The Choice
The data is starting to suggest that Sen. Barack Obama would beat Sen. John McCain among independent voters — while McCain would beat Sen. Hillary Clinton with indies.
But it also suggests that Clinton has an advantage when it comes to holding on to Democratic voters.
Ron Brownstein at National Journal takes a closer look using data from Pew and Quinnipiac.
As Brownstein writes: “Findings like these help explain why many Democrats think Obama offers greater potential rewards as a nominee, but also presents greater risks. If Obama runs well, he seems more likely than Clinton to assemble a big majority and trigger a Democratic sweep — not only by attracting independents and crossover Republicans but also by increasing turnout among African-Americans and young people.
“But if Obama stumbles, he could face a greater danger of fracturing the traditional Democratic coalition by losing seniors and blue-collar whites to McCain, principally on security issues. Clinton’s reach across the electorate may not be as long, but her grip on her voters could be firmer.”
What say you?
- jpt
Email
USS Gabrielle Giffords Honors Courage
Mitt Romney's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
I honestly believe Hillary would have the hardest time winning the Obama supporters and Independents.
Obama can gain several of the Blue Collar voters by chosing the right running mate (Edwards).
Posted by: Vanessa | March 15, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am
I have always voted democratic but cannot vot for Obama. How could anyone listen to a paster like that for 20 years – I would not last one week. Now we know why Michelle Obama is so angry about her country. If they give the nomination of MY party to this upstart, I walk along with many others.
Posted by: Sheila | March 15, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am
I suspect those polls are very out of date at this point. After wide publication of the sermons of Rev. Wright-friend, mentor, pastor, savior,whatever, to Barack Obama, you can forget about Blue Collar Dems and Independents supporting Obama in the general election. What a difference a day makes.
Posted by: marie | March 15, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
This data means nothing before the Republican attack machine gears up.
Who can withstand it better?? I think the answer has become clearer in the last couple of days.
Posted by: s.b. | March 15, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am
Trudy,
Thank you. I completely agree. As Nancy Pelosi said, she can’t image the superdelegate overruling the candidate with the most delegates.
Independents will never vote Hillary. Their option right now is between Obama and McCain. Bothof whom who are going through similar situation.
Obama can get majority of Hillary supporters by chosing Edwards. I don’t see any other choice but Edwards.
Hillary, no matter who she choses, she will lose the AA, young, and Independent voters.
And to think she was the “inevitable” candidate. Funny what a year makes.
Posted by: Vanessa | March 15, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am
I agree Edwards or Robinson two good men….Clinton will have so much dirty laundry and no tax returns the Rep will not let her get away with it.I for one DO NOT want Billy boy back in the White house and I as a IND will NOT vote for HILLY….
Posted by: H | March 15, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am
Obama just stumbled. Don’t you read your own news?
How many blue collar Americans are going to vote for a man closely identified with a pastor who preaches “God Damn America.”
Think of the field day the Republicans will have using this material (if the Democrats’ death wish results in his nomination). Especially in conjunction with his wife’s remarks (now understandable in this context), and videos of Obama next to Hillary refusing to make the pledge of allegiance.
Posted by: Susan Rennie | March 15, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am
Bill Clinton was not removed from office because of the support from the democrates especially the african americans, it is not because of Hillary’s strength to resist republican attack machines. That difference is very important to make. Hillary is not tested nor veted as she pretends, she is overmarketting herself, she has to understand that she cannot win general elections without the support of independants and unhappy republicans and she will never get these two voting blocks.
Posted by: BKMC | March 15, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am
There’s one sure thing I’m glad about and it’s
1)This news came out now rather then 3 days before Penn or North Carolina.
2)The news will die down within the next 2 weeks and as the debate approach.
3)We will see more pressure for Clinton to release her earmark, tax returns, and her documents as first lady.
Posted by: Vanessa | March 15, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am
I am middle class, white, female, college educated and a life long democrat. If it is not Clinton, it unfortunately will have to be McCain. It has nothing to do with Mr. Obama’s skin color. To most of the media and a lot of voters it seems as if he has the same teflon effect that Reagan had. All of the things that have come out about Obama just seem to bounce off of him. I am afraid America is going to realize too late that it would be a horrible mistake to elect him as President.
Posted by: Janice | March 15, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
i think that it is very possible for hillary to gain the support of obama only if obama stop being stubborn and run for vice president. then the democrats would be unstoppable
Posted by: joseph | March 15, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am
The fact that Obama is able to only garner votes from youths and blacks is a testament of his inability to attract voters that really consider the major issues. According to exit polls, blacks voted for Obama because he is black. Not because they care about the issues and who can best lead this country. Youths flocking to Obama says it all (no comment). And the fact that most Hollywood stars endorse Obama doesn’t say much about Obama as a candidate. Really, does Hollywood care about the issues – they’re all superficial grossly entangled in their own superfluous drama and vain lives.
I hope that this primary election get back on track with the major issues at hand. Obama would love for it to veer off the track and make race a big issue or make superdelegates a big issue. The election isn’t over – let’s see who has the better policies, the better plans for America.
Lastly, the news about Obama’s long and deep spiritual relationship with his bigoted pastor (yes racism goes both ways) HAS TO BE ADDRESSED AND PLACED PARAMOUNT on people’s minds when they go to vote. This issues cannot be swept under the rug like most of what Obama’s past problems have ended up. Obama’s answers to his relationship with this pastor is INSINCERE and his denounciations were backed up with excuses for this pastor. Obama said he denounced on those remarks, on those particular statements made by the pastor, YET he still upholds his respect and views of the pastor. That is not denouncing nor rejecting. Perhaps this is Obama’s definition of denouncing and rejection when he said the same of Louis Farakan – it is insincere and a complete mockery of the American people.
I don’t expect die-hard Obama supporters to scorn Obama for his relationship with this pastor because they seem to have an undying support for this man – but I would hope that they would look at this issue of Obama’s spiritual walk with Wright as a warning. Doesn’t it mean odd that Obama would continue to support and attend this church for 20 years knowing the vile instructions he’s been fed about America. How can you with a conscience sit there and call this man like an uncle whose ideals he claims is antagonistic to his for America. Or is Obama just playing us now. How many excuses should we allow? If this isn’t the most gross and blatant warning to the American people (especially when it comes to allegiance to this country) than I don’t know what is.
Posted by: Michael A Nick. | March 15, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am
I have never trusted Obama. He claims that he only “recently” learned about the “statements at issue” by his pastor, because he never heard them while he was sitting in the pew. That settles it, right?
To paraphrase a Pat Buchanan comment, this is yet another example of Obama’s strategy of holding his breath and hoping nothing new comes out.
If Obama thinks that just because he is not white, he is going to get an automatic pass on anything and everything, he is greatly mistaken. In case Obama and his supporters haven’t noticed, there are millions of us out here who do not decide what to think based on what the “press” is “reporting”.
AND if the Democrats are foolish enough to nominate Mr. Obama, we will witness a rout that will make Walter Mondale’s defeat look like a Mondale landslide.
This latest Rev. Wright bombshell could turn out to be a net plus. It just might inspire the Obama camp to stop crying racism every time a white person or a black non-supporter utters anything they can magically transform into a “race card” or one of those “despicable [Hillary or Bill] racial attacks”.
Granted, their ongoing strategy has worked with millions of black people. It won’t work with this one.
Posted by: prittfumes | March 15, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am
Why would Obama take the VP spot when he’s leading. Leading in votes, states, and delegates.
Obama supporters (including myself) don’t want Hillary anywhere near that ticket. As president or as Vice.
And for Hillary to suggest Obama to be her VP is VERY hypocritical since her entire campaign is based on Obama not being ready for presidency.
Chosing a VP is based on who you believe would do the best job besides yourself as president.
She has already claimed McCain would be a better fit, which is why Nancy Pelosi and several other democrats made calls to her campaign.
No matter who’s the candidate, that statement will come back a hurt us.
Posted by: Vanessa | March 15, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am
For anyone who says Independents will never vote for Hillary, think again. Who are you to speak for me? You obviously don’t. Independent and voting for Hillary. If not Hillary, then McCain, but NEVER OBAMA.
Posted by: Kitty | March 15, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am
Now is the time to ask the Sen. Clinton what her 35 yrs of experience really is. Now is the time to ask questions about what the American public need to know and are going to ask very soon. If we don’t ask these questions, the republican’s will. Every American knows all of the stuff that’s part of Clinton’s experience like: Whitewater, Travel gate, Monica Lewinsky and impeachment, renting out the Lincoln bedroom, the loss of the Rose Law Firm billing records for nearly 2 years until they were miraculously found in the White House living quarters, removing files from Vince Foster’s office following his suicide and before investigators could get there. Has anyone asked why she hasn’t released her library records as First Lady or tax returns? What if she’s hiding something negative that might cost our party the White House? Most people believe she is hiding something terrible. While you guys are deciding the republicans will consolidate and take the white house again.
Posted by: Chan | March 15, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am
A vote for a Democrats is a vote to end the war and the killing of our men & women in uniform. A vote for a republican is a continuation of the war. Who wants to spend $12b a month in Iraq, when we have problems in America that need those dollars now. I’ll vote for an end to the war, instead voting for someone who sang bomb, bomb, bomb Iran or thinks we should remain in Iraq for 100 years.
Posted by: Chan | March 15, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am
IT’S A SHAME THAT A BLACK MAN CAN’T BE A BLACK WHEN RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT. HE HAS TO WALK A FINER LINE..HE HAS TO MORE THAN ANYMONE ELSE..ITS SHAMEFUL WHAT ALL THESE NEWS CHANNEL TRIED TO DO TO HIM.
Posted by: betty | March 15, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am
I am a long-term democrat and will not be voting for Hillary Clinton if she gets the nomination. I know a lot of long-term dems who think like me, so I don’t know how firm a grasp she has on dems.
Posted by: Dem | March 15, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am
These polls are meaningless – coming just after the two expected wins by Obama and before the offensive videos of Obama’s minister came to light. Imagine what the republicans will do to promote this issue. Also, can we believe Obama when he says he never heard these ugly, separatist, militant messages by his minister? A 20 year relationship. Come on now!!!
Posted by: where is the DNC? | March 15, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am
I agree, I think Obama can shore up his support among dems by choosing a running mate who appeals to traditional dems. I don’t think any Clinton ticket would be capable of expanding her base into Independents and Republicans. So Obama does have more potential to create a greater coalition. Not only will Clinton not be able to expand her coalition, I think she could also loose a significant portion of Obama supporters, more liberal dems (like myself who will not vote for her in November if she steals the nomination). Either way Clinton’s margin is much more narrow.
Posted by: Dem | March 15, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am
I suggest waiting for updated polls. I really don’t think the majority of Americans will stand for the fact that BARACK OBAMA placed a known rascist, America-hater on his team in the first place, shows extreme lack of judgement. Why should we trust Obama at this point? The right thing to do was to never bring the guy into the campaign. Poor, poor judgement.
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 15, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am
As I read the blogs from Obama’s supporters, it’s clear that THEY are playing the race card. What’s really upsetting is that they’ve managed to sideline and obliterate the unity that Bill Clinton developed among all democratic fashions – and the Clinton’s authentic regard for all groups in the democratic coalition. It might take some distance from this campaign but that will be the story of this election – that this so-called transformational candidate did so much to undo the gains of the last 16 years. Thanks for taking us backward, Obama! Years ago, I crossed party lines to vote for our state’s first Black senator. Before you and your supporters reduced this election to a racial contest, I was excited by the prospect of your candidacy. Now, I’ll never vote for you – in this election or any future one. I hate to think that the outcome of this election is in your hands. Your vanity and arrogance will keep you from recognizing this fact.
Posted by: nonnie | March 15, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am
As I read the blogs from Obama’s supporters, it’s clear that THEY are playing the race card. What’s really upsetting is that they’ve managed to sideline and obliterate the unity that Bill Clinton developed among all democratic fashions – and the Clinton’s authentic regard for all groups in the democratic coalition. It might take some distance from this campaign but that will be the story of this election – that this so-called transformational candidate did so much to undo the gains of the last 16 years. Thanks for taking us backward, Obama! Years ago, I crossed party lines to vote for our state’s first Black senator. Before you and your supporters reduced this election to a racial contest, I was excited by the prospect of your candidacy. Now, I’ll never vote for you – in this election or any future one. I hate to think that the outcome of this election is in your hands. Your vanity and arrogance will keep you from recognizing this fact.
Posted by: nonnie | March 15, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am
I just have to say I agree with Janice If not Hillary it will have to be McCann And I know I’m not alone in this. I live In PA and we are getting ready to vote, just knowing you would associate yourself with a hate monger, like this pastor I know I could not vote for Obama!
Posted by: Vicki | March 15, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am
I just have to say I agree with Janice If not Hillary it will have to be McCann And I know I’m not alone in this. I live In PA and we are getting ready to vote, just knowing you would associate yourself with a hate monger, like this pastor I know I could not vote for Obama!
Posted by: Vicki | March 15, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am
venessa – you don’t say what “this” is in your post. You doubt that McCain will take aim on what? LOL you can’t even bear to stomach it so much so that you can’t even tell us what “this” is. Look, Obama’s pastor said point blank “God damn America!”. The other candidates’ spiritual leaders never said anything like that. The fact that Obama continues to defend his pastor who believes that God should damn America is unpatriotic. A pastor can say many things even teach wrong doctrine there are many of them out there probably all denominations have something wrong, BUT there is a difference when it comes to statements like “GOD DAMN AMERICA” and statements like AMERICA DESERVED 9/11 (say that to someone whose family member died in the 9/11 attack). I dare you to say that what Wright preached is no different than what you claim. How dare you!
I will never vote for Obama even though I don’t like McCain – McCain is far more patriotic far more respectable than Obama could ever be in a million years.
Obama has only shown that he is WEAK, he is a COWARD, he is UNPATRIOTIC, he is NOT COMMANDER IN CHIEF!
Posted by: Michale N | March 15, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am
This is why the Democrats will lose come November. Obama supporters won’t vote Hillary and vice verse.
The Hillary campaign have no one to blame but themselves. If it weren’t for Bill, that other womens’ comment, and Hillary’s previous tactics. If wouldn’t be as hard as it is now to vote for her.
But this candidancy has now turned perosnal, where neither side will vote for the other.
We might as well give McCain the keys now.
Posted by: Vanessa | March 15, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am
“Vanessa”,
Decisions on the latest polls? I don’t think so. If so, McCain would have been out of the race last summer and Hillary would have been out of the race after Iowa. New Hampshire polls had her down in double digits but she prevailed. Polls, schmolls. All you are interested in is trying to get us to focus on Bush 3 as some kind of viable alternative. Ain’t going to happen.
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 15, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
Anyone remember that the state delegates CAN CHANGE THEIR VOTES AT THE CONVENTION? Can say buyer’s remorse?
Posted by: pp | March 15, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
I’m just stating the facts. The possibility Hillary AND Obama will win the GE is almost slim to none UNLESS one drops out now (highly unlikely).
What you’re also forgetting is, Hillary was the “inevitable” nominee. She had the connections. She had her campaign organized years ago. She had leads of 20′s and even 30′s in states Obama has won.
And as of today, Obama leads in states 30-14. Leads in votes by 800,000 (according to CNN) and has a delegate lead of 161.
Although Clinton has a lead in superdelegates. Her lead has been eroded. It was once over 100. Now its at 30.
I guess by all means, Hillary is winning???
Posted by: Vanessa | March 15, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
Picture this in the general election…
a picture of BHO’s preacher spewing, “GDA”, from the pulpet
…and break away to McCain in uniform, then POW outfit.
Slam-dunk, the game is over.
Posted by: pp | March 15, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
This is one angry Democrat who has been paying attention, and along with my family and friends, we are staying home in NOV. The DNC has run a sham of an undemocratic primary. The MSM and many in the blogosphere have used deception, lies and double standards when covering Hillary and Obama. And I am sick of the race baiting by the Obama campaign(read the 4page memo) who started this all and now it is backfiring on them. If this is how Obama wants to bring us all together he can forget my 20 family and friends. Obama is a media and DNC creation just like Bush was a RNC and media darling creation. Wake up, People!
Posted by: tiffany | March 15, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
betty, yawn. actions matter. i knew of wright’s sermons months ago. why didn’t obama? he did. simply by showing up week after week, obama showed us who he is. supporter of a racist. i always tell my kid, it’s not your friends i am concerned about. it’s your friend’s friends. is obama your friend?
Posted by: Kitty | March 15, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
pp,
So true. Even though we’ve all seen the footage of these sermons, the spin, spin, spin of the Republican attack machine is going to have a field day with this. Let’s only hope they hold off until the GE (in the event Senator Obama is the nominee) rather than now. If the RAM puts out those ads now, that will be huge trouble.
Posted by: LOM | March 15, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
A vote for a Democrats is a vote to end the war and the killing of our men & women in uniform. A vote for a republican is a continuation of the war. Who wants to spend $12b a month in Iraq, when we have problems in America that need those dollars now. I’ll vote for an end to the war, instead voting for someone who sang bomb, bomb, bomb Iran or thinks we should remain in Iraq for 100 years.
Posted by: Chan | March 15, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
Obama is beginning to get that “deer in the headlights” look. One of the Fox news commentators said something similar last evening during their very focused coverage of the ugly, divisive preacher that Obama continues to support.
By the way, it’s incredible that Obama and so many of the Obama apologists include the fact that he’s a former marine. Who cares? Most marines can point to at least one of their own who tried to dishonor the corps.
Posted by: nonnie | March 15, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
I’m 62 and I’m here in Michigan.
I don’t see Obama losing “Seniors” at all, in fact several office mates that voted W’04 and in 2000 are now looking seriously at Obama but would never ever vote for Clinton. These people have seen the mess that the Republican agenda has created for their grown children with young families and want no more of that.
They didn’t like Bill and like Hillary even less.
Posted by: dennis | March 15, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
Obama supporters it is OVER for him, those videos plus new ones will run on the internet forever. And if he is the nominee the republicans will run them everyday in ads. He laughed this week at the Clintons offering him the VP slot when he was in the lead. NOW it is too late for that position also.
Posted by: toby | March 15, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
It is going to be interesting to see how big Obama’s crowds are now.
Posted by: Tina D | March 15, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
You all need to break down the numbers…
the hard core central democrats are stuck in this argument protecting the Clintons …like my parents arguing that “Reba” was the best show on television because of all the people in their condo association in Floridas television sets are on at that time…
…or that eating less fat and more carbs was the way to lose weight…
You have been arguing for the Clintons for so long that you can’t break away from them being the bar.
This has a lot to do with “defending the queen” mentality…and I feel for you all…seriously. It’s like arguing with my parents over whether “Reba” is the best written show on television. Trust me, I like Reba, but I think Reba would argue with them.
More importantly…
The surge is not doing it’s job. Lets get focused.
How much “life” and money have we spent on the surge? How much life and money have we spent on the war? How much more life and money will we spend on the war/surge?
…and what of General Petraeus’ comments on the political establishment not making progress…since that was the only point of the surge. Since it was redundant to say a military surge would quell violence after a period of time.
The Choice we should make is going to end up dealing with this issue…you watch. …and those numbers as the economy tanks and we are still in Limbo with no movement toward any kind of real government in Iraq…and our soldiers are warn to the bone… and we have to tip into the kiddie again…
It’s the economy stupid…and the war/surge is going to be the biggest hole in the bucket…dear Liza, dear Liza. Well fix it dear Henry dear henry… (for those of you who aren’t of the sesame generation it’s from the show)
Posted by: dl | March 15, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
…adn vanessa is right about the numbers.
Posted by: dl | March 15, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Obama supporters are truly delusional if they want to hold on to “days old” polling results. The vetting has begun. Your candidate has that “deer in the headlights” look.
It seems he can’t stand up to scrutiny. He’s on the defensive and he’s got a lot to defend – a divisive, racist minister, a land deal with a Chicago crook, his wife’s ugly rants. I’m almost feeling sorry for him.
Posted by: nonnie | March 15, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
Shouldnt these poll number be BW = before wright or AW = after wright
Posted by: toby | March 15, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
Ummmmm, I just saw a news ticker that showed “Joe Biden (I-CT)”.
Just checked his website to see if he changed to an Independent. Nothing there. Where else can I look to verify this???
Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | March 15, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
I believe this Rev. Wright flap will not go away. Even my brother who hates Hillary and is a big supporter of Barack, can not believe he has never heard any of these hateful comments. It will be interesting to see what margin Hillary wins by in PA. I think she was ahead by about 10% and usually Barrack narrows that margin when it gets close. I have a feeling she may open her lead and that will be very telling. I think we have to wait and see how all this plays out.
Posted by: Tina D | March 15, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
Gut feeling:
Hillary can’t win against McCain with traditional democrats alone.
Al Gore/Barack Obama could win against McCain, however because Gore could hold the traditional party votes and Obama would hold the new votes.
Posted by: Karen | March 15, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
I saw the town hall meeting with Obama. It was great. He spoke on issues, address the revs comments, and had the crowd at their feet. It seems Obama didn’t lose too much. The crowd was mainly white.
Posted by: Vanessa | March 15, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
I don’t think it’s fair to say that Hillary would do a better job holding on to Democrats against McCain.
There’s still a democratic primary process going on and democrats are still divided in either the Hillary camp or the Obama camp. So as they answer a general election poll, they will be choosing whichever democrat they currently support in the primary process, and they will be hesitant to support their primary opponent.
However once the primary process is over and the Democratic nominee is decided, democrats will no longer have conflicting loyalties within the party and i think only then can the polls accurately depict what level of support a democratic candidate has in the general election.
I think it’s deceptive to look at how these general election polls break down while the primary process is still furiously engaged. Right now, if you are a Hillary supporter you will be very hesitant to vote for Obama in anything, even a general election poll against McCain.
But once the primary process is over and the democratic party is coalescing, i think that same Hillary supporter will vote for whoever is the democratic nominee.
Posted by: jozsef | March 15, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
obama HAS stumbled, so the premises of the commentary have changed, and to obama’s serious detriment.
those of you, like vanessa, who say obama can gain blue collar voters by choosing the right running mate need to go in for reeducation. blue collar voters who see ads, that will definitely be aired, of obama and wright and farrahkan, and hear what they have to say and how obama has praised wright over the years, will never vote for this guy, even if he had mother teresa on the ticket. and, vanessa, the issue of obama as vp, which you scorn, has become even less a possibility for him. he will be lucky if he holds onto his senate seat. and, btw, vanessa, that song and dance you were playing last night about being 17 years old – i fell for it, shame on me.
Posted by: so saddened | March 15, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
IT’S VERY FUNNY HOW THE MEDIA SEEMS TO BE FOCUSING ALL OF ITS ENERGY ON JEREMIAH WRIGHT AND HIS SUPPORT OF OBAMA. WHY DOESN’T THE MEDIA PAY ATTENTION TO SOME OF THE CONTROVERSIAL REMARKS MADE BY JOHN HAGEE AND ROD PARSLEY WHO BOTH ENDORSED MCCAIN. WHAT MOST DON’T SEEM TO RECOGNIZE IS THAT MANY OF THE COMMENTS THAT WERE MADE BY JEREMIAH WRIGHT (AS RADICAL AS THEY MAY SEEM) STEMS FROM A REALITY THAT CANNOT EASILY BE ERASED. REPORTERS SUCH AS HANNITY TRY TO MAKE IT APPEAR THAT PASTOR WRIGHT IS ANTI-AMERICAN BUT THIS IS SIMPLY NOT TRUE. IT IS QUITE CLEAR TO ME THAT A MAN CAN LOVE HIS COUNTRY BUT NOT ENTIRELY AND BLINDLY ACCEPT ALL OF ITS ACTIONS OR POLICIES. ONE WOULD THINK THAT AFTER EIGHT YEARS OF BEING UNDER THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION, AMERICA WOULD BE SCREAMING FOR CHANGE. IT IS MY BELIEF THAT THIS CHANGE EXISTS IN BARACK OBAMA; NOT IN HILIARY CLINTON WHO IS SECRETIVE AND A BIT UNTRUSTWORTHY NOR DOES IT EXISTS IN JOHN MCCAIN WHO IS A BUSH CLONE. WAKE UP AMERICA!!!!
Posted by: Kenyada | March 15, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
From a European perspective I have to say that you Americans are so funny – you pretend to know anything about someone’s beliefs and character (in this case Rev. Wright, and Obama in extension) by picking out a few quotes from a 20 year career and I think it’s so funny to read Hillary fans saying they’ll never vote for Obama even though his and Hillary’s policies are 95% the same and while McCain doesn’t believe in universal health care and rejects abortion. Tell me, especially you so-called emancipated women, how can you vote for some like that just because you don’t like Obama as a person? Again, the man opposes abortion!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Laura | March 15, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
Please give obama a break. You shouldn’t hold him accountable for his minister remarks.Look
Posted by: Evelyn | March 15, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
Correction: I agree with VANESSA. Laura is also correct. I can see how we look strange from a foreign perspective.
Posted by: Josh | March 15, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
You know its funny that so many attack Obama based on the fact that he goes to a church where a pastor has certain views. The fact that Obama has went there for twenty years holds no bearing on his personal belief. Case in point. Lets say you are white and your grandparents are racist. In fact lets say they are members of the Klan. You have visited your grandparents constantly throughout the course of your life for 30 years. Does that make you a racist? Should a black man hate you are not trust you because you love your granparents. Exactly! Association does not make a person a racist. And to be honest John Mccain has two endorsements from evangelist John Hagee and pastor Rod Parsley who have said for worst than pastor Wright. That is unless since New Orleans was mostly black you don’t count it as part of America and you think its ok to kill all people that don’t share your religion. If you think their statements are ok then you are nothing more than a closest racist as is anyone who sits around and attacks Senator Obama but has nothing to say about Senator McCain. Also when a catholic goes to a church for 30 years and then it’s found that the Bishop had been molesting little boys does that mean the entire church thinks its ok? I mean if they share the Bishops other views they must share that too right? Again nothing but closet racist attacking Obama.
Posted by: common sense | March 15, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
Hilary is certainly more prepared in one way, but that’s maintaining the status quo and that’s exactly what this country doesn’t need! Look at what the Clinton’s and their sycophantic followers have done to this campaign. They have no shame! Disgraceful!
Posted by: geddesman | March 15, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
How much money has Rezko donated to Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton’s campaign. Why are they in a picture with Rezko? What was Rezko’s affiliation with the Clinton’s?
Posted by: Gaby | March 15, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
All younger Voters do you all see how the older American ppl are? We all should be able to Date or Marry who ever we want! The older generation are still caught up in that white should marry white and same for the minority’s!, This is Wrong! Obama brings New Politics and a change to this Great Country.Time for the Old ways to move on, and time to bring in the New! Vote Obama in Nov.Lets take out the Trash.
Posted by: Demo Rules | March 15, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm
What I don’t understand is how could any body sit through the hate sermons and all.
Posted by: ShadowKnows | March 15, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
McCain would rip through Obama’s inconsistencies.
Every word that Obama utters or writes is inconsistent.
He claims his dad came with the Kennedy airlift in 1960. His dad came to the US in 1959.
He is soooooo smoooooth, that everyone falls for him, and does not notice the inconsistencies.
When Clinton attacks him, she considered shrill. However, when McCain attacks him, people will listen.
Posted by: Inconsistencies | March 15, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
Obama went to a church that had Wright preaching for 20 years and Obama happened to miss all the racist,damn America sermons,just like he missed having even one meeting on the foriegn affairs commitee he chairs you know the one that decides the level of troops in Afganistan.He also lied about Rezko and his level of involvement with him.Rezko was selling favors,contracts and appointments to the Illionois Health Facilities board and whos one of the members why Obama is.Rezko contributed over 250,000 dallors to Obamas campaigns and Obama only gives 150,000 to charity that he says came fron Rezko.Obama has radicals like Willian Ayers,Louis Farakhan,and Wright as friends.This will be the first time in my life that I’ll vote republican if Obama wins.Step down Obama and stop tearing the dems apart your not presidential material.
Posted by: girlinvt | March 15, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
The Democratic party has no idea has much young voters can change the race for the house. The year, we’ve never been so energized; coming out in vast numbers.
Many will sit out if Hillary is nominee. I can honestly say this with no mockery or sarcasm. The HOPE that Obama has energized within us will leave with him if he isn’t the nominee.
Independents will crossover to McCain.
Republicans that thought of crossing over will not.
African Americans will feel robbed (this shouldn’t be situation, but we have to face reality)
Posted by: Vanessa | March 15, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
Obama was playing the race card in Iowa, and he has never stopped!but does any make a point about it? no, just when Hillary camp says any thing does he start to squal like a wounded monkey, further more the white house,senate delgates will make sure he gets in and it will be the last of our freedoms here in the United States- he will never get my vote! and i am not a racist- say good bye to our country
Posted by: pearlruth | March 15, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
How about Joe Biden for Obama’s VP choice.
Posted by: mcgreen | March 15, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
Obama is the only hope we have for improvement in the status quo.
Posted by: bmacc | March 15, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
tiffany,
Apparently you and your ’20 family and friends’ did not read the several articles out there that stated it was the CLINTON campaign who sent out the ‘Muslim smear email’ which started the race issue – it was the Clinton campaign who played the race card LONG before Obama rose in the number of states won! The email was traced back to the Clinton campaign…
Please, for your own sake, do some research!
Posted by: NanD | March 15, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
I’m curious if the news media is looking at how many democrats have been turned off by the liberal wing’s support of Obama. The assumption that all democrats will fall in line with the masses supporting Obama is significantly overrated. Many non-Obama supporting democrats are disgusted with all the “old school” attacks on the Clinton’s and on us for supporting Hillary. I say let the nasty Obama supporters deal with the nasty republican’s and I’ll just “boycott” any political media coverage in the next seven months. Enough is enough.
Posted by: mary | March 15, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
Young voters have historicly never shown up in November after being active in the primaries, but that’s not even important because no republican, nor independent will ever vote for Obama now. So Obama supporters get over it and stop justifying and arguing when it’s all over for Obama. I just read another poll which said Obama’s 8 point lead has already melted away due to Wright’s remarks-and that’s just in 2 days.Wait till the news really spreads and the new Rezko revelations is out fully. This is before the 527s/501s or republicans ever even make 1 ad/clip, so say good bye Obama. Should have accepted the VP position instead of playing charade. The cult leader has finally fallen from the grace of the media. “Judgement”-what a joke.
Posted by: AmericanAbroad | March 15, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
Obama may not win those particular state but he can win the SWING STATES, colorado , wisconsin, iowa for expample
Posted by: Vanessa | March 15, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
Young voters have never shown up because we’ve never had a reason to SHOW UP. I will laugh in mockery when this news die down and the media starts pressuring Hillary to release her earmark (which she refused to today after Obama released his), her tax return, and her first lady documents.
Posted by: Vanessa | March 15, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
ATTENTION Delegates/Super-Delegates; Hillary has made a deal with the Devil by Praising McCain on National T.V. and should be BOOTED from the Democratic Party
Posted by: Demo Rules | March 15, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
Did you NOT read my post. Polls show Obama AND Hillary losing to McCain in Ohio. Both Obama and Hillary beating McCain in Penn. Michigen will revote and this time Obama will win because of the young voters (college students) and large African American population.
Listen its okay that your “inevitable” nominee may not be the candidate but I think its time that you grasp the idea and lets all become Obamanites.
Its so sad because even Nancy Pelosi is for Obama. She said herself, whomever is winning in the delegate count by June will get the nomination.
WE ALL KNOW CLINTON CAN’T OVER TAKE OBAMA LEAD.
Posted by: Vanessa | March 15, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
It would be interesting to see new polls after this weekend…
Posted by: Victor | March 15, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
what poll has mccain winning ohio because Zogby USA today had hilary LOSING BOTH CALIFORNIA Ohio and Texas
not too mention new hampshire by sighficant margins
so please dont think ohio will go to mccain if hillary is choice
Gov. Ted Strickland is loved by rirual ohio & he beat the republican candidate by 70 % just last election… & he’s Hilary’s true powerful weapon here along w steph tubb jones in cleveland…
and that makes Ohio extremely competitive IF Hilary wins nomination…only…
Posted by: appalachia blue | March 15, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
So polls indicate Clinton leading in Penn. Should I say their wrong and Obama will win by 20???
In New Ham, Hillary won, HOWEVER, Obama recieved the most delegate. I wouldn’t entirely count that as a victory.
Bush did lose the popular vote and win the presidency.
Posted by: Vanessa | March 15, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
Those same superdelegates will back Obama up when he’s the nominee. So whats your point???
Posted by: Vanessa | March 15, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm
It is time for Democrats to put an end to this nonsense. Democrats are heading for a disaster if they don’t put stop this toxic campaign. It is a testament to the fact that there is little difference between the policy stances of Obama and Clinton that the campaign has descended into recriminations on what their respective supporters have said, with overtones of racism and allegations of corruption where there is zero evidence that either candidate is really bigoted or ethically challenged.
More troubling is that the battle appears headed to a contentious convention. Any Democrat old enough to remember 1968 or 1972 knows this leads to nothing but a Republican victory in November. If things go as expected, Clinton will win Pennsylvania, while Obama will win virtually everywhere else. Neither will have enough pledged delegates to wrap it up and will turn to super delegates. Obama will claim that the most pledged delegates and most popular votes entitles him to the nomination, while Clinton claims winning big states entitles her to the nod. Whoever loses will go away angry. If Obama wins, feminists and probably the Michigan and Florida Democrats will feel they were robbed. If Clinton wins, with even more justification, Obama supporters will believe a nomination he won with the voters was taken away by party insiders. All the young people motivated by his campaign will turn away from the system and will go back to a cynical view of the whole process. African-Americans will feel this confirms those who claim this country will never accept them as full citizens if an appealing candidate like Obama is denied the nomination based on such a negative campaign run by Clinton and an insider intervention.
The end result: President McCain.
There is a way out of this, one that neither Democratic candidate is going to like. Sen. Clinton is right that a ticket that includes both candidates is what is needed. She is wrong on the order; it has to be Obama as Presidential candidate and Clinton as Vice-President. No matter how Pennsylvania goes, Obama is going to have the most delegates and most popular vote. The math is inescapable.
Obviously, Clinton and her supporters won’t be happy with this. But she should realize that she is not going to be elected President this year. If she gets the nomination it will be a Pyrrhic victory. The bitterness that would come from the party insiders overturning the vote of a majority of the pledged delegates and the popular vote won’t be overcome by November. A Clinton nomination would be doomed. On the other hand, if the joint ticket wins, in eight years she will still be considerably younger than McCain is now and the odds on favorite to succeed Obama.
Obama will not be that happy either. It would mean taking on his bitterest rival as a running mate after a nasty campaign. And if Clinton is the V.P. nominee, it will not be the normal subservient roll. He would have to allow her great input on the campaign and the platform. For instance, he would need to pick up a good portion of the Clinton health plan. He would also have to integrate the Clinton machine, including Bill Clinton, into his campaign.
The problem is, this needs to be done before the Pennsylvania primary. If Clinton wins Pennsylvania, the urge to take it all the way to the convention will be overwhelming. If Obama pulls out an upset, the race is over and Obama won’t need Clinton.
Parties leaders need to intervene with both candidates, now to end this. Otherwise, get ready for another four or eight years of Republican bumbling.
Posted by: bgjd1979 | March 15, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
There seems to be alot about nothing being written here. I have read about swing states–Colorado, Wisconsin, and Iowa. Wake up–the swing states are, and have been, Ohio, Florida, Arkansas and Tennessee. Is McCain going to win South Caolina? (Yes). Is Obama going to win Massachusets? (Yes). But, the question is who will win three of Ohio, Florida, Arkansas and Tennessee? Clinton already has. The Democatic Party (1982) created the super delegates so that the Party could nominate a strong contender. Clinton has shown that she is a very stong contender–particularly where it matters most. She, and she alone, can win in November.
Posted by: tzaristdave | March 15, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
the delegate count in Ohio for instance is a false read…and it will end in disaster if it becomes the base line for nominating the presidential candidate
and here’s why
again..hilary won 84 counties in Ohio
and she won them by over 60% margins across the southern and much of the intensive blue collar youngstown vote
an area by the way that obama’s campaign heavily targeted
and again…even his campaign thought they would be competitive on such key swing areas…
but they failed and failed to capture even 40$ of the vote in such regions
..in a heavily campaigned, head on money driven contest by Obama he had ground game w/ 40 000 vols, air, radio and other ads outnumbering hilary 4 to 1
…and yet…and yet…
he picked up almost equal number of delegates in OHio
and i say..this while the rules of the game at present
is a SERIOUSLY misleading indicator of the way to the white house
because…that means..at least 1.4 million voters choice was
SERIOUSLY diluted by the rules of the dem party
i’m not debating the rules…all parties agreed …
but if you are interested in winning the white house…and this is the prize
the demographics coming out of OHIO
put an end to the idea of any
“momentuem” among blue collar voters and RAY GUN [rr] catholics for him…
it was a complete disaster for OBAMA on this front
he is keeping a brave front and face
but EVERYONE EVEN KENNEDY AND KERRY SAW THE RESULTS AND SO DID ROCKAFELLER
AND SO DID CNN AND OBERMAN
AND EVERYONE”S JAW JUST WENT SLACK…
this is the critical demographic
in real serious big states
obama is NOT WINNING ANYMORE
AND HE WON”T WIN IN TEH FALL AND IF NOT
ITS ANOTHER REPUBLICAN VICTORY AND WE SIMPLY CAN NOT TOLERATE THIS
WHY IS THIS HARD TO UNDERSTAND?
the students and the bright ones among us and you yourselve vanessa are to be praised for being so interested, and son committed..i don’t fault this
and i know he’s brought a lot of people to the table..and that’s all good
but please..please take it from someone who’s been in this game and who has some wisdom
this is MAJOR LEAGUES GIRLS AND BOYS
and you don’t send in an apprentice to
fix your water main break do you?
you send in the real deal and the real deal are those who play in the serious ball games
and Ohio Texas, California and New Jersey and Florida and wva soon and kentucky to another degree
are very very serious critical big players
and the demographics just simply
point to one candidate and one ONLY
and this is THE FACTS OF LIFE IN THE US AT PRESENT
it simply does NOT favor OBAMA AND NO ONE IS SAYING RACE ALONE OR ANY OTHER THING IS A FACTOR
its JUST THE REALITY OF AMERICAN MAJOR PRESIDENTIAL POLITICS
LOOK EVERYONE WAS WAITING TO SEE OF THE POLLS ON ELECTION DAY FOR OHIO AND TEXAS WERE GOING TO BE ACCURATE…
and they simply were NOT
by a very long shot
why do we consider pa’s polls now differently?
for one or two reasons
i can spell it for you
OHIO
TEXAS
the demographics in PA ARE EVEN MORE SERIOUS FOR CLINTON THAN THEY WERE IN OHIO
and this is why the tracking polls are so clear for pa right now
NOT TOO MENTION>>>
EVEN THE PHILA MAYOR IS FOR CLINTON AND RENDELL AS YOU KNOW IS FROM PHILA
and that’s obama’s ONLY HOPE THERE…
its not a pretty picture vanessa
and i imagine you’re as bright and sharp and as probably good looking as
you’re name implies
but…lets face it…
many many smart , politically savy african american and powerfully vibrant progressive political observers understand
hilary is right now…delegate counts as false read as they can be and WERE AND ARE Coming out of OHIO
…the odds on super candidate and has THE MOST POWERFUL POLITICAL MOMENTUEM
simply put…even with the seroiusly diluted…and i mean diluted voter delegate count
OHIO CHANGED EVERYTHING AND FRANKLY I’M NOT SAYING THIS BECAUSE I’M SO FOND OF EVERYTHING IN THIS STATE at all
…i’m not
but its just serious serious major league baseball…ok?
the proof is in the demographics and i just knew the major elite progressives of the national party prior to the OHio voter
were missing “on the ground” what we in Ohio were sensing
even despite the so called “shift in white demographics” coming from virginia and maryland and even wisconsin
those states dont EVEN BEGIN TO COMPARE WITH CAMPAIGNS RUN IN THIS HUGE STATE AND EVERYONE IN THE SERIOUS BIG GAME HUNT KNOWS THE SCORE
Posted by: appalachia blue | March 15, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
i say that it’s the day after i saw obama’s spiritual advisor’s video in which he repeatedly says ‘god d*mn america’ and that the clip will be shown over and over and over again for months if obama is the democrat’s nominee and he will never get the votes of the folks he needs to put him over the top in the swing states. i’m a liberal and i’m sickened by it and by the fact that now he’s lying when clearly anybody who spends time with their ‘mentor’ and ‘spiritual advisor’ knows the person’s socio-political opinions. what, they never talked about anything but the bible itself? he cannot beat mccain at this point and the polls in the next few days and weeks ahead will demonstrate that. but you know what? fine. let him have the nomination and lose. maybe he deserves that fate more than being saved from it and being allowed the chance to run again in 4 or 8 years.
Posted by: ChrisSanDiego | March 15, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm
The same as Texas. Even though Hillary won Texas, Obama recieved the most delegates.
The delegates are split due to areas with heavy population and democrats who voted the most in previos election.
Cities like Dallas, Austin, and Houston went to Obama. Those cities have much more delegates then the cities/counties Hillary won.
It’s the same as Ohio. The places Obama won had a heavier population and voters who voted in previous election.
The rules are the rules.
Thats why I say Obama should def chose Edwards as VP. The blu collar votes loved Edwards. They were his base.
Can Hillary gain Obama based without Obama???
NO.
And I’m pretty sure Obama would not take an offer as VP.
Posted by: Vanessa | March 15, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
Only the big states matter, and the rest of the Country be Damned, is that what the Democrat National Commmitee thinks? Is that why all the good paying jobs in America allways wind up in the big states, like Texas, California, Florida, and Ohio? I think Democrats across this Country all contribute to this race, not just the big states but even the smallest, and you would have me beleave that our voice is of no value, no I dont think that is the message that the DNC want to define their candidate. To do so would be Totalitorian, Dictatorial,and we just aint having non of that here, no more.
Oboma won more States, more pledged Deligates, more crossover votes, more indipendant votes, now Hillary wants to steal the election by seating Florida, Ohio, on the argument that she has more Popular votes? Nah, it ain’t happening. it ain’t right. Had the Democrats used the Republicans stratagy, winner take all, Oboma would clearly win, Are you adking for a three party race?
Posted by: Nathaniel Franklin | March 15, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
If Obama can’t win Penn state.., then his president dream will be dimishing…
He has to win or lose at at very close margin… Otherwise, he just proves again and again: he just can’t win big blue states in his own primary… Hillary and his political backers will have much stronger case against his candidancy..
if he can’t win Penn.. The chain reaction is he will lose Michagin and Florida re-vote…
In the end, Obama may lead a narrow delegate count into Convention but lose popular vote… The MO is no longer with Obama…
This likely will happen if he can’t win Penn…
Posted by: Truth | March 16, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am
Not necessarily,
North Carolina is coming up (big state). Obama can get the votes and delegates back that he may possibly lose from Penn.
Polls indicate both Obama and Hillary would beat McCain in Penn.
Posted by: Vanessa | March 16, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am
If Sen. Obama is on the ticket, I’m voting Republican. You can put John Edwards, Obama’s minister, or even Obama’s chickens on the ticket with him and I’m not buying it. I’m from North Carolina, and Sen. Edwards didn’t do anything for us here: I don’t expect a whole lot more from him as vice president. As a supporter of Sen. Clinton, let me assure you that Edwards is hardly the asset for which you take him. Nor does one have to be a feminist to support Sen. Clinton, one only needs to lay off the Kool Aid for a bit.
Posted by: North Carolina | March 16, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am
you may be right in stating, if obama is the nominee…he may have strickland and rendell
of course
but they will not have the assurance of the demographic voters that put them in office
and frankly..they themselves will be looking over their shoulder at that race…
b/c?
why?
84 out of 88 counties went lopsidely
AGAINST OBAMA in this same election year here
and it promises to be very very similar in the pa primary also
and in wva…obama is DOWN 3 to 1` right now…
and so…yes in name these supers would have to support him…
but they are true serious politicians
and vanessa
before they allow the national convention to nominate a candidate
don’t you think
their voices will be heard..very very loudly and powerfully and considerably higher
than say the governor of colorado or wyoming or a delegate from maryland or virginia for that matter?
i mean…the power that strickland and tubb jones have RIGHT NOW
inside the present matrix of this national seroius dem party debate
is OVERWHELMING
THEY TOOK A SERIOUS SERIOUS RISK IN JUST PUTTING UP W the onslaught of media, pundits and serious party insiders who were ALL READY TO CROWN OBAMA
dont you remember the newsweek story
“hillary get out now!”
…and yet strickland hung in there..at first very very trepidatiously and very almost uncertain
but by election day…
he was as proud as any super delegate to be standing next to a real serious presidential contender
and again…
it was the 84 out of 88 mainly counties of ohio who put him in that favored status
and this was WITH THE NAFTA ISSUE PERCULATING AGAINST AT LEAST ON THE GROUND AGAINST CLINTON…
….and yet she won even among the white hard core blue collar votes hands down readily
i know…becasue i come from a rust belt city..in southern ohio
it was a complete route here and she simply outcampaigned obama personally in such regions..all on her own
not her campaign spokesperson, not her staff…no one …save…her
she brought about her own victory here in ohio
the same way she will do so in the fall
and its by campaigning on the stump in a major way…
speaking to lower middle class and working poor [mainly white] lower class voters about what really matters to them
outside of the urban issues…
and this is what “spoke” so well and caused her campaign to simply do a “fly over” his much more well spent, well organized and super delegate rich effort
in a very very critical swing state
where he was drawing major college crowds and major urban crowds
who in the end..did not matter very much to
a real serious political fight
….
and this is why these super delegates support RIGHT NOW are critical to who will obtain the nomination
they themselves are politicians in their home states first
and they will have a story to tell
the likes of KERRY AND KENNEDY AND ALL others who have ventured outside of the main stream working class issues of middle america
its dangerous to believe in a person who sells hope only
and doesn’t even begin to match his delegate count
with the real powerful “ground game” results…
in Ohio and soon to be found in PA
and in wva..and indiana
where the gov supports clinton by the way of course…also…
as does the gov in michigan
Posted by: appalachia blue | March 16, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am
As of right now Obama has the supporter that matter, (she hasn’t gone public but its fairly obvious)Nancy Pelosi.
The highest ranking Democrat in office right now.
Voters will have their voices heard. Just don’t be surprised when it Obama as the nominee.
Posted by: Vanessa | March 16, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am
As a Pennsylvanian, I was not sure if I would get a chance to cast my vote. I have been watching both democrats closely. And now am happy that I have had time to see Obama’s true colors start to emerge. He is a risk to this country. There is no way that I could ever vote for that man. He just keeps telling lies to cover up his actions. I feel bad for the voters that supported him, who are sorry they did. He is not trustworthy… if Wright was his mentor, and Obama stood by Wright for 20 years, I don’t think we should take the risk of him running the presidency. I don’t want to find out that he is a racist after it’s too late. Like it or not, we know what Hillary is all about.
Posted by: waiting to vote | March 16, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am
So far, I don’t McCain can be beaten by Dems yet… The chance for Dems to win W.H. in Nov only 50/50 or less than..
Dems can’t beat McCain on National security or foriegn policies or even international trade.. It is the fact…
Dems can only use the recession of economy as their weapon to shoot down Rep… However, who will be the best candidate to lead country on this?
If Obama is nominee, Rep will crash him on experience even on economy since he has been potrayed as in-experienced on all…
If the advantage of Ohama is to bring our more vores for Dems… Those votes are not relaible and will change any time…(it has been approved in Dems primary too: more late deciders went to Hillary)…
It is hard for Obama to re-claim himself on judgment and integrity because all the coming issues just indicated he is the same as others…”true old politican backing by the same old politicans”…
Too bad…
Posted by: Truth | March 16, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am
chrissandiego, you are so right about how obama winning the nomination then going down in flames in the general election would have the benefit of him being totally done for, as opposed to having the chance to try to sell his crap again in 4 or 8 years. i still hope he doesn’t get the nomination, and believe he won’t. but if he does, then president mccain can serve four years, obama will be history and have to try very hard to hang onto his senate seat, and we will move on. one thing for sure is that obama won’t win the general. vanessa and all the deluded ones who just keep posting the same stuff over and over actually seem to believe that blue collar people will vote for obama, despite the wright thing, that hillary supporters will vote for obama, despite the dirty tricks, playing of the race card and getting hillary blamed for it, and media-in-the-pocket reasons for obama’s getting this far, and all the rest of his nonsense. they are so wrong on all counts. polls already show this, and they were taken before the wright thing became public.
Posted by: so saddened | March 16, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am
I’m not a democrat, republican or independent, but as a voter, I will not vote for Obama no matter what now. Frankly he should step down as he and his past have made it only worse.I’ve learned enough to make my choice for Hillary even though she’s not my favorite person. I know what I’m getting with her and don’t care about the personal stuff because with the economy in this shape, I know she and Bill will restore America to surpluses, and that’s all that counts.
All these comments by people like Vanessa who must not have anything thing better to do. Why talk about trivial stuff, who cares? Everyone, unless you’re new to the game like the teenaged Obama cult worshipers, knows that it’s the 4 swing states taht matter-PA,OH,FL,MI-Who ever wins 3 of 4 will win the presidency and that’s the end of it. They chose Hillary for a reason, and I agree with them, and I’ll bet the superdels will to.
Posted by: Obamadefecter | March 16, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am
in a word
clinton beats mccain in a fairly close but clear victory
iraq has sickened everyone
‘dem can’t beat mccain on foreign trade’?
what have you been smoken dude?
what foreign trade…come to the midwest and say that
and then ask the voters here
if they will care if some gay guy gets to marry his dream lover like the voters seemed to care so much about in 04 w/ karl rover at the controls
i don’t think so
and by the way..what’s the debt to export ration under these 8 year of republican rule
…ask Bear Sterns….
if you think McCain has the inside track on that
and this is written from southern ohio dude…
but i digress
hilary ought to be able to win Ohio w/ Strickland
and Pa w/ phila’s mayor and Rendell
and the pittsburgh mayor’s recent endorsement as well
in the fall
so….i think she’s very very competitive in the fall
and you’re so right…
the “god damn america” statement
has ended the true independent/republican voter swing
once and for all
but as i have indicated
it already ended..even before this
Wright Stuff
because of the true MR. Right Stuff
Astranaut and former Ohio Senator Glenn’s backing of his old
friend and supporter
Hillary the one remaining hope for the dems this fall
and she will kick McCain’s ass on the economy alone…
[or bill will do it for her]
Posted by: appalachian blue | March 16, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am
you know what? it’s no longer important who has more delegates etc. what’s important is, will hillary or barack have the better chance of picking up those swing voters in those swing states? this is not a racist comment but based upon our ridiculous winner-take-all electoral crap, none of the dems black or white in the southern states matter at all. they might as well not even vote – those states will go republican as they always do. obama cannot change that fact. this race will come down to ohio, florida, pennsylvania, maybe one or two other. now, have you seen the ‘god d*mn america’ clip? picture it in your mind going over and over and over throughout the months of july (esp the fourth of july? oh great!), august, september, october and into election day in november. the average voter in america is a middle-aged white person. do you think that the average voter will vote for barack obama this year? no. do you think that the average voter in the swing state will vote for hillary clinton this year? at worst, maybe. at best, why the hell not, give her a shot, john mccain is more of the same. now, who has the better chance in november 2008 of grabbing the white house back from the republicans, obama or clinton? be honest with yourself and i think you’ll know the answer. plus – he’s young! he’ll be able to distance himself from this and be an even stronger and more wise and experienced candidate 4 or 8 years from now. what think?
Posted by: ChrisSanDiego | March 16, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am
and as for nancy pelosi
she needs to put her womanly jealousy away
realize she allowed this nation to suffer thru two more years of hell under a neo emperor in residence at the 1600 pa avenue
and simply not shove her hubby’s 50 million dollar S F real estate mogul money’s opinions down our working white folks in the midwest’s mouth when she claims to ‘lead this party’
…what a shame…for the nation’s first woman speaker
she jumped into bed w/ bush before we could even get out of bed the day after we partied over the victory of this republican nightmare…
Posted by: appalachian blue | | March 16, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am
Vanessa, Obama moblized the young and AA’s to vote for him. If Hillary becomes the nominee, then perhaps we will lose the young vote. However, we will not lose a big chunk of the AA vote, they will vote for the nominee because they know. They know Hillary and Bill and even if there were some tense times in this campaign, they know the Clintons are on their side. The rest is the meat and potatoes of the Democratic party, the blue collar workers. It’s their party, it’s the party we belong to and they are for Hillary because Barack is a risk and we must win due to the economic threats. It’s not that a lot of people hate him, they want him out because the rist is too great.
Posted by: irma | March 16, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am
now irma knows what side of the aisle she lives on
and its clear…the clintons are NOT against the AA or the youth for that matter and its simply silly to suggest they would be
they have critical black leaders in their campaign right now…and they were very good to the AA in the 90′s
so lets get real here…
its not about hating obama or trying to make him look poor or say mean things
campaigns are campaigns and its a ruthless process to get to the nomination
and no one campaign has the edge on what has been inferred…
and bill is broken hearted if you would truly understand what he is about
when it came to losing the urban vote in south carolina …not because of he’s so political
but because he invested ALOT in the AA over his time in public life
and its not some false notion he cares for the inner city culture
and cares about civil rights…they do very very much
its just a reality check right now baby girl
and its BIG TIME major baseball here
and we need to come together
right now
“over me”
as john lennon would sing
“he’s got MOJO football”
he’s got Hair down below his knees…”
….come together, right now
and we can win this thing
and hilary will not hurt any major constituency of this party
and everyone in the know..knows it
Posted by: appalachian blue | | March 16, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am
If you assume that core Democratic states stay blue….I think Hillary gives us a better shot at Arkansas, Ohio, Florida, Michigan, New Mexico, and Texas.
I think if Obama is the nominee we may pick up some Southern traction maybe South Carolina and Louisiana.
There is nothing silly about the Clinton strategy. It seems very viable to me.
Someone should really analyse the numbers of previous votes. For instance take the total number of Democratic voters in the primary states and see what the increase is. Then project voter turnout for an election. As long as voters don’t switch to McCain in droves we will take back the Whitehouse.
Posted by: Colo | March 16, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am
again dont’ leave out for Hillary
pa…which is conservative as well as its blue collar and white outside of phila…
….
and hillary takes on WVA and does pretty well in missouri…as well
i think the latinos will NOT go for mccain per se…in western and texas votebecause she is known to the major latino political leaders and now is even more well known to the younger latinos
Posted by: appalachian blue | | March 16, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am
All three candidates are politicians. They all got something they want to hide. BUt with Hillary in the spotlight for so many years, you know all her dirt. You know her bad and her good. Same with McCain. BUt with Obama, no one knows him and unfortunately, his negatives have been brushed aside in this year long love fest. By the time more and more dirt comes out, it will be too late.
Better to choose the better known evil than an unknown evil.
At least you know what she is capable of doing for this country judging by what she’s done for this country already.
With Obama, you’d just be taking that leap of faith and “hoping” he’ll do something great to our country.
Posted by: Bill Jergens | March 16, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am
as to colo idea about voter increase from primary to now and then projections
Ohio is simply off the map
i did some of this very kind of work for clinton hq and it stunned even us
it represents a true demographic shift
towards her
not just against obama
but for her period…and it was seriously signficant in Ohio…pa projects even better across the board
….this is why kennedy went back to talking about border patrols, sherrod borwn is talking about ‘ending the war’
and john kerry and heintz seem to have taken a sudden european ‘policy’ vacation abroad
and jay rockafeller is probably trying to figure out how to unendorse his choice for president….with a 3 to 1 lead for hillary in his own state
and increasing….
Posted by: appalachian blue | | March 16, 2008, 1:52 am 1:52 am
Hillary is arguing that the superdelegates should decide on who should be the nominee, regardless of which candidate accumulates the most delegates.
Do people realize that her “overall advantage among superdelegates has come from current and former party officials, reflecting the ties she and her husband have built over the years.” (New York Times).
So she apparently thinks it is fair for her friends and associates to choose the nominee. A person who would argue this way is very hard to imagine as president. It is troubling.
Posted by: Mike Denhof | March 16, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am
Mr Denhof…
ever been to a republican party “mixer”
its much much worse than this when it comes to back room “fixers”
party politics runs the game …
and its not for mere conjecture or without a basis in historical realities
i.e. mcgovern sound familiar dude?
so..perhaps…its not just because the clintons have weight among the supers
but now she is truly the powerful populist candidate among the working class and mainly white rural and ex urban voter of this nation in the midwest and she is combining this with the true signficant statistical victories in california and new jersey
and then w/ the mainly rural voters of tennessee and arkansas and oklahoma and missouri
so…while the super delegates will probably make the final call here
its not ALL about “insider politices”
if she lost OHio or simply even broke even among the demographic groupings here in Ohio alone
she would have been forced OUT OF THE RACE BY THESE VERY SAME INDIVIDUAL WHOM YOU ARE IMPLYING ARE “FIXING THE RACE OUTCOME FOR HER
its a non argument…if you were on the ground in ohio…
and truly…every one inside the major democratic party who are not simply on some kool aide trip with some idealistic but failing candidacy
and/or some republican /independent spoiler schema in play
understand exactly what happened here in Ohio
the heart of all…literally
and texas rural vote coupled with the latino vote was super serious icing on that cake
Posted by: appalachian blue | | March 16, 2008, 2:12 am 2:12 am
I am an independent. I am voting for Hillary. If Hillary doesn’t win, I will vote for McCain.
I cannot vote for someone when their spiritual foundation is based on hate and victimhood.
Posted by: Julie | March 16, 2008, 2:43 am 2:43 am
Now Obama needs to recognize that he is a Politician like the others. That he lies and that he compromises with crooks to get support or to buy his house. He needs to recognize that when is not convenient for him he forgets his firends or denies his spiritual leader. Obama does not stand to defend anything. Where are his convictions? Is his hope for change the same as Rev. Wright who is actually the author of Obama’s theme. Hope for Change is not an Obama’s original either he got it from Wright. Do both refer to the same kind of change?
Posted by: Raul | March 16, 2008, 5:57 am 5:57 am
Hillary should definitely be the nominee. Obama association with Farrakan and his pastor who disparages and slams our country and Obama and his wife’s unpatriotic actions, no saluting our flag, no flag lapel pin, not being proud of our country till now, ties to Rezko, who is a crook, I don’t call that change. The Republicans can’t wait to run against Obama in the primary. Wake up Democrats!
Posted by: Doreen | March 16, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am
Most Recent Rasmussen Poll has McCain beating Obama and Clinton by 5% and 4% respectively. Additionally, Julia Baird of Newsweek is reporting that there is a widening divide among supporters:
“According to exit polling in the Texas primary, 91 percent of Clinton supporters said they would be dissatisfied with Obama as the nominee; 87 percent of Obama fans said they would be dissatisfied with Clinton. Nationally, a quarter of those who back Clinton say they’d vote for John McCain if Obama won the nomination (while just 10 percent of Obama supporters would do the same if he lost).”
Posted by: smartprimate | March 16, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am
HRC cannot get the nomination without somehow stealing it. PLEASE do the math. Obama, by superior campaigning, picked up as many delegates at the Iowa convention yesterday as HRC did in winning OHIO! She doesn’t have a clue or a chance. All she can do is try to drive his chances in November into a ditch and hope for 2012.Does she think Obama supporters will ever forgive her for this???
Posted by: bskahn | March 16, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am
I like Obama, I just do. I support him 100% and then some.
What worries me is I am scared for Obama when he becomes President of the United States. Scared for his life. There are too many racist idiots out there that hate him. I had heard that some morons think he is the antichrist, can you imagine the stupidity. Nonetheless, if there are those dumb enough to believe such crap it poses a threat to the greatest man to have ever been elected to office. Maybe they need a law banning all guns before the election. One can never be too safe….
Posted by: jill k g | March 16, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am
I’m not understanding why people are saying that Obama could only win among blacks. This is a distortion by the media. Someone should research the scandals of the Clintons. They make Obama look like a choir boy. He is still the best to beat McCain. That is why they are creating these problems.
Posted by: Dee | March 16, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am
Do you honestly believe Obama is going to beat McCain? When the republicans pull out those videos from his pastor where he say in the pew and this guy served as his life advisor – THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE HIM FOR LUNCH.
I will not vote for him either. I am an independent and have decided to support Hillary. I gave to her campaign for the first time yesterday.
We can not let this man get in – do white people not see what is happening?
Watch the “sermons” preached by this man – watch the State of the Black Union from 3 weeks ago.
Then hopefully you will see the light – otherwise we WILL lose the white house to the republicans.
Its Hillary or Republicans – one or the other – BO has not chance and if he truly wants to unite the party – he needs to get out NOW
Posted by: Drew | March 16, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am
As an “older” female supporting Hillary Clinton, I could easily cross over and vote for McCain. I am a Conservative Democrat so national security is a primary issue for me. I believe Clinton to be strong on that issue whereas Obama is not (go to you tube and type in 52 Obama).
Then there’s the question of the abortion issue. I have been listening to Obama supporters call me a moron menopausal woman for months now. They are right about one thing – menopausal. Us “old ladies” don’t don’t have a vested interest in that issue like a young woman does.
I am pro-choice but would sacrifice that issue for national security. GO HILLARY!
Posted by: JD | March 16, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
Anyone who would vote for McCain cannot call themselves a democrat. If you would vote for McCain you are a moderate.
I do not wish to see this war continue. McCain has guaranteed that it will be business as usual at Wars R Us.
Posted by: wardcleaverr | March 16, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
Well probably “independent” is a better description. Either way, you can’t vote for McCain and still consider yourself a democrat.
Posted by: wardcleaverr | March 16, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
Being a democrat for more then 36 years, if Obama is on the ticket I will go with McCain a choice I don’t like but there is no other choice.
For those people who believe Obama never knew of Rev. Wright’s hate filled sermons I refer you to a news publication dated in August 2007.
It was a well know fact that Wright was a hateful pastor. So why has it taken Obama so long to come out and denounce Wright – because Obama could no longer hide it from the mainstream media.
Posted by: Say_No_To_Obama | March 16, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
Out of curiosity I was looking at RCP one on one polls betwee MacCain and potential Democratic nominees Hillary and Obama for New Jersey. In the latest Rasmussen poll for NJ McCain beats Obama by 2% but looses to Hillary by 11%. In the primary Hillary beat Obama by 62% to 36% among White voters. Is Race going to be a factor in November in NJ?
Posted by: satish | March 16, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
The majority of the people here talking against Obama were not going to vote for him anyways. You can sit here and try and tear him down on 2 incidences. Truth is Hillary and Bill Clinton have more scandals than we know about. That’s why the Republicans are eager to run against her. Don’t be a fool and subject yourselves to more years of the Bush Administration by voting for McCain. Obama is winning huge. Hillary can not catch up without bending rules. Please do not be fooled.
Posted by: Dee | March 16, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
FACT: No candidate can win the presidency without independant voters.
FACT: Independant voters are more highly educated and tend to carefully scrutinize candidates.
FACT: Independant voters are usually moderates.
FACT: Male independants outnumber female independants more than two-to-one.
FACT: Independant voters, especially males, do not like Hillary Clinton, because we view her as devisive and polarizing.
FACT: If Hillary Clinton takes the Democratic nomination, John McCain will be the next President of the United States.
It’s up to you Democrats. Back a winner or waste your time.
Posted by: Independant | March 16, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
I do not think that Obama can pull this one off. When you run on JUDGEMENT and WORDS MATTER this is a big problem. And any of the Clinton scandals just do not matter to us anymore even FOX NEWS have said this.
And those of us who have voted for Hillary already do not care about taxes either. And his Iraqi speech is pretty much worthless now.
If by chance he does pull this off and gets the nomination I will not vote for him.
Posted by: Melissa | March 16, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
Neither of these Inexperienced
Lightweights will beat McCain!
He will wipe the floor with either
Obama or Clinton in the debates and
Clean their Clocks in the General
Election! Get Real!
Posted by: reaganfan | March 16, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
Although, obama has better numbers now. He is feeling the first taste of the republican smear machine since they have their candidate. If he thinks the “Clinton Machine” is bad as the Republican smear machine he is naive. Need I need to remind you that John Kerry had better numbers tahn Bush at this particular time in the campaign.
Once they show that he dodges controversial votes, label him as a free spending liberal, connect him to controversial anti-america rhetoric of his wife and minister and scare people about his inexperience, in december the pundits will be talking about obama being rezkoed(swiftboated).
Posted by: The Lord of war | March 17, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am
I am a black, 42yo Southern gal (Louisiana), and registered independant who has never been an Obama fan. While I am proud of the fact that a black man can be considered as a viable candidate, I look at the ENTIRE package when deciding who to cast my vote for. Obama reminds me too much of George Bush when he was running for office – lots of rhetoric, lots of calls for change, charisma, and yet nothing to back it up. He’s GWB in liberal clothing. I would be afraid to leave our national security in the hands of another president needing on the job training and with so little experience. I am convinced the reason that Nancy Pelosi and the Dem establishment want him is because he can be molded to their will.
I am also very distressed about the video of his pastor. My dad is the same age as his pastor and is not this angry! I also take issue with the fact that he calls any black person who doesn’t agree with him ‘Uncle Toms’. Yes, racism exists – to deny this fact is to effectively have your head in the sand. As someone who is raising a biracial child I find his comments AS offensive as any I have heard from white supremacists – just on the other side of the fence.
If not, Hillary then this independant voter will be voting for John McCain.
Posted by: AsnCajun | March 17, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am
Obama cant win the general election now. He is damaged goods. His MENTOR for the last 20 years is a racist anti american.
Give it a rest. The clinton voters will NOT vote for obama. Not anymore.
Posted by: tomdavie | March 17, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am
Obama supports wont vote for Mc Cain. They have NOTHING in common with Mc Cain. Only the FAR LEFT supports Obama now.
Clinton supporters see Mc Cain as an actual candidate worth voting for.
The new truth about Obama and his church for the last 20 years has turned the clinton voters right into Mc Cains arms if they INSIST on promoting Obama anyways.
He is toast.
Posted by: tomdavie | March 17, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am
I have every confidence in Senator Obama and I know that we can win in November. Senator Clinton can push this all the way to the convention if she must, but I believe Senator Obama will be our nominee and he will beat McCain in November and I will do my part to help.
OBAMA/EDWARDS ’08
Posted by: LB | March 17, 2008, 2:45 am 2:45 am
A good survey question for the pollsters to ask will be: Who will you vote for if Hillary Clinton (Barack Obama) loses the Democratic nomination, Barack Obama (Hillary Clinton) or John McCain? This is a good question for folks in this Comments page, too. What do you think people?! Respond!
Posted by: Ottile | March 17, 2008, 2:50 am 2:50 am
I agree Asncajun,
Hillary Clinton has the skill we are going to need for us to get through this upcoming depression. Remember all the people who either resigned or were ousted when Bush took office? Clinton has access to these people and can garner them to start immediately repairing government. They are skilled public servants who didn’t drink the kool-aid.
We do not need someone vulnerable to unsound plans presented to him and we don’t have the luxury of a learning curve.
He will never be able to win a general election, now, in any event. And, the country can’t take another Republican president. Especially in this economy.
Posted by: Hopeful | March 17, 2008, 2:58 am 2:58 am
appalachian blue i just got to say, I appreciate your way with words. I really do. And, your analysis too.
Posted by: Hopeful | March 17, 2008, 3:17 am 3:17 am
Hard to ignore the elephant in the room. The UCC/Rev. Wright fiasco is resonating with the voting pubic in ways that the mainstream media is reluctant to acknowledge. Watch for the figures in places like PA, MI and FL (assuming a revote) and fairly moderate Southern state like NC. My feeling is Obama is already toast. In the GE, he’d have no chance against McCain in PA, OH, NC, MO or any other so-called battleground states. Given the sensitivity of NY and NJ voters regarding memories of 9/11, Obama is no shoo-in in those Democratic strongholds either. CA will be competitive for the first time in a long time with McCain appealing to Reagan Dems.
Posted by: Bartlebybickle | March 17, 2008, 5:49 am 5:49 am
Obama… Obama… Obama… is he the ONLY candidate left in this presidential race??? He sure is getting a LOT of FREE media exposure. How come we haven’t heard Hillary clamoring for EQUAL time??? Com’on Hillary, turn UP the heat on this LIGHTWEIGHT and demand your equal time! I want to see more democratic carnage. And as the democrats annihilate each other, John McKennedy is quietly preparing his TRANSITION team. I LOVE IT!
Posted by: Doug | March 17, 2008, 7:24 am 7:24 am