Obama Foreign Policy Adviser Calls Clinton a ‘Monster’
Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., may be reluctant to throw a punch at Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y. — but at least one adviser doesn’t appear to be, at least when she thinks she’s off the record.
Samantha Power, the executive director and founder of the Carr Center for Human Rights Policy at Harvard, is touring Europe to promote a book, and she gave an interview with The Scotsman, which quotes her saying of Clinton, "We f***** up in Ohio. In Ohio, they are obsessed and Hillary is going to town on it, because she knows Ohio’s the only place they can win. She is a monster, too — that is off the record — she is stooping to anything."
Power said, "you just look at her and think: ergh. But if you are poor and she is telling you some story about how Obama is going to take your job away, maybe it will be more effective. The amount of deceit she has put forward is really unattractive."
The newspaper notes that "If a conversation is to be off the record, that agreement is usually thrashed out before the interview begins. Sometimes, public figures say something and then attempt to retract it by insisting it was ‘off the record’ after the event. But by then it is too late, particularly if it is in the public interest that the story be published…
"In this instance, Samantha Power was promoting her book and it was established in advance that the interview was on the record."
In December, Obama said he had "been very clear to my campaign. I do not want to see research that is involved in trying to tear people down personally. If I find out that somebody is doing that, they will be fired. And I have been absolutely crystal clear about this, and I have been clear about this for a very long time."
Would this count? Should Power be fired by the Obama standard?
- jpt
UPDATE: Statement from Samantha Power: These comments do not reflect my feelings about Sen. Clinton, whose leadership and public service I have long admired. I should not have made these comments and I deeply regret them. It is wrong for anyone to pursue this campaign in such negative and personal terms. I apologize to Sen. Clinton and to Sen. Obama, who has made very clear that these kinds of expressions should have no place in American politics.
Statement from Obama campaign spokesman Bill Burton: Sen. Obama decries such characterizations, which have no place in this campaign.
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
I would say she “qualifies” as someone who should be fired (based on obama comments). Let’s see if he follows through on that one.
Posted by: Jim | March 6, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
Yes! she should be fired. But Obama won’t fire her and will use some weasal language.
Posted by: Tom | March 6, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
“you just look at her and think: ergh.”
Actually, I admire her very much and thought she looks and sounds spectacular especially in her victory speech the other night.
It’s unfortunate Obama thought by having a woman say something so vile about Hillary that it would acceptable. Power should be fired.
Posted by: Sarah | March 6, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
I think Obama and his advisor should apologize to Senator Clinton and her supporters.
Shame!
Posted by: pat | March 6, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
Fired? Of course. Surely there’s no question?
Posted by: Bo | March 6, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
Well isn’t she?
Posted by: Steve | March 6, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
I so disappointed in Obama and his campaign. The woman should be fired based on stupidity. There is no “off the record” when you’re not in America.
Posted by: April | March 6, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
Such a classy bunch of people, they will surly all be an asset to the presidency, expletives in the WH while talking to the press, I don’t think the voting public can ask for more.
This election is sure taking a new low, I don’t think he will fire her maybe this is all part of the new plan of attack on Hillary.
Posted by: SJ | March 6, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
Power needs to be fired immediately
Posted by: ginaswo | March 6, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
Who cares if the comment was “private”, the comment is inapropiate; and I think that if Obama practices what he preaches, Power should be fired.
Posted by: steve | March 6, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
Wouldn’t be surprised to see this truth-teller get the axe.
Posted by: petee | March 6, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
This is a sad day in the Obama campaign. He must come out immediately and apologize. This is yet another example of the “wink wink” candidacy of Barack Obama. He Talks about Hope, but privately harbors this irrational hatred for a politcal rival they call “a monster.” Politics is a tough game. If you cant stand the heat Hillary is giving you, then you wont be able to handle the the real monsters in this world. If Obama doenst hold a press conference ASAP, this becomes a MAJOR MSM SCANDAL I predict.
Barack Obama looking more and more like The “wink wink” candidate! Nafta-Gate, Rezko-Gate, Monster-Gate. All in his first week of real scrutinty…
Posted by: Ben M | March 6, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
Excuse me, what is so wrong with expressing what is obvious to most people? There certainly was no exageration or distortion here, simply some personal dislike.
Posted by: Sara | March 6, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
Monster? Power was being kind. Hillary Clinton a “Democrat” endorsed McCain over Obama at least 5 times in the past 3 days.
If Hillary can’t get her way she wants McCain to be President so she can 4 again 4 years from now.
Hillary is all about Hillary. She does not care about the Country, We the People or the Party.
All she cares about is Hillary and yes that makes her a Monster and so much more.
Posted by: Maddie | March 6, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
Check it out — Obama has found somebody in Canada to say that Hilary’s camp is also claiming that her position on Nafta is just for political reasons. Obama is so fond of saying how desperate Hilary’s campaign is. This latest allegation is pathetic and is very clearly an attempt by Obama to slither out of that memo that went all around Canada. Yahoo has it.
Posted by: druggstohr | March 6, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
I think it could also be viewed as an insult to the people of Ohio because he was advertising there 3 or 4 ads ratio to her 1, and he and his campaign had plenty of time to speak for itself.
I think Ohioans decided for themselves.
This tells me a lot more about Samantha Powers and what she is willing to stoop to.
We’ll see whether she gets fired or not.
My guess is she won’t.
Yes, double standards.
Posted by: Lauren | March 6, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
She is Liberman redux.
Posted by: Maddie | March 6, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
“Old politics” as usual — but Obama will likely do nothing about it. He’s peculiarly lackluster and passive on a number of fronts and will be here as well.
Susan Rice skirts this area all the time. And the constant claims of racism they make at every turn — is in the same vein.
Posted by: scorbs | March 6, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
No one can doubt McCain’s experience on national security and Hillary would be rather untruthful to go about the place saying that McCain was weak on that aspect.
Its not right to take away from McCain that fact or pretend that the man has no idea what he is speaking about.
Posted by: SJ | March 6, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
Maggie I am thinking just like you. You hit it on the spot. She is trying to feed this election to John McCain, I just said the SAME THING. She is on such power trip that if she does not win, she is trying best to make sure John McCain wins. She is sore loser…
Monster? Power was being kind. Hillary Clinton a “Democrat” endorsed McCain over Obama at least 5 times in the past 3 days.
If Hillary can’t get her way she wants McCain to be President so she can 4 again 4 years from now.
Hillary is all about Hillary. She does not care about the Country, We the People or the Party.
All she cares about is Hillary and yes that makes her a Monster and so much more.
Posted by: Karen | March 6, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
Wow, she sounds just like one of Obama’s bloggers that go around all over the internet insulting people. You can’t even post a comment at the DNC blog without being trashed by them. At least we know now that the fowl language starts at the top. And to think I have been trying to excuse them thinking they are just children……Wait we will here…..What she meant to say was…….He won’t fire her………get real…….
Posted by: Debby | March 6, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
I think she should be promoted and given a huge bonus. Clinton is a monster. How the people in New York ever voted for her as senator is a joke to begin with, She didnt even live there for christ sakes.
Posted by: Ron | March 6, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
Obama fire her? Heck no. Obama will give her a raise and a pat on the back and blame it on the media. There was no meeting with Canadian officials and we had his word on that too.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 6, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
Karen, honestly I think it is Obama who is on an ego trip and should drop out for the good of the party. All his delegate lead is from the anti-democratic caucus states. Hillary is the one who has won the big state primaries. Hilalry is the stronger candidate and the more viable candidate against McCain.
Posted by: Tom | March 6, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
As director of the Carr Center for Human Rights Policy at Harvard one would expect better judgment from Samantha …but as Obama’s foreign policy adviser I have much concern that he is getting advice from a light weight.
I’m from Ohio originally and the people of Ohio are perfectly able to read, assess and judge without some little snit’s opining.
This is elitist arrogance and the people of the U.S. don’t need her advising our foreign policy ever.
Obama, try a graduate of a public university.
Chicago gave us Chile’s economic mess and Samantha is a phony.
We need integrity, sincerity and truth.
Posted by: Grace | March 6, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
Maybe when Obama’s Foreign Policy Advisers pick up the phone at 3.am we all know what they will say (expletive) and hang up
Posted by: SJ | March 6, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
Actually she sound a like Ron who cannot express himself without swearing as well. This is not the Huffington Post.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 6, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
How much money did Obama pay her to say this?
Posted by: Elizabeth | March 6, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
Obama doesn’t have the guts to fire her. He’s a man you NEEDS to be admired, charmed and loved. “Vetted” he is not. The KNIGHT IN SHINING ARMOR is gettin’ a bit tarnished, don’t ya think.
Posted by: catherine in nm | March 6, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
I think Samantha Power is very angry about their big loss in Ohio! It looks like she was the one chosen to do some of the campaign’s dirty work. After all, you can’t have Barack Obama do it. The “celestial choirs might stop singing.”
News for Samantha: Ohio is not the only place Hillary Clinton can win. People there saw her as a fighter and a person who will work hard for them. That is why she won!
And she is Barack Obama’s foreign policy advisor? I think the firing should have been fired a long time ago.
Posted by: Peggy | March 6, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
Obama should just come right out and put this whole story to bed: “Hillary’s not a monster… as far as I know”.
Posted by: rst | March 6, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton is far better qualified to be the president of our country than any other candidate, including Senator Barak Obama. Mrs. Clinton’s deep grasp of issues and policies makes her far more ready to take on the presidency than Mr. Obama and besides each debate I see Mr. Obama merely copying her; without originality in thought or words not to mention the depth of grasp that she has. His lack of foreign policy experience makes him even less qualified to be our next president and those who give him advice like Samantha Power serves our nations interests poorly.
Posted by: chandp | March 6, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
To Lauren – SHE LIED about NAFTA when she was the one calling Canada in the first place telling them not to worry what she says about it wink, wink, nudge, nudge. She lied to the people of Ohio saying Obama was doing what she herself was doing all along. Obama was innocent.
Posted by: Maddie | March 6, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
She isn’t employed by the campaign so she can’t be fired.
She is right – Senator Clinton has employed the most ridiculous tactics.
Posted by: Vik N | March 6, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
To chandp – what 35 years of experience? Being alive? Was it the Wal-Mart union busting and having Chinese slave labor bring over their goods? How many years was that? How many years at Rose Law Firm? A few years in the Senate – check. And she had NO SECURITY CLEARANCE during Bills Administration so what exactly did she do?
Still doesn’t add up to 35 years of anything!
Posted by: Maddie | March 6, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
Maddie here the facts so even you can understand. It’s from Canadian papers: “Mr. [Ian] Brodie, [PM Harper’s chief of staff], during the media lockup for the Feb. 26 budget, stopped to chat with several journalists, and was surrounded by a group from CTV. The conversation turned to the pledges to renegotiate the North American free-trade agreement made by the two Democratic contenders, Mr. Obama and New York Senator Hillary Clinton.
“Mr. Brodie, apparently seeking to play down the potential impact on Canada, told the reporters the threat was not serious, and that someone from Ms. Clinton’s campaign had even contacted Canadian diplomats to tell them not to worry because the NAFTA threats were mostly political posturing. The Canadian Press cited an unnamed source last night as saying that several people overheard the remark.
“The news agency quoted that source as saying that Mr. Brodie said that someone from Ms. Clinton’s campaign called and was ‘telling the embassy to take it with a grain of salt.’
“The story was followed by CTV’s Washington bureau chief, Tom Clark, who reported that the Obama campaign, not the Clinton’s, had reassured Canadian diplomats.
“Mr. Clark cited unnamed Canadian sources in his initial report. There was no explanation last night for why Mr. Brodie was said to have referred to the Clinton campaign but the news report was about the Obama campaign.”
Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 6, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
Didn’t we hear Michelle Obama expressing some form of “HATE” toward Bill Clinton the other day? What’s the deal with these people? OBAMA is a charade… He’s a HATE MONGER disguised as a HOPE MONGER … There are an awful lot of really mean nasty obama supporting bloggers…
and what else is weird… obama himself talks about Hillary going “very negative” just because she questioned his readiness to be commander in chief… doesn’t he get it that that’s a legit campaign compare/contrast?
Posted by: kmkmkm | March 6, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
Maddie you Obama supporters love to say only the uneducated support Hillary, now don’t make your group liars.
If you took the time to read all the reports you would see exactly who spoke to the Canadians, even Obama admitted that the guy who spoke to the about NAFTA was just a economist and not a politician, so check on your fact a little please, and get a better picture of what happened.
Posted by: SJ | March 6, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
Wow… That’s unbelievable. She is her main foreign policy advisor…
What on earth is Samantha Powers doing talking about US politics in that language and overseas !!
Is she out of her mind?
I used to respect her, her thinking her
voice against recent genocides. But this…. wow…this is preposterous: how can she be a POTUS’s foreign policy advisor after this?
I don’t know what was she thinking; but she really screw up here… Wow.
Posted by: arnod | March 6, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
First a Univ. of Chicago prof secretly meets with Canadians about NAFTA; now a Harvard prof. makes fun of our neighbor state, Ohio.
Hey Obama, we don’t need all these private school snobs making our policies.
Pennsylvania is part of the U.S.A. and you can take all your Harvard advisers and tell them to get lost.
Posted by: Joe from Philly | March 6, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
PS: I meant “She is one of his (Obama’s) main foreign policy advisors”
Posted by: arnod | March 6, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
The disdain for the voter, and, interestingly, for poor people, comes through loud and clear. Just what we need from the Democratic nominee. If the Democrats disdain the poor, the poor really have nowhere to turn. Clearly, Obama people love caucuses, which poor people (and old people) can’t attend. I think of them as a violent herd, trampling the weak, the tired, the poor…
Posted by: MereMortal | March 6, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
Hey Eliz,
Obama cant punch. Its all over the news.
We kicked Obama so hard in Ohio that he doesnt smile anymore.
Posted by: MattOhio | March 6, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
Samantha Power speaks for a lot of people who have observed the Clintons during this and other campaign seasons. They are conniving, manipulative, and down right deceitful. Now there’s a news story out that one of Hillary’s surrogates visited Canadian officials and was pruported to have said that they should not take Hillary’s stance on Nafta seriously. Boy, that’s rich! Hillary accuses Obama of the same thing her campaign aid has done, but it doesn’t get reported because she’s too busy crying foul about Obama. Just rip up the Democratic Party; just bully the DNC into counting delegates in Florida and Michigan, states that were penalized for moving up their Primaries before Feb. 5. States where Hillary Made A Promise not to campaign in, but she’s fighting for those delegates now. Is there such a thing as wanting something Too Much, so much so that you’ll do anything and destroy anyone to get it?
Posted by: ji_john | March 6, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
Glad someone had the gall to tell the truth. Clinton is beyond a monster. I never thought I could hate someone but I hate her guts. All she cares about is herself. She has lied, attacked, distorted everything about obama since she found herself losing and she is a disgrace. She can’t win the nomination because SHE has the least amount of votes, states and delegates and it is IMPOSSIBLE for her to catch obama. All she is doing is making a fool out of herself b/c she will lose to McCain if she is the nominee. Every single poll out here shows that.
Posted by: Laura | March 6, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
Say what you want about McCain, if I had to pick between McCain and Obama, I will pick McCain any day, class is class and one thing I am abundantly sure he will never get into trash talking about Obama if he was running against him.
You know what the say you can never find gold in a coals bag no matter how hard you look, Obama and his goon camp have no class and are not fit to even be running in this race.
Posted by: SJ | March 6, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
Hillary campaign compared Obama to Ken Starr today…..should her spokesperson be fired….give me a break. She complains of Karl Rove and Ken Starr tactics…however has anyone watched her negative campaign tactics. Who is she fooling.
Posted by: leslie | March 6, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
Eiz : do you have any idea what a gaffe is for anyone in her position ( foreign policy advisor to a US presidential candidate) to be using that language and talking like that against anyone at all *overseas* ?
She is not you, Axelrod or some political
operative. She is his FOREIGN POLICY ADVISOR using vulgar language about the US political process and candidates OVERSEAS.
And the three of them (Clinton McCain and Obama) are *also* US Senators.
She just CANNOT use that language.
Everyone knows she is Obama’s foreign policy advisor and her language reflects awfully bad on him. He doesn’t need this. That’s for sure.
That is the point.
Posted by: arnod | March 6, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
Joe in Philly make sure your friends in PA know what Obama’s elites really think of working stiffs like us. Need more truth Joe just read these Obama bloggers cheering her on.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 6, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
I’m sorry…People want to talk about the one thing that came from the Obama camp (Monster comment) when all Sen Clinton has been doing is Mud Slinging this whole time??? Ironic. I’m on the edge of my seat to see what she has up her sleave next.. GO OBAMA!!
Posted by: cc | March 6, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
Hi,
I’m a McCain supporter. Keep it up Demos! You’re making our job easy. Your party is splitting apart. It’s kinda sad, but hey, go for it. Both your candidates are idiots.
Posted by: Heather | March 6, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
Wow! This is not about Hillary at all — she has been called worse and she can take it. These Obama supporters sound immature not to mention his advisors. Read the original article — the language and the ideas are not befitting a prof and a director in an Ivy League institution not to mention being the POLICY advisor for a presidential candidate. Did she have any positive thing to say about her boss and his substantive position in that article? It is all about low-class anti-Hillary diatribe. Actually as the reporter says it reveals the inexperience of this campaign. They all need to grow up! That “this is off the record” gave me a hearty chuckle.
Posted by: pm317 | March 6, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
Anyone who can honestly justify her language abroad about a US presidential campaign being one of Obama’s main foreign policy advisors doesn’t have a clue.
It shows how naive and amateur you are in foreign affairs. This include Ms Powers. And that is freightening.
It reflects bad on Obama. You bet he doesn’t need this. Don’t defend it b/c is indefensible for her, in her position to talk like this overseas. Period.
It might satisfy your personal hunger for whatever it is you feel against Clinton. But it was a major screw up from her part; she failed Obama big time.
Posted by: arnod | March 6, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
Let us examine Obama’s political team…
Goolsbee – Sr Economic Advisor. Goofed up with NaftaGate.
Samantha Powers – Foreign Policy Advisor – Goofed up by slandering DNC Nomination Opponent.
Axelrod – Chief Campaign Strategist. Goofed up all Primary states. Big Mistake
Michelle Obama – Wife and America-hater. Promotes racial-divide in America.
Kerry – Biggest Ketchup Moron. Couldnt finish off Bush, has come to fight with a Clinton. What a joke
and the list goes on…….
Posted by: MattOhio | March 6, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
I’m in PA and I don’t believe a thing, not one word, that Hillary says. She’s a complete flipflopper. And, what was she doing endorsing McCain today? Throwing the Demo party under the bus?
I’m a ‘blue collar’ worker and we don’t do that to our folks. No matter what.
I think us folks in PA can learn from Ohio’s mistake. We understand it, but we won’t be hoodwinked. Just look at all the new evidence against her. What a joke!
Posted by: Sheryl | March 6, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
One more time for Mr. Unity US so even he can understand.
“The news agency quoted that source as saying that Mr. Brodie said that someone from Ms. Clinton’s campaign called and was ‘telling the embassy to take it with a grain of salt.’
“The story was followed by CTV’s Washington bureau chief, Tom Clark, who reported that the Obama campaign, not the Clinton’s, had reassured Canadian diplomats.
“Mr. Clark cited unnamed Canadian sources in his initial report. There was no explanation last night for why Mr. Brodie was said to have referred to the Clinton campaign but the news report was about the Obama campaign.”
Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 6, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
Why is it surprising to anyone that Hilary would be stabbing Obama for talking to the Canadians while she was actually doing it herself? She’s been willing to sign a document stating that Michigan and Floridas primaries shouldn’t count…then go back on her word when it suits her goals. She’s claimed experience “in the whitehouse”, but hasn’t released any document from the period to prove it. Speaks of her work for the lower and middle class while taking the most money from lobbyists (inluding the medical companies…watch Moore’s “Sicko”). And how about the tax forms, or the donors to her husband’s library. And if anyone thinks that she has no dirty laundry…get serious. She will do anything to get elected. It’s a shame that anyone would expect less than the same old politics from a same old politician.
Posted by: Tom | March 6, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
I am just waiting patiently to see how the media is going to handle this. If you substitute Hillary’s campaign for this foul language hell will definitely break loose. It seems to me anytime Obama sustains a heavy loss, he thinks negative campaigning from the other side is responsible. Look at yourself and figure out how a campaign of hopes and inspiration topped up with speeches can fix the montrous problems we have now. What is the campaign going to do with Samantha?
Posted by: Mark | March 6, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
This is unbelievable.
BO’s foreign policy advisor impugns a former first lady, a respected US Senator and a presidential candidate to a FOREIGN newspaper.
These people are running amok.
Posted by: Ann | March 6, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
I thought this was the candidate for change I guess he sends a women to do his dirty work Senator Clinton did not attack him personally but it looks like no matter what he can’t do no wrong.
Posted by: Christel Robinson | March 6, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
I do not believe what Powers said was appropriate. Clinton is not a monster and it is not the place for an advisor to make such remarks – ever. An apology is required.
I have also heard some terrible remarks from the people in the Clinton campaign which is disturbing. The snuggling up with McCain is terrible.
Both groups need to settle down and get back to talking about the issues. Both are not serving the American public by bickering, going negative, and name-calling.
I know Obama supporters are frustrated by the recent losses. And Clinton supporters are frustrated by the fact that their candidate probably cannot win the nomination.
But we have to try to play fair.
I’m still very undecided, but do want to see a Democrat in office. I’m very worried that that may not happen – and the reason may be because we wasted out time destroying each other.
Posted by: Harriet | March 6, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
Tom,
Get your facts straight, please. The only document any of the candidates signed was that they wouldn’t campaign in FL and MI (a pledge BO broke by the way when he bought ads in FL). No one signed an agreement that the delegates wouldn’t count. That was a DNC decision.
Posted by: Ann | March 6, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
So, what happened to “change we can believe in?”
Looks pretty much like politics as usual.
Just depends on the day.
Posted by: ken | March 6, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
I’m also a McCain supporter and I have to hand it to the Clinton campaign for helping us prove to the American people that our guy is the most experienced – and will the best choice for protecting our country!
We need that vote of confidence from our friend, Senator Clinton! A voice of reason within the collapsing Democratic party.
Posted by: Brenda | March 6, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
I’m disappointed to see many of you agreeing with someone who is supposedly a foreign policy advisor to a presidential candidate insulting another candidate of the same party overseas. I’m surprised that only Arnod has a grasp of what her statement looks like internationally as she is an advisor of someone who would be American President. This is the reason why when Hillary claims Obama is inexprienced I tend to agree with her. Look at Susan Rice yesterday. Do these people not know to be more poised and professional when speaking publicly?Even I know that and I’m not a politician. Get a grip all of you calling Hillary a monster and worse. Most of those women here trashing Hillary just envy her. The men on the other hand may just be intimidated by her personality.
We’ve put up with worse from men. Lets give a woman a chance. At least in the democratic party she seems to have her feet planted on the ground, has a sense of reality, and her supporters do not seem to think she is the second soming and walks on water. I know about only one person who did and Obama is not the Messiah.
Posted by: Salida | March 6, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
It seems as if Hillary Clinton gets called a new name by the Obama campaign pretty much on a daily basis.
There has been much worse, and I doubt whether she will lose any sleep over it.
But, the move was incredibly stupid coming from a campaign that claims to be above politics as usual.
Change we can believe in?
Yeah, right…
Posted by: ken | March 6, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
For all the Obama supporters can you explain why Obama who raised $55M in February lost Ohio, Texas and Rhode Island?????????? By the way were is his big supporters??????? So Obama can’t controll his team, first the Canada scandel, then his forgein affairs expert doesn’t know when she is the off the record, this is experince????? Speaking of were is the we are above all the nasty insider nastness that Obama claims he would not bring to the job, then he needs a whole new team, since this one did not get the meno. Also please explain how he has lost all the major States?????? How can he say is the peoples choice, when he did not get California, New York, Texas, Ohio, Mass??????? Alexrode needs to address this, the superdelgates that support Obama need to explain how this is execptable??????
Posted by: Bridget | March 6, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
There’s a foreign policy strategy, call your opponent names. If Hugo Chavez is being irascible Obama’s team can call him up and tell him he’s a MEANIE!
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 6, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
I guess she is not going to be fired then
Posted by: SJ | March 6, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
These comments do not reflect my feelings about Sen. Clinton.
Well Sammy why did you take the time to say them then??? Guess someone told you that you made an out so now you feel this watered down apology will do….nope apology not accepted!!!!
Posted by: SJ | March 6, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
All these obamabots want to say Hillary deserves this because of tactics in the campaign. What tactics bringing into the discussion National Security (OOh she’s so bad).
Posted by: toby | March 6, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
Look – the people who really know Hillary, like Hillary.
Both people she works with and people who don’t have political agendas like Steven Spielberg, John Glenn, etc.
If you can’t trust good guys like Steven Spielberg and John Glenn, who can you trust?
They wouldn’t be friends with, and support a monster. They KNOW she is not a monster.
The people who call her these things are the people who don’t truly know her.
These comments were very immature on the part of Mrs. Powers, and I do feel like the Obama campaign is often acting very immature, taking and making things personal, when this is really about who is more qualified.
For me, it is not at all a personal or racial attack that Barack is not as qualified at this time. But it is my hope that he is not our candidate this time, because I think we will lose. He just doesn’t have enough proven national experience, and the Republicans will exploit that way more than Hillary’s mere mentioning of it.
He’s already showing how flimsy he is.
I hope he runs again when he has more experience. He would have a better chance after he has proven himself more.
I would like to see him have a chance when he is more qualified and see what he could really do.
But I don’t think he will get that chance this time – a lot of swing voters like McCain too. And they are both weak on the economy.
Posted by: Lauren | March 6, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
I think Hillary will laugh off the monster remark, but she will take the insulting of OH voters seriously.
I am more offended that Power said OH voted for Hillary because of their obsession. That is just down right insulting voters’ decision. I’m sure OH voters casted their vote with conscious and concern about their future.
Posted by: joeysky | March 6, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
Samantha Power is a Pulitzer Prize winner and an expert in genocide. It’s unfortunate that her personal thoughts during a moment of frustration with the Ohio results was publicly aired, especially when she meant for them to be off the record.
Any honest person has to assume that Clinton operatives say some very nasty things about Senator Obama in private. People get emotional over their candidates.
I don’t think this reflects the message of the Obama campaign at all. And we shouldn’t blow this thing out of proportion.
Posted by: Valerie | March 6, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
I have to say both Obama and Clinton supporters act as if their candidates are gods.
I’m still undecided – and from my perspective, you both look like fools. C’mon people, get with it, will ya.
This story is more childish than the junk we did in High School.
Wake up zombies! Don’t be fooled by either of your candidates.
They are people who make mistakes like everybody else.
My 10 year old seems more mature than most of you. And she picks her nose!
Now stop it!
Posted by: Maria | March 6, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
It is a given that McCain’s military background certainly does not disqualify him as Commander In Chief ala Kerry in 2004. HRC is just stating the obvious about that part of it. It is his GOP warmongering idealogical mindset and his famous temper that screws him up as someone you would want in the job. Do you really want this guy’s finger on the button ? But HRC was stating the obvious on the qualified part of that. What, she should say he is not ? Nobody will ever buy that a war vet is not CIC material up front. That dog won’t hunt.
Posted by: Stryker | March 6, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
Update: I see that Ms. Power has apologized and an Obama spokesperson has denounced the comment.
Good for them. Now let’s get back to real issues instead of fake distractions.
Posted by: Valerie | March 6, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
Surprised that these Ivy league graduates have no clue about protocol. She is now saying her words do not reflect her feelings or whatever, she does not know not to talk to a reporter if you do not mean what you say?
This is the change all of you who have jumped on the wagon can believe in. A foreign policy advisor insulting another candidate. It is much much better than an experienced politician isn’t it. Yes who’s next on their list?
Posted by: Salida | March 6, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
Shouldn’t have said it in the first place Powers. You should be ashamed and fired. This is not the new politics we need.
Posted by: Jim | March 6, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
For FL and MI, the best option is to award half of the awarded delegates from each state to the candidates, since do-over is expensive. Clinton would net about 90.
Posted by: MattOhio | March 6, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
Good points, Lauren,
But, I wonder if any of the candidates will actually be able to fix the economic mess that we are in right now.
The US economy is not Illinois, or New York, or Arizona. The economic chaos created by Bush is so much darker and deeper than anything we have seen in our lifetimes.
Honestly, I feel sorry for whoever does get elected President. No change in economic policy will be able to correct the free fall that we are starting to witness.
And, now we have a government trying to explain why a contract that would employ about 40,000 US workers was given to a French based company. What an economic stimilus package for working class America!
Sorry, just had to vent a little about that.
But, I did enjoy your post.
Posted by: ken | March 6, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
Obama really needs to address how his team is behaving and he needs to take leadership of them. Obama also needs to address that his supports need to bring it down in tone and hatred they are showing to his fellow Sentor, remember after all is settled that Obama may need Hillary’s supporters to win, don’t think you don’t, if you do then McCain surley will win. Calling Hillary names and constanly ranting on about how you hate her only makes republicans happy. If Hillary doesn’t get the nod then I would support Obama, but the sad thing is I don’t think you Obama supports would support Hillary, you would rather have 4 more years of Bush policy.
Posted by: Bridget | March 6, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
That’s called “Chicago style politics,” Bridgett.
And, you are right.
Posted by: ken | March 6, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm
Apology accepted? Can we now get on with the real issues at hand?
I do think the more we infight, the more McCain wins.
Posted by: Jane | March 6, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
So the question becomes will Obama fire her and end her association with the campaign? If she claims that is not how she personally feels and that instead is how others within the campaign feel will they be fired?
Posted by: Eric | March 7, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am
Thanks, Ken.
The first Clinton administration got us out of a recession and deficit and into a surplus and prosperity, so I am sure that they will use what they learned when they did that, but adjust it to current conditions.
Not to say that it’s going to be easy, but I definitely think that there’s no one more qualified to help the economy.
Posted by: Lauren | March 7, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am
Ladyvoter Clinton is not a monster, you may say you don’t like her, you don’t like her policies (but that would be hard to say, since her policies and Obama’s are 95% the same). You are part of the problem, the name calling at the personel level, instead of addressing what you do not like about her policies. Obama stands for changing the tone and old ways inside the beltway, but you sound just like what he is against, think about it.
Posted by: Bridget | March 7, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am
A monstrous comment, and Power should be fired. The apology is necessary but not sufficient, after a senior foreign affairs advisor and a journalist shoots off her mouth to the international press, and only then tries to make it “off the record,” and at a time when we have to restore our world status. Instead, she offers no “hope” that her candidate would help us recover from the amateur hour that has stretched to amateurish, agonizing years under Bush.
For the first time, will Obama finally live up to his vow to fire anyone in his campaign who crosses the line? Clinton did so. Not Obama, not yet. Instead, he “decries” Power’s comment. Pfffft.
Neither her candidate nor Power — nor Goolsbee nor too many other Obama advisers in only the last couple of days — are ready for prime time even during a campaign. He cannot be elected to represent us, not with his judgment on staff. What next, put these people in his cabinet?
Posted by: G.G. | March 7, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am
RE: Jake’s “scoop”
I think he got this story from the Drudge Report, so much for the scoop. Drudge likes to stir up drama instead of focusing on the issues that matter.
Posted by: Valerie | March 7, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am
If Ms. Power says that Hillary is a monster then it must mean that she expects Obama would sit down with her face to face in person within the first year … as he has pledged to do with all the other monsters.
Posted by: epi | March 7, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am
I think Obama has had a bad day again. First Susan Rice tells Tucker Carlson that Mr. Obama is not ready to take the 3:oo a.m. call. Now Ms. Power insults the the state of Ohio. Looks like the wheels are coming of the Obama wagon. Just in time for the PA primary. But according to the Obama they can win without OH or PA. Tell that to John Kerry.
Posted by: russell | March 7, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am
Susan Rice said NONE of the three candidates are ready for the 3 am phone call because none of them has been the president.
If you go along with Clinton’s logic, Laura Bush more qualified to make national security decisions than John McCain.
Posted by: Valerie | March 7, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am
Mara -
It’s not at all surprising that people are passionate and have strong feelings, especially those in the campaigns – dealing with conflicts and pressures.
But there’s a difference between reporters viewing what’s going on behind the scenes and a foreign advisor making remarks like that to a foreign press during an interview process.
I agree that it’s the focus on petty fighting that has poisoned a lot of our politics – everyone’s responsible. Politicians, those who work in the foreground and background, the media, and citizens.
I personally try not to name call, or even feel that way.
Posted by: Lauren | March 7, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am
It is time for Democrats to call on Obama to suspend his campaign and wait 8 years so that he can gain some experience, put his name to significant legislation and learn more about foreign policy, hold a few hearings instead of campaigning, learn that universal access is not universal health care, and not sneer about helping people whose homes are being foreclosed. He doesn’t do that anymore, but his first reaction to a freeze was that it would benefit wealthy home owners or speculators.
He is the one who has said that if he wins, her supporters will vote for him, but he cannot expect the same if she wins.
Let him be the healer and uniter and make sure that his voters support Hillary for President, not threaten that they will not. That is bullying and blackmail – neither an attractive trait. This is a time for leadership and unity.
Senator Clinton will stay positive, talking about specific and practical solutions for real people and their problems. That should not keep her from drawing distinctions with Obama and calling attention to gaps between rhetoric and reality such as with his failure to hold hearings as chair of an important subcommittee, his inexperience, and the shortcomings of his health care plan.
Can we all agree that it would be better to raise money and spend time and energy re-grouping to beat McCain?
I am already sensing that there may be spreading buyer’s remorse as Hillary’s competence and achievements become increasingly clear and compelling. As Gov. Ed Redell of PA says, “she has the best ideas, a wealth of experience and is ready to be President!”
We know that Hillary will work hard to earn every vote, and we all can mobilize our enthusiasm and pride, and help make the distinctions and comparisons that will advance her candidacy.
Posted by: Ricki LIeberman | March 7, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am
While Samantha is now busy dishing out apologies, how about giving one to the people of Ohio? She should also give an apology to all of the people in this country for giving an interview overseas in which she degrades a presidential candidate. Her dirty work is international in scope. As a foreign policy advisor, she clearly knew better. His campaign is desperate now and it shows.
Posted by: Dana | March 7, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am
valerie: My gal is ready to take the call. She will not meet with dictators over lunch. She will hold meetings about whats going on with Nato’s fight in Afganistan. She is ready on day one! With Hillary america will be safe!
Posted by: russell | March 7, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am
Wow! She calls someone she admires all her life as a monster. She accuses someone as stooping to anything and yet she goes from the most contemptuous dismissal to an apology within a span of a day or less just to save her job. BHO relies on her for foreign policy advises? And then he continues to talk up his ability to make good judgment?
Posted by: esvida | March 7, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am
This woman was not involved with the heavy daily pressure of the Obama campaign. She was overseas and had time to unwind and actually think without the pressure. This woman still made those comments. There is no explaining this away.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 7, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am
Why should Senator Obama suspend his campaign. It makes no sense…he’s leading in delegate count.
I think Susan Rice has being refreshingly honest. We don’t know how any of the three would react to a 3 am situation.
Here’s what I do know:
1. Clinton has shown manic behavior, i.e. “I’m honored to be campaigning with Barack Obama”, then the next day, “Shame on you Barack Obama” and so on.
2. McCain cussing out fellow senators.
3. Obama always shows a consistent and calm temperament.
Posted by: Valerie | March 7, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am
I am amazed and astounded that Ms. Power – not only in the position she has in the Obama campaign but her position at Harvard would say something so “nasty and personal.” It’s no secret that many journalists in cable media hate the Clintons and even when they are supposedly being objective, news is obviously skewed in favor of Obama. Unfortunately many of these cable pundits have had to eat crow with Senator Clinton’s decisive win of Ohio, unexpected win of the primaries in Texas and landslide in Rhode Island. Because many in cable media have given until quite recently a “free pass” to Senator Obama and his campaign, I think that the Obama campaign has become quite arrogant thinking that they can say and do anything and the media will “wink, wink” if Obama or his minions are less than politically or ethically correct. Well the honeymoon is over. Stories are beginning to surface that show Senator Obama and his associates and some of his advisers are anything but unifiers. It’s not just politics as usual; it’s politics at its worst. I’ve been a Democrat all of my life and have voted Democratic in every Presidential election since I was old enough to vote but if Senator Clinton is not on the ticket this Fall, I don’t know who I will vote for. Certain members of cable media and people like Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, and Claire McCaskill have tried to ramrod Obama down our throats. But my husband and I weren’t born yesterday. (We both will be 60 later this year.)We know Hillary Clinton is the best candidate for President running this year. She has the best economic plan, the best healthcare plan, and she has a real record of working across the aisle. What’s more she is a fighter – not someone who votes “present” on controversial bills. She has been knocked and punched around and has come back each time to do what she has always done – fight for the rights of those she serves. Obama is “much ado about nothing.” He probably won’t fire Ms. Power although he should by anybody’s standards and it will be interesting to see if this hateful rhetoric will be even be aired by the media or if it is mentionned – more like a footnote. Of course if the Clinton campaign had attacked Obama in such a personal way, we would be hearing about it for weeks. After all, it’s negative campaigning when Hillary points out facts which are a matter of public record which are not in agreement with his rhetoric. I thought this was a presidential campaign and that’s what opponents did so the voters could decide who is best suited for arguably one of the most important jobs in the world.
Posted by: Cathy Overton | March 7, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am
These people in Obama’s campaign and their surrogates seem like a very angry bunch. Everyone so hateful…
Now we have Jessie Jackson throwing out vague threats of uprising. It is getting hard to stomach. It feels like were going back to the dark ages.
Posted by: PammyH | March 7, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am
Obama should fire her and make it very clear he is not only strong against Hillary’s bad politics but within his own camp. I am a full supporter of Obama and would rather much see him take a stance on this issue BOLD, STRONG and with MUCH AUTHORITY!
Posted by: Karen, NYC | March 7, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am
Lauren, I respectfully disagree. Everyone in politics has rough people on their campaign staff. It seems that everyone also has lobbyists. But not everyone has a chief advisor from one of the ugliest PR firms in the world – one that has shamed a nation I love dearly.
Posted by: Mara | March 7, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am
Hey Valerie, remember the “Axis of Evil” guy. So Samantha Power is an expert at genocide, and now name-calling. By the way, just because you say something is probably happening doesn’t make it so. You might be a MEANIE!
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 7, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am
Think about the idea of leadership. 9/11 happened because of leadership failure. The 9/11 hijackers were not sophisticated. They used box cutter and knife. Most of them were here with a fraudulent visa or caught with expired DL and visa and they were let go off. They attended flight school etc…These things happen under two administrations clock. What did an experienced president done for us? Nothing. Then Afghanistan and Iraq. Totally unrelated. Sadam never liked Osama because (it does not require intelligence) Sadam wanted to control Osama’s fatherland (SA), so for the West, Sadam would have been a perfect balance for so many reason, such as: Israel would not have been venerable etc. Now Iran is stronger than ever and we don’t even have a comprehensive peace plan for the Middle East. We cherry pick dictators whom we want to support, ex. Pakistan, Ethiopia ….For instance, compared to Ethiopia, Cuba by far is the most stable and “for the people” not necessarily “by the people” country. We deal with Communist China and Vietnam. Isn’t that bi-standard foreign policy? Folks that is not leadership by any stretch of imagination! If you think a disaster call comes at 3 a.m. in the morning, you must be naive. The only emergency call in those hours would be a “mud slide” or “earth quake”. All the terrorist activities happened on rush hour or broad day light because terrorist seek their target to score big; Madrid, London, New York, etc… Don’t be swayed by pep talk, be intelligent and know the facts, that would make you a better person, who cares who said what, stick to the facts. We are not shopping for “Palmolive” or “Exxon Supreme,” we are electing a president. For that matter, you don’t plan dating them either, so it does not matter who gets elected, as long as they stand on the principle, but that is for you to evaluate. Peace.
Posted by: Nevermind | March 7, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am
OBAMA-YIKES: 10:40. RE: CLINTON ADVISORS. On advisors, you might want to check out the Washington Post today. It gives an in-depth view of the people Hillary surrounds herself with. People who are undisciplined, constantly at odds, say some very bad words, and seem to hate one another passionately. One of those people is Mark Penn. He is worldwide CEO of Burson Marstaller, the firm which prepped the Blackwater Security firm before their congressional hearings in the fall (for killing civilians in Iraq). The firm is also well-known for its PR work with repressive regimes. They whitewashed the Saudis after 9-11. Not very pretty. Penn is one of her top advisors, takes credit for the win in Ohio – and is lead on the new Clinton approach. What does this say about Clinton?
Samantha Powers sounds a little like one of our presidential candidates – sounds off without thinking and has never had an unexpressed thought. Definitely not the kind of person you’d want in a tough and closely watched campaign. She has a short-life in politics, still, I defy anyone to compare her to Mark Penn.
On the third candidate, McCain, I guess it would be pretty tough to comment, since the press doesn’t cover McCain. They just visit him in at his ranch in Sedona and eat ribs.
One last thing: is the press going to start reporting any time soon? They spent the early 90s on Whitewater – instead of health care. They spent the late 90s on Monica. They’ve helped elect Bush by reporting on trivialities and spent the Bush years typing his lies as fast as he spewed them out, without question or investigation. Now we get stories about body language and more real estate deals and pols who are almost as snarky as the correpondents. I want reporters again. Real ones. Like David Halberstein and Edward R Murrow. People who had intelligence and courage and knew what mattered. And wrote about it.
Posted by: Mara | March 7, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am
Oh come on, she’s only telling the truth about Hillary. Hillary is George Bush’s twin sister–she’s flexing her dictatorship muscles. Do you now know why she couldn’t pass the health care reform as 1st lady? She couldn’t lead a dog.
Posted by: Sallie | March 7, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am
PammyH wasn’t Jessie Jackson sent to lower zombotia by the Obama camp. Saw it on SNL.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 7, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am
my take on this is that hillary Clinton is the only candidate who has the diplomatic know how and the realistic math to bring our troups home safely. for it take more than six month, as senator Obama promised, for the soliers to even pack their bags,ship back the all their material close down the businesses we started there and so forth and making sure we don’t leave it in a bigger mess . So to me her time period is the more realistic to me the more feasable the some sensible.
As business ower I know this simple fact: that is if go bankrupt I just can’t close my doors and throw away the key. I am bound by certain step I have to take first.
Posted by: ruthmatters | March 7, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am
Wow. Honestly I’m shocked at how unprofessional Power behaved in front of a foreign press. She insulted Senator Clinton, millions of Clinton supporters, Ohio voters and even the poor.
Posted by: laurel nyc | March 7, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am
Ruth, Obama is the level-headed, calm, smart leader here, not Hillary. Obama will steer us to the best solution for Iraq. Hillary lies all the time, just to get votes. Obama doesn’t lie. Someday you’ll realize that.
Posted by: Sallie | March 7, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am
Well Samantha,
Thank you for expressing the views of the Obama campaign to the world!
Nice of you to also belittle the good people of Ohio as well as the poor people of America with your vile remarks about Senator Clinton!
Hope all those Super Delegates are taking notice of the Obama campaigns words and actions, although once again the damage has been said and even if Obama takes action this time around doesn’t make up for all the misdeeds that have happened in the past!
As the slew of vile comments made and done by the Obama campaign are disgusting, starting with Michelle Obama turning statements made by former President Clinton on Barack’s 2002 speech on Iraq and subsiquent stances as “fairy tale” into racial remarks were not called for in the least, to the exposed memos by Obama’s vampaign in SC of turning the heat on about Hillary’s MLK statement into racial remarks, to NAFTA-gate and now this!
Thank you Obama campaign for showing us the NEW WASHINGTOM you stump on bringing if elected!
The most disgusting exibit of politics in modern history being shown as the New Politics, simply disgusting!
Posted by: Clear Choice | March 7, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am
Laurel, there is no way you can call Hillary’s behavior professional. Call Hillary’s bad behavior and acting out for what it is. She’s speaking from the gutter. You know why? Because she’s gotten desparate and her manipulate ways have gone into overdrive. Wow, what a trait for a candidate to have–personally I see Obama was being the presidential one.
Posted by: Sallie | March 7, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am
Cathy: Your comments were true as well as intelligent. The problem with the Obama campaign is that they have great speeches but no plan for america’s future. Like Lincoln said “you can fool some of the people some of the time but you can’t fool all the people all the time.” Finally america is wakening up!
Posted by: russell | March 7, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am
Sallie your personal attacks on Hillary are uncalled for. No Hillary supporter on this blog has attacked Obama’s appearance or his hair in any way. Perhaps you might be a little more civil especially if Obama wins you’re going to need Hillary supporter a heck of a lot more than we need you.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 7, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am
I applaud you Cathy .
This is one of the most important jobs in the world, and much of the press has been favoring style over substance.
There are plenty of other areas in our lives where we can choose style, but in many areas where what is substantial is truly what is most important.
It’s really our country’s weakness that style is often favored over important substance.
Even with the press playing Obama up and Hillary down, many have voted for Hillary. It makes me feel better about our country, that people can’t be influenced so easily.
They were surprised when Hillary did so well on super Tuesday. Then Obama won more smaller states, and with the caucuses that are hard for a lot of people to attend.
But the big states tell the bigger story. And that is that people know Hillary is the more qualified candidate.
Barack will have his turn when he is more qualified.
And it’s not that Barack is all style and no substance, but at this point he’s mostly style without a lot of proven substance.
Posted by: Lauren | March 7, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am
Sallie: Don’t take my word for it look at the exit polling on who has the most clear plan for america’s problems. Who will be the best commander and chief. The answer in Ohio and Texas was Hillary. But according to Ms. Power the people of Ohio are stupid and so their opinions should not count!
Posted by: russell | March 7, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am
to samantha ,
well samantha, ive been a huge fan of yours forever..until this moment when i saw hmmm the woman behind all the human rights lingo about human dignity sort of tears down people herself. How interesting Ms. Power. Ive heard you speak at genocide conventions, turns out you yourself are a little ruthless at the mouth. How unbecoming of such an intellect… in the meantime, im giving your books to the local library.
Posted by: charmaine | March 7, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am
I am shocked and outraged by Powers behavior and language. I am reminded of the shock and outrage the public had when the Dixie Chicks said something very negative about Bush back in the day. And this is from the hope and change camp!
Posted by: Nancy | March 7, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am
To all you Obama supporters. The democratic party has given FL and MI to the republicans with out a fight. So we’re down two to nothing before the general begins. There will be no caucuses in the red states to run up the score. The McCain folks will be using Power’s words over and over in Ohio on how stupid they are-So I’d be interested in how you expect Obama to win the White House now?
Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 7, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am
“We are tired of aristocratic explanations in Harvard words.”
- Dwight David Eisenhower quotes (American 34th President)
Posted by: Humm | March 7, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am
The way things look for Obama with the Rezco trial,(Obama’s name came out in day 1)it does not look like a man headed for the White House, but to Gitmo.
Posted by: Latasha | March 7, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am
To the Superdelegates: Go ahead and pick Mr. Obama and give the state of Ohio to the republicans according to Obama they do not need the state of Ohio. Well I think that Oabama should have a little talk with last democrat to lose Ohio a man named John Kerry. Go ahead and give the election to McCain. The people of Ohio do not like to be kicked when they are down. Maybe thats why they picked Hillary.
Posted by: russell | March 7, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am
Those who are feigning outrage over this need to get over themselves very quickly.
For months, the Clinton campaign has been silently condoning and enabling and actively nurturing every kind of racially and religiously charged name and / or false characterization of Obama.
“Monster” is, in comparison, a model of restraint.
And you know what? What Hillary Clinton and her campaign are saying and doing right now, with respect to Obama, IS ethically monstrous.
That, clearly, is the sense of Powers’s comment — a comment FOR which she obviously had to apologize but WITH which I and, I am quite sure, countless others wholeheartedly agree.
Posted by: horizonr | March 7, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am
It seems that none of you know who Samantha Power is, and perhaps you should spend a little time doing the research before you call for her head. Ms. Power is a pulitzer award winning writer. The book she won her pulitzer prize for is “A Problem from Hell” about Genocide. Much of it deals with the Rwandan Genocide, an event that took place during Bill Clinton’s tenure as president. Clinton (Bill) did nothing to stop it, and in fact his government interfered with any other country trying to stop the slaughter – this has been well documented by many respected journalists. Clinton many years later apologized for this. But close to a million people were already dead.
Ms. Power’s comments are not helpful for Senator Obama’s campaign and are very unfortunate. And though she may be way out of line on this, she is one of the few, and I mean few, people who have continually spoken up for ending the bloodshed in Darfur and the horror that is Gauntanamo. She has more knowledge under her belt about international politics, history and war then most politicians and her being fired, rather than simply scolded for her actions, would be rash and foolish on any candidates part.
Posted by: daisy | March 7, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am
Hey “Daisy”, if she’s so smart how come she’s so stupid?
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 7, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am
Horizonr I wondered when the someone from the Obama camp would begin to pull up the race card. Not going to work this time. Thanks to Ms Power and her wonderful adventure.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 7, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am
I love the update, it’s kind of like, “Well I said it but I didn’t really mean it, wink, wink”. Hey, this is not the first time we’ve heard that winking sound coming out of the Obama camp. The man has a GOLDEN TICKET (let’s blame Canada).
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 7, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am
Daisy Ms Power has already shown herself to be completely bias and her work is now suspect. Furthermore, the Durfur situation is still on going and if it’s your contention that it is the sole responsibility of America to cure all the world’s ills then we’ll be in more wars than you can even imagine. Perhaps you could do yourself some good by calling out the rest of the world who curse America, yet do nothing to help others.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 7, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am
horizonr,
Well those who believe that about the Clintons are being nothing much more than paranoid haters themselves.
Because the Clintons have always been great civil rights activists and supporters.
It’s some of the press and Obama supporters and campaign who are paranoid about race, and have ‘made’ it about race.
I really get the impression that Michelle Obama especially thinks everything is about race.
It is not racist to say that Obama does not truly have enough experience. He only has 3 years national experience.
If he were white, people would say the same thing.
Qualifications and proven national political experience matter.
To be President of the United States, qualifications matter.
Posted by: Lauren | March 7, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am
Yes, just when is Obama going to do what he said he would do – fire people who make despicable statements. I seem to recall an equally despicable statement by Axelrod that Hillary was responsible for Benazir Bhutto’s assasination. That should definitely have been the occasion of a firing. But as usual, Obama is all talk and no walk.
Posted by: CognitiveDissonance | March 7, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am
the “audacity of the hope-less” … how quickly Obama-maniacs turn ugly.
Posted by: Jackson | March 7, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am
Hey “T.P.” that is an old story, was in from the beginning, Jake already covered it earlier, it’s now a non-story – the fact is a SENIOR ADVISOR to Obama MET with the Canadians. Do you see the difference between a low level staffer and a SENIOR ADVISOR? If you don’t you may want to get some assistance voting this time around.
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 7, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am
Mom of 3, shame on you- where are the facts and logic to support your claim. Hey, I bet your own kids say that about you sometimes. Can’t fire your kids. Ms. Power should be fired, though, she’s supposed to be a grown-up.
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 7, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am
CognitiveDissonance Obama would need to first fire his wife for her turning former President Clinton’s talk in NH of Obama’s Iraq speech in 2002 to his flip flops of convenience in 2004 and 2005 as they suited Obama politically as it all being a “fairy tale” and Michelle Obama turning that into racial overtones against Bill Clinton in say “what is it a fairy tale for a black man to become President”
We all know that it will be Michelle Obama answering the phone in the whitehouse at 3AM because Barack will be sleeping in the dog house for not being a good boy that day…..lol
Posted by: Clear Choice | March 7, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am
I am a devoted democrat, and I am really tired of many on the left who try to blame all the things they wish were different in the world on the Clintons.
Stop making the Clintons your scapegoat.
They accomplished tremendous good for this country – one of the most socio-economically prosperous times in our nation’s history.
They get criticized if they intervened in another countries fights and criticized if they didn’t.
Well, it’s easy to armchair politic.
But the truth is these are always incredibly complicated situations.
Rwanda was a mess with people running around with hatchets – it wasn’t considered safe for anyone.
What do you do when people are running around hatcheting each other up everywhere?
Go in with troops, and what?
Shoot them? No one would like that either.
You don’t want to bomb them either.
Tear gas them?
Then what else?
It all happened so fast – most of the media had to leave – in the moment it was so hard to figure out exactly what to do. As the US, we often get criticized no matter what we do.
It’s always easier to figure a better potential solution out later.
Overall, the Clintons did an excellent job and they were and still are, loved around the world.
Posted by: Lauren | March 7, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am
It seems that Mr. Obama surrounds himself with women who are rather disdainful of the electorate. (First time I am proud of my country……etc)
Why is it that the political leftist elite always imply that the rest of us are flawed? I’m sick of it.
Hillary has tenacity that doesn’t always flower gracefully, but I think her heart is in the right place.
I thank God, Ohioans understood that.
Posted by: Lynn | March 7, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am
You are all destroying the democratic party so I would have to guess you are ron paul’s supporters. Black people are misbehaving . They injected the race card to Bill Clinton check the facts. S. Powers need to apologize to the american people. Obama supporters really need the hope and change. he is right he needs to change you not us , there is nothing wrong with us
Posted by: applepie | March 7, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am
so he doesn’t fire her. typical! guess he’s just all talk. (oh, i forgot, we’ve always known he’s just all talk).
and she says the comments don’t reflect her actual feelings – yeah right!
Posted by: so saddened | March 7, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am
“So Saddened”, so you have met the enemy and they is us. Hey that’s right out of Pogo. I thought we discovered that we were the ones that we’ve been waiting for, but now it turns out we (in this blog) are not included in the chosen ones. Hey, this story doesn’t turn out where there are twelve of you guys and a last supper scheduled, does it?
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 7, 2008, 2:04 am 2:04 am
“So Saddened”, my apologies, I should have said “ApplePie”. Hey “ApplePie”, what I said!
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 7, 2008, 2:05 am 2:05 am
WestCoastMessenger, I am not sure what applepie was saying but I think it may have been the other way around from what you thought.
Posted by: Lauren | March 7, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am
Frist Rezko and now Powers. What unsavory friends Obama has. Are there more like these waiting to crawl out of the wood work? Can you see them running our country? God, I hope not.
Posted by: James | March 7, 2008, 2:14 am 2:14 am
Maybe you were right WestCoastMessenger.
All this you and us, it’s hard to tell.
Posted by: Lauren | March 7, 2008, 2:14 am 2:14 am
Obama spoke against such tactics in December. That was after several remarks against Hillary and Bill had occurred throughout the summer. One in particular where Michelle made a statement about Hillary not keeping her house in order. Sounds pretty personal.
Telling people that you intend to be above it all, does not automatically make people believe it, especially when one (Obama) is obviously lying.
Posted by: irma | March 7, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am
Yeah, Lauren, you are probably right, but the whole Ron Paul thing threw me way off, so just in case, I thought I’d throw a screwball. ApplePie is probably a very nice person. Hmmm, I think I’ll go get something to eat.
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 7, 2008, 2:17 am 2:17 am
Clinton IS now ROVE, the fear card? really? how insulting! we’re not frightened partisan sheep!
So the real question is, how much lower will she stoop? Fliers saying Obama is AlQueda?
Posted by: Hill4everNot | March 7, 2008, 2:35 am 2:35 am
Sam Lim: Hmmm. Samantha Power (Barack Obama’s foreign policy advisor) is using Hillary Clinton to sell a book. And what a better way to do it than to go overseas, conduct an interview which bashes Hillary, suffer possible job loss not to mention humiliation, and having to apologize to Senator Clinton and Senator Obama, and potentially lose him some voters. This book should sell millions. I’m sure most people will buy it. She should title it, Why My Opinion No Longer Matters?
Posted by: Diane | March 7, 2008, 2:38 am 2:38 am
Sam Lin Ms Powers will get few sales of her book in Ohio. Plus few Hillary supporters will line up for this book either. Not the best way to sell books is it Sam? Guess you can’t wait for your copy, right?
Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 7, 2008, 2:39 am 2:39 am
So Obama hasn’t fired her? What gives? Oh that’s right. Obama is a child WAY out of his depth and he’s also dishonest.
He pledged to fire anyone who behaves like Powers but he didn’t.
He pledged not to run campaign ads in Florida but he did.
This guy is David Axelrod’s lab project and has no core of his own. People who support him are very, very foolish.
Posted by: hammen | March 7, 2008, 2:49 am 2:49 am
Power spoke the truth, and more power to her for saying it. Maybe she shouldn’t had called her a monster but HRC is indeed ruthless and willing to do anything to win the nomination. Any discreet person can see that.
Posted by: Rialb58 | March 7, 2008, 2:51 am 2:51 am
Powel jus said what many democrats are thinking and are afraid to say
Posted by: leche | March 7, 2008, 2:56 am 2:56 am
This is just another example of Obama’s (and his campaign’s) hypocrisy. He says they are adhereing to a different standard, but this type of behavior shows that they are petty and negative. His words say one thing but his (and his surrogates’) actions say another. This type of attack is not even based on facts or substance. It’s simply name calling.
Posted by: EA | March 7, 2008, 3:06 am 3:06 am
No, Leche, only Obama supporters would say something like that. Yet, I do hope that all Obama supporters are not like you. I can just imagine if Hillary’s foreign policy expert came out with the gem about Obama. Can you say race card?
Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 7, 2008, 3:08 am 3:08 am
Give me a freakin’ break compared with all the outrageous statements that Clinton surrogates Wolfson and Penn have been making about Obama – on the record…this is a hill of beans. I can’t believe all the feign disingenuous indignation being displayed here by the HRC fan club.It’s so reminiscent of the candidate you’re supporting. This is precisely why a dream ticket will not work and if Hillary somehow miraculously ascend to the presidency it will be over a bitterly divided nation beyond repair.
Posted by: Rialb58 | March 7, 2008, 3:12 am 3:12 am
Rialb58 Ms Powers said this overseas to a foreign press. If you can sit there and support Ms Powers when you know McCain will be playing these remarks over and over during the general in Ohio more power to you. We’ve already given FL and MI to the republicans. Furthermore there will be no caucuses in the general, now Ohio will be leaning McCain as they will not forget this slight on their intelligence, and McCain is very strong with Latinos in California putting that state into play. Good luck winning.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 7, 2008, 3:18 am 3:18 am
Factsyoucantrust so is your anti-Clinton outburst meant to attract Hillary supporters to the Obama side should we lose? Or is it meant to further drive us from the Obama camp?
Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 7, 2008, 3:49 am 3:49 am
Ok…this is getting ridiculous. It’s unfortunate that Power’s moment of frankness was pounced on by the media and yes, she should have known better…but come on. Do you think the Clinton campaign has been any kinder? And Power’s slip of the tongue during an exhausting campaign doesn’t speak to her overall competency as a foreign policy advisor; last time I checked Pulitzer Prizes aren’t found in crackerjack boxes. While it’s regrettable that she didn’t zip it for the duration of the interview I can’t help but appreciate the unpolished, unprofessional candor of her remark. But then…I prefer folks who have feet of clay.
Posted by: natalie | March 7, 2008, 3:55 am 3:55 am
Human rights are ill-served by Samantha Power, a woman whose contempt for the working class people of Ohio is so evident.
Senator Obama chose Samantha Power as an adviser. Power expressed disdain about Ohio and hatred for Senator Clinton. I’m a union member and I voted for Senator Clinton because she understands the struggles of blue collar men and women.
She lives the life Eleanor Roosevelt talked about when the UNDHR was forged.
You, Samantha Power, should go back to Harvard where you write the words but never walk the walk.
Posted by: Ken | March 7, 2008, 4:21 am 4:21 am
how appalling ….. its no wonder that with advisers like her that he going about creating international diplomatic incidents (pakistan, canada) even before he is the nominee…
NO thanks to the ‘hope’ diplomacy we don’t need these retards going around the world representing our country…
Posted by: mita | March 7, 2008, 4:22 am 4:22 am
Mr Obama has painter a picture of him being a nice, sweet, religious man. But
Has run a negative campaign since he has started. He has misled the American people, and lied to the American people.
And he has ran on Woe is me.
The War: He condemns any one who voted for it. Putting down McCain and Clinton, Bush. Publicly.
77 Senators – vote Yes
Does he condemn them – Denounce them, Does he not want them in office??????
He does want their backing, votes and super delegate votes. hypocrite.
NAFTA- is he a liar and hypocrite.
He condemn anyone that was for it. told the American people he was against it.
Then comes back and says it was campaign rhetoric.
Liar and hypocrite – The nerve of you
telling the American people, you want to clean up politics, then lie to us.
You and your wife went through Ohio. Telling our youth, “Don’t go into corporate America” Work for the community. Be social workers. Be a nurse. Those are the careers that we need, and we’re encouraging our young people to do that.”
Say, What? Your kidding right? The Nerve of you………. How Dare You!
Only thing I can think, is you are planning for a socialist state. Why else would you try to steal someones dreams?
Probably the number one reason you lost in Ohio.
So many times you have said one thing, come back and said, I didn’t mean that.
or have been called out on it, and here you were playing the American people.
Over that past 20 years, I am sure you learned and were taught a lot. From crocked politicians in Illinois, Mr Rezko getting money from no where at all. Mr Ayers, Mr Farakan, Mr wright.
All working together but apart so you could all pretend to be, and have others
not see who you really are.
You won so many of Americans hearts with your Charade. I wonder how they will react knowing you lied, cheated and stole from them. I do pray it is soon.
If there is a monster, it is you Mr Obama
Posted by: seah | March 7, 2008, 4:57 am 4:57 am
Samantha got it right. There is no need for an apology for telling the truth. Fired? Heck no. Promoted.
Posted by: An Adult American Female | March 7, 2008, 5:18 am 5:18 am
What happen with the phone call to Canada? She will stop at nothing to win. The Clintons are the old guard. Do not dream, vote republican.
Posted by: Juan | March 7, 2008, 5:21 am 5:21 am
I was saying the same thing as many here now about Obama 2 MONTHS ago. It became very clear to me right away that the Obama lovers were 20 years old or outright RADICALS.
just like George Mc Govern did in 72. Same thing.
The base of the party (Clinton supporters) will leave and vote for mc Cain, just like they left Mc Govern and voted for Nixon in a huge landslide.
Posted by: tomdavie | March 7, 2008, 6:03 am 6:03 am
well Fox finally stated the TRUTH this morning….the Obama campaign, and Barack Obama, DID NOT, I repeat, DID NOT tell the lying canadians that bs about NAFTA. But of course the story is now small…and nothing about how it was actually deceitful hillary and her lying campaign people that did it. But I’m sure the hillary sheeple will still push the lies and distortions, anything for her to win.
All we hear about now is MI and FL. The same issue that has been on the back burner for the last two months, now has top billing….trying to figure out how they can bring hillary from behind, trying to make all this bs look fair.
The press keeps beating Obama up about Rezko, but nothing about Peter Paul, nothing about Norman Hsu, nothing about bill’s money connections to arabs, nothing about their tax returns.
But now hillary says Obama is Ken Starr….the same Ken Starr that impeached bill….why? because Obama asked for taxes?? He released his, why won’t hillary and bill release theirs?
Does it look like they have something to hide? Of course not. hillary and bill are the most honest politicians we have ever seen, right?!
So way to go to the stupid people in OH, for believing all the bs hillary spews. She is nothing but a deceitful, liar, that will do and say anything to get back into the white house.
Posted by: LA in Indiana | March 7, 2008, 6:49 am 6:49 am
The remarks of Samantha Power quoted above have nothing to do with “research” and therefore nothing to do with Obama’s comment about “research.”
Posted by: Eric Jaffa | March 7, 2008, 6:58 am 6:58 am
A BIG CLINTON (ABC) Network. Keep up the good work. Go Clinton, what a supporter we have in ABC. I almost feel they work for our campaign. Great job guys.
Clinton 08.
Posted by: Jim | March 7, 2008, 7:30 am 7:30 am
Oh, I see, if Barack Obama is not elected THEIR President of the US, then black voters will stomp their collective feet and stage a “Black Out” , or so they claim. OK, then if Senator Hillary Clinton is not elected President of the US can all WHITES stomp THEIR collective feet and state a “White Out”? That claim by blacks is exactly why we need Hillary in the White House. So much for Barack Obama being a “uniter”. UGG.
Posted by: PhillyPaul | March 7, 2008, 8:03 am 8:03 am
Well I guess vocabulary isn’t one of the required courses at the Carr centre of Harvard. I’m sure they ae very proud of this classy lady.
Wow.
Posted by: s.b. | March 7, 2008, 8:03 am 8:03 am
Listen to what former senator Bill Bradley had to say on NewsHour:
“I think Barack Obama has a much stronger chance of beating John McCain in the general election. I think Hillary is flawed in many ways, and particularly if you look at her husband’s unwillingness to release the names of the people who contributed to his presidential library.
And the reason that is important — you know, are there favors attached to $500,000 or $1 million contributions? And what do I mean by favors? I mean, pardons that are granted; investigations that are squelched; contracts that are awarded; regulations that are delayed.
These are important questions. The people deserve to know. And we deserve, as Democrats, to know before a nominee is selected, because we don’t want things to explode in a general election against John McCain.”
Posted by: Sara Hart | March 7, 2008, 8:04 am 8:04 am
WOW!
Samantha Powers for President!
Now there’s a strong, independent and REALLY intelligent lady!
Posted by: Jill Scott | March 7, 2008, 8:07 am 8:07 am
Fired? Not unless Clinton is fired by the American people for promoting the OTHER PARTY, namely John McCain, over the other Democrat who might win the presidency. That is incredible and unforgivable. Democrat superdelegates are going to leave her in droves over that calculated outrage.
Just out of curiosity I wonder if Clinton thinks Ken Starr is a monster. Someone should ask her that very question. Hillary may not be a b***h, but karma is.
Posted by: Wayne | March 7, 2008, 8:10 am 8:10 am
Obama is being impeached without being a president. hillary will all the skeletons she got have guts to try to come after obama, because she old faithful’s who are blind followers like the hispanics and her special interests.
If obama has lost 11 straight contests the whole world would have been on him to withdraw. for hillary on the other hand looks like the media and special interests are trying hard to portray her as a good candidate.
Posted by: mikail | March 7, 2008, 8:15 am 8:15 am
Obama and his team have broken their promise to usher in a new politics of hope. The entire premise of his campaign is that he has a unique capacity to move us beyond the divisiveness that has harmed our nation. With each passing day, he seems less up to the task. He needs to reconnect with his core message again. Step one would be to fire Samantha Power. This is really a new low.
Posted by: NJH | March 7, 2008, 8:21 am 8:21 am
FWIW I totally agreed with another sentiment Samantha Power, who btw is a great woman and a great writer, expressed on Hillary Clinton:
“You just look at her and think: ergh.”
Haha. That is SO true.
Samantha, thanks.
Posted by: Mariana McCloud | March 7, 2008, 8:21 am 8:21 am
Please note: Senator Obama immediately decried the comments. Samantha Power apologized. I hope Senator Clinton accepts their apologies.
I’m sure we’ve all lost our cool at some point. I’ll mention that Senator Clinton herself, in the last week or so, did just that, with her “Shame on you, Barack” tirade and then the sarcastic “heavens will open, celestial choirs”riff, all on national TV. I can tell you that everyone I talked with felt that warranted an apology; it was very disrespectful of Senator Obama, his supporters, and also of those who felt it mocked religion. Umm–she did not apologize that I’m aware of. I guess with the stress of campaigning, patience can fray.
Which is not to say that it’s okay for Power to call Clinton a monster, but, again, to me the apology sounded sincere.
Furthermore, yesterday Clinton’s communications director, Wolfson, compared Obama to Ken Starr, which is so unwarranted and is beyond the pale.
The Daily News reports: When asked whether she agreed with her spokesman likening Obama to Starr, Clinton replied, “Oh, I’m not going to respond to that.”
Hmmmm…..
Posted by: None-So-Blind | March 7, 2008, 8:27 am 8:27 am
Samantha Powers is not on Obama’s payroll. She took a year off from her job at Harvard to volunteer for Obama. So what does “firing” her mean?
She is a very smart woman who won a Pulitzer Prize for a book on the history of genocide. She has strong ethical principles–strong enough to realize when to step aside if it is hurting Obama’s campaign. Unlike several of Clinton’s advisors.
(Speaking of Monsters, take a look at Penn’s client list. Hillary is in good company).
Mary Refling
Posted by: Mary Refling | March 7, 2008, 8:28 am 8:28 am
What Obama supporters fail to realize, yet Republicans know, is that we HRC supporters are inured to anything negative you might say about her. We have heard it all before, and for years. Yet we still think she is the best choice for this country.
I think what causes you Obama supporters so much angst is that you really know nothing of import about Obama, and are scared to death of what is out there. You will not have to wait long, it will come!
And, by the way, Andrea Mitchell, confirmed again on MSNBC this morning, that Goolsbee was the person that contacted Canadian officials about Nafta, and said the Obama campaign assured her he was “chastised”!
Posted by: Mike | March 7, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am
The Washington Times is confirming that many, many Clinton supporters will crossover to McCain if Obama gets the nomination. and furthermore Obama does NOT attract Republican voters.
Posted by: geevill | March 7, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am
You can see how fanatical Most Obama supporters are, some are actually agreeing with her. It’s ok to call people “monsters” who don’t agree with Obama’s “idea” of change.
He obviously won’t fire her, even though it fits his criteria for that. He’ll talk his way through it somehow, afterall the Canada nafta employee is still with him.
Inexpereinced candidate, hiring inexperienced people, making silly comments and mistakes.
Posted by: Pat | March 7, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am
All my women friends hate Hillary. I, for a change, only dislike her though I’m starting to dislike her enormously. She doesn’t seem to do well with highly educated women, who happen to favor Obama.
Hillary seems to want to be like a man in her demeanor and politics, makes few concessions to the social demands of femininity, and yet seems to be only a partial feminist. She seems above us, exempting herself from compromises women have to make every day, while, at the same time, leaving some of the basic tenets of feminism in the dust. We are sold out on both counts. In other words, she seems like patriarchy in sheep’s clothing.
Clearly, Hillary and her advisors have calculated that for a woman to be elected in this country, she’s got to come across as just as tough as the guys. And maybe they’re right. But so far, Hillary is not getting men with this strategy, and women feel written off. After the dark ages of this pugnacious administration, many of us want to let the light in. We want a break with the past, optimism, and a recommitment to the government caring about and serving the needs of everyday people. We want what feminism began to fight for 40 years ago—humanizing deeply patriarchal institutions. And, ironically, we see candidates like John Edwards or Barack Obama —men— offering just that. If Hillary Clinton wants to be the first female president, then maybe, just maybe, she should actually run as a woman.
I guess it’s too late for that now.
Posted by: Joana Linton | March 7, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am
Once Obama is the nominee, I think many Clinton supporters will realize whats at stake. “I will crossover to McCain if Obama is the nominee”, I beg to disagree. I know it hurts, not everyone can get what they want, but I believe once Hillary supporters get over it, they’ll vote Democrat.
Posted by: Vanessa | March 7, 2008, 8:54 am 8:54 am
From the Washington Times
This doesnt even poll how many women would vote McCain over Obama, and 1-2% switch in women gives the white house to the Republicans.
“There are now more McCainocrats than Obamacans — about 14 percent of Democrats say they would vote for Mr. McCain today instead of Mr. Obama, but just 8 percent of Republicans say they would vote for the Illinois Democrat, according to a Pew Research Center survey on Feb. 28.
Additionally, 20 percent of white Democratic voters say they would defect to Mr. McCain if Mr. Obama is the Democratic Party’s nominee — twice the number who would cross over if Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton wins the nomination, Pew found.
Posted by: s.b. | March 7, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am
I agree with Samantha Power’s comments – before the apology!
She told the truth that many of us are thinking about Hillary. And you just wait until Rush Limbaugh gets started on Hillary if she’s the nominee.
Posted by: Janine | March 7, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am
Nice foreign policy move.
Posted by: Vnd | March 7, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am
s.b. can i get a link. the story is not credictable with no link. Furthermore, a recent poll show Obama beating McCain by 12%. Clinton would win by 6%. I THINK THE CHOICE HERE IS CLEAN.
Posted by: Vanessa | March 7, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am
btw the Washington Times being quoted here has stats that somehow disagree with every other poll.
Obama outpolls McCain and Hillary in poll after poll. Look at all the polls, not just one.
Posted by: Janine | March 7, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am
The Washington Post contributor seems to forget the decisive factor in the general elections: turnout numbers. Just see what happened in the primaries. NO WAY John McCain will be able to beat Obama, as many Republicans themselves have already acknowledged.
Their ONLY chance would be Hillary Clinton as the nominee, who is disliked vehemently by almost 50% of all Americans. That’s why conservative folks like Limbaugh and Coulter propose to vote for Hillary in the primaries.
Obama MUST be our nominee if we want the Democrats to take over the White House in 2008.
Posted by: Brent Wood | March 7, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am
How we as Americans fail to realize that Ms. Clinton has not shown lady like behavior. I mean that has nothing to do with being a politician? Her body language is awful, tears, rage, phony.
The Clinton campaign wants down and dirty politics and I think down and dirty come with character and I see her character as being down and dirty. Now print this!
When Senator Obama won she only congrats him for winning a day late and a dollar short. She was unfair to the people who voted for in South Carolina, left and a did a rally in Tenn. She can dish it, but she can’t take it.
Check out the real NAFTA information and you will find out that the Clinton Campaign did the exact same thing. But I guess the Media goes with who gets the info out and that is not fair game. The truth should prevail for both campaigns.
The Ken Starr came out before the Monster and the Media doesn’t have any
good news so this will be played all day and frankly they will play into the Monster.
Posted by: JBBaker | March 7, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am
From Joanna Linton,s Comment: ” She(HRC) doesn’t seem to do well with highly educated women, who happen to favor Obama.”
That seems like a perfectly honest and true statement. I assume she doesn,t actually “do well” with anyone that favors Obama!
However, she certainly does very well with highly educated, and quite accomplished, high achieving women like my wife and her large circle of friends and contacts who happen to admire her, and consider her one of their own.
Posted by: Michael | March 7, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am
I guess that is How Obama will become “strong”. LOL.
Posted by: nosense03 | March 7, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am
You’re seeing the “Obama administration” in sneak preview here. A bunch of free-lancers set loose on the world stage. Goolsbee, Rice, Power. Totally inept.
Posted by: Marie | March 7, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am
Oh yeah that survey was taken before Obama’s numbers took a nose dive. They would be worse than that today.
Posted by: s.b. | March 7, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am
I find it ironic that after Obama lost 3/5 (including Texas caucas which he is winning and is predicted to win therefore winning the most delegates in Texas) that rather then Clinton gaining momentum, she’s still below. OBAMA HAS GAINED 9 SUPERDELEGATES SINCE MARCH 4. HE WILL WIN THE CAUCAS AND THEREFORE GAIN MORE DELEGATES.
In conclusion, Obama has a more delegates difference then he had entering march 4
Posted by: Vanessa | March 7, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am
I find it ironic that after Obama lost 3/5 (including Texas caucas which he is winning and is predicted to win therefore winning the most delegates in Texas) that rather then Clinton gaining momentum, she’s still below. OBAMA HAS GAINED 9 SUPERDELEGATES SINCE MARCH 4. HE WILL WIN THE CAUCAS AND THEREFORE GAIN MORE DELEGATES.
In conclusion, Obama has a more delegates difference then he had entering march 4
Posted by: Vanessa | March 7, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am
“Dr. Paul”, with all due respect, I am old enough, erudite, and sophisticated enough not to need hope and inspiration from any candidate, male or female.
I do not feel this country needs a “hoper”, I feel we need “doer”.
If I want to be “moved”, I put on some good music and dance. As for inspiration and hope, I get that from GOD each and everyday.
Posted by: Mike | March 7, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am
Again, the incident proved that preaching is not same as practicing and that’s why Hillary says we need “Action” instead of “Words”.
Samantha Power, the executive director and founder of the Carr Center for Human Rights Policy at Harvard forgot one of the Human Rights Policy:”Promote greater respect for human rights, including freedom from torture, freedom of expression, press freedom, women’s rights, children’s rights, and the protection of minorities;”
Samantha Power, Practice what you Preach. Don’t just sell books. Connecting the voters is a rich real experience that Hillary has for over 35 years than you writing the book in the closed door.
Posted by: Humm | March 7, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am
My apology for the double post. Errant fingers!
Posted by: Mike | March 7, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am
Why are the links to the washinton times story being removed? Is that against your posting policy?
Posted by: s.b. | March 7, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am
Vanessa : so you understand now why Obama will lose in November, don’t you? If not, then rethink what Obama has been winning, red states like Alaska, caucus even he certainly lost in primaries, will the general election count in the caucus results? maybe Obama’s supporters can submit a law suit to get them counted. LOL.
Posted by: nosense03 | March 7, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am
Economist : hmm, another person from the chicago inner circle… whatelse can we say?
Posted by: df | March 7, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am
Miss Power was very nieve to think
she could denigrate Senator Clinton
to the media over here.
President Clinton, Senator Clinton,
are highly respected this side of the
Athlantic Ocean,Due to the efforts of
President Clinton and John Mitchell the
North of Ireland.has a peace agreement
after 30yrs of terrorism.
In answer to Obama’s question on
Hillary’s foreign policy experience,
she may not have signed any treaties
but she did receive 8yr’s on the job
training which is more than Obama .
Europe for HILLARY AS PRESIDENT.
Posted by: dee | March 7, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am
Economist Humm. Thay guy with glassess who play with numbers in the closed door and draws some broken cricle, rectangles and crooked lines.
(sipping beer) He punched in some number and riffed my bros man.
Posted by: Humm | March 7, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am
Head of the Human Rights Center at Harvard and top Obama staffer and she calls Hillary “a monster”. But yet he’ll met with foreign dictators and tyrants upon assuming the presidency! Three major Obama staffers, three major snafus within a week or two — this guy surrounds himself with folks even more inexperienced and naive than himself!
Posted by: hopesprings52 | March 7, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am
We’ve gone from “CHANGE we can believe in” to “HATRED we can live without”. Senator Obama has lost my vote.
Posted by: Anthony | March 7, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am
Nothing this woman said about Clinton isn’t true. Ohio was stuffed full of simple-minded voters who were easily fooled by the Clinton Machine. It’s too bad this woman had to backpedal on her comments.
Posted by: Chris | March 7, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am
dee, you must know all too well – if you’re really European – how excited Europeans are about the prospect of Barack Obama being the next President of the United States. The press, in the US as well, has covered that strong and dominating sentiment extensively.
The only reservation Europe has towards an Obama presidency is that they foresee that the US under Obama will become stronger than it has ever been since the aftermath of WW II. As Der Spiegel wrote: “With Obama the USA will again rule the world in every respect.”
I suppose though that many Americans would welcome enjoy that regained power.
Posted by: European | March 7, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am
Chris : fooled, not sure which one might be living in a dreaming land thus so easily being fooled — a person who needs to work hard to support his/her family and knows the reality of life, or a college student who partying, drinking, and …
Posted by: 35yearsold | March 7, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am
As a resident of Ohio, I am very offended by the arrogance of Obama’s campaign people. My parents were working class people who were honest and very proud to be Americans. They struggled to put three children through college. Yes- there are actually college educated people living in Ohio and many of us see through Obama. That’s why he lost in Ohio. Wake-up Obama and at least act like you are not so superior to the working class people that you are pretending to care about.
Obama needs to fire a foreign policy advisor that would portray the citizens of Ohio as just poor people who cannot think for themselves. What kind of foreign policy advisor goes to foreign countries and talks condescendingly about their own citizens? Talk about lack of judgement and inexperience…so much for “hope and change”. I guess if Obama wins the nomination we will have to “hope” that he and his staff can “change”.
Posted by: ST | March 7, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am
OBAMA is the most divisive. DON’T BE FOOLED. States are complaining about the arrogance of members of CAMP OBAMA. WELL, where do you think they get it? He is the most arrogant person himself.
When is the media going to stop selling or should I say pimping him???
Posted by: maria | March 7, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am
Obama shows very poor judgment in whom he surrounds himself with- which would be very critical if he were ever president in all of the appointments he would be required to fill. Plus he has stated that he would be a delegating type of president which makes his poor judgment in people he surrounds himself with very worrisome to this country.
Posted by: enoughnamecalling | March 7, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am
Yes, she should be fired, but Obama does not have the strength of character to do that. He demonstrates a lot of Bush characteristics- sticking with people that are bad news and demonstrating very poor judgment in the people he surrounds himself with – from friends, to pastor, to staff. As president Obama would be required to appoint several people to very key positions affecting millions of people. Obama’s poor judgment of character makes this responsibility of appointments very very worrisome.
Posted by: newday | March 7, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am
Can we please be grown ups here? This is presidential politics — Hillary has spent the whole week promoting John McCain’s candidacy above Barack’s; 17 months into the campaign Hillary has not disclosed her tax returns but has put $5 million into her own campaign without telling anyone where she got it; her team wants the DNC to change the rules and give her uncontested votes in Michigan AND with her campaign’s back against the wall she puts an ad on the air that Karl Rove would be proud of -so other than a reflection of the frustration Obama supporters feel about the do-anything-to-win tactics that it’s pretty obvious the HRC campaign is predicated on, what’s the problem with the comment and why is this news? We got serious, grown up problems in the world people – let’s have an election about them.
Posted by: marc | March 7, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
“Off the record” was a foolish mistake with media that looks to pounce on the next “gotcha!” moment. What a non-event. Nice diversion from the issues, though. “Monster”…oooooo…not even worth a mention.
Posted by: MidwestIowa | March 7, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
HAHAHAHAHA Salutations to Samantha Powers. It refreshing to hear someone speak the truth. I am a sorry to hear she apologized for her timely and much need to be said statement. Hillary never says sorry she attacks with out remorse. This woman is a political sociopath whos ethics are more like Joseph Stalin than Karl Rove. She will totally destroy Senator Obama’s career to get this nomination. All is fair we will change rules, lie, slander, stage damaging events aka nafta canada gate. Obama needs to realize he is in a political civil war not just for the nomination but for his political future. Its good BO is fighting back but be warned, dont hit soft and dont bring a knife to this gun fight.
Posted by: Barbarian | March 7, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am
Joana Linton: I appreciate your concerns about Hillary. Hillary hasn’t made those concessions that some women keep hoping she will make to meet their expectations of the perfect feminist. That she is tougher that some women like seems to threaten their femininity, i.e. if she is tough and aggressive, she seems to act “like a man”. This assumes that only men can be or should be tough or aggressive and that if a woman is tough and aggressive, they don’t get to be in the “true feminist” club. As a result of this imperfection, these same women, then ironically, choose a “man” rather that her.
We want the same things “what feminism began to fight for 40 years ago—humanizing deeply patriarchal institutions.” Obama was a child then and Hillary a young woman entering the fight for rights. It is sad to me that in this pivotal moment when a strong woman emerges, who stood for these same ideals long before it was popular and who has fought for them long before many took any forward steps and who is a person who truly understands theses issues, is dismissed by other women, because she fails that one last test of perfection, “playing nice” like little girls should.
Do you really believe that these men even begin to understand and that they would in any way admit that the patriarchy exists and that it should be repaired at best and ideally dismantled? John Edward’s unthinking remark about Hillary’s jacket, does he get it, really? Obama’s lack of battle scars on any women’s issues and any real substantive issue, not in simple tests passed by most, but hard long battles that aren’t always won but are realized by many to be but one battle lost in a long protracted war against the evil of misogyny that denies equality for one gender. When I see the misogyny spewed on these boards and hear the hate spewed from “wanna be” news organizations as they assail Hillary attempting to silence her voice and ours, I remain amazed at the women who look for a “more perfect woman”.
I hear that you really believe that Obama and Edwards are the bearer of that perfect or acceptable light for which you are searching. I have to say that no man has ever spoken for me and he will never understand the fight necessary to accomplish what is necessary in this world to end misogyny and bring dignity and equality to all women and thus, all people. The philosophical musings about Hillary’s imperfections will take place at Starbucks and in the feminist thoughtful circles for those who have the time and luxury to shop for a better woman. That woman will apparently be able to take on the issues that men define, in an arena that men define, with the rules defined by men, while exhibiting the perfect feminist methodology. I personally don’t see Obama being that perfect feminist.
My light shines on Hillary. I trust her experience and knowledge to lead the country in the right direction. I and many in the underclass obviously hear her message and it resonates with us. For us, it’s about finally having a true fearless warrior who understands the evil in this patriarchy and whose past battle scars attest to her strength and her tenaciousness which is essential for success in the necessary battles involved in the political arena. And, yes, it’s ok with us if she isn’t perfect and if she is tough as it takes to get the job done.
In my world, all of these characteristics are necessary for the next President of this country. Hillary put it best “It will be a ‘sea change’ if a woman is elected”. A lot us are going to catch that wave.
Posted by: AmazonTraveler | March 7, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am
Looks to me like Mr. Hope’s, “come together and sing Kumbaya, I’m going to change how things are done in Washington, I’m going to stop all the bickering and infighting” is nothing but a facade. Who knew? I DID! The man is as fake as a 3 dollar bill and as corrupt as any good Chicago Machine Politician. Obama needs to be thoroughly exposed so we can just move on with our candidate, Hillary, and win the November election. Enough with his bogus “feel good” pep rallies. Now we all know who he really is and it’s NOT “a different kind of politician.”
Posted by: Vickie | March 7, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am
Obama and his supporters routinely insult people who simply vote for another candidate. They have run the most degrading campaign I have seen in my life.
Posted by: bryan Shuy | March 7, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am
If you have a cult mentality, those who question you are out of order and those who stand in your way are “monsters”. The whole attitude of the Obama campaign has been “Shame on you” for asking me to answer that question — whether it be the lack of experience, the 130 present votes etc. Bush was able to sidestep accountability — we can’t afford another president who thinks himself above accountability!
Posted by: hopesprings52 | March 7, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am
This doesn’t require any spin as the past has already proven something in Obama’s words!
W.hat O.bama R.eally M.eans is not going to fly anymore!
There is a truth to the meaning of certain words and statements that have held the test of time and this is one of those times something holds true!
Your true being is shown by those whom you surround yourself with!
As Obama’s past record of silencing his opponents to fast track his political career even became evident during this campaign by Obama injecting the most deadly of poison to silence a critic by having Michelle inject the racial issue towards former President Clinton calling Obama out on his “fairy tale” stance of the Iraq war we now have many actions to judge the type of person Obama really is!
Obama talks a good talk, but his delivery upon it has proven to be nothing more than that of a con man!
Fool me once, shame on you-GWB in 2000
Fool me twice, shame on me-GWB in 2004
there is no fool me a third time, because that would mean Obama as the nominee, and that isn’t going to happen!
Posted by: Clear Choice | March 7, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
Looks like Obama’s theory about losing is to call you opponent names but the strange thing is that they have decided to bash the people who did not vote for them. I am not convinced that this is a wining strategy. Mr. Obama said that he would fire anyone who trashed his opponent personally. Well we are waiting. I will not be holding my breath for his promises are like sticks easily broken. Ms. Power seems to insinuate that the poor white people of Ohio had the wool pulled over their eyes and that’s why Obama lost. I think that it is the reverse. The people of Ohio saw Obama for what he was not the new kind of politician but just another politician that would say anything to get elected. The people of Ohio and Texas refused to get taken in by a con artist. According to the Obama campaign they do not need Ohio and PA to win I quests that they forgot to ask John Kerry what he thinks. I for one am glad that the campaign is going on with just a little pressure Mr. Obama seems to be imploding. Mr. Obama we are waiting!
Posted by: russell | March 7, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
How can you fire someone who is not on your payroll? She’s a volunteer adviser. Maybe Obama won’t take her advice anymore – at least not her advice on catchy nicknames for opponents.
Posted by: KayTee | March 7, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am
Power is right. No need to apologise. Just observe the “pretentiousness” of Clintons in this race.
Posted by: Basil | March 7, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am
Samantha Power’s comments are a disgrace!! Her entire “off the record” conversation is unprofessional and extremely inappropriate, particularly since she was talking to a foreign journalist. She should offer her resignation and Obama should accept it.
I live in NJ and PA is nearby, I will make it my goal to go campaign for Hillary in PA as hard as I did in NJ.
The so called “uneducated” people (code word for working class) are the backbone of the Democratic party, not the college students and the upwardly mobile. Power should be advising the Republicans.
Pennsylvania, remember this woman’s words on April 22!!!!!!
Posted by: Bea | March 7, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
Obama is trying to get the nomination via caucuses and superdelates and by passing the actual citizen voters who have overwhelmingly supported Hillary Clinton. We have seen the contempt his supporters show for anyone who is not aboard the Obama cult.
Posted by: geevill | March 7, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
To Vanessa:
Think again. I will not “cross over” to vote for Senator Obama. I am a registered independent voter; and I will vote for McCain before I vote for Barack. Barac is a nice guy, but too inexperienced, AND, I really, truly do not like the character of his supporters in general, as well as his “key advisors”, such as the “senior foreign policy advisor” indentified in this article. No Madeline Albright is she. She sounds more like a petulant child. How insultint! I cannot believe she would make the stupid comment she made about Senator Clinton, and to an overseas publication no less. Obviously the author of the piece was not impressed by his subject.
Posted by: Ms. Smith | March 7, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
At least someone has the audacity to point out the obvious, since media is afraid of stepping on Clinton toes.
Posted by: Daniel | March 7, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am
Vanessa….I agree with you…I am a 54 year old man…an Independent and former Edwards supporter….Hillary has driven me to support Obama because of her cold, calculating, purely political approach to this campaign and her arrogance. If she is nominated she will drive me to support McCain as well..
Posted by: John | March 7, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am
Looks like all the Obama supporters don’t beleive their canidate either. They keep saying that she does not have or should apologize for her remarks. It is their canidate who set the standards for his campaign now he and his deciples say that it is ok to ignore his promises. Looks like man over principle. Audatious but not very hopeful.
Thanks from the Hillary campaign the donation meter is going faster than Rezko fleeing U.S. marshalls. We could not have asked for a better fund raiser!
Posted by: russell | March 7, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am
dee..If Hillary is so let popular in then she should run for president of Ireland. She is not popular here other than core Democrats. She will not win over moderate Republicans or Independents like myself, particurly in the South or Midwest. John McCain will. As much as I dread another Republican in office I would view it as the lesser of the two evils.
Posted by: John | March 7, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am
I believe Obama’s team should follow the rules set by Clinton in this campaign….That is, have your followers be as negative of your opponent as can be, disavow responsibility for you followers, and never apologize. Clinton wanted this type of fight so give it to her.
Posted by: John | March 7, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am
I think that the manner in which Hillary has conducted herself has been wildly inconsistent, and patently NOT her own woman, being maneuvered in a million different directions by schizophrenic campaign strategists. What has been revealed in recent weeks has been a petulant child – and to have back-to-back petulant children for president is a disastrous choice for the country.
Kudos to Senator Obama who is still doing his best to introduce civil discourse into American politics. As for Ms. Powers, I think it’s perfectly possible to respect someone’s past record and yet call them on current behavior.
Posted by: Jan | March 7, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am
oh, and by the way, y’all hillary sheeple worried about Rezko?
you might want to google Peter Paul
lolololol
just stupid
lololololol
Posted by: LA in Indiana | March 7, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am
In response to an earlier comment-
Foreign policy IS a “Grown-up” issue. Yes, let’s hope that Obama’s foreign policy advisor does grow-up.
Posted by: ST | March 7, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am
Actually, I’d love it if Clinton and Obama would discuss the actual issues, but Clinton isn’t able to win on issues.
She can say “Oh Obama selling our country out to NAFTA”, when now it looks like it was actually Clinton’s camp that said it. That WOULD have been a negative on Obama, and it would make me pause – but now it seems that CLINTON is the one who said it. Maybe all her ties to foreign leaders gives her experience schmoozing with our allies, than some neophyte from Chicago.
Her staff send out pictures of Obama “dressed like a muslim”, in order to imply he might blow us all up. That’s just like the slam at McCain about his Indian daughter. Same damn playbook.
She and her husband imply that black people in South Carolina vote for black “extremists” like Jackson, knowing that we white folk were going to remember Jackson’s H-town comment, and somehow think Obama is the same kind of person. That’s someone who knows how to balance her allegiances, and keep community lines open. Oh yeah.
But maybe Monster isn’t the right word. Cookie Monster is charming, for example.
Maybe we should just stick with fear-mongering bigot. At least the facts support that.
I’m an independent, owe allegiance to no party – and I will vote for McCain if she somehow manages to turn the democrats into muslim-hating quivering sheep. They’re probably the same people who secretly voted for Bush the last 8 years.
You can’t control a brave people, that’s why they try to use fear on you. That’s how Bush won the election, and apparently Hillary’s on the same game. So please America – keep the powermad out of office. Vote McCain, Vote Obama, or even that fruitbat Ralph Nader. But keep the Clinton Hate Machine out of office.
Posted by: Hillarasaurus Rex | March 7, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am
hey russell, you might as well say hello to President McCain for that matter because after bill’s arab connections come to light, and the news reporters finally report truthful on the NAFTA/hillarygate issue, and oh yeah, Peter Paul….can’t forget about him, right?!
So you hillary sheeple keep dreaming. Y’all should have known better to stand behind another clinton, knowing full well that karl rove is standing out in the hallway
lololololol
Posted by: LA in Indiana | March 7, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am
AmazonTraveler….nice post except….Hillary’s problem is that for, better of worse really do not like her. I am someone who has come to dislike her only recently. It is based on the way she has conducted this campaign. She has shown her true nature of being nothing more than a political animal and reminiscent of the same people who control the White House today. That is her problem…If she is nominated Democrats will have missed an opportunity and made a very big mistake.
Posted by: John | March 7, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am
John, please go vote for John McCain, ad yourself to all the others who voted for Obama in primary’s and have since jumped ship to the Republicans!
The candidate of change is proven to be the swindler of words, from stating no lobbyist money taken in, well directly anyhow, it is all bundled for him Chicago style!
The candidate of change who has eliminated prior opponents by dirty Chicago political tactics!
The candidate of change who sends out negative flyers continually that have been proven false and when a truthful flyer appears on him, he crys foul!
The candidate of change who won’t release who contributed to his bundled money!
The candidate of change who has won only 2 Primarys because he cannot stack and use strong arm tactics when people can vote, but controls the caucus’s by intimidation!
The candidate of change who takes on Chairs of commitees to pad his resume, yet doesn’t hold a single meeting proves he is a W.O.R.M.
W.hat O.bama R.eally M.eans
empty chair + empty suit + empty words = Obama
Posted by: Clear Choice | March 7, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am
I have a great idea for a music video lol. We need to get some of Hillary’s clips where she is doing her “Bride of Chucky” poses and set it to the song by, The Automatic called “Monster”. The Lyrics are perfectly made for this ROFLOL.
Posted by: Barbarian | March 7, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am
Great speech AmazonTraveler!! I agree 100%
Posted by: toby | March 7, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am
well, it’s politics as usual for Obama. Saying one thing and then not doing what he says. He is change I certainly can’t believe in. If he ends up being the nominee, which I doubt, it will be a landslide for McCain. Hillary’s supporters will go in droves to vote for the one who is more qualified. And that is definitely not Obama.
Posted by: newsworthy | March 7, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am
She can’t win. But she can ensure that Obama is so bloodied, to use Rush Limbaugh’s description of the Clinton strategy, that Obama is damaged goods come the fall. After all, if Hillary can’t get the nomination, then nobody should.
Posted by: val | March 7, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am
Does ‘SEA HAG’ count as a monster? Because I see her as sort of a ‘SEA HAG’ but I really don’t put that into the ‘Monster’ category.
Hmmm… I could be wrong.
Posted by: PulSamsara | March 7, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am
Clear Choice….from your post I cannot tell if you are a Hillary supporter seriously stating that you don’t care about Independent voters or you are a McCain supporter who would welcome me. Based on your Obama rant I suspect you support Hillary. Let me just say that Clinton will not win the election without attracting moderate Republicans and Independents like myself in Southern and Midwestern states. Take a look at the red/blue state maps of the last two elections and that is exactly how it will play out in the next election if Hillary is nominated.
Posted by: John | March 7, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am
So when is this Obama aide going to be fired?” OH YEAH! that’s right, Obama doesn’t fire anyone who fouls on his team, just like Bush!! Hillary has held every last one of her aides accountable for this kind of thing, Obama has shown every time on the other hand what he would do as President, protect his cronies and never fire them and hold them accountable!! just like Bush does!! Voting for Barrack Obama is a HUGE mistake! Hillary Clinton has the integrity to lead honestly and fairly as this one of many examples once again proves.
Posted by: Hillary All the Way!!!! | March 7, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am
Well, well, well, looky what we have here: politics as usual?! Say one thing, do another. Lead by example? You are only as good as your advisors. Ever hear of “top down” management? Obviously the Obama team is talking out of both sides of their mouths and if we listen closely, the deafening sound of hypocrisy is obvious. Transparent government? Only what I want you to see. Give me a break! Obama you have some explaining to do on a number of issues, not the least of which is why you can’t control your own staff. The “we have run out of time”, or “I was busy” or “that was a boneheaded move” doesn’t cut it! Not with the press and not with the American people. If you are going to run for President on the platform of “change you can believe in” or “new politics”, then you’d better do it. Actions do speak louder than words.
Go Hillary! A proven, tested, vetted leader ready to go to work for us on day one!
Posted by: Sunny Ohio | March 7, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am
No- Referring to Samantha Power as she has been defined as one of Obama’s foreign policy advisers. That is what this thread is about- her hateful comments about the people of Ohio and Senator Clinton- or did you not have time to read it? It must be tough being a paid blogger of Obama’s and spewing so much hatred. Hope and Change- hope and change -hope and change- what a joke.
Posted by: ST | March 7, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Disclosure: I am a Hillary supporter. I also find Obama interesting, but not ready for prime time. I like what’s going on in our Party right now. People are starting to think critically about the candidates. Until Ohio, (not counting NY), the Democratic rank and file weren’t showing up in enough numbers to offset the newbies: made up mostly of young people, most likely college students (where Obama has built enormously on what Dean and MoveOn started 4 years ago), and independents. The rank and file, mostly hard working folks with families, and a lot of young women who don’t have the baggage “feminism” seems to evoke in so many,have been outnumbered in the primaries, mostly in cauceses. The suffrage movement was a civil rights movement,giving women the right to vote, to have a voice, and the feminism that evolved from the 1960′s, just as my generation of young women went off into the world of college, jobs, activism, marriage,children, careers, was continulally advocated just by virtue of the choices we were making: the right of women to have equal opportunity in education and equal pay for equal work. Obama documents his journey in his books and his story is also compelling and his purposeful life is to be commended. Let’s just all pay attention and participate, and let the contest proceed. We need to get back the White House; over the next few months, we will see our 2 contenders continue to battle it out, and millions of more votes will be cast in States that have not spoken yet. I may be convinced, but I’m not the voter in Mississipi or the voter in Forida or Michigan, either. If Obama is smart, he’ll stop trying to wring superdelegate votes and whining about delegate counts, and enter the arena. He can wash his hands afterwards, which the last few weeks have shown he is perfectly capable of. Politics is a rough game, so is the presidency.
Posted by: Thinking Working Mom | March 7, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
This lady just stepped down,now the jerk that cslled Qbama Ken Starr is he stepping down did he say he was sorry NO>>> NO>>>> two different sets of rules you Clintons make me sick and if she is on the ballot we WILL have another republican in the White House.
Posted by: honest | March 7, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
John I am a Democrat, and I certainly do not hold to the belief or threats made by supposed Independants who are:
Non-commital to anything!
Use threat tactics to move their agenda along!
Disguise themselves as such an run back to the Republican Party anyhow come election time!
I also do not care if the candidate is white, black, red, green or yellow, what I care about is what the candidates say, their records of achieving what they say and their performances which provides their experience to hold a certain office!
This being the office of the President, there is no way on earth I would support someone who:
claims to attract Independants and Republicans when his record on elections shows otherwise!
claims to be a uniter, yet he did nothing his first 6 yrs as a State Senator and only did things or had his name added to Bills for appearance sake his final year before going after a US Senate seat!
claims to be one thing, yet his actions prove he is not!
claims to be transparent, yet has to have teeth pulled before providing more! Even Alexrod stated they will decide in time if they will release more documents on the Rezko and the house dealings, that transparency!
Stump speeches followed by inaction on a persons part simply says words are empty!
Clinton never stumped on transparency, Obama did, yet he hides and throws accusations towards his opponents as to his values on the stump, sorry don’t fly in do as I say and not as I do!
There is no way I will join the movement like that when as every cult in history has proven that the Cult leader is no messiah, only a self serving profiteer!
Posted by: Clear Choice | March 7, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
Which, as Tina Fey so well explained: they get things done.
Posted by: Thinking Working Mom | March 7, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
Power spoke the truth, and more power to her for saying it. Maybe she shouldn’t had called her a monster but HRC is indeed ruthless and willing to do anything to win the nomination. Any discreet person can see that.
Posted by: Rialb58
Rialb58, you saying that isn’t so about Obama? Injecting the race card in the campaign, the deadliest of political sins in America via his wife towards Bill Clinton telling the truth on Obama’s Iraq war stances (plural, not that one speech, but all actions since)and his campaign by the leaked memo on how to turn Hillary’s MLK statement into a racial remark just before SC?
Those grounds alone show just how low Obama will go, from stacking caucus’s and using strong arm techniques in them to lossing every major state where the people vote as they should!
Sorry, I listen to what candidates say and Obama clearly stated in 2004 that he has no EXPERIENCE what so ever to run for President and he has since proven he hasn’t! My how a persons own words come to haunt them huh!
Posted by: Clear Choice | March 7, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
If I say that the sky is blue, should I be required to quit my job?
Posted by: Thank God for Karma | March 7, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
Oh it is a well manipulated and orchestrated ploy by the Obama campaign. She is going to be forced to resign just to prove the point that Obama doesn’t tolerate negative campaigning. It’s all too familiar but I am sure it will get all the attention it deserves, more publicity for Obama’s camp.
Posted by: mona | March 7, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
Thinking Working Mom: Thanks for the most honest statement I’ve seen on this board, especially the opening “Full Disclosure. ” Do we get the same from the National Correspondent? His posts are running at least 12-1 pro-McCain and we still haven’t seen a single piece on a) McCain and the fawning press (and I’m not talking about Obama, I’m talking about Sedona); McCain’s reversal on torture; McCain’s flip-flops on the Iraq war (100 years, 50 years, a few years, or real soon), or the realistic costs of any of the McCain proposals. What would the press response have been if Obama sang “Bomb, bomb, bomb Iran in repsonse to a foreign policy question? This week, one of McCain’s foreign policy advisors stated that the December intelligence report on Iran (probably the most comprehensive intelligence piece in recent history) was “sketchy”.
Yes, it was a dumb political move for an Obama staff member to mouth off. But does that compare to a presidential candidate singing “Bomb, bomb, bomb Iran” in response to a foreign policy question?” It would be a disasterous foreign policy move to engage in yet another war in the middle east by attacking Iran. Which is more important? A dumb off-the-record statement by Samantha Powers, or another war? Do you want to send your kid to fight in Iran?
There are endless things to admire and like about McCain. But that doesn’t mean that he deserves a free ride to the White House – and that’s what the MSM is giving him.
Posted by: Mara | March 7, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Oh…Please I confuse now…
The slogan has gone : Hope and Change.
Should I take my vote back?
I told you so…
Posted by: crisis08 | March 7, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
But she is a monster! Hiderbeast; the most terrifying ‘women’ on gods green earth. Just listen to that hideous cackle, it bloody gives me nightmares it does.
When I see on her on the old TV box it almost makes me wish I lived in some Muslim country, somewhere like Iran. At least then they would make her put a towel over her head.
In fact that’s a great idea! Barack Hussein Obama for president!
Posted by: Daniel | March 7, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
I read these comments and wonder who in the world the Obama supporters are trying to “win over” with their childish tirades. Certainly not any HRC supporters (about 13 million so far). I have stated before that we have heard such rants for years and still think she is the best choice.
Possibly, the rants are merely to appease their own frustration over the fact that their candidate has ceased “to progress” and now is regressing. Don’t give up the hope! Hope and about 5 dollars will buy you a gallon of milk.
Posted by: Mike | March 7, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
I don’t care if Ms. Power is fired or resigns or stays on the Obama campaign, but her comment is instructive; she could hardly blurt out that kind of language if the idea was not current in her milieu, although she may have been naive enough to think, momentarily, it was OK to say it in public. The monster concept, if not the word, is built into Obama’s speeches, his supporters’ screeds on the internet, and the hostile media coverage of the campaign: An ambitious woman who refuses to step gracefully aside when Prince Charming appears is a monster. Must be. There is no other possibility. Once you get that part, all of the rest, from foreign-policy experts to bloggers to Drudge, makes perfect sense. Check the above comments. It’s all there.
Posted by: Brownell | March 7, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
I don’t know if this is worse than Obama calling both the Clintons liars. He also refers to Hillary as divisive and had certainly suggested that they are both crooks and cannot be trusted.
Hillary runs an ad on a general question on who would the American people rather answer a phone call at the white house at 3:00 a.m. in the morning in time of crisis, and they cry foul, even though, Obama camp plagiarized the same ad content and actually mention Hillary’s name in his ad about the same subject in rebuttal.
The more the media (NBC, MSNBC, Newsweek, CNN, FOX, & NPR) beat up on Hillary, the more we love her. The media will not succeed telling us who to vote for in this election.
Posted by: SO | March 7, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
Hillary Clinton never intimates that she’s not a monster; she’ll never deny that. Hillary just called Barack Obama’s hand and he folded. Barack might have called Hillary’s bluff; so Hillary, are you in fact saying that you’re not a monster? Monster in this sense: inhumanly cruel or wicked person. Barack chose to lose a staffer instead. Let Hillary gloat and strut, let her also deny that she’s not in fact an inhumanly cruel or wicked person
Posted by: Peggy McGilligan | March 8, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am
Well what would Othello do? Not trust his wife? Hum does that transfer gender to campaign fodder? I haven’t been watching the deification of Obama as after a few speeches in Iowa of puffery rhetoric and Oprah’s tent revival complete with coloquial renditions I spared myself the political opera. What would suit the Republicans more than the Dems running a candidate with scant experience against Mc Cain? How Rovian to split the ticket and bring out the misogynist vote. Will the American public be fooled again? Holy Moly more twists and turns than a three penny opera. Go Hillary, my god let’s get something done! Political posturing with hearts and flowers is great for the movies but in reality experience counts wake up and vote for Hillary Clinton.
Posted by: Sandra Lea | March 8, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Obama just depresses me. I know he won’t care about women. Power just voices what Obama’s campaign says in private. I’m a lifelong democrat and if Obama wins I would see no reason to vote because his nomination would mean women don’t count.
Posted by: Maria V. | March 9, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm