Clinton Calls on Bush to Boycott Olympic Opening Ceremony
ABC News’ Eloise Harper Reports: Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., is calling on President George W. Bush to boycott the opening ceremony at the Olympics this summer.
First reported on the Drudge Report, Clinton’s call for a boycott specifically cites China’s reaction to recent violence in Tibet and inaction in Darfur.
"The violent clashes in Tibet and the failure of the Chinese government to use its full leverage with Sudan to stop the genocide in Darfur are opportunities for Presidential leadership," Clinton said in a written statement.
"These events underscore why I believe the Bush administration has been wrong to downplay human rights in its policy towards China. At this time, and in light of recent events, I believe President Bush should not plan on attending the opening ceremonies in Beijing, absent major changes by the Chinese government."
Set to begin on August 8, 2008, the Beijing Olympics have been surrounded by controversy ever since the International Olympic Committee awarded China the Games.
The harsh crackdown by the communist nation against recent protests in Tibet have only intensified calls for boycott.
Clinton did not call for an outright boycott of the Olympics in general, targeting only the Opening Ceremony.
"Americans will stand strong in support of freedom of religious and political expression and human rights. Americans will also stand strong and root for the success of American athletes who have worked hard and earned the right to compete in the Olympic Games of 2008," she said.
Clinton’s call makes her the first presidential candidate to call for an outright boycott of the opening ceremonies although other prominent U.S. politicians including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi have urged Bush to consider such action.
"I think boycotting the opening ceremony, which really gives respect to the Chinese government, is something that should be kept on the table," Pelosi, D-Calif., told "Good Morning America" co-anchor Robin Roberts in a recent interview. "I think the president might want to rethink this later, depending on what other heads of state do."
German Chancellor Angela Merkel has announced she will not attend the Olympic Games. Pelosi, meanwhile, has been outspoken in support of Tibet, the site of recent crackdowns on human rights demonstrators by the Chinese government.
In her interview with "GMA", the Speaker continued to denounce China’s rule over Tibet and expressed regret that the communist nation would play host to the summer games.
"I don’t think China should have gotten the Olympic Games to begin with," Pelosi told GMA. "I had a resolution in the Congress which was very popular, and bipartisan support on it. But they did get them with the promise that they would open up more and have better respect for human rights and freedom of expression. They have not honored that."
Bo
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
touche, hilary, touche.
Posted by: smart move hilary | April 7, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Not a Hillary fan but YES – he should stay away if he had any decency.
..oops, sorry I forgot it was Bush we are talking about.
He’ll turn up!
Posted by: America - A Nation Of Sheep | April 7, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
BREAKING: AMERICAN ELECTORATE CALL ON CLINTON TO BEGIN TELLING TRUTH OR WITHDRAW FROM RACE
Posted by: Bill | April 7, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
Politically motivated to get the focus off her campaign problems. . . She’s scrambling to find something to take the high road on.
Posted by: JW | April 7, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Maybe we should send Obama there and he can give a magnificent speech and the Chinese government will be so in awe of his oaratory that they will stop all human rights violations. When they see how people faint when Obama speaks they will know that they are up against a greater power !!!! Just don’t punish the athletes like we have stupidly done in the past. !!
Posted by: jimbo | April 7, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Hillary is doing anything to keep the focus away from her disastrously mismanaged campaign.
Posted by: Cindy S | April 7, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
TimTom, that was funny. I laughed out loud at work.
Posted by: Nikki | April 7, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
Would be nice if Hillary could shut up for once instead of always trying to grandstand.
Posted by: Patriot 2008 | April 7, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
BREAKING NEWS – Hillary took a poll before deciding this was her decision.
Posted by: America - A Nation Of Sheep | April 7, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
If Hillary went on the game show “The Moment of Truth”, she would fail the very first question. She will go down in history as the nation’s most prolific liar.
Posted by: Linda | April 7, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
I have to say most people in Western countries never go to Tibet and know Tibetans. What you have known is just from a very small group of Tibetans. I have several Tibetans friends in China. Tibetans are treated very well and much better than Han-Chinese. They enjoy their lifes and get along with Han-Chinese very well in China. Dalai Lama just wants to rule Tibet again and have most Tibetans as his slaves. Before you say somethings seriously, please go there and talk to different people and know the truth. Don’t just believe what you heard from one side. Instead, do your own research.
Posted by: Gina123456 | April 7, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
Careful, she may deny she said this later.
Posted by: Don | April 7, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Its easy for her to say this. She does not have to make the final decision.
Remember!! The Clintons are in bed with China, Sold us out to China, Gave China missile information, Took donations from China interests. Give me a break. Do you all think she will jeopardize the money flow to her and Bill?
Posted by: Jim Rod | April 7, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
She lost her strategist folks so cut her some slack. She’s flying without a pilot…:)
Posted by: Elijah112668 | April 7, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
Anyone from America (and probably a lot of other contries for similar reasons) that thinks China should give Tibet its land back should give the land that they own back to the indians before they say anything.
I’m not saying China is right. I’m just saying that the protestors are hypocrites.
Jon
Posted by: Jon | April 7, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
It’s funny for Hillary to say that. She really often makes mistakes in her judgement. It’s not democratic spirit when she uses her own political opinion on sports.
Posted by: Gina123456 | April 7, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
I voted for Hillary in our state and am so ashamed of myself. I tried so long to give her the benefit of the doubt but now it is so clear she is a terrible manager of her finances, her campaign, her people and she cannot tell the truth to save her soul. I cannot believe how wealthy she is and it seems she just wants more. I’m so sorry I threw my vote away.
Posted by: Mary McCarthy | April 7, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
Linda – If you really think Hillary Clinton will go down in history as “the nation’s most prolific liar” then you truly must have been living under a large very well-insulated rock for the past 8 years. Our President holds that distinction, dear; and history will judge him accordingly.
Posted by: Scott | April 7, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
Why would Bush, a fascist totalitarian who has no respect for human rights, expect a communist totalitarian country, China, to respect human rights?
Posted by: Charles | April 7, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
While I applaud all efforts to get Bush to forego the opening ceremonies, I seriously doubt he will heed the calls. After all, he’s going to the Olympics because he’s a ‘sports fan’. If anyone had doubts about whether he ‘gets it’, this statement should have lain them to rest.
What really rankles me is that the IOC bought into China’s promises of reform! China should have been allowed to host an Olympics only AFTER they had shown several years of steady improvement in human rights and civil liberties, NOT on the promise to do so.
Posted by: Bob | April 7, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Bush should NOT skip the Olympic opening. The Olympics are supposed to be a non-political event to celebrate the youth of he world, not a stage for a political platform.
Posted by: jbate | April 7, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
While I applaud all efforts to get Bush to forego the opening ceremonies, I seriously doubt he will heed the calls. After all, he’s going to the Olympics because he’s a ‘sports fan’. If anyone had doubts about whether he ‘gets it’, this statement should have lain them to rest.
What really rankles me is that the IOC bought into China’s promises of reform! China should have been allowed to host an Olympics only AFTER they had shown several years of steady improvement in human rights and civil liberties, NOT on the promise to do so.
Posted by: Bob | April 7, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
I find it so interesting that Obama supporters are so cynical. Why? I don’t see Hillary supporters bashing Obama anywhere near the level vice versa. Are you scared of something? Are you worried that she is always the first one to come out against something? Are you afraid that she always has the ideas and leadership first. That’s not taking a poll thats standing for something you believe in. Human Right’s are important and should be respected by all.
Hillary 08
Posted by: Michael | April 7, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
All she is doing is pandering to the orientla vote!, lets be honest here!
Yes Bush should Boycott but all she is doing is giving her 2 cents worth, which I want back, just a loan to her campaign. She is drumming for the Votes only – typical politics – lets get back to the issues – such as her constant lying
Posted by: ron | April 7, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
Politics should not be projected into the Olympics or other international sporting events. There are other avenues ie the UN to voice these concerns. rwe
Posted by: Robert Enquist | April 7, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
No Jim Rod I see a lot of people who like to linger on meaningless scandals forced on us by consevatives to dishonor two people who have dedicated there lives to make this country a better place for ALL Americans.
Posted by: Tom NYC | April 7, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
I think all first term Senators should stay out of world affairs until they have more experience in the political arena.
Posted by: Tom | April 7, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
Don’ do mean to tell me you believe Hillary had no idea of what was going on with China? She did not know SHE got contributions from China interests? Wow, you have been washed over the side of the boat. This is a lady who is professing she has 11 years of experience? And you say she new nothing? She is the SGT. Schulzts (miss spell) of the democatric party (I KNOW NOTHING!! NOTHING!!) but please vote for me?? Wow Don, Good luck to you and your followers.
Posted by: Jim Rod | April 7, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
Hurry, hurry Hillary!! Change the subject of your lies and millions. You are loosing and you might as well admit it. Goodbye Hillary.
Posted by: Let's Change Subject | April 7, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
Enough is enough! Why must everything be politicized. The Olympics were founded in Greece as a means of generating good will and showcasing athletic talent. Greek city states put aside differences during these games. Stop turning them into a political spectacle. It’s bad enough that countries use it to promote their “superiority”. Perhaps all athletes should compete under the Olympic flag rather than the flag of their nation.
Posted by: SC | April 7, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
Although I protest China’s actions in Tibet and handling of Darfur I don’t think we should penalize our atheletes for the actions of another nation…especially actions that are not direct towards us. There are other ways for us to make our voices heard.
Protest Yes, Boycott No
I’m an Obama supporter.
Posted by: JohnCz | April 7, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
Arm twisting tactics won’t work with China or any country anymore. Let’s grow up. We need to change course on how we deal with other countries.
Posted by: Daniel | April 7, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Hillary is the ultimate in Johnny come lately’s. Does this women ever have an original idea? Maybe one before the poll numbers come out?
Either way this is a catch 22 for Bush. If he doesn’t boycott it, he’ll be criticized for not having any sympathy for the Tibetans. If he does boycott, he will be criticized for antagonizing the Liberals surrogate masters.
Posted by: Nobel_manbearpig | April 7, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
who cares… so the strongest thing you can bring up today on China and the treatment is to boycott the Olympics…
Is this supposed to be some commanding leadership stance. Calling for another official not to go to a sports activity.
That is the big protest and leadership stance on China.
and why today? …how about when this all started happening. How about soon after this all started happening.
Oh that’s right …time to stand up for something because the timing is right and helps her campaign redirect focus.
If you really want to “call” for something make it about a little more than just “the President not going to some opening ceremony”…
Posted by: dl | April 7, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
No Jim Rod I see a lot of people who like to linger on meaningless scandals forced on us by consevatives to dishonor two people who have dedicated there lives to make this country a better place for ALL Americans.
Posted by: Tom NYC | April 7, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
Be careful in agreeing with Hilary too quickly. If it backfires she will change he mind and blame it on you!
Maybe Obama will open his mouth, breathe, and China will stop their human rights violations.
Posted by: Rochelle | April 7, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
Let’s see, Clinton and her remaining staff (those few who HAVEN’T been fired yet) sat around this weekend and decided they MUST change the focus since the last 2 weeks have been a disaster for her campaign as she has made monumental judgement errors).
“Let’s talk about the weather”… “no, how about global warming”, “yea! yea!!!”, “no, how about let’s talk about electric cars should be given more R&D grants”, “Cool!”, “No, let’s talk about AIDS”, “No, overdone”, “Let’s discuss how rich I am”, “that would be another disaster”. “Oh OH OH!! I KNOW!, let’s put out a statement saying that you America needs an HONEST politician! Our flock will BUY THAT ONE!!!”. “Hmmm. no”
Ok, Ok, “First thing Monday morning, I will put out a press statement that will SHOCK the world. This one will surely take the heat off me, at least at ABC “news”… ” I CALL ON PRESIDENT BUSH TO BOYCOTT THE OPENING CEREMONIES”. Ok, that should do it, everyone back to their telemarketing…
Posted by: Jeff | April 7, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
I hereby call on Hillary Clinton to
Mind Your Own Business!
You are Not the President yet and
You Never Will Be!
Typical of the Lowlife Clintons, Always
Playing Politics! Get Lost Hillary!
Posted by: reaganfan | April 7, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
I see mostly Hillary bashing on the China/Tibet Olympic opening ceremonies issue. OK. Then suppose all you Obama supporters write in here and outline Obama’s stance on this issue. Anyone?
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 7, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Ya know I’m so proud of HRC for speaking her mind. There’s no voting present or pressing the wrong button for this Senator. And if you want to talk lies Obama has 68 and counting… or are you not opening your eyes?
Posted by: Bacio83 | April 7, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
I think our President should boycott the opening ceremony, BUT then there should be another ceremony back here to show our athletes how proud we are of them…ALL POLITICS ASIDE!
Posted by: Rochelle | April 7, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
Why does anyone care about the Olympics anymore anyway? The games are a joke now, nothing like they used to be. Just a bunch of doped up morons.
Posted by: Britt | April 7, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
Bush has sent over 4000 americans to their death to support freedom and democracy, yet he will go to be a feather in the Chinese cap. Its fine for them to deny freedom to millions and use force to subdue citiznes.
The athletes can play, but the policitians should stay home.
Posted by: scott jeffries | April 7, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
During the Clinton Administration they did absolutely NOTHING to stop the genocide of nearly 1 Million people in Rwanda, I sure find it convenient that she speaks up now.
Posted by: SF KID | April 7, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
I Misnpipes, I mispoke, I miscellanous, I am sorry Mr. Bush i meant you should go to China; i mean Iraq.
Posted by: Nkoso | April 7, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Tom NYC
we can’t even linger on the scandals because new ones come up every other week…or month…or two months…
This is the problem. You won’t acknowledge as you try to point at Obama’s 3-5 spots that need to be vetted…(“HES NEVER BEEN VETTED…she’s been vetted”)…
that those lingering scandals about two people who dedicated their lives to be politicians… don’t confuse that completely with making this a better place… there is a difference between doing things that will help you get elected and have a legacy…and doing good things for goood things sake…
These people are part of the engine of the system that got us here…the good and the bad…
and their bad we are supposed to ignore by your rules and your defensive posture…
Who has lists as long as the Clintons… we would have to be morons as a country to not look at the sheer number of questions…and you all don’t even acknowledge 1…”it’s the MSM…It’s the Republicans…It’s the Obama supporters…it’s because she is a woman…it’s because Howard dean doesn’t like her… it’s because people are brainwashed by words… ”
This is not the person we want to be leading our country… why are you all so so defensive that yuo can’t acknowledge those scandals that no one is allowed to talk about …ARE the things we should eb talking about yet he is winning without even those.
Posted by: dl | April 7, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
Steve Meyers – What is Obama’s opinion on the China/Tibet issue? On Bush attending the Olympic opening ceremony to salute the Chinese government who take away more American jobs than any other nation on earth?
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 7, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
You go Hillary, and Pelosi you shut up.
This is the right choice, no backing down or voting present. It’s Obama that says he voted wrong, yet pushed the right? button, he needs to join the army and get his left, right dressed right! Pretty serious when your computer doesn’t recognize Obama’s name on the spell check. Is this a RED non-American flag? It doesn’t recognize Pelosi either!!!! HUMMM!
Posted by: carolyne | April 7, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
SC, your comment shows that you didn’t read closely. Clinton wants Bush to boycott the OPENING CEREMONIES, thereby sending a message but NOT penalizing our athletes. I don’t think she wants to strip these people, who have worked so hard to get there, of their right to participate in the biggest sports event in the world.
As to all of those who are saying Clinton is a liar and so forth, you need to provide some specifics before ranting like a crazed person. I am a Democrat and an Obama supporter (for real! I even made calls for him), but this tone is insane. If you debated Hillary on any of this stuff she would tear you to pieces.
Posted by: krol | April 7, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
Amen – SF Kid. I think Hillary said she “suggested” something about Rwanda. Sad. Wonder if she considers those days part of the “peace or prosperity” of the 90′s
Posted by: Annie | April 7, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
Hey Hillary since you’re so outraged by
the behaviour of China are you going to
return the illegal campaign contributions you received from
Norman Hsu, Johnny Chung etc?
If the Chinese Govt is so bad why do you
accept political donations from
Chinese Nationals?
I know you “Misspoke”! LOL!
Hillary Pinnochio Clinton strikes again!
Posted by: reaganfan | April 7, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
DL – What is Obama’s opinion on the China/Tibet issue? On Bush attending the Olympic opening ceremony to salute the Chinese government who take away more American jobs than any other nation on earth?
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 7, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
I do not believe that we should boycut the opening ceremonies of the olympics. This is an event for all of the people all over the world and has got nothing to do with our politics. What China does to their people in their country is their business, now, if it is affecting the lives of our people here in the USA or is damaging our trades with them then we can say “yes”, boycut. Other than that. Hillary! shut the @#$$%^ up.
Posted by: Tony Aquiningoc | April 7, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
Annie – What is Obama’s opinion on the China/Tibet issue? On Bush attending the Olympic opening ceremony to salute the Chinese government who take away more American jobs than any other nation on earth?
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 7, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
Tom we don’t linger on them if they are Bills, Hillary’s or most any Democrate but we do linger if they are Bush’s, McCain or even Romney?
You sound as if you are one that wants it all one way? Bad for us but good for you. All politicians are fair game and when they support China as the Clintons did they are even more open.
Posted by: Jim Rod | April 7, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
How brilliant Clinton is. She’s damaging relations with China even before the nomination. Maybe she should offend Russia, Israel, Egypt, and a few other countries too so that even more of the world aligns against us. That way her defense contractor buddies can get richer.
Posted by: Eric | April 7, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
Tony Aquiningoc – What is Obama’s opinion on the China/Tibet issue? On Bush attending the Olympic opening ceremony to salute the Chinese government who take away more American jobs than any other nation on earth?
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 7, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
It’s amazing the people on this blog that are now against Hillary simply because she released her tax returns. Don’t any of you remember that this is a capitalistic society where education and hard work pay off. The jealousy expressed by people simply because someone else has made more than you is quite repulsive. I don’t support Hillary or Obama (who is also a millionaire) but what has a person’s income got to do with a political position. As I said, pure jealousy. If you’d get off your lazy butts and go beyond your eighth grade educations, maybe you could make some of that money yourselves.
Posted by: BJ | April 7, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
Why is everyone so hung up on being an activist now? I understand the human rights issue, but spend your time and effort on making your own country a better place. I see so many people treat each other like garbage, but then they care (or act like they care) about whats going on in another part of the world. Whats the deal?
Posted by: mj | April 7, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
It is more than sickening to read posts here that blast Hillary Clinton for anything BUT calling on Bush to boycott the Olympics in Beijing. It was the absolute right thing to do. It is not just Tibet, either. Darfur is an area that China could have a positive impact on by stopping the rapes and killing of civilians. But all many of you see is that Hillary beat Obama to the punch, if he ever does punch. Obama is the one that has to see an action in writing, or see it already happening, before he can support it.
Posted by: MJ Corliss | April 7, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
Dogsoldier
You know… right now I do not put if President Bush goes to the Olympic ceremonies above a hundred other issues …including other ways to deal with China.
She knows it is the other story running today because of the torch being snuffed…so she jumps on that PR bandwagon.
I want Obama to stay focused on the economy, trade, Iraq, healthcare and getting this country out of a mess.
I sure as heck don’t want him taking the focus off to call for the President to go to some sports event opening ceremony as some kind of really weak political maneuvering (as much as he shouldn’t go …it’s down there on priority of things that we have to get him to do)…to influence China.
Posted by: dl | April 7, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
Am I the only person left on the earth that see the Olympics and Tibet has two separate issues.
Posted by: dawson | April 7, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
It was Mark Penn’s idea.
Posted by: Jack | April 7, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
In response to Jon’s comment about us giving back land to American Indians if we think Tebet should have its land back – interesting post. Same could be said for Isreal giving back land to Palestineans et. al. But I think the protesters – at least many of them – are protesting the treatment of the Tibetans rather than the not giving the land back – though some may be. The truth is that if you go back far enough, we all took the land – it was just more politically correct to do so before the 20th century. Again, interesting point.
Posted by: Mark | April 7, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
This is not the first time she’s stood up against China – she did so as first lady when she delivered her Women’s Rights/Human Rights speech in China.
Posted by: Jenny | April 7, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
Can we prioritize here for just a moment? What is more important Sen. Clinton’s latest press release telling a lame duck president how to be a diplomat or a press release detailing what she knew about Mark pPenn’s meeting with Columbia and when she knew it?
I for one would like to hear how she plans to be an agent for the change we need in America when a top member of her political team is lobbying for foriegn interest in direct conflict with the interest of the middle class union workers of America.
Posted by: Andre | April 7, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
Sick him Hillary! You’re in the right and we agree with you!
Posted by: irma | April 7, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
dl – China/Tibet is a world problem that any future president MUST address. That’s their job. Seems like there are a whole mess of little people in the world willing to stand up and be counted as per the news. Where are OUR leaders on this issue. You Obama supporters wanted to talk about something besides the mutual hate WE have for each other, well here’s your chance. Same with Durfur. Here’s your chance.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 7, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
I think it’s an excellent recommendation. A few days free from that Beijing air will do the athletes more good than anything.
Posted by: Muzzy | April 7, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
Andre’s right…hands down.
Posted by: dl | April 7, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
Boy, these people are really vicious toward Hillary, give it a rest it is getting old.
Go Hillary!
Posted by: Rick | April 7, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
I don’t see any one trying to impeach Bush for lying to the entire world. and staring an illegal military action against Iraq.
Posted by: Tom NYC | April 7, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
Why don’t we do something that would really send a message and stop buying stuff that is Made In China? Talk is cheap, especially in politics.
Posted by: ddugger | April 7, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
ANYTHING to shift the focus from her campaign!
Posted by: dano | April 7, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
The opening ceremonies are for the political arena anyhow, and it would send a great message if all attending countries would do as such. Just don’t punish the athletes who have prepared for so long to participate. Let the games go on as expected.
Posted by: Carl | April 7, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
Had Bush made the decision to stay away from China before Hillary’s people could tell her what to think, she would have pointed and screeched about an Olympic boycott being a continuation of bad foreign policy.
Posted by: Ed | April 7, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
Keep fighting, Hillary. The mainstream media seems to think you have no supporters which is untrue (MSNBC is the worst). I’m switching to McCain if you lose. I will never, ever vote for the Obamas.
NObama ’08
Posted by: MSG | April 7, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
reaganfan, no thanks I’m already living in a more decent place (Canada).
What’s surprising is the hypocrisy of the Americans and Europeans. All these protesters’ countries have committed and are committing more grave crimes: America (Iraq/Palestine/Somalia) and Ethiopians by either supporting the US or not doing anything at all (after all their leaders did not boycott the US nor have there citizens demanded a boycott).
Posted by: zak | April 7, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
dano – China steals more American jobs than any other nation on earth. You want your president to stand up to China well here’s your chance? Why should Bush salute the Chinese Government at the opening ceremonies? That is if the Obama people really give a crap about American job losses. Well?
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 7, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
Democrats will have to support Obama if he wins the nomination. That is what Hillary would want us to do. She has spent most of her life fighting the Republican agenda that is why she gets attacked so much. Most of the people bashing her in these blogs are really consevatives posing as dems.
Posted by: Tom NYC | April 7, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Another attempt at Hillary to change the subject over the damaging coverage she has gotten over the weekend…. Why doesn’t the news media see the pattern???
And I AM a Hillary supporter!…
Posted by: Sonya | April 7, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
She should focus the problems facing Americans now before looking outside…She is trying to divert the real problem she is facing…by pointing to China now….We are suffering now more than chinese do…poor economy,housing problem…and so forth….Lets not assoiciate olympic games with politics..We need a leader who can bring peace and unity in the world and not separation….Go on Obama bring the world again to America where it was…Restore the dignity of America.
Go On Obama 2008
Posted by: kibs | April 7, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
zak – Perhaps we could ask the Quebec folks what they really thought about Canada, huh? What do you suppose they would say? Or, why do the people in Quebec want to leave paradise? Maybe we could even ask the western provinces what they thought about an Ontario dominated Canada at the expense of the rest of Canada and what do you suppose Alberta would say? What does Danny Williams of Newfoundland say? Were not all stupid down here. Some of us live near the border remember?
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 7, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
The olympics are a celebration of sports and the athletes that have worked a lifetime to compete in and in NO WAY has anything to do with politics. Stop trying to make everything polital an realize what the olympics are before you jump on some boycot polital bandwagon.
Posted by: Randy | April 7, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Hillary once again trying to divert attention. Pathetic attempt!
Posted by: Don | April 7, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
I do agree that China is not the greatest in term of human rights but I have a problem with this strategy. First off, the Olympics is an event meant to bring us together, not raise arguements in regards to differeing social, economic or political policies. The Chinese people have an obligation to stand up to their government themselves for what is right. When are we going to stop dictating to other countries how they should be acting? We have just as much of a responsibilty as China to intervene in places like Darfur and it is even worse that we are using the less than justifable Iraq war as an excuse not to act. I don’t think Senator Clinton would be doing this unless she was losing an election and trying a strategy that makes people look away from how bad her campaign is going. We are so self righteous in this country and we have a responsibility to get out of the Iraq war and improve the lives of Americans before telling other countries how they should conduct their business. Are telling me that we can go to the Olympics in 36′ during Nazi Germany but China is off limits? The IOC is stupid for picking such a controversial place as China but the ones who suffer are the American athletes who have worked their tails off to walk into that stadium and wave the flag of the USA.
Posted by: Tim | April 7, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Hillary is just looking to seek new ways to get across to the masses. She will use this “cause” like any other.
To further herself!!!
And speaking of herself…
I’m ONLY stating what the professionals, news reporters and the majority feeling of the public think. When it comes to the crunch, the up coming question will be – will the super delegates soon overturn the popular vote? They know that if they do, they will divide the party, lose the serious dramatic upsurge in new voters brought by Obama, lose a serious amout of support and votes from the youth of America (the future voters of elections also), lose a VERY SERIOUS amount of possible revenue and lose the confidence of everyone that has supported the majority popular view. Like it or not – this contest is over. The only ones not seeing that are the die-hards that refuse to accept that the voice of the public has spoken. That voice MIGHT be wrong but that we can only tell with hindsight and time. The majority of America have already made their feelings known about Hillary. She can continue to lie, fire more staff, not pay others (due to over spending), flip flop on policies depending on what state she is in on the day (NAFTA is a simple example, there are others) but the truth is the truth weither some refuse to see it or not.
The contest is over. Stop flogging this now NON-contest to death. Enough already! Lets move on and sort of the country, not continue in-fighting. Its ONLY now helping the republican party and thery are dancing at the idea that the opposition is still at each others throats.
Posted by: America - A Nation Of Sheep | April 7, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
I agree with Hillary. It is okay for the athletes to go but the president should take a stance. Wait, it won’t be too long – Obama will jump in the bandwagon soon! He will sniff the wind and will want to be counted too! The guy cannot stand on his own and he wants to be president?? Good Grief!
Posted by: Voter | April 7, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Good job ABC, you took the bait, Hill wants you to take the focus off of Penn and the Columbia issues!!!
Posted by: George Tramms | April 7, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
I dislike the Clintons so much that I cannot give a unbiased comment… but it seems to me that she is trying to change the headlines from Penn and Columbia and the fact that he still is working for her campaign, and all the other lies and dirty tricks she has played and will play if she is given the “nod”. We as a country have had enough of them. Let them ride off into the sunset! There is a 23rd Amendment for a reason… You only get 2 terms as president… not a third (even if by proxy). Please let the Hill-Billys go back home… I am a DEM, but it would be a hard pill to swallow if I had to choose between Hill and the little troll Mccain. I could not vote for her in good conscience. I would be an enabler.
Posted by: Hope4Truth | April 7, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Randy – Are you naive? The Olympics is politics. Have you paid attention to who gets to host Olympics? How ever government involved with host cities do their thing? Notice how the athletics themselves run around with their national flags. Playing of National anthems? And on and on?
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 7, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
Democrats will have to support Obama if he wins the nomination. That is what Hillary would want us to do. She has spent most of her life fighting the Republican agenda that is why she gets attacked so much. Most of the people bashing her in these blogs are really consevatives posing as dems.
Posted by: Tom NYC | April 7, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
So tell me how Obama diverts bad publicity? Just by giving another speech? Are the Obama supporters forgeting that he fired his foreing policy advisor first and he lied about how much he got from his friend Rezko. Not to mention how he ‘mispoke’ about his JFK and Selma connections. Obama is unelectable in the general elections… give it up already!
Posted by: Moses, Seattle | April 7, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Justinteim – I heard about her blatenly trying to steal pledged votes! We are we even bothering to vote if she can just go sway, buy or threaten them to go her way??? The Clintons must go!!!
Posted by: Hope4Truth | April 7, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
I hope BUSHIE goes and takes CHENEY with him and STAYS..Maybe he can destroy China like he has this country.
Posted by: Pat m | April 7, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Obama – You better elect Bill because you have no opinion on China, nor the thousands of American jobs lost to China. Matter of fact, you have no opinion of freedom of Tibet and its people. When do you stand for freedom if at all? And you want to be president?
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 7, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
WHAT HAS OBAMA DONE?!!!!!??
… other than trying to quit smoking?
Posted by: Jackson | April 7, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Grandstanding.
Her husband campaigned heavily in opposition to Bush Senior’s China policy. Yet, under his presidency, the ‘made in China’ age begain in ernst.
You can look it up.
Posted by: Surelock Homes | April 7, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
I’m still waiting to hear what the 35 years of experience entails… I think that claim may be a lame as the sniper fire one. What do you think?
Posted by: Hope4Truth | April 7, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
Surelock Holmes,
The guy that got us launched on relations with China was a Republican, one Richard Nixon. Remember that guy. He was perfect too!
========================================
Just say no to Obama!
Just say no to boneheads in office!
Just say no to cocaine users like Obama!
========================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 7, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
J Robinson – Well it only took Obama twenty years to notice a problem with Reverend Wright. Way too soon for Obama to notice all the American job losses to China or the Tibet freedom thing, Wright?
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 7, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
Dogsoldier, you did not answer my question… I’m still waiting to hear what the 35 years of experience entails… I think that claim may be a lame as the sniper fire one. What do you think?
Posted by: Hope4Truth | April 7, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Dogsoldier,
If you want to equate Quebec separatism (I hope you’re aware that THEY chose to continue to be part of Canada through a referendum) etc. to US crimes against humanity, then I’m afraid you’ve only proved the opposite of “Were not all stupid down here.”
Posted by: zak | April 7, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Good call, Hillary! We need to stand up to China while we’re still able!
Posted by: April | April 7, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
Please tell me this is the “last straw” she’s grabbing at! Enough with this woman, I cant wait till Jan. ’09 when, I dont have to hear this squirrel at the very least,for another 4 yrs!
Posted by: Michelle | April 7, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
WestCoastMessenger
Study your history.
Nixon opened up DIPLOMATIC relations with China but the concept of trade was non existent at that time. Trade was opened slightly under Bush Senior but the floodgates came open under Clinton.
Posted by: Surelock Homes | April 7, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
If he was really championing freedom then this would be a no brainer.
Posted by: Russ G | April 7, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
Brilliant Hillary? And would our olympians would be safe after insulting the hosting government? Oh well consider the source.
Posted by: plas jaramillo | April 7, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
Hope for Truth, How easily you forget the 8 years that Bill clinton served as president. one of the most prosperous times in our history. and legitimate proof that the clintons can get things done and that the republican agend is a failed. but even better proof of that is in the last 7years under Bush.
Posted by: Tom NYC | April 7, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
It is so wonderful to see liberals finally realizing that they have supported liars and frauds. It takes awhile but even they can be taught when they find it convenient.
It is also interesting to note that most of you have issues with the amount of money they have made, not with the actual sources of that money. I suppose it doesn’t matter that Obama and his wife are very wealthy as well?
Oh well, it is just wonderful to see the true “culture of corruption” tearing at each other!
Posted by: SJ | April 7, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
It’s funny how the Obama supporters and the news media have repeatedly called Hillary divisive, but about 90% of the posts here appear to be Obama supporters taking cheap shots at Hillary that are definitely divisive.
You should closely examine Obama’s career in politics and how he was spoon fed legislation to enhance his resume. Id don’t think the guy has had an original thought in his entire political life, but you Obama supporters keep calling for “CHANGE”, and that’s all that’s going to be left in you pockets once he’s taxed us all into the poor house.
By the way, unless you’ve been to China and seen what true poverty is all about, you should not take cheap shots at them. I’ve been there many times, an they haven’t stolen a single job from any country. They are doing work that has been contracted out to them, or in many cases are working for companies that have started from scratch in China. The labor unions in this country have done far more to destroy American jobs than the Chinese have. It’s their turn to be the cost effective manufacturers, so get used to it. The jobs aren’t coming back no matter who the next president is.
Posted by: bj | April 7, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
Tom NYC
The Clinton years were prosperous because both houses of congress were controlled by REPUBLICANS. Clinton hardly participated in running the country.
You can look it up!
Posted by: Surelock Homes | April 7, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
Like Bush will ever do anything to make China mad.We owe them billions. He’ll probably look in the eyes of the Premire of China and say he’s a soulmate just like the Russian Premire.If Stalin and Hitler were still around Bush would have been soulmates with them no doubt. They have so much in common.
Posted by: AJ | April 7, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
What isn’t made in China? You say we shouldn’t buy things made in China so then what do we buy? There would be only a few things we could buy.
Posted by: Laura | April 7, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
zak – US war crimes? You reading the Liberal left wing papers in Canada again? Overdose on Jack Layton? The fact is it is we, the US, who protect your lazy ##### in Canada because you all don’t have the means or the will to look after yourselves. Nor do you have the means to even defend your oceans if we didn’t do it for you. Whimps. If we didn’t provide you people with with the military means you people would still be using muskets.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 7, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
When you look at Clintons Senate record, there is very little of substance, only a few pork barrel items. Now she is calling for a boycott of the Olympics opening ceremony. Now this is an achievement.
Posted by: John | April 7, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
China is lending us the money for the Iraq war. Where does Clinton think she is going to get all the money for her promises if she gets in office? I know she’s trying to score points but really, she is too reactive. If China is shamed by this, what all that money dry up.
Posted by: Right on Day1 | April 7, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
It is obvious Ms Clinton has double standards. She is critising China about the lack of freedom – but at the same time US forces have occupied Iraq and imposed their own rule there. If the US is sooo pro-freedom how is it does not stop fighting all over the world? Was the occupation of Panama for the sake of Panama’s freedom or to capture a former CIA operative? The USA invades the island Grenada, just because it does not have the power to fight back? Learn from your own history Ms Clinton. All wars fought in the name of ‘Truth, Justice and the American Way’. The American Way is world domination nothing else.
Posted by: Jeddy Khan | April 7, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
Right on Day1 – Then where is Obama going to get all HIS money for HIS promises?
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 7, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
Jeddy Khan – So what is Obama’s stance on FREEDOM? On American JOB losses to China? On the Tibet issue? On Iran nukes? On Durfur? On abortion? Perhaps we could start there.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 7, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
Dogsoldier,
Where you’re a responsible member of the international community, you don’t need the level of protection you refer to. A medium sized army will suffice.
On the other hand, when you commit war-crime upon war crime against countries that have not in any way provoked an attack, then you need all the arsenal in the world to protect yourself (such is the case of the US of A).
Posted by: zak | April 7, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
Hillary, I don’t remember hearing any complaints from you about China when Bill was taking illegal campaign money from Red China in 1996 in return for satellite guidance (now ICBM guidance!) technology.
Posted by: carl | April 7, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
zak – As opposed to having NO OPINION like your country on a constant basis? Face facts, Iran has more international clout than you people ever will and they’re a dictatorship. Or Syria. Or North Korea. Even Mugabe makes you people look like amateurs on the world scene. You’re mixing with an unsavory crowd there fellow but then again that’s the kind of regimes people like you admire.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 7, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
How about the 500 million in donations to Bill’s library? Think there might be some favors attached to that? The Clinton’s are frightening and teh thought of 4 more years of their deception actually sickens me physically..
Posted by: Rob | April 7, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
The only problem I can see with bush boycotting the Opening Ceremony is the fact that once we anger the Chinese, its difficult to cooperate or even change their minds afterwards. How can someone sit down with the Chinese and change anything if they are angry? A group of people willing to talk and compromise should be sent there to discuss and assist. Let’s make the Chinese countries our friends, instead of alienating them. You can tell them clearly the problems you are upset with, however, alienating the Chinese is not going to change their way of doing things. Talking and diplomacy will go further than a spectacular insult to their respect. Oriental countries work to “save face” and insulting their country in front of the whole world is not going to endear us. How will they listen to anything we have to say if they are insulted by us?
Posted by: Willow | April 7, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
What an absolute joke! Not only because the Clintons have long-standing ties to red-china, and have made the world less safe through dangerous technology transfers to them. But Hillary is also has China’s official endorsement for the presidency, and we all know how much money they’ve funneled into Clinton campaigns and the DNC in general!
A complete and transparent joke!
Posted by: squeenter squillo | April 7, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
Our cozy economic relationship with totalitarian China (note the real application of that adjective) began under the Clinton administration. It would seem to me that Hillary has no problem pointing out all the ways her husband was wrong… now.
But look at it this way: our economic enabling of the Chinese is producing classes within their “classless” society. People see the massive wealth that is entering their country that is serving to enrich the political elite. The underclass is starting to demand access to the goods and services of the Western world as compensation for producing that wealth. Strife is growing as conditions worsen, and they are worsening.
One has to remember the successes of waging economic warfare agains the Soviet Union.
Posted by: SJ | April 7, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Dogsoldier,
It’s interesting how you equate notoriety with clout. The countries you’ve listed are human rights abusers and mostly featured in the news for exactly that reason (except for Iran in which the main reason it constantly appears on front pages is not for how it abuses citizens but because the media is mentally preparing the masses for a US invasion and occupation).
Believe it or not, the US is in the same league as the countries you’ve listed.
Posted by: zak | April 7, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
SJ – Reagan put the Soviets into bankruptcy with his star wars plan and with the economic might that is America. Today OUR economic might is severely under stress. Yes, China is funding OUR war because we cannot fund it ourselves. And that is the danger of a China today. They have the economic power to severely hurt us if they suddenly called in ALL their debts.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 7, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
The Olympics are a sporting event. It’s where the world is supposed to set aside their differences, their politics and their prejudices and come together for the purpose of healthy competition and national pride in their respective countries. Boycotting the Olympics opening cerremonies brings politics in where politics do not belong. Hillary is just trying to deflect the attention off herself because everytime you turn around recently, one her people is jumping off her sinking ship. One of those things that makes you say, “Hmmmmmm…..”
Posted by: MrsS2rt | April 7, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
As usual, Hillary sets the tone and policy of this race and Obama is sure to follow after her claiming his “idea” is mostly the same, but better, because it’s Obamabetter. Hillary demonstrates once again that the woman in this race is the true leader. Of course, the major media won’t portray it that way because their news coverage of Hillary is SEXIST!
Posted by: rs | April 7, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
Hillary is such a fake. Where is her denunciation of chinese government operatives Norman Hsu, John Huang and Johnny Chung and their Clinton Campaign contributions.
Posted by: Templar | April 7, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
If Bush goes to the opening ceremonies he’s, in essence, agreeing with the Chinese actions against Tibet and Darfur. That means, he’s standing alongside in support of the same government who abuses the people of both Tibet and Darfur. China is also displacing millions of its own people to build this Olympic Village. These Chinese are now homeless and street people. I hope Bush realizes this too will become his legacy. Shame on him ! As Americans, we will bear that same shame!
Posted by: soose | April 7, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
Whoa doggy!
Our economic might is hardly waning and China would be foolish to shoot the mighty cash cow that is the USA. They need us just as much, if not more, as we need them. It is simplistic, and wrong, to believe that China can “call in” the debt owed. It doesn’t work like that.
What is the issue is China’s rising unemployment, their rising inability to feed their own citizens, and the inability to maintain total control over a population that is getting more technologically savy and empowered. Things are coming to a head and the old Marxist utopia will soon be unable to keep the screws down on their population.
Economic warfare is not just about outspending your enemy.
Posted by: SJ | April 7, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
Michelle – Spring is here? Nothing’s happening on this end. Maybe things will get better for me if PA votes for Hillary? I can hope can’t I?
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 7, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
Why are people protesting the Olympics? China hosting the Olympics seems like a step in the right direction to me. I don’t get it. If the Olympics in China fail, how does that help the U.S. or anyone else for that matter? I didn’t even know that Bush had plans to go to China. Do you realize what a nightmare that would be for the Secret Service? Of course, Bush went to Iraq, so I guess nothing is off the table. Still, I don’t think people should be protesting the Olympics. There must be another high-profile way to protest. I think protesting the Olympics will be counter-productive.
Posted by: Sean O'Brien | April 7, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
Hey Dogsoldier. Wright who? Lol. It’s over dude.
Posted by: J Robinson | April 7, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Why should we boycott the Olympics to issue a political statement? I agree with ESPN commentators when they say that this is a time to celebrate athletes and their hard work as opposed to making a political statement. If you want to comment on the problems with China, why not do it on your own time, instead of stealing the spotlight from those competing.
Besides, boycotting the Olympics isn’t going to send any kind of message. Why don’t we boycott goods from China to protest? That seems like a much more logical and effective way to go against them, rather than using a sporting event. Why didn’t we protest Major League Baseball playing an exhibition game in China?
Posted by: Me | April 7, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
And a boycott worked so well in 1980 when Carter and the Democrats boycotted the 1980 Olympics in Russia (or U.S.S.R. then) and they turned around an boycotted in 1984 in LA. That really showed them! Just go to show that Clinton and Democrats will say anything to win whether it makes since or not.
Posted by: wendypryor | April 7, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
This is no place for politics. These are athletes. It is crazy to try and do something at the Olympics to try and change a country – any country. All you do is hurt the athletes who are trying to complete after years of hard work to be the best in the world.
Posted by: Mike | April 7, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
FDR wisely stayed out of the boycott olympic fray.
Athletes are not political pawns!!
The athletes will speak for themselves and if they don’t want to go that is up to them, not G. Bush or anyone else.
Posted by: Dwayne G | April 7, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
wendypryor – Hillary just wants Bush to stay home for the opening ceremonies ONLY. Not boycott the Olympics. The bad air in China will cause enough problems for the athletes without a boycott.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 7, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
I HEAR THAT OBAMA IS TRYING HIS BEST TO BECOME PATRIOTIC NOW. I DON’T KNOW ABOUT MICHELLE WHETER SHE WANTS TO BECOME PATRIOTIC OR NOT. WE SHOULD SEND OBAMA TO CHINIA AND HE CAN GIVE A SPEECH AND ALL THE PROBLEMS THAT CHINIA IS HAVING WILL BE GONE.
Posted by: S4B0 | April 7, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
Musta done well with Penn’s Polling
Posted by: The Commander Guy | April 7, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
I voted for her in primary, but she will loss my vote in general election.
She does not understand the current issue of Tibet and China.
Posted by: Amer | April 7, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
Thanks Hillary..Now I know who I’m going vote for now. Go Obama.
Posted by: lol | April 7, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
Senator Clinton,
Shut up.
Posted by: Willy | April 7, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
I have never read such a bunch of misinformed and hate filled comments. Hillary Clinton has repeatedly spoke out about human rights abuses by China for years. In 1995 when china was far less open with the rest of the world Hillary Clinton attended the womens forum in Beijing and spoke forcefully about womens rights and human rights. She went to China and confronted the chinese about human rights abuses both there and around the world, there was a huge political furore about wether she should have attended or not, Hillary Clinton stood her ground and made a stand for women in one of the most repressive countries in the world, that is a true leader. She is calling for a boycott of the opening ceremonies not the games, france are also thinking about boycotting the opening ceremony. As for Obama he can’t decide what he wants the US to do as per normal he can’t make a stand on any issue, I’m sure he will come out on the side of Hillary Clinton in the next few days since she has already made stand and then all you Obama supporters will be jumping up and down about how the US should boycott the opening ceremony. Since you can all use the internet try to do some research before you write your hateful remarks and denigrate Hillary Clinton all the time, you are showing the rest of the world an extremely ugly side of America.
Posted by: angela | April 7, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
I underestimated her — release tax information on Friday at 4:00PM, shake the campaign up, and then on Monday call for a boycott of the opening ceremonies…
Great smoke screen, who remembers anything about putting money into her own charity now?
Posted by: Alexb122 | April 7, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
Way to go, Hillary! I agree with you! You are always putting America first as you should….the sign of a GREAT President! Keep it up, in just a couple of months you will be the Democratic nominee! BTW, tell Obama that he needs to be quiet, we wouldn’t want his Muslim financiers to get mad and quit donating to his campaign!
Posted by: david from texas | April 7, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
Hillary is dictating foreign policy before she secures her party’s nomination? Doesn’t she realize that Jimmy Carter is the official Democrat armchair quarterback?
Posted by: Karl | April 7, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
Hillary is dictating foreign policy before she secures her party’s nomination? Doesn’t she realize that Jimmy Carter is the official Democrat armchair quarterback?
Posted by: Karl | April 7, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
“I think boycotting the opening ceremony, which really gives respect to the Chinese government, is something that should be kept on the table,” Pelosi, D-Calif., told “Good Morning America” co-anchor Robin Roberts in a recent interview. “I think the president might want to rethink this later, depending on what other heads of state do.”
I think this statement, by Nancy Pelosi, exemplifies the weak resolve of the Democratic party that has allowed it to repeated concede power to the Bush Administration. “I think” and “should be kept on the table” and “might want to rethink” are very ambivalent statements. The leader of the Democratic House should figure what position the party will take, and take it, no ifs ands or buts.
Clinton’s willingness to boldly make this statement demonstrates she has the decisiveness to effectively deal with the Rovian tactics of the Republican party.
It’s easy to argue she’s only doing this because she’s trailing Obama in the delegate count, but there was nothing to prevent Obama (or McCain) from the making the same statement on their own.
Posted by: ilyon | April 7, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
Hillary wouldn’t give up the opportunity of going to the Olympic opening ceremony in China if she were the president of the United States. No doubt, she is trying to do everything desperately hoping a miracle for her campaign would happen, a common behavior all losers have.
Most people supporting Tibet independence in western countries recently are misled by many bias reports from some Medias including CNN. For example, CNN unprofessionally used videos of Nepal’s policemen arresting some monks in the reports of Tibet riots recently. The following link exposes many ugly Medias in the recent reports of Tibet related issues:
http://www.anti-cnn.com/forum/en/forum-2-1.html
Beijing Olympic Game is only 4 months away. It is for sure that in such a sensitive time, Chinese government wouldn’t do anything that would cause any demonstration in China.
However, it is the best time for those anti-Chinese government groups to take ugly actions which are happening now during the Olympic relays in Paris, London and San Francisco. Hilary’s calls on Bush today will cause severe damage to her campaign. At least, she lost my support instantly.
Posted by: JD | April 7, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
Hillary is grandstanding. Again.
Posted by: Surelock Homes | April 7, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
Surelock Homes said: “The killing of babies is OKAY. It’s the woman’s right to choose.”
_______
I’m sure Chinese government uses similar logic when justifying the atrocities, carnage and human rights violations in Tibet
…So where does ANY liberal have ANY moral authority to tell China how to behave when you’re all perfectly content to Brutally Slaughter MILLION of innocent American babies on demand???
It’s LAUGHABLE to witness this faux “moral outrage”, coming from far left liberals like Hillary (et al).
Hypocrites! ~ Every liberal in America…
Every last one.
Posted by: James TK | April 7, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
THIS IS JUST A STORY HILLARY PUT OUT TO TRY TO GET PEOPLE TO FORGET ABOUT THE TALE SHE TOLD ABOUT THE WOMAN WHO DIED BECAUSE SHE COULD NOT RECEIVE TREATMENT BECAUSE SHE HAD NO HEALTH INSURANCE.
THE STORY TURNED OUT TO BE FALSE.
EITHER HILLARY KNEW IT WAS NOT TRUE OR SHE SHOULD HAVE KNOWN. IN EITHER EVENT, SHE AGAIN SHOWS A LACK OF JUDGMENT.
Posted by: rhbate | April 7, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Hey Willy, how do you know all these people are Americans? Freedom of speech – learn about it. Stop attacking people who have a different opinion than yours.
Posted by: Matt | April 7, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
Beijing was awarded the games when Clinton was still in office, and the situation in Tibet was around long before that. Why is Clinton speaking up only NOW about the games, after the public began making a (futile) noise concerning the boycotts? Why didn’t she speak about boycotting the games when children were playing with toxic toys and pets were being poisoned just months ago? I used to think Carter was a gutless wimp for (llegally) prohibiting the Americans from participating in the 1980 Olympics, but the grandstanding of this desperate and opportunistic junior Senator makes me want to retch at times.
Posted by: Publius | April 7, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
A boycott is a boycott, not a halfcott. Buying items from CHINA to the tune of BILLIONS a year makes you unable to boycott them, is this not completely obvious? Bush not going to the olympics just plain stupid. He should go and then tell the Chinese government to put up or shut up.
Posted by: Austin | April 7, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
Surelock – it’s difficult to tell the difference these days.
Liberals liars (redundant) like Hillary (et al) will happily justify the brutal massacre of MILLIONS of American babies, yet work themselves up into a political frenzy of moral indignation so long as they can take a hateful cheap-shot at the President in the process.
Honestly, the ‘Willful Ignorance’ and the ‘Blatant Hypocrisy’ of the leftist liberals has been so incredibly excessive these days that it becomes difficult to separate hyperbole or parody, from their deeply hypocritical viewpoints.
Oh well…
Should we expect anything else from a political party that is Driven by HATE – and Consumed by FEAR?
Posted by: James TK | April 7, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
Great posting…Angela…I totally agree. Instead of people understanding what she is trying to do…all the Clinton haters do is spew hatred just like Wright. I don’t know why they hate Clinton soooooo much. Hillary might not be perfect but she is the best presidential candidate we have.
Posted by: bpatz3 | April 7, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
Hillary hasn’t been someone to respect since she stole the goodies from the White house on the way out and trashed what they didn’t take. She left behind a first-lady legacy that will long be remembered — Whitewater, Travel gate, a naive and expensive health care proposal. Just to name a few.
She has no character. But then again, neither does Obama. How could the democrats pick such turkeys? How can they willingly overlook their obvious faults? For what princple?
Posted by: Surelock Homes | April 7, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
I applaude Sen Clinton’s advocating the boycott of the opening ceremony but not the whole event. We need to send a strong message/warning to the Chinese government that we disagree with their abusing human rights. However, we also need to continue encouraging them to open their market and socity, by giving them the opportunity to be a prominant and positve role on the world stage, such as this coming Olympics. Great call, Hillary!
Posted by: Vickie | April 7, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
Since Clinton is calling on President Bush to boycott China, I wonder if that includes her having to give back all those Chinese donations she and hubby have taken?
Posted by: Brian Schmidt, New Jersey | April 7, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
Chinese donations she and hubby have taken?++++++++++++++I don’t know maybe we should give back all the money we borrowed from them to,,,,,,,,,,bet they would like that,,,,,,,,since Bushes new stimulus comes out of borrowed money from china, or maybe we could give back the money they loaned the banks to keep us a float, how about that,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Posted by: backoffnewscensors | April 7, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
Hillary,
Give me another day to take a few more polls and then I’ll tell you what you should say about this tomorrow. By the way, our strategy of making it look like I quit seems to be working. On the other hand, I’ll need some more kickbacks since the Columbians are now angry with me. Maybe you can float me a “loan” from the Clinton library fund. Great idea to call that a charity on your income taxes!
Posted by: Mark Penn | April 7, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
Without her now-disgraced strategist, this is just weak political posturing on her part. I agree with her, but she is in no position right now to tell any president what to do … unless she becomes John McCain’s running mate.
Posted by: Mokopane | April 7, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
I say every one needs to go back to the countries of their forefathers, and give the Indian back THEIR land, at least they respected it , and loved it, and they had a better way of picking leaders. the strong one leads,
Posted by: backoffnewscensors | April 7, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
Pelosi:I don’t think the chinese should have gotten the olympic game for the first place.
Of course this is natural coming from a person who has the bloods of racists who implemented 60 years of Chinese Exclusion Act after the western railroads were built. No wonder she is so close to Dali Lama, who wanted same Acts to be implemented.
Posted by: Frank Lau | April 7, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
Desperate to the deflect attebtion from the Mark Penn fiasco. It won’t work. Reports say that Penn is still on the payroll and is actively working in the campaign. He was on the daily conference call with the media again thhis morning.
Posted by: Bob, DC | April 7, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
blah, blab Desperate to the deflect attebtion from the Mark Penn fiasco. It won’t work._______________what is attebtion? He is not in the lead who cares, it is her money, not yours, Obama gives yours to Mr Wright,
Posted by: backoffnewscensors | April 7, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
Bush made lots of mistake, make him unpopular, but he is honest. He knows all the uproar about tibet is just a gimmick to needle china to be less independent in their foreign policy, he can’t win the debate with the chinese on real issues.
Hilary Clinton is naive, she didn’t research the issues in depth, just play to the gallery of naive voters.
Posted by: Frank Lau | April 7, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
Some people in the USA are so naive. Before China invaded in 1950, the Tibetans were servants to the Lamas. The Dalai Lama is a phoney. He wants his slaves back. The Chinese government bring the Tibetans freedom and modernization (just like the USA does all the time). To attack China for not supporting the the separation of Tibet, the USA must support: giving back the American southwest to Mexico, allow the confederate states to setup their own country, rescind the unconstitutional Louisiana purchase, and redo the borders with Canada in favor of the latter; “54-40 or fight”. On an International front, the USA must favor the separation of the Basques from Spain, Chechnya from Russia, and Scotland, Northern Ireland, and Wales from the UK.
Posted by: TigerStar | April 7, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
James TK+++++++++++++++++Ok let me understand, we are trying to stop that kind of stuff in Iraq, and every one says we need to keep our noses out of every one else fights, yet we are up in arms over what is going on in china, It is ok to tell who you want to tell what to do, but not who bush wants to tell what to do. we either mind our own conflicts, are we police the world, which is it?
Posted by: backoffnewscensors | April 7, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
Headline grabber. Cheap campaign trick, not sincere as usual.
Posted by: robby10001 | April 7, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
Last throes of the Hllary Clinton campaign.
Posted by: Bob, DC | April 7, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
Many of the comments are by people who don’t understand what the Olympics are about. The games are not to be used as a venue for political statements, but rather as a place where the international community can compete in a positive way. If you don’t like what China is doing, take it to the United Nations. We Americans would consider it bad taste to use our sporting events to conduct politcal agendas, so why should we hold the Olympics to a differet standard?
Posted by: FYJIMOJO | April 7, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
I think Clinton is wrong on this. I think the olympics should be kept a peaceful opportunity for everyone. To boycott it would only make it a political arena which it is not. The athletes who have trained for this deserve to participate in peace. Perhaps the Preident should make a statement supporting the olympics as a peacekeeping effort. The time to object to China having the olympics is long long past. Peaceful partitipation by all may increase negotiations with China to the point of bringing about changes within China. I do not think protests would help in any way. And would just cause violence. The olympics does not need more violence fouling their history.
Posted by: AnnD52 | April 7, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
What the heck?
China does not torture prisoners at Guatanomo. May be China should import some CIA torturer.
This is stupid – China is on the right side history. Tibet has always been a part of China. Forget it people, you can’t steal Tibet from China.
Posted by: Uppity Guy | April 7, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
Considering how much we buy from China, it seems to me a boycott means very little.
Prestige maybe, but what is that when they already owns us and we send them billions in trade?
Posted by: Thinking | April 7, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
irma;
What does “sick him Hillary” mean?
Your post makes no sense!
Who is “we”?
Does the Clinton Campaign give you
a script to read and then post on the blogs everyday?
Posted by: reaganfan | April 7, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
Would somebody kindly tell me to what extent are we to allow our hipocricy to go on? Who are we to tell the chinese what to do if we can’t even allow the freedom of expression to our own people to post a simple blog?
Posted by: ruthmatters | April 7, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
clinton was calculating some thing that might be help. it’s wrong judgement.
Posted by: brightofeyes | April 7, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
If she is so set on boycotting the Chinese, then why didnt she and Slick Willie boycott the campaign money that came to them from China? Can we say hypocrite?
Posted by: Eric | April 7, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
Who the hell is Hillary Clinton to tell Bush what to do?
Posted by: G | April 7, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
Hillary gave a big speech in the 1990s in China, and at the time, there was a huge discussion about whether she should go given their human rights abuses.
However, because it was a big stage, she went.
Hillary is a hypocrite.
Posted by: Keif | April 7, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
I have personal friends who were boycotted in 1980. They can’t get it back. They work for years to make the team and then don’t get to go.
This is not supposed to be about politics.
If you are looking for an Obama supporter, Obama would probably just “HOPE” the problem would go away, then “CHANGE” his mind after the polls show that Americans wanted something else.
Posted by: teachthem | April 7, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
Bush Calls on Hillary to Boycott American, as well as Human Race.
Posted by: taad | April 7, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
She will loss my vote in November, just like she voted yes on Iraq war based on misled information, she is wrong again based on misled information on Tibet vs. China. Does she know that before 1949 Tibet was a slavary society? DaLai was the largest slave owner in Tibet?
Posted by: Amy | April 7, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
Hillary Clinton went to China and gave a speech on human rights violations to them in their own country. How does that make her a hypocrite? I think that makes her a pretty damn brave person, someone I want as my President. Please name me one brave thing Barack Obama has done in his entire political career. I’m waiting……..
Posted by: Grammy Barb | April 8, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am
I personally think Mrs. Clinton is wrong in her want of a boycott of the Olympic Opening Ceremonies. It’s time for sports to be sports and politics to be just that, politics. Why debase one with the other. I, myself am getting tired of candidates out there using these venues to get their political agenda in the news. I think this detracts from the point of the Olympics which is and has always been the pursuit of athletic excellence!
Posted by: John Lukes | April 8, 2008, 4:53 am 4:53 am
The world needs to know that Tibet deserves some freedom and autonomous existence, however it is not enough reason to disrupt our hard earned rights to host the Olympics. It is not enough for Hillary who has lost my vote to call for a boycott. I hate liars, she is making the case for Tibet on hypocritical notes. We all know she is trying to score cheap.
Posted by: Concerned Chinese | April 8, 2008, 5:51 am 5:51 am
If Hillary says anything, the Obama supporters always say it is for political reasons. If she says it is a nice day, then they say, ‘she’s saying this for political reasons’ It getting really silly out there. Boycotting the opening ceremony is one way to show that we are opposed to the government that is sponsoring the event, not the athletes. Obama should quit waiting for Hillary to be against or for something before he makes up his mind. During debates, he says that Hillary is right because he understands that most of her positions on issues are dead on.
The olympics do not really mean anything any more. When the olympics started, even if the Greeks were at war with each other, the wars stopped during that time. The only thing the olympics are for is bragging rights. Athletics of any kind should be a diversion, just like movies, from normal life. It is an escape for a few hours or days. They have no other use.
All people should unite behind something. But it should be important issues, not a bunch of games.
Does anyone else find it strange that Obama has missed two of the most important Aferican American events, the State of the Black Union and the 40th rememberence of the death of Martin Luther Kind? He was too busy to attend because he was campaigning, but he took about 4 days off for a vacation before the King event and took off Monday, just after the event. Hillary went and people say that she is pandering to the black vote. If she hadn’t gone to either of the events, then she would have been called a racist. Did he not go because he doesn’t want to be seen with a black audience and remind everyone of his biggest supporters, or doesn’t he want to be associated with Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson.
Posted by: Paul from Texas | April 8, 2008, 7:21 am 7:21 am
Okay in the interview she once again refers to the Canad story and Free trade, ummm did Robin miss the opportunity to mention the fact when this story hit Canada’s press they said it never happened.
What happened here, are you all going to let her perpetuate her lies?
Lets be a little more critical in our reporting please. If we are going to let the candidates speak with out critique we are asking for them to use it to speak mistruths about another and the news will turn into another slander pulpit, like their ads.
A.
Posted by: Autumnblu | April 8, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am
It seems obvious that Obama would be the first to come out voicing for a boycott of the opening ceremonies by Bush, considering his backing by moveon.org and other liberal organizations. But it is Hillary Clinton, who has already gone to China to fight for human rights, that is the FIRST CANDIDATE to take a stand and make a statement. That is because WAFFLEBAMA does not know how to take a stand on controversial issues that put him in the spotlight. OBAMA FLIPS, OBAMA FLOPS, OBAMA VOTES PRESENT, OBAMA SAYS OOPS I MADE A MISTAKE ON MY VOTE, I NEED TO CHANGE IT NOW…FLIP, FLOP, FLIP, FLOP, WILL THIS MAKE ME LOOK GOOD???? I NEED TO LOOK GOOD!!!
Posted by: rs | April 8, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am
What Hillary said adds to the perception of her campaign needs, and what Perosi said fully shows she lacks political sight, oh, my god, it is quite unfortunate for the American people to have such politicians!
Posted by: Jimmy | April 8, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am
If george bush is so enamored at spreading democracy throughout the world, perhaps he should give symbolic support toward the tibetan independance movement. I am glad at least one presidential candidate is at least addressing the issue.
It is amazing that obama and clinton has almost the same positions on the issues but they bring out such hate on the other by their supporters.
Posted by: The Lord of War | April 8, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Olympic Game is not a stage of politics.
The 2008 olympic game in Beijing,is a stage for all people around the world,who love peace, love lives and love our whole world, to express their passion and energy.And for the atheletes,it is the only chance to get the honored award of their hard practices. So any one have not have the right to deprive their opportunities.
Posted by: Liv | April 8, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
Whatever, she’ll forget all about Chinese and Tibetan human rights if she gets elected to the oval office (which she won’t, even if she conquers the now monumental task of getting the nomination), just as soon as the prospect of all that chinese money comes up, just like Willy did.
Posted by: JB | April 8, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
I have been an supporter of Hillary all along this process, I think it is absolutely unnecessary for Hillary to take on this Olympics issue.
It is just too oppurtunistic to touch on this issue.
I do not like a presidential candidate to act based on populus slogans.
Posted by: Eric | April 8, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
Why can’t the people of the world just have fun and play a few games together (like we do every four years) without getting politics involved? Give the kids a soccer ball, maybe they’ll quit kicking each other.
Posted by: Erin M | April 9, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am
She just lost my vote.
Posted by: Jim | April 9, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
So let’s see. Hillary consults polls and finds that 70% of Americans are mad about China and the Olympics. In the face of much bad news about her truthfulness and her ability to run a campaign, she seizes on the most important issue confronting the US today — the Olympics, making an over-heated call for a boycott of the opening ceremonies, demanding that her competitors do the same.
Safe move, once again. Fake leadership, once again.
Posted by: CBIG | April 9, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
President of US should give all possibilities to American People to express protest.
Any President’s political action on international level should be motivated with the best political interest of USA, taking into account no only HUGE population of China and HUGE American debts, but also nuclear weapon, that China holds.
The action should not be pushed to come by Dems.
With all my respect to Dem party, and personally Barack Obama, political figures should stay apart in this case.
It should be come the Movement of People. The one and only way it will work.
Everyone should do their job on their place, mixing cases never leads to success.
As for Hillary – she just tries to change the subject from her disability to manage ANYTHING.
Posted by: Linda,Fl | April 9, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
Her comments just caused this and many other Chinese American families to vote Obama (even McCain). “peaceful protests,” right.
Posted by: hozo | April 9, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
Not only has Bush taken away leverage over the Chinese goverment,since China owns our debt, but also we need full protection for our athletes while in China.
If you are going to make a stand you either have to have a complete boycott or try and make a true differnce by keeping your encouragment out of the media.
Grandstanding will not change China, will expose US to financial jeopardy and will put our athletes in harms way
Posted by: Kathleen | April 10, 2008, 6:26 am 6:26 am
China violates Human RFights and this is a fact. All Heads of the Western world should boycott the Opening Ceremony, regardless of political views.
Posted by: Luca | April 11, 2008, 3:22 am 3:22 am
China is doing quite ok. Why support racial conflict all over the world??? Some people, including Hillary Clinton, are just arrogant idiot. This country never wants peace around the world. When Los Angeles riot broke out due to racial problem, no one said the US should let LA split and become an independent country. We and our leaders are becoming increasingly evil in interfering other country’s civil issues.
Let clean up our own backyard first!!!
Posted by: jean | April 14, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
I feel we Americans are so violated repeatedly by our own government and stupid policies and war in Iraq. We just paid income taxes with no say about the war and about a lot of other things.
What is human right in this world? Our own right to attack very one else??? Do we want every country to fight domestically like Pakistan and Iraq??? Are we blind when accusing China about Tibet?
Posted by: John | April 14, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
I voted for Hillary during the primary in our state. She can forget about my vote in the future!!!!!! What an arrogant politician! She could not stand up to say no to the war against Iraq, she then voted for that bankruptcy law which was so bad for little people. Her vote was obviously influenced by bankers’ campaign money to her. This woman has no standard. When she says boycott Olympics opening, what cause did she see? Just another chance to show she is a standup person?? But what is she standing up to? Those who killed small business people and burnt other people’s homes and cars? If so, terrorists should be able to justify 911 because they do not like America and Wall Street??? Hillary is not even unique or different: the same voice like others shouting slogans. Her China bashing attitude says nothing good about her but show she is just one of the many. Why should I vote for her then? Just because she is a woman? I bet if there is another McCarthy time, she will be one of those who will join the persecution of the so-called Communists.
Posted by: Fay | April 14, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
IF CHINSES COMMUNIST GOVERNMENT REALLY WANT TO EMPROVE THEIR HUMAN RIGHTS, THEN THEY SHOULD CONSIDER ABOUT FREE TIBET AND DRAFUR.
PEACE
Posted by: FREEDOM | April 20, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
MrsS2rt I agree with you. We should not bring politics to Olympic. The game has hardly anything to do with Tibet or other human right issues whatsoever. The speech she made just reflect how ignorant she is. If only Hilary is a professional and or has a good knowledge of Tibet, she wouldn’t
Posted by: brian | April 30, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
and she should not have such knowledge as opposed. Tibet is China internal political issue, other countries have no authority to touch the indignity of China.
Posted by: brian | April 30, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
The whole story of China supressing Tibetians and Uighurs is based on the concept of DIVIDE AND RULE, China seems to have a very strong Economic growth, the communist country is growing at 15% Annually and added to it it has very good relations with major asian and Global nations. The success of this communist nation backed by China and Midle East has negative implications on Capitalist USA nad West Europe.The USA wants to now instigate the Urmique region by arming the Urmique people in the same way how it helped Afghanistan to form Taliban and Alquida to remove Soviet so called occupation. Olymics will give chinese Economy a huge boost and envious USA will use Media to create hate stories and Propoganda highlighting the Tibetian Dead issue and Uighur problems. Dalailama has no political and Economic ideology and if haded over to him, Tibet will once again become a Buddist Fundamentalist and Theorocratic State. India on oher hand will be behind USA as its entire Economy is US based.
Posted by: Mohammed | July 2, 2008, 4:01 am 4:01 am