Philadelphia Feeling
After doing the rounds of cable interviews to answer questions about Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s incendiary sermons, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, decided late Friday that he wanted to address this controversy fully in the context of a larger discussion on the challenge of race.
It’s a speech he had been talking about for some time, sources close to Obama say, but the events of the past few weeks prompted it now.
Senior officials on the Obama campaign say that the candidate himself worked hard on the speech in the last couple of days, and, after arriving in Philadelphia last night, finshed it early this morning.
The speech will address not just Wright’s comments, but the context of that kind of fiery rhetoric in black churches, and the importance of moving beyond the battles of the past.
More pressing questions for Obama, of course, may be the political ones. Why wasn’t this issue dealt with until now? What else do voters not know about Obama? And how does his pledge to unite the country square with his attendance at a church where those of his late mother’s hue might not feel comfortable?
Email
Mitt Romney's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
Romney Makes His Case to Conservatives at CPAC
The obama campaign did adress this issues about 1 yr ago when the stroy first broke (no one paid mcuh attention because he was down 20+ points in the polls).However; I still can not understand why anyone would attend a church with a pastor such as this. I recognize that the church does much good in the community and it is likely that his “quotes” are being taken out of context but I personally am saddened that Mr. Obama did not distance himeself form this preacher earlier. it wopuld be sad if the hop of a nation was destroyed due to the ignorance of one overly enthusiastic misguided preacher.
Posted by: shame2008 | March 18, 2008, 7:11 am 7:11 am
I do not have mentors who are convicts, thieves, drug dealers etc. Why? Because i have nothing in common with them.
My son heard the “N” word the first time when he was 8 yrs old and asked me what it was. (on a rap song he heard it)
I am not racist but something about the way the media treated Obama turned me off.
When the media gets thrills up their leg, or apologizes for reporting, something is wrong. He couldnt be that perfect..what else is could there be…..I saw the african garb photo when searching for a mitt romney article and thought nothing of it.
I saw the Jeremiah wright Video months ago and wondered why it didnt matter.
Now we know more about the man. And we know more about the media.
Growing up i heard people, say dont trust the media but never understood it.
Wow i do now. The media cant make me believe a tornado struck in Atlanta – i do my own search to see if it is true.
OK thats far fetched but you get the picture.
My thought the media protecting Obama also is causing his political demise.
These fawners, thrills etc is so obnoxious it is nauseating.
I have a feeling no one from either party will take MSNBC and CNN as serious as before they started to faint.
When channel surfing i skip over them as quickly as possible.
And the local media is just as bad of course many of them are sister stations to CNN.
That said – thank god for loyal LOCAL small town newspapers who give us all the scoop of the day!
Posted by: Leigh Pittsburgh PA | March 18, 2008, 7:36 am 7:36 am
For this country to heal we would have to get rid of MSM. They are like the school yard bully if you want to be thier friend then you must do as they say but if they want you out of the game ther is not much you can do unless you grow bigger at some point.
Posted by: Bishop | March 18, 2008, 7:56 am 7:56 am
Obama’s speech is happening because of one thing only – the truth about his pastor and his church, the truth that Obama has been trying to suppress since before the campaign started, has been exposed. Thankfully, some real reporting has started and his free pass days are over. His speech, just as his panicked rush of interviews last Friday, is a reaction to his attempt to keep the ugly racist and anti-American underbelly of people who he has been extremely close to for over 20 years (8,000 church members go a long way in a state senatorial district election) under wraps has failed.
It’s the result of
Obama’s own very poor judgment.
If the speech was so important, why did it take days of playing his pastor’s hateful rants on TV to get him to give it? It’s political desperation as he sees his image begin to crumble as he finds himself running against two strong candidates who never give up and are unwavering in their love for country and disdain for racism. His candidacy is based on transcending these race issues and on being different and transparent. Yet he has attempted to hide this from us and has (badly) attempted to brush it away as and then to talk his way out of it. He’s failed us and himself at every turn.
He’s just another highly ambitious politician who’s quite good at reading a scripted speech. No doubt, some adoring admirers will be bamboozled by yet another speech from the speech candidate.
Let’s see him answer questions.
Posted by: Enid | March 18, 2008, 8:00 am 8:00 am
Of course, now I get it. One has to go only to a church, where you only hear all the wornderful things about life. Joel Osteen anybody? But you have to get up an leave when another one start telling you things of what is wrong with America’s way of life. When the truth hits you just have to quit the congregation, that is what will make you a better person. Not!.
A strong speech is like a wake up call. Obama is probably well suited of what is wrong with America, he heard it he elaborated and he is working to bring that change to its core. America is confortable as it is, she doesn’t understand the opportunity that she has, and would like to believe that she is a country of an ancient culture, not a melting pot, she wants to believe that no matter what she did to others in wrongfull way, she will still be blessed. That because she is powerfull she can do anything and still get away with it. America isn’t perfect, the best product there is “democracy”, isn’t perfect. And the way the right wind talk, corporate America and the way GWB are leaving it upside down, it is undeniable that a change needs to be done. Who will be your man?
Posted by: Angel | March 18, 2008, 8:04 am 8:04 am
(am not an american)
Don’t you gang up and retaliate in defence of the children of the old glory. Its just a comment.
You Americans can be quite irritating sometimes. Why should someone be judged for being passive on a leader; at a time when he was not in a position where he had the power nor authority to make a difference, and whose opinion was irrelevant at the time. Its petty. Of course the material is released by political rivals but Americans always feed on such useless material like manna from heaven. Why shouldn’t the society display responsibility by not giving attention to such non sense that politicians like Clinton release on each other. Its a pity.
Posted by: Katrina | March 18, 2008, 8:05 am 8:05 am
Lets remember that Obama did not say those statements of that of the Pastor. He the Pastor grew up in the Civil Rights era, where they had dogs turned on them, fire hoses, and the beatings they had to watch each day. I don’t agree with the statements, but lets remember that the Pastor grew up with racism and he is now exploiting the past. Obama is the future of a generation that has forgiven the past, therefore just let it rest. I do have to ask this question, “why when McCains’ and Clintons’ folks make racial statements it last a couple days?” Does the media want Obama to lynch the Pastor for all the anger and pain that he had to go through. Lets remember we do still live in White and Black America for those folks that had to go through the 40s’, 50s’, and 60s’.
Posted by: DNEL | March 18, 2008, 8:06 am 8:06 am
I agree with Enid. No more speeches and poems, he’s given plenty of those.
Answer the questions about the church and this anti-american pastor.The voters deserve the TRUTH!
Posted by: Missmadeleine2002 | March 18, 2008, 8:08 am 8:08 am
Finally an American politician with courage! who dares to enter the minefield of the American race issue.
What a difference this man is going make when he is elected President. Here’s the opposite of business as usual, and I can’t wait to see the impact of Obama’s speech on our right under the surface still painfully divided country.
No man and therefore no politician has come without flaws. But I’m pretty sure that Obama will convince the larger part of Americans that in him we indeed, as the Kenendys have stressed, have found someone of JFK’s stature.
Posted by: Heather | March 18, 2008, 8:16 am 8:16 am
If a preacher said God Damn America, will that make God to Damn America?? He made these remarks since 2003.WHY THEY COULDN’T BE DEALT WITH AT THAT TIME UNTIL TODAY??? This is the question we must answer. WHY TODAY???
My people let’s talks about real issues. Economic is the real issue now focus on.
thousands of jobs have been jost and US dollar is declining badly. These are the major problems we are facing now in this country. A hint to a wise is quite sufficient.
Posted by: I.A.T Smith | March 18, 2008, 8:17 am 8:17 am
Let’s face it. If Obama has been conceiling more than the Wright issue. He has been conceiling his relationship with Tony Rezko, the disgrased business partner with whom he purchased property. Also, his close association and friendship with William C. Ayers, the self-proclaimed Pentagon terrorist.
So, no words from Obama will change my mind. If Obama becomes the Democratic nominee, my vote goes for McCain.
Posted by: Meck | March 18, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am
How can anybody in good faith support Obama after hearing all these hateful words for 20 years?
Obama divides Americans, not unite them. Vote for Obama and we will loose the general election in November!
Posted by: Gennie | March 18, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am
I am so sick of everyone making this a big issue. If you are that sick about it then you need to distance yourself from everyone around you who says thing you don’t agree with. This is crazy–the media is having a field day with this and you are feeding it. What about Hillary and Bills deep dark closet? Why aren’t the people around them being held accountable for all they say and do? I am a white woman in Iowa who says enough. It is not Obama dividing us or Hillary it is the media.
Posted by: Tiffany | March 18, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am
In 1984 Rev Wright went to visit Ghadafi in Lybia with the Nation of ISlams Louis Farakhan. At this time Ghadafi was still plotting attacks on US military installations, Lybia was a rogue state and Ghadafi was a terrorist dictator. This is a man Rev Wright and Farakhan admire.
Mr. Obama started attending Rev Wrights sermons and considering him a mentor in 1897, three years later and has been close to him and financially supported his efforts since then.
If anyone doesn’t think that will be an issue whenthe republicans get ahold of Mr. Obama, they are wrong. Supporting this man finaincially for 20 years and ascribing to his views for that same length of time is not Presidential.
Posted by: s.b. | March 18, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am
Sure there’s free speech in America. Absolutely.
Rev Wright is absoolutely free to prew his venom from the pulpit.
That doesn’t mean that someone who supported that kind of ministry for 20 years is fit to be President.
This has nothing to do with freedom of speech or freedom of religion.
This has to do with the political views and hatred preeched at Mr Obama’s church for 20 years and if that’s appropriate for a Presidential candidate.
Not if you want to WIN the white house.
Posted by: s.b. | March 18, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am
I have to wonder if this whole Wright issue was cleverly orchestrated by the Obama campaign themselves…just so he can give himself a reason to give a powerful MLK-like speech to the masses.
He seems to love to present himself as a modern day MLK, and this Wright issue gives him the perfect opportunity to go MLK on everyone.
The man is seriously deluded, but I have to admit clever, if this is the case.
Posted by: BC | March 18, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am
When a white pastor said 9/11 was God’s curse on America for its homosexuals and baby-killers, he gets invited to the White House. When a black preacher said all the foreign policy mistakes and atrocities committed by America overseas caused 9/11, he’s lynched. This is a pastor that devoted some 30-40 years of his life to helping black inner city youths and inspired Obama to dare to HOPE to make a difference in public office. His life is now reduced to 30 seconds of his most incendiary sermons, negating his life’s work of building a Church that made such a positive impact on the community. This retired old guy is being torn down in order to further somebody’s political agenda and the country seems to go with it. In contrast to Ferraro, this is really killing the old pastor/mentor of Obama to hurt him. This is what finally convinces me that this type of politics are really beneath us all, and if the society doesn’t wake up to this, America deserves another 8 yrs like the past ones.
Posted by: Qwerty | March 18, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am
This should ber taken seriously – The church he, his wife and 2 daughters attend are the very much source of spirited renewing. One goes to church for uplifting, to hear the messages that our priest, minister or pastors deliver each week. We take that in, if we continue to return to the same place of worship for 20 plus years we MUST BELIEVE IN OUR PASTORS MESSAGE! The truth is out on this so called beloved Obama. I attended The Church of God in Christ, and the catholic churches for the past 30 so years, I am white and am married to a black man we have 3 children who are at the age to vote for the 1st time in an election. I have never felt attacked at the black church the minister preaches unity OF ALL PEOPLE and hatred of NO ONE. Why would Obama go to a church who turns on his own mother, totally disgusting. HE SHOULD NOT BE VOTED INTO OFFICE. PLEASE WAKE UP PEOPLE….. WE NEED TO COME TOGETHER ONE AND FOR ALL…. Please make a full assessment of the situation before voting for someone who believes in hate!!!!
Posted by: Cathy | March 18, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am
Wright’s speech is evidence of the racial divide in this country. I do not find his speech shocking. I dont know how many times I’ve heard this claim of “chickens coming home to roost.” And sorry! but there is a bit of wisdom to it.
Nonetheless, I think its obvious that Obama doesn’t embrace this kind of rhetoric. And in fact, if the racial divide upsets you, Obama is our best bet for healing. With a black father and a white mother– he chooses to embrace both cultures.
How about McCain’s supporter Reverand Haggee?
Hagee on Hurricane Katrina “All hurricanes are acts of God because God controls the heavens. I believe that New Orleans had a level of sin that was offensive to God and they were recipients of the judgment of God for that.” [NPR Fresh Air, 9/18/06]
Nevermind his nutjob ideas about Israel and the need to go to war with Iran…..
Who is more dangerous??? Really?
Posted by: mel | March 18, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am
I have to agree with a couple of earlier posts — one from someone outside of America. We give too much credence to ridiculous news items and run with them. This really only masks the real issues.
Please, please, please can we stick with the economy, the war, and the myriad of other troubles this nation is now facing!! I don’t care about Obama’s pastor, and I don’t care about Geraldine Ferraro. Just talk about the issues and let the voters decide who would lead this country to a better place. STOP THE BICKERING!!
And for all of you who claim that you will vote Republican if your candidate doesn’t win — that is just wrong. After 8 years of Republican “leadership” we are in a huge mess. The worst in decades. That is a “my way or the highway” attitude. We have to band together, regardless of the outcome, and hope that whichever Democrat gets in will help clean up this mess. John McCain is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. We don’t need more Republican close-mindedness and nonsense in this country! Leave that to the news stations.
Posted by: tiredofhype | March 18, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am
The Wright issue is not about race. It is about poor judgment. It is about credibility.
He is playing the race card yet again by having a speech about race and politics. Notice it was the superdelegate who defended Wright personally saying there are much worse than him (another diversionary tactic) that said he needs to have this speech and talk about race.
He hinted the content will attempt to clarify Wright’s statements. Trying to justify hate speech by saying only black people can understand what to ignore is ludicrous. Those people hootin and hollerin were not ignoring the hate speech they were appluading it. This is what the superdelegate calls being lifted up? This is just another political ploy to draw attention away from the truth. There is so much wrong with the “racism” justification I cant begin to post it here.
I thought to myself maybe he just doesnt get it. Then I realized that would be yet another reason he keeps losing credibility. He is caught… he believes he is right to support hate speech as a motivator, he is trying to smooth talk and mesmerize people into buying that BS, he is using the same diversionary tactics he has always used.
We should be grateful the vetting has now revealed the truth to America and the world before it was too late. This man has poor judgment, no credibility, plays the race card whenever anyone questions his associations, and has some very dangerous associations and potential influence in his life. He has been groomed and lead down this path and possibly brainwashed into believing he is entitled. A separatist group shaped the life of an inspirational leader in history who was not vetted before he was elected.
Years ago, a country in turmoil with a failing post-war economy was mesmerized by a young leader’s speeches, he gave them hope and unity, he said “he who owns the youth owns the future”, he convinced them his ideas would lift them up and return the country to its rightful standing in the world with a prosperous economy, he was elected by a huge following without being vetted… the country was Germany… the leader was Adolf Hitler.
Posted by: DCVoter | March 18, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am
When everybody talks about the 20 years of “hate” learned presumably from Rev. Wright, do they seriously believe that the result would be an outstanding public servant like Obama, who has worked to solve problems for people of all colors and stripes who needed him??? Who would write a moving tome about dreams and HOPE??? Whose title, “The Audacity of Hope” was inspired by Rev. Wright’s sermons?? Wright might have made mistakes, don’t we all? How often have we railed at some perceived injustice and lost control of our tongue? Yet none of us would accept it if our WORST moments are compiled as a summation of our life’s work and meaning. The test of the pudding is in the tasting. Don’t judge the pastor by this viciously edited clip, judge him for the RESULTS of his ministry, the positive attributes of his flock, the number of lives he has brought hope to.
Posted by: Qwerty | March 18, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
For a year, both pundits and ordinary voters have listened to Obama and seen in him the possibility that he can help heal the nation’s racial divide by being a mediator between the worlds of black and white. Now, however, at least some folks are upset with Obama for his membership in this church and his relationship to Wright. I am as offended by the Wright remarks as anyone, but we must keep in mind that for Obama to serve as an effective mediator, the black community must see him as someone who understands that world.
Recall that Obama has shown the ability to listen to, tolerate and befriend people whose views he radically disagrees with on the right as well as the left. So I do not find it difficult in the least to conclude that Obama could see great spiritual value in attending Trinity while thoroughly disagreeing with the more radical elements of Wright’s political ideology.
Posted by: RaymondA | March 18, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
Many have embraced Senator Obama as a person who can unite our country. Now, some are dismayed to hear that the senator is equally at home and accepted in the US senate and in a black church that sometimes preaches a radical message, even when he himself has stood clearly for a more hopeful, conciliatory tone. How did you think Senator Obama was going to unite- by accepting only the sound-bites we feel comfortable with, or by accepting all, and then using his unique stature, vision, wisdom, intelligence, and charisma to help us all become the best we can be in this multi-racial, multi-class, multi-faith, multi-viewed country of OURS? The fact that Senator Obama has been able to clearly articulate his differing views and his strong condemnation of anyone who makes divisive or negative comments, whether it is his close friend Samantha Power or his former pastor, shows me that he knows exactly what he stands for and will not falter no matter what. I commend him and urge you all to look beyond the media sound bites to the substance of this man.
Posted by: katharine | March 18, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
s.b. actually there are limits on free speech by law. There are some who believe that Wright is guilty of sedition and that may be why he left the country to avoid prosecution.
This is just more of Obama playing the race card. He claims to transcend racism but continually uses it whenever it is politically convenient. Continuing to try to draw our attention away from the fact he lied about not knowing about Wright’s views is an insult to all Americans.
Posted by: DCVoter | March 18, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
Qwerty: This is what I was saying in my previous post. Mr. Obama says that words matter that a single speech can change the world. Now he is going to say lets put all of this into context. Why won’t he and others say that Hillary’s vote on Iraq should be put into context of what was happening at the time, how all the intelligence agencies said that there was a threat, that Sadam posed a threat, and the fact that 9/11 was fresh in our minds. Not to mention that more than 80% of the people approved of going to war. One can not ask that Rev Wrights comments should be placed into context and not same the same for Hillary’s Iraq war vote!
Posted by: russell | March 18, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am
I think that it was Mr. Obama who said that words matter I think he forcefully reminded Hillary Clinton of that fact in Wisconsin. Now is prepared to make a major address which will have its central thesis that it is only words that put into proper context that really matter. This also goes to his theory that it is not experience that matters as mush as it is ones judgment that matters. So what does it say about his judgment when he aligns himself with someone like Rev. Wright for 20 yrs and just now is made aware of his racist and hateful views? He is going to say that one’s entire life should not be judge on one mistake but that one mistake should be put into context of what one does over the course of their entire life. Is this not what Hillary Clinton is saying, that her whole political judgment should not be based on one mistake, her vote for the Iraq War! That she should be judge on her entire political life. Even as Mr. Obama makes his case that Rev. Wrights words should be put into context he will also be making the case for Hillary Clinton. Yes Mr. Obama is now painfully aware of how words matter!
Posted by: russell | March 18, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am
The truth is plain and simple- Obama has been caught in a lie and is just trying to save himself. He is a politician and is just as guilty as the rest. Yes, words are important and so are the actions that go with the words.
Posted by: t | March 18, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am
russell – because that is not politically convenient to tell the truth. This speech will play the race card in a major way. He claims to transcend it but actually uses it as a tool to brainwash his followers and divert our attention from the real issues and the truth. I can only hope America has woken up and will not buy into these very same tactics used in history by another leader influenced by separatists.
Posted by: DCVoter | March 18, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am
My gut feeling is that Obama will overcome the hate that is out there and the piling on from some members of the radical right who want him to fail.
His speech today is going to be about the America we believe in — all that is good and just about this country. The hate mongers will not win….the arc of a moral universe is long but it bends towards justice. Si, Se Puede!
Posted by: LM | March 18, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am
I find the focus on this story both idiotic and disturbing. The real issues are ignored to pick apart the work of a man who lived through Civil Rights, served in the military, and still has the strength to work for the good of his community. Sure, he said some over the top things, but I still can’t figure out exactly how over the top they were because I’ve only seen a string of 30 second clips strung together. I’d love it if one of the so-called news stations thought it was worthwhile to actually provide a transcript of these sermons in their entirety. Without the context, I can’t decide if the man was preaching hate, or making some other point. I suspect it was not hate. I said, for example, “I am so angry at my husband for forgetting our anniversary — I want a divorce from this selfish jerk. But then I remember how much we love each other and how silly it is to fight.” Would taking a sound bite where I said I want a divorce have any relationship to the way I feel? The answer is no. This is why context is important.
Posted by: Marla | March 18, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am
“Followers” is right, dcvoter. Expect a lot of “amens” from his hand picked–memories of George–”followers” today.
Posted by: pp | March 18, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am
Obama is trying to close the barn door after the horses have run out. Looking at the tapes of the Wright service, here you have a congreation giving high five’s, jumping out of their seat and praising the words of destruction on America and Whitey, now he is coming to talk unity and race.
His wife is not proud of being a American, her proudest moment is the fact that he husband won a few state and is the front running, so she instantly started to feel proud to be an American, if he was lagging behind would she have been proud, or would she be feeling its because Braack is black he cant get ahead?
All these ill feeling towards the system, all this hidden agendas that we get a glimpse off now and again from the Obama’s is rather unsettling. As a voter I do feel as if there is more to all this, something is just not coming across as correct, there are too many unanswered question with Obama and am sure after this famous speech we will all be no nearer to knowing anything about this man or really what he is about.
Posted by: SJ | March 18, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am
“Senior officials on the Obama camp say….. ”
” …the candidate himself worked hard on the speech the last couple of days….”
Jake, who might those senior officials be ?????????
Posted by: catherine in nm | March 18, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am
Obama is giving this speech today because of political expediency, not because he is a brave conciliator. His judgment is what is in question. Obama’s explanation that Pastor Wright is like an uncle, and you can’t disassociate yourself from your uncle is ridiculous. One is stuck with one’s family, that is true, the only member of your family that you choose is your spouse, and yes we all have family members with whom we do not agree 100% on political and social issues, and generally we tolerate each other at the occasional family events where we are together. BUT, Pastor Wright is not a member of Obama’s family, Obama chose him as his pastor, and he stayed with him for 20 years. If you give Obama the benefit of a doubt, and believe him that he was not in the pew when the remarks were made, you still have to question why in the world would he have dis-invited him to his announcement of his presidential campaign in 2007?? Once again, Obama has shown what poor judgment he has, with REZKO, WRIGHT, NAFTA…
Posted by: svsolis | March 18, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am
Dcvoter: I am afraid that the media will not ask him about this contradiction in his own reasons why voters should choose him and not Hillary. He gets to choose the setting and will not answer any questions. I can tell you now that the MSM will say that it was an inspirationa speech the likes of which we have not seen since MLK. They will say that he has put this behind him. They need to do this because they have so much invested in not what he does but what he says. In political science this is called cognitive dissoance. That it is the struggle to assimilate information that differs from what we beleive. In most cases people simply choose not to accept any information that goes against their beleifs. This is true for the media as well!
Posted by: russell | March 18, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am
“what else don’t we know….”
the man has written two books about his life; one of which was painfully honest and written long before entering professional politics.
people who say we don’t know enough are trying to not know enough. he’s put his life out there pretty well.
and when you consider the blatant refusal of McCain and ESPECIALLY Clinton to be open and transparent with the voters in the most basic way: tax returns (McCain and Clinton), Earmark requests…presidential library donors…First Lady schedules (Clinton), than the question journalists SHOULD be asking is:
What don’t we know about Sen. Clinton? Obama’s been much more transparent than her.
When will Hillary sit down for 3 hours to discuss the indicted (or imprisoned) people who have raised money for her over the years??
Posted by: huh | March 18, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am
Do you think BHO will wear a flag on his lapel today, or play the Star Spangled Banner and cover his heart?
Not!
Posted by: pp | March 18, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am
pp – i wont be watching it. I will peruse the transcript later as I do with Bush’s BS. I cant stand to watch either of them on TV or hear their voices. It makes me sick to my stomach, angry, and fearful of our future all at the same time. Why? Because they both double-talked their way along their political careers using religion as a shield. Both of them inexperienced and both heavily reliant on advisors. That means they are easily controlled by well oiled machines.
With Obama, the danger to America from within is much more of a concern… his associates support terrorism and genocide by race. I question his patriotism strongly.
I fear his ascension to power. We have a system of checks and balances to help prevent this. Campaigning and political endorsements by churches is prohibited by law. The wall between church and state in governing must be absolute. Sedition is against the law. The people need to allow the vetting to continue and the focus to remain on the judgment, credibility, experience, qualifications, and the records.
Posted by: DCVoter | March 18, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
My main concern is the audience response to the speeches made by Wright. Ok so we end up with Obama as President what does that mean now?
Is his nomination going to give every nutty preacher license to go on a podium and blast everything in the USA from day one? Is his nomination going to give every AA the right to blame anyone they feel like for slavery and whatever else went past in days when I was not even around?
Are demands going to be made in every quarter to even the score, change the way things are done, will some of us now be asked to move aside because there is a change of the guard and things are no longer the same?
I am sure in today’s speech he will try and reassure most Americans that having him as president things will be the same, but is that really going to be so, are his supporters going to go on as usual or will this country now be divided more than ever, with all the people that held grudges over the years wanting to even the score?
Thinking about all this sure is uncomfortable and its hard to look beyond these questions and not wonder about it when you listen to all the chatter on blogs of what tomorrow may hold.
Posted by: SJ | March 18, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am
It does not matter if OBama is half white or not. He chose to continue to be a member of this church and its rhetocis for over 20 years. He choses to expose his young children to this rhetoric week after week to hear how the white man has brought them down. He choses to exercise poor judgement, which is a major trait he is focusing his campaign on. I for one am tired of being a white person in Amercia who has to listen week after week about how my race is keeping black people down, because my ancestors made poor decision. To this day, I am still seen by reflection of behaviors toward my race as responsible for their actions. Well, I denonce my ancestors, does that make it all better now?Because that is exactly what Obama will try to convey in his speech today. He willI denounce his reverend for his words which he does not always agree with but he will continue to support my church and faith (And don’t you believe that those types of preachings will come to a halt). This reverse racism is already embedded in him no matter what anyone says. You cannot be a contributing member of a church which spews such rhetoric for years and denounce them when you feel it will benefit you. His childrens minds are already poisoned, how can he possible change the worlds views on racism when he could not bring it upon himself to depart with it in the first place.
Posted by: Alleyoopvolley | March 18, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am
Good work Rev. Wright!
The momentum in the Pennsylvania Democratic primary battle has shifted back to New York Sen. Hillary Clinton, who now leads Illinois Sen. Barack Obama 53 – 41 percent among likely primary voters, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today.
This compares to a 49 – 43 percent Sen. Clinton lead in a February 27 poll by the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN uh-pe-ack) University. In that survey, the momentum was with Sen. Obama who had narrowed a 52 – 36 percent gap from a February 14 poll.
Posted by: Hank | March 18, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am
There is such a disturbing double standard happening here. Rev. Wright, Obama’s former pastor, said America had defied God by locking up 1/3 of black males and God should punish our country (“God damn America”). Obama has had a 20-year relationship with Rev. Wright, but he has not been involved in Obama’s campaign whatsoever. Meanwhile, John McCain is openly embracing the support of Rev. John Hagee, who, quite similarly, claimed that America already has been punished by God (through Hurricane Katrina) for tolerating homosexuality. McCain appears on stage with the man, cites his support on his website, etc. Why is this not a bigger problem for McCain? What’s the real difference between Wright’s words and Hagee’s? Any chance race has something to do with it?
Posted by: Ben | March 18, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
If anyone says that some religious leader didn’t say anything about 9/11 and what may have caused it they are liars. Heck the sunday after 9/11 all the churches were filled with people because they thought the world was coming to an end. So trust me, if everyone recorded those sermons/speeches that sunday after 9/11, you would be surprised now about what was said then.
Posted by: Christian | March 18, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am
Social views have always been a factor. We are after all human. The lessons of the past must be heeded. History has shown us that racism and sexism are wrong. We consider separatists to be hate groups and rightfully so. We must remember the mistakes of the past… genocide is wrong. The role of government is the protection if its citizens from harm by passing and enforcing laws. Social healing comes from social organizations as it should but we cannot control or regulate their teachings. Therefore, the separation of church and state must be absolute. Free speech is wonderful but laws of sedition must be enforced to protect our national security.
We can address racism and sexism with dialogue. Much work has been done to improve income disparities between the races and the genders.
The statistics show that sexism in this country is much more prevalent than racism. Black men and white men no longer have pay differences. The effects of affirmative action appear to be resulting in a reversed racial disparity and needs to be reviewed. Yet, after 30 years of so-called progress, women still have the same income disparity – 70 cents on the dollar. We have seen blatant sexism in the media, corporate America, and this campaign. Even the media assessed its own bias and admits to the gender-biased coverage it has provided.
If Clinton were to even “think” about holding a speech to address the issues of sexism in our society today, she would be accused of playing the gender card and would likely destroy her career. She would be presenting the facts to the people and opening a dialogue on how we can eliminate the discrimination to improve the lives of women and children of all races.
Gender-bias has had an impact on Clinton in this election. It has divided voters along gender lines. Yet, Clinton maintains her focus on the campaign issues that must be addressed for ALL races and genders: economy, defense, national security, immigration, healthcare, poverty, jobs, and education. She doesnt use the gender card as a way to try to brainwash other people into feeling guilt for wrongs committed against women in the past. She focuses on accomplishing things through hard work and focus. She doesnt need to tell you what she will do, she proves it.
Posted by: DCVoter | March 18, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am
BTW Obama has scrubbed his website of Wright and NOI but he left a trail. In fact, one of the groups on his website is the New Black Panthers, a black separatist group classified as a hate group and watched by the Southern Poverty Law Center alongside the neonazi and other white supremacist or separatist groups. He was embarassed into denouncing and rejecting Farrakhan’s endorsement. He professed to remove the ties to NOI. Then we discover the ties that bind are indeed still there within TUCC. He is embarassed into denying knowledge and disassociating himself from his pseudo-father. Do I believe it was sincere? No. Do I believe he lied? Yes. When a person does not reject and denounce on principle, it is because he agrees with their views.
Posted by: DCVoter | March 18, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am
Obama’s speech so far does nothing for me. This is another opportunity for him to spread the empty rhetorics!
He’s better ready to quit now!
Posted by: Hank | March 18, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
If Clinton were even remotely associated with any organization (church or otherwise) that supports or honors leaders of white hate groups (white supremacists or separatists), the world would be in an uproar. The media would be having a field day. No way would anyone stand for her to try to justify it by saying white people know how to cut through the hate speech and be lifted up and transcend beyond racism. Leaders would be calling for her resignation. I cant even begin to list the details of the witch hunt that would result.
Posted by: DCVoter | March 18, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am
Interesting how the Obama staff started to aplause after he began taling about Brown vs. Board of Education.
How pathetic!
I’m not convinced.
Posted by: Nancy | March 18, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am
Mr Obama will keep the African American voters. Unless he denounces his church.
that would put him in a bad light for The African American Community.
Most African Americans have a solidarity, and most feel America owes them, blames them for being slaves. Although none alive today have ever been slaves, they blame that on everything wrong with their lives, and want restitution. The majority feel that way. They look for Obama to get them that.
First and foremost their main goal.
The bills are already written and ready to push through.
Thet want money, land, housing, all free for life.
Posted by: seah | March 18, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
Good point. He is trying to distance himself from Uncle “Wright”.
I’m not buying this. He is no MLK!
Posted by: Jeremy | March 18, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
There they go again. The paid Obama staff starting to clap every chance possible.
Shame on you Obama. If you want to eliminate the racial divide, then repudiate your paster.
Posted by: Cid76 | March 18, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am
Give it up Obama! You’re toast.
Posted by: PA-Independent | March 18, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am
Reading the above post – I shake my head in disgust with you people. I am reading the most ingnarant stuff in mylife time here. Oh yeah – racisiam is alive and well on this very board. Every one of you should be ashamed of yourself. How dare you condemn a man for the sayings of another man. The dumbing down of America. It is truly a sad day in America here today. All of the above take a good look at yourself.
Posted by: cc | March 18, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am
When things get tough we get more BS talk. Talk Talk Talk!!!! Sometimes I think he thinks he can justify anything with endless talking. You mr. Obama can’t win our hearts with talk alone. Try going back to your job and going something instead of talking!!!! You sir are no different than the rest of the phonies in Washington.
Posted by: jackmax | March 18, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am
Well let’s see he started out as far back as 1787 and then he started bragging about his wins in the white states. He blames the racial tension in South Carolina basically on the Clinton’s. He lied before , because he said he know how Wrights racist words were divisive, making excuses, more excuses blah, blah, blah, Geraldine Ferraro brought up, OJ. Well, he covered all his bases, but the speech was just empty meaningless words trying to prevent even more damage. It was not effective at all.
Posted by: Jay | March 18, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am
Obama is still blaming Ferraro for being racist…..what a hypocrite
Posted by: MattOhio | March 18, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am
That was a lame speech and did nothing to change my mind.
Words and speeches cannot cover his apparent hatred of white people.
Posted by: BC | March 18, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
CNN is trying to spin it with AfricanAmerican commentators saying that he answered all the questions……Obama accepted that he knew about Wright’s comments before but dint reject them because he agreed with those comments….so he has accepted that he lied on National TV
Posted by: MattOhio | March 18, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Sounds to me like there was proof he was at the sermons. Nothing else could have forced him to admit he lied.
Posted by: DCVoter | March 18, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am
I wonder how long it will take the pollsters to produce valid results? I guess we will have to wait until after all the media spinning is done (good and bad)… and get results in a week?
Posted by: DCVoter | March 18, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
Obama is saying that the burden of AfricanAmericans is far more than any other American. What a load of crap…he still blames us(White America) for slavery in the last century.
Posted by: MattOhio | March 18, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
We dont hold the germans of today responsible for Hitlers atrocities. He should not be holding the people of today responsible for the atrocities of its ancestors. Doing so keeps old wounds open and anger alive. This leads to separatist views and division. This is hardly a uniter philisophy that we need.
Posted by: DCVoter | March 18, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am
DCV
Looks like you got your work cut out for you today.
I read that Obama speech and it sure ain’t no Romney speech.
Good Luck.
Posted by: The Commander Guy | March 18, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am
DCV – Ha! Did you just bread Godwin’s Law to bash Mr. O?
All this Clinton shilling gets pretty hard when you gotta do highwire style w/o a net and campaign propaganda to cut and paste into a post.
Don’t screw up.
Posted by: The Commander Guy | March 18, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Obama has done the following
1. Still blames Ferraro for racism
2. Does not want to distance Wright
3. Accepted that he knew Wright’s comments from before but dint condemn when he knew
4. Blames founding fathers of America for race….
5. Thinks Blacks have more burden than other Americans
and many more gaffes……he is mincemeat
Posted by: MattOhio | March 18, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
This was not effective for me at all. I do not need an historical context. I know we have a constitution; I know about the framers. Far too much time was spent on this mood music. News for Sen. Obama, the framers would have protected Rev. Wright’s First Amendment rights, but would never have supported him as president. That has nothing to do with the color of your skin, but has everything to do with politics.
Juxtaposition of Geraldine Ferraro and Rev. Wright is ludicrous and distasteful, or was it Geraldine Ferraro and OJ? It all begins to merge after a while.
Posted by: marie | March 18, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Oh I get it now… If we don’t vote for him it will be our fault that racism still exists. Got to give him credit for trying to dig himself out of a ditch and put it all back on the American people.
He cannot win against McCain in the general election. Hillary can.
Hillary 2008
Posted by: t | March 18, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
MattO.H. – I.0! – Dude let Marie and DCV do the HRC shilling. You ain’t helping. Just some friendly advice.
Posted by: The Commander Guy | March 18, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
As an addendum to my previous post and perhaps the most important point:
Obama presents himself as the only vehicle to achieve health care and jobs and racial harmony and on and on. He presents a choice between John McCain and himself.
Shoudn’t someone tell him that Hillary Clinton is still in the race? The audacity of his belief that he is the ONLY answer and the ONLY way infuriates me.
Posted by: marie | March 18, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
Commaner Guy
If you cant understand those words…it is your problem….dont condone racist victim behavior(Obama’s)
Posted by: MattOhio | March 18, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
MattOhio – Changed my mind. Keep on typing dood. The more you type and the faster you post, the better. You got this nailed man. Don’t be shy.
TELL THE WORLD.
Posted by: The Commander Guy | March 18, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
LET’S BE REAL! PLEASE BE HONEST WITH YOURSELF!
EVERYONE on this blog have family members, associates (friends) that makes or have made racial statements that you laughed at or dealt with. YOU DID NOT REALLY DISTANCE YOURSELF FROM THAT PERSON! Even if you were the ONLY person that heard it. CATHOLICS have not distanced themselves from the SEXUAL IMMORALITIES OF THEIR PRIESTS, there are other ministers WHO HAVE HAD AFFAIRS in the denomiation churches and have not distanced themselves from the CHURCH. There were ministers after 9/11 and after Mr. Moore’s movie regarding the knowledge of 9/11. There were so many AMERICANS who spent their opinions of hatred toward American government and pastors such as Rod Parsley, John Hagee, Jeremiah Wright, etc., blasted America’s government and stated that AMerica is judged, damned because of either the sin or leadership at the helm of the country. They have called Bush the antichrist, racist, etc.. As a child that was brought up during the Civil Rights Movement, years after years, I have heard racial statements from my mother, father(who served his country in the US Army for 32 years) grandfather(who served the Caucasian as a cook travelling from one house to another), brothers (who served from 5 – 32 years in the US Armed Forces), sisters (who experienced hatred slurs from Caucasians while cleaning their houses and cooking in their businesses, aunts (who experienced hatred slurs from Caucasians while working in their businesses, uncles, nieces, nephews and neighbors and teachers, etc., have made statements reflecting their views, experiences, and hurts from what they have encounted from Caucasians. YOU MUST BE STUPID, IGNORANT AND BLIND IF THESE PEOPLE can easily push pass these experiences. Most have written them, most have harbored them in their hearts and lives have been altered. If this was Rod Parsley or John Hagee, it would not be intensified or blogged so much. All of the priests that committed the high level of SEXUAL IMMORALITY against CHILDREN WERE OF THE ANGLO-SAXON DECENT. Take that and run with it! GOD HAVE JUDGED AND WILL JUDGE EVERY MAN ACCORDING TO THEIR WORKS!
Posted by: LoisT | March 18, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
Apparently Obama doesnt know the constitution or JFK’s principles. Holding true to Jefferson’s doctrine, the separation of church and state must be absolute. JFK envisioned an America that honored held that wall. Churches are not allowed to violate law by endorsing or campaigning for a politician in church. Obama had a duty as a Senator, lawyer, and a member to advise them not to break the law. Not only did he not advise them correctly, he and his campaign staff participated in it. Unfortunately, the IRS case is going to take years to complete as usual. On the content of the sermons, the right of free speech is still subject to our laws. Hate speech that incites riots, etc. is not allowed. Defamation of character with libel and slander is not allowed. Speeches that incite the overthrow of the government can be interpreted as sedition. It is time we hold our current agents accountable and tell them to do their jobs. We need a President who will restore the constitution to its place of guidance in our governing principles.
Posted by: DCVoter | March 18, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
Commander Guy
If you want to be cynical and unappreciative like Michelle Obama, or evasive like Obama I cant help you….after you will vote your conscience….the one thing among many that isnt straight.
Posted by: MattOhio | March 18, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
“The speech will address not just Wright’s comments, but the context of that kind of fiery rhetoric in black churches, and the importance of moving beyond the battles of the past.”
Posted by: Navarro | March 18, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
marie – he has always been condescending and sexist… why should we expect him to change now?
Posted by: DCVoter | March 18, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
Terrific speech. I don’t see any way Clinton or McCain can top this. We’ll see what the polls say later, but I’d say Obama knocked this one out of the park.
Posted by: Tom J | March 18, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
I wonder how this will play with PA voters? Most of whom are white and middle class?
Posted by: an Opinion | March 18, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
I’m white and middle class ( whatever that means)and I thought the speech was eloquent and honest. Senator Obama opened up an honest discussion for people of every color..I think now the question is do we talk about the racism part of things- the something shiny the media has been trying to shift our focus to, or do we talk about the issues that affect people of every color throughout the country, everyday..you know gas prices, foreclosures,..that pesky war…. I for one am ready to hear both of them talk about those things again.
Posted by: dreamer? | March 18, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
Hmm…So it’s OK to speak about race–as long as it’s a black person doing the talking?
I don’t think so Obama.
Posted by: BC | March 18, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
How can anyone say that a man who stands at a podium and reads the words while looking down for most of the speech is a good speaker? No wonder he and McCain both use teleprompters. Why did he not “speak from the heart”? Certainly a person running for President who has been thinking about this speech for some time per his own campaign (which makes me wonder if they didnt plan the delivery by deliberately enticing scandal) should have been able to exhibit adequate public speaking skills. He is an Ivy League graduate for goodness sakes! Keeping the sound muted and watching the captioning really brings out the insincerity.
Posted by: DCVoter | March 18, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
LoisT wrote:
“LET’S BE REAL! PLEASE BE HONEST WITH YOURSELF!
EVERYONE on this blog have family members, associates (friends) that makes or have made racial statements that you laughed at or dealt with. YOU DID NOT REALLY DISTANCE YOURSELF FROM THAT PERSON!”
Lois,
First, I have NOTHING IN MY BACKGROUND THAT EVEN APPROACHES THE LEVEL OF HATE SPEWED BY REV. WRIGHT. IN FACT, I HAVE NEVER EVEN WITNESSED ANYTHING QUITE LIKE THAT VITRIOL.
Second, Rev. Wright is not Obama’s family. He has a family both black and white. If you read his books (I have only skimmed them), you will see that he never forgot, as he reminded us today. the words of his white gramdmother he deemed racist. Though it was his white mother and white grandparents who shouldered the full brunt of his upbringing, you rarely hear of a thank you. If you look further you will even see that he did not go to his mother’s bedside when she was dying. He muses that he did not know she was that sick. Hello. she was dying of ovarian cancer. That was no secret.
Upshot: Obama is a man of great oratorical gifts and many other talents. However, when I look at him I see a man still struggling with his racial identity; a man, in the words of his sister, Maya, who walks between two worlds; a man who harbors, but does not face, great resentment toward non-blacks. Thus, his loyalty and embracement of Rev Wright are understandable.
Posted by: marie | March 18, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
Obama said that “we” are speculating that all white males will vote for McCain regardless of his policies. He basically called any white man who votes for McCain a racist. Nothing said about his black supporters and their motive.
Posted by: geevill | March 18, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
Jackson said “I think he bared his soul”… so he has to read wht his soul is off piece of paper about an issue that is supposedly one of struggle and great importance all his life and the most pivotal moment in his campaign? NAH… not buying it!
Posted by: DCVoter | March 18, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
marie – I agree. His disrespect for women shows in his condescending nature and his failure to be with his mother when she was dying. His obvious bias against non-whites shows in his need to be a part of the “black community” that he gives as a reason for joining TUCC. As was stated by a black Chicago political analyst the other day in an interview, (paraphrase) he had a choice of numerous other congregations to join in Chicago, yet he chose the one that is the most divisive.
Posted by: DCVoter | March 18, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
I knew this would be the speech. The people who are black haved suffered because of the older generations and ancestors; so all you white people should feel ashamed and guilty and be better people. You can do that if you elect ME. Because I am not a racist, I just know a lot of them. Thank you, Obama.
Posted by: Irma | March 18, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
Words are indeed powerful. Wright’s sermons are still more powerful than the speech given today by Obama. You cannot erase 20 yrs of feeding into this divisive messages and call yourself a uniter overnight. If he was a TRUE uniter who cares deeply about his friend, mentor or adviser, then he could’ve changed Wright’s views or at least convinced him to tone down his divisive speeches – as he himself admits that it is not helping the situation. Instead, he allowed this man to keep giving inflammatory speeches, cultivating more anger and animosity among African Americans. The only explanation I can think of is, he believes and feels the same way about America.
Posted by: Felicia | March 18, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
leigh, pittsburgh, totally agree with you re cnn and msnbc – have them on boycott for a month now. you are lucky that your local papers give you info – mine is just like msnbc. so i just read the sports page and come to the net for news. need to get around to cancelling the paper.
and, yes, the fawners are almost as bad as their golden boy. i used to be able to occasionally look at them for purposes of humor, but now can’t stand the sight of them. same for obama, just click away when he or one of his apologists come on the air.
i think we all know that if the media had covered obama in an objective way, he would’ve never gotten this far. and if they had covered him in the rabid way they cover hillary, he would’ve folded his tent long ago. but they have not and will not. and now that they’ve invested so much of their own “credibility” into him, they are stuck in a trap and have to continue praising him to the high heavens in a (futile) attempt to justify their own pandering.
i so miss the days of murrow, etc., but they are gone.
re obama and his speech, like so many who can’t stand the sight of him, i just read the transcript. predictable damage control stuff. not buying it. can’t undo 20 years with a speech.
mlk wasn’t doing his speeches to cover his own behind, he was doing them for the good of others – quite a different matter. loved mlk, cried when he was killed. same for bobby and john. obama is no mlk, bobby, or john.
Posted by: so saddened | March 18, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
DCV, Marie and the Gang
Why can’t you all just say that BHO gave a good speech, but we like our Girl better? I mean with you gals, BHO can do nothing right and HRC can do no wrong.
BTW, this stuff about Jeffersonian Doctrine and such is plain nonsense. DCV, wasn’t Ol’Jeff in Paris while the Constitution was drafted?
Posted by: The Commander Guy | March 18, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
I am with Dreamer. Truly. I am half black, but from the beginning I knew Obama was manipulating people with race and that NEVER ends well. I know. I did experience being called the N word and being physically attacked for it at age seven, when we moved into an all white neighborhood in 1969. So I know. I just can’t get past the fact that race became an issue because Obama CHOSE to make it so. Yes there is racism against black people, but I know now that the vast majority of white people, especially our generation and beyond are more open minded and willing to work out our differences. However, Obama, while preaching unity, called on and pointed to any race related issue possible, mostly to make accusations in order to win the Presidency. I will never trust him to unite the country when his tactics are so incredibly divisive.
Posted by: Irma | March 18, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
DCVoter stated:
I would have respected a more noble speech from him if he had said,
“With regards to Pastor Wright, I was there, I heard what he said, and I believe some of it to be truth. I lied to the American people and for that I truly apologize. I never intended to divide this country along racial lines and I see that my own struggles to accept myself and forgive others for their prejudice born of the ignorant acts of our ancestors played a role. I have failed in my quest to unite America because I am still torn within. For the good of the party, the country, and the world, I am withdrawing from the race and fully endorse Senator Clinton for President of the United States.”
You know, DCV, I half expected him to step down and I envisioned a speech just like you have presented.
Posted by: marie | March 18, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
I read on another bloggers post that John Kerry and Ted Kennedy were trying to win the Presidency they were never able to get, through having Obama as the candidate. Hmmmmm.
Posted by: Irma | March 18, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
Commander Guy said:
“DCV, Marie and the Gang
Why can’t you all just say that BHO gave a good speech, but we like our Girl better? I mean with you gals, BHO can do nothing right and HRC can do no wrong”
Commnander Guy, Make no mistake, I really did not think was a “good speech.” For the most part, I found it boring. I was never moved. I was never enlightened. I heard no revelation or incite.
Posted by: marie | March 18, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
“Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.”
“All propaganda has to be popular and has to accommodate itself to the comprehension of the least intelligent of those whom it seeks to reach.”
“He alone, who owns the youth, gains the future.”
“It is always more difficult to fight against faith than against knowledge.”
“The victor will never be asked if he told the truth.”
- Adolf Hitler
Posted by: DCVoter | March 18, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
Last post errata:
“Incite” should be “insight”!! Funny though. LOL
Posted by: marie | March 18, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Tom J, may we hear specifics as to your opinion?
Posted by: Irma | March 18, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Irma, I’ve said many times that the enthusiastic endorsement of Obama by the Kennedy and Kerry establishment was in large part to get the power to manipulate a weak president. Obama is totally beholden to them and other politicians. I believe the real shame is that Kennedy, Kerry, etc. know that Hillary would be the best president, but they wouldn’t be able to use her as a puppet.
Obama supporters: you think he stands for “Change”? Only if Kennedy, Kerry and all of the congressional supporters say so.
Posted by: cappamore | March 18, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
marie – from a speech making critique perspective, i agree.. he looked down and read most of the time yet Jackson claims he bared his soul? On an issue that was supposed to be such a large part of his life? Nothing from his heart? He has to read it off a piece of paper? his stump speeches with a promise of change and hope were better but they lacked substance… this was nothing more than damage control from a typical politician
Posted by: DCVoter | March 18, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
cappa – let’s not forget that in 2004 he flat out said he would not run in 2008 because he was not qualified to do the job. In an interview with CNN after announcing his run, he said that yes he initially was not going to run but some senior democrats encouraged him to do so. Ferraro was right, some of the party set him up for this.. including the speech at the convention… let me guess… the liberal wing encouraged it? aka Kennedy Kerry clan?
Posted by: DCVoter | March 18, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
I don’t know if we will learn anything else about Senator Obama. I hope we don’t learn it after he gets the nomination.
Posted by: Tina D | March 18, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
DCV, Marie and the Gang
Ha Gang. HRC has thrown the towel on fighting this and has moved on.
She said in Philly today:
“I did not have a chance to see or to read yet Sen. Obama’s speech, but I’m very glad that he gave it. It’s an important topic,” she said. “Issues of race and gender in America have been complicated throughout our history, and they have been complicated in this primary campaign. There have been detours and pitfalls along the way.”
She further went on to say:
It isn’t the quality of the speeches “It’s whether the president delivers on the speeches.”
There that wasn’t so hard was it? HRC could see it.
DCV – I think you need to take a Break after violating Godwins Law Twice here now.
Marie – fair enough on the speech. To each her own. I thought it read well. And at least you ain’t callin up da little guy with the funny stache.
Posted by: The Commander Guy | March 18, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
geevil writes:
Obama said that “we” are speculating that all white males will vote for McCain regardless of his policies.
Posted by: Navarro | March 18, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
But “…we can speculate on whether white men will all flock to John McCain in the general election regardless of his policies” really wasn’t put forward as a prediction.
No, it is a statement indicting all white males as racists. “We’ being Obama and his supporters. No where in the speech does he “speculate” about his own supporters. Everyone else is racist or part of the problem. Not Obama. Not a greart speech if you actually read it. It is an insulting attempt to lay a guilt trip on white people.
Posted by: GEEVILL | March 18, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
GEEVIL writes:
“It is an insulting attempt to lay a guilt trip on white people.”
Posted by: Navarro | March 18, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
“I will never forget that in no other country on Earth is my story even possible,” he said.
“It’s a story that hasn’t made me the most conventional candidate. But it is a story that has seared into my genetic makeup the idea that . . .”
Posted by: Navarro | March 18, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Commander Guy wrote:
“Marie – fair enough on the speech. To each her own. I thought it read well. And at least you ain’t callin up da little guy with the funny stache.”
No, I am not. However, I do see a similarity to Mussolini. He was a very popular politician, could move the masses, brought schools to remote mountain villages in Italy that had never enjoyed such privilege. Poor Italians who had emigrated to this country sent their gold jewelry to support such effot, not knowing of the monstrous acts to come. Not Hitler, but perhaps Mussolini who started out as a true socialist and sucked in the peasants.
Posted by: marie | March 18, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
WE SHOULD ENDORSE A UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!
This is an election about:
Economic change
Job prosperity
Housing ( foreclosure campground)
education
A yes vote for this war–(About 145 thousand Americans are fighting this war) How many Americans have been killed fighting this war? How many more will die? — AMERICA HAVE A LEADER FOR A WAR COMMITTEE, NOW LET US ELECT A PRESIDENT.
IOWA VOTED FOR CHANGE
Posted by: Em | March 18, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Marie
Your post speaks for itself.
Posted by: The Commander Guy | March 18, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm