By Jennifer Parker

Mar 18, 2008 4:49pm

Three Smart People Talk About Obama’s ‘Race’ Speech

Shelby Steele:

“I thought in the end he did not take responsibility for being in someone’s church for 20 years, being close to that person — I thought he evaded that.

“Barack Obama is what I call a bargainer. He’s someone who gives whites the benefit of the doubt, who flatters them in a way by saying, ‘You’re not racist and I’m going to trust that you’re not,’ and that makes him popular. Challengers on the other hand are like Al Sharpton and others who actually challenge the system all the time. One of the reasons Barack Obama is so popular is because he’s not a challenger. When he has a relationship with a minister who clearly is a challenger, who is a protester who was been anti-American in many of his remarks, that’s the worst bind someone like Obama can be in because his success is based precisely on not doing that kind of thing.

“I think Barack Obama has to become himself, he has to tell us who he really is, what he truly believes. When you talk about anger, you talk about ‘whites want this’ and ‘blacks want more,’ where are you in that? What’s your position on affirmative action? What principle are you reasoning out of? We just need to know a lot more. He’s a great descriptive speaker, tells us our problems but we need to know more about what his principles are.

“He’s vulnerable because he is not well-known and has worked in many ways to be kind of invisible. So as we see more aspects of who he really is as we did this weekend with his minister then he’s going to have to stand up and be more frank about what he believes and what direction he would actually take the country. When he says ‘change’ what does he mean by ‘change,’ ‘hope’ what does he mean by ‘hope,’ what can we expect from him on these issues?

“He’s done a little too much of fashioning a space for all the different constituencies in America. He needs to let us know what he really thinks and run on that — make a politics of that.”

*

Donna Brazile:

“Senator Obama had to walk a fine line of disavowing the comments of his pastor while explaining to America how he found his faith by joining that community.

“People are trying to look into Senator Obama’s heart and see if there’s any of Jeremiah Wright’s sermons lurking around his soul. And I think what he put into context today was that his heart and his soul are made up of not only his experiences as a member of that church but a young man raised by his white grandparents, and someone who had to come uh into his own by reconciling all of the various pieces as he said of America in him. Today he laid out the puzzle and I think it fits that Senator Obama is a candidate that is trying to bring the country together based on where we’ve been but also where we should go.

“I think Senator Obama showed the American people exactly who he is what he stands for and why he’s running for president because he had to explain in a few minutes American history — the long and perhaps difficult journey that the country has gone though to get to this moment. And the moment is of course whether or not America is prepared to accept or reject Obama based on who he is and what he stands for but not because of the color of his skin.

“Senator Obama was able to disavow the comments without having to rebuke the human being that Jeremiah Wright is. I thought he went out of his way to explain Jeremiah Wright the person but Jeremiah Wright the preacher may never be explained enough to some of seen Obama’s critics.”

*

Richard Norton Smith:

“This was not a focus group speech, this was not a sound bite speech, this was not a spin-doctored speech it sounded like a speech from the heart. it sounded like a speech that had been a lifetime in the making, and I suspect it will reverberate for a very long time to come

"If Barack Obama becomesPpresident of the United States it will probably be dated to this speech. This was only secondarily a speech about Rev. Wright…this was really a speech about us, about our willingness to be challenged by a presidential candidate to deal with some painful unaddressed issues of race and class.

“It’s also a challenge to the political process about what kinds of campaigns we want to run. Are we going to deal with tough long-standing issues or are we going to be distracted and let wedge issues and talk radio define our democracy?

“It wasn’t a reassuring speech to be sure, it will reassure many Obama supporters and why they’re attracted to him in the first place. But it seems more it was a speech challenging us and we all say we want to hear from presidential candidates and ultimately most never do.

“This was a speech about asserting moral authority, about bringing difficult moral as well as economic and racial conundrums before the public, and that’s the essence of leadership.”

– interviews conducted by ABC News’ Avery Miller

- jpt

User Comments

Didn’t any of these people hear the part about actually hearing Wright’s controversial remarks in church?? This means he lied all over the networks on Friday about how much he knew and heard about Wright. That is what’s important here. He is not credible.

Posted by: cappamore | March 18, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

He sure can be a smooth talker when the stakes are high. I dont believe he wanted to say anything bad about wright at all. He is a liar and I will never vote for him no matter how many speaches he gives.

Posted by: benjie | March 18, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

Obama himself has turned this campaign into a racial extravaganza; and I’m sick of it and sick of him!!!!! from day one his response to everything has been, pull the race card!!! OOOH What a President he would make!!!!

Posted by: Cali | March 18, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

LOL Donna Brazile still on the fence. She wants to support him but knows he is not convincing her or the voters. She gave him all the hints and instructions for his speech content and he did not follow them.

Posted by: DCVoter | March 18, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

When was the last time Americans elected a President for a speech that criticizes the US Constitution and its very founding?
Are democrats who continue to support this man’s candidacy completely deluded?
He will be running against a war hero.

Posted by: s.b. | March 18, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

It was a great speach but hes known for speaches,in his own words “I give a good speach”.Obama could have carried on the work of MLK,he could have started that work in his very own church he did not.I have never sat in a church that Da*med America.I never sat in a church that didnt preach brotherhood and love. I have left two churches that preached things or values I didnt believe in.Its still Hillary or McCain.

Posted by: girlinvt | March 18, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

I think the truth is yet to be told. If Obama has been part of the church for more than 20years, it is a grand deception for him to try to disassociate himself from his pastor today. Americans, put on your reasoning caps before it is too late.

Posted by: Idong Idiong | March 18, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

Posted by: Cali | Mar 18, 2008 5:08:11 PM
…1) He did not address my major concerns about this dustup and raised even more questions.
_____________________________________
Did not address YOUR major concerns…..?
Who are YOU? The speech wasn’t for YOU! The speech was for every American. Take what you can from this 30-minute speech and move on.
Where does all of this ignorance and arrogance come from?

Posted by: Tre | March 18, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

you can’t pick your family, you can pick your friends. Obama loves wright, and his ideals, even if he has to do it silently for political reasons. You, obama are a reflection of the people you associate with. that was again a warm and fuzzy speech, but your credibilty means nothing to me now, you have lied to us about wright, rezko, and so on.

Posted by: D | March 18, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

He just blew holes in his own patriotism. The republicans will ove the parts where he criticises the US constitution. The past that up with the pictures of him not covering his heart for the pledge of allegience or national anthem, no flag pin, and his darling wife’s comments about America.
He will be running against a hero. Democrates are nuts if they nominate this man, completely deluded.

Posted by: s.b. | March 18, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

Another speech?
Obama’s speech is happening because of one thing only – the truth about his pastor and his church, the truth that Obama has been trying to suppress since before the campaign started, has been exposed. Thankfully, some real reporting has started and his free pass days are over. His speech, just as his panicked rush of interviews last Friday, is a reaction to his attempt to keep the ugly racist and anti-American underbelly of people who he has been extremely close to for over 20 years (8,000 church members go a long way in a state senatorial district election) under wraps has failed.
It’s the result of
Obama’s own very poor judgment.
If the speech was so important, why did it take days of playing his pastor’s hateful rants on TV to get him to give it? It’s political desperation as he sees his image begin to crumble as he finds himself running against two strong candidates who never give up and are unwavering in their love for country and disdain for racism. His candidacy is based on transcending these race issues and on being different and transparent. Yet he has attempted to hide this from us and has (badly) attempted to brush it away as and then to talk his way out of it. He’s failed us and himself at every turn.
He’s just another highly ambitious politician who’s quite good at reading a scripted speech. No doubt, some adoring admirers will be bamboozled by yet another speech from the speech candidate.
Let’s see him answer questions.

Posted by: Alicia | March 18, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

half of u couldnt wait for an obama slip up so u wouldnt vote 4 him. what the pastor said is true anyway. Hilliary has slipped up so many times and shes a fake snake. Dirty as hell

Posted by: jrc | March 18, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

I am a Clinton supporter but I don’t think Senator is a bad guy. But if Senator Obama is the nominee, I can see it, two weeks before the election a commercial by a 527 group. Rev. Wright’s greatest hits with Senator Obama in the audience.

Posted by: Christine D | March 18, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

Obama has inspired so much that I’m going to compose a speech to my boss explaining why I wasn’t able to complete the project that I’ve been working on. I’ll even get some of my co-workers to cheer and clap for me in the background. Maybe I can get him to sob before he fires me.

Posted by: Action! | March 18, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

I was impressed by the speech. People will use it to push thier own adgendas. Those against him will use it to stay against him, those for him will do the same.
But perhaps, for just a few very intelligent Americans, they will actually listen to what they man said. There was a lot of good stuff in that speech.
Jay

Posted by: Jay A. Kelley | March 18, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

Sounds like he blamed other people for this racist thing and try to bring up the ancient story about race.
Look like he just wanted to get a sympathy.
Anyway,,somebody else helped him to write those speeches.

Posted by: crisis08 | March 18, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

a wonderful, insightful and moving speech. Anyone who actually listens to or reads the speech has to admire Obama’s sincerity, thoughtfulness and vision. He is a remarkable leader and the US will be fortunate indeed to have him as our next President

Posted by: orlandobhb | March 18, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

He’s shown a great deal of courage and honesty, and has shown how he handles difficulty — with tact, eloquence, and grace. His intelligence and discernment far surpass his negatives. He tolerated some inflammatory rhetoric on the part of his pastor. That’s his crime? How many times does he need to denounce or reject or otherwise part ways with Wright? Forgive him. Obama, on his own feet, represents the best of America, and our best hope for a freer, more prosperous America for our children.

Posted by: Walter | March 18, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

Obama spoke words, that’s all. Just more pretty, calculated words to convince us to ignore the truth about him and vote for him based on the illusions he has crafted for us. Anyone who votes for him because he made a “great speech” is as gullible and irresponsible as the ones who voted Bush into office two times. His attempt to explain away his tacit support and probable active participation in twenty years of racial hate against most of this country’s population is both deplorable and insulting. I am not ashamed of being white and I do not feel the least bit guilty or responsible for any wrongs done to blacks. I can’t keep you from hating me simply because of who I am, but don’t expect me to go along with it. And don’t expect me to vote for you, ever.

Posted by: Griffin | March 18, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

This is how Obama will respond when the phone rings by 3 a.m in the morning,we all know this is just his 3 a.m. make your judgement. As you judge,so shall you be judged

Posted by: Adams | March 18, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

Obama’s campaign has essentially asked the public to IGNORE the following facts BECAUSE he is a UNIFIER:
that he was ranked 99th in the senate, that he has little experience (each time he held office, he spent most of the time running for the next office he hoped to win), that he has friendships and ties to people who have bombed American targets (and show no remorse) and to political fixers and money-launderers (Rezko, Auchi and others), that he won his first bid at office in Illinois by bringing legal challenges so that ultimately all the opposing candidates were eliminated from the ballots, that he does not want to allow the voters of Michigan and Florida to have a re-vote, and the list goes on.
But then we find out that this “unifier” has been going to a church for the last 20 years in which entire groups of people are demonized and blamed for social problems, where the pastor uses hate speech against whites. And again, in Obama’s speech, we are told to IGNORE all this because he can unify and propel the country forward.
Part of getting beyond race and racism is abandoning the use of different sets of standards for different people, depending on the color of their skin. ONE set of standards for everyone. No rationalizing and justifying, because this can only be done by exploiting whatever views may be fashionable, and this ultimately leads to more entrenched racism.
It is clear that if another candidate ATTENDED A CHURCH for 20 years in which the pastor made racist statements about an ethnic group and in which the pastor’s general world view was one of hatred toward that group, that candidate would be forced to drop out of the race. Here, not only has Obama come out unscathed, he even received one hour of free air time on all the channels to give us his excuse.

Posted by: SEB | March 18, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

I agree with Shelby Steele more than being a liberal, I am not comfortable with agreeing with Steele. I know he’s a conservative. However, I don’t feel that these SMART people took it far enough fo us po folk. Obama is too deep in his own personal struggle with his identity and so much more. I feel that he was pushed and rushed into this by Kennedy, Kerry and the likes. WE ALL KNOW there’s racism. We all know it is a problem. Nevertheless, you cannot run as a uniter when apparently the conflicting inner Obama can’t unite his own ideals with his behavior or choices. You cannot claim unity when you choose to listen to anger and divisiveness. You cannot claim unity when someone who is not black refers to race and you allude to them being racist. You cannot claim unity when you use race, manipulate with race and then claim that you did not.

Posted by: irma | March 18, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

Some people had fallen again for him because of his speech which he had perpared so many days and with some help also.
The truth is we don’t really know what is in his heart.
If he is that kind of person he would have abandoned that church long time ago
or confronted his pastor speech since he is like an uncle to him.

Posted by: crisis08 | March 18, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

I’m tired of his speeches, all of them. He thinks he can just gather together his speechwriters, throw a few sentimental one liners in there, and make everything better. I’m afraid that method won’t work as President.

Posted by: DWC | March 18, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

Obama defended Wright and threw his “White Grandma” under the bus

Posted by: MattOhio | March 18, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Obama is the man for the job, period. I am a woman and I support him and I will continue to support him. If Hillary is nominated you can believe that millions will either stay home or vote McCain. No matter what Obama said today those that did’nt like him before will continue to not like him, but those on the fence (really on the fence) will vote for him. Hillary is yesterday as she plays to our fears and divide and win politics.

Posted by: Karen | March 18, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

US VET, great post! Thanks for the info.

Posted by: irma | March 18, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

Obama is the man for the job, period. I am a woman and I support him and I will continue to support him. If Hillary is nominated you can believe that millions will either stay home or vote McCain. No matter what Obama said today those that didn’t like him before will continue to not like him, but those on the fence (really on the fence) will vote for him. Hillary is yesterday as she plays to our fears and divide and win politics.

Posted by: Karen | March 18, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

When will Obama and any other’s who speak for the “Minority” finally stop blaming others who have a different skin color for their problems, things will improve on both sides!
For example, SKIN COLOR is due to the bodies response to the sun. Human who were exposed more to sun have darker skin over time to protect their skin, while those who were less exposed (or lived in colder climates) had lighter skin so they could absorb UV light easier to produce Vit-D. This is EVOLUTION and has nothing to do with race. You have more DNA in your genes that deal with HEIGHT than with skin color!
Also for those say “white america” will always keep “our group” down, history shows America is one of the most forgiving and accepting countries on EARTH. We have leaders of every race, creed, and national origin!
In 1941 Japan attacked America, we locked some up in camps, and fought a WAR against them that killed over 1 million Americans. Yet within 10-20 years after the WAR they were seen not only as our friends, but Allies! Also, we dropped two Atomic Bombs on their country and they forgave us and needed some help to rebuild their country, but they are not blaming us 50 years later for their problems like Obama’s pastor is!
Those in groups (white, black, brown, etc…) who blame another group (white, black, brown, etc…) should look in the mirror and see their OWN actions (or lack of action) are holding themselves back more than anything else!
I may vote for Obama, but not if he plays the “Victim” Card, which his own life has proved is not valid. If you work hard, stop blaming other, and realize skin color is (and should be!) meaniless, you will succeed in LIFE.
Case Closed!

Posted by: John | March 18, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

lol
these posters are completely delusional. I have never seen anything like this before in my life!
Barack Obama has told us who he is for the last year. Jeremiah Wright is his pastor, period.
The double standards this country lives by is what is keeping this mess going. Obama continues to jump through hoops to answer questions. After today, I see that no matter what he says, none of you will be satisfied. You will just continue to pick apart everything that he is and says.
Your own dishonesty and distortions won’t allow you to accept him for who he is.
There are those of us who still support him and believe in him, and will work hard to get him elected as the next President of the United States of America.
God only knows, this black american loves this country….just as the Lord knows MY heart, so does he Barack Obama. Nothing can change that.
Ok, as you were….

Posted by: LA in Indiana | March 18, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

How does Obama expect to change the minds of the entire country when he could not change the mind of his very close old uncle in 20 years.
Doesn’t it look like a failure in Obama’s part. Charity begins at home Mr. Obama. First try to rectify your own old uncle and your wife (who was never proud of US), then try to rectify the entire nation and the “STAINED CONSTITUTION.”

Posted by: Someone | March 18, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

If Obama is elected president, it will be because he has been the first candidate in many years to try to appeal to what is best in America:
“What is called for is nothing more, and nothing less, than what all the world’s great religions demand—that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us. Let us be our brother’s keeper, scripture tells us. Let us be our sister’s keeper. Let us find that common stake we all have in one another, and let our politics reflect that spirit as well.”

Posted by: CKaiser | March 18, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Obama is totally , 100% responsible for further dividing the Democratic Party. I’m sickened by every report that supports his candidacy. This is truly the fall out of inexperience (among other things).

Posted by: catherine in nm | March 18, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

Well, Mara thanks for sharing your small global view. Because it would be so unlikely that we, the working and lower income masses who support Clinton could in anyway identify with those type of struggles as you quoted from “Ashley”. We have no reason to be supporting Clinton other than for some evil and sinister conclusion. Unbelieveable that you could possibly be that sheltered to behave as though the “Nigtengales” of the poor could only exist in the elite/”educated”/wealthy Obama supporters. Right, you’re all so much deeper than we. Thanks for saving us…..

Posted by: irma | March 18, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

Some of you make the argument that Senator Obama sends conflicting messages by his having sat in the congregation during Rev. Wright’s sermon’s, in which he, Rev. Wright, made comments that were derogatory towards those outside of the African American race.
To sit there and say that Senator Obama was wrong for sitting in the congregation while his Pastor made disparaging comments is nothing more than a reflection of America as a whole. Every American has sat in the presence of someone who has made disparaging comments regarding those of other ethnic groups – to say they have not is a complete un-truth. Racism starts in the home – period. It would be very naive of us as Americans to believe for one minute that there is someone out there who has not heard negative racial comments and has said nothing! The media needs to stop perpetuating the race issues that continue to divide our nation!
I am sure that you have heard someone in your family or inner circle make racial statements that have been less than becoming. Racism is America’s dirty little secret. The only way we are going to begin to heal our nations racial divide is to acknowledge that it exists and to deal with it head on, like Senator Obama did today.
Let’s get off of our high horse, stop looking at Senator Obama with your noses in the air and stop acting like you or someone close to you has not made racial slurs or comments where you did nothing.

Posted by: Ms. Tphil | March 18, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

Was this speech the work of JFK’s old speech writer? I bet Caroline, Ted and the rest of the Kennedys are so proud of their candidate. Has anyone checked on Oprah’s reaction? I bet the only part that Obama wrote was the racist remark about his white grandmother. Good work, Mr. Uniter!

Posted by: Sam | March 18, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

We’ve been in the business of demanding people be thrown overboard this week, but we can’t throw our grandmothers overboard.
Most of us have had to make choices at some point about whether and how to keep friends who have said deeply offensive things. Some of us have said offensive things ourselves. And here’s the IMO
most impressive thing Obama said today:
“I can no more disown Jeremiah Wright than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother – a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe.
These people are a part of me. And they are a part of America, this country that I love.”
If there’s only truly Christian politician today, it must be Obama. He embraces America as I haven’t seen any other powerful politician do before.

Posted by: Jack | March 18, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

Mr. Tphil; Family vs. CHOICE. He is running for President.

Posted by: irma | March 18, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

So the reverend was removed from the African American leadership position of the campaign. Do the other candidates have such a position or are they only concerned about the AMERICAN problems. Send Obama and anyone else that condones hatred of the USA back to Africa. We have enough problems of our own without these blacks living in the past and using racism to intimidate and blame others for their shortcomings.

Posted by: Susan | March 18, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

I told you guys he is unelectable. But the Liberal media will FIGHT HARD to try to bury the issue now. For reasons I STILL cant understand, they want him to be president???? Or just get rid of Clinton so Mc Cain can walk all over him? I have no idea, but either way he should have ripped himself away from his black power roots,church and Pastor. He didnt. He turned it into a 1960s history lesson and his inner desire to fight the fight.
Just like his Pastor.

Posted by: tomdavie | March 18, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Spin, Spin, Spin, however, the truth is
Obama displayed very poor judgment by following a racist pastor, who blames white Americans from everything from HIV to 9-11.
Obama displayed very poor judgment again by continuing to support Jeramiah Wright and his controversial Afrocentric church, which applauded the call to “God D_amn America, instead of blessing it.
Instead of a perfect diamond, Americans have discovered that Rookie U.S. Senator Obama is really just cracked glass.

Posted by: USMarine | March 18, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Does that mean that the News Media will be looking at all Preacher’s Sermons?

Posted by: Lookup | March 18, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

If only Obama had made the same speech to Wright…..we wouldnt be in this situation…aint it Obama?
So he is about 20 yrs late on this speech and he should have spoken to Wright about acceptance of America…

Posted by: MattOhio | March 18, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

J Dunham; Sorry I can’t get this across in a more intellectual sounding way…..He started it! He continues to use race for the purpose of being elected.

Posted by: irma | March 18, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

I absolutley loved him until I heard his Pastor give his hate filled message. This made me rethink what Obama’s motives are. I thought he was a man that stood on change for all people. The message in that sermon was sickening. I thought Obama was different… I would never vote for him now.

Posted by: Louise | March 18, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

Look up, yeah if someone is running for office. Where have you all been for the past elections?

Posted by: irma | March 18, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

as a black man i found senator obamas speech interesting not because of the controversy surrounding his pastor, but because it tackled race from the vantage point of a mixed race person. I think all of america would be well served to listen to his speech. black father /white mother ,lived with white grandparents who can imagine what thats like to think that he grew up to love everybody is truly remarkable

Posted by: renard | March 18, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Based on this article, one in three of really smart people (smarter than the rest of us?) surveyed think that Obama’s speech was a failure.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 18, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Obama is doing and saying anything to stay in this race and he will say and do whatever to win.

Posted by: D | March 18, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

If only Obama had made the same speech to Wright…..we wouldnt be in this situation…aint it Obama?
So he is about 20 yrs late on this speech and he should have spoken to Wright about acceptance of America…

Posted by: MattOhio | March 18, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Commander Guy,
I think these are informed people from “inside the Beltway”, as it were. There is an analytical failure across the board, though. To a person, these really smart people fail to raise the JUDGEMENT failure, i.e., OBAMA put the incendiary REVEREND WRIGHT on OBAMA’s campaign. They are more concerned with his craft of spinning the message. Please note that OBAMA did not put OBAMA’s own rascist Grandmother on OBAMA’s campaign. Apparently OBAMA had good sense to not do that, it would have been an equal abysmal failure in judgement.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 18, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

Vicki, Donna Brazil is a very smart lady who has managed properly,with style, dignity and skills Al Gore’s campaign and compare it to the shameful campaign management style we have seen at Hillary’s level.

Posted by: BKMC | March 18, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

Obama’s speech just served to make me angry–I just wish that I had a crutch on which to place blame for ALL the injustices I have experienced in my life (and believe me, there have been too many to count). Talk about unfair! I was born to parents who started out with NOTHING, educated themselves in the midst of some pretty steep obstacles, and made something of themselves. They were certainly victims of tough childhoods and poverty. But they chose not to be victims–and built something together through hard, hard work and staying together. They never gave me too much, and I, too, had to work very hard–so I would eventually appreciate what I have. I’m a white woman, and some of my best and dearest friends are black, hispanic, native american and other ethnic groups. Even though the color of our skin and our cultural backgrounds are different, we share common principles, values–and we have all worked hard. We REFUSE to be victims of anything! Why can’t we just all get along instead of harboring ills from the past–and we ALL have ills from the past, no matter the color, race, ethnic origin, religion, gender, etc. Although I deeply regret the dark stain on this country’s history in connection with slavery and the heinous acts of bigoted people, the fact of the matter is, we live in a day and time that if one is determined to work hard and make it, it can be done!

Posted by: DanaDee | March 18, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

Sam,
And your point is? Is Barack Obama supposed to be accountable for something he said about Imus two years ago? That’s a lifetime in politics and past statements are usually wiped away because it is no longer current. He does not have to stick to his claim that he would remove someone that behaved like that. In fact, he actually installed the guy who behaved like that AFTER the Imus statement. What more evidence do you need to show that OBAMA does not have to stick to his past message.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 18, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

Tina you are a mafioso, you are not an american. Missolina does not deserve a day in this free America. Slavery is a reality which cannot be denied, America has to pay for its history, it cannot run away from it. Obma has not taken one penny from you to go to Harvard and excel.

Posted by: BKMC | March 18, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

mr. expediency. time to quit!!!

Posted by: bob | March 18, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

Hey 2009,
That neocon Newsmax article went belly up after all due to lack of adequate vetting. Bill Kristol himself got egg smeared on his face. It is what it is, though, and I doubt the neocons are going to be happy with that miss. I’m sure they are looking for an alternative bit of data, and this time its going to weigh at least a ton before they put it on the scale. Obama has two weeks of life if they have their way.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 18, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

I have never heard any sermon like the one from Pastor Wright. I have never been to a hate filled sermon in my life and I have been to many different church sermons. Never have I heard such filth. I was shocked and sickened.

Posted by: Louise | March 18, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

I think that it was Mr. Obama who said that words matter I think he forcefully reminded Hillary Clinton of that fact in Wisconsin. Now is prepared to make a major address which will have its central thesis that it is only words that put into proper context that really matter. This also goes to his theory that it is not experience that matters as mush as it is ones judgment that matters. So what does it say about his judgment when he aligns himself with someone like Rev. Wright for 20 yrs and just now is made aware of his racist and hateful views? He is going to say that one’s entire life should not be judge on one mistake but that one mistake should be put into context of what one does over the course of their entire life. Is this not what Hillary Clinton is saying, that her whole political judgment should not be based on one mistake, her vote for the Iraq War! That she should be judge on her entire political life. Even as Mr. Obama makes his case that Rev. Wrights words should be put into context he will also be making the case for Hillary Clinton. Yes Mr. Obama is now painfully aware of how words matter!

Posted by: russell | March 18, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

LA IN INDIANA*** Obama admitted to sitting in the audience. Has he LIED AGAIN???????

Posted by: Bonny | March 18, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

Obama lied Again!
He evade the main issue, “God Damn America”
He turned it into a race issue.
He two stepped and dance all around.
The Race issue he needs to tell the African Americans, that everyone in America are equal, Not to live in the past. Not to hold grudges for something that happened before 1863. This is today and now.

Posted by: seah | March 18, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

Jackt51,
I have not heard a single OBAMA supporter say that the judgement to place WRIGHT on the campaign was a good judgement. I have not heard a single OBAMA supporter even raise it for discourse. Are you saying it was a good JUDGEMENT? C’mon put your mouth where your mouth is. Does he get a bye on this, and if so, why? Because he’s a really good speechmaker? I don’t think so.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 18, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

I particularly recognized my own feelings about Sen. Obama’s speech in Andrew Sullivan’s first reaction for The Atlantic. I’m not convinced, I must say, by the integrity of Shelby Steele’s response. But I guess I’m old-fashioned about the value of integrity, which may be a reason why I overcome with emotion halway Sen. Obama’s speech. I did not expect to see a man of his intellectual, spiritual and emotional quality rise in politics ever again during my lifetime.
Here is how the good Andrew Sullivan reacted, and I deeply agree with his words:
” I do want to say that this searing, nuanced, gut-wrenching, loyal, and deeply, deeply Christian speech is the most honest speech on race in America in my adult lifetime. It is a speech we have all been waiting for for a generation. Its ability to embrace both the legitimate fears and resentments of whites and the understandable anger and dashed hopes of many blacks was, in my view, unique in recent American history.
And it was a reflection of faith – deep, hopeful, transcending faith in the promises of the Gospels. And it was about America – its unique promise, its historic purpose, and our duty to take up the burden to perfect this union – today, in our time, in our way.
I have never felt more convinced that this man’s candidacy – not this man, his candidacy – and what he can bring us to achieve – is an historic opportunity. This was a testing; and he did not merely pass it by uttering safe bromides. He addressed the intimate, painful love he has for an imperfect and sometimes embittered man. And how that love enables him to see that man’s faults and pain as well as his promise. This is what my faith is about. It is what the Gospels are about. This is a candidate who does not merely speak as a Christian. He acts like a Christian.
Bill Clinton once said that everything bad in America can be rectified by what is good in America. He was right – and Obama takes that to a new level. And does it with the deepest darkest wound in this country’s history.
I love this country. I don’t remember loving it or hoping more from it than today.”

Posted by: Rev Hudson | March 18, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

Has anyone seen any children in any of the snippets that we’ve seen? NO. Could it be that they were in Sunday school or children’s church? Please stop with the “exposing his children” B.S. Please.
And for those of you who want to parse every single syllable – you remind me of the game “telephone.” It’s laughable really.
Vote for him or don’t. But some of this stuff is soooooooo ridiculous and tired. Most of you weren’t going to vote for him anyway. So, stop the madness. And if you allow Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly, etal and the ignorant “ratings driven” media to influence you…then that’s pathetic. Geesh!

Posted by: rcw | March 18, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

What is disturbing about Obama is that he remains the invisible man that says what others feel. The whites feel…the black man needs… etc. He is the consummate politician that says, “My friends are for this and some of my friends are against that. My fellow Americans I stand here today that I am for my friends!”. We know little of this fellow and when he won’t disown the hate spewing Wright because he means so much to him. We doubt what this man might do as president when it’s between him and the invisible principles of hope and change he speaks so much of. It’s beginning to become clear not by what Obama says as so much as what he has surrounded himself with. Like my white grandmother would say, “birds of a feather flock together.”

Posted by: Stone K Quehte | March 18, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

Jackt51,
The fact is that a CNN poll released today (and I abhor CNN because they have been so overtly pro-OBAMA) indicated that this matter has harmed OBAMA, with the effect of creating an increasing perspective towards him with 1/3 of all voters. Not surprisingly, 52 per cent of people had not even heard about it. This is much greater than the people on this blog.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 18, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Bonny….of course he was in the audience, whenever he went to church.
The NewsMax story put him there at one of the firestorm sermons, on July 22, 2007. And then tried to call him a liar.
However, he was NOT in church that day, he was in Miami for a fundraiser. But they didn’t shout THAT story…not as they shouted the original lie.
Typical.

Posted by: LA in Indiana | March 18, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Irma, First of all, there were censors, such a personal attack never would have been posted. Second, you know nothing about me. I’m the 11th child of a dirt farmer, my father never made over $12,000 his entire life and he was the finest man I have ever known. He never turned his back on a person in need. My parents are those people who worked everyday of their lives and had nothing to show at the end – including health care – they literally had to split pills to try to make them last through the month. That’s why I went into the work that I did. I was moved by Obama’s speech because I know it to be true because I have witnessed it. I saw good people, black and white, the richest doctors and the poorest patients try to work together to try to save women’s lives in what is considered to be one of the most segregated part of the US. And they did it. With hope, and faith in each other, and basic human decency.

Posted by: Mara | March 18, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Obama’s race is not the issuein this Presidential campaign. The issue is his inexperience, naivety, junior tenure as a senator, and judgmen, specifically Rezko affiliation and comments from 2 of his inexperienced advisors (re: Canada, Hillary). Now his affiliation with such a controversial figure as Rev. Wright has surfaced. I have a lot of respect for Obama. He is an inspirational speaker. He needs however, 4 to 8 more years of political experience and savvy before assuming the highest position in this country. Obama would be far more effective as a Cabinet member, Ambassador, or further honing his skills and contributions as a Congressional leader. This is not the time for our country to elect a junior senator as President so he can cut his teeth and build his experience base. We need an individual who understands how to navigate the political waters and complicated issues that face us internally and internationally

Posted by: seethruit | March 18, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

CORRECTION, I should have said increased negative perception about OBAMA, from 1/3 of all voters.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 18, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

Barack is a handsome, charismatic, charming, eloquent, deep thinking, inspirational, pathalogical lier. There is little that could be more disturbing than that.

Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | March 18, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

Actually, I think Reverend Wright gives a better speech than Obama and Wright can even get the faithful to sing and dance and get involved. Wright at least is man enough to stand up for what he really believes to the last sermon. Obama, on the other hand, only tells you want he thinks you want to hear. But only if he is caught. Obama, you had twenty years to stand up and be counted. You did not. There is no possibility that a twenty minute speech can make me forget your twenty years of silence.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 18, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

I feel like he was hiding a big secret from me. I had no idea this is how he spends his Sunday mornings. No idea at all…..I am really glad to know this. It’s like he is a secret member of a secret clan of haters.

Posted by: Louise | March 18, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

lol me too Tungsten!

Posted by: LA in Indiana | March 18, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

I absolutley love this: “Barack is a handsome, charismatic, charming, eloquent, deep thinking, inspirational, pathalogical lier. There is little that could be more disturbing than that.” SadStateofAffairs….tooo true.

Posted by: Francis | March 18, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

WCM: Well, as if YOU actually care.
Steele, in addition to being a total tool, has a supercilious structure he puts contemporary Black people into. That’s part of his “bargainer” language.
He’s been hammering this stupid view of Obama (and promoting his little book) since before the campaign took off. This snide little blurb of his just shows how narrow and ossifed his sweet little academic worldview is. I doubt he really even listened to what Obama said.
Typical academic drivel.

Posted by: Tungsten | March 18, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

Mara,
You talk about a family history that engenders great emotions. Can you understand the emotions of someone who hears a Reverend like Wright blast them because of the color of their skin? Do you understand the emotions of someone who sees this fiery hate speech embraced, by placing the speaker into a position of high trust on a Presidential campaign? The way to get past hate speech is to confront it at every corner. What happened before today was not what Dr. King talked about. White people have been trying to erase bad acts with words for many years, with bad actors such as Wallace and Thurmond. Bad acts cannot be erased with one speech. MR. OBAMA failed to use the necessary JUDGEMENT to not include a bad actor in his campaign? How much in funds flowed to REVEREND WRIGHT? They will give you a sense of the degree his statements were endorsed. The press really needs to explore this for what it is.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 18, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

I just can’t believe the people who still rationalize Rev. Wright’s remarks! Please stop comparing Wright to Hagee, Falwell, and others. John McCain did not say they were his personal spiritual advisors and mentors for 20 years! There is a difference in having a close personal relationship with a hateful racist, and repudiating remarks made by party loyal endorsers. It’s simple: Sen. Obama is trying to get himself out of a jam by offending as few people as possible. It has nothing to do with inspiration, eloquence, history making speeches, dreams, hopes, or anything else. He got caught and HE will do or say anything to get elected. He lied (again) on Friday night on the news talk shows, plain and simple….

Posted by: DWC | March 18, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

Tungsten,
As I recall OBAMA has been in the business of promoting his own book – THE AUDACITY of HOPE. We are beginning to get a little more insight on what he meant by AUDACITY.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 18, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

LA IN INDIANA*** Okay, fine!! We can argue that point later!!
WHAT YOU CAN’T ARGUE IS OBAMA SAYING THAT HE WAS IN THE CONGREGATION WHEN HE (WRIGHT) SAID CONTROVERSIAL THINGS. OBAMA TOLD PUSS-BOY COOPER (CNN) THAT HE WAS NOT IN THE AUDIENCE AND NEVER HEARD HIM SAY THINGS LIKE THAT!!! What is your excuse to this??

Posted by: Bonny | March 18, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Why can’t we all just be Americans…even on a blog some think they have to point out “their” groups poor pitiful me crap. Just be a runner for all people. You cannot be a runner for a chosen few that have different hate filled agendas. It will not work. He is OUT. I would have voted for him. He is a snake in the grass. He tricked me. Shame on him.

Posted by: Missy | March 18, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

Jackt51,
This may be a factor in Pennsylvania, but it will most likely fizzle out over time. American people seem to have a very short memory.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 18, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

For the Obama faithful, like the Wright faithful, they believe, period. Obama could have sprouted nursery rhymes and the Obama faithful would have talked about his great speech. Twenty minutes will not erase TWENTY YEARS of Obama inaction. I said I was going to give up smoking but I haven’t yet. But I said I would.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 18, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

I grew up in Senator Obamas district in Chicago. My grandfather took citizenship classes at the same grade school my father and I attended,the grade school the Senators children would have gone to if they attended public school. The neighborhood was safe, prosperous, clean, multi ethnic and presentable. As a child I would walk to the park or schoolyard without concern. I could run up to the “busy street” and shop or catch the bus or train to anywhere in the city.
Two years ago, while visiting Chicago (I have been away for 40+ years) the cab driver and I discovered he lived less than a block away from my old house and his kids went to the same grade school. “Take me by the house” I requested.
He said “no”. “It’s a war zone there, we would not get out without trouble, I don’t even bring my cab home because it would get all broken up if I did”
Later that week I took a rental car by the house. It was a war zone. High fence around the school and the gate locked, no one sitting out on the stoop, Houses in disrepair, every, I mean every single shop on the “busy street” closed. Cars abandoned along the street. I thought it was the bizzaro land.
What the hell happened?

Posted by: flyover | March 18, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

This is not guilt by association that is the problem with Obama. He was involved for twenty years with Dr. Wright. Intimately involved in a church that gets more excited about politics than religion and whoops it up when mention is made of their victimization and identification of anger and hate. To deny that you are unaware of this and use the blind followers to your own advantage tells me that Obama either is naive or that he is lying. Given the set of circumstances and facts I choose the latter.

Posted by: Stone K Quehte | March 18, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

WCM: Oooo. A little counterpunch there. You do so love to argue, even if it’s with basically random statements. I’m guessing you didn’t listen to Obama’s speech with an open mind.
And you never did answer my question: will you vote for Obama if he’s the nominee? Or are you such a narrow little partisan that you have to keep tearing Obama down no matter what? I’ll vote for Clinton if she steals the nomination, even though I find her disgusting. The Republicans are far worse.

Posted by: Tungsten | March 18, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

flyover: Great question, and amazingly enough a thougthful post on this board.
A lot has happened in that 40 years. Your question is clearly not going to be answered on that board, but it’s a good one. And it goes a long way towards explaining the harsher aspects of Wright’s rhetoric.
My wife is a resident at U of Chicago hospital, and it can be like a war zone. It’s really the front lines in a big rift of race and class in this country.

Posted by: Tungsten | March 18, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

I just got to know, did Rezko sit next to Obama in church?

Posted by: D | March 18, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Califelephant-That’s typical Obama. Blame the other guy but when he has to stand up he did not. Who fires you, Obama?

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 18, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

He has regurgitated the obvious.
He failed to transcend race in this contest.
This speech was more damage control.
Too little, too late.
See you, goodnight.

Posted by: rpg | March 18, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

Tungsten,
I haven’t had the opportunity to listen to OBAMA’s speech, plan to do so this evening. If it doesn’t include a recognition and an apology for a lapse in judgement about according a campaign position to a highly divisive personality then I doubt its worth much more than a can of soup. I’ve heard snippets and I’m struck by the fact that Obama talked about his own white Grandmother’s rascist stereotypes. Thank God he had sense enough to not put her on the campaign. Works both ways, my friend. I plan to vote for HILLARY CLINTON or write in the name of a trustworthy Democrat, otherwise. Maybe I’ll have to write in Tungsten.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 18, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

I agree that the speech may not be enough for Barack. But I don’t know if I agree with how some pundits exaggerate and distort Barack’s relationship with Rev. Wright. The url is creators.com and then click opinions columns. There is another similar column on the site by Pat Buchanan.

Posted by: BK | March 18, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

I am sure that if I am not swayed by Obama’s speech into believing he is our new Messiah, I will be called a racist. But I am not gullible enough to be moved bya a presidential candidate who says he has never heard Rev. Wright utter a racist statement. Every sentence in Wright’s screaming diatribes says “WHITE”! Are white people not entitled to be an offended racial group? He now admits that Wrights opinions were out of justified anger from a racist past in which he was brought up. So, why did Obama make him an official on his campaign staff? He never touched that issue.
Obama then goes on to represent Wright as a patriotic Marine, virtually an American hero! No, Barack, I will remember your hero’s words, “God damn America” and, as a veteran myself, think what a pitifully lowlife Marine he must have been.
New political Messiah? We may need one but it surely is not Barack Obama. Nice try but no cigar! It is no surprise that you didn’t close your speech with “God bless America”. That might have meant something.
I pray that voters will not be taken in by this attempt to gloss over your lies and deceptions. I pray that Reverend Wright will denounce his American citizenship and move to his place of choice in Africa.

Posted by: doofus | March 18, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

WestCoastMessenger,
You should read the transcript for a more objective look at his message rather than watching it.

Posted by: LOM | March 18, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

FOX –THANKS FOR THE NEWS ON MORTGAGE LENDING AND ECONOMY——THANKS LIZ
Racism started before the eighteen hundreds. Ok, let’s forget the eighteen hundreds.
Have Congress, Senators and this present Republican party put racism to rest?
We the Americans have to put race problems to rest!
Little girls was burned in a church yard in Alabama because of racism.
Several people have been harmed regardless of their skin color because of racism.
Who is the Republican American Senator, in the news that do not want a person to be elected for president because of a name?
Will the American Government separate and denounce this Republican Senator?
Racism is a Republican and Demarcated problem (not just an OBAMA problem). The situation opened a door for positive communication according to the people at CNN. Racism is an American problem. Can Americans put racism to rest? Can Rich of FOX NEWS help Americans put racism to rest ?
Can Rich teach America how to bring about an economic change? Can Rich help Americans understand people are not white or black according to color theory? Can Rich help America move forward? Rich what is a third culture thinker? Should Kristen and Rich have a talk show and call it ‘ “THE BRIDGE TO WALKING OUT OF RACISM .”
Fair and balance judgment. Racism is an American Problem not just an OBAMA problem!
If you see this election as history making for a woman or the word black. You are wrong! This is a United States of America so don’t try to separate the people.
ENOUGH ABOUT RACISM–MOVING ON
This is an election about:
Economic Change
A yes vote for this war has caused 145 thousand Americans to leave home. How many Americans have been killed fighting this war? How many more will die? AMERICA HAVE A LEADER FOR THE WAR COMMITTEE. NOW LET US ELECT A PRESIDENT WHO WILL CHANG THE OLD WAY OF DURING BUSINESS.
JOB PROSPERITY
TRADE TALKS
HOUSING (FORECLOSURE CAMPGROUND) –Dose McCain know about the foreclosure camp?
EDUCATION
WILL YOU HELP AMERICA CHANGE AND TO CREATE A BRIDGE TO WALK INTO A BETTER FUTURE?
IOWA VOTED FOR CHANGE
I SUPPORT CHANGE
LARRY KING, ANDERSON COOPR, LOU, WOLF, KIRSTEN, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS AND FOX LET US HEAR FROM YOU

Posted by: Em | March 18, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

JUST WORDS! HE WILL SAY ANYTHING TO WIN. He is a liar! He needs to drop out, he is destroying the democratic party.

Posted by: D | March 18, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

HE LIED!!!
You can never explain that!!
What about Rezko? It was first 5 billing hours, then $$$$ amount of money donated now we are finding out this $$$$$$$$ is the new amount. Maybe Obama has early Alzheimers. Maybe that is why he needs the presidency…for the fabulous insurance????

Posted by: Bonny | March 18, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

The only problem with this “uniter” is that I and most Americans have no desire to be united with the irrational racist haters with whom Obama so freely associates. I do not wish to be united with people who applaud when terrorists crash airplanes into the Twin Towers and who irrationally think that white people like me diabolically created HIV to destroy the black community. These people can remain in their self-made world of separation and pity while the rest of us — white, black, brown, Asian — get on with our collective lives.

Posted by: LAGuy | March 18, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

In reading quite a few of the comments here, it’s always so interesting to read the devisive and incendiary comments from the many Clinton supporters that luck around here every day.
It was a speech from the heart, if you can’t agree with it, then, well, I have no idea where you’ve been or what you’ve seen in your lifetime – and yes, it’s up to the voters to decide where our country is going to go, but if the majority want to keep focusing on Rezko then our country has truly gone to hell and Barak might just as well head on down the road.

Posted by: dennis | March 18, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

There are smarter persons as Nobel prize winners and Warren Buffet.
Nobel literature winner Doris Lessing predicted that, if Obama is president, the country will be in turmoil, because he is not decisive and strong, he can not control when different opinions appear. She predicted that Hillary should be the best candidate for president.
A Nobel peace prize winner, he said Hillary as first lady, DID HELP on various foreign policy events.
Warren Buffet, the richest person in the world, said Hillary is the person to lead the country.

Posted by: golfgirlusa | March 18, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

These three may be intelligent, but are they are non-biased to offer a “fair and balanced” critque?
Ms. Brazile has always been discreetly biased from many comments that I have heard from her. Shelby Steele is certainly biased. I do not know about Richard Norton.
We have to consider the context and background (events) of this speech. This is about the election and Mr. Obama’s candidacy. It appears he took the gamble of bringing the race issue, openly, I might add, for the first time, with a hope to win voters who may have become skeptical after the belated exposure of his church and its former pastor. Rather than address issues related to transparency and judgement, he chose to blur them with a speech on race. Smart strategy and it may have worked. But, questions remain unanswered. Well, I think these questions will be forgotten once he goes on the offensive after this speech.
The speech had some vey intellectual elements to it. We must commend him for that. To bring up the isssue of racial divide so openly is quite bold.
The speech also had some intellectually dishonest elements to it, such as comparing small, personal fears and streotyping of a private individual to a preacher, whose racially-divisive sermons reached hundreds if not thousands belonging to young and old generations. After listening and embibing such sermons for 20 odd years and expressing his utter gratification to the church and its former pastor repeatedly in his book, he claims to come forward to unite all stripes and colors as if it is destined by God Himself. What audacity and arrogance he must have!
I am not surprised that people in the right have increased the bashing on Mr. Obama, but what surprises me is the fact that liberal intellectuals keep putting him in the pedestal. Mr. Obama is just another politician who wants to acheive his dream at the expense of people. Nothing wrong about that, but that is what his candidacy is about.
Perhaps somebody can fill me in. In his tenure at the Illinois senate and US Senate what has he done to transcend race and build racial bridges?

Posted by: Onlooker | March 18, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

LOM,
Thanks – good suggestion. I’ll read what Mr. Obama says. If there is no apology there for his having made a bad judgement about appointing a bad actor to his campaign, then I believe I will have wasted my time.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | March 18, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

cult classic

Posted by: jt | March 18, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

Jake,
Someone in your group must have read my notes-thank you for having Shelby Steele
on this Blog-I have encouraged everyone to read his book “A Bound Man”-Why we like Barack Obama-and why he can’t win
also go check cspan-maybe the program that featured Mr. Steele is still on.
Mr. Obama gave a great speech today.
but for me as an African American female-(and I feel for him-I saw the tears in his wife’s eyes-I say shame on axelrod,bradley,dashelle, Kerry and Co.
for not handling this better-( I think they used obama as a spoiler to Hillary)
But today-even with such an eloquent and truthful speech-for me it is now all about credibility-His political career is still to close to its infancy-to have so many problems-the Nafta thing with the canadians, S. powers in ireland talking about the war, and his people not being proactive about this rev. wright thing-have I left anything out? oh yes, the Rezko deal-I also found it very slick-that while everyone wwas screaming about the rev. wright ordeal, obama-had to slip in the more money from rezko-(typical politician, and their handlers). sounds like even our guy of hope who wants to transcends race, and run a different campaign-has has to resort to running a campaign of old.
Just an interesting observation-cnn showed showed Hillary giving a speech after obama-and a guy wrote in to the cafferty file and said-How dare Hillary-
stand up there looking “Presidential”
Hillary is running for president-and if people will try to get over the crazy stuff-and elect her-she will be a good president.

Posted by: jgaw | March 18, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

Mr. Tapper:
On April 11, 2007, you wrote an article about Don Imus where Senator Obama holds Mr. Imus to higher standards than you or the rest of associates do at ABC. Come the end of the day, Mr. Imus was a shock jock. When you dialed into his program, you certainly had an indication of what to expect on the dial. Senator Obama is “interviewing” (as is Senator Clinton) for the highest office in this country. Doesn’t it seem somewhat peculiar that we aren’t applying standards as strenuous to a presidential candidate as we do a disc jockey?

Posted by: beebopareebop | March 18, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

And you people actually THINK AND BELIEVE that obama wrote this speech for himself?
BETTER THINK AGAIN
These are Hollywood screen writers who write for obama – It was a Hollywood staged setting – all set up for you to think of obama as a patriotic American – Flags, blue background.
No, obama did no more than read what was before him. He might have been coached from earpieces on voice tone and pitch.
Obama is a staged person. You think this speech came from the heart. No, he is just a good actor with a lot of good coaches.
The true obama will soon emerge. A public person cannot hide the true self for very long.
If one speech can make a president without any real qualifications for the job, we in the USA had better look out.

Posted by: Lou | March 18, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

So, now what do we owe the black people, Obama? New homes? Come in each home and FORCE their children go to school? Is it money? What? I wasn’t there when Jim Crow did anything. Now what? My church is not preaching racism and bigotry. So how does my church heal yours? I did not operate slave ships. I did not sell blacks. Now what? Am I to blame? If so how?

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 18, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Today Mr. Obama borrowed from Shakespears Julius Caesar,” friends,romans,countrymen, lend me your ears today I come to bury Caesar not to praise him”. Thus it was with Mr. Obama today,he said that he was going to denounce Rev.Wright instead he gave a long list of excuses as to why he could not disavow the man,only the sermons. Although this may be a good thing for a devoted friend to do it is not a good thing to do if you are trying to tell america that you are not like all other politicians that you are different. In this speech he now admits that he did indeed hear controversial staements by Rev.Wright while he sat in the pew! Yet it was just last Thursday when asked if he had heard any of these comments from Wright, his answer was that he had heard nothing that would indicate that Rev. Wright held such devisive views. Well what a difference a few days make. This goes to the heart of his canidacy, that judgement is more important than experience when picking a president. So what do we make of the judgement of someone who would, as he now admits, set and listen to such disgusting statements. Do not look for the answer to this question in his speech for it is no where to be found. For all of its imagery and poetry at the end of this important speech on race relations the voters are left with the naging question. Is he for him or is he against him?

Posted by: russell | March 18, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

jgaw…. AMEN!

Posted by: D | March 18, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

During the Imus flak, Obama called for Imus to be fired and said this:
“I understand MSNBC has suspended Mr. Imus,” Obama told ABC News, “but I would also say that there’s nobody on my staff who would still be working for me if they made a comment like that about ANYBODY OF ANY ETHNIC GROUP. And I would hope that NBC ends up having that same attitude.”
Obama the hypocrite.

Posted by: Joe | March 18, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

Barack Obama’s speech didn’t impress me at all. He likes to place blame on everyone but himself. He lies and then only admits to it when the evidence is presented to the public. He addresses problems of race in his speech but doesn’t even want to attend the State of the Black Union event in New Orleans. You would think this would be an event he would want to attend. After all, nearly 90% of African American voters are supporting him. I know Hillary Clinton was there.
His speech also tried to play on people’s emotions. The “Ashley” story was obviously done for this purpose. Imagine an African American man voting for an African American president — and it was all because of Ashley. Right.

Posted by: Beth | March 18, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

Imus, a shock jock, was held to a higher standard because he is WHITE. Obama is held to a lower standard because he is BLACK. Period!

Posted by: Dogsoldier | March 18, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

It was just reported on CNN that John Murtha is endorsing Hillary.
Hillary 2008

Posted by: t | March 18, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

A couple of posters here have observed that those of us who were not “persuaded” by Senator Obama’s speech were listening with closed minds. This isn’t a pageant. This is the Democratic nominating process for the privilege of facing the Republican candidate in November. I don’t need to do anything. A candidate needs to do for me. He or she needs to demonstrate a genuine love for all of America and its future, honesty, sincerity, an understanding of current events, a plan for our future, experience which would qualify him or her to make the most important decisions — not just for us here in America but as the leader of the free world.
None of us are perfect. But the person who will sit in the most important office should not be so obviously and fatally flawed.

Posted by: beebopareebop | March 18, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

America can’t handle the TRUTH:
Obama told the Truth once again, with his relationship with Wright. The Press will fail to applaud him on that.
Ignorant Americans are more willing to accept the NEGATIVE of a minister (not Obama WORDS) and except the words of LIARS.
He stated the truth of the hurt and fears of both races. No other leader has ever stepped up to the plate and said let’s put the whole issue on the table, and why, even Wright’s HURT, FEARS and PAIN was express the way it was.
Hillary lied in msnbc last debate:
“I never support NAFTA from the beginning” was her statement.
Hillary lied in her support of the Iraq war, “I did not give the President the authorization to go-to-WAR”.
Can we as people have the wisdom to say shame on you, and still love one another in America. And make this the Nation it should be.

Posted by: American9 | March 18, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

oh yes, I left one thing out-obama in his speech admitted he has been in the church and heard some of the vile things
we have heard. Now, as I said before-for me-it is all about credibility now.
His wife gave a speech on cspan sunday and said something to the effect
it is what you do in the shadows that count. not what you do when the lights are on-so when his handlers axelrod and co. and speech writers put him up there and he tell us what they think we want to hear-but what he has done in the shadows-is gradually coming to light. Now Pa, Nc, WVA,indiana-it is your time to right this wrong-please do not do an axelrod on mr. obama and his family-do not send him into the general election against mccain-where we will not know what else will be brought to light.

Posted by: jgaw | March 18, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Shelby Steele says that Obama isn’t a “challenger”? That’s rich.
What was today’s audacious, ambitious speech if not a challenge… to ALL Americans?

Posted by: Creamy Goodness | March 18, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Jgaw wrote:
“Someone in your group must have read my notes-thank you for having Shelby Steele
on this Blog-I have encouraged everyone to read his book “A Bound Man”-Why we like Barack Obama-and why he can’t win
also go check cspan-maybe the program that featured Mr. Steele is still on.
Mr. Obama gave a great speech today.
but for me as an African American female-(and I feel for him-I saw the tears in his wife’s eyes-I say shame on axelrod,bradley,dashelle, Kerry and Co.
for not handling this better-( I think they used obama as a spoiler to Hillary)”
Jgaw, I also scanned Steele’s book. It was a great assist to me as I simply could not figure out Obama. He is not a challenger, that is for sure. I have read accounts of fellow law students from Harvard, also black, who described Obama as laid back, likable, affable, aloof, during the greatest racial unrest in the history of the law school. While other black students were actively involved in student protests because of the dirth of black faculty, he was missing in action, making his connections, never making waves. I also have a black friend who was a student at HLS at the same time and had worse to say. Obama presents himself as the agent of change but change is hard; change is work; change is a challenge.
I do agree with you that Obama was used as a spoiler by Kerry, Kennedy, Dashle etc as they were absolutly panicked at the thought that Hillary Clinton might be President. Imagine, a woman president! They did do Barack Obama a great disservice. He simply was not ready. He needed some years behind him. He needed time to mature or not. Those people owe the democrats an apology. Those people owe Black Americans an apology.

Posted by: marie | March 18, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

This speech only proves again “Change in What?” What the hell is he talking about?
He is a good orator and nothing more. We don’t even know who this man is. Finally, we are starting to see or at least the MSM is starting to report his character.
He, according to what I got out of his speech, is for change yet has affilated with his raciest “Uncle” for the past 20 years listening too “Social Gospel” better known as racism, class warfare, dependancy, and self loeving. What did he do in Illinois to make such change? NOTHING!!!!!!!
We are just now learning who Obama is and I don’t like what I see or hear.
If this was a republican, white male, with a KKK “spiritual advisor” that candidate would be thrown under the bus by America and most certainly by the media. THIS SITUATUION IS NO DIFFERENT.
Race reverale in full force in a day of political correctness and certainly this is a double standard.

Posted by: Honest Abe | March 18, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

I thought the speech was a well delivered, but it was an act of cowardice! He basically said two things… it’s not my fault but I can fix it! But like all his speeches he miserably fails to show how he gets from point A to Point B.
First, this mess we’re in was the fault of the founding fathers that left out Blacks from full participation. But he can fix all that because he has a multi-racial background and his family is made up of every ethnicity and hue. (He conveniently fails to mention that this less than perfect union also excluded women.)
Second he blames, although he does not mention by name, Bill Clinton and Geraldine Ferraro for bringing up the ugly specter of race in this contest. But I can fix it because he can transcend race and the politics of identity.
Third, it’s Rev. Wright’s fault for uttering the frustrations of the African-American community in an impolitic manner. But I can fix that because my very being will remind everyone that while we have come a long way, we still need more to do. (Wright wasn’t completely thrown under the bus, but he was gently nudged under a mini-van)
Finally, he wraps it all up by not addressing race at all, but by saying that his candidacy is not about race, so let’s put it behind us now. He is running for the peeps… those masses of people who sacrifice so much. How can these people be wrong!
The notion that this was some sort of watershed moment in our divisive history is a mockery to those people of faith and conscience throughout our nation’s past who have tried and sometimes bled and died to make this “a more perfect Union.”

Posted by: smartprimate | March 18, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

Obama did use the words to describe racism as “racial injustice”?
Then the rumor that has been going around that when he is president he will embrace a Racial Injustice Department? What will this Racial Injustice Department do – what is it’s platform? Who will be its members?
OK White US America – if this is true, then what comes next?
I just hope that it is a rumor and has no substance.

Posted by: Lou | March 18, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

Would you still attend church if you heard your country cursed from the pulpit? Would you want your daughters to watch your preacher gyrate while talking about Monica Lewinski and Bill Clinton? Exactly just what kind of person would tolerate that?

Posted by: Joe | March 18, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

OBAMA – Speech on Race — Open Letter of Inquiry
Simply, the issue was evaded and obfuscated. In your usual fashion, you spoke in descriptive terms regaling us with the flaws of man while highlighting our problems. But what, may I be so bold as to ask, are your principles concerning hate speech. We know your words but your deeds leave me cold.
When John Mc Cain was faced with the ugliness of innuendo, distortion and enmity directed at you by one of his political lieutenents, poking fun at your middle name and linking you to Islam, McCain immediately took the stage and disavowed the man, his intent, and his rhetoric. Have you done the same with Rev. J. Wright?
The premise gist of your retort was that you could no more deny the minister than you could deny your grandmother or “Black” folks generally. I do not buy it. The analogy is neither principled nor contextually consistent. First, his race and blood are givens that he had no control over or ability to influence either from inception or as he aged. He will always be black and related by blood to the grandmother. Whereas, your relationship to the minister was voluntarily assumed and continued. The relationship of mentor/mentee and his role as your spiritual leader was not foisted upon you sans ability to repel it.
Consequently, when one examines your attachment to the church, its ministry, philosophy, and the orator the result is not acceptable to my sensibilities. The choice is yours Mr. Obama. One either stands with or against the devil. There will be no parsing of this issue and no fancy dancing on the head of the pin.
Are you all in or out?

Posted by: Lamont Buffington | March 18, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

What has America done to transcend race and build racial bridges? What have the American Government done to build racial bridges? What have I done to build racial bridges? CNN notice–People want change!
Thanks to all the news-FOX, CNN, MSNBC, AND KRISTEN

Posted by: Em | March 18, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

Creamy goodness:
As I’ve said before, Steele is a complete pseudo-intellectual tool. The bargainer/challenger thing is his lame idea of a topic for a book.
Folks, read or listen to the speech yourselves, without all the babble by the chatterers. Win or lose, Obama has re-framed the way we talk about race in this country. This will be in the history books as one of the great American political speeches.

Posted by: Tungsten | March 18, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

Here’s a piece by Ron Klein of the NYT, someone a hell of a lot smarter than the total tool Steele:
—-
For more than a week, since the media began to report on Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s sermons, the anger has been building. First from whites who found these sermons filled with “hate,” “race baiting,” and “dangerous … radicalism.” And then from the black community, who defended Reverend Wright as a modern-day prophet and a speaker of views that resonated with “mainstream … black America.”
It was into this maelstrom that Barack Obama stepped on Tuesday with his “Race in America” speech. I have little doubt that it failed to assuage the angriest voices on both sides of the racial divide. Those who wanted to see Senator Obama repudiate Reverend Wright will be angered by Senator Obama’s declaration that he can no more disown Reverend Wright than he can disown the black community. Those who wanted to see Senator Obama defend Reverend Wright’s most extreme views will be angered by his statements that Reverend Wright’s views reflected a “profound mistake” and failed to acknowledge the genuine “progress” that has been made.
But for people who are looking for a more hopeful, unifying course in race relations — and for a broader healing in our society — Senator Obama’s speech will be long-remembered and oft-acclaimed. It was powerful, brilliant and effective. No matter what happens in the 2008 presidential campaign, it is an address that Americans will read and recall for generations to come.
Most impressively, the address found the middle path, not by splitting the difference or offering up vague platitudes: if anything, just the opposite. More than any public figure I can recall, Senator Obama was direct and frank about lingering bitterness in the black community over advantages whites have, and about lingering white anger over busing and affirmative action. This was not a speech that sought a new unity by papering over differences: it was one that sought to face these differences squarely, call them into the open, and then ask people of good faith on both sides to see the other’s point of view and to work together to overcome these divisions.
In fairness to Senator Clinton, I have little doubt that her views on race are similar to Senator Obama’s, and that she is equally dedicated to racial healing – and that she could (and should) give a similar address on the issues of gender and fairness that her campaign has brought to the fore. But today belongs to Senator Obama, who stepped up to face a difficult situation and high expectations and succeeded tremendously.

Posted by: Tungsten | March 18, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

I say shame on Kennedy,Kerry, Dodd and the people who have used Obama I support Hillary but the evil that the losers in the democratic party are to blame

Posted by: Bishop | March 18, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

I was surprised and disappointed by Shelby Steele’s comments. I wonder that he and I heard the same speech. Senator Obama challenged all of us, all of America, to move beyond our carefully correct racial entrenchment to a new future. to see all that we have in common not just where we differ. To say Barack Obama “has to tell us who he really is, what he truly believes” misses the whole point. He showed us who we are and that together we can aspire to a higher calling. He’s challenging us to come together.

Posted by: bertkauf | March 18, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

Obama mentioned OJ. Wright thinks he didn’t murder two innocent white people, does Obama? Someone please ask him.
Why does Obama suggest white men voting for McCain are racists?
The speech was a sickening piece of garbage.

Posted by: geevill | March 18, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

He re-framed the racial dialogue by saying: “if you are broad-minded and want to end racial discrimination vote for me.” He doesn’t say how or why, but like everything he says it is soaring rhetoric without much substance.

Posted by: smartprimate | March 18, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

The more you read his speech and try to understand it the more you would think he try to remind white people are racist.
He just spread some more hates on his speech.

Posted by: crisis08 | March 18, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Donna Brazile atated:
“And I think what he put into context today was that his heart and his soul are made up of not only his experiences as a member of that church but a young man raised by his white grandparents, and someone who had to come uh into his own by reconciling all of the various pieces as he said of America in him. Today he laid out the puzzle and I think it fits that Senator Obama is a candidate that is trying to bring the country together based on where we’ve been but also where we should go”
I think this is precisely what Barack Obama tried to explain today-how conflicted he is, how complex his background is, how he has made it his lifetime work to fit the pieces of the puzzle together, how he could not disavow a person he considers a deep friend, just as he could not disavow his grandmother. It WAS heartfelt. However, while I can sympathize with his inner struggles, they are not mine at all. He owns them.

Posted by: marie | March 18, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

dogsoldier
Imus said the words.
Obama didn’t.

Posted by: dl | March 18, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Tungsten quotes the New York Times to suggest that is the authority we are to bow to along with his Messiah Obama.
I don’t think so guy.

Posted by: Stone K Quehte | March 18, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

and DCVoter
Donna Brazille is just trying to do the right thing
Have you see her have to take a breath a hundred times over in interviews and panels because she starts to show where she leans.
She asked the superdelegates (of whom she is one) to not overturn the delegates and she is trying to let the votes play out as they will.
Sheis cool i must say.

Posted by: dl | March 18, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

I am sure these are the same conversations that occurred when JFK gave the catholic speech and Lincoln on several occasions and MLK’s.
I’m glad that I will tell my kids and my Grandkids that their Grandpa fought for this…and was on the side of President Obama.

Posted by: dl | March 18, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

Joe is exactly right. Obama denied hearing anything like what goes on at Trinity Church in his interview last week but admits today that he did.
What’s up with that?

Posted by: Stone K Quehte | March 18, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

So–we should give him a free pass?
NO!! He will not win!! He needs the Clinton supporters to win! We will not give him a free ride.

Posted by: Bonny | March 18, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

Tungsten: “one of the great American political speeches”. Consider yourself brainwashed.

Posted by: Jon | March 18, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

I love Donna Brazile to death. And I support her to tons of people who support Senator Clinton. And I can buy that Senator Obama is conflicted. But Gerry Ferraro had no place in his personal torment. He had already done enough to her reputation. Instead of apologizing to her — for saying EXACTLY WHAT IS ON HIS SENATE WEBSITE — he snipes at her THREE more times. He can’t pull out of this race fast enough. Nancy Pelosi and Howard Dean need to hear this: End the Drama — withdraw Obama.

Posted by: beebopareebop | March 18, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

Obama gave a very good speech today.
and to those of you who support him-have you been listening to him. Obama..YIKES’ has a right to say what he has said. and to the person who said something about the George Washington picture on the bus…have you been listening to obama’s speeches? What you wrote back was uncalled for. I wish since we are in an election season-we should stay on the issues before us.
to the people yet to vote: NC, Pa, WVa,
Indiana,-go and vote for Hillary. Try to get past the crazy stuff that is made up, cannot be proved, we do not know if it is true, and really has nothing to do with what we are facing in this country today.
Instead of trying to pin every shooting since Lincoln on Hillary Clinton-
Do you want better healthcare?
Do you want the college students to pay for their college education by doing service for the country eg-nursing,fireman,teachers or do you want them going and giving their lives in Mccains 50-100year war. And has anyone thought about the 50-100year war Mccain wants-he will not be around to finish.
I will not either-I’m 53.
Mccain has said he does not know much about the economy. so lets give Hillary a try. I promise you-your gossip life will be full-and your pocketbook will be too.

Posted by: jgaw | March 18, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

Judging from the comments… so much for healing the racial divide. He, more than any politician in recent history, could have seized this moment to begin a significant dialogue. Instead it is just more damage control. Very disappointing.

Posted by: smartprimate | March 18, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

Obama’s grandmother lives in a shack and is on Medicaid, while he lives in a $1.6 million mansion.
Today, he threw her underneath the bus, accusing her of being a racist.

Posted by: Joe | March 18, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

I have to admit that some of these comments are precisely what makes it so difficult for anyone to take on this issue of race in America. It explains why the issue has been tabled for so long. It is no doubt a brave act on Obama’s part to take it on. This man wants to bring all races together, recognizing that America’s problems transcend race. But that the race issue makes it very difficult to take on the stark challenges of our time. At least give Obama an A for making the effort to take on such a delicate issue. The question you should be asking yourselves is, “do Rev Wright’s comments make Obama a racist? If your father is perceived a racist, does that make you a racist. I say no. I do not subscribe to this notion that Rev. Wright is racist. Rev. Wright is a product of an era in which racial inequalities existed. We, as a people have come a long way. We must continue down this road. America’s problems are more economic than racial. Obama talks about Corporations shipping jobs to foreign lands due to the bottom line; profits. It is a practice that adversely spans white, black and brown. All races, whether white, black or brown are feeling the pang of the economic disaster that we find ourselves in. We must therefore not allow any polarizationh whatsover to take root. But rather, take on the corporate interests, and those who are hell bent on using fear and racial divisivenes to advance their goals. We must stop this foolishness immediately.

Posted by: win322 | March 18, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

The children are not to blame for their education if what they hear from the likes of Dr. Wright and his hate messages deprives them of the heritage of what is good and right about America.
It is time educators quit apologizing for America and allow children to celebrate what is good. Guilty Whites patronizing children to their detriment is not helping anyone.
The message of hope is that people do not need a false messiah but would think for themselves with the information that doesn’t paint America as the villian.
Yes we can!
without Obama we can!
God Bless America!

Posted by: Stone K Quehte | March 18, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

Jack: I would like to ask you why you agree that Barack Obama’s speech today was “one of the great American political speeches.”

Posted by: Jon | March 18, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

I do not understand the commentators who call this a great speech or one that will be remembered throughout the ages. The speech was mundane at best and his delivery unappealing. If you went into the speech hoping for the next “I Have A Dream” moment, you will probably find something in this lecture to hang your hat on that it was “brilliant”, “effective” or “historic”. But you know deep in your heart it was the speech of a political survivalist. He did not want to make this speech – he had to in an attempt to stop the wheels from falling off his campaign. He wanted this “crazy uncle” to stay locked in the basement, but he did not and so his hand was forced – and like always he tried to thread the needle.
Those of us who listened to this speech looking for truthful answers from Obama about his affiliation with this specific church and this specific pastor found nothing more than further inconsistencies. Just last week Obama stated that he had never heard inflammatory comments about U.S. foreign or domestic policy from Reverend Wright. Today, we learned that Obama did in fact hear Wright make such remarks. I for one do not go to church to hear my spiritual leader expound on foreign or domestic policy and when they have, I actually have left such church (such denomination, in fact). Obama chose not to distance himself from Wright until it became a political necessity. What does that tell us? It tells us he believes more of what Wright says than not. And what Wright preaches is a racially-charged message. How can Obama claim to be the candidate that transcends race, and then brazenly ask US to look beyond race, when HE himself ascribes to such a race-based dialogue?
Obama’s speech listed some worthy aspirations concerning race relations in this country. But they are undigestable coming from him. He really is “audacious” in his hypocrisy.

Posted by: Nicole | March 18, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

The inability of Obama to call Wright a racist (which he is) means the speech was a sham.

Posted by: geevill | March 18, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

Obama’s tortured logic regarding Geraldine Ferraro and his grandma can be summarized in his speech as:
Two wrongs = one Wright. Now he thinks he’s even with the American people.

Posted by: Mac | March 18, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

To dl:
Donna Brazile is on the DNC Rules Committee that decided to strip both Florida and Michigan of its delegations.
Right now, I would be more interested in how she thinks that the Democrats are going to take this thing in November without seating Florida and Michigan.
Calling her out, yes, I am.

Posted by: OhioNative | March 18, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Nicole: Thank you.

Posted by: Jon | March 18, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

It appearred to me to be an “I and others close to me are obsessed with your race speech”.

Posted by: Bill | March 18, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

Oh, Nicole. That refreshing honesty is only going to get you lambasted by some folks here.
I agree that he gave a good speech. However, I think he fundamentally missed addressing the credibility problem that stemmed from this entire Wright issue. I don’t see Obama as a racist at all, but his handling of rev. Wright as a liability to his campaign was mismanaged from the start.
I truly feel had he made this type of speech at the beginning as a Thought Leader, he would have had this clinched by now. As an after thought to quell an uneasiness in many who question his credibility doesn’t do the speech justice.

Posted by: LOM | March 18, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

Joe,
If you could prove your comment of:
Obama’s grandmother lives in a shack and is on Medicaid, while he lives in a $1.6 million mansion.
Today, he threw her underneath the bus, accusing her of being a racist.
This would put Obama’s campaign in the coffin.

Posted by: Stone K Quehte | March 18, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

Nicole,
Excellent post. May I quote you?

Posted by: Stone K Quehte | March 18, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

Stephen-please do not encourage such
crazy talk as Joe’ about obamas grandmother. this election is to important-as Hillary said in her Economics speech yesterday-we are in the soup now. If we keep focusing on things like the clintons are crooked and obama grandmother status-we are all going to be in the soup line-because it will be the only way we can pay for mccains 50-100yr war. stay on the issues in front of us please,citizens.

Posted by: jgaw | March 18, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

why are people on this board afraid of the truth?
there is not enough space available to correct all the falsehoods
to the person who falsely discusses his grandmother’s residence -
Obama has two grandmother’s
One who lives in Kenya – is the mother of his father. She chooses to live in her village where she has lived her entire life
The other grandmother lives in Hawaii – that is the grandmother he refers to in today’s speech is 84 years old and she is just fine
This is the mother of his mother.
Where are you getting your news – NewsMax?
Didn’t the fact the Bill Kristol had to retract his article from yesterdays NYT for inaccurate information from Newsmax teach you to trust your sources?
amazing drivel

Posted by: alison | March 18, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

Obama abided racial invective from his own reverand for 20 years and did not condemn it until there was a media firestorm. He did not step up and lead his congregation to move beyond this racial invective, how can we expect him to lead the nation to transcend race? The man gives a good speech, but that is not enough. I for one am not convinced that he knows how to translate words into action. He did not even begin to address how specifically he would bridge the racial divide in this country. Rather, he seemed to suggest that a vote for him was all that was requred for America to secure redemption. Somehow that seems very cynical…. Overall, a very disappointing performance.

Posted by: Nancy | March 18, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

Tomorrow morning Senator Clinton heads to Michigan to accuse Senator Obama of obstructing the re-vote in Michigan.
Go in for the kill Senator Clinton. Time to put Obama’s campaign out of it’s
humiliating misery.

Posted by: Mark David | March 18, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

Nicole
WOW! Great message.

Posted by: toby | March 18, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

Now, please do not try to blame Hillary for obamas woes. It is unfortunate enough-no not try to cancel out both of the democratic canidates-we need some one to face mccain in the general election. hillary had nothing to do with this and please do not try to drag her into this. Stay on the issues. Dean and his group are the cause of the Dems problem with michigan and fla, not the canidates.
stay on the issues. obamas woes are not hillary’ fault.

Posted by: jgaw | March 18, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

I like the way the press treats everything Obama does as if they are judges and Obama is a contestant on “American Idol”.
Did Obama “Wow” the judges?
Well then, it’s on to the next round!

Posted by: OxyCon | March 18, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

Nancy and All of the Fearful,
Is your nose so long that you can’t see past it?
A person’s character is judged by his words and his actions. Not by another mans words or action.
Here Obama has given a speech that would unit the nation by admitting the problem that we have as people in this nation.
But as you lose your job, as you lose your home, as you lose the food on your table, as you will have to walk to your children’s school PTA, as you loose your dignity… You would rather stay on course with the same old game of deceit of the press, which wants more polarization.

Posted by: American9 | March 18, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

How can a man who accuses everyone around his opponent of being racists ever get the idea that he could have any role in transcending race relations?
He’s forfeited any claim to being transcendent through his twenty year relationship with a bigot and his knee jerk use of the race card.
We need someone with better judgment than Obama possessess.

Posted by: OxyCon | March 18, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

Barak Obama had the opportunity to confront the issue of the overwhelming hatred spewing from the very soul of Jeremiah Wright.
Instead, Obama chose to try to shift the focus and the blame of the controversy to the premise of racism in white America.
In addition, Obama had the opportunity to separate himself from the division of the hateful message of Jeremiah Wright.
Instead, Obama offered various excuses for the type of narrow minded and bigoted behavior for which there can be no excuse.
Today, Barak Obama had the opportunity to set the tone for the remainder of his campaign to get to the White House.
Instead, Obama chose to succumb to the racism, hatred, division, and defeat of the Wright House.

Posted by: Ken | March 18, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

Some folks on this board (Ken) stated that Barack Obama has called others racist. They have also stated that he blames Whites and White racism. Are we talking about the same person and the same speech he gave today. He pointed out the well-founded resentments of Whites and Blacks. I think we should really have an open discussion and understanding on race as he said by understanding everyone’s views and concerns. In the end we live together or we die together but we are together.

Posted by: D.S. | March 18, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

Okay, it was a good, maybe a great speech, but as others have pointed out you can’t run the country with speeches. I don’t think the biggest problem with the country right now is race or that should be the main focus. And if it was the focus, Obama should have been more universal in his comments. Black aren’t the only minorities in this country. Population wise there are just as many Hispanics, there are many Asians and so on. And what about the prejudice against gays, women, etc.? “Human rights” like Hillary has mentioned. It really bothered me how he tried to make a comparison with the comments of Ferraro and Wright.
I think Obama would be great for running a University or a business or following a lead like Gore with the environment. But I don’t trust him at this point to be president (face it, he’s lied about what he knows about Rezko and Wright, and is only giving a speech because of the pressures and necessity of the campaign). I’d like to see him do a lot more (say over the next 4 or 8 years), and provide some accomplishments to show that he is worthy to be president of the U.S.
In the end, as far as the election goes, sorry to say, but he doesn’t stand a chance, not even a small one if he makes it to the general election. Hillary ’08 or bust!

Posted by: CK Canon | March 18, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

Just listened to Obama’s speech in its entirety. Maybe I’m tired, but I didn’t get a clear call to action. I have this sense that he wants me to vote for him, but no clear sense of how that would change anything unless I believe that he is uniquely situated to effect change. That would be a leap of faith, particularly since he did not demonstrate any ability to eliminate racial hatred within his own congregation. So why is everyone so excited about this guy? I just don’t get it. I mean, if he were my pator, I would think that this was a nice sermon, but my President—-no way!

Posted by: NancyJ | March 18, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

No, D.S., that is not a correct statement.
Barak Obama did not call anyone racist. Axelrod would have never allowed that.
What Barak Obama did was to try to shift the focus away from his association with the hatred and racism of his pastor and mentor of 20 years.
The electorate majority (and, now, the superdelegates) will not allow rejection of the statement and acceptance of the man.

Posted by: Ken | March 18, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

Judgment should be questioned!
If a campaign is based on a speech and judgment, judgment should be questioned when a candidate deeply (20 years) associated with a pastor who preaches hatreds of his own country, government and people.

Posted by: v,ca | March 18, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

Oh my gosh, I just read how Obama’s grandmother is still alive and the Obama campaign has prevented anyone from doing an interview. How could he talk about her like that? I assumed she had passed on the way he was talking. I wonder if she appreciates what he said. Guess we will never find out what she has to say about it. Anything to get elected I guess; he’s just as power hungry as Hillary and will do anything to get elected. They are both tearing up the democratic party to get elected, better to choose who has the best chance to get elected vs. McCain.
Hillary ’08 or bust!

Posted by: CK Canon | March 19, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

Allison,
You get it.
Someone once said “United we Stand: Divided we FALL”
A house divided:
The Roman Empire:
Yes, Obama laid the cards on the table, and the insecure (sheep) of this nation cannot stand it. Maybe knowing, or NOT, that they are on their way to the (sheep) slaughterhouse as was Rome (history does not have to repeat itself).
No matter how much hate you have and want to stir the RACE card in your heart and words, true AMERICANS need a leader that will promote UNITY AND TRUTH

Posted by: American9 | March 19, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Shelby Steele:
“I thought in the end he did not take responsibility for being in someone’s church for 20 years, being close to that person — I thought he evaded that.”
Shelby Steele is right on target. In fact first Obama claimed he had never heard the Reverend Wright’s hateful preaching until recently. Today he said he knew what Reverend Wright had preached and tried to explain it away. The media must stop applauding anything and everything Obama says regardless of the truth. The media is obligated to report what is true and not work on behalf of any candidate.

Posted by: J. | March 19, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

J.
Once again the sheep is feeding to get fat for the slaughter.
Obama said, “I have heard controversial statements of the Rev.” he did not say that he heard those sound clips that have you have been feed as a sheep.

Posted by: American9 | March 19, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

There is something that I have noticed on this board.
1)Most of the critics here HAVE NOT HEARD OR READ OBAMA’S SPEECH. They simply picked up just the sound bites and taking points.
2)They are not rational. They are not supporting barak, have no intention of supporting barak and will never support barack.
3)They are way too ignorant to understand the depth and message in BO’s presentation today.
But then the exit polls reflect the quality education of voters that does not usually vote for him. Only this makes me understand why one could have listened to the speech and did not understand the underlying challenge and the goodly, honest soul from which it came. This was far from a political speech.
Today I am proudy American and I would have voted a thousand times for the man name Barack Hussein Obama.

Posted by: maxy samy | March 19, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am

Just comparing the quality of the different viewpoints of you all there is an ABC evaluation;
1. There are 2 class of bloggers; the informed and the uninformed.
2. What is identical about each category is that each reflects the candidate they support;
informed-SEN. OBAMA
uninformed-Sen hillary c.
The worst side a man can be on is the wrong side of history.

Posted by: maxy samy | March 19, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am

I think it’s weird that the Obama campaign claimed they were the elite educated ones and pulled off something so, I don’t know, dumb? To be so aggressive about pushing race, picking up on any cue as “racism”, making deliberate sexist remarks that never received the out cry we knew he was baiting us for and now after letting his pastor take the heat for Obama choosing to use him for political clout among the black community; he tops it off with mentioning his grandma is a racist. I don’t care what the minister has said in his church, I care what the guy who wants to be president says and does. His words and actions don’t match up and he let’s other people take the rap for his judgment! Then he acts like he cares about the minister by making the political move that all the media pundits said he should make a couple of days before the speech, making him look like such a great person by maintaining his relationship with the minister. Yeah, beautiful….but WHY DID YOU CHOOSE HIM twenty years ago huh? Because you injected race twenty years ago, when you BEGAN YOUR POLITICAL CAREER. A very fitting career for a POLITICIAN. Change, PALEEZE!

Posted by: irma | March 19, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

“Why does Obama talk so much about what other people say?” “Why doesn’t he tell us more about what he’s going to do?” “How can he attend that chuch for 20 years and not be affected?”
Ah, so it has all blown right over your head it appears. So many politicians don’t have the ability to listen … They “have all the answers” already wrapped up – there’ll be plenty of time for President Obama to act with ethics – he’s been listening and developing his platform for uniting the people of this country and restoring international respect and admiration for our country.

Posted by: dennis | March 19, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am

Shelby Steele: “Barack Obama is what I call a bargainer.” …..I think you are right there. Obama does not see things as “black and white,” the way most of his critics see them. He believes thas everyone has a point of view and needs to be heard. His persona is a statement of his life, his up bringing, and what he seeks to represent.

Posted by: akrob | March 19, 2008, 2:06 am 2:06 am

Say what you want about them being just words, maybe they weren’t sincere, maybe they were, but they were true. Sweeping that under the rug is a travesty. Trying to brush off the issue of race and telling ourselves that everything is rosy and all better is a complete lie.

Posted by: truvy | March 19, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am

Okay since were agreeing with Obama to say there is a racial divide and Obama is obviously not denouncing or rejecting Wright. I will say Bill Cosby was right about the African American community. How’s that?

Posted by: mona | March 19, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am

smart people commenting (article title). i’m a smart person too. here’s my comment.
obama pulled sleight of hand. he tried to, and probably succeeded in, change the subject from his own association with and support for wright and his anti-american rantings to a general discussion of racial relations and how he’s the guy to help us fix them. very good sleight of hand. lots of pretty pretty words. lots of people bought it. i don’t.

Posted by: so saddened | March 19, 2008, 2:18 am 2:18 am

Is there anyone Senator Obama did not placate in this speech? So everyone should be really happy with it. Except, maybe, for Geraldine Ferraro who was dumped into the same pot as a ranting racist. But she doesn’t matter much. She’s an old woman. Another old woman who doesn’t matter much is Grandma. But she won’t complain. This speech was finely-crafted and well delivered. It did exactly what it was intended to do. It was a political masterpiece. Hello Mr. President.

Posted by: presto | March 19, 2008, 2:27 am 2:27 am

nicole, your analysis of the obama sleight of hand speech is right on target. re the media pundits calling it brilliant, despite its obviously not being so – i think they actually believe their so-far-successful efforts to push this guy will continue to succeed and he will end up in the white house. and i think they are already salivating at the stories and books they will write and the millions they will make off of it. so painting today’s speech as akin to king’s i have a dream speech is just part of their (fictional) first draft. (and, of course, they also think writing this stuff will help get him elected).
interestingly, i think they’d end up with much better books/stories if they portrayed it accurately – stories of someone’s self-destruction tend to sell better.

Posted by: so saddened | March 19, 2008, 2:29 am 2:29 am

Maxy Samy – I realize you are an Obama supporter and that is fine. But, you really do need to read his speech again. I don’t think trashing everyone who does not share your opinion is exactly what he had in mind. Name-calling and referring to non-Obama supporters as ignorant is just not what he is espousing. If Barack Obama were standing right in front of you, he would tell you that unity does not come from that kind of invective. If you want to support him, do him the honor of listening to his message.

Posted by: presto | March 19, 2008, 2:36 am 2:36 am

It was a good speach but in the mans own words”I give a good speach”.The point was why did Obama sit for 20 years in a church that da*ms America, says that whites concocted HIV as a tool for genicide against blacks. Gives an award to Farakhan,that basiclly gives him a big high five for spreading racism.In the 20 years of being at that church Obama could have used his gift of speaches,vision of unity and changed the congregations anti American views and white hate, he could have brought the unity he says he would bring to america as president.Instead he sat in the pews and said amen.This wasnt about racism in the campaign,if it was he wouldnt be ahead in delegetes.The speach was a way to change the focus away from Wright and Obamas choice to stay in that church.

Posted by: girlinvt | March 19, 2008, 2:53 am 2:53 am

Obamas good friend Oprah says when some one shows you who they are believe them. Obama has lied again, and yet those willing to sacrafice on the altar of Obama still won’t believe who he plainly is showing us who he is. A liar with poor judgment, and not at all who he says he is. How can a Pioneer of hope and change be listening to and have as a mentor someone so old school as Pastor Wright? With the same old lets blame everything on the white man speeches of racism and hatered. if Obama really was a Pioneer of hope and Change he would have changed his Pastor to some one with a message that promotes peace and unity and equality all the things that pastor Wright obviously does not. OR is it all just simply political positioning join this popular black church in Chicago where he needed the black votes to be Senator and then when your campainging for president and need the white votes sell your Pastor down the river and distance your self from him. Is it the same political positioning as the Ohio/Nafta/ tell Canadian officials he really doesn’t mean it? Or one of his advisors telling another government that he really doesn’t mean he’ll pull out of Iraq right away.Or when he didn’t really mean it when he agreed to piblic funding and has since changed his mind. Or how he really didn’t mean to do a dumb thing with his land deal and Rezco. PEOPLE he IS SHOWING YOU WHO HE REALLY IS YOU JUST DON’T WANT TO SEE IT.
P.S. I’m not republican,democrat or independant just neutral and observing this charade

Posted by: Donna Canadian Observer | March 19, 2008, 2:56 am 2:56 am

The pundits were out in full force praising Obama’s speech today and it was hilarious when they compared him to Bill Clinton. Someone should verify, Obama didn’t piggy back off of one of Clinton’s old speeches.

Posted by: mona | March 19, 2008, 3:12 am 3:12 am

Obama made another speech.
In his speech he told how his grandmother’s (that raised him and was white)racial and ethnical stereotyping made him cringe. Then why was it fine with him when his reverend made racial and ethnical ramarks about white people? And what true American would stay in a church that condemed and hated America, to the extent of saying “God D__ America? He went to that church for 20 nyears?. And this person waants to hold the highest office in the country he has been condoning hate towards.
WAKE UP AMERICA! We are a country of many colors and ethnic backgrounds. We are proud of that. I am American. It doesn’t matter the color or race. And to condone MY country being badmouthed is unexceptable.We have freedom of speech but I would walk away and not look back. I sure wouldn’t join in become part of and stay with it for 20 years. And then try to use a speech to cober up my true way of thinking. Given a choice even a republican is better than a man only interrested in one group, and worse must in some way agree with his reverend about America or he wouldn’t expose his children to the hate sprewing from that reverend.

Posted by: Nancy | March 19, 2008, 3:40 am 3:40 am

When independent- thinking people (and here I do not include the corporate media) begin to rally under flags, when writers, painters, musicians, film makers suspend their judgment and blindly yoke their art to the service of the “Nation,” it’s time for all of us to sit up and worry.
Arundhati Roy

Posted by: Phillip Stephens | March 19, 2008, 5:52 am 5:52 am

It doesn’t matter what you would do if you were in his situation, it only matters what he did. Take it or leave it.

Posted by: Cal Bear | March 19, 2008, 6:21 am 6:21 am

I think Obama should have stopped attending his church a long time ago. I also think that we all should have stopped watching Seinfeld reruns because of Kramer’s racist tirade.

Posted by: Frank | March 19, 2008, 6:31 am 6:31 am

The term “anti-American” is usually used by the American establishment to discredit and, not falsely – but shall we say inaccurately – define its critics. Once someone is branded anti-American, the chances are that he or she will be judged before they are heard, and the argument will be lost in the welter of bruised national pride.
But what does the term “anti-American” mean? Does it mean you are anti-jazz? Or that you’re opposed to freedom of speech? That you don’t delight in Toni Morrison or John Updike? That you have a quarrel with giant sequoias? Does it mean that you don’t admire the hundreds of thousands of American citizens who marched against nuclear weapons, or the thousands of war resisters who forced their government to withdraw from Vietnam? Does it mean that you hate all Americans?
But there are many Americans who would be mortified to be associated with their government’s policies.

Posted by: Samiam | March 19, 2008, 6:45 am 6:45 am

You can come out the closet now! It’s not a Obama/Jeremiah Wright thing, it’s a race thing. RACE to the White house
I was looking for information on Obama’s speech that I am hearing so much about. I was led to this blog. Though I have never had a reason to do this before, I must add my comment. I was wondering why Obama found it so necessary to make this speech yesterday. I know now that if for no other reason, it was to show us as a people who we are…really who we are and to bring attention to where we have been, where we are now and most assuredly where we are going. Is there really any hope? WE haven’t changed, though it is time for change, will we ever? It is obvious that there is still so much work to do in the (heart)s of America. This land of freedom of speech…religion…free to judge…and hate… real hate that come out at times like this where we can freely and openly share our biases. In our closets , on blogs, where no one knows who we really are; what we really feel, only who we pretend to be in our offices (work places) neighborhoods and even yea! at church. This is where you can really feel free to share your true feelings. This is a safe/nice place to be where you can say what you really mean and spew out all the derogatory remarks one after the other, one to another. . No one would know the better. How convenient this is. Think about who or when you have heard or read something someone said about this country; a leader, a particular kind of race; that you didn’t agree or did agree with? Be honest was Jeremiah Wright the first? But because of the connection you did not quit your association with them; it could very well have been in your own household. I feel it would do us so much more the better to stop entertaining ourselves with hate, prejudices and destructive rhetoric and get on with the mending of a broken economy etc.
Oh! But as I began this blog, I was wondering about Obama’s speech…now as I have been on this blog, read the many derogatory comments, I understand what Obama was saying? I understand so very well, and I also know that those who are looking out to destroy this candidate by his association with Pastor Wright and others and not judging him on his own merits (that got him to be the Senator in the state of Illinois), was not going to vote for him in the first place and are now have found a legitimate reason to safely and openly vote against him or/and hinder him successfully campaigning for presidency.

Posted by: jh | March 19, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am

THE OBAMA TIMELINE OF LIES
posted by justme819: Mar. 19, 2008 – 4:17 AM EST
March 18, 2008–Obama stated:
“I have already condemned, in unequivocal terms, the statements of Reverend Wright that have caused such controversy. For some, nagging questions remain. Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes. Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely – just as I’m sure many of you have heard remarks from your pastors, priests, or rabbis with which you strongly disagreed.”
”I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community.”
March 14th–Obama stated this:
“uh, none of these statements are ones that I had heard myself personally in the pews. uh, o-one of them I had heard about after I had started running for President & I put out a statement at that time condemning them.”
March !8:
Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes.
March 14:
uh, the other statements were ones that uh I just heard about while we were uh wh-when they started being run on fox and some of the other stations.
March 18:
Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes.
March 14:
uh, and so they weren’t things that I was familiar with. Once I saw them I had to be very clear about the fact that these are not statements that I am comfortable with. I reject them completely.
March 18:
Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes.
..
March 14:
Had I been sitting in the church at the time they were spoken, uh, I would have be-been absolutely clear to Rev. Wright that I didn’t find those acceptable uh… and if I had thought that was the tenor or tone on an ongoing basis uh of his sermons then uh yes I don’t think that it would’ve been reflective of my values or uh of my faith experience.
March 18:
Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes.
March 14:
There-there-there, no no no, uh, wai-wait there I-I-I didn’t know about all these statements. I knew about 1 or 2 statements that ha-had been made. And as a consequence, as I said, if it was just 1 or 2 statements then that’s not something that would lead me to distance myself from either my church or my pastor.
March 18:
Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes.
“I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community.”
then it can still validly, etc., be stated that one does not have a a mentor/spiritual advisor for over 20 yrs. without sharing the same views!…Obama`s refusal to ‘disown’ his Pastor strongly suggests that`s the case here!
but perhaps the larger issue here is that while Obama`s preaching togetherness, he goes to a church who`s Pastors preach racial, anti-American garbage…and who preach a separatist, ‘Black Only Value System”, which is as divisive as can be…even Obama`s mentor, etc., the Rev. Wright, stated that it`s a separate but = black theology!
and what`s this use of the word ‘disown’…doesn`t Obama know that`s RACIST…but against black people…
and why did Obama compare his white Grandmother to the Rev. Wright?!…i guess he`ll say/do anything to get votes!
just another dirty, lying, scheming, and hypocritical politician…i have one more word for Mr. Obama – BUSTED!!!
The timeleine shows Obama’s MO to lie to the American people. Totally unbecoming of a Presidential candidate. Obama can’t be trusted. His support is fractured and his numbers are dropping.
Obama is UNELECTABLE.

Posted by: USVet | March 19, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am

I’m confused-what does everyone think he lied about? He said he was not in the church at the time of the G.D. America statement and he has proof. Obama did acknowledge he heard OTHER statements he didn’t agree with. I think we need to focus on the real issues. Today is the 5 year anniversary on the war in Iraq and you people are focused on a pastors sermon. What does that tell you about America? Let’s get real.

Posted by: Tiffany | March 19, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am

Obama has said he desires to bring the country together and change the things that have caused us to suffer economically. He has said he believes if we could work together to form a more unified nation of people and work together to bring about this change, it can be done. I believe he can help us do that as president as he has stated by providing proper medical insurance, improve the educational system, and end the war in Iraq..etc.
AS president …I believe that he can…
However I heard it said on a Cable TV news station just yesterday and read it on the blog this morning that if Obama wanted to do the right thing, to show his sincerity to the country regarding the Pastor Wright comments, he would change the Pastor Wrights heart, you know; I don’t think that he can do that. I really don’t agree with what was said, but and if that needed to be done, I know that Obama is not the one to do that. Obama is not Jesus… Nor God…only Jesus Christ changes the heart of man or did you not know that? This Easter holiday is a good time to take note of that IF YOU DON’T.

Posted by: jh | March 19, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Tiffany – First when did he say that, he also said he never heard any of the speeches, and then two days later said he was at some but did not pay attention. oh and by the way if Obama was not there at the GD America speech, WHY was the Secret Service there protecting him??
got to wonder!!

Posted by: spock | March 19, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am

God Bless our Troops and let them fully complete their Victory in Iraq!!

Posted by: spock | March 19, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am

God Bless our Troops and let them fully complete their Victory in Iraq!! on this one front on the Terror War on us!!

Posted by: spock | March 19, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

When I was growing up I was taught that hate and discrimination, pigeonholing, stereotyping, being judgmental, had no place in society. I was taught that simply listening to a friend say such things and not speaking up and reminding my friend that such speech is not productive would be just as bad as having said the same words. I was taught to speak up against hatred, because if we are to remain silent then we accept it and we allow it to build up. That was a long time ago, in a different country.
Are American children not taught to speak up against hatred? Was Barack Obama not taught to speak up? Sometimes a child, innocent, not yet having learned wrongness, can teach his parents. Should we not speak up more to people who might listen to us? Don’t just cringe, speak up!

Posted by: Roger | March 19, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

I will refuse to be taunted.
I will refuse to lose a vision of a nation that believes in the Constitution.
I will refuse to listen to your sexist, racist and white supremist skinhead comments.
I’ve never read such stilted crap in my life as I’ve read on these forums at this website – you’ve accomplished one thing as far as I’m concerned – you can have this public forum all to yourselves from now on.
Oh yeah, you can even say “he refused to listen to the truth” – there won’t be anyone here to read it. Morons.

Posted by: dennis | March 19, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am

spock: The GD America speech you refer to happened 3+yrs ago. Obama didn’t get Secret Service protection until LAST YEAR!!! Please be factual when you post things to try to make a point. He wouldn’t have needed SS protection at the time Wright made the comments he made because he wasn’t running for POTUS as a black man at that time.

Posted by: with eyes wide open | March 19, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Mara, what are you talking about? You are correct, I don’t know you, which is why I did not make a personal attack.

Posted by: irma | March 19, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

His speeches sure are pretty. Unfortunately, this country needs substance, not speeches. His speech was about diversion. Let’s talk about race. Let’s not talk about why I sat in a church for over 20 years, that promoted racisim and hatred. I am getting so tired of the double standard-call other people racist, but don’t address the racism in your own pastor. It shows (as well as other things have shown) a real lack of judgement. He really should step down, for the good of the party… the supposed uniter, has really divided this party.

Posted by: beachnan | March 19, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

Like Mr. Obama or loath him what i want to know is: Are any of you ready to discuss the issue that has been raised? Whether you owned slaves or not whether “race” is real or not, it exists in today’s america and needs to be dealt with and extinguished. We’ve had a liar in office for the past 8 years and it hasn’t seemed to bother anyone, we’re in a recession, men and women are dying so that oil companies have made their biggest profits ever, working people cannot afford health insurance, no one can afford to go to college, katrina victims, jena six victims-i can go on and on. There are real issues here, and for the first time in this election one has been raised by a candidate. I would like to see a debate on what the 3 candidates believe can be done to end discriminitation/racism and indicate with proof what they have done in the past. I don’t care about what the people in their camps say or do; those people are not running for president.

Posted by: stephanie | March 19, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

I see that many understand Senator Obama’s position, but there are many that still don’t get it… and really are not trying to understand. Of those who have passed negative judgment on Rev. Wright due to the slant of the media, how many have heard one of his sermons in its entirety? Probably very few. Please seek full understanding of the whole man that Obama describes before you judge him. When you seek this, you will find frustration and anger… not hatred and racism. This man isn’t some angry preacher that has been sitting in a church on the south side of Chicago. He is well respected amongst Christian ministers WORLDWIDE. His ministry has reached all parts of the globe learning of social struggles in places you have never heard of much less been to. These Christians are of all colors. He not only learns their cultures, he speaks their languages, studies their histories, and bridges a connection with us here. Be fair to yourself, him, and Barack Obama. Listen to a whole sermon before you pass judgment.
I have been a member of Trinity United Church of Christ for many years before Obama’s candidacy brought it to the forefront. I can honestly say, like Barack, Rev. Wright married my wife and me and he baptized my child also. As a Black American who has worked hard as a professional to build a career and support my family, I have experienced much racism that has been nagging obstacles. I have not used racism as a crutch or gone out here looking for racism … racism has knocked on my door and threatened my American Dream that I have worked VERY hard for. Many White Americans couldn’t imagine what I have experienced. Most experiences are common for many Black Americans. It can be subtle micro-insults by Whites daily or larger occurrences such as a realtor attempting to steer you from a community where services and quality of life are the best because they don’t personally want you there. Even with all of this, we continue to pursue the American Dream with a Christian mindset and without hate. If you listen to Rev. Wrights sermons, you will find sometimes that he rants, like the news has shown over and over, but he offers a Christian solution for us coming together and working together. That is the part they conveniently left out. Many of us Black American men seen others leave the home leaving Black American women to raise our children alone. Not to say that it doesn’t happen in other homes, but it is like the plague in the Black community. One of Rev. Wright’s sermons that stays in my head and keeps me strong is describing the role of the father in the home. Many say he is the ‘head’ of the house like a ruler that everyone in the home should serve. Rev. Wright analyzes the Bible on this subject showing how God says that role is more like the ‘point man’ in an army… the one who goes into battle for the family. The one who is willing to face dangers to protect his family. I have shared this concept with many Black men and I can say it helps galvanize the Black family when so many external forces are working to tear it apart. This is one of the MANY teachings of Rev. Jeremiah Wright. This is what Obama speaks of… Different from the critics, I know FIRST HAND.
Lastly, the background on the United Church of Christ Christian denomination; it is primarily White. Trinity is one of the few Black churches within this denomination, and THE largest due to Rev. Wright’s ministries. I have seen many groups of White visitors to this church over the years. Not only White Christians from American churches, but from all over the world! Rev. Wright has traveled the world sharing his respected theology and openly learning the culture of others. If his teachings were as bad as the sound bites indicate, do you think he would have this much support by Whites? When considering Obama’s relationship with Rev. Wright, Americans, this time can we be smarter than the news media and use our intelligence for this important point in this nation’s history? I fully support Obama and his message that we can move beyond race relations that has been our albatross. Let’s move on to other discussions that are more productive and can help us ALL keep food on our tables.

Posted by: ReelMan | March 19, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

Okay Obama, it was history’s fault, no wait, it was grandma’s fault, no wait it was the ministers fault but then again that’s history’s fault. Oh wait, it is the white people’s fault too because they don’t get it, so they are defensive about being hated because of their ancestors. Again, history’s fault. So let’s look at history….Could it possibly be your fault Obama, by choosing minister Wright and his church at the beginning of your political career twenty years ago? Where in the speech did Obama take responsibility for himself? No where. He excused himself and provided rationalizations for the short comings of everyone else around him who was not as enlightened as he. Apparently you can only understand such issues in depth if you are of mixed race. Well, I am mixed race and I understand perfectly that Obama used race and created the renewed racial tensions for the twenty first Century. I know that Wright spoke the way people speak when they vent. A lot of times when we vent about others, the last thing we want is for the other person to hear us, we just want to let off steam. Thanks to Obama’s high profile in his quest, the minister has been dragged down and Obama did NOTHING to stop it. He made a speech loaded with excuses in his own defense. He spoke to people as though the issue was a needed history lesson. The the pundits came on saying; “Well, he spoke to us like we are adults.” What the hell? He spoke to us about history and excuses in a very impressive way; but he spoke to us like we’re idiots. The reason he needed to give the speech was to explain his choice of message to listen to vs. his false campaign message. He is the problem not the solution.

Posted by: irma | March 19, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

It was one of the best speeches I have heard in a very long time! — Obama spoke to us as if we were adults (to borrow a phrase from both Gergen and Stewart) — I wondered why I felt a part of it until I heard that phrase. Being a 64 year old white woman, growing up during the JFK, RFK & MLK years, I too, heard racial slurs from within my own family and cringed when I heard them — in understanding himself; he has had to understand and love that which is of the white community as well as that which is of the black community If Obama had repudiated the man rather than the words, then he would have been the slimey politician he says he is not. If he had done what some pundits say it should have he would have been disloyal to himself. I am glad he took the high road, let the Clintons stay in the gutter!

Posted by: Paulet | March 19, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

I am sick and tired of people saying who is Barack Obama……Who do you think he is??….Who does he look like? Soung like?…..I get that all time from white people…telling me they don’t know who I am…….My response….what you see is what you get…..what more can I say…the real question is if you know yourself….it is easier to know someone else…..I see that most people are totally lost and confused today…..

Posted by: Musheera | March 19, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

to beachnan:

Responding to: “Let’s not talk about why I sat in a church for over 20 years, that promoted racisim and hatred.”

If you truly believe that any modern, sanctioned church of many believers “only promotes racism and hatred” you are much more ignorant than I thought people could be. Or, you are willfully ignorant, in the hopes that your PERSONAL hate can bring down the rest of us. I have NO DOUBT WHATSOEVER that the majority of the members of that church, and the sermons given by Mr Wright, were good and moral and Christian based. That you think 30 seconds of controversial comments define an entire congregation of God shows how truly sad and hateful you are. Were we all to be judged in such a manner, we should all go to hell.

Posted by: a j | March 19, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

What you see is what you get. Okay, I see a lying fake.

Posted by: irma | March 19, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

It’s about Obama, his choices, his contradictions, his race baiting, his false messages, his ripped off speeches, his holier than thou behavior that he and a lot of his supporters share.

Posted by: irma | March 19, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Where is Condoleeza Rice?

Posted by: TexasJ | March 19, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

So I note you put the ultra conservative up first. The one that believes that racism and predjudice does not exist and that the issues facign the black community are the government’s fault.

Posted by: Louis | March 19, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

aj… go to the Trinity United site and buy yourself 5 tapes and listen to them if you want to see if they are really racist, any church that states whites concocted HIV and introduced it into the black comunity for purposes of genicide has a problem.

Posted by: girlinvt | March 19, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

In reading these comments, much like Trinity Church has as it’s members the best and worst of society. These remarks truly show just how completely ignorant some people are and just how brilliant others show themselves to be. And to be truthful, some of the brilliant remarks come from people with whom I don’t agree with in the least, but at least there’s intelligence in their response.
You cannot have a good opinion on things listening to 30-second soundbites of anything, and this doesn’t even take into consideration the media spin on which 30-seconds you see!
30-secs do not give you context. Summaries do not always reveal intent or implication. And when I see the Obama writes many of his own speeches and Hilary will pretty much let whatever will help her win spill from her mouth… the contradiction and hypocrisy is really disturbing … I think I’ll be4 more apt to have a greater respect for the man (or woman) who has proven themselves true.
Look, I’d love to see a woman president one day. But NOT THIS TIME. NOT THIS WOMAN.

Posted by: Molly | March 19, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

Of all the people to ask for reactions, you ask SHELBY STEELE?!?! Please.

Posted by: Tom J | March 20, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am

I don’t understand why so many people want to use Obama’s association with Rev. Wright as an excuse to denigrate his candidacy, yet support McCain, who has aligned himself with (after once distancing himself from) white Christian conservatives like Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell, who blamed 9-11 on feminists, homosexuals and liberals. I don’t like what Rev. Wright said any more than I like Robertson, Falwell and their ilk; but I’m even more concerned that so many people can blithely condemn the former and embrace the latter (and, by extension, their political associates) without seeing the double standard.
I thought Obama’s speech was amazing, disproving those who call him all rhetoric, no substance. The rhetoric of this speech was off-kilter, in fact — his delivery was sometimes tepid, the cadences were not as rhythmic as we’re used to from him, the applause points were off the mark, and the whole thing was a little bit awkward. As it should be! Have you ever had a discussion about race (in mixed company) that WASN’T awkward, uncomfortable, and a little confused? Race is a tangled issue. My (white) father gives his time, money and respect to the local black church yet doesn’t hesitate to use the “n-word” and make racially charged jokes and comments. Do I applaud or condemn him? Both and neither. Race in America is difficult, complicated, messy, and sometimes contradictory. Obama knows that. He also knows that it must be talked about, not with overly simplified binary rhetoric, but with intelligence, empathy and knowledge of all the factors involved.
This is more than politics.

Posted by: Jessie | March 20, 2008, 4:11 am 4:11 am

Poster thinks a church that blames whites for HIV has a problem. Did you ever hear of a church (Catholic) that taught its member for hundreds of years that
JEWS CAUSED THE PLAGUE by poisoning the wells.
Obama has the potential to be great.
Lets not blow this election.

Posted by: Don | March 20, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

Barack Obama is the presidential candidate, not Wright. That is an important distinction to make.

Posted by: GRRA | March 25, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.