Mar 16, 2008 5:26pm

Obama Condemns Wright’s Statements

…in a new Youtube video

.

– jpt

User Comments

Greta, Barak is the candidate of Unity, HOPE, togetherness and lifting-up each other. He will be the President of all Americans, therefore will not accept nor tolorate suhc incendiary statements from anybody on earth, he is resolute and will fight these kind of divisive rethorics and ideas with his last energy. Obama08

Posted by: BKMC | March 16, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

BKMC what do you feel they are going to pick his name out of a hat?? People has to vote for him in case you did not know.
I would love Hillary to win this, but am so disgusted with the democrat party on a whole am going to give my vote to Mc Cain, I cannot vote for this fools anymore.
Whenever the DNC gets its act together maybe I will think about supporting them again, but at the moment I cant.

Posted by: SJ | March 16, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

BKMC: Can you tell me why he didn’t fight this evil racist rhetoric for the 20 years he was listening to the hate in his church, and only now denounces it when he has been found out by the MSM?
Mr.Obama does not tell the truth, and his trust and credibility have been thrown out the window.
When a video finally surfaces about him being in the audience agreeing with Pastor Writes racists sermons, he will have to step down

Posted by: Jay | March 16, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

America’s beauty is its Christian views and culture, full of forgiveness and full of tolerance. Obama’s pastor has his views and these do not represent Obama’s views of America and the world. Obama08

Posted by: BKMC | March 16, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

Jay and SJ, voting for McCain is a Bush third term, I am not usre that we are ready to swallow that. Secondly, there are two generations of black americans. The racial black Americans and the post racial post Americans and Abama belongs to that second generation of Americans. By giving him a chance because of who he is, America will be healing one wound and win against its own history. Let us judge Barak for his values and standards and his vision for America, the great nation on earth.

Posted by: BKMC | March 16, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Shame on you Senator Obama for not only having a relationship with a racist, then trying to hide it, trying to laugh it off, & finally lying that you did not know about it.
If this is the company that a potential President of the United States is going to keep, no thank you,
Yes, Obama lied & knew damn well what his preacher & church was all about…

Posted by: Mike | March 16, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

Does Obama sound believable? NO
Noticing that after the report that he knew about his pastor statements in August, 2007, Obama now moved the date of having knowledge to “the beginning of his campaign”.
Obama seems to suggest that he considered leaving the church is not because the pastor is retiring. Why did Obama hire the pastor as member of his campaign?
If Obama wants people to believe him again and helps mending some fences, Obama must admit knowing of the pastor extremist view.
Considering the pastor was part of his campaign, Barack Obama should start writing letters of apology for those offended, specially the families of the innocent victims of the 9/11 attack after his pastor speech.

Posted by: Angel | March 16, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

Am voting for McCain because the democrats are a bunch of idiots, Dean need to put down his “Ten ways to lose an election” play book and wake up.
The Republicans are looking like a class act against these blundering idiots that cant see this party is busting wide open, and there is one person to blame for that Obama.
McCain is off touring Iraq and the Democrat are here fighting over delegates, why a black man cant be president, Hillary cant because of Bill, blacks pushing a “our time now” put a AA as President and on it goes.
Democrats can forget the WH they will not see that until maybe the next 100 years.

Posted by: SJ | March 16, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

Malthusian77, there is no record of Rezko giving any money to Bill Clinton either. Plus I am told by my legal friends that The Peter Paul case will be throw out when it begins because they have many years of evidence of Mr. Peter Paul as being a liar and con man in the entertainment industry, so let’s see how that trial plays out before we get all excited. Hillary may be called as a witness , but she is not a defendant.

Posted by: Jay | March 16, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

Is it possible for someone knowledgeable about constitutional law and aspirations for the Oval Office, be intimately involved in a church for 20 years and not realize that there are some thorny issues with this association? What do statements like “non-negotiable commitment to Africa” really mean for a member of this church when he takes the Oval Office? Leave alone sermons that may have mixed politics and religion.
Why condemn and reject church statements related to “Farakkhan” and “9-11″ only after they surface (despite the resistance from some of the media – the ones that claim they are more than “fair and balanced”)?
Some evidence seen through this blog suggests that Mr. Obama was aware of some of this a while ago.
First of all, is this what he meant by “change that we can believe in”.
Apologies and condemnation come only after evidence surfaces to the public in politics. It has been different in Mr. Obama’s case.
At least, now we know that exception to the expression “it sounds too good be true” has not been provided once again by political candidates.
Mr. Obama has joined the ranks of the “glass-jaw” politicians – officially!
That said, he will use this to strengthen his well-paved path for nomination. Most politicians suffer when negative things suffer about them. Not so, for Mr. Obama. This is the only thing that seems rather unusual in American politics.

Posted by: Onlooker | March 16, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

Malthusian77, you better learn how to read. That old pic proves nothing. He donated money to the Illinois Democratic party, still no direct donation to Hillary Clinton or Bill.
You forgot to mention thought that the donations directly to Obama went from $70,000 to $150,000 to now over $250,000.
You’re really not helping Obama out here.

Posted by: Jay | March 16, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

Nothing new in the video. I don’t think it changes anything

Posted by: Joan | March 16, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

Democrats will lose if Obama is the nominee. That was likely before Wright; it is a certainty now.
The media will not cover Obama’s declining prospects, however, especially in the post-Wright period. That much is also certain.

Posted by: Marie | March 16, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

Mr Obama has lied before, while acting sincere and caring, on numerous occasions.
How will we ever know when he is telling the truth?
Is he an habitual liar?
Just lying to get what he wants.
Does he think Americans are dumb enough
to keep turning their cheek to another lie?
Are we that dumb and stupid?
Shall we put our Country, our self, the future into someone who keeps lying to us?
Lies he keeps getting catch in. How many others are there that we are not aware of yet?
I do not think I am ready to put my life in the hands of a liar.

Posted by: seah | March 16, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

Who would you rather have as a spouse in the White House?
A man who is respected by foreign governments, has an accomplished record of civil rights and non-racist appointments in his administration, was successful in mediating peace in several areas of the world, who apologized for his sexual indiscretion, who has stood by his country and his family in spite of it all, continues to raise money to help the impoverished, worked with the Republicans to help victims of catastrophy, is loyal to the party, and is considered one of the most intelligent men in the world.
A woman who wrote a paper who blames and depicts the separatism at Princeton on the white population, who attends and is a member of a black separatist church, whose patriotism is questionable, who claims to have left corporate America for public service but serves as a VP in corporate America with a salary in the top 2% of the socioeconomic ladder, who blames another woman for her husband’s cheating, and who does not support the very political party that her husband is benefiting from.
During a redphone moment, I have no problem with Bill Clinton being there to advise Hillary Clinton. He has been there and knows what needs to be done. What would Michelle do? Tell Baraq to support Hamas because they consider the jewish people of Isreal unworthy? Remember she hasnt left the church or denounced Wright’s teachings.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 16, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Please do not say all black church preach this kind of vile. I am black and go to a black church-my pastor never talked this.
Do no compare this man with Dr. King
Dr. King would be appalled at this.
I do not think my black people will not vote for Hillary in November-They have not asked questions of obama-and now they have had a rude awakening-and so have many, many white people-but now they will pay attention to the issues-listen closely to what is said-and vote their interest.-Hillary-the poor and middle class knows Mccain has no interest in them.-and he said he didn’t know much about the economy anyway.
so it is Hillary. and my black people will vote their interest this time-black people want healthcare for all
black people want jobs
black people want their kids to be able to go to college
black people want the gas prices to come down.
My black people will vote-and vote for Hillary-because she will get all those things for them-and whites also-and we all know it.
Black people will not stay away in november-they will come out in November and will help put Hillary in the White House. Why?
Because:
Fannie lou Hamer
jimmie lee jackson
megar evers
mlk
rosa parks
and all the other stalwarts of the civil rights movement who suffered and died. Black people will not stay away from the polls in November-we all as american’ still have a lot of work
and Hillary is going to help all.
Hillary 08

Posted by: jgaw | March 16, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

Jake I still think you’re good reporter at ABC but what is it about the controversial pastor Wright that makes you stick so stubbornly to this issue? Hasn’t everything already been said in the five or so threads on the issue here in Political Punch?
You may, quite understandably, have forgotten about it, but Hillary is still in the race as well. Is there nothing to write about her? Well, for instance, according to the watchdog group Taxpayers for Common Sense, Hillary has secured 360 earmarks worth a combined $2.2 billion from 2002 to 2006 in all spending and authorization bills.
$2.2 BILLION… That is, Jake, American taxpayers’ money. Your money as well. The interesting thing, apart from the incredible amount itself, is that Hillary is not prepared to release these earmarks for the public to see and check.
I know, Hillary is secretive about everything that is about the flow of big money in Clintonia, but wouldn’t you as a political journalist agree that American tax payers deserve to know where these 2.2 BILLION dollars went?
Just a question, of course. You might disagree.

Posted by: Harriet | March 16, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

From an Obama supporter:
Obama’s judgment: Wright or Wrong
By now everyone has seen some of the exceedingly provocative clips from Mr. Wright’s (Obama’s pastor) sermons. As an Obama supporter I am assailed by the following questions/confusions regarding the fallout of this episode. I have tried my hardest (believe me it’s been excruciatingly hard) to objectively confront the implications of our candidate’s relationship with his pastor. I persuaded myself to face these questions by telling myself that one is nothing if one is not intellectually honest:
1. There is an undeniable close knit 20 year relationship between the pastor and Obama. I gather, the Pastor married Barrack and Michelle, baptized his children, dedicated Obama’s house, has been his “sounding board” for all that time. The title of Obama’s book “Audacity of Hope” is from the Pastor’s sermon. From WSJ I gather, the Pastor was one of the first people Obama thanked after his election to the Senate in 2004. That, Obama consulted him before deciding to run for president and prayed privately with him before announcing his candidacy last year. How can one distance oneself from this deep and this long a relationship? That would be akin to trying to distance yourself from half your life. Won’t it?
2. The Pastor called US the number one killer, held US responsible for AIDS/9-11/Mandela’s imprisonment and apartheid/Palestinian plight/killing of innocents to bring down Castro & Libya – I mean, it goes on and on over, not one or two, but several sermons. How do you explain how you presumably sat through such incendiary sermons with your family? Or, at a minimum, continued having a spiritual relationship despite such rhetoric?
3. Then I read that these clips directly contradict some of the things Obama has been saying about the pastor. It seems Obama said clearly that he does not regard his church to be “controversial”. While addressing the Jewish Leaders he apparently explained his pastor’s anti-Zionist statements as being rooted in Israel’s support for South Africa when it seems those statements were never qualified as that. I don’t know if anyone has more insights on this.
4. Our candidate’s primary counterpoint to Hillary’s Experience has been his Judgment. If people question his judgment for keeping close kinship with someone who was asking God to damn America, how will he respond? What will he say?
5. Obama’s candidacy is significantly based on his crossover appeal. That is, his appeal to Republicans and Independents. He may yet get the nomination but is his appeal not fatally compromised? How can he hold on to the mantle of being the less divisive candidate while having an unapologetic 20 year spiritual relationship with such a radical preacher? I feel so hopeless about this point. I mean, how would we feel if McCain was taking his family most Sundays to Jerry Falwell’s discourses?
6. Obama’s appeal to the young and the “latte liberals” has been his fresh-faced sincerity and honesty. To me, I know, that has been his primary appeal. Now, how do I reconcile this with what his detractors will call: the hypocrisy of calling, say, Ferraro as divisive? I mean what is more divisive than the things the Pastor said about “white folks”, even clearly lambasting Europeans.
7. Of all the incendiary things one can say about race and society and country where is an Obama supporter or surrogate who now has the moral high ground to accuse the opponent’s surrogates for being divisive. What is disheartening here is that Obama has forever ceded that high ground to Clinton/McCain.
I may be wrong – do persuade me that I am. It is very hard for me to vote for Hillary but now I am thinking about the general election and finding it really hard to figure out how Obama can keep his constituencies, his image of being a uniter. How can he? I am seeing those Republican ads running day and night showing a montage of all the different ways this Pastor has denounced America and Europeans and Israel, punctuated by Obama in his own words: “I don’t think actually that my church is particularly controversial”. I mean, Judgment, Moderation, Sincerity – can they be Obama’s defining pillars anymore? This is so disheartening. Where do we go from here?

Posted by: Jay | March 16, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

New RCP Average is now Obama by only 8/10 of a percent for the nomination. The gap has closed… so apparently Obama is losing ground after this Wright fiasco.
PA poll – Clinton +16%
NC poll – Obama +8%
The other state polls have been removed so we can expect new poll results soon.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 16, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

Hillary is “old Politics” How funny..lol
Mr. Obama is the real “Old Politics” guy here…
That’s all we need is a Chicago born and bred old politics con man in the White House spreading the Chicago Politics virus throughout the entire world. If Obama even gets elected, which I highly doubt, we are so screwed.
I was born and raised in Chicago. I know exactly what I am talking about.

Posted by: Jay | March 16, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

This man was Obama’s spiritual advisor for twenty years. If Obama didn’t know he should have. This begs the question what else is it that Obama doesn’t know. I would rather he tell the truth than beat around the bush. This is enough for me to cast my vote elsewhere.

Posted by: proudamerican2008 | March 16, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

Jay, McCain has the same problem with his association with his pastor and other pastors around the country, do not worry much about that. Wright is from the first generation of black americans and Obama is from the second generation of black americans who want to be post racial and post partisans in politics. Nobody could say that Obama is in agreement with Wright’s comments or views. Obama will be the president of all americans. He has the judgement, the ability and the leadership skills. He shall prevail.

Posted by: BKMC | March 16, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

Let’s assume Obama didnt know. He was a member of a church that he had to 1) pledge allegiance to another country 2) has a documented doctrine of black separatism 3) gives a lifetime achievement award to Farrakahn that he admittedly knows about and lies as to what it was in the debate. Do we really want someone so stupid as to not know in the WH as President?

Posted by: DCVoter | March 16, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

BKMC, I respect your right to freedom of choice , but so far,
Mr.Obama has horrible judgment(Rezko, Wright, Farrakhan, William Ayers etc..),has no ability to do anything that has been proven so far and his leadership skills are at best questionable and unproven. He shall ultimately fail.

Posted by: Jay | March 16, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

Jay, where we go from here is unite behind Hillary-encourage all who have not voted-Pa, NC and others to vote Hillary. If we stay on the issues plaguing our country-and listen to the plan Hillary has to solve them-we will defeat mccain in november-do not worry about any dirt they will bring up against her. remember she said she will not be swift boated- because she knows if the american people really care about this country and where it is headed-they will vote Hillary. I believe by the time november rolls around-after a summer of high gas prices, more housing woes-everyone will be listening to what she has to say and will unite behind her. What do you want to happen-Mccain and more war-and further tank our ecomony-or Hillary working to rebuild our country. with our help she will do it. lets give her a try. lets not cut off our nose to spite our face. If I had to have surgery-I would want the best surgeon out there to operate on me-one who knows exactly what to do. Hillary knows exactly what to do.
Hillary 08

Posted by: jgaw | March 16, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

It might be too late for Mr. Obama. He should change the church 20 years ago. I will close my eyes and vote for John McCain even Dem has Obama/Clinton ticket.

Posted by: stock_craft | March 16, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

DCVoter, you seem to have something against Obama if not against black people. I will ask you kindly to chill out a bit. McCain has the same problem with his spiritual adviser and other pastors. Would just want us to make a difference between the first generation of black americans and the second generation which are led by Jessy Jackson Jr, Obama, Patrick, etc. They want to turn the page and be post-racial and be post-partisan in politics so that the majority of the amercian in need will be served and big problems facing America will be addressed with a majority beyond party line and racial line. OBAMA08.

Posted by: BKMC | March 16, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

jgaw, I respect and agree with you whole heartily. I am a professional musician with many black friends, and many of them feel exactly as you do. The blacks in the music community do not support Obama as a whole and are now getting behind Hillary. I do non paid volunteer work for her campaign here in California. Phone calls, etc… so I will make sure to get the word out to all my friend of all colors.
Hillary 08

Posted by: Jay | March 16, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

I heard that too. But then I heard Obama contacted those ministers to make sure they understood that he’s not against Rev. Wright just those comments.
I’m glad he set out this video. I will pass it on to other forums.

Posted by: Vanessa | March 16, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

It might be too late for Mr. Obama. He should change the church 20 years ago. I will close my eyes and vote for John McCain even Dem has Obama/Clinton ticket and consider 3 times before I cast Hillary/Obama ticket.

Posted by: stock_craft | March 16, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

Sorry Tungsten, nice try, but I have spoken to quite a few black and white Obama supporters who are very upset, and said if they knew all of this before they voted for him, they would have voted for Hillary, and their main theme is they all have said they would not vote for Obama in the general, and these are fervent Obama supporters. Obama admitted in his own video there has been a shift in his support. How many supporters he has lost and how much damage this has done remains to bee seen, but don’t try and say there hasn’t been any damage to Obama’s base, because indeed there has.

Posted by: Jay | March 16, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

Vanessa post: “I heard that too. But then I heard Obama contacted those ministers to make sure they understood that he’s not against Rev. Wright just those comments.
I’m glad he set out this video. I will pass it on to other forums.”
It’s too late. Most of the mistakes, we usually can correct it or it can correct by itself but some never can.

Posted by: stock_craft | March 16, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

Why is it that when a black person votes for Obama because of his color. Its called black pride.But if your white, your called a racist.

Posted by: bluesman622 | March 16, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

BKMC: almost 14 million of us have already voted for Hillary and we will come out in force in the general. Many of Obama’s supporters will also vote for her in the general when push comes to shove. so you say she is unelectable , but that is your opinion and hope and dream, not a fact. Obama’s numbers are slipping everyday. By this summer, he will be completely unelectable in the general and he cannot win the primary without super delegates, and you will see a mass exodus of SD’s committing to Hillary at the convention. Watch and learn.

Posted by: Jay | March 16, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

Tungsten: You can call BS all day. I am speaking the truth. Obama will never become President.

Posted by: Jay | March 16, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

New RCP Averages:
National – Obama by a mere 8/10%
PA – Clinton 16%
NC – Obama 8%
Other state races were removed from the website so we can expect new polls soon.
It is clear Obama is losing ground.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 16, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

Reality is Obama fans, that he was up on McCain by 6 points 3 days ago, Here is the latest poll. He lost 10 point in a 2 days spread. It will just get worse in coming weeks.
Rasmussen Tracking 03/12 – 03/15
McCain Obama und
47% 43% 10% McCain +4.0%

Posted by: Jay | March 16, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

Jay, the last contest and vote was in Iowa and Obama has won more delegates than your Hillary, and more delegates in California, etc. Whose numbers are falling? The problem you have is that Obama can get Hillary’s people out to vote for him but Hillary cannot get Obama’s people out come November. That is the real difference between these two candidates. Furthermore, Hillary will energise the republican base and get them behind McCain.

Posted by: BKMC | March 16, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

Okay, so what exactly is your point???Hillary is hiding something or she would have revealed her info by now. When she IS forced to do so, Obama path to nomination will be clear.

Posted by: Vanessa | March 16, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

Tungsten,
Obama has become objectionable on judgement grounds. I am waiting to see what further vetting produces. My gut feeling is that he is not electable and is not of Presidential caliber even if he’s chosen as the nominee. This is unfortunate for the Democratic Party. I think we only have one viable candidate, and that is now Hillary Clinton.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 16, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

BMKC, you didn’t read my post properly. She is releasing the last 6 years of tax return from 2008-2008

Posted by: Jay | March 16, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

BKMC,
So based on your comments you are distinguishing between the pastor’s words (implication is unacceptable) and Obama’s judgement (which you believe to be acceptable). However, the unacceptable preacher was posted to a position in the Obama campaign, when the facts of said preacher were known to Obama before the rest of us. This is the JUDGEMENT problem. If the cook decided to add a bit of manure to the pie the pie does not look so tasty anymore. Shall we blame the manure or th cook? I say the cook is the master of the meal. Its about JUDGEMENT.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 16, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

Vanessa you are mislead by propaganda. The facts are that Obama has lobbyists in his campaign, is the largest recipient of campaign funding from lawyers (the lobbyists), and voted against transparency in lobbying which Clinton voted for. He voted with Fiengold on another lobbying bill that some experts say was less stringent on lobbysit reporting requirements. He says one thing in his campaign but the facts dont support it. Just another typical politician telling you what you want to hear. Edwards is also not against lobbyists. His record shows he works with lobbyists, took money from trial lawyer associations which have lobbyists, and worked for Hedge Funds which have heavy lobbying in Congress. Any politician who claims they dont work with lobbyists or wants to get rid of them is lying to you. It is a large part of how things get done. Are you saying you think lobbyists trying to get bills passed and funding for better schools, cures for disease, medicine for the impoverished, and a host of other noble causes should be cripled and excluded from our system?

Posted by: DCVoter | March 16, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

On Friday, Obama sat with the Chicago times and answered EVERY question pertaining to Rekzo. He also released his earmark and is have reject Mr. Wright comments.
It’s being reported why Obama did this is, this upcoming week and weeks to come, they will pressure the Clintons to release ALL their records.
Ask on Friday if she would release her earmark… she flatly ignored the reporter.
I wonder why. She definately hiding something.
Hillary knew she would be running for office two years ago, why didn’t she file her tax return knowing it would be asked of her???

Posted by: Vanessa | March 16, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

Does anybody else find it incredibly weird that the media is investigation Obama’s church yet Huckabee who himself is a preacher, the media NEVER EXAMINED his church or any of his sermons.
I think the media is indeed doing a DOUBLE STANDARD here.
Why isn’t the media examining McCain’s church’s sermons or Hillary’s church’s sermons? Why only Obama’s church sermons?
Perhaps the media is indeed racist?

Posted by: maritza | March 16, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

Sorry,
Chicago Tribune

Posted by: Vanessa | March 16, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

maritza – Huckabee was never a viable candidate and therefore the media does not spend money to vet him that deeply. The vetting we see now is appropriate based on the election process.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 16, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

Why should be leave the teach when Wright is no longer the pastor. This church can’t be that bad since this church is also the church of Oprah.

Posted by: Vanessa | March 16, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

DCVoter, could we remember that Hillary was the inevitable, all the polls were in her favor? Of course the name recognition was there before the real thin has started. Please let us be realistic and not to think that there is race in this race because of Obama, always Obama has between 25-30% of the white votes and in some states more. Let us focus on the message and the issues, I have the very strong conviction that Obama will be a better president than Hillary and McCain. Because he has judgement and command respect. Hillary in November will be a big disaster for the democratic party, she cannot win the general election, simple.

Posted by: BKMC | March 16, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

the fact that Sen Obama has spent the last 20 yrs with the rev wright is very scary I belive we need more news coverage on all station not just fox and obama needs to be exposed.

Posted by: cc | March 16, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

obama—-YIKES and BKMC -
let’s not forget about his poor judgement to remain a member of TUCC which teaches black separatism and the new pastor is pretty much the same as the old one… his judgement is to continue exposing his daughters to these teachings… and his wife shares in that judgement

Posted by: DCVoter | March 16, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

DCVoter, you seem to be a vivid Hillary supporter, you know her church, her donomination, how mant times she goes to church etc. You cannot be an independant as you claim. Am I right? It is very unfortunate that your candidate cannot win against McCain. Obama is the sole HOPE for the democrats in November. OBAMA08

Posted by: BKMC | March 16, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

Wow Harriet, talking about some christian that I’ve never heard of from back in the 70′s and 80′s. Anyone, any pastor that wants God to damn America is no good in my book.
I don’t care what the Republicans did back then, if McCain was a member of Jerry Falwell’s church for 20 years I would have a big problem with that, if Hillary was a 20 year member of a church whose pastor likes to say God should damn America and incite hatred for African-Americans with hate-filled comments from the pulpit, I would have a big problem with that. Hillary is looking a lot better to me since she doesn’t have any ties with extremist pastors.

Posted by: traci | March 16, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

Actually, Oprah still attends this church. She was called as the fourth person of th church. I don’t know why and nor do I know what it means.

Posted by: Vanessa | March 16, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

BKMC – in a country torn apart by war with a failing economy, a leader with the same great speaking style as Obama united half the country behind him, he had the ability to mesmerize his audience with whatever he was talking about, he said “He who owns the youth, owns the future”, that country was Germany, the leader was Hitler… let us not make the mistake many germans made in their desparation for a better future and elect an unvetted candidate
This election is about more than Obama’s ability to mesmerize and energize voters. Clinton has a strong following that is energized behind her too. The difference is she has substance to go with it. She has a history that is sound. She is not a mystery to the voters. She doesnt ask us to trust her – she asks us to hold her accountable for what she has done and what she will do if she is elected President. Let the vetting nd the nomination process continue. The world is watching – let’s make educated decisions based on a combination of voting records, campaign promises, judgement, credibility, patriotism, experience, qualifications, and electability. We cant afford to do any less – it is our responsibility to our country, our world, and our future.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 16, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

I have nothing against Black churches or TUCC.
Obama has lied to American youth on his past and ideologies. That is Obama’s biggest problem. He believes in a Black Separatist Muslim philosophy(NOI).
I for one cannot knowingly follow/trust a person who tries to deceive voters in such a blatant manner by utterly underestimating our intelligence.

Posted by: MattOhio | March 16, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

Yeah. Obama is condemning Wright’s teachings of hate now because they got caught.
Sure, Obama has been aware of Wright’s teaching for 20+ years and certainly been proud of this man for that long, so for him to claim ignorance of what Wright stands for is really an insult to our intelligence.
Republicans will destroy his candidacy in November. Not even, the liberal wing media (MSNBC, NPR, CNN, NBC)will be able to save him.
Look at what happened to Max Clelland of Georgia. This guy lost 3 limbs fighting wars for his country, and the Republicans were still able to brand him as unpatroitic and get him defeated in his senatorial re-election.

Posted by: Sam | March 16, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

Vanessa – Oprah disassociated herself from TUCC several years ago. However, the ridiculous “fourth” you refer to wa reported as below:
VATICAN CITY, APRIL 1 — Oprah Winfrey has been declared the fourth person of the Trinity, according to an astonishing new theological agreement hammered out by the world’s major Christian denominations. Along with the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, the popular talk show host will be recognized as one person in the sacred and indivisible unity of the Godhead–or Quadhead, as the updated Trinity will now be called.
“We knew that we had to broaden the Trinity’s appeal,” says the Rev. Robin Griffith-Jones of Temple Church in London. “It was so gender-biased.”
“Christianity must overcome its sexism and racism or die,” says Episcopalian bishop and author John Shelby Spong. “The revelation that an African-American woman is co-eternal and co-equal with God the Father, uncreated and omnipotent, is something all modern Christians need to hear–and embrace.”
So it appears there are some who think she is divine. I would bet those are the same ones who say things like “coming to Obama”. Just thought I would provide you with the answer about what that meant.
Religion has no place in our government. The separation of church and state should be honored.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 16, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

Obama–Yikes. Please let us remember that Obama is the only one candidate with good judgement in the race for 08. Like it or not, it is the fact. McCain said that US will stay in Irak for 100 years, Hillary is not connecting with anybody else than the less educated and the less fortunate, has no real life experience than being a wife. Old politics. So the only thing we need is to separate pastor Wright and his words from Obama and his vision, judgement and leadership for America.

Posted by: BKMC | March 16, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

It cannot be a coincidence btw that Tiger Woods is a member of that same church.
Barack Obama is the Tiger Woods of this presidential race. The big winner.

Posted by: John Minsk | March 16, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

BKMC,
You continue to trumpet without any logic to back your claim that Obama is a viable candidate. I think at best that is well up in the air. Just saw ABC evening news, its clear the press is moving in on this one like a pack of wolves. I would agree, that if he survives this one and emerges as believable then he is a viable candidate, but not the only viable candidate. He has impaired judgement in my opinion, but I’m only one vote. However, if he emerges as no longer believable by the American public, which is where this thing may be within the next week, then he is no longer viable. My best estimate is that right now he is down on believability probably 60/40 with the forces moving against him. It all depends on whether the press feels like he’s tried to pull a fast one on them. The ABC roundtable analyst said it best today when he said, “Those things can be checked”, referring to Obama’s claim that he did not know what that pastor said. Donna Brazille, also an African-American and a neutral Democrat implied that Obama’s claim will not stand.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 16, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

As an example, BKMC, Elliot Spitzer himself was a “viable” future presidential candidate up until a week ago. It’s a long way until the convention.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 16, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

BKMC – I am an Independent and Clinton supporter. The question of religion came up several days ago and I reserached it then so I already knew the answer. However, I am politically active and have been most of my life. If you want a good source of unbiased information, try starting at vote smart org website and federal sites to get facts and not just look at either candidate’s campaign information.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 16, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

Hey Gover,
You are citing Mark Goodman, a shock jock from Sirius radio, coursing around with the same old tired conspiracy nut theories that the R’s tried to play through two presidential terms, as an authoritative source. Can we please talk about reality for a change?

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 16, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

The media is only looking into Obama’s church because Obama claims the most influenctial person in his life is Pastor Wright.
Since there is not much known about Obama and his past, it seem natural to find out where he is coming from and how his views are shaped. In order to know what someone will do in the future, you have to know what they have done in the past.
Obama touts his “SUPERIOR” judgment over his competitors. What’s your conclusion after knowing that the two most important influence in his life are;
Tony rezko – who created and bankrolled his politial career
Pastor Wright – his mentor and spiritual guide.

Posted by: SAMMY | March 16, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

No you are showing the true Obama supporter colors BKMC. Insulting Clinton supporters by calling them less educated. I thought there was a decent dialogue. Now I see it was futile. There are plenty of educated people (with and without college degrees) that support Clinton and McCain. A bunch of college students and rich liberals does not make Obama’s supporters more intelligent. Have a great day.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 16, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

Hey StepDown,
There is no double standard. Hate speech is universally unacceptable (but permissible under the Constitution). Equally permissible, but more valuable is speaking up against hate speech, with promptness. What is tragic is if an inspirational leader fells to confront hate speech by waiting at least a year, and only because there is a public outcry. In my opinion that does not a leader make.

Posted by: WestCoastMessegner | March 16, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

Yeah Mark Goodman was right in that Washington Times article. The DNC will NEVER nominate Clinton because a strong GOP pressure on further investigation of the 120 missing pages of the Barrett Report could easily make the Clintons end up in court if not in jail.
An overheated pastor is nothing in comparison to what the Clinton Risk is all about, and Pelosi, Dean, Kennedy and Kerry amnong others knows about that all too well. It’s the main reason they support Obama and will ensure his nomination.

Posted by: DNC | March 16, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

How any of you can presume to instruct Sen. Obama to LEAVE HIS CHURCH is just beyond me. To assume that you know all there is to know about his church, his religious activities, to the point where you would presume to demand that he abandon his church of 20 years is just so arrogant & offensive. I have news for you: He’s not leaving his church, he’s not leaving the race, he’s still going to win this nomination and the presidency. Anyone swayed by the sermons of this pastor as an indicator of Obama’s fitness to be president is extremely small-minded and the coming Obama majority won’t need you anyway.

Posted by: dem in chicago | March 16, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

Vanessa, you want a video? Peoples’ first hand observations are not enough? Read the article and read the previous article also cited therein. Of course, Barrack Obama was present during the racist ranting of Rev. Wright. Everyday in this country people are tried and convicted based on eyewitness acounts, devoid of videotapes. If we had a video and showed it to you, you would then challenge the authenticity? Obama was present; he knew. There is no way he did not know. Read the article. Oprah Winfrey left that congregation because of the racial rantings of the “good” reverend.
I KNOW THIS IS HARD TO FATHOM. I CANNOT UNDERSTAND IT EITHER. I SWEAR WE NEED A PSYCHOANALYST TO FIGURE OUT WHAT IS GOING ON. AT TIMES I BELIEVE EVEN OBAMA BELIEVES WHAT HE IS SAYING.
What is it that his sister, Maya, has said? “He walks between two worlds.”

Posted by: marie | March 16, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

Westcoastmismessenger: Your last note came in as I was signing off. Yes, Obama is a great speaker. He also has the most cogent policies that outflank the Clintons’ best efforts. And we can all agree that McCain is just yet another Bush. (That pains me, because I voted for McCain in the primaries in 2000. I knew all along how bad “W” Bush would be. But with either Obama or Clinton, McCain is toast in the fall, despite his effective theatrics today.)

Posted by: malthusian77 | March 16, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

dem in – Obama chooses to remain a member of a black separatist church who, defends Wright, continues to allow him to speak for the church via a new radio ministry, groomed his replacement who teaches the same black separatism, and exposes his kids to this stuff. I am not telling him to resign from the church but in choosing to continue his association after now having to admit he knows the details and exposes his kids to it is poor judgement unfitting of a President IMHO.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 16, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

Gover,
The Barrett report redacted pages can be seen by any members of Congress, the pages are not missing as Goodman claimed. This pertains to Henry Cisneros in Bill Clinton’s administration, prior to 2000. This is a big yawner.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 16, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

jb00722,
that’s old news, and a black pastor in my white view has every right to talk about ‘white arrogance’ and, in a provocative manner, about ‘the United States of White America’.
These remarks will make a lot of sense to millions of black Americans; or would you to pretend that there is no reason whatsoever for black people in the USA to show skepticism and sarcasm when discussing our land of freedom and justice and equality for all? Come on.
Martin Luther King’s fight is not over, if you like it or not. In the speech that Obama attended, Wright is in good company. I guess if you would read Dr. King’s speeches you’d just as appalled as you are now. I guess that tells me something about you in the first place.

Posted by: Harriet | March 16, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

BKMC – Clinton does not have the military experience McCain has but that is not what foreign policy experience is. Clinton and McCain both have strong support from the military. Both have different types of foreign policy experience and both have been validated by experts and the RNC agrees. It is not just sitting on a committee on either count. If the RNC admits to her experience it must be valid since it is not to their advantage. Clinton has more support from military leaders, serves actively on more committees, and has an medal from the Sec of Defense.
I dont claim to be a military expert and Obama never served so he apparently doesnt think military experience is needed to be CIC. Obama used poor judgement accepting the chair of the EU committee which is pivotal as oversight for NATO operations in Afghanistan knowing full well he had no time to serve as chair. In fact he continues to use poor judgement by not holding a single hearing to ensure the military gets what it needs to capture OSL and win the war there. If he had good judgement, he would have declined the position and allowed someone with time to serve in that position. He was given a crucial responsibility in protecting this nation and he failed miserably. His excuse? He was busy campaigning. Tell that to all the soldiers who lost life and limb.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 16, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

WestCoastMessanger, remember the fact that the war brought US into economic recession, big inflation, USD 108 a baryl, costs 12 billion a month, and close to 4000 lives and how many wounded soldiers?. We should not minimise that historical event, it was a call for judgement and it is a call for judgement. Hillary and her very best friend McCain gave the authorization to Bush for this war and Barak said no to it.

Posted by: BKMC | March 16, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

I just read the article on Newsmax by Jim Davis well Obama will have to come out now and call this man a liar, because he is saying he sat in the same pew with Obama when that sermon took place.
I guess the ball is now in Obama’s court until then if he cannot deny this report it would mean he lied to the people to save his skin.

Posted by: SJ | March 16, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

WetsCostMessanger, you may remember that Colin Powell was sent to the UN to make a case to invade Irak, but he was not able to do so because of inconsitancies in the intelligence presented to him. You know it is because of these kind of miscalcualtions that Tony Blair was pushed out by the courageous British citizens? My conclusion is that Obama was right ten and he is right now and I like the type of judgement he will bring to the White House.

Posted by: BKMC | March 16, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

BKMC – if you think our soldiers have not died and lost limbs in Afghanistan you are sadly misinformed.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 16, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

I think it is time to think more on economy. We are seeing the giants victims Bear Stearns, Countrywide etc.
showing the impact of the slow economy.
It is time for America to think of a President who can address the economy.

Posted by: Humm | March 16, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

Vanessa -
1) all cheaters lie about cheating until they are caught
2) he atoned and she accepted
3) she honored her vows of marriage and it has no relevance to her job performance or judgement
4) he is not running for President now so who cares about other affairs
5) she had the strength to stand by him and defend him until it became known that he cheated
6) anyone would defend their spouse against accusations or sexual pursuits of other women trying to interfere in their marriage
7) she is a strong image for young girls everywhere with all of her accomplishments and ability to go through everything she has and still be standing
8) i dont agree with not divorcing him but i dont belittle her decision not to
9) she has addressed the topic in detail in books and multiple public interviews.. try watching or reading them for a change

Posted by: DCVoter | March 16, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

WetsCostMessanger, during the time of the vote for a war in Irak, there was no intelligence or information which could convince anybody that Sadam has WMD, after the UN and international restrictions, the US embargo, no fly zones, etc. there was no possibility for Irak to develop anything but to survive with the anxiety that Iran may invade them. there is what it presented and there is what you make of it. That is what judgement is about and that is what Obama will bring to the White House.OBAMA08

Posted by: BKMC | March 16, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

Is the argument for Senator Obama here that he used superior judgment by voting against the war?

Posted by: LOM | March 16, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

BKMC – the title of the bill can be as misleading as the title of a news article in this blog. Competent Senators dont vote based on titles. He admitted the title of the bill was misleading in his earlier interviews. Hey! yet another poor judgement example for Obama… thanks for pointing out his lie in the debate.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 16, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

Let’s see, so now Obama has to come out and call Jim Davis from Newsmax a blolfaced liar, or Mr. Obama himself will not only be labeled a liar, but He will no longer have the trust of the American people by using such dishonest tactics to cover up this scandal.

Posted by: Jay | March 16, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Humm – the economy is a very important issue, as you may not be aware, Senator Clinton’s plan was reviewed by the experts as the most viable and the polls show the voters have confidence in her stand on the issues by a significant majority.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 16, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

It’s not ONE affair. Lord knows how much there was. As far as I know…
There was Monica.
Gennifer Flowers (there are phone tapes of conversations between her and Bill)
Elizabeth Gracen. Bill never admitted NOR DID HER DENY.
There had been other accusations

Posted by: Vanessa | March 16, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

To all you Obama supporters. I applaude your loyalty. If I were ever in trouble I would want you to have my back for sure. It would be of great comfort.
But there is one major issue I have a problem with concerning Barack and TUCC. Several months ago, when I was doing my homework on this candidate, I went to the TUCC website. Do you know what I found then that is no longer there today? A pledge. A pledge that all associated with TUCC are encouraged to make. A pledge of allegiance. Not to our flag. Not to our country. Not to our countrymen and women. No. Nothing like that.
No, they are asked to make a pledge of allegiance to AFRICA! WTF????
I will try my very best to uncover it again so I may post it for all of you to see. Obama’s been there 20 years. I’d say its a safe bet he made that pledge. And you want him as a President for the United States of America? Really?
WOW.

Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | March 16, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

JAY:
I really respect what you posted. That is the most sincere and honest appraisal I have heard from an Obama supporter. I’m not an Obama supporter but I have been asking myself these questions over and over. Senator Clinton is not a monster. She could do a lot of good. She’s certainly tough and intelligent and dedicated. At 60 I admire her energy and ability to get out there and campaign. This is no joke to Hillary. Somehow I think Obama sees this as some sort of boardgame. I really am confused by him. Sorry for your pain. I predicted in a post some weeks ago that O supporters should brace themselves just in case Obama did not turn out to be the messiah you all have lifted him up to be. You will survive this. I believe what Senator Clinton said. This will all work out the way it is supposed to for the good of America. She has this insight because she has survived many storms and has the wisdom of her age.

Posted by: JJ | March 16, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

BKMC
you are not listening….you ought to listen and understand an argument….the only thing you are saying all the time is Obama has “GOOD JUDGEMENT”….in what???????
Obama is always lying….If he has right judgement, Obama shouldn’t have to lie this much.

Posted by: MattOhio | March 16, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

BKMC,
You totally lost me because I fail to see the connection in your story with some action that was promulgated by Obama, or even shows his intellect in action. Let’s give Barack Obama the benefit of the doubt, though. Regarding Reverend Wright his speech was condemned by Barack Obama, as soon as the public outcry became significant enough to show that there was campaign damage. It’s only been about a year since Barack Obama brought this denounced speaker into Barack’s campaign. So isn’t it fair to see that Barack acted with GREAT SPEED to rectify the situation, it has only been a year, and when the public got mad it was instantaneous action. I think this may be what is meant by the AUDACITY claim in the Obama campaign. He shows us that he is a quite capable politician and can act with great executive authority when he so chooses.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 16, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

DCVoter, I believe in what was said during the debate than what you are saying now. Obama said it and Hillary was there in front of MSNBC (Tim and Bryan) and she has not objected to it and I do not know why should I believe you more than Hillary herself and my own ears and eyes. I will not go into insulting anybody.

Posted by: BKMC | March 16, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

Vanessa: You keep bringing up Mr. Clniton’s affairs from the early 90′s. Why would anyone care about that now? I give props to Mrs. Clinton for forgiving her husband and working to save her marriage. I suppose Mr. Clinton is the only politician who has EVER cheated on his wife. I could give you a list, but the hundreds of names stating with John F. Kennedy, would be too long to post. So what is your point? What has this got to do with Mr. bama and his pastor?

Posted by: Jay | March 16, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

Did you guys know that the ECONOMY is literally going DOWN THE TUBE as we speak and this site is focused upon what Obama’s pastor said instead?
Sirens should be BLARING about the Economy folks and yet we are talking about what a man said in his own church?
I think we have our priorities all screwed up.

Posted by: Maritza | March 16, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

Vanessa
again…Bill is not running for President…stay on topic please….
By the way..Bill is a player….dont hate the player….

Posted by: MattOhio | March 16, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

Vanessa,
If I didn’t know better, I’d say you have the HOTS for Bill……..your jealousy is showing.

Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | March 16, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

Vanessa wrote:
“The fact that she know without Bill she would be no where. Why esle would she stay with him when he has repeatedly cheated on her. Political gain???”
Vanessa, Hillary Clinton was a graduate of Yale Law School, the most selective law school in the country. Needless to say, she got there on merit. I doubt that anyone, other than you, questions her intelligence or competence. In no way did that depend on her husband. In fact, she was consistently his biggest asset.
I think it is a testament to their relationship that they are still married. The cheating? Ask yourself how often that happens in today’s society. I suspect that many, many marriages have endured despite that. I find it admirable that she stayed with her husband, not something negative at all.

Posted by: marie | March 16, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

Old news Vanessa – the majority of the country does not care about that… Clinton left office with an approval rating of 60% from the country, a surplus, economic prosperity, and a nation at peace. The dems rated him at 80% favorable at the beginning of this campaign last year. This is about Senators Obama vs. Clinton vs. McCain. Have a great day.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 16, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

Yes….Obama no matter what is fine and dandy and anything that is not appropriate is turned a blind eye….. I cant believe that the Obama supporters made such a big deal out of what Ferraro said yet this is okay…
to me the people that Obama associates himself with…Racists and criminals and such does not make for good character….they are the people I avoid not idealize or use as my mortal compass…yet have them as my INSPIRATION to write my book.
I am not saying that he is racist but if not why stay in a church like that…and than there is Michelle his wife that has written her thesis on how whites are…and how she has not been proud of her country till know and in addition how she said that she would have to think real real hard if it came down to voting for Hillary….what’s all that about???
she does not stand behind anyone but her husband and she has always come across as questionable!

Posted by: modeonusa | March 16, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

DCVoter and MattOhio, the mayor of New York who is not an amator but a professioanl in economics has said of Obama’s economic plan the best for America. Secondly, I remain convinced that the judgement Obama has exhibited is the one America needs to get itself together, solve its problems and lead the world again.

Posted by: BKMC | March 16, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

The superior judgement claim from Obama is now a moot point. He voted to stay 20 years at that Radical Black Church and sat there for years as these sermons becane commonplace. No Excuses Please. It is what it is. Obama is guilty of poor judgement for someone wha wanted to run for president. Why didn’t he grab his family up and demand that they find and integrated church in Chicago that preached love, tolerance and peace for all people. Then I would say Yes We Can…..but all I can say now is No He Didn’t.

Posted by: JJ | March 16, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

BKMC,
Help me out here – what specific judgement would that be?

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 16, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

SadStateofAffairs,
Funny stuff, keep it up!

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 16, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

Appreciate that Obama4Us. But what does that have to do with Barack, Wright and the TUCC? (Which is the topic BTW)
Just wondering, how much do you pro obama bloggers get paid by the campaign to flood these blogs with diversions?

Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | March 16, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

Yes, maritza we know that the economy is a mess.
Did you know that Rep. Senator Wayne Allard, Colorado put forward an Amendment to a Bill a few days ago, that attached 111 Barack Obama Campaign Economic Proposals?
Did you know that? Just 2 days ago the Senate voted on that Amendment? And did you know that it lost 97-0?
Did you know that Barack Obama voted against his own proposals? Those SAME proposals he tried to beat Hillary Clinton over the head with in debates all year?
Did you know that the cost estimate for these Presidential Debate Proposals of Obama’s is 1.4 TRILLION dollars over 5 years?
This man is an amateur, out of his element and out of his league. And it showed in spades.
What is he going to be doing, Vetoing his own crazy bills?
I will give you all this – Obama is a Uniter!!!
He united the entire Senate 2 days ago to vote against his own bill that would have devastated this country, had he been President, and had these proposals made it into law.
His incompetence is BLARING.

Posted by: 2009 | March 16, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

DCVoter, under Clinton presidency democrats have lost the Congress (House and senate), the very big comeback with Newt and also in 2000 the presidency went to Bush . I do not know what to say about that situation??????

Posted by: BKMC | March 16, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

Well as a white American I simply disagree with Obama’s total condemnation of Wright’s remarks.
I condemn them as foul mouthed bad taste etc. but I see so anti-white racism in them.
He doesn’t say the white race is an inferior one; which has been the fundamental premise of white racism against black people.
Wright says, yes in a bad taste and in a rather aggressive manner (but I’m no churchgoer anyway so I can’t compare) that white Americans run this country, that white Americans have never encountered racist humiliation in a way black people have etc. Furthermore he states that 9/11 would never have happened if America would have had a different foreign policy towards Middle-East and Arabian countries. Well, you can agree or disagree on that, but I fail to see the ‘scandal’ in the opinion. Plus he clearly is skeptic about Presidents like George W. Bush saying “May God continue to bless the USA” while that very same USA wages an illegal war on Iraq, where it carpet bombs thousands of young Iraqi soldiers who had no choice other than joining the Iraqi army (that has never been officially at war with the USA btw), and causing enormous death tolls among Iraqi people and a national chaos and destruction compared to which the Saddam regime had been a haven of peace and tranquility, without any Al Quaida hanging around. For those kind of aggressive and murderous actions, as for using nuclear weapons against Japanese civilians, Wright argues that the Christian God most certainly will NOT bless America but damn it. What’s so weird about that way of thinking? I don’t see that, even if it is far from how I or others would address such issues.
I may be nuts but I simply don’t get the SCANDAL here. I think it’s MUCH more scandalous and above all ridiculous to compare this church to the KKK or Obama to Hitler because of his appeal to the masses, as many people have done in these threads. Often these are the very same people who blame a preacher as Wright…
Anyway, I’m astonished about a lot of things while reading all those ‘comments’ here, as you will understand. There’s hardly any example of a reasonable approach to be found, so I wonder that the real value of these blogs could be. An outlet for people obsessed by hate, among other things. It’s sad.

Posted by: Harriet | March 16, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

The media takes everything totally out of context and viewers and readers take it to the next galaxy. These kinds of associations are commonplace – and so is the necessity of disavowment of the same association.
Who among you doesn’t have a friend, or a child, or a co-worker who hasn’t said or done something outrageous, illegal, revolutionary, or deceitful?
It’s up to us voters to look past these peaks and valleys and elect the best one for the job. I happen to believe that Barak Obama is that person.

Posted by: dennis | March 16, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

BKMC. In truth Obama’s judgment is completely untested. Since the beginning of his career he has been guided by his handlers, political advisers, campaign managers, media relations advisers, speech writers, economic advisers, foreign policy advisers. and many others.
He hasn’t gone a day in his political life without the constant guidance of a multitude of people. In my opinion, he has no experience at all in judgment. He has the best paid people available to make him look presidential.

Posted by: Jay | March 16, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

As a White American Male who lived in NYC for 30 years, and if I could afford at the time…had my fair share of trouble getting a cab…….Obama is not even someone I will ever regard as worthy of my precious vote.
I will not now nor ever vote for Obama or anyone who has physically, financially, spiritually or emotionally ever supported verbal terrorism against myself or My country or my God. Especially from an Altar!
These videos are sacreligious, discusting and disgraceful and NO EXCUSES will ever change my mind.
Trust me, I am no prude, but this is inexcusable behavior and Obama supporting this for 20 years, makes him even more unbearable, cause he LIES about it!

Posted by: DsvUncle | March 16, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

Yes… I’m guilty. I often dream of Bill, a guy old enough to be my grandfather.
I don’t question Hillary intelligence. I’m sure her credentials are high. But there are other women out there with the same eduation and credentials as her and their not in this race… because their not married to Bill or any former president.
This may be old news, but news that can perhap be brought up in GE and also file-gate and alot of other scandal during the “Clinton era”.

Posted by: Vanessa | March 16, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

BKMC – I am not asking you to not believe your ears and eyes. She has addressed this in previous debates and was not asked about it in that debate. The moderator was baiting and she knew it. Obama went along trying to bait and lie about what that vote was about. She didnt respond because she didnt take the bait. I am asking you to actually look at the real facts and realize that Obama shows poor judgement in many cases including his politically motivated move to distort the facts because that gets voters to support him. The RNC will have him for lunch if he gets the nomination on all of the things we have been discussing. If you truly want a dem in the WH and I know you agree unity is necessary, Clinton is the most electable. The polls are showing Obama is losing ground and the vetting will continue as the votes are tallied through June. Our discussion has been good… you helped clarify several lapses of judgement by Obama I had not seen before. Thanks for solidifying my support of Clinton.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 16, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

So BKMC
In 2000, did you and Obama vote for Bush? Another of Obama’s “GOOD JUDGEMENT” calls…

Posted by: MattOhio | March 16, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

2009,
Thanks for the additional data. I hope some folks that are beating a drum and walking blindly to the Obama chant of yes we can pay attention. It is very apparent that he CAN’T.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 16, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

Tomorrow you can count of the media picking up the news max story on Obama lying about being in the church.
And he’s best be VERY careful, cause News max is sneeky. They just might have a photo or two. But there are going to wait for Obama to come out Monday or Tuesday and say I NEVER, THEY ARE LYING.
And then BAMMMMMMMMM
Video or Photo – Game Over Liar.
So he has to tip toe through those TWO LIPS cause he isn’t sure what they got. Let’s see if he is dumb enough to come out and lie again.

Posted by: 2009 | March 16, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

Vanessa,
That sounds like the Ferraro argument. Don’t forget, Hillary took her out.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 16, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

WetscoastMesanger, the judgement is about what the reality is on the field, what are the objective intentions of involved professionals are? and what is the quality of materials presented to you to judge on? their consistancy? and reliability? These are key elements to take into consideration when aking a judgement.

Posted by: BKMC | March 16, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

2009 I saw that story about Obama not voting to pass his own economic platform. The republicans did that purposely with the intent of embarrassing him. The did their job, he was not even aware that the 111 separate spending were all his.

Posted by: Jay | March 16, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

2009,
I doubt the MSM will quote Newsmax, but I can guarantee you they are descending like a pack of lions in search of any and every shred of evidence which will confirm or invalidate Obama’s credibility, and will obtain their own sources. As the ABC roundtable analys said, “These things can be checked”. Thinks are not looking well for him right now.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 16, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

On Purpose or not ALL THE DEMOCRATS including OBAMA voted against it.
It was done to show what an amateur, incompetent fool he really is. He hasn’t a CLUE about legislation. 900 Bills he passed?!
Dude, that is as true as saying Wright was a White Girl Scout From Uptown.

Posted by: 2009 | March 16, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

DCVoter please let us avoid insulting people, that is not good. MattOhio, we have not voted for Bush at all in 2000. The reality is simply that the war is costing 12 billion per month and the economic recession is here etc. Judgement. OBAMA08

Posted by: BKMC | March 16, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

BKMC – Bloomberg is not the only finance guru in the world. Even Trump agrees with Clinton. LOL But the more important thing is that both have a plan and both have plusses. But who do the voters have confidence in to implement the changes? Clinton – I would bet that is because they believe she has good judgement when it comes to the issues and a proven record of getting the job done. Can Obama do it? who knows… do I have confidence in him? I have seen nothing that makes me want to trust his judgement. I have seen a lot that says not to.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 16, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

If I was Jeremiah Wright Jr. I would be pissed and angry that Obama used him. At one instance he used him to get the African American vote and now he is distancing himself from him.
Hypocrite!

Posted by: Magic Potion | March 16, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

2009 – I am wondering if (if Obama gets the nom) the really damning evidence wont come out until after August… maybe around October as the nail in his coffin hammered in by the RNC. If the potential ties to some realy bad people pan out in the vetting it is possible we may see it before then. Perhaps a 527 or the media will purchase a video that someone is holding ransom knowing this is going to be worth big bucks. LOL

Posted by: DCVoter | March 16, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

I feel so sad for you boys.
I just checked today’s polls at realclearpolitics and they all favor Obama over Clinton.
It ain’t gonna work, all your hate mongering. On the contrary, I’d say.
Besides that, Clinton has effectively already lost the nomination as everyone could and should now. But I understand the State of Denial is all hers – and yours here.

Posted by: Harriet | March 16, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

Harriet: When combining the averages of all polls, it would be more honest to say it is a dead heat.
Date Obama Clinton
03/05 to 03/15 45.8% 45.0% Obama +0.8% RCP Average

Posted by: Jay | March 16, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

MattOhio,
That’s not it. The “Pledge” was originally on their mission page I beleive. It’s no longer there….It’s been removed within the last couple of months. It was a very detailed “Pledge of Allegaince”…..to Africa.

Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | March 16, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

SadState – are you talking about the God Bless America tune sung to inappropriate words by Wright in his sermon?

Posted by: DCVoter | March 16, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

“Judgment. Obama ’08″
Does Senator Obama’s superior judgment stem from his vote against the war and Senator’s vote for the war?
By the way FOLKS on both sides, ‘judgment’ only has 1 ‘e’.

Posted by: LOM | March 16, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

Have any of you thought of this
Who would be swearing in our Uniter President?
Wright On Day 1?

Posted by: 2009 | March 16, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

Who do we elect to represent our party. Everything is messed up.
Anyway now is the time to ask the Sen. Clinton what her 35 yrs of experience really is. Now is the time to ask questions about what the American public need to know and are going to ask very soon. If we don’t ask these questions, the republican’s will. Every American knows all of the stuff that’s part of Clinton’s experience like: Whitewater, Travel gate, Monica Lewinsky and impeachment, renting out the Lincoln bedroom, the loss of the Rose Law Firm billing records for nearly 2 years until they were miraculously found in the White House living quarters, removing files from Vince Foster’s office following his suicide and before investigators could get there. Has anyone asked why she hasn’t released her library records or tax returns? What if she’s hiding something negative that might cost our party the White House? Most people believe she is hiding something terrible. While you guys are deciding the republicans will consolidate and take the white house again.

Posted by: Owen Hill | March 16, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

Owen Hill,
Can you please just engage with specifics instead of conducting drive by dirt-tossing? Otherwise, I have to dismiss your effort as just a mean spirit. What is your specific beef with Hillary and why? Don’t give me a link I have to dig through if you have a thought about it that is worth discussion.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 16, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

Oh I bet fact check org is reeling over this because they said on 1/10/08:
“while its controversial pastor is a fiery advocate for blacks and liberal causes and a fierce critic of anti-black discrimination, we’ve seen no evidence that he preaches hatred of or discrimination against whites.”
all that video evidence disputes their fact checking ROFL

Posted by: DCVoter | March 16, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

Owen Hill,
You are attempting to trade on the same old recycled conspiracy nut theories list that people like Rush have been hawking for several years without any success. Vanessa has already tried that once today before you. Nobody is buying. Please bring some real stuff to the table for a change.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 17, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

Good find DCVoter, it also discredits Owen Hill link post.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 17, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

DCVoter,
Actually it does bring Obama’s judgement into play, as well as the church leadership. I may have to write it off to naivete, but nonetheless, it’s more poor judgement evidence, or inexperience evidence. I really don’t think these guys are trying to play hardball with the IRS, though. I could be wrong, the Scientologists have tried to do it and get spanked all the time.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 17, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

LAIR LIAR.

Posted by: Someone | March 17, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Ken,
I know that and you know that. However, when people want to put Senator Clinton’s judgment into question, they seem to omit that very point that Senator Obama didn’t vote for the war NOR did he vote against it because he wasn’t in the Senate. I should have explicitly garnered an answer from the Obama supporters…

Posted by: LOM | March 17, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Barack wasn’t IN THE SENATE AT ALL for the vote. He was in Illinois.

Posted by: 2009 | March 17, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

WestCoastMessenger – i cant chalk that up to niavete… it is a well known fact that churches who promote politicians can lose their tax exempt status… as a lawyer and Senator i am sure he knew better… churches can work causes all they want but they are “are barred from becoming directly or indirectly involved in campaigns of political candidates.”
This was questioned in every election I can remember because of right wing churches trying to influence their member votes… nope i see it as poor judgment.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 17, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

2009 – on one of these articles the other day i posted a comparison of experience between Clinton and Obama without using her years as First Lady… the comparison looked at both professional and political experience, awards, activities, and both non-legislative and legislative committees… Clinton had twice as much “experience” and qualification by sheer numbers… anyone can pull the info off the vote smart website for each candidate and compare “resumes”

Posted by: DCVoter | March 17, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

BAGHDAD — Sometime soon, the U.S. military will suffer the 4,000th death of the war in Iraq.
When the 1,000th American died in September 2004, the insurgency was just gaining steam. The 2,000th death came as Iraq held its first elections in decades, in October 2005. The U.S. announced its 3,000th loss on the last day of 2006, at the end of a year rocked by sectarian violence.
The 4,000th death will come with the war further out of the public eye, and replaced by other topics on the front burner of the U.S. presidential campaigns.
Thank you, Hillary, for your good judgment, your experience and your patriotic stand.

Posted by: 4000 | March 17, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

DCVoter,
We agree that it is poor judgement. It would seem like a sitting U.S. Senator would have the jurisprudence and common sense to recognize the separation of church and state and would have advised his pastor to act accordingly, and would have rebuked any tender of clerical support to a political matter. On the other hand, they do this kind of stuff very openly in Baltimore. It seems like the IRS would be equally concerned about that which is happening in their own backyard.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 17, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

I also read an interview done with Farrakahn in January with his advice for 2008 to his followers on one of their news sites:
“Barack Obama has been very careful not to position himself as Reverend Jesse Jackson or Reverend Al Sharpton as a promoter of “The Black Cause.” He has been groomed, wisely so, to be seen more as a unifier, rather than one who speaks only for the hurt of Black people.”
Given the appearance of the Nation of Islam “guards” standing BEHIND the pulpit while Wright was preaching, dont any of you find that disturbing?

Posted by: DCVoter | March 17, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

@4000 | Mar 17, 2008 12:25:28 AM:
“Thank you, Hillary, for your good judgment, your experience and your patriotic stand.”
In all fairness, you forgot to include Senators Daschle, Kennedy, Kerry, Dodd and Rockefeller, all Obama supporters, in your thank you statement.
You should also thank Senator Obama for having an identical voting record as Senator Clinton since he arrived in the Senate on votes pertaining to the Iraq war.

Posted by: LOM | March 17, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

WestCoastMessenger – I agree it goes on but the IRS questioned the church’s involvement because the posted the text of the speech and sold copies of the video. Pretty blatant violation. Obama should not have participated in the violation and should have advised the church not to violate it. In earlier elections, people with tables outside a church promoting a candidate were deemed a violation by the church because they allowed it on church property.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 17, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am

So BKL: Where exactly does Obama say he was on that Sunday? Of course they are going into denial spin mode, they have to until a video surfaces.

Posted by: Jay | March 17, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am

LOM shouldnt Obama be rejecting and denouncing the support and endorsement of all those who voted yes to the 2002 authorization? LOL

Posted by: DCVoter | March 17, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

Did TUCC donate to Obama’s camp since they made money from selling the videos of his speech? Is that legal?

Posted by: DCVoter | March 17, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am

Jay – perhaps he will use the excuse that he used before saying he stayed home with the little one and Michelle and his oldest went to the sermon. Does anyone believe for a minute that she has never told him what she has heard in the sermons – especially the controversial ones? Does anyone think it is good judgment to expose his kids to hate speech?

Posted by: DCVoter | March 17, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

DCVoter — I don’t think it’s a very compelling argument to continue the ‘judgment’ line of attack on Senator Clinton because of her Iraq vote AND on the other hand openly and proudly accept the support of so many other Senators who voted the same way. It seems so contradictory to me.
So, she has exhibited terrible judgment and now doesn’t pass the Commander-In-Chief test. Shouldn’t the same sentiment be applied to the other senators and if so, that terrible judgment is supporting Senator Obama?
Above all, quite frankly, I think judgment should be a word that is rejected and denounced by the Obama campaign after this week.

Posted by: LOM | March 17, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am

“Greta, Barak is the candidate of Unity, HOPE, togetherness and lifting-up each other.”
Keep telling yourself that and perhaps it will become true. A glass of wine in hand will make it even more believable.

Posted by: Joseph | March 17, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am

In October 2002, before being elected to the U.S. Senate, Barack Obama made a speech opposing the Bush Administration’s plan to go to war in Iraq because he felt it was an ill-conceived venture which would “require a U.S. occupation of undetermined length, at undermined cost, with undetermined consequences.”
Now, as a U.S. Senator, Senator Obama has continued to critique the Administration’s mishandling of this war, and believes that while our troops have done an outstanding job in Iraq, there can be no military solution to what is inherently a political conflict between Iraq’s warring factions. The only hope to end this burgeoning civil war is for Shias, Sunnis, and Kurds to come together and resolve their differences. That’s why Senator Obama agrees with the Iraq Study Group’s conclusion that we must begin a phased redeployment of American troops to signal to the government and people of Iraq that ours is not an open-ended commitment.
To set a new course for U.S. policy that can bring a responsible end to the war, Senator Obama introduced the Iraq War De-escalation Act in January 2007. The legislation would have begun a redeployment of U.S. forces no later than May 1, 2007, with the goal of removing all combat brigades from Iraq by March 31, 2008, a date that was consistent with the expectation of the Iraq Study Group.
The Obama plan allows for a limited number of U.S. troops to remain as basic force protection, to pursue international terrorists, and to continue the training of Iraqi security forces. If the Iraqis are successful in meeting the 13 benchmarks for progress laid out by the Bush Administration, this plan also allows for the temporary suspension of the redeployment, provided Congress agrees that the benchmarks have been met and that the suspension is in the national security interest of the United States.
Since this legislation was introduced, Senator Obama has continued to be a strong advocate for legislative actions that could bring the war in Iraq to a responsible end. He opposes funding for the war in Iraq that does not immediately begin the responsible removal of our troops from Iraq, with a clear timeline and end-date for this drawdown.
Senator Obama has also stressed the importance of holding private security contractors like Blackwater USA accountable to ensure that their conduct is not jeopardizing our military’s efforts to bring the war in Iraq to a responsible end. In February 2007, he introduced the Transparency and Accountability in Military and Security Contracting Act. One provision, which requires federal departments to compile and report information to Congress on the role of contractors operating in Iraq, was passed by Congress as an amendment to the defense authorization act. Senator Obama is also working to pass other components of his legislation to increase accountability of American security contractors operating in war zones by subjecting them to U.S. criminal law.

Posted by: US Senate | March 17, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am

try using a real source that is not biased “US Senate” LOL i am paging down through most of your diatribe

Posted by: DCVoter | March 17, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

joseph, there’s not enough wine in the world to make obama’s nonsense believable. but the obamaites might find it helpful as they mourn their lost innocence when they finally realize what a charlatan he is.

Posted by: so saddened | March 17, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am

so saddened — Is there such thing as a born-again “new politician?”

Posted by: LOM | March 17, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am

Brother Wright said, the white man invented the HIV virus to kill the black man and Obama still has not said that is wrong.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 17, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am

the thing about the repubs putting together a bill containing all of obama’s proposals and it going down 97 to 0 and obama himself voting against it, apparently without even realizing it contained his own proposals – is too funny for words, on so many levels. he doesn’t know his own proposals. he doesn’t think before voting, or he’d know how it looks to vote against your own proposals. and he says he can reach across the aisle and the repubs will work with him, etc., but they basically mocked him, and the dems went along with it. shows how little respect his fellow senators have for him and shows how stupidly naive he is about his so-called ability to reach across the aisle. SO funny!!!

Posted by: so saddened | March 17, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am

lom, lol re born again new politician!

Posted by: so saddened | March 17, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am

Did Obama leave the racist hate church? No! Did Obama support the hate church? Yes, $22,500 worth. That buys a lot of hate.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 17, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am

us senate, nobody reads cut and paste stuff, just makes our page down buttons wear out faster.

Posted by: so saddened | March 17, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am

DVC-I noticed the paid guy and they sure as heck don’t get much for their money these days.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 17, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am

Well, someone’s going to be made out to be a liar. It’s either Newsmax or Senator Obama.
Did Senator Obama have secret service detail back then? Plane itinerary? If Senator Obama is going to make the statement that he was not there, then I take his word for it.
However, if ANY evidence comes out contrary to this, he can kiss his presidential bid buh-bye. He’s putting so much more on the line posting this as a “fact” on his website. Yikes.

Posted by: LOM | March 17, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am

The Church itself and the pastor are not a problem because we have freedom of speech. It’s the US President Candidate who are going that Church for 20 years and claim himself as patriot and doesn’t condemns it until the news leak out.

Posted by: stock_craft | March 17, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am

I vote for and support Hillary Clinton not because she is BLACK or WHITE skin but because she can distinct WHITE or BLACK when facing national problems or issues. Did anyone recall that she was the first to start Universal Health Care movement back in 1992-1993 when everyone thought it was a silly thing?

Posted by: stock_craft | March 17, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am

vanessa, you say that it’s ok now since there’s a new pastor. but the new pastor was dancing in glee as the old pastor gave those sermons – it’s on tape. and the new pastor preaches the same stuff the old one did. obama says no need to leave the church because there’s a new pastor. he’s trying to pull another snow job.
and you sound pleased that obama “contacted those ministers” to say he wasn’t against wright, just the comments. reference unclear, but sounds like another instance of saying one thing publicly and another privately. in any case, if you’re not against a minister who preaches hatred for decades, something’s wrong.

Posted by: so saddened | March 17, 2008, 1:44 am 1:44 am

Funny how the Obamites want to move on and: not address the matter at hand; not wait for more proof; not find out if Obama is lying again with his fact check denial; not talk about the issues because they cant defend Obama; and all of the other issues discussed in this thread… uh huh obamadoo happens, spin the barrel some more axelrod, the compost stinks

Posted by: DCVoter | March 17, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am

Sleep well Dave South Bend, but a Chicago to Miami flight is approx 2 1/2 hours, faster if you’re on a private jet. So if Obama went to the 8am service and left at 9am even with traveling time to Midway Airport he still would have enough time with the time difference.

Posted by: Jay | March 17, 2008, 2:00 am 2:00 am

Dave – Obama doesnt fly commercial… your times are all messed up LOL

Posted by: DCVoter | March 17, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am

DCVoter,
As I said early, I vote for and support Hillary Clinton not because she is BLACK or WHITE skin but because she can distinct WHITE or BLACK when facing national problems or issues while Mr. Obama even can’t distant himself from the Pastor who hates America so much and want to be US President. Go damn America,I hope it is not come true. I always ask myself and tell my family, if you don’t like the country where you live, then who will?

Posted by: stock_craft | March 17, 2008, 2:03 am 2:03 am

Trinity services start at 7:30am. If Obama stayed an hour (normal service) and left at 8:30 am.. 1/2 hour to Midway Airport and in the air by 9:15 Arrive in Miami by 12 noon ( allowing 2 hour and 45 minutes flight and landing, would be 1 pm Eastern time & half hour to drive to the event.
I think it is a very real possibility he attended the service and spoke in Miami.

Posted by: Jay | March 17, 2008, 2:06 am 2:06 am

Yep Jay – but as was discussed on This Week, these things can be checked. If nothing more than simply checking the flight data, the secret service reports, the reporters schedules, etc. There is evidence in there somewhere.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 17, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am

Personally, evidence of Obama attending is damning but I dont think it will matter much. Most thinking and moral people realize that he mustve known (there is lots of evidence of his knowledge) and he did not distance himself until it was politically necessary and the perception is that he lied and used poor judgement and continues to do so. This wont go away… it will only get worse. If you have already voted, be active online, talk to friends, family, etc. The Internet is a great viral medium. If you have not voted yet, Vote Clinton!

Posted by: DCVoter | March 17, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am

Do you really believe that Obama is such an idoit that in 20 years he never had a clue to what his mentor, pastor, and life coach was peaching? Do you really believe this? Obama himself said words are important, they bring hope, fear, and they can hurt. Obama is 20 years late on denouncing his pastor (crazy uncle).
VOTE AGAINST OBAMA … ELSE BE READY TO GREET UNCLE REV. WRIGHT TO THE WHITE HOUSE!

Posted by: Chicago-Lawyer | March 17, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am

Welcome home Clinton supporters. We wont hold it against you for being duped. We know the vetting did not begin early enough because he tried to set the play nice tone to prevent it. The important thing now is to get the word out and help the voters in the remaining states see through the hype and lies. We can make it happen, 60% of the remaining delegates and Clinton passes Obama in delegates and popular vote then the supers dont have to worry about the pressure being placed on them. Remember, only the black supers are being pressured to move to Obama based on race. Stand with conviction and unite with Clinton to beat McCain.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 17, 2008, 2:37 am 2:37 am

i am Macjive, i resident in the UK.
i NEVER KNEW AMERICANS ARE THIS ILLITERATE AND GULLIBLE- (sorry 60%)
The fact that a pastor in a church at a time (5 mins) said something inflamatory
does it mean that he says it all the time ?,
does it mean, that is his believe and position ?
does it mean his congregation are unpatriotic and should be held accountable to a 5 mins spill?
What people should be asking should be:
IS THAT A REOCCURRING SERMON IN THE CHURCH ?
Even the pope has said something inflamatory at a time ,
does it mean,that is the position of the catholic church, and hence every member in the church.
Remember ur vote today, will be ur vindication tomorrow.
” Americans this is ur time to show commitment and participation to the American dream that blood and sweat has being sacrified freely and willing for ”
vote for ur future.

Posted by: macjive01 | March 17, 2008, 3:08 am 3:08 am

Frankly, there has to be something wrong with Obama! He listened to that anti-american rant for 20 years and even took his young daughters there.
When that pastor preached about 9/11 being America’s fault, Obama still chose to stay. That tells me everything i need to know about this man and his superior judgment…

Posted by: Missmadeleine2002 | March 17, 2008, 3:11 am 3:11 am

To Peter! from London. Your sentiment is echoed around the world. To DCvoter, soldierdog, so saddened and others, who were up ’till the wee hours spreading myths and rumors … get some sleep, then wake up and smell the coffee: Clinton won’t get the 64.2% of remaining delegates she needs.

Posted by: malthusian77 | March 17, 2008, 7:21 am 7:21 am

I don’t understand how my fellow Dems can muster up the forced cheer for a candidate that is finished. Check the latest numbers, Malthusian77, in the key battleground states Obama LOSES by bigger margins than even Hillary. And wait till they play those Jeremiah Wright rants in their attack ads!
Hillary actually has a fighting chance (yeah, she’s a tough old you-know-what, there’s nothing the Rovian machine can throw at her that didn’t already come up during Bill’s years). Better yet, the Dems could actually come to their senses and decide to win the GE by drafting Edwards or Gore, but, no, that would be about as wishful as thinking Obama acutually has a shot at the presidency.

Posted by: Bartlebybickle | March 17, 2008, 7:30 am 7:30 am

Bartlebybickle: The numbers I gave are accurate, and Clinton won’t get there. Obama has risen above the hateful statements of Pastor Wright, and is not implicated in the Rezko trial. You think the Republicans don’t have a few kitchen sinks to throw at Clinton? Why do you think they are voting for her in the primaries? Obama has the best intellect, demeanor, and policies I’ve seen in a long time, and I’m going to judge him on what HE says.

Posted by: malthusian77 | March 17, 2008, 7:39 am 7:39 am

P.S. The argument about Clinton winning key battleground states is complete nonsense, and I can’t believe that the Clinton campaign is spinning such worthless “logic.” Whether you do it by math or by history, there is no correlation between primary wins/losses WITHIN a party, and general elections.

Posted by: malthusian77 | March 17, 2008, 7:44 am 7:44 am

In his 1993 memoir “Dreams from My Father,” Obama recounts in vivid detail his first meeting with Wright in 1985. The pastor warned the community activist that getting involved with Trinity might turn off other black clergy because of the church’s radical reputation.
————-
So in Obamas own words in 1993 he states that he knew the pastor was radical, and now after attending his church for 20 years he’s telling us he didn’t know his pastor was radical. Obama is a liar.

Posted by: Jo | March 17, 2008, 7:58 am 7:58 am

Jo: Here is what Reverend Wright said: “Some of my fellow clergy don’t appreciate what we’re all about. The feel like we’re too radical. Others we ain’t radical enough. Too emotional. Not emotional enough. Our emphasis on African history, on scholarship –”
You’ve got a lot of nerve to use a partial quote and then call Obama a liar.

Posted by: malthusian77 | March 17, 2008, 8:14 am 8:14 am

DCVoter, WestCoastMessanger and Jay, the Hillarylovers, please wait and see, the delegate count will remain on Obama’s side with my a margin of 200 and the popular vote will go to him and the number of states won will go to him also. Obama is on the first place closer to the nomination, Hillary is the second and Hillary has to accept that reality and live with it. OBAMA08.

Posted by: BKMC | March 17, 2008, 8:24 am 8:24 am

Malthusian77, I judge my candidates on the entirety of their ideas, experience, flaws, etc., not mere words.
Thanks for trying but Obama as the Dem nominee will mean a 48 or 49 state landslide for McCain.
A candidate’s strength in the primaries don’t correlate with the GE?? That’s risible. Do some research into the past several GEs and then come back to tell me that a guy who carries Idaho, Montana, etc., but can’t prevail in OH, FL, PA, NJ and other states that actually matter (yeah, sorry, small states, but that’s how the math works) actually has a shot in hell. Especially with his Goddamning America “crazy ole uncle” on his back. Wake up, folks, it’s over for Obama no matter the math.

Posted by: Bartlebybickle | March 17, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am

Obama, should not have to deny or rebut was his church leader’s say and think. Not everyone believes in everything thier church believes. On the other hand from the ABC News report this morning, his church leader did not say anything that people are not already thinking. The United States was built on trusting God, yet we have taken it out of the schools for our children and removed all word “in god we trust” from so many other area’s of government. Our nation is at war because of religious beliefs, yet our nation shows no belief in religion.

Posted by: S.C | March 17, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am

Bartlebybickle: Like it or not, we’ll test your hypothesis in November, with Obama leading the Democatic ticket.

Posted by: malthusian77 | March 17, 2008, 8:46 am 8:46 am

From all of this evidence coming out about who Obama really is he’s lost my vote.
I wish I could take back my primary vote for Obama.
Obama has lied to us and a lot of us are angry at being betrayed by Obama.

Posted by: Dana | March 17, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am

If Obama is so stupid as to not know what his church stands for over 20 years, then he is incapable of being President of the United States of America.
Obamas church awarded Louis Farrakhan, the black separatist leader, and award last year, don’t tell me Obama and other church members didn’t know as it was awarded in the church.
Obama has tried to cheat America and he’s lost now.
Obama will never win the general election because the majority of voters are not black separatist and don’t have the racist views that Obama has subscribed to for 20 years through his church.

Posted by: Troy | March 17, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am

Malthusian77, I wouldn’t bet the farm on Obama heading up the Dem ticket, at least not with PA, IN, KY, FL and MI revotes still remaining. Oh, and who knows when another explosive Obama associate will burst inconveniently on to the scene to spoil your fantasies – the Weather Underground anyone? Yeah, do a little research, and start fidgeting because Rev. Wright may just be an offensive buffoon but essentially harmless but others close to Obama may not be.

Posted by: Bartlebybickle | March 17, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am

We actually have an example of how the MSM plays the “guilt by association” card when it comes to certain political and religious figures. In the 2000 campaign George W. Bush spoke once at Bob Jones University; it was an event used to bludgeon Bush with for the rest of the campaign and into his presidency. And, of course, Bush did not attend Bob Jones University, financially support it, or consider Bob Jones to be his spiritual mentor or close friend for 25 years. Yet these things mattered not at all. Bush spoke at Bob Jones University — and so to many in the press, he was joined at the hip with it. The association between Reverend Wright and Senator Obama is far deeper in every respect.
Peter Wehner

Posted by: michelle | March 17, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am

Sorry about the reposting and any previous typo errors. Thank you for you time.
What would victory in Iraq be, if there were such a thing to be had? Who surrenders? How can we tell what level of safety is considered a victory? Will we be there until Utopia is achieved in Iraq? We all should realize that anything close to a Utopia in the Middle East not going to be a reality. We rid Iraq of Saddam, Iraq had a Vote, the new government passed a constitution, and has some form of a security force. Why is that Victory not enough? The war was sold to the American Public based on conjecture and false pretenses. By international law it was technically, Illegal. We were not attacked by Iraq on 911 as stated by the Pentagon’s recent report. So it was an unprovoked action. Not to mention the fact that Iraq voted country into a theocracy with our US tax payer help. We also created 1000’s of young terrorists with the anti-Muslim rhetoric from conservative pundits and our “kill them all and let God sort them out” dogma. We shocked and awed them to win their “hearts and minds,” If we have a victory in Iraq it will never be the one any rational person should hope for. Is another Islamic State what the region needs? Is that Democracy, Letting religion run a nation? Just because you have a vote does not mean you cannot vote yourself right back into tyranny. Which is just what Iraq did (with our help). The lesson is that there is less freedom of religion now in Iraq. And our cultural ignorance has fed right into the rhetoric of people like Bin Laden. We through the blunder of our foreign policy and war on a tactic, “terror” has brought the world more “terror” and vicariously became Bin Laden’s personal recruiter. This is a position we should be in. The side effects of this massive hemorrhage in decision-making are flowing down hill right into our economy, our liberty, our credibility as a nation, and the future safety. We as a nation need to stop voting for more of the same we need to vote

Posted by: JohnDavid Prince | March 17, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am

I feel it is too late for condemnation for a man who is running on the premise that WORDS MATTER. He cant have it both ways. For 20 years he never condemn this man.

Posted by: toby | March 17, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am

Sorry about the reposting and any previous typo errors. Thank you for you time.
What would victory in Iraq be, if there were such a thing to be had? Who surrenders? How can we tell what level of safety is considered a victory? Will we be there until Utopia is achieved in Iraq? We all should realize that anything close to a Utopia in the Middle East not going to be a reality. We rid Iraq of Saddam, Iraq had a Vote, the new government passed a constitution, and has some form of a security force. Why is that Victory not enough? The war was sold to the American Public based on conjecture and false pretenses. By international law it was technically, Illegal. We were not attacked by Iraq on 911 as stated by the Pentagon’s recent report. So it was an unprovoked action. Not to mention the fact that Iraq voted country into a theocracy with our US tax payer help. We also created 1000’s of young terrorists with the anti-Muslim rhetoric from conservative pundits and our “kill them all and let God sort them out” dogma. We shocked and awed them to win their “hearts and minds,” If we have a victory in Iraq it will never be the one any rational person should hope for. Is another Islamic State what the region needs? Is that Democracy, Letting religion run a nation? Just because you have a vote does not mean you cannot vote yourself right back into tyranny. Which is just what Iraq did (with our help). The lesson is that there is less freedom of religion now in Iraq. And our cultural ignorance has fed right into the rhetoric of people like Bin Laden. We through the blunder of our foreign policy and war on a tactic, “terror” has brought the world more “terror” and vicariously became Bin Laden’s personal recruiter. This is a position we should be in. The side effects of this massive hemorrhage in decision-making are flowing down hill right into our economy, our liberty, our credibility as a nation, and the future safety. We as a nation need to stop voting for more of the same we need to vote

Posted by: john david prince | March 17, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am

Every time a black person mentions the proven historical oppression of their people, some white people scream reverse racism, How sad, how ignorant, and how despicable a claim that some fearful white people are making of the current mud slinging in American politics. If there were a God, that God would not be proud of many of Humanities actions toward Humanity on this planet. Is it a new concept that a religious leader would talk about damnation of actions of individuals, a group, or even a Nation from God? No. J Fawell, P. Robertson, R. Parsly, J. Haggy have all made statements about Liberals, gays, Muslims, the ACLU, The NAACP, and women’s right groups that are not founded in any form of reality. These “tapes” of Jeremiah Wright are full of some things that are the truth and some things that are conjecture like HIV’s origin. His assertion that we brought 911 on ourselves, that statement has a yes and no answer to it, which we are still debating to this very moment. Were we told the complete truth about Iraq? Not according to UK, the Pentagon, or the CIA. The Tuskegee Experiment Really Happened. We are the # 2 weapons supplier to the world. Hiroshima could have been handled better, say dropping the A-Bomb off the coast of Japan thus intimidating them into surrender and saving innocent life. But who knows in hindsight what could have been in that situation. So where is the controversial statement other than the HIV aspect? If you are white, ask yourself, can you really relate to the victims of hundreds of years of hate filled slavery and discrimination? Can you relate to being a Jewish victim of Hitler if you are a Christian and white? No. One could come close. But never, ever really, truly achieving the same level of understanding as the victim

Posted by: johndavidprince | March 17, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am

Harriet it’s unfortunate you are so short sighted as to feel that anyone who disagrees with the pastors SELF DESCRIBED radical views is a racist.
The hypocrisies you speak of lie within your own value system and not that of the American people.
No society is perfect and blaming all the woes of a society on a race of people is ignorant.

Posted by: LPS | March 17, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am

Harriet, you really think you have everyone figured out don’t you? It sounds like you disapprove of anyone who believes differently than you. Let’s all say it together “God Damn America”, does that make you feel better?

Posted by: michelle | March 17, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am

Harriet,
Those are some might sweeping generalizations. Isn’t that like the church accusing the media of an attack on them, because of a 30 second sound byte over a thirty year history? My question out of this is whether the church sufficiently groomed Barack Obama to be President, since that is from where he took much of his foundation.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 17, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

I am disappointed and hopeful at the same time. I understand that the history of African Americans is not taught in schools and therefore there may be a level of ignorance regarding the black experience. Unless you have been Black in America you “CAN NOT” fully understand the emotional experiences of racism. Unless you have attended a Service at Trinity Church you are uninformed. Trinity Church in Chicago is a Christian Based Church with an African American Congregation that has direct knowledge and experience of being Black in America.
Black Americans were not invited to America they were brought in chains as less than human. We are only a few generations removed from these atrocities, and yet Black Americans have survived.
As a nation if America is to prosper and survive it will need to embrace the idea of judging individuals not on the color of their skin. All of us are mixed with something. No one is pure anything. Our commonality is humanity.
America has not been a complete angel in the world, the reality is that there are other countries that hate us.
America the world is watching you. Stop hating and love your neighbor, your life may depend in it.

Posted by: Diane Odell | March 17, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am

Malthusian,
Have you noticed a substantial difference in the overall participation and tenor of this blog since the Wright matter has erupted? It looks to me that sentiments are running about 4 to 1 against your position, and holding. If any more evidence comes in that purports to show Obama judgement the dam might break on him. What then?

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 17, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

Ms. Odell,
So as a liberal I’m supposed to somehow feel guilty about the black experience and I can atone for it by a) being quiet if hate remarks are spewed my direction or b) voting for Barack Obama? Frankly, I don’t think this is what Senator Obama stands for and the reason he condemned the pastor’s remarks. Or is Senator Obama just trying to play it safe?

Posted by: WestCDoastMessenger | March 17, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am

The problem with Pastor Wright hating white people is that he is forgetting that many white people gave their lives during the civil war so that black people could be free. Many white people thought slavery was wrong back then and many white people since then have fought for the rights of black people. You can not change racism by preaching racism. And Obama cannot unite people when he belongs to a separatist church.

Posted by: T | March 17, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am

For all those obama supporters.
IF he wasn’t wrong about Wright, If those videos are miscontrued and Wright is indeed the patriot you paint him out to be,
WHY IS HE APOLOGISING?!
WHY IS HE DISTANCING HIMSELF FROM WRIGHT?
You don’t apologise when you’re right and you don’t distance yourself from things you believe in. Take yourself as an example, you are neither apologising nor distancing yourself from Obama BECAUSE YOU THINK YOU’RE RIGHT. Your conviction demands you stand by your beliefs and I applaud your integrity for that!
Your beloved leader however, does not share your convictions!

Posted by: Jsn | March 17, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

There are some facts that the african american community needs to face.
These are the facts and they are unrefutable.
1. Not every white person endorsed slavery.
2. Africans have sold africans into slavery.
3. Africans continue to enslave africans today.
Face the facts:
Some white people did your ancestors wrong, some didn’t care and some helped right the wrong.
Some black person could have sold your ancestors to some white person.
If you were born in Africa now, you could be a slave.
What does this all mean to you? Be glad you’re in America, study hard and work hard. Stop playing the victim.
I tell you, I’m sick and tired of hearing the slave sob story. Yes, I agree that it’s wrong and that it should be condemned. But FFS, MOVE ON!

Posted by: Jsn | March 17, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

to all obamaites,what excuse are you going to give when the american public finds out that he straight LIED to them about ever being at one of wrights divisive sermons.he has and all you have to do to prove it is to go to newsmax.com aug 9th 2007 and read the article.now maybe some of you will not think that wright refering to the United States of White America and obama nodding his head in agrement is bad.i personally do and im sure that a lot of other americans will also.two things he Lied and for the saint thats supposed to unite us to nod in agrement to me means he does not believe his own words.

Posted by: don tufts | March 17, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

Also did not Michelle Obama’s speech about not being proud of this country sound like a preaching by this minister?

Posted by: spock | March 17, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

Mr. Hannity could care less who your next president is. This shock jock wants more attention, more ratings, more money, period. He loves a racist rant so he can point his little finger. I’m not fooled Mr. Hannity, you are a racist and the worst kind. You sit back react to other’s percieved racial remarks and cry foul. Mr. Hannity, Rush, Mr. Grant should disclaim that they are for entertainment purposes only. No self respecting voter shoud base his/her valuable vote on their twisted views that are only spewed for shock value.

Posted by: mims | March 17, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

What happened to Separation of Church and State. Every American be politician or not has the right to choose his or her own faith group or church. Politics is politics and religion is relilgion. Our forefathers settled this issue a long time ago. We want to go back to square one and screw things up. This is clearly a violation of Senator Obamas personal faith reguaredless. For anyone to debate or question this issue befalls our Constitution. Be American and respect our traditions they have worked for alot longer than any of you have been around.

Posted by: Scott Boggs | March 17, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

Right on JSN. What you said is SO true!

Posted by: Pat | March 17, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.