive an eight year stint with Bush as President, I can live with John McCain for 4 years. He has integrity and if there is a significant number of democrats with similar intentions, he may just be able to shake those right wing, evangelicals from the Republican Party.
However, I’m still hopeful that the DNC will wake up and let the voters decide. Whoever the candidate is who is way ahead in the popular vote should get the support of the superdelegates. One caveat though: If the Obama campaign continues to marginalize Clinton in the ways they have been doing and we see her support falling in those states she is expected to carry, then I’ll have no problem moving over to John McCain.

Posted by: morningside | March 28, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

i don’t look at “every word out of her mouth as racist or divisive”. i mean, i think she’s capable of saying those kinds of things (if it helps her get votes, OR, keeps people from voting for Sen Obama).. but i don’t think of that every time she opens her mouth.
i actually just think she is lying every time she opens her mouth

Posted by: drzoon | March 28, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

Dan,
Obama’s positions are simply a cut and paste of Hillary’s. This is what I’m talking about in regards to Obama. He has no thoughts of his own. Except of course his speech on race which was at best, average IMHO. Not what one would expect from one who posses such a “highly intellectual package”.
He is idealistic. And naive and dishonest and frankly I think he harbors some very deep phsychological issues regarding who he is. Not great traits for a leader. He is an aberrition. A facade.
But mostly, he is simply insulting. Telling everyone that he had no idea of the ideology that was being spewed from the pulpit by his mentor of 20 years. How disgusting.

Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | March 28, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

She is concussed. But she is a scrapper, a fighter, and she’s doing what she knows how to do: scrap and fight. Only harder. So that she ups the ante every day. She helped Ireland achieve peace. She tried to stop Nafta. She’s been a leader for 35 years. She landed in Bosnia under siege and bravely dodged bullets. It was as if she’d watched the movie “Wag the Dog,” with its fake footage of a terrified refugee woman running frantically from mortar fire, and found it not a cautionary tale about manipulation and politics, but an inspiration.

Posted by: sheisalreadypacking | March 28, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

This race is way too close to call and far from over. Hillary Clinton should not drop out and or take it all the way to the convention and let it be decided there. Senator Clinton has every right to let the voters decide and since she won every state with more “ELECTORAL VOTES” than Obama. The Obama won states have less “electoral votes” or some are sure won Republican states anyway.
The rules of the DNC say the “super delegates” should decide. The rules should be followed.
Michigan and Florida also go to Senator Clinton yet due to total bungling by the Democratic Party they are trying to make them not count.
Obama and his staff just wants to use evil scare tactics to try and intimidate and sway the public.
What angers me most is that Obama has no accomplishments to show for all his talk and his short career except his latest evil and divisive hate speech calling white people like his grandmother a “typical white person”.
This racist remark by Barrack Obama is the shot heard around the world saying all white people are racist. As if all white people are typical racists? How evil to not only spit in the face of the white voters that supported him but all white people. Racism still exists in small fringes but for the most part it is over. He is a pefect example to prove it attending Harvard and his wife a Doctor attending Medical School. If anything the Obama’s practicing reverse racism affirmative action is the reason they got where they are.
Then he insults our intelligence saying that in over 20 years he never knew or heard his close friend and mentor Rev. Wright make these racist statements(which he also prints in his bulletin and sells the sermons on cd in his church).
And Obams adamantly states we should vote on his judgment. The only judgment he shows is obvious bad judgment and racist judgment like his pastor.

Posted by: Paul Smithson | March 28, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Missouri Rassmussen Poll – 3/26
McCain 53, Obama 38, Und 9
McCain 50, Clinton 41, Und 9
Obama won the Missouri vote by 1%. This latest poll shows that Obama would trail McCain by 15 percentage points whereas Clinton would trail by 9. What happened there?

Posted by: LOM | March 28, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

I am changing my party affiliation from this undemocratic, spineless, disorganizes party. We Florida and I am sure Michigan voters also are fed up with our votes being invalidated, no revote, and listening to the pandering of the unamerican caucuses, superdelegates, apportionments. How many other ways can they find to erase our votes. Now Sen. Leahy has deemed, “who made his god?”, that Hillary should quit. I guess the voters in Pennsylvania, Indiana, Kentucky, West Virginia, Oregon and Puerto Rico won’t mind if their votes are disregarded too. He should keep his mouth shut and let the process play out all the way to the convention if it has to. Let it all out and get on with it. Having Obama deny our revotes and having him shoved down our throats with his race baiting speech. Anyone could have made that speech. It was calculated to make all the cowardly pundits, media hacks and politicians fearful to be call racist if they even dared utter an opinion. If the party thinks that we will cool down and follow the party line they are sadly mistaken. I and millions of others are leaving your party. Get used to that!!! Just remember that your reputation is made and judged by the company you keep; Obama has soiled his forever.

Posted by: Judy H Schulte | March 28, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

GI Joe who wrote in to a news blog: “Actually Mrs. Clinton was too modest. I was there and saw it all. When Mrs. Clinton got off the plane the tarmac came under mortar and machine gun fire. I was blown off my tank and exposed to enemy fire. Mrs. Clinton without regard to her own safety dragged me to safety, jumped on the tank and opened fire, killing 50 of the enemy.” Soon a suicide bomber appeared, but Mrs. Clinton stopped the guards from opening fire. “She talked to the man in his own language and got him [to] surrender. She found that he had suffered terribly as a result of policies of George Bush. She defused the bomb vest herself.” Then she turned to his wounds. “She stopped my bleeding and saved my life. Chelsea donated the blood.”

Posted by: towinsheneedsmorelies | March 28, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

“But she cannot admit to herself that she can lose.”
Can Obama and his supporters admit that there is also a possibility that he will LOSE the nomination?
Take it to the convention floor and let the process play out! What are you all afraid of?
If his nomination is a certainty it would a) be over with, which for SOME reason is not (maybe because he doesn’t have the necessary 2,024 delegates) and b) why worry if it goes to the convention if you guys are so sure that Clinton has “no chance of winning?”

Posted by: LOM | March 28, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

That’s what the Bosnia story was about. Her fictions about dodging bullets on the tarmac — and we have to hope they were lies, because if they weren’t, if she thought what she was saying was true, we are in worse trouble than we thought — either confirmed what you already knew (she lies as a matter of strategy, or, as William Safire said in 1996, by nature) or revealed in an unforgettable way (videotape! Smiling girl in pigtails offering flowers!) what you feared (that she lies more than is humanly usual, even politically usual).

Posted by: Shegotcaughtagain | March 28, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Right on Judy! Well said.
Careful…here come the Obama folks to smite you down. Brace yourself but know that you are not alone.

Posted by: LOM | March 28, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

News Flash…
I just recieved an email from Howard Dean and the DNC asking for a donation. I already sent them what I thought they were worth…. .02 cents. (I really did this. I taped 2 pennies to a piece of paper along with a nice little letter.) Now, when they start backing the candidate who actually posses the experience and track record to move this party forward, I might consider a donation that is worth more than the stamp to send it with.

Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | March 28, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Pa people vote for who they think is best for the country and they know Clinton is best the avg age is 50

Posted by: Bishop | March 28, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

Dan: You wrote: “the Democratic party did not pick Obama early on; they picked Clinton. She led polls all of last year. But the people have been picking Obama, which is why he’s won so many more states than she has (even the small ones, if you believe that they should count).”
Yes, she did lead in the polls last year, but of course, that was prior to the horrendous media bashing 24/7 of Hillary Clinton this year. It actually took a skit from Saturday Night Live to expose them for their complete bias.
Obama has won more states — mainly caucus states. Good for him because as we all know, caucuses are unfair, and do not show a true representation of the voters in a particular state, and will also get him nowhere in the general election. They only have primaries in the general election. Hillary has won the Big states. The states that a Democratic candidate will need to win in the general election.
Also, I want to point out that if the DNC had not sanctioned MI and FL ???? Hillary Clinton would have won these states, picked up more delegates and would have been able to create even more momentum going into Super Tuesday.
And why did it take so long for the Rev. Wright issue to appear? Did the DNC not know about Obama’s 20 year past history with a racist, hate-filled, anti-American pastor. A man he considers to be his mentor. Didn’t they bother to check out their candidate? Or did they think they could hide it? Because if the Rev. Wright sermons and videos had been made available to the public early on in this race, do you think he would be leading right now??????
And I really appreciate all of the “love” being sent out by the Obama supporters. I hope you will love Hillary Clinton as the Democratic nominee. She will become the 44th president of the United States of America. Hillary ’08.

Posted by: Theresa | March 28, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

You’d think she’d pivot back to showing a likable side, chatting with women, Weeping, wearing the bright yellows and reds that are thought to appeal to her core following, older women. Well, she’s doing that. Yet at the same time, her campaign reveals new levels of thuggishness, though that’s the wrong word, for thugs are often effective. This is mere heavy-handedness.

Posted by: shetriedAllandlost | March 28, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

I think it is very unfair for Senator Leahy to come out with this suggestion. After all, none of these 2 candidates will be able to make the 2024 delegates needed so it’s up to voters to decide. Also, the fact that Sen. Casey has endorsed Sen. Obama does not guarantee him the nominee as Sen. Leahy sighted as another point for her to drop out. Sen. Clinton has also been endorsed by Gov. Rendell, Mayor Nutter, Congressman Murtha and many other prominent people in PA and above all, she is leading in the polls in PA.
What are these guys doing? Does Senator Clinton being a strong and intelligent woman intimidate these guys or what? I just don’t get it.
Voters should listen to both candidates and judge for themselves who can be the best president and move this country forward. Rhetorics and good looks do not mean a person can be a good president.
Voters, beware!
A woman president for USA is the best we can have in 2009.
VOTE HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT!!!!

Posted by: Nana Adwoa | March 28, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

LOM — Polls showed Hillary ahead in Missouri by 13 and 19 points just weeks before the primary, yet she lost. Comparing head-to-head matchups between hypothetical candidates in November is really unhelpful.
Also LOM — taking the fight all the way to the convention is a lose-lose situation. The convention is at the end of August. If both candidates enter the convention hoping to win, and then one loses, it will leave very little time for the party to “come together” around the winner before November. It would also mean that John McCain would have another five entire months of a free ride. In short: it would virtually guarantee a McCain win. That’s what *all* Democrats should be afraid of, Hillary and Obama supporters alike. Does that make sense?
Judy — you’re obviously very angry about Barack Obama and an ardent Hillary supporter. I certainly hope you don’t mean what you say about the Democratic party. They *are* letting the process play out — it’s gone many weeks longer than the GOP contest already — and the people, so far, have chosen Obama. Future contests may, but are extremely unlikely to, change this outcome. If you believe in the principles of the party as you say you do, I hope you’ll come around to the idea that majority rules and believe in the millions of other proud Democrats who believe Barack will be a fantastic leader for this country. I would certainly do the same for Hillary if it were she who was nominated.

Posted by: dan | March 28, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

I don’t beleive Senator Clinton is ‘called to lead the people’ as she cliams. Most of the good will she currently enjoys is because of Bill.Her criticisms of Obama are bourne of pure selfishness. It’s time for her to see the bigger picture-Democrats winning the BIG election!!

Posted by: GODWIN | March 28, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

Sad State of Affairs:
Hey, great idea! I’ve been sending back their begging letters with notes attached saying not another penny until they count MI and FL, but I like your idea even better. It really gets the point across. Go Clinton!

Posted by: free to speak | March 28, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

Dan — You’re the one that brought up the fact Obama won Missouri and I really was left with no clue as to what conclusion I was to draw from that. I don’t follow the polls too closely and definitely don’t listen to folks pushing them as “fact” that one candidate is doing better than another because most people don’t know how to interpret polls and leave out the important elements like margin of error.
One more reason to not take polls too seriously–they are supposed to take random samples that are representative of the population–oversampling 100 African Americans in the latest WSJ/NBC poll doesn’t quite do that.
Speaking of polls though, check out the RCP Poll Average (real clear politics) between Obama and Clinton. You will see a sharp upward trend for Obama between January and March. That is two months.
You don’t really know how the country will unite if we take this to the convention floor. If that many people can coalesce around a candidate in two months, it is possible that all of the democrats can do the same thing after a nominee is decided in August. To say that we can’t be united by the time the GE comes around is short-changing the will and determination of the American people.
So, take it the convention floor. Let the process play out. What are you afraid of?

Posted by: LOM | March 28, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

product of affirmative action
So Obama is asking his surrogates to tell the Media that HILLARY should drop out
OBAMA you are HIJACKING THIS ELECTION!
you are leaving out michigan and florida because you would lose!
YOU ARE STEALING THE ELECTION AND YOUR CRONIES ARE DOING YOUR DIRTY WORK!
THANK YOU MSM FOR DESTROYING THIS ELECTION

Posted by: STEALING ELECTION | March 28, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

Gee, it’s funny how Mr.Obama called for the super delegates to go with the “will of the people.” Two weeks in a row now we have seen him gaff on that notion. Richardson of New Mexico, whose state voted for Clinton, and now a senator from Pennsylvania, whose state has not even voted yet. Sit and spin Obama. BTW- By telling Clinton to bow out now, you are telling voters in the remaining states do not have a say. Is our party so insecure? Settle down!

Posted by: David Humpal | March 28, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

obama IS A WIMP!
I hope he gets destroyed by the republicans in the general election
I HOPE THEY VETT THIS MAN ABOUT HIS THIN THIN THIN CREDENTIALS!
I HOPE THEY SHOW WHAT AN EMPTY THIN SHALLOW MAN HE IS
I HOPE THEY SHOW HIS THIN RECORD IN THE SENATE
I HOPE THEY EXPOSE HIM AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN ABOUT HIS RACIST VIEWS OF AMERICANS
I HOPE HE GETS DESTROYED IN THE GENERALS ELECTION AND
MCCAIN WINS!
I WILL NEVER EVER EVER VOTE FOR HIM

Posted by: I HOPE HE DROPS OUT | March 28, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

He is nothing but a store bought MSM product

Posted by: store bought brand | March 28, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

Theresa,
“she did lead in the polls last year, but of course, that was prior to the horrendous media bashing 24/7 of Hillary Clinton this year…”
This is your opinion. But if you think the media is pro-Obama and anti-Hillary — which do you want running in the general election? Which stands a better chance of beating McCain, if the media prefers one over the other?
“…as we all know, caucuses are unfair, and do not show a true representation of the voters in a particular state…”
This is your opinion. But even if caucuses were unfair, why did Obama win them? Hillary Clinton had every opportunity to complete in them, but did not. Why was she less organized? Why did she only criticize the caucus process after losing, rather than before, if it was so undemocratic?
“Hillary has won the Big states. The states that a Democratic candidate will need to win in the general election.”
Again this is your opinion. Hillary won, for example, New York and California, both of which will be Democratic wins in the fall; ditto Barack and Illinois. Each candidate won some red states, some blue states, and some purple states. The bottom line is that all states count, and that each candidate knew the rules of the primary season long before it started.
“…if the DNC had not sanctioned MI and FL, Hillary Clinton would have won these states, picked up more delegates and would have been able to create even more momentum going into Super Tuesday.”
Again, your opinion. Because no other candidates’ names were on the MI ballot, and because no one campaigned in FL, we will never know who might have won. Certainly the results would have been different than they were; that is certain.
“Did the DNC not know about Obama’s 20 year past history with a racist, hate-filled, anti-American pastor. A man he considers to be his mentor. Didn’t they bother to check out their candidate? Or did they think they could hide it?”
Barack Obama is not the candidate of the DNC. He is running to become their nominee. It is not the DNC’s responsibility to check candidates in this manner. Every politician has past problems that can be spun to create the appearance of scandals. Certainly Hillary has many — Whitewater, Lewinsky, cattle farming, etc., and more recent events, that have been completely ignored by the media (and the DNC).
“And I really appreciate all of the ‘love’ being sent out by the Obama supporters. I hope you will love Hillary Clinton as the Democratic nominee. She will become the 44th president of the United States of America.”
Thanks. I would certainly vote for Hillary over McCain, just as I hope you would vote for Obama over McCain. I’m frustrated that the contest is so nasty, and hope it will end soon. Hillary would be a vastly better president than John McCain. But it is extremely unlikely she will win the nomination. I hope ardent supporters like yourself will begin to process this reality soon and start to come to terms with the Obama candidacy. We will need your help to succeed in the fall, and we want to make your voices part of the larger Democratic party come this fall. Consider taking another look at Barack Obama, looking beyond the spin and smears. You may like what you see.

Posted by: dan | March 28, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

The truth is neither one can win without the super delegates. So why are the super delegates dragging this out. Of course the rest of the primaries should take place. But those super delegates need to choose now.

Posted by: maryland | March 28, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

Barack Obama did not call for Hillary to drop out–Sen. Patrick Leahy did.
Barack Obama did not make the rules concerning delegates that were agreed upon by both him and Sen. Clinton prior to the beginning of the election process–the Demoratic Party did.
Barack Obama did not make or endorse the remarks that Rev. Wright made–Rev. Wright made them.
Barack Obama did not claim to be under sniper fire–Hillary Clinton did.
Barack Obama has not sent down Hillary’s campaign in flames–you are dong that.
And yet, those who support the Clinton campaign act and talk as though all of these things are Sen. Obama’s fault. I think this is patently unfair, and for you to protest the issue of fairness so much, it seems like to me, if you were that concerned about anyone being unfair, you would be pointing your finger(s) at yourselves first. It is this kind of unfairness that has made me turn away from the Clinton candidacy, and I believe it is turning off alot of other voters as well. If you don’t respect the rules which your candidate agreed to play by; if you don’t respect the pledged delegate count that the voters have properly elected; if you don’t appreciate the values of the Demoratic party, then you probably aren’t a Democrat anyway, and when you switch your vote out of spite, then you will find yourself in a minority that will have no influence in American politics anywhere. When you leave, it will simply make room for those who are more closely aligned with the rules and values of honesty, and fair-play that you are so willing to abandon.

Posted by: Justinteim | March 28, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

GAME OVER, WAKE UP.
OBAMA won
Hillary lost
I know it is unbelievable but what else could you do? She tried all and still did not work. GAME OVER.

Posted by: ITISOVERFOR2008 | March 28, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

Clinton ride on show them that you will be another American Magret Tatcher that will condone no indiscipline OR CORRUPTION. The race has just started and we will fight it out till the end. American Press will be disappointed. and all sAy AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: A True black American | March 28, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

Hey BHO you can’t handle Hillary!
I love your cronies going out trying to kill off Hillary. Do you think this will UNITE the democrats. Opposite, you are fueling all people to not vote for you because your ugly side is showing and the more we see it and the more media coverage you get the LESS likely you will win!
This man is an empty suit, with no credentials but a MEDIA that has swooned and worshipped him!
MSM is OBAMA’s church of RADICAL conversion to OBAMA votes!
MSM has repeatedly pushed the OBAMA agenda down our throats and trying to force us to vote for him.
OBAMA would be nothing without MSM!
OBAMA you are stealing the DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION
YOU ARE A THIEF, AND A SHADY CHARACTER THAT I WILL NEVER TRUST!
you are pushing another candidate aside because you can’t handle her STRENGTH and INTELLIGENCE!
you are nothing but an empty vessel going nowhere!

Posted by: bob | March 28, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

MSM and OBAMA are DECIDING the OUTCOME OF THIS ELECTION NOT THE PEOPLE

Posted by: STEVE | March 28, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

shetriedAllandlost: Peggy Noonan would probably be flattered that you quoted her column from today’s Wall Street Journal. Although, credit would be nice. Incidentally, Ms. Noonan makes some excellent points in her column today.

Posted by: Hilton | March 28, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

CNN,FOX, ABC,CBS etc are forcing us to vote for OBAMA.
Obama you are ACTING like a DICTATOR, forcing the WILL of the people to ONLY HAVE YOU AS THE CHOICE!
you are a THUG and a DICTATOR.
YOU ARE NOT THE CHOICE OF THE PEOPLE

Posted by: castro methods | March 28, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

Barack Hussein Obama
will never WIN!
you have RUINED this election!
you are a nobody the MEDIA created and elevated!

Posted by: freeeee ride | March 28, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Obama=The last 1 term Dem. president.
Hilary = The last 2 term Dem. president.
Figure it out before its too late.

Posted by: Rico | March 28, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

it cracks me up. al of these “mothers” who don’t have a problem with voting for someone who is a serial liar.

Posted by: drzoon | March 28, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

“What’s Hillary and her followers have in common? Racism.
If the white snake doesn’t win they’ll vote for the other white snake. ”
WOW we are now to the root of the problem with Obama and his supporters. If you disagree you will be called racist. Much like if you disagree with GWB you are enabling terrorist activity. Is this what you all want? I sure don’t I can take McCain he is a central Republican with Democtratic leanings much more than another zealot no matter what he or his supporters call him.
On his choice of Rev. and Church please wake up. If he did not agree with this Church he should not have stayed. Also what good does it do his children now if he disagrees? He has subjected them to the hate filled sermons since birth.

Posted by: TxMom | March 28, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

ANSWER THE QUESTION YOURSELF WHAT MAKES YOUR FRAUDULENT OBAMA QUALIFY FOR PRESIDENT. THIS MAN IS A BIG FRAUD COVERING HIMSELF BY THE AMERICAN PRESS, I DESPERATELY HATE THE AMERICAN PRESS THEY ARE AS USELLESS AS ANYTHING. THEY ARE PLAYING DOWN WRIGHT AND PUSHING UP BOSNIA WHAT AN UNFAITHFULL WORLD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SHAME ON YOU AMERICAN PRESS

Posted by: A True black American | March 28, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

@cindy | Mar 28, 2008 4:09:06 PM:
I’d be happy to tell you if I thought you’d even listen. Is your question an invite to find some ways to tear Hillary down?

Posted by: LOM | March 28, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

drzoon did you not mean brothers?

Posted by: Rico | March 28, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Jean Thompson, I agree totally. I was just saying yesterday that Obama is Bush all over again. Runs on change. No experience. Says “I’m a uniter, not a divider”.
I said a year ago that I would never vote Republican again, but guess what? McCain is a true American hero and a fine man. Though I disagree with many of his ideas, he’ll be saddled with a Democratic Congress which will keep him in check.
The Dems are burning bridges and don’t even realize it. Why are they more concerned about African Americans than they are about women and blue collar workers? Their wanting to stop this process now confirms that. I know that no matter what happens in the remaining states, they’ll throw Hillary under the bus. Well they’re going to have to look her and every one of her supporters in the eye and do that. And then they can pay the consequences in November.

Posted by: HoosierSue | March 28, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Media clowns like Jack Cafferty, Anderson Cooper are trying hard to shove OBAMA down our throats!
I am glad that people are not taking the MSM seriously.
the OBAMA CRONIES behave like the supreme law and act as if they are ahead by 500 delegates!
Keep pushing Hillary aside, but remember KARMA OBAMA what goes around will come around.
MSM have shielded you and given you a free ride because YOU ARE A WEEEEEAAK CANDIDATE WITH NO SPINE.
YOUR CRONIES ARE EMPTY SUIT WHO ARE LESS MASCULINE THAT YOU.
I LOVE HILLARY KEEP GOING GIRL!!!
THESE ARE A BUNCH OF SEXIST, JELOUS, EMPTY PANTS YELLING TO PUSH HILLARY OUT.

Posted by: weak MEN | March 28, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

It’s unfortunate that the remaining state primaries will drag this on for several more weeks, leaving Clinton and Obama to fight among themselves and distracting from every McCain screwup. But I believe the voters in those states have a right to be heard, as I would feel (NY here).
I voted for Clinton in our primary, but at this point support Obama, for many reasons – her 24/7 personal bashing of him (she has been far and away the instigator of the intra-party fighting), the BS about the sniper fire (as one delegate was quoted in a recent news story, “I may forget what movie I saw two weeks ago, or even what I had for dinner last night, but I could never forget coming uner sniper fire no matter how long ago.”), her casual dismissal of her “memory lapse” with a laugh and a “hey, I’m human” (sort of like Cheney’s recent “so?”), Bill Clinton’s adulation of McCain and Hillary while dissing Obama – AFTER McCain’s telling statements about not really knowing who’s who or what’s going on in Iraq/Iran, etc., etc., ad nauseam. A good fight is a good fight, and so be it. But the style and substance of Hillary’s campaign of late has become desperate and destructive, and she shrill and at times appearing only semi-coherent.
In the ensuing, remaining weeks, both candidates need to clean up their acts, Hillary in particular, and commit themselves to a discussion of the issues and the differences between what the democratic candidates have to offer versus, as Obama put it, McCain’s pursuit of George Bush’s third term.

Posted by: Robert Anderson | March 28, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

I feel bad for the Hillary people. I really do.
She misled you — she got you to think she was qualified and experienced, and then when she found out people wanted change, she said she was the candidate of change.
She lies and “misspeaks” all the time, and if anyone brings up her past it’s a smear (whitewater anyone?), but her pretending not to know if Obama is a Muslim or not (“not as far as I know…” she said!) or bringing up his church — that’s just part of the contest.
She thought she’d waltz through the primary season, but when it didn’t happen she imploded, she had to loan herself $5 million (not sure where it came from since she won’t release her taxes like Obama did). She fired campaign staffers and blamed everyone else but herself for her problems — the caucus system, the calendar, the DNC, the media, Obama, everyone.
I feel bad for you, Hillary supporters. You fell in love and Hillary did you wrong, and you deserved better. I hoped for a civil campaign from her, too.
But now she’s exercised the Tonya Harding option — if she can’t win, she’ll take out her opponent so neither of them can.
This is what you’re defending?
I feel badly for you. Come on over to Team Obama. The weather’s nice over here, and we’re backing a winner.

Posted by: Jim | March 28, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

“What’s Hillary and her followers have in common? Racism.”
Wow, I had no idea I was a racist. This is such a revelation for me seeing how I’m Thai, have a half asian/white sister, two white brothers and one black brother, married to a Jew and have two half asian/Jewish children.
I’m going to go repent now for my 32 years of living a lie. My life has been such a scandal. Shame on you LOM!

Posted by: LOM | March 28, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

TxMom–you attribute the charge of “racism” to Sen. Obama, but you don’t seem to be too concerned about the constant barrage of “sexism” charges that are levelled by Bill Clinton, and others in her campaign. Why are you so quick to condemn one and to excuse the other? You don’t exactly sound like you are concerned about the issue of fairness. Moreover, you are quick to level the criticism of guilt by association to Sen. Obama, but you didn’t mention that it was former Pres. Bill Clinton who sent for Rev. Wright, when he was embroiled in the sex scandal which was in itself pretty telling about what he really thinks of women.

Posted by: Justinteim | March 28, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

Rico: Ireland peace treaty? Bosnia “sniper fire”? (note: i’m a vet. and let me tell you, it’s not something you forget IF it ever happens. S-CHP? (ask Hatch/Kennedy). now … those are some pretty world class lies. i mean… “we had to dodge….” ? Rico: you have no shame?

Posted by: drzoon | March 28, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

Barack Obama did go on a jihad against Don Imus (who is white) demanding that he be fired for an offensive remark. Obama claimed that his daughters should not have been subjected to those comments. He also claimed that he would call for the firing of any ethnicity that engaged in such behavior.
Obama did attend a racist church for 20 years but didn’t have any problem with letting his daughters hear Wright’s filth for years. He then embraced Wright. His excuse was that he knew about Wright’s better side. Of course Obama knew full well about the better side of Don Imus who raised millions to help the black community. So Obama has taken sides & instituted a double standard.
Obama proclaimed himself the race candidate in a damage control move & just 1 day later he threw his grandmother in front of the bus when he said she was a “typical white person” with “bred into” behavior. Such terms might be OK for an animal but are totally unacceptable when describing a typical white person, a human being & certainly not appropriate to describe a family member.
So when Obama embraces Imus & pays his back wages then he can talk about being a race healer but until then he is just another hypocrite that engages in race baiting whenever it suits him.
What a lie, that new kind of politics bit. Sorry Obama but your actions speak louder than your empty words.

Posted by: phil | March 28, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

One thing it says to me is that Obama and his campaign, supporters are quitters. When the chips are down they run away. On the other hand, Hillary Clinton proves there are Some democrats who are fighters. Some democrats that will stay in for the long run, some democrats that don’t run when the chips are down and some democrats that stand by the people who put them where they are today and allow the voices of those to be heard. Hillary Clinton is a democrat that can win in Novemeber.

Posted by: Kelly | March 28, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

“TxMom–you attribute the charge of “racism” to Sen. Obama, but you don’t seem to be too concerned about the constant barrage of “sexism” charges that are levelled by Bill Clinton, and others in her campaign. Why are you so quick to condemn one and to excuse the other? You don’t exactly sound like you are concerned about the issue of fairness. Moreover, you are quick to level the criticism of guilt by association to Sen. Obama, but you didn’t mention that it was former Pres. Bill Clinton who sent for Rev. Wright, when he was embroiled in the sex scandal which was in itself pretty telling about what he really thinks of women”
You know what I am not a racist, no one has ever accused me of being one until this election. I was raised in a Military town, I have tried to raise my children to respect people of all races and religions.

Posted by: TxMom | March 28, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

CARINGFOR SOMEONE:
ummmmm.. ok.. Thanks but no thanks.

Posted by: Alan | March 28, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

Why so negative? What experience did G.W. Bush have when he became President? Governor of Texas, which for the record he did not do very well as. What foreign policy experience did he have? Absolutely none. Which brings me to my point. Barack Obama may not have the fat portfolio of credentials that McCain does, but what this country needs to seriously consider is that 1. The so-called “experienced” of this country have led us down a path of war, economic hardship and international alienation. 2. Did it ever occur to you and everyone else, that maybe, if we took a different approach, such as talking to other nations, not as a pompous super-power, but as equals, that maybe, peace and non-confrontational rhetoric just might get us back some of the respect we have lost overseas? Barack Obama is coming into this fresh and new. He will by no means try to do this on his own. That is why Presidents have cabinets. In addition to his knowledge, his ability to THINK and respond with a cooler head, the positive mentality and his own experience, albeit not vast, but enough to get us back on track coupled with brilliant minds of cooler-headed senators alike, can and will propel this nation forward again. Can you for one minute stop and ask yourselves, “if Hillary Clinton was meant to have this nomination, the votes, be they primaries or caucauses would speak for themselves”. Nothing has been stolen from anyone. How would you feel if you were about to get a major job promotion based on your good performance and feed back from your supervisors, only to be told that 2 negative supervisors whose input was not to be counted, will now weigh in on your promotion and now your prospects for that promotion will be dashed and instead go to your rival, who just happens to be very good friends with those 2 negative supervisors? How would you feel? This is what is happening. Please, everyone, don’t, out of anger, resentment or pay-back, decide that you are going to vote republican just because your candidate does not win. We have too much at stake here. Some on this board may be immune (or think they are for now) to what the state of the economy is. But, mark my words, if America, makes the mistake, again of putting another Republican in office, the price we will pay will be so great, that history will wonder if this is the second fall of the Roman Empire. Please think of what you all are saying and doing. If hope is what helps the laid of father of four get back out on the street to look for a job, then that is a start. Please think about what you all are proposing. We, the American people will lose if McCain goes in office. We do not have the man-power any more for this war or any other. McCain proposes to do nothing about the economy stressing that a free capitalistic economy needs to work itself out. That would be true if that typical Economics 101 text-book answer imagined that this society would be the information age and that no one could ever imagine debt in the trillions of dollars due to an illegal war! Please, stop and think. You may not like Barack Obama, but right now, this country is so bruised we do need some of this political back-stabbing to stop. Ms. Clinton is vilified by the republicans. Remember that. She is a fine senator and yes would make a good commander in chief, but times have changed and we can’t risk having anyone, be it Obama or Clinton, whose first allegiance is to billionaire donors, special interests and party favorites. I would rather see someone who though not as experienced, but is willing to tell these corporate giants, “either you bring the jobs back from India, Phillipines and Singapore or you get taxed retroactively for the free money you got from Bush!”. Please everyone, think. About yourselves, your family, your loved ones and the quality of our lives. All I am asking is to please give it a try. If Senator Clinton wins this FAIR AND SQUARE, yes, I and everyone else will stop at nothing to support her. But if Barack Obama wins, please everyone, put all prejudices, misconceptions, hatred, uncertainty and retaliation aside. Please. Just think about it.

Posted by: Pour Quoi | March 28, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

I really resent Obama backers who claim that those who don’t support him are influenced by his race – in other words, we’re racists. I don’t have a problem with the color of his skin. I have a problem with his inexperience, the lies he’s been caught in, and his lack of judgment that brought on his Rev. Wright problems. I’m also concerned that I don’t know much about him – other than his pretty speeches – but I do see the company he keeps and their views (his wife and Rev. Wright). “Show me who your friends are and I’ll tell you who you are.”
I support Hillary. If she doesn’t get the nomination, I’ll support McCain. I don’t have to wonder whether or not they have a hidden agenda. I don’t have to worry that they’ll make a novice “boneheaded” mistake when it comes to our national security. I trust them. I can’t say the same for Obama.

Posted by: HoosierSue | March 28, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

as an Obama supporter… let me say.. “Hilary! please stay in the race! Do not “quit”.. not until the very very end of this whole thing should you whatever it is that you are going to do. THE REASON: its time to burn the Clinton brand to the ground. and nobody could do it better than you. and then, and only after then, can we move on in the country and get some very hard and important work done without all of the “baby boomer” baggage safely out of the way.
i hate “llberals and i hate conservatives. i only want people who are ready to do what needs to be done and BE HONEST about it. that is the only reason a very conservative “liberal” like me is voting for Sen Barack Obama. He’s going to tick a lot of folks off… and i am just fine with that

Posted by: drzoon | March 28, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

I didn’t know Chelsea had a black 1/2 brother? The Link is below
Just get out Hillary and take your ostrich supporters with you, If you can get their heads out of the sand!
WalMart Queen conned the Ohio and Texas unions to endorse her, So much for the UNION!
Hillary needs some time to run down to Australia and visit with Chelsea’s 1/2 brother DANNY!
If you want to see a DANNY BABY PICTURE just click on the following link or paste it into your browser.
If you want to see Hillarys hidden papers early just click on the following link or paste it into your browser.
If you want to see 225 other Clinton scam articles just click on the following link or paste it into your browser.
THE CLINTON CRIMINAL PAGE
Don’t forget to save these sites and forward them to your friends.

Posted by: Ron | March 28, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

One thing it says to me is that Obama and his campaign, supporters are quitters. When the chips are down they run away. On the other hand, Hillary Clinton proves there are Some democrats who are fighters. Some democrats that will stay in for the long run, some democrats that don’t run when the chips are down and some democrats that stand by the people who put them where they are today and allow the voices of those to be heard. Hillary Clinton is a democrat that can win in Novemeber.
Hillary Clinton won’t be accused of running away from anything and the republicans will try and use that against her on Iraq. This is proof that she doesn’t quit. And an exit from Iraq won’t be because the demoicrats easily back down. Or more so it won’t be an exit becasue the united states backs down. If ever you have the chance to vote for a woman that has bigger guts thean any man in this country.. Now is that day. Have some guts yourselves and vote for Hillary Clinton…

Posted by: Kelly | March 28, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

RON: That was wrong. you know it was wrong.. we all know it was just flat out wrong.
obama supporter here

Posted by: drzoon | March 28, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

At least GW Bush had failed at something Obgama is still sitting in the dark dreaming of the lightbulb.

Posted by: Kelly | March 28, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

Kelly, is this a joke to you? Since when has failure been something to brag about? This is our nation we are talking about. What is so hard for people to understand that sometimes it takes someone with a different view to change the status quo? Obama is not dreaming of light bulbs. For someone who had written not one but two books, I feel has accomplished more in life than someone who would put his country in great peril and sacrifice the lives of 4,000 of its citizens for a war that should never have happened. I do hope that your view of life is more than, “at least you failed at something”.

Posted by: Pour Quoi | March 28, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

Asking Hillary To quit is indicitive of a weak opponent. He already said that he would have quit if he lost 12 elections in a row. do you want a weak leader like that to run your country, your military, John Mccain has been running for president for years now. He hasn’t quit. Mcain will eat obama alive on that comment.

Posted by: Kelly | March 28, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Edison said I havn’t failed I have only found 10000 ways that haven’t worked. How many ways has Obama found that haven’t worked?

Posted by: Kelly | March 28, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Point is, that he hasn’t done anything but talk and write books. Perhaps the terms I used were over your head.

Posted by: Kelly | March 28, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Sometimes touted as a contender for the Republican vice-presidential slot, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has aired her thoughts on race in the United States, a prominent issue in the presidential election campaign.
Rice, the top ranking African-American in President George W. Bush’s cabinet, told The Washington Times she had watched Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Barack Obama’s major speech on race last week.
“I think it was important that he (Obama) gave it for a whole host of reasons,” said Rice in a transcript of the interview released by the State Department on Friday.
Obama would be the first black U.S. president if he wins the Democratic nomination and beats Republican candidate John McCain in the November election to succeed Bush.
Obama’s speech — which he gave after a storm of criticism over racially charged sermons by the black pastor of his church — spoke of a racial stalemate in the United States and a need to heal racial wounds.
Rice said the United States had a hard time dealing with racial issues.
“There is a paradox for this country and a contradiction of this country and we still haven’t resolved it,” she said in a detailed reply to questions about Obama and race issues as a whole before next week’s 40th anniversary of the slaying of civil rights leader Marin Luther King.
“But what I would like understood as a black American is that black Americans loved and had faith in this country even when this country didn’t love and have faith in them, and that’s our legacy.”
Rice said her own father, grandmother and great-grandmother had endured “terrible humiliations” growing up in the segregated south and yet they still loved America.
—-Condoleeza Rice, a Republican woman, is acknowledging the “uniter” in Barack Obama. This is a woman who is a true role model, and an example of success, for American women who do care about this country.

Posted by: Justinteim | March 28, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

Kelly, since when is non-violence weak? Have you heard the term, “the pen is mightier than the sword”? Just because Obama may not have been a prisoner of war, does not make him weak. Would you rather a hot-head who just because he can’t stand the Iranians today, decided to push the button to show them who is boss? We need business taken care of HERE FIRST! We will always have enemies abroad, but if your first thought is to brandish the guns, then I fear, McCain will indeed be our president. But, despite it all, I do hold out hope that when the pain of buying Milk, eggs, flour, snacks for the kids, GAS, and finding a job get to people enough, I have a feeling that will stop and think. I wonder what McCain’s response will be during that debate. I won’t be crude and say Obama will eat him alive, I will leave it at…strike 1!

Posted by: Pour Quoi | March 28, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

Seems to me all those college graduates may be voting for Obama but they sure aren’t campaigning for him.

Posted by: Kelly | March 28, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

“..And there is no way that SENATOR OBAMA is going to win enough pledged delegates to secure the nomination, EITHER!” All these clowns calling for Hillary to drop out “for the good of the party” like to ignore this pesky fact. Convenient, Huh!
What’s more, if Hillary Clinton does well enough in Pennsylvania, Indiana, W. Virginia, and Kentucky, there’s a very real chance she will actually overtake Obama in the popular vote.
Hillary Clinton winning ALL the big states and being ahead in the popular vote at the finish line IS exactly what Leahy, Richardson and their pals do not want to see happen. This is obviously their only motivation behind shutting down the remaining primaries.
It has nothing to do with “what’s good for the party”. Come on!

Posted by: Scott Hansen | March 28, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

Senator Obama, despite the unprecedented help from media and other power groups, you still lost in almost all the important states, and your win largely come from caucuses and crossover rotes from republicans, you have no chance winning in general election, so for the good of democratic party and our country, please drop out of race right now!

Posted by: waq | March 28, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

Pour Quoi: Yep the pen is mightier than the sword. But only if you know who you are writting to.
I am saying that Hillary clinton has a better chance against mcain because she can say she has not backed down even when notable people in her own party tell her she should. She has guts. And Obama, well he just kinda talks a good game. When he starts to debat John Mcain over Iraq John Mcain will play him as being weak, and cowardice, and the type to run away. Hillary clinton will be able to say “I NEVER HAVE EVER RAN AWAY FROM A FIGHT” Not in the 8 years the republicans tried to takle them out iun the 90′s not even when her own party tried to take her out today.. She never runs away..

Posted by: Kelly | March 28, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

kelly: how can you reward someone… in the case Hilary… for her vote to go to war with Iraq… that as we all know has killed 4000 of “ours”.. and destroyed 100′s of thousands of other serviceman’s lives… and killed probably a million Iraqis… HOW CAN YOU REWARD THAT VOTE with your vote for President? and dont give us that crap that “she didn’t know”. SHE didn’t know. Al Gore did. Ted Kennedy did. Barack Obama did as well. and… SO DID SHE! how can you be part of killing those 4000 with a vote for her??

Posted by: drzoon | March 28, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

When John Mcain plays the video clip of Obama saying he would have quit if he lost 12 states he will depict him as a quitter and ask you and all the former marines and army and navy if you want a quitter running the military. The he’ll say Obama want’s to quit our fight in Iraq.. Obam will not win

Posted by: Kelly | March 28, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

I rsally don’t care about the facts. Facts don’t win elections. Ask Karl rove and the 527 if they used facts to beat John Kerry.

Posted by: Kelly | March 28, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

New national Gallup pole shows Obama 50%, Clinton 42%.

Posted by: ll | March 28, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

dirve by: seriously. where did you hear anyone is abandoning Obama. every poll out there right now (WALL STREET JOURNAL)… shows her in a free-fall.

Posted by: drzoon | March 28, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

…and we’re talking about the Democratic Party? Drop out? Maybe you Mr. Leahy should drop out? This is obsurd! If it hadn’t of been for the screw ups in Florida and Michigan, Hillary would be ahead, but she was robbed of that. So be it, she still won in the biggest states and she’s going to win PA as well! Obama is not going to get enough delegates either, so why on earth would Hillary drop out? Wish on…

Posted by: Larry | March 28, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

All I can say is that Hillary clinton is the best chance against John Mcain. He has way too many political fouls against him. And when the uninformed unconcerned voters hear him say “I would Quit” and His rev. “GD America”, Muslim name, kenyan father, Michelle Obama “I have never loved america.. They will come out in packs to vote against him.. Bush had the christian right.. Mcain will have the christian white…

Posted by: Kelly | March 28, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

they volunteered

Posted by: Kelly | March 28, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

What about rewarding someone a vote for the Presidency who chooses racism and hatred for America for more 20 years?

Posted by: esvida | March 28, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

Hillary has proven time and again that she is no quitter and those of her own party that are appearing to swift boat her are just proving that she cannot be swift boated. I think they are preparing her for battle against McCain while Obama goes along as nothing more than a poster boy.

Posted by: TexanDiane | March 28, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

and it was her responsibility to be careful with their lives with her vote.
you have no idea how offensive that is to a vet (me) to be so dismissive of their lives like that

Posted by: drzoon | March 28, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

esvida: ever seen any killed? ever kill anyone? ever ask anyone to kill for you? that is a big big big leap yo make from what a PASTOR said.. to voting to kill 4000 serviceman and women

Posted by: drzoon | March 28, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

well for a person who likes to quote a poll that some how adds up to 106% I think, as per usual, she is exaggerating, I mean, mispeaking, I mean lying through her teeth.
She has not released her taxes that would answer the questions regarding some questionable financial issues. Her first lady itinerary does not back up her experience claims. The company she worked with Wal-Mart on labor issues is suing a brain-damaged employee for her medical costs and has no qualms about leaving her destitute. Exactly what qualifies her for President again?

Posted by: Louis | March 28, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

For “pour quoi” – thank you for that your “genuinely sincere” beutiful work above – you said it all! I agree with everything said because at this late time in my life, I want peace in this nation and abroad, and I know that I cannot be the only one who feels this way. I am an Obama supporter, but like you said, IF clinton wins FAIR AND SQUARE, then I will vote for her – I won’t like it, but I will do it for the good our country. If there are those of us willing to do that for her, I just pray that she will actually do for our country and pray that I was wrong in thinking that she cares more about winning than actually helping “we the people”. Thanks again pour quoi.

Posted by: Disparaged | March 28, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

VOLUNTEERED….
Nobody asked you to do it. DRZOON…
If you didn’t want to fight join the peace corp.

Posted by: o | March 28, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

Why would a Barack Obama supporter such as Sen. Leahy, be asking for Hillary Clinton to drop out now? What are Barack Obama supporters afraid of? Are they afraid of letting this play out? Are they afraid that Hillary Clinton can still win the nomination if this goes to the convention? Are they trying to shield their candidate from more Wright issues? Why won’t they let the voters decide the outcome? Weaklings.
I also know they do not want Obama to have to face a humiliating defeat in the PA primary, which would certainly help Hillary Clinton’s cause and rally her supporters even more. And, didn’t Barack Obama agree to debate on April 16th in Philadelphia, ahead of the April 22nd PA primary? I know how much he loves to debate.

Posted by: marybeth | March 28, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

Wow, Kelly, you are right. I have not thought about all this until reading your posts. You are so right. I am glad that there are some people that are still using their heads instead of a dream to see what is happening. Obama is clearly a bad choice for the Democrats.

Posted by: Phillybabe | March 28, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

How is being a liar going to ruin her in the general? Considering the vast majority of all peoople veiw all politicians as liars I don’t see it causing much harm. On the other hand. whn people realize how much hate Obama is spreading around. It’ll mobilize a whole new movement of conservative votes. If you don’t think white people will be offended and become defensive about being called a typical white person you are pretty naive.

Posted by: kelly | March 28, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

drzoon, my husband has been in Iraq and he too is a vet. He also knows that while Obama was against the war, he had no vote on the war because he was not in the Senate at the time. He also has said many times that he doesn’t know how he would have voted had he had the same information about the war as did Senator Clinton, so this is all just a wonder and no proof as to where he actually would stand on the war. Hillary has fought for so much for our veterans. My husband who is still active duty is still very much in support of Hillary because she does have a plan to get the troops out. Her foreign policy endorsement of 34 flag officers, as a vet, you should know, that this is a very very good thing for America. Obama’s minister damned the nation that our troops have died for in Iraq. He lost credibility as a candidate by not denouncing the man, not just his words.

Posted by: TexanDiane | March 28, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

O: esvida tried to equate what Barack’s Pastor said with the “go to war” vote of Hilary’s. a vote that killed 4000 of ours. ruined 100′s of thousands of lives.. and killed at least a million Iraqis. and from my own personal experience… i can tell you… that is a very very big leap! its why a vote for Hilary is a vote to reward her vote to kill 4000 of our men and women

Posted by: drzoon | March 28, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

Leahy’s never been to swift anyway! What’d Obama promise you?

Posted by: Jim | March 28, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Louis, Hillary was on the board of Walmart while it Mr.Walton was still in control. After the old man died the Walton children took over and turned it into a hornets nest that it is. Hillary was gone by then and therefore, what Walmart is and has become is no reflection on Hillary. Get the story straight if you are going to tell it, otherwise, it makes a liar out of you. Therefore you are no better or no worse than any other politician.

Posted by: TexanDiane | March 28, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

texas diane: with all due respect… and i mean that… don’t trust what Hilary says she will do. and although my service was four years in early 70′s…. i still “get it”. and for the record: i think we should yank the US out of Iraq… and put most of them in Afgan and melt that place down until we kill Bin Laden and his boys.. every last one of them.
but let me be clear… please don’t believe anything Hilary says. she just can’t help herself

Posted by: drzoon | March 28, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

HILLARY, YOU SHOULD NEVER QUIT
Howard Dean and Patrick Leahy should shut up. These guys have their own agenda. Both of these guys are Obama supporters. If they have any respect for democracy, they should not try to disfranchise the people of Florida and Michigan –the states Hillary won- by colluding with Obama. Let the people vote. This is democracy not dictatorship. They should not be allowed to silence the voices of the people in Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Indiana, Guam, Puerto Rico, Kentucky, Montana, Oregon, and South Dakota. Also they should try to seat the delegates from Florida and Michigan instead of taking sides in this historic election. By disfranchising the people of Florida and Michigan they are trying to steal the election from Hillary. Hillary, you should never quit. If you quit, we will vote for McCain.

Posted by: Independent | March 28, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

texas diane: i didn’t know there was a timing thing on the Wal-Mart thing. let me look into that! thanks…
(note: i did see and watch about 30 minutes of board mtg footage where they were talking about killing unions. and hilary was in attendance. they were very proud of having her on the board… i think they said something about her being their “first woman” on their board)

Posted by: drzoon | March 28, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

Even Obama who supports change would be open to a move away from party politics. I think Obama would be in favor of Clinton with her huge base taking a run as an independent.

Posted by: Drop out | March 28, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

i’m glad to see other people see the bias in the media.cnn msnbs just want us to see what they want.wright comments he didn’t hear them for 20 years wright says i’m sorry i didn’t hear it i’m not jewish or italian but i would be outrage.i’m irish i’m waiting for wright outrage against us

Posted by: mik | March 28, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

jmaya, what are you talking about, do you even know

Posted by: ll | March 28, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

Obama is a candidate that would support and understand the need for change and that we have to get away from the machinery of the parties taking the vote away from the people.

Posted by: Drop out | March 28, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

SHE SHOULD NOT DROP OUT.
If she drops out, the Democrats loose the ONLY candidate able to beat McCain.
Swing people will not vote for someone that sits in a pew for 20 years and listens to hate being preached and does nothing about it….
I for one will not.
Its choice 1-Clinton, choice 2-McCain.

Posted by: Steve from Dallas | March 28, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

Just for saying that Sen. Leahy, I will be contributing to Hillary’s campaign today. :P

Posted by: echo | March 28, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

I figured out today that Obama will be a uniter if he’s the Democratic candidate after all. He will be uniting the Hillary people with the Republican Party. If Obama gets the nomination I hope they become known as the Hillary Republicans in honor of her. By the way Fox News has an interesting article about Rev. Wright retirement home being built by his church for $1.6 million and $10 million line of credit (probably his retirement account). It’s kind of funded by us taxpayers since the church is tax exempt. You think their struggling parishoners would have been better served if they could have been helped by the dollars not to mention the hypocrisy. And Glenn Beck from CNN has commissioned a report on Black Liberation Theology.

Posted by: Maggie | March 28, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

So if everyone loves Hillary why is her approval rating at 37%

Posted by: jj | March 28, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Steve from Dallas
IF she drops out and runs independent she is no longer hampered by the backroom stings of the part. Obama who supports change would have to be in favor of this. Clinton won’t loose much of her support as an independent and she will pick up all those Republicans who don’t want to vote for another Bush but don’t want to vote for the DP.

Posted by: Drop out | March 28, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

maggie! your pro life! and … you would love to have a pro life supreme court for the next 30 yrs! wow.. you must be a great democrat ! Who would have known that we had all these mother-in-laws that were pro life?? judge Thomas…. mover over.. we’ve got a lot more just like you on the way! THANKS MAGGIE!

Posted by: drzoon | March 28, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Steve
Obama controls the back room of the party. He is slowing walking Mi and Fl on one prong by saying he wants the party to follow the rules and ignore the votes. Then he will switch and want the party to ignore the rules and force the Super delegates to follow the people. The same people he struck down earlier on the first prong attack. He’s making these attacks with the support of the back room and Hillary is a candidate with huge support but boxed in. The party does not have a vote in the general

Posted by: Drop out | March 28, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

Steve
With in the confines of the Democratic Party the attacks on Clinton have a soft landing. If Hillary runs as an independent and sticks to policy, ignores attacks these attacks will not have a soft landing for those making them. There is not much she won’t be able to answer from this position.

Posted by: Drop out | March 28, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

THIS IS JUST A BIG SETUP TO SHOW HOW HARD CLINTON CAN FIGHT. MCAIN IS GOING TO BE A TOUGH FIGHT AND THEY CAN’T HAVE VOTERS SAYING THAT IT WAS JUST GIVEN TO HER. SHE HAS TO SHOW THAT SHE FOUGHT FOR IT.

Posted by: HIST010 | March 28, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

The constituents of Senator Leahy should call for his immediate resignation. Not wanting a democratic process to proceed is grounds for termination.
Senator Leahy has no business calling for either candidate to drop out, regardless of who he supports.
Remember, Senator Leahy, 10 states still have to vote. Michigan and Florida voters still deserve to be counted and their delegates seated.
Regardless of what the DNC and Barack Obama supporters (maybe the same thing) are calling for, no United States Senator (Leahy) has the right to attempt a coup in the Democratic nomination process.

Posted by: Jayhawk | March 28, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

OBAMA CAN’T UNITE THE DEMOCRATS. HOW DOES HE PLAN TO UNITE DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS?

Posted by: HIST010 | March 28, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

People like Senators Leahy and Casey are sorry representations of Democracy to the rest of the world.
Rather than let the process continue and risk defeat of the candidate they support, Leahy and Casey would rather install their candidate of choice.
Definitely not the best America has to offer.

Posted by: Jayhawk | March 28, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

When Hillary says she has “won all the big states” as an argument for the superdelegates to use to give her the nomination, is she also saying that Obama would not beat McCain in California or New York, as an example? Makes no sense. Also, as a Michigander, I (and alot of others I know) would have gone to the polls to vote for Obama in our Democratic primary if we knew it would have counted and Obama was on the ballot. So she wants to seat the Michigan delegates as is? Please… The blame for the Michigan fiasco goes to the Michigan Democratic Party Leadership, headed by Governor Granholm, herself a Clinton supporter, who pushed for an early primary, breaking the rules, knowing full well that the DNC had already warned her that they would not seat the Michigan delegates….but she and Senator Levin did it anyway. Why should Obama be blamed? Especially since Hillary herself was quoted in October agreeing with that decision at that time…..so she tries to change the rules now when she is behind and blame it on Obama…how typical. Also, looking at the polls, Obama is still beating McCain while Hillary is not…..and the negatives for Hillary are double what Obama’s are. Bottom line to all Democrats, Independents and enlightened Republicans…..Obama has a much better chance of beating McCain than Hillary every will. Let’s give him the opportunity to fight for us….he is certainly proving he can fight and beat Hillary more effectively than she can fight him, despite all the early advantages she had with the Democratic Party establishment. We risk losing a whole young future generation of Americans if the superdelegates overturn the will of the voters, whatever that is after June 3. The long term prospects of the Democratic Party will be toast if one side or the other is seen as “stealing” the nomination.

Posted by: Ed from Michigan | March 28, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

JAYHAWK:
Then what about those that have endorsed Hilary? are they not interested in Democracy as well?

Posted by: drzoon | March 28, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

I AGREE ABOUT LEHEAY. HE SHOULD RESIGN. I THINK HE IS STIRRING MORE DIVISION IN THE PARTY. OBAMAS TEAM DOESN’T WANT CLINTON TO QUIT BECAUSE SHE IS BEHIND, IT IS BECASUE SHE IS COMOING BACK.

Posted by: HIST010 | March 28, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

Jayhawk, Hillary should have dropped out several weeks ago. She has bad judgement. She would rather cheat and delay her exit. She’s putting on quite a show, but no one is fooled by it.

Posted by: Sallie | March 28, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

When John Mcain plays the video clip of Obama saying he would have quit if he lost 12 states he will depict him as a quitter and ask you and all the former marines and army and navy if you want a quitter running the military. The he’ll say Obama want’s to quit our fight in Iraq.. Obama will not win the general election against Mcain.

Posted by: kelly | March 28, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

kelly: give it a rest. at least have something NEW to say. oh… and thanks for your vote to kill 4000 of our servicemen and women. Hilary didn’t have a problem with that vote either! if you dont have a problem killing more … vote for her again!

Posted by: drzoon | March 28, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

Hillary mocks democracy. She gives her word to the DNC that she will follow their ruling on Michigan and Florida, then cries “foul” when she gets behind. She wants to change the rules now that she’s losing. That’s such a phony and fake thing to try to do.

Posted by: Sallie | March 28, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

A message to both sides from an Independent:
Obama supporters: stop letting Clinton supporters get to you and being reactive.
Clinton supporters: tone it down and reign in the anger and negativity.
You both want the same thing: a Democratic president. Now make it happen… or elect McCain instead, and let’s have some more tax cuts for the rich, aid for large corporations, shunning of the poor and middle class, and a long, drawn out war in Iraq.
Peace.

Posted by: DCA | March 28, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

maybe iraq was wrong but we are there now and no president can take it back. what is important is that we elect a president who is going to do it in a way that will not have a negative impact on the country and the safety of the military in Iraq. If there is a base in Iraq for 100000000 years that is fine with me. There are bases in Korea. Japan, germany, france, england, all countriies we have been at war with and the strategic sense of it may be to maintain a presense in Iraq.

Posted by: kelly | March 28, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

Ok…. and this means what to me? I appreciate that you volunteered but 4000 deaths is expected. I didlike bush as much as anybody but 5 years ago the same people who want out of Iraq now were the ones lining up at the recruiters office becasue they wanted their chanve to get revenege for 9/11. There wasn’t a draft and nobody made them go. They knew the risk and in some some weird way I’m glad they took that risk so I didn’t have to. But that doesn’t matter. what does matter is that if the WE DEMOCRATS want to win this election in novemeber we need a candidate that has a chance against mcain. This guy is a war hero who spent 5 years in a prison cell in vietnam. He has fought for president in two primaries. He doesn’t give up. Obama is sending the image to america that itt is ok to quit sometimes when it becomes obvious you will fail. He said on tv a while back that if he lost 12 electiosn that he would quit. Hillary Hasn’t quit. That is why Hillary is a better fight against mcain. If you think I am kidding about this the just ask all of your military friends who they would elect. The guy who served his country was a pow and fought for his life. Or the guy who admitted he would quit. admitted he would leave his church… No matter how you spin the wright controversy he comes out losing in novemeber…

Posted by: kelly | March 28, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

typo I DISLIKE BUSH AS MUCH AS ANYBODY ooops

Posted by: kelly | March 28, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

What’s wrong with Obama suggesting Hillary drop out of the race, he didn’t drop out of his church even after Rev. Wright preached messages of hate for 20 years.

Posted by: Rezcos The Rascal | March 28, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

kelly: first of all. it was the biggest mistake .. the worst vote … anyone could have made a mistake casting. knowing what i know about hilary, i believe in my deep dark little place i call my heart that hilary’s vote was a “political vote”. i believe she knew it was a “stupid war”, but had to LOOK TOUGH so she could become the first woman president. as for my military buddies? they take no comfort in knowing that either hilary or mc cain (who is just a flat out lunatic by the way!) will have the exec office. me? i think when a country tries to attack us, we melt them into the sand and call it a day. but when they haven’t DONE ANYTHING… you just keep them scared.

Posted by: drzoon | March 28, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Why should Hillary drop out? It’s really quite simple: Either she steals the nomination with superdelegates or does everything to take Obama down with her. Excuse me while I choke up with emotion as I remember her saying at the end of a debate (compliments of plagerizing her husband and John Edwards) that no matter what happens in the campaign she will be fine, but expressed concerned whether the American people will be alright.
It’s sincerety like this that will change the Democratic Party to the Doomed Party.

Posted by: Chicago Andrew | March 28, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Every state, every voter should be heard before anyone drops out. The race is close and not over yet.

Posted by: Rezcos The Rascal | March 28, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

drzoon, Hillary is not being endorsed by 34 flag officers because she is pretty. She is being endorsed for her policy. Obama was put in charge of NATO IN AFGHANISTAN and has yet to hold one committee hearing. Your views of Afghanistan are right but still Obama has not even acknowledged these troops. This is not good for our troops there. My husband has seen the inside of Iraq and has been to Afghanistan once, so forgive me for being more than angry at Obama’s little dance of “I was against the war.” He was not a United States Senator, neither were the troops but they did what they were told to do.

Posted by: TexanDiane | March 28, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

didn’t you know that 9/11 caused a recession? She had planned on having a democrat for president. You can’t do a whole lot with a bush as president. But enough with the history, what does tommorow hgave for you? What does Obama have to offer? He can say he is going to create jobs but where are those jobs coming from. Hillary clinton has laid out detailed plans to help stimulate the economy with green collared jobs.

Posted by: kelly | March 28, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

It doesn’t matter what obama is for he’ll never get past the election anyway. He could offer free money tpo every person under the sun and he wouldn’t be any more electable.

Posted by: kelly | March 28, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

John in CA, don’t expect Hillary supporters to support Obama in the fall. We support Hillary but not so much the party any more. There are 47,000 people that have promised to not vote for Obama and of course these people have friends and family that will also go Republican. Obama willnot win in November. Especially the white Christian vote.

Posted by: TexanDiane | March 28, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

Phillybabe: (and i love that name by the way)…
i’m not blaming her for the job loss. it was a promise she made! she made that promise. she did she make that promise if she can’t deliver on it in the first place? because… she will SAY or DO anything to get elected.
to be clear… george bush and bill clinton are more responsible for that job loss as much as a president can be for the economy. bill de-reg’d banks (housing/sub-prime mess and NAFTA/ and george’s “hands off”/protect the rich policy)

Posted by: drzoon | March 28, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Barack is NOT electable. He can NOT win the general election against McCain. Remember folks, we’re fighting for electoral college votes in a winner take all format by states. Just for grins, it’s interesting to note that if the democratic state primaries were winner take all then Hillary would be leading by 173 candidates. And that’s not counting Florida and Michigan. Right now it shows Hillary as the much stronger candidate.

Posted by: JD, Pittsburgh, PA | March 28, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

Obama has no more bragging rights that he can get the independents from John McCain. With the Wright revelation and aftermath, Obama is showing more and more everyday that he is wait out there in the left field. Hillary DO NOT drop out!

Posted by: echo | March 28, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

Since Congress presently has a lower approval rating than President Bush, I think that Leahy and Pelosi and those like them should probably just shut up and go back to doing the jobs they were elected to do. Voters gave them a majority in the last election, and they have done very little to push back at Bush like they should have. Wimps, all of them. I want a fighter in the White House – go Hillary!!

Posted by: Grammy Barb | March 28, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

I just came back from a Hillary rally in Gastonia North carolina where Bill Clinton spoke. The gymnasium was packed, Hillary supporters were pumped and Noone that I could see wanted Hillary to drop out. North Carolina is pumped up and we want a say in who our next president will be. Maybe Obama and his supporters should focus less on Hillarys dropping out of the race and figure out why so many democrats still want her in it.

Posted by: roberincharlotte | March 28, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

I still don’t understand why Kennedy, Kerry, and Richardson get to choose Obama even though Clinton won their states, yet everyone is screaming that the superdelegates should follow the state voters. Don’t these hypocrites realize it’s just another Obama tactic to steal the election. The superdelegates know that Clinton won the big blue states yet they are being intimidated to vote for Obama. I have not renewed my DNC membership and will switch to Independent by November. The Democrat “leadership” of Pelosi, Reid, Kennedy and Kerry make me sick!

Posted by: Beth | March 28, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

OBAMA GETS AWAY WITH LIES ALL THE TIME, while Clinton is crucified for exaggerating a story. That’s how powerful the media is.
The media can twist and report lies to Obama’s benefit. Obama was on the View (aired 03/28/08) and he basically said the same thing, lying contradicting himself again regarding Jeremiah Wright and his church.
REMEMBER IN OBAMA’S FAMOUS SPEECH, HE SAID HE COULD NOT DISOWN WRIGHT ANYMORE THAN HE COULD DISOWN HIS WHITE GRANDMOTHER, WHO LOVED HIM AND HELPED RAISE HIM.
Now he sings another tune. Can anyone see how deceitful this man is?
TODAY, OBAMA said, “IF THE REV .WRIGHT “The Minister Of Hate” HAD NOT RETIRED I WOULD HAVE LEFT THE CHURCH”.
ONCE AGAIN, OBAMA IS PLAYING THE AMERICAN VOTERS LIKE A PIANO!

Posted by: proudamerican2008 | March 28, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

Now Westie …. I don’t think I’ve ever heard of this Leahy character before, he appears to be a heavyweight Dem with some pull.
And he appears to be offering Ms. Hillary some wise counsel.
So according to this honest broker, if she does the right thing and drops out and then goes back to the Senate, she can still have a wonderful and productive career.
But if she keeps buring bridges…this would be bad not only for her party but for the Junior Senator’s career.
Thank You Pat Leahy for looking out for Hillary.
Plus she could get a job in an Obama Administration. Say Ambassador to Bosnia or something.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | March 28, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

Dan, no way will I look at Obama, he is much too frightening to think of as president. I am about sick of the democratic party as well.

Posted by: kay | March 28, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

Stay in Hilliary OBAMA KNEW FROM DAY ONE ABOUT REV WRITE.
In his 1993 memoir “Dreams from My Father,” Obama recounts in vivid detail his first meeting with Wright in 1985. The pastor warned the community activist that getting involved with Trinity might turn off other black clergy because of the church’s radical reputation

Posted by: Kolasea | March 28, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

I know that Senator Hillary Clinton is a fighter that we can believe in and that she should stay in the race. Senator Obama is a dishonest opportunist and will say or do anything to get elected, even spy or tell lies.
He has always used race when it was to his advantage and Geraldine Ferra was correct in her statement. Most of the racist statements came from his camp or supporters. He has lied about his pastor’s statements, his association with Toni Rezko, Larry Sinclair, special interest groups and even known terrorists. He may tell some truths only after getting caught and exposed by the media. Even most of the policies that he says he supports have been highjacked from the Clinton campaign.
Americans may think we are in trouble now but will really know trouble if Obama is elected. His love of country does not come before his need for power and perhaps, revenge.

Posted by: M.L.Holmes | March 28, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

Of Course Obama’s supporters want Hillary to drop out. The connection with the radical church leader is a big eye opener for some. There is still a chance she can pull through.
I personally hope she does.
Charm does not warrant being able to Lead a Country. Obama gives a lot smoke ~n~ mirror comments. Re-phrasing what he says he does NOT mean to say the very same thing – semantics – I don’t believe in Gay marriage – but I support civil unions to give the same rights- What is the difference?
It’s time to take Obama of the ticket -
Hillary – keep your post.

Posted by: Made in the USA | March 28, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

God forbid we continue to debate who is best qualified for the most important job in the country. There has been talk about this contest going on too long ever since no clear winner emerged from the Iowa/NH contests. It’s ridiculous. Millions of people haven’t had the opportunity to go to the polls yet. Will their votes change the outcome? Maybe not. But how arrogant are these handful of Democratic leaders to believe they have the right to determine when “enough” voices have been heard.

Posted by: rhenry101 | March 28, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

First “Obama Girl” wants Hillary to quit. And now Senator Leahy. Both requests deserve the same level of attention.

Posted by: Shirley | March 28, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

SENATOR OBAMA IS A GOLDEN BOY WITH A SILVER TONGUE. THE ONLY PROBLEM, IT IS FOOL’S GOLD AND THE TONGUE IS FORKED.
SENATOR OBAMA AND HIS MENTOR SHOULD TAKE A VERY LONG TRIP BACK TO AFRICA AND BRING PEACE AND SALVATION TO ALL HIS FIGHTING RELATIVES.
WAKE UP AND VOTE FOR A TRUE AMERICAN, HILLARY CLINTON

Posted by: OK Granny | March 28, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

I am heartily sick of people telling Hillary to drop out. And I’m becoming more disenchanted with the whole Democratic Party’s undemocratic candidate selection process. Caucuses are as slanted against the average working class citizen as anything the Republicans have come up with.

Posted by: Charlie | March 28, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

Leahy is my senator. He is showing signs of becoming senile. Leahy has been a bigtime Obama support since January. Leahy and his wife did a radio commercial for Obama and they sounded like a couple Alzheimer patients.

Posted by: gtessex | March 28, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

They are right,
After so many lies AND unsuccessful Kitchen sinks, we no longer want to see Hillary using this race as her personal playground…and yes..she needs to drop out,as she has become even more unpopular because of her arrogance and lies…
goodbye Hillary….
oh Bosnia Bosnia…..

Posted by: Paola Waf | March 28, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

I am really uncomfortable with Obama. Anyone, But absolutely no Obama

Posted by: Tim | March 28, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

The case for Clinton to drop out would also apply to Obama because neither one of them will be able to clinch the nomination without the super-delegates.

Posted by: Lee | March 28, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

dont you think bho arrogance of thinking he is ready has played into this?

Posted by: fedup | March 29, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

I find it laughable that Senator Leahey feels what Senator Clinton is saying about his candidate Barak Obama is more hurtful than any thing John McCain has said about him. McCain hasn’t started to criticise him yet. Leahey uses this as a reason for Hillary to withdraw from the race because she might damage Obama’s image, I suppose. This is a race for the Presidency of the United States isn’t it? If Obama can’t take it he should be the one to get out of the kitchen. Leahey shouldn’t be taking sides to protect his candidate. If Obama is worth his salt this should make him stronger. If not he shouldn’t be president.

Posted by: Chuckwillswidow | March 29, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Leahy is right! Clinton has no chance
of winning the nomination now(short of cheating)! Dems should be happy about that! There is No Way that
Pinnochio Clinton(Hillary) can beat
The Straight Talk Express!
Honesty and Integrity Matter!

Posted by: reaganfan | March 29, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am

I think they should all quit……….. that would include Obama, Clinton, and McCain. Can we please, for a change, have a viable candidate for President?

Posted by: dk | March 29, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am

There are many people on this blog who do not understand polling. Yes, the NBC poll include more African-Americans, but in the tally they count as half a vote. So the poll was not skewed in favor of Senator Obama – actually he scored higher then the poll showed.
There is so much hate on this blog – more than any other blog I have been on. I am a bonafide supporter of Obama, and I hope he wins the nomination, but I will not sell my party down the tube if he does not win the nomination. You are either a Democrat or you are not. A vote for McCain means more dead soldiers, a longer recesssion then we are already in, more government spending, more etc., etc., etc. If you want to see more body bags coming home, our grandchildren and great-grandchildren in Iraq forever, our great-great-great-grandchldren paying for the Iraq ‘war’ – then go ahead vote for McCain, but do not sit on this blog and call yourself a Democrat. If you are willing to sell your soul for another 4 years of bush then please – change your voter registration to reflect what you truly are – a Republican. Democrats do not need or want turncoats in the party, or people who will destroy the party because the candidate of their choice is not the nominee. You wonder why you are characterized as brainwashed or uneducated? Go back and read your posts – you bring it on yourselves.

Posted by: sandy | March 29, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am

I refuse to accept that the American people would stand by and watch the sexist media and the so-called Party leaders try to push the only female candidate in this election, who happened to be the most qualified, out of the race.
America should not stand for that. Every voter should have a say in the process. If not, why have primaries and caucuses in the first place if everybody’s vote does not mean a thing. What does that say about how we treat women in our soceity.
We must always hire the one that is the most qualified for any job. The rest of the states should have a say in this election. Period.

Posted by: Sam | March 29, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am

sandy, nice diatribe, as a die hard democrat, i will not vote for bho because i do not like him, do not trust him, do not believe the wright story, think he and his wife think little of the country, think he is a smooth talker who has won over many by his oratory skills, think he has no agenda, and think he has a poor grasp of the issues relavent to the country.not voting for bho is a conscious decision based on my opinion of the man, and i am a democrat, and you cantry to dis me all you want. it is the bho supporters who are destroying the party, by putting their own arrogance and self-righteousness above the party.

Posted by: fedup | March 29, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am

Made in the USA – “I don’t believe in Gay marriage – but I support civil unions to give the same rights- What is the difference” — this is actually ne of the few things I agree with Obama on.. the difference is that there is a lage portion of the American population that still sees marriage as a religious covenent between a man and a woman and don’t want that religious custom to be usurped by a union that is not supported by religious doctrine. Civial unions allow gays to enjoy the same financial rights and protections as other married couples without denigrating the sanctity of marriage.

Posted by: givemeabreak | March 29, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am

SAM — “I refuse to accept that the American people would stand by and watch the sexist media and the so-called Party leaders try to push the only female candidate in this election, who happened to be the most qualified, out of the race.” — Explain to me how she is qualified? of for that matter how either of the democratic candidates are qualified…?

Posted by: givemeabreak | March 29, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am

Hillary don’t quit! Don’t listen to those old men, they just don’t want a woman president.

Posted by: Johanna | March 29, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am

No fed-up – what you are is a person easily swayed by built-in bias and prejudices. In order to vote for Hillary I will have to hold my breathe until I turn blue and force my hand to mark her name on the ballot, but I will do that before I will vote Republican.
Instead of spewing hate on a blog, I did my research. I have read his books, done research on Senator Obama’s background as well as Rev. Wright’s, and I really listen to Senator Obama’s speeeches. I do not depend on soundbites to help me make up my mind.
I am 66-years old, a female, and part of the voting block Hillary is depending on. The problem is I am also educated – halfway through my doctorate degree studies. One great advantage of education is that one develops exceptional critical thinking skills and reasoning power. It is precisely because of those traits that I support Senator Obama. I am neither self-righteous or arrogant, just smart.

Posted by: sandy | March 29, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am

What a mess. The DNC is backing another loser. No choice but to vote for McCain, if they kneecap Hillary.

Posted by: Mack | March 29, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am

Obama’s promise of a “new” politics is now defunct. His mantle of hope and change is tarnished. In recent days he seems to have little or nothing positive to offer. What a shame his “new” politics has descended into the muddy morass of pettiness, lies and personal attacks, not to mention the ditch of racial hatred and anti-American sentiment preached by his spiritual mentor and former member of his campaign. Obama has dug himself into a hole and gotten dirty. His esteemed judgment is now called into question. His promise of transcending what divides us has now split the Democratic Party. His willingness to disenfranchise the voters in Michigan and Florida for fear of losing to Hillary Clinton, along with his campaign’s call for Hillary to concede the nomination makes him seem weak and frankly un-American. I see no promise of success for him as the nominee, just a victory for McCain.

Posted by: dwilson | March 29, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am

I was amazed this evening when Charlie Gibson and George S. was discussing this story. They both agreed on a view of this that wasn’t so blatantly for Obama that you wanted to throw up. George informed Charlie that the people stating publicly that Hillary should quit are actually hurting the party. They will end up alienating to a certain extent enough of Hillary’s supporters if they feel she is being pushed from the race. He really hit it on the nose. Hillary has a right to run all the way to the convention. She also has the right to run after as an Independant, if they name Obama the Nominee. And I said name because without ALL STATES votes being counted, he will have not been duly elected. If it happens, I hope she does run as an Indie, because when she comes in second and Obama third in a three horse race, maybe next time Dean and Pelosi and the rest of them will finally see that they should have quit trying to manipulate this election and let it run it’s course, instead of sticking us with four more years of Republicans.

Posted by: Melanie | March 29, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am

Obama should drop out.
He has too many un answered problems.
Like Pastor Wright, Rezko, No record of accomplishment.
Obama Promises too much.
Hillary is a better choice!!
Leahy or Lazy whatevere his name should drop out of the senate his been there too long.

Posted by: JT | March 29, 2008, 2:38 am 2:38 am

Leahy should be ashamed.

Posted by: Alicia | March 29, 2008, 2:38 am 2:38 am

Even the supposed PHD is duped by Obama. First it was Richardson who was offered VP or he is applying, then Casey, and then Leahy. Now, I hope these men will not be fighting each other if Obama will choose not aming them or if they have “sintodo comon” common sense, they are hoping agains hope. As for Hillary, better she will run as independent, the democratic party has gone crazy and stupid if they ever nominate Obama. All registered democrats who supported Hillary will have to change their party the moment Hillary lost the nomination.

Posted by: asd | March 29, 2008, 2:39 am 2:39 am

Sen. Pat Leahy, an early Obama supporter, asks Hillary Clinton to withdraw from the race?
What an idiot!
There’s something wrong with this dude Leahy. I just can’t put a finger on it. But it’s bad. Real bad…

Posted by: Ottile | March 29, 2008, 4:14 am 4:14 am

I don’t trust Hillary on day one or day twenty one or day 221. Why, because she had all those days to get health care through under Billy boy and in the end, simply failed. Yes, health care is an issue for me but track record is a bigger one. If she couldn’t manage to succeed with just one important issue in the minds of many uninsured then, how on earth’s name is she going to handle numerous important issues as president?
As for the Obama-preacher issue. I respect him for sticking with someone who he may have close ties with, yet at the same time he may disagree with in other ways. I am certain there are many of you out there who’ve had differing views with someone in your own life yet still care for and respect that person.

Posted by: John | March 29, 2008, 6:40 am 6:40 am

WE NEED SOMEONE FRESH & NEW THE CLINTONS ARE NOT FRESH & NEW NOR IS MCCAIN/GW BUSH CLONE SOOOOO OBAMA HE IS!!!

Posted by: gina | March 29, 2008, 8:08 am 8:08 am

Why should Hillary drop out? America can’t survive with out her Tax increases, government health programs, and socialist governing politics. Why!!! Queen Hillary is the ruler of the hen house and she’s not leaving as long as there is one rooster in the pen.

Posted by: William F. E. | March 29, 2008, 8:12 am 8:12 am

So Hillary should drop out because some people in the democratic party say so? When you look at the total votes cast and the popular vote, there really isn’t much difference between them. With the popular vote within 5 percentage points, should anybody drop out? I say no. People who want Obama to drop out are wrong and people who want Clinton to drop out are equally wrong. What most people on both sides do not seem to understand (including the DNC is that the democratic party does not have a nominee until the convention.)
If the superdelegates vote before the democratic convention, then we will have a presumed nominee, but will not have a real nominee (decided at the convention).. If the DNC was smart (not likely), why did they set the convention so late. They thought that the vote would be one sided so they set it late because they wanted a lot of free publicity just before the election date.
If something comes up that makes a candidate unelectable, then the super delegates and other delegates at the convention will change their vote to elect the candidate that can possibly win. (I’m not saying that will happen)
The RNC in Florida played the DNC by moving the primary up knowing that Dean and the DNC would be stubborn and punish the voters who had no choice to vote except on the date that the state set. Most states do not allow different dates for primaries, only a few do. Also in Michigan the state sets the date, not the voters. Voters have to vote on the date specified, or not vote. If anyone did not vote in either of these states, then they did not want to vote. Voting is your only expression of who you want for the nominee. Staying home and not voting is a cop out even if your vote might not count. If you didn’t vote in any election be it primary or general, you have not right to complaign about the outcome.
If the DNC picks the nominee before the convention, then they are violating their on party rules and thus their votes should be nulified ( like the 2 states who violated the party rules).
Either all voters should have a voice or not based on the rules, but super delegates should also.
I support Hillary, but I am tired of Republican administrations. If the superdelegates vote before the end of the primaries, then they will be Republican light.
All or none is not a democratic process. All votes should count, not just the winning side.
Just my opinion. If the democrats can not win this election then we deserve the government we get. Just let the democratic process play out.

Posted by: Paul | March 29, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am

Senator Lehy, Senator Kennedy, Governor Bill “The Judas” Richardson and Howard “Looser’ Dean are acting like bullies in the high school. They simply are jealous of the Clintons and it shows. Senator Clinton should not drop out even if Senator Lehy says she cannot win. All states must have their say in the process. Ultimately only the God decides who will win and not these bullies.
there are six months to go and who knows what will happen except the God. Senator Clinton should keep the faith and march on. Even if it means splitting the party that time may have come.
Keep the faith Senator Clinton. All the way to Denver.

Posted by: clintonalltheway | March 29, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am

Senater Leahy should retire isn’t he “like” 85?

Posted by: Jim | March 29, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am

hillary should have dropped out a long time ago she does nothing but lie she can not be trusted he bosnia story is what ended it for her. it’s time for someone fresh & new.
GO OBAMA

Posted by: Bev | March 29, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

Obama supporters,
Shame on you for being so un-democratic. You want Hilary to drop out before the voices of people heard in every state. This shows how much you care about people.
American people,
I know by now you have realized how much Obama cares about people. He and his supporters want to end the race before the people voice is heard in every state. SHAME ON THEM!! So un-democratic and selfish!!

Posted by: Shame on you | March 29, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am

LEAHY AND DODD: These Obama cronies are from two tiny states (who represents about 4 million people in Vermont and Connecticut) are lecturing over 70 million people [(Pennsylvania (>12 million), West Virginia (>1.8 million), Kentucky (>4 million), Oregon (3.7 million), Indiana (> 6 million), Guam (0.17 million), Florida (>18 million), Michigan (>10 million), North Carolina (8.8 million), Puerto Rico (3.9 million), South Dakota (0.7 million), Montana (0.9 million)] that their voices won’t count. What arrogance. This is democracy not dictatorship. What right these two people (Dodd couldn’t even gain a single delegate in presidential election) have to tell over 70 million people that their judgment is inferior. Give me break. Let the people vote

Posted by: Independent | March 29, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am

A new ad by Sen. Obama running in Pennsylvania falsely claims that Obama doesn’t accept money from big oil. In the ad, Obama says, “I’m Barack Obama and I don’t take money from oil companies or lobbyists and I won’t let them block change anymore.” According to the Center for Responsive Politics, Sen. Obama has received over $160,000 from the oil and gas industry. The major bundlers for Obama’s campaign are George Kaiser and Robert Cavnar who are big oil CEOs. Obama has accepted money from Exxon, Shell, BP, Chevron and just about every oil company. Last month, Obama accepted another $8,400 from ExxonMobil, $12,370 from Chevron and $6,500 from British Petroleum. This makes Obama the biggest liar of them all. The last thing this country needs is another big oil president like Bush that allows the consumers to be shafted to no end. Yes the Obama supporters have been very naive. Obama is big oil’s man. Anyone that thinks that Obama will do something about gasoline prices needs to pay attention to these facts! Here we have Obama claiming that he doesn’t take money from big oil & that he will not let big oil block change while he’s been getting major campaign funding from big oil the entire time! Obama will never get my vote! I will never vote for big oil’s man!

Posted by: phil | March 29, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

To the post by American. The calls for Mrs. Clinton to quit are not about affirmative action. They are about coordinating a strategy to win the Whithouse in November. Something that the Democrats are sorely in danger of botching the longer the race for a Democratic nominee continues. If the numbers were reversed there would be strong pressure for Mr. Obama to quit.
The Clinton campaign uses the term “voter disenfanchisement” a little to liberally and too conveniently. The Democratic primaries in Florida and Michigan were cast outside DNC rules. There are rules for voting in this country. Rules for voting in the election, rules for casting absentee ballots. You have to be of age to vote. Rules are what they are and they are in place for a reason. Vote outside of the rules and your votes don’t count.
Disenfranchisement to me means that a person in keeping with the rules is somehow either stripped of their right to vote or their vote, duly cast, is not counted.
In fact the Clintons seek to disenfranchise many people by taking their “fight” to the convention floor, brokering backroom deals with super delegates and overturning the will of the people as reflected by the pledged delegates. Bravo to party leaders for urging super delegates to vote in line with the popular vote.
When Mrs. Clinton says “I will fight for you,” I, as an American voter, see a couple who wants to return to the Whitehouse so badly that they are willing to sacrifice their party and the American people to get there. I have watched the Clinton campaign pander to America’s fears and predjudices by running that rediculous “3AM ad” and leak pictures of her opponent in traditional African garb hoping that American voters would believe him to be a “closeted muslim”. Mrs. Clinton could have run a brilliant campaign. Instead I have watched her take frequent trips to the gutter in an effort to win.
The only way that Mrs. Clinton should stay in the race is if she can campaign on the issues, put forth her vision for America and attack the presumptive Republican nominee, John McCain. A candidate who has admitted he knows nothing about economic issues and is in favor of expanding the war in Iraq. If Mrs. Clinton cannot do those simple things she needs to drop out of the race and the Democratic Party needs to do all within its power to accomplish that end.

Posted by: Ouida Vincent | March 29, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am

I have never heard off the stupid statement “People vote do not count because they didn’t follow the rules”.
No other country I have ever seen has imposed such STUPID RULES. These rules are stupid. These are not made for American people. These for the party leadrs. We didn’t ask these stupid party leaders to make some stupid rules.

Posted by: never heard off | March 29, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Hillary should stay in the race. Let the voters decide. If Wrightgate had happened 4 months ago, the political landscape would look much different today. Many voters are feeling buyer’s remorse.
Americans were shocked when they watched videos of Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Rev. Wright’s preaching is a reflection of his world view. Rev. Wright agrees withe world view and teaching of James Cone and Black Liberation Theology.
Voters need to be informed about a candidate’s world view. This is not a peripheral issue. Any person aspiring to be our President should undergo that scrutiny. Barack Obama needs to be candid and answer 3 questions.
Why did you choose a spiritual advisor/mentor who agrees with the world view and teaching of James Cone and Black Liberation Theology?
Why didn’t you choose a spiritual advisor/mentor who agrees with the world view and teaching of Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.? Rev. King warned against “drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred.”
Why did you give significant amounts of money during the past 20 years to support Rev. Wright’s preaching of Black Liberation Theology?
Rev. Wright and his congregation should be commended for establishing ministries that help people with a variety of needs. However, nearly all churches have ministries that help people with a variety of needs. The good works Rev. Wrright has done does not excuse his unpatriotic and incendiary preaching.
Barack Obama has said he was not in church when Rev. Wright made his unpatriotic and incendiary remarks. That does not matter. Barack Obama understands the world view of his spiritual advisor/mentor for the past 20 years, Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

Posted by: ConcernedCitizen731 | March 29, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

This is another example of the Obama camp trying to call time before the game is over and attempting to deflect closer scrutiny on them. This is a close contest being fought by two very committed and passionate candidates. Mcain is shadow boxing at the moment! Let the contest continue.
Go Hillary

Posted by: pjm | March 29, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am

This is another example of the Obama camp trying to call time before the game is over and attempting to deflect closer scrutiny on them. This is a close contest being fought by two very committed and passionate candidates. Mcain is shadow boxing at the moment! Let the contest continue.
Go Hillary

Posted by: pjm | March 29, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am

This barrage against Hillary is too clearly a barrage by certain elements who have a common trait. Observe for yourselves. I believe the party needs to split and create a third party. It does not matter who retains the label of democratic party since the divide is down the middle and equal. Both start well behind the republicans anyway.

Posted by: benvictor | March 29, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am

I think the voters have decided since national polls show Obama 50%, Hillary 42%. I doubt she’ll be able to catch up

Posted by: ll | March 29, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Why doesnt Obama drop out? We still have states that havent voted. I heard Hillary didnt have a chance in Ohio & Texas she should drop out…look what happened there. Of course, Obama wants her to drop out….he’s losing ground. NEITHER CANDIDATE will have enough delegates. She has just as much right to stay in the campaign as he does. LET THE AMERICAN PEOPLE finish voting.

Posted by: Debbie | March 29, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am

PS…the polls mean nothing..I’ve never been polled have you? The polls change all the time. Like I said….let’s let the rest of the states have their say.

Posted by: Debbie | March 29, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

The more old fogies like Dodd, Kennedy and Leahy keep talking, the worse it will get for Obama. The press and the talking heads have already made neutral folks like me take a stand against voting Obama – If Clinton is not the nominee I may have voted Obama – but now with all these forces piling up on Hillary (may be because she is strong and smart) I will vote for McCain and become a republican – I do not share these old fogies views – they have already messed up the country beyond repair – I hope they get voted out of their states – for a CHANGE in the Senate and their state.

Posted by: hrao | March 29, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

Why all the panic about Hillary staying in the race?? Senator Leahy may support Obama but there are many who feel Obama would not be in the lead had voters known about his racist mentor/pastor who he is still making excuses for and remaining loyal to. We knew nothing about Obama when the primaries began other than he delivered a speech well. Now we’re learning more about this man and not liking what we’re finding out so late in the game… Are Leahy, Kennedy and Dean afraid Hillary will win all the upcoming primaries?? That can be the only reason there is so much panic on the part of Obama backers. But what they need to realize is that the public will be outraged if they don’t let the American voters decide. You can only bully someone so long without a reaction. So certain Democrats need to stop bullying Hillary Clinton or people will pull the lever for John McCain in November in retaliation.

Posted by: jhmor | March 29, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

Of course everyone should vote but ultimately it will be up to the super delegates to decide

Posted by: ll | March 29, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

OK
We ALL know that all the politicians say exactly what we want to hear, until they are elected, of course. Then it’s all theirs. 43 presidents, all men, have proven this fact!
Why not give a woman a try and see what she can do. I know every time my Mother or Grandmother spoke everyone listened or paid hell for it.
GO Hilary, or should I say Madam President!?!

Posted by: Dis'd n Pis'd | March 29, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

To the last post with the 2 slashes as a name (I dont know how to type that!)…then so be it. NO ONE SHOULD DROP OUT. Let the remaining states have their vote.

Posted by: Debbie | March 29, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

The only predictable thing about this democratic race is its unpredictability. May the best man or woman win!

Posted by: katrina | March 29, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

The only predictable thing in this race is a bunch of old white men telling Clinton to get out of the race. I e-mailed Leahy and told him his 30-seconds of fame was over and to shut up.

Posted by: Danielle | March 29, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

Let the voters decide. Hillary is not that far behind. The Dem Party wants their dream boy to win so badly, they don’t even want this to be about votes. First they whined about superdelegates voting the way their states did. What about Mass.? What about NM ? Hillary won those and she isn’t getting those superdelegates and that is alright with the Obama folks now. He is just a show pony, or is that phoney?

Posted by: KC+1701 | March 29, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Why drag this out any longer, she won’t win. Her negative rating is too low

Posted by: erin | March 29, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Danielle wow, telling him to shut up, that’s telling him.

Posted by: ll | March 29, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Erin…let’s see the “negative” ratings have the rest of the elections. Obama is dropping and will continue to. She has EVERY right to stay in this race

Posted by: Debbie | March 29, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

Erin…let’s see the “negative” ratings after the rest of the elections. Obama is dropping and will continue to. She has EVERY right to stay in this race
(sorry mis-typing in previous post should have said after not have)

Posted by: Debbie | March 29, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

When Bill Clinton left office in 2001 his job approval rating was over 60%. Right now that 60% is greater than the combined job approval ratings of both George Bush and Congress. So maybe Dodd and Pelosi and Kerry and Kennedy should just go back to Congress and do the jobs they were elected to do and let the voters decide who they want for their nominee. Democracy – what a novel idea!!

Posted by: Grammy Barb | March 29, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

Superdelegates should pay attention to the Clinton supporters too. Senator Bayh said in an interview on CNN, “Who carries the states with the most Electoral College votes is an important factor to consider because ultimately, that’s how we choose the president of the United States,”. So if Clinton wins PA and Indiana, she’s ahead in the votes that count in November. Obama can count all the red states he wants, but those Republicans and Independents only voted for him because they know he will be easier to beat in November.

Posted by: Tim | March 29, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Ken Blackwell – Columnist for the New York Sun
It’s an amazing time to be alive in America. We’re in a year of firsts in this presidential election: the first viable woman candidate; the first viable African-American candidate; and, a candidate who is the first frontrunning freedom fighter over 70. The next president of America will be a first.
We won’t truly be in an election of firsts, however, until we judge every candidate by where they stand. We won’t arrive where we should be until we no longer talk about skin color or gender. Now that Barack Obama steps to the front of the Democratic field, we need to stop talking about his race, and start talking about his policies and his politics.
The reality is this: Though the Democrats will not have a nominee until August, unless Hillary Clinton drops out, Mr. Obama is now the frontrunner, and its time America takes a closer and deeper look at him.
Some pundits are calling him the next John F. Kennedy. He’s not. He’s the next George McGovern. And it’s time people learned the facts.
Because the truth is that Mr. Obama is the single most liberal senator in the entire U.S. Senate. He is more liberal than Ted Kennedy, Bernie Sanders, or Mrs. Clinton. Never in my life have I seen a presidential frontrunner whose rhetoric is so far removed from his record. Walter Mondale promised to raise our taxes, and he lost. George McGovern promised military weakness, and he lost. Michael Dukakis promised a liberal domestic agenda, and he lost.
Yet Mr. Obama is promising all those things, and he’s not behind in the polls. Why? Because the press has dealt with him as if he were in a beauty pageant. Mr. Obama talks about getting past party, getting past red and blue, to lead the United States of America. But let’s look at the more defined strokes of who he is underneath this superficial “beauty.”
Start with national security, since the President’s most important duties are as commander-in-chief. Over the summer, Mr. Obama talked about invading Pakistan, a nation armed with nuclear weapons; meeting without preconditions with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who vows to destroy Israel and create another Holocaust; and Kim Jong II, who is murdering and starving his people, but emphasized that the nuclear option was off the table against terrorists – something no president has ever taken off the table since we created nuclear weapons in the 1940s. Even Democrats who have worked in national security condemned all of those remarks. Mr. Obama is a foreign-policy novice who would put our national security at risk.
Next, consider economic policy. For all its faults, our health care system is the strongest in the world. And free trade agreements, created by Bill Clinton as well as President Bush, have made more goods more affordable so that even people of modest means can live a life that no one imagined a generation ago. Yet Mr. Obama promises to raise taxes on “the rich.” How to fix Social Security? Raise taxes. How to fix Medicare? Raise taxes. Prescription drugs? Raise taxes. Free college? Raise taxes. Socialize medicine? Raise taxes. His solution to everything is to have government take it over. Big Brother on steroids, funded by your paycheck.
Finally, look at the social issues. Mr. Obama had the audacity to open a stadium rally by saying, “All praise and glory to God!” but says that Christian leaders speaking for life and marriage have “hijacked” – hijacked – Christianity. He is pro-partial birth abortion, and promises to appoint Supreme Court justices who will rule any restriction on it unconstitutional. He espouses the abortion views of Margaret Sanger, one of the early advocates of racial cleansing. His spiritual leaders endorse homosexual marriage, and he is moving in that direction. In Illinois, he refused to vote against a statewide ban – ban – on all handguns in the state. These are radical left, Hollywood, and San Francis co values, not Middle America values.
The real Mr. Obama is an easy target for the general election. Mrs. Clinton is a far tougher opponent. But Mr. Obama could win if people don’t start looking behind his veneer and flowery speeches. His vision of “bringing America together” means saying that those who disagree with his agenda for America are hijackers or warmongers. Uniting the country means adopting his liberal agenda and abandoning any conflicting beliefs.
But right now everyone is talking about how eloquent of a speaker he is and – yes – they’re talking about his race. Those should never be the factors on which we base our choice for president. Mr. Obama’s radical agenda sets him far outside the American mainstream, to the left of Mrs. Clinton.
It’s time to talk about the real Barack Obama. In an election of firsts, let’s first make sure we elect the person who is qualified to be our president in a nuclear age during a global civilizational war.
Kind of scary, wouldn’t you think Remember–God is good, and is in time, on time–every time.
According to The Book of Revelations the anti-christ is: The anti-christ will be a man, in his 40s, of MUSLIM descent, who will deceive the nations with persuasive language, and have a MASSIVE Christ-like appeal….the prophecy says that people will flock to him and he will promise false hope and world peace, and when he is in power, will destroy everything. Is it OBAMA??
I STRONGLY URGE each one of you to repost this as many times as you can! Each opportunity that you have to send it to a friend or media outlet…do it!
If you think I am crazy..I’m sorry but I refuse to take a chance on the “unknown” candidate.

Posted by: lewis | March 29, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

Ken Blackwell is a black man too.

Posted by: mark101 | March 29, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

Oh sure, Obama’s momentum is gone! Why don’t you all go back to your little church and hate all the people who WON”T VOTE 4 YOU! Get out Obama! We can’t stand ya! The can’t stand ya numbers are growing. You can’t make the qualified person step aside for your “whatever” it is you’re selling.

Posted by: irma | March 29, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

Mr Leahy i hope you are doing this on your free time, which i doubt. You are an elected official so you should know how it feels to be running for something and being very close to winning. The process is still on going and millions of voters are waiting to vote for one or the other candidate, don’t try to squash that chance for voters. It’s their given right when they turn 18 or become a citizen of this great nation. Stop acting irresponsible by talking nonsense, neither candidate have what it takes to grab the nomination. We all know you are talking because you are a Obama supporter, but please stop talking and don’t take momentum away from the voting process.

Posted by: Persio | March 29, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

YOU MIGHT BE AN IDIOT:-)
If you think Barack Obama with little or no experience would be better than Hillary Clinton with 35 years experience.
You Might Be An Idiot!
If you think that Obama with no experience can fix an economy on the verge of collapse better than Hillary Clinton. Whose ;-) husband (Bill Clinton) led the greatest economic expansion, and prosperity in American history.
You Might Be An Idiot!
If you think that Obama with no experience fighting for universal health care can get it for you better than Hillary Clinton. Who anticipated this current health care crisis back in 1993, and fought a pitched battle against overwhelming odds to get universal health care for all the American people.
You Might Be An Idiot!
If you think that Obama with no experience can manage, and get us out of two wars better than Hillary Clinton. Whose ;-) husband (Bill Clinton) went to war only when he was convinced that he absolutely had to. Then completed the mission in record time against a nuclear power. AND DID NOT LOSE THE LIFE OF A SINGLE AMERICAN SOLDIER. NOT ONE!
You Might Be An Idiot!
If you think that Obama with no experience saving the environment is better than Hillary Clinton. Whose ;-) husband (Bill Clinton) left office with the greatest amount of environmental cleanup, and protections in American history.
You Might Be An Idiot!
If you think that Obama with little or no education experience is better than Hillary Clinton. Whose ;-) husband (Bill Clinton) made higher education affordable for every American. And created higher job demand and starting salary’s than they had ever been before or since.
You Might Be An Idiot!
If you think that Obama with no experience will be better than Hillary Clinton who spent 8 years at the right hand of President Bill Clinton. Who is already on record as one of the greatest Presidents in American history.
You Might Be An Idiot!
If you think that you can change the way Washington works with pretty speeches from Obama, rather than with the experience, and political expertise of two master politicians ON YOUR SIDE like Hillary and Bill Clinton..
You Might Be An Idiot!
If you think all those Republicans voting for Obama in the Democratic primaries, and caucuses are doing so because they think he is a stronger Democratic candidate than Hillary Clinton. :-)
Best regards
jacksmith…

Posted by: jacksmith | March 29, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

Jacksmith; I love it!!!!

Posted by: irma | March 29, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Yes, drop out. We need 4 more years of Bush.

Posted by: drwfll | March 29, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

If the most offensive thing about Obama is his old pastor then he will have my vote

Posted by: PDC | March 29, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

If for some reason Clinton does not win the nomination becasue florida and michigan were not seated I will simply sue the DNC florida and michigan for every single penny that I have contributed to Hillary clintons campaign. I didn’t contribute money to her campaign so they could screw up the election and give my candidate an unfair result.

Posted by: JoJo1967 | March 29, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

That was poetic Jacksmith..

Posted by: JoJo1967 | March 29, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

I have no respect for Hillary. I understand it is her right to stay in the race even if there is no way she can mathmatically overtake Obama’s lead. No one should make that decision for her. What I don’t like is her bitterness. She IS NOT staying in the race because she expects to win. She’s staying in because she wants to put her message out there…”I may not win, but neither will Obama.” She’d rather McCain win than Obama, despite the fact she and Obama agree on almost every single issue. That’s why she said she and McCain have experience and Obama has a speech. Her own bitterness is getting in the way of the objectives of the democratic party. And now the media is afraid to criticize her because she complained that she’s been treated unfairly.

Posted by: Mary | March 30, 2008, 2:08 am 2:08 am

Senator Leahy affects a condescending attitude, especially with that little word “frankly.” We already know Leahy is being frank, the use of that word apparently is just to highlight the fact he is trying to act like somebody’s daddy, a trick right out of Reagan’s playbook. Why should anyone pay any attention to what this tired old representative of the New England hoity toity liberal elite, bereft of new ideas, has to say?

Posted by: homes1 | March 30, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Obama will get the nomination even without Florida and Michigan. And he will have a landslide win over McCain in November.

Posted by: Sebastian 11 | April 1, 2008, 2:45 am 2:45 am

Somebody making an opinion of what he views is Right does not make the person as our enemy.
As such you lots stop bombarding Lehy for his thought. I know deep down if Obama is in such situation, peolpe will always have their opinion about a way forward.
Hillary supporters seemed to me they all would have graduated from the same School of Thought, different from we others. As such, if only the Hillary supporters shall stop draging the Democrats and Obama and his supporters in to Political Gutter.
I hope at this juncture Hillary will stop henceforth not to continuosly damaging Democratic party or think of causing Caeos among supporters by not Restricting herself from usin Gutter Politics to stain Democratic Presidential Rules and Process.
She can therefore stay as long as she wants, that is what Obama wants so that a winninig contender can come up in time whilst the Remaining Super Delegates decide who they are endorsing as quickly as possible so as to save our time to ganner energy and strategy for the General Election against Mc Cain.

Posted by: Roy | April 7, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am

I think McCain needs to drop out he just isn’t a powerful enough speaker.Obama is from Illinois and people from Illinois really aren’t that smart. Clinton knows the Whitehoue like the back of her hand.when she was in the Whitehouse she was called the second president.

Posted by: Trey | April 26, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

I think McCain needs to drop out he just isn’t a powerful enough speaker.Obama is from Illinois and people from Illinois really aren’t that smart. Clinton knows the Whitehoue like the back of her hand.when she was in the Whitehouse she was called the second president.

Posted by: Trey | April 26, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

I am in Oregon. To say stop the vote and drop out is totally undemocratic. Our vote out west has never count, this is our chance. The same with Indiana and NC. Just shows you where Obama stands, he is far from being a Democrat.
Also why does he constantly lie and never mention that as a child he lived and went to school in Indonesia from six to ten years of age?
How come the Blackwell scandel has not made the news today?

Posted by: Tony B. | April 28, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am

These men want her to quit because they know she will win,and they are scared. They keep running to CNN TO run another false poll saying she can’t be trusted. CNN was shown up to make false poll against Clinton by the PA voters. They said we trust her. CNN wipes Obama’s nose every time he stumbles, but Americans are smart, and use their common sense, you don’t get programed for 20 years with your Pastors ranting hate for white people that Obama thinks the same way, and he did admit he would not give up his Pastor Wright. Obama lovers you should know “Y0U CAN FOOL SOME PEOPLE SOME OF THE TIME, BUT YOU CAN’T FOOL ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME’ Therfore Clinton will be elected President in 2008.

Posted by: Madelyn Ryder | May 2, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.