Charlie Cook: Clinton in “Political Purgatory”
"The good news for Hillary Rodham Clinton is that she’s winning a lot of battles," the essay writes. "The bad news is that the war is pretty much lost."
The column is from well-respected Beltway prognosticator Charlie Cook.
"If this contest were still at the point where momentum, symbolism, and reading tea leaves mattered, Clinton would be in pretty good shape," he writes. "Everything she has needed to happen is happening now. Obama is getting tougher press coverage and critical examination. He’s also getting rattled a bit, and he didn’t perform well in the recent debate in Philadelphia. Clinton is winning in big, important places."
But, Cook notes, "it’s happening about three months too late."
Cook says that in some ways "Clinton has spent the past six weeks in a horrible situation. How do you quit a race when you’re still winning primaries? …But even in victory, she isn’t getting any closer to securing the nomination. This political purgatory will continue if she manages to win Indiana but loses North Carolina — hard to drop out but harder to see winning the nomination. If she loses in both states, then her campaign’s donors and creditors, as well as superdelegates and party leaders, are likely to intervene. But that can’t happen as long as she continues to win."
Cook is of course not always correct. (Perhaps most glaringly, he declared Sen. John McCain’s campaign dead prematurely, saying "the physicians have pulled up the sheet; the executors of the estate are taking over.")
But his occasional evidence of fallibility notwithstanding, he’s pretty astute, far, far more than I am, it likely goes without saying.
And his harsh assessment will no doubt be widely circulated among superdelegates who know and respect Cook.
- jpt

Email
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
Another MSM idiot in Obama’s pocket.
Posted by: Tina from Florida | April 24, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
I’m glad Hillary had a victory in Pa.
Posted by: Bishop | April 24, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
Hillary won’t quit. Its not about the party, its about her.
Posted by: Adjaloo | April 24, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
Amazing that people who don’t feel that Clinton is “entitled” is referred to as an idiot.
She cannot and will not win this nomination – the numbers state it very clearly. No way to spin your way out of this one :-)
Posted by: Dani girl | April 24, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
I just got some news from a political insider I know in the Republican machine. The reason they want to run against Hillary so badly is that they have a lot of dirt on Hillary. The story line is that Vince Foster is the father of Chelsea, not Bill. I’m following the story and will post more.
Posted by: Chris | April 24, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
If she wins, the Democratic party as you know it today will be done.
Posted by: Becky | April 24, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
Hillary won’t quit. Its not about the party, its about her.
Posted by: Adjaloo | April 24, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
It’s only over if you don’t count Michigan and Florida and Michigan and Florida will have to count or the Dems don’t want to win the white house.
She’s within 9 delegates right now and winning the pop vote. Even if Obama is given 25% of the vote in Michigan from exit polls for sake of arguement, she will have won the pop vote when all is said and done and be leading in delegates, including MI and FL.
Dems either want the person with the most actual delegates, electoral college votes and popular votes to win
or they want to split hairs over proceedural minutia and lose the white house.
It’s easy. The Dems want the white house or they don’t.
Posted by: s.b. | April 24, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
Funny the voters keep disagreeing with all these pundits who say she can’t win.
If she couldn’t win, Obama wouldn’t have to fight so hard and spend so much money to gain a couple of points on her.
15 million voters disagree and counting.
Posted by: s.b. | April 24, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
For all of you Hillary Clinton Supporters
1. What has she done, besides being the wife of Bill Clinton, to be CEO of the largest company in America.
2. What happened when she was in charge of health care reform (a disaster)
3. How can you be CEO of the largest company in America and not be trusted by over 62% of the American people
Posted by: bob hayes | April 24, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
s.b. – You got it exactly right.
Posted by: Kris | April 24, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
Hillary Clinton should have locked the nomination up by now. She was the de facto nominee one year ago, and every advantage was made available to her. The problem is that she had a sense of entitlement to the nomination, and nothing but contempt for Barack Obama prior to Super Tuesday, so that she was totally unprepared when he fought her to a draw that day. She was too lazy to be prepared to fight beyond that Tuesday. Laziness is what killed her. Quite frankly, she deserves to be where she is now. She should have worked harder.
Posted by: FilmMD | April 24, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
Becky,
The Democratic Party as many of us think of it is already over….maybe that is a good thing as it seems to be overtaken with radical ideas and mainstream America seems to have been tossed out with yesterday’s paper. That’s why I call myself an independent now. We don’t need another 4 years of a newbie playing President relying on arrogant advisers. This is no job for someone needing on the job training in today’s world. Say what you like about Hillary, she at least presents specific plans for what she wants to do, he never gives specifics, just generalities and boring rhetoric…yawn.
Posted by: dc | April 24, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
Hillary said:
I won that double-digit victory that everybody on TV said I had to win, and the voters of Pennsylvania clearly made their views known, that they think I would be the best president and the better candidate to go against Sen. McCain.
The reality: She won by less than double-digits 9.3% if you do the math. I don’t know why she wouldn’t be expected to win a state that had adopted her. However, everybody even the experts at CNN, ABC, NBC and FOX who said she needed double-digits is silent on her missing the mark. She failed and everybody is trying to spin, frankly have successfully turned a strategic loss into a “win.” And you folks believe–I’m glad I’m not flying soon because in this Twilight Zone I’d expect to see a monster jumping on the wing.
Posted by: Wellican Uzacalculator | April 24, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
I dont think it is too late for Hillary to win. Because if the democrat go ahead with obama we will lose another presidential race. This writer is probally an obama supporter. obama is flawed badly and will look weak against McCain in November.
Posted by: toby | April 24, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
And just because he state this it doesnt make it true. Hillary has half the democrat voting for her who will not vote for obama in november.
Posted by: toby | April 24, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
This is a generational fight. I KNOW
the older generation will NEVER vote for a black. NOT EVER.
They are reminded of the 60′s. Once Hillary’s generation and older are gone we won’t have this problem any longer. Anyone younger than 50 years old don’t remember that part of American history. It’s just that…history. We need to move
on and live like we’re in the 21st
century not the past!
ps what’s with Rocky theme..1976!
Anyone under 30 wasn’t even born yet!
Posted by: Reilly | April 24, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
“Another MSM idiot in Obama’s pocket.
Posted by: Tina from Florida”
So what exactly makes him an idiot? Charlie Cook just points out the obvious. In fact the MSM is the single big reason why we are still talking about Hillary Clinton. They want to make an exciting race when is so evident that she lost. It was clear in February. It’s crystal clear now. How can you continue to back an egotistic sore loser?
Hillary is like a basketball team that is down by 30 some points and scores a couple of baskets with few minutes to go. Except that she plays nasty throwing elbows left and right. Nothing to get too excited about. It’s rather pathetic.
Posted by: red mpls | April 24, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Hillary will win the nomination. The tenacity of this woman and her ability to take a hit and not go down will eventually win over the undecideds and super delegates. It is not too late.
Posted by: Andrea | April 24, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
Sure, Andrea, keep telling yourself that!
Obama 2008 — Yes, WE CAN!!!
Posted by: Jackt51 -- Vietnam Vet and Proud Liberal | April 24, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
If Mrs. Clinton is qualified to lead this nation, than why do over 60% of the American people not trust her??
Posted by: bob hayes | April 24, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
andrea
they do not pick a nominee on taking a hit and getting up.
but if that were your measurement of a good president or nominee…
do you see where obama is and where hillary the queen of the democratic party is?
If she is such a fighter…then why did she lose to Obama in her own party where she had a much greater chance at winning…
So you think she will do better out in general…the woman who has been the queen of the democratic party for 15 years?
Obama is the fighter…he beat THE CLINTONS! in their own party.
It’s done.
Posted by: dl | April 24, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
It’s the DNC that is in “Political Purgatory” not Hillary Clinton. 2024 delegates. Neither candidate can meet that threshold without the SD. They would be wise to let the voters vote, count the votes they are not counting or at least allow a re-vote in MI and FL.
After all, wasn’t the DNC that proclaimed that “every vote counts and we will count every vote”? And, it was the DNC’s duty to vet Barack prior to jumping on his bandwagon. Talk about a lack of judgement.
If Obama is the nominee, he will be credited for losing the Whitehouse for the Democrats and causing the defection of 30% of the DNC’s most loyal supporters.
Silly DNC. Will they ever “get it”???
Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | April 24, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
Cook stated that with each victory she is getting no closer to securing the nomination, but in fact with each victory she is gaining in popular vote and delegates but likewise, Obama is no closer to securing the nomination.
I really love this logic of states having primaries but political bosses who don’t want people to actually be able to vote for their choice because it isn’t going the way for the party bosses pick.
The bosses were so intent on barring Florida and Michigan results because they were too early for the bosses liking, if they didn’t want Indiana and West Virginia and Kentucky and Montana and other states to vote becaue they were scheduled too late, I’m sure they wouldn’t have hesitated barring those states from participating as well. After all, they’re Obama bosses, they can do what they want I guess.
But no, bosses, we’re going to keep voting and keep voting for Hillary ’08 and put her over the top in popular vote and close in states won (and actual states that matter, not red states like Idaho that will never send a Democrat to the White House), and close in delegates.
And when Florida and Michigan slap the party bosses around enough until they get their attention, then Hillary will have a commanding lead in all categories.
Same as she will this fall against McCain.
Having said that, I know that many people will be angry either way the Dem nomination goes, and I am hopeful that we will unite behind a Clinton/Obama ticket where in eight years Obama will have the history and record we can look at to vote for him for President.
Hillary ’08
Posted by: rd | April 24, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
Eveybody knows that Hillary
now has the direct path to the
WhiteHouse…
Hillary 08!!!
Posted by: ruth | April 24, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
Hilly is the Queen alright lmao.You forgot to say of what>I can tell you but not very nice.
She is dead in the water …………..
Posted by: honest | April 24, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
People don’t vote for Obama is not because he is Black..
It is because of his lesat experience, his least strength, his hiding about his pastor’s speech and the relationship with his long time pal Rezko, his double talking about trade and even the withdraw of Iraq war, and his arrogance,his same old political tricks but he claimed he represents a new politics….
Obama is leading because of Dems’ primary rule and his “first love” for young voters and AA…
Obama was constantly defeated on white votes, women votes, latino votes, Asian votes and other minority votes except AA….
He no longer attract rep or ind after all his issues surfaced….
What else does he have: register more young voters by his “inspirising speech”….That’s it…
Posted by: True Truth | April 24, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
Not only the superdelegates are
free agents, so are the delegates
- so to say it is over is very
wishful thinking… Hillary has
just begun!
Vote Hillary 08!
Posted by: susan | April 24, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
The problem might be Obama’s empty, filthy
rhetoric…
You think???
Posted by: sally | April 24, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
thank you pennsylvania; obama proved you cannot buy an election. democracy is alive the people decide.
Posted by: sonia trevino | April 24, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
I would say the devil has been outdone if Hillary is down there with him. Better make room for Billy Boy too.
I couldn’t think of a better person to burn in hell.
Posted by: Well Well | April 24, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
“Silly DNC. Will they ever “get it”???”
They’ll get it in November, if they aren’t beginning to get it now. Nader/McKinney will be the winners, if Obama is on the ticket.
Too many people work too hard in politics to have some manufactured “post-partisan” phony jumped to the head of the line by the WORST people in the Democratic Party, assisted by “left” hotshots of yesteryear.
Posted by: Belle Starr | April 24, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
why would we want a pres that cannot or is afraid to debate? what would he do if he had to debate with a foreign leader-read them a poem written by somebody else? or wait for hillary to prompt him answers like he does at all the debates. debate, and negotiation skills are critical for any leader.
Posted by: sonia trevino | April 24, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
“If she wins, the Democratic party as you know it today will be done.”
Excellent. The DNC as it has run this election cycle is already done as far as the Democratic voters are concerned. They allowed extremists to hijack the election. No more.
Hillary is going to win this election. Where her opponent’s supporters talk about boycotts and riots, she talks about prosperity and peace. Where they talk about racism and generational warfare, she talks about economic initiatives and ending the war.
This is going all the way to the convention where the delegates will have to decide if they want to give it back to the Republicans or win. If they want to win, both of these names will be on the ticket, or it will be Hillary Clinton and John Edwards.
This is an easy choice. The pundits and the polls are wrong. The fact that the Republicans will unite to beat Hillary Clinton is the best reason for her to win. If they detest her that much, she is the right choice. For eight years Repubicans have chosen against my best interests. No more.
Posted by: len | April 24, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
Obamas ONLY argument is he is ‘ahead’ in delegates.
He will be ‘ahead’ in delegates at the end. He will be ‘ahead’ ‘ahead’ ‘ahead’
What is the point of all this?
None of the remaining states are swing states . Most are strictly republican except Oregon , which has gone democratic for decades.
Why? To get more ‘voters’ ? For what? Hoping it will start to have an effect 4 years from now in republicans states?
4 years from now they could be loving Mc Cain or Hating Clinton or Obama so they will re register republican anyways.
If the nomination is REALLY rigged for Obama, there is no point in continuing at all. No positives.
Egro the party insiders have a war going on that the media WONT talk about. This is why the super delegates are still keeping quiet.
Posted by: tomdavie | April 24, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
It’s over Hillary.
Posted by: Stacey | April 24, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
mr. cook; you forgot one pesty little detail THE PEOPLE WANT HILLARY TO STAY!
I AM SICK AND TIRED OF PRESIDENTIAL- HOPEFUL LOOSERS DEAN,KENNEDY,RICHARDSON, AND THAT PATHETIC PEOLOSI THAT ARE DETERMINED TO STOP THE AMERIAN PEOPLE FROM VOTING. WE WILL NEVER FORGET!
Posted by: sonia trevino | April 24, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
Not true none of the remaiining are swing states. West Virginia is most decidely a swing state, Kentucky and Indiana and Montana and North Carolina all recently voting Democrat.
They should all be considered swing states at this point for a new Democratic majority.
Hillary ’08
Posted by: rd | April 24, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
Maybe the people who really need to think about what Cook’s article implies are the journalists, the media. If OBama was properly vetted in January, he would not have been in today’s position. He would not have won so many states. The real question is why many journalists self-sencored out bad news coverage for Obama. They have lost their ethics and worked as advocates for Obama. I have stopped watching CNN and MSNBC for a while now. So, readers, before you read any article by so-called respected journalist, ask youself “does this guy an ardent Obama supporter?”. For example, I don’t trust anything coming out of Chris Matthew’s mouth.
Posted by: amy | April 24, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
belle star; thank you for your eloquent, and insightful post. you must be one of those ‘typical’ uneducated, downtrodden, gun-toting hillary supporters. go hillary.
Posted by: sonia trevino | April 24, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
That’ what I love about the Clintonistas! What do they think about when they think of black folks feeling disenfranchised? Riots! So they throw that word out there, even though there’s been no talk of that from ANYONE, in the event that Hillabeans is successful in STEALING — Yes, in case you didn’t hear me, S-T-E-A-L-I-N-G the election — the only option left open to her at the moment.
Yet, they claim they are not racist — and they probably believe that themselves!
I appreciate your zeal for your candidate. I really do. I was originally for Edwards, and I respected his decision when, faced with the political and financial reality of his original pledge to take his fight to the convention, he chose to bow out. Had he stayed in, I would have supported him a little longer. Heck, I might even have felt as strongly about it as you Clintonistas.
But at some point, you have to face reality. Hillabeans cannot win. Obama has not stolen the election; he has not been annointed by the MSM, DNC or anyone else. He simply ran a better campaign.
Obama 2008 — Yes, WE CAN!!!
Posted by: Jackt51 -- Vietnam Vet and Proud Liberal | April 24, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
i love the latest fairy tale from the pundits and party bosses who claim that we will ‘come together in november’. never, we will never, forget the betrayal. loyalty to democracy before loyalty to the party. count all the votes if you want party unity then maybe we will consider it. but only after we send all the party ‘traitor’ fat cat elitists packing. kennedy, richardson, peolosi, dean, kerry start packing, your fired! democracy is alive she has risen.
Posted by: sonia trevino | April 24, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
OK, Cook–your point is that the Democrats have effectively signed a suicide pact with Obama and must go through with it.
Never mind that Obama can’t connect with middle America, this is the Democratic way–pick a candidate from the far left wing of the party and suffer loss and ridicule– think McGovern,Dukakis Kerry… America is moderate. Obama is not (see his record on this, not his speeches) .
Dems–start thinking about that last meal. Arugula perhaps?
Posted by: NJH | April 24, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
Sonia trevino,
I am with you. All the Dem bigwigs made this a mess.
COUNT ALL THE VOTES!!!
Posted by: countallthevotes | April 24, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
s.b., the Dem want the White House with a winner Obama and not with a loser Hill the Bosnian General. That is the reality to live with, Obama is the nominee and let us get behind him and support him to beat McCain as a drum in November. God bless America and God bless Obama.OBAMA08.
Posted by: BKMC | April 24, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
Jake,
What happened to that little moment when Obama won 11 PRIMARIES IN A ROW? Did anyone question her electability? Sure, she was encouraged to bow out–no different than now.
Except, she won ONE state. ONE state and now she’s in a comeback? She won ONE state in the last TWELVE?
The media seemed to skip over those wins as significant. According to Clinton herself, “A win is a win is a win” and for Obama it was that eleven times….
Now, why does Pennsylvania matter and the other states don’t? That’s what I want to know. Why does the media, and the American people, forget so quickly?
Posted by: Jerome | April 24, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
s.b.
HAHAHAAAHAHAAHAHA
Your analysis of MI and FL, popular vote and delegate count for Hillary made a giggle…
Why doesn’t Hillary count the popular votes in the caucus states… democratic???
If we were to add MI, FL, and the caucus states popular vote
Obama would lead 500,000+
Hillary’s philosophy is, lets only count the states where I’ve won and can come out on top
the SDs aren’t buying it lol
4/5 SDs endorsements since PA have gone to Obama
What you think about that? (rhetorical question)
lol
Posted by: Vanessa | April 24, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
all obama does is cling to guns religion and the antipathy of other people…
Vote Hillary 08!
Posted by: ruth | April 24, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm
One CNN:
US: Mugabe trying to still the vote. To me the title should be “Hillary trying to still the vote”
Posted by: samurai | April 24, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm
Frankly, Obama is at most qualified to be
a legal assistant.
Posted by: see | April 24, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
Amazing that people who don’t feel that Obama is “entitled” is referred to as an idiot.
He cannot and will not win this nomination – the numbers state it very clearly. No way to spin your way out of this one.
Hillary 08!!
Posted by: ro | April 24, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
Racist?
How about 92% of the voters voting for a man because he’s the same color?
it’s not about the older generation or the younger generation, or about the rich or poor, educated or less educated.
IT’S ABOUT R A C E!
Just because it’s black against white… doesn’t make it any more right!
Hillary happens to be the best candidate of the two; she can’t HELP being white.
Vote for HILLARY!!!!!
Posted by: eyes extremely wide open | April 24, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
How can HRC say she will be better on the economy, when she has bankrupted her own campaign?
Mike Lupica * 4/24/08 * Daily News
“Why Hillary is still eating Obama’s dust”
EXCERPT: “She raised more than $200 million to run for President. It wasn’t nearly enough, and yet she continues to tell the voters and the country that she is the one who will put money back into everybody’s pockets. Her own people issue press releases that trumpet her ‘commitment to jump-starting our economy’ when she can’t even jump-start her own.”
Posted by: MDA | April 24, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
It is obvious that Hillary is the best candidate. How can any superdelegate consider voting for Obama when he can’t win in the big states outspending Hillary 3 and 4 to 1? It is frightening to think that the superdelegates are still debating. What on earth are they thinking? Do they really believe that a candidate can win who can’t even take NY, California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and others. The only big state state he has won is Illinois.
Posted by: Two-cats | April 24, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm
countallthevotes; absolutely. i don’t know about you. but i really do believe that most democrats would have supported either candidate. until the party bosses, cultural elitist’s pac’s like moveon.org, and other (to borrow belle starr’s words) “left” ‘hotshots of yesteryear…’ decided collectively to coronate our next president-that is not democracy. and that is not my democratic party, or the party of my ancestors. those are republican tactics- that we so much abhor. those are the same tactics that installed gwb. ironic isn’t it? loyalty to democracy before loyalty to the party.
Posted by: sonia trevino | April 24, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
Jake,
Charlie Cook prediction back in 2004:
London, UK: Will it all come down to races in Ohio, Pennsylvannia, and Florida?
Charles Cook: A general rule of thumb that some people on both sides use is that whichever candidate wins two out of those three: Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania, will probably be the next president. While one can certainly construct other scenarios, it all probability, that will be true.
Clinton won Florida, Ohio, and PA, correct??
Posted by: countallthevotes | April 24, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
As a woman that is Hillary’s age, and white, I have to say that I find it offensive when women of the Democratic Party say they will not vote for Obama if he wins the nomination. Hillary Clinton has worked very hard to win, but if she doesn’t, do you think you will be doing her a favor by voting for McCain? How many years has she been working for health care reform? If Barack Obama wins and she remains in the Senate, she may well be able to write the legislation that she wants, and Barack would sign it. On the other hand, if McCain wins, he will never sign it and it will take 2/3 of the Senate to over ride a veto. The Democrats will probably not get that many new Senators.
Then, there is the Iraq war. Do you want to bring the troops home or not?
I understand why women want Hillary to win, but to not vote, or vote for McCain, will insure that the things that Hillary has worked so hard to accomplish will not happen.
Hillary also wants to improve education for our children, as well as make college affordable, do you want to forget that? McCain will continue No Child Left Behind as it is. Is it worth it to refuse to vote for Obama and lose all of the things that everyone in the Democratic Party wants to accomplish?
If McCain wins, we will be in worse shape than we are now and we will lose many more of our sons and daughters in Iraq. Is it really worth that to stay home or vote for him, just because your Democratic candidate didn’t win the nomination? I hope you will reconsider the consequences of that.
Posted by: Ann, MO | April 24, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm
American hostages
I used to believe that the Bill of Rights protected our freedom of speech, press and religion. Then the current Presidential race for the first time has a Black and a Female candidate. The female candidate is being attacked not only by her primary competitor, but also by most news networks. At the same time, Blacks suggest that most Blacks voters select a Black candidate because he is the right candidate. These same voters suggest that in this one-sided voting, race is not an issue even though 98% of the Black Pennsylvania voters voted for Sen. Barak Obama. What I find appalling is that Obama, his campaign committee and Blacks are holding Americans hostage. I think it is unfair that Black Americans are attacking those that voted for Sen. Hillary Clinton and suggest that somehow race was the primary reason. The reason Pennsylvania voters voted for someone other than Sen. Obama was because Americans found out about Obama’s true character.
Once Obama’s true character about his associates was learned, and once Americans heard Obama’s back door comments, voters voted for Sen. Clinton. All of a sudden, cable news networks are displaying one expert after another that suggest race is the primary factor voters are voting for Sen. Clinton. Yet, not one suggests that Americans are concern about Obama’s friends and associates, his recent and past actions, and Obama’s reluctance to show proper respect to American customs. Recently, the Senator from Illinois was force to display proper respect to the American flag. Obama gave numerous reasons why he did not show respect to the flag stating that one’s actions were more important. After defending his views for over 18 months, no one was fooled when Sen. Obama said, “God bless you and God bless America”. All of a sudden the Senator from Illinois use such phrases and he wants us to believe that politics has nothing to do with this sudden change. As a minority, I believe it is wrong that all Americans have to worry that anytime someone says something about Obama or a Black person, that we will be held hostage and labeled a racist. For brevity sake, I won’t discuss Obama’s views on the right to keep and bear arms.
Posted by: Dr Hubert, Lt Col, USAF Retired | April 24, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
The race is over. It was over when Obama went on the long winning streak while HRC waited for a “big” state to win.It’s amazing that anyone thinks it’s still in question.MATH-MATH-MATH-MATH.Get it?
Posted by: bskahn | April 24, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
IT’S TIME AMERICA:
It’s time for everyone to face the truth. Barack Obama has no real chance of winning the national election in November at this time. His crushing defeat in Pennsylvania makes that fact crystal clear. His best, and only real chance of winning in November is on a ticket with Hillary Clinton as her VP.
Hillary Clinton seemed almost somber at her victory speech. As if part of her was hoping Obama could have defeated her. And proved he had some chance of winning against the republican attack machine, and their unlimited money, and resources. In all honesty. I felt some of that too.
But it is absolutely essential that the democrats take back the Whitehouse in November. America, and the American people are in a very desperate condition now. And the whole World has been doing all that they can to help keep us propped up.
Hillary Clinton say’s that the heat, and decisions in the Whitehouse are much tougher than the ones on the campaign trail. But I think Mr. Obama faces a test of whether he has what it takes to be a commander and chief by facing the difficult facts, and the truth before him. And by doing what is best for the American people by dropping out of the race, and offering his whole hearted assistance to Hillary Clinton to help her take back the Whitehouse for the American people, and the World.
Mr. Obama is a great speaker. And I am confident he can explain to the American people the need, and wisdom of such a personal sacrifice for them. It should be clear to everyone by now that Hillary Clinton is fighting her heart out for the American people. She has known for a long time that Mr. Obama can not win this November. You have to remember that the Clinton’s have won the Whitehouse twice before. They know what it takes.
If Mr. Obama fails his test of commander and chief we can only hope that Hillary Clinton can continue her heroic fight for the American people. And that she prevails. She will need all the continual support and help we can give her. She may fight like a superhuman. But she is only human.
Sincerely
Jacksmith… Working Class :-)
Posted by: jacksmith | April 24, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
Oops!
After Hillary repeatedly bringing up Rev Wright against Obama The NC state republican Party plane to use the Rev Wright against fellow Democrats in NC. She has remained silent about the issue until today, now she says it is outrageous.
Now she stops to think!
Way to Go Hillary! I amsure yopur fellow democrates will remember how helpful you were in supporting those of you party.
Obama08
Posted by: Thinking | April 24, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
The GOP must be laughing their keysters off. Set to lose, now things are looking very good. The Clintons, with their “shoot to kill” tactics haven’t just blown it for Obama but also for themselves. It would have happened to any candidate opposing her, He just happened to be there. What Bill did to Gore, Hillary is doing to Obama. She has helped close the gap in the polls and turned off a lot of voters. If things go her way, many are going to sit this one out.
Posted by: Al | April 24, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
TO: Superdelegates
FR: Obama Campaign
RE: The strongest candidate to face John McCain
DA: April 24, 2008
Who’s the strongest candidate to take on John McCain?
After 45 contests, Senator Obama has won more delegates, twice as many states and territories, and more of the popular vote. He’s won in every part of the country, and has scored victories among every segment of electorate. He’s inspired Democrats, Independents, and Republicans, building an unprecedented coalition of more than 1.4 million contributors. And when it comes to head-to-head match-ups versus John McCain, Obama performs better than Clinton in key states and shows the potential to put new states in play for Democrats up and down the ballot.
Polling data from across the country, from large states and small, reflects the advantage Senator Obama would bring in a race this fall. His ability to expand the Democratic base, and his ability to capture the crucial Independent vote, make him a stronger candidate than Senator Clinton, who would enter the fall campaign with the highest unfavorable ratings of any nominee in half a century.
Big States
• California: Obama beats McCain by 27, Clinton beats him by 23. (SurveyUSA, 2/23)
• New York: A February poll of Clinton’s home state shows her beating McCain by 11, while Obama beats McCain by 10. (Quinnipiac, 3/18)
• New Jersey: Obama and Clinton both beat McCain by 5. (Farleigh Dickinson, 3/30)
• Illinois: Obama beats McCain by 29 in his home state, while Clinton wins by 9. (SurveyUSA, 2/28)
Traditional Battlegrounds
• Iowa: Obama up 7, Clinton down 6. (SurveyUSA, 4/17),
Among Independents: Obama up 9, Clinton down 31. (Rasmussen, 3/31)
• North Carolina: Clinton trails McCain by 11, Obama ties him. (Rasmussen, 4/10)
Among Independents: Obama up 8, Clinton down 16. (Rasmussen, 4/10)
• Oregon: Obama up 9, Clinton up only 1 (SurveyUSA, 4/17) A march poll showed Obama up 6 and Clinton down 6 (Rasmussen, 3/26)
Among Independents: Obama up 11, Clinton up 4. (Rasmussen, 3/26)
• Wisconsin: Obama up 5 while Clinton ties. (SurveyUSA, 4/17) A March poll showed Obama up 4 and Clinton down 4. (WPR, 3/26)
Among Independents: Obama up 17, Clinton up 2. (Rasmussen, 3/26)
• Michigan: Obama trailing by 1, Clinton trailing by 3. (Rasmussen, 3/25) A February poll showed Obama up 8 and Clinton tied. (Rasmussen, 2/17)
• New Mexico: Obama up by 3, Clinton down by 3. (Rasmussen, 4/8)
Among Independents: Obama up 8, Clinton down 5. (Rasmussen, 4/8)
• Nevada: Obama leads by 4, Clinton leads by 1. (Rasmussen 3/19)
• Minnesota: Obama up 14, Clinton up 5. (Rasmussen, 4/22)
Among Independents: Obama up 9, Clinton down 14. (Rasmussen 3/19)
• Pennsylvania: Clinton up 9, Obama up 8 (Rasmussen, 4/9)
Among Independents: Obama down 1, Clinton down 19. (Rasmussen, 4/9)
Making new states competitive
• Colorado: Obama up 3, Clinton down 14. (Rasmussen, 4/19) A February poll showed up Obama up 9 and Clinton down 6. (SurveyUSA, 2/28)
Among Independents: Obama up 9, Clinton down 13. (Rasmussen, 3/17)
• North Dakota: Obama up 4, Clinton down 19. (SurveyUSA, 2/28)
Among Independents: Obama up 9, Clinton down 29. (Survey USA, 2/28)
• Virginia: Obama down 8, Clinton down 16. (SurveyUSA, 4/17)
Among Independents: Obama up 10, Clinton down 8. (SurveyUSA, 3/16)
• Montana: Obama down 5, Clinton down 18 (Rasmussen, 4/6)
Obama down 2, Clinton down 12 (Rasmussen, 4/6)
• Texas: Obama down only 1, Clinton down 7 (SurveyUSA, 2/28)
Posted by: Thinking | April 24, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
thinking,
Is Sen. clinton supposed to win the nomination for obama?
obama has had a pass from everybody,
and the THINKING people-say no-this man is interviewing for the most powerful job on the planet, he should be vetted,
held under a microscope, turned upside down to see what falls out.
everybody is supposed to put their trust in him to do the right thing for everyone-and we the voters can’t even ask him a question-it is not right.
obama would not be in the lead now if the media had done its job.
and i a talking about all froms of the media.
we the voters have let the media set the agenda.-while they have pulled that ond joke on us-telling us to look over
there and we look-they steal this election from us. who is winning-the corp sponsors-cnn-msnbc and fox are not news stations anymore-they are all just a notch above jerry springer-and while they feed all the sensational crap to us
and inbetween the crap-feed us boniva,
viagra, lipator, soap powder etc.
and all of us lap it up day after day and night after night.
mag,newspapers,tv and radio, all in the hands of a few very very rich people, and they in effect decide what the national conversation should be.
once again i will say if the media had done its job in the beginning-we would not be at this point. if any of the things we now know about obama had been know earlier-this race would be between sen. clinton and john edwards,
we had so really good candidates running
people we all knew-this year 08 was to be the dems year-and maybe maybe not
we would really be having a conversation that concerns the american people-but no the media has set this course-and we are just riding it out.
Posted by: jgaw | April 24, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
the majority of the american voters are in political purgatory
Posted by: jgaw | April 24, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
Gosh think he might be telling the American public the truth as opposed to coloring it the way you have Jack?
Again….say it after me….this race is won by DELEGATES…and the supers look at and are lead by the PUBLIC that votes them into office…..they will go with the majority. This race was over a month and a half ago and EVERYBODY who knows politics knew it.
I can post 6 instances where Wolfson stated it was a race for delegates..of course that was when Clinton was ahead…darn don’t ya hate it when your words come back to bite ya?
While there may be a few supers who are so enjoying their 15 minutes of fame the majority of them will go with the person ahead in elected delegates, most states and the popular vote…yes even including FL and MI the Clinton campers are not even cpnsidering the caucus votes….and they are more that Obama has won and yes, those numbers have been sent to the delegates so the only ones still under the illusion that she has the popular votes are those they are still milking for money to pay the campaign debts. 10 million? That just caught her up to almost out of debt. She still owes 5 million more and you can bet the emails will be going out to try to get that paid too.
Go ahead and send her money LOL Actually those of us who know the facts? Are laughing out tails off.
Obama 08
Posted by: Brian | April 24, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
It is funny some one still tried to use OLD polls to demonstrate how strong his candidate was….
First, don’t fall in love with POLLS…..
Second, the tide has turned…look at what happens now and will happen tomorrow…
Posted by: True Truth | April 24, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
“The good news for Hillary Rodham Clinton is that she’s winning a lot of battles,” the essay writes. “The bad news is that the war is pretty much lost.”
———————-
One MINOR thing to notice: when MSM mentioned Hillary, sometimes they spell out the full name (including middle name)…
However, you never saw MSM did the same way to Obama…. Maybe MSM is afraid of his middle name or maybe even Obama is not proud of his middle name…
Every one should be proud of his or her own name because it ws given by the parents and there is nothing wrong with that…
So what are they or what is he afraid of????
Posted by: True Truth | April 24, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
The Public school system ability to teach basic math skills has left some behind.
Why do some Hate MATH more than others?
Posted by: The Commander Guy | April 24, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
Most ultra liberal democrats don’t care about all of baracks baggage:
-James Wright’s “god damn America” sermon,
-Antoine’ Rezco, got barak’s campiagn started, jailed political fixer
-domestic terrorists Ayers and Dorhn
these guys blew up 25 bombs in the US
-bitter small town Americans
-HAMAS in the church bulletin
-he admitted smoking crakc / cocaine
but most mainstream americans / democrats do:
see PA OH vote results and if the media got on barack earlier, he would never have won the earlier states he did…
FOR 16 months hillary got hammered and obama got a free ride… now that some of his skeletons are out of the closet he can’t win dem primary… look at his rresults with PA AND OH DEMOGRAHPICS
smells like mcgovern
and dukakis and gore and kerry.. the ultra liberal democrats are going to give the whouse to mccain…
PA PUTS CLINTON BACK ON TOP
FLORIDA and PENNSYLVANIA are identical demographically speaking.
Barack will be painted quite easily as less than american – wright, rezco, ayers, dohrn, farrakhan, HAMAS in the church bulletin, and the list goes on…
The republican dirty tricks bag is limitless and they can’t kill hillary — her ideas wont die.
Hillary got tough questions for 16 months as the front runner, now obama cant handle the heat unless its from the end of his pipe or cigarette.
no smoking in the whitehouse
and yes … he admitted smoking CRack in his youth…. if hillary did, she would be gone a long time ago…. Hillary fired her campaign manager in NHampshire for talking about it…. though ..the republicans are going to grind him into soup meat, if he wins …
u can’t win in November
WHEN IT COUNTS THE MOST
with out FLORIDA
and PENNSYLVANIA
Obama is electorally doa.
Posted by: voter | April 24, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
True Truth
Nothing else to use other than hearsay.
I have heard all about how Obama is not electable. Based on what? He leads Hillary today. And polls indicate he leads in the GE over McCain and Hillary.
So what do you and Hilary use other than wishful thinking?
Obama08
Posted by: Thinking | April 24, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
Ann from Mo,
I agree with you as long as there is reciprocity from Obama supports and Obama, himself. If Clinton wins the nomination, would you support her?
Posted by: Catamandua | April 24, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
Thinking,
First, please don’t fall in love with Polls… Kerry was polled to beat Bush in 2004 so you knew what happened then…
Second, Obama is unelectable because of his inexperience, his least strength, and he can’t win white votes and other minority votes excluding AA…
Posted by: True Truth | April 24, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
The democratic party is full of dummies, including these superdelegates who still come out and support Obama after his heavy loss in Pennsylvania. It’s absolutely naive to believe that Obama will win the general election if he’s the nominee. So far, there are only two presidents from the democratic party who had been elected twice. What does this tell you? In this country, republicans have a very strong base. In order to beat them, the democratic party has to elect someone who is not too left wing, but moderate or slightly conservative candidate. Hillary Clinton is such a perfect example, that’s why she can do so much better than Obama to cast catholic voters’ votes. Plus, there are many conservatives would rather vote for a white woman than a black man with a middle name Hussain, who has ties with a controversial pastor and a radical underground member.
On top of that, Hillary’s pragmatic and she has laid out many plans to fix the economy and many other issues that Americans desperately need to solve. She’s much more experienced and knowledgeable, so if Mccain wants to debate her in issues, she’s in a much better position. I just really don’t understand what’s in these democrats’ mind? So stupid! I really prefer to be an independent.
Posted by: smartcookie2008 | April 24, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
So now Democrats will be held hostage by the Affirmative Action plan for electing our nominee. Thank you DNC. Since Obama and his wife aren’t grateful for their Ivy League educations, do you think they’ll be grateful for being handed a nomination that is not won with all 50 states participating, and superdelegates votes are threatened, bullied and bought? Since Obama will lose in the GE, will the AA threaten to riot like 1968 then in order to guilt and frighten Americans into giving Obama the presidency? This is the real politics of fear.
Posted by: frisco girl | April 24, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
Very good point: “Cook is of course not always correct. (Perhaps most glaringly, he declared Sen. John McCain’s campaign dead prematurely, saying “the physicians have pulled up the sheet; the executors of the estate are taking over.”)
… Hillary Clinton has defied almost every political journalist in this primary. It is not over, until it is over. Obama has yet to prove that he can win a General Election. And from what I am hearing many of the people who have voted for him are now regretting it.
Posted by: Jesus Francisco Cardenas | April 25, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am
Two-cats:
Obama Won Texas!
Obama 98, Clinton 95!
Posted by: reaganfan | April 25, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am
“Obama has yet to prove that he can
win a General Election.”
I’m guessing that you just didn’t notice that he has already won several general elections? State Senator, U.S. Senator from Illinois, like that?
Posted by: Lee C. ― U.S.A. | April 25, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am
Since Mr. Obama pressed the issue of tax returns….did anybody notice that in 2007, the year he earned the $4.2 million, his meager, but largest contributions were to ONLY black charities? Cheap and racist.
Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | April 25, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am
TCG,
You with the burnin’ house theory. The implication is that somehow Obama owns the house. It’s not Obama’s house my friend. If you check the votes, more Democrats have pulled the lever for Hillary, whether those votes are respected are not. The only house gettin’ burnt down is the one the working class Democrats live in. Surprisingly, their not riding horses and bearing torches this time around, their ridin’ limousines and totin’ lattes, but they look just like a pack of Zombies.
========================================
Obama, completely out of touch with the working class voters!
========================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 25, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am
Vanessa,
Your boss Obama said it was up to the media to reflect the popular vote count. Fact is, ABC News shows it both ways. I know you don’t want to respect the voters in Michigan and Florida, you say that would be against the rules. So be it. Let’s put it this way then. If you add the voters that have not been disenfranchised, with those that were disenfranchised because the Republican party broke the rules, more Democrats have pulled the lever for Hillary Clinton. You can take that fact and shove it where the sun don’t shine my friend.
========================================
SuperDelegates, just say no to bonehead Dean.
========================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 25, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am
Wellican,
You are the only yokel perpetrating that particular math myth. The important thing to focus on is the why. It just leaves a bitter taste doesn’t it, the Obama loss. Obama could not close the deal!
========================================
Obama and BitterGate, we’ll never forget!
Obama is out of touch with small town voters! (He’s a lousy bowler too!)
========================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 25, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am
Let’s play by the rules folks…take it to the convention!
Posted by: LOM | April 25, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am
Democracy is alive the people decide.
thank you pennsylvania for setting the record straight-obama you cannot buy this election. and all your fat-cat party bosses, and endorsers pelosi, kennedy, kerry, richardson, dean, start packing we are coming for you next. by trying to shove ‘your’ candidate down our throats you divided the party, alienated your base, and doomed any chance of a democrat win in november. put the blame where it belongs people instead of on each other. now they are trying to blame negative campaign tactics and the candidates to deflect attention away from them-the party opportunistic hotshots blew it.
Posted by: sonia trevino | April 25, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am
Those Political Pundints that think if obama wins the nomination everyone will come around and support obama are as stupid as believeing Pennsylvanias’ exit Polls. What they are not taking into account is the DNC has alienated two states, treated Hillary unfairly, and sucked up to obama when there could have been a revote. That helped lose me. But, even before that I had listed Candidates in order of who I would vote for in the GE and tust me obama was down the list. obama does not reflect any of my values. I don’t care if he is green, orange, black, or pink, but,anyone that tries to buy an election ,or, anyone that is supported by Maria Shriver, Ted Kennedy, and John Kerry would never get my vote. Anyone that thinks obama is the second coming of JFK is just stupid. Great orator my keester, if its not memorized its uh uh uh uh uh and no one whines like he does. Anyone that thinks Hillary is gonna drop out or quit fighting for the nomination has their head stuck where the sun don’t shine. Hillary’08
Posted by: Beau | April 25, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am
More Good News for Hillary-The Blue Collar Workers know that Bill & Hillary supported NAFTA and fought to give China Special Trade Status. Our jobs disappeared & went out of the Country. If they know better and don’t have the courage to do the right thing. I guess things won’t get better for the faithful blue collars by their own admission. Bill & Hillary made 110,000,000 million dollars during this time. I don’t hear them complaining as Hillary says IT”S ALL ABOUT ME!
The Roman Catholics are just enchanted with the Clintons. Once upon a time President had the opportunity to sign the partial birth abortions bill into law not ONCE but TWICE he vetoed this. The Pope came to speak to Clinton during this time to plead his case for the brutal, skull smashing brain sucking form of killing our babies. This didn’t bother Bill or have any lasting trauma on the Catholics. It seems that they’ve bonded together even closer now. What does all this amount up to?
I guess about 110,000,000 dollars for the Clintons. They seem to be doing quite well and the Roman Catholics get autographed pictures of Bills historical Vetoing of the Bill and they both seem quite content with their place in History.
Posted by: Time for them to go | April 25, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am
timeforthemtogo. the way i remember it hillary has said that nafta needs to be re-negotiated. the way i remember it, it was obama staff that told canada that obamas stated position on nafta was political posturing, wink, wink, don’t worry.
as far as abortion the way i remember it, is both obama and hillary share the same position on abortion. so what you have left is what, they made money? at least they were respectful enough to show up take time off the campaign and welcome the pope at the white house reception, unlike obama.
Posted by: sonia trevino | April 25, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am
nor Obama nor Hillary Clinton will reach the 2025 delegates needed to win, there is no rule that says that the candidate with more delegates wins the nomination unless they reach 2025. It is not a math dilemma it is a dilemma about who can win the general election. Obama is unelectable. Senator Clinton can defeat McCain.
Posted by: Felixdiaz1 | April 25, 2008, 2:18 am 2:18 am
Hey Time For,
The fact that more working class Democrats have pulled the lever for Obama, given your claims, is rather surprising isn’t it? What does that say about Obama then? He can’t close the deal because he’s out of touch!
========================================
Hillary, let’s march all the way to the convention!
We’ve got your back in a floor fight!
========================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 25, 2008, 2:22 am 2:22 am
here, here, westcoastmessenger-yes let’s march to the convention.
Posted by: sonia trevino | April 25, 2008, 2:34 am 2:34 am
Lol @ this guy who says Obama is more electable.
Not today he aint.
This other guy goes thru a long diatribe tap dancing SELECTED states and SELECTED stats.
Go see for yourself all 50 states.
Posted by: tomdavie | April 25, 2008, 2:36 am 2:36 am
By right Hillary should be out of the race now .She had to win PA by double digits and she did not. But in order to keep her in the race the MSM reported it as a 10 point win, when it was a 9.2 according to PA state site,and 9.3 according to CNN.Obama did stop her in PA.Maybe thats why he has been gaining SD.
Obama 08!
Posted by: merle7 | April 25, 2008, 2:43 am 2:43 am
All the young supporters of Barack Obama who view Hillary supporters as old timers who shouldn’t have a say in the political process need to read about a man named George McGovern who ran for president in 1972. All the young “never trust anyone over 30″ crowd supported him, and they joined with the left wing of the party (blacks, gays, women’s libbers, hippies) to push him through as the nominee. In the general election, he only won one state in a landslide defeat to Richard “I am not a crook” Nixon.
And of course it should be noted that the Superdelegates were formed so that a McGovern disaster never again felled the Democratic Party.
Posted by: HoosierSue | April 25, 2008, 3:02 am 3:02 am
obama is just a walking marxist scandal.
every time you turn around it’s something else.
there will be more and more.
by november, he’ll be in a fetal position.
couldn’t happen to a more deserving marxist.
Posted by: so saddened | April 25, 2008, 4:26 am 4:26 am
I agree with Charlie. It all comes down to Indiana. If Hillary loses IN and NC she should drop out immediately. If she wins IN she’ll probably stay in till June but will then realize it’s best for the party to drop out. Either way the democrats will realize that politically both candidates are very similar and they will need to get behind Obama to take the White House. Obama 2008!
Posted by: pt | April 25, 2008, 7:08 am 7:08 am
Hope Sen Clinton bears in mind that it is not about the party but about the COUNTRY.
Hope she delivers this country from an RHETORICALLY GIFTED SCARY unknown or from a BUSH SURROGATE.
Posted by: politicsIsdirty | April 25, 2008, 8:02 am 8:02 am
I just do not understand it. PA was a tailor made state for Hillary. She should have won, she has roots there, grandfather played for Penn State. Had the Mayor of Philly (who was actually no help, since she was destroyed there), the vast majority of other mayors, the governor, and others on her side. She was a 20+ point favorite going in. Yet she won by 9.3% points. Come on now, she basically held serve in PA.
She does not have those home grown factors supporting her in NC or Indiana.
Posted by: Shawn | April 25, 2008, 8:11 am 8:11 am
We will see how she fairs on a equal playing field. I give her credit for holding serve in PA, by any means necessary. However, she clearly does not have the best interest of the party at heart, because it is clear that she cannot win, at least not honestly. She is too far behind and is she is given the nomination at the convention, the Democrats can forget about this election.
Posted by: Shawn | April 25, 2008, 8:13 am 8:13 am
Well-respected, but seeldom right.
How’s that President Kerry prediction working out for Cook? or the McCain is finished prediction?
Obama would lose a national Democrat primary.
Posted by: geevill | April 25, 2008, 8:35 am 8:35 am
HoosierSue
lol
Obama is not George McGovern. Hillary and Mccain may be part of the machine like Nixon… but Obama is not McGovern.
and hopefully we have learned… and can use that argument you just brought up…
Look what the country got for voting for Nixon.
This IS just a case of not necessarily “older” Americans being nervous…but “Old school” politics holding sway over choices …people not recognizing that they have made choices like these before… it is out of this thought process safety on the old school party that we have failed… Bill Clinton was not part of that old school party when he won. Al Gore was (though I love him as a candidate for the President and wish he was the President) John Kerry was…
We have always won when we choose the right nominee not the embedded in the party loyalist nominee.
It is hard to change… that is why Obama is a better fighter.
He beat the Clintons in their own party where here favorables were sky high at the beginning…now you think she is going to win when HE beat HER in her own party … and she is best in the general where her favorables are below the floor?
I don’t care if it sounds “elistist” …that’s dumb.
so the way you convince everyone that Hillary is better is to trash the real candidate of your own party to try and bring his lower than hers? the guy who is the only other person running carrying the torch for these issues?
again…dumb.
Posted by: dl | April 25, 2008, 8:37 am 8:37 am
Geevil
Obama beat HILLARY in HER OWN PARTY.
How do you think Hillary would have won the general where her favorables and pluses are a half …maybe a third of what they were in the primary? She lost with double triple the chances…
so you all are arguing that SHE is the better nominee?
Obama BEAT the CLINTONS …in the their OWN PARTY. How in the heck are you people typing this stuff with a straight face.
If she can’t win with just DEMOCRAT voters and beat Obama…and you think Obama couldn’t win …who has higher favorables amongst those outside the party… how would she ever be a better case to win with independents and republicans thrown in…
are you thinking at all before you make that argument or is it just going from that angry space of wanting your nominee straight to your keyboard …surpassing the logic part of the brain?
Posted by: dl | April 25, 2008, 8:44 am 8:44 am
So now Democrats will be held hostage by the Affirmative Action plan for electing our nominee. Thank you DNC. Since Obama and his wife aren’t grateful for their Ivy League educations, do you think they’ll be grateful for being handed a nomination that is not won with all 50 states participating, and superdelegates votes are threatened, bullied and bought? Since Obama will lose in the GE, will the AA threaten to riot like 1968 then in order to guilt and frighten Americans into giving Obama the presidency? This is the real politics of fear.
PS – Who said Hillary had to “win” by 10 points to “win” – the biased media, the pundits? Only in Obama land can Hillary’s win be labeled a loss, and Obama’s loss, be labeled a win. Wimpy loser.
Posted by: calli | April 25, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am
It is Hillary that can’t close the deal…Obama is taking down the machine.
Change is hard.
Change is even harder when people have fought for the clintons in a defensive position for 15 years.
Posted by: dl | April 25, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am
calli wrote, “Who said Hillary had to “win” by 10 points to “win” – the biased media, the pundits? Only in Obama land can Hillary’s win be labeled a loss, and Obama’s loss, be labeled a win. Wimpy loser.”
—————
Well Calli, she did win, but she only picked up 8 pledged delegates. That does not put much of a dent in Obama’s lead. I assume you are talking about Fl and Michigan again also. Do you not acknowledge the fact that Hillary was not thinking about either state until after her beat down on super tuesday. At this point, I am almost willing to say just give her Florida, but there is no way in H E L L, that she should be Michigan in her column.
Posted by: Shawn | April 25, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am
It is all over, the nomination is over, Obama won and what is happening now is only the side show for us and the media to enjoy. I bet it will be Obama- Clinton against Mccain-Romney in Nov 4, 2008.
Posted by: alexis compton | April 25, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am
Calli looking at the numbers …to say that Obama won just because of AA…is like saying Hillary only got her votes because women 50 and over (a much larger population) voted for someone that looked like them.
There will always be a certain amount of population that is swayed by population… there are a lot more racists than their are African Americans…
and there are as many people effected by sexism as there are people voting for Hillary because she is a woman.
This argument is a moot point.
The only difference is Hillary outwardly uses her being a woman to garner votes.
Obama only uses his “race” or combination of races (that he is both black and white) to answer the claims and accusations on the other side that he is racist or that he is using his blackness…
and you can’t find me a clip that says otherwise.
Posted by: dl | April 25, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am
If Obama does not allow a revote in MI or FL or count the votes, then this primary will be looked at as Election 2000 repeat – Obama steals the election. But that fits Obama’s election MO, he cheats and uses dirty tricks to win! What is Obama so afraid of by allowing two huge states to vote? The democrats living in FL and MI didn’t make these stupid decisions affecting democracy, the idiots at the DNC did? Why does Obama want to punish the people he claims “that we can do it together?” If Obama is listening to “his people” they are asking to vote! What happened to “Americans doing it with Obama together”? Obama is just all BS and we all get it. Threaten to riot, bully, do whatever it takes to get Obama the nomination, but he won’t win in November because Hillary supporters will vote for McCain. That slow drip, drip you hear is Obama bleeding from the mortal wound of Rev. Wright. Hate and racism are so 1960′s. Moveonorg. is the POLITICS OF THE NEOCONS – LIBERAL VERSION!
Hillary is going to the convention!!!!
Go Hillary 08!!
Posted by: calli | April 25, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am
Obama is afraid of brand new primaries being held in Fl and MI.
Obama is afraid of debates.
Obama is afraid of reporters asking questions.
Posted by: geevill | April 25, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am
I am proud to be a supporter of Hillary Clinton. In fact, I’m one of the thousands of new donors just after her PA victory.
What got me was imagining who will be stronger, more knowledgeable and better equipped to make the best decisions immediately (without having to consult countess people because of lack of knowledge, learning curve, etc…)
Obama does not give me a feeling of safety- he will cower in the corner when something happens. THAT is not the kind of president I want.
Posted by: MarkRoanakeRapids | April 25, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am
Calli, so you are saying that it is Obama that is keeping Fl and MI from revoting? Are you sure? Where did you get that from? Was it not disenfrachisement when Hillary signed and agreed that FL and MI did not count. Had she come out ahead on super tuesday like she thought, she would have never mentioned those states.
Do you not acknowledge that point?
Posted by: Shawn | April 25, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am
I stand by what I said… if the Democrats want a landslide defeat in November, they’ll nominate Obama. Just like they did McGovern in ’72. Read it and weep!
Posted by: HoosierSue | April 25, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am
And Hillary is afraid of “Sniper-Fire.”
Posted by: pt | April 25, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am
The arguement could be made that Obama voters decided to stay home in Florida because they knew that it would not count. It was agreed by all Dem candidates that it would not count. No need to change the rules at this point. It would be different if Hillary had went on record as saying how unfair it would be, but she did not. She had no problem with it because she assumed that the nomination was hers because her last name is Clinton.
Posted by: Shawn | April 25, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am
Hillary did not take her name off the ballot in MI because she was angry at the DNC for punishing MI and FL for moving their primaries up, when Iowa, NH, SC and Nevada did as well, and they were not punished. Because Hillary left her name on the ballot in MI, Iowans were FURIOUS with her, and it hurt her in the caucus – as well as the fact that IOWA HAS NEVER ELECTED A WOMAN TO ANYTHING! But now, given that the race is so close, and the PEOPLE OF MI and FL ARE ASKING THAT THEIR VOTES AND VOICES BE HEARD you are saying that it fits Obama’s message of “UNITY” by not allowing revotes in MI and FL – and everyone including the NYT has reported that Obama is blocking the revotes. Obama is running away and hiding from debating, revotes, and answering tough questions about character and connections. If Obama is too wimpy to handle this, if he isn’t tough enough to campaign in MI and FL and try and FIGHT for Americans the way HILLARY WILL FIGHT FOR AMERICANS, then why should anyone vote for Obama in the GE? Obama will never win if his politics of change is to push through radical, liberal left wing ideas. Moveonorg. and Obama should moveon out of the primary and quit hurting the democratic party!
GO HILLARY! Obama is a wimp. Afraid to debate a girl.
Posted by: calli | April 25, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am
The Clinton team is just like the New England Patriots last season, crowned champions before the season started, everyone said they couldn’t lose and no one dared even try.
Her campaign is, and will, end like the Pats did with an effort that was too little too late.
It does make for some good post analysis articles though.
Posted by: Richard | April 25, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am
Calli, do you make this stuff up as you go along? Your responses are comical. Please provide one credible source to support what you just posted. Please know that the DNC and the candidates agreed to not count those states well a year before the primaries started. Hillary did not voice any protest at that time. She did not first mention any outrage until after super tuesday, coincidence? I think not.
Posted by: Shawn | April 25, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am
Hillary is unelectable
Obama08
Posted by: Thinking | April 25, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am
When they are not calling Hillary all kinds of foul names the Obamacans resort to “It’s the numbers. She can’t win because of the numbers.” It’s not about the numbers, it’s about who can beat McCain. The delegate numbers we have come from a nominating process with rules more arcane than the rules for Dungeons and Dragons. (Dungeons and Dragons is a role playing game favored by teenagers, with incredibly complex rules that get argued over for hours.) How can the nominating rules makes sense if Hillary won the popular vote in Texas but received fewer delegates? Also, how relevant is the delegate count, or the popular vote count, if you do not count Florida? Yeah, I know, the rules say you cannot count Florida. Well, I say the rules are wrong. The rules are there to help nominate a candidate who can win. They are not there for the sole purpose of helping the Democratic party drive over a cliff.
Posted by: David H | April 25, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am
David, if those same numbers that you are now discrediting were in favor of your candidate, you would not have any problems with them. Your opinion is that Obama cannot win, you are entitled to that. I respect you for it, this is America, we can have whatever opinion we desire. However, those numbers that you are attempting to discount mean the more people are of the opinion that Obama is the better candidate.
It is the Hillary campaign that is trying to distort numbers to make her the overall vote leader.
She wants to count Fl and MI, but not the caucuses. Wow!
Posted by: Shawn | April 25, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am
You are right Calli, there is no place for rules in our society. People should just be able to make stuff up as they going along, or at least until it give them an advantage. Did Hillary voice any concern about not counting FL and MI at the beginning? End of discussion.
Posted by: Shawn | April 25, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am
calli
most impartial pundits have said that despite hillary and her fans in the state and other… fanning the flames and her hypocrisy…
when the general comes yes …Florida may screw up the dem vote but that has more to do with Florida’s democratic leadership than it does with Barack Obama.
yes many of Hillary’s supporters may sit it out…and that could hurt them…but it may make a difference when thew ar is being proposed to continue and it looks like we may be looking at expanding our military initiatives into other countries rather than shrinking
The Floridians aren’t stupid as you all want to make them out to be.
and Michigan has almost an entire democrat system …governor, and state officials…you think that a state like that is going to go for mccain? in this horrible year?
this is just again…dumb
are more afraid this year of being homeless or poverty stricken or destitute when they get older…and theri are too many reasons why Mccain’s fear argument doesn’t work for him (the nonfocus on Bin laden, that terrorist are recruitting faster ebcause of our image getting worse in the world and another bush foreign policy supporter is not going to get us away fromthat)
This argument will be a non starter…
Hillary has lost (and if she has lost in the dem primary with it being the one place she had strength in her favorability numbers…she would have never had a chance in the general fighter or not)…if you all want to tear down the one candidate who will get us out of this mess go ahead…
but it’s dumb. yes as “elitist” as that statement may be…
it is dumb.
Posted by: dl | April 25, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am
Clintons are just using wishful thinking. Based on what is Obama not electable? Based on what is Hilliary more electable?
Obama is leading Hillary in the GE polls Is leading McCain In the Ge polls and is leading Hillary in the primary.
Based on what is Hillary doing better?
Come on give me some facts, some base on which to come to the same opinion as you.
Without some fact it is just an opinion, useless argument.
Obmama 08
Posted by: Thinking | April 25, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am
David H
Who can beat Mccain?
Obama has beaten Hillary in the primary.
Obama BEAT THE CLINTON in the democratic party…where hillary’s odds were a heck of a lot greater than the general.
He chances go down significantly in the genral with her favorabilities…
She could not beat OBama…and now you argue that she is better suited to beat mCCain
her strength was with dems… what happens to her chances when you intorduce independents and republicans…they go down.
This argument again… either it is oblivious shouting anger …that skipped reason or again just dumb.
If she is such a great fighter why did she lose in her own party! where not a single scandal was brought up from her entire lists of scandals.
She had a low ceiling to begin with (just over 50%) and now she has pissed off half of her own party…how the heck do you make the jump that she is the better nominee to beat McCain
oh I see by trashing the only other candidate that will help end the war, fight to focus on the economy…the one candidate that people’s all over the world will celebrate the night of the Presidency if we elect him.
but you all want your candidate elected so bad you feel you need to trash him however you can (including ways McCain the republican opponent has come out against) to bring him lower than your candidate.
Guess what it may work to bring him down…but he will never be less electable than Hillary…
Yeah it’s about the welfare of the country and these issues…yeah right.
Posted by: dl | April 25, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am
Hillary and Bill are reaching for straws and trying to fool the people in NC and IN it wont work the American people are fed up with the Clintons, Bushs, and the old sneaky McCain Bush want-to-be politics as usual. The American people are to smart for that and will turn the page. The Talk Radio Conservatives “Shook Jocks” want the American people to believe that their for Hillary but they want the fight between Hillary and Obama to continue until November to try and make McBush look good that want work either.
Obama’s state wins 30 lost 15, Delegate count 1715 +/-, Negatives are way down, Better nominee
Clinton’s state wins 15 lost 30, Delegate count 1585 +/-, Negatives way up. Not a good nominee.
Fund Raising Obama beats Clinton or McCain Expediently.
Registering new voters Obama beats Clinton or McCain.
Bring the country together Obama beats Clinton or McCain.
Overall, Obama beats Clinton or McCain.
Race against McCain, Obama better nominee.
Obama all the way!
Posted by: Lookup | April 25, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am
In reality Hillary or Obama could both probably beat mcmore-war. No party has ever held onto the white house during an election year when there was a recession. More and more people are realizing that we are in a recession now and we don’t want to head toward a depression. Obama is the best person to start cleaning up the mess the whole bush-league has caused. Obama 2008!
Posted by: pt | April 25, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am
Everyone has an opinion. And my opinion FWIW is that Florida and Michigan will have to be counted/after a revote primary. Those people can not be left out of the political process. If that is done then once and for all this can be put to bed. As for Cook, of course, he has his right to say this but it is only his opinion.
In the long run we are known by the company we keep. No matter what we say, once the nominee is selected/elected that will reveal how americans felt about all these issues.
So far we have existed in a Patriarchical society, with Nancy Pelosi getting SOTH…that has caused some kind of a shift and for me, I want to see a female President …Hillary has Brains, Beauty and Ballz and she has weathered many storms. Obama is still being tested, he is brilliant, a fine speaker,,,,even if using teleprompters, handsome, likeable but it bothers me that his name used to be Barry S……..and then he changed it to Barrack Hussein Obama and decides to run for the highest office in the land and if his middle name is used we get anxious. How would this play out if he was elected POTUS. Would we ever be able to be critical of him without being accused of being racist. This to me is a huge stumbling block. And the other huge block is how the Right Wing Zealots will portray him if the nominee. You are known by the company you keep. Will some smarmy twit be following his every move, will some crazy go ballistic and do something horrendous, will the convention get ugly ala 1968, how is this candidate going to bring us together if his very candidacy is so polarizing.
Posted by: LL Barra | April 25, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am
Catamandua–yes, I will support Hillary if she wins. I am sorry that I did not include the Obama supporters in my comments, but my concern is that there are so many Clinton supporters that are saying they will not vote for Obama, vs. the number of Obama supporters that say they will not vote for Clinton in the exit polls, but I agree that I should have made it clearer that all should be included in my comments. We all need to get behind the one that wins the nomination because if we don’t, then we all lose.
Posted by: Ann, MO | April 25, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
Hillary is unelectable
Obama08
Posted by: Thinking | April 25, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am
Mgck, you sound like a child, what is with all the name calling. You call Michelle Obama a little, what is really going on with you? Does your mother know that you are on the computer?
Posted by: Shawn | April 25, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am
Shawn I’m a 52 year old woman I can say what I want… I am embarrassed to have the likes of an Obama and his bag of tricks represent me or my people and, don’t you think I’m alone. They talk about the blacks supporting Obama but, what they fell to tell you is that 14% less voted in this primary than past primary’s. I find him sickening to have even played my people in the media the way he has. Oh and Rev. Wright I know about him too. Have known about him since the 80′s. That crap he’s trying to feed the American people that those speeches were 15, 6, and 7, years ago is just that. I have heard tapes that were recorded as early as last year. I don’t feel like this grown man playing with my intelligance. He needs to get over himself.
Posted by: Mgck59 | April 25, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
Pelosi, Dean, Reid, Kerry, Kennedy, Leahy and Richardson are all “HAS BEENS”. Their political careers have been placed on the line by their ignorance in backing a freshman senator with zero to no world experience; who has a 17-20 year history with his personal mentor who is a racist, bigot reverend; and hangs with guys named Rezko and Ayers.
Obama is too “green” behind the ears to succeed as the President of 2008 issues. He has NO strategic plans to address this nation and world’s problems. In Fact, his policies now reflect the Hillary Clinton policies….how peculiar.
Just like his “second hand’ speeches…he cannot think for himself. First he acts two-faced with no integrity re: Rev. Wright (or is it Wrong????) then he steals like a thief just to get elected. WE HAVE 50 STATES — NOT 48.
Americans should not stand back silently. Silence is acceptance. I refuse to do this blindly and with just plain “HOPE” that it will be alright.
Hillary all the way!!
Posted by: Concerned American | April 25, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
The Republicans want Hillary as the nominee because they know they can beat her and have years of dirt on her. Any Democrat who can’t see that and doesn’t have the brains to have figured that one out need to be certified mentally deficient and put in a care home.
Posted by: Jeff | April 26, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am
I understand that the Republicans want Hillary because they know they can beat her and have years of dirt on her. So the pundits say.
That in reality is only half right. McCain is in the same capacity. They both have 35 years of experience in Washington with similar ideologies. On their watch we seen our jobs go overseas, rising costs of living on their watch. Lobbyists love them both, the Media’s darlings. The way they swindle the People.
Why would either one of them want a real change in the way business is done on Capital Hill. They’ve been doing quite well for themselves and lobbyist friends , thank you!
When Mr. Obama came to Washington and now has a chance to bring about a real change, they both become quite upset. Their big contributing Lobbyist Friends have put them under a lot of pressure.
So why have both Hillary & McCain come together fighting to keep Obama out of the White House? You’ve got it! Heads they win – Tails we lose! Just maintain the Status Quo at all costs. So SAD!
Posted by: Fooled ya | April 26, 2008, 5:46 am 5:46 am
At first I was very much & still disappointed with Pelosi, Dean, Reid, Kerry, Kennedy, in backing Senator Obama.
But the opportunity to really turn this country around and get back to doing the work of the American People has never been clearer.
We’ve currently have McCain & Clinton both with 35 years of consorting with Big Business & Lobbyist and amassing large fortunes just to prove it. While the rest of us have become part of their FOOD CHAIN. This clearly shows me what 35 years of experience can do for them and they’re not complaining.
Pelosi, Dean, Reid, Kerry, Kennedy, are not without fault, but in reality are doing the right thing. McCain or Clinton just toss a coin – heads they win & tails you lose again. Our jobs are going overseas, higher costs for the consumers. We just can’t afford either one of them to continue to guard the hen house.
Posted by: Fooled ya | April 26, 2008, 6:06 am 6:06 am
If Obama is nominated the Republicans have it in the bag and they know it. It amazes me how stupid they think the American public is. Do you honestly think people with good sound common sense would vote Obama in. If you put him up against McCain….better hope McCain has a good VP. An elderly gentleman 80 years old, Veteran, white, told me he could never see himself vote for anyone that didn’t respect the American Flag. He stated he’s fought in two wars for this country and doesn’t like Obama not because he’s black but, because he’s not patriotic. Said how could you trust a man to protect the United States if he doesn’t even respect the United States. Now he is the voting generation. The faithful voter.
Posted by: Mgck59 | April 26, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm