Clinton Campaign Chair Threatened to Strip Michigan of Delegates in 2004
Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., has staked her path to the Democratic nomination on the officially illegitimate contests held in Michigan and Florida somehow being recognized, in opposition to Democratic National Committee rules.
What’s so remarkable about this is that two of the Clinton campaign’s most important strategists have in the past taken the stand that these states should abide by the DNC’s instructions — even if that meant stripping them of their delegates.
In direct contrast to the positions they hold now.
Senior strategist Harold Ickes as a DNC Rules Committee member in 2007 voted — along with the other 11 Clinton supporters on the 30-member committee — to strip Michigan and Florida of their delegates as punishment for disobeying the DNC primary calendar schedule.
Ickes now is a leader of the "count Michigan and Florida" rhetoric coming from the Clinton campaign, despite his previous position.
Now comes this curious find, on Daily Kos.
It turns out that irrepressible Clinton campaign chairman Terry McAuliffe once — when he was DNC chairman — threatened to strip Michigan of delegates if that state’s Democrats carried out their long-time goal of disobeying the DNC calendar.
In his lively book, "What A Party!: My Life Among Democrats: Presidents, Candidates, Donors, Activists, Alligators and Other Wild Animals," McAuliffe tells the tale. If you’re an Amazon.com member, you can read the passage for yourself on pages 324 and 325.
McAuliffe at the time had been pushing for early contests for South Carolina and a Western state with a large Latino population, perhaps Arizona or New Mexico.
"Our plan became very controversial," McAuliffe writes. "Some people thought any change was bad. Others thought we were not shaking things up enough. Leading the charge for more radical alterations in the primary calendar was Michigan Senator Carl Levin, who thought Iowa and New Hampshire should not have exclusive rights on voting first and that it was time for other states to have a turn. He had pushed unsuccessfully for change before the 2000 elections and was back in full force this election cycle. He made it very clear on the telephone that if I allowed Iowa and New Hampshire to go first, then Michigan was going to act on its own and put its primary first."
McAuliffe invited Levin to make his argument before the full DNC meeting on Jan. 19, 2002. Levin did, and his motion was defeated by a unanimous vote.
"After the vote, the issue was settled in my mind — however, not in Carl’s," McAuliffe writes.
On Feb. 1, 2003, Levin, Rep. John Dingell, D-Mich., and Dingell’s wife Debbie (a DNC member and power broker unto herself) called McAuliffe.
"They told me they were going to hold the Michigan primary before New Hampshire’s," McAuliffe writes, "which would have led to complete chaos since New Hampshire has a law stating that it must hold the first primary and the DNC had already voted on this issue and settled it.
"’If you do that, I will take away 50 percent of your delegates,’ I told him.
"They thought I was bluffing. But it was my responsibility as chairman to take action for the good of the party, and taking away half their delegates was well within my authority…The whole primary calendar was in danger of spinning out of control. The candidates kept calling me and asking what was happening with the schedule, and I made it clear that I was not going to let Michigan throw the entire process out of whack. Finally I’d had enough and scheduled a meeting in Carl’s Senate office for April 2 to settle this once and for all…
"Soon Carl and I were going at it.
"’I'm going outside the primary window,’ he told me definitively.
"’If I allow you to do that, the whole system collapses,’ I said. ‘We will have chaos. I let you make your case to the DNC, and we voted unanimously and you lost.’
"He kept insisting that they were going to move up Michigan on their own, even though if they did that, they would lose half their delegates. By that point Carl and I were leaning toward each other over a table in the middle of the room, shouting and dropping the occasional expletive.
"’You won’t deny us seats at the convention,’ he said.
"’Carl, take it to the bank,’ I said. ‘They will not get a credential. The closest they’ll get to Boston will be watching it on television. I will not let you break this entire nominating process for one state. The rules are the rules. If you want to call my bluff, Carl, you go ahead and do it.’
"We glared at each other some more, but there was nothing much left to say. I was holding all the cards and Levin knew it."
Clinton herself said, in October 2007, "It’s clear, this election they’re having is not going to count for anything." She said she was keeping her name on the ballot (unlike her competitors) just so when it came time for the general election she could argue she had not ignored the state.
It wasn’t until Clinton lost the Iowa caucuses in January that she acted as if the Florida and Michigan contests had any meaning at all. As Tallahassee political journalist S.V. Dáte recently wrote in Slate, "Last summer and fall, when the DNC made these decisions, she had a lot more clout. She exercised none of it."
As for Ickes and McAuliffe — they have exercised a great deal of clout. But it has been in the name of preserving order, even if that meant stripping recalcitrant state Democrats of their delegates.
As McAuliffe said then — "the rules are the rules."
Why? "For the good of the party," he wrote (then).
- jpt
Email
Can Mitt Romney Win Conservatives Back?
Possible Contraception Compromise in D.C.
Frankly I am not suree Hillary Clinton is overly concerned with what is good for the Democratic Party or for the American people. I think the Clinton’s are more concerned with winning the White House, and perhaps maintaining that family’s grip on the party.
Posted by: markymark | April 26, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
I really don’t see the inconsistency. Michigan and Florida disobeyed the Party rules and had to be disciplined. They have paid a big price already. But now as this primary season has shaken out it has become clear that no matter who the nominee is he must have those two states on board, especially in a razor thin nomination contest.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | April 26, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
Yea big surprise. Do you think it changes anything? No I do not think so the minds are made up. This is a joke Hillary is a joke I am tiered of hearing about it.
Pundit after pundit, voter after voter knows this, Hillary and Bill will just smile thier way through this and the voters, the press, and the world will let it slide, and then they will complain about it some other time.
It has been one lie after another, but she is more electable, more ready, more fit. It is the state of the union I have resigned myself to it. We in America suck. We have become a third worl country. We are third world in Healthcare, third world in production, third world in Education, third world in morals, third world in leadreship, and certainly Hillary and Bill are third world in politics, along with the republican party. From what I can tell the Democratic Party is right behind them rushing to catch up.
Posted by: Thinking | April 26, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
It’s not that they really care. The Clinton’s have just decided they will not come down off of the thrown.
I hope she decides to lose in a more dignified way. If not she can always join the Lieberman party.
Posted by: John Compton | April 26, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
Yoohoo, MIchigan voter here. I WENT to the polls in January, and voted on two local millage proposals. That other part of the ballot was just a beauty contest (Senator Clinton’s words – not mine). I don’t blame the candidates, I blame my state party and government. However, Senator Clinton cannot claim a victory in a race where she was essentially the only candidate, and she sounds more and more desperate every time it comes out of her mouth.
Posted by: Ann | April 26, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
Rules when they disenfranchise people or hurt more than help should be reviewed and if needed changed. This “sticking to the rules argument from the media and the Obama supporters is yet another sample of absolute hypocrisy. If it were Obama on Clinton’s situation everyone, and I mean everyone, media and Obamamaniacs would be demanding for the votes to be counted. And please, please don’t deny it.
If they (Michigan and Florida voters) are counted…The scenario would be completely different wouldn’t it?
Why do you think Mr. Obama kept his name on the Florida ballot? Because he is not an idiot.
Posted by: Lilia | April 26, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
Lila,
Obama kept his name on the Fl ballot because of the rules in the state Fl would not allow him to remopve his name.
I am going to say this one more time if yopu can not understand it then I give up. Obamas name was not on the ballot in MI, it was not an election. Can we all agree to that at least?
Good grief!
Posted by: Thinking | April 26, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
Clinton is a phoney, through and through. Both of them.
Posted by: Justinteim | April 26, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
Gee tapper. You are going to try to convince us with a straight face you can NEVER find ridiculous dirt on Obama.
Always tap danced dirt connected to Clinton somehow. You are an embarrasment to the journalistic community.
Posted by: tomdavie | April 26, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
DNC be warned, we the youth and university students have form a platform call young democrats, any attempt to turn the table we will destroy the democratic party and they will never win election in this country. Put us to test is not a threat but reality, we are mobilizing already.
Posted by: KC, NY | April 26, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
Hill wants to get it both ways. SHAME ON YOU HILL THE BOSNIAN GENERAL.People will debate with honest people, but Hill is known for her dishonesty, her lack of principles and willing to say anything and everything just to win including going to bed with the right wing. God bless America and God bless Obama.OBAMA08.
Posted by: BKMC | April 26, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
When the democratic nominee is decided, the losers will quickly kiss and make up. The loser’s followers (AKA lemmings) will not only follow suit, they’ll sweat the differences between the two candidates were merely superficial.
And who said the democrats don’t have heart-felt principles and iron clad convictions?.
Posted by: S | April 26, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
Doublestandard: What is it about this that you don’t understand? The DNC, which is the authority over all the state democratic parties and imposes RULES governing how and when primaries and caucuses are held, made it clear from the very beginning that Michigan and Florida results would NOT be accepted or counted. Clinton knows very well, and knew all along, that these results wouldn’t count, and SHE AGREEED TO THAT RESULT. Senator Obama’s campaign has never had any role in the DNC’s decision, and rightly agrees that the DNC has the authority to uphold the rules that were clearly stated from the beginning. Clinton is the ONLY dishonest flake here, because she only cares about counting those results because she needs the delegates. There’s no way anyone (not even you) can legitimately argue that the results in Florida and Michigan were fair, or should be counted. Clinton’s continuing insistence that these delegates should be seated demonstrates the depths to which she will sink in order to try to win the nomination, even at the risk of destroying the entire democratic party. I am beginning to think she suffers from a clinical personality disorder; she obviously is a narcissist and has delusions of grandeur.
Posted by: stsw531 | April 26, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
The vote did count. The delegates didnt.
Go re read the rules.
only the CORRUPT MEDIA wants to paint the WHOLE primaries in Michigan and Florida dont count.
The ONLY thing that didnt count was the DELEGATES.
Posted by: tomdavie | April 26, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
RE READ the rules they agreed to.
Nowhere does it say the VOTE doesnt count. It did count.
They were not awarded any DELEGATES .
Re read the rules.
Nowhere does it say the primary couldnt be held or the VOTE wouldnt count.
They just agreed that nobody would get DELEGATES out of it.
Posted by: tomdavie | April 26, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
Great reporting Jake. Keep em honest. Hillary’s people really define the word hypocrisy. Unbelievable. Thanks for filling in the fascinating details for us. Fortunately, there is justice in this world, and honest politicians like Obama come along every now and then. History will show that electing Obama President of the United States will prove to be a defining and healing moment for our beloved country. Warmongers no longer. Peace, negotiation, and cool heads will prevail. The Clintons offer their hot headed carry a big stick philosophy, and according to Hillary, they are ready and willing to obliterate Iran’s innocent women and children with NUCLEAR weapons, in retaliation for the actions of their evil dictator. There are better ways to solve the world’s problems, other than threatening to obliterate other countries with NUCLEAR weapons!
Posted by: rco | April 26, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
Yea, to all the Hillary lovers, one think you dont get is that the rules of this primary is that it was one based on the number of delegates, not the number of votes. So just go stuff it down a sock!
Posted by: Dana Twombly | April 26, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
Its simply how much hypocrisy is going on in most of the postings all driven by some far-fetched outlandish sentiments.The facts remain clear as they have always been.DNC guidelines were violated in Michigan and Florida.Therefore,in formal terms,the party did not present its candidates for primaries in those states and this was understood and agree to by all the candidates .If anyone’s name was left on the ballot,it was an act of mischief for which the pendulum swings between the state electoral commitee and the RNC. Hence,for Hilary Clinton to expect to pick up votes as spin off of that incident just continues to amplify not only her dishonesty but a willingness to betray the party just to get the nomination. I don’t think she lives on the planet with us.
Posted by: Imagine | April 26, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
I believe if they don’t seat MI and FL delegates the voters in both states should not vote at all. That would fix the DNC when the Democrates don’t get any votes. That will penalize the DNC like they did to FL and MI. Its a dog eat dog world.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | April 26, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
Well finally this comes out. Obama has nothing to do with the revote or recount or anything. he said that whatever the DNC wanted to do he would support. the DNC said they wont be counted so how is it his fault. you have to play by all the rules to which you agreed. you cant be selective on which rules you want to use when its to your advantage. how did he disenfranchise the voters? they new ahead of time the rules and the governing body voted anyway, they put their states in that position not him. blame the states not the candidate
Posted by: Allamr18 | April 26, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
It is ridiculous that neither Barack nor Hillary will have enough votes/delegates on their own to reach the number needed to be nominated. Yet, only Hillary is supposed to drop out?? How much more unfair and silly can this be . . .if neither can get the magic number, each has a right to compete by the timeline and process provided. How come aren’t there calls for Obama to drop out? He seems weak. For example, most of his victories are in caucus states, but the general election will not be decided by caucus!! It is primaries like the ones HIllary has been winning! Also, I read that Barack’s lead in votes of about 800k is based on 400K+ is based on voters from Illinois?? Don’t democrats want to win? Then, why not do a cool headed analysis and given it to the most capable of winning? The Clintons are the ONLY democrats in the last 20-30 years that have won the White House. Come on people don’t be foolish!! yes, e is charismatic, appealing and powerful, but he is veryyoung and he can run in 8 years. Then, we will have seen how he uses his leadership adn better able to judge his claims of being “the one we have been waiting for.” Hillary is heroic the ways she has withstood the powerful mostly male media,weak leaders from her own party and the thousands of silly people following the media and waisting ink on stereotypes and sexism. Much of hte stuff said about her could not be even suggested about Obama. Could one suggest how dare he keeps Hillary from running unopposed? That is what Obama and his friends are saying: Obama wants it easy. Hillary is entitled to ran until the timeline and process under the rules allows. She may yet be the best hope for Dems to win the whitehouse. The problem is that if Obama is as weak as he appears as a candidate, the Dems will not have a shot to the White House for another twenty years.
Posted by: lola | April 26, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
It simply shows how much hypocrisy is going on in most of the postings all driven by some far-fetched outlandish sentiments.The facts remain clear as they have always been.DNC guidelines were violated in Michigan and Florida.Therefore,in formal terms,the party did not present its candidates for primaries in those states and this was understood and agreed to by all the candidates .If anyone’s name was left on the ballot,it was an act of mischief for which the pendulum swings between the state electoral commitee and the RNC. Hence,for Hilary Clinton to expect to pick up votes as spin off of that incident just continues to amplify not only her dishonesty but a willingness to betray the party just to get the nomination. I don’t think she lives on the planet with the rest us.
Posted by: Imagine | April 26, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
scathingly: The only change Obama knows is the change in his pocket. The only hope he wants is to make history like MLK. And he is desperate to do that. When you want something somebody had that’s a streak of jealousy. He doesn’t care less about the people. That’s just a copied speech from RFK that he speaks on the platform. Its people like you that are too dumb to catch it.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | April 26, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
Imagine: And you really are imaging things. The DNC made an appointment with FL and MI to discuss their delegates. Where have you been? I don’t think you read well. Of course the DNC wants to seat them. The DNC would get a good shocker if FL and Mi decided not to vote at all in the general election and where would that leave your Obama. Think about it and get the facts straight.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | April 26, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
Why doesn’t the title of this piece say Clinton Campaign chair threatened to take away HALF of Michigan’s delegates in 2004?
This is exacly the proposal that is before the rules and bylaws committee now and what is actually called for in the rules.
Gee i wonder.
Posted by: s.b. | April 26, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
Politics: When you talk about the devil you must be talking about that non-christian racist candidate who is attending a church with a racist anti-american pastor. And I know I am correct. Obama honest? Your kidding. He said he wasn’t friends with Ayers but they live next door to each and had dinner together. I am so glad George caught him. And caught him in a lie.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | April 26, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
The whole thing with Hillary’s campaign is manipulation.
No wonder Obama won’t debate. Who wants to debatea a master manipulator.
He’s right, how politics are done needs to change.
Try being honest with the American people Clintons.
Posted by: Anna | April 26, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
Hope: Maybe what you need to do is save your own soul and clean out your own backyard. Most of the commentors and haters of Hillary, I wonder what’s in their closet? Drugs and booze like Obama use to take in college. From what I have been reading most college students have to take drugs to survive or drop out. Maybe that’s why they have so much trouble thinking straight. Are you one of them?
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | April 26, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
Dana,
I agree with you that the DNC rules address only delegates. They do not encompass popular vote. However, that does not render the popular vote irrelevant at all. It just meams the DNC rules do not control them. the popular vote is important as a true indicator of voter support in FL and MI. To be sure, the popular vote will be used to persuade superdelegates.
Posted by: countallthevotes | April 26, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
Tom Davie
No matter how much you WANT your argument to make sense it doesn’t. People came out in Fla because there were other issues on the ballot. Many Obama supporters did NOT come out because they understood it would be for nothing…you cannot change hisotry when it is convenient. Michigan is a no-brainer…just look at how many voters picked “other” rather than vote for Hillary. The Clintons are DEAD to the black community no matter how this turns out…iut is just a matter of time before we see if the Democratic Party is dead to them this year also.
Posted by: porchhound | April 26, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
A have a plan!
If the DNC does not doover MI and seat FL as the currant results and force out Clinton from this race and give the nomination tyo an unelectable guy, we, Hillary supporters started switching our positions to send tyhe message to the DNC!
So many Hiollary supporters will be changing their registered democrat status to independant to send the message to the DNC!
They will understan that it is NO JOKE!
obama can not win! It is proven after PA!
Posted by: Dennis | April 26, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
A have a plan!
If the DNC does not doover MI and seat FL as the currant results and force out Clinton from this race and give the nomination tyo an unelectable guy, we, Hillary supporters started switching our positions to send tyhe message to the DNC!
So many Hiollary supporters will be changing their registered democrat status to independant to send the message to the DNC!
They will understan that it is NO JOKE!
obama can not win! It is proven after PA!
Posted by: Dennis | April 26, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
Obama can not win so I will vote for Hilalry in NC!
I was told by my union to go for Hillary otherwise mcCain will be the president!
Posted by: Peter | April 26, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
Porchhound,
Fl voter turnout was an all time record and you know it. Wasn’t it over 2.5 million?? Seems a lot of people cared enough to vote. Sorry you missed it.
Posted by: countallthevotes | April 26, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
Allamr: Apparently you don’t read either. Obama did not want a revote and Hillary did. The DNC should not have power over the state. If the states want to change their primary date so be it. I understand Howard Dean didn’t penalize New Hampshire for changing their primary date. Reason being he thought Obama was going to win and he is an endorser of Obama. So is Reid. But there is a deal going on next week with the DNC, MI amd FL. They may be seated yet.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | April 26, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
I voted for Obama and I don’t think that he can win in November!
If Hillary gets the nomination, allthough I hate her, I will accept it!
Because it is better than McCain!
Posted by: Pam | April 26, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
Seat FL delegates and doover MI!
Posted by: Gail | April 26, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
By stripping a state of its delegates, for whatever reason, the national democratic committee is violating the suffrage rights of the entire state’s citizens.
Other sanctions should be applied for these states violating the voting schedule, but taking a basic civil rights away from the people is not only illegal, it is wrong.
Posted by: Battle_Doll | April 26, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
Hope: Where have you been. Don’t worry about Hillary chances of spoiling it fot Obama McCain will do a good job him when he gets 40% of Hillary’s voters if she doesn’t win the nomination. That’s the good news. I am a Hillary supporter but will vote for McCain if necessary and I hope he wins the general election if he has to go against Obama because why would we want a racist in the white house. Between Obama and pastor Wright I don’t know who is worse.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | April 26, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
let’s summarize Obama’s strategy:
1. deny FL and MI voters their constitutional right to vote
2. deny voters in the remaining states any opportunity to see Obama vs. Clinto in a straight shooting debate
3. pretend that he doesn’t know that there is no way in heaven that he can win the necessary votes to win the nomination.
now now .. does all that look like W behaviour to you? it surely does to me..
Posted by: Average Joe | April 26, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
Blacks are divided in NC, some of us will go for Hillary!
Belive me, Obam may even loose NC!
Posted by: randy, NC | April 26, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
You people are all so stupid and ignorant. HRC is an evil self-centered person who only has visions of power for herself and her lying husband. Go ahead and vote for McCain if Obama gets the nomination, you’ll show them republicans then, won’t you?? Idiots!
Posted by: JJ | April 26, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
Veterans will be supporting Hillary in NC!
Madam prwsident!
Posted by: Veterans , NC | April 26, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
Peter,
You are soooo right. Obama CANNOT win; it will never happen.
Go Hillary!!
Posted by: countallthevotes | April 26, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
I think many of the superdelegates want to vote for Hillary but are getting threats to vote Obama. I agree with Mayor Nutter when he said this is America and I will endorse whom I choose and he did. He endorsed Hillary. The three black superdelegates that got threatened, I think it was the Obama campaigner’s that did that. But they should stand up for themselves like Nutter did and say I’ll vote for whom I please.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | April 26, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
I work at a bar in NC and everybody that I know who was supposed to vote for Obama is switcehd for Hillary!
She may win NC!
Obama is really unelectable!
GO HILLARY
Posted by: Phill | April 26, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
There were bunch of Obama signs where I live, and accept two, all of them switcehd to HILLARY signs with in a week!
Obama is finished!
Posted by: Shirley, CApe Cod | April 26, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
omg shirley,
are you in the golden triangle region?that is so interesting, because the msm would have us outsiders think otherwise.
thanks for the real news
Posted by: jgaw | April 26, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
I am an independant in IN, I have never thought I would have to vote for Hillary!
I was so sure of Obama’s victory but I will have to change my position and vote for the lady!
She is better than John McCain!
Posted by: Brien, IN | April 26, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
imagine, Did you get into a front end collision and hit your head? Or were you just born stupid? First learn how to spell and type. Then make sure what you say makes sense. Last clinton is an outright liar. She said she misspoke about her bosnia trip. Hmmmm! Gee she did three times. In my book that makes you a flake. If I were under sniper fire I surely would remember that, but for hillary she can just make up her own memories as she goes. What would happen if she gets in the
White House and starts to make things up in head. She’ll never get in. Let her keep running. Its quite entertaining to watch what she comes up with next. Barack never asked her to step aside, infact he said she should run as long as she wants. Shes a loser, shes deceitful, she lies, and will do anything to win. face it she is pathetic
Posted by: john | April 26, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
thanks brien in ind.
and shirley in cape cod
the union is saved
HRC-POTUS 2008
clinton/edwards 08
Posted by: jgaw | April 26, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
I think that Mrs. Clinton will win both IN and with a very narrow margin NC and
win the nomination too!
She bounced back stronger than ever!
Posted by: Herry | April 26, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
So. What do the Clinton supporters want, to eventually (in sixteen years, if not sooner) hold the Presidential primaries the month after the existing president is elected? Because that’s what is going to happen. Michigan and Florida disobeyed rules and LAWS which stated New Hampshire had to hold its primary first (and with Iowa holding the first caucus).
If you allow them to break the rules, and go unpunished for it, then it will invite chaos in the future. No candidate is worth that. Wait four to eight years, have Clinton run then. For now, it’s too late. You lost. Live with it.
Rob H.
Posted by: Tangent | April 26, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
Hill Girl is going to win IN and NC!
Obama girl is finished!!!
Posted by: HILL GIRL | April 26, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
Mariann Pepitone–
I am a mature woman in my 50s, the same generation as Hillary. I met Hillary in 1992, supported Bill Clinton in 1992 and 1996 and more than once wrote sympathetic letters to Hillary when she was in the White House and undergoing one difficulty after another–including the Monica scandal and Bill’s impeachment. Her behavior this year has been so disappointing, though, I’ve lost respect for her. I believe Hillary has brought many of her troubles on herself. She seems to cause strife and divisiveness. It’s as if she one-upsmanship and pitting one side against the other seems to be her modus operandi. The 60s are over–its time for us to stop name calling and accusing and work together for our collective good. Hillary believes in divide and conquer, but our country doesn’t need division right now. If we are to thrive in a global economy, we have to work together.
Posted by: Hope 1906 | April 26, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
I don’t care what the bigwigs in the party did then or now. No one asked the voters of FL and MI what they wanted. Why can’t they have a re-vote? The voters did not do anything wrong and should not be punished. You people in the remaining 48 states, how would you feel if your vote was taken away.
Posted by: Tina D | April 26, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
Shelgirl is correct it maybe time for a new party. The two party system just does not give us the choices we need.
Posted by: Thinking | April 26, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
I will be voting for hillary in NC!
I don’t think Obama has any chance to make it!
If he can not control Rev Wright now, how is he gonna stop when he runs for the White House against Mccain!
Obama is on;t hope Hillary is the real deal!
But I have to say if PA would be couple pounts loss for Obama I’d have considered him!
Posted by: SEAN, NC | April 26, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
I can’t remember the last time a poll was correct.
Posted by: Tina D | April 26, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
“Auliffe said then — “the rules are the rules.”
Why? “For the good of the party,” he wrote (then)”
Ahhh, but everyone knows that The promise given was a necessity of the past: the word broken is a necessity of the present; plus Rules are for the little people.
And we all know that some people are above the rules, don’t we.
Posted by: The Commander Guy | April 26, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
Sean in NC
Last I heard it is a free country the Rev wright is entitled to do anything he wants, with or with out Clinton’s or Obama’s permission.
Posted by: Thinking | April 26, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
Clinton will keep arguing she should get the MI and FL votes to the end because she’s a woman, and women always need to get their way. Men don’t want to lose their affection so they usually give in. Just look at all the court cases of the past – male judges show favoritsm to female defendents disproportionately.
Posted by: jon sid | April 26, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
jon,
You are funny. Do you even know that??
Posted by: countallthevotes | April 26, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
It is clear that Hill & Bill will say & do anything for power. Americans are so gullible you’d think they’d get more educated after allowing the country to be run by a bad chearleader called Bush. Americans got bushed alright, now get some education that Obama is recommending and help bring us back to a first rate country instead of a third world nation.
Posted by: Sue,Texas | April 26, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
John posted:
“Did you get into a front end collision and hit your head? Or were you just born stupid? First learn how to spell and type. Then make sure what you say makes sense. Last clinton is an outright liar”
Elitist, snob, Obama supporter.
Posted by: countallthevotes | April 26, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
OK…….lets stop all this about Hillary lies, because Obama is no better in that department. Like he attended Rev. Wright church but, never heard him say those things. Or when Obama denied one of his underlings not saying or talking to Canadian oficials about Nafta and then saying later yes they did. Or that he doesn’t know anything about Rezenko. You can go anywhere and find plenty more he has retracted.
Obama has proven himself to be just another politician, so don’t be so enamored about him being so clean and forthright. As sure as the sun comes up every day, something else will come out on Obama. Lets just “hope” it doesn’t happen If he gets the nomination.
Posted by: Average Joe | April 26, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
jj: I would rather support McCain then a candidate who attends a racist church with a racist pastor who is anti-american and hateful. I believe Obama to be racial himself but its people like you that ignore the truth and would vote for him anyway. That’s the trouble with this generation they don’t which way the wind is blowing.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | April 26, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
NinK,
Florida could never afford a revote. Their economy has tanked and they are laying off state workers. No joke there.
Over 2.6 million Dem. voters cast their ballots in the primary. It was flawless and for Florida that is an achievement. A revote simply would not happen there.
There is no reason to spend time on that discussion becuase it would never happen. No good reason to revote either with the record turnout. While the candidates pledged not to campaign. as we all well know, Obama had his ads air in Florida for three weeks. Clinton attended 3 fundraisers, all allowable under the pledge.
Also, be careful what you wish for. Edwards took parts of northern Florida. Upon a revote those votes would never go to Obama. I know the area well.
Posted by: countallthevotes | April 26, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
tim,
Fair enough. All the candidates are flawed. There is no such thing as a perfect candidate. Such a candidate does not exist. I readily admit that and do not agree with Hillary Clinton on every issue either. I am still amazed at the Bosnia story. It reminds me of a guy with a fish story. You know whenever it is repeated the guy gets more carried away and the fish gets bigger. On the whole, she would represent me well and better than any other candidate. I also think she would represent us all well.
Posted by: countallthevotes | April 26, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
and ya know what sucks the most out of all of this… do you wanna know how pissed off i would be if i was a democrat in florida or michigan?????? im talking, serious outrage. all because of your “for the people” party.. for the average citizen. what a joke… cant believe theres not more outrage on that fact versus having a revote or not.
Posted by: tim | April 26, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
Who cares about 2004. Al Sharpton’s on the warpath in NYC. A potential member of an Obama administration.
Posted by: geevill | April 26, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
Listen, I have no earthly idea why the democrats would think it is democratic to not count two of the states in the primary, especially when those are two states that have a major impact on the general election.
Put aside all this he said she said BS or rules are rules and try to put yourself in the shoes of the voters in FL and MI who came out to vote in record numbers. They had no real say on when their elections were to be held, yet they are the ones not being able to excercise their right to vote. If Obama thinks that it is unfair to count the original votes because he wasn’t able to campaign, I can sympathize, but why then did he drag his feet and try to prevent a re-vote in these two states? That to me is the real question. If he wants to win legitimately, he should want these states counted, not to mention if he wants to carry these states if he gets the nomination.
I don’t mind you bringing up issues of what originally happened to warrant a re-vote Jake, but if you do, you should at least call into question the undemocratic means that Obama is trying to steal this nomination.
Posted by: Andrea | April 26, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
100% agree – “Frankly I am not suree Hillary Clinton is overly concerned with what is good for the Democratic Party or for the American people. I think the Clinton’s are more concerned with winning the White House, and perhaps maintaining that family’s grip on the party. “
Posted by: chris | April 26, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
The DNC can’t say SC can break the rules but Florida and Michigan can’t.
I say seat the Florida delegates as voted, with all the candidates on the ballot (which I voted in), and seat the Michigan delegates, with the uncommitted just that, free to choose who they want.
Hillary ’08
Posted by: rd | April 26, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
Clinton will keep arguing she should get the MI and FL votes to the end because she’s a woman, and women always need to get their way. Men don’t want to lose their affection so they usually give in. Just look at all the court cases of the past – male judges show favoritsm to female defendents disproportionately.
Posted by: jon sid
——————-
Jon, who in the world would want Hilliary’s affection? Does she have any affection besides to herself? And even that is debatable! She is disliked by 63 percent of the American population!! No, thanks, I can do without her affection…..remember, if you go against her, she’ll throw you under the bus. Witness Gov Richardson! If you stand in her way, she’ll slander you; and if you are a minority she will tear you apart and then drag you through the streets of the politics of yesteryear. No, thanks, I believe the great majority of us would be more than happy to reject and denounce any affection she might display toward us…you just don’t know if it is fraudulant affection, if it is a misspeak, or a misheard. Rest assured, if you are a minority, she will definitely assassinate you and drag you through the mud!!
Posted by: NinaK | April 26, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
Alison,
One thing you should factor in with Michigan is that the serious and extensive effort by Obama surrogates to rally people to vote uncommitted for him was definitely campaigning in violation of the pledge. He does not come to the table with “clean hands.” Also consider his airing TV ads in FL was campaiging in violation of the pledge. Again, he does not come to the table with clean hands.
Posted by: countallthevotes | April 26, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm
ANDREA
… see thats the thing here. the DNC made the rules, obama didnt. while everyone can agree it was ridiculous, they still did it. thats the bottom line. i think it looks better on obamas part not to try to get them to go back and revote. while it definately is undemocratic for these votes not to be counted, you have the DNC to blame not obama or hillary. it looks a whole lot worse for hillary to go now asking because shes losing, to go and say ” we need to be democratic, we need to count all the votes”. cant do it. just like the gov’t shouldnt bail out lenders, or people who screwed up the housing market. people have to suffer the consequences of their mistakes sometimes. the DNC screwed it up, and they have to suffer the consequenses for the party. you as a democrat are responsible for remembering this come time to vote for your leaders.
Posted by: tim | April 26, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm
HAHA
The Clintons are caught… The will of the people???
I guess only when it’s in your favor
HYPOCRITE lol
wow
Posted by: Vanessa | April 26, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
This is the thing – all that party infighting, who said what when or why – THAT DOESN’T MATTER EXCEPT TO THEM AND YOU GUYS. What you are all forgetting is the voters – fortunately in the U.S. they still matter, although political insiders seem to have to still be reminded of that – to their peril occasionally. AS A VOTER I WANT MY VOTE TO COUNT!!!
Posted by: A Florida Democrat | April 26, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
Markymark, you are totally wrong. The reason why Hillary is still running because she believes that only she can beat Mccain and win the general election and thus saves the democratic party. It’s Obama who is only concerned with winning the white house. As a freshman from the senate, someone who has never been tested and doesn’t even enough knowledge and experience to be our commander-in-chief, Obama merely raises false hopes and illusions among the nation. He can’t fix the economy nor can he fulfill all his promises to the Americans. But he doesn’t care. He only cares about his white house bid. He was the one who has divided the party. He’s the one who should bow out of the race in order to save the party and the nation. He should just patiently wait and work hard for another 8 years and we’ll support him wholeheartedly if he can pass the eight-year test.
Posted by: smartcookie2008 | April 26, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
It seems there are about four actual Hillary supporters on here spreading their venomous remarks and threats and, just like their candidate, are willing to do anything or say anything to win. Put all the multiple posts on here you want but your fantasies re North Carolina and the nomination are just that..”Once upon a time in a land far far away there was a president named Hillary.”
Posted by: porchhound | April 26, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
The DNC throws the voters of Michigan and florida to the curb, they are going to lose many.
The the Democratic leaders in florida and Michigan to the curb, not the voters.
Try to remember we the people
Posted by: seah | April 26, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
Democrats will loose the election in Nov. if the primary votes in Fl and MI are not counted. If the democrats won’t count us in January, the republicans will count us in Nov. If Obama is the nominee, by not counting FL and MI primary votes, the dems loose the election. If the FL and MI votes are counted, Hillary is the nominee, the dems win the election November.
Posted by: John W. in FL | April 26, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
ya know, its interesting to see all the differences here. im voting for mccain, just for the record, but if i were a democrat, i would be outraged right now! first off, the whole deal with MI. and FL.not counting should be enought to freak out, and then you have two canidates that basically want the same things but everyone hates!!! hillary supporters hate obama, and obama supporters hate hillary. so its a lose, lose situation for the democratic party. i mean, i really cant see, either way, the party comming together for either one. im not complaing, but ive never seen so much outrageon two canidates who basically have the same views? only in america.
Posted by: tim | April 26, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
Remember the story about the discrepancy in the exit polls. The data showed Clinton with a smaller win than she actually got?
Who other than african americans would not disclose that they in fact voted for Clinton? Obama is losing support among african americans.
Because of the Obama campaign’s bullying, agressive tactics, I can understand why people would be afraid to disclose to pollsters that they no longer support him.
It will be interesting to see the results in N.Carolina and Indiana.
You Obama people have a really unattractive reputation – and like my italian family says “fish rot from the head”.
Posted by: s. valenti | April 26, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
So if CountAlltheVotes has it right: The DNC has no legitimate reason to not allow the popular vote of MI and FL to count – and Obama knowing “the rules” managed to get his name off the ballot in MI, but could not do so in FL. Hence, Obama’s argument that since my name is not on the ballot, the popular vote should not count (even though we advertised to vote uncommitted to our supporters) in MI and advertised and held a press conference in FL. Secondly, if “the rules” are to be followed, then Iowa, NH and SC should be stripped of their delegates and popular votes as well – if the DNC is going to follow “the rules”. It really comes across as arbitrary politics, without any common sense used by Dean or any of the other powers that be in the DNC. So, all the popular votes should be counted – and Hillary is leading. Otherwise, Obama should man up and allow a revote in the two states.
Posted by: frisco girl | April 26, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
The democratic leadership forgets, the Florida republican legislature set the primary voting date. Now, the democratic leadership is going to ignore our votes. If my vote don’t count, hello John McCain…
Posted by: Atisha | April 26, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
JOHN W. IN FLA.
sad but true. you summed it all up perfectly. thats EXACTLY what is going to happen. i would just encourage democrats not to blame either canidate for the mess in those two states, (or to encourage a revote as bad as it is), but rather the DNC and the states democratic party. i feel terrible for the millions of democrats who got screwed. think about that when it comes to your states election for congress. a complete disgrace.
Posted by: tim | April 26, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
This is why many people don’t like Hillary. She can changes her position instantly as long as it benefits her politically. She will “obliterate” Iran, or any country for that matter, if that’s what it takes for her to be elected. She has no principles, only political ambition.
Posted by: panabiker | April 26, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
BlackManisRight:
Great rationalizing! I think Obama is a white man who looks black… anything wrong with this?
Posted by: mjamesjr | April 26, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
I am SO tired of the Clintons. Since Hillary cannot win the nomination legitimately, could she have mercy on the party that she is supposed to love and bow out? Puleeze, Hillary – bow out now and help save the Democratic party and the country!
Posted by: Marilyn | April 26, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
frisco girl: You are so right. Obama doesn’t want a revote and there never should have been a rule that the state can’t change their primary date. Who does the DNC think they are. New Hampshire changed their primary date and did not get penalized. Howard Dean thought that Obama was going to win NH and got fooled. Therefore it was too late to penalzie that state. He is as underhanded as can be. He previously endorsed Obama and he doesn’t want her to win the nomination. Dean and Reid should step down and Pelosi should go back to Italy. I hope the superdelegates are smart enough to vote Hillary and leave Obama in the dust.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | April 26, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
There are many unhappy democrats here in Florida. If were not counted, then we won’t vote democrat in the general election, in November.
Posted by: Martha in Orange Park, FL | April 26, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
Can any Hillary supporter answer a couple of questions from this Obama supporter? 1. Why do you think Hillary can win the nomination? (If you have a link to anything I’d appreciate it.) 2. If you do NOT think she can win the nomination, do you know why she is still running? Thank you in advance.
Posted by: Marilyn | April 26, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
Dear mjamesjr…
I agree with you. Thanks for raising the point. But he’s still married to a black woman, and won’t get the votes from those who believe blacks should never be allowed to lead in the white house. No poll would ever ask such a question. Sorry.
As for Al Sharpton mentioned in an earlier post – I am smart enough to honestly post that I don’t believe Obama has any close association with Al Sharpton or that Sharpton would ever be included in any leadership at the white house if Obama won. It would never happen. Yes, Obama is a white man who happens to look black.
Posted by: maxjessup | April 26, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
Hillary has more votes tha Obama, if the democrats refuse to count them, they are worse than the repubicans in the 2000 election. Remember how the republicans cheated in counting the votes in FL. Our country paid the price for this blunder, look at our ecomomy and the Bush blunder in Iraq.
Posted by: Chuck | April 26, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
Hillary has more votes tha Obama, if the democrats refuse to count them, they are worse than the repubicans in the 2000 election. Remember how the republicans cheated in counting the votes in FL. Our country paid the price for this blunder, look at our ecomomy and the Bush blunder in Iraq.
Posted by: Chuck | April 26, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
Who in the hell cares who said what about this? The fact is its WRONG to leave two states completely out of the process. I am a Hillary supporter but if she was ahead and Obama wanted to have a revote, I would be saying the same thing. How can you have a nomination process leaving Michigan and Florida out?? This country is based on the right for people to vote. I don’t think it should be up to the “party” to decide this.
Posted by: Harley. | April 26, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
Everyone knows that Clinton is trying to still the nomination and cheap american people for their own egoist goals. It is complettely dishonest from her to pretend that the vote of Michigan and Florida should be counted. Rules are rules she signed them and must respect them. This is not politic but the fundation of human dignity: Respect own word and engagement.
Posted by: leche | April 26, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
Clinton will steal the nomination and the darkies will riot! 1968 all over again.
Posted by: john spinner | April 26, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
Can any Hillary supporter answer a couple of questions from this Obama supporter? 1. Why do you think Hillary can win the nomination? (If you have a link to anything I’d appreciate it.) 2. If you do NOT think she can win the nomination, do you know why she is still running? Thank you in advance.
Posted by: Marilyn | April 26, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
Hillary can win. Obama is fading in the home stretch and is looking to weak to face McCain in the fall. His poll numbers have dropped 10 points nationally since PA.(47-47) If it keeps going like this…he is done.
Posted by: Harley. | April 26, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
Obama ran campaign adds in Fla. and Mich. for the primary. What a hypocrite and liar. The votes should count for Hillary and not for Obama in florida and michigan. Never reward a hypocrite/liar.
Posted by: dalton | April 26, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
I bet the Obama kool-aid crew can’t wait for Rev. Wright to give a prayer breakfast sermon in the White House. The question is, will the sermon include: a)racism b)hate c)anti-American feeling d)all the above. What has our country become?
Posted by: james | April 26, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
So the HRC camp are shown to be hypocrites. So what else is new? They threw FL and MI under the bus, now they want to go back and show themselves to be the heroes who want to count their votes? How transparent does this need to be?
Posted by: Frustrated Voter | April 26, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
If Fla. and Mi. are upset that their primarys won’t count–they only need to look their elected leaders.They got greedy and wanted to jump the gun.They wanted to be the first kids on the block with the newest toys. But it backed fired—and now they are screaming to high heaven.Like it or not every one of us has rules to live by. What is that old saying?? Remember the “Golden Rule”!! You know the one that says”He that has the gold makes the rules .”
Posted by: orange cat | April 26, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
Oh, America…Reading these comments is sad. Sad for what I dreamed America could be, might be…It is actually a Country filled with a WHOLE LOTTA racist bigots. Just wow…My heart goes out to the good among you…btw, in Canada, Obama wins Canadians votes by a landslide. He is real.
The World IS watching, you know…show us what you’re made of, America, country of Lady Liberty!
Posted by: A Canadian Friend | April 26, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
Supposedly, Obama is using some of Howard Dean’s 2004 grass roots strategy in his campaign. Dean and Obama have been in this together since the 2004 convention. The whole “big speech” that Obama gave at the convention was the set up for the start of the presidential run. The media and the DNC almost had democrats hoodwinked and bamboozled into believing that Obama was the new kind of politics. It’s just a shame that all these young people have been caught up in this sham. The best way to look at it is they are living a tough life lesson – life, like politics, is never fair.
Posted by: frisco girl | April 26, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
Since neither Obama nor Clinton is having the required delegates to get nominated, FL amd MI are very important.
Clinton asked for a re-election after the race became tight but the DNC and OBama camp did not provide enough support…
So now the only option left is the count the delegates as it is… infact OBama is getting a bonus in MI. He is getting to keep those votes that might have gone to Edwards. So Obama should be happy that he will get to keep more delegates from MI than what he would have gotten both Edwards and he had their names.
Go Hillary 08.
Posted by: Jack | April 26, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
There is no newsworthy inconsistency here. The Clinton camp is trying to find some way to count the votes cast in Michigan and Florida now that A) the race is so close these states are more crucial to deciding the true outcome of the nominating process, and B) winning these swing states in the general election (which Obama seems determined to lose) is more important than ever. Besides, not seating the delegates does not mean the elections never took place. The Democratic Party, is the party which insists on counting all the votes.
Posted by: JETrout | April 26, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
Also people have to change based on circumstances and new information. One cannot go in a straight road without changing lanes… We are seeing this with Bush, who is arrogant and unwilling to change even when provided proof of his mistakes.
Hillary you are wise and can lead this country better than Obama or McCain.
Posted by: Jack | April 26, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
Hillary will go to the convention even if it means she will not nominated. Even if she looses NC and IN, it does not matter she will keep fighting.
PR, KY and WV are supporting Hillary by more than 10/15% points.
Obama is no general election candidate. He is a radical person who will bring this country down.
Posted by: Jack | April 26, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
dalton, you are correct Obama is the only one who broke the rules in FL. He ran commercials on CNN.
Posted by: wwt | April 26, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
When Clinton told, over and over in minute detail and without blinking, the bald-faced lie about how she took sniper fire in Bosnia, it just brought home the point of how she will do anything to get the nomination. I also think it was very insulting to the men and women in the war zones who are taking fire and truly risking their lives.
Posted by: Kithara | April 26, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
Hillary is which ever way the wind is blowing at any given moment , what ever it takes to get your vote is who she is and which direction she goes and then come the next day and the next event a different group of people and she’s someone else taking the opposite stand she took yesterday.
Posted by: Ray | April 26, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
Thank you so much. Now, tell the public why we have New Hampshire first, so that a small state is available to unknowns, without a personal fortune, so they can have their point of view heard.
Posted by: bruce becker | April 26, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
Another non issue, makes a difference if your winning or losing. It’s the American way, you see it in Sports constantly the team that refuses to change strategy when losing is doomed to defeat. Why did you obamaites start running all the negative ads, comments, blogs? Because you saw it all slipping away. Hillary sees it and is doing something positive about it by taking it to the people while obama whines about bitter voters. She wanted the people in those States to know she was not discounting them, better than taking a name off a ballot cause you might get beat. Sounds Presidential to me. Hillary ’08
Posted by: Beau | April 26, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
Mariann Pepitone ,
I have no doubt you’re the one who’s out of touch with scheme of things.Of course,the DNC will sit the delegates from MI and FL if they want to.Be rest assured it won’t be by rigging the primaries in those places so it favors Hilary Clinton and then she can be ‘coronated’queen of the American ‘empire.Woman get real.Don’t let some outlandish emotional passion drive you off the highway.
Posted by: Imagine | April 26, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
fourthsign—BAD STUFF DUDE.
Posted by: BikernAz | April 26, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
I keep seeing all you Hillary haters harping on the fact that you don’t like her. She’s not out trying to win a popularity contest like Obama. Is this guy really worried about his suits and shoes not making look like an elitist? I was really happy to hear that he likes pot roast so that just makes him a regular guy. Aren’t we trying just a little bit too hard here? Let me guess, he cuts the lawn with regular mower because to use a riding one would look too elitist. If this stuff has him looking like a deer in the headlights what’s going to happen in the Fall?
Posted by: James France | April 26, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
The primary was ALLOWED to proceed.
They were ALLOWED to vote.
They were ALLOWED to count the votes.
They were STRIPPED of their delegates.
Clinton has TRIED to get a revote. Obama doesnt want it.
The fact is, if they let it stand as it is, the delegates DONT count.
but the VOTE towards the popular vote SURE DOES.
Posted by: tomdavie | April 26, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
I dont know about the rest of you but we did teach our kids to obey the rules..the laws..and such..im a florida native but we all knew back then our votes wouldnt count because florida broke the rules…and michigan too…and it –isses me off our votes dont count but rules are rules..lets get a better system so this never happens again
Posted by: Joe R | April 26, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
Jack
Rules and agreements are there to abide by. No zigzag or change of lanes!! Try to rob a bank because you need money and then you’ll understand why rules and conventions are there. Animals have no rules, that is probably where everything is allowed. Why dont you change your spicies, you’ll have it much easier!!
Posted by: Samy | April 26, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm
The nomination process is definitely good for Obama. Clinton’s heavy punchs made him understand what shall be coming. It is good that it took longer to seal. However, there is no way he will not be the Candidate with all the figures to his favor. It is time to think beyond the coming primaries & unite. If Hillary does it without breaking rules, then she shall have all our support
Posted by: Samy | April 26, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm
Bottom line; you can’t change the rules in the middle of the game.
Ickes and McAuliffe are hypocrites, with zero ethics or credibility. I wonder if selling their souls will be worth it to them in the long run?
Posted by: nandssmith | April 26, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
I have been reading the posts both here and other sites and decided to speak my mind. I was a supporter of Edwards and when he dropped out of the race I had no real preference as to the nominee. But after watching thr MSM denigrade Hillary and push Obama down our throats, I became angry and decided to support Hillary. The hatred expressed by Obama supporters is chilling. Do I want someone like him to be our President NO!. I have been a Democrat all my long life but I must ask a question.Will I leave the democrat party YES! Will I vote for Obama NO!NO!NO!
Posted by: Jackieann | April 26, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
The vote counts. The delegates dont. End of story. There was no agreement not to count the vote in the popular vote.
Posted by: tomdavie | April 26, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
Ladies, I sorry but Hillary will never win the primary or the general election!!
Posted by: GHM | April 26, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm
Its apparent that “stephen ” is a republican trying to divide us.
Posted by: GHM | April 26, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm
Obama opted to have his name removed from the MI ballot; Clinton left her name on the ballot; that’s not flaunting anything, that’s just being politically intelligent. Clinton won that election and Obama has previously refused the offer made by some to have a re-vote. He’s afraid. In part, the MI and FL primaries were combined as an economic measure and just who does the DNC think it is that it can disenfranchise all of those voters and delegates? The DNC needs a major overhaul, including how the caucuses are conducted. They’re ruining all principles of democracy. In order to save face, the DNC will have to dissolve either the popular vote in MI and/or the delegates; it would be suicide if they opted for both. FL has its own similar challenges. Thank you Howard Dean for this mess. It was a blessing that you never made it when you ran for President.
Posted by: Terry | April 27, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am
here is some fresh news you can use
google chicago tribune
obama knows his way around the ballot box
or look up obama and alice palmer.
mr. obama is old school dirty politics
from the word go.
I do not think we should let that clean cut face fool us any more.
He is bad news.
Posted by: middleoftheroad | April 27, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am
was a hillary supporter
what is your point?
I do not see eye to eye with my wife on everything either.
so what,
Posted by: middleoftheroad | April 27, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am
James you do know that obamas church has white members and is under a white christian institution right?
Posted by: Allamr18 | April 27, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am
After all this is over, we clearly need to take a hard look at our nomination process. With very genuine and sincere emotions running so high, no matter who you support – this was a very remote chance of this happening. Women sticking with Hillary through thick and this, newcomers drawn in by Barack very hopeful to change our stagnant government. The electorate cut up and hacked up so as to find clues as to who supports who where. Truth is both are really great candidates. Each has had their mis-steps, and both have come roaring back with a vengence in one way shape or form at various points. I truly believe after everything that has been said, that either would represent us well come November. Problem is, both are VERY historic candidates. First Woman President? Wow. I can fully understand the older generation wanting to see that in their lifetime. First Black President?gasp. An utter demonstration to the world that we can be color blind, and listen to message over impulse. This is truly a historic time. I am glad to be alive to witness it.
Posted by: Erica Williams | April 27, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am
Al: you mustve never been around black people growing up. id advise you to go into barnes and noble go the the minority section pick up a book written by dubois, carter g woodsen, assasta shakur, mumia jamal, john henrik clarke etc. surprise surprise black people are mad at white people. this really surprises you? your lucky barack is running if it was any other blacks your fears would be legitimized
Posted by: Allamr18 | April 27, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am
Al: Obama’s candidacy has really opened my eyes, and the eyes of millions of other Americans, to the extent of hatred by some (not all) blacks against white people in this country. Before Obama’s candidacy, I had no idea what black liberation theology was (Obama’s religion), and how it preaches hatred against the “white devils.” I also had no idea how accepted these racist ideas were with some (not all) in the black community. But most startling of all, I had no idea that in order to support their so-called candidate of “change,” Obama supporters would ignore, or even justify, this hateful and racist theology in order to elect their “messiah.” I think America really needs to wake up to this issue, before it’s too late. Whenever I see Obama at his rallies, and you see white people in the audience cheering him on, I feel sorry for them. I wonder how they would feel about their “champion” if they knew that the fundamental basis of his “religion” was, as James Cone puts it, “the destruction of the white enemy.” Obama’s candidacy is arguably the most terrible hoax ever perpetrated on the American public by any Presidential candidate in history.
Posted by: James | April 27, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am
If I am not mistaken there have been several times over the years when threats have been made to strip delegates for one reason or another. It has NEVER happened. Thats the part that is left out by the these blog pieces that are trying to push Hillary out of the race.
Posted by: Firefighter | April 27, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am
Allamr: The UCC is a very large group of churches from around the country. It is primarily white. Trinity United, is a member church, but it is primarily black. Rev. Wright preaches black liberation theology at Trinity, which is not preached at other UCC churches. Black liberation theology, as I noted in my earlier post, is a very racist perversion of Christianity developed in the 1960′s, and is based upon blacks fighting the “white oppressors” and “white devils.” The quotes I listed in my prior comment were directly from James Cone, who is Rev. Wright’s theological mentor.
Posted by: James | April 27, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am
Lol what? do you think after 300 years of being crapped on by the government that their wouldnt be parts of minority communities that are angry at whites and the government? Surprise surprise people of color write about things that bother them. yes black people write about black issues just like chinese people do and hispanic people do. you say hes a fraud why? because he went to a black church? because hes surrounded by black people who scare you? because hes beating the candidate who ran as an incumbent?
Posted by: Allamr18 | April 27, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am
“Those are my principles, and if you don’t like them… well, I have others.”
-Groucho Marx
Posted by: Tom J | April 27, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am
With Open Eyes: The interview of Wright on PBS doesn’t tell the whole story. Anyone can appear to be rational and non-threatening in an interview. During the 1930′s, many world leaders admired Hitler, even John Kennedy’s father, Joseph Kennedy. The “truth” that people need to know about Rev. Wright (and Obama) is the fundamental nature of his theology. As stated in my earlier post, black liberation theology is a theology of hatred against “white people.” If you agree with that, then so be it, but the American public deserves to know the truth, BEFORE the end of this nomination process.
Posted by: James | April 27, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am
The chorus of cynics and fearmongers persists their endless, mindless drawl. Pushing base fears and not respecting individual’s intellect. This is a pattern that repeats election after election.
No matter who you support, know where you stand on issues, then listen to your candidate’s position and vote accordingly.
“With Open Eyes” has the right idea while pushing their candidate, but more importantly we should NOT succumb to the fear mongering tactics that continue to divide us as a nation. We do share some common interests. Don’t get your facts from only one source is a good rule of thumb, then discuss with friends and family.
Good luck to all the candidates this year!
Posted by: Own Your Vote | April 27, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am
James how is it hatred and racists? no one says hate white people, it says embrace your roots and ancestry. you dont know any of the members of that church. you dont know there relationships with whites or chinese or anything. your make a pretty rash conclusion. maybe you should go to a church before judging its people. you read a few paragraphs and label everyone hating whites but you dont know.
Posted by: Allamr18 | April 27, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am
how do you know what the people are filled with? and what are they supposed to be afraid of? fear of what and hatred of what?
Posted by: Allamr18 | April 27, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am
Allamr: You say that because of 300 years of “300 years of being crapped on,” blacks “are angry at whites and the government.” First, I’d like to ask you something; in what way are you inferior to a white person under the law? Secondly, your statement is an example of the kind of racism that I wish we could put behind us. Your reasoning is just like that of Rev. Wright, James Cone, and Obama. You are angry at “whites,” as if all white people have “crapped on you” for 300 years. I’ve never met you, so I doubt I’ve had any effect on your life, whatsoever.
Posted by: James | April 27, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am
As was posted in another blog, three other states also violated the DNC rules and were not penalized by the same DNC leadership.
If Obama and his campaign want Michigan and Florida to be penalized for breaking the DNC rules, then the same standard should apply to all states.
To do anything less will disenfranchise Michigan and Florida Democrats and result in a McCain victory.
Pelosi, Dean, your actions speak louder than your words.
Posted by: Jayhawk | April 27, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am
@James:
I was reminded last evening of Godwin’s law. Your post is indicative of it. No offense intended.
Posted by: MIguy | April 27, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am
tww: Moyer’s “interview” with Rev. Wright was a blatant attempt to rehabilitate his image. No tough questions. Not even serious questions about black liberation theology, which is the crux of Rev. Wright’s teachings. Unfortunately, serious broadcasting has degenerated into support for Obama, American Idol, and Hillary bashing.
Posted by: James | April 27, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am
One more thing about the Moyer’s interview. It was interesting, however, that Rev. Wright let it slip out that Obama says what he has to say because he is a “politician.” What does that mean; it means that Obama is not being genuine with the American public, and this statement is from Obama’s own “mentor and spiritual adviser.”
Posted by: James | April 27, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am
James: Under the law right now? i dont know ask Sean Bell, ask the teens of Jena Six, ask the victims of Katrina. ask the mother of Emmitt Till, ask the family members of mlk, medgar evars, mumia jamal. I dont hate white people in any form or fashion. i was raised in the military and lived with people of all races. And i said that whites now arent like that. but in the 60 and 70s they were. Bill Clinton himself said that there were certain laws he wishes he hadnt have passed because they unfairly targeted minorities. do i think hes racists of course not nowhere near it.
Posted by: Allamr18 | April 27, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am
I wonder why moyers did not ask rev. wright about his statement
Hillary ain’t never been called the N word?
what kind of campaigning for your candidate is that?
and why did he need to say such
Posted by: HRCforamerica | April 27, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am
How is Wright doing him a dis-service? obama is speaking as a politician. hes saying what he needs to say and what he feels. this is why theres a clear distinction of the separation of church and state. speaking to two different audiences. if you go to church and your happy the entire time and you havent been challenged your not paying attention. the second you step out of your comfort zone you will see this. my dads a minister. my uncle is. rev moss who is now the pastor at trinity is a great man he spoke at my church many times. its two different audiences
Posted by: Allamr18 | April 27, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am
MiGuy: Thank you for not intending any offense. Now, please do yourself a favor and read “Black Theology and Black Power,” by James Cone. Truly research black liberation theology, and then come back and we can have an intelligent conversation about it. No offense intended, either.
Posted by: James | April 27, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am
Allamr: I appreciate your response, and I agree that it was MUCH worse in the 1960′s. My problem with Rev. Wright, is that he preaches like it is still 1960. My problem with Obama, is that he has been listening to that hateful rhetoric and exposing his children to it for many many years.
Posted by: James | April 27, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am
Ive read it. i dont agree with all of it. but youre looking at it too literal. its talking about worshipping idol gods, and partaking in actions that arent beneficial to the upward mobilization of black people. Destroying oppressors is not new. it says that in the bible. what do you think exodus was about? God destroyed the oppressors of his chosen people. Your destroying a concept and idea not an actual person.
Posted by: Allamr18 | April 27, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am
Hillary can’t win. Tsk tsk to all your obviously and soooo incredibly desperate supporters who will continue in their efforts to slander you and destroy the democratic party out of spite.
OBAMA ’08 !!!!!!!
Posted by: Patti | April 27, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am
James: Ive grown up in black churches and in white churches and i dont disagree that his comments were a bit much. but your assuming that because barack was there he thinks in that way. i go to church every sunday and i disagree with alot of things my dad says and the head pastor says, i dont adopt their thinking though. my dad doesnt like gays that doesnt influence me. you have never spoken to his children so you dont know how they view the world. they could very well be the most well rounded little girls and you wouldnt know the difference.
Posted by: Allamr18 | April 27, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am
Al,
I think you need to wake up. We are not voting for Rev. Wright. Put him on the sidelines while we discuss The war in Iraq, foreclosures, high inflation rate, outrageous gas prices, climbing food costs and 8 years of the worse president in American history. When you get your head focused on the important stuff, Rev. Wright and his statements seem a little useless. Remember this Rev Wright’s words won’t harm you – just don’t go to his church. However allowing yourself to be distracted by the “politics as usual” tactic just might!
Posted by: julescator | April 27, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am
Allamr: With all due respect, and I do think you are a straight up guy, the problem I have with that kind of hate speech is that everything is framed as a black against white issue. James Cone isn’t stupid. He could have framed it otherwise, if he wanted. For example, he could have said the fundamental struggle was between the ruling class and the rest of us; but he didn’t. He chose to spew hateful rhetoric against “white people,” very much like Rev. Wright does, in a divisive and inflammatory manner. Allamr, you ask us (non-blacks) to try to understand what blacks have been through; all I am asking you to do is try to understand how this kind of hate language sounds to us. I’m sure you’d agree that if the language were used by a white racist against blacks, it would not be acceptable.
Posted by: James | April 27, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am
Allamr: The reason I am so bothered by Obama sitting in Rev. Wright’s church for 20 years and calling him his “mentor and spiritual adviser,” is because in my life, I try to put myself in the place of others, and be objective about how I would react in the same or similar instances. If I were in a church, and a pastor said even one racist statement about blacks, I would not attend another sermon by that pastor, period. Twenty years to me, seems like Obama was much too comfortable with Rev. Wright’s theology. Anyway, I need to get some rest, but I do want to say again, that you seem like a good guy to me. We may not agree on everything, but we can respect each other, and I do respect the way you have responded to my comments. Have a good night.
Posted by: James | April 27, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am
I agree. it was a bit much. but i am used to it so i do understand you. This conversation we are having right now has not been had since what the 60′s? Im glad you can say im not like that and cant stand people who are, im the same way. Rev Wright preaches the way martin luther king was during the latter part of his life. its very much in your face open your eyes i want to challenge you. not everyone is receptive to that. there are times when its a bit much for me as well. but the body of work of that church is amazing. the congregation is too. But dont charge it off to obama though. if you dont like his policies thats fine, but he obamas not racists neither is bill or hillary.
Posted by: Allamr18 | April 27, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am
Al: what does that mean? campaign spiritual adivsor? and arent you glad he took it down? if he wouldve left it up you wouldve been far more upset. And judgement about what? he chose a pastor that people dont like, but he voted against iraq he voted to pass legislation for the aid in katrina. your talking about personal judgment in relationships that you dont agree with. not his policies
Posted by: aLlamr18 | April 27, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am
Just read this story and that is the good indication of what kind of candidate is.
She changes her position based on what is good for HER.
- Vote for Iraq (before she ran)- Against Iraq (after she ran)
- Sinper Fire story (before the vidio comes out) – I made a Mistake (after the vidio came out)
- Florida and Michigan does not count (early in her campaign when she was saying it is all about delegates) – Florida and Michigan has to count even though Barack name was not in the Ballot (after she had no chance of getting the delegates)
- NAFTA is Good (for 13 years) – NAFTA is Bad (right As soon as she ran)
- Rich people had a president for 7 years now it time for you (telling the working class people) – I am rich and I love rich people (she said after her taxes came out)
Posted by: Tina from NY | April 27, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am
Well yeah why would he leave it up. thats like when hillary lied about the hospital story she stopped using it. makes sense for her to not have it anymore.
Again what judgments policy wise has he made that are bad for america. because we have all made poor judgements with associations. rev wright was not a poor judgement it was poor speaking on rev wrights part not obamas
Posted by: ALlamr18 | April 27, 2008, 1:43 am 1:43 am
Bottom line:
Clinton can’t run her campaign – she spends more than she takes in. She took in $10million and owes $15 million. A lot of this is owed to small business owners who helped he along the campaign trail. This is telling. 1. Clinton is not the person to fix the economy – she can’t fix her own. 2. Clinton doesn’t really care about the working man and woman or she would not have stiffed them. 3. Clinton has no personal conviction – she changes her speech for the crowd – she doesn’t believe what she says. she says what she has to to get elected. She voted for the War in Iraq just to appear tough. Big Mistake. She works on polls and triangulation. She is a known liar and those are her personal traits. Obama does not have those traits he is sincere, truthful. He told us he would be honest with us and when he is, people cry foul. I guess many can’t handle the truth.
Posted by: julescator | April 27, 2008, 1:44 am 1:44 am
Al,
Wait until you see the documents on John McCain. It seems the war hero was not quite truthful about his 20 hours in combat in Viet Nam before capture. The document was written by highly respected Col. David Hackworth. Once again this is a first hand story and not a guilt-by-association story like Rev. wright.
Posted by: julescator | April 27, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am
Al,
McCain asked Hargee to endorse him knowing how inflammatory his comments were about the Catholic Church. Did McCain distance himself from Hargee? Heck no. Did Clinton denouce Carvill for calling Richardson a Judas, nope. Have all Catholics left the church after the massive child molestation cases? Nope. So explain to me why Obama, who has both renounced and repudiated what Wright said is such a problem for you? Fair and Balanced?
Posted by: julescator | April 27, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am
All we ever get now from Hillary is FLIP-FLOP in her Desperate actions to hang on in the race, add to that her LIES & SMEARS it is time now for the Voters! of Indiana and North Carolina to send her a clear message THE EXIT DOOR! – she has tried to FOOL VOTERS! well we are starting to see the real Hillary and Bill and they never change, NOT FIT FOR OFFICE!
Posted by: John B Sheffield | April 27, 2008, 2:29 am 2:29 am
Wow, Jake, you’re on fire. You’re blogging better details and references than I’ve seen on the majors. I’d given up checking in here for information, but I see you’re competitive. You’re keeping up. Thank you for a good source of reporting.
Posted by: Karen | April 27, 2008, 2:41 am 2:41 am
I would like an Obama lover to stop fighting dirty all the time.
SHOW me the evidence Clinton and Obama agreed the primary and VOTE would not count.
They didnt. They agreed NO DELEGATES would be awarded.
The vote counts. Period.
Obama lovers, and the corrupt media that supports him, tries to BLEND in this idea that the WHOLE PRIMARY didnt count.
It sure did count.
-they set up the polling stations for democrats as well.
-they had ballots. They ALLOWED you to vote. They COUNTED up the ballots.
If it didnt count, they would have not done that in the first place.
Obama is an idiot for taking his name off the ballot in the first place.
I guess he could care less about all the folks who wanted to go out and support him anyways.
There were no delegates at stake. Why bother ? Right? Thats all that mattered to the guy.
DUMMY.
Posted by: tomdavie | April 27, 2008, 2:44 am 2:44 am
To many Americans are caught up in the race game, being blinded by race, religion and differences between us. Does any clear headed individual think that any of the candidates, All U.S. Senators are biased, racist or undemocratic? If yes, your vote should be taken away, because you are obviously disillusional. Think about the last eight years and the Damage to America. Vote on the issues that would benefit you and the Country. Then we will get the president we need. Vote on petty issues of race or bias and you will get the president you deserve.
Do some good for America vote with your brain.
Posted by: jld1959 | April 27, 2008, 2:52 am 2:52 am
Hopesprings52, you are absolutely right!! this is a razor thin contest, and believe me….and I have heard this so many times from friends I know that live in other states….if they could take back their vote when they found out about Obama and his cast of characters……they would…and our girl Hillary would have had this thing by a landslide.
Posted by: carla sue | April 27, 2008, 3:04 am 3:04 am
Hillary wants two debates for the free air time! Where’s all the money after Pennsylvania???
Adrian Millet
Posted by: Adrian Millet | April 27, 2008, 3:18 am 3:18 am
Is it just me or is there some kind hysteria driving this campaign?
As I understand it, when hysteria is driving, nothing has to add up, make sense, or be rational. That is because the actions are representing needs split from consciousness. I think.
Example: There’s this drumbeat now, “Debate Me, You Chicken!!!” and even her local surrogates are taking it up. It’s creepy how tacky and immature it is. Whether it pleases enough voters to send Obama home remains to be seen. But to me it seems like of loony. Like what are we getting if we put this person in charge of the free world?
She needs to demonstrate a little relaxation and a little reality therapy as those would be reassuring to some people she might votes from. If she can send Obama home, she’s going to want a LOT of votes that right now she is alienating so recklessly.
Posted by: GaiasChild | April 27, 2008, 3:19 am 3:19 am
Howard Dean said recently that the superdelegates can disregard the delegate count and the popular vote, if they chose to. Those are the party rules. That’s fine. Let them go ahead. If black people (and a host of others, especially new voters) feel that this was a case of another stolen election,this time WITHIN the party, the Democrats will have no one to blame for continued time in the wilderness!
Adrian Millet
Posted by: Adrian Millet | April 27, 2008, 3:23 am 3:23 am
I am not exactly sure what this is about all this ‘tide is turning’ to Clinton? Perhaps the media is just spinning this to make a story last longer.
The result in Penn, well was it really 9 or 10 %? Whatever, the claim that Obama cannot win the big states against McCain is wrong, simple logic comes into play. In these contests, Obama was fighting one to one with Clinton, he was not up against McCain, it is obvious that the result would be very different if that was the case. If he was going up against McCain in Penn, he would not have had been up against the well ‘establishment’ machine supporting Clinton.
When in just a few weeks he got down the difference from 25% or so to 9 or 10 % whatever you wish to choose. This represents a massive swing. That was a good result for him.
My question is this. If the race to the White House is to be won be having the ‘blue collar workers’ or the ‘elderly’ on their side. Surely the media should be conducting opinion polls specifically targeting ‘blue collar workers’ or the ‘elderly’ with the simple question: “if in a general election the presidential candidates are Obama and McCain, who would you vote for?” That would give you a better answer to that ‘she is more experienced’ to win the bigger states.
This ‘hot potato’ and I am amazed the other networks have not picked this up, that is emerging is that the Clinton Campaign Chair threatened to strip Michigan of Delegates in 2004 if the DNC calendar is messed about with….Now the same is singing a different tune, to make sure they are counted. So my question goes back to first statement surely the tide is turning to Obama. Especially post Penn, he has had a string of high level endorsements.
Posted by: Rafael | April 27, 2008, 3:29 am 3:29 am
Gee whiz people think about it…when the Clintons had the WH previous, we all had jobs, we had roofs over our heads, food on the table, clothes on our backs, gas in the tanks…and this country was in a surplus! Do you have a problem with that?????
Posted by: carla sue | April 27, 2008, 3:32 am 3:32 am
I use to support Hillary. What’s turning me off is now you see how poorly she manage her campaign. She even lied on her debt. She should have been 15 million in the red. Now she’s talking she has the most popular vote. How can she count both FL & MI? In the beginning she and all the candidates signed that FL & MI was penalized for moving their primary. How can she even count MI when she was the only one on the ballot? She is really insulting voter’s intelligence! Even the media is laughing at her. More and more I’m turned off at her lies. What will she do in the White house? She already said she will bomb Iran with all the US weapons at her disposal if they bomb Israel! The republicans want to go into Iran, will she follow? Now she’s changing her stance on war? No negotiation with Iran? I have a son eighteen and one fourteen and I don’t want to see them drafted. It may happen because the troops are spread thin. Over four thousand soldiers killed and the economy in a mess. Her and McCain will continue this path and bring us to ruin. How can I be so blind? She and McCain are bad news.
Posted by: Jerry's | April 27, 2008, 4:02 am 4:02 am
Hillary won PA by 9.7% and there were some abseentee ballots not counted until yesterday in Clinton Stronghold. So it may go up a .1 percent.
Posted by: jacob | April 27, 2008, 4:04 am 4:04 am
Let’s not forget that Obama’s same spiritual advisor was personally invited to the White House to spiritually advise the Clintons after Bill got caught lying under oath about cheating on his wife.
Posted by: Mark Thomas | April 27, 2008, 4:15 am 4:15 am
I really don’t care what states were threatened by the DNC in the past.
I do wonder why 5 states broke the rules and moved their primaries up and only 2 were punished….Regardless of the DNC or the candidates positions all states need to vote.
FL and MI both had revote plans which were approved by the DNC…..Obama and his attorneys stopped them.
Obama promised FL he would make sure and “do the right thing” where FL was concerned. He promised at his only “rulebreaking” press conference with some local reporters.
If Obama was in Hillary’s position he would have 100 lawyers working full time to get those votes counted.
Posted by: Jackie | April 27, 2008, 4:43 am 4:43 am
The Superdelagates from Michigan and Florida should not be seated if the elected delagates are not. Dont these elected politicians and party big wigs represent the same people as the elected delagates? Oh, I forgot. The party rules or any rules for that matter, don’t apply to them, after all they’re “super” and they haven’t cared what the voters think for years.
Posted by: Steve Dapkus | April 27, 2008, 5:56 am 5:56 am
This article makes Hillary Clinton’s “courageous” stand for the voters of Florida and Michigan look utterly false. She only cares about their democratic rights now because she needs them. When she thought she didn’t, she showed her contempt for them.
Be careful who you step on on your way up, because you will meet them again on your way down.
Posted by: FilmMD | April 27, 2008, 6:17 am 6:17 am
Junior2, I am an Independent who has voted Democrat since 1984 when I felt that the Republican part was being completely taken over by idealogues. Yes, I voted for Bill twice and defended them against the nasty Republicans. However, Bill let us all down by providing fuel for Republicans to pursue. During this campaign season I prefferred Edwards and was indifferent to Hillary and Obama. After Edwards left and Hillary began her kitchen sink strategy I became more and more disgusted with her and Bill’s hypocrisy and shall we say….less than truthfulness (lying?). It reminded me of their supposed Republican enemies and brought back memories of Bill pointing his finger into the camera and stating “I did not have sex with that woman”, him stating “I did not inhale”, him arguing what is the defintion of sex….All the sleaziness that seems to be part and parcel with Bill and Hillary. And yes, they are tied together. Since Hillary wants to take credit for Bill’s successes she needs to accept responisbility for his failures as well. So, if Hillary somehow wins (steals) the nominiation I will either vote Republican for the first time in over 20 years since I believe McCain is a decent man (albeit in the wrong political party), or write-in a name (probably Edwards). But I will guarantee you I will not hold my nose and vote for Hillary. BTW…I considered registering Democrat this year and I am glad I did not. I believe Democrats behavior (particularly the Clintons) have been distasteful. I have officially joined the thinkers that it is time for a third party.
Posted by: indy_voter | April 27, 2008, 7:09 am 7:09 am
carla sue said:
“Gee whiz people think about it…when the Clintons had the WH previous, we all had jobs, we had roofs over our heads, food on the table, clothes on our backs, gas in the tanks…and this country was in a surplus! Do you have a problem with that?????”
That seems to suggest that the successes of that administration was due to both of them jointly. Mrs. Clinton says that she privately disagreed with her husband’s decision on NAFTA. How many other of his policy decisions did she privately disagree with? Would his administration have been as successful if he followed all of her advice? We will never know. What we do know is that is Ms. Clinton failed publicly when she was given the handle to drive her husband’s administration effort on health care.
On the other hand, it would be patronizing to suggest that she would automatically follow all of his advice in her administration. Don’t presume we are getting the benefits of two-for-one or a copy of a Mr. Clinton presidency in a Ms. Clinton presidency.
Posted by: jrenkx | April 27, 2008, 7:37 am 7:37 am
Anne Marie
So now Jake is wrong for reporting these two men are just like Hillary herself… (you know two of the four men surrounding her in the ring against Obama alone…but yeah she’s the fighter as Obama goes up every day against these two (one of which is the other exDNC Chair, Rendell, another ex-DNC chair,Billy boy an ex President, and McCain who wants to fight Hillary in the ring …not Barack)
This team…They do not care about the voters in Michigan in fact they are mcuh more at fault for this situation ( all of them …and if you read the DNC delegate counting committee’s notes…Mr. Pennsylvania…Rendell is way up there on this as well)
for discounting both Florida and Michigan (remember when Hillary had the power of the idea that she was the front runner…she could have figured this out but then she didn’t care that Michigan and Florida did not count)
This is a big issue…not a side issue…
It is about Hillary consistently cares about the voters when it effects her position only…and by doing so she makes situations worse. It is the Clinton way
Clintons first then everybody else.
The War…
The Nomination Process
The NAFTA debacles
The healthcare issue promising full healthcare coverage which is a statistical impossibility the way she is approaching it unless the insurance companies get A LOT of moneya dn the taxpayers have to pay an enormous amount…with the poor gettign tax breaks…c’mon you think tax breaks are going to help those people who are choosing food and rent over healthcare?
Do you think this program can afford to be more about preventative medicine…no. It will be bad reactionary at best…and fiscally it is a nightmare…is anyone looking at Massachusetts…it’s about cost…universal healthcare can’t be implemented until we get costs under control)
or
saying “obliterate” Iran with Nuclear Power to reinforce a win in PA not caring that the Iranians will use that soundbite to tell other nations why they need to protect themselves with Nuclear Weapons…
and promising “Massive retaliation” to countries to win PA not only giving a rogue nation a soundbite but subjegating America’s checks and balances and congressional approval to a campaign promise that is horrifically dangerous, fiscally irresponsible, and militarily back-breaking.
This woman is dangerous…she plays “I have been” in battle and has no idea what it’s effects are.
It is their way think tactically for their own power …not out of
This is a case of Marie Antoinette.
Posted by: dl | April 27, 2008, 8:17 am 8:17 am
“threatened to strip” is different from “actually stripping”
They might have told to to change the deciciosn that MI anf FL were taking.
Whatever said and done … currently we are in a tight race and the MI and FL election results are very important and need to be counted as they are.
Obama is anyway getting bonus in MI, all of Edwards and other votes are getting counted as if they are for him. In FL Obama ran ads that no other candidates aired, so infact he is getting a good deal.
Posted by: Jack | April 27, 2008, 8:25 am 8:25 am
Apparently, the anger it takes to revise history can keep people up at night. It also seems that many of us start with a conclusion and work backwards to justify it. Sounds very similiar to our current administration.
Posted by: MIguy | April 27, 2008, 8:31 am 8:31 am
Guess Clinton must be up in the polls
Stop Hillary!
(before she wins again).
LMAO
Posted by: Tonga | April 27, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am
What this misleading article proves is that Ickes and McAuliffe never stripped Michigan and Florida of their delegates at any time. In addition, Hillary only promised not to campaign in Florida and Michigan, she never said that the votes shouldn’t count. Hillary is entitled to these votes, she won them fair and square.
Posted by: Doreen | April 27, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am
frisco girl,
You got it right!! Good recap.
Posted by: countallthevotes | April 27, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am
Doreen,
Ickes and 11 other Clinton supporters made up almost half of this cycle’s Rules Committee. Clinton had vastly more supporters on that committee than any other candidate, and in 2007 they chose to strip MI and FL of their delegates. Simply put, the decision was made primarily by Clinton supporters. It’s not a topic for debate or discussion, it’s a documented fact.
The additional detail of McAuliffe’s actions in 2004 just further demonstrates how duplicitous the Clinton position on this decision is. It’s a shame that so many Clinton supporters are unwilling to see this for what it really is.
Posted by: Justin | April 27, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am
justin,
The point that you ignore is the DNC has not followed their rules, not who made the rules. Any discretion has been consistently used to benefit Obama. That is an abuse of their discretion. If they followed their rules, all 5 states would have been stripped, not cherry picking just FL and MI, which Clinton won. Also, DNC could have very well sanctioned Obama for campaigning in FL and MI and, using their discretion, they chose to do nothing.
They needed to follow the rules, you are correct. They did not.
The message and positions of Ickes and McCauliff are consistent. Follow the rules even-handedly.
Posted by: countallthevotes | April 27, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am
I don’t care that Obama and Clinton agreed to discount Fla. and Mi. if they held early primaries. My issue is that the people of Fla., Mi., and the rest of the United States didn’t agree to these terms. No one asked America if it was okay to discount any citizen’s right to vote and be counted. If we allow this to happen to Fla. and Mi. what’s to say they don’t start making different rules and backdoor deals to manipulate elections as they see fit in the future. If the DNC doesn’t count Fla. and Mi. this lifelong democrat may vote republican for the first time. It won’t have anything to do with which candidate wins the democratic nomination, but instead with my frustration at the audacity of the DNC to decide what Americans do and do not have the right to be counted.
Posted by: KC | April 27, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am
On the scale of one to 10, 10 being best
Which You’d rather vote for: One who said a White lie or One who spent 20 years listening the hate mongerer and said nothing: white lie(7) listening to hate words about the country I live in (-10)
Posted by: ruthmatters | April 27, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am
For those of you upset that Florida and MICH have not yet been included> Please consider the following about New Hampshire. It has few people. It is physically tiny. It has only a few towns. Therefore, any person, even you reading this, can campaign there and be heard. The whole idea is to allow a democratic process that any one can afford to be in. If you have big states first ONLY the rich and famous will be candidates. MICH and FLORIDA should NEVER be first.
Only small states allow an unknown to be part of the early process and to gain traction. If we have states like Florida, with 25 million people, first, you turn the election into a nobility only event, for the BRAND NAMES and BILLIONAIRES.
Please stop being angry about the MICH and Florida people. They will get to vote and maybe they will actually learn about the issues while they have this time on their hands. Any of you know the only candidate remaining in the race, to speak to restore the constitution?
Did you know that the Constitution has been erased? You no longer have the right to be charged with a crime, a speedy trial or to see the evidence against you or to cross examine witnesses.
Stop worrying about the mess the the Florida Republican and MICH Democrat local people made trying to shove their way in after they have been told in plain English not to do it. Do you understand why we MUST not have large states first?
It would be the end of democracy. You would get Clintons and the super rich and that’s all.
Posted by: bruce becker | April 27, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am
Typical —Her campaign staff is just as deceitful as she@ her sneaky husband are. What does it take America to wake up and see those Clintons for what they really are—Liars and hypocrites
Posted by: Dan A | April 27, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
The television interview of Howard Dean this morning reinforces my beliefs that the failure of the Democratic Party leadership will result in the failure of the Democratic candidate in November.
Howard Dean is still seething with resentment from his own failed presidential candidacy. After he had been annointed as the frontrunner, he was soundly defeated. Now, he wants justification of his own failure by a repeat of history.
Throughout the entire interview, Howard Dean tried to portray himself as a neutral referee rather than a participant in the rules debacle he is currently presiding over. Mr. Dean, we all know better.
Regardless of what excuses Dean, Pelosi, and the rest of the Democratic leadership make, the voters of Michigan and Florida will determine the outcome of the November election.
Not even Jeremiah Wright could damage the Democratic Party as much as the failure of the DNC has already done.
Michigan and Florida voters will be heard…one way or another.
Posted by: Jayhawk | April 27, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am
Michigan and Florida disobeyed party rules knowing what would happen and BOTH Clinton and Obama agreed to the DNC ruling ,with no fight or protest from either side . Well , surprise surprise ! Clinton starts getting her fanny whooped and suddenly says the ruling is not fair and suddenly she is so concerned with Michigan and Florida and Democracy , of course she wants their votes counted even though Obama did not bother to campaign in Florida and his name was not even on the ballot in Michigan and many people didn’t vote because of the ruling ,they decided why vote if our states votes won’t matter or be counted ! So this is just another desperate and completely unethical ploy on the part of Clinton who has no shame . The only fair way to count Florida and Michigan would be to split the delegates evenly and that’s all that counts .
Posted by: Ray | April 27, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am
One more item about Howard Dean’s and the DNC’s failure in leadership:
If it is so important for Michigan and Florida to be held accountable for breaking the “rules,” then why are New Hampshire, Iowa, and South Carolina not being held to the same level of accountability for their rules transgressions?
Could it be that Florida and Michigan voters would determine a candidate who has more influence in American politics than Dean, Pelosi, and the entire DNC?
Posted by: Jayhawk | April 27, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am
If the delegates are split evenly in Michigan and Florida, then the delegates from every state that broke the rules need to be evenly split (Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina).
The nominee will simply be selected at the convention by votes of delegates and superdelegates. That gives equal treatment to each and every state in question.
And, while we are at it, caucus results, in whatever state they were held need to be discarded with representation being evenly split.
Caucuses are a pathetic excuse for a means of candidate selection and need to be eliminated from any present or future consideration.
Posted by: Jayhawk | April 27, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am
countallthevotes,
The rules committee decided on who to punish and how. They chose to punish MI and FL by stripping their delegates. Clinton had more pull on that committee than any of the six candidates. She very nearly had a majority, and her people voted strip the MI and FL delegates.
Now stop with the lies and evasion. The Clinton people did this, and now they’re trying to change the rules to suit them. If a candidate and her people are willing to behave this way in a primary, just imagine how little respect they’d show for the Constitution and rule of law. We’ve had seven years of that, we don’t need any more.
Posted by: Justin | April 27, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am
The rules made by the DNC are not the Constitution or anything close. And, the leaders of the DNC are not political gods, even though they may see themselves as such.
If applied, the DNC primary rules do need to be applied equally to each and every state that was in violation regardless of who the state went to.
Discarding the votes of Michigan and Florida puts the DNC and the party as a whole on the same level as the Florida scam that got Dubya elected.
Perhaps, everyone needs to remember who set the primary date in Florida…the Republican Party!
Posted by: Jayhawk | April 27, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
Justin,
You are silly. You think that Hillary Clinton stripped the FL and MI votes?
Posted by: countallthevotes | April 27, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
Stealth Obama supporter Donna Brazille DID strip Florida and Michigan of their delegates.
Posted by: OxyCon | April 27, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
SINCE WHEN DID MAINTAINING PARTY UNITY BECOME THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF HILLARY CLINTON?
SHE OWES NOBODY ANYTHING .
SHE HAS A RIGHT TO RUN TO WIN..
Posted by: TJ | April 27, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
WHY DID OBAMA AND HIS SUPPORTERS STOP THE REVOTE IN FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN?
WHY ARENT THE VOTES IN FLORIDA ALINE BEING COUNTED AS IS—-EWVERYBODY WAS THERE. THE VOTERS DID NOTHING WRONG–
OBAMA IS TRYING TO STEAL THE ELECTION……VOTES FROM ALL AMERICANS MUST COUNT.
Posted by: TJ | April 27, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
The Clintons feel they are above any rules or regulations. Those apply to everyone else. The Clintons make up THEIR OWN rules which everyone is expected to fall in line and support.
I’ve often heard Hillary was a socialist candidate, I certainly agree now. Her presidency would be more of a dictatorship than democracy. I just learned about the communist law firm she worked for in the 60′s. No wonder she wants to employ the Cold War strategy she used to justify her comments on oblitherating Iran. Seems she always goes back to the past instead of looking to the future.
News flash Hillary, this is a very different playing field than back in the Cold War era. It could very easiy heat up into a world war quickly. News flash Hillary today’s economy isn’t like the 90′s and you can’t apply Bill’s policies to fix it. In fact Bill’s policies with NAFTA and China trade contributed to where we are today. In fact special interest and lobbists run this country and you and Bill are in everyone of their pockets.
I say Hillary, Bill, give us all a break! We are not so stupid to believe anything you say anymore.
Posted by: Sick of Clintonism | April 27, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Yes, Dan, and can you understand why Obama would never have her on his ticket?? What do you think would happen to him?? He wouldn’t last 30 minutes.
Posted by: jjboss | April 27, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
Count them or not, It still doesn’t matter. Neither candidate will have enough elected delegates to seal the election. So the point is mute. The real question is who you think is more likely to win against McCain in the general election. And don’t forget Hillary has won all the big states. Also don’t forget that Michigan and Florida are both also big crucial states that we have to win in the general election in order to win the presidency.
Posted by: Angie Lines | April 27, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
I have been shocked at the false statements Hilary Clinton is making. She claims “I have gotten the most votes.” This is a dishonest and deceptive marketing tool. Party rules govern, and this is both a misleading lie and truth. OUCH – fact is fact. Wow – I was very disappointed with her honesty and moral integrity. Hilary was counting Michigan and Florida. Those primary votes don’t count.
NOTE – And fact is Democratic Candidate nomination is by DELEGATES WON. This year no Democratic candidate can win the nomination without the superdelegates voting. Yes, delegates won. Popular vote is calculated in each state, district by district, delegates awarded district by district, then totaled. Additional delegates may be awarded at a later time. Etc. If a State caucus was done actual true state popular votes not totaled.
Hilary Clinton signed an agreement to honor and abide by the DNC rules. All the candidates did. Those states were punished many months ago. Those discussions about moving primaries up were discussed with DNC several years prior to 2008 Democratic Presidential Candidate race. Articles appears as early as 2002. The members of the governing body voted and states primaries if moved up would be unsanctioned and not count.
I really feel sorry for the voters of those states. Democratic Party Representatives of those states let all their voters down. That is the bottom line. And one court already declared this move up law was unconstitutional. Court of law has declared contests don’t count.
It does not make a difference which candidate we are supporting. This is about being honest and demonstrating good sportsmanship. Rules can not be changed midstream. Too many variables would exist since no campaigning had been done. Fact is primaries were unsanctioned primaries. Fact is a contest of any kind that is not approved or is declared unsanctioned by the specific governing body will not count. Key here is “contest of any venue and any kind.”
Barack Obama – I have only found his stances were for fairness. Did he stop new primaries in those states? My guess he had ample support for making sure the proposals were fair. Each proposal for new primary presented by those states were totally unfair to the poor voters and also Barack Obama. He suggested dividing up delegates 50-50 as quick fair resolution. Last proposal by Michigan would not wipe slate clean on democratic side and let all vote again. I was totally shocked reading the proposal. I was really hoping a fair proposal.
HILARY CLINTON – She started pursuing these votes after she fell behind. She kept herself on these ballots though. I saw what she may be doing. And as campaign unfolded – I was disappointed my “red flag” was right. I am alarmed at these dishonest and unfair tactics. Continued political sales of those primaries is dishonest and unfair. Discouraging to see her too using those poor voters.
New primary at this stage?? It is now too late, and poor voters of these states need to now address the representative at state level who sold them out. Hilary Clinton and Barack Obama are not to be blamed for any of this.
Voters lets show we are all good people that stand for real honesty and fairness.
Posted by: Sharon | April 27, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
What sterling character these Democrat
leaders possess! A party like this
should be elected in perpituity. Who
even needs those rascally Repubs.
It’s obvious that Harold Ickes sits
at the left hand of God.
Posted by: hombre | April 27, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
look up:
in Florida-Bill 537
in Michigan-B.O. & Edwards not sending their names on time to remain on the ballot. They were forced to remove it. In order to diminish Hillary’s strength in this state,they strongly conducted a campaign via e-mail to their supporters to vote uncommitted.
case close
Posted by: ktow | April 27, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
It’s clear that the Democratic party is a mess and is, yet again, poised to make another McGovern, Dukakis, Gore, and Kerry. Either Hillary Clinton gets the nomination, or, as it appears more necessary everyday, the party should be destroyed.
Posted by: Jeff in Illinois | April 27, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
Doreen said: What this misleading article proves is that Ickes and McAuliffe never stripped Michigan and Florida of their delegates at any time. In addition, Hillary only promised not to campaign in Florida and Michigan, she never said that the votes shouldn’t count. Hillary is entitled to these votes, she won them fair and square.
Here is another lie. Doreen you should get your facts straight before you post things.
CLINTON RHETORIC: “Let’s talk about the agreement. The only agreement I entered into was not to campaign in Michigan and Florida. It had nothing to do with not seating the delegates. I think that’s an important distinction. I did not campaign… that’s not the case at all. I signed an agreement not to campaign in Michigan and Florida.”
REALITY: Clinton Said “It’s Clear” That The Michigan Primary Won’t “Count For Anything”
Clinton Said “It’s Clear” That The Michigan Primary Won’t Count For Anything. Clinton, on why she stayed on the ballot for the Michigan primary said, “Well, you know, people in Michigan are flat on their backs. They have the highest unemployment rate in America. They are now grappling finally with what they are going to do with the auto industry. 1 in 10 jobs in America is tied to the auto industry which is — the American auto industry, which as we know is centered in Michigan. You know, it’s clear this election they’re having isn’t going to count for anything. But I just personally didn’t want to set up a situation where the Republicans are going to be campaigning between now and whenever. And then after the nomination we have to go in and repair the damage and be ready to win Michigan in November 2008.” [NHPR Interview, 10/11/07]
Clinton Campaign Said She Was “Not Participating in the Michigan Primary.” Clinton spokesman Mo Elleithee said, “Clinton signed a pledge saying she will not campaign. She is not participating in the Michigan primary because she is not campaigning there. She is honoring the pledge.” [New Hampshire Union Leader, 10/11/07]
Posted by: Dennis in Orlando, FL | April 27, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
Hillary is liar… If you’re willing to do or say anything to be President, then you don’t deserve to be President… it is as simple as that.
Posted by: Vision Quest | April 27, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
Hillary, a matter of character: I landed in Bosnia under sniper fire (bluff). A pregnant woman in labor and without insurance wasn’t accepted in a hospital. She died later on (bluff).She
(Hillary)has received more votes than her opponent in this election campaing(bluff)…and on, and on, and on.
Let’s review:If she counts the Florida and Michigan votes, and gives Obama credit for the caucuses on those states, he is still ahead by more than 500,000 votes yet. Any other bluffs?
Posted by: Robert | April 27, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
Most ultra liberal democrats don’t care about all of baracks baggage:
-James Wright’s “god damn America” sermon,
-Antoine’ Rezco, got barak’s campiagn started, jailed political fixer
-domestic terrorists Ayers and Dorhn
these guys blew up 25 bombs in the US
-bitter small town Americans
-HAMAS in the church bulletin
-he admitted smoking crakc / cocaine
but most mainstream americans / democrats do:
see PA OH vote results and if the media got on barack earlier, he would never have won the earlier states he did…
FOR 16 months hillary got hammered and obama got a free ride… now that some of his skeletons are out of the closet he can’t win dem primary… look at his rresults with PA AND OH DEMOGRAHPICS
smells like mcgovern
and dukakis and gore and kerry.. the ultra liberal democrats are going to give the whouse to mccain…
PA PUTS CLINTON BACK ON TOP
FLORIDA and PENNSYLVANIA are identical demographically speaking.
Barack will be painted quite easily as less than american – wright, rezco, ayers, dohrn, farrakhan, HAMAS in the church bulletin, and the list goes on…
The republican dirty tricks bag is limitless and they can’t kill hillary — her ideas wont die.
Hillary got tough questions for 16 months as the front runner, now obama cant handle the heat unless its from the end of his pipe or cigarette.
no smoking in the whitehouse
and yes … he admitted smoking CRack in his youth…. if hillary did, she would be gone a long time ago…. Hillary fired her campaign manager in NHampshire for talking about it…. though ..the republicans are going to grind him into soup meat, if he wins …
u can’t win in November
WHEN IT COUNTS THE MOST
with out FLORIDA
and PENNSYLVANIA
Obama is electorally doa.
Posted by: demvoter | April 27, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
Fact: all of the Democratic Party candidates agreed to respect the stripping of Michingan’s and Florida’s delegates, and to not campaign in those states. Fact: the voters in Michigan did not have a true choice in the Democratic primary, because Obama, Edwards, et al. were not even on th ballot because of the aforementioned agreement (not because they supposedly proscrastinated and missed the deadline). The results of the Michigan primary therefore don’t truly represent the choice of the voters in that state, because they didn’t have the ability to choose between all of the candidates officially in the race. Michigan’s primary was an illegitimate primary no matter how you look at it.
Posted by: Jim | April 27, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
With Hillary winning PA she has won ALL the BIG State’s. People say “Obama has won more State’s” Yes, true. But don;t you see taht the majority of these are SAFE REPUBLICAN State’s? In some States not even 10,000 voters came out, compared to the millions in PA, FL, OH, and even MI.
As far as I am concerned, they better count our Votes of us in MI, and our friends in Florida. Obama is trying to get it his way. Too bad he wanted his name OFF THE BALLOT in MI, HIS CHOICE, unlike some of the folks on here trying to see he didn’t have time to put it on.
Bullcrap. He was on the ballot in FL, and still lost by DOUBLE DIGITS. The Democrats pass him through as our nominee, this is one lifetime Democrat voter going to cross over to McCain.
No Obama presidency for me.
Shirley, MI
Posted by: ShirleyD | April 27, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
Hi All,
We still have a horse race between two
good candidates.
The top candidate needs two win with
2025 or more delegates, but, must win
by a 369 vote over the 2nd place
candidate.
The 369 vote gap can be made moot if
the Dems ask and help pay for primaries
in Florida and Michigan.
Thanks and Good Luck
Posted by: Frank Henry | April 28, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am
Just Words?! Clinton Says Actions Matter – They Do!
CLINTONS:
Paula Jones – LIE
MONICA – LIE,
BOSNIA – LIE,
COLUMBIA – LIE,
IRAQ VOTE – LIE,
NAFTA – LIE,
WRIGHT ONLY FRIEND OF OBAMA NOT CLINTON – LIE,
RUNNING FOR 2008 BUT NOT FOR 2012 – LIE
RACE CARD – LIE
RE-OPENING MI, FL VOTE – LIE
OBAMA AS VP – LIE
POPULAR VOTE – LIE
FERRARO – LIE
FARRAKHAN NOT FRIEND FOR ED RANDELL – LIE
$105 MILLION ASSET, 50% NOT FROM LOBBYISTS – LIE
ENDING IRAQ WAR – LIE
BILL, not intentionally “RACE CARD” topic every primary day to capture more WHITE VOTES – LIE
NOT FLIP-FLOPING ON OBAMA ELECTABILITY IN DEBATE vs RALLY – LIE
CLAIMING HER FAILED HEALTH INSURANCE UNIVERSAL – LIE
BILL “NOT” Bombing other countries 7 times day before Monica’s Court Appearance – LIE
HILLARY NOT USING 3AM Ad, “BIN LADEN” to use BUSH SCARE TACTICS – LIE
Last 20 YEARS its “BUSH+CLINTONS” like SADDAM HUSSAIN did to IRAQ REGIME. USA IS NOT REGIME – LIE
Do you really want to VOTE for 8 more years of these?
Posted by: kg | April 28, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am
People in Michigan and Florida are going to be very upset if their votes are not counted in this historical election. This needs to be fair. We are The United States of America.
Chris in Indiana
(where my vote will count….we need Michigan and Florida and all of the states to be fair!)
Posted by: chris | April 28, 2008, 3:34 am 3:34 am
“Terry McAuliffe once threatened to strip Michigan of delegates” So what? he threatened, he didn’t, he was wrong, what is the issue?
Posted by: libre | April 28, 2008, 4:36 am 4:36 am
The Democratic leadership in Michigan is to blame for our delegates not being seated. They knew that the DNC would strip us of delegates if we voted early, and they deliberately ignored party rules and held the primary early anyways. Many people, myself included, voted differently (or not at all), knowing that it would not make a difference at the convention. Now that she is losing, Hillary wants to count the votes. WE HAVE ALREADY BEEN DISILLUSIONED IN MICHIGAN. COUNTING OUR DELEGATES NOW WILL ONLY FURTHER OUR DISILLUSIONMENT. Just do your best in the remaining contests, and don’t worry that MI and FL would refuse to vote in the General Election. That is ridiculous – us folks up here in Michigan are even MORE excited to vote in the General Election! I hope to be able to vote for the candidate that has more delegates, more of the popular vote, and more electability – BARACK OBAMA!
Posted by: Jaime | April 28, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am
It’s ridiculous that she wants to account FL and MG. She behaves like a kid playing games – wants to turn over what already made as a rule/voted for when she sees herself lost.
No account! If she insist, then half and half.
Posted by: bornjustice | April 28, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
This is another current example of Hillary’s hypocrisy. The list goes on: In 2006 Hillary was refusing to have a single debate with her challenger for her seat because she was the front-runner. Now that she is not the front-runner, she considers 21 debates to be too few. She wants free air time and more opportunities to rehash the “scandals” that are the focus of her hollow campaign.
Posted by: MeMyself | April 28, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
Boy I sure am glad to be an Independent. Reading these posts is enough to drive ANY sane, honest and reasonable person fromn the Democratic Party.
Continue with this and you will once again continue your glorious streak of stealing victory from the jaws of defeat and circular firing squads.
Hillary will not only lose the White House…but probably congress along with it.
Posted by: Chris, jacksonville | April 28, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
Err….I meant stealing defeat from the jaws of victory.
Alas you know what I meant after all it is your history.
I wish there was an sane, centrist, common sense 3rd party that the intelligent people could vote in.
They would bury the Republicans and Democrats.
(shakes head)
Posted by: Chris, Jacksonville | April 28, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
VOTER “PHOTO ID” SHOULD BE REQUIRED IN ALL STATES.
OBAMA IS AFRAID TO DEBATE. HE CAN ONLY READ SPEECHES FROM A TELEPROMPTER — NOT GOOD ENOUGH TO BE OUR PRESIDENT!
WE HAVE 50 STATES — NOT 48! COUNT THEIR VOTES!
TODAY, THE DNC STRUCK A “MONEY DEAL” WITH OBAMA. THIS JUST MIGHT ASSURE HIM THE VOTES OF THE SUPER-DELEGATES. WE NEED TO GET RID OF DEAN, PELOSI, REID, KENNEDY AND KERRY.
HOW SAD FOR ALL AMERICANS. OUR VOTES DON’T MATTER — MONEY DOES!
THINK ABOUT TIES TO WRIGHT, AYERS, REZKO, FARRAKHAN, SINCLIAR, AMONG OTHERS!
WE NEED TO CLEAN OUT OUR WHITE HOUSE. WE NEED NEW REPRESENTATIVES FOR ALL 50 STATES! THINK BEFORE YOU VOTE FOR SENATORS AND CONGRESS MEMBERS.
VOTE HILLARY 2008!
Posted by: 4MYCOUNTRY | April 28, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
HRC and her supporters may be hypocrits on this issues. But that’s not unique. Any politician does that. Had the position reverse and Obama in HRC’s shoe election result wise, he would advocate the same thing regardless of initial call. But what matter is I found democrates are really undemocratic. It’s disenfranchisement of voters of two important states with their rules. I think the country is ripe for a third party. I wish HRC leaves the democrats and start a third party though unlikely, :( Dems has move too far left and not in synch with the mainstream american.
Posted by: JJ-VA | April 29, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am
Remember folks, some of the more bizarre and incendiary comments on these boards, and perhaps most of them, are from the Lush Rambo HRC for nominee contingent, right-wing nutcases many of them, Republican voters come fall every time. They are posing as both HRC backers and Obama backers in order to divide the Democrats and alienate us from sticking with the Dems if our choice is not the nominee. Don’t fall for it–Dems must unite when this is over.
Posted by: stan | April 29, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am
Senator Obama is a train wreck, a tornado, earthquake and a hurricane all rolled up into one “typical” politician.
One simply does not know what he is or what he believes in. He keeps trying to change his colors in order to win. It looks like Obama’s chickens “are coming home to roost”.
GO, SENATOR CLINTON!
Posted by: CONCERNED | April 29, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am
The article is stating that “Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., has staked her path to the Democratic nomination on the officially illegitimate contests held in Michigan and Florida somehow being recognized, in opposition to Democratic National Committee rules.”
Look at what we have here, several Clinton supporting delusional fleeing from reality. She has lost…. I see dead people, it’s just they don’t realize they’re dead.
Posted by: Fred | May 3, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am