Bill Clinton Says Hillary Tried to Join the Army
A big Indiana national security endorsement today for Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill.
9/11 Commission Vice chair Lee Hamilton, a former member of Congress from the Hoosier state, announced that he’s backing the lanky Illinoisan.
Possibly to avoid being one-upped on Indiana national security politics, former President Bill Clinton told a crowd in Columbus, Indiana, today that his wife had tried to join the Army.
Listen to an excerpt HERE.
"I remember when we were young, right out of law school, she went down and tried to join the Army and they said ‘Your eyes are so bad, nobody will take you,’" he said, after heralding her record on issues of concern to the military, such as body armor and access to health care.
I assume this is a version of the "Hillary Clinton tried to join the Marines" anecdote that then-First Lady Clinton told in 1994 that we wondered about since it’s a story she never seems to have told again.
The original story was that in Fayetteville, Arkansas, in 1975, Hillary walked into a local Marines recruiting office. The Marine recruiter looked at her, she recalled, and asked how old she was. Twenty-seven, she said.
"He looked at me, and in those days that was before I learned how to wear contact lenses," Sen. Clinton told a crowd of women veterans in 1994. "I had these really thick glasses on. He said, ‘How bad’s your eyesight?’ I said, ‘It’s pretty bad.’ …Finally said to me, he said, ‘You’re too old. You can’t see. And you’re a woman.…But maybe the dogs would take you.’"
("Dogs" being a reference to the Army.)
Perhaps she did so — and hence Bill Clinton’s Army story today?
Or maybe he’s conflating the two stories?
(Add that Bosnian sniper fire, and you might have something there that Julia Roberts would want to option.)
– jpt
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
Good for her! At least she tried… I havent seen any reports that Obama tried at all!
Posted by: The Commander Guy | April 2, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
another story from the Clintons. They will never learn lessons from the previous exagerations. the Bosnia story is still on the news now they want to add another one. It is sad how this couple coupled of lies in trying to survive. Nice try!
Posted by: Politics | April 2, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
“He looked at me, and in those days that was before I learned how to wear contact lenses,” Sen. Clinton told a crowd of women veterans in 1994.
She had to LEARN ‘how’ to wear contact lenses?
That’s it.
I’ll vote for Obama.
Posted by: king | April 2, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
I’m not suprised.
Hillary even tried to become President of the United States.
Posted by: boras | April 2, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
Boy do I wish we could find that recruiter now.
We should give him a medal.
Posted by: bsmith | April 2, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
That training may have come in handy in Bosnia…….
GI JANE FOR PRESIDENT! WooHoo!
Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | April 2, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
Willingly suspending disbelief for a moment, why would Bill be proud of this since he gamed the draft system to -quote- “maintain my political viability” -unquote-.
Posted by: Ryan | April 2, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
The real truth is that too much ‘sniper fire’ prevented Hilary enlisting. lol
Anyone who believes the Clintons are as nuts as they are liars! lol
Posted by: New Yorker | April 2, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
In fact, the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette noted back in 1994:
At the time, the future first lady was 13 months into her job as an assistant professor of law at the U of A. She was also the director of the university’s Legal Aid Clinic. All this while she kept a private law practice. Meanwhile, Bill Clinton loomed as the odds-on favorite in the upcoming attorney general’s race.
Kind of an odd time to join the Marines, no?
And kind of odd that with all of the attention on Hillary Clinton all through the years, all those interviews, all those profiles, it never was mentioned until she addressed a lunch on Capitol Hill honoring military women…
Posted by: krach | April 2, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
Yes, Hillary also tried (?) to tell the truth…but ended up telling seome patheic lies.
And who is testifying that effort of Hillary: arguably THE BIGGEST PATHOLOGICAL LIER in our recent history.
Posted by: moeen | April 2, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
On July 24, 1994, a columnist for the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reprinted a letter from an enlisting officer which reportedly appeared in the July 11 edition of the Navy Times:
“I was assigned as an enlisting officer in an Armed Forces Examining and Entrance Station in one of the largest major metropolitan areas in the country in 1974-75 and would like to present a few facts that relate to how difficult it was to get into the service at that time.”
(…)
“Recruiters were desperate to get anyone they could into the service. I personally witnessed the following abuses:
— A legally blind recruit who had undergone cataract surgery.
— A Marine recruit with a medical history of polio who had special waivers from the Corps to get in.
— Recruits with records of assault and battery, grand theft auto, sodomy, and lighting fire bombs in their high school cafeteria. Many applicants were given five choices by judges — Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force or jail — and we were grateful to get them.
— One recruit with an AFQT score of 16 whose DD Form 4 guaranteed him ballistic missile guidance repairman school.
It is my strong belief that recruiting in Arkansas was no better than where I served; in fact, it was probably worse. From my own experience, I have no doubt that if a 27-year-old female with a doctor or bachelor of laws had appeared before any recruiter’s desk and inquired about entry into the armed forces, that recruiter would have probably been willing to violate a half-dozen clauses of the UCMJ to get her in.”
Posted by: bsmith | April 2, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
How come every endorsement for Obama is a BIG endorsement? Clinton gets endorsements too and they’re never characterized as BIG. It’s like these polls that say 90% of this and that are for Obama when they only sampled a couple hundred people (from where they never say). Why anybody would want to get themselves into this political crap is beyond me and whatever you say, it goes for ALL the candidates.
Posted by: druggstohr | April 2, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
Will the Clintons ever quit lying?
Posted by: Jerry | April 2, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
And good news AGAIN.
The flow of superdelegates doesn’t seem to be slowing, as a former senator from Montana, John Melcher, says he’ll back Obama.
Posted by: greg | April 2, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
First the Rocky thing, now this. When will it ever cease?
Posted by: em | April 2, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
Well, that answers MY question. I just had a mildly critical comment of Obama removed. I guess Fox is the last “fair and balanced” outlet left.
Posted by: druggstohr | April 2, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
I’m not surprised as belligerent as she is even as a civilian…
Posted by: outragious008 | April 2, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
HURRAY HILLARY! Like I have been saying…Hillary is a better man than Obama. PEENSYLVANIA & INDIANA owe Hillary Landslides despite the orchestrated back stabs from the weak Democratic Party. They have acted like mafia bosses trying to ruin this beautiful woman…maybe simply for being female. Remember how Obama started with corrupt money and corrupt friends…sooner or later he will be tied into a scandal….
Posted by: Pete in TEXAS | April 2, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
Hillary has been endorsed by many retired military and flag generals. Not Obama. There is probably a reason for that. Hillary’s got brass.
Posted by: Got Brass? | April 2, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
If ol’ Bill said “I have white hair”, all the Obama folks would say he was lying. Even if they were looking straight at his head.
So, he might as well say whatever he wishes to, and not sweat it.
Nothing he can say will stop me from looking for that bridge entrance back to the ’90s, and the relative serenity that this nation enjoyed.
The same serenity that Obama by-passes when he talks of returning to the Reagan/Bush1 years. I was here then also, and I prefer to stop on the 90′s block. Although, Reagan/Bush1 surely beat the last 7.25 years.
Posted by: MC | April 2, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
When EVERYONE was watching the S Carolina debate to find out if Sen. Obama was real… before the ten wins in a row, when the media needed a matchup… where are all these campaign donations going…
Obama On Tony Rezco, “I only worked for five hours for a client as a junior lawyer.” and later, “he never asked me for anything”
Posted by: greg | April 2, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
No…no, this is true. Hillary Clinton tried to join the US Army after being rejected by the Marines, the French Foreign Legion, the U.N. Blue Helmets, the British Expeditionary Force, Erwin Rommel’s Afrika Corps, the Elks Club, the Knights of Columbus, the NYPD and LAPD — not to mention, the Girl Scouts of: America, Ethiopia, Scotland, Mali, Djibouti, Sri Lanka, Canada, the Ivory Coast, Egypt, the Ukraine and the UK. She also tried to enlist in the Swiss Guard to help protect the Pope, but was finally successful in becoming a Secret Service Agent and CIA Operative while hubby, Bill, was President. It’s all so very true, just ask her about it.
Posted by: H. Aslan Aslani-Far | April 2, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
“..It is my strong belief that recruiting in Arkansas was no better than where I served; in fact, it was probably worse.”
Or it says that sexism was alive and well in those days too.
Hillary Clinton chose to serve the country for her entire career. Anyone who doesn’t get that should go sign up for the armed forces today and learn.
If Obama wants to lead, a tour with the Big Red One will sure teach him how. Then he will have some experience we can believe in.
Posted by: len | April 2, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
Ohno,
Yes, you are so convincing I must agree with you. It is an ENORMOUS lead. Obama’s lead is such that only a rabbit in a race with a turtle could squander such a lead. By the way, are you feeling like you and your gang deserve a nap right about now? You do and by all means, go for it. Hillary’s WAY too far back for you to worry. Please, feel free to cut some zzzzs.
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 2, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
they would not take her as a recruit, but she wants to be commander in chief? That does not instill confidence. If serving in the armed forces or joining them makes you qualified for the 3 am phone call on a world crisis, based on Hill and Bill, then McCain is the best qualified.
Posted by: scott jeffries | April 2, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
This is another blatant lie by the Clintons. When Hillary moved to Arkansas she moved there to be with Bill so that Bill can start his political career.
Bill dodged the draft several times in order to persue this political career. So why would his girlfriend/wife try to join the Marines or the Army if he would not? This makes no sense at all and is a blantant contradiction to the Bill argument why he did not join the military.
In the 70′s, a married man would have to show a family picture in order to get elected. Nice conservative wife and a well rounded christian background (even for democrats), not a wife serving in the Military with the husband at home running for office. Bills political viability would have been directly linked to his wifes presense beside him.
Lies..Lies..Lies
Posted by: Kate | April 2, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
RE: OBAMA and NO SERVICE:
What?
We didn’t have an army, or a navy
or a marine core he could join since 1974?
Very enlightening!
Posted by: questioner | April 2, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
“SLEEK WILLY” has done it again!!! The Clintons will say and do anything if they thought it would help Hillary to get the Democratic nomination. I bet you this story will make the round of the news and late night show circus, especially as it is incredibly exaggerated, self-serving and timely for the story teller’s manipulative aims. The Clintons never cease to amaze us with their political stunts and half-truths. Willy never bordered to tell, though, why he avoided military service, the ultimate patriotic act!
Posted by: Dr. Sam | April 2, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
“Hillary Clinton chose to serve the country for her entire career.”
Sure! She was even prepared to defend the interests of Walmart and other companies against the whining of unions and women asking for part-time work.
And YET better, she was prepared to defend a rapist by blaiming his 12-years old victim, attacking the credibility of the girl on the basis of how many men she fantasized about…
Hooray for Hillary, your all time servant!
Posted by: king | April 2, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
Even if it is a fib thats better than deserting the Air National Guard. that comes with a manditory 6 year obligaton
that better things to do doesnt get a waiver. No honerable discharges are handed out to those that just walk away.
thats it cut and dried just stopped attending drills, my twenty plus years service confirms to me you cant do that, its called desertion. Some come off your high horse about Hilary.
Posted by: kevin | April 2, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
I’m not surprised by that, Hillary loves her country, unlike some people I know.
Posted by: Jacko | April 2, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
The military rejected Clinton because she couldn’t see? This is a punchline just waiting to be written by the late-night talk shows. I wonder if it’s true or if both Clintons have problems misremembering.
Posted by: Publius | April 2, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
Ha ha ha!
NOT ENOUGH ‘SNIPER FIRE’ TO DUCK UNDER, KEPT HILARY OUT OF THE MARINES. LOL
Another Clintonian whopper?
As in:
“I did not have sexual intercourse with that woman, Ms Lewinski’.
Posted by: New Yorker | April 2, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Ohno,
A couple of thoughts and questions?
Obama definitely has a lead, no doubt about it! Please tell me the exact formula by which he turns that lead into a win.
You folks are always talking about the “math” against HRC. Please be good enough to tell us the equation by which Obama wins. I have no doubt you know, and are just keeping it a secret, Right!
Right it seems that the only sure way would be for Hillary to “quit”, which she is not going to do!
All you Obama folks claim Obama won Texas caucuses. If he did we out here in Texas do not know that either. Maybe y’all actually mean “he has been projected” to win the Texas caucus votes by about 7.
You see Ohno, the caucus stuff “ain’t over yet”, will not be decided until June. JUNE, that is when the Texas Democratic convention convenes in Austin.
Posted by: MC | April 2, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
Hillary is just about out of gas.
Posted by: JDofTampa | April 2, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
OK, now the Clintons are getting ridiculous!
Posted by: das Kruemelmonster | April 2, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
hmmm. if they LOWERED the tests for military recruits just last year, then how can it be that all those blind moronic and otherwise debilitated candidates were permitted to join up during the time frame Hillary was talking about?
As for learning to use “contacts” I have NEVER been able to!.
_________________
SATs for Soldiers
How hard is the aptitude test for U.S. military recruits?
By Melonyce McAfee
Posted Tuesday, April 10, 2007, at 6:27 PM ET
Download the MP3 audio version of this story here, or sign up for The Explainer’s free daily podcast on iTunes.
Last week, the Army National Guard lowered its standards for new recruits in 34 states. These states will now be able to enlist those who scored in at least the 16th percentile on an aptitude test. How hard is that test?
It depends on which branch of the military you want to join. The Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery includes sections on general science, automotive information, mechanical comprehension, electronics information, and assembling objects. But these scores are only used to determine which jobs a recruit might be good at once he or she enters the military. The ASVAB also includes two math sections and two reading sections, together known as the Armed Forces Qualification Test. If a recruit can’t pass the math and reading sections, he or she won’t be eligible to enlist.
GIVE ‘EM HELL, HILLARY!!!!!
Posted by: questioner | April 2, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
And how is this newsworthy? Should we delve into the whoppers in Barack Obama’s “biography”?
Posted by: countallthevotes | April 2, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
People can talk and point fingers all they want. Talk is cheap and doesn’t reflect reality. The 90′s were some of the best times we have had in this country. I remember how depressed I was after Reagan and Bush thinking there were no good times a head for the country. When Clinton got in the White House he really turned things around. Things were great for everyone, rich, poor and middle class. All the talk in the world will not change that. I feel secure having Hillary in the White House and Bill’s being there is a huge plus. Bring back the good times, bring back the Clintons!!
Posted by: Firefighter | April 2, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
WestCoastMessenger, sarcastically to Ohno, writes:
“It is an ENORMOUS lead. Obama’s lead is such that only a rabbit in a race with a turtle could squander such a lead.”
Posted by: Sanhedrin | April 2, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
only Senator Clinton can win in November…..I love my child and am very protective of him and I know that Senator Clinton will be the best President for him
Posted by: chris | April 2, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
Hey Kevin,
First, despite Rather’s desperate search, there is no proof to your claims about Bush.
Second, McCain is the man running this time. He has 22 years of Navy service, 5.5 years as POW, and 25 years in the Senate. Compare that to your Hillary.
Posted by: Gary | April 2, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
i feel sorry for you if you cannot actually support your candidate of choice with the same positive passion….
Posted by: chris | April 2, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
I am currently an Obama supporter who is old enough to vote but, I have to agree with you; these messages here are quite cruel. Whether you vote for Hillary or not, she is still a lady and should be treated as such.
Obama ’08
Posted by: ddpwoman | April 2, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
Okay, it wasn’t Bosnia where she experienced the sniper fire, it was from the military office she tried to join.
Hillary, it’s okay to use this story.
Posted by: Sandra | April 2, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
What branch of service did Obama serve in or did his spiritual advisor suggest he not serve?
Posted by: Bulldog | April 2, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
My eyes were way past 20/400 (which means off the chart) but correctable to 20/20 so like tens of thousands of other four-eyes back in the 60′s I got drafted. This story about the Army is as dumb as her claim about trying to join the Marines. Hill should really just shut up about the military and combat, as they sound incredibly stupid.
Posted by: Glen | April 2, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Why is this news? Hillary Clinton has told this story many times before. When she was first lady of ARK., first lady of the U.S. and running for senate. Because it’s a slow news day, and Bill Clinton mentioned it again, it’s suddenly a story. Flashback: OLD NEWS from the 90′S.
I’m a liberal republican, I’m almost tempted to vote for Hillary Clinton just to get back at the MSM for all the bashing they do to the Clintons. If Barack Obama would have taken this kind of media abuse, he would not be standing today.
Nothing new here!
Posted by: Morrison | April 2, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
Wow, another great story!! I guess we’ll just put this one in the file for later. Classic.
Posted by: JJ | April 2, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
Barack Obama supporters:
Would any of you please list for me, Barack Obama’s foreign policy experience?
Posted by: Hannah | April 2, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
“Hillary tried to join the Military”? Uh ohhh, my BS red flag alert just went off. Here we go again!
Posted by: dgfiit | April 2, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
She’s trying to paint the picture that she is a military gal, without anything to back it up. Like being in the military is the only prerequisite to be president. For those of you that think so, have you ever thought about what America would be like if it wasn’t pro war, pro military? I imagine it would be a nice place to live…something we should try.
Posted by: JJ | April 2, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
ok, I figure you didn’t like my last post ABC, lets try this. If you watched the Clinton/obama debates, who did you think won? Caution: this is not a scientific poll. Its about as accurate as most tho. I admit i thought Senator Clinton walked all over obama. I am stupid like that. i keep thinking the better candidate should win rather than the one that whines loudest.
Posted by: Beau | April 2, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
Hillary went to Bosnia. Obama has trouble rolling a gutter ball.
Posted by: Bowling Ball | April 2, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
Hannah, what is Hilarys experience, not counting close encounters with the press and girls bearing flowers.
Posted by: jenny | April 2, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
Bowling – So lots of people go to foreign countries does that make them qualified to be commcander in chief?
Posted by: jenny | April 2, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
Hannah, do you think this story is more foreign policy experience for HRC? Or Bosnia? Ireland? China? Well, this one isn’t either.
Posted by: JJ | April 2, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
Hillary wants a candidate who can be “ready on Day One” and her campaign has proven that given her running behind to at best neck and neck with Obama that she was not ready for the campaign on Day One or Day 41.
Why didn’t she try to join the Coast Guard, Air Force or Navy? If she wanted to serve her country either of those would have worked. This is more Clinton BS.
Posted by: Sheeza Laeyer | April 2, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
Riiight
AND
Hillary will end this campaign season with more pledge delegates then Obama
Humorous
Posted by: Vanessa | April 2, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
Oh
The Clintons.
Flowers – I didn’t do it.
Broderick – not I.
Paula Jones – no way!
Kathleen Wiley – you kidding?
Lewinsk – never! Evidence? This is a vast right wing conspiracy after my husband, said Hillary.
There they go again!
At least this time, no CBS records can POSSIBLY exist about this incident.
And I doubt that there are any eye witnesses left. Bill may even swear he was there. What the heck!
Refined lying. The learning curve has been long.
Like they say, a good (Obama) act, deserves a clownish introduction!
Posted by: cfukara | April 2, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
bull – Obama served in the same branch Bill did.
Posted by: jenny | April 2, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
Apparently, this site has a problem with Deutsch grammar in a comment.
Yet, has no problem with it being used by an Obama sopporter as an avitar.
Well….OK, guess that’s fair. Like this whole primary is fair!
Tie, minus one goes to Obama!
Posted by: MC | April 2, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
Jenny, does giving a good speech about hope and having a racist spiritual advisor give Obama experience in foreign policy?
Posted by: Advisor to Kings | April 2, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
Senator Clinton lis about everything. If she did try to enlist in the military, it is just one more example that she has bigger gonads than Bill. These folks are liars and will do and say anything to keep Senator Obama from getting the nomination
Posted by: tekrab | April 2, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
She misspoke, for she misremembered.
It was all about an audition for M.A.S.H. she did, but in the end Hot Lips was hired.
Posted by: kong | April 2, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
And, I blew my whole argument when I put an o instead of a u in supporter.
I stand chastised!
Posted by: mC | April 2, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
No it dosen’t BUT he never lIED about having that experience!
Posted by: Deanna | April 2, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
Jenny, Hillary’s running, not Bill.
Posted by: Bulldog | April 2, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
Bowling Ball:
“Hillary went to Bosnia.
Obama has trouble rolling a gutter
ball.”
Actually Sen Obama rolled it effortlessly.
At least Sen Obama’s gutter ball was real, he admitted it and he did not hallucinate about his athletic prowess.
But Sen Clinton has won you over with the sniper fire caper.
Posted by: cfukara | April 2, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
Jenny wrote:
Hannah, what is Hilarys experience, not counting close encounters with the press and girls bearing flowers
***************************************
You didn’t answer my question. Take all the time you need.
Posted by: Hannah | April 2, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
Yes, they have questioned that particular office but at this late date they cannot confirm her “story” though one of the gentlemen who was there at the time does not recall that situation though he did not deny it happened. Those are the kind of lies she needs to stick too…the ones that can’t be proven.
Posted by: Deanna | April 2, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
I tried to join the army but when the recruiter never showed up to pick me up I lost interest. I don’t support voting at all in a system that is less than what the constitution says it should be, but I tried should I be able to use this as a claim of me being good as president. Also anyone that uses “my child is important to me and I think (add candidate name here)will be good for my child” argument should remember people where saying that about BUSH too. Its weak. Don’t Vote 2008!
Posted by: Ronnie Rucker | April 2, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
What has Mr. Obama done for this country? Did Mrs. Obama love her country before her husband’s campaign?
I really don’t know the answers for the questions above, but I’m sure at least Sen. Clinton loves her country.
Posted by: Allison | April 2, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
Does anyone on here, including the owner, know for a “fact”, that HRC did not try to enlist in the miltary.
I have absolutely no idea.
That may be the place to start. If someone can factually refute it then they should do so.
Speculation should be reserved for the “markets”.
Posted by: MC | April 2, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
What has Obama ever done except attend Rev. Wright’s racist church and work for the shady character Rezco?
Posted by: Rezco the Rascal | April 2, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
Had Bill Clinton try to join military when he was young and when the nation needs him ……..?
Posted by: ddn | April 2, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
She didn’t try, it is all tripe. Regardless of what the recruiter said, she was entitled to a full evaluation. She was not turned down in any official capacity according to her story. She did not actually apply had she been serious about doing so she would have been enlisted.
Another lie.
Posted by: Louis | April 2, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
Obama supporters continue to be the most mean-spirited people that I have ever heard. I just don’t believe you are democrats or you wouldn’t keep making such nasty comments about the Clintons. I mean it’s one thing to support a candidate, but quite another to slam the Clintons with such hateful and stupid rhetoric.
Posted by: sarnorton | April 2, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
Hillary didn’t try and join the army.
It was a joke. Hillary and her friends were seeing if the recruiting officers were against women joining. It was to test if there was bias against feminism. Click on the link that we wondered about.
This lie is far worse than the Bosnia lie. In 1994 Hillary lied saying she tried to join the military. It was a game her friends were playing.
McCain was a POW having his arms hanged while Hillary was playing games with recruitment officers.
No recruitment officer would at that time say we can’t take you because you can’t see. They were looking for soldiers.
Bill was running for attorney general in arkansas at the time. This is the worst lie of all from the clintons.
In 2004 Hillary said on balance Nafta has been good for america and new york. She said this to a business group.
She is a serial liar. She can’t tell the truth.
Posted by: Mike | April 2, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
Obama has encounters of 3rd kind, Rezco, Louis Farrakhan and Rev Wright.
Posted by: HarryEknee | April 2, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
Obama gains another SDs today.
Yet, this website doesn’t report it or has yet to count it onto his total
We sit here speaking of foolishness
Did Hillary enter the military…
NO
So why is this necessary
Sen. John Melcher, of Montana WELCOME to winning side
Update:
According to PPP poll released today
Obama leads by +2 in Penn
Posted by: Vanessa | April 2, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
“People can talk and point fingers all they want. Talk is cheap and doesn’t reflect reality. The 90′s were some of the best times we have had in this country. I remember how depressed I was after Reagan and Bush thinking there were no good times a head for the country. When Clinton got in the White House he really turned things around. Things were great for everyone, rich, poor and middle class. All the talk in the world will not change that. I feel secure having Hillary in the White House and Bill’s being there is a huge plus. Bring back the good times, bring back the Clintons!!” This bears repeating. Salient post.
Posted by: beau | April 2, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
@Speculation should be reserved for the “markets”
It’s the markets that make the economy, stupid.
There’s proof beyond reasonable doubt in HRC’s biography of these Arkansas years that she did NOT try to join any army ofter than that of corporate lawyers fighting the unions, and that of women prepared to endure the humiliations of their cheating husbands.
Posted by: kong | April 2, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
Hillary held sit ins at wesselly protesting the military. Bill was running for attorney general of arkansas at the time. Her friends when the NY Times investigated admitted she wasn’t trying to join the army for real. She was testing if they had a bias against feminism.
Hillary has never been asked if she will continue to use Gloria Steinhem as a surrogate after making fun of McCain as a POW.
Posted by: Mike | April 2, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
Obama just changed his campaign poster. It went from having the word “HOPE” underneath his image to “HOPE TO FOOL YOU ALL!”
Posted by: onodream | April 2, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
what does this story have to do with the price of Healthcare?
Let me say right up front, I am a black woman, a supporter of Hillary Clinton.
I have resigned myself that the majority of my black brothers and sisters are going to continue to blindly support obama (through some misguided sense of a symbolic win-sort of like going for oj-to get back at the justice system-oj is guilty)
So to try and stop this I must appeal to my white brothers and sisters,especially if you are any of the citizens left to vote-to pick our nominee for president-I will pray you will vote for Hillary
Mr. Obama has been a member of a church for 20years that at it core believes
“If God is not for us (the black community) then he (god) is a murderer and we had better kill him”
“What we need is the distruction of whitness-which is the source of all misery in the world.”
These are quotes from James Cone-a collegue and fellow minister with Rev. wright.
(I guess obama is going to start with the bowling alley in the white house)
He said today one of the first things he was going to do is distroy the bowling alley-and put in a basketball court.-I know he laughed-and I know he was joking-in re; to his poor bowling skills-but It just made me think.-just how funny that would be.
Chris Matthews and the media are stacking the cards against Hillary clinton-(I do not know what the clintons did to Chris Matthews-but it must have been something pretty bad that he would go against-the ethics of his professio-claiming to report and be fair and impartial.Cause Chris Matthews is badly tainted.
Everyone knows obama is not good in debate with hillary-so what does msnbc do-Chris Matthews is there interviewing obama in front of a college audience giving him questions-that the answers will not really fully inform the voter.
We need to be able to see a potential president-under pressure answering the hard questions-why is obama not as good answering questions as he is giving a speech-ask George Bush.-In the debate with hillary-obama answering questions reminds me of george bush during the debates with al gore.
Obama does not know what he is doing
He and his handlers, axelrod, kerry, dean and co. are doing to voters what karl rove and bush did to the rural and evangelical voters.
I want a black president-but not in this crooked way.
I cannot see how anyone who has listened to-for 20years such teaching claim to be a uniter-and a healer of the race problem in this country.
and now I have a new fear for my country
in addition to:
war, poor economy, lack of healthcare for ALL, students in college being taken advantage of by predatory loan companies, and we are headed for more violence, and race riots.
his type of uniting is a false unity
because black people have followed blindly-and are expecting(although he has promised them nothing) something from him. and it is economics-and he will not be able to deliver on the economic front-Because it is hillarys plan.
I feel sorry for Hillary-because after losing to him-with the big wigs in dem party going against her, the media-she cannot win.
I feel sorry for her because-after losing in such a crooked way to obama-the dem big wigs are going to then turn around and ask her to help save him-from
mccain.
any of you who think the clintons are all washed up-wait until we hear how the dem. party will be going to them to ask for them to help against mccain.
i want a black man-but not him because
he is not smarter than hillary.
I just wish people would stop falling for the fluff- Obama is not ready to be president.
Posted by: jgaw | April 2, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
Hillary is a Patriot. I haven’t had a revelation of what Obama is.
Posted by: I DID THE DANCE | April 2, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
Obama join the military?? Are you crazy??? The biggest reason I’m voting for McCain if Obama is the nominee is McCain’s war service to this country.
Why the hell would I want to vote for someone who is only thinking of themselves??
Posted by: libby | April 2, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
I really am not surprised that she lies or bends the truth.
But the fact that she lies in such a careless way concerns me. It reminds me a lot of how Bush lied to our faces even though we all knew the truth.
Posted by: David | April 2, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
Wonder if she had to take a class in contact application.
Posted by: David | April 2, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
Oh, Bill do tell more – so was it right after law school or in Arkansas in 1975? Because if it was right after law school does that mean that she really wasn’t eager to fight for Children’s rights, she was eager to fight in VietNam? And if it was just after VietNam then why would she try to enlist after she just decided to move to Arkansas to be with Bill? Did she have second thoughts? Did she also consider moving back to Washington? Why didn’t she get contacts? How bad WAS her eyesight?
FAIRYTALE!
Posted by: SamTheCat | April 2, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
Are they being serious?
Jake Tapper reports on a claim made by Bill Clinton that his wife once tried to join the Army. Hillarys version is that she tried to join the Marines and was told to try the Army.
Hillary and Bill were both staunchly anti-Vietnam war, and the t…
Posted by: Sister Toldjah | April 2, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
Funny stuff and no way to prove it either way, except to believe her friends’ saying she was testing out the military’s attitude regarding women. Still, sniper fire or not, recruiting or not, you made me think on it and I’d bet she’d make a fine Commander in Chief. My first reaction was to think the topic was unworthy of this blog, but on second thought, thinking about it, she’d make a fine Commander in Chief.
Posted by: Mandelay3 | April 2, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
Oh the tangled webs we weave when first we practice to deceive. You’d think they’d be gun shy about telling whoppers by now. How can they think that all these lies are somehow attractive. They constantly remind us that when it comes to character, their deficit is bigger then their campaign debts to small businesses who can’t afford to carry them.
Posted by: karela | April 2, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
WestCoastMessenger, sarcastically to Ohno, writes:
“It is an ENORMOUS lead. Obama’s lead is such that only a rabbit in a race with a turtle could squander such a lead.”
Posted by: Sanhedrin | April 2, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
Oh the tangled webs we weave when first we practice to deceive. You’d think they’d be gun shy about telling whoppers by now. How can they think that all these lies are somehow attractive. They constantly remind us that when it comes to character, their deficit is bigger then their campaign debts to small businesses who can’t afford to carry them.
Posted by: karela | April 2, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
Obama folks certainly do have assured and certain mentalities. Facts or no facts. I am ‘sure” they all probably do well in the “markets”. J
ust “will” a stock or commodity to perform well, and it will. Then if it does “in fact” fail, they can fall back on “Hope and Change”.
However, given all their certainty, I wish one, just one, anyone of them. Would answer these questions:
Please tell me (or us, Clinton dummies) the exact formula by which Obama turns his lead into a win. Obama definitely has a lead, no doubt about it!
You folks are always talking about the “math” against HRC. Please be good enough to tell us the equation by which Obama wins. I have no doubt you know, and are just keeping it a secret. Right?
Right now it seems that the only sure way would be for Hillary to “quit”, which you are all calling for to do to “save” Obama. Yet she is not going to do quit!
I thought Obama was the Democratic “savior”, why should he even nedd help?
Then all you Obama folks claim Obama won Texas caucuses. If he did we out here in Texas do not know that either. Maybe y’all actually mean “he has been projected” to win the Texas caucus votes by about 7.
Actually the caucus stuff “ain’t over yet”, will not be decided until June. JUNE, that is when the Texas Democratic convention convenes in Austin. Until then all is one more case of “speculation”.
Texas results will be decided then, and until then Obama has won nothing re Texas. Only HRC has, she won the popular vote, the only vote that is “official”, so far!
Posted by: MC | April 2, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
From what I am reading here, I think people have already made up their minds. There is no need to be hateful or call names. The poster who said Obama is racist is probably not speaking for most people in this country. It appears that most are honerable people who have gotten past race and sexism and are looking at these two candidates for their positions and likability. No need for the hatred – we are ALL Americans and we either stand together behind the nominee or we hand the country over to the people who have tried to destroy this country. BTW – MOST Americans don’t serve in the military but that does not mean they don’t serve their country!
Posted by: julescator | April 2, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
Hillary Clinton and John McCain are Patriots.
Posted by: Dexter The Mouse | April 2, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
yes, obamanot
As a black woman, this is a story that has been kicking around in the black community-via black talk radio stations-and a topic that was referred to as
“yea, but we better not talk to much about that-”they might get the wrong idea”
“yea, and it is not even like that”
and to you obama supporters on this blog know this:
obama will not win the white house in nov. without Hillary Clinton’ supporters. and the dem. voters in florida and michigan.
If obama was the change-new type politician-running this new type above the fray campaign-he would be pulling for florida and michigan to have a vote.
he is the old deal-throuh and through wrapped in a smile and a suit.
but none of it will change the fact-Mr. obama is not ready to handle the job of president-and the way he will have won will comeback to haunt him
I hope pa, and indiana, wva, and all the other states left to vote-will send him a clear message-he is not entitled to be president just because he is black
Posted by: jgaw | April 2, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
yes, obamanot
As a black woman, this is a story that has been kicking around in the black community-via black talk radio stations-and a topic that was referred to as
“yea, but we better not talk to much about that-”they might get the wrong idea”
“yea, and it is not even like that”
and to you obama supporters on this blog know this:
obama will not win the white house in nov. without Hillary Clinton’ supporters. and the dem. voters in florida and michigan.
If obama was the change-new type politician-running this new type above the fray campaign-he would be pulling for florida and michigan to have a vote.
he is the old deal-throuh and through wrapped in a smile and a suit.
but none of it will change the fact-Mr. obama is not ready to handle the job of president-and the way he will have won will comeback to haunt him
I hope pa, and indiana, wva, and all the other states left to vote-will send him a clear message-he is not entitled to be president just because he is black
Posted by: jgaw | April 2, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
MC – Somehow I dont’ think you really want an answer to your quesiton. I think you just want to vent! That’s fine. Vent!
Posted by: julescator | April 2, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
Isn’t it strange that after all of
these years of “being vetted” this is
the first time anyone has heard this!
I guess she also wanted to be the next
Florence Nightengale at one time in her life! Puleeze, no more garbage from the
Clinton Lying Machine!
This is so ridiculous on any level!
Bill Clinton was a Draft Dodger and Hillary wanted to join the Army!
Please Go Home Bill and Hillary, Now!
Posted by: reaganfan | April 2, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
jgaw – I don’t think any African American expects ANYTHING good because they are BLACK. I am not Black, but you must know this. How in the world would a Black man think he is entitled to the presidency? Based on what? We only have 1 Senator now and have had 3 since this country began to have a legislative branch. Surely you are not basing your conclusion on anything historic. So just what are you basing it on. I think, based on your argument, John McCain a White man is entitled to the job since for 43 presidents that is all we have had. I think you are very wrong on your analysis. obama is both Black and White and none of us have the right to dismiss half of his family!
Posted by: julescator | April 2, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
she tried unlike Obama who is a nitwit for being a wiseguy
Posted by: Abel | April 2, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
Bulldog:
Hillary’s running! You could have fooled
me. If Hillary is the candidate why does she need this lecherous drunk
running interference for her?
Can’t she run on her own?
Posted by: reaganfan | April 2, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
That comment on Clinton’s debts coming from one her advisers is mighty interesting, for it may explain why she is intending to stay in the race for as long as possible. It’s the donations!
By continuing to ask her supporters for donations, Hillary hopes to climb out of that debt hole before she can bow out. She doesn’t advertise that much anymore, because she’s using the incoming donations to pay off the enormous debts. And then, when all will be finally settled financially, she will bow out ‘gracefully’.
She’d better not tell this to her supporters though, who give everything they have as long as Hillary convinces them she’s still in it to win it, and that winning is still a plausible possibility. ‘Yes we will!”
Posted by: greg | April 2, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
King…I read that story and i was horrified. Hilary badgered this little girl to the point that she did not know that Hilary was the defendant’s attorney. She put it out of her mind, she is now 27 years old and is afraid to face Hilary.I have 4 daughters and if Hilary would have done that to one of them I would be all over her as she is running for President. That speaks for itself.Shame on you Hilary! Sorry Hilary supporters but that was wrong!
Posted by: Emilianna | April 2, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
Good for her! At least she tried… I havent seen any reports that Obama tried at all. Another story from the Clintons. They will never learn lessons from the previous exagerations. the Bosnia story is still on the news now they want to add another one. It is sad how this couple coupled of lies in trying to survive. Nice try!
I’m not suprised.
Hillary even tried to become President of the United States.
Posted by: hi mom | April 2, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
jules,
my black brothers and sisters have been
are voting for obama in record number without vetting him-if you will remember-at first my community was saying Obama who?-and then-he isn’t black.-meaning he did not come up with the experience the majority of blacks his age did.-and from what we are told of his history he did not.
fast forward to now-black elected officials are being threatened with not voting them back in office-if they do not support obama (it does not matter that they have served their people well)
“Just go out there and vote obama”
black people in the community are being asked by other blacks-right off the bat after they say hello-they are asked “How about my man obama”-it is just presumed you support him-because he is black. and if you do not support him-you had better pretend you do.-because no matter-the clintons have been side by side trying to help advance and help catch up the black community-against all the set backs the american system has given then-they are mud now.
How do we account for the fact that out side his region-black people have never heard of him? if he was such a advocate for black people and helping advance black people-why was he unknown on the national scene?
Because it is now understood he gets the black vote-without any vetting from the black community-obama and his handlers gambled right in their presumption-he will have the black vote.
“Just because he is BLACK”
but because he has not been vetted-the things that are being suppressed in the mSM about his (just to spite the clintons) will come out in the GE.and MCcain will win.
It will be the biggest throw away of the black vote since our struggle to get the vote.
If my black brothers and sister really wanted to advance themselves they would bvote their true interest-and that is on Hillary and her promise of helping the economy.
This is not the time or the year for
the “Symbolic Give it to the Black Guy”
Posted by: jgaw | April 2, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
From the very beginning of this primary campaign, Hillary Clinton has been vilified, trashed, crucified, and slandered by the biased, sexist, and chauvinistic media & press. The worst offenders are CNN and FOX….both male and female pundits speel venom to adnauseam. Right now, Senator Clinton is the best hope this country has to turn the economy around and to change our image in the world. Too many (men) in the White House have sold this country down the river and sacrificed our precious sons and daughters. It is time we have an intelligent, savvy, skilled,and visionary woman to lead our nation. We will never have this opportunity again. It is just an outrage that the votes in Florida and Michigan will not be counted—-what a pathetic sham. Barack Obama cannot hold a candle to Hillary Clinton. If Hillary does not get the nomination, myself along with millions of other Americans will be heartsick for another four years. For those voting for Obama, be careful what you ask for….please think twice (and once again) before pressing that button in the voting booth. P.S. If Colin Powell had run for election at any given time, I would have voted for him in a heartbeat. Barack Obama is not in the same league as Colin Powell. Thank you for listening. GO HILLARY! There are millions of us out here supporting you contrary to what the media would have you believe. FIGHT ON–WE ARE PROUD OF YOU!
Posted by: Carol | April 2, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
From the very beginning of this primary campaign, Hillary Clinton has been vilified, trashed, crucified, and slandered by the biased, sexist, and chauvinistic media & press. The worst offenders are CNN and FOX….both male and female pundits speel venom to adnauseam. Right now, Senator Clinton is the best hope this country has to turn the economy around and to change our image in the world. Too many (men) in the White House have sold this country down the river and sacrificed our precious sons and daughters. It is time we have an intelligent, savvy, skilled,and visionary woman to lead our nation. We will never have this opportunity again. It is just an outrage that the votes in Florida and Michigan will not be counted—-what a pathetic sham. Barack Obama cannot hold a candle to Hillary Clinton. If Hillary does not get the nomination, myself along with millions of other Americans will be heartsick for another four years. For those voting for Obama, be careful what you ask for….please think twice (and once again) before pressing that button in the voting booth. P.S. If Colin Powell had run for election at any given time, I would have voted for him in a heartbeat. Barack Obama is not in the same league as Colin Powell. Thank you for listening. GO HILLARY! There are millions of us out here supporting you contrary to what the media would have you believe. FIGHT ON–WE ARE PROUD OF YOU!
Posted by: Carol | April 2, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
She tried to join the army, came under sniper fire in Bosnia and ran back to Bill to complain about the attitude of the male snipers.
Posted by: Chan | April 2, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
Did Bill Clinton mention that he avoided joining the military and that was an issue in the primaries for him. He was able to defend himself, beat the odds & win the general election. At that time it was a very serious issue and it could have cost him the general election.
Posted by: Chan | April 2, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
jgaw,
Obama does NOT run as an advocate for black people. He runs as an advocate for American people, and that’s exactly why so many black folks like him as a black politician. He’s not a Civil Rights Hero, he’s a hero of defending the American Constitution. Constitutional Law happens to be a specialism of his. He doesn’t have a special agenda for black America, he has an agenda for a united America.
Posted by: greg | April 2, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
MC,
I’m pretty sure that ‘economy, stupid’ phrase was a Bill Clinton quote.
Posted by: downhill | April 2, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
Right now, Senator Clinton is the best hope this country has to turn the economy around and to change our image in the world.
GS,
Oh, wow. Eyes wide shut, eh?
Posted by: Sparky | April 2, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
@Carol
“P.S. If Colin Powell had run for election at any given time, I would have voted for him in a heartbeat. Barack Obama is not in the same league as Colin Powell. Thank you for listening.”
Why compare Obama to Powell? Because both happen to be black men? O, I love it when the Hillary women expose their racism so naively. Do you LOOK like Ferraro as well?
Posted by: downhill | April 2, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
Two comments to the poster that felt the need to use “stupid” to try to make a point.
Probably useless, but contrary to your assertion: Markets do not make the economy. Employers, producers, manufacturers, and consumers do!
There would be no “markets” without those elements. Also, the majority of the above first three are not even “listed” on the exchange. They are called “small businesses” ever heard of them and their effect on the economy?
Then as to your second assertion regarding your “proof beyond a reasonable doubt” re HRC. Post IT! or Give us a definitive link to your definitive proof.
You are “speculating” and losing. Stay out of “those markets that make the economy”. You will lose your shirt. Seems you may have already lost your soul, to Hate and vitriole!
Posted by: MC | April 2, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
ReaganFan writes:
“If Hillary is the candidate why does she need this lecherous drunk
running interference for her?
Can’t she run on her own?”
Posted by: Navarro | April 2, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
greg,
It is to bad the poor and working class black people have not received that message-because on the black talk radio stations-are telling them and pumping them up telling them what he is going to do for them when he gets into office.
I agree-obama seems he should be in a classroom-he is a very good speaker.
but for president-I think Hillary clinton is the one for the times we live in right now.
and obama will not be able to win the white house without the support of hillary clinton-and most importantly her supporters-and do not forget he needs to step up and show his stateman like qualities and speak up for florida and michigan to have a say.
His people need to get off the “punish them”
Posted by: jgaw | April 2, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
I’m beyond being surprised at anything that comes from the Clintons these days.
Posted by: LongT | April 2, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
Greg,
sorry, I had to go back and read you comments.
as far as the uniter of america
If he wants to be a uniter-he and his people are going about it in the wrong way.
now I will concede-he is probally going to win the dem nomination-although I personally from what I have seen-is a good clean win-and what i mean by that is-he should have won because he had the better command and understanding of the issues that face us. not a win through having the media, and many other entities stacking the deck against his opponent.-(but I understand his and his handlers need to work it that way.)
If he had won the nomination the right way-he may have had a chance against mccain in the general. but because of the:
rev. wright,marxist mom,and the other things we know about and who knows what will come out in the general.
He will not win against mccain.
Posted by: jgaw | April 2, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
For all you Clinton backers hoping for the 1990′s to come back…forget it. That was then and this is now. The internet and computers made the 1990s what it was, not Bill Clinton. Everyone would have been singing a different tune if the Dot.com bubble burst during his final turn and 9/11 happened. Hillary keeps trying to keep you guys in the dark. You follow blindly living in la la land of the past. Hillary is not the leader this country needs. The Clintons are cruel to members of their own party. Bill freaked out on Sunday at a party that was for a bunch of superdelegates. Still wallowing about the Richardson endorsement which sparked the whole nonsense. Many superdelegates were shocked they said at his display. Later he had someone call the superdelegates to appologize on his behalf. Luckily the openminded and hopeful see through her and that now includes Sen. John Melchior a superdelegate today!!! Thanks John.
Posted by: GM from MN | April 2, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
I was a veteran’s advocate since shortly after my discharge from service in 1970.
The military had quotas for women recruits which they could not meet. During the Vietnam war the military was accepting every eligible recruit it could find.
A number of studies during that period indicated that the military could not meet its women recruitment quotas because they could not be drafted and did not want to enlist.
The amazing and audacious irony is Hillary’s 1994 assertion that she was not allowed to enlist because she was a female was made at a lunceon honoring women veterans in preparation of the dedication of the Women’s Veterans Memorial at Arlington National Cemetery. Clearly these women did enlist and serve, many at great risk to themselves. God bless everyone of these women who succeeded where the current presidential candidate claims, against all odds, failed because she was a woman. (I was at this luncheon representing a veterans organization)
As I recall she and Bill, who admitted he purposely avoided the draft, protested against the war.
Is this like: After I tried to enlist I decided to be an antiwar protester instead? Something like I voted for the Iraqui war before I was against it?
Posted by: legspet | April 2, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
Oh, now I understand,
the democratic obama supporters, only want to beat Hillary.
I thought we were trying to get a dem in the white house for the next four years.
Obama will not win the white house with out the support of the Hillary supporters.
but I see now-you all didn’t want the white house (like we did) you just wanted to beat hillary.
no president obama without the supporters or hillary clinton.
Posted by: jgaw | April 2, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm
jigjaw…..Obama hasn’t done anything outside of what hillary has done. In fact she has crossed lines and non of her supporters acknowledge that. I guess you like to turn a blind eye. The whole issue about MI and FL is not his doing and it would not have been an issue if this matter was resolved BEFORE the two states voted. He WAS for a resolution that was FAIR to both sides, he is now working again with Hillary and the DNC to have those delegates seated in a way that is FAIR.
Posted by: GM from MN | April 2, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
@jgaw
“It is to bad the poor and working class black people have not received that message-because on the black talk radio stations-are telling them and pumping them up telling them what he is going to do for them when he gets into office.”
I think Obama won’t disappoint them, for these people are very much part of his program; just not the only or the most important part. Of course Obama is passionately committed to raise the living standards of poor and working class families in our country, just as he is committed to ban the effects from racism, sexism or homophobia from our society. Poor black folks will profit from that, no doubt, and so will poor white folks. And he’s not raising their standards of living only out of social concern, or out of his deep ‘be your brother’s and sister’s keeper’ conviction, but also out of an economic concern. No economy can thrive when many millions of people have hardly an extra dollar to spend on our goods.
Posted by: greg | April 2, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
Obama and his cultists have accomplished the unthinkable. Made many of us diehard Hillary Clinton supporters
Posted by: geevill | April 2, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
I don’t get why either candidates supporters would say that they would rather vote for McCain just because their candidate didn’t get the nomination. I would never do that. That would mean I’m focusing too much on the candidates personal lives rather than the issues that affect us as americans. Hillary and Obama agree on over 90% of the issues, its the few differences that they have that seperate them. Just because we hold grudges over the candidates personal lives, why should we hold it against the issues that they support, which in essense are the issues that WE all support.
Posted by: GM from MN | April 2, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
Besides personal differences that people have with people whom obama associated with in the past, can anyone that says they’ll vote for McCain tell me in detail why?
Posted by: GM from MN | April 2, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
jgaw writes:
“I thought we were trying to get a dem in the white house for the next four years.”
Posted by: Navarro | April 2, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
I have not turned a blind eye-except-I keep telling myself the media is not being unfair to hillary, and favoring obama more-in spite of what I see.
Mr. obama has tried to position himself as a change agent-and someone who is above dirty-politics-and at the same time reminding us of how he has been able to be a player and win in as he says “down and dirty chicago politics”
and I know he is not on the up and up when he tells us he sat in a church for 20years and didn’t hear or was not influenced by the hate talk of his preacher. for as long as this conflict between fl and mich has been going on obama’ surrogates have been out there telling everyone fl and mich. need to be punished. and I know if I heard it
the fl and mich voters heard it also.
haven’t you heard Jamal and co. talking about how fl and mich should be punished? I am sure NOW he is talking about solving it-since it has steadly grown as a big issue-as well it should.
the acceptance of the fl and mich vote
SHOULD be front and center in this discussion. I suppose come nov. we will have a new president by “hook or crook”
but if it is done without fl and mich
it will be terrible.
Posted by: jgaw | April 2, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
A poster asked about HRC supporters attitudes.
I won’t vote for McCain, I will resign from the Democratic party, become an independent, and then sit home and watch.
My reason, I feel that the far-left Dean/Axelrod/MoveOn/DailyKos element is a mirror image of the far-right Republican party, I find both despicable.
I would never join in voting with either of those groups, anymore than I would any other hate group.
They do not represent my idea of Democracy or the Democratic party principles that I have known for my 46 voting years. They want “old folks” out. I am one of those, and I will leave saddened about the party, but comfortable about my integrity.
Posted by: MC | April 2, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
jgaw-
If you would actually read a transcript from one of the church sermons you would see that much of what was said is taken out of context.
As for MI and FL as I said before, the matter should have been resolved BEFORE they voted. I didn’t hear ANY of the candidates raise a huff before their campaigns started.
Posted by: GM from MN | April 2, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
GM fom MN,
I agree with you. I will vote for whomever the nominee is. Their policies are the same. I don’t agree with the republican policies and wouldn’t even consider voting for McCain. If McCain is in the white house this war will never end. Our military is stretched so thin that the only alternative will be a draft.
Posted by: maryland | April 2, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
gm from mn-are you going to vote for hillary-if obama does not get the nomination?
one of the reasons I am for hillary is because of the times we are living in and the issues we have ahead of us.
We DO need someone who knows a little about the in’ and out of the Washington of today. that is hillary.
It is true we do not need someone who
will be president in training as much as obama will be-hillary will have a learning curve also-but not as much as obama.
I watched geo. bush hum and haw when in debates with al gore-when asked direct question about his solutions to problems and I decided right then and there-if he is elected president
“AMERICA-WE HAVE A PROBLEM”
I see obama doing the same thing when he is in debates-this kind of performance tells me-he cannot think on his feet and he does not have a good command of articulating the solutions to the issues-(learning curve-experence)
and as to his past associations-(which are not really past-judgement)
I also see many of his present associations-which i believe some not all will try to take advantange of his lack of experience-with the expectaion of getting something in return-(no change there politics as usual)
and within in all of this the issues that face us-and the people who so badly need solutions-will be lost is an obama presidency-I my humble opinion
these are not the time for what obama and co. will have to offer
we do need the “old salt” Hillary
Posted by: jgaw | April 2, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
Posted by: jgaw,
What difference does it make. If the situation were reversed, would there not be calls even DEMANDS that Obama step down? So, why is she so special?
Why is there always an excuse for everything Hillary? Oh, the boys are picking on her,; Oh they are trying to bully her; Oh he is out spending her; Oh she is being attacked; Oh….oh…oh….oh….oh;
I am sick to death of this double standard. When he takes hard punches or the media bites his a** people say tough! People say he needs to “BULK up”…be a man they say…..But, when the situation is reversed, it is poor Hillary this and that – a thousand excuses. Well, why can’t she bulk up and why can’t she step aside.
Lord knows, if the situation were reversed, Bill Clinton wouldn’t be saying “chill out” – ole red faced bas****…And many of you wouldn’t be encouraging him to stay in the race as you are HER.
Well, Hillary is not special and she is NOT owed the nomination, I don’t care what she or ANY of you think….Why don’t you people spare us the double talk and double standards.
Jessie has a message for you people:
“keep hope alive”
Posted by: Macy | April 2, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
gm from mn-but the matter was not resolved before-and if we keep going over that-we will have to stay with the punish them solution.
The matter was not resolved before-it is still front and center and needs to be dealt with.
now mind you I do not blame obama or hillary
I lay where we are at now with the fl and mich issue-right at Howard Dean and the dnc door. I think as in any organization-when a mistake is made of this magnitude-the buck stops somewhere and heads need to roll
I think in this case Howard Dean should be one of those to go. there maybe others-but right now he has the bounty of being the face of the DNC.
Posted by: jgaw | April 2, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
MC:
“They do not represent my idea of Democracy or the Democratic party principles that I have known for my 46 voting years.”
I agree with your post. Did you know that the RNC sanctioned the same 2 states, MI and FL, for moving their primary dates up — cutting the delegations by half.
This is the same penalty specified in DNC rules, but the committee, upped the penalty the furthest that it could legally —100%. A very severe sanction, wouldn’t you agree?
Posted by: colleen | April 2, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
I don’t understand how intelligent people who check into each candidate can possibly believe anything the Clintons say. I mean there is no way the media could possible invent all the horror stories dating back to the seventies just to persecute Hillary. One or two incidents maybe but my God half of them haven’t been brought back up yet but rest assured they will. This makes Hillary unelectable. I don’t care how much she whines or lies, we can read and with the internet, lies get noticed! She sincerely thinks she is helping the party by stealing the race because a black is unelectable; however, no matter your color a liar and immoral person is unelectable. I will vote for an honest person over a liar, which is why I have to consider McCain over Hillary if she steals the race with bullying. I sure hope Obama is cautious because people have been known to die when associated with Hillary. The press has stayed away from that one but I was around when she should have gone to jail.
Posted by: butterfly3344 | April 2, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
jgaw-
Yes. If hillary can achieve the nomination she will achieve my vote. While I do not like her all that much, I will not forfeit this chance to bring about a different course for America. Although I find her conceited and manipulative, to have four more years of this current course, could prove disasterous for future generations.
If we allow McCain to continue with this war, it will take years to end. Currently we are paying known insurgents to be Armed guards…both shiites and sunnis. Iran’s involvement in the Basra incident is fishy. And when the war first started Bin Laden reportedly said, “for every dollar we spend, the U.S. spends $10,000.” Bin Laden and anyone whom is loyal to him will try and keep us over there as long as they can. The beat the soviets the exact same way….by dragging out a war which destroyed their economy.
This war is draining our resources, stretching out our military, allowing Al Queada to gain a firm safehave in Pakistan, and is weakening our Dollar…. As the dollar becomes weaker the price of oil goes up, due to other countries being able to bid just as high or even higher than us for it.
Posted by: GM from MN | April 2, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
macy,
JGaw here,
the issues facing us are to important-for us to use this wonderful form of communication-to rant and rave.
lets stay on the issues.
and everyone can read my comments and see I did not write what you just atributed to me.please do not use me as an intro to your post.
I appreciate your passion.
and for the country’ sake I as an african woman of 53 years will
“Keep Hope Alive”
Review the issues-I do not believe you nor I know hillary personally-so lets judge her on the issues-and the solutions she has put forth. in her claim to help the country
she said she is for affordable healthcare for all
making college affordable
getting the economy on the right track
I believe she has the right solutions for these issues and many more.
I do believe we will be better off
after four years of a Hillary presidency.
Posted by: jgaw | April 2, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
jgaw- I agree that Hillary would definately have an inside view from the point of the presidency, however I still think that she will have to learn on the go as well (she would have a curve as you said).
I agree that with MI and FL. I blame Dean and the DNC. After this election is over the democratic party needs to resolve some of these major issues so all sides feel that neither candidate was given a unfair advantage.
All contests should become primaries, we should not drag this process out as long. I feel it should end by the end of May. States should vote in blocks (i feel) 25% at a time, and so that each block has roughly the same number of delegates up for grabs. Although I understand the point for superdelegates I find having them being as just as much of a problem as they are meant to be a solution.
Posted by: GM from MN | April 2, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
Macy writes:
“Oh he is out spending her ….
Jessie has a message for you people:
‘keep hope alive’”
Posted by: Navarro | April 2, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
gm mn 9:27 post
I have read your thoughts about the DNC
and I agree-I feel confident there will be changes-if not we may see a really historic event a well established independent party-one that will give the dem and rep. a run for their money.
Posted by: jgaw | April 2, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
jgaw-
Thanks for a meaningful dialogue. I’m out for the night.
in the meantime i will count the days until bush is out and we can say to bush
“No more years! No more Years!”
Posted by: GM from MN | April 2, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
I would certainly agree Colleen.
The same thing happened in ’82, I think re Iowa and NH.
Pelosi was the Dnc chair then, and she eventually seated them unpunished.
Also, Dean front-loaded the primary season this year to favor Obama. Which is very surprising, considering that most of us had never heard of Obama except his Senate candidacy.
One would not think Dean/MoveOn were thinking ahead that far re Obama, yet they were.
I have suggested on here that people go to the book website: “Burning at the Grassroots. com”. “Inside the Dean Machine” by Dana Dunnan. They selected Obama in 2004 as their candidate, US Senate was just a “stop-over.
That site has details from the book and otherwise that read like a script for Obama’s campaign. Explore it.
The book was written following Dean’s loss. They took that gameplan, tweaked it, got Obama and here we are. It is amazing how everything from press, to internet, to youth, to Malcolm X “traps” for Kerry, controlling caucus states, winning Black vote in SC, etc.
Spells out tactics, and explains why Dean front-loaded primary as he did.
Posted by: MC | April 2, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
MC writes:
“They selected Obama in 2004 as their candidate, US Senate was just a “stop-over.”
Posted by: Navarro | April 2, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
Hillary: Grunt or Jarhead?
Bill Clinton says Hillary tried to join the Army from Political Punch notes that President Bill Clinton tried to buoy up his wife’s military cred by claiming that she tried to join the Army – but was turned away due
Posted by: PAXALLES | April 2, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
I have to agree with you, bsmith, that recruiters in those days — even after Vietnam — would not have turned her away, and certainly not that quickly. A warm body is a warm body, though in Hillabeans case, that may be pushing it!!
I like the theory that sniper fire prevented her from enlisting!
Obama 2008 — Yes, WE CAN!!!
Posted by: Jackt51 | April 2, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
The Clintons can’t keep their lies straight. She lied about trying to join the Marines and now Bill gets the lie mixed up and says it was the Army. We, Americans, know that both Clintons loathe the Military!
Posted by: Don | April 2, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
Clintons are notorious liars. No one can match the skills of Clintons when it comes to lying through their teeth. Not even, Republicans.
Posted by: Pete | April 2, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
MC is a paid Hillary employee. Such people want Hillary to stay in the race for ever so that they can make a buck or two for months to come.
Posted by: Valerie | April 2, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
All Right People.
Hillary’s Bosnian Adventure Tale now has some collaboration.
Some fellow named Tripletee on that Kos site now is backing he Hillary. So lay off Hillary until you read his account.
I would give you the link but it is frowned on here.
Posted by: The Commander Guy | April 2, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
MC,
Very interesting re: Obama really chosen back in 2004, with the Senate as only a stop-over. I think you are right that he was chosen years ago. when he came to the Senate, Daschle was out he was delivered the cream of the crop of Daschle’s staff. Very nice for the young senator. I believe he was fingered even before then though. Go back to Chicago!!! Harvard Law School. I feel like I am watching a movie plot.
Posted by: countallthevotes | April 2, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
Earlier today I praised Hillary for trying to join the Army to defend our country just like George W Bush did when he protected our country from invasion by air from the south when he was a youngster. Thank You President Bush.
And Apparently I have been endorsing Hillary over the past couple of days so often that I don’t even remember any of these endorsements.
But GWB and HRC can team up to protect our Country we are all truly blessed.
GBU GB the United States of America.
Posted by: The Commander Guy | April 2, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
For a woman whose life has ONLY been about politics and power, Hillary does some pretty stupid things. Next to Obama and McCain she looks like the amateur in this game.
After making bogus of serious events in Bosnia, a story that military folks didn’t particularly appreciate, we get THIS silly story. I’m not even saying that this again is another Hillary lie, but the idea that this story would do well is so completely stupid. Military people hate her for playing games with such serious and deliberate choices in life as joining the US Army.
Didn’t the Clintons learn anything from their White House years except to lay a sound foundation for making BIG money in their future lives?
No way the US Army would want this woman for President. She will not be recruited. NEVER.
Posted by: kantor | April 2, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
“Are the Republicans paying this guy to keep giving speeches?”
LOL
I’m afraid they ain’t got the money for that…so… Bill is volunteering!
Posted by: herta | April 2, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
Kantor
Forsooth gentle fellow. Hillary has achieved great things, single handedly in many instances. Many of these Great Accomplishments, you you will never know.
The Army did recruit Hillary. Hillary went on many special ops.
We are all safer because Hillary …. and GWB made the decision to defend OUR country when they were youngsters.And we all owe the greatest debt of gratitude to these two.
Posted by: The Commander Guy | April 2, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm
Hillary’s lying is nothing new, not by a long shot. She has been a corrupt human being for a long, long time. Any Hillary supporters have a response for the following news from today?
Dan Calabrese’s new column on Hillary Clinton’s past may bring the curtain down on her political future.
Calabrese interviewed Jerry Zeifman, the man who served as chief counsel to the House Judiciary Committee during the Watergate hearings, has tried to tell the story of his former staffer’s behaviour for years.
Zeifman fired Hillary for unethical behaviour after she conspired to deny Richard Nixon counsel during the hearings. The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary, says her history of lies and unethical behaviour goes back further – and much deeper – than anyone realizes.
Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career. Why?
“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.” When informed that public evidence (Douglas impeachment files) showed a precedent for the right to counsel, SHE ABSCONDED WITH THE FILES TO ELIMINATE THE EVIDENCE.
Posted by: Sparky | April 3, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am
I find it so sad-from 10pm until now
not one of the issues that face the american people-and over the next 4years
has been discussed.
I love reading all the comments about a candidates views of how they will solve the ills of this country.
but this bile is just a downright waste of time.
pick an issues; healthcare,the economy,student loan mess, the hight price of gas-any issue, and talk about what your candidate is saying they will do to solve it.
Posted by: jgaw | April 3, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am
jgaw,
The topic I pick is: Hillary Clinton’s credibility, honesty, and trustworthiness.
She has a long and well known record of criminal behavior:
• Securities Fraud on cattle futures
• disappearing/reappearing records from the Rose Law firm
• selling national security secrets to China for personal gain
• stealing furniture and an art collection, etc. from the White House
• the largest campaign finance fraud in American history
• and much more
Why would any rational person trust such a person with the presidency?
Posted by: Sparky | April 3, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am
Maybe you could write Brooks Jackson at Factcheck.org. By the time he is done checking the facts, Senator Clinton will have joined the Marines. Which would be pretty remarkable after having worked for George McGovern.
I’m not going to pretend that I was for that war – but I do care about the people who went – kids who didn’t have a chance to go to Wellesley or Yale died in that war – a lot of them before their 21st birthday. I agree with the people who said this was a worse lie than Bosnia.
Posted by: Mara | April 3, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am
well, while pawing over those things-
Hillary will cont’ to reassure the people left to vote in the primaries about the solutions that our country needs to get healthcare for all citizens
Me and my family a looked at the affordable college plans of her’s and obama’-and we hope america gets her education plan-it is great-and gonna help a lot of young people.
Obama-has copied her plans.
Hillary has a good command of the issues and she will be the one to set the economy right again.
I heard a retired general on cspan today
he was asked directly which had the better plan for getting us out of iraq.he replied without hesitation-”from what I can see-Sen. Clinton has the closest plan to what I would do”
I could go on, but go to Hillaryclinto.com-the official site and read it for yourself.
You are probally of on the very rich and well off-and whoever gets into the white house you will be fine financially but for some of us-the issues that I have mentioned here-and what the candidates plans are to solve them-do matter to me.
I do have a rational mind-and reading the topic you chose-I cannot see how those things you listed will help anyone
over the next four years.
Posted by: jgaw | April 3, 2008, 2:03 am 2:03 am
I won’t vote for a woman who enabled her rapist husband so they could climb the political ladder. In fact, not only did she enable him, she assisted him.
I don’t care what plans her staff comes up with for solving our every problem…it will take more tax money and in the end that never works better than we can do for ourselves….IF we’re willing to stand on our own two feet.
She’s a crook, she’s lied and cheated for years. She was fired from the Watergate committee for this and that wasn’t the first and hardly the last. Anyone who votes for her is just asking for more of the same.
Personally, I think she’s nuts. Any normal person would never try to pull these stunts….running through sniper fire…how insane to tell this whopper to an international audience. Something is really wrong with her.
Posted by: SuziQ | April 3, 2008, 2:38 am 2:38 am
First she was trying to join the marines now it is the army. I thought the story was they said it was the marines and only the army would take you.
It seems like the Clintons can’t keep their lies straight.
Bill Clinton in 1975 was running for attorney general at the time. Hillary and her friends were seeing if there was a biased against feminism. They had no intention of joining the military. They were feminists. They held protests against the military in college. Hillary is close friends with Gloria Steinhem who mocks the military.
Posted by: Mike | April 3, 2008, 3:22 am 3:22 am
Hillary is one big LIE. She sat on the board of walmart and said nothing bad about their anti worker practices.
She helped pass nafta. In 2004 to a business group said on balance nafta has been good for america and new york.
Hillary in October on npr in new hampshire was against counting the election in michigan saying it wouldn’t count and it didn’t matter if she kept her name on the ballot.
What are wrong with the voters of this country?
Can’t they see that Hillary Clinton is a serial liar.
Do they like being lied to. What is this a monarchy and we are all peasants.
Hillary was for the invasion of iraq. She is on tape on march 6, 2003 being for the invasion. At no time did she talk about inspections.
For years after the war Hillary was for it as she thought it would be good politically to try the thatcher role.
Hillary’s whole candidacy is a lie.
35 years of experience. She had no security clearence in the white house, she didn’t get daily security breifings or attend nsa meetings.
Hillary didn’t even know when her campaign was going broke. Her campaign manager told her you are broke and need to loan 5 million. Hillary is aloof. She picks loyalty over competence. She isn’t a manager. She never managed anything. Her balance sheet for her campaign is a nightmare.
Hillary is a serial liar. American peole must like being lied to and feeling like peasants to the great monarchy.
Posted by: Mike | April 3, 2008, 3:29 am 3:29 am
Hey, wait a second! The way I heard it she actually did get into one of the services, became famous for her heroism, and they made a movie about her life in the Armed Services called “G.I. Jane”. Naturally, Demi Moore was chosen to play HRC since the two look so similar? Isn’t that the way it happened?
Seriously, Bill is killing HRC’s presidential hopes. He really needs to be shipped off to Siberia. Every time he opens his mouth, some political gossip article shows up on Drudge or ABCNews or whatever. Can’t he stump without making waves for her?
Posted by: J. T. Bigglesworth | April 3, 2008, 6:36 am 6:36 am
Seriously, I wonder what went on in her mind? What did she hope to accomplish being in the military? Did she intend to pull strings inside and get more support? Questions, questions, questions.
Posted by: Faramir | April 3, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am
Whopper alert! This is pathetic. You don’t need perfect vision to join the Army. You do need to have a commitment to serve your country ahead of yourself. The Army recruiter didn’t need glasses to see that Hillary was a “poser”, not a recruit. Hillary is going to flop in PA. Her lead is dribbling away. She seems intent on snatching an embarassing defeat out of the jaws of a close contest. So be it…
Posted by: Sean O'Brien | April 3, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am
What strikes me most about the Clinton campaign is that so much of it is based on claims that can’t be substantiated by objective 3rd parties. The few that were substantiated by 3rd parties contradict what Clinton claims. That’s what makes this latest announcement by her husband so suspect and in my opinion irrelevant.
Posted by: Publius | April 3, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am
The want-a-be veteran married to the famous card burner. I’ll buy that. Who wrote gullible on the ceiling?
Posted by: jijalagi | April 3, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am
Dan Quail’s service in the reserves was criticized, as was George W. Bush’s service in the National Guard. Democrats claim that both should have served on active duty. Bill Clinton’s card burning was overlooked, “that was a long time ago”. Now we are expected to believe that Hillary would have served if she could have. Double standard is bad enough, lying about it is even worse. I’m no great fan of Juan McCain but if military service is a factor, he is the only veteran in the bunch. McCain tried to enlist and he can prove it.
Posted by: jijalagi | April 3, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am
Dan Quail’s service in the reserves was criticized, as was George W. Bush’s service in the National Guard. Democrats claim that both should have served in active duty. Bill Clinton’s card burning was overlooked, “that was a long time ago”. Now we are expected to believe that Hillary would have served if she could have. Double standard is bad enough. Lying about it is even worse. I’m no great fan of Juan McCain but if military service is a factor, he is the only veteran in the bunch. McCain tried to enlist and he can prove it.
Posted by: jijalagi | April 3, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am
I note that Bill did not specifically state which army she or they tried to join. Perhaps she tried to join the NVs or perhaps the Red Chinese Army. The good news is that, if Hillary had not made this inevitable run for the presidency, Bubba may have been able to continue to live the lie! As it is, it will be much harder for the “bony-fingered one” to resume creating a fictional legacy after the ball is over.
Posted by: David | April 3, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am
Kind of weird to watch the nation moving to a race war
Posted by: SS-Mann | April 3, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am
Just when you think things can’t get much worse in this campaign. I think it would be best if the Dems would just quit campaigning and depend on the sense of the American people to make a decision since it seems neither Dem candidate has the sense God gave a pissant anymore. They are acting like two five year olds on the first day of kindergarten and Bill Clinton has lost all touch with realty since the campaign started getting rough. They are making the GOP very, very happy. If the Dems lose again in 2008 it will be their own fault this time, no one elses.
Posted by: Ron | April 3, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
I think a large part of the problem is that the main stream media let Bill get away with lying during his entire term. He was never called on it by the media, and I think both he and Hillary thinks they can still get away with it. Maybe the media either got ashamed or got fed up with it. Either way good for them for calling their hands on these lies. They should not let them keep going on. This fable is an affront to every service member past and present, and it doesn’t even have a moral.
Posted by: ka | April 3, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Those of you who doubt that learning to wear contact lenses obviously didn’t have to try in the 1960s and 1970s. None of my family’s very upscale doctors wanted my parents to allow me to get what were then HARD contact lenses because the docs had all tried unsuccessfully, each of them on more than one occasion. Some of them even felt contact lenses could damage the eyes.
Eventually, I was allowed and, after a lot of trying, breaking more than one lens and a good deal of frustration, I was able to wear them, but I was much younger than the docs.
Posted by: oldgirl | April 3, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
Maybe it was the sniper fire she dodged in getting to the recruiting center in AK that prevented her from joining. Come on Hil, what else you got for us?
Posted by: stop2think | April 3, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
So Hillary tried to join the Military. Yeah right.
Posted by: Joe | April 3, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
Oh please, please, please, Hillary!
I joined the army in 1975. I can tell you that in the post-Vietnam era military recruiters were desperate for quality enlistees. They would have at least sent Hillary for a physical – the Marine recruiter wouldn’t have just summarily dismissed her.
As for her age? Well candidates her age WERE accepted during this time. I met some.
But here’s the kicker. As a college graduate, and law school grad no less, Hillary would have been ideal OCS material. It is likely both the Army and Navy (as the parent of the Corp) would have pegged her as a perfect JAG officer. In fact now that I think about it she would have been good reservist material. A lot of JAG officers were in the reserves back then.
Posted by: Mr. 360 | April 3, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
Let’s see, during the dreaded Vietnam War, Little Lib Hilly volunteered to serve in the Army and/or Marines? She has said that she loves combat, and her interest in serving even in Vietnam confirms that. No wonder she voted as she did to OK the administration’s war lust.
Also, Obama was approximately fifteen years old when the Vietnam War ended.
Posted by: Mary Scoles | April 3, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
“And if you believe that, you’ll buy this watch”
“How can you tell a Clinton is lying? Their lips are moving!”
Apparently this lie isn’t even worth conflating and defending, as Hillary ‘stood by’ her Bosnian BS longer then this. (No comment from her about the comment from the now 20 something ‘little girl’ who THOUGHT Hillary liked her poem and was at least paying attention!)
Anyway-so the former 1st Lady who wasn’t named until she was 6 years old tried to ‘Join the Marines’ but was turned down because they preferred, and took, less qualified and accomplished recruits.
Sheesh-I realize somebody would need to be morally obtuse and intellectually inadequate to vote for Hillary but that doesn’t mean she needs to campaign to them so explicitly!
Posted by: JeffsterCO | April 3, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
bill clinton is lying.
there was NO “BODY ARMOR” in those days.
health care was NOT an issue.
Posted by: deroy | April 3, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
David made a good point at 11:21 AM
I think Hillary tried to join the Mexican Army. She seems more patriotic toward Mexico than she does the US.
Posted by: jijalagi | April 3, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
Both Bill’s and Hillary’s stories beg one glaring omission; we are at war at the time of the alleged enlistment attempts. The Army or the Marine Corps would have enlisted a lawyer immediately, regardless of her visual ability. She would have then went through a short officer indoctrination course, and then would have been assigned to a stateside position as a legal officer, freeing up a man who could see to go war in the jungles of Vietnam.
Posted by: Lee | April 3, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
@ clinton supporters And what is her experience besides being an ex presidents wife? Obama will be a fine president he would just need to pick his cabinet and vp wisely. If the Clintons get back in they won’t be any different from Bush. All of their politician friends will be rewarded with top level jobs for sticking by them. Also does their relationship with the Bush family bother anyone but me. Before she started her campaign Bill was globe trotting with Bush Sr. I see he hasn’t done that in a while. Bush/Clinton/Bush/Clinton. In 2016 it will be Jeb’s turn because he’s entitled right?
Posted by: obama girl | April 3, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
I joined the service in 1970, and at that time there were enlisties as old as 28 in my company at boot camp. Three of my wifes female best friends went into the service in 1971, one in the navy, two in the Air Force.
Personally, my glasses were slight thiner than coke bottles and correctable to an acceptable level that the service hod no problem letting me in.
This story is just another Clinton fantesy for Hillary supporters. I’m surprised she hasn’t brought out her collection of war medal’s, Navy cross, Bronze star, purple hearts and the like.
Posted by: DLW | April 3, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
Liar like all the rest of her reder.
Tried to “join the Army”
Went to a Marine recruiter.
Dah
You don’t join the “MARINES”, you become one.
Posted by: Gunny | April 3, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Perhaps the other co-participants in the Clinton’s anti-American antiwar group convinced them to join the U.S. Army as spies for the enemy. Unfortunately for Bill, he had already burned his draft card in London.
Posted by: David | April 3, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
I have a hard time believing anything either one of them say; I especially have a hard time believing anything he says. Fortunate for her, eventhough I am not supporting her right now – I would still vote for Hillary (if she gets the nom) over Bill(I wouldn’t vote for Bill again though). Bill is just a bold face you know what….
Posted by: Angie Thomas | April 3, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Well, is anyone here surprised? The Clintons, lying. My vision was 20/600, and I was accepted into the Army as an M.P. And I had a heart value defect. Yes, it’s true. I knew many people who were as blind as bats without their glasses or contacts, but their vision was correctable to an acceptable level and there we all were, in, what was called at that time, the most effective form of birth control, the military issued glasses. They were as ugly as sin, I’ll never forget basic training in those things. But this kind of disproves her claim.
Thank God, though, that she did not get in. I am sure this was another ploy with an covert attempt to gain something for her future political career, not serve her country. She and the card-burner deserve one another, but this country does not deserve them. Save us all!
This woman will stop at nothing at this point, her tactics are well-known in most circles. This claim takes the cake though.
Not a praying person, I now pray nightly that this woman doesn’t not get in office. God help us then. Mark my words.
Posted by: Lisa | April 3, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
Hey…what does it matter. Ludacris has now endorsed Obama….so he is a shoe-in:
What a joke
Posted by: richard | April 3, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
I think Hillary belonged to the same super-secret military team that John Kerry was part of when he went on a “secret mission” to Cambodia for President Nixon at a time when Nixon was not even in office. If you believe that whopper you also believe Hillary grabbed an M16 and swept those snipers off the runway in Bosnia so all those cute little kids could give her flowers. What next? Obama will say he tried to join the army, but they refused him because the military that produced men like Colin Powell was too racist. Demos can’t even lie well.
Posted by: James | April 3, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
I think Hillary belonged to the same super-secret military team that John Kerry was part of when he went on a “secret mission” to Cambodia for President Nixon at a time when Nixon was not even in office. If you believe that whopper you also believe Hillary grabbed an M16 and swept those snipers off the runway in Bosnia so all those cute little kids could give her flowers. What next? Obama will say he tried to join the army, but they refused him because the military that produced men like Colin Powell was too racist. Demos can’t even lie well.
Posted by: James | April 3, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
GO HILLARY !!!!
WAS OBAMA Ever in the Military ?????
DID he even try – what about his wife?
Obama will not be elected – his judgment & backgroaund are far too questionable to be President of the UNITED States.
Posted by: Molly | April 3, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
I don’t believe a WORD out of anybody’s mouth with the name Clinton. She was called the “campus Commie” back in college. Doesn’t anyone remember when the Clintons had to move out of the White House and they tried to steal property in the White House? Almost $200k and they got caught and had to put it back!!! FACT!!!
Posted by: BuffyOne | April 3, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
Bill and Hillary Clinton have told so many stories, for so many years, they believe that grass roots folks are dumb enough to buy into their stories of greatness. When is a lie, no longer a lie? I have it – When the lie is a “Clinton”. Right now, somewhere, someone is going over Hillary Clinton’s past interviews, public records, phone logs, etc. and the lies are going to flow like water. We will then be told that Hillary must have been under the stress of the Campaign Trail. What would be the motive for a U.S. Senator and Past First Lady, to lie? Why would a Clinton Lie? Da!
Posted by: Inspector | April 4, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am
In 1994 she claimed she tried to join the Marines. In 2008 Bill Clinton claims she tried to join the Army. Look out Hawaii, by the time she gets to you, Hillary will have tried to join the Navy. As a Viet Nam Vet, I find this whole thing laughable.
Posted by: Terry | April 4, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
I am a combat Veteran with 16 years in the service. I am getting ready to return to Iraq soon for my third OIF/OEF deployment and my sixth deployment overall. I am disgusted by Senator Clinton’s claims as they dishonor all those who have served in our military forces. If Senator Clinton is elected I will be unable to serve under her leadership as it is inconceivable that I or any other service member would, could, or should serve a Commander in Chief that does not share our Core Values. Although I have disagreed with many decisions of current and past presidents, like any good Soldier I have saluted the flag and carried out my mission with Loyalty, Duty, Respect, Selfless-Service, Honor, Integrity and Personal Courage! That said, I am simply unwilling to serve under the leadership (if we can call it that) of a person whos character is so morally deprived.
Posted by: Randy | April 4, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
the only thing hillarys eye sight would have prevented her from doing is flying a plane or helicopter…let the lies continue
Posted by: godisnotreal | April 4, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Hillary has shown nothing but contempt for the military her whole life. She only supports the troops when it is in her best interest.
Bill saying that Hillary wanted better armor for the troops.
Did she forget that it was BILL that starved the military for 8 years.
We went to war with the supplies HE got us.
At least Bush made an effort to correct that.
Posted by: Alex L | April 4, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
Anyone who believes that she tried to join the army,navy or marines believes in the tooth fairy!
Posted by: Jerry/Fountain Valley | April 4, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
Hey Bill, the Salvation Army does not count as military experience! You were Commander and Chief once, right?
Posted by: Not Born Yesterday | April 4, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm
I spent 10 years in the army. Got out because of bill. The clintons are an embarassment to this country. Draft dodgers & compulsive liars have no place in office to run this country.
Posted by: Jason | April 6, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
I agree with Randy (posted April 4, 2008) I am a female, and retired disabled US Navy vet. HillBilly cares less about all the long duty hours, separation from family, missed birthdays of our children, marital strains, and even the ultimate sacrifices our brave men and women are giving for our country. She is a disgraceful doggish troll, who questions our intelligence, when it only shows her lack of. She’s a liar and cannot not be trusted to furhter any cause that doesn’t benefit her. She lied again about a preganant woman dying from lack of health care. Every day it’s another one. Her rep is talking NAFTA in Columbia while she’s saying how much against it she is. HillBilly is trifling, putrid, wretched, and vile. I wouldn’t vote for her to replenish the toilet paper at greyhound bus stations.
Posted by: Debra Erics | April 7, 2008, 4:37 am 4:37 am
She didn’t try. She is lying again and again. Right out of law school? She would have at least been in as a JAG officer.
Posted by: Dave | April 7, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Hey so nice to see so many totally round the bend US idiots commenting in here. It’s no wonder you’re the by far most despised people on the earth.
Posted by: Kourian | May 17, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
Compare Hillary Clinton on the issues to Obama and it’s like rookie vs pro!Let’s end the mandates on NCLB and get a gas holiday ! Go Clinton !
Posted by: Peace Out For Unity | May 18, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
hillary clinton needs to quit the race i mean seriously shes an awful person you may as well call her america’s next top hitler!
Posted by: gator gal | May 23, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
i think all the candidates are screwwy and i’m not voting this year from what who the candidates are trying to make us believe who they are is what america will want to be their next presidente’
Posted by: marc | May 23, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm