Pelosi Endorses

Pelosi is a fool if she thinks Obama is the stronger candidate including those “red” states.

“GOLDEN TICKET”….
would be the correct choice of words. Perhaps Ms. Pelosi was eyeing a spot for herself. And if you thought CLINTON was polarizing… It will be CLINTON/OBAMA, mark my words.

Pelosi is an embarrassment to the democratic party and women in general.

As far as Hillary Nomination is concerned, I’m seeing negative coattails.
If its Hillary at the top of the ticket, look for campaign commercials showing the face of your ordinary democratic candidate morphing into Hillary. The general rule, in the election fight is that the ordinary average Democrat will get a fraction of Hillary’s friends to watch his back. But he’ll inherit all her enemies (And See Gotta lotta them) and they’ll be tying him to her.
So now in the weeks and months ahead let’s look at what Nancy does as this Democratic Nomination drags on. Is she gonna be watching out first and foremost for her bright shiny new toy also known as the House of Representatives? Or will she roll the dice and hope she can hold the house for a cycle or two?

I dont care who she supports and what her motives are, this is stupid thing to say during a heavily contested race which can turn out to be very very divisive. She just added to the divisiveness. She should not be trumpetting Obama talking points while slamming Clinton, if for no other reason than if Clinton does become the nominee and consequently the president she will have a rough relationship with the WH. She shouldn’t act like this.

What are you saying there?? It is possible that some red states can be turned to the BLUE STAES. This is America. Impossible can sometimes be possible.

Now that Sen. McCain is the Republican nominee, the “dream” running mate for him is either Dr. Condoleezza Rice or Gen. Colin Powell. Since Sen. Obama is almost a guarantee to be on the Democratic ticket (either as the Party nominee or as Sen. Clinton’s running mate), having Dr. Rice or Gen. Powell on the Republican ticket should greatly neutralize race as being an issue. In addition it will likely bring the War on Terror back to the forefront of the campaign. There will be a very distinct choice for the American electorate: The Democrats who want to cut and run, and hand al Qaeda a military victory in Iraq VERSUS the Republicans who take the terrorists’ threats seriously and are willing to defeat them wherever they are, no matter how long it takes.

geevil, that statement regarding Canada is an outright lie!
You and hillary, no matter how many times you keep telling the same lie doesn’t make it true. I do understand however, that your purpose of repeating the same lie is to have people, that don’t take the time to research the truth, believe it.
Obama DID NOT wink/nod at the canadians. The trust came to light that it was the clinton campaign that did that. Of course the media hushed it up because they themselves bashed Obama before they got all the facts. It is extremely difficult for people to apologize isn’t it?!
Nafta was a major clinton failure. How disingenuous now for the clintons to push off some wink/nod bs as the fault of Obama. That is the clinton strategy, to continually push their failures off on others. They are dishonest, deceitful failures, and the majority of this country does NOT want them back in the white house.
The clintons cannot offer Obama VP when Obama is the frontrunner. Another deceitful push by hillary. That was her way of trying to get people to vote for her, thinking they could get him too. He is not running for VP, so why offer when you’re second?
This campaign has passed stupidity and ridiculous level.

LA in Indiana,
The Canadian Prime Minister’s Office has confirmed it was Obama’s people and only his people who did that. I am sorry if your devotion to Obama is so strong you cannot face reality and the facts. If it makes you feel better, you are not the only one hoodwinked by him.

lolololol yeah geevil, that is one of the first stories after the initial blowup….go read some more, I’m sure you’ll find the truth buried in other newspapers. A few news stories, though not mentioned on any front page…the canadians said it was NOT obama’s campaign that gave them the wink/nod. As a matter of fact, a few witnesses actually heard the gentleman say the assurance came from the clintons, not Obama.
lolol geez, you hillary sheeple are truly amazing. hillary has taught you to twist and distort the truth very well.

I’m not that fond of Pelosi, but I know she’s very well informed on Clinton’s years First Lady and as a Senator. She agrees with many prominent Democrats that President Bill Clinton’s wife is a highly overrated politician who runs on her husband’s name.
Leon Panetta, Bill Clinton’s White House chief of staff, and Sandy Berger, Bill Clinton’s national security adviser, both said that Hillary Clinton wasn’t privy to the president’s daily intelligence brief, nor did she sit in on National Security Council meetings.
It’s unclear whether Clinton had a national security clearance when she was first lady. Several former top-level Clinton White House officials couldn’t recall, and a Clinton campaign spokesman didn’t respond when asked on Tuesday.
Hillary Clinton takes credit for helping to bring peace between warring Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland.
One of the key Irish negotiators last week called Clinton’s description of her role in the process a “wee bit silly.”
“I don’t know there was much she did apart from accompanying Bill (Clinton) going around,” David Trimble told Belfast’s Daily Telegraph.
Trimble, the former leader of the Ulster Unionist Party, and John Hume, leader of the nationalist Social Democratic Labour Party, shared the 1998 Nobel Peace Prize for their roles in the peace process. “I don’t want to rain on the thing for her, but being a cheerleader for something is slightly different from being a principal player,” Trimble said.

How could Pelosi support Clinton? She’s not boarding a sinking ship. Nor will the majority of the superdelegates do so. Pelosi, on behalf of the DNC is giving the Clinton campaign a signal: it’s over, you totally screwed things up and damages the party, time has come to bow out – certainly after losing the delegate count in Texas last week. For don’t forget that even AFTER his 11 wins in a row Obama won 4 of 6.
So what are still talking about here? The MSM wants the profitable show to go one, but down the facts and the math this race is over. Let’s focus on Obama – McCain, that’ll be more relevant.

Rant if you will, but Pelosi is a powerful force in the Party, and she is looking towards the future. Many in the party both respect and fear the Clintons, but a growing number are seeing that they are vulnerable, and are looking to “bury Caesar”. Her actions have certainly alienated much of the black electorate (permanently, who knows?) Top of the ticket is very important, and I, for one, don’t think Clinton can achieve 50% plus one. Her negatives are too high. I think that Pelosi’s comments show which way the wind is blowing. “I didn’t want to leave you with any ambiguity”

In Mississippi Clinton got 9% of the black vote. Nine percent!
In an amazing example of political spin (with a racist touch), the Hillbillies use that as an argument against Obama.
?!
That is too silly for words. Hillary getting 9% of the black vote, which is and has historically been so important for the Democrats, is an argument against Hillary Clinton and nothing else. She has alienated a crucial part of her party’s base by running a polarizing and divisive campaign.
The DNC won’t honor her for doing so, as all the current indicators show, Pelosi’s comment among them.

Hillary Clinton Supporters!!!!
Hillary is now the Huckabee of the Democratic party. She cannot win, and with Pelosi’s affirmation that even a Obama Clinton ticket won’t be happening, the wick on the candle is flickering. Now that’s from the most powerful woman in American politics with REAL EXPERIENCE.
Hillary can’t even carry Pelosi’s bra strap in experience.
LIGHTS OUT “HILLABEE”

Pelosi simply keeps a cool eye on what actually is happening in the Dem. race.
It took just two victories in one week for Obama to erase the net delegate gains Clinton picked up on March 4. And the pattern will repeat itself in the next two months. Clinton goes on to win Pennsylvania, but Obama negates that after victories two weeks later in North Carolina and Indiana. So, how does Clinton change the dynamics and math of the race? She doesn’t, for she is toast.

On the Clinton side continuing this campaign is no longer the politics of winning. It is the politics of getting paid. Those high priced advisors/pollsters/consultants are keeping this going until there is not a dime left in the bank.
It is not an industry of passion for them, rather one of profit.

Even though the New York Giants scored more points than the New England Patriots in the recent Super Bowl, we should designate the Patriots as the winner.
Does that sound absurd?
That’s exactly what the Clintons and their supporters are proposing with respect to the Democratic nomination.
The Clintons and their spporters claim that the race is essentially tied even though they are behind in pledged delegates and there is no plausible scenario where they can catchup without pilfering Obama delegates.
The Clintons and their supporters claim that the states that they have won are worth more than the states that Obama has won.
The Clintons and their supporters believe that the rules don’t apply to the Clintons, and that they deserve special treatment. If they can’t win by the rules then they have no ethics, morals, character, or integrity from preventing them from breaking the rules to win.
The Clintons and their suporters are attempting to make the case that she is somehow more deserving of the nomination even though she has received less votes, won less delegates, and won fewer states.
If the New England Patriots and their supporters tried to make the case the Super Bowl was essentially a tie even though the score was 17-14; the Patriots touchdowns for some reason should be worth more; the rules did not apply to them so they should get more points even though they did not earn them; and the Patriots are more deserving of the Super Bowl, there would be a public outcry and everyone would think that argument is completely ridiculous. And that’s just a football game!
What the Clintons are trying to do goes against everything this country stands for and circumvents the democratic process! But given their history of scandals, pathological lying, and moral bankruptcy, we should not be surprised, but we should not let it stand!

Jeff, there are more DEMOCRATS supporting Hillary. We’re supposed to give up our rights to a DEMOCRATIC nominee because REPUBLICANS have helped Obama’s numbers in our open primaries? Please. You can’t bully out the bigger half of the party Obama wants to represent.

In February 2007, Sen. Clinton was out front in condemning DP World, a Dubai government-owned company seeking to take over key operations at American ports. But, at the same time, Bill was advising the the emir of Dubai, Sheik Mohammed Bin Rashid Al Maktoum, to hire his former press secretary, Joe Lockhart, to get the deal approved. Back then, Lockhart denied working for the emir. And when Bill’s role became public, Hillary claimed that she had no idea that he had any involvement in the DP World issue. Now, it turns out that the emir’s Dubai International Capital Corp. hired Lockhart’s company, Glover Park Group, in April 2007 to help with another U.S. deal – a takeover of two defense firms. The relationship between the Clintons and the emir has long been too close to avoid scrutiny.
Something is driving up Bill and Hillary’s net worth pretty dramatically. In 2003, Sen. Clinton disclosed assets of at least $352,000 but less than $3.8 million. By 2005, she was declaring assets in the $10 million to $50 million range.
Where is this money coming from?
Why have the Clintons not released their tax returns since he left office?

HRC’S 1994 HEALTH CARE PLAN, according to one account, included fines of up to $5,000 for refusing to join the government-mandated health plan, $5,000 for failing to pay premiums on time, 15 years to doctors who received “anything of value” in exchange for helping patients short-circuit the bureaucracy, $10,000 a day for faulty physician paperwork, $50,000 for unauthorized patient treatment, and $100,000 a day for drug companies that messed up federal filings.
In Feb 2008 on ABC’s “This Week,” Hillary Clinton said regarding forcing people to buy her government health plan, “I think there are a number of mechanisms” that are possible, including “going after people’s wages.”

LA TIMES – To fuel her rise, Clinton has relied on the controversial funding device known as “earmarking.” The earmarks enabled her to win favor with important constituents, many of whom provided financial support for her campaigns. . . Since taking office in 2001, Clinton has delivered $500 million worth of earmarks that have specifically benefited 59 corporations. About 64% of those corporations provided funds to her campaigns through donations made by employees, executives, board members or lobbyists, a review by the Los Angeles Times shows.

Hillary has the experience on day one?
Please explain how someone who is ready “on day one” didn’t plan for the election to go past 2/5?
Read the Washington Post’s story on the chaos in Hillary’s campaign, and explain to me how a person who can’t get her campaign to agree on anything is ready for day one.
Please explain how a candidate who didn’t know she was broke until she was broke is ready on day one?
Please explain how a candidate who didn’t know the rules of the Texas Primary/Caucus until one week before the contest is ready on day one.
Please explain how a candidate who thinks it is an acceptable strategy to poach her opponents pledged delegates is ready for day one.
If they way she has run her campaign is any indication of how she would govern if she were elected, looks like more “Your doing a great job Brownie” incompetence to me.
Hillary Clinton is anything but ready.

Rezkobama – It is already too late. Senator Clinton can not catch up. It’s simple math and I believe it was a Clinton satffer who said “it’s about the delegates”, so this nonsense about big states and popular vote are more smoke screens to try to change the outcome. Everyone need to play by the rules or let the revolt begin.

Lou-
Actually after the Democratic leadership performs an intervention and gets Hillary’s crack pipe away from her, I think Hillary supporters and a majority of the country will realize that Obama is a better candidate and would be a better President than McCain because the country does not want to stay in Iraq for 100 years and continue the disastrous policies of the Bush/Cheney Administration.

I wish the Clinton supporters would take a look at the popular vote counts again and see that she can’t catch up there either.
If we include the Florida result, a big Hillary win, Obama still leads the popular vote: + 407.390
He even leads when we add the Michigan votes for Hillary. A recount wouldn’t help her at all (and may hurt her even more in the delegate count, for the recent Michigan poll showed a tie).
I wish some clear reasoning would start doing its work among Clinton supporters. She is losing this race, if you like it or not. Difficult to accept, no doubt, after all the invested energy and emotions, but time has come to fix our attention to the greater cause: the Democratic agenda for the USA in the eight years to come. Both Hillary and Barack agree that that is where this election year is all about.
The individuals who say they’ll vote for McCain if Hillary is out apparently never understood nor valued her political struggles and proposals in the first place. They don’t even deserve to be Clinton supporters or Democrats for that matter.

SADSTATEOFAFFAIRS<
You're such a pessimist. At the end of the campaign window, Barack Obama will have the most delegates and the most in vote count. A first grader could see that if shown on a piece of paper
Ultimately, he will be selected by the DNC as the presidential nominee. Meaning???
THE WINNER.
Any ambiguity with clear wording?

For both fans, you should list the strategy or strength how your dems candidate can beat McCain in Nov…
1. Ohama: strength and weakness
2. Hillary: strength and weakness
3. McCain: strength and weakness
People need to carefully study the contrast and advantage/dis-advantage from each candidate and give you a rational conclusion… Emotion sometimes will blind your rationality..

The democratic party is on a deep left swing right now. That is why they do not like the Clintons because they are Hawks. The Clintons should leave the democratic party and let them pass out flowers and peace signs. Pelosi and Claire Mcaskil are traitors. They do not believe that a woman can lead. They are peace activists and will only wake up when al-qaeda strikes our shores on their watch!

Truth,
Agreed!
Joris……insulting one’s intelligence and slinging insults is exactly why so many do not support your candidate. He simply brings out the worst in people. Really, don’t take it personally….

SADSTATEOFAFFAIRS
Your name fits well.
pes·si·mist–noun 1. a person who habitually sees or anticipates the worst or is disposed to be gloomy.
That’s ok. Things will soon be better in January an optimist at the helm.
OBAMA 08

Joris…Pumpkin, please calm down. Let’s talk about what a bonehead Ms. Pelosi is, shall we?

Obama will win at least the following swing states in the general:
Virginia
Colorado
Minnesota
Wisconsin
Michigan
Missouri
Iowa
As a coincidence, he won all of those states in primaries or caucuses. That equals an easy general election win for him. Clinton is a lot less likely to win Virginia and Colorado, so will have to win Ohio and Florida. That is going to be a lot harder for her to do.

Jay,
Such a naive lil grasshoppa…..
I know, you’re worse off than you were 8 years ago and you want to keep it that way. For starters, you need to Go Decaf on Rush grasshoppa. May I suggest some NPR and a little Lawrence Welk to calm your nerves? Afraid of everything, you say?
Tell Daddy what’s on your mind.

Can some one explain how Obama can beat McCain on those states: Black votes?? Independent votes?? Younger votes??
Virginia
Colorado
Minnesota
Wisconsin
Michigan
Missouri
Iowa

Joris/Siroj
I don’t think your exactly the image Obama is trying to project. It’s your style of mean spirited comments that make people run from your candidate.
Now, let’s get back to Ms. Pelosi and why the Dems have gotten themselves into this mess.

Jay,
The Democrats have been getting back many Reagan Democrats starting with 1992. This will be lost if they nominate the leftwing peacenik candidate Barack Obama over the moderate candidate Clinton. Another McGovern/Dukakis disaster.
I am one of those voters who will go with McCain if the far left prevails.

Why is she a fool. Obama is a stronger candidate in those “red” states. It has proven itself every time. Perhaps Ohio and Florida don’t have to be the swing states in 2008. Plus, we seem to forget that the republican party is damaged by the war in Iraq. And as it comes out little by little we will all finally see how the current administration and the republican commerades tricked the American people into a war that we were never meant to win. Our soldiers have been brave and it is time to take them home. That should be at the top of our next presidents list and I trust the man who saw through the BS to begin with

the way Hillary Clinton run her campaign is like my nephew’s room in a new house, dirty, messy, clothes all over, oh yea, smelly too.

I don’t know about all of this “endorsement” talk. I think it’s a little speculative even though it may well happen. I think that people who have known Pelosi over the years know that she’s a “party first” type of Democratic leader and she doesn’t want to see someone’s blind ambition tear it apart. For Pelosi, it’s always bigger than any one person, including herself.
There was a great column in the Oakland Tribune yesterday written by Pelosi’s first campaign manager from 1987. It’s candid and interesting, and it shows how her performance in that campaign foreshadowed her rise to Speaker. Worth a look. I found it online too at the columnist’s site

“Can some one explain how Obama can beat McCain on those states: Black votes?? Independent votes?? Younger votes??”
Yes Truth, all of those. Plus changing demos in VA and CO. Both states will have Dem governors and senate delegations after this election. All the other states have been swing states in the last several elections and the Democratic Party has a lot of wind at its back. That’s how they took Hastert’s seat. VA and CO aren’t going to vote for Clinton, though, because of her history. She got crushed by BHO in all of them, but especially in VA and CO. BHO will also out-raise McCain 3-1.
I wouldn’t be surprised if BHO put some of the southern and plains states into play either. Especially if he takes Sibelius as veep. I expect him to take Kaine though, to really lock down VA.

Obama would love to keep the Ferraro comments going it stops people from looking at his past and his many non existant policies.It sells american short,we’ve come along way both woman and blacks.But still we have a presidential front runner who wants to meet with Raul Castro and south Koreas leader so hay playing the race card and keeping it going is a great way ta keep people from remembering his policies

geevill: If Greg Craig and Susan Rice (not Suzanne) are incompetent, why did Bill Clinton have both of them in his adminstration? Because he was too “inexperienced” to chose good advisors? Rice served for several years in the Clinton administration – her last position was as United States Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs (4 years).

I would like to quote a genius that posted on this board…
“When we talk about the division along racial lines, this isn’t something exclusive to blacks…or whites. We all, naturally, align ourselves with people who are similar to ourselves. Evangelicals choose the Huckabee’s of the world, Utah’s Mormons rallied to support Romney. Hispanics love and support Bill Richardson in staggering numbers. Black people, overall, have adored the Clintons (particularly Bill) and they courted this relationship extensively during his campaigning. Blacks supported him overwhelmingly as well.
We are inclined to support people who we feel are somewhat connected to ourselves, our thoughts, our beliefs. I do feel that Blacks have rallied to Barack…but so has affluential whites. To say that race is the only reason that he’s doing well is offensive. Blacks make up an overall 12% or so of the voting public. If Barack had 95% of the black vote and 0% of the non-black vote, he wouldn’t still be here.”
bravo What.Say.Me… for being intelligent enough to make this observation. you must have been taught in a foreign education system.

Thanks Will!

If the liberal wing of the Democratic party continue to scorn and diss Hillary as they appear to bhe doing, I will never vote for any Democrat again.
We were all brought up to believe that the best qualified person be hired for a job. It seems the liberal wing is conspiring against the Clintons. This is a real shame. I suspect there will be a backlash by women around the country if the media and the liberal wing continue this uncautionable manuvre to defeat Hillary.
It has been an unfair election. HRC had to run against the liberal wing of his party, the media, and Obama.
It is outrageous.

Nancy Pelosi is responsible for the dem party maintaining its majority in congress
Of course she has to back Obama as he is the better chance for the party at the top of the ticket
It is difficult to understand how Sen Clinton could think she would be the leader of the democratic party with her actions and words as she tries to steal the nomination through super delegates as even her campaign admits she will not win more states, pledged delegates or popular votes
what else can this be called

Hillary as little miss hyperbole,
Of Ferraro’s comment, Hillary Clinton told her audience: “I certainly do repudiate it and I regret deeply that it was said. Obviously she doesn’t speak for the campaign, she doesn’t speak for any of my positions, and she has resigned from being a member of my very large finance committee.”
Very large as in larger than that of Barack Obama? I don’t think so. sort of goes along with:
“I was named for Sir Edmond Hillary.”
“Chelsea was right by the Twin towers on 9/11.”
“I won Michigan and Florida.”
“I was responsible for Peace in Northern Ireland.”
and the list goes on and on and on…..

Hillary’s Record in Northern Ireland:
Statement from John Hume former MP MEP, founder of the SDLP and an architect of the Good Friday Agreement. He is the only person to win the Nobel Prize for Peace, the Ghandi Peace Award and the Martin Luther King Peace Prize.
“I am quite surprised that anyone would suggest that Hillary Clinton did not perform important foreign policy work as First Lady. I can state from firsthand experience that she played a positive role for over a decade in helping to bring peace to Northern Ireland.
She visited Northern Ireland, met with very many people and gave very decisive support to the peace process. There is no doubt that the people of Northern Ireland think very positively of Hillary Clinton’s support for our peace process, due to her visits to Northern Ireland and her meetings with so many people. In private she made countless calls and contacts, speaking to leaders and opinion makers on all sides, urging them to keep moving forward.
Anyone criticizing her foreign policy involvement should look at her very active and positive approach to Northern Ireland and speak with the people of Northern Ireland who have the highest regard for her and are very grateful for her very active support for our peace process.”

By the way do a little research, the caucuses have hardly brought out any voters compared to the primaries. Caucuses disenfranchise shift workers, the elderly and disabled. The numbers in primaries are never the same as the general elections.
The red states will still be red states….Kansas will remain that way. The small numbers that attended caucuses in KS are not the same as the numbers that turn out in the GE.
Every time I have voted here in KS in a presidential GE the lines are enormously long not so with the caucuses. I have literally had to wait more than an hour almost 2 hours.

Pelosi is right on! How can Hillary support Obama after basing her entire campaign strategy against his ability to lead the country? And for Obama to run Hillary as VP? Certainly Pelosi isn’t thinking this, but the notion of Hillary’s self-serving strategy “at all cost” to ensure her Presidency is seriously daunting. (insert theme for Dead Presidents)

To all truely devoted Democrats, and displaced Republicans. This primary campaign was a rough contest from the beginning placing two minority candidates against one another. A Woman versus a Black. In my and many other American’s judgment this was a big mistake by the Democratic party which is trying to gain back the Executive Branch of the government to at this point to attempt to save America as we have known it most of our lives. The comments I have read tonight, from a so called cross section of educated of voters, seems to forget just how bad things have become with Bush in the Whitehouse. Not to mention that the monkey see monkey do retoric of Republican candidate McCain who openly states that he will stay in Iraq or other countries for as long as it takes to beat down the terrorists. He at best it pounding his chest as Tarzan, because the United States cannot withstand another 8 years of this type of carnege on both the military personell as the extended damage to the economy. The Clinton bashers forget all too soon that Bill Clinton left the country with the first surplus in the budget in over fifty years, by leaving the books in the black to the sum of over 40 billion dollars. Which by the way was pissed away by Bush inside five months.
They say that behind every great man is a great woman. Is has been exemplified
by the way Hillary handled her and Bill’s problems. There again the problems of a mans private life should be just that private. Obama is the truly unknown candidate. He has excellent verbal skills that can get the croud fired up, but so do carnival barkers or reverand Jesse Jackson, heaven forbid!!!
But what is happening to the democratic party is disintegration!! The party is divided down the middle, and on neither side Obama nor Clinton do I see a win for the Democratic party. McCain is a sure win with either as a sole candidate. The pair Clinton and Obama is truly a “winning combination” thatshould have bee examined and discussed with both candidates within the first three or four weeks of primary elections. By now it may be too late as both are now polarized from one another. I could not only support this “Dream Team”, but would campaign for as well. The party has to get them on the sidelines and analize abilities, or toss a coin, to decide who will be president first, and both be able to live by it, or we the people of the United States are doomed to the next administration being Republican again. I believe that many of the posters on this blog tonight, this may be the first time or maby the second time that you have voted. You have never seen the effects of a divided party before. Well it usually ends up badly, for the party, by losing the contest to the candidate of the opposing party. Neither democratic candidate can survive with this devastating division of the Democratic party. As exemplified by statmrnts by several bloggers tonight, they will vote for McCain if their Democratic candidate loses the primary. The exit polls discussed earlier showing this sentiment exactly, and I truthfully believe that the vast magority of Democrats believe in this “Dream Team” concept as well. I will not sling mud at either candidate, but individually neither stand a chance alone. The big fear again is allowing McCain into the Presidential seat!!!

8 years of being the fisrt lady should be deducted from Hillary bragging experience, anyone that hasnt run as a president does not have the presidential experience, what really matter here is the right judgment to lead during the time of crisis.For the past 7 years, we have seen the impact of Bush negative judgment. This attribute is one the basic qualities of a good leader and not just travelling over the world as a first lady. For Mccain people, i wish you good luck, if Mccain emerge as the winner, i will move to Canada or Europe, because the worst is looming.