By Ed O'Keefe

Mar 13, 2008 12:43pm

Re-Do Me a Favor? Obama, Clinton Attend to Day Jobs

ABC News’ Z. Byron Wolf Reports: Clinton, Obama, McCain walk into the Senate…haven’t heard this one? No one has for quite some time.

It’s been five months since the final three contenders for the presidency in 2008 have attended to their day jobs and voted at the same time in the Senate.

The annual budget — in which senators decide where to put U.S. tax dollars to work — drove the candidates from the campaign trail, each of the canceling campaign events to be present in Washington.

Journalists crammed into the Senate press gallery to watch Clinton and Obama as they voted, anticipating another snub, like the one observed during the President’s final State of the Union address January 29th.

Obama’s name was called at 11:19 am while Clinton barely made it into the chamber to vote just after 11:30 am.

En route from Chicago to DC, Obama spoke about the anticipated dynamic with Clinton on the Senate floor.

“I’m sure we will both be effusive and make sure that we shake hands,” Obama told reporters before adding, “I’m sure that both she and I are probably glad that we can step back from the one primary a week pace and actually think a little bit, which is something that has been hard to do. It’s been so frenetic. Now’s a good time to be able to step back and you know, think about where we’ve been and I would say make midcourse adjustments, but it’s not midcourse.”

But presidential politics seemed to invade the Senate chamber along with the candidates.

Off the C-SPAN cameras in the chamber, Obama was locked in deep conversation for ten minutes or more with Sens. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., and Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., who just so happen to represent the two states debating a re-do of their primaries.

Clinton ignored the conversation as she walked by it. Both Stabenow and Nelson are Clinton supporters.

Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., joined the conversation toward the end. He has not endorsed a candidate, but his brother, Rep. Sander Levin, D-Mich., is for Clinton.

According to Senate records, McCain last voted on February 13th, when he voted in favor of the Indian Healthcare Improvement Act. It would have looked bad for McCain to miss that vote; he sits on the Indian Affairs Committee and is a former chairman.

The last time Obama pointed his thumb downward in the direction of the Senate clerk and voted “no” on a cloture motion with regard to the Senate’s version of a bill to update the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. He was in the minority on the 69-29 vote.

He and McCain were seen greeting each other that day on the Senate floor.

Clinton missed votes in the Senate on February 12th even though she was in Washington campaigning ahead of the so-called Potomac Primary contests in Washington, D.C., Maryland and Virginia that day.

The last time the former first lady case a vote was on Feb. 6th when she and Obama both supported cloture on a more generous version of the economic stimulus bill than the one that eventually passed.

Clinton, through a surrogate, criticized McCain for missing that vote. But she missed the vote on final passage of the stimulus bill that ultimately became law. Neither vote was close enough to have been swayed by the Presidential candidate.

The last time all three senators voted on the same measure was October 24, 2007, on the confirmation of a controversial judicial nominee, Leslie Southwick of Mississippi to be United States Circuit Judge for the 5th Circuit.

Obama and Clinton both opposed the nomination, McCain supported it, and Southwick was confirmed 59-38.

On deck on Tuesday is a “vote-a-rama” — a series of votes allow multiple opportunities for the candidates to cross paths.

First up was an amendment that would make permanent several tax provisions set to expire in 2010.

They’ll keep going on and off all day long, perhaps into the wee hours before passing the non-binding fiscal guideline, almost surely on a party line vote.

The big amendment to keep an eye on is one offered by Sen. Jim DeMint of South Carolina to plate a one year moratorium on “congressionally directed spending” a.k.a “earmarks.”

All three presidential candidates support the measure, even if the two Democrats dog-eared some combined 314 earmarks worth almost $400 million last year ($266 million for Clinton and $126 million for Obama).

It’s also notable that Senator Robert C. Byrd, D-WVa., who was hospitalized in recent weeks, first after a fall and later for a bad reaction to antibiotics, dragged himself out of his hospital bed and is in the chamber in a wheel chair to vote.

ABC News’ Sunlen Miller contributed to this report.

User Comments

HILLARY CLINTON went out of her way to speak to Obama who SNUBBED her last time around. It’s interesting that he’s trying to get advance press on a potential make-up non-snub greet. Good thing he’s not a same old kind of politician doing the same old thing. Nope, he never tries to manipulate the press for his benefit.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 13, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

WestCoastMessenger – you claim to want a Clinton/Obama ticket and have said you’d support him in his presidential bid after he’s gained more experience. Yet, you continue to smear him by any means necessary in an attempt to tarnish his name. Why cause so much damage to a man you claim you would support in the future? Your attitude is near-sighted. Dems trying to ruin Obama for Clinton’s benefit in this round of competition (though they would support him in future rounds) don’t see that they are hurting the party’s future chances if this were the case.
Criticisms on issues are valid – even towards a candidate you support. I support Obama but have criticized him when it was due. I don’t see the same from Hillary supporters on this site. No matter what the news is, it’s always “Praise Hillary GOOD FOR HER… Hallelujah! Shame on you Obama!” It makes the public unable to take their comments seriously because they’re obviously not showing clear judgement – only rabid fanaticism for Hillary.
But my point is, if people claim that they would support Obama in a future presidential bid (or even support him in the GE if he is the Dem nominee), then trying to damage him unnecessarily in the primaries is just helping to strike the Dem party with an axe. We don’t need Dems attacking Dems with personal attacks. We have Republicans for that. If criticism must be leveled, it should be kept to ISSUES.
Anyone on this site who claims to be a true Democrat, think of the good of the party in the long run, PLEASE. Whether it’s Clinton or Obama (or their supporters on both sides), let’s keep the debate focused on issues.
I don’t support attacking Clinton personally either, for the record. The only reason why this post was mostly about attacking Obama was because I see the same 4 or 5 pro-Clintonites posting the same rabid fanatical comments in every blog post – just blindly singing Hill’s praises and decimating Obama with personal attacks. It’s not even helping their candidate. No one is going to start supporting Clinton just coz her supporter was on the internet personally attacking other candidates and acting sanctimonious, condescending and superior.

Posted by: Whatever | March 13, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

What an accurate display of three Senators who have forgotten their respective responsibilties to constituents and the United States as a whole.
Would it be too much to ask that Senators Clinton, McCain, and Obama try to author, co-sponsor, or even support an effort currently underway by those who condemn the Air Force award of a government contract to build supertanker aircraft to a foreign business currently being sued by the United States government?
Instead, the “Big Three” are busy trying to slam dunk their opponents, pander to potential support, beg for support, or defend themselves against attacks by fellow Senators and their political campaigns.
What is wrong with this picture? Or, have Americans forgotten that they can hold politicians responsible for their failures?

Posted by: Change | March 13, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

Interesting that BO was sweet talking Florida an Michigan people…But it would be very difficult to run those polls again. The thing is, the voter’s made their choice! Those votes should stand! BO wasn’t on the michigan ballot list? Well, he knew it was happening!BTW it was apparetly a REPUBLICAN decision to move the Florida date forward! VERY SMART! They’ve been screwing up Florida’s chance to vote since 2000! I say LET THE VOTES STAND!!!

Posted by: Di | March 13, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

I believe that the Michigan and Florida votes should not be counted because many poeple in those states were told that their votes would not be counted.
Hillary Clinton signed agreement not to ccompaign in those states. Now, she kept saying that these votes should be counted. I don’t think that’s fair.

Posted by: Ha | March 14, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am

well , I can telll yout that clinton wont be supporting Obama after the STUNT his pastor has exposed.
Obamas political future is at stake

Posted by: tomdavie | March 15, 2008, 6:53 am 6:53 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.