By Nitya

Apr 14, 2008 4:21pm

Bill Clinton Keeps ‘Bitter’ Alive

ABC News’ Sarah Amos Reports: Former president Bill Clinton’s campaign rally this morning at the junior high gym in Corydon, Indiana was a wealth of Hillary Clinton surrogates, among them many who had their own thoughts about Sen. Barack Obama’s recent comments about small town voters. 

The former president was introduced by Indiana’s Former First Lady Judy O’Bannon, who spoke of rural pride and reminded the small town crowd it was not a sentiment shared by the all the presidential candidates. 

"All over Indiana there are people in communities like ours, and we aren’t just blind fools who live here because we don’t know where the road is that goes out, are we?" Some candidates would imply that, wouldn’t they? Read the newspapers and see what some candidates say about places like the hometown where you belong," said O’Bannon, after talking about how her husband Governor Frank O’Bannon was a Corydon local. 

Citing concern over the economy, health care, and Iraq, O’Bannon passionately continued, "We’re worried about that. And that is why we know that you just don’t do the things that the other candidate implied – sit around and quake and cling. You get up and you do something about it."

President Clinton, Hillary’s number one surrogate, then used O’Bannon’s remarks as a springboard to share his own experiences of reactions to Obama’s comments at a recent San Francisco fundraiser where he said small town voters were "bitter" and "cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

Over seven stops in North Carolina, Clinton said "Everywhere I go there are all these people with signs, saying I’m not bitter – I’m not bitter."

Clinton said during a stop in Jim Thorpe, Pennsylvania "this fellow said to me… "President Clinton, we are not bitter, we just want to turn the country around."  Clinton said another supporter in North Carolina said  "I hunt ’cause I like to and I go church ’cause I need to. And if I were a millionaire, I would still hunt and go to church.’ He said what we need is to get this country together, get it on the road and go forward. So that is what this election is about. And we all gotta go forward together. We all have to go forward together."

The strong sentiments were appreciated by the crowd, but were not entirely accurate.  During Clinton’s seven stops in North Carolina on Saturday there were no "I’m not bitter" signs.  There was a small assortment of people at his later events wearing stickers with the slogan, but many of those sporting the stickers weren’t even sure what they meant.  Clinton also was a bit confused about his encounter in Pennsylvania.  The conversation actually took place at an earlier event in Bloomsburg, PA – or so Clinton told the crowd in Bloomsburg.

Despite the evolving anecdotes, the fact that the Clinton campaign needs this story to stay alive in Indiana and other rural states was crystal clear.

And just in case the reporters in the room weren’t totally sure what the message of the day was, the Clinton campaign’s Indiana co-chair, Joe Hogsett was ushered out to the press riser to talk with reporters before the rally began.

The former Indiana State Secretary told reporters "apparently Senator Obama believes that those of us in Indiana only practice our faith because we are mad at the government, or that we seek refuge in recreational activities because we are frustrated by our economic plight.  Nothing could be further from the truth. As I said earlier, we pray because we love God. We hunt and fish because that is what we have been taught to do. Those are values that are time honored here in Indiana and values that apparently Senator Obama doesn’t understand"

Hogsett also made it clear that he did not believe Senator Clinton has attacked Obama over these remarks.  "Oh, it is not our attack, it is Senator Obama who attacked Senator Clinton this morning saying that she would say anything to get elected, even carrying news crews around behind her to take a shot and drink a beer, trying to suggest that she shares Hoosier values. When it is in fact Senator Obama himself who suggested in California last week that he is out of touch with Hoosier values," said Hogsett.

User Comments

Bill Clinton the congenital liar. This guy is just like an STD. Please just go away. We don’t want our dicks leaking like busted pipes.

Posted by: Kevin | April 14, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

I hope Obama didnt say anything about beer-drinking and hoops shooting when he paraded around Western PA bowling and drinking Yuengling. Come on now.

Posted by: tony | April 14, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

I think the media, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and pundits have completely lost their marbles.

Posted by: tomdavie | April 14, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

Of course he keeps it alive. This is what they do. Hillary has a blunder and the press jumps all over her and where in the hell is Obama? He is no where to be found. Now, when the shoe is on the other foot, she jumps all over it and so does her disgraced husband, supporters and everyone else.
He NEVER says anything – about anything – that involves her!! He better go back and dig up all the dirt and bad press she has had from the past 3 weeks and bathe her in it.
I am sick and tired of camp Hillary slamming him on every single thing. While he sits back and lets her skate by. The Bosnia, he didn’t say anything. Bill’s lie and interpretation of Bosnia he didn’t say anything. The Mark Penn stuff he didn’t say anything, etc. etc. etc.
He let someone who made over 100 million dollars in less than 7 years call him an elite member of society!…. He better wake up from whatever he thinks he is doing and go after that b//// once and for all.
Enough with the nice crap. If she can pounce on him, he should pounce on them. If she can twist his words, he better can in the game twist some of hers. He better be leading the charge to dig up some of Bill’s comments and some of Hillary’s as well.
Wake up Obama, these people are ghetto politicans, you better get dirty with them or get off the stage! People are sick of this nice guy crap. The Clinton’s are flawed and disgusting people, why can’t you focus on that?!

Posted by: E.L. | April 14, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

Kevin – rush to CVS before it closes and renew the lithium prescription.

Posted by: tony | April 14, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

If his claim to fame is his inspiring, sparkling rhetoric, he needs to be called to task when he puts his size 12 in his mouth. Yes, his opponents are having a hay-day with this but what if he puts his insensitive foot in his mouth on the world stage. He needs to go away and ferment for another decade.

Posted by: Jill Elliott | April 14, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

Oh EL – lol. Obama does not have to scrutinize Clinton because the media are doing the work for him. Please, the man is apparently above any type of analysis. So much so – that his worshippers become enraged over a little heat. What: did you really expect he would cause the nation to fall down and honor and obey him, as his campaign suggested? This is what happens when college students control your message. “I, the Lord Obama, shall rid the USA of ‘politics as usual’ and usher in an Obama Generation of hope and change and civility. I will smite divisiveness in the world and cause a new era of cooperation. I the Lord Obama will reach across party lines and cause the Republicans who hate the Democrats to lay down their hatred and follow me.” LOL – sorry, he cannot even unite his own party, how can he unite the nation.
QUESTION FOR OBAMADROIDS: His campaign has said it will be “above” politics as usual and that he will unite Republicans and Democrats. Then why is he describing McCain as Bush III and distorting his message on Iraq? Why is he going around doing the “Annie Oakley” instead of trying to really figure out why ALL poor voters, except for African Americans, have given him the cold shoulder. Could it be that poor folks have pick candidates whom they believe will deliver something concrete – unlike college students and wealthy white people who want soaring oratory and impossible, vague promises?

Posted by: tony | April 14, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

Go Bill. Go!

Posted by: Aston | April 14, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

If they (camp Clinton and McCain) want to keep this in the press, fine. He should use this to choke the life out of both of them. Both of them are MILLIONAIRES. He should focus on their money to explain some of their policy positions. If he were to do that, McCain would tank and Hillary wouldn’t be to far behind.
There are tons of comments out there that have been said. Many of those comments by the Clinton’s. The Obama camp would be damn stupid if they are not digging that stuff up right now to dump in her lap on national tv come Wednesday. I’m starting to have reservations about Obama. He isn’t a fighter at all.
Hillary might fight dirty and she might do something as disgraceful and idiotic as go after another Democrat for her own gain but at least she is a fighter. She is a classless person and will never get my support but at least she attacks holes where she sees them EL, Obama doesn’t do anything.

Posted by: Hannah | April 14, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

And the press gives Clinton a free pass to pound Obama for saying that some people are bitter when Clinton said that “economically insecure white people are scared to death”.

Posted by: UCLAdy04 | April 14, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

“Wake up Obama, these people are ghetto politicans, you better get dirty with them or get off the stage! People are sick of this nice guy crap. The Clinton’s are flawed and disgusting people, why can’t you focus on that?!”
Perhaps because he has marketed himself as the Dali Bama. It would be weird seeing the Prince of Peace digging up dirt on people….LOl. Now politics as usual seems appropriate….why? Hint: because that’s the name of the game. OOOPs, am I cynical? Maybe bitter is a better word. Yes, I’m bitter. But because I am well educated in live in a Northeastern “blue” community, I do not have a gun and only go to church for weddings and funerals.

Posted by: tony | April 14, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

Don’t ever kid yourself. Mr. O’s goal in life is to overcome his affirmative action education and join the group. Problem is, if he is this uppity now, can you imagine the arrogance if he has money and is president. The world leaders will chew him up and spit him out. He is such a child, such a babe in the woods.

Posted by: Mary Miles | April 14, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

I’m tired of Washington telling me they fight for small towns. Every election, it’s the same thing.
Washington politicians would sell their soul to get elected.
Bill Clinton has sold America.
He’s taken money from China, Dubai, Colombia, Canada, and probably several more countries.

Posted by: Dan | April 14, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

there are bitter people out there. Ones that have lost jobs overseas and homes to foreclosure, they have to chose between going to doctor and paying the rent. Their kids joined up so they could go to college but have seen their tours of duty extended and stop-lossed.Asumming they are still alive or uninjured.
Religions and radical groups routinely seek out the bitter and disenfranchised. So it is irrestponsible to say that there are no bitter Americans. It is irresponsible to say that these people seek out answers and support from any quarter and that there are those they would prey on them. Again, the Clintons attack because a truth has been told.

Posted by: Louis | April 14, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

Tony,
He has been above it, I am like the Clinton’s myself. If I were the Clinton’s I would have wipped the floor with the Obama. Needless to say, Obama should polish the floor with Hillary. Even her supporters must know he hasn’t gone after her in the manner she has after him? If you people can’t admit that, you are stupid as people claim.
As far as race, are you one of those race idiots? What does race have to do with this? I was under the impresssion, what you people are looking for – insurance, jobs, whatever didn’t have a color? The ignorace of some voters proves the elite may have been right when the limited ruling and authority to those of a certain class…………
Greg

Posted by: Greg | April 14, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

Oh Hannah – stop acting like you were born yesterday. Kerry said that Dean was unfit for the presidency. Ted Kennedy was so angry with Carter that he pushed for a convention fight and then refused to shake hands with him after he received the nomination. Gary Hart was a very competitive individual who raced to the convention – despite trailing in delegates – and said that Mondale and Carter were totally inept and that Reagan is delighted by the prospect of Mondale winning. All of these MEN are proud Obama supporters. They criticized other Democrats. Reality check: that’s what people do when they seek the nomination. Obama has called Clinton “more of the same,” said that she “lacks judgment,” argued that the Republicans have a “dumptruck of dirt” on her, and said that she has a problem with the truth. I guess this is not an attack because it comes from the mouth of the Lord Obama. Do you guys see your own hypocrisy? It’s absolutely stunning to me that Obama supporters pretend that he has been a choir boy in the election, when he has been just a strategic and conniving as any other politician out there. Wake up and let go of the kool-aid.

Posted by: tony | April 14, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Mary
you just proved his point you ignorant c//t.

Posted by: ChelseabillhillaryClinton | April 14, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

“I’m tired of Washington telling me they fight for small towns. Every election, it’s the same thing.
Washington politicians would sell their soul to get elected.
Bill Clinton has sold America.
He’s taken money from China, Dubai, Colombia, Canada, and probably several more countries.”
LOL – Obama has taken money from oil execs and Wall Street has given both Democratic candidates far more money than McCain. Democrats are so gullible. Really got to leave this pathetic excuse of a political party.

Posted by: tony | April 14, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

“So it is irrestponsible to say that there are no bitter Americans.”
You want to know what else is irresponsible: Not responding to the entire quote! It’s not that Obama said that people are bitter that is the problem. It’s him linking that to religion, gun control, opposition to same-sex marriage and trade which is the problem.
Query for Obamites: Obama said that he is opposed to same-sex marriage, that he is religious, and he blasted Clinton for supporting Nafta (althoug he has not said he would not have voted for it). Is he bitter too? Or is he just saying these things to get elected?

Posted by: tony | April 14, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

MONICA LEWINSKI

Posted by: robby10001 | April 14, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

Greg:
Obama has “gone after” Clinton through his surrogates primarily. Also, most of the liberal webpages on line have been highly vitriolic in their coverage of Clinton (Huffinton, Daily Kos, and Politico). Obama even sends them his campaign statements sometimes so that they can receive rapid circulation. Also, the mainstream media have been solidly behind him. Accordingly, he can refrain from doing any type of attacking. He has a lot of free and very public help on this issue.
Second, why on earth would you call me a “race idiot”? Please indicate why you feel that way.

Posted by: tony | April 14, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

Greg:
Obama has “gone after” Clinton through his surrogates primarily. Also, most of the liberal webpages on line have been highly vitriolic in their coverage of Clinton (Huffinton, Daily Kos, and Politico). Obama even sends them his campaign statements sometimes so that they can receive rapid circulation. Also, the mainstream media have been solidly behind him. Accordingly, he can refrain from doing any type of attacking. He has a lot of free and very public help on this issue.
Second, why on earth would you call me a “race idiot”? Please indicate why you feel that way.

Posted by: tony | April 14, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

Those comments are NOT the same as him going after her. If you don’t know the difference, shut your mouth. I’m trying to give your ignorant, classless….etc, candidate a pat on the back for standing in the race and doing something to overcome the mountain she has to climb. However, don’t lecture me on what was said to whom and who is this or that…..or anything else. I know the difference of what is political and politics…what is disallowed and what is allowed….I know a good candidate and a mdeicore one…and facts are Hillary is a medicore one. Period.
She has run the worst campaign to date. Now she wants to run the country and idiot supporters want to let her. Now you tell the rest of us who is drinking the kool-aid. I’m beginning to think her supporters are the same people that were taken out of the David Koresh compound. What a bunch of wack jobs………total brainless idiots.

Posted by: Hannah | April 14, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

Lauren
I just read where Hillary was sharp and Obama was in one of his stuttering modes.

Posted by: S | April 14, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

Sadly Tony if Obama stays above these politics he will lose. I agree the dems are looking pretty sad. I just don’t agree with the modern day republicans. Remeber Abe Lincoln he was a republican pretty “libral” thinker too. I just don’t see how republicans can look to the future when they continualy base themselves in sever right wing thinking. But democrats can be way to libral for me some times so I think the conservatives do some good there keeping them in check. I think Obama is a good man for the job and it will be refreshing to see a new face in the white house. But I agree with E.L. he needs to put her out of her missery and focus on the repubs.

Posted by: Joe | April 14, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

As A Canadian, I am astounded Americans put up w/ outright LIES from this couple AND YET STILL consider them potential LEADERS? THAT is unbelievable to me! Wow…

Posted by: cheryl | April 14, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

StanCH AKA DCVoter

Posted by: S | April 14, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

Hey Lauren pandering is the name of the game. You don’t really believe Hillary wanted to be in the position at this time do you? My gawd being forced to drink like that and appear as if she is on of “them” hell she deserves to be POTUS! People like you just don’t understand, it is hard being rich and living amongst the common folk.
She might be richer than they are but she needs them. She has to tell them what they want to hear. She has to behave as if they do. When you become waelthy perhaps then you will understand, until that time please get back to walmart and leave Saks and Rolex’s to folks like Hillary, McCain, Romney’s and other millionaires

Posted by: Angela | April 14, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

Obama is not god, I am! Everyone makes mistakes. Unless your Hill Dog never lies just misspeaks you know no big deal, doesn’t apologizes so why should he? Oh wait! he did! Besides I’m a small town guy I support Obama the only thing it makes me want to see is Obamas gun control policy.

Posted by: Joe | April 14, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

Sorry Hannah – you are blinded by the Obama Light. You said it was “disgraceful and idiotic” to “attack another Democrat.” By saying this, you show that you are either so in the tank with Obama that you have abandoned any ability to engage in objective discourse OR you know absolutely nothing about politics. I listed the ways in which prior candidates have done even tougher attacks than Clinton – even taking the fight all the way to the convention. Only when Clinton attacks O-Lamby is it a “disgraceful” and “classless.” Sorry – packaging these comments in a paragraph which says “at least she is a fighter” does not make them less troubling (or less inaccurate).
Gary Hart, who criticized Clinton for going after Obama, said Mondale was completely inept and was a part of a failed administration of Carter/Mondale and that Ronald Reagan could not wait to run against him, instead of Hart. I guess that was ok. Ted Kennedy was so nasty to Carter, that he refused to pull out despite him trailing Carter in the delegate total — much greater difference than in this race — and he refused to shake hands with Carter at the convention. With respect to his opposition to the Iraq War, Kerry said that Howard Dean lacked credibility and fitness to even run for the presidency – not to mention occupy the White House.
Would you describe these MEN as “disgraceful” and “ignorant”? Just yelling and saying you know the difference does not make your arguments persuasive. What is the difference between their rheotoric and Clinton’s?

Posted by: tony | April 14, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

S,
That’s not DCVoter’s style, he has much more class than that. I’m not talking Obama class, because we know that Obama is way above us, he’s got down home class.
Best part of the above story: I hunt because I like to and I go to church because I need to. That brings tears to my eyes, I used to love hunting back in the day.
========================================
Obama, trying to make hunters ashamed of themselves.
Obama must have a better religion than us!
========================================

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 14, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

Lauren,
You are still running in way overtime trying to divert attention off of BITTERGATE. Is it working? I don’t think so.
========================================
Obama, bitter, bitter, bitter, bitter, bitter, bitter, bitter, bitter, Obama
========================================

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 14, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

If Barack loses he can always make money selling ice cream, call it Baracky Road, and it’ll have a slight bitter taste to it.
========================================
Barack Obama, it doesn’t get any bitter than this guy.
========================================

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 14, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

Joe – I do not agree that anyone needs to be “put out of her misery.” If anything, the Democratic Party needs to be put out of its misery. The Democrats have only had one two-term president since Harry Truman in 1952. Wow. What a bunch of losers. The only other one was Bill Clinton. Yes – the one that Democrats, including Obama, have dismissed. Well, Bill was the last Democrat to appoint multiple justices to the Supreme Court. He balanced the budget, oversaw a surplus, appointed liberals to the federal courts, veoted conservative legislation, and we had economic prosperity. You guys are revising history in your descriptions of Clinton. The Republicans launched NUMEROUS investigations into the Clintons and only proved one thing: he had oral sex with Monica but denied it. Big Deal! Yet – Bush has led thousands of soldiers to their death, given us the second Bush recession, and is completely incapable of doing anything. Yet, you guys portray the Clintons as monsters? You Democrats deserve every loss you get. And trust me, you will lose with Obama. It is too late for Clinton to win this time. I definitely admit that. But I am actually excited. As a Democrat who is frustrated by the awful decisions this party makes, I cannot wait to see McCain defeat us. Unfortunately, I am sure Obama will just blame Clinton and Bush for his loss. They seem to be responsible for everything else that goes wrong in his life. I’m sure they wrote Wright’s sermons!

Posted by: tony | April 14, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

WestCoastMessanger, the Lincoln bedroom is for sleep overs and Bill the Hotel manager would like to make money out off the White House again. Hill the Bosnian General has not finished swalling more alcohol and get drunk, and Bill has not finished making money out of middle class Americans. Colombia’ 800 000 is not enough. At all, no class, the Clintons have no class. If Hill wins the nomination this way, then my vote is discarded, maybe I have to go to vote for Berlusconi in Italy. God bless America and God bless Obama.

Posted by: BKMC | April 14, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

Cheryl, spare us the Canadian elitism. I respect Canada a great deal, but you really should take care of the North of the border issues. Stephen Harper? LOL.

Posted by: tony | April 14, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

Bill’s great!!! He should say that Senator Obama talked about Senator Clinton going “up a blind” with a “six shooter” to shoot ducks!!! She is Annie Oakley!!! We love her!!!!

Posted by: kt | April 14, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

Joe,
Right on point! So many people have been saying this for a long time, he needs to fight hard and dirty. Simply stated, it is time for him to get down on her level. He doesn’t want to do that but if he doesn’t then he needs to get out of the race. He promised a different type or campaign but he can’t deliver that when dealing with a Clinton. The public will understand because the simple fact is, the Clinton’s do bring out the worst in people. Only diehards love them to death, reasonable people understand everything and everyone has a shelf life!….Anyway, I agree with many of you, he needs to go after her foul ups hard and heavy from this point on. I mean he needs to go after her in the same manner she is going after him. No more playing nice with her, no more holding her hand, no more nice-nice and kiss-kiss stuff. She is not doing him any favors and he had better stop doing them for her.

Posted by: London | April 14, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

OBAMA FANS
I dare you to read this article in SLATE:
http://www.slate.com/id/2188487/#foursins

Posted by: A | April 14, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton is a Liability to the Democratic Party. Dems will cut their losses and unite behind Obama and unify the party around Obama.
If anyone is Elitist (109,000,000.00) it’s the Clintons.
Obama all the way!

Posted by: Lookup | April 14, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton is a Liability to the Democratic Party. Dems will cut their losses and unite behind Obama and unify the party around Obama.
If anyone is Elitist ($109,000,000.00) it’s the Clintons.
Obama all the way!

Posted by: Lookup | April 14, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

We, the Blue collars of PENN Totally and unequivocally agree with Senator Obama. Yes, We are bitter and angry that our jobs has been gone and none of these administration have helped us.
Bill Clinton Championed NAFTA. Hillary Clinton supported her Husband on that.
Mccain and George Bush only made it worse by tapping into unnecessary war and channelled much needed money into it.
Yes, we are bitter and angry and when no hope is forthcoming, WE start to PRAY AND START STEERING our energy and pass times into Games like Hunting. We hate hearing that illegal immigrants are getting our jobs.
Many of us turn to these not because we know of their existence for the first time but because we want GOD TO DELIVER US OUT FROM THESE HARDSHIPS.
Do HILLARY CLINTON AND JOHN MCCAIN KNOW WHAT IT MEANS TO NOT BE ABLE TO FEED ONES FAMILY?
How many times have I cried because I wonder how I can raise up my children? They made millions and John MCCain cannot even help Mortgage Forclosure VICTIMS With government Money, not his own money? Pls GIVE ME A BREAK.!
DO WE NEED A PRESIDENT THAT drinks BEER AND THEN WHISKEY at the same time? What message are we sending to our young children?
I don’t mean to demean her, but look at her face when not in make-up. Is it not all these drinkings that cause those?
I BET OUR BELOVED WOMEN BLOGGERS WILL AGREE WITH ME.
AMERICA WAKE UP! WE ARE GOING TO VOTE FOR OBAMA.
Yes those who are not going to vote for him won’t vote for him not because of HIS CANDID REMARK.

Posted by: Bob from Pensylvannia | April 14, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

BJ Clinton at it again. LOL.

Posted by: Doug | April 14, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

John Baer: Decades of working-class neglect – now that’s insulting
By John Baer
Philadelphia Daily News
Daily News Political Columnist
SOME THOUGHTS on the latest diversion of Campaign ’08, a campaign apparently hell-bent on keeping the nation mired in its own stupidity.
As a native-born, small-town Pennsylvanian, a son of native-born, small-town Pennsylvania parents – one from the coal region, one from Lancaster County – let me assure you that the so-called offensive, condescending things Barack Obama said about the people I come from are basically right on target.
“Bitter” perhaps best describes my late mother, an angry Irish Catholic who absolutely clung to her religion.
Dad, also a journalist, wasn’t really bitter as far as I know, but he sure liked to hunt.
So, despite carping from Hillary Clinton and annoying yapping from her surrogates (really, it’s like turning on the lights at night in a puppy farm), I take no offense.
What’s offensive to me is suggesting that small-town, working-class, gun-toting and/or religious Pennsylvanians are somehow injured by a politician’s words.
Are you kidding me?
They’re injured all right, but the injury is long-term and from lots more than “just words.”
They’ve been injured from decades of neglect by political cultures in Washington and Harrisburg driven by special interests.
They’re injured by a system of isolated, insulated political leadership that protects itself and the status quo above all else.
They’ve been harmed by a lack of political guts to fix a health-care system that works against the poor and forces middle-class families to pay more for less, while at the same time giving politicians the best coverage taxpayer money can buy.
They’ve been taken for granted by political parties and candidates who stay in power by – and this was the apparent gist of Obama’s remarks – forcing attention and debate on issues tied to guns, religion and race (precisely because such issues resonate) rather than real problems such as health care and the economy.
They’ve been consistently made fools of by their own elected representatives who, year after year, pull fat salaries ($169,000 for every member of Congress; $150,000 in salary, perks and benefits for every state lawmaker) with automatic raises no matter how little gets done.
A new Associated Press poll shows Congress’ approval rating at 23 percent. And don’t even get me started on the Pennsylvania Legislature.
Insulting?
What’s insulting are the sizes of salaries and perks of politicians in a state where the median household income is $43,714.
What’s insulting is the ongoing failure of elected “leaders” to deal with long-term, working-class worries while insuring their own futures with hefty, over-rich pensions.
And, look, what Obama said, given a charged atmosphere close to a critical primary, was ill-advised – not because he’s wrong, but because it changes the discussion.
The 24-hour broadcast-news cycle will jabber on this for days – the irony being that Obama’s “words,” which had positioned him so well, now threaten to trip him up.
Another irony is that the candidate running to effect change where change is needed, and to offer hope to those without it, is suddenly tagged as somehow diminishing those he seeks to serve.
So the question is whether Obama effectively defuses this, as he did the controversy surrounding his former minister. And that remains to be seen.
Just don’t tell me that he insulted a state or, given his background, that he’s an out-of-touch elitist.
And I especially don’t want to hear such arguments from a candidate who spent decades in the bubble of a governor’s mansion, the White House and the U.S. Senate, and under the blanket of $109 million income during the last eight years.
Pennsylvanians might cling to religion and guns. I hope they don’t cling to stupidity.
Send e-mail to baerj@phillynews.com.
For recent columns, go to
http://go.philly.com/baer.

Posted by: nick | April 14, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

Every time Clinton does something nasty to Obama and he strikes back, she accuses him of being “on the attack.” Hillary, we are onto your little game. It’s so obvious, it’s painful to watch. You are the Democratic version of a suicide bomber.

Posted by: Megan | April 14, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

OMG! What Fun!!! Which Clintonista an Repugnant Racist Statement should I pick out (from the MANY) on this board???
Mary Miles said:
“Don’t ever kid yourself. Mr. O’s goal in life is to overcome his affirmative action education and join the group. Problem is, if he is this uppity now, can you imagine the arrogance if he has money and is president.”
Yes, can’t have those “uppity negroes” getting over on us whiteys!
And West Coast Mess — whine, whine whine!!!
Obama 2008 — Yes, WE CAN!!!

Posted by: Jackt51 -- Vietnam Vet and Proud Liberal | April 14, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

I think NAFTA is a reason not to vote for the clintons!
800,000 is a reason not to vote for the clintons!
The women who are invisible to hillary is a reason not to vote for the clintons.
I list lots of reasons at my blog but there are too many people who don’t care what the clintons do. The media does an Obama witch-hunt and stays on it until the votes are counted and then prepares for the next round. Ms. Fowler should keep her dang mouth shut because what happened was an innocent statement made into a big thing. With donations like hers who needs enemies?
Why aren’t the jumping on hillary’s relationship with Huma?

Posted by: Mem | April 14, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

This was what clinton had to say during his campaign.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/13/bill-clinton-flashback-al_n_96433.html

Posted by: Michael | April 14, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

“Don’t ever kid yourself. Mr. O’s goal in life is to overcome his affirmative action education and join the group. Problem is, if he is this uppity now, can you imagine the arrogance if he has money and is president. The world leaders will chew him up and spit him out. He is such a child, such a babe in the woods.”
God Bless America? USA showing it’s true colours for all to see. Pure unabashed racism in the 21st century.
USA! USA! USA!
If anywhere has the moral center and stability to spread truth and democracy across the world it’s America. It’s almost like a human and civil rights exchange program. As the GOP strips it’s citizens of rights and freedoms guaranteed under the constitution it delivers rights and freedoms, by force, to other countries.
USA! USA! USA!

Posted by: Mike | April 14, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

The sad thing about the link, which I am glad that you posted Michael, not as many people have read that compared to ms. fowlers messages. Goes back to the media and the witch-hunt for Obama. They keep this thing alive through showing hillary saying something about it every 5 min. CNN and MSMBC are getting as bad a fox with this crap.
http://ak-elections2008.blogspot.com/

Posted by: Mem | April 14, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

AP – In a major campaign blunder, Senator Barack Obama stated today that the sky is blue.
“This proves his elitist insensitivity,” reported correspondent Karl Rove “There were clouds over many parts of America today, including states the Democrats need to win in November. He completely ignored millions of Americans.”
From The Spoof

Posted by: Trillium | April 14, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Bill Clinton Sunday times 1991:
You know, he [Bush] wants to divide us over race. I’m from the South. I understand this. This quota deal they’re gonna pull in the next election is the same old scam they’ve been pulling on us for decade after decade after decade. When their economic policies fail, when the country’s coming apart rather than coming together, what do they do? They find the most economically insecure white men and scare the living daylights out of them. They know if they can keep us looking at each other across a racial divide, if I can look at Bobby Rush and think, Bobby wants my job, my promotion, then neither of us can look at George Bush and say, ‘What happened to everybody’s job? What happened to everybody’s income? What … have … you … done … to … our … country?’”

Posted by: Thinking | April 14, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Bill Clinton”
The reason (George H. W. Bush’s tactic) works so well now is that you have all these economically insecure white people who are scared to death,” Clinton was quoted saying by the Los Angeles Times in September 1991

Posted by: Thinking | April 14, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

Hillary speaks to us:
“I do remember shooting a duck once when I was first lady in Arkansas.”
Annie Oakley for president.
She should have been shooting at Bill with a pellet gun, after one of his many episodes, at the Excelsior Hotel in Little Rock.

Posted by: Lone Ranger | April 14, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

The accusations about a lack of patriotism of Obama were bogus — made up. He used a phrase of someone else without giving credit — who hasn’t done that?
The bitter comment, though, is more serious. It suggests that he doesn’t trust most Americans to react in the right way to the trade war, and furthermore it suggests that his own religion is a put-on. He seems to view people of faith in negative terms, while also claiming to be one — obviously that’s hypocritical.
The most serious issue with Obama is his lack of definition, and utter lack of accomplishments for someone in his position. There is no way that he should be where he is, and therefore Geraldine Ferraro is seeming more correct by the minute (like it or not). Would Oprah have backed him, if he were white? It seems like she was pretty keen on Hillary, before. So, yes, I think that Ferraro was correct in saying that Barack Obama wouldn’t be where he is without being black. That’s as racist as voting against him because of his color, or voting for McCain or Hillary due to color. (That’s as sexist as a voting for or against a candidate due to sex.)
Ultimately, it comes down to what’s best for this country, and likely it comes down to their positions on Iraq. Should our boys come home ASAP? If we do that, though, will it invite al Qaeda to take over Iraq and use it as a base to attack the world, including NYC, LA, Chicago, Houston, Boston, Atlanta, Miami, etc? Won’t we just end up sending more troops back into Iraq a 3rd time — the way we had to go back into Korea after leaving prematurely?

Posted by: S. Walker (independent) | April 14, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

Stop it. Just Stop it. I am switching to republican if Obama the weardo is nominated. Obama is a disgrace to the USA.

Posted by: amanda bellman | April 14, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

The biggest liar is OBAMA. Count them up. Rezko trial mentioned him and Michele at a known terrorists party, today. He said, he didn’t know the guy.
NO OBAMA.

Posted by: mj | April 14, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Thinking,
You are exactly right, I read that quote of his as well.

Posted by: ric | April 14, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

From CNN article 2004
In her suit, filed in 1994, Jones alleged that in May 1991, when Clinton was governor of Arkansas and she was a state employee, he groped her and exposed his genitals while they were alone in a Little Rock hotel room.
Clinton denied any wrongdoing.
When he was ordered by a federal judge to submit to a deposition from Jones’ lawyers, he appealed all the way to the Supreme Court, which refused to delay the case in 1997.
It was during the Jones deposition that Clinton was asked under oath about former White House intern Monica Lewinsky. His denial of a sexual relationship with her triggered an investigation that led to his impeachment by the House on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice.
Clinton eventually admitted to an “inappropriate” relationship with Lewinsky. He stayed in office after he was acquitted of the impeachment charges by the Senate.
Jones and Clinton settled their lawsuit in November 1998, when he agreed to pay her $850,000 but offered no apology or admission of guilt.
At the time, the suit had been dismissed by a federal judge, but Jones was challenging the dismissal on appeal.
In his new book, “My Life,” Clinton again denies harassing Jones. Expressing confidence that he would have won the case, he said he decided to settle the suit to put the scandal behind him.
But Jones said if Clinton really believed he would have won in court, “Why didn’t he take it all the way?” She said she believes she would have eventually won her suit.
“Nothing bothers this man,” she said. “I don’t understand it.”
Other women in Clinton’s life
Two other women who figured prominently in allegations swirling around Clinton’s personal behavior, Lewinsky and Gennifer Flowers, have also disputed the former president’s descriptions of their relationships in his book.
During the 1992 campaign, Flowers publicly disclosed that she had a 12-year affair with Clinton. He later admitted to an extramarital relationship with her but, in his book, insists “there was no 12-year affair.”
That prompted Flowers to issue a statement through her lawyer saying she was “sickened by his continued disregard for the truth.”
“Bill Clinton pretends to be contrite, but he continues to bear false witness against his neighbor. He is a national disgrace.”
In an interview with the British newspaper The Daily Mail, Lewinsky also took issue with Clinton’s characterizations of their relationship, including his statement that he had an affair with her because he could.
“He talked about it as though I had laid it all out there for the taking. I was the buffet, and he just couldn’t resist the dessert. That’s not how it was. This was a mutual relationship, mutual on all levels,” she said. (Full story)

Posted by: Lone Ranger | April 14, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

Hello. Can someone tell this man to shut up.
People are not bitter with 100 million as income. People are not bitter when you are collecting loby money from china and columbia. People are not bitter when the economy is going down and people are loosing jobs. Please let us hear word Bill

Posted by: mariakrow | April 14, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

I am tired of this Obama guy. Nothing but a plain lying canidate. His comments, racist embracements, elitist remarks make me sick. He needs to leave the US if he don’t like us.

Posted by: Alicia C | April 14, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

I’m a 75 year old Democrat and have seen more of life than most. I may not be alive for another presidential election but If Hillary is the candidate in November, I will stay home! How long do you think it’s going to take Bill to stray once he’s in the White House again without power, needing something to boost his ego! I had enough of that last time and don’t want him anywhere near the White House!

Posted by: mandy33 | April 14, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

Who listens to Bill anymore? And…….once Barack really gets to Indiana, he will trump that Annie Oakley whiskey shooting fool.
Bill should concern himself more with his illegial foreign interests and that billion dollar donor list for his library.

Posted by: Sylvia | April 14, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

I understand why somebody lies about having an affair, but what is the point about lying about people having a specific sign?
I just don’t understand it.

Posted by: johnnydrama | April 14, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

So Bill thinks voters aren’t bitter. If they are n’t bitter, they should be, and they should be bitter at politicians like Clinton and Hillary. Politicians lie to them, use them and then forget them. Example: Bill Clinton came through Ohio , Michigan and Pennsylvania in 1992 and loudly proclaimed that he would never finalize the NAFTA treaty without renegotiating the treaty. Once in office, he almost immediately went back on his word, accepted the Bush1 treaty with no changes and pushed it through the Senate. And he never went back to those people he promised to fight for and told them why he abandoned his promise. Those voters should be bitter and they are delusional if they believe Hillary, or her husband, are one of them.

Posted by: Dennis | April 14, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

I live in Central PA, and I am indeed bitter.
Bitter that I have to put up with this garbage from the Clinton campaign every day.
Come on PA!! Let’s end this thing right here next week.
Obama ’08

Posted by: Susan | April 14, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

No, those voters are not bitter; they think the Clintons will give them some money to make life lots better. And those voters who think that, are more ignorant than others who are not only bitter, but angrier than hell at the government (Bushco and Clinton). Don’t think for one minute those people aren’t angry, unless Clinton was talking to only the elite since those are really the only types Clintons want anything to do with. They will do “anything” for a vote for HRC – they would even stoop so low as to shovel sh*t if it meant getting votes! But they would bitch about it the minute the voters backs were turned because they can’t stand being around “blue collar workers” – they are afraid they may catch some disease from us! Foolish/ignorant voters who don’t see through this garbage – shame on them!

Posted by: Disparaged | April 14, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

The destructive policies of the Clintons and Bushes, are a bane to politics. Character assassination….. Ah forget it I am disgusted
Obmam08

Posted by: Thinking | April 14, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

Thank you Cheryl from Canada. You are so right. I can’t believe, as an American, that some ignorant people here don’t seem to realize that LIARS would make horrible presidents because we the people wound never know if the truth was being told since those people would have NO character and this is the most important trait. But some people are deaf, dumb and blind (not in the legal sense of those descriptions)! They just REFUSE to see LIARS when they stand right in front of their face. Like you say though, I will NEVER vote for Hill (and you get him too) because she is a PROVEN LIAR!

Posted by: Disparaged | April 14, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

Hey James, try just listening to what he says. I’m an independent, voted for Reagan, Bush, then Dem since then. Bill Clinton was a good president and a lousy man. Bush jr was predictably incompetent and divisive. Now Obama comes along and reminds us that Americans need to hang together, or as Franklin said, we will all hang separately. His legislative record appears as impressive as H Clinton’s to me. Clinton has clearly tried to exaggerate her accomplishments, i.e. Bosnia & others. Obama has attempted to open dialogue, though on the other hand it’s clear he’s not as well versed as Clinton on policy. Both have attacked each other, though what I notice is that Clinton keeps trying to attack Obama for silly things, and she gets boo’d for it. Also Wright was over the top, but what did he really say? God Damn America for treating people like property? Especially people of color? & by extension for the damage done to the black family that still is so far from being overcome? The condemnation of Wright is overdone – as is the condemnation of Hillary and Barack. America is the greatest nation, but we have done many bad things also. Many people don’t want to accept that though, and simply want to go on believing their most cherished beliefs, regardless of the reality in front of them. The problem is, nothing gets fixed that way. I see unreasoning hatred in many of the comments here, be they in support of Obama, Clinton, or McCain, particularly in the denigration of the opponent. I guess it’s not good enough to support your favorite, the others all have to be the modern incarnation of Satan for many of the folks on this thread. I support Obama, not because he’s a good orator, but because he starts from the right principles, as he makes clear in his speeches. His anti-lobbyist rhetoric carries weight with me, moreso than the other candidates. I don’t think he’s god, and I’m a lot older than 18 years old. I don’t agree with all of his policies (I’m an Independent), but I do think he’s the right man for right now. Only time will tell.

Posted by: JRM | April 14, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

Yes, I am bitter that a candidate can look down on me and other working families and call us “bitter” when in fact we are happy and hopeful of our future. Senator Obama is an arrogant, condescending and previleged man who feels he is the only ONE who has the answers. He is a liar and as corrupt as they come in politics. He lacks all the qualities of a candidate that most informed people would vote for. He dishes out dirt on other people when he himself is the dirty one.
GET LOST, OBAMA. America does not need you and your bigoty.

Posted by: Grandmother | April 14, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

Why doesn’t this report put in the first paragraph that Bill Clinton lied about seeing “I’m bitter” signs at seven different stops? It seems to me that’s the news. We already know the Clinton campaign is playing on this story. Why not put up front the fact that Clinton is misrepresenting his wife’s own supporters!

Posted by: Ohio Voter | April 14, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

I am not bitter when you lied to me Mr. cheating President. Remember wagging your fingers and in cold face saying “I did not have sexual relation with that woman”. Yes, I am not Bitter!

Posted by: Daniel | April 14, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

CAN ANYONE TELL ME THREE THINGS THAT SENATOR OBAMA DID THAT HAS MADE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA A BETTER PLACE FOR EACH AND EVERY CITIZEN. IF YOU CAN, YOU SHOULD BE THE PRESIDENT, NOT OBAMA. HE HAS DONE ABSOLUTELY NOTHING, NOTHING, NOTHING FOR SOUTH CHICAGO OR THE US THAT CAN BE CALLED PROGRESS.
HE IS OUT OF TOUCH WITH MOST AMERICAN FAMILIES. HE IS A FAKE. HE IS JUST TALK, TALK, TALK, TALK, TALK, LIES, LIES, LIES, LIES,—————-etc.

Posted by: Mary | April 14, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

Dear Bob from Pensylvannia, I know exactly what you are talking about as a blue collar worker here in VA. We were going to support her, but then we saw the way she talked down to us and had even said she would be the nominee by Super Tuesday – well we here in VA voted on Super Tuesday and guess what, she was not the nominee. She has been crass, rude, nasty, whiny, victim, and just a rotten human being ever since she lost Super Tuesday. Now she thinks that if she can tell PA about her duck hunting (at the Ducks Unlimited Store maybe) and have a drink wiht you all that she will prove what a good ole boy she is. Well we have come to realize that she will do ANYTHING for a vote – I mean anything. She has pretended to be so sad talking about MLKing when it was his holiday (but Paris Hilton would have done a better acting job and she can’t act at all)! So HRC did not get an academy award for her performance as it was the worst and such a phoney. So I am so glad to know that you are so smart because you are not “legally” blind, deaf, or mentally challenged. Once a person gives their vote to HRC, they never hear or see from her again until 4 years later when she needs you again to give her your vote. I’m proud of you and yours for NOT giving this LIAR, CHEATER, AND PHONEY your vote(s). Thank you again and God bless you and yours. I know (in my heart) Obama is really going to help us and I will keep you and yours in my prayers.

Posted by: Disparaged | April 14, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

Next we’ll find out that Bill just “misspoke” and there was actually sniper fire at those NC events and he couldn’t stick around long enough to check the scene out.

Posted by: Elrod | April 14, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

However you feel about Obama is fine…but as a Democratic Voter I am offended by how Hillary is trying to win ugly. Tearing down other Demcrates only makes Hillary look bad. This is why I moved to Obama from Clinton, because I do not like her tactics. She is a piece of work!!!
Dems Unite

Posted by: Gail | April 14, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

Bill should stay out of the fray, especially since he uttered similar unartful phrases about “economically insecure white men” in Los Angeles in September 1991.

Posted by: Rachael | April 14, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

Obama said those people are antipathy. Seems to me he’s the one who is really antipathy and completely lack of compassion. People are duped by some wealthy liberals in the america who love to destroy Clinton whatever way they could by propping up Obama. You don’t have to agree with people with faith and believe in 2nd amendment of constitution, but to show such contempt says loudly about the true color of this Obama character as well as his unqualification as a statesman. Imagine what outcry the media will be bursting with if either McCain or Hillary disparage African Americans with similar contemptuous remarks. They will be crucifixed by the media immediately. Here Obama and his supporters not only shown no sign of remorse, they even belittle the insensitivity and continues their offensive smear against Hillary. What arrogance projecting himself champion of hope and change and comparing himself as Kennedy and MLK. He’s nothing but another cunning politician, American are misled.

Posted by: JJ-VA | April 14, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

THANK YOU, JRM!
This election I’m voting American. Enough of the Republican and Democrat labels.
What is best for the country?
And anyone who calls Sen. Obama arrogant and elitist hasn’t really listened to him or his story. Shame on you!
BTW, did anyone actually see HRC go duck hunting? I don’t believe her.

Posted by: hofkurz | April 14, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

I do not understand what the bickering is all about…he said, she said…and so many misguided folks that cannot post anything rational but resort to name calling. No wonder this country is in so much trouble.
The race is over. There is a mathematician on the UD site who does stats every week on the primary season. Good stuff – it is quite long but it should shut some people up. And it surely beats the name calling!
This report is posted at: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=5493720&mesg_id=5493720
THE MATH – Monday, April 14 – One Week Before Pennsylvania
TIME: 6:00 a.m. Eastern (US)
Delegates needed to win nomination – 2,023.5 (considering status quo)
Pledged Delegates in – 2,687.0 of 3,253.0 – 82.6%
********************************************
THE MAGIC NUMBER
Here’s what we have after considering the information in the Polls section below:
Senator Obama’s Magic Number – 93 of 304 remaining superdelegates needed, or 30.6%
Senator Clinton’s Magic Number – 230 of 304 remaining superdelegates needed, or 75.7%
The Huckabee Index – 74 (or 24.3% of remaining superdelegates needed)
The “Huckabee Index” is the number of any combination of superdelegates and convention/caucus delegates that the Obama campaign needs (or the Clinton campaign loses) to make it mathematically impossible for the Clinton campaign to win the nomination, based on current delegate count and polls for upcoming contests. (Disclaimer: This is meant to poke fun at Mike Huckabee, not Hillary Clinton)
Spreadsheet for Current Data
Spreadsheet for Magic Numbers and Huckabee Index
PROJECTED END-RESULTS OF PRIMARIES BASED ON POLLS:
Projected Pledged Delegates:
Barack Obama – 1,700.5 (74 above HALF)
Hillary Clinton – 1,534.5 (92 below HALF)
Projected “Popular” Vote (unweighted) without Florida and Michigan:
Barack Obama – 16,675,542 (+663,192)
Hillary Clinton – 16,012,350
Projected “Popular” Vote (unweighted) with Florida and Michigan added*:
Barack Obama – 17,251,756 (+40,111)
Hillary Clinton – 17,211,645
*Uncommitted – 238,168 (Michigan only, Obama wasn’t on the ballot)
********************************************
TOTAL DELEGATES
Estimated Total Delegates as of April 14:
Barack Obama – 1,654.5 (369.0 short)
Hillary Clinton – 1,502.5 (521.0 short)
Remaining Total Delegates – 871.0
(Sources: NBC, Wikipedia 4/14/08)
SUPERDELEGATES
Superdelegates (highest reported for each candidate):
Barack Obama – 230 (Source: NBC 4/14/08)
Hillary Clinton – 259 (Source: NBC 4/14/08)
Remaining Superdelegates – 304
PLEDGED DELEGATES
Estimated Pledged Delegates as of April 14:
Barack Obama – 1,420.5 (206.0 short of HALF)
Hillary Clinton – 1,248.5 (378.0 short of HALF)
Remaining Pledged Delegates – 566.0
(Source: Wikipedia 4/14/08)
OVERALL CONTESTS WON: Barack Obama – 30; Hillary Clinton – 15
PRIMARIES WON: Barack Obama – 16; Hillary Clinton – 12
CAUCUSES WON: Barack Obama – 14; Hillary Clinton – 3
BLUE AND RED STATES WON:
Barack Obama – 11 Blue, 16 Red
Hillary Clinton – 6 Blue, 8 Red
********************************************
POPULAR VOTE (for informational purposes only)
Total weighted* popular vote as of April 14:
Barack Obama – 15,812,583 (+1,761,239)
Hilary Clinton – 14,051,344
*Weighted popular vote adds primary votes and 5.5:1 skew of caucus votes
Status Quo unweighted as of April 14:
Barack Obama – 13,689,293 (+827,308)
Hillary Clinton – 12,861,985
(Source: Wikipedia 4/14/08)
Primaries only (Status Quo) as of April 14:
Barack Obama – 13,218,123 (+620,440)
Hillary Clinton – 12,597,683
Caucuses only weighted* popular vote as of April 14:
Barack Obama – 2,594,460 (+1,140,799)
Hilary Clinton – 1,453,661
*Weighted popular vote adds primary votes and 5.5:1 skew of caucus votes
Caucuses only (Status Quo) unweighted total caucus votes as of April 14:
Barack Obama – 471,170 (+206,868 caucus votes)
Hillary Clinton – 264,302
(IA,NV,AK,AS,CO,ID,KS,MN,NM,ND,NE,VI,WA*,ME,HI,TX*,WY,Guam)
With Florida only added, weighted as of April 14:
Barack Obama – 16,388,797 (+1,466,467)
Hillary Clinton – 14,922,330
With Florida only added, unweighted as of April 14:
Barack Obama – 14,265,507 (+532,536)
Hillary Clinton – 13,732,971
With Michigan only added, weighted as of April 14*:
Barack Obama – 15,812,583 (+1,432,930)
Hillary Clinton – 14,379,653
*Uncommitted – 238,168 (Michigan only, Obama wasn’t on the ballot)
With Michigan only added, unweighted as of April 14*:
Barack Obama – 13,689,293 (+498,999)
Hillary Clinton – 13,190,294
*Uncommitted – 238,168 (Michigan only, Obama wasn’t on the ballot)
With Florida AND Michigan added, weighted as of April 14*:
Barack Obama – 16,388,797 (+1,138,158)
Hillary Clinton – 15,250,639
*Uncommitted – 238,168 (Michigan only, Obama wasn’t on the ballot)
With Florida AND Michigan added, unweighted as of April 14*:
Barack Obama – 14,265,507 (+204,227)
Hillary Clinton – 14,061,280
*Uncommitted – 238,168 (Michigan only, Obama wasn’t on the ballot)
********************************************
POLLS FOR UPCOMING CONTESTS, USED TO DERIVE THE “MAGIC NUMBER”
Polls have been released for some of the upcoming contests. Where no polls are available, I have marked it as “No Poll” and used a 50/50 calculation for that contest’s pledged delegates. Obviously this information will change, and I plan on updating these calculations whenever we have new or updated polls.
Pennsylvania (April 22): Clinton +4.0 (Zogby 4/8)
Guam (May 3): No Poll
Indiana (May 6): Clinton +9.0 (ARG 4/3)
North Carolina (May 6): Obama +21.0 (PPP 4/7)
West Virginia (May 13): Clinton +28.0 (Rasmussen 3/20)
Kentucky (May 20): Clinton +29.0% (SurveyUSA 3/31)
Oregon (May 20): Obama +10 (SUSA 4/6)
Puerto Rico (June 1): Clinton +13 (Reg y Reg 4/9)
Montana (June 3): Outdated Poll (before Super Tuesday)
South Dakota (June 3): No Poll
If anyone has links to new or more recent polls, please share. Thanks!
********************************************
SUPERDELEGATES NEEDED IF REMAINING PLEDGED DELEGATES ARE 50/50 SPLIT
All scenarios (2 through 9) showing Florida or Michigan being seated as is or holding new elections have been removed.
Hillary Clinton needs #/% of remaining superdelegates if remaining pledged is 50/50:
1. Status Quo – Clinton needs 233 of 304, or 76.6% of remaining SDs
10. FL Half-count, MI not seated – Clinton needs 230 of 305, or 75.2% of remaining SDs
11. FL not seated, MI Compromise – Clinton needs 222 of 316, or 70.1% of remaining SDs
12. FL Half-count, MI Compromise – Clinton needs 218 of 317, or 68.6% of remaining SDs
Barack Obama needs #/% of remaining superdelegates if remaining pledged is 50/50:
1. Status Quo – Obama needs 90 of 304, or 29.6% of remaining SDs
10. FL Half-count, MI not seated – Obama needs 108 of 305, or 35.2% of remaining SDs
11. FL not seated, MI Compromise – Obama needs 95 of 316, or 29.9% of remaining SDs
12. FL Half-count, MI Compromise – Obama needs 112 of 317, or 35.2% of remaining SDs
The “Florida Half-count” would net 52.5 pledged delegates for Senator Clinton and 33.5 pledged delegates for Senator Obama. The “Michigan Compromise” would net 83.0 pledged delegates for Senator Clinton and 73.0 pledged delegates for Senator Obama.
********************************************
SUPERDELEGATES NEEDED IF REMAINING PLEDGED DELEGATES ARE 55/45 CLINTON
All scenarios (2 through 9) showing Florida or Michigan being seated as is or holding new elections have been removed.
Hillary Clinton needs #/% of remaining superdelegates if remaining pledged is 55/45:
1. Status Quo – Clinton needs 204 of 304, or 67.1% of remaining SDs
10. FL Half-count, MI not seated – Clinton needs 201 of 305, or 65.7% of remaining SDs
11. FL not seated, MI Compromise – Clinton needs 193 of 316, or 60.9% of remaining SDs
12. FL Half-count, MI Compromise – Clinton needs 189 of 317, or 59.5% of remaining SDs
Barack Obama needs #/% of remaining superdelegates if remaining pledged is 55/45:
1. Status Quo – Obama needs 119 of 304, or 39.1% of remaining SDs
10. FL Half-count, MI not seated – Obama needs 137 of 305, or 44.8% of remaining SDs
11. FL not seated, MI Compromise – Obama needs 124 of 316, or 39.1% of remaining SDs
12. FL Half-count, MI Compromise – Obama needs 141 of 317, or 44.3% of remaining SDs
The “Florida Half-count” would net 52.5 pledged delegates for Senator Clinton and 33.5 pledged delegates for Senator Obama. The “Michigan Compromise” would net 83.0 pledged delegates for Senator Clinton and 73.0 pledged delegates for Senator Obama.
*********************************************
FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN SCENARIOS REGARDING PLEDGED DELEGATES
These are the possible scenarios concerning Florida and Michigan, and what it would require for Senator Clinton to catch up to Senator Obama in pledged delegates. These scenarios are for pledged delegates only. Superdelegate counts are not included. (Note: All scenarios (2 through 9) showing Florida or Michigan being seated as is or holding new elections have been removed.)
The “Florida Half-count” would net 52.5 pledged delegates for Senator Clinton and 33.5 pledged delegates for Senator Obama. The “Michigan Compromise” would net 83.0 pledged delegates for Senator Clinton and 73.0 pledged delegates for Senator Obama.
Scenario 1 – Status Quo (without Florida and Michigan)
Senator Obama needs 34.8% of all pledged delegates in remaining contests to stay ahead
Senator Clinton needs 65.2% of all pledged delegates in remaining contests to catch up
Scenario 10 – Florida Half-count, Michigan not seated
Senator Obama needs 36.5% of all pledged delegates in remaining contests to stay ahead
Senator Clinton needs 63.5% of all pledged delegates in remaining contests to catch up
Scenario 11 – Florida not seated, Michigan Compromise
Senator Obama needs 35.7% of all pledged delegates in remaining contests to stay ahead
Senator Clinton needs 64.3% of all pledged delegates in remaining contests to catch up
Scenario 12 – Florida Half-count, Michigan Compromise
Senator Obama needs 37.4% of all pledged delegates in remaining contests to stay ahead
Senator Clinton needs 62.6% of all pledged delegates in remaining contests to catch up
********************************************
More Links:
Brokered Convention
Official Delegate Selection Rules for the 2008 Democratic National Convention
Links to the spreadsheets (feel free to download and create your own scenarios):
Spreadsheet for Current Data
Spreadsheet for Magic Numbers and Huckabee Index
Link to my journal … For past editions, click on the link to view my past journal entries:
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/phrigndumass

Posted by: sandy | April 14, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

hey hanna id rather live in a usa under hillary or mcain than live in a usa with a antiamerican marxist trying to show us the reeducated way of true liberation marxist theology.so call me names i really dont care saint obama has hung himself with his own words both in his books and in his statements.GO HILLARY

Posted by: don tufts | April 14, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

Clinton or McCain 2008 !!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: keith | April 14, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

We luv Hillary & Bill, the buckhorn
crowd.

Posted by: Fannie | April 14, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

Gosh let’s see if anyone with a brain respects his opinion: Empeached, disbarred, real issues with women that include an inability to remain faithful, NAFTA, 111 Million dollars that came from countries that want to take from US workers, Bosnia and genocide…..gosh I am not sure where to stop!
But hey go ahead and send money to a campagin that has no hope of winning other than allowing the Republican s to win come November. NO ONE in Washinton, other than those looking to make more money, want them back…so guess what? Hillary 2008 ain’t happening….the media just dosen’t want you guys to know it yet LOL

Posted by: Brian | April 14, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

Bill probably saw the “I Am Not Bitter” signs right before Hillary borrowed them to shoot at for target practice.

Posted by: marie burns | April 14, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

Being bitter is good for U- makes u get up in the morning and try to go to a job. Don’t have to wait on the secret service or the limo.
I’ve got Clinton fatigue.

Posted by: Marylynette Ferguson | April 14, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

who are these wishful, optimistic thinking folks believing in ‘turning things around’? These jobs that have gone overseas to India and Mexico are not coming back to your towns and cities. That’s reality. You all gave power to people who got your votes and then took your jobs and way of life away from you all. What did the government do for you working class blue collar workers? While you all got poor, the rich got richer. Bill Clinton made 150K in the past 7 years while the NAFTA that he pushed for took jobs away from you and how much money did you all make and save in the past 7 years, I like to know?
As the saying goes: fool me once shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Haven’t we all suffered enough?

Posted by: bitterme | April 14, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

sandy – the race is not over until the convention when a nominee is selected. Math scenarios do not apply since they are all just supposition and projections. After 1982, the DNC altered the rules to ensure that delegates can change camps as well as superdelegates. In addition, there are 76 unpledged delegates that will likely be appointed by the state parties in this historic election. Multiple ballots will be required to give either candidate the “half” of all delegates needed to get the nomination. Since we dont know how many actual delegates until convention time and we dont know who will vote which way on which ballot event, all of the projections are simply that – guesses however educated or historically based they may be. We have already seen that this election does not follow statistical precedence. There are 10 more contests and unknown factors yet to be determined. The only way the race can be over before the convention is if one of the candidates withdraws which is not likely.

Posted by: DCVoter | April 14, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

Bill Clinton is a lying cocksuckee.

Posted by: jeff | April 14, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

DCVoter – good evening! This guy posts stats every Monday. His figures have been right on every week. Even the scenarios. He is an Independent and has not decided who he is going to vote for. The thing I like about it is that he covers every possible scenario and like I said, he has been right on.
Anything can happen yet – that is true, but I honestly do not think this primary season is going to go all the way to the convention before it is settled. We will have a nominee before then.

Posted by: sandy | April 14, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

bitterme – the jobs that went away in PA did not go away because of NAFTA… they went to asia and india. The problem with all the candidates this year (as was for the past 12 years) is the perception that NAFTA in itself was bad for all Americans. It has been bad for some Americans and needs to be renegotiated for sure. It was brainchild of Bush Sr. and was pushed through by a filibuster and veto proof republican congress. The projections for its success at that time was strong but they were incorrect (benefitted business mostly). Bill Clinton signed it under that pressure and should have pushed for a better analysis with a delay and he failed to do that. This is the mistake he made politically. But as with all things, hindsight is better than foresight. A republican congress and president for the last 8 years has allowed it to continue unmodified because they are pro-big business. Put the blame where it lies please. Educate yourself about the real truths. Senator Clinton has pushed without Republican support to revamp NAFTA. Obama pushed a similar bill through for Peru that Clinton did not support. She has been consistent since running for President that she would revamp NAFTA or end it for the US if she is President. It will take a Democratic Congress and a Democratic President to make that happen. If Obama pushed a NAFTA-like agreement with Peru and has proposed similar ones with asian countries, we can be assured he would not revamp NAFTA or subsequent agreements in favor of the people.

Posted by: DCVoter | April 14, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

I can’t stand the way HRC makes me support her….I’m on the hook bc I donated to her losing campaign 4600 so I have to see this thing through…but I’m seekly hoping Obama wins. So ignore my pro Hillary anti-Obama statements as I don’t mean a word that type.
Tony

Posted by: tony | April 14, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

I guess I’m kind of heartened that we live in an age when two rich white men and a rich white woman can call a black, former civil rights attorney “elitist.” And I’m even more heartened that few people seem to be buying it.
The only sad thing is that I really used to like Bill. But I guess I can replace him in my heart with Obama.

Posted by: Chris | April 14, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

I am old and bitter and said some nasty things about Obama. Totally not me and who I him as I’m just a sweet nice old lady but judgment is clouded bc of cataracts….
Damn those cataracts.
Obama 08 bc my grandkids told to vote for him or else they would put me in a nursing home…yes, I have early alzheimers as well so I keep forgetting Hillary is the devil and I often need reminders to not vote for her.
So if you get more negative comments from me supporting the devil, errgh I mean Hillary, please put me in my rightful place.

Posted by: grandmother | April 14, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

Hillary losing would be like winning the lottery…a joyous occasion.

Posted by: tony | April 14, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

sandy it is technically impossible to have a nominee without a convention. I think you mean presumptive nominee. I too cover all scenarios in my own projections and have been accurate in my predictions for every state contest so far. I dont share them on a website because I work for a living. LOL I just have a short break before I resume teaching math tonight. An interesting item of note is the ARG polls which are fairly conservative (republican leaning). Last week they put Obama and Clinton in a statistical tie and are now projecting 20 point win for Clinton in PA. RIght now I think that is a little high but it is clear (with other polls now showing a shift to Clinton also) that public opinion has shifted in her favor. Time will tell once we see the trends. The bad part about any of the polls is not just the poor wording by some pollsters. But more so the interpretation of the results. Often a poll will show one candidate over another when if you actually look at the numbers there is a crossover indicating a statistical tie. The is true for some of the head to head matches as well as state contests. In any case, back to numeric projections, it is entirely possible for Clinton to overtake Obama in delegates (all) but not possible for either to get to 1/2 the total since we dont know what the total is or the allocation of MI and FL delegates (Dean made the reservations and the court cases are ongoing). The only way a presumptive nominee can be accomplished is if one of them withdraws. Asking either to do so is unprecedented. Funny how when Jesse Jackson in 1988 ran all the way to the convention (potentially jeopardizing the black voting bloc split from the party), he was heralded and respected for his effort. People calling for her to step down are definitely not interested in a democratically selected nominee and are applying different standards to her candidacy. Is it misogynistic? Possibly but as with any form of discrimination it is hard to prove.

Posted by: DCVoter | April 14, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

Statements not accurate! Since when do American voters care about accuracy?
No they like, Patriotic, Ma and Apple Pie, Bread and Butter.
We did that and got Bush twice, and loss of personal freedoms, endless war, lower statues in the world, not to mention loss of jobs, can’t afford that Apple Pie, cost of bread and butter sky high.
Oh yea did I mention that the rest of the world see us as Elitist, and Arrogant.

Posted by: Thinking | April 14, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

Bitter, hell yes. What Judy O’Bannon doesn’t tell you is what her husband did. He vetoed a bill that would have given the Native American Indian people a commission. I wasn’t going to post, but when I saw that she insinuated that everybody in Indiana is happy go lucky…..don’t think so Judy. And she knows it too, because we were really vocal about it when it happpened. Everybody needs to tell the truth. And we all need to remember what Jack said “you can’t handle the truth”
OBAMA ’08

Posted by: debra | April 14, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

Can’t we all just get along?
DCVoter has some nice points; Clinton should not be pressured to leave the campaign. Heck, it is so close to the end at this point that leaving would not make sense for anyone, especially one who has races ahead that can clearly be won.
Still, lets not get crazy. The candidate who entered this race as the presumptive nominee has been out maneuvered in so many contests that it really calls into question her status. Why was she the front-runner if she loses twice as often as she wins?

Posted by: jericho4119 | April 14, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

An elitist is someone who believes in ruling by a party of the few elites. This means an elitist believes their group knows best regardless of what people think. We can then conclude an elitist places themselves “above” others and stereotypes their behavior. The statements made by Obama were in response to a question about why rural voters are generally not voting for him. He chose to try to blame them based on stereotyping instead of saying he should work harder to get in touch with their needs and find out why they dont support him. He then tried to justify his statements about 5 times before finally saying he regrets his words. Even then, he tried to justify the regrets. The general perception now is that people dont believe his attempt at an apology because they believe he was or is being elitist and only regrets being caught talking about them in a stereotypical manner. Growing up in rural Texas, I can tell you he was off the mark completely and fully understand why people are offended. He may have cost the democrats the election in doing so as well as democratic races for Congress and other offices. Anyone notice his surrogates (the important ones) have been silent and MIA? I suspect that is because they know the damage may be irreparable.

Posted by: DCVoter | April 14, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

jericho – the most electable nominee is not determined by wins in states that wont vote dem in November. Her argument is sound based on how the electoral college works. Dont like the electoral college? Well you should work to get it changed if that is the case. But for this year, it still exists and has to be a determining factor. Obama’s wins would only net him 150+ electoral votes in states that will vote blue or are projected to swing blue. There are not enough left for him to approach 270 need to be President without the majority of Clinton supporters. For Clinton, she has won the equivalent of 260+ electoral votes and there are plenty left. Strong wins in the states she is projected to win of the remaining contests clearly help her accomplish 270 without Obama supporters. Additionally, she would have the popular vote total as well. This is the essence of the electability argument.

Posted by: DCVoter | April 14, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

DC – I supect some of the reasons the surrogates for Obama have been silent is this whole situation he wants to handle by himself. He ‘created,’ it, he will handle it. He does not need anyone running interference for him – he is his own man. Personally, I believe it is MSM that continually whips up a storm, and the supporters on both side go crazy. We all support the candidate we support – name calling and mudslinging accomplishes nothing but hurt feelings and more negative reactions. In the end we are all going to have to come together and support the Democratic candidate. You and I are on opposite sides of the candidate spectruum – I have respect for your stand, I hope you have respect for mine.

Posted by: sandy | April 14, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

Bill and Hillaryous:
You ‘bitter’ watch out, you ‘bitter’ not cry, you ‘bitter’ watch out, I’m tellin’ you why…
Barack Obama is coming to your former town!!!

Posted by: reef 133 | April 14, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

With all of her talk about grace and the “Holy Spirit” surrounding her, one would think that compassion and forgiveness isn’t also the job description of the Holy Spirit.
When you are down & out & with absolutely no where to turn, you can be sure that, when you finally get on your knees you aren’t calling on the name of Hillary!
Obama needs to turn this page, and stay on point. There’s always going to be a snake in the trees.
OBAMA 08

Posted by: M.H | April 14, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

I do respect your stand sandy even if I do not agree. As an Independent with a liberal view of the world you might find my stand unusual. However, I am an American first and I know many Independents not participating in the primary season (as usual) who will not support Obama. Recent news coverage shows that the analysts are looking at this as well. Yesterday’s article projects as much as 1/3 of the electorate are Independents may sway the dem nomination and possibly the election in Novemeber. Given that 44% of the country declare themselves as Independents (unlike 26% in 2004), I would bet the latests anaylsis may be on target.
I do not believe an inexperienced intellectual at this time in our history is the best thing for our security and our economic recovery. There are many points I could discuss but no argument would change my support anymore than I suspect it would change yours. Each of us posts out of interest or potential hope of influencing voters who have yet to vote. Debating is a great educational tool. Only the candidates’ actions could influence those like us who have already decided who we support. My interest now is as an American and mathematician. It will be interesting to see how the sociological influences and the political processes come into play as we approach convention time and the GE. The last state convention is June 29. By July 1, there will be a more definitive picture of the numbers but, as previously stated, the multi ballot convention is the only thing that selects a nominee.
I suspect we may see something interesting happen with party politics for the future.
Since it is not possible for Obama as the nominee to beat McCain without the majority of Clinton supporters, party unity is required for a win against McCain. If he is the nominee, much work would have to be done to ensure party unity and possibly an Obama/Clinton ticket. End result? Obama needs Clinton’s support and party unity of which the latter is not predictable.
Since Clinton has shown she can win enough electoral votes without party unity, she could potentially beat McCain without the majority of Obama supporters (many are not core democrats). She could therefore win without Obama on the ticket even though unity would ensure a win against McCain.
Many in the party are comparing Obama (at this point in time) to Kerry and Carter on electability. The voters are hard split between the candidates for a variety of reasons. Independents are not solidly going to support a Democratic nominee and they are the swing vote this year.
Does this mean the party may split over this primary season? If there was ever a time since the inception of the Democratic party, the time is ripe for a new or revamped party to evolve. The two party system no longer holds a working majority of the electorate. The republican party is split along wing lines. The democratic party is split among wing lines. If the DNC screws up this year and loses in November, well they deserve what they get IMHO. They have shown themselves to be incompetent in winning any election for President when the liberal wing is in control since LBJ – this is the case for all but the Clinton years when moderates had control of the party.
One important fact that many voters are unaware of is that whenever we had a moderate controlled Democratic congress, the country prospered economically and socially regardless of the party the President belonged to. From that persepective, the more important races are for Congress not President. Unfortunately, with so many voters tending to cast their vote along party lines, the presidential race is the one that influences congressional race results. This is why so many party power players are concerned – not because they are split between Clinton and Obama – but because they are worried a Democrat will not win in Nov. The electability argument has therefore become even more important and I think Clinton has that argument won. We shall see in July what happens. If the DNC is smart, they will move the convention to July instead of August.

Posted by: DCVoter | April 14, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Senator Obama showed empathy and discipline for workers of pennsylvannia (as disciplinarian father) and drooling Clinton jumping at the role of over-indulgent grandmother smothering workers as if the American workers were whimpy.
In order to fix a problem we first have to create awarness.

Posted by: alma Ludivina | April 14, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

EL…don’t kid yourself Obama’s campaign is orchestrating daily attacks on hillary and then his surrogates are in control of a not so “unbiased” media…in addition your hero attacks Hillary daily from his stump speeches.
“You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone…And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”
He needs to stop trying to kill the messenger and clean up his own mess….

Posted by: Jackie | April 14, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

Let’s ask Hilliary what Bill Clinton
meant by his comments.
All these economically insecure white people who are scared to death,”…
As the rumination continues over Barack Obama’s comments about economically-depressed small town voters, statements made by Bill Clinton on the same topic — uttered while he was running for president in 1991 — have now surfaced.
“The reason (George H. W. Bush’s tactic) works so well now is that you have all these economically insecure white people who are scared to death,” Clinton was quoted saying by the Los Angeles Times in September 1991.
A couple months later, Joe Klein, writing for the Sunday Times, reported that Clinton made the following remarks:
“You know, he [Bush] wants to divide us over race. I’m from the South. I understand this. This quota deal they’re gonna pull in the next election is the same old scam they’ve been pulling on us for decade after decade after decade. When their economic policies fail, when the country’s coming apart rather than coming together, what do they do? They find the most economically insecure white men and scare the living daylights out of them. They know if they can keep us looking at each other across a racial divide, if I can look at Bobby Rush and think, Bobby wants my job, my promotion, then neither of us can look at George Bush and say, ‘What happened to everybody’s job? What happened to everybody’s income? What … have … you … done … to … our … country?’”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/13/bill-clinton-flashback-al_n_96433.html

Posted by: Brenda | April 14, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

I will vote for McCain if senator Obama is not the candidate, I think Condy Rice will be the VP, she is very intelligent and well spoken, and also has the experience.

Posted by: alma Ludivina | April 14, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

Loved the part about Bill’s “evolving” truth. I’d say it’s more a matter of mutation, though.
The Clinton’s have no one to blame but themselves.
This was theirs to lose. And they have.
Either way.

Posted by: KS2 Problema | April 14, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

Greg….Obama’s campaign has put out memos accusing her of racism in South Carolina..Early on he put out ads saying “She’ll say or do anything to get elected” He has run the most negative campaign in history and continues to insist he’s practricing the politics of hope..in December 2007 his spiritual mentor attacked Hillary from behind the pulpit…
Daily he attacks her on the stump. His surrogates demand she quit the race…What are you talking about? Obama’s attacks on Hillary have never stopped…He has the MSM 100% behind him…and still she has a virtual tie for the nomination…

Posted by: Jackie | April 14, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

I will watch Obama win and Clinton lose while drinking a double espresso. That will be bitter-sweet moment for me.

Posted by: Jason | April 14, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

James, your statement about Oboma looking down on hard working Americans is ridiculous. The one that is looking down and laughing at you is $109 million dollar making, whiskey drinking, dodging bullets Hilliary. And it does not matter what people like you think about Oboma. Admit it, you were not going to vote for him anyway!

Posted by: Brenda | April 14, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

Is he just a pathological liar? Why can’t Clinton manage to tell the truth?

Posted by: janet | April 14, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

To observer; you must be foaming at the mouth–because how dare anyone disagree with your way of thinking??You seem like a know it all. Are you one of those –my way or the high way sort of people.You must not have any friends–because you are too angry and bitter to be around.

Posted by: orange cat | April 14, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

To observer; you must be foaming at the mouth–because how dare anyone disagree with your way of thinking??You seem like a know it all. Are you one of those –my way or the high way sort of people.You must not have any friends–because you are too angry and bitter to be around.

Posted by: orange cat | April 14, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

I’m surprised that the impeached Presidential Rapist Bill Clinton (who had no shame and refused to resign like Nixon), is even allowed to comment.
Oh, that’s right he was disbarred for lying also.
I guess that gives him credibility.
His wife slept with the impeached rapist and stayed married, thus covering for him.
That makes her Presidential…. as long as she sleeps with Bill.
You know, as bad as the Repuiblicans are, you cannot pull someone down like that , unless, you are given an in.
Looking beyond Monica…
The corrupt Clintons have done more damage to the Democratic Party than any other Democratic president in memory.
Because of Bill Clinton’s lies, we lost out to GW Bush. Let’s not forget that.

Posted by: Chuck | April 14, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

if you fools vote for McSame or Shillery you will get what you deserve for picking old school oportunists
if you respond to her negativity and pandering you deserve 4 more years of whats to come…..

Posted by: robin m | April 14, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

It is not unusual when life’s circumstances have been disappointing for bitterness to take root and begin to grow. For the Clintons and their supporters the campaign may not turn out as they expected.There are signs of a bitter root beginning to take hold. The bitterness is directed toward Barack Obama.The Clintons and their supporters can either let the root grow,as they presently are, or weed it out, as they may never do.

Posted by: kent | April 14, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

It is not unusual when life’s circumstances have been disappointing for bitterness to take root and begin to grow. For the Clintons and their supporters the campaign may not turn out as they expected.There are signs of a bitter root beginning to take hold. The bitterness is directed toward Barack Obama.The Clintons and their supporters can either let the root grow,as they presently are, or weed it out, as they may never do.

Posted by: kent | April 14, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

Did Bill turn beet red and wag his finger like an angry schoolmarm while he was lying? It always cracks me up when he does that.

Posted by: Dearlittlemonkey | April 15, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

I love Hillary and Bill. So what if they made a 100 million dollars in 7 years? So what if he had sex (or didnt) with that woman in the oval office? So what if she called someone a jew b#^*^#^? She what if she lied about her foreign policy experience? So what if she could not accomplish in 8 years what she says she wants to do as president? So what? At least she says the right things about God, about Guns, and small towns.

Posted by: Linda | April 15, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Of course there were signs, didnt you people see the Snipers waving them!

Posted by: CM Hussein | April 15, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

So just a few more lies from the Clintons, what else is new. For those who prefer this to a man who tries to understand and explain small town American, you can have exactly what you deserve with four more years under a Republican administration given the Clintons search and destroy policy. If any of you really believe that she is electable you are living in the same Bosnia sniper fire reality as your candidate. Good luck, you’ll need it.

Posted by: Fed up | April 15, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

So just a few more lies from the Clintons, what else is new. For those who prefer this to a man who tries to understand and explain small town American, you can have exactly what you deserve with four more years under a Republican administration given the Clintons search and destroy policy. If any of you really believe that she is electable you are living in the same Bosnia sniper fire reality as your candidate. Good luck, you’ll need it.

Posted by: Fed up | April 15, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

I think it is kinda sad actually that everyone can’t talk with out fear of their remarks being picked apart. Obama should have mentioned gas prices. I am bitter every day I get up and drive somewhere. They really need to talk about why we are bitter that gas is crazy expensive.

Posted by: Larmaggy | April 15, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

Tony,
You didn’t really say, “…if he is this uppity now…” about Sen. Obama, did you? I hope you are an Obama supporter and were just being really sarcastic. I keep hoping that there aren’t folks with those racist ideas anymore, but I guess you just confirmed that there are! If Obama loses, as extraordinary as he is, racism will be the major culprit

Posted by: Racism is alive! | April 15, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

Bill in a word is delusional and yes racism is alive and well Tony.

Posted by: Gaby | April 15, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am

YES I AM BITTER! and have been for quite sometime. I am a hard working american and has felt that the government has not been working for the good of all people, only for a few! Everybody knows it! It has been a hot topic for a many many years. I dont live in pennsylvania but these are my sentiments EXACTLY! That’s why I support senator Barack Obama because I believe he is going to make a postive change where this issue is concered! And with this country in the situation it is in TODAY, YEAH, I am bitter. I have felt left out of the American process. And it seems more than obvious there has been no consideration for the working and disadvantaged American people. So for Senator Clinton to not know this is very hot issue for many many Americans does not speak well for her BEING IN TOUCH with ALL Americans. Yes, I’m bitter and to dismiss the issue is very insulting to me as an American. “Bitter” expresses what MANY of us feel. So, is that supposed to be what???? un-American or a bad thing or way to feel?? Just what is really going on here for people not to know this already…. it’s been talked about to DEATH! But no one in our government wants to address. IT’S A BIG ISSUE for America. Thank’s senator Obama for having the insight to recognize this and I look forward to him addressing this SPECIFIC issue. “PEOPLE are bitter. If our government does not know this, now they know it, yet still continue to ignore the problem. Lastly, I can’t believe NO ONE in Pennsylvania is not “Bitter” and why senator Clinton does not recognize this. As, a woman I admire and respect sentor Clinton, I think she is great! But for as long as she and former president Bill clinton where in office, this issue is somehow “NEW” or “UNHEARD OF” reflects how OUT OF TOUCH with America she really is!

Posted by: marja j | April 15, 2008, 8:12 am 8:12 am

Who wants to talk about what the Clintons DO…instead of what the twist, manipulate and manufacture in the news? They are superior campaigners but what they Actually DO is contradict themselves for cash….she does not support Columbian trade deal…he does and made $800,000 doing so. Why is this not in the news? They rely on the media to put the spin out and creat the ‘bitter’ flurry…yet feel they can escape scrutiny for what they actually do!! C’mon ABC….send someone out the get the story on the TV…

Posted by: R | April 15, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am

Were any reporters present when Clinton met with the gentleman in Pennsylvania? I already know the answer. NO. When a candidate is talking privately with a voter, the operative word is PRIVATE. How can this propagandist make his claim. He can’t even name the alledged reporter who supposedly heard this private talk. How lame is that. What does entirely accurate mean. Does it mean that 6 out of 7 stops voters had signs. It means that this reporter has no leg to stand on, but thought he could go on the limb with this statement because of its vagueness. It is called creating news where none exists. Journalistic integrity has gone down the tubes.

Posted by: Ed | April 15, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am

Bill Clinton sees many non-existant things as well as those signs. Sometimes what he sees is scary.

Posted by: Dennis | April 15, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

I lived in Denver Indiana, and i was bitter at the government for ignoring us while raising taxes and spending more and more, causing our inflation. i move to Ball State and muncie is the same way, the population is declining. We are bitter because the government promises to help us, and just raises prices.I’ve seen too many buisnesses go out, and nothing to replace them. I’ve spent my whole life under bush and clinton (yes, Im 22) and they have done nothing. We cling to what we can, as everything else is taken away.
I’d hate to meet the person who isn’t bitter and believes the government has helped rural indiana for the last 24 years.

Posted by: Redbeardo | April 15, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

The Clintons are truly a pre-web political phenomena. If the Internet had been as advanced in 1992 as it is today, there is no way that Bill Clinton would have been elected president. Habitually shading the truth out of political expediency might have worked back then, the but it doesn’t work today. But he still doesn’t get that part, nor does his wife, apparently. And that’s why she is going to lose.

Posted by: Tim Allik | April 15, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

It’s all too clear who is really out of touch. The Clintons have lost it.

Posted by: Melissa | April 15, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

Time to take you ruined legacy and ride off into the sunset Bill.

Posted by: BrianInMKE | April 16, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.