Bill Clinton Says Underdog Hillary Stayed Positive in Pennsylvania Primary

Better cover your rear end in NC Obamabots. If he loses there heis finished. kaput.

Sure she did — and I’ve got a bridge to sell you!
And, Geevil, YOU WISH!!!
Obama 2008 — Yes, WE CAN!!!

I do believe Hillary could solve most of our problems and that is why I will vote for her.I think this thing with Wright is justy putting it out there to det it out of the way before the GE good acting on both OBama and Wright’s and MSM. But it still won’t go away .Obama the arrogant is a better title for him.

bill anb your wife the most lier people i never see in my life time

I believed in Bill, and I believe in Hil! He did a great job running this country with his head and his heart, and Senator Clinton will do the same.
Noone is perfect, not you, not me, not the Clintons, but she is suited to run the country, despite her imperfections. What matters is that she wants to make the country a better place! I would love to have a debate in 8and a half years about whether she was a better president than her husband…

EXCESS PROFIT FEE???
WELL GUESS THE PRICE OF GAS WILL GO UP AGAIN. THE GAS COMPANIES WILL ALWAYS PASS THE FEES ONTO THE CONSUMER.
THEY WILL NOT GIVE UP ON PROFITS.

Hillary 08 …
It is nice to see Bill supporting Hillary.

Exit polls in PA placed the blame 66% on Hillary and 50% on Obama for the negative campaign. Now Bills advisors are counseling the campaign, and Bill as chief advisor is telling Hill to hit harder, sharper, sooner, and meaner. Bill is so yesterday ….

Hillary won in PA, and she’ll win again in Indiana. She may even win NC, after the staged Wright speech at the National Press Club, and the carefully scripted Obama denouncement repeat (courtesy of Axelrod).
Great strategy to win over blue-collar white voters, Axelrod. Too bad it backfired.
RISE HILLARY, RISE!!

Sad how Bill Clinton has completely destroyed his legacy. Soon he’ll be known primarily as the guy who tried to sabotage President Obama’s campaign.

I couldn’t agree more with “geevill”.
The obama supporters will go nuts if Hillary wins in N.Carolina.Now that she’s got the backing of their governor,hopefully she can pull off wins in N.Carolina and Indiana.I heard some of the superdelegates on some of the morning,political news shows this past Sunday saying that Indiana would be the tie-breaker.So,even if she just wins Indiana next week,then goes on to win W.Virginia,my home state of Kentucky,Oregon and Puerto Rico,the super delegates will have to see that she is the stronger candidate.Even an MSNBC news anchor said she was the stronger candidate and we all know that MSNBC is in the tank for Obama.I agree with “Ken in Texas” that Bill Clinton was a good president and I believe Hillary will be even better.I am looking forward to that debate in 8 years!!!Obama can only blame Rev.Wright if he loses the nomination,that man is no friend of Obama’s.He was only trying to make things worses for Obama by speaking at the press club on Sunday.It was a good thing for Obama to completely denounce Rev.Wright and his comments today,I just think he should have cut all ties with that man sooner.

Bill, you’re a fabulous speaker, and Hillary is a terrific fighter. Obama’s campaign chief, Axelrod on the other hand, likes to think he has strategic acumen.
THE WRIGHT STRATEGY


The plan hatched by David Axelrod unfolds…
Axelrod: I just talked to Jeremiah, and he’s prepped and ready for the National Press club speech.
Obama: Good.
Axelrod: Okay, we need the blue-collar white vote, so you need to denounce Wright again, and that’ll take care of the white vote.
Obama: What about my strong hold on the black vote? How do we keep them satisfied?
Axelrod: Don’t worry! African American’s will believe what Rev. Wright’s gonna say about you only distancing yourself for political purposes. That’ll appease all of them in North Carolina and Indiana.
Obama: Cool, then we’re all set. Hey, what was that cabinet post Jeremiah said he wanted after I’m elected?
Can’t win ‘em all Axelrod.
Rise Hillary, Rise!

mceversole — I agree with most of your last statement, but don’t think Hillary will win Oregon. The rural areas are probably too sparse to overcome the numbers in the urban areas. However, I did see that the Register Guard (Eugene) was calling for Obama to engage in a debate. If he can’t appease one of the most liberal papers in the state, that could be a sign of defection from his candidacy.

“Obama’s character is good and she can’t dredge up any real issues- Wright and Rezko and a slip of the tongue about guns and religion that is based in truth are not real character issues. ”
C’mon, Paul. How many times can two men have so called slips of the tongue before you realize that they have no character?
Rise Hillary, Rise!

Hillary will win based on people’s belief that she is the best equipped and uniquely qualified to tackle our nation’s critical issues from health care, the economy, education, the Iraq war, etc. She is ready to deliver solutions for our nation. She is the one to win the General Election this fall against McCain.
Clinton/Edwards 2008!!!

“Rise, Hillary, rise? Sounds very stupid.”
That’s the same way the Obama camp feels about “change we can believe in” now.

LOM
You said it right! I think Edwards will seal the deal

tomdavie: Obama is ahead, Clinton is behind. In your fantasy world she is ahead.

If Obama wins the nomination, then he wins it. The rules are the rules and that will be what is dealt. The downside to this outcome, however, is that he is simply unelectable and John McCain will be our next President. I suspect there are a fair number of superdelegates that know this otherwise, the floodgates would have opened by now. What happened to the 50 SDs that were ready to pledge their support after Ohio and Texas? Obama is having a difficulty garnering the support of white blue collar workers which is an obvious important voting bloc in the GE. So, if the SDs really want a viable chance this fall to take back the White House, they will need to back Clinton, which they can do because the rules are the rules.

LOM: How is Obama unelectable when he is beating Mccain in the polls int he following swing states and red states: Indiana, Colorado, New-Mexico, Nevada, Virginia, Iowa, Georgia, Missouri, and Oregon. Looks like he is electable…

ahead for now Tom but not in a few days shes already leading nationally and its down to 10 pts in NC and shes up 3 in IN its over face it

Tom
Wrong again
Hillary today is leading Mccain nationally by 9 and Obama is withing the margin of error and Obama will not tie In but Hillary may tie NC which will split the delegates… its over :)

its laughable to still brign up the bosnia thing like Obama hasnt been lying even about the existence of Wright and ayers etc

Apparently Obamabots dont know of such poet laureats that reside at Wake Forest University :)

stanium: Wrong again.. Pennsylvania had 158 delegates, NC has 115 delegates..seems to me like your making up facts on the spot. Go research your lies before you post them.

@ Paul,
Not to belabor a point, but you can’t be serious. The tongue slips you attribute to both Obama and Wright are incalculable. So many slips, in fact, that the only explanation is Tourette’s.

LOM: You made a mistake…in your facts Obama is ahead in Iowa. I don’t know where tom got his information, but I saw a poll in Indiana last week that showed Obama 49% Mccain 41%.

kate — you’re right. Obama is ahead in Iowa. I had the numbers, but did miss that in my analysis. Thanks for the catch.

Tom
every delegate in every state is not considered equal there maybe just 115 in NC but that doesnt change it for Obama he is gone dont try to rationalize it :) and your polls are stupid btw

More lies from the people who
perfected lying, the Clintons!
Hillary was Never an Underdog in
Pennsylvania!
In fact she had a 20 point lead at one
time and only won by 9 percent of the
vote!
Yeah she was real positive in PA,
especially in the debate when she allowed her lapdog, Stephanopoulus to
bring up the negative stuff about
Rev Wright and Bill Ayers!
Get Real!
Obama will win the nomination and Hillary and Bill can go home and play
Family Feud!

stanium: Different organizations take different polls. Kate saw the same poll in Indiana that I saw…Obama will rap this up by winning NC, OR, MT, and SD. Clinton can take Indiana. It won’t change things. In fact, Obama can just win Oregon and North Caorlina, and still be ahead by over 100 delegates…your logic is failing once again.

Reaganfan
No nomination for Obama now I can pretty much guarantee it he might have to make a deal with Hill now though:)

nope you are wrogn TOm get used to NO hope :) hes at best even with Clinton now that is a fact

stanium: Where’s your proof?

Regarding oil prices, the Gore followers WANT the oil prices to stay high because they want all of us to stop driving our cars. Period. So releasing the reserves, or punishing the oil companies in an effort to get them to lower gas prices are not policies that will be followed by the green movement which actually will include all the candidates. As far as the republican swiftboat machine derailing Barack, he doesn’t need their help because he is doing a fine job all by himself by the company he choses to mingle with.

I think that Governor Easley made the correct decision in endorsing Senator Clinton. As a citizen of NC I can say that Governor Easley has done a fine job during his eight years of service. I bet that MANY people in states that held earlier primaries wish they knew then what they know now…that Senator Obama is not quite ready to lead this great country. Early on I could have supported Obama if he indeed became the nominee. However, as the months have passed, that feeling has changed dramatically. I bet many who voted for him in the earlier campaigns, now are suffering from “buyer’s remorse”. Obama is showing that he is not quite ready to be a presidential candidate, and I REALLY blame the press and media for giving him too many free passes. All of these concerns should have been aired much earlier. While I read a few criticisms early on about Senator Obama, it seems most everyone was giddy with praise for him and not interested in thoroughly “vetting” him. Senator Clinton could be an excellent President right now, and with some time Senator Obama could possibly be as well, but he needs some more time to develop and to explain why he continued associations with people/organizations who espoused such disturbing positions.

Coming from the right side looking for a breath of fresh air (and some honesty) from the left, I can’t tell you how disappointed I’ve been. Not only the lies Bill AND Hillary throw out there every day but also the lies from their supporters (news is bias towards Obama…come on!). The Dems like to say they’re so different from the GOP but you’re not. In fact, with all the back stabbing, lying, cheating and deceitfulness I’ve been seeing I think it’s sending this Independent vote back to the right.

stanium: I used more than enough proof in my logic…your the one who has been making wild statements that don’t make sense to people who are grounded in reality. If you don’t have the proof, than don’t make up the lies.

staniam:
I wouldn’t bet my house on that!
No Way she will get the nomination!
If she does the Democrat Party will be
destroyed and McCain wins the general
election!
This has become a no-lose situation for
McCain because she has weakened
Obama so much with her “kitchen sink”
campaign that McCain will win the
general against him!
When January 2008 rolls around you’ll have Hillary Clinton to blame for
the Inauguration Of President John McCain!

tom — do you really think that a margin of less than 3% in pledged delegates is turning over the “will of the people?” There are no back-room deals to be had, this is about electability, the number one priority for the Democratic elite. There is no stealing an election — that implies that it has belonged to someone.
The SDs can vote anyway they want where they can also use MI and FL votes as a measure of the will of the people.
Why don’t you do a little research on how well the youth vote gets out during an election cycle. Not looking so good for Obama…
That’s funny…YOU know that Gore and Pelosi are for Obama? You should let the Obama campaign know that because I couldn’t find that on his website. He can have Pelosi though–she is enjoying an approval rating lower than good old W right now. That’s not something I would brag about.

stanium,
thank you. it seems there are some on this post who are are belligerent. do you find that to be the case? i prefer to have a civil conversation. is that possible here?

The Clintons threw Gore under the bus repeatedly…of course he is for Obama. Pelosi’s statements make me believe that she is for Obama….the youth vote will get out for Obama because he is a young candidate that they can connect to, not a 72 yr old. Do you really believe that all of the new registered Dems. and party swithchers are for Clinton? LOL! Good one!!

staniam — I am with you. I initially said I would support Obama should he get the nomination (and even ‘scolded’ some folks here for saying they would vote for McCain). However, the more we get to ‘know’ him, it has become obvious that he is not ready to lead this country. I am willing to vote for McCain should Obama win the nomination because he will be a change from Bush and has the leadership to make those changes. I have survived the last 7 years…I can survive the next 4. People might say I’m selfish for making a statement like that; however, McCain has a track record for proving he can work across the aisle to bring about change. I’d take that any day over the rhetoric that Obama spews.

LOM: Mccain…change from Bush? Wow, your credibility is gone.

tom — you do know why they are called “baby boomers” don’t you?
Also, I would recommend a read on McGovern. I find a striking resemblance of his and Obama’s campaign strategies…

tom — My credibility is gone? Wow. I’m going to take that as a compliment because that implies that I started with some. I hope you’re not upset that 30% of Clinton supporters will not vote Obama. The SDs are well aware of this statistics as well and spells T-R-O-U-B-L-E for Obama.
McCain is a change from Bush. Why do you think so many conservatives HATE him as the Republican candidate??? Even Ann Coulter thinks he is more “liberal” than Clinton!

MA — It all depends on whom you engage if you seek a civil discourse here. Best of luck!

yea I never wouldve participated in live blogs if the so called ultra left bloggers hadnt pissed me off there needs to be some balance with true insight rather than people spoutign stuff that is trash talk like Obamicans do

@ Tom:
One more thing, some of those folks representing 30 percent of Hillary supporters LOM mentioned, are right here on this blog. If you actually think your charming, pithy little snipes will convert us, think again.

yea I never wouldve participated in live blogs if the so called ultra left bloggers hadnt pissed me off there needs to be some balance with true insight rather than people spoutign stuff that is trash talk like Obamicans do

ABC NEWS IS SCUMBAGS WHO ARE VERY PARTIAL IN DEBATES. THEY MADE MILLIONS BY SHOWING FALSE IMAGE.

@ MA:
The direction you mentioned may come from people like you. People in NC have the power to stir the supers to action by voting for Hillary. Talk to people at the supermarket, bank, video store, or even “Wal-Mart!” Tell them what you posted earlier on this blog.

Emily
Im doing more than that Im working in asheville at the HQ doing calls all over NC I nswered an opinio Dynamics poll this afternoon that I saw tonight already that had clinton down 5 in NC

Anyone who thinks Obama is more electable should take a look at an electorial map
http://www.electoral-vote.com/
Obama is losing to Mc Cain and Clinton is winning easily.
And its just going to get worse.
Did you guys know that NOBODY has ever won the white house when LOSING all the major primaries?
Never once in the history of the united states. Ever.
With Obama’s dubious past and liberal agenda, he aint going to be the exception.
My guess is that all you Obama lovers think somehow he will REGAIN his media shield and he can go back to being a GURU who will waive a magic wand for everyone.
LOL.

Tomdavie
Its tough trying to create a utopia for themselves :)

LOM
yea I understand that it was 16 I think when Hillary was in asheville the other night but like that one that had her up 20 in pa was never right things can be all over the place

Lorenzo
I read the book and I think he went to the southside of Chi town when he didnt know what to do with his life after Columbia in NY he went there with 20 bucks yada yada but hes worth a heck of a lot more now and Wright has a million dollar home under construction and I swaw where The Obama peopel “tried to give PR advice to Wright” as recently as yesterday ?

The word “dubious” simply means “open to doubt or suspicion.” His platform of change, hope and judgment has been challenged by his performance in the Senate, questionable associations and his perceived elitist status. That qualifies as dubious as in “Obama’s dubious past may evaporate his ability to be Democratic nominee as serious electability problems have been exposed.”

Obama Zombies,
You people just never seem to get it. It’s over, we’re just waiting for the dust to settle. You can stop taking the coolaid. I guess even after World War II ended there were people that it took a long time to get the message to.
========================================
Obama, finally rejected Wright!
He’s still a bad bowler!
C’mon Obama, get up on the flat bed, chicken!

Emily: I am not trying to convert anyone, especially you. A person who
doesn’t live in reality cannot be converted.
Stanium: I’m not a left wing fringe person…I’m a real Democrat, not some rural voter who is swayed by Hillary’s pro-war,
pro-corporation stance.

That should have been “I’m just NOT seeing how an Edwards endorsement goes his way.”

I heard someone say today that he will have to take on the lincoln-douglas debate challenge now!

The Clintons wouldn’t know what words like truth and honesty mean. They’ve been doing this for too long to remember. Not sure if they ever knew. They’re too dysfunctional from their lives and upbringing.
how do you even rationalize electing a president who had sex with an intern one-half his age, while he was POTUS IN THE OVAl OFFICe.
what kind of morals can ths guy have? And what kind of morals can the people who believe in the two of them have?
i don’t get it..

Lorenzo–
There are copious articles involving Obama’s relationships with a host of “dubious” Chicago characters, including: Ayers, Rezko, Blago, Daley, Stroger, et al.
Obama’s unsavory spiritual friends and mentors: Wright, Meeks, Bill Ayers, Frank Davis, et al.
Obama’s corporate and lobbyist connections/contributors: Exelon, Houston-based Mission Resources Corp., Tulsa-based Kaiser-Francis Oil Co., Mr. Hsu, Iraqi Billionaire of ill repute, Nadhmi Auchi, et al.

tom — since when are the latte liberals and youth vote listening to a populist message?

i agree that ms. edwards probably has a greater support for sen. clinton because of her health position. i saw the clip on tv this afternoon where ms. edwards was clearly on sen. clinton’s side with respect to health insurance. ms. edwards also said while she was not endorsing any democratic candidate, she would be happy to speak out on any other specific topic that she was asked about. HOW ABOUT IT REPORTERS?? WHY NOT ASK THE WOMAN ABOUT HER THOUGHTS?? Yes, I meant to scream. Why have the mainstream media been doing such a lame job???

stanium: Mccain and Clinton have far more ties to lobbyists and corporations than Obama. That is a clear fact.
LOM: I actually take the term latte liberal as a complement, not an insult.

Emily — To be fair, didn’t Mr. Hsu donate largely to the Clinton campaign? That “controversy” never had legs though and didn’t go anywhere (the ONE thing during this election cycle).

LOM– I agree. Edwards likes Hilary’s stance on the underprivileged and healthcare, and he knows she’ll continue that work throughout her presidency. A Clinton/Edwards ticket is exactly what we need.
As much as I hate to leave you and staniam to fight with tom alone, I must sleep. Goodnight.

Tom
that is what the media is telling you there are other factors

Tom
Im glad you take Latte liberal as a compliment we here in NC dont lol goes back to the bitter comments

Hillary would probably make a decent president but don’t insult your intelligence. She WANTS this and she and Bill feel they DESERVE it. They will say or do whatever they can to win and that includes tearing up any fellow Democrats who stand in their way. There’s no rule that a leader must be particularly NICE. Do you wonder why so many former Clinton associates are supporting the OTHER candidate?

tom — it’s a good thing you hate math. do you hate rules as well? NEITHER candidate has enough delegates to clinch the nomination. BOTH candidates need the support of superdelegates to put them over the top. So, your position that she needs 80% of the vote would be true IFF there were no SDs in this primary contest. But guess what? There are and those are the rules. Nice try at spin though…it just so happens that you’re not very good at it.

staniam,
i used to be cable junkie, but i gave it up because my nerves couldn’t handle it…not i find this discourse different, but not necessarily easier. it’s much more swift, interactive, and yes, intimidating. but it does make network news alot like snail-mail!!! it can be all terribly informative IF people want to be challenged AND changed by the dialogue.

yea they see the partial picturte of things but I dont wish anyone Ill even though I disagree with them but yea thats true neither candidate will get 2024 delegates before the convention and even then they only have to vote for their original candidate on the first ballot

The situation that the Dems find themselves in really does sadden me…I can still remember when we actually had an overwhlming chance of winning the White House.

LOM: Your comments are completley out of control. You do know that bashing Obama on this blog will not sway any voters?

LOM
Can anyone say President GW Bush thats what ticks me off the most is that hes got the exact same manerisms and temprament

stanium: How dare you compare Obama to Bush? Not even close. I am sick and tired fo the lies that are being spewed out of your mouth. Your mother should wash your mouth out with soap.

Tom
Takes one to know one didnt thinkId have to bring that one out tonight ;)

stanian,
ok, i was going to bed, but i had to agree with you. gees, what would it be like to find dozens of people you wanted to converse with nightly?? it may very well be overload. i will work for sen. clinton, and i sincerely hope she wins the nonination and the presidency!!

Stanium & LOM: I’m done….I don’t agree with either of you but it was nice chatting….

tom — Really? Do you research ANYTHING?
“Enact a Windfall Profits Tax on Oil Companies to Pay for Temporarily Suspending the Gas Tax – Hillary will impose a windfall profits tax on oil companies and use the money to temporarily suspend the 18.4 cent per gallon federal gas tax and the 24.4 cent per gallon diesel tax during the upcoming peak summer driving months. Hillary will ensure that this relief is passed along to consumers by charging the Federal Trade Commission with conducting aggressive oversight. Unlike Senator McCain’s plan, Hillary’s plan will be fully paid for by taking away oil company profits through a windfall profits tax. This will ensure that the Highway Trust Fund is not affected at all by the gas tax suspension, and can continue to support critical repairs and maintenance for our infrastructure and highways. Suspending the gas tax will provide real, immediate assistance to American families and for our economy. Recent testimony before the House of Representatives by the American Trucking Association indicates that even small changes in price can have big impacts. Just a one-penny decrease in the price of diesel annualized over an entire year would save the trucking industry $391 million a year.”

MA
Thats good that you want to help her win honestly I thought the peopel at the HQ I went to were too nonchalant .. and the event the other night they told us to go out and collect the sign up sheets for the event and I got about half of the 2500 that filled one out I almost missed the speech itself :)

Tom
I dont think he drove himself when he was back in IL this whole thing about sittign back and coming up with a solution Hillary already has a list and Obama wants to be like W and be president in name only

LOM: Your views are illogical….you paint Clinton as an angel….you think Obama is the devil…do you really want another Bush term? Please get a reality check.

LOM
Have a good night

After reading along here, it is apparent there are plenty of voters still confused by our electoral system for the GE. At this point, with the primary season closing in a deadheat, the most important factor is electability – who is more likely to beat McCain. We can supposed all day long but the SD’s will be looking at some actual data and analysis. To help some of you who are confused, I put together some numbers.
Regardless of what any candidate says, we are a red/blue/purple country. For the dems, the upcoming GE will be determined by wins in swing states and blue state strongholds. The winner of the GE needs 270 electoral votes. Here is how that breaks down in electoral votes across the country:
Red states=183
Blue states=168
Swing states=187
Some republicans think this is why the dems will lose. McCain is the only one who took the race seriously because he knows how easily it can be lost in the swing states. Some people seem to think that we add up the electoral votes for states won by candidates but we cant do that since the dems will not win all states. But to appease that logic, here are the numbers:
Electoral power without regards to red/blue/swing state voting history -
Clinton wins=284 (surpassed 270)
Obama wins=202 (not enough left to get 270 ie. Remaining contests: 52)
Obviously the above logic does not work since there is no way the dems can win most of the red states included above. The next set of analysts try to say they can legitimately compare the wins with blue and swing states per candidate. While this is true for the voter preferences from dem voters, it is not accurate for the GE. Here is how that argument pans out:
Clinton blue or swing wins=222
Obama blue or swing wins=133
Dont get all excited McCain fans! The above logic might be closer to reality but it is far from representive in terms of electability. The solid blue states are expected to support either candidates and many of the states were close races and either candidate is likely to carry those states. Here is how the real electability analysis shapes up based on the voting results:
Awarding Blue states to both plus swing states won -
Clinton=288 (surpassed 270 needed to win)
Obama=235 (not enough left to get 270 ie. Remaining contests: 52)
Now to bring us up to date, the pollsters have been running daily and weekly polls in particular states to get a snapshot prediction for the GE. I think it is still too early to predict but here are the states where head to head polling is being tracked:
WI, IA, MA, IN, MN, NV, AZ, CO, NY, CA, WA, AL, KS, NM, MO, OH, OR, VA, KY, PA, FL, NC, TN, ME, NJ, VA, CT
Current electoral map results based on polling alone -
Clinton vs McCain = 269
Obama vs McCain = 199
The pollsters failed to include MI which is a big mistake. MI has a significant number of electors and is a swing state that McCain lost heavily in and Clinton won with a strong margin. That would put her at 286 electoral votes and Obama at 216 electoral votes.
Bottom line in all of this is:
Things are still unpredictable and the GE will be a tough race no matter who the nominees are. But when we look at who is most likely to beat McCain in the GE, no matter how you spin the emotions and political aspects of the election, the numbers dont like – Clinton is clearly indicated as the most electable. The SD’s are paying attention and so are the Republicans. Be wary of the tricks they have begun – party power players are starting to appear in various interviews and coyly dogging the dem party and its nomination race along with its candidates. The RNC knows how to run and win elections – dont take them for granted!

LOM: Are you anti-war? Aren’t you worried about Mccain’s age. If he gets elected he would be 77 at the end of his term.

LOM: Not mean..just defending my views when attacked by others…good night.

tom — you can defend your views by basing them on FACTS and DATA.

dcvoter,
That was awesome, thank you. It is easy to believe it and say it, but you have it solid.
Alot is said this election about voters in this election, but isn’t it just possible that the people going for Hillary (ie. old, uneducated, racist, stupid, blah, blah, blah, me) know, from experience, that the only electable candidate is Hillary. The more they try to parse out the voters, the more I believe it.
Just lately I LOVE checking all the polls.

am a 70 year old white woman and I am really amazed at the nonentity of certian persons who keep hitting someone for someone else’s mistakes. Obama is the candidate and let’s talk about him. This is all utter distractions from fools who have nothing to offer but negative ads and stupid criticisms. This is a political election and not a church or spiritual election. Hillary and Bill have nothing to offer to this dynamic generation and so they are all out to destroy, divide and run. We talk of peace and she is on obliterating a nation! That’s evil on her part! I will not be surprised to see and hear about terror attacks on us sooner or later because of her threat over a nation! SHAME ON HER AND HER SUPPORTERS. MY SUPPORT GOES TO OBAMA FROM NOW ONWARDS. She is scary using fear to manipulate and mislead voters and you called that wisdom or being a fighter? I called it weakness, divisive, evil, witchcraft and above all a looser tactic! She has no message that is positive. What I see is that even though she lied a thousand times, her stupid and idiotic supporters call it truth. She is misrepresenting Americans in the world as a symbol of liars. If she becomes president, terrorists will wreck this nation and we will have enemies all over. DO NOT BE STUPID BY HER SILLY AND DIRTY GAMES! REAL AMERICANS ARE NOT STUPID AND IDIOTS AS DO HER SUPPORTERS!

If this is the truth then I think we had all figure out somewhere else to live. What a liar – and you want to put his wife in the WH?

look you people piling on the Clintons while they are not piling on Obama about wright at this time cdease and desist the Clintons are honorable even though they have their flaws we dont know about most of Obamas flaws because of the mafia based Chi town that Obama is from Wright I think wants to expose it but then that would mean bringing down an entire counterculture that is scurilous but maybe he thinks its worth it!

If you are going to list all the ways Hillary was negative, can you please list Obama too, his attack on Hillary’s health care plan in PA, again, which how many people need to say is a lie over and over again. Calling Hillary’s character into question, over and over and over and over again. Feeing the Bosnia story to the media, again, with not being able to put flowers on the Tomb of the Unknown soldier, Obama’s final closing statements during his Pennsylvania tour, COME ON people, just come on! If you hate negativity, I get it, I really do. But please, to say some negativity to respond to other negativity is okay, is a LOSING ARGUMENT, period.

Based on her experience, judgement, associations, and management skills, it is my humble opinion that Senator Clinton will do NOTHING to inspire the American people to be better, work harder, or partner to bring about the change that this country needs. Her campaign has made a mockery of honesty, integrity, unity, empathy – you name it. What we’re left with is negativity, divisivness, scandal, corruption, the worst kind of unethical behavior. It is amazing to me that women consider her a feminist standart – she enabled and condoned President Clinton’s abusive sexual behavior and when faced with the fact that they couldn’t lie it away, chose to attack those women who objected to his predatory behavior. If she were a man, I’d have the same objections. To me, this world cannot afford another agressive, negative leader in the White House – you think Iraq is bad now, think about how she plans to deal with the Iran situation. Those of you who have not done so, need to spend some time researching the Clintons all the way back to Arkansas – there is a pattern to their behavior. Regarding the Bosnia lie stuff – think about the implication of putting your only child in that situation – what kind of family values are those? One more thing – part of the Clinton White House legacy can be found ON DISPLAY at the Smithonian Institute in DC – it’s blue and it’s stained.

What does the “greatest football upset ever” have to do with the Clintons stealing the nomination through a backroom deal? What a lame analogy. Bill, you have lost your touch.

Rob, I will say this….Hillary does inspire me….She inspires me to support whomever her opponent is since I find nothing admirable about dishonesty.

Why of course Bill would say such things, we would be very disappointed if he did not try to spin things her way. Thats his job.
But, he also said that the Obama camp played the race card on him first. And he also told us he did not have sexual realations with that women too. Hey, when you have that kind of crediabilty, it must be true.

what parallel universe has this man been in for the last seven weeks?