What Should We Expect to Hear from Camp Clinton Tuesday Night?

Hillary should go on NO MATTER what!!! No one will have enough delegates by August, so it is anyone’s game. In the 6 months to the convention, anything could happen–My bet is a major scandal will destroy Obama and leave Hillary as the nominee!
Hillary08

ABC is good: Anything But Clinton.
I would say ABCD- Anything But Clinton or a Democrat.
Arabs for McCain

The question we should be debating is: “What will happen in the general elections” if Senator Obama is the nomminee regarding the Rezko connection? Democrats: WAKE UP!!
Senator Obama’s JUDGEMENT IS COMPROMISED: When he had something to gain (MANSION, WHICH HE COULD NOT AFFORD BY THE WAY!!!), HIS JUDGEMENT WAS TO USE QUESTIONABLE DEALS WITH REZKO, A KING OF CORRUPTION UNDER FEDERAL INVESTIGATION.
As a Legal Expert, Senator Obama should have known. He is claiming that he had missed those red flags.
I am saying that HIS JUDGEMENT IS BAD! DEMOCRATS: DO NOT GIVE REPUBLICANS RED MEAT TO FEAST ON. DO NOT VOTE A THIRD BUSH TERM.
OBAMA = THIRD TERM FOR BUSH! This is very bad for the Democratic Party. If you love the Democratic Party and you love this Nation, VOTE FOR HILLARY CLINTON!!!!
For now, WE NEED MORE ANSWERS FROM SENATOR OBAMA. He has had many years to tell us the whole truth. Yet, until this day, we are still waiting for the truth! WHERE IS THE GOOD JUDGEMENT???
GOOOOOOOOOOOO HILLARY GOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
HILLARY CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT!

Whatever is wrong with letting everybody vote before you declare a winner? Isn’t this a democracy? I see nothing wrong with both candidates staying in the race until everyone has had their say.

If she wants to ever become president, she has to keep going.
If I were her, I would keep going, force a negotiation, force myself onto the vice presidential ticket as being completely “independent” from Obama, and then run again in 2012. This is the best way to keep her “legacy” in tact while providing a future opportunity to run.
Another possibility is to keep going in the hope that the pressure from her campaign and the newly skeptical media peters out Obamamania. She might not get chosen, but it would help out McCain who would be 76 in the next go around.
There might be a do-over in Florida, which ups they chances of staying in. Obama does worse there against McCain than does Clinton according to Rasmussen.

Hillary ASSUMED she was going to be appointed the democratic nominee after Super Tuesday. Since then she has been in denial that an upstart (Obama) could or would dare beat her.
She’s run an inept campaign and the majority of democrats have rejected her message.

Hillary ASSUMED she was going to be appointed the democratic nominee after Super Tuesday. Since then she has been in denial that an upstart (Obama) could or would dare beat her.
She’s run an inept campaign and the majority of democrats have rejected her message.

No one is telling Mike Huckabee to stop. Why is it different for Hillary? Why give it to Obama when he isn’t that far ahead? For the good of the party you will ignore half of the voters and pick your guy to lead us. If she does get pushed out, why should her supporters be any happier than the Obama folks who are whining about superdelegates while he is buying and strongarming them daily ? Stay in Hillary; we still are there for you.

If the tables were turned and it was Obama that failed to win 11 straight states he would have been pressured to drop out of the race long before now. And I imagine he would have dealt with it with way more dignity and respect for his opponent than Hillary has shown to hers. I was a HIllary supporter at one time. I also voted for Bill Clinton twice. But watching how ineffectively she’s run her campaign and the scorned ways she’s responded to her opponent, weakened my support for her weeks ago. Hearing that she now potentially plans to sue my state Democratic Party if the results in our election aren’t to her benefit makes me want to smack her with a “stop whining” stick. She wants to divert her potential losses in these two states to now say that if Obama doesn’t win all 4 states he shouldn’t be the nominee. She’s unable to get the results that she wants so she’s now trying to raise the bar for her opponent since she can’t lower it for herself.
I find it awesome, this opportunity I have as a feminist in this free country of ours to vote for the right person for this particular time in history. And it is surprising to me that it’s not a woman. To vote for a candidate just because she is a woman and not because she is the best candidate, completely undermines the strides we have taken as a gender in this country. We fought for our right to vote, and we still fight for equality on so many levels. We as women are held to a different standard, we have to work twice as hard and be four times as sharp as our male counterparts. And so I find it really difficult to support a female candidate who rides on her husband coattails, and conducts herself with a sense of entitlement in regards to this nomination. Her, “I’m a fighter” stance comes across more as “I’m a sore loser.”

Ummm, NO Jake,
Obama will blow her out in Texas by double digits and she’ll squeak by in Ohio. He’ll win Vermont with 70% but will lose Rhode Island 60-40. He’ll go up in pledged delegates by 210. And there’ll be a chorus calling for her to drop out after Gov. Richardson endorses Obama.

Mariann Pepitone: STOP TRYING TO SPEAK FOR EVERYONE in America. I am a Hillary Clinton supporter but if she does not win the popular vote, that means she could not hold her own. I will be voting for Barrack Obama. Stop trying say what all Americas are going to do because you have not interviewed everyone in America. I don’t believe all America’s voting for Hillary called you and told you this either.

I am all for a woman president……Just not Hillary……..

I am an indepedent and I am not excited to see a repulican in oval office next year. But this is the truth and all this because of big politics inside democratic party…thanks to Clintons. I had hoped and prayed for a liberal as I can’t take 4 or 8 yrs of non- functioning administration anymore. If she gets the nomination, mccain and republican functionaries would crush her..granted she has more expereince…but is it quality experience? she will definitely be crushed by repulican propaganda…if obama wins the nomination..she will make it difficult for him to win…in fact she has given a lot of ammunition to republicans already….she has already polarized the party….why she needs to believe that oval office is her birth right? she has done engough for American people and the people appreciate it.but she should dnow understand her limitation….let the party’s agenda be above that her silly ambitions…why can’t CLinton loyalist see that…. Democractic party is head for south…and neither clinton loyalist will win nor will they let any democrat to win…I was proud of Bill Clinton..but now looking back it is probably the greatest liability of the democratic party ( even more than what Bush Jr. is to Republican). I am sorry to say….but I don’t see how a factured democratic party can unite us…however unfortunate it may be..I will vote for McCain

Hillary has run a republican style smear campaign against Obama since Super Tuesday. Since then, she has run not on her own policies, but on attacking him.
The truth is that she has no more relevant experience than Obama. She is 60, he is 46, so she has more life experience than he.
What Clinton (and McCain) supporters fail to grasp is that this country is hungry for change and a leader that has the will to push for change. Obama is that leader. And regardless whether you bring up Obama’s middle name, his failure to wear a flag lapel pin, his wearing of native guard while on a trip to Africa, or other smear, it will not stop the continuing support Obama continues to attract based on his notion of HOPE.

The primary season must continue. Obama is just now being vetted by the media. THe party should not want to crown a nominee whose political sidekick is just going on trial this week.
PA and the other states deserve their turn.
Let the race continue – so that both candidates are scrutinized equally before a nominee is decided.

Two biggest selling points of Obama, according to himself and his fans, are: 1) Obama is a uniter who can bring republicans and independents together, while Clinton is a divisive figure, and 2) Obama has excellent judgement as demonstrated in his anti-war stance and 2002 anti-war speech.
Honestly, I do not think that Clinton has been effective in disect Obama’s claims, perhaps she is worried about hurting democrats’ chance in the general election. Now let me argue that Obama’s claims are bogus.
1) On Obama as a uniter and Hillary as divisive.
Obama’s ability as a uniter only shows up in his speeches. His voting records both as state senator and US-Senator do not support his claim. In fact, if anything, his voting records showed just the opposite. His voting records earned him as the most liberal democrat in the US-Senator, which basically means that he never or most unlikely vote for issues that have some common interest with republicans. This is not what a uniter would do. Therefore, you really have to believe in his words in his speeches that he is a uniter and that he will work with republicans to solve problems.
On the contrary, Hillary, after she got to the US Senate, has worked with many most conservative republicans including those who led impeachment of her husband on various bills. Many of them actually admitted that Hillary is an excellent colleague in the Senate. McCain of course also has an excellent track of records in bridging with democrats.
In short, among the three major contenders, Obama has the least credentials as a uniter, if you do not count on his speeches. Of course, the fact that Obama jumped into this election by ignoring the seniority (out of his personal political ambition), thus effectively divided the democrats does not help him to be called as a uniter.
2) On Obama’s 2002 anti-war speech and his anti-war stance.
We have to remember that as Bush administration drumed up the war with Iraq in 2002 and early 2003, the majority of democrats (let’s say 20 millions) were very suspicious about administration’s intention and resisted the war idea. Obama was one of those 20 millions. At the heart of the issues was whether or not Iraq had the weapon of mass destruction (WMD) and whether or not the US and UK intelligence information was believable. Besides democrats, Bush’s own secretary of State, Colin Powell (my hero) and his associates, were initially also very suspicious about the information and resisted the war idea. A lot of Americans later on changed their mind, mainly because the intelligence information became more believable or at least believable enough that Colin Powell changed his mind to go to the UN to show part of the information. I started to believe the story after Colin Powell was willing to do.
At this point, most Americans possibly except for the real liberals agreed with the war idea. Therefore, I would argue that given the information that Americans had at the time, it is a solid judgement to vote for the war. That is what and why the congress did. In 2004 election, Kerry and Edwards both said this — they did not question the decision and vote for the war, but they faulted the administration for executing the war.
Of course, the true liberals are those who are against war under any circumstance. Is Obama one of those true liberals? There are only two answers.
The first answer is yes, and I have reasons to believe that he is one of those true liberals. In this case, Obama’s anti-war bet in 2002-2003 was not because of his sound judgement, as he often claims. His bet was derived from his political and philosophical belief that is simply no war no matter what. Do we need such a person in White House? His bet in 2002 was a lucky one, but what about next time?
The second answer is that perhaps Obama is not the true liberal, and he was just like many of us who initially opposed the war but subsequently changed views after seeing more information or hearing Colin Powell’s UN speech. I have reasons to believe the second answer, because he later in 2004-2005 admitted that if he had been in the US Senate in 2003 he would have voted the same. In this case, he is no different from Hillary. If this is true, I would feel slightly more comfortable with him as the command-in-chief in case he wins in November.

And here’s a tip for Hillary: the negative attacks against Obama aren’t working.

Hillary needs to just save face and bow out. All her supporters will then jump on the Barack-O-Wagon. All Hillary does is cloud her supporters best judgement.
Barack 2008

Is there a possibility Hillary might try to iceberg Obama and go for an independent run?

Hillary will lose on Tuesday because she will not capture enough delegates nor ever catch up to Obama. Super delegates will abandom her…she can go on but it would just be that more obvious that she doesn’t have the class or foresight to step aside…

A Constitutional Professor at Harvard, Editor of the Harvard Law Review, a Community Organizer on the south side of Chicago, a Civil Rights Attorney working on Death Penalty cases, a State Senator for 8 years, the most sweeping Ethics Reform since Watergate (per the WSJ), and a Senator at the federal level for a couple of years…
And she calls him an empty suit?
The gall.

Lois is funny. Just like a Clinton, she can’t come up with anything of her own to support her losing candidate.

Thanks Texasrules,
You are so kind. :-)

This fight will end at the Convention, Hillary will no give up..Florida and Michigan hang in the balance..come this summer Obama will be fully exposed for what he is really is an extreme left winger with ties to unpatriotic sectors of the country..Obama will never be elected President, He is a liar…

Bye, Bye Obama!! He thought he wuld get a free ride–with the trial starting he’s run out of time. It is inevitable
that the dirt will come out. Hillary
should remain in the race no matter what, America deserves a real person, not an superficial one.

If those are not your questions why post them? Don’t trivialize the results of our state’s election.
You are helping Hillary make excuses for her not winning the Texas vote. God knows she will come up with her own and file a lawsuit.
Hillary won’t win Texas for no other reason other than WE DON’T LIKE HER DOWN HERE! Pure and simple…we don’t like her lies…we don’t like her dirty politics.
I think America will speak in all the state primaries on March 4. America will REJECT and DENOUNCE the Clintons.
Hillary will keep trying to STEAL the election. I can’t begin to think what disgusting level she will stoop to, but she won’t win it by votes.

Katie Mason,
I can verify that what you say is true for us in upstate New York, too. When she ran for the Senate here, she promised 200,000 new jobs. Well, they never materialized, and as Tim Russert said at the debate the other night, the reality is that we LOST 30,000. So of course Hillary blamed everyone else. I swear if you think Healthcare is expensive now, wait to you see how expensive and unsatisfactory it gets if Hillary is elected.

From the tone of the blogging, some of the Obama campaign employees must be on the payroll today.
By bloggers on the payroll, I refer to the groups of college students hired as Axelrod internet storm troopers.
This bunch is easy to identify: just picture your children or grandchildren fighting over the remote or throwing a tantrum over a video game.
Now, there’s some hope for change!

I doubt there is any way Hilary will drop out unless Obama sweeps both Texas and Ohio with impressive margins. I don’t see that happening. I can see a close finish either way, but no slam dunks. I do see Obama keeping the delegate lead, but that wont be enough for Clinton to bow out and why should she if she wins the popular vote? I’m hoping Obama wins either Texas or Ohio and comes close on the other. This will keep his momentium going and Clinton against the ropes. Unfortunately I think this will keep going after tuesday. Unless Obama wins big! Lets hope he does ;)

On Tuesday, Hillary will be allowed to cry for the last time on TV.
This will be her last day in presidential politics.

Wake up DEMOCRATS! There is nothing there with Rezko. My husband works for a major investment firm in Chicago and they did public financing for Rezko and his development for years. He was a very respectable land developer who did good business for years in Chicago and elsewhere. No one could have known that he was slipping. NO ONE!!! Once he came under suspicion companies still did not withdraw because his reputation was very good within the business/ financial community. It was awhile before the business community started to shift from Mr. Rezko. Now I would be very interested to know why Bill Clinton is doing business with the President of Dubai. Dubai will wind up owning the U.S. with Hillary as President! The Clinton’s know everything about how to play dirty politics and if there was something for them to play on they would have play it by now. There is nothing for them to use and they are having a very hard time just running on issues and experience.

I think the question that needs to be ask is why Clinton lost 11 in a row and why she even stayed after that? Lets talk about that..if Obama lost 3 they want to say he can’t win yet he beat her 11 in a ROW…anyone other than me notice the elephant hiding in the room that for some unknown reason no one wants to discuss???????

Initially, I don’t really care what comes out of any of the campaigns on Tuesday night, any of them. Most of it will be a repeat of what we have already heard, and the campaign gibberish will drag on for about eight more months.
Probably the most repulsive form of campaigning I have witnessed as of late is the barrage of television ads and spam email. Why should I have to pay for same people in the same jobs to assure me that change will cure everything?
To top it all off, this morning I was treated to a televsion commercial featuring the moaning of “OOOO-BAAA-MAAA…OOOO-BAAA-MAAA…OOOO-BAAA-MAAA.”
Initially, I had to wonder if Moonies or some sort of other cult had slipped in a Sunday morning television show. but no credits were given to the Reverend Moon or any other prophet. My morning coffee went cold and I half expected my Sunday paper to burst into flames.
Then, I had to make sure that a rerun of the movie “The Mummy” was not playing: Remember the scene with the zombies chanting Iiim-hooo-teep…Iiim-hooo-teep…Iiim-hooo-teep?” The resemblance was uncanny.
After that, I had to look outside to see if my cattle had gotten out of their corrals and were impatiently reminding me of feeding time. Cows just don’t seem to understand the importance of politics when compared to an empty stomach.
But, all of the possibilities that would have made sense were not to be. Instead, I figured the irritating noise was likely the same group of previously unemployed college students hired as Axelrod internet storm troopers now being induced with dollars to moan in unison. Can’t they do that in the dorm?
By the way, I am not a Republican or a Democrat. My vote is my own, independent, and still undecided. The behavior of the candidates and their campaigns as a whole is reprehensible. And, I do not look forward to eight months more of the juvenile behavior exhibited by all sides.
Just draw straws, credit your campaign funds toward the national debt, and a majority of the country’s voters will thank you.

She should not drop out until PA is over and the DNC decides what to do in FLA and MI, it may be by then that he has to drop out. Also, wait for the Rezco trial to get underway (if any media really reports on it). I am finally starting to see some media questioning Obama, and the republicans are just getting started on him.
The tide is finally turning and I am glad.

The biggest question is WHY the democrats would nominate someone like Obama who doesn’t have nearly enough experience to be qualified to be president. Hillary has barely more experience than Obama. How the heck are we supposed to vote for a democrat when these ninnies are the only choices?

What do I expect to hear from Hillary Clinton? I expect to hear her say that she will continue on because this country can ill afford to have such an experience person as her opponent as president. The world is not safe enough as it is. The last thing we need is to turn it over to someone so utterly ill prepared as her opponent. Go Hillary!!

Hillary is the best candidate, the best choice, and our best “HOPE” for “CHANGE”. No one should count her out or underestimate her ability to lead.

What say me?
WHAT DOES CLINTON WANT?
[that question used to be splattered gratuitously across the opinion pages after Jackson lost a few primaries in previous contests. Clinton has lost a string of them, and still the media 'gurus' have yet to dig up their hate files ..]

Hillary Clinton must and will fight all the way to the convention in June. I am sick and tired of these people trying to CHEAT the process to install their man. It’s disgraceful and highly unethical. Rest assured this is Obama and his campaign peddling the convenient view that Clinton must “exit”. He wants to cut this race short and cheat his way to the finish line. It ain’t gonna happen!
How dare anyone try and deny the public of its right to play a role in selecting the Democratic nominee. Every state should have their votes counted! LET THE PROCESS TAKES ITS COURSE! No more FREE PASSAGES for Obama.
Do these people (Media/Obama/Obama’s supporters) know who they are dealing with????? Hillary Clinton doesn’t take rubbish from no-one! She is not about to roll over and hand victory to a man whom she knows she is infinitely more knowledgeable, experienced, skilled and qualified than. These requests for her to exit are laughable. It’s just not going to happen.
I trust that Hillary Clinton has the same view and will take this all the way to the convention. By that time, hopefullly REALITY will have set in, Obama will have been accordingly discredited once the TRUTH comes out, and all the superdelegates will flock with glee to Hillary!
Dream on Obama fans. See you at the convention!

Hillary is my choice and a choice of millions. She should fight for nomination to the end. I distrust Obama. He was born a muslin and may be changed to Christian. But at least he should talk it clearly. Do not play with race. He is a new kind of politician, whom we do not trust. I would rather vote for McCain than him.

It’s over for Hillary on Tuesday night.
GO-BAMA!

I hope we hear……
nah nah nah nah
nah nah nah nah
hey hey hey
good bye.

It doesn’t matter what message is spun to the public; what matters is the reaction of her large backers writing the checks and the party leadership. If the money dries up and the party says “party over”, she’s done.

Women in the Democratic party are tired of “pimping” for the white boys. It’s our time and it’s now!
There are a very few articles that have even attempted to address Obama. A few were out this weekend. Stating that he wasn’t what he has been suggesting that he is. These are the news pieces that are here, one such article talks about the lobbyist that are “volunteering” for Obama. He’s not taking the “money”, wink, but he is allowing direct access to him. They are in fact running his campaign. (Don’t tell Jake.) Then there is the article mentioning that he isn’t such a “reach across the aisle” man that he projects, but in fact is one to take the “soft issues” and fails to stand when there are tough issues. One article mention that “he was missing in action “ in the Illinois legislature and that he would often not show up for tough votes there, just like he didn’t show up for the Iran vote.
So lobbyists, he says he doesn’t take their money, but he lets them run his campaign. He says he reaches across the aisle, but only when it’s safe. He says he going cause change but he doesn’t show up for tough votes to take a stand on the record. That’s not change, that’s what we’ve got already – Incompetence and irrelevance. Good grief, get past the misogynist press and think about it.
And the part about Hillary and the women backing her tossing in the towel-When hell freezes over!

bravo bravo… i wish those were your words. i wish those will be the superdelegates’ words. dont drop out hillary. it’s time for america to choose a leader not an american idol.

In the last two weeks, Senator Clinton has set the Feminist movement back decades. She is the wrong person to represent all women.
She certainly doesn’t represent me.

Senator Clinton won’t drop out, no matter what the results are. We’re supposed to rally around her and support her, darn it, and she’s not going anywhere until she gets her due. This is, after all, entirely about her, right?
Her claim of bringing change is only partly true, in my opinion. I have to admit that she would bring change. Instead of a bitterly divided country led by a Republican president, we’d have a bitterly divided country led by a Democratic one. Other than that, however, it’d be the same broken down, bitter system that caters to special interests and not to citizens. This is the reality of the “experience” that our long-established politicians have, and that some people oddly still seem to want. Personally, I don’t think it’s worked so well. There are tons of snide comments about buying into a message of hope and change, and “drinking the kool aid” is a tired cliche being overused. I’ll offer one of my own for those who prefer “experience.” Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
Finally, there’s the whining about Senator Clinton being treated unfairly in the press. Is there anyone who doesn’t think that if their positions were reversed, with Senator Obama having lost eleven contests in a row, that the Clinton campaign wouldn’t be applying every kind of pressure imaginable to try and get Senator Obama to drop out? I’m sure they be screaming about a “clear mandate” in that situation. And I sincerely doubt the press would be making up scenario after scenario where Senator Obama could make a comeback.

Funny how the Clinton campaign expects to claim that a *combined* net gain of 5-15 delegates out of Ohio and Texas is a “win” (best case scenario).
All of Obama’s wins in the last 4 weeks have been by at least that much:
Hawaii +9; Washington +28; Virginia +25; Nebraska +8, etc.
Anyone other than Huckabee would have stepped aside a long time ago, though some say that Huck has some purpose down the road for staying in. Is there some other objective for Hillary to stay in the race?

Asking Clinton to drop out is ludicrous. Why should anyone drop out before the primaries are done? That essentially means that “for the good of the party” the folks in the later primaries should not get a say. This whole system just doesn’t make sense and gives too much priority to the votes of the people from the states having early primaries. We should go to a U.S. democratic primary…one day…everyone done.

Carl Rove ad Rush Limbaugh want to see Hillary continue.
Good card-carrying members of the Democratic party, that lot are…
They know that the longer we wait before uniting behind a candidate, the better it is for the Republicans.
tI’m all for HRC deciding to stay in the race, but only if she gets candid with the American people: Sen. Clinton, why haven’t you filed your tax return info and your earmarks, as Obama has?
Elise in NH
The Obama Minute: quick, easy actions
to support Barack Obama’s candidacy

“THE EMPEROR MIGHT HAVE NO CLOTHES ON!”
I do no understand why Hillary is being asked to get out of the race. The only reason the Democratic big wigs want her to step aside is because they feel that because the Republicans have selected their nominee, the Democrats who have not yet voted should be denied the chance to vote for THEIR Candidate. Lets wake up here. McCain is the “last man standing” through the popular vote. However, on the Democratic side, it is still too close to call. Lets remember “stepping down” seems to be called for more by the press constantly repeating and repeating that she has no chance, but really it is a “dead heat” still. And like Jay said, with Obama having SO MUCH support and money to “finish her off,” that is a question on his ability to win in November. Lets look at the facts why this should go to the convention, which by the way, in situations like THIS is WHY WE HAVE A CONVENTION!
Obama is only winning by 110 delegates over Hillary. If Florida and Michigan’s primary delegates are reinstated, which they should, since just because they had their primary early, is no reason to disenfranchise voters in the third most populous state, Hillary would be LEADING, Obama by more delegates than he is leading her.
We have to remember on the state level, there are ALSO superdelegates in some states, MUCH MUCH more than 110 delegates left to be given out on the state level in the state conventions.
Generally to win an election in this country with electorial votes where we have to remember, unlike the primary delegates, where it is based on a popular vote instead of “winner takes all”, in most elections you generally need 2 of the top 4 delegate rich states and Ohio, or 3 of the top 4 States. Of there top 4 states, 3 of them are overwhelmingly Democratic rich states, Ca, Fl, NY. Texas is about 50% Republican. Up until now, Obama has FAILED to win in theses electorial rich contests, and lost to Clinton by HUGE MARGINS.
Lastly, it seems to me that Obama started to get MOJO, and when McCain was the last man standing. Since in many states, Texas especially, Republicans and independents are now “Democratic Primary, Wild Cards” and CANNOT be counted on to vote in November for Obama. The Republican party’s hatred of the Clintons is well documented, so people need to stop and think, are the Republican sabotaging the Democratic primary and voting for the weaker candidate on issues so he can be steam rolled in November? I THINK SO!
Remember Obama, has only been on the national stage for 2 years. He was able to win his seat when a popular Republican had to step down over a scandal, about his “personal life”, his relationship with his wife which was a family matter, but he was “hung by the Illinois press.” He sailed right into the seat, after 8 years in the Illinois Senate, where if you research his accomplishments and what his peers though about him, you will find that he was just an average candidate, voted usually with the Democrats issues, but also, avoided, possible issues that could be controversial. In stead of voting he is listed as “PRESENT” basically, he was there, but did not vote. If you saw Bill Maher’s show on HBO last Friday, he had a reporter go to a big arena rally for Obama and kept asking the same questions to the FANatics, “Name two things Obama has done or accomplished in the Senate or in the Illnois Senate.” Most people had trouble naming one, rather then two, and most could not think of one!
I DO BELIEVE that Obama has a great future and probably WILL BE President someday and has an incredible future if he keeps his “nose clean.” However fellow Democrats, lets remember whay happened last time we voted in an “outsider” without much experience on the NATIONAL STAGE. Remember Jimmy Carter? He was a nice guy, meant well, and went on to win the Nobel Peace Prize. But as soon as he arrived, “they cut his legs off immediately” even by his own party. The same thing will happen to Obama, especially since he keeps preaching “Change” but he still has not told us, how he is going to do it! Just that he WANTS to do something.
Please take this all into account and stop listening to Oprah Winfrey on who to vote for. This is not the “book of the month club” and even Oprah has been wrong, with just her book club. Remember that guy who faked his credentials, or was not forthcoming with the details? Finally, after he was, “nominated” and his book became a bestseller, we found out he was a fake.
Come everyone, until Obama has more substance, instead of Rock star, which I believe might happen in the future, I think we are going realize, if he gets the nomination, based on Clinton being forced out, instead of discussion at the convention, I am sure by November, we might find out…
“THE EMPEROR HAS NO CLOTHES ON!”

Sometime ago, I was writing a novel with the first woman president and in my fiction she was a Scorpio born in Oct 26th, I didn’t know hillary’s b-day…she’s the one…there are many Republicans who’re praying Obama will win, so the Republicans will be there again for 4 more years.
Vote Hillary!

anybody but Lady MacBeth!!!