Candidate Clinton to Richardson: ‘Barack Obama Can’t Win’
ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos Reports: Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., and former President Bill Clinton are making very direct arguments to Democratic superdelegates, starkly insisting Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., cannot win a general election against presumptive Republican nominee, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.
Sources with direct knowledge of the conversation between Sen. Clinton and Gov. Bill Richardson, D-N.M., prior to the Governor’s endorsement of Obama say she told him flatly, "He cannot win, Bill. He cannot win."
Richardson, who served in President Clinton’s cabinet, disagreed.
At a rally in Oregon, standing next to Obama, Richardson insisted, "My great affection and admiration for Hillary Clinton and President Bill Clinton will never waver." But he added, "It is time, however, for Democrats to stop fighting among ourselves and to prepare for the tough fight we will face against John McCain in the fall."
Yet here’s a wrinkle, from a source with direct knowledge of Richardson’s conversations with the Clintons: Richardson himself told Sen. Clinton and former President Clinton that he didn’t think Obama could win, back when he was (according to the Clintons) telling them earlier this year that he wouldn’t endorse Obama.
"Too inexperienced," Richardson said, the source tells ABC News.
WATCH GEORGE’S FULL WORLD NEWS REPORT BY CLICKING HERE.
A report in the San Francisco Chronicle detailed another explosive exchange in which the former president angrily objected to Richardson’s endorsement.
"Five times to my face [Richardson] said that he would never do that," Clinton said, according to the Chronicle — before, the newspaper reports, he "went on a tirade that ran from the media’s unfair treatment of Hillary to questions about the fairness of the votes in state caucuses that voted for Obama. It ended with him asking delegates to imagine what the reaction would be if Obama was trailing by just 1 percent and people were telling him to drop out."
Another, neutral superdelegate who was in the room for that meeting called the Chronicle’s take "a bit exaggerated." But there is no question the Clintons are passionately arguing their case against Obama in what is fast becoming an intense race not just for the votes of the public but of the Democratic elite known as superdelegates.
For all the latest from the campaign trail, read The Note every day exclusively on ABCNews.com.
And don’t miss "The Last Lecture: A Love Story for Your Life", an unforgettable special about Professor Randy Pausch’s inspiring last lecture at Carnegie Mellon about living life to the fullest, only on ABC.
Email
GOP Rap: 'Take America Back'
Afghanistan Timeline Realistic?
The longer the super delegates let this circus go on, the more damage they do to their Party (who cares?) and the more electable they make John McCain, aka Bush Lite, McSame, Mr 100 more years of Fear, War and Debt.
Posted by: x32792 | April 2, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
Hillary can’t win either.
Hillary can’t even win against Obama.
We have a colossal race of failures.
Politics is putrid.
Posted by: Nice Guy | April 2, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
Those who vote for McCain must like military funerals.
Posted by: db | April 2, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
Obama can’t win? It’s Hillary who can’t win. Hillary is a household name and she can’t get more than 45% among Democratic primary voters! If she can’t win among Democrats, she sure can’t beat McCain in the general. She may be a tough campaigner, but she’s a weak candidate.
Posted by: Peter Cannady | April 2, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
Between the 2 of them punching each other out, by November, might as well get used to saying “President John McCain”
Posted by: MFM | April 2, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
Superdelagates….what a stupid idea!!
Posted by: Sophia | April 2, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
This country deserves the person they elect for President. Look at how blindly this country voted for Bush and for his personality. The same holds true for Obama. When the excitement of his charisma wears out, it will be too late. Damaged is done.
Posted by: mary | April 2, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
This country deserves the person they elect for President. Look at how blindly this country voted for Bush and for his personality. The same holds true for Obama. When the excitement of his charisma wears out, it will be too late. Damaged is done.
Posted by: mary | April 2, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
You couldn’t ask for an easier election for the democrats to win. Bush’s approval rating at 30%, the war not exactly a strong point, and the economy headed south. It’s hard to believe you could screw this one up, but it looks like that’s exactly where you’re headed. If you guys can’t win this, it’s just time to get out of the business.
Posted by: Dave B | April 2, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
Hysterical post Bob, reminds me of 2004. McCain leads both candidates in many polls. You keep that wishful thinking pal!
Posted by: Scofield Bob | April 2, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
SuperDelegates,
The correct word is unelectable. Barack has been unfairly labeled as the “black” candidate. He is indeed a person of color. America is ready to elect a person of color, without any question. The results in many contests show that.
Barack Obama is not electable, though, because he is a pure unadulterated ELITIST from Harvard. He’s also a bad bowler but I’ll excuse the latter.
========================================
Obama got $250,000!
Rezko gets jail!
Obama is unelectable!
========================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 2, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
Here_IN_PA
You obviously cherry pick the polls you want to try and support Hillary.
Barack will win one way- using the same strategy he has used to (unbelievably) take the nomination form the anointed Hillary of the Clinton dynasty.
I am sick to death of Clinton fanatics- you continue to parrot the Clinton machine, whose only remaining strategy is to raise doubts about Obama. Has Obama stooped to tearing her down?? NO, and he could, easily remind voters of the nightmare of much of the Clinton Co-presidency.
That’s why he has my support, and I started out prepared to vote for Clinton.
Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton-NOT!
Posted by: US citizen | April 2, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
“Why exactly does she think Obama can’t win? Because from where I stand his coalition looks rather unstoppable.”
His coalition represents about 50% of the democratic party and about 20% of the general electorate. He can’t win.
Posted by: Aslan | April 2, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
Who cares? All three candidates suck, you have ultra socialists in Clinton/Obama and a moderate socialist in McCain.
After 8 years of Bush it’s time for a conservative. 20 years of liberalism is enough!
Posted by: WhoCares | April 3, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am
He can all money and people in world. Let states vote who never done yet. Putting faith in man who known 2 yrs and ABC World News
Posted by: bradva | April 3, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am
“He lived a life of privelidge…PERIOD!”
Well at least he lived a life that taught him spelling. If you can’t write, and likely don’t read much why should I trust your political analysis?
Posted by: Turandottir | April 3, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am
You reap what you sow? You make your own bed..? Dig your own grave? Yup DNC.. you get what you deserve.
This weakened Republican party will still be strong enough to defeat todays DNC house of cards!
The Liar The Witch And The wardrobe is the worst thing that has ever happened to the DNC.
Obama is doing well simply because he’s not a Clinton!
The big question is… Will the Left commit suicide-by-Iraq once more?
Posted by: trax | April 3, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am
I’m a Republican that would vote for H. Clinton over McCain. But I would vote for McCain over Obama.
Posted by: Ann | April 3, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am
There is something very creepy about Obama. I feel there is some serious things that he is hiding. He may be a good cheerleader and stuff but the keys to the White House contain the key to the nuclear arsenal of the USA. Although I have to admit, I like Obama, I definetly DO NOT TRUST HIM.
Posted by: Teresa | April 3, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am
I do not care if Hillary or Bill end up endorsing Obama IF he is the candidate. I love the Clintons But COULD NEVER vote for Obama! What would become of our country if Obama were elected? Where is the love?
Posted by: Kimberly | April 3, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am
Just for the record Jerry,…
Why did you care to research that? Where did you find it? How long have you been obsessive about posting it to prove,…absolutely nothing?
That is one of those great pieces of esoteric nonsence that adds nothing to the conversation.
“Gee Wiz Jer,…how did you know all that?”
But the real question is…what does it matter?
________________________________________
His whole life in America is a lie!! And you fell for it,..Sucker!!
Posted by: Jerry | April 3, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am
It is already easy to imagine the Republican attack ads against Barack Obama.
They open with video of his wife, Michelle, saying she was proud of America “for the first time in my adult lifetime” because of her husband’s presidential candidacy. Cut to the Illinois Senator explaining that he doesn’t wear an American flag lapel pin because it is a “substitute for true patriotism.” Then flash a clip of Obama explaining that his Caucasian grandmother was a “typical white person” because she uttered racial epithets and was afraid of black people.
Finally, the coup de grace, pictures of Obama’s angry, arm-waving preacher blaming the United States for 9/11 and shouting “God Damn America” to the rafters of Chicago’s Trinity United Church of Christ.THE ARE GOING TO SEAT FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN, AND IF THE BLEEDING IN WRIGHT SERMON,ONE SUPERDELEGATE FOR OBAMA, OBAMA HAS REFUSED TO GO AHEAD WITH REVOTE GOING TO BACKFIRE ON .ii have beenlistening to talk radio this story is not gong away i guarantee superdelegates willgo for hillary it just tuf luck now.blieve me their willbe no blood to play. hillary ahs alread been maiking inroads in pennsylvainia among black she now has 35 percent of them supportingher since jeremiah wright ,i predict it will be hillary 70 percents and obama18 percent inpennsylvani ,and in north carolina 60-40 for hillary!!TYPICAL WHITE PERSON IS GOINGTO DO ALOT MORE DMAGE THAN YOUN COULD IMAGINE
Posted by: dave rosenberg | April 3, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am
Why would anyone believe that Obama cannot win. He’s ahead on all fronts. He’s ahead in most polls.
Statisticians have determined that it is a mathematical impossibilioty for Clinton to catch up to Obama in pledged delegates. They also indicate that she has nearly zero chance of catching up in the popular vote.
Clinton’s only argument is to say that Obama is somehow seriously flawed. But she has no credibility. I think she also is shooting for the voters who havent been paying attention. Who else would buy into her claim (other than white racists and angry females who want Hillary to be their hero and avenge the gender discrimination they have experienced in their lives).
White male, age 39, PhD
Posted by: Mike Denhof | April 3, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am
Those of you who are so overwrought
by the current “war” in Iraq have no sense of what real war is. In fact it is no longer a war at this stage (as one is conventionally defined); but my point is that historically the losses so far are
very small. Consider that the US lost more than 4000 KIA on several SINGLE days during the Civil War and WW2. And Britain lost nearly 20K on 7/1/16 alone.
It is far to early to judge the worthiness (or unworthiness) of the current engagement, but I have a sense that it may someday be considered a resounding success. We’ll see.
Posted by: Historian | April 3, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am
“if Hillary doesn’t win the nomination I will vote for McCain and so will my family.”
Sorry Mariann you don’t get to tell them how to vote and you’ll never now how they did. That’s why we have one man one vote.
Posted by: Turandottir | April 3, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am
Gotta love right wing patriots like “Ryan” up at the top. His tax cutting president and congress have trashed the country at home and abroad, weakened our military to the point of absurdity and have been the most corrupt leaders this country has ever had and all he can think about is that his taxes MIGHT go up (in fact, unless he’s a millionaire many times over, they’ll probably go down under a Democratic presidency). Give Republicans an A+ again and again for the “what’s in it for me” award.
Posted by: homer | April 3, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am
I filled out my Form 1040 today. If either Obama or The Witch are elected my taxes will increase by $800 whthout an increase in income–merely by making dividend income fully taxable–the restoration of the double taxation of corporate profits so dear to the balck harts of the Democ-rats.
The only things the Democ-rats have a religious devotation to is high income taxes and the Death Tax. Go to the voting booth in November and kill them first!
Posted by: David S. Levine | April 3, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am
NAV: The posts are primarily articles from various sources, such as the Chicago Sun-Times and NBC. If you can’t take the heat (truth), then get out of the kitchen.
Posted by: Cowbell | April 3, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am
go ahead play the follow leader game now with his “make up ideas and Changes talks”
Posted by: john nc | April 3, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am
Jerry, if I want to go to rightwing propaganda sites I know how. Thanks.
Posted by: All the News that's fit to dump | April 3, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am
A lot of conservative columnists continue to attack Hillary Clinton and ignore Obama. A number of Republicans in earlier primaries have supported Obama in an effort to prevent Hillary Clinton from becoming the Democratic Nominee.
The last laugh, or more correctly weeping, might very well be on the Republicans. When the votes are counted after the November election, I think it very likely John MCCain will lose the election.
In which case, if Obama is the next President he will be much more liberal than Hillary Clinton. Obama is a Marxist, who believes in collectivism and his Presidency will be a “movement” to mobilize the nation into collectivist actions and policies unlike anything since the New Deal.
That is what Talk Radio, conservatives of all stripes, and Republicans who fear and hate Hillary Clinton should really be concerned about. McCain is a slender reed indeed against the realities “change” under Barack Obama will bring to our nation and society.
Posted by: RPhillips | April 3, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am
Not proud of Senator Clinton or Bill right now. They seem prepared to try to sink the democratic nominee and the party if they do not get their way. Don’t do it. So tired of the divisivness.
For Democrates who vow to vote for McCain if ‘their’ dem candidate does not get the nomination…get control of these emotional outbursts. Our country is in serious trouble after 8 years Republican reign and McCain has been a significant contributor to major things that have gone wrong. Now all of a sudden he walks on water? PLEASE.
If McCain becomes President, this country will continue to suffer greatly…he is a continuation of Bush. Trying to distance himself from Bush is strictly political to get votes.
Voting for McCain is voting for more of
Carl Rove (advisor), War and more War (100 more years in Iraq), No clue about fixing the economy, and selecting Supreme Court Justices that will make partisan/right wing rulings that have impact for generations to come.
Appreciate his sacrifice, however McCain is NOT the only one who has served our great country. And he should not be President. Almost every person who has served in Iraq and now running for political office is running as a democrat…there is a reason for that.
Posted by: Retired | April 3, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am
I hope that I’m wrong, but I think that the DNC will use the super delegates to take the nomination away from Obama if he wins the popular vote. If they do this, they are insuring a McCain win, since HRC can’t win the general election. If Obama gains the nomination, I think that he has a very good chance of being victorious over McCain. I guess that we’ll see what we see. I think that it’s clear that the Democratic Party doesn’t have the cojones to run a black man for president.
Posted by: Burlroad | April 3, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am
I am extremely frustrated to the see that senior Democraty Party leaders are trying to discredit the party. Who is Obama? No body knows anything about him. He still not even denounce his old pastor. He divided the country blacks and whites. He has no morals. It is only Young people’s Obamamania. Nothing less. I hope true dmocrats will rise up and elect Hilary Clinton as their nominee for the election in Nov 2008. She will surely the next President. Otherwise disastrous for the country.
Posted by: George Lonen | April 3, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am
I admit to not reading all of the posts here, but the ones I have read are misreading the quote, and that includes the author of the story.
Hillary said to Richardson, “He cannot win Bill. He cannot win.” Think for a moment of the real meaning behind that desperate comment. It doesn’t mean Obama is UNABLE to win…it means that Obama must be STOPPED from winning.
Now this isn’t to say that they will do ANYTHING at all costs to stop him, rather, it is simply a somewhat frightened remark coming from an individual that is seriously concerned about the consequences of an Obama victory.
What becomes even more intriguing is when you begin to connect the dots of the Bush-Clinton Monarchy over the past 20-some years…why G.W. has been so accomodating to the Clinton’s and the release of their presidential records. The cozy relationship that Bush 41 has had recently with Bill, and the Clintons suddenly spending an unusual amount of time with FOX News, Limbaugh, and some of the other conservative media.
Something very strange is afoot, and I fear it isn’t something the American public is going to want to hear.
Posted by: Steve K | April 3, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am
they have been playing with obama , they have no intention of letting him in the white, house , why do you think they did the thing with florida and michigan, so they can could use it when they needed it, why do you think edwards took him name off the ballot in michigan, so Obama would, so hilliary would be the only one on there, so she would be a shoe in, and once they declare their votes good, she is all the way to the white house, the super delegates will put her in,,,,,,,,,,,,,go hilliary,,,,,,,,,,,,,
by backoffnewscensors
I see your candidate is not the only one who is delusional. By the way, do you have any Bosnia sniper stories to share with the rest of us while you are on a roll here?
Posted by: kojiPham | April 3, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am
Jack, I respect your opinion but I don’t agree… and so does America. At least the people here are aware of the world situation. Most Americans have no idea whats going on in the world right now. Going with that, regular people will vote for change. Obama and Clinton are change.McCain is Bush 3. I think they will vote for anyone but Bush 3. But then again, Bush was reelected in 04…
Posted by: Felix | April 3, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am
Here is a William Safire article about Hilary in 1996. You think these issues won’t come up in a general election? Hilary is unelectable.
**************************************
From the New York Times January 08, 1996: Americans of all political persuasions are coming to the sad realization that our first lady – a woman of undoubted talents who was a role model for many in her generation – is a congenital liar.
1. Remember the story she told about studying The Wall Street Journal to explain her 10,000 percent profit in 1979 commodity trading? We now know that was a lie told to turn aside accusations that as the governor’s wife she profited corruptly, her account being run by a lawyer for state poultry interests through a disreputable broker. She lied for good reason: To admit otherwise would be to confess taking, and paying taxes on, what some think amounted to a $100,000 bribe.
2. The abuse of presidential power known as Travelgate elicited another series of lies. She induced a White House lawyer to assert flatly to investigators that Mrs. Clinton did not order the firing of White House travel aides, who were then harassed by the FBI and Justice Department to justify patronage replacement by Mrs. Clinton’s cronies. Now we know, from a memo long concealed from investigators, that there would be ”hell to pay” if the furious first lady’s desires were scorned. The career of the lawyer who transmitted Hillary’s lie to authorities is now in jeopardy. Again, she lied with good reason: to avoid being identified as a vindictive political power player who used the FBI to ruin the lives of people standing in the way of juicy patronage.
3. In the aftermath of the apparent suicide of her former partner and closest confidant, White House Deputy Counsel Vincent Foster, she ordered the overturn of an agreement to allow the Justice Department to examine the files in the dead man’s office. Her closest friends and aides, under oath, have been blatantly disremembering this likely obstruction of justice, and may have to pay for supporting Hillary’s lie with jail terms.
Again, the lying was not irrational.
Investigators believe that damning records from the Rose Law Firm, wrongfully kept in Vincent Foster’s White House office, were spirited out in the dead of night and hidden from the law for two years – in Hillary’s closet, in Web Hubbell’s basement before his felony conviction, in the president’s secretary’s personal files – before some were forced out last week.
Why the White House concealment?
For good reason: The records show Hillary Clinton was lying when she denied actively representing a criminal enterprise known as the Madison S&L, and indicate she may have conspired with Web Hubbell’s father-in-law to make a sham land deal that cost taxpayers $3 million.
Why the belated release of some of the incriminating evidence? Not because it mysteriously turned up in offices previously searched. Certainly not because Hillary Clinton and her new hang-tough White House counsel want to respond fully to lawful subpoenas.
One reason for the Friday-night dribble of evidence from the White House is the discovery by the FBI of copies of some of those records elsewhere.
When Clinton witnesses are asked about specific items in ”lost” records – which investigators have – the White House ”finds” its copy and releases it. By concealing the Madison billing records two days beyond the statute of limitations, Hillary evaded a civil suit by bamboozled bank regulators.
Another reason for recent revelations is the imminent turning of former aides and partners of Hillary against her; they were willing to cover her lying when it advanced their careers, but are inclined to listen to their own lawyers when faced with perjury indictments. Therefore, ask not ”Why didn’t she just come clean at the beginning?”
She had good reasons to lie; she is in the longtime habit of lying; and she has never been called to account for lying herself or in suborning lying in her aides and friends. No wonder the president is fearful of holding a prime-time press conference.
Having been separately deposed by the independent counsel at least twice, the president and first lady would be well advised to retain separate defense counsel.
Posted by: Jimmy | April 3, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am
JR
Aren’t you cool, getting the inside scoop – you stated “I have heard some of the nations most formidible intellectuals who do not divulge their political affiliations stating that this is not a very bright man, he is a scary man.” Why the secret identity of these ‘intellectuals’? Did they call you personally from a dark corner or are they willing to stand up and be counted?
The sounds of “empty suits”…
You say that there will be no change (with Obama as Pres) – not sure how you know this. I sure hope you are wrong.
Posted by: dude | April 3, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am
The Clinton’s true colors are coming out now that the heat is on; Hillary has hit the panic button quite a bit over the past few weeks but true to fashion, she’ll go down kicking and screaming rather than bow down gracefully. She’s mad because Richardson endorsed Obama but how could she expect Richardson to back her after the lie she told about coming under gunfire in Bosnia. Obama cannot be held accountable for remarks made by Rev Wright like the media wants him to be but Hillary most definitely can and should be held accountable for a lie that came from her own lips. The Republicans are scared because they know that Obama will give McCain a run for his money because Obama was against the war from day one and McCain is as bad as Bush as far as wanting to keep the troops over in Iraq and Afghanistan. McCain is a replica of Bush and the American people want no more reminders of Bush after 2008 and they want the troops out of Iraq…the polls clearly show that. If that means making history by voting for an African-American president, they will vote for Obama.
Posted by: 1967Girl | April 3, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am
No, the super delegates won’t give it to Hillary. She has lost the black vote. She won’t get the new voters who’ve been galvanized to political action for the first time. The middle of the road Republicans who might like Obama hate her guts. And then there’d be those of us who would feel enraged that we voted for nothing and that the Democrats do NOT believe in democracy.
Hillary unites only in hate.
Posted by: Analyst | April 3, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am
try again…+++++++++++++++++You might want to turn off of cnn and check out the real count if they give them to her the way they stand now, not the half stuff they have been saying but the way they stand and she wins pa, she is in the lead,,,,go hilliary,,,,
Posted by: backoffnewscensors | April 3, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am
Later on when dust will settle for Clinton and Obama and Mc Cain will be the president, the democrats will regret about choosing Obama as the nominee. Democrats will disitegrate and one party will emerge, a moderate liberal, ourging the leftist Obama supoorters. America can not live under the far end of the views.. all it atakes is a centrist to unite. McCain is a liberal and not so conservative in his view, safe for an average American.
Posted by: asd | April 3, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am
She’s right. Obama can’t win. He trails McCain in Florida, Pennsylvania, and Ohio, among other key states.
Hillary has a commanding lead over McCain in Pennsylvania and Ohio, and a small lead in Florida.
If Democrats want Obama to carry their flag whether he can win the electoral college or not, that’s their prerogative. It won’t be the first time something ‘grand’ has failed because someone forgot to count their votes.
Posted by: KC | April 3, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am
Here’s a cold dose of reality.
The Rev. Wright episode has destroyed the Obama campaign. Many people won’t admit this, but insiders know that Obama will be toast in a general election.
Posted by: JP Vanderbilt | April 3, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am
Just wondering – I don’t see anyone commenting on the point — that Obama’s main strong point was on votes via ‘caucuses’, whereas ,the general elections won’t be so…. With such a system … who says he will have any luck at all…. Yes he has the youngsters behind him that have the time and energy to mobilize voters …. etc. but that will and mainly works in a caucus system … it won’t be much of a factor in the regular general election system.!!!
Posted by: mlow | April 3, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am
Old lady go away.
Posted by: True Feminist | April 3, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am
I think a real outstanding ticket would be Ventura-Paul or Paul-Venture. These are two who would get this country back on track with the roots from which it came.
Posted by: Ed Hartwell | April 3, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am
If Obama would lose against McCain, Hillary would be humiliated by John McCain. In fact, all democrats would be shamed by her humiliation.
Posted by: Gillis | April 3, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am
Hillary is just like most politicians. They will say whatever it takes to win. But the idea that she is a better candidate than Obama is silly. HRC is a very divisive character. Many people absolutely hate this women. She seems daily to redouble her efforts to prove them right. She is mean and vindictive and appears to be only representing herself, her lust for power and place in history. It is likely too late for her. Obama has come very far up against the strongest political machine in modern history. I don’t know why some think he is un-electable. He got this far, has out raised everyone else, and obviously is very smart. He is inspirational in his speechs and his tone is dramatically different from most politicians. He seems to be a real change for the better. I think he will easily beat McCain who frankly represents the politics of the past. The Iraq war could blow up again at any time and McCain is tied strongly to it. Obama at least offers some hope to get out of this mess. I hope Obama will make a great President and at least he represents something new and fresh instead of more repeat redux as in Bushs or Clintons.
Posted by: David Pittis | April 3, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am
Really? Really? LOL Good luck with that line of attack there Hil…..ROTFLMAO it appears the popular vote, the majority of elected delegates and thr majority of states disagree with you on that one …and based on the delegates that Obama has picked up since the first of the month…16 to your 1…it appears the super delegates don’t agree either…so ..again Good luck with that…..
Posted by: Deanna | April 3, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am
All McCain needs is some die hard Republican come out and proof that Obama was at the Wright’s hate speech against the country! Put it together in a ad, and say: Do you trust this man to be your commander in chief?! Yet another swift-boat episode replayed again! When can Democratic ever learn! Obama is a dream candidate for Republican to beat! They are waiting eagarly to show their trump card!
Posted by: fair minded from NC | April 3, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am
A pause for thought for you Republicans.
If you can’t spell “right” you have nothing to say I am interested in hearing. Your McCarthy actics haven’t worked for fifty years. They won’t now.
Posted by: Cup of Joe | April 3, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am
Obama is an eloquent speaker as long as there is a teleprompter in front of him.
But, watch how he answers impromtu questions.
Especially, on subjects he doesn’t understand. He’s not very good at winging it.
Just watch!
;)
Posted by: McTagh | April 3, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am
I’m not really sure why this is such news. Hillary Clinton’s argument all along has been that Obama can’t win. That will be McCain’s argument too. What’s the big deal? ABC, like every other news network, has become so biased against Hillary Clinton that they will try to make a story out of nothing in an effort to either harm her politically or to force her out of the race. The media should be ashamed, but so should whatever moron thinks there’s something interesting to this bit of “news.”
Posted by: Kevin | April 3, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am
McCain has had touble getting people to attend his fund-raising dinners…. no one wants to have dinner at 4:30pm.
Posted by: dude | April 3, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am
A lot of conservative columnists continue to attack Hillary Clinton and ignore Obama. A number of Republicans in earlier primaries have supported Obama in an effort to prevent Hillary Clinton from becoming the Democratic Nominee.
The last laugh, or more correctly weeping, might very well be on the Republicans. When the votes are counted after the November election, I think it very likely John MCCain will lose the election.
In which case, if Obama is the next President he will be much more liberal than Hillary Clinton. Obama is a Marxist, who believes in collectivism and his Presidency will be a “movement” to mobilize the nation into collectivist actions and policies unlike anything since the New Deal.
That is what Talk Radio, conservatives of all stripes, and Republicans who fear and hate Hillary Clinton should really be concerned about. McCain is a slender reed indeed against the realities “change” under Barack Obama will bring to our nation and society.
Posted by: RPhillips | April 3, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am
We all know the best Democrat in the race is John McCain!
Posted by: Radiant Times | April 3, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am
A RION, a lying thieving crook, and and empty suit who only talks about change.
Face it folks were screwed by both parties who only answer to they various handlers.
Posted by: who cares | April 3, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am
Delusional…and comical. To think that Obama has a chance in the general election. Given his past, (and lack of it), the majority of this country will NOT vote for Obama the unfit; he does not have a chance so get real.
Posted by: Kimberly | April 3, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am
You speak for me, John M. — almost. While I would suppress the gag reflex long enough to vote for McCain over Obama, if it is a contest between Hillary and McCain, I will probably not vote at all.
As for Bill Richardson: “unwavering affection” my eye. Carville had the right of that sleazeball. Except I might call him “Brutus” instead of “Judas.” Tomato, tomahto.
Posted by: John Q | April 3, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am
Hillary’s only accomplishment in the campaign is that she has totally ruined any chance for the Democrats to win the general election. I haven’t decided between Obama and McCain but Hillary has LOSER written all over her forehead.
Posted by: Katie | April 3, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am
Too bad there is not another choice on the ballot in November……..”NONE OF THE ABOVE!”.
At least then one could feel that they were voting for a change in the way politics have been played in this country for years!!!
Sad that every 4 years we are given the option of voting for the lesser of the two evils???
Posted by: Tom Albright | April 3, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am
McTagh wrote:
Obama is an eloquent speaker as long as there is a teleprompter in front of him. But, watch how he answers impromtu questions. Especially, on subjects he doesn’t understand. He’s not very good at winging it. Just watch!
—————————————
I have done a fair amount of public speaking to groups as well as debating in my adult life. In a debate on the economy, economics, and the war, given that I am pretty enough for the camera (g), I would have Obama tongue tied. He would be creamed in a debate with me. Just imagine what Bill Buckley or Christoper Hitchens would do to him.
JR
Posted by: Jack Ryan | April 3, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am
“Obama has been bribing superdelegates with thousands of dollars, each.”
Gosh John, what a pity you aren’t a real reporter? Then you could break the story and have some real facts.
Posted by: Perry White | April 3, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am
That Comment about “that this country is damned to generations of failure unless we elect Obama.” Is such Horse Dung I nearly fell out of my chair.
He is a good speaker who knows NOTHING…. he has done NOTHING… in a general election that point will be driven home you can bet on it.
I hate Hilary but I would still prefer her to that chump.
Posted by: John M. | April 3, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am
IT WAS part of the “kitchen sink” strategy of the THE CLINTONS TO make Obama unelectable by attempting to destroy him. The more Obama seemed indestructible, the lower they descended in their tactics. Now they are telling us that Rev. Wright is the reason why Obama can’t win; but what they have done in this campaign will give the Republicans more stuff against Obama than any damage the Wright controversy can possibly do. There is always something very menacing, ugly and destructive about the Clintons. Just follow the saga of their lives: The Presidency, then the Monica Lewisnky scandal; the Governor’s mansion in Arkansas cum Paula Jones, Jennifer Flowers and others; the Clinton Presidency and the loss of the Democratic majority in Congress, and on and on, including the sudden death and disappearance of many former aids who knew too much. It is always about the Clintons and nobody else! This time they will not succeed! The Obama movement will prevail against the old politics because America is turning the corner on the negativism of the old politics. The Clintons will continue to wallow in their destructive habits and, in reality, self-sabotage!!!
Posted by: Dr. Sam | April 3, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am
Even if Hillary were more electable than Obama (which she isn’t), so what? We would have Hillary who is no better than McCain. Winning a booby prize like Hillary is not winning.
Posted by: DennisNC | April 3, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am
Hillary is wrong again,she underestimates Obama’s capabilities,thats why they thought they would wrap up the nomination by Feb -5. Surprises in store for people like her in the upcoming general election.
Posted by: Adams | April 3, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am
To the people saying Hillary can’t win the democratic votes, she’s actually leading with democrats, Obama is keeping the white guilt Independents.
Posted by: Josh | April 3, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am
Maybe I’m missing something, but did McCain do anything else in the war BESIDES get captured?
Posted by: Russert | April 3, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am
Either Hillary or Barrrack in the White House would be able to accomplish something great that John McCain could never do in a hundred years. That would be to hand the Senate and HR back to the Republicans at the next mid-term election. Please pray that all of the decrepit SCOTUS members can remain on life support until that great feat has been accomplished.
Posted by: Dale | April 3, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am
Wake up Dems…..neither one of your candidates can beat McCain!!!
Posted by: Chukkal | April 3, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am
Jack Ryan:
You’re making an assumption that being Black has more benefits than negatives for a candidate. I dont think its true.
Posted by: Mike Denhof | April 3, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am
“Obama has been bribing superdelegates with thousands of dollars, each.”
Gosh John, what a pity you aren’t a real reporter? Then you could break the story and have some real facts.
Posted by: Perry White | April 3, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am
I am a lifelong Conservative who plans on voting for Obama. I am tired of arguing for a war that makes no sense, arguing for our current healthcare system that is pathetic, and aligning myself with with the backward religious right. Eventually you have to admit when you are wrong and then drop back and punt.
Posted by: Recovering Republican | April 3, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am
People need to wake up to the FACT that Obama is as much a white man as he is a black man. What a news flash for the racist out there in la la land.
Posted by: Brian | April 3, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am
Bill, I suspect whatever Democrat you oppose will automaticly “have the most liberal voting record”, an attribution you pull out of mid air. As for FL and MI, neither state has had a primary recognized by the DNC. The decision to nullify those state’s delegates was made in 2007. Are you part of Hill’s disinformation crew?
Posted by: DennisNC | April 3, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am
“neither one of your candidates can beat McCain!!!”
My cat could beat McCain
Posted by: Dharma | April 3, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am
Notice how really loud and squeeky the Clinton people sound? LOL They cannot debate with facts so make these wild comments and show that the uneducated truly are voting for her LOL What a proud group you guys must feel a part of LOL NOT!
Posted by: Brian | April 3, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am
Bullwinkle J. Moose.
I’ve seen him shout “Watch me pull a rabbit out of my hat!” and pull out a rinocerous head. That I can live with.
I keep hearing the three liberals we have running for president shouting the same thing and I’m frightened what they’ll get when then reach in the hat.
Think I’ll just vote for Bullwinkle.
Posted by: Jeff in Kabul | April 3, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am
Freedomofspeech08…..sounds great but has no basis in reality or fact. That’s simply YOUR opinion and based on what has occured since the Wright issue became fodder for the media? Obama has gained 16 new super delegates while Clinton has gained 1….kinda makes your supposition pretty weak……
Posted by: Brian | April 3, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am
Why does Obama say “uh” alot when he’s not reading something off of a teleprompter? It’s really, really irritating.
Posted by: Deb | April 3, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am
from swimming freestyle:
“Barack Obama’s election to the presidency in November would put a serious crimp in Bill Clinton’s power, influence and resulting earnings. Obama and his Administration would, by virtue of their position, become the de facto leaders of the Democratic Party. Bill and Hillary Clinton will continue to be powerful forces in the Party, but the bulk of that power shifts from the Clinton’s to the new guys in town. They become a good deal less marketable.
One can understand why the thought of losing all that might make Bill Clinton a little grumpy.
http://swimmingfreestyle.typepad.com
Posted by: Jay McDonough | April 3, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am
Dear Recovering Republican,
You fool no one. I know A LOT of republicans – a whole lot! Not one is saying what you did as they have the horse sense to know that for whatever the many reason we got into the war, it’s not leaving us if we pack up and leave; it is coming back home with us.
Go peddle your lies elsewhere.
JR
Posted by: Jack Ryan | April 3, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am
“To the people saying Hillary can’t win the democratic votes, she’s actually leading with democrats, Obama is keeping the white guilt Independents.”
Nice playing of the race card, Josh. You Hill supporters are not that different from the right wingers.
Posted by: DennisNC | April 3, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am
most of the comments sound like “ned in the first reader”-no wonder we are getting the choices we have-
Posted by: mary fields | April 3, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am
You are right Deb….maybe we should call him “UH-Bama”
Posted by: Fred | April 3, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am
Nobody wins in this election…We’re not voting for who like the most but who we dislike the least. Hillary/Billaary is too dishonest (Bosnia) and corrupt (we can’t take another scandal) and Obama is too liberal/ineperienced for either of them do the job properly. McCain is not a conservative no matter he says. Though he will be better than Bush…We’re all screwed until 2012 or 2016.
The problem is not these candidates, it’s the America voter. As long as we/you keep re-electing, yes, that’s re-electing, these losers it’s going to remain the same-o same-o.
Posted by: Mark | April 3, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am
Deb, perhaps he says “uh” because he is thinking before he speaks. It’s too bad more of our politicians do not do the same.
Posted by: DennisNC | April 3, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am
Hillary can’t win the nomination and she knows it, she just wants to sabotage Obama and keep raising money to run again in 2012
Posted by: KnivesofLaird | April 3, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am
worried-voter-from-NC, perhaps you should contact Oliver Stone. He has the book “1001 Conspiracies”.
Posted by: DennisNC | April 3, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am
Mike Denhof:
“You’re making an assumption that being Black has more benefits than negatives for a candidate. I dont think its true”.
I apologize if I did not point out that I meant it only with regard to the democrat nomination. Search and read “The Angry White Male” to see how many who have sat home for years will get up from their Barcaloungers and vote against an unqualified black man. I’d vote for Alan Keyes, a Clarence Thomas, a Walter E. Williams, or a Thomas Sowell. But I am not voting for a swindling, land deal lying, racist black man. And that is what Obama is and will be seen to be by enough people before the election.
JR
Posted by: Jack Ryan | April 3, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am
“it’s not leaving us if we pack up and leave; it is coming back home with us.
Go peddle your lies elsewhere.” – Jack Ryan
So, after we left Vietnam, the Communists took over the Continental 48? Wow, I never knew that.
No one believes what you are saying. No one. Not even you.
Peddle your 40-years-discredited testosterone geopolitics in a nation that doesn’t care about freedom.
Posted by: Domino MF | April 3, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am
Can’t win….let’s see…he’s winning elected delegates, winning the popular vote, won more states and gained 16 super delegates this month to Clinton’s 1…..gosh looks like someone is not letting facts get in the way of THEIR reality…..good luck with that train wreck of thought…….
Posted by: Brian | April 3, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am
Using a filler word to punctuate your speech is fine but “uh” is not the classiest choice.
Posted by: Joe | April 3, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am
Operation CAOS is working better then ever imagined.
Posted by: Tom | April 3, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am
Thinking while speaking is one thing…pausing every other word is suspect and annoying.
Posted by: Deb | April 3, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am
Hooray for illary and Bill. Richardson is a loser, as is Obama. President Clinton — eight more years, this time it’s Hillary.
Posted by: HRC fan | April 3, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am
given all the turmoil and definitive subjective news stories regarding the Democratic primaries and the supporters of the respective candidates, I am very surprised that most major news networks did not even touch upon the intimidation tactics and demeaning language used against some African-American superdelegates who have publicly supported Senator Clinton. Threats to their official positions and derogatory terms like “Uncle Tom” are a few of the more offensive examples of the pressure and harassment these supporters have endured. The following website goes into more detail about the reprehensible behavior of these supporters of obama who, ironically, cites his unifying influence as his biggest asset: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0208/8762.html
Posted by: chris | April 3, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am
My Dad, very intelligent, paused too but not on every other word. He, at least spoke a complete thought, before he paused.
The pause was to allow you to absorb what had already been said.
Waiting and hanging (with baited breath) on every other word is ANNOYING!!
Posted by: Kenneth | April 3, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am
All three remaining candidates are unfit to be president. Especially though, Hillary. If she should get elected, we could officially consider ourselves to be a third world nation!
Posted by: B.L. Zeebub | April 3, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am
I’ve been a firm Clinton supporter since the beginning of her campaign. I organized, canvassed, volunteered, made phone calls…
However, I’ve come to the conclusion that my True Blue Democrat idealism isn’t as tempered as I once thought.
This race is putrid…yes.
Is it the candidate’s fault??? No.
It is the media! The media has decided to pick our Democratic nominee for us this go-around…squarely supporting Barack Obama.
And, as Bill Clinton said in that interview, we’re looking at fractions of percentage points separating the two candidates.
Party unity? We’ve got a Republican Governor of Florida pleading with Howard Dean to allow a re-vote…
The Democratic party has lost my interest. While politics has always been and will continue to be a fascination of mine, it will be from overseas if I witness an Obama or McCain White House.
Posted by: Ryan | April 3, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am
Obama’s game of Deceiving the voters is in full swing now. Didn’t Gore said he wasn’t gonna run for President? Now why in the world would Obama think that he is interested in VP or a lower position? Oh i see to Deceive the voters into thinking Gore is part of his campaign. NICE TRY OBAMA. I keep saying this and will say it again. Obama we are smarter than you give us credit for. WE WON’T FALL FOR A PHONY LIKE YOU OBAMA! The Messiah spoke again, GORE DO YOU HEAR THAT, HE WOULD CONSIDER YOU FOR A POSITION! Would someone knock his freak show off the stage already.
Posted by: Persio | April 3, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am
“What all the educated dopes that propose to be my peers pretend to see in Obama, I admit I can’t.”
Never mind, you’ll have four years to figure it out.
Posted by: Harvey Stockwood | April 3, 2008, 2:22 am 2:22 am
Dear Jr
Who cares how many fellow conservatives/Republicans you know? I have seen many sheep gathered in one spot before but it does not change the fact that they are sheep who don’t think or see. As soon one takes the intellectual step to rise above the rhetoric and the sophmore level intellect of the talking heads one soon realizes that the war was a collossal mistake and Obama was one of the few clear thinking people who would have avoided this catastrophic mistake in Iraq. Yes we are in Iraq by mistake and it is FUBAR’ed and we have to find some way out with some sort of dignity. But at some point you have to admit that we conservatives were dead wrong and Obama was right. I too know many conservatives and some of them, like me, have started thinking without Rush or their pastor telling them how to think which quickly leads us away from the modern day GOP. You obviously have not evolved enough to know when you are being lied to and by whom. But when you are outwitted and outmatched it is always a good strategy to call the other person a liar.
Posted by: Recovering Republican | April 3, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am
“You are all a bunch of political junkies totally divorced from reality. ”
No. They are entirely personality junkies. About politics they know zilch
Posted by: Harvey Stockwood | April 3, 2008, 2:24 am 2:24 am
Senator Hillary Clinton is receiving calls from Senator Patrick Leahy, Senator Chris Dodd and others to drop out of the Presidential Primary even though the difference between the two candidates in both popular vote and pledged delegates is minimal and the fact that neither candidate can win the nomination without the Super Delegates. The question no one is asking is, if the fortunes of the two candidates were reversed, would there be calls for Senator Obama to withdraw? Frankly, I doubt it. The DNC would be afraid of alienating the loyal and highly vocal African American base. More than likely any attempt to push Senator Obama out of the race would be met with charges of racism.
Women comprise fifty-one percent of the population and an even greater percentage of the voting electorate. Yet, women are vastly underrepresented in all three branches of government, from the congress to the cabinet, and there has never been a female President or Vice President. On a personal level, I am reminded daily of the subtle yet significant government sponsored sexism that permeates my life. Not a single piece of paper currency has a picture of a woman on it and the vast majority of pictures on stamps are of men. Pick up any newspaper and compare the number of photos of men vs. women, and you’ll be astonished by the results. From Wall Street to the White House, we are in many ways still a nation of “men and girls.” Women are undoubtedly still the second sex.
Hillary’s candidacy is significant to me as a woman. She knows what it is to be a woman, to be marginalized and sidelined. I want the Obama supporters who are trying to push Hillary out of the race to know to me a woman in the White House is CHANGE, REAL CHANGE and the most significant political event of my lifetime. I want the woman and girls of America to see a woman in the White House. I am a registered democrat, but if Hillary is pushed out of the race, I will not vote and I urge other women to do the same. Why should I be loyal to a party where a group of men try to shame the first female candidate for the Presidency out of the race?
Posted by: ll48 | April 3, 2008, 2:24 am 2:24 am
Obama CAN win,
even though Hillary does not want him to.
Much like too many of her supporters supporters, she will probably vote for McCain in the general election out of childish spite.
Posted by: R.A.W. | April 3, 2008, 2:25 am 2:25 am
Bush & McCain are virtually the same. Both from rich affluent families. Both had misspent youths. Poor students in school and College. Never accomplished anything on their own. Both have serious inferiority complexes. Both wanted to prove to themselves and their family they are as good if not better. But neither got there on their own. McCain wants to be Commander in Chief so badly he would do anything. Like Bush probably desperate enough to rig two elections. Have a debate with Hilary & McCain or Obama & McCain, McCain would be eaten alive he’s not that intelligent. However he could always be wired so the answers could be read to him like Bush did in the debates.
Posted by: Realism | April 3, 2008, 2:26 am 2:26 am
marywnm, the US is fine to live in, but there are many other places one can live as well.
Posted by: DennisNC | April 3, 2008, 2:26 am 2:26 am
For those of you with any semblance of progressive intelligence, Senator Clinton’s nature is to work and fight for what she believes in and compromise and cooperate when the issue demands it….she has proven such character as a law student, as a lawyer, as First Lady of Arkansas, as First Lady of the United States and as Senator from New York……she is a workaholic and a fighter, and she will absolutely embarrass john mccain in every debate they have and she will absolutely frustrate those anti-American special interest groups who are, once again, unable to defeat her, which will be great news for America, our children, our troops and our world…..we need Senator Clinton to establish and lead an international coalition to defeat terrorism….we need Senator Clinton to establish health care so many more won’t have to die…..we need Senator Clinton to help push our economy forward again….we need Senator Clinton to give our children’s health, safety and education a stronger future…..we need Senator Clinton to give America a better future…….we all realize this to be true….we know that she is not as charismatic, young and charming as obama, but she knows what needs to be done, she knows how to fight, she works harder than anyone else to do what’s right and what will benefit those she is working for…..
Posted by: chris | April 3, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am
She’s right. Obama cannot win the general election neither though can she.
The next President is John McCain.
Posted by: Brian | April 3, 2008, 2:43 am 2:43 am
Seems to me the people elected Bush in 2004…goes to show you how blind voters can be. Seems to me also that Colin Powell told the United Nations that Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. Seems to me that George W. Bush was trusted by the Congress to go to war to disarm Hussein only as a last resort. Seems to me that Bush lied and now thousands have died. There were 29 Democratic Senators that voted for that initiative for a total of 77 Senators. Sen Clinton was one of 29. Have you bothered to read her speech she gave before voting saying it was the hardest decision she ever had to make. She also said in the speech at the time that it was not a vote for pre-emptive war. Senators Kerry,Edwards,Rockefeller,Biden,Dodd were among the 29 that voted the same as Sen Clinton. Names sound familiar? They had poor judgment then too and some are now supporting Barak Obama. Has their judgement improved? Maybe, maybe not. Why not question their judgment? The Congress was lied to and the President abused the trust Congress placed in his hands. I know that a President Hillary Clinton will not abuse her Presidential powers. I know a President John McCain will not abuse his Presidential powers.I cannot say the same for Barack Obama.Hopefully the voters will be smarter this time and figure it out before the general election. It has to be about trust this time. No one has perfect judgment.
Posted by: sparklewdc | April 3, 2008, 2:43 am 2:43 am
The only good thing that will come out of this is that the Democratic party will be seriously weakened if not totally split.
I am hearing that Clinton supporters are talking about voting Republican all the way down the ticket, just to show the Dems that they don’t appreciate the in-your-face insults and cherry-picking which rules to enforce and which votes to count and which narratives to splatter all over the news.
It’s funny to hear coming from lifelong Dems, but this party has abandoned whatever it was it once stood for.
Posted by: wow...just wow | April 3, 2008, 2:43 am 2:43 am
The only good thing that will come out of this is that the Democratic party will be seriously weakened if not totally split.
I am hearing that Clinton supporters are talking about voting Republican all the way down the ticket, just to show the Dems that they don’t appreciate the in-your-face insults and cherry-picking which rules to enforce and which votes to count and which narratives to splatter all over the news.
It’s funny to hear coming from lifelong Dems, but this party has abandoned whatever it was it once stood for.
Posted by: wow...just wow | April 3, 2008, 2:44 am 2:44 am
How disillusioned Hillary now is and husband Bill is just attempting to use use “Bully” Tactics against The Superdelegates – How anyone can treat Bill seriously after the LIES he told the People of America I can’t understand.
Voters thankfully are starting to see The True Hillary, in Pennsylvania the 26 point lead Hillary has is falling daily now just a few points, these Voters have such an important decision to make and can bring this Race to an end so The Democrats can prepare to face McCain.
Posted by: John B Sheffield | April 3, 2008, 2:44 am 2:44 am
Sen. Clinton can easily defeat McCain, but Obama does not have a chance.
Posted by: Raul | April 3, 2008, 2:48 am 2:48 am
The Clinton’s are pathetic, they are habitual liars, distorting the truth about everything!
Hillary’s judgment is a perfect example of her being unfit to be President, She has stayed with runaround Bill for her on gain politically.
Barack Obama has more honesty and integrity in his little finger than she has in her whole body.
The Clinton’s are desperate and trying anything to
try to scare people into voting for her, sound familiar? George Bush was successful at it so they figured what the hell!
Posted by: KR | April 3, 2008, 2:48 am 2:48 am
kr……then why did obama allow his constituents in illinois to freeze in sub-standard housing? oh yeah, because his friend and donor tony rezko owned the buildings….Obama: enough integrity in his little finger to wag it at others (but is unable to point it at his friends who neglect those he is supposed to protect)
Posted by: chris | April 3, 2008, 2:51 am 2:51 am
or maybe obama has just enough integrity to exaggerate the extremist nature of his school mates to make himself look more tolerant and mature, as was the case with his autobiography…..
Posted by: chris | April 3, 2008, 2:52 am 2:52 am
Wright’s comments are un-American. He does not need to damn anybody to criticize or judge history.
Posted by: Raul | April 3, 2008, 3:17 am 3:17 am
Two big reasons McCain cannot beat Obama.
1. The economy stupid
2. The war in Iraq
McCain could only beat someone that is a pathological liar like say—Hillary!
Posted by: rockychance | April 3, 2008, 3:20 am 3:20 am
The last time I voted Republican was when Jimmy Carter ran….
No one is oerfect but I trust Hillary with my country and my vote. Not so sure about Obama. Hillary has my vote.
Posted by: sparklewdc | April 3, 2008, 3:22 am 3:22 am
Of course the Dems are uniting angry voters, if you have paid attention to the debacle of the last 8 years, you have every reason to be mad as hell, the call for change, is everyone saying, get us out of this mess, and now. there is the consensus. It is a frustration driven by hope, and indeed love of the country and knowing we can do better. Though we try to be rational, emotions are running high in this campaign, and will be decisive in the voting booth where people make impulsive, intuitive gut choices, not rational ones.
Posted by: shockmando | April 3, 2008, 3:25 am 3:25 am
I think a pathological liar ia that one that says thet his parents met 4 years after he was born just to use Selma for his own purpose. also the one to accuse his grandmother of racist to defend sermons of hate.
Posted by: Raul | April 3, 2008, 3:30 am 3:30 am
At least Hillary is honest about everything.
Posted by: sparklewdc | April 3, 2008, 3:30 am 3:30 am
I really wish Gore would get in the race.
Posted by: Raul | April 3, 2008, 3:33 am 3:33 am
No politician is honest about everything. At least Hillary knows the issues, has plans and acts for the good of the country instead of giving empty speeches.
Posted by: Raul | April 3, 2008, 3:34 am 3:34 am
Comments never cease to amaze me. Hillary has had prior trouble with FEC fraud and non-disclosure. She got herself removed as defendant on the civil lawsuit, but will have to testify. We all know she lies constantly, as does Bill. The trial is scheduled to start on 4/25/08 in Los Angeles court. Does no one remember Vincent Foster? Billy Dale? Monica, Flowers and all the rest? Whitegate? Air strikes in no fly zones?
The pair are horrid role models for our youth; her mandatory health INSURANCE discriminates against certain segments of the population; it is sure to benefit her pharmeceutical lobbyist friends that she has lead her followers that she will fight in DC. She lies and they swear to it. She and McCain both want to bomb Iran~you know cluster bombs in civilian areas; we are in debt to China to pay for Iraq; have been cautioned by both China and Russia about invading Iraq…
…and she is the only one they trust to run the country??? Obama is the best person for the job, despite what comments say~he is a worker for the people. That is why the Clintons hate him; he has already helped pass or written legislation to prevent people like them from defrauding the government and taxpayers. Why oh why do voters want known corruption and liars in DC.
Posted by: mary CA | April 3, 2008, 3:34 am 3:34 am
Hillary is corrupt beyond imagination. Obama isn’t electable, isnt’ qualified, and has a horrid list of ideas that will destroy our economy and way of life. McCain is moderate (if not a liberal). So Democrats should be happy with McCain. I was hoping for a more conservative candidate, but McCain will have to be my guy. I live in the Middle East and I know how US politics affects this region. I can tell you that Obama would be an awful choice. Hillary far and above Obama would be better…but both of those infinitely worse of an option than McCain. To the anti-war crowd, people here in the Middle East don’t hate the US because of the war in Iraq. They hate a percieved bias against Palestine and toward Israel. People who think it’s about Iraq are deluded. I know that most anti-war people either aren’t college graduates, or they don’t understand geopolitical systems, but that is no excuse. Stop the cliches about how voting for McCain is a vote for military funerals, etc. I could be just as rediculous and say a vote for Obama or Clinton would be a vote for terrorism. Let’s not be stupid people.
Posted by: middleeastguy | April 3, 2008, 3:36 am 3:36 am
Sometimes,I’m at a loss as to what to make of americans!!!How on earth,and on what ground would a guy like Obama be considered a leftist(I guess what is really meant is a communist!!)?How come believing in fair distribution of such a huge wealth as america’s scare many americans to make them prefer to vote for guys like McCain? For people that would indulge america into perpetual war with the rest of the world!!!Wake up guys!!!Your best bet is in Obama, not Hillary and surely not McCain!!
Posted by: Gebrie | April 3, 2008, 3:36 am 3:36 am
Hillary is also one of the smartest women in the country.
Posted by: sparklewdc | April 3, 2008, 3:36 am 3:36 am
Obama views on the economy are similar to McCain. Tax cuts, help for the subprime industry not for homeowners, etc, etc
Posted by: Raul | April 3, 2008, 3:37 am 3:37 am
Al Gore? You wish. Al gore is an American who sticks to American Values,not socialistc ideals.He goes to a good church that doesn’t damn Americans and America.
Al Gore is Nobel Prize winner why would he choose to work for your inept administration
and abandon his cause? mayby to bail you out of the numerous bone headed mistakes we’ll have to endure Nationaly and Internationaly if he’s not by yor side.
I hope Gore will come out and publicly reject your offer which is soly staged to sway the Penn voter.What a lame way to do business. What a lame way to run a campaign. What a lame President we would have.
Posted by: ruthmatters | April 3, 2008, 3:37 am 3:37 am
By now, most people probably realize that McCain will win the general election by a small margin.
My guess is that most democrats will want to take their chance with Obama. At least they will be able to say that they supported a black man for president.
With Hillary it’s a double loss. Not only does she lose the election big time, the vote was wasted on an uninspiring, hack, Machine politician.
This is not an endorsement of either McCain or Obama, just an observation.
Posted by: Jigs | April 3, 2008, 3:38 am 3:38 am
Al Gore won a Nobel prize so he must be one of the smartest men in the country
Posted by: ruthmatters | April 3, 2008, 3:39 am 3:39 am
When I look and listen to George W BuSh all I feel are lies and more lies with secrets inbetween….with Mccain and Hillary they seem to be saying what they think others want to hear…with Obama it seems as if he speaks from the Heart and there is a genuiness there that I see and feel. WHO is qualified? I don’t know, but I know who’s real, and that’s more important than anything right now. Who is real? If it aint Obama, well then I guess Obama is the best liar I have ever witnessed!!
Posted by: matt | April 3, 2008, 3:41 am 3:41 am
Obama would never raise taxes. Even if he creates all kinds of entitlments and benes he’ll never raise nay kind of taxes.
Posted by: Raul | April 3, 2008, 3:42 am 3:42 am
Senator Clinton is action and solutions. She has at least 20 more years of experience than Obama, even if detractors want to say that she did not participate in any decissions. She has met with more world leaders, has been present in more decisive meetings, has survive constant attacks from republicans, and has won two elections to the US Senate.
Posted by: Raul | April 3, 2008, 3:42 am 3:42 am
Hillary the LIAR is making it real easy for me in PA to vote Obama. But even so, I believe in what Obama believes and what he wants for the people of this country and for our children. The one thing I hate is a liar, and she is a liar. She must think the voters are stupid here in PA, well Hillary you haven’t seen anything yet to match the loss you will have in the great state of Pennsylvania.
Her “He can’t win” comment is really a cry for herself, she can’t believe she is losing this thing. Wake up HRC, you’ve lost fair and square.
Posted by: Penny T. (50 yr old white woman) | April 3, 2008, 3:42 am 3:42 am
Why do people think Obama is unelectable?
Posted by: chigger | April 3, 2008, 3:47 am 3:47 am
“Those who vote for McCain must like military funerals.”
Yeah, what’s up with the terrorists holding military funerals nowadays? And why aren’t we using these opportunities to take out more terrorists? I am confident McCain will not make this mistake.
Posted by: Decent Person | April 3, 2008, 3:48 am 3:48 am
Winners and snoozers aside– what got me about this choice information being dropped by nameless sources to Stephanopoulos (Who served as the communication guy for the Clinton campaign and moved on to be a senior policy and strat advisor…)
Does the fallout make the Clinton Camp look confident or panicked?
I cannot get what this play is, and why it is sitting ‘above the fold’ on the Drudge Report.
It’s fishy to me. On either end.
Posted by: Carole IL | April 3, 2008, 3:48 am 3:48 am
Clinton elected? Maybe some of the goods they looted from the White House when they left comes back. No concensus government. She’s a power because her vindictiveness is feared.
Obama elected? Another feel-good Carter presidency, which only lasted one term. For good reason.
McCain elected? Depends on how the ticket is balanced, I suspect.
Posted by: Bill Smetts | April 3, 2008, 3:48 am 3:48 am
I am a long time Democrat, but with Obama attending sermons for 20 years with they preach hatred against White people and anti-American beliefs; and Hillary lying about being under sniper fire when she should know this would have been world news if it had been true…neither one can probably win. I am hopeful another Democrat will come forth and be nominated by the Party to give the Democrats at least a chance.
Posted by: Mark | April 3, 2008, 3:50 am 3:50 am
Hillary has tried everything to stop Obama, from her kitchen sink strategy, to praising McCain, to raising doubts about Obama’s electability…need I go on? Yet somehow, Obama is still winning and Hillary is behind and deep in debt. I used to be a Bill Clinton supporter but this primary has opened my eyes to the Clinton’s wicked ways. Now I support Obama. I think that many people see that he is smart, rational and can do some great things for this country. The Clintons, on the other hand, are sadly becoming irrelevant…
Posted by: Mammamia | April 3, 2008, 3:51 am 3:51 am
Stephanopolous has being a Clinton hater since he left Bill Clinton administration.
Posted by: Raul A. | April 3, 2008, 3:52 am 3:52 am
The terrorists and terrorist sympathizers posting anti McCain propaganda here really amuse me. They must be shaking in their boots. :D This news item is about HRC vs. BHO and not about JSM.
Posted by: Ralf | April 3, 2008, 3:53 am 3:53 am
there are no doubts Obama is unelectable
Posted by: Raul A. | April 3, 2008, 3:54 am 3:54 am
I would have to agree with those who have pointed out that writing on these blogs doesn’t seem to have much impact on changing any minds here, but what I would like to talk about is the problem that we all have … voters and candidates alike: the Media.
Has anyone else been thinking about why the Media’s coverage has seemed so lopsided and full of favoritism? And that it doesn’t seem to matter which candidate it is.
It is because the Media isn’t interested in reporting facts … or even the truth. Newspapers, magazines, television broadcasts, websites — the Media makes money not from writing about facts or the truth … the Media makes money telling stories that sell, regardless if those stories are accurate or not.
The truth is, the Media is the big — and maybe the only — “winner” in this election process because no matter what they print, say or do, the Media makes money … it doesn’t have to be accurate, factual or even meaningful … it only needs to sell and sensationalize.
The Media doesn’t make much money these days from selling newspapers and magazines … the Media’s big money comes from advertisers and, with the rise of the Internet, the Media makes tons of money for every click made to their sites, blogs, etc. Just look on this page … full of ads, right? Each time we click on a “news” story, participate on the blogs or even click from a search engine onto this site, this website makes money.
The Media’s strangle-hold doesn’t stop there … if a candidate wants to raise public awareness of who they are, what has to happen? They have to get Media coverage.
Do you wonder why it’s so expensive to run a political campaign? That’s because they have to pay top dollar for their “air” time and who profits? The Media.
Most newspapers and “news” services endorse a candidate. That makes them very “selective” about what they print about their endorsed candidate. Not to mention that the Media has to run ads and articles that are okayed not only by the owners, but also by the advertisers. Again, it’s money for the Media that calls the tune about what gets published and what doesn’t.
Ask any celebrity about how “easy” it is to sue the Media for printing lies and slander. It takes huge amounts of money and years in court … meanwhile, the Media is raking in the profits from printing their half-truths and lies … and since it is costly and time-consuming to bring a lawsuit against a Media outlet, the Media can afford to keep printing their trash because they know this. It is cheaper to tell lies and reap the profits while the lawsuits languish in court.
What this country really needs is campaign reform and more public-owned broadcasting and news services. As it is, only the extremely wealthy and well-connected can afford to run for office, due in large part to the control and manipulation of the Media.
We, the people, need to turn our attention towards ways in which we can wrest election coverage away from privately-owned Media outlets so that we can have a truly healthy, factual public debate on the candidates. If we could get campaign reform, we might actually get wholesome candidates who would give it their all, with honor and integrity.
Thanks to those who have read this … I really needed to talk about these problems.
Posted by: SM White, Irvine, CA | April 3, 2008, 3:54 am 3:54 am
The folks who claim that there is a race problem are the ones with the race problem, Hillary says Obama cant win, i do believe that she is the one who cant win…and for all those if he is the nom i am voting Mccain people, i think you should take your sorry fair weather a*ses on and vote for him, then look in the mirror and realize that YOU are Americas problem….
Posted by: unite-or-divide | April 3, 2008, 3:56 am 3:56 am
The polls compiled by RealPolitics.com say Obama would have problems in the general election in the big electoral swing states. General Election polls:
McCain vs Obama McCain vs Clinton
Nation:
McCain +0.2 Tie
Penns:
McCain +1.0 Clinton +0.8
Ohio:
McCain +5.0 Clinton +2.5
Florida:
McCain +8.0 McCain +3.0
Posted by: truthseeker | April 3, 2008, 4:00 am 4:00 am
I’ll vote McCain if Obama is the Dem because he can’t win.
Posted by: Raul A. | April 3, 2008, 4:01 am 4:01 am
Americans who have read ‘The Audacity of Hope’on top of a little brain that thinks scientifically and positively would not conclude as’middleeastguy, StopObama,Raul,’and many more out there who for me seem either unable to see beyond color or are, politically speaking, simply raw!!!
Posted by: flint444 | April 3, 2008, 4:01 am 4:01 am
The past several months of primary campaigning have left me — and I believe a growing number of Democrats –with the realization that our party and its top leaders have become a laughing stock and an embarrassment. Indeed, over the past 18 months, after regaining control of the US House and telling the nation we were on the cusp of something really uplifting and positive, we Dems have:
1) Elected the most inept group of congressional leaders I can recall in my 40-plus years as a party member, and proceeded to demonstrate that we really haven’t a clue how to lead and accomplish anything of substance for the nation.
2) Divised primary election rules that grant party bosses superdelegate status at our national convention so party hacks retain a greater say in selecting our presidential nominee;
3) Conducted a primary election campaign that threatens to rip a good portion of the party — if not the country — apart over issues of race and gender, of all things;
4) Developed rules allowing the national party to dictate when state parties can or can’t hold a primary, then adding rules that any state party failing to follow such dictates would not be seated at this summer’s national convention.
5) Carried on an embarrassing national debate with ourselves regarding privately funded “DO-OVER” elections;
6) Then, following this self-inflicted embarrassment, we’ve had various factions in the party add insult to injury by threatening to drag the process through the courts.
Indeed, with this kind of performance can there be any wonder that voters are beginning to question the ability of this generation of Democrats to be trusted with the reins of our government, let alone lead it?
And frankly, can there be any wonder that some Dems — particularly those of us who feel a greater loyalty to and love of country than political party at this dangerous time in our history — are strongly considering doing what many of us previously deemed unthinkable — casting our votes for John McCain.
Posted by: Bristol Mercheson | April 3, 2008, 4:07 am 4:07 am
Hillary knows the middle east.
Posted by: Raul A. | April 3, 2008, 4:21 am 4:21 am
No matter who is elected people will still find a reason to bitch about any decision that is made. Obama/Hillary/McCain – it’s all gonna be the same in the end because one they take office they will seek course in which they deem fit. They should be held in writing to uphold the foundations of their electoral stage. Here we go round in circles, welcome boys and girls to this joyride!
Posted by: Jay | April 3, 2008, 4:21 am 4:21 am
“Never mind, you’ll have four years to figure it out.”
I think the impending Clinton or McCain Presidency will obviate any need. Dealing with nonreality-based folks like yourself going through yet another Kubler-Ross stage sequence will be quite enough.
Btw, why don’t you answer my answer- just what can and will Obama politically sacrifice himself for? (And by extension, what common good would people like you truly sacrifice for, other than for the resentful ego trip known as Our Turn?) Is that crickets chirping I hear, again?
Posted by: cd | April 3, 2008, 4:27 am 4:27 am
Until now, only Bill knew how ugly Hillary could get. Now the entire world is going to see how mean and bitter this woman really is.
Posted by: Ben | April 3, 2008, 4:28 am 4:28 am
Let’s be honest! All 3 are Disneyland politicians. No one is paying attention to what’s happening to our financial system and Wall Street. We need a Mulligan and some new and way-better choices for where we are in current history. This is more reminiscent of a Student counsel election(silly) instead of a serious election for the President of our future. Wakeup or you won’t be in Kansas anymore people. Freedom and our future here is at stake. Use an unbiased view to see beyond the rhetoric and see the truth. It will set you free! Together we stand, divided we fall.
Posted by: Bob | April 3, 2008, 4:28 am 4:28 am
Obama is unelectable
Posted by: LIBERTY | April 3, 2008, 4:31 am 4:31 am
Whoever came up with this “super delegate” idea shows such arrogance. Look at how the campaigning has gone: there’s the campaigne to convince the average person, then there’s the special campaigne to convince the local “kings and queens” who are the super delegates. This entire idea is so condescending, so demeaning, and purely undemocratic.
Posted by: Adam Smith | April 3, 2008, 4:31 am 4:31 am
The fear on Obama is his lack of substance his laziness to vote in the Senate, his bad judgment about Rezko, about Wright, His “pushing the wrong button by mistake”
Posted by: Libertyandlife | April 3, 2008, 4:34 am 4:34 am
I am completely disgusted at the fact that these “liberals” are using something like race or religion as a qualifying factor for candidacy. John F. Kennedy was approached with the same ignorance for being catholic, but it is amazing that 43 years after the induction f the civil rights movement, I read these boards and see people calling African Americans, as well as Caribbean Americans monkeys. It is even more upsetting that people are not aware of the struggles that have been waged by the previous generations, in hopes that ours would be shed of the ignorance that taints our productivity. If you believe Obama is not a capable candidate, because of something his priest said, that is your own prerogative. However to deny that Senator Clinton or Barack Obama are not public servants us absurd beyond belief. Despite disagreements I have with all five candidates, it is not my position to judge them by age, race, religion, or their gender. They deserve to be measured by their individual character, and the qualifications they can bring to restore America to the prestige it once possessed as a superpower.
This country needs a change of direction, as clearly demonstrated from this forum. We discriminate each other’s opinions rather than debate issues. We continue to characterize candidates by a “Reverend Wright” reel, A Muslim name, Gender, “Monica Lewinsky”, and age amongst other things. However these arguments are stagnant in helping us collect the information of who will help us realize a greater vision of America. A vision that will essentially have us working together to strengthen the economy, and turning energy green, depleting the dependence on limited oil. Aiding Americans in the housing crisis during the recession, bringing new jobs to the dry job market, making healthcare affordabe, and education more efficient. Fixing the prison systems. Creating a country where our diplomacy matches the strength of our military. We must also prevent the government from separating itself from the people. Generating the transparency of Washington enables us to become more active in our government, and gives us the opportunity to hold politicians accountable for their activities in office. Public servants should be there for the people, not themselves.
We are very far off track from what I truly envisioned for America, and we truly need to stop knocking each-other, and pay attention to the facts. Hold your bias away from the candidates, and invest interest in their actual operations. Not just the rumors that are meant to distract you from the issues that plague America. Only when we are united will we ever be able to do things greater than ourselves. I challenge you to not get wrapped up in the moment, but analyze life and apply your knowledge to the future. Writing on these blogs can disheartening, as there is an arrogance that is stemmed from debate. But if you read something, take the time to look it up, and find out for yourself.
Posted by: Maurice | April 3, 2008, 4:38 am 4:38 am
The fear of Obama is how he stumbles in the debates, how uncapable he is to answer questions on the issues. How he gets money from Exxon.
Posted by: Libertyandlife | April 3, 2008, 4:38 am 4:38 am
But the worst fear of all is to have the Republicans winning the WHITE HOUSE AGAIN, AND THAT WILL HAPPEN IF OBAMA IS THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE. HE DOES NOT STAND A CHANCE IN THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS
Posted by: Libertyandlife | April 3, 2008, 4:40 am 4:40 am
I am completely disgusted at the fact that these “liberals” are using something like race or religion as a qualifying factor for candidacy. John F. Kennedy was approached with the same ignorance for being catholic, but it is amazing that 43 years after the induction of the civil rights movement, I read these boards and see people calling African Americans, as well as Caribbean Americans monkeys. It is even more upsetting that people are not aware of the struggles that have been waged by the previous generations, in hopes that ours would be shed of the ignorance that taints our productivity. If you believe Obama is not a capable candidate, because of something his priest said, that is your own prerogative. However to deny that Senator Clinton or Barack Obama are not public servants is absurd beyond belief. Despite disagreements I have with all five candidates, it is not my position to judge them by age, race, religion, or their gender. They deserve to be measured by their individual character, and the qualifications they can bring to restore America to the prestige it once possessed as a superpower.
This country needs a change of direction, as clearly demonstrated from this forum. We discriminate each other’s opinions rather than debate issues. We continue to characterize candidates by a “Reverend Wright” reel, A Muslim name, Gender, “Monica Lewinsky”, and age amongst other things. However these arguments are stagnant in helping us collect the information of who will help us realize a greater vision of America. A vision that will essentially have us working together to strengthen the economy, and turning energy green, depleting the dependence on limited oil. Aiding Americans in the housing crisis during the recession, bringing new jobs to the dry job market, making healthcare affordabe, and education more efficient. Fixing the prison systems. Creating a country where our diplomacy matches the strength of our military. We must also prevent the government from separating itself from the people. Generating the transparency of Washington enables us to become more active in our government, and gives us the opportunity to hold politicians accountable for their activities in office. Public servants should be there for the people, not themselves.
We are very far off track from what I truly envisioned for America, and we truly need to stop knocking each-other, and pay attention to the facts. Hold your bias away from the candidates, and invest interest in their actual operations. Not just the rumors that are meant to distract you from the issues that plague America. Only when we are united will we ever be able to do things greater than ourselves. I challenge you to not get wrapped up in the moment, but analyze life and apply your knowledge to the future. Writing on these blogs can disheartening, as there is an arrogance that is stemmed from debate. But if you read something, take the time to look it up, and find out for yourself.
Posted by: Maurice | April 3, 2008, 4:41 am 4:41 am
“Not me… its the Constitution Party in 08 for this voter.”
I’m with you Airborne! Ron Paul had the best platform in my opinion.
It may take a bit longer since all the old people are so in love with the likes of McCain & Hillary. They’ve been voting in garbage for the past 30 years plus! Then they wonder why there are issues with SS & Medicare and the government as a whole is a big piece of trash.
Posted by: Expat | April 3, 2008, 4:43 am 4:43 am
She has it backwards doesn’t she? I don’t hear people saying that they absolutely wouldn’t vote for Obama. I hear people saying under no circumstances would they vote for Hillary!
Posted by: don myers | April 3, 2008, 4:44 am 4:44 am
Why do you people keep saying Hillary voted for the war? Have you lost your minds. Do you not remember WHY ..well I will refresh your feeble minds..it was because she was lied to…lied lied lied. Of course once the war was started she has to voted to fund it. What do you want her to do, let all those poor soldiers go without the money they need? SHUT UP with the Hillary supported the war line of bull****!!!!!
Posted by: Vickie | April 3, 2008, 4:44 am 4:44 am
The Bosnia story has destroyed HRC credibility on experience and judgment.
Posted by: time4change2008 | April 3, 2008, 4:46 am 4:46 am
Aslan
50% of the Democratic Party and 20% of the general is a bad %. That means McCain has 100 % of Republicans and 50 % of Democrats and 80% of the general. BAD NUMBERS.
Obama nor HRC can Win.
Pres.
McCain
Posted by: David | April 3, 2008, 4:48 am 4:48 am
McCain/Romney are going to make Mondale/Ferraro look like a close race.
Posted by: Tony Darbo | April 3, 2008, 4:49 am 4:49 am
“Why do you people keep saying Hillary voted for the war? Have you lost your minds. Do you not remember WHY ..well I will refresh your feeble minds..it was because she was lied to…lied lied lied.”
Of course, George Tenet [brought in by Clinton] orginated the lie that Iraq was the most dangerous country to the US back in 1998. I think there is blood on both parties hands.
Posted by: ExPat | April 3, 2008, 4:51 am 4:51 am
Everyone of the talking heads on the new shows have said that the superdelegates should and will vote for the candidate that they’re state voted for. Will of the people and all that. Well, Hillary won New Mexico. Why is Richardson given a pass on going against the vote of his state? Arizona. Same thing. Hillary won, the governer is giving her endorsement and superdelegate vote to Obama. Are any of the news programs going to address this kind of crap? That is two more superdelegates that according to the media, should be in Hillary’s pocket and not Obama’s. How many more are there. This whole thing is a sham.
Posted by: dennis | April 3, 2008, 4:54 am 4:54 am
i’m sticking with Obama. I think Hillary’s finished
Posted by: jacky | April 3, 2008, 4:57 am 4:57 am
No,No,No……………. trust? what everyone should really be scared of are the 35,000 lobbyists chasing the 435 congressmen and 100 senators running our 300 million strong country. I encourage everyone to take in 1 or 2 hours of C-span
and watch some of the 70 and 80 yr olds trying to read a complicated pharmaceutical or budget bill. It borders on the grotesque. In nearly all other democracies, lobbying is ILLEGAL and often leads to resignations and trials.
I digress, Obama is the clear choice, simply because he has been around these bloodsuckers in Washington the least. He can still point a finger at someone and call them out.
Posted by: Dizzy | April 3, 2008, 5:00 am 5:00 am
HRC was fooled by Bush and Cheney into voting for the Iraq war. That shows a lack of judgment and wisdom on her part.
Posted by: time4change2008 | April 3, 2008, 5:05 am 5:05 am
Tony Drab – I’ve yet to see an intelligent word come out of your mouth. I’d reserve judgements if I were you, it seems as if you’re a few IQ points shy of average.
Posted by: Expat | April 3, 2008, 5:10 am 5:10 am
Voting means nothing. Don’t waste your time. All this BS about voting and it’s the electoreate that makes the final count. Super Delegates? Where the hell did they come from? There has been articles all over the net about them being wooed and bribed. Thats how our next president will be elected? God save us. These 3 candidates are the worst bunch of losers I have seen. Come on people. Lets see what happens if we just don’t vote. I know it will never happen but would’t you like to see what happened if we could pull it off? The powers that be will choose our next president. As a matter of fact, that choice has been made long ago. We have never been in control. All this BS about a close race and the choice for VP and all the other crap is just to keep us occupied while the country falls down around us. Damn them all. We should throw the whole congress out and start over. ALL of them. Yes, all of them. They are all dirty. Now I know I will be called crazy and uneducated and don’t know the facts and God only knows what else. But you know what? I don’t care. You all know I’m right but are to weak or afraid to admit it.
Posted by: Real Man | April 3, 2008, 5:10 am 5:10 am
Tony Drab – I’ve yet to see an intelligent word come out of your mouth. I’d reserve judgements if I were you, it seems as if you’re a few IQ points shy of average.
Posted by: Expat | April 3, 2008, 5:10 am 5:10 am
To Nice Guy: Those who vote Democratic must love terror victim funerals. More to come…
Posted by: Nutty Buddy | April 3, 2008, 5:11 am 5:11 am
The issues for Hillary are trust and integrity.
She seems to be lacking in both.
Obama can’t be elected? Uh huh. Sure. Who’s ahead in the democratic primaries? Who has a 48% negative rating?
Other than self interest and ambition, what exactly is she running for?
Posted by: Michael in BKK | April 3, 2008, 5:11 am 5:11 am
A vote for Hillary…NEVER! In the beginning, I considered Obama. But, he now appears to be another loser! Obama lacks experience and has NOT been properly vetted. Is he is a closet black racist…who really knows for sure? His long-time church/pastor association is VERY troubling! If he becomes the nominee, Obama will be fortunate to get 45% of the popular vote. McCain was never my ideal choice for President. But, when considering the alternatives (Obama or Hillary), McCain looks like George Washington!
Posted by: TRS | April 3, 2008, 5:13 am 5:13 am
“Obama can’t be elected? Uh huh. Sure. Who’s ahead in the democratic primaries? Who has a 48% negative rating?”
Obama actually has a better ability to take votes away from undecided republicans than Hillary ever would hope to have. Hillary is struggling in her own party where she was once nearly a 30 point favorite. She is also HATED by most Republican voters.
Obama is the party’s best chance.
And, once again the voters lose because all of these candidates are going to spend and tax, spend and tax. Hope you like Socialism!
Posted by: ExPat | April 3, 2008, 5:18 am 5:18 am
Gore should run
Yes because he is fat and needs to lose some weight. Gore is a fool and anyone who thinks he could win is delusional.
Posted by: Don | April 3, 2008, 5:18 am 5:18 am
Gore should run
Yes because he is fat and needs to lose some weight. Gore is a fool and anyone who thinks he could win is delusional.
Posted by: Don | April 3, 2008, 5:18 am 5:18 am
Poor Richardson. Al Gore is now on the line being demoted by Barack Obama. What a slap in the face but that happens to traitors.
Posted by: Pancho | April 3, 2008, 5:39 am 5:39 am
“Hillary can negotiate peace better than Obama.”
You mean like in Ireland and Bosnia when they were shooting at her?
Or, do you mean her stellar negotiation skills the first time she tried to pass her socialist healthcare system and miserably failed?
Posted by: Expat | April 3, 2008, 5:42 am 5:42 am
God Bless America and our Troops and may we overcome the hypocrisy and cowardice of those who do not have the stomach to defend this country and its citizens, even the traitors and scoundrels among us. John McCain will defend this country, thank God. The Democrats will surrender to the terrorists.
Posted by: DC | April 3, 2008, 5:43 am 5:43 am
Dennis – don’t assume that everyone under 25 is that way, there are just as many if not more uninformed voters over the age of 25…to form an opinion about a group based on the actions of a few (or even the majority for that matter) is just plain ignorant. One Man, One Vote every person has the right to vote based on what they feel is most important…I believe that’s one of the things that makes America the best country on earth!
Tony Darbo – What’s wrong too many words for you? Its ok I have a picture book coming out this spring…for now just keep scrolling.
Posted by: choosing the lesser of evils | April 3, 2008, 5:44 am 5:44 am
Obama should concede. Karl Rove already has his next manufactured scandal prepared. Barrack Obama’s surrogates loves the masochism of humiliation..once again !! What does Obama care, anyway?
Posted by: MicheleW | April 3, 2008, 5:45 am 5:45 am
I’m an American that has moved to London to be with my same sex partner – America has major problems with human rights and just common sense. If America votes in another Republican then everyone who votes Republican should be happy that more people are out of work than any other time in history, the country is bankrupt, Oil is higher than ever time before, 38 million Americans on food stamps, hated by the rest of the world – come on it doest take a brain scientist to know that another republican will finish off the country that I love! Wake up America this is your chance to change the way things are being handled. Stop this war, rebuild trust in the free world and bring peace and stability back to America! A vote for the Democrats in the next election is a vote for freedom and change. God Bless America and forgive us for mistakes that this mighty country has made.
Posted by: Austin Mason | April 3, 2008, 5:45 am 5:45 am
John McCain nationally gets the hero of the year award. Here in Arizona we got over the POW thing years ago. We know McCain as a guy who was up to his neck in the Keating scandal. His beautiful America loving wife will not be much of an asset to him in the bible belt when they find out about some of her little secrets. Her money was made in the liquor ditribution industry, everyone knows about her addiction to pain killers which we can all sympathize with, but few know where she was getting her “stuff”. Anyone remember the McCains being involved in deals to send pharmacutecals to underdeveloped countries? Some people just can’t keep their hands outa the cookie jar. All this and all the rest will come out in the general election.
Posted by: dennis | April 3, 2008, 5:47 am 5:47 am
Does anybody remember the movie “Blazing Saddles”? There was a line in it where the old man with the binocular wanted to tell the people that arriving sheriff is a “ni*ger”. But he was frustrated because of the sound of the band which made it sound like he was saying that the sheriff is “near”. Then finally the sheriff rode into town and everybody’s enthusiasms fell flat simply because he was a man of color. That is exactly what Hillary Clinton is trying to tell Americans in coded language that Obama IS a black man, therefore he cannot be president. Never mind his intelligence, or better judgment, he cannot win because he’s black. The Clintons are not saying that he’s not electable… since he’s got more votes than her, and won more states. They are insisting that we must wake up and realize that we’re trying to elect a black man as president of the United States. She is doing what she’s been doing all along which is to summon our lowest racist common denominator and deny a man of higher moral integrity a position he’s clearly more qualified for. That my friends, IS the gist of her argument. It is also what Pennsylvania Ed Rendell is trying to say.
Posted by: joolio | April 3, 2008, 5:47 am 5:47 am
I wonder if the super-delegates are noticing the Clintons’ newfound appreciation of, and collaboration with, the “right-wing conspiracy” of the likes of Mellon Scaife, Fox News, and Rush Limbaugh. There’s not even the pretense of Democratic character and integrity left with these power-mongers.
Posted by: Wayne P. | April 3, 2008, 5:48 am 5:48 am
Michele and Barack..Please ! Stop the Voodoo to America or you will get caught on fire !!!
Posted by: RossiMas | April 3, 2008, 5:48 am 5:48 am
I have read every single comment posted. I am sorry to say that I have.
Most of these posts are spite initiated. Either against Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama. Its stupid. You all keep talking up the others weaknesses. I doubt it will ever change anyones vote.
I myself am I Hillary Clinton supporter. If Obama wins the nomination , I am voting for John Mc Cain.
Not out of ‘childish spite’ . Not because i think Obama is a racist. Not because Obama is black. It has nothing to do with this nonsense.
I would rather have McCain because he is mature and experienced enough to run the country. I would trade off universal healthcare for stability in the world .
I do not believe in radical withdrawl from Iraq. I would have NEVER invaded Iraq, but too bad. We are there. If we leave, the same IDIOTS who attacked us on 9/11 will surely become far more powerfull.
Nothing Obama has done in this election has ever convinced me he is responsible or mature enough to run the country. He is a fantastic public speaker, and is highly intelligent.
But he really does fumble around when it comes to judgement, and he speaks too loudly in philisophical terms, and rarely in concrete terms.
He relies heavily on his aids or the teleprompter to keep his head around issues. Talking about issues doesnt come naturally to him. He does better in a ‘speech’ setting rather than a tooth and nail negotiation setting.
This notion that a pied piper can come along and wave a magic wand to save us all is surreal. Its a political ploy to feed off our worries and insecurites.
The problems this country faces cannot be solved with a left wing platform no matter how loud Obama whines to get republicans to work with him.
We need someone who will get the job done. Hillary clinton will get the job done. Mc Cain to a lesser degree.
Obama will NOT get the job done. He doesnt have the experience or temperment to be president. He just has the speaking voice.
Posted by: tomdavie | April 3, 2008, 5:48 am 5:48 am
Thanks, thats good information Dennis…I had not heard any of this before…will have to do some more research
Posted by: choosing the lesser of evils | April 3, 2008, 5:50 am 5:50 am
Obama should concede. Karl Rove already has his next manufactured scandal prepared. Barrack Obama’s surrogates love the masochism of humiliation..once again !! What does Obama care, anyway?
Posted by: MicheleW | April 3, 2008, 5:51 am 5:51 am
What’s the matter Bill? Stop whinging!
I thought you said everyone got clipped every once in a while. How does it feel?
Posted by: Fred in Texas | April 3, 2008, 5:54 am 5:54 am
Obama is very talented as a politician, very intelligent, not divisive and he can probably beat McCain. He’s vulnerable on some fronts (the fact that he’s part black may not help him win many southern states), but McCain is also vulnerable.
McCain has made scary statements about foreign policy which indicate his tenure would be prone to more wars that will likely damage the American economy further.
As for Clinton, she is desperate and is at the stage where she is “throwing the kitchen sink.” Too bad, she could have gone out in a positive way, with people regretting her – now it will be a relief when she does eventually quit the race. It looks like her strategy is to stay in until it becomes absolutely clear that she can’t win – in any way, even by taking down Obama at the risk of paving the way for McCain.
She is probably calculating that if McCain wins, she can challenge him in 4 years, when he’ll be like 76 if he lives that long.
But with this attitude, I just don’t see how she would win in 2012, everyone will just remember her bitterness.
Posted by: max the mad scientist | April 3, 2008, 5:54 am 5:54 am
Richardson go away or stay with Obama which is the same. Shame !
Posted by: Pancho | April 3, 2008, 5:55 am 5:55 am
“Vote Hillary for President………..vote Expat for dogcatcher.”
There always has to be a village idiot somewhere. Darbo – YOU WIN!!
Posted by: Expat | April 3, 2008, 5:57 am 5:57 am
I am already sick of Barack Obama’s false prophecies. He must have learned from his uncle Wright. Plaguiarism at its best !
Posted by: RossiMas | April 3, 2008, 5:58 am 5:58 am
So what is the deal with the American media? Even the British media is calling the American media Obama-phile. Are we being Oprah’d? You know, the same woman who brought us the spectacle of Dr. Phil as well as that lovely school in Africa where children were being sexually abused? Or is the problem much bigger than that? I know we have some very fine journalists, particularly in newspaper (some of them), I just wish we had more of the Wall Street Journal and less of Jerry Springer and Entertainment Tonight!
Hillary isn’t a perfect candidate, but at least her positions are consistant with her voting record, we have a fair notion of what to expect. Remember the NAFTA flap? So… after the bare faced lying denials didn’t work out for Obama… did we ever get a clarification? No? So, would Hillary have gotten away with that? No? Do we have any credible position from Obama? No? And that isn’t a problem why, exactly?!
Posted by: Totoro | April 3, 2008, 6:00 am 6:00 am
The big America it looks so small now thanks to Bush,
Here in Europe we love it as Americans can’t afford holidays here in United Kingdom any more.
Hillary she is a liar, McCain he is old with poor ideas
Obama is the new star,
Wish all the best arrogant Americans
Posted by: Sam | April 3, 2008, 6:00 am 6:00 am
Nasty Buggers — Thursday Whip
The Borgias of U.S. Politics ‘E Can’t Win Nasty Buggers! Bill’s Tirade Judge Blocks Clinton Deposition The old FBI files story Gore’s Conspicuous Silence Rove Likes What He Sees Bedtime Totty
Posted by: Liberty Peak Lodge | April 3, 2008, 6:00 am 6:00 am
Obama’s fading star wil be subpoena soon by the court of Illinois for money laundering.
Posted by: Josephm20 | April 3, 2008, 6:02 am 6:02 am
It’s pretty scary how quickly a segment of the Democratic Party jumped on the Obama-wagon when the guy is clearly not ready to be President. Three years in the Senate – and running for President for two of them. This is another Jimmy Carter just waiting to happen. Unbelievably bad judgment.
Posted by: K.F. Miller | April 3, 2008, 6:02 am 6:02 am
Obama should concede. Karl Rove already has his next manufactured scandal prepared. Barrack Obama’s surrogates loves the masochism of humiliation..once again !! What does Obama care, anyway?
Posted by: MicheleW | April 3, 2008, 6:04 am 6:04 am
Hey “lesser evil” – If you wanna read up on what I mentioned about McCain, just type “McCain Keating” into google, its loaded with info. As far as the little woman, type in “Cindy McCain”. The whole story on her is at Salon News.
Posted by: dennis | April 3, 2008, 6:06 am 6:06 am
whoaaaa!!!! what an argument? Obama can’t win LOL he is winning the DEMS nomination race and argue that he can’t win the Gen election HillyBill are nuts LOL!!!!!!!!
Posted by: alexis compton | April 3, 2008, 6:07 am 6:07 am
McCain, a liberal? What Kool-aid are you drinking? McCain will continue the same nonsense that has bankrupted this country and caused 4,000 American deaths in an illegal war in Iraq. Yes, we are bankrupt because the middle class has been gutted, and these are the only people that historically pull the country out of recession with their tax base. Ask the oil companies or Wal-Mart for help out this time…lots of luck.
Posted by: bob | April 3, 2008, 6:10 am 6:10 am
Go Bama Go!!! The Candidate for the 21st Century.
Barack Obama is a leader who has worked in the trenches and knows what shortcomings confront the little guy. He has an ability to unite and remain above petty dirt battles.
He is what the Democratic Party so desperately needs today and in the coming years. He is what we need today and in the future of America…A LEADER who does not divide but UNITES!!!
Go Bama Go !!!
Posted by: Buddy in pa | April 3, 2008, 6:15 am 6:15 am
Wake up voters? Are we so desperate for “change” that we would actually cast a vote for Obama or Hillary for President? I agree with most that we need to alter our course, but do we need to drive over a cliff before thoughtfully considering our vote? Folks, Obama and Hillary are not prudent choices. I doubt Obama even knows the sport played by Mickey Mantle or the last name of America’s most decorated WWII soldier named Audie? Hillary probably knows, but wouldn’t be able to explain their significance to our American heritage and history. I wonder why? If this what our great country has become…candidates such as these two?
Posted by: TRS | April 3, 2008, 6:15 am 6:15 am
You should vote for Hilary because she will wake up at 3am one morning (she’s gonna get a phone call planned for that time!) and solve the credit crunch unlike the nasty repubs. I know this because Hilary dodged bombs and sniper bullets in Bosnia. :)
Posted by: Philip Lewis | April 3, 2008, 6:15 am 6:15 am
as for Mccain aka the warlord, he will not win the Gen Election simply because most of the electorates were tired of Republicans.
Posted by: alexis compton | April 3, 2008, 6:16 am 6:16 am
Operation Chaos! Thank God for Rush! He has drawn out the Liberals and they are finally showing their inept selves.
Posted by: Laru | April 3, 2008, 6:16 am 6:16 am
Are we really supposed to take any of this seriously?
Three Narcissists who believe in nothing but their own careers. You can’t really vote FOR any of them, if you have half a brain at all, the only possible motivation for voting would be to VOTE against _____
Posted by: erik | April 3, 2008, 6:16 am 6:16 am
WAKE UP!!!! WAKE UP!!! Once again, this country is having the wool pulled over its eyes. Hillary will win the democratic nomination, because this country will never…and I mean EVER let a black man come within a sniffs distance of the white house. Hillary will be given the Dem nomination in August, the same way Bush was given the White House in 2000. The media has tried now for 3 weeks to make the words of Pastor Wright, Barack Obama’s words. They are two different people. But the media doesn’t care. For once you had a candidate that reached a vast array of people, who brought blacks, whites, young, old and middle America together, and actually had them excited about the electoral process. I have heard people say countless times, alot of black people are only voting for Barack Obama because he’s black..well you’re right! The same way that white people and women and old people are voting for Hillary Clinton, because she’s an old white woman. It’s not that we don’t know who Barack Obama is…hell, we didn’t know who “W” was and he was a president’s son. I waited for the demons of racism, of evil, of tearing down to bang on the Obama door, they always come, when someone who happens to be a person of color reaches a certain plateau. I am an Obama supporter and honestly I hope he doesn’t win. This country and all of it’s negativity and stupid racism and bigotry and idiocy…really don’t deserve change…you deserve the “McSame”..or the wicked Bitch of the East. We did not deserve RFK, we did not deserve JFK, we did not deserve MLK…that’s why we didn’t get those leaders or have them for very long. The gutteral disgusting underbellied evil of this country is what we love and what we ask for…even when there is a way out. So I’ll vote for Obama but I’ll be rooting for Hillary to win, no reason to steer this country away from hell when we already have a one-way ticket there…as Bush would say, we might as well “Stay the Course”. Even better…let’s use Hillary’s words. Shame on you…America.
35, white, PhD, North Carolina
Posted by: KR | April 3, 2008, 6:22 am 6:22 am
She was right. Obama can’t win against McCain and the 527′s. If he can’t take this campaign to the convention, it clearly shows he doesn’t have the backbone to be president.
Furthermore, the election in November will not be decided by caucuses than can be filled with college students whose registration isn’t even checked.
Obama can’t beat McCain. He is not electable. And, I’m one of those Clinton supporters who will be voting for McCain if Obama gets the nomination and my son says he will too.
Posted by: gorgegirl | April 3, 2008, 6:24 am 6:24 am
She was right. Obama can’t win against McCain and the 527′s. If he can’t take this campaign to the convention, it clearly shows he doesn’t have the backbone to be president.
Furthermore, the election in November will not be decided by caucuses than can be filled with college students whose registration isn’t even checked.
Obama can’t beat McCain. He is not electable. And, I’m one of those Clinton supporters who will be voting for McCain if Obama gets the nomination and my son says he will too.
Posted by: gorgegirl | April 3, 2008, 6:24 am 6:24 am
It’s pretty ironic that the party that rails against the elite, and warns of back room political deals is the party that may well resort to back room deals of elite superdelegates to deny the people of their voted preference…but don’t let the facts get in the way of a good time.
Posted by: Dibujo | April 3, 2008, 6:26 am 6:26 am
Wow buddy, you are a truely great supporter of Obama. Reminds me of another untested, relatively unknown, man with little experience that was ordained as “a uniter, not a divider”. He went on to win two elections and serve eight years as president. You remember the uniter of 2000, Dubya.
Just a quick comment on all of those that are against the war and pointing fingers at who did and who did not support the war. I remember watching the tanks and trucks blazing across the desert sands on a blitzkrieg to Bagdad and I remember one of the news announcers talking about how awe inspiring it was to see. He also said that 98%, yes 98% of the American people were completely supportive of the invasion. I was in the two percent. During that time I learned that it was prudent to sit down and shut up, simply because everyone was so stirred up. Sure sounds like a lot more than 2% of Americans today will admit to jumping up and down and applauding the invasion. We have no problem with hypocracy anymore in this country.
Posted by: dennis | April 3, 2008, 6:26 am 6:26 am
erik – my sentiments exactly, it all boils down to choosing the lesser of evils
Posted by: choosing the lesser of evils | April 3, 2008, 6:31 am 6:31 am
They’re right about this one. Obama can’t win but I don’t think Hillary can either! McCain’s a sure bet to be the next president.
Posted by: jim | April 3, 2008, 6:32 am 6:32 am
Just LOVE watching PC-blinkered Democrats smacking each other like swinging piñatas! Every contact shows how utterly bankrupt liberalism really is.
Its actually more fun than the Republican primaries, because they are so predictably practical.
But Dems really ARE idiots— deeply, truly, thoroughly. It doesn’t get any better than this!
Cheers
Posted by: Centava Dozier | April 3, 2008, 6:33 am 6:33 am
Hillary can stop McCain. Drop out of the race so Senator Obama, who can win, will not have to spend valuabl resources defending against her lies. If she steals the nomination, we will lose this fall. As of now the Republicans are a shoe in thanks to the ruthless, personal objectives of the Clintons.
Posted by: tekrab | April 3, 2008, 6:33 am 6:33 am
BILL CLINTON WENT ON A TIRADE?
ALL HE HAD TO DO WAS PUNCH THE LIGHTS OUT OF ONE OF THOSE IDIOTS IN THE MEDIA,ESPECIALLY, FOR ME.
THAT WOULD MAKE A LOT OF PEOPLE HAPPY!!!
LYING BACKSTABBING IDIOTS.
CLINTON HAS PROVED HIMSELF FOR 8 YRS. WHAT HAVE THE REST OF THEM DONE, THAN BACKSTAB THEIR FRIENDS AND GOSSIP.
BIL RICHARDSON THOUGHT HE WAS A HERO-
HE IS CALLED BILL “JUDAS” RICHARDSON-TRAITOR
Posted by: TJ | April 3, 2008, 6:34 am 6:34 am
The clinton Obama mudslinging is entertainment to distract you from the Recession we are in that is quickly goin into a depression. The only 3 candidates mentioned are.
1. Insane McCain.
2. The Hilderbeast. Hitlery.
3.Osama Obama bin laden.
If you want a real President then vote for the real Candidate RON PAUL in 2008.
Yes he is still in the race only the media has blacklisted him and are afraid to even speak his name because he speaks the truth and is NOT bought and paid for by BIG BANKS or SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS.
Posted by: Nailer | April 3, 2008, 6:36 am 6:36 am
The Clintons are right. Obama will not win the election. Most of us “typical white Americans” as Obama calls us– will not vote for him based on his dismal performance as Senator, his Illinois voting record or lack of it and his association with people like Rezko, the Black Panthers and that racist Wright. Had the media portrayed him accurately he never would have won alot of those primaries. He givesa good speech but talk is cheap. He has been described in the Senate as “folding like a cheap suit. ” Obama admits he couldn’t get much done in the Senate and what he did accomplish in Illinois was handed to him by others who did all the work. When the Republicans get a hold of him they will dig up more dirt on him and the Democrats will lose. They deserve to lose if they choose Obama. I, and many others will cross over and vote for McCain. We don’t feel SAFE with Obama.
Posted by: JIMBO | April 3, 2008, 6:36 am 6:36 am
The one good thing about Rev Wright controversy, wheter Obama wins or loses is, White America is learning just how racist they are and how much they can’t stand the thought of a black man in the white house, regardless of whether it may be best for the country or not!!! Why don’t you listen to Rev Wright’s sermons in their entirety and tell me what he says isn’t true in it’s whole context?? Obama is America’s only hope know right now and you all know it!!
Posted by: Revelation1 | April 3, 2008, 6:37 am 6:37 am
Gun powder minded John Mccain will not win Gen Election, but in case, which is 0.5% possibility he wins, we will bomb bomb Iran that is for sure and more foreclosures and jobs be shipped to China will be expected.
Posted by: alexis compton | April 3, 2008, 6:37 am 6:37 am
I am amused by the majority of these posts. They are done by either wet-behind-the-ears who wouldn’t know what is good for our country if it bit them in the butt, dyed in the wool socialist wannabees or complete idiots. Hillary and Bill are seething because something strange happened on the way to the coronation, some upstart smooth talking guy who has NOTHING but an ability to give a smooth prepared speech. Keep up the good fight Dems WE LOVE IT!!!!!!
Posted by: Chuck | April 3, 2008, 6:40 am 6:40 am
I am amused by the majority of these posts. They are done by either wet-behind-the-ears who wouldn’t know what is good for our country if it bit them in the butt, dyed in the wool socialist wannabees or complete idiots. Hillary and Bill are seething because something strange happened on the way to the coronation, some upstart smooth talking guy who has NOTHING but an ability to give a smooth prepared speech. Keep up the good fight Dems WE LOVE IT!!!!!!
Posted by: Chuck | April 3, 2008, 6:40 am 6:40 am
Bill is a convicted liar, Hillary is a proven many times over liar, Obama is an empty suit with absolutly no qualifications to be president except that he is half African and half hippie.
McCain is a dead man walking who has to be reminded every morning wich political party he belongs to and who forgets by noon wich one it is.
I pass!!!
Posted by: redsticker | April 3, 2008, 6:41 am 6:41 am
Centava, your little minded smug name calling is exactly why America is sick to death of Republicans. Anyone who thinks Republicans are practical is destined to be the butt of a joke. I encourage you to keep making these kinds of posts at as many sites as you can. They do more to turn people off to your party than the Trent Lotts, Newt Gingrich’s and Bill O’Reilly’s all put together.
Posted by: dennis | April 3, 2008, 6:41 am 6:41 am
If the Dems lose in Nov., it will be Bill’s fault.
His ego is getting bruised and he can’t wait to see the new selection on interns in the WH.
The thought of missing all that potential “new action” must be driving him nuts
Posted by: fred astaire | April 3, 2008, 6:41 am 6:41 am
If the Dems lose in Nov., it will be Bill’s fault.
His ego is getting bruised and he can’t wait to see the new selection on interns in the WH.
The thought of missing all that potential “new action” must be driving him nuts
Posted by: fred astaire | April 3, 2008, 6:41 am 6:41 am
HOW CAN HILLARY SAY BARACK CANT WIN WHEN HE IS BEATING HER IN DELAGETS AND THE POPULAR VOTE AND MOST STATES WON. IS SHE REALY THAT SLEEP DEPRIVE.PLEASE SOMEONE TELL HER THE FAT LADY IS WARMING UP AND THAT ELVIS AS LEFT THE BUILDING.
Posted by: LB | April 3, 2008, 6:42 am 6:42 am
HOW CAN HILLARY SAY BARACK CANT WIN WHEN HE IS BEATING HER IN DELAGETS AND THE POPULAR VOTE AND MOST STATES WON. IS SHE REALY THAT SLEEP DEPRIVE.PLEASE SOMEONE TELL HER THE FAT LADY IS WARMING UP AND THAT ELVIS AS LEFT THE BUILDING.
Posted by: LB | April 3, 2008, 6:43 am 6:43 am
Since I judge people by the content of their character, I would vote for Hillary Clinton!
Posted by: Marty King | April 3, 2008, 6:43 am 6:43 am
Americans hide your money and your guns, because it doesn’t matter who wins this election – Obama, Clinton, or McCain, the next government will be coming to take it all from you.
Posted by: rob campbell | April 3, 2008, 6:44 am 6:44 am
Nailer as much as I would like to see Ron Paul get a fair chance the sad reality is that we live in a country that only sees left and right. Though most people fall somewhere in the middle we are almost forced to choose between the two if we want our vote to count first. I think we should eliminate political parties and endorsements whatsoever, every candidate should run on their personal merits and policies.
Posted by: choosing the lesser of evils | April 3, 2008, 6:48 am 6:48 am
To have so much and be so shameless.
They must have trouble sleeping at night..
Liar-liar pants on fire.
Posted by: goathorn | April 3, 2008, 6:48 am 6:48 am
It is time to wake up around here people. Obama and Clinton are Marxists. Do yourself, and America, a favor and research exactly what that means. In a nutshell it means that the little people, whom they are supposed to be protecting, become even further enslaved to this system. Do your homework people. Anyone who talks about how big companies are screwing people and how they are going to “take those profits” is also someone just dying to take away your jobs when they do it.
Wake up, this isn’t about black, white, male, female, republican, democrat here. Its about two people who will push this country further into the grips of a losing socialist society to which we will all face certain bondage.
Posted by: Gary, Lansdowne, PA | April 3, 2008, 6:49 am 6:49 am
No negroes for President. He will just make all the white people pay extra money in taxes for them reparations. Then we will have to take the fight to the streets and take care of this little black problem we got around here.
No women either. I don’t want no new tea party laws.
Posted by: Morris | April 3, 2008, 6:52 am 6:52 am
Some people boast that if Hillary doesn’t win the nomination they will vote for McCain. Who cares? If you vote for McCain, please don’t annoy me with your whining when the body bags continue to come home from Iraq. McCain is a one topic fellow just like Bush. He is only interested in fighting “terrorists.” He will use real service men and women as if they were toy soldiers as he experiments to see which manuevers will bring about a “win” for Americans. He doesn’t seem to know it, but Americans lost in Iraq years ago.
Posted by: Billy | April 3, 2008, 6:53 am 6:53 am
The superdelegate system is an exact example of how ineffective the Democrats govern. They had a fear that the free market process would not work, they intervened in that process (developed the superdelegate system), and overlooked the unintended consequences. Now they are staring in the face of that failure and lashing out emotionally instead of addressing the issue. Its unbelievable that they are going to negotiate over Mich. and Fla. rather than vote – they have no concept of what this country is and why it was founded. They are anti-free market capitalists and anti-democracy.
Posted by: Adam | April 3, 2008, 6:54 am 6:54 am
McCain in a landslide. He is sitting back and just laughing at what a cakewalk it will be come November.
Posted by: Funkmaster Chris | April 3, 2008, 6:56 am 6:56 am
Superdelegates: the Democratic Party’s back-room mechanism for keeping the black man in his place… on the Dem Plantation.
Posted by: Rufus | April 3, 2008, 6:57 am 6:57 am
This is why neither Democrat will win, when people learn the reality of Democratic Fiscal responsibility…consider the tax plans, and this is just the beginning, the proposed new spending is unbelievable:
MCCAIN:
Single making 3 0K – tax $4,500
Single making 50K – tax $12,500
Single making 75K – tax $18,750
Married making 60K- tax $9,000
Married making 75K – tax $18,750
Married making 125K – tax $31,250
CLINTON and OBAMA (same ideas)
Single making 30K – tax $8,400
Single making 50K – tax $14,000
Single making 75K – tax $23,250
Married making 60K – tax $16,800
Married making 75K – tax $21,000
Married making 125K – tax $38,750
Posted by: Dave Kay | April 3, 2008, 6:58 am 6:58 am
Atta boy Gary! Here, here. They’ll have to pry my gun from my cold dead fingers before they turn my country into some Canadian style socialist camp. Geez. We are the only industrialized nation in the world that doesn’t have some type of universal health care for our citizens. It’s not only he who has the most toys wins, but it’s he who has the money for insurance lives. What do you think the US Postal Service, Fire Departments, Police Departments, all Federal agencies are. Socialism. We are not a true capitalist society we have a lot of socialist concepts integrated into our country. The only way we can make it truly work.
Posted by: dennis | April 3, 2008, 6:59 am 6:59 am
Hillary has proven what a freak she is with some comments already.
I for one don’t want her anywhere near the White House!
Throw HER under a bridge and Bill, too.
Phil Foster would be smiling!.
Posted by: john | April 3, 2008, 7:00 am 7:00 am
Here are some interesting observations: (1) Democrats usually spout rhetoric of a socialist utopia where all are equal but yet they have created their own class struggle with this delegate-superdelegate nonsense – which could end up giving the nomination to someone who doesn’t win the popular vote. Talk about destroying your party from within. (2) Both candidates are talking about their electability over McCain, but yet neither can beat the other to even get to that point. (3) Hillary Clinton will never acquiesce. Period. She doesn’t know how to lose with grace (or win with humility for that matter) and if and when she does finally have to give in, it will be a meltdown of Biblical proportions. What does that say about her character? (4) You can’t have it both ways. Consider this – the people don’t want to elect a career politician, and the people don’t want someone who is naive. That rules out all three candidates.
None of the candidates have a strong personality that is both likable and genuine. Hillary comes off as being shrew-like and aloof. Obama comes off as disingenuous and smug. McCain is portrayed as doddering. This will be the worst election since Polk v Clay in 1844, but the most significant since Wilson beat Roosevelt and Taft in 1912.
Posted by: Marty | April 3, 2008, 7:01 am 7:01 am
There is no way Obama can win the general election. He is associated with too many racists. The Clintons have been nice about the whole racist thing, the republicans will not be so nice. Obama is condoning racism by supporting people like Rev. Wright, James Meeks and the Black Panthers. It is my opinion that those who support Obama are supporting racism.
Posted by: James | April 3, 2008, 7:03 am 7:03 am
Obama is one of my senators and I really like him. I do not have any problems when I call his office. They have always been very polite and been honest with what it taking place. When I receive email from his office it is not upsetting as to his standpoint. It is not hard to see why Hillary is staying in the race.
Bushes & Clintons – Bushes & Clintons – People don’t realize just how cozy they have been for years and years.
Posted by: anonymous | April 3, 2008, 7:04 am 7:04 am
If this country wants CHANGE, they are sure going to receive it with Obama as president. Here are just a few of his views, positions, and voting records:
He supports a driver’s license, health care, welfare and social security for those who have entered this country illegally.
He has voted against English as the official language spoken in the U.S.A.
He is against tort reform.
He wants a bigger gov’t with much higher taxes.
He has voted against parental notification for child abortion.
Voted against the interstate transfer of minors’ law.
He has a Muslim father, step-father, brothers and has raised funds for Muslim organizations.
If this country votes for this kind of CHANGE, we are in deeeeeeeeep doo doo.
Posted by: Skip | April 3, 2008, 7:04 am 7:04 am
morris the idiot,brain lizard and ugly ass. God created man and man are all created equal, The american Indians are the real owner of the Country called USA, and telling us that negroes have no right to lead this great nation shame on you to say that only whites have the right, your soul is now in the septic tank idiot.
Posted by: alexis compton | April 3, 2008, 7:04 am 7:04 am
If this country wants CHANGE, they are sure going to receive it with Obama as president. Here are just a few of his views, positions, and voting records:
He supports a driver’s license, health care, welfare and social security for those who have entered this country illegally.
He has voted against English as the official language spoken in the U.S.A.
He is against tort reform.
He wants a bigger gov’t with much higher taxes.
He has voted against parental notification for child abortion.
Voted against the interstate transfer of minors’ law.
He has a Muslim father, step-father, brothers and has raised funds for Muslim organizations.
If this country votes for this kind of CHANGE, we are in deeeeeeeeep doo doo.
Posted by: Skip | April 3, 2008, 7:05 am 7:05 am
Super Delegates is also a counter productive idea to make the democrats a party of the elite. If you think you have a voice you are mistaken. It’s all about political expediancy–what hypocracy.
Posted by: Wolf | April 3, 2008, 7:06 am 7:06 am
Hillary’s logic is Obama can’t win because America won’t vote for a black, regardless of his or her worth. If it’s true, what does it say about this great country we’re supposed to be so proud of? However, I think it’s just another vote by Hillary based on faulty intelligence.
Posted by: mike | April 3, 2008, 7:06 am 7:06 am
Fas.cism \ ‘fa-,shi-zem
A political philosophy, movement or regime(as that of the Fasciti)that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for central autocratic government….Merriam Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, tenth edition.
Look folks, let’s be honest,the Democratic party, with all it’s schemes to centralize control over practically every meaningful element in our lives – is the modern American fascist (light) party. Even their senior Senator (sitting in Washington right now; Robert Byrd) is a past Klan member.
The opposite philosophy, that of extolling “the accrued benefits to society at large in the enlightened pursuit of individual interests” – the Republican mantra – is the best system. All else is a dangerous utopian pipe dream, like the nazis, the bolsheviks, the trotskyites, mao, fidel,now chavez who have come before them. This is true because of the simple fact that people, as indivuals, will always act in their own enlightened self interest anyway.
Why don’t we look for ways to “split the difference”. We’ll give you some fish to eat even as we teach you to fish. However, if you refuse to go fishing for supper with the rest of us when once fully trained and able, we’ll have to call you what you are – a parasite – and marginalize you and your opinions.
Posted by: Thurston Howell | April 3, 2008, 7:06 am 7:06 am
HILLARY IS RUNNING SCARED BECAUSE THE SUPERDELEGATES ARE DOING A DOMINO EFFECT TOWARDS OBAMA,I THINK IN HER MIND THAT AMERICA WILL NEVER ELECT A BLACK PRESIDENT BUT REMEMBER ONE THING IT IS NOT ONLY WHITE AMERICA ITS BLACK,LATINO,ASIAN AND NATIVE AMERICA.
Posted by: LB | April 3, 2008, 7:06 am 7:06 am
If Hillary Clinton does not win the nomination it will mean one thing; The Republicans have won the war they started back in 1993.
All the Dems who call Hillary a witch and such have simply fallen for the smears the Clintons have suffered for years. Fair weather Democrats all. Ask them why they harbor such hyperbolic feelings and not one of them can give you a reasonable, rational answer.
Obama just isn’t ready to be President. Hillary is. Don’t like her? Fine. She would still be the better leader for America.
Vote for Obama and suffer the consequences. You can’t say you weren’t told.
Posted by: ww | April 3, 2008, 7:07 am 7:07 am
As Chelsea Clinton continues her cross country travels pimping herself at every “gay” bar she can find we have Obama Lama Ding Dong sitting in the first pew for the last 20 years listening to a raving lunatic preach his racist bile. Is this really what we have descended to as a society? Wake up America! Do you honestly believe either of these two are capable of being President of the United States?
A “Typical White Person’s” Prediction:
You want change? Well, you’ll get it. It’s what you’ll have left at the bottom of your pockets after either of these two clowns fleece you for everything your worth. Now that’s change you can believe in!
Posted by: Jim in PA | April 3, 2008, 7:08 am 7:08 am
All of these candidates are suboptimal choices for the position of President, as all of them lack critical, sustained, and significant executive experience. The three with that experience (Richardson, Romney, and, gag, Huckabee) are all gone. I’m ready for a President who’s not white. Hell, I was ready thirty years ago. Obama’s just not the guy, not yet anyways. He’s articulate and smooth, even moving. I don’t think he’ll have the slightest idea of what to do on day one, and there is little in his background that suggests he is prepared for this position. However, there is much in his character that suggests he would be the right person after proper seasoning. Sadly, he will be President too early. It won’t be the Democratic equivalent of nominating Bush, since Obama has a conscience, but it will be a mistake.
Posted by: Frank | April 3, 2008, 7:08 am 7:08 am
All of these candidates are suboptimal choices for the position of President, as all of them lack critical, sustained, and significant executive experience. The three with that experience (Richardson, Romney, and, gag, Huckabee) are all gone. I’m ready for a President who’s not white. Hell, I was ready thirty years ago. Obama’s just not the guy, not yet anyways. He’s articulate and smooth, even moving. I don’t think he’ll have the slightest idea of what to do on day one, and there is little in his background that suggests he is prepared for this position. However, there is much in his character that suggests he would be the right person after proper seasoning. Sadly, he will be President too early. It won’t be the Democratic equivalent of nominating Bush, since Obama has a conscience, but it will be a mistake.
Posted by: Frank | April 3, 2008, 7:08 am 7:08 am
Let’s face it. Neither Obama or Clinton will win. A preacher and a Clinton lie has buried these two.
Posted by: Fred | April 3, 2008, 7:09 am 7:09 am
Hey Billy…
Please answer me a question, if you would be so kind. Have you ever reached out to the people whom we are fighting and asked THEM to pull out of Iraq?
Whose side are you on here? I have NEVER heard any of our enemies (you know, the people we are fighting) offer any terms of surrender here. I have only heard them say that they want us and all of the Jews wiped off the world map.
To me, that says they are coming here. It seems to me that fighting them there keeps them there. But that makes too much sense.
Bottom line is this…if you would like the war over, GET BEHIND IT (since it was already overwhelming voted for) and let the military WIN IT RAPIDLY, and they the other side quit, or die, and our boys can come home.
Posted by: Richard C | April 3, 2008, 7:10 am 7:10 am
I think the number of representatives, etc. endorsing Obama is a message to the Clintons that SHE can’t win. Or maybe a message from them that they are tired of the same old Clinton bs and want them to simply go away. The Clintons are extremely arrogant people and that goes all the way down to Chelsea. Any state which voted for Clinton will also vote for Obama in the general. Those states are Dem states.
Posted by: RufusVonDufus | April 3, 2008, 7:12 am 7:12 am
I won’t vote for anyone who lies so brazenly about being under sniperfire in Bosnia.
Obama will be the nominee and thank goodness the Clintons will be off the national stage for good.
Posted by: Southamco | April 3, 2008, 7:13 am 7:13 am
I won’t vote for anyone who lies so brazenly about being under sniperfire in Bosnia.
Obama will be the nominee and thank goodness the Clintons will be off the national stage for good.
Posted by: Southamco | April 3, 2008, 7:13 am 7:13 am
Those who vote for Hussein Obama must like civilian and military funerals.
Posted by: mike | April 3, 2008, 7:13 am 7:13 am
Obama is hype and it is sad to watch the former Clinton press secretary continue his anti-Clinton reporting. It’s like a joke Jessie Jackson told in the 80′s about himself and the Pope. Both men walked on water; the press reported it this way: Pope performed a miracle; Jackson can’t swim. In this election Hillary is in the Jackson role when it comes to the press.
Posted by: Tori | April 3, 2008, 7:13 am 7:13 am
Skip,
You said if Americans vote for Obama “we are in deeeeeeeeep doo doo.” Don’t you think we are already in that situation? Bush is overseas now begging NATO to send troops to Afghanistan, because he chose to start a war in Iraq, a country that had nothing to do with the events of 9/11, instead of focusing on Afghanistan, the country that had the training camp that the 9/11 attackers trained at. Americans are stuck in Iraq with no way out. Meantime, in the U.S., there are a record number of foreclosures, growing unemployment and homelessness, and a growing dependence on food stamps. Obama can’t possibly screw up things any worse than the White guys have screwed up things.
Posted by: Billy | April 3, 2008, 7:14 am 7:14 am
Dear Alexis…
People are NOT equal. Face the facts. All human, but no way equal. The Chinese are the smartest, then the whites then the Mexicans then the blacks. If a black has some white in them then they have a chance of getting some brains and it helps make them more equal. But with that black in there there is no hope except on the basketball court.
Posted by: Morris | April 3, 2008, 7:15 am 7:15 am
The party big wigs seem to think that the party base will support Obama, well they are wrong and they will learn a hard lesson, when we vote McCain in as the next president.
Posted by: Jacko | April 3, 2008, 7:18 am 7:18 am
We have two socialist partys. None of them represent the American people. God help us all.
Posted by: GLENN | April 3, 2008, 7:18 am 7:18 am
Pathetic. What argument will she try next, that America is not ready for a non-white President? She has now scraped the bottom of the barrel. I’d like to think there is no lower she can go, but I suppose it is possible that she can surprise us yet again.
Posted by: Dave | April 3, 2008, 7:20 am 7:20 am
Obama can’t win? Hillary Clinton has no concept of herself. Again, I fear that she has a pandering inner circele (like Bush) that shelters her from real perceptions and skews her self-perceptions. It is she who cannot win.
Her perceptions and her deceptions make her a flawed candidate. She lied about NAFTA, and she lied about Bosnia. It’s frightening to realize that she might not even realize she is lying; I guess the other possibility is more frightening.
Either way, she is the far lass electable candidate come November.
Posted by: anotherparicia | April 3, 2008, 7:21 am 7:21 am
If you read his first book you know Obama is a bigger racist than his pastor. He was in that church for 20 years having his wife and kid indoctrinated every Sunday with hatred and bigotry. Obama only wants to preach, if the “average white” brings up color it is racism.
There are three liberals running for president. No real choice there.
Posted by: steve | April 3, 2008, 7:23 am 7:23 am
This is for Billy, the guy who thinks he has a handle on US military issues:
I am in the military. You know absolutely nothing of which you try to speak…so just zip it. I don’t tell you how to fashion hair at your salon, stay out of my business.
Regarding the economy, keep spewing hatred and lies. We are not in a recession, Google it, you will see what a recession really is. But here’s a quick notion for you regarding the ecopnomy: You say we are in dire straits, do you really think doubling our taxes (per Obama’s AND Hillary’s plan) will help those who are in financial hot water?
You and all the democrats just continue on your schizophrenic path to defeat.
Posted by: GI Joe | April 3, 2008, 7:25 am 7:25 am
It is obvious he will never win the Presidential election.
28% of Hillary’s supporters will never vote for him, and Republicans will never vote for him.
Hillary is correct.
She polls as beating John McCain in a Presidential election and Obama doesn’t.
So don’t bad mouth her for telling the truth.
Do the math!
Posted by: Sonia | April 3, 2008, 7:25 am 7:25 am
Who really cares. The Democrats are leaderless and clueless when it comes to almost any issue in this great country.
The 100th Do Nothing Democrat Congress has the worst approval ratings in the history of Congress.
The DNC can’t even put together a process for states that moved their primaries forward. (They could have just copied the GOP process)
Simply put, Obama and Clinton are probably the weakest and most unqualified candidates that the Democrat party has ever submitted.
Either one even comes close to having the “leadership” skills as someone like John McCain.
Posted by: Allen Ridge | April 3, 2008, 7:27 am 7:27 am
I’m not against a black candidate for president, but Obama is such an empty-suit liberal.
I’m not against a woman candidate for president, but Hillary is such a controversial seething ball of political energy who I don’t know if she would do good or bad for the country.
I’m not against an elderly candidate for president, but John McCain is a hot tempered political-loner who doesn’t play nice with all the other kids.
I really don’t know what to make of this presidential race.
Posted by: Bill K | April 3, 2008, 7:31 am 7:31 am
Obama CAN beat McCain. Sorry but half of politics is image. IN a debate you have McCaain and Obama together on stage, I promise you Obama wins.
Hillary has the highest negatives of any candidate ever running for the office. She is unelectable. The other thing is the way the both of them behave (hill and bill_ reminds you again of how sleazy they really are. They simply will say anything to get elected.
Also Hillary can win PA by 20 points and they may come out with a net gain of a few delegates. She Cannot catch him in delegate count. That is a reality. The nomination is Obama’s and it is driving the Clintons nuts. It was supposed to be her. Ya gotta love it.
McCain is dead and comes back, HIll is a certain winner and she loses….God bless the voters..
Posted by: ajfrommass | April 3, 2008, 7:34 am 7:34 am
Robert… Obama and/or Hillary will tax us to death. That IS the change.
Posted by: dugmatik OS2 | April 3, 2008, 7:37 am 7:37 am
Its pretty cut and dry at this point. HRC winning is infinitesimal AT BEST. Seriously, its absolutely ridiculous at this point. It is over..why don’t HRC supporters simply suck it up and bow out with the ounce of grace thats still left. There is no more game to be played…
Posted by: Pierre | April 3, 2008, 8:00 am 8:00 am
Hillary can’t win and you folks know that. Obama is still wet behind the ears and Hillary can’t tell the truth.I look forward to having John McCain in the whitehouse. The democratic party is acting as always like a ship of fools. Get all your pork belly spending done, you people will be out of work soon. GOD BLESS AMERICA & Our next President JOHN McCain…
Posted by: Jim | April 3, 2008, 8:02 am 8:02 am
Obama cannot win. Look a the latest swing state polls where Clinton beats McCain, but McCain beats Obama or Obama’s lead is a fraction of Clinton’s.
When the Rev. Wright TV ads run all of October in swing states, there will be huge block of voters who either do not show up for Obama or vote for McCain instead.
Posted by: Leslie | April 3, 2008, 8:02 am 8:02 am
why dont the superdelegates make their mind so that this loser could go find something else to do.
I am wondering why any superdelegate can freely endorse anyone and not Richardson. This is exactly the kind of racial attitude of hillary and her husband.
Posted by: leche | April 3, 2008, 8:11 am 8:11 am
People said Obama won primary’s. He mostly one caucus states. I think he had 1 or 2 primary’s that he won. That is why he won’t win in November. There are no caucuses in the general election. Besides that the Republicans are going to dig up every little piece of dirt that, to this point has been uncovered.
Posted by: J | April 3, 2008, 8:13 am 8:13 am
Oneness – My parents were college professors both with PhDs – retired. They and one of their kids are voting for McCain – the other will support whoever the Democrats nominate. They are not bigots or evil embracers of “Us” vs. “Them”. And I believe you are sincere in your desire to elect Obama – I think my brother just hates any Republican, but I respect his right to do so and so do my parents – so please vote for Obama. Just know that everyone who votes against him is not evil or uneducated. And I will know the same. Its not the good and smart guys against the evil and mental midgets. Its people disagreeing in a free society and accepting the legal outcome – let the world see that.
Posted by: Mark | April 3, 2008, 8:17 am 8:17 am
Saw Obama on Hardball last night…..Wow, I was leaning towards Hillary…however….My vote is now going to Obama. His plan about not being a “permanent presence” in Iraq…AWESOME! (unlike McCain who is willing to leave troops in Iraq for 100 yrs or more). Obama wanting to put the 12 billion dollars we spend EACH DAY on the Iraq war and put that money into early childhood ed. for urban areas, etc…raising teachers pay, as well as give them incentives to continue their education in the teaching field.
Regulating Bank loans to college kids, so that when they leave college they dont have huge student loans…..Also making sure there are more Federal Grants, less bank loans.
Amazingly, I havent heard Hillary say anything about her plan and what she will do…All I hear is her talk about how she has experiance, how Obama is this and that.
Yet Obama, says nothing disparaging about Hillary and keeps his talk about the issues. Also, I find it intresting about something Obama said last night.
Chris Matthews kept bringing up his Pastors tyrade…and I think Obama made a wonderful point. He said roughly, “This is a great way to detract from the issues at hand, nothing I can say will make everybody happy, but this “clip” still wont keep people from losing their houses, losing their benefits and losing their jobs’! Aint that the truth.
He did a great job…and he will get my vote come NOV!
Posted by: Michelle | April 3, 2008, 8:46 am 8:46 am
Clinton supporters are pointing out the obvious to uncommitted super delegates: OBAMA CAN’T WIN the general election against McCain. The obvious:
Polls show McCain beating Obama everywhere (only Clinton leads McCain in battleground states)
Though we’ve gone underground to allow the DNC time to work out the mess they created in seeming to hand the nomination over to their “guy” Obama BEFORE 10 STATES HAVE EVEN VOTED – we will vote for McCain before we vote for an untested, inexperienced freshman senator. McCain is no GWB and we know it. Remember he’s the other experienced, known quantity in this race.
Independents and republicans will not vote for Obama if he were the nominee – questions will continue right up until November about what kind of judgement he used in remaining with and promoting an anti-american, racist minister for 20 years.
The DNC knows that his polling peaked in February – long before the Wright scandal surfaced. – that “new boyfriend” syndrome. We’re always drawn to the new, shiny thing – then, reality sets in. Obama’s vanity, arrogance and inexperience are showing.
Look what the republicans did to Teresa Heinz Kerry – and her effect on voters -believe me, republicans are salivating at the prospect of tearing this woman apart.
If super delegates want the Democrats to win in November, they should be considering this message from Clinton’s surrogates. Of course, if they want to continue their propensity for “snatching defeat from the jaws of victory” to placate the left wing that represents Obama’s core support, then, they can accept responsibility for our 3rd straight loss. Keep in mind, Obama’s supporters really have nowhere else to go – except to stay home this election. Centrists are centrists and can find a fairly comfortable home in either party.
Posted by: s. valenti | April 3, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am
Barack Obama made a mistake in choosing to run this year. When he won his US Senate seat in 2005 he is on record stating unequivocally that he would complete his first term in the US Senate. He went on to say that he did not possess the experience to be president. Shortly after these statements were made, Sen. Obama formed an exploratory presidential committee.
Posted by: Uncle Sam | April 3, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am
So, someone (Richardson) lies to Bill Clinton and he gets upset?? He’s getting what he deserves and hopefully it’s just the beginning.
Posted by: Chris Rainey | April 3, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am
Now we know how a pathological liar (Bill) reacts when someone lies to him.
I’ts quite revealing, the Democrat Party, home of all the open minded, loving, accepting, progressive thinking people, is ripping itself apart over a woman and a black man wanting to be their Presidential candidate.
Posted by: Danny Clark | April 3, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am
They are both Socialists. The good people of the US will not let the most powerful job on the planet go to a Marxist.
Posted by: mike | April 3, 2008, 8:54 am 8:54 am
Just like Shrillary to get shrieking and hysterical when she’s losing. And Bill doesn’t seem to understand that the more he tries to fight her battles for her, the weaker she looks. I’m not crazy about McCain, but I’m voting for him. What a bunch of losers the Dems are, running Hillary and Obama.
Posted by: Brad | April 3, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am
As someone who has participated in campaigns since RFK in 1968, it is easy to see that the Clintons have reached the Desperation stage. They are financially strapped, have been outplayed, outwitted, and outsmarted by a rookie, and now can’t face the fact that they are going to lose.
Obama’s reference to Al Gore yesterday was only done with Gore’s prior approval and is a signal to Super Delegates that the time to move is rapidly approaching.
By July 1, Obama will be named the nominee. By Aug 1, Michigan and Florida will be seated so they can participate in the convention.
Obama will wipe out McCain in November. It won’t even be close.
Posted by: Gary Mialocq | April 3, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am
Hillary, has done nothing but lye thur this whole campaign, Between all the clintons there is nothing you can believe.She pretty well knows she lost, she’ll never beat McCain on his worst day. For the Dems they can take the White House with Obama and out an end to the last 7 1/2 years of the down grading of the US.in front of the world. This lady and I say that very loosely it a power hungry liar That has been said to be like RFK is more like Castro in a skirt
Posted by: softail | April 3, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am
I think it would be worthwhile for all McCain supporters to read up on the Keating Five. McCain is crooked on a Nixon-esque level. Is this really a person you want in the White House while banks are collapsing because of the subprime lending mess?
Posted by: Thomas | April 3, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am
As a white university professor, I, along with my children and grandchildren, am honored and privileged to be part of this great history in the making. Now, will America rise to the occasion and embrace this great change and truly unite, showing the world that ONLY in America this can happen, and that it really is the land of the free? Or, will those whose better judgement is clouded by petty prejudices and misconceptions continue the divisive tradition of ‘Us’ and ‘Them’, propagated by those politicians who firmly believe in their politics of divide and rule?
Posted by: oneness | April 3, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am
When researchers do brain MRIs, while directing the subject’s attention to politics, they find that the “emotion” section lights up more than the “rational thought” section.
At any rate, it’s decidedly emotion that’s winning the upper hand on this blog.
Posted by: Sophie in VA | April 3, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am
All this discussion of electability should be focused on the independent voters. Which candidate can motivate the most votes from that pool. If we consider that Democrats (hardline and moderate) make up about 30% of the electorate and the same thing applies to the Republican party. The candidate that will win the election will be the one that inspires the base to get out and vote and, more importantly can inspire the most support from the independents.
In looking at the three candidates it appears that McCain is struggling to inspire the party’s base, but has strong appeal with independents (except for the 100 year comment). The Democrats can than ‘W’ for inspiring the base, more than either of the candidates. One can argue that Obama is slightly more popular/inspiring to the base (based on the numbers). The real clincher for me is the perception that “Oh my God, not Clinton” message will resonate with the Republican base and consolidate the base for McCain. Thus, due to the independent voters I believe that Obama is the candidate most likely to win in the general election, followed by Clinton, just slightly ahead of McCain.
Posted by: BooMan | April 3, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am
Bill Clinton desperately wants to return to the White House. That’s why he is now resorting to the kind of dirty politics he is so adept at. Instead of promoting Hillary, Bill tries to convince the supers that Obama is not electable, which is laughable at best. If Senator Obama is not electable and he leads Clinton in pledged delegates, popular vote, and number of states won, where does that put Hillary in the equation? His argument about Obama not being able to carry the big states in the general election is also pathetic Does anyone really believe that states like California, New York, and Massachusetts will vote to return a Republican to the White House after eight disastrous years of George Bush? Then there are Hillary’s high negatives nationally. Too bad, Bill, looks like you’ve taken your last ride on that “cool” Air Force One.
Posted by: lhummer | April 3, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am
Whaaaaa …. whaaaaa. More immature crying from the Clintons, that happens to be quite false…..again. Loser, Liar, NOT experienced ….. why would any intelligent person vote for her after she has proven that she cannot be trusted for one day to even tell the truth…forget about managing the country.
Posted by: C.Myles | April 3, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am
It takes a lot of ‘audacity’ for a chicken that was too scared or too selfish to serve in the U.S. Military to want to be Commander-In-Chief. What a joke.
Posted by: JTC | April 3, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am
Obama is not ready to be a president… Hilliary 08 or McCain 08
Posted by: diane | April 3, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am
Peace in our time
Posted by: ab | April 3, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am
He can beat her…..
Posted by: Jay | April 3, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am
Thanks guys!!! Keep on doing our work, your making this just too easy.
Posted by: Republicans | April 3, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am
HRC=Glenn Close(Fatal Attraction)
Mrs.Bill Clinton, or should I say Clinton-2 cannot win.
She faults Obama for his pastor but shuns any talk of her husbands misgivings with women,veracity,women, veracity, temper!!!
The sooner the Clinton and Bush families disappear from our political landscape the better off America will be.
Posted by: jase | April 3, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am
Clinton is so pathetic!
Posted by: Jim Bob | April 3, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am
Axiom – please vote. Surely you can vote against the lesser of two evils – whatever that is in your opinion. If you don’t vote, you deserve what you get. And not just in Presidential elections. My wife and I get active in school board elections. I am apalled by the apathy out there for the people that control education in the community. I get frustrated sometimes with the choices. But if we don’t vote – it means we have given up and don’t care. I implore you to vote – a lot of people died to give you that right.
Posted by: Mark | April 3, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am
I agree – Obama in not going to win. I am a white progressive male and I wouldnt vote for him. If it is between Mccain or Obama I will stay home. I cannot legitimately vote for either of these two candidates, which means I wont be voting for any other progressive issues down the ballot either. Sounds like we have more to lose than the tip of the ticket
Posted by: Chipo | April 3, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am
Obama has racked up delegates through an organized caucus drive. If you look at the Primaries, he has obtained a few significant wins. In reality, mile by mile across America, Hillary has been the winner. Obama’s strength is in the some major inner metro cities. Clinton has won the rural, general votes. This has been the case in Ohio, Texas, and Missouri that I know of.
Posted by: Darla | April 3, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am
UNTITE – So this is about Race?? I thought you Obama fanatics keep saying it’s not???? You too speak with forked tounge
Posted by: Chipo | April 3, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am
It’s hilarious how desperate the Clintons have become. Obama is smarter, a better organizer, obviously a better money manager, and has outsmarted, outwitted and outplayed the Clintons.
Hillary’s lies about Bosnia ended her credibility and she is now toast among vets and blue collar workers.
Al Gore gave permission for Obama to publicly state that he would be part of his cabinet. That’s all, folks. It will soon be over. She will be lucky to win PA after having a 29% lead, and the race will end in North Carolina where he will destroy her.
As to McCain, he is tied to the war which is costing us $400 million PER DAY and is the reason our economy is in the toilet. Obama will bury McCain on those two issues alone.
All you racists out there — stuff it! By the way, Rev. Wright was a decorated Marine who received special commendation for being the cardiopulmonary technician who worked on LBJ during his heart surgery and whose great work saved his life. Get the facts, racists.
Posted by: Mountain Jack | April 3, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am
I liked Obama at first, but the more he talks, the more unreal he sounds. Lying about things that don’t matter reminds me of Hillary and Bill and we had many years of that (yes, I voted for Bill..twice). Michelle Obama also turned me off completely and frankly, I find her thought process more than a little scary (NOT someone I want in the White House). This 20 year association with Wright, the property problems in Chicago, and the misleading statements Obama has made and then tried to change really put me off. Now the deception about McCain’s statements…it is all too much. Being an independent, I have to consider both sides. McCain gets my vote, no matter if Clinton or Obama wins the Democratic Party nomination. I am sorry Obama is turning into such a disappointment. I had felt hopeful…not anymore.
OBAMA, PELOSI AND DEAN HAVE DESTROYED THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.
Posted by: proudamerican2008 | April 3, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am
Mountain Jack….Loves it! Keep it coming! It seems u and I are some of the only ones who actually researched the candidates! lol
Posted by: Michelle | April 3, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am
For someone who is unelectable, she sure is having a hard time catching up with him.
What does that say about her?
Posted by: Thinking | April 3, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am
Michelle,
Polls yesterday showed that both Democrats and Republicans overwhelmingly say that Obama is a much tougher candidate to beat than Hillary. Half the country hates Hillary and Bill, and she can’t even get 50% of the Democrats to vote for her. She is toast and Obama is the oven.
Posted by: Mountain Jack | April 3, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am
Hillary cries that Obama is trying to tell people not to vote; she’s trying to tell people how to vote. She seems to be a spoiled brat trying to get her way by any means necessary. If people don’t see now that her tactics will not work as president, there will be a problem that is true to life. The race is about her, not the USA. She wants to be the center of attention.
Posted by: Rena | April 3, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am
The Clinton’s has run a dirty “no holds barred” campaign, and unprofessional.
The Democratic Party delegates are starting to Unite behind Obama!
Posted by: Lookup | April 3, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am
Bill ought to just shut up! It has always been about power with the Clintons and not with what was is best for the Democratic party or the American people. I have lost all respect (what little I had left) for HillBilly! As an Independent I would never vote for them (the Clintons) in November. And, I say “them” because in reality, just as before, they are both running for president.
Posted by: Indy_Voter | April 3, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am
Obama is beating her in every measurable category. Her only hope for winning is if the super delegates go against the democratic voters.
If she can’t win against Obama, a democratic candidate. How can she win against McCain?
Posted by: carlos | April 3, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
I honestly believe that if Hillary Clinton doesn’t get the nomination, she wants Obama to lose to McCain. She and her husband are like children. Like, “If I can’t have it, nobody can.” Then if Obama loses to McCain, the Clintons will lay the blame on the voters who chose Obama as the nominee, saying that she could have beat him. The Clintons need to get over themselves, but that will never happen. They’re much too arrogant, which is why we do not need them back in the White House.
Posted by: Jim | April 3, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am
It sickens me to think how this race has turned out. I am losing hope in our political system. I just want someone in government to do their job and stop all this crap!
Posted by: tanilan | April 3, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am
This is the line that the Clintons could not afford to cross and that the party should not stand by and allow. Now it is time for the superdelegates to step in and effectively end this nomination process. When these two idiots stand in front of microphones declaring their own party member as unelectable they do irreparable damage to the party. They are all about the Clintons and now it is obvious to us all.
Posted by: Lou - Londonderry, NH | April 3, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am
Time and Halperin are saying that the “Barack can’t win” comment came from Richardson … any thoughts?
Posted by: beebop | April 3, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am
Hey, if Clinton doesn’t get the nomination, a lot of independents and Democrats want to see Obama lose to McCain. Obama is unfit in any way to be president. At least McCain appears to be an honorable man, not a lying, corrupt racist. Once again, Senator Clinton, form your own party. It’s way past time for another choice in this country and if anyone could do it, it’s you.
Posted by: Griffin | April 3, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am
Word to the ill-informed OBAMA IS HALF BLACK…the other half WHITE! Therefore his children are not black, they are 3/4 black and a 1/4 white! If he truely felt they way you all are making it out to be…dont u think his “white” family would dis-own him?
He said last night that his family comes as white as Margaret Thatcher and as black as Bearnie Mack.
How about holding him accountable for the words that come directly from HIS MOUTH!
If all you people can do, is trash his pastor, then clearly it shows just how one-sided, single minded you are!
If Obama stood at the pulpit and said “God Damn America”…they you’d have a very valid arguement.
But unfortunately for u…he didnt. So how about you all let the pastor crap go and focus on what matters the most…..OUR FUTURE and THE ISSUES THAT FACE AMERICA RIGHT NOW!!!!
Posted by: Michelle | April 3, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am
Why do you think so many Republicans have voted for Hillary in the primary? Because they know McCain can beat her, but he can’t beat Obama. And, why does she think Obama’s not electable, when he’s won so many more votes than her? In many primaries, he won more votes than Hillary & McCain together.
Obviously, she’s the one who can’t win!
Posted by: Cindy | April 3, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am
Rush Limbaugh was trying to get his listeners to vote for Hillary so she would run against McCain and lose. Obama has a chance but Hillary has no chance in hell of beating McCain. If the DNC gives her the nomination she will lose and the DNC will lose a lot of it’s African American base. Every year more blacks leave the party because they are starting to make more money and becoming conservative. If they screw Obama over this they will lose many more and may never recover.
Posted by: John A. Miller | April 3, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am
Gosh, I do love the fervor with which all of you are supporting your positions! One note though – Hillary, Barack and Johnny Mac each have “a chance to win”. Whether one or the other WILL win, or may be a better candidate is a different issue.
Isn’t democracy great!? Now if we could just get more voters to avail themselves of it.
Posted by: J. D. Edelman | April 3, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am
Mountain Jack: HAHAHAHA That was funny..thanks so much for the Chuckle!
Posted by: Michelle | April 3, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am
compassion and humanity, reaching across the aisle, bringing integrity back to washington. Okay either Bush is running again or Obama is the reincarnation.
When will you people realize that the founders established a multi-party system for checks and balance. See what happens when everyone does not question leadership. IRAQ.
The only way everyone in DC will get along is one party decides to not seek leadership and that’s not going to happen. I like our system, I do not want everyone to get along. I want them to monitor each other because I have a job and family and school and can only monitor them slightly.
Obama or Clinton? I voted for clinton because Hillary is tenacious and as a man I like that, plus she is smart and has a plan. Bad iraq vote but she will get us out.
I like Obama but do we really in this wartime and economic downturn after the raping of america by the bush admin. have time for someone to stumble around aimlessly in the dark for 3 years figuring this thing out. No Obama knows the problems Hillary knows how to execute and enact the solutions. She won’t mind twisting arms to do it either.
Posted by: ronart | April 3, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am
So much for Obama for being a uniter and not a divider, He can’t even unite his own party.
Posted by: Harold | April 3, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am
Hillary’s argument that she is more electable against McCain is baloney. She keeps referring to the race for nomination as close, but without the support of racists and Republican crossover voters, and the support of people like Limbaugh, Scaife, and Kristol, her numbers wouldn’t be that close. She is being propped up by the right wingers, not supporting her because they like her, but because they are afraid of Obama. That support she is getting from the right is defacto support for McCain and those people would certainly turn against her in the general election. It is Hillary who can’t win.
Posted by: habeas corpus | April 3, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am
There’s a big difference between what’s behind the charisma of Bush & Obama. Obama is brilliant, Bush is not. Obama was president of the Harvard Law Review — a place reserved for geniuses. Bush’s father negotiated W’s entrance into Yale.
Posted by: Read & Write | April 3, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am
Steve K, I think you’re onto something…I’ve said all along that the Clintons behave like Republicans. Man, if I want to vote for a Republican in November I will vote for someone I respect and not the classless Clintons.
Posted by: indy_voter | April 3, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am
Bill and Hillary should come to grips with this simple fact — this election and public rejection of them is not about their positions or lack thereof –it is about HILLARY. She cannot be TRUSTED. The “BIG WHOPPER” about coming under fire in Bosnia is indicative of why Mr. & Mrs. America does not and cannot trust her. Her becoming the democrat’s nominee will be their biggest downfall. Repulicans cannot wait to shred her into pieces. SHE CANNOT WIN PERIOD.
Posted by: El Ele | April 3, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am
I believe a lot of the Obam online supporters are Republicans. They will jump ship in November.
Posted by: ken | April 3, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am
“If Hillary doesn’t win, I will vote for McCain, and so will my family?” Is this because he is African American? WOW….what an IDIOT!!
And if this is NOT a race issue, then HOW could you POSSIBLY jump the fence like that and vote for “Grandpa”, just because Hillary (who doesn’t have a chance in HE** to catch Obama) won’t win???
Posted by: T Daley | April 3, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am
Viewing the nomination as a popular vote race is silly. Obama has more votes and more delegates based on his strength in Red States that he will never win the general election. Superdelegates should know this. Clinton’s strenth in big states and swing states would challenge McCain better. Karl Rove and other analysts have pointed this out. I am a conservative and do not care for any candidate, but I will go with the least liberal.
Obama is a bad choice if liberals want to win the Presidency. He may lose in record fashion despite the polls. Winning 48% of the popular vote in Red States does nothing for his electoral college.
Posted by: Tex | April 3, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am
Barack is unelectable in the general election because his coalition is only strong for the democratic primary. His demographic is white liberal voters and blacks. Both of these are not swing demographics. They generally favor democrats in all general elections. That means they will vote either Hillary or Barack in the general, regardless of who the Republican candidate is. It is very hard to imagine liberals or blacks voting en mass for the Republican.
Working class whites, older whites and hispanics are swing voters (all Hillary’s core demographics). They can sway the election either way depending on who they turn out for. Unfortunately for the Democrats, McCain is probably the best suited to take their votes among all the Republican presidential candidates.
From a Demographic standpoint, hispanics will probably favor Hillary, then McCain and lastly Obama. So if Barack runs against McCain, he loses the southwest states to McCain.
Working class and older whites split between Hillary and McCain. Barack is, again, last. This is reinforced with the anti-american, anti-white speaches from his spiritual mentor. So, again, if it is Barack against McCain, McCain wins OH, PA, MI, Fl, and NJ. Barack will lose by less than Hillary would’ve in Iowa, ND, VA, SC, and other red states due to his appeal to disenchanted Republicans, but he would lose those states nonetheless. They are simply too red.
Hillary, on the other hand, beats McCain with hispanics thus winning a few extra southwest states. She wins PA and NJ outright because they lean Democratic, all other things being equal. She competes in OH, Fl, and MI, probably carrying 2 out of 3 due to the anti-Republican sentiment carryover from the Bush administration.
That is why Barack is unelectable.
Posted by: Phil | April 3, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am
As a proud Scandinavian Marxist I am saddend by all of you here who think Obama or Clinton are anything close to Marxist or Socialist.
Unlike Reverend Wright’s comments that 9/11 was America’s own fault, I do believe your current economic problems are your own fault.
They are just a natural correction in any Capitalist society as predicted in Marx’ “The Communist Manifesto” and “Capital”.
Posted by: MarxistViking | April 3, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am
“David Axelrod is also a gay rights activist.”
Ooooh, what a scary post! Not – - (gasp!) a “gay rights activist!”
Posted by: ariane | April 3, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am
what is so wrong in telling the superdelegates that Obama cant win? One of the bloggers has mentioned that “it is crossing party lines…” In what way is it crossing party lines?
Do u think Obama’s camp does not do it? Then u r all not being honest with ur ownselves. Obama himself told in late Feb that she had a high negative rating and that he could get some of the states that she could not — is that nothing but a round about way of saying that she is unelectable?
Folks…Obama may be a better candidate but u cannot be losing ur sense of objective analysis. Dont think that he will have a cake walk in Novemeber.
Posted by: satish raman | April 3, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am
Barack can’t win??? Where does that come from??? He’s beating HER!
Posted by: Sandra from TN | April 3, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
Obama can not win he’s told to many lies…He’s involved with some very Disgusting people…and he’s a very weak man….He doesn’t have what it takes to be President of the United States of America.And his wife is not a person that America wants to be the First Lady of America…Hillary 08
Posted by: Rebecca | April 3, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am
How does it help the Clintons to spend two weeks attacking a popular governor who said that he believed Obama was a special candidate, but that he would always have a soft spot for them? It doesn’t even make them look like grown-ups, much less Presidential.
Posted by: Drew | April 3, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am
What do you expect the Clintons to say, they are on the way off the big stage in the political arena? They are loosing the big one and they can not stand to loose. O yes, for the writer that thinks the Clintons never lie, you may be in for a wake up call or heading to duck for cover as Hillary lied about.
Posted by: Leon | April 3, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am
Obama may not win, but Hillary cannot win. Do the math– divvy up the diehard Republicans on one side, and the diehard Democrats on the other. Everyone else is up for grabs– and, obviously, Obama is the one who has been getting that vote so far. In my opinion, this is a subtle appeal to racism, the “a black man can’t win” argument forwarded by Clinton surrogates (and Billy-Boy himself, with overt attempts to link Obama with Jesse Jackson). If you don’t vote for somebody for this reason, some of this is on you.
Ironically, I feel that “a divisive woman can’t win,” with the (unfortunate) understanding that this makes me a misogynist by extension.
Posted by: Hypo Maniac | April 3, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am
The common mantra of Obama supporters seems to be his lead in convention delegates and the popular vote.
The problems remains that no candidate can win the White House by any other means than the electoral college, which Obama cannot win.
If you don’t agree, then consider the results of a recent (April 1) Rasmussen survey:
“If Obama is nominated, just 56% of Clinton supporters say they are likely to vote for him against John McCain. Forty percent (40%) of Clinton voters in Pennsylvania say they are not likely to vote for Obama.”
The same 40% of Clinton voters are the ones that would ensure an electoral loss for Obama in November.
If you really want to see what is going to happen in August at the convention, start reading about the 1968 Democratic Convention.
Perhaps that is why we are starting to hear more from Al Gore.
We can only hope.
Posted by: Jayhawk | April 3, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
“He cannot win, Bill. He cannot win.” Interpretation of this statement all depends on the word emphasis used when she said it: Like “He cannot win, Bill. He cannot win. (Sob! Sob!)” or “He cannot win, Bill. He cannot win. (The SOB!)” I expect that true to her teary self, she said it the first way. So don’t beat on her. Instead, fluff her up a bit.
Posted by: Madmunk | April 3, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am
As you read this posting Bill Clinton is hard at work twisting the arms of Superdelegates. The Clinton’s strategy, much like that of the WWII Soviet Union, is scorch the earth. If the Democratic Party dies in the process so be it. The Clinton’s will be the founders of a new party.
Bill to Hillary …”What do you think honey? Should we call it the Industrialist Party?”
Superdelegates beware the twister is coming.
Posted by: L1Standing | April 3, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am
So… Obama raked in over $40,000,000 in March and more than $55,000,000 in February… Clinton isn’t paying her bills and has no real ammunition, so she attacks everyone that Obama has ever been associated with (safe tactic, considering most of the skeletons in the Clintons’ closet are actually and mysteriously real skeletons now)… And she think that she can get more support?
I used to be a big Clinton supporter, and would have voted for Hillary just to have Bill back in the White House (it’d be nice to have a stable economy again).. But I started looking through a different lens about six months ago, and personally, the Clintons seem desperate, spoiled, and willing to damage their own party if she doesn’t get her way. Seems to me that Obama actually wants to lead the country and make positive changes, and Hillary just wanted to be the first woman president. I’ll take policy and agenda over birthright/sexright any day.
Posted by: justjoeindenver | April 3, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am
Clinton is no spoiler. Their popular vote totals are nearly tied. National polls show Clinton winning the important states against McCain. The real spoilers this year are that faction of the DNC and left wing media that promoted a guy who’s inexperienced, untested but who are prepared to let his candidacy proceed on the basis of “more pledged delegates” – even though THEY know he can’t win in November. If it gets to that – the DNC and the media have no one else to blame than themselves. Remember, Clinton is incredibly competitive with VOTERS – despite daily attacks from TEAMOBAMA and a complicit media.
Posted by: s. valenti | April 3, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am
Hillary is a better candidate for President on democrat tickets. You need moderate candidate. Obama is too liberal just like Bush is too conservative. He will be same disaster as Bush.
If Hillary is not a nominee, then it should be McCain since he is also a moderate. Extreme candidates are bad for country.
That is the reason I will not vote for Obama and vote for McCain if Obama will be a nominee, even though I am a democrat.
Posted by: Jake | April 3, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
Bush a conservative? Really?
Posted by: justjoeindenver | April 3, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am
I’m not a DC insider per se, but I do have opportunity to be around a lot of them. For many months now the Republican campaign staff and the Republican consultants have been very open that they’d prefer Hillary as a candidate to run against, they feel they can rally to beat her, but they fear Obama much more and aren’t sure how to beat him. This may be changed somewhat by the Wright issue, but prior to that even the Republicans felt Obama was more electable. Just some insight.
Posted by: tamad | April 3, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am
I am no Hillary fan, but I agree with her about Obama’s non-electibility. Obama is a charismatic speaker and makes a splendid appearance, but he is too liberal, has little experience and has too much baggage (Rev. Wright, NAFTA issue, Rezko, Michele Obama, and heaven knows what else,etc.) His positions on abortion are extreme, e.g., he voted against banning partial birth abortion. He is so pro-abortion that he refused as an Illinois state senator to support legislation to protect babies who survived late-term abortions because he did not want to concede — as he explained in a cold-blooded speech on the Illinois Senate floor — that these babies, fully outside their mothers’ wombs, with their hearts beating and lungs heaving, were in fact “persons.”
“Persons,” of course, are guaranteed equal protection of the law under the 14th Amendment. Add to this the report on some forums that he had Nation of Islam members working for him in Chicago and forget it – he will never be President of the United States. Compared to this liberal novice, Senator McCain towers like the true statesman that he is – and the next President of the USA.
Posted by: Justinian | April 3, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am
Gee, the LIAR says “Obama Can’t Win”? To me, that translates into YES HE CAN!
Posted by: R. Penmark | April 3, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am
I am a Democrat who will vote for McCain if Obama is selected as the Democratic candidate.
If you haven’t read the interview with Carl Rove (one of my LEAST favorite people, please do so. I will attach the link. I read the 4 screen interview knowing he would ‘tell all’ regarding both Hillary and Obama. I finished with my opinion of Obama being supported, along with Rove citing an exchange between he and Obama that I hadn’t heard before.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=4569091&page=1
I am fed up with the ‘hands-off’ policy that is afforded Obama and his campaign tactics while there is practically a ‘lie-in-wait’ attitude toward Clinton and her campaign. When all is known about Obama, I predict that super-delegates will distance themselves like marathon runners – to save face and to try to hold onto the seats that they presently are serving in.
The 2 Senators from ND and the 1 Representative already know that I have voted for them for the last time – for giving Obama their super-delegate votes. My entire family will be not be voting for them either. I cannot vote for people who do not careful enough when making decisions. Clearly, jumping on Obama’s bandwagon before they knew all about him was the wrong behavior for ‘seasoned’ politicians.
Posted by: SM in NDakota | April 3, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am
Rebecca,
American Flag pins are made in China and Taiwan, that’s why.
Posted by: R. Penmark | April 3, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
The article posted by Jimmy about the ” New York Times article of Jan. 08, 1996″about Hilary is bang on,and every super Deligate should be emailed that article to remind them why they cant vote for her because the republicans are just waiting to throw it all at her.What Obama Pastor preached is not Obama’s words or stance but her lies were meant to decieve
Posted by: O. A. Murray | April 3, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
Why Sen Obama will lose if he becomes the Presidential nominee.____________________
Sen Obama cannot complain about the way the campaign is conducted. —During the primary, he can complain about it and the party elders will intervene. The general election will be a totally different ballgame. No holds barred. Independent groups will attack his patriotism, experience, leadership and judgment 24/7. The more he complains about it, the more he will be branded a “cry baby” by the right wing media and it will make him look really bad._____________________________________
Sen Obama cannot put in doubt’s Sen McCain’s experience.—- He is going against someone who has a long list of achievement in the senate. ______________
Sen Obama’s patriotism or lack thereof will be magnified.—- People will be comparing a Sen McCain, a Vietnam War hero against Sen Obama whose patriotism has been put in question especially after the Wright and Farrakhan controversy.___________________________
Sen Obama will not win any of the red states.—- His only hope is to win in the swing states like Ohio and Florida where his chances are dim._____________________
Sen Obama cannot use the race card anymore.—- The more the black people coalesce around Sen Obama, the more the white people will coalesce around Sen McCain. Sen Obama’s penchant to use race has already been exposed during the primary.______________________
Sen Obama’s politics of the future argument.—– This cannot be used anymore since the primary election has exposed Sen Obama as just like any politician who received money from lobbyists, flip flops on issues and also a mudslinger._______________________
Media equal time.—- Currently the media has been biased against Sen Clinton. Take MSNBC for example, you watch Joe in AM, Chris Mathews and Keith Olbreilly and you see how the media has been biased against Sen Clinton. In the general election you will see a more balanced reporting since half of the commentators are for Sen McCain.
Posted by: politicsIsdirty | April 3, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Obama can’t win the general election, Clinton can’t either. It’s okay since neither are fit to be president. McCain is no great hero of American sovereignty either but he’s better than the other two. Whoever wins the election one thing is for sure, the American people will lose.
Posted by: jijalagi | April 3, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am
Almost all of the superdelegates are politicians, and relatively well-off. Why would it be a surprise that some endorsements are made to show support for the presumed favorite, rather than b/c they necessarily think he can win a GE? There’s clear pressure on African-American SDs to support Obama (everyone should be jarred by John Lewis saying that this decision was harder than the Selma march), congressional challenges are using endorsements to raise the question of who really represents constitutents, and there’s a clear message that not believing is Obama means not supporting change (i.e., shows they’re unfairly benefiting under the old system, otherwise who doesn’t want change).
Since everyone’s always looking at the personal agenda behind Clinton actions, just consider what everyone else stands to win/lose. In the end, how much does Richardson’s life really change if McCain is president? Doubt his taxes or career options change significantly if there’s another 4 years of R-rule. Don’t think he has children in the military. And, for many pols, being the party not in control has perks – you can raise the $, make the case (esp on national TV as a punditing bobblehead), AND not be held accountable for not making progress.
Richardson for Obama — all we really know is he gave his endorsement. Let’s not pretend anyone can actually say why.
Posted by: Gracie | April 3, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am
I, like most women in my category – I am an Hispanic highly educated AF veteran woman over 50 yrs old – will not vote for Obama, period. I, will not vote for McCain either…I will, instead just not vote for a President if Obama is the nominee. I will, however, vote democractic for all other positions in the hope that when McCain becomes President, we will have the House and Senate under solid democratic control and just maybe, in this way we can keep McCain the the Republicans at bay. This is the best most of us can hope for now that the nomination has been stolen from Hillary thanks to the republican media and old school male “leaders” like Kennedy and Kerry who still want to keep women down.
Posted by: Sylvia | April 3, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
i’ll will for with McCain if obama wins the nomination . Who is Obama ????
I do not trust him at all .
Posted by: Lee Nguyen | April 3, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am
I cannot and never vote for Hillary. She is the one who will never win a general election, she cannot even beat a junior senator obama despite of advantages she had. She can not even manage her own campaign which is in chaos. How will I trust her with the presidency…absolutely ridiculous
Posted by: wycliffe | April 3, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am
Hillary has her flaws and some r definitely flaws that I wish she did not have. But I support her and so i could be accused of being biased. I know that she is not perfect but neither is anyone else. This has now become a likeability contest which she is losing.
But I got to say this — her flaws have been so over examined and amplified by the media so successfully that she is been made out into a witch and a “b….” !! She lacks the sophistication of the Obama attack machine– that is about it.
And the media has waxed poetic eloquence on Obama so much that his negatives dont appear as negatives to the people.
The man never really addressed race before his “speech” — sth he did to control damage done by rev wright and he is getting so much credit for that speech. It was a good speech, no doubt but how can u overlook that it was not a proactive speech but rather a reaction to a problem?
Hillary is accused of being ambitious…! Jeeze what is wrong with being ambitious? Do u think she wont be a good president if she were to somehow win it all? She is not running for school president. I am sure there are a lot of us who have our own life ambitions aboout our respective careers and Hers happens to be the Presidency of the Country!
Do u all think Obama is not ambitious? How is it that the man decides to run for the presidency within 2.5 yrs of being a senator? I believe he started running for the US senate position half way into his state senate position! And yet it is okay for him to run for presidency.
One time he said no to the war and that is absolute proof of his judgement? What about Rizko and the rev wright situation? Dont they somewhat negate his “judgement “? He is a very good speaker and i give him credit fo that. He may be a very good leader too but what has he done in the past to prove his leadership in the political field. Community organization is done by everyone and that cannot be adequate a measure of his ability.
Bill clinton is the one who lost his cool with the superdelegates meeting in CA — why is Hillary responsible for it? ANd he is her husband and he cant get frustrated? If he loses his cool than it is ambition…crossing the line etc etc but when Michelle Obama says “she is proud for the first time blah blah…” than it okay?
Hillary should not have misspoken/lied about bosnia — I agree with that but does it mean she is nothing but a liar? COME ON!! Does it mean she has no other international experience?
If organizing community events are counted for Obama’s experience then why are her trips to 80 odd countries and the intricacies of being the first lady of the strongest country in the world — not mean anything!!??
He is charismatic and she maybe not but she is a hard worker and that is yet to be proven by Obama.
She is accused of dividing the Democratic party and that is so readily accepted by the media and a lot others…!! What about Obama saying so many veiled comments about “changing from the past to the new blah blah and having his surrogates call her flawed and divisive” as if he is going to wave a magic wand and the senaqte and congress will fall in line with him!
All Bill did was pitch for his wife — what is wrong with that?
Posted by: satish raman | April 3, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am
MFM I don’t think the people “blindly voted for Bush”. I think Diebold blindly voted for Bush and even then the Supreme court had to appoint him. However, Diebold made it happen on their own the second time.
Posted by: bonanzaman | April 3, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am
“Can’t” like “IS has many definitions
Posted by: scott wells | April 3, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am
I don’t know about you guys. If i’m hearing that both clinton and obama want to raise taxes from 15% to 28% to fund there “programs” is correct, this economy as fragile as it is now..will be DESTROYED! I know i’d be if my taxes nearly double!
Posted by: matt | April 3, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am
YES raising tax from 15% for billionaire
hedge fund mangers is the plan.
Do you pay 15%
I don’t
OBAMA 08
Posted by: scott wells | April 3, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am
trust? On what grounds do people not trust Obama? It is my estimation that trust is a deeply interpersonal relation that can only be legitimately founded within a framework of two truly integrated lives. To some extent, I think it would be ridiculous to “trust” anyone you don’t know. Hence, “trust” should not be an issue when picking a political candidate. Moreover, what is it that you feel he is going to do behind your back? Is he going to steal a pie off of your windowsill? so many people say they can’t “trust” him, but then don’t give any real reason why, or any real, tangible fear…this leads me to believe there is an underlying current here…perhaps Mr. Dubois’ wretched Veil has returned to haunt us in a time when we could be could be eating of the fruit of optimism.
Posted by: big j | April 3, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am
Hillary now has the popular vote with Michigan and Florida coming to the table.
She has always had it and will have it in the General Election. The more Obama and his supporters tried to block the votes of the good people of Florida and Michigan, who did nothing wrong, the more entrenched into her corner we became. The rudeness by Obama supporters to us only makes us more determined NOT to let injustice happen to us and Senator Clinton.
Posted by: John | April 3, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am
People ignores simple history. THere is always been more democrats than republicans, but it did not help for the last years , did it?
The fight between H and O is not helping anyone. Cain camp wants Obama to win. He will be easiest to dismiss in general election compare to H.
RIght now people are too hyped and blind ( like chemical reaction during infatuation) , but when the times comes in november O may not have as much chance .
I am not sure that being democrat is guaranteed to vote for either candidate if the supported one right now will lose. So if O wins not many of H supporters will follow the suit and specially since Cain is practically democrat in republicans cloths. Reality is out there , but for now it seems to be a distant one.
Many people trying to Portrait O as antiwar hero… Does not matter, He is not going to pull any troops out. HE ain’t that stupid. IN last 2 days in FLorida we got 3 full boats of cubans who have reached our shore ( wet foot, dry foot). We have no idea where are the 12 million illegals in this country… so saying that we will fight terrorism on our own territory is a joke. O is not stupid and he has a full cabinet of advisers, so don’t expect him to pulling the troups out.
Posted by: PicassoInActions | April 3, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am
All have great comments here, but a very few are thinking straight. As difficult as it is but it’s time we leave our personal garbage and start thinking about what this nation needs. Leave your emotions and tempers in your closet, just think constructive. As long as we don’t follow this these politicians manipulate us “the sheep” as someone said earlier in one of the comments. God Save this Country.
Posted by: The Unfoolish | April 3, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am
Uh, did anybody look at the new polls posted on Real Clear Politics today? Hillary polls soundly ahead of McCain in OH, PA, and FL, three crucial states in the general election, while McCain is solidly ahead of Obama in OH and FL, and Obama is only modestly ahead of McCain in PA. What does this tell us? That Hillary is turning out to be the strongest candidate with the best chance of winning the general election. There are only a handful of states that will determine the next president, given the electoral college structure that is currently in place. OH, FL, and PA are 3 of them. MI is another. Hillary will win AR which has been a completely red state in prior elections. She may very well win TN and MO, also red states. I am amazed that nobody is discussing the race in this context. The Superdelegates need to be aware of this, the Democratic Party, and any voter who wants to have the best president possible this time around, and that president is Hillary.
Posted by: Matt L. | April 3, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am
Those who have called Bill Richardson a Judas appear to have been correct. What a snake that guy turned out to be!
Posted by: John Zeger | April 3, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
the fact of the matter is if she wins i will vote mccain, i can not vote for someone that is everything i tell my children not to be, she has ran a dirty hate filled race. She has so many questions surrounding her crimes that havent been answered to. cost us millions of dollars to uncover the lies and dirty deals she has been in she has made bad actions she took as first lady,
Health Care Reform, a process that cost the taxpayers over $13 million, selecting a female Attorney General,Craig Livingstone,White House Travel Office fired,Paula Jones lawsuit,Whitewater documents, which led to the appointment of Ken Starr as Special Prosecutor. After $80 million ,Bill lost his law license for lying to the grand jury.
—- And Bill was impeached by the House,husband pardoned FALN terrorists in order to get Latino support and the New Square Hassidim to get Jewish support. Hillary also had Bill pardon her brother’s clients, for a small fee, to get financial support, return $200,000 in White House furniture, china, and artwork she had stolen, How about those tax returns?
Posted by: melissa | April 3, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
Lee Nguyen:
After reading that senator Obama raised $40,000,000.00 (that’s Millions, Lee)…..yes, he raised $40 million in March….”March Millions” ….Lee…
Looks like there’s a lot of folks out there who TRUST senator Obama…
Who cares that you don’t trust him?
Posted by: tony | April 3, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
Neither Obama or Clinton can win…and I am not a McCain person….just looking at it with clear eyes. Obama will probably make it to the convention with a majority of delegates but not enough to win…Hill may actually get a bit up by popular vote…now this is where the Dems are screwed. If they decide by super delegate to give it to Hill then all hell will break out because the AA community will feel as if they had been robbed……anyone remember 68…..these riots will make that look like a small bar fight. She will not get the AA community to vote for her and without that large block of voters she can’t win….very simple math. If Obama does get the nod many Hill people will not vote for him either although not as large in numbers as Hill’s problem. Obama’s problem is McCain. Once it’s heads up between those two Obama comes off as Marxist and anti-American and Americans will not elect anyone to the highest office they don’t believe to be American to the core.
Posted by: Tom Annandale virginia | April 3, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
Matt: “If you’re married making 60K, under mccain you pay 9K in taxes, under obama and clinton it’s 16,800. ALmost a 50% increase..it’s not just the hedge funds and billionaires..it’s avg people getting HAMMERED. That 7800 a yr difference in take home pay for a family that makes 60K will DESTROY them and this country if it happens.” Thanks Matt for the figures. Both Obama and Hillary claim they want to undo the tax cuts but that is only the beginning….their future plans for all their projects will make it worse than that….those figures are just their jumping off place. Another reason why neither can win…..I have seen elections for decades and I don’t ever recall even one where someone won on the platform of “I will raise your taxes”.
Posted by: Tom Annandale virginia | April 3, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
Hillary is the one who can’t win!
She can’t beat Obama in her own party. Hillary, give it up! She lies so much that she can’t tell the difference. (running from Sniper fire w/her child in Bosnia). She’s not human, she was surprised that she got caught in a lie.
Obama is clearly the most qualified candidate to lead this country back from the duldrums. The country has elected a two time dummy and another big liar in W.
The War was a lie, the economy is in shambles, gas prices are almost $4.00, health care is out of whack and people question the ability of Obama? Give me a break!
So the options are
1. A liar in Hillary who’s partisan.
2. A 100yr old relic who’s partisan.
3. An intelligent man & a new breath of ideas to move the country forward to bring EVERYBODY TOGETHER to make this country great again.
The answer is clear……
YES WE CAN!
Posted by: Independant Stan | April 3, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
Perhaps HRC should prove that she can compete with him in the primaries first, before talking about Obama’s electability in the general election!
Posted by: Henric | April 3, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
Sources with Direct Knowledge? What does this mean, Richardson told them it was said. Richardson says a lot of things, what is true is another matter.
Posted by: kathleen | April 3, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
Clinton can win the general election because she was able to carry out the swing state such as Ohio and Florida. Obama had more delegate than her because he win a lot of caucus states. In general election, there is no caucus states and how can he win if he was not able to show that he can win more big primary states than her. She was able to win more big states than him and show her strength in the general election. In order for Democrat to win in November both of them must join dream ticket and Clinton is on the top. Republican will be happy if Obama is democrat nominee, they can go after his pastor’s statement, inexperience candidate and his patriosm. His speech is based on judgment and change/hope.
What’s is his good judment? If he has a good judment, why he stays around with his pastor for 20 years and let Rev Wright to become his spriritual advisor.
What are the changes he can make ? He was able not to work with the republican in the past. Do we want another Jimmy Carter?
Posted by: stephanie | April 3, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
This country does not need another Clinton scandal in the presidency. We have had enough of that, haven;t we? or do so many of you just forget about what happened and the disappearance of aids and the deal with “I did not have sex with those women” from Bill Clinton?Hillary says she did all kinds of things for this country when her husband was in office, however, they have all been proven to be lies!! She never did anything about the health care problems and issues either! What makes you people think that she will do anything that she says? That is having false beliefs in something that will never happen. I wish that she would just drop out of the presidential race and leave it to Obama. He is what this country needs right now, not more lies and scandals from the Clintons!! I am a Republican and I am all for Obama!
Posted by: Tracey | April 3, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
Hillary only won Florida and Michigan because Obama’s name was not on the ballots. Also, she may have won the primary in Texas, but then she lost the caucases there and the popular vote. I do not agree with her being able to claim the two states mentioned above as wins when she didn’t have any competition because her name was the only one on the ballot for the democrats.
The military didn’t like her husband as commander in chief, I should know because I was in the service during his terms in office, so why would they like her and except her? In case you other women don’t know this, women have no say in other countries, if they open their mouth they get hit by the men. So, how is she going to keep this country safe from other countries when they won’t listen to her and feel that what she has to say is not important? Just something to think about.
Sorry for the missed key strokes in my previous post.
Posted by: Tracey | April 3, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
Obama is not suitable for president of this great country….he is weak…look at his “present’ voting record which reflects LAZINESS & Ignorance of the issues. Morally…he has come out of corrupt politics…his house, Rezko, and his corrupt campaign money…sooner than later he will be caught himself. Richardson does not represent Hispanics…he is just a bloated politico wanting scraps from any table….
Posted by: Pete in Texas | April 3, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
“Can’t”
Like
“IS”
has many definitions
Posted by: scott wells | April 3, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
In all of the primaries thus far, the LOSER of the Clinton/Obama contest has gotten as many – and most of the time more – votes than McCain. How do the Nov polls predict a win for McCain? Are they assuming that there are a lot of lazy republicans that didn’t go out to the primaries, or are they counting on a fractured democratic party?
I, for one, will likely vote democrat based on the ISSUES, whether or not the candidate I like gets the nom. I think it’s foolish to vote for someone because s/he is/isn’t black, is/isn’t a woman, is/isn’t old. It’s all about the issues, folks, we need to put petty differences aside if we’re going to get this wonderful country back on track.
By the way, the post that said, “I’ll vote McCain if Obama is the Dem because he can’t win.” is just about the most idiotic thing I’ve ever read. So, you’ll vote for the person you DON’T want to win just because you think the candidate you want CAN’T win? Huh? I think someone needs a refresher on democracy…
Posted by: jr | April 3, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
Clinton’s hoping that the superdelegates overturn the will of the people.
Posted by: Dave | April 3, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
“Axiom – please vote. Surely you can vote against the lesser of two evils – whatever that is in your opinion. If you don’t vote, you deserve what you get.”
You’ve got it backwards. If you DO vote, you deserve what you get. As a proud non-voter, I can say with pride that I didn’t contribute to this grotesque parody of a government we have now. If my choices are between Communist and Socialist, why the hell should I bother?
“But if we don’t vote – it means we have given up and don’t care.”
No, no, no – a thousand times no. If no one deserves my vote, then I will not give it to them. That’s like saying because I go into a restaurant, I must order something. If it’s a crappy restaurant, I’m not going to spend my money there.
“I implore you to vote – a lot of people died to give you that right.”
1) Soldiers died defending our Constitution, which includes many rights, not just the right to vote. 2) If it’s the “right” to vote, then not voting is an option one has in connection with that right.
Posted by: Ricardo | April 3, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
The Tony Rezko trial is heating up and now they are saying an indictment of Governore Blagdovich is “inevitable”. The corruption in Illinois politics is so widespread, it travels vertically and horizontally at all levels. Obama’s first employer, Allison Davis is now implicated, and it’s not looking good for Obama’s “friend” Rezko. How will Obama get out of this one? Another speech? Another I have been friends with him for 18 years but I didn’t know he was Syrian and corrupt? Please explain how this makes Obama electable. How many voters wish they could have a “redo” in their states now? Also, please explain how Obama’s anti-American and Arab “friends” make him electable? The Republicans will have a field day with Obama starting with the picture in front of the flag with his buddy Richardson, Edwards and Hillary.
Posted by: rs | April 3, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
Tom Annandale VA- Where did you find those figures on Obama and Hillary’s tax bill versus McCain’s, for married filers with and an income of 60k? Plus did you factor in credits, such as tuition, child care, or credits for those who do not itemize deductions? The credit line items have grown so much over the years, and when you think how much more will be needed for social security, are we really paying that much in taxes? The problem is not the amount, it is how it is misspent by the government, and lack of transparency about how it is spent.
Posted by: shockmando | April 3, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
OBAMA can’t win with females…
What about the inappropriate way Senator Barack Obama engaged a woman in Scranton Pa yesterday: Obama asked a woman wearing a Hillary button if giving her “a KISS” would help change her mind to vote for him instead. He treated this woman as a sexual thing who could be manipulated by his charm. The last thing a working woman wants is to be addressed sexually – in any manner. It subtly – and sometimes not so subtly – keeps her in her patriarchal place. I believe Obama’s comment to this woman says a lot about the ways he would address (NOT!) issues related to women’s rights in America. I just am not convinced that he is the best candidate to voice issues that concern , e.g., equal pay, sexual harassment in the workplace, equal opportunity in the military, etc.
Posted by: mark | April 3, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
Since the Democrats took control of congress:
Higher gasoline costs, Housing market crash, higher food costs, endless time and money wasted on meaningless investigations (baseball players), etc…
can anybody name some more?
Posted by: ricarod maxwell | April 3, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
I dont’ know why I bother reading these boards anymore, it’s so frustrating and disheartening to witness the hate and ignorance among this country’s voters. But this is the country who voted in Bush twice, so why am I surprised. Vote on the issues people, not based on which candidate you “like.” We don’t have to be friends with them, or attend the same church.
Posted by: tamad | April 3, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
Burlwood,
The interesting news is that some of the uncommitted SuperDelegates are now saying that it was Bill Richardson himself that was walking around saying that Barack Obama was not electable before he switched.
I’m sure that argument ended when Bill Richardson was cut a backroom deal for the VP role, or for a future cabinet level position. Richardson misses the pinnacles of power more than anyone, you can see it in his hungry jowls.
=======================================
Obama got $250,000
Rezko gets jail
Obama is not electable
=======================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 3, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
shockmando: Those figures came from another poster but a quick net look puts those at bacically hat the rates were prior to Bushes tax cuts. Both Dems want to repeal of of those. “are we really paying that much in taxes?”….no question about it…we are. All levels pay too much. The basic problem is the government spending. It is not the intake….this government is taking in more revenue with Bush’s tax cut than prior to it. Fact. The problem is Congress feels more than compelled to spend it…some quite foolishly on pork projects. People need to keep more of their money….it’s in their hands that it fuels the economy when they spend it. Government spending does not fuel an economy. Stealing from folks to give to others is wrong and taking from people that make more because they work harder/more is very wrong. Success should never be punished.
Posted by: Tom Annandale virginia | April 3, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
If it wasn’t for Oprah, Obama would not be winning against Clinton, Oprah does not belong in politics!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: griffrag | April 3, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
In third world countries, the joke is that a new guy is always hungrier for more graft. The older one has already had its share so at least he will do a better job. On top of this, Obama is a socialist, what is yours is mine and what is mine is mine. Watch the largest budget deficit in the making, bigger than Bush’s. It is our money and social security!
Posted by: cwu | April 3, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
I’m a transplant to the West from the East.
People in the West do not understand what the Clinton name means to moderate and independent voters in the Southeastern United States (outside Arkansas).
Californians should ask themselves what Democrats and Independents outside of California think about “Clinton’s Experience”
Posted by: Jonathan | April 3, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
This is a big political risk for Hillary.
She may very well be telling the truth that no one in the Democratic power circles wants to hear.
But being right is sad consolation unless she is charting her strategy to return in four more years.
I for one think that Hillary is correct. But she will always be blamed for whatever defeats or disasters are ahead because no one else will be willing to take responsibility for their role in putting up such a weak candidate.
Posted by: sherr | April 3, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Justinian: You left out that Obama views pregnancy as punishment. Thank you for pointing out Obama’s extreme view and vote on partial birth abortion which is horrific to most moderate democrats. Obama has been so wishy washy on his voting record, voting present 130 times, voting one way and saying “I made a mistake, I meant to vote the other way”, that it says a lot about his true values that Obama took to the Senate floor and made the statements and votes on partial birth abortion that he did. One time Wafflebama was not waffling.
Posted by: rs | April 3, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
Observing Bill Clinton’s almost daily petulant temper tantrums when an audience member expresses support for the Obama candidacy suggests that Slick is very close to loosing it. The “serial groper” is unable to accept the fact that he’s trying to peddle a defective product; i.e. Hillary. This is a woman who hasn’t managed so much as a corner vegetable stand, or for that matter her own marriage; but, of course you could count Whitewater, and her tenure as “Madam” for Bill’s White House Brothel. So what possibly is there that qualifies Bill’s official “Bimbo Containment Chief” for the Presidency? Further, Hillary’s increasingly frequent crying jags raises a legitimate concern about her mental stability. But, having meticulously planned their coveted return to the White House for several years now, the Clintons will certainly not exit the scene with grace or dignity. This is the political duo that honed “The Politics Of Personal Destruction” into an artform; and, most certainly will not tolerate, who is in their mind, the “upstart Obama” to derail Hillary’s pre-choreographed coronation. Greg Neubeck
Posted by: Greg Neubeck | April 3, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
She’s right.. he can’t.
Posted by: An opinion | April 3, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
Richardson has gambled friendship for opportunity. Was he afraid to wait until time for the superdelegates to handle their part of the process? What would he have said then? No, he calculated that his chance of becoming Obama’s VP was to strike while he had a chance. Either way, he loses. It is a sad day, and such a waste.
Posted by: georgia | April 3, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
There are three good reasons for why Obama will be a formidable Democratic nominee for president. He has a strong grassroot appeal, the best economic program and is the only candidate who was against the war in Iraq from the start.
Posted by: SBNilsson | April 3, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
(There is something very creepy about Obama. I feel there is some serious things that he is hiding. He may be a good cheerleader and stuff but the keys to the White House contain the key to the nuclear arsenal of the USA. Although I have to admit, I like Obama, I definetly DO NOT TRUST HIM.)
This comment devoid of any point and sustance instead of prejudice,typical of the all so desperate Clintonians today!!
How can u decide to live in illusion by prejudging(still trying to dig stuffs which you´ll never find)a neat proactive man while the negativities, mischaracterizations, and flaws)obs! Tax returns to be released of HRC are just spilling over the barrel and soaking up the public opinion.
With yet much time to go in Penn,OBAMA is already steadily gaining ground Queen Clinton struggles frustratingly and desperately to land us another political dynasty! OMG!! Are we in America in some sort of African, Pakistani or Indian democracy??
Posted by: Bill | April 3, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
Did I hear someone say “racist” again? It must have been the Obama camp and their continuing strategy. As Geraldine Ferraro said after she had made an analogy for historical campaigns, “I am not a racist….after 40 years of fighting for and supporting equal rights….”. Ditto for me. This campaign is about race because the Obama camp has injected at every turn. The reasons why others do not support him is because: he is woefully inexperienced on the issues, he double talks on his real relationship and knowledge of Wright’s hate sermons, he lies about his real relationship with Rezko, and he copies others’ speeches and policy plans as though they were his own. To put it simply, he is green.
Posted by: georgia | April 3, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
There are three good reasons for why Obama will be a formidable Democratic nominee for president. He has a strong grassroot appeal, the best economic program and is the only candidate who was against the war in Iraq from the start.
Posted by: SBNilsson | April 3, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
OBAMA is the only one who CAN win.
McCain admits he is an ignoramus on the economy, he can’t seem to raise any money, and he’s seen as a warmonger. Rove can’t mudsling his way out of this one. Hillary starts out offending 42% of the voters, she’s been caught lying on tape, and she will anger Obama’s passionate base.
Bill Clinton views Obama as a taller version of Jesse Jackson. That shows he’s prejudiced and patronizing and too old to understand or accept change. History will chew the out-of-date Clintons up and spit them out.
Posted by: Garg | April 3, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
Re: to scott wells
The numbers in a primary are meaningless, although they are hyped incessantly by the media. Usually about 10% or so of eligible voters vote in primaries. So what if the “energized” Democrats voted at 2 or 3 times that rate this time? It doesn’t change the total of eligible votes, just the number who voted.
I can hear the cries of “we were robbed”, “voter fraud”, “disenfranchisement” developing in the embryonic state.
Obama will lose. Demography is his enemy. His far left views are his enemy. His choice of friends is his enemy. America will not buy it; so the media, the far left, and whoever else will buy it, will sell that the election was “stolen” somehow.
Nevermind that most of America finds his views on abortion abhorrent, or his foreign policy views naive. He will have lost because of race, or fraud, or otherwise, never because of his extreme liberal views…
Posted by: Tex | April 3, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
I don’t see how most folks consider Obama a racist being that he is bi-racial!! Ppl are getting worked up over nothing. The truth is Obama is way more electable than Hillary because he has the vote surge in the youth bracket, states that Hillary won would STILL swing his way anyways and his most important flap has been rev wright which is getting its place on the trash heap as we speak. Obama’s greatest wrong was not talking about Rev wright before it became headline news. As a Canadian, we know here that it was the Clinton campaign that got in touch with the Canadian govt about Nafta opposition talk as “talk”. OBama will beat McCain in a GE because americans are tired of the politics of old, pls read Bush, Clinton and McCain. Speaking of clout, McCain has very little even among die-hard republicans. I see Obama squeaking by in PA because folks think Hillary has lost because of the way the news channels play she has lost daily. Obama is ur next president guys!!!
Posted by: JJ | April 3, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
What is this Two or three Vs. One, I swear everytime I hear/read something its Bill (clinton) or Chelsea or Hilary running there mouth!!!! If Hilary needs back-up now.. what does that show? We need one person to be president. Its not President(s) of the United States. Bill go sit down and have a cup of tea. You want Hilary to be president… then let he fight her own war!!!!
Posted by: FirstCrush | April 3, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Gee, the LIAR says “Obama Can’t Win”? To me, that translates into YES HE CAN!
Posted by: solomon | April 3, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
I’m a democrat who will likely vote for McCain if Hillary wins the nomination.
I simply don’t trust Hillary to lead objectively and morally. She takes far more money from lobbyists than Obama, and certainly more than McCain.
I definitely prefer Obama to McCain, but when it comes down to it I want an honest president. I can’t vote for Hillary.
Posted by: Adam | April 3, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
That statement is as valuable/valuless as it should be when it comes from someone who:
1. Managed to score 4 pinnochios in one phrase, straight faced, looking at the whole nation in national media.
2. Managed to loose in 30 out of 44 states’ primaries/cacuses, to her opponent.
3. Managed to loose in popular votes to her opponent, in the primaries they contested so far.
4. Managed to loose in total delegates to Obaama (by 160+ delegates) in the prinmaries contested so far.
AND, anbody paying to check if they lost some of their sanity which dictates their common sense, or simple logic, what 2+2 adds up to.
Posted by: moeen | April 3, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
my head is about to explode. 99% of you can’t even have a respectful debate about the qualities of the candidates. you just tear each other down. this isn’t a football game, this is our and our childrens’ future. grow up and develop a mature opinion. all of you spouting labels like marxists and radical socialists hardly even know what those labels mean or represent. pick up an encyclopedia and look up some real examples and compare for yourself. all three of these candidates are AMERICANS and so are all of us. lets have an election and regardless of who wins treat the winner with a healthy dose of skepticism and doubt, like ALL good Americans should. What ever the party, trust no one and hold them accountable!
But first and foremost… GROW UP!
Posted by: Jeff A. | April 3, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Hillary is right; Obama can’t win. This sounds like Richardson and Leahy calling for Clinton to get out of the race. Clinton’s giving it back.
It was Obama caught lying on tape with saying on Olberman that he DID NOT hear Wright’s controversial sermons then in is famous speech, said he DID hear the sermons. IN addition, he lied about NAFTA in OH (cost him that primary), lied about Rezko’s contributions to his campaign, and the fact that Kennedy helped his father come to the U.S. Did I leave anything out? God, what else has he lied about? I don’t want to know…I just want him to go away. This has been a nightmare.
Posted by: Jackson | April 3, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
The assertion that Obama can’t win is absurd. If Obama can’t, Clinton can’t.
Just consider these two numbers:
1. People who will vote for Obama but not Clinton; and,
2. People who will vote for Clinton but not Obama.
Which is bigger?
I know this is still a racist country, but it’s a sexist one, too, and large numbers of people HATE Hillary Clinton beyond all reason. It’s unfortunate, but it’s true.
Obama would clearly be the stronger general-election candidate.
Posted by: JonTV | April 3, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
We need somebody who can actually get something done and make change happen in Washington, and that is Senator Barack Obama. See agin barack camp declear more than $40,ooo,ooo wowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww you are too much for them carry on my generation his thankful to GOD, that we saw a man that can make thing happen in a positive way.
Posted by: solomon | April 3, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
WHATS WRONG WITH OBAMA?
Nothing.. But obviously most people don’t like him and it has to be because of something he has no control over that is his skin color!
Hey if you vote for someone base on not liking Obama and you know the other canadiates are not going to make this country a better place in four or more years. Then do me a huge favor, don’t come on the message boards complaining about rising gas prices, more death tolls in Iraq and you losing your job to somebody in India because you voted for it be that way. Thanks!
Posted by: lulu | April 3, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Obama is on the course of winning this thing folks! Whether you like it or not!! Like any ordinary match where there comes naturally a loser and a victor, the frustrated and now angry Clinton supporters should just play the fair game and lose with dignity.
Not only does he consistently outraise and outspend the Clinton mantra by 2-1, he has also doubled her states wins and leading so insurmountable, in both delegates and popular votes.
The Obama machine is unprecedently fired up to the dismay of the Clinton dynasty and no amount of treacherous mudslinging and these typical kitchen sink attacks can withold it back folks! Clinton supporters-open your eyes and face reality! The democratic party can not be held hostage by the increasingly dismayed and grumpy Clinton dynasty!
————————————–
With yet much time to go in Penn,OBAMA is already steadily gaining ground Queen Clinton struggles frustratingly and desperately to land us another political dynasty! OMG!! Are we in America in some sort of African, Pakistani or Indian democracy??
Posted by: Bill | April 3, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
tom, i responded earlier..post must have got deleted. And no i didn’t factor in tax credits, child care and all that cause it’s irrelevant. The fact is Hillary and OBAMA will tax you to into financial hell. I won’t vote for either of them. If my tax rates goes from 15 to 28% i’m going to be destroyed financially. If a family making 60K has to pay an extra 7800 in additional taxes under obama/clinton what will it do to the economy? I think people get all worked up over “the issues” but fail to look at what’s going to come out of their pocket. Cause i don’t think there is ANY red blooded american out there who should be willing to go from 15% to 28% in taxes..unless they’re insane. What has any of the democrats said about illegal aliens working in our country collecting benefits, schooling, etc, or getting social security after only paying into it a short time instead of people like the rest of us who have paid taxes and social security deductions our entire lives????? You think hillary or obama is going to do anything about immigration, which CANNOT continue. If illegal immigration does continue it will destroy this country sooner than later and cannot continue to be ignored, nor can their posture on nearly doubling your taxes..I could care less about o’bama’s grass roots or hillary’s experience. How are YOU going to pay for their programs.
Posted by: Matt | April 3, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Can’t people of good faith change their minds? There was a time when I thought Obama was too naive, too. He changed my mind.
Posted by: Teresa Valdez Klein | April 3, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Why the hell can’t Oprah stay out of politics? I have seen such a ham and a camera lover in my whole life. Anytime she spends money, whe wants her dues in notoriety, right Oprah?
wch
Posted by: Bill Hardina | April 3, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
Clinton is no more electable than Obama is. With Clinton the Reps will have a field day on all the scandals and mischievous behaviors. If Obama is unelectable only because of his skin color then it’s more of the same ugliness we have come to know in this country. With Hillary comes Bill and that, is an electability problem for me.
Posted by: BH In Phoenix | April 3, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Ha ha ha! Wonders shall never end!!
It is very interesting to see the Clinton disilusioned camp and thier surrogates conceding defeat so uncannily by not predicting Obama losing the primaries-but already projecting him in the general election which they pray he loses.
Your badlock and plan for the democratic party would not work. Obama machine has beat you hands down and is on the course to a historic precidency which the whole world and even you will be proud of. You don not need to be a brain surgent or an astronaut to see this!! The momentum ganered so far projects he-on the democratic ticket WILL still win with or without an insignificant but unrepentant fraction.
Posted by: Bill | April 3, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
I keep hearing aboutthe terrible Clinton Years. I remeber when I use to have money to go to the movies with my family during that era.. something I can no longer afford and gas was under $1.20 a gallon during that time. Oh yes and the United States had a 5 trillion dollar surplus and was thriving. Damn they really destroyed us didn’t they?
Posted by: alleyoopvolley | April 3, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
I will never vote for the Bosnia Lady.
Obama 08!
Posted by: leighg1 | April 3, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
Obama is the ideal candidate/scapegoat for both the Dems and Reps. No amount of Presidential vison is going to fix 8 years of Bush in a single term. Then the Reps will run a real candidate in 4 years and blame everything on Obama. Hills will come back and say I told you so, and it will be business as usual in DC.
Posted by: Louis | April 3, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
O: Maybe they got their money from Rezko!
Posted by: russell | April 3, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
If the way Clinton ran this campaign is any indication, duck and run for cover like those imaginary snipers she remembers.
Posted by: Dj | April 3, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
Now if Obama will only release all the memos that exist between him and Rezko then we may finally see how close their relationship really was and the true amount of money he has given him! When Axlerod was ask to release the memos he refused!
Posted by: russell | April 3, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
Hogwash! It’s amazing that some folks continue to underestimate Barack Obama. He’s an exceptional leader who is running a brilliant, dignified campaign. He’s galvanizing the electorate, bringing a new generation of Americans into the political process and raising more money from more hard-working Americans than any candidate who has ever sought a party nomination. He has shown incredible grace under fire and continues to withstand the Clintons’ gutter politics and win-at-all-costs “kitchen sink strategy.” I earnestly believe that Barack Obama has the character and ability to lead our country following the gross incompetence and failure of the Bush administration. With great pride and hope in America, I look forward to next January when Barack Obama will be inaugurated as the 44th President of the United States.
Posted by: Jim, Princeton, New Jersey | April 3, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
The Obama supporters who are giving such great amounts of money to his campaign must not be worried about losing their jobs and homes or paying for college and healthcare. Perhaps that is why they are wild about Obama. They can afford to take a chance on him. Many Hillary supporters are poor and working class members of society that cannot afford to give lots of money to her campaign. They are struggling to keep food on the table and gas in the car so they can get to work. They are supporting Hillary because they know she will get to work on the problems as soon as she takes office. Obama will have a line up of people to give him a piece of paper 5 seconds before he needs to choose a name off some list so he can try to put together a committee first.
Posted by: mpwdc | April 3, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
I have given the maximum allowed to Obama for the primary campaign but will not give any more for the general election until I can make sure that Hillary is not on the ticket.
All politicians are to some extent “ethically” challenged, but none more than either of the Clintons.
Clintons, husband and wife, are the pre-eminent negative campaigners. Their standard ploy includes a preemptive accusation of the negativity of their opponents by putting false words in their opponents mouth as in “his reaction will likely be…” Then they complain, often bitterly, about facts not in question as negative or suppositions which they make over which their opponents have had no part of. Then they parade out the surrogates, which they can throw overboard, should their message be taken badly.
If Hillary is on the ticket in any capacity, I will not only be voting for McCain, I will be donating the maximum I can to him.
Posted by: decline-to-state | April 3, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
Hillary Clinton is very desperate at this point. She has exhausted herself with lies, exaggerations, red phones, heavy debts, and defecting super delegates. There is no place else to run. She has racebaited, frightened, lied and even sought to buy votes. None of which have worked, so she is now trying to brainwash the American people that he can’t win. The kitchen sink strategy has Obama still neck and neck with McCain, as McCain gets a free ride. It says that once Obama and McCain go one on one, the Democrats will win the White House and down ticket, the house and senate in impressive numbers. Hillary, your swan song is playing. Walk into the light.
Posted by: wanakee | April 3, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
HOMER
The entire left wing apparatus in this country is all about “whats in it for me”. To broadly paint conservatives and Republicans with that pathetic lie is just crazy. There is not a single issue liberals are for that does not correlate directly with immediate satisfaction and easement of irrational fear. Democrats calling Republicans corrupt is outrageously laughable. When Americans learn the truth that every tax increase against the “Big Corporations” is absorbed by the middle class, the democratic party will be all but dead.
Posted by: AMG1967 | April 3, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Hillary, when are you releasing your tax info, I think we will find something interesting to talk about once she releases them…
Posted by: tiredofthelackofknowledgeofvoters | April 3, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
I wonder why the press haven’t considered this factor about the Clintons. Losing the nomination to Obama would not only hurt Hillary, it would gradually pave the way for the demise of Bill Clinton as a world figure, who can generate thousand of dollars per speech. What we see in this campaign is that Obama has began to eclipse Bill in terms of turn out. This is new for the Clintons, to suddenly discover that Bill is no longer important and someone else does and Bill’s future in speech making business is in disarray. Since living the whitehouse Bill has raked in over $47M for making speeches around the world. If Hillary failed in her bid for the whitehouse, the ripple effect of that defeat would be felt by Bill, thus they’ll prefer to hang on to the nomination, even though they might not be able to pull a win.
Posted by: Ben Emos | April 3, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
HOMER
The entire left wing apparatus in this country is all about “whats in it for me”. To broadly paint conservatives and Republicans with that pathetic lie is just crazy. There is not a single issue liberals are for that does not correlate directly with immediate satisfaction and easement of irrational fear. Democrats calling Republicans corrupt is outrageously laughable. When Americans learn the truth that every tax increase against the “Big Corporations” is absorbed by the middle class, the democratic party will be all but dead.
Posted by: AMG1967 | April 3, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
O.k. Hillary. Let’s get this straight. Independent statisticians have already confirmed with mathematical certainty that you cannot catch up to Obama in pledged delegates. They also indicate that you have almost zero chance of catching up in the popular vote. You obviously also can’t catch up in terms of states won. Obama leads in recent national polls. Obama is by all indicators far ahead, and he has accomplished this DESPITE your dirty campaign tactics (playing the race card; playing the religious card; the Muslim card, etc.). Recent polls of Republicans also indicate that approx 80% believe that you (not Obama) would be easier to beat in the general election. Further, your husband and campaign surrogates are now branding certain Democratic leaders as “traitors” when they choose to endorse or switch to Obama (apparently as a way to scare other superdelegates who might want to do the same). This is un-American, unethical behavior.
And you want us to buy into the idea that OBAMA is unelectable?
A president-worthy person would not make such a ridiculous claim (even out of desperation).
Posted by: Mike Denhof | April 3, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
MFM hit the nail on the head. If Americans want to elect based on catch phrases and rhetoric, yet again, then Americans will deserve another bad 4 years.
People are voting the way they are because they aren’t learning the facts about the candidates. BO is vague and doesn’t seem to have any real realistic plans. It seems more of a challenge to see if he can get elected.
The network media’s lovefest for BO has kept Americans from hearing any of the negatives – and many there are – about him. They helped convince Americans to vote W for a second term and their opinionated news reports are doing it again.
Posted by: JD | April 3, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
Obama supporters–don’t you get it? THE DAMAGE IS DONE….
Posted by: JoeT | April 3, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
Obama supporters have to make personal attacks on Senator Clinton to make their point. Why? Because he can claim nothing but hope and change and all that other crap. Tell me three things he has DONE that will impact my life and make it better. A civil rights speech isn’t it. I still get treated the same as a professional black woman. I am a woman first and that is what has caused me to be held back. Not the color of my skin. He is a man…one day African American, the next black, the next bi-racial. What will he become as president? White? Any man who disrespects the mother and grandmother who raised him after his polygamist, alcoholic father took off for another white woman will never get my vote. How is he any different than the rest of the brothers on the street? All talk no substance.
Why didn’t his fancy speech mention how many times his white mother was called a n-lover? Or that Sasha and Malia are 1/4 white? Just another brother hustling the sisters. He keeps mentioning slavery and the oppressed blacks in America. He’s from Kenya. He wasn’t brought here in chains. His white side had slaves. Just another black brother relying on white guilt. Give me a woman no matter what color. Somebody who gave birth and understands what pain and sacrifice is. A woman knows how to put their child first. Obama has been putting himself first since he wrote that crazy a** story about a father he met for one day. A lying player of a father who took off and never supported his mother. What kind of son doesn’t have a picture of his mom on his website?
I am a proud black woman and I want my sister Hillary to lead me out of the darkness. There are a lot more black women like me that won’t come out in public and say that. And all of us see right through the sweet talking fraud Barack. Michelle is a righteously angry black woman who did not grow up in poverty and is living in a million dollar mansion. Talk about sell out. What type of black Americans do they represent? Nobody in my neighborhood. What are they going to do once they get in the White House? At least I know Hillary will have my back as a mother and a working woman.
Posted by: marvita | April 3, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Her fate rests with an inferior and poorly run campaign strategy. Which includes violating a cardinal rule in business, sport, politics or any other competitive endeavor – Know your competition and never underestimate them. Imagine what would happen if as president she underestimated the potential of a North Korea? End of any discussion regarding experience.
Posted by: Bh In Phoenix | April 3, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
sweet talking fraud Barack. Michelle is a righteously angry black woman who did not grow up in poverty and is living in a million dollar mansion. Talk about sell out. What type of black Americans do they represent? Nobody in my neighborhood. What are they going to do once they get in the White House? At least I know Hillary will have my back as a mother and a working woman.
Posted by: marvita | April 3, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
Run, obongo, run! Ki ki kik ki!
Posted by: Herr Groobee | April 3, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
The discussion is straying from the issue. Is Obama electable? If you honestly think about it – no do not be fanatic — you will see the answer is a resounding NO!
Posted by: DS | April 3, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Hillary can’t win the nomination but she can win the presidency.
Posted by: Party divided | April 3, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
I applaud Marvita for her factual and intelligent way of thinking. Many men are “afraid” of strong and intelligent women. That seems to be a factor in this race that nobody has discussed. The gender bias is not helping Hillary.
James Beat must be feeling uncomfortable.
Posted by: JD | April 3, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Hilary is the one who can’t win. She is currently losing. It’s interesting to me that she keeps saying she wants Michigan to count. She was the only major democrat on the ballot and she only got 55% of the vote. 40% of the people who voted did not choose her and the rest chose other candidates. In Florida where the candidates “agreed” not to campaign, She still somehow apeared for a “funddraiser” around the time of the election and even still only got 55% of the vote. Who knows what would have happened had the other candidates broken the agreement not to campaign and showed up in Florida. Clinton is desperate and becoming more and more irrational every day due to her ambition.
Posted by: ER | April 3, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
I think Hillary might be right, but according to the polls, she’s fibbing again. Why is it that everytime I hear a quote from Hillary Clinton I feel it’s been carefully crafted? If by some chance she did get nominated AND win the presidency, would that mean 8 more years of Clinton politics? She was asked if she really said this and her answer was circular! My God woman! Please just be honest!
Posted by: LongT | April 3, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
I can only say those who are not accepting Obama´s unprecedented momentum for change which is being reckoned by the larger electorate yet already wishing him doom in the eventual general, are SIMPLY in a state of DENIAL. Period!!
As stubborn an unrepentant as Bush´s stands on Iraq´a WMDs.
Posted by: Bill | April 3, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
In a desperate quest for the presidency, this woman is sinking her already embattled credibility to a dangerously zero level!!
Waow!! Now she has admitted never saying that OR is it another misspeak?? How much more can the American people absorb from this sleazy lying presidential hopeful??
Posted by: Bill | April 3, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
I will never vote for Obama in a million years. If he is the nominee I WANT John McCain.
I am an American first and a Democrat second.
I don’t know how Obama can win when half of the Democratic party (the real half) won’t even vote for him in the general
Posted by: Carol 17 | April 3, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
It’s interesting that she is sending out all the blows and he just keeps campaigning. This kitchen sink strategy has run it’s course along with the 3AM phone call. Give it up Hillary the polls in Penn. are now under 9% single digits. She has a 22% cushion. America has woken up and is ready to put her to rest.
Posted by: Dennis | April 3, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
First: Thank you to the neutral Superdelegate who told the truth about Clinton’s comments. The media, whom I’m pretty sure has access to the internet, must know by now that the Obama supporters (more than any other candidate on either side in the entire primary season) are the most.. well.. vocal, and unobjective.
We alll know that Richardson felt that about Obama. Doesn’t anyone remember his comments while he was still in the primary? He complained that suddenly have a resume was a liability.
Gosh.. wonder what OBama has promised Richardson? I mean, New Mexico went to Hillary, and Richardson as a hispanic has to know that they have come out in huge numbers (in his state, too) for Hillary. With Obama suddenly invoking Al Gore’s name (don’tcha love how they use someone not affiliated in any way with them as bait for the voters?), you have to know that Richardson, et al, are vying for that VP slot. It’s embarrassing, really.
Posted by: Diana | April 3, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
Marvita’s post was dead on.
In the beginning, I didn’t have a preference over Obama or Clinton. As time went along and after watching the earlier debates etc., it was obvious who has a direct plan of action, who can be asked a question and directly answer it, who I know can provide a better future for my children, and that’s Senator Clinton. Senator Obama makes great speeches but where is the substance?
I do not care what color/gender a candidate is. I want the best person for the job. And all we are getting from Senator Obama are inspiring speeches that are empty of solutions to our country’s problems. Also, he turned me off with his race rhetoric. I live in OK and am aware that there are problems with racial discord but it seems like he is really making it more of a problem and causing division. I am a white married homemaker/student and absolutely do not raise my children to question race, sexuality, gender, etc. So I frankly find Sen. Obama’s race talk very insulting and disturbing and believe it could cause more division than before all this started.
Posted by: biograd | April 3, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
Hmmm.. have you ever noticed that the most vile posts against Hillary and for Obama are always from men?
Someone further up the thread was right. The DNC is crazy if they think that treating the female voters like trash is part of their strategy.
Posted by: Diana | April 3, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
Here’s my take: “electability” is pretty simple. Obama is on the ballot, so he’s clearly electable.
If you’re going to argue that someone can’t win, at least back up your case with something like “candidate can’t win because s/he:
A. doesn’t have enough votes
B. doesn’t have money”
Feel free to add your own assertions, but I think Gee W Bush pretty much set the bar low enough such that *anyone* can be president (if you have votes and money).
AFAICT Obama has votes and lots of $. Clinton has less votes and not so much $. The picture should be pretty clear to you if you’re NOT chewing bubble gum while reading this.
The whole race-based “he can’t win” stuff is a bit dated, too. Seriously, being 1/2 Irish isn’t so bad.
Posted by: The Man | April 3, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Obama won’t be able to win against McCain once the Larry Sinclair story goes mainstream. The Republicans are just waiting for Obama to get the nod, and then all hell breaks loose.
Posted by: Jack | April 3, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
It’s a shame that Obama got this far. If the media had covered him like they did Hillary, he wouldn’t be here today. Where was the media scrutiny and objectivity?
I hope the MSM are proud of themselves as they chose the Democratic nominee, not the voters.
The DNC can’t even count the voters in FL and MI and that’s only 2 states!
Obama says they can be seated as long as they don’t affect the totals??? They should affect both the delegate and the popular vote totals. If you can’t come to an agreement wtih Obama, why should that punish Hillary and the voters?
Some uniter, Obama. You couldn’t even unite your own church, transcender of race, my fanny.
I think you’re the one “ridin dirty” the American people. By the way, that was shanmeful of Rev. Wright and you owe the Clinton’s an apology for at the least, that. Like we are idiots and don’t know what that means. Never in my life would I ever think I would hear that from the pulpit. In front of children no less. Disrespecting a past President, another lack of patriotism as all our Presidents are symbols of this country. And you excuse the man?? You want to represent adn stand up for our country and you couldn’t even stand up to one man?
Won’t participate in “old politics”? What do you call this FL and MI disenfranchisement? How about all the lies or lack of information or record, you tell on the stump,in your TV ads and interviews and through your surrogates? How about the lack of your Senate record? How about information disappearing from the church’s website, your site, and Trumpet magazine site has been taken down where those inflammatory bulletins from your Reverend came from. That is a conspiracy Obama. How dare you want to be our President with philosophies and behaviors like that. Well, at least you did deliver that character, honesty, integrity and judgement you promised me. But it sure wasn’t positive and that’s disheartening.
Who’s in charge here anyway, DNC? Stand up to Messiah Obama Mr. Dean, Pelosi, Reid, Dodd. He’s already conned the people thus far, be careful as you may be stuck with him.
Posted by: Tricia | April 3, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
The Democratic Party’s dirty secret is they can’t trust their radical left wing base, who might nominate Rev. Wright, a former marine who went crazy, or Howard Zinn, a good man who wants to disband the American military. That’s why they have superdelegates — in case their base nominates a left-wing loo-loo. The problem is this left-wing loo-loo is black, so now they are afraid of losing the black vote.
They need the black vote for their congressional seats, so they’re willing to lose another general election with Obama. What the heck, they never win the White House anyway — unless a Clinton is running.
Posted by: whoframedrudy | April 3, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
The campaign for the White House is carried out in a circumstance where the candidates are supposed to give pronouncements about their policies and their intended service to the people. Instead what we are witnessing is a Junior High school yard brawl!
Lies, dirty tricks, false information and not a word of policy!
On January 21, 2009, we still won’t know what we have. The Housing crisis will still be raging, the unemployment will have risen, and banks will still be collecting unholy levels of interest. All because, as people we allowed the candidates to spend their time explaining why they didn’t pick Sally Rogers up in time for the prom; or why they cut chemistry in the 10th grade. Trivia that has little to do with the task at hand. But, we like sensationalism, so play that election Soap Opera for me one more time.
In the mean time Mr. McCain’s dementia gets a free ride; Mrs Clinton’s disdain for the truth is ignored and we never are able to discern the level of experience Mr. Obama brings to the job. But we love our Soaps!
Posted by: Good Karma | April 3, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
Obama is just not electable. he will lose badly in the Generl Election. I am urging all my deocrat friends to vote Mccain if he is the nominee. I will again start volunteering on Hillary’s campaign for 2012
Posted by: Sujesh | April 3, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
LOL @ Larry Sinclair reference. Of course people are going to just make crap up and hope it sticks… what else can be done?
All this obsession about a personality sort of distracts from the issues, you know? Stuff like war, education, the public good, what it means to be more of a citizen and less of a consumer… health care, access to opportunities….
Back to electability, though; Clearly Obama *can* win. Whether or not you like Obama as a person or you think he’s a charlatan, you have to admit his campaign is being floated almost entirely by small donors. That’s pretty cool, and is something new in the world of US politics.
New and scary! Boo!
Posted by: The Man | April 3, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
anyone who believes that the rev. wright issue is over is really drinking the kool-aid to excess. when the repub. heat machine starts to fan the racist rants of wright, the wild fire will break out and consume obama. he has had it easy up to this point. hannity and rush are just waiting for him to get nominated so they can carve him up. we have only seen the tip of the iceburg from wright. come oct. and nov. you will see the whole picture. and then when the backstapping, turncoats come crying to bill and hilliary to bail the country out of another dem. f–k up, i only hope that they make richardson and kennedy do the ass kissing. clinton did one hell of a job as pres. and all we dems can remember are the repub. talking points. what a discrace. shame on us dems. and the lackys we call politicians. an obama nomination means, more dead soldiers, high gas prices, high food prices, no health care for our children or parents because it will ensure 4 more years of mcshame mcsame neocon rule. good luck america, you will need it.
Posted by: jimt | April 3, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
Once Big Media secures the nomination for Obama, they’ll turn on him like rabid dogs. They’ll swiftboat him so hard, his supporters won’t know what hit them.
They’ve go Rezko in one pocket, Wright in the other, and a passel of lies, prevarications, oopsies, and slithery excuses to pick from.
It’s what in store for the Democrats, I’m afraid.
Posted by: Thrasyboulos | April 3, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
The Clintons lie?………..NAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH!
Posted by: Alva L. Fincher | April 3, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
My motto: vote for whoever will do the least amount of damage.
As a young person, it’s been fascinating to watch Obama come into this campaign in a way that I thought could be very enriching for our whole country. I personally think that those who have been in power the longest are the most corrupted, and the most addicted to their power. I think that this is partly why Obama is so popular with people my age. We’re all very cynical about politics, and why shouldn’t we be?
I thought it wouldn’t be until the general election that we would see the racist tendencies of our society come out, and I’m disheartened that we have flagrantly and unabashedly gone this route. If anything, an Obama candidacy can reveal to ourselves our foolish fears a misplaced discriminations. I would never suggest that someone vote for Obama because of his heritage, not for Hillary because of gender. These are both important issues, but not manifest in a single person. My limited experience tells me that people vote on a visceral level. People go with their guts.
My hope in this campaign has been to see our country confront the racism and biases that we all have. We all need to continuously question these things.
I have to ask as a side, is McCain too liberal for most? I think that neoliberalism doesn’t really count as liberalism, it’s just colonialism and hegemony in disguise.
Matthew white male 26
Posted by: Matthew | April 3, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
Why does Obama always associate with muslims in his criminal activities? Examples: Resko, Auchi, PLO, Farrakhan and Malcom X. Birds of a feather…
Posted by: martha S. | April 3, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
Richardson wants the VP nomination from Obama, if he is nominated. I thought Richardson was a man of his word, I was wrong.
Posted by: Charles | April 3, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm
Gov. Richardson was correct on one point, Obama can’t win in November. Obama lacks wisdom. As you may know, wisdom is the combination of intelligence and experience. Obama has no experience, he can’t handle his duties of senator. Obama is chairman of a sub-committee in foreign relations and has yet to start this job. Obama should be impeached !!!
Posted by: Chuck | April 3, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
Why do you ave to resort to name calling and racism diatribes Chuck? Please, your views are valuable, but sifting through it is impossible.
Posted by: M | April 3, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
Why do you ave to resort to name calling and racism diatribes sickandtired? Please, your views are valuable, but sifting through it is impossible.
Posted by: M | April 3, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
She’s right, he can’t win.
That’s why me and Rush are voting for Hillary in Pennsylvania.
Posted by: Poorah Goy | April 3, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
Most amazed was I at the ineptitude displayed by the Democratic Party in ’04. Guess what folks? It’s time for round two. The economy isn’t that bad; didn’t they learn from Kerry; screaming gloom and doom will get you nowhere. Does anyone really believe Bush will leave office without first drawing down troop levels in Iraq drastically. He won’t let McCain or Obama claim to be the president who got us out of Iraq. I promise you that there IS a timetable, and al Maliki knows it. If the Democrats lose this election, the party should be dissolved.
Posted by: Riverhippie | April 4, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am
Do any of you realize that if Hillary wins the presidency and then gets re-elected that the U.S. will have been run by two families for 28 straight years. Who in their right mind wants that?
Posted by: Riverhippie | April 4, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am
We all KNOW that if Michigan and Florida were added to the total… as they should because they ARE part of the United States, that Hillary Clinton is in the lead.. we all can count that far!!!
Secondly, you can bet your last penny on a fact that Hillary is the most RELIABLE candidate for Presidency, and that she will be there for all americans…. irrespective of colour or gender.
In the other camp you will find loads of voters who are gender-biased and one-race-supporters. What a shame!!!!
Posted by: Retro Vision | April 4, 2008, 2:54 am 2:54 am
all three candidates are the worst of the worst.To see debate or support of them turns my stomach,sick.Try getting them to comment on SPP,NAU or the future unprovoked attack on Iran(if Bush Co,with nothing to loose doesnt just do it before they end their terms in office)? The candidate who can get by American outrage the best,for an Iran attack,is the winner.
Posted by: mike | April 4, 2008, 7:38 am 7:38 am
I can’t understand how people would vote for McCain. Oh I know why.. Your republican and you would rather not see a woman or a man of color in office. I would vote for anyone other than McCain. My reasons??
1. He knows nothing about the economy – Go ahead and vote for him, when the economy goes even more to HELL i hope you all follow him.
2. War – We continue to spend Billions, let me repeat the BILLIONS of dollars on this so called war. You keep supporting it and we are not getting anywhere at all. I would keep some troops there for protection, but the war needs to end. This is hurting us all. If you idiots can’t see that then go vote for McCain.
I would rather OBAMA in office over Clinton because of all the lobbyists money she is taking to run her campaign. Now don’t you think they will want something in return?????? Please open up your eyes and stop letting the media dictate who you vote for. Please read all the stories and stop following your friends without actually READING!!!! Its really fundamental!
Posted by: You idiots | April 4, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am
Let’s see? Who am I going to believe?
Governor Richardson or the Clintons?
That seems like an easy decision.
I don’t think it’s Bill Richardson who is embarrassed…………he seems very comfortable with his choice.
I think it’s Bill Clinton who is embarrassed that he couldn’t strongarm the Governor away from voting his principles.
Posted by: Old time Dem | April 4, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am
I CAN’T TAKE IT ANYMORE…
-Obama has a White mother and a Black father;HE is in the unique position to be able to say”Typical White woman”OR”Typical Black man” and get away with it.If it is an insult,then he just insulted his mother.
-He’s answered the questions about REZKO;that’s why it hasn’t “come out” yet.If it DOES “come out”,he can point to where he answered all the questions.
-He’s answered the question of why he didn’t throw Wright under the bus(with his Philadelphia speech),unlike so many other politicians who associate with people for years-and then they say something “incendiary”and they are thrown in the lions’den.
-IF THE MEDIA CAN INFLUENCE YOUR VOTE,THEEN YOU DON’T DESERVE TO VOTE.
-Obama supposedly can’t win against McCain-so why was Rush Limbaugh trying to get Republicans to switch to Democrat,vote for HILLARY,and switch back? Because they KNOW that Obama will DESTROY McCain in the debates,and they heard Hillary practically endorse McCain,saying that they BOTH had a “lifetime of experience”(he’s got more,so he should win,right Hill?).
-”Obama equated an unborn child with ‘punishment’”-Yes,he did,and to a 14YO girl(or younger),it IS a punishment.Self-inflicted,but a “punishment”nonetheless.Her childhood comes to a crashing HALT as adult responsibilities she is most likely unprepared for come into play.I’m sure,when this comes up again, he will clarify that point.People who point to this as some “a-HA Moment” are just clutching at straws.
-Obama “can’t win”- but he IS.Was Hillary CRYING when she said it? Either she’s in denial(like a mother who finds out her child is pregnant or in jail),or she KNOWS SOMETHING…
Posted by: Passenger57 | April 4, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am
mike wrote:
Please open up your eyes and stop letting the media dictate who you vote for. Please read all the stories and stop following your friends without actually READING!!!! Its really fundamental!
yes.. yes it is mike
truth is people this, mccain wants us to spend more billions and have economy go more into hell.
hillary is just a lobbyists kissass who I feel is more power hungry than anyone should be allowed. Not the person I want sitting behind the red button of doom.
Barack… for all the people who dont think he can win. Well his fundraising is majorily from the ground up. A revelution of sorts that is using the very internet that hosts ideological slanderous bullshit that comes out of peoples mouths. BUT while you all bitch and complain there are people wanting change and really would not like to see a recession in this lifetime. So before many comment here or there, please read all the candidates information and from real outside literary sources as well. Recent Rolling Stone has an amazing article about Obama for example. Out of maccain, hillary, or obama, only one has literally army of ground support. To all the people who read and actually know more than household table-talk, ty for reading.
Posted by: k my thoughts | April 4, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
Obama will beat McCain in November.
We all know coventional wisdom can no longer be relied upon. The last few months have shown that.
- McCain doesn’t have the support of much of his base.
- Age will be a factor.
- Many folks will want to be on the right side of history.
- Once Barack starts debating McCain, pundits will switch to his side, as will the voting public. Obama has a command of the facts and is a great debater. McCain confuses Shia and Sunni on a regular basis, and doesn’t understand that building military bases in the heart of the Middle East is the problem, not the solution.
I don’t think it’ll be close.
OBAMA 2K8
Posted by: John | April 4, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
Hey, everyone, Neither Ron Paul or Mike Gravel have dropped out of the race! It’s just the MSM won’t give them airtime. Know why? They have integrity and no dirt can be found on them. We can vote for either of them. I don’t care about their gender or color, I care about their integrity. It is time for integrity in the WH. Clintons have proven to have none, McClain has none and it is clear that Obama is suspect. Demand airtime for Gravel and Paul.
Posted by: Diane, Cerrillos, NM | April 4, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
Here they go being delusional again. Will somebody please tell these Clintons that not only has Obama WON what 24 states, well, maybe 25 including TEXAS, he has has won MORE DELEGATES, has MORE POPULAR VOTES. So it appears to me and anyone with half a brain that CLINTON CAN’T WIN AGAINST MCCAIN BUT OBAMA CAN!! Go Obama!!!!
Posted by: RuthieM | April 4, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
There was a time when I was pro Hillary. I’m now at the point where there just isn’t any way that I can cast my hard won vote for Hillary Clinton. In my opinion she is the one that is unelectable. If the super delegates decide to give the nomination to Hillary, I will have to vote for McCain and just hope his previous record reflects his true standing instead of the Bush rhetoric he is spouting now to gain conservative votes. I can’t imagine anyone other than Hillary Clinton being as big a disappointment as George W Bush.
Why can’t I find mention of the Peter Paul lawsuit against Hillary Clinton?Even if the man was a quack, I’d expect a simple story indicating that the charges were investigated and determined to be unfounded. There isn’t one article from a major news source regarding this topic. Yet, I can’t hide from stories telling me what Obama might or might not have heard some Sunday morning with his family. It just makes me wonder…
Posted by: J | April 4, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
j, I’m sorry that you feel as though you would vote for Mc cain over Obama.. talk about cutting off one’s nose to spite his/her face…
Posted by: bk | April 4, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
sorry I meant over Hillary
Posted by: bk | April 4, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
GEEZZZZZZZZZZZZ PEOPLE DON’T YOU KNOW THAT BILL RICHARSON AND Obama are liars.they want this bad so Obama can continu to take money from the oil companies and hope for a way to get Rezko out of the mees they are both in.Obma new him 20 years.and he said he didn’t know of his dirty dealings.well a newpaper came out of letting people know hit the stands.and then after that hit four days later.wired was to Rezko and Obama brought his house that day as well as rezko wife brought rezko and her house next to Obamas and rezko brought a the lot between them cause Obama said he would have brought it when was ask by Rezko,but he couldn’t aford it,well then Rezso’s wife brought it and then turned and sold it to Obama,there is more to this man you don’t know,,,,
Posted by: baby | April 5, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am
Read a good one on Crooks & Liars a couple days ago. It was the first mention I had seen of the two types of Republicans:
millionaires and suckers
Poor suckers.
Posted by: Greg Forest | April 5, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am
You people only need to remember this; Obama is winning because he is showing he is consistent, positive and intelligent, Hillary is meandering all over the map ethically and semantically.
There are only 2 kinds of republicans, rich ones and suckers.
Posted by: wirehedd | April 5, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
I just LOVE Hillary’s in-sourcing tax policies she has just announced! She is FANTASTIC, and as expected, she is the lady that brings forth the BRIGHT IDEAS to make our ecomony better.
Globalisation is only good for the multi-billion dollar companies, because they can move or take manufacturing where it is the cheapest without inpunity. But hey, they are bringing products back to the US to sell and make incredible profit margin while many of our workforce are unemployed.
Hillary is right, those goods that were not manufactured in the US by American companies, must have such taxes imposed that it will not be lucrative for them to take manufacturing jobs away from here if they want to sell their products in the US. We have a huge market and therefore people-power to re-dress the situation – but we need a good government, a GREAT insightful leader like Hillary Clinton who will be there for every decent hard working American, every race and gender!
GO HILLARY, the white house is yours, You will make the most fantastic president in history. God Bless You.
Posted by: Retro Vision | April 5, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
And why can’t he win? It’s ridiculous.
Posted by: trademark registration | April 5, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
as an outsider looking in i can only go with the fact the the clinton ticket is the only international recognised option for getting the USA and global economise back on an up Bill did it he put the US in the black and two Bushes managed to burn the economy either side of him.
Bush demonised Muslims yet the 9/11 killers were Kuwaitis not Iraqis just son keeping daddy happy i suppose with i got him for you
Posted by: francis trimm | April 6, 2008, 4:19 am 4:19 am
My number #1 choice and the man I think would be best for the job of being our next President is Ron Paul.
Unfortunately, he has absolultely no chance of winning either the Republican nomination, or even the general election in November, if he decides to run as an Independent, this Fall!
Posted by: Ross | April 6, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am
Mike Denhof, Ain’t that the truth!
Posted by: gayle in California | April 6, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Gee Whiz People. Wake up and look at reality. This primary election between Obama and Clinton is very instrumental in showing where an insignificant amount of people’s heads are. They are demonstrating that they are still stuck on stupid. Where a significant amount of peope have not progressed beyond the good old boy society, this is a new day designed by a power that is bigger than you and me. The Clinton’s thought that this race was all wrapped up and that they did not have a viable opponent. Obama has been consistent and made the most sense of all of the candidates who changetheir views and answers depending on who is asking the question. The statement that Obama “can’t win” is an asinine assumption. Did any one ever tell you what the word assume divided is. ASS/U/ME. This all comes from taking people for granted. She needs to bow out gracefully. Abd, this is coming from a former Hillary supporter who voted for her husband twice. I can’t wait to cast my vote on May 6 as well as other North Carolinians. And you will see once the dust clears who can’t win!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: BJ in North Carolina | April 6, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
The super delagates will have to look at the 527s and realize that 2 months of Rev. Wright and no one in North Carolina will be voting for Obama, not even you. Wake up, you do remember Swift Boating?
Posted by: mkm in Denver | April 6, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
I don’t like any of them. None of the them have the qualifications. Being first lady is not good enough. Being a senator who may show up for a vote is not good enough. I would rather see a write in candidate…NONE OF THE ABOVE.
Posted by: JP | April 7, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
I’d hate to level-headed anaylsis of the simple facts into this “discussion,” but here goes: Hillary CAN NOT WIN THE NOMINATION! Not under any circumstances.
My statement isn’t based on what I think will happen it’s based on what has already happened. Obama’s lead is simply inurmountable.
He has a lead of roughly 160pledged delegates and a deficit of 25superdelegates. Even assuming that everything (and I mean EVERTHING) goes Hillary’s way, this lead cannot be overcome.
Assume some devastating news comes out about Obama and his current lead in the polls disappear,Consequently people start voting for Hillary en masse.
In PA, where she is currently leading in polls by 3% to15%, she is able to pull out a victory of 15%. In fact, lets make that a complete blowout of Obama. She wins by 20 percent surprising everyone. — She will net rougly 30-32 delegates.
The same thing happens in Guam and Indiana. She completely blows Obama out and wins 60% to 40% (note that polls currently show she is leading in Indiana by only 5-10 points) — She will net 15 delegates.
In N.Carolina, Oregon, Montana, and S.Dakota (states where Obama is heavily favored), the unbeilevable happens – Hillary is not only able to overcome his lead but actually squeezes out a 5 point victories in all these states. – She will net 8-10.
In W.Virginia, Kentucky, & Peurto Rico (states where Hillary is favored), lightning strikes for the umpteenth time, she beats Obama by larger than expected margins – I mean MUCH larger than expected – 60% to 40% in all 3 states. – She will net 28 – 30.
With all of this, believe it or not, Hillary is still behind by almost 80 pledged delegates and counting supers she is behind by roughly 50, and that is once again assuming that the supers break even from now on rather that going for Obama as they have in the past 3-4 months (Highly Unlikely)
ITS TIME FOR HILLARY TO GO. SHE CAN NOT WIN!!! THE LONGER SHE STAYS IN THE BETTER THE FOR MCCAIN.
Posted by: sos419 | April 10, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
The falling of america.after BUSH they make the same mistake by electing a black man because he thinks black.and later they ll be the one to rally outside in demonstration.the better politician can t be black.take a look at AFRICA they all black leaders there all evil ones.Hillary is still fighting because you can t see the mistake you re making with OBAMA you’;re blinded by color and it’s dangerous.having a very little knowlegde in politics is dangerous.SNOOP dog knows what he’s talking about calling barrack a coward and snitch.only double eyes can see barrack is empty and unable to a presidency but as long there be empty people like you to vote for him he be in the course.be sure by now he won’t win.visualise things and don’t fantansise.if you having visions you ll know
Posted by: blackpower | April 13, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am
So now we know Hillary talks out of both sides of her mouth. During the debate on Wednesday, she practically did a backstep on the “Obama can’t win” statement and said he can.
Posted by: ChayaFradle | April 17, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
This is worse than watching Bush win the White House.
Obama is not capable to win this race.
Too many negatives.
Elitist
No white vote
Revered Wright
Michelle
He lost when he is suppose to be a front runner in West Virginia
No health care
He may win the primary but not the general.
McCain will grab all of Clinton’s votes
That will be the end.
Posted by: Al from NJ | May 14, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
This is worse than watching Bush win the White House.
Obama is not capable to win this race.
Too many negatives.
Elitist
No white vote
Revered Wright
Michelle
He lost when he is suppose to be a front runner in West Virginia
No health care
He may win the primary but not the general.
McCain will grab all of Clinton’s votes
That will be the end.
Posted by: Al from NJ | May 14, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
Obama can not win because of race.
There are too many older white and Latino’s that won’t vote for him.
I don’t care who stands with him.
That’s just being honest.
He’s got four challenge
Not honest
Not trustworthy
Does not share his values
People believe he is not like them but is more like Reverend Wright.
These are real issues. There is no prejudice here
Posted by: Al from NJ | May 14, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
Let’s see a hard fight ahead against McCain with Barrack or a slam dunk win with Hillary, this seems like a no brainer. There is nothing more to beat the Clinton’s up on. Barrack does not even know fight. They are trying to beat Hillary right know. If he wins the nomination you will then see how Republicans keep winning elections. When the turn their attention to the ROOKIE.
Posted by: Richard Dreiling | May 19, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
i used to respect Hillary Clinton, considered myself a Clinton-Democrat but have become disgusted by her recent campaigning….the “Gaming” for Michigan/Florida delegate votes really angers me. I understand the people of these states want a say…fine—-then divide the votes 50/50….Anything else is ridiculous! Rules were set at the beginning and now her campaign wants to change rules to better their own position. This is shameful and reflects poorly on both her and the party..Since when does having a majority of the popular vote mean victory? In truth, i wish it did, but as the rules are currently set, they do not (remember Al Gore?).
It is a flawed process, but she should respect it and work to change the process, not manipulate it to her own advantage…
Posted by: sue | June 3, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
George Staphanoupolis in his interview with Sen Lieberman lacked any real intereaction. Sen Lieberman calls Sen Obama a flopper on the war and the withdrawal of troops. Sen Lieberman, the biggest flip from Democrat to Independent to the biggest republican supporter of McCain, is a flop with no claim to a constant position. The pot is calling the kettle black…no pun intended/
Posted by: Paul | July 6, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am
This is a sad day for the Democratic party. Thanks to all the hype and attention from the media, Obama won the nomination to run against McCain. Obama doesn’t have the experience to run a country. He was a young black man with a family that the media compared to the Kennedy’s so often… they made everyone think he was another JFK. He’s not sorry. I have been a republican since I first registered to vote. I would have voted for Hilary but will not vote for Obama. I will vote for McCain. He’s my 2nd choice, but he beats having Obama for president. If the Media would stop making him such a god who is going to save our country and really look at his accomplishments compared to Hillary’s … then they would have supported the right person. The one with experience and the fight … and the one who never gave up until forced to. I’ll write Hillary in on the ballot before I vote for Obama.
Maybe if we do a write in for Hillary, we’ll have the President that we are suppose to have … and that’s not OBama. Thanks for listening.
Posted by: Gina | July 16, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
If you think Bill Richardson is your friend …
watch your back, for when you least expect it, this Judas is sure to stab you deep, right between your shoulder blades!!!
Posted by: HOWARD | August 21, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
Quoting Rihanna, from “Take a Bow”…
“You look so dumb right now”
McCain-Palin 2008
Posted by: John | September 15, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
Some in the government, like Barack Obama, are seeking to limit the American peoples’ access to on-demand, short term financial assistance. Some cities and towns are trying to impose restrictions on where these legitimate businesses can set up shop. Even worse, several states, including Georgia and North Carolina, have successfully imposed all-out bans on the industry, with several more attempting to follow suit. Citizens all across the nation are seeking to have their voices heard by fighting legislation that would obliterate the payday loan industry nationwide; misinformed political officials are pushing for a complete ban in the name of personal political gain, regardless of the hundreds of thousands of potential lost jobs in an already turbulent economy.
Post Courtesy of Personal Money Store
Professional Blogging Team
Feed Back: 1-866-641-3406
Home: http://personalmoneystore.com/NoFaxPaydayLoans.html
Blog: http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/
Posted by: Payday Loan Advocate | September 23, 2008, 4:21 am 4:21 am
i hope you both win but tou can’t so try your best
Posted by: siera and krystle | September 26, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
i hope you both win but tou can’t so try your best
Posted by: siera and krystle | September 26, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
Keep up the excellent piece of work, I read few blog posts on this website and I believe that your web site is real interesting and holds lots of good info.
Posted by: Juliet | October 13, 2011, 9:24 am 9:24 am