By Saira Anees

Apr 9, 2008 10:05am

Clinton Campaign Debt Watch, Part II

You may recall when we took a look at Sen. Hillary Clinton’s $8.7 million in campaign debts she reported (see "Debt Be Not Proud," March 31).

One of those debts comes from a visit by former President Bill Clinton to a school in California — the University of California in Davis.

The local CBS station reports that the school "is ready to take the Clinton presidential campaign to a collection agency if they do not pay back the thousands of dollars they are still owed" if the bill is not paid within the month.

"Ready on Day One! (Debt collectors, come see me the middle of next month, please.)"

- jpt

User Comments

Sad that this candidate is still being not only considered but people are fighting for this to be much of the the management of the west wing.
ugh

Posted by: dl | April 9, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

The campaign still owes Penn more than 2,000,000 dollars which is a great nuisance now that they would prefer to fire him.
But if they do, Penn will show the MSM Clinton’s piles of dirty laundry and THAT would certainly close the last door for her. For the problem is: Penn knows everything about the Clintons.

Posted by: susan | April 9, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

The school is being petty and some on in their finance dept backs Obama.
Its not unusual.

Posted by: s.b. | April 9, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

And notice that this was a JANUARY event!
That really tells us something about what these many many debts are about. The campaign will never get out of that debt hole anymore; at Hillary’s official site the PA donations meter learns us that the online donations have slowed down enormously, in fact they’ve almost come to a standstill.
She has 5 ads up in PA, but no money to pay of them. It is a real disaster, believe me.

Posted by: hencken | April 9, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

s.b…..come on, stop blaming Obama for Hillarys mismanagement.
If she owed me money I would want ot get paid also. How can she run our country if she cannot run her own finances?

Posted by: cindy | April 9, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am

This is not unusual at all.
Where I live there was a nomination fight that ended, 15 months ago. The person who won still hasn’t paid off his debts. (people are beginning to be concerned) The campaigns have 18 months to pay their debts under election financing laws here, some of the strictest in the world, but they can apply for an extension. I dont know what election law says about time frames to pay off debts for US federal nomination contests, but I bet its more than two months.
A two month old debt for a nomination contest that is still ongoing is not unusual in the slightest.
The school is being petty and someone who works there backs Obama.

Posted by: s.b. | April 9, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

No need to panic. Just chill out, help is on the way.
Yes there is a Horserace here in Penna. Hillary with her 35 years of combat experience, most recently her heroics in Bosnia, has all the Horses coming to her rescue. As usual Mr. Ed & Mayor Nutter have come out to take Lil Hillary by the hand, spoon fed her, and lead her around to the FUND RAISERS which she enjoys very much.
Senator Obama has been going at it alone. No small task since the The Old Guard Demos mounted a 26 point lead for Hillary when Obama came to town. He has shown us here in Pa. that he is willing to do it the American Way. He works for it.
Hillary Horses have been trained well, they sing many songs of praise for her. However, if you listen closely it becomes quite clear which part of the Horse this talk is coming from. That”s no BS…..

Posted by: Fool me | April 9, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

This debt is not unusual, not in the business world, not in the government world, not in the campagin world.
Does anyone think that the Clinton’s can borrow money or raise money after making 109 million in 8 years???
Honestly. This debt is a non issue and a ploy by someone who supports Obama.
She has spent too much money on her staff, and has not spent enough on TV advertising. That’s an issue. The fact that online donnors are still outpacing her for Obama is news.
A small two month old debt to a college campaus is not news. It’s not unusual.
Its petty.

Posted by: s.b. | April 9, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

I like Hillary but the Hillary campaign has been a disaster.
Pay up your debts Hillary.

Posted by: maritza | April 9, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am

Hencken is right. And I’m amazed that journalists do not seem to follow what’s going on the candidates’ official web sites. They should be fascinating material.
Hillary’s finances are going to be the Total Disaster this month.
For almost a week now there is this special PA donations meter up on the front page of Hillary’s web site. In all those days she raised a TOTAL of 341.000 dollars for ‘TV Airtime’in PA.
However she’s spending millions on PA TV ads, desperately trying to compete with Obama’s record spending in the state.
It is totally irresponsible behavior, and there’ll be an enormous backlash that could even make her lose her Senate seat in the next election. It’s sad, but true.

Posted by: arianne | April 9, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

For all those who say this is “normal”… tell that to the guy in NH who fell behind on his own payments because of rent from the Clinton campaign. They would not pay him until he went to the press.
Campaigns…or good ones…with good candidates …with the ability to manage them (sound ones anyway) don’t normally have numerous issues where the threat of debt collectors are brought in over and over.
This was not created by Obama supporters…this was created more by people the Clintons did business with…and I would guess most of them use to be Clinton supporters when they were interacting with them initially.
Management and Inspiring people to work with you are half the job of the President…oh yeah and judgement “pre” not post a situation.

Posted by: dl | April 9, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Well she’s going to raise a couple of million tonight in NY so she’ll have enough to pay for the ads.
Her win in Penn will also generate donations.
Remember something, Obama has to outspend her 4:1 in Texas and Ohio to lose ground. He’s outspending her 5:1 in Penn and she’s still winning.
That’s not good for Obama. McCain will have 85 million to spend in two months for the general election. Will obama have 400 million????
Doubtfull.
It’s a problem for Obama. People should be asking why he isn’t blowing her out of the water when he’s been outspending her 4:1 for months.

Posted by: s.b. | April 9, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

Wow. Can we please let Clinton run the country! She really knows how to run something. I mean, look at the state of her campaign.
Pay your bills!

Posted by: for Hillary | April 9, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Well the guy in NH had empty office space, that is probably still empty that she paid to rent.
He wouldnt have made his bill payments anyways, if the story is true because his office space was empty. If you cant make your payments one month’s rent isn’t going to change that.
Like I said, its normal to take time to pay bill sin a campaign and to pay off debt.

Posted by: s.b. | April 9, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Obama is running a campaign where he has to outspend his competator 4:1 to break even.
Much like his policies his campaign is expensive. Wait for your tax bills if he is ever elected.
Spending is what hedoes best. Again I’m not sure that’s such a good thing in a Presidential candidate, especially spending 4 times your opponent just to break even and not lose ground.

Posted by: s.b. | April 9, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am

For those of you who think this is normal business practice, you would NOT be able to sustain your business like this… as a small business manager, you wouldn’t be happy if your customers didn’t pay you on time, how would you pay your own bills? And if you don’t pay your own bills I doubt anyone would want to extend you credit especially when they ask for referrals!
Either way, how is it ok not to pay someone?

Posted by: bluesxtreme | April 9, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am

Yes Clinton would be much better at running the country, so would McCain. They both hold their own or better without burning through 55 million a month.
You bet they’d both be better at running the country.
Obama’s campagin is like Imelda Marcos at a shoe sale on steroids.
Wait for the tax bill if he’s ever elected President. The thing he knows how to do best is spend money.

Posted by: s.b. | April 9, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

He’s outspending her in PA because he is looking at it for the general. …and in every state no matter whether she paid the same for tv ads or not… he gained significantly as the state got to know him better. When they really finally focused on the candidates he gained…significantly. As he is doing in PA again…she starts with the “first Lady for 8 years ” lead and then they realize what a real candidate looks like not just one with name recognition.
He has to fight for the nomination because she has been the “queen” of the party for 15 years and has every politician in the state looking at her as the old boss…”Do I lose my job or take a risk that a new boss is comning in?”…and feeling pressure to campaign for her. That’s hefty battle to fight.
but he’s winning…who knew someone could beat the old political machine.

Posted by: dl | April 9, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

sb,
who are to trying to brainwash with your ‘it’s not unusual’? LOL. Us of yourself?
There have been many reports, even by Clinton backers, on the UNUSUAL amount and expansion of the Clinton campaign’s debts. And they are progressive at high speed; this month as said here will very probably become the most disastrous one, for she’s heavily outspending her own funds in PA, while Obama is still outspending her with the many millions donated to him every week.
Just imagine what the Super Delegates will make of this when weighing the strength of her campaign. Who would want to see a candidate go into the GE with piles of debts on his or her shoulders? Believe me, it is VERY damaging to her.

Posted by: hencken | April 9, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

A political campaign is not a small business, its a political campaign.
And businesses take two months to pay their bills all the time.
How many installments do you get to pay your tax bill??? 4 right.
It’s normal and it’s a campaign, very normal.
Campaigns generally use friendlies to provide what they need. There is someone at this school that is an Obama supporter, that’s all.
It’s not unusual.

Posted by: s.b. | April 9, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

What does the law say about the time frame to pay off debts for a political campaign???
2 months??? I doubt it.
How many intallments do you get to pay your taxes?????
This is pure political pettiness on the part of the Obama campaign, that is best at spending money.
55 million a month to break even.

Posted by: s.b. | April 9, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am

I’d like to hear the facts on this one. Did the Clinton campaign ever receive an invoice? I used to pay contractor’s invoices and would get overbilled by many thousands of dollars. I would not pay until the bill was made accurate, a good management practice.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 9, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am

If I were a super delegate, I’d consider how much money Obama has had to spend to break even with Clinton.
Will he have 400 million to outspend McCain by the same margin to not lose ground??
A very compelling question!

Posted by: s.b. | April 9, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am

California Businessman Kyriakos Tsakopoulos Joins Barack Obama National Finance Team
He is a Member of the Board of Trustees of Columbia University, and also sits on the Board of Visitors of Columbia College. He is a Trustee of the California State University System, the largest university system in the world, and sits on the Board of the University of California, Davis M.I.N.D. Research Institute,

Posted by: countallthevotes | April 9, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

Its true, campaigns often carry debts over a few months to try and make their cash situation appear positive! The Hillary supporting posters are correct! Of course, the reason this is newsworthy in this campaign is that Ms. Clinton’s opponent is not doing so, which demonstrates the huge disparity between the fund raising success of the two campaigns. Is this media bias? No! Should be media be focusing even more attention on the flagging finances are poll data of the Clinton campaign? Yes! The Clinton spin-machine is effectively countering the very logical signs of a failing campaign with the same sort of claims posters on this site have made. “Media bias”, “non-news”, “out-spent but still winning” are all dodges generated by the Clinton campaign and perpetuated by her supporters. The real harm of dragging out the nomination process is proving not to be the harmful attacks as much as the party division generated through claims of an unfair pro-Obama bias. As of today, the only pro-Obama bias with an impact should be the +8% in the Gallup poll.

Posted by: Rick Johnson | April 9, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

@s.b.
“If I were a super delegate, I’d consider how much money Obama has had to spend to break even with Clinton.”
First, Obama is leading in every aspect of the race, instead of ‘breaking even’.
As an example, in the end he came out of Texas having won more delegates, two weeks after a 20 point lead in the polls for Clinton. So that has been some might effective spending.
Second, what else is Obama supposed to do with the many millions donated to him than spending it on the promotion of his campaign? His supporters expect and encourage him to do just that. Or do you expect him to pay Penn’s bills with it since Hillary fails to do so?

Posted by: hencken | April 9, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am

Of course obama has more monmey than Clinton we know that.
A two month old bill however is not news.
The real story, and its not a distraction is:
“How can Obama be spending this much money, and it is collosal, record breaking, most ever in the history of political campaigns on the face of the planet kind of money, not be winning in all the battle ground states and all the big states and in fact is only 1% ahead in the pop vote and even in delegates when MI and FL are counted.
How can he be spending THAT MUCH MONEY and not be blowing her out of the water???
That’s a real story!
He’s the Mitt Romney of the Democratic Party. Will he have 400 million to beat McCain, or just stay even with him?
No he won’t.

Posted by: s.b. | April 9, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am

Here’s a breakdown of expenses:
- The UC Davis Marching Band cost $500.
- Cleanup services after the rally cost $250.
- UC Davis Police officers didn’t come as cheap. The security bill is more than $5,600.
“I’m more than willing to be held accountable for it, because that’s the way life is,” Hillary Clinton said to a Montana crowd on Monday. There is no word whether she’ll apply that philosophy here, or if she even knows about the outstanding debt.
Her Sacramento campaign office closed its doors after Super Tuesday, and her campaign spokespeople didn’t return my calls.
UC Davis is planning to put its final bill out this week, and if the debt has not been settled within a month, they are going to turn the matter over to a collection agency.
It looks like the Elitist can not pay their bills again
Maybe she should send them a personal chrck you know out of their millions

Posted by: lauren | April 9, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

No Obama is 1% ahead inthe pop vote and dead even in delegates.
You see in Nov Mi and Fl count.
To not count them is to lose the white house.
They are dead even tied.
And this takes him 55 million per month, in select states. How much money is that across every state for two months for the general. About 400 million, to hold his ground.
He doesn’t have that much money. That’s what he needs to break even with another candidate and that’s in a race where they have to play nice. The Republicans wont play nice.

Posted by: s.b. | April 9, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

This might not matter so much if it were the only lingering unpaid bill, but it’s not. The Clinton campaign is being mismanaged, plain and simple. Obama is out-fundraising her, managing his campaign better, and he has won (Hillary just hasn’t admitted it yet).

Posted by: Ruth | April 9, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

Lauren — You seem very disturbed by the fact that the Clintons have made millions of dollars.

Posted by: LOM | April 9, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

@sb
“How can he be spending THAT MUCH MONEY and not be blowing her out of the water???”
You might not have noticed, but he is doing just that. He has demolished the Clinton Machine. He has beaten the candidate who was supposed to be the Unbeatable and Entitled One when the primaries started. The Clintons still refuse to believe what actually has happened: a junior black Senator named Barack Hussein Obama has been able to succesfully barricade their return to White House… an AMAZING achievement that no one could have ever predicted.
And please check today’s polls again.

Posted by: hencken | April 9, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am

If I were a super delegate, I’d consider how much money Obama has had to spend to break even with Clinton.
Will he have 400 million to outspend McCain by the same margin to not lose ground??
A very compelling question!
Posted by: s.b. | Apr 9, 2008 10
This is good because it shows the supers just how many people support him that they are more than willing to GIVE HIM THEIR HARD EARNED MONEY.
a vey god thing
Go Barack

Posted by: lauren | April 9, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

No s.b., we shouldn’t question why he isn’t blowing her out of the water….we already know the answer to that. See, facts are little pesky things to you hillary supporters that just keep getting in the way of your fairytale lies.
He has had an uphill battle from ‘day one’. He has managed to close the gap, from ‘day one’. Even though the man has a white mother he is still considered black. The clintons have done all they could to insure that everyone knows he’s the black candidate, including help from Geraldine ‘I’m not a racist’ Ferraro. (Someone please help me understand WHY she made the comment at all! The same comment she made 20 yrs ago)
He is not able to put her away because he is black. It is that simple. You hillary supporters would love to claim that she is somehow a better candidate. No, she isn’t. He just happens to have brown skin. And we all know that most whites simply won’t vote for him because of that simple fact. Another fact: racism is alive and well in the good ole usa.
So stop playing the stupid card, it doesn’t look good on you.

Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 9, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

The Clinton campaign out-raised and out-spent the Obama campaign before Super-Tuesday. Aren’t current arguments about being outspent short sighted? In December she was declaring she would be the nominee after Super-Tuesday, then it turned out she had spent all her money and netted less delegates. To argue spending after that point is to accept that her campaign under her guidance horribly mismanaged her money and face-recognition advantages. Which is it? Did she let her campaign spiral toward a loss, or has she just been beaten by a very charismatic politician? No matter how you spin the numbers, even by including the Florida vote, Obama still leads in the popular vote.

Posted by: Rick Johnson | April 9, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am

McCain might still impress some folks with his POW stories and analysis of Al Qaeda operations in some Miami home for the elderly, while enjoying a glass of lemonade.

Posted by: gatsby | April 9, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am

Peter Acevedo
Interesting link. Very informative.
Thanks!

Posted by: S | April 9, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am

Here’s how political campaigns work for those out there who don’t know and have never been involved in one, as evidenced by many comments on these threads.
A campaign will say have an event at a restaurant, like Clinton did several times in Nevada. This restaurant has to bill the campaign, under the law. They however are friendly to the campaign, ie a supporter. So, WHEN they get paid is not an issue to them ie a year later, or whatever is allowed under the law.
Obviously, some bills are paid right away like for advertising. They have to be paid for before they happen.
Polling however, as in Mark Penn’s firm, can probably wait a while. So out of the 8.7 million dollars of debt the vast majority of it is to friendlies i.e. they dont care when they get paid.
So you have non issues like one landlord saying he didnt get paid a months rent. It can happen. Bills gets lost in the shuffle. Someone forgets or thinks someone else was taking care of it ie paid through the local bank account not the central campaign.
Non issue really. Or a university that’s pro Obama saying that if they arent paid within a month, they will send their bill to collection and goes to the press about it. Notice the bill hasn’t gone to collections and we dont even know if the campaign was properly invoiced in the first place. etc.
These are so minor as to be laughable and to highlight them in the press is petty, well its an Obama campaign tactic.
The Liberal Party in Canada had a leadership contest last year. The combined debt of the candidates after the contest ended, was about ten million. That’s for a country with one tenth the population, so a comparable figure is 100 million in debt after the race was finished. Possibly much more as only about 2% of Canadians belong to political parties.
It’s at least a 100 million debt in comparison. The fact that Clinton is 8.7 million in debt to friendlies is a total non issue in a political campaign. It really is. It’s much ado about nothing and its a part of the same get out of the race garbage that has been perpetuated by the Obama campaign since IOWA.
The fact that he outspends her massively and is still tied, (yes FL and MI exist) is the real issue.

Posted by: s.b. | April 9, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

Is this a suprise to anyone? That Mark Penn has been paid over 10 million dollars while the small vendors are having to consider court? The Clintons have always taken care of their friends and everyone else can go fly a kite.
Imagine this woman as President…these’s a reason the fat cats support her. They KNOW there’s a payday if she wins..one way or the other. They also know that if Obama wins? The gravey train is over.

Posted by: Sam | April 9, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am

These two “unpaid bills”, are as simple as someone putting them in the friendly pile when they weren’t.
Hillary Clinton will have no problem whatsoever paying off her campaign debts in the required time under the law.

Posted by: s.b. | April 9, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am

Sam it’s quite the opposite. Her “friends” dont get paid as quickly. That’s how political campaigns always work.

Posted by: s.b. | April 9, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

It is no surprise that hillary and her supporters are constantly bringing up MI and FL. That is their plan to twist reality in the minds of the voters.
Obama set this issue up from the start.
Obama is the candidate who made sure that MI and FL attempted to move their primaries ahead of everyone else because they wanted the media spotlight.
Obama is the reason MI and FL primaries were not counted.
Obama made the rules.
Obama, single handedly, twisted hillarys arm (and the other candidates) and forced her to sign the pledge.
It is all Obama’s fault.
lol you people are truly ridiculous.

Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 9, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

Actually, 5 million of the debt is to herself and 2.5 million is to Mark Penns firm for advertising and polling, so her real debt of unpaid invoices is 1.2 million.
When the campaign is spending 30 million a month. That means that they are 1.2 DAYS behind on their invoices.
Absolutely much ado about nothing!

Posted by: s.b. | April 9, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

I work for the UC system. Obviously, someone in the UC systems who is an Obama supporter is using this as a political and negative attack on Hillary. Shame on you. Trust me when I tell you there are bills in the UC system that do not get paid for years that are greater than this.

Posted by: mona | April 9, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

LA in Indiana, Justfy anything you want.
Obama can’t win while disenfranchising 8% of the electorate.
If he wins the nomination without MI and FL counting, he has lost the white house.
You can say whatever you want. Nothing changes that fact. Florida and Michigan will vote Republican.
You can scream from the rooftops about how unfair it is and rules are rules.
MI and Fl will vote republican and Obama has lost the white hose for the Democrats by supressing the vote of 8% of the electorate.

Posted by: s.b. | April 9, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

Why do Obama supporters even care? Their position is that he already won. Their position is that he still wins even with the FL and MI votes counted.
So lay back, ralax, Obama people, just count all the votes. What is your problem; why all the angst??

Posted by: countallthevotes | April 9, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

Hillary is worth 109 million and yet is stiffing the little guy. But she has enough to pay Mark Penn 10 million.
The Clinton campaign trashed hotels in Iowa and ran up donations on a campaign worker she didn’t agree to so much she got in credit trouble.
Clintons also won’t let people stop montly automatic payments if they want to stop them.
Clintons are not paying bands that performed for them.
Clintons are not paying interest in late payments even when they do pay back.
Hillary is worth 109 million yet is charging interest to be paid back to her for her 5 million dollar loan.

Posted by: Jason | April 9, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

lol s.b. again….
Yes, Obama is the one who is disenfranchising the voters in MI and FL.
It is Obama’s fault. Explain why exactly is is his fault.
And tell me s.b. why is that miss inevitable didn’t open her mouth about MI and FL until she was losing???
If she thought they were being disenfranchised from ‘day one’, why didn’t she open her mouth when it was time to sign the pledge???
Oh….and if you give her FL, does she win?
Michigan is a different story in all of this, but all you hillary supporters have stated and continue to state that it was a “FAIR” primary.
Let’s change the rules when its convenient for our candidate….you would be crying foul from the rooftops if the situation were reversed.

Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 9, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

Hillary Clinton has many positions that differ from her husbands.
She is much more conservative and protectionist than he is and was a Republican her whole life until she became involved with him.
She has her own ideas.
Besides, he isnt telling a foreign government to ignore what she says on the campaign trail because she really doesnt mean it.
He expressed his own oppinion THREE YEARS AGO, that a) could have changed and b) is his own.

Posted by: s.b. | April 9, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

What fools the people of Ohio were played for.
Yeah Hillary Clinton who sat on the board of walmart is for the little guy.
Yeah Hillary Clinton who in 2004 said on balance nafta is good for america is for the working man. She was speaking to a business group when she said it. Another problem with the Clintons is honesty.
Hillary pushed for nafta. She held meetings gathering support for nafta and in her book called nafta a great success.
It is time for the electorate in pennsylvania to call out the Clintons hypocracy.

Posted by: Jason | April 9, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

Obama sent teams of lawyers to MI and Fl to block revotes.
Everyone in those states knows he is campaigning to keep their votes from counting.
Say whatever you like. MI and Fl know he is the one blocking their delegations from being seated based on how they voted. Even his own campaign team in Michigan admits it and has asked him to let the delegates stand as is.
Again, say what you like, MI and FL know who is keeping their votes from counting. It isn’t Hillary Clinton and it certainly isn’t John McCain.

Posted by: s.b. | April 9, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

Hillary is bad at management.
She had no clue her campaign was going broke. She rarely calls into headquaters. She is said to be aloof.
She let Mark Penn run the campaign. Gore fired Mark Penn in 2000. Not only is she aloof she picks advisors for loyalty over competence.
Hillary Clinton has never run anything in her life. She is an incompetent manager. She is not suited to be a cheif executive.

Posted by: Jason | April 9, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

Voters of Pennsylvania put this trainwreck of a campaign out of its misery.

Posted by: Jason | April 9, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

Will somebody PLEASE sound the bugle and end this thing. Hillary at this point is just making a total fool of herself.

Posted by: DMR | April 9, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

Come on Jason.
Where in the world do you get the idea that the clintons are worth $109M? Give us a break!

Posted by: S | April 9, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

@ s.b. Obama did not “burn” through 55 million his donors “gave” this amount, at the end of the month he had 30+ million in cash, $625000 of unpaid debts FOR THE MONTH, I know this is a stretch but check your facts before you post. He has to spend money in order to introduce himself to the people of these states, when these people get to know him hillary numbers go way down.
I she can’t budget millions of dollars how can expect her to manage billions, trillions of dollars. This is the height of hypocrisy.

Posted by: Carol | April 9, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

I love the wall mart bashing.
lol
Yeah the working class hates Wallmart. That’s why they have so many customers.
Only the bourgeois hate Wallmart and those white upper middle class college kids looking for a purpose in life to alleviate their guilt.
Lots of people appreciate paying less money for household goods and can’t shop at Crate and Barrel or the Pottery Barn. Arent those cute names where you pay too much money for goods made in sweatshopsin the underdeveloped world. Soo much better than Wallmart.

Posted by: s.b. | April 9, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

The fact of the matter is that Obama and his advisers are not quite as smart as they think. There is nothing more sacred in this country as one man/woman one vote. By showing their rather intense disinterest in not allowing the Fla. and Mighigan delagations to be seated, team Obama had shown it isn’t really interested in the fudamental rights of our citizens to be heard. It’s yes we can only if you vote for me.
No wonder they don’t want a revote in these state, if Clinton wins Pa. by more the 5%, then a Florida followup could be a Obama disaster. It is a shame that the Clinton camp is soooo inept in exploiting this hyposcrisy. Where’s the outrage on this? Can somebody get Howard Dean a teaching job in Vermont, his leadership, his courage and vision, and the DNC have beeen a disaster on this. It is always easy to be a small man, Howard. True courage is surrmounting the fear of losing by standing foremost for principal, got that Senator Obama?

Posted by: Jersey John | April 9, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

We do not need a monarchy in this country. The Clintons need to put themselves out pasture. They have done their best for thirty-five years and now its time for someone else. Once a person has passed their peak mental and physical part of their lives its time to pass the torch on to someone else. I am ready for a younger and more vigorous outlook.

Posted by: Rich | April 9, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

to S,
Jason got this dollar amount from their tax returns “dumped” late last friday.

Posted by: Carol | April 9, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

My facts are correct.
Obama spends money like Imelda Marcos at a fire sale, and he’s still tied.
When you count MI and FL, he’s soon to be behind, even with all that money.
That’s trouble in a general election. When he has to outspend his opponent in a friendly race 4:1 to be tied.
Again. The Republicans won’t be friendly with him.

Posted by: s.b. | April 9, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

What will be the national debt be if she gets in? Cripes will we have debt collectors knocking on the white House doors?
She can not manage her Campaign how in gods name will she manage a nation..and represent us world wide?
Boy are we in trouble if she gets in. Be afraid be very afraid if she wins .

Posted by: Lauren | April 9, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

Jason you think anyone voting for Hillary is foolish. I suppose then most working class people are foolish? Now how elitist is that?
Nice that you know so much more than all the working class fools.
Tell me, have Obama and Michelle ever had a real job, you know prior to being professionals?
They have not that I can see anywhere. While most students were working summers to pay their college tuition. Obama was travelling the world to Indonesia, India, Pakistan. Not only did he not have to work to pay his tuition, he had funds for that kind of trip!!!
While Hillary was a student at Wellesley, she spent one summer cleaning fish in Valdez, Alaska.

Posted by: countallthevotes | April 9, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

DMR back to Jake’s earlier post on sexism. No one, and I mean no one, would be calling for Obama to leave the race or for Michigan and Florida not to count if the situation were reversed.
Obama’s campaign would be screaming racism from the rooftops.
They are tied. MI and FL exist. There is absolutely no reason for Clinton to leave the race when she is leading in most of the rest of the contests.
Absolutely no reason, other than sexism.

Posted by: s.b. | April 9, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

Wow
I always figured the the Elite paid their bills ontime…Guess what they say is true you do learn something new everday

Posted by: Lauren | April 9, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Bill,
why don’t you dip into the $800,000 you got from Uribe and the Colombians? You know for supporting the Free Trade Deal that your wife….SUPPOSEDLY opposes!
WINK WINK!

Posted by: stacy | April 9, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

Facts are Facts He is getting more in donations than hillary he has more supporters
My facts are correct.
Obama spends money like Imelda Marcos at a fire sale, and he’s still tied.
When you count MI and FL, he’s soon to be behind, even with all that money.
That’s trouble in a general election. When he has to outspend his opponent in a friendly race 4:1 to be tied.
Again. The Republicans won’t be friendly with him.
Posted by: s.b. | Apr 9, 2008 12:20:10 P

Posted by: Lauren | April 9, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

Lauren if he has soo many supporters, why is he about to be behind in the popular vote??
Just wondering.
He is also already well behind in the electoral college vote, which is all the support that matters.
Outspending her 4:1 and significantly behind in the electoral college vote is not good news for Obama and should be a great concern to super delegates.
Oh yeah, he has to disenfranchise 8% of the electorate to win too. Something else to consider.

Posted by: s.b. | April 9, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

s.b-
Yes she is telling a foreign gov. to ignore what she says on the stump.
It turned out it was her campaign that cold the Canadians to take Hillary Rodham Clinton’s remarks with a “grain of salt.”
Mark Penn and BILL CLINTON both support the Colombian Trade Deal.
Her words…”if someone in my campaign was caught saying the opposite behind closed doors to a foreing government than what I was saying to the American People, I would say that raises a lot of questions…The old WINK WINK!”

Posted by: stacy | April 9, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

S.B, Hillary herself said the election in Michigan didn’t count for anything.
Hillary in New Hampshire in October on NPR said this election in Michigan isn’t going to count for anything.
She didn’t change her tune until she needed them after their flawed elections.
Michigan and Florida were the only states where the GOP had a higher turnout.
Voters in Michigan stayed home or voted in the GOP primary.
Now Hillary is saying those voters independents who chose to vote in a meaningful primary in michigan now can’t vote in the new dem primary.
The cheif clinton surrogate making this argument is harold ickes who himself helped make the rules saying Michigan shouldn’t count.
The Clinton supporters in michigan originally moved it up so it would be so early the one with the name recognition would win. They also wanted it during winter break where the youth turnout would be reduced.
Moving Michigan up hurt Obama in New Hampshire.
In New Hampshire 9 of the 10 campuses were closed. You not only had the students away but you had all the support staff and professors away too.
Hillary would have lost New Hampshire if those campuses had been in session.

Posted by: Jason | April 9, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

countallthevotes
He went to these places because that is where his mother was at the time. He had student loans for his tuition, working to improve your community means not only was he working but he was making much less than he could’ve if he worked in corporate america

Posted by: Carol | April 9, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

Here is something to ponder. Do they wealthy remember what it is truly like to struggle with bill paying…Even if they were poor in the past? Some have said in the beginning it reminds them but as time goes by the memory fades.
they collect higher debts they buy more expensive toy or what they would call luxuriousness, boats, villas, $1000.00 toilets private jets. Do they really understand people have to juggle money around just to pay bills? GOD help them when there car breaks down there goes an unexpected expense.

Posted by: Lauren | April 9, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

First lady Michelle Obama.
Think about it.

Posted by: S | April 9, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

sure s.b. just keep saying its Obama’s fault and the working class will believe you. They might even vote for hillary. lol
And I believe you’re wrong….if Obama was behind at this point, everyone would be telling him to fold so they could unite behind hillary. People have already been calling for him to fold, even though he’s in the lead. So how’s that for fairness?!
S, the clintons took in $109 million since leaving office in 2001. But I betcha that $109 million wasn’t on your back, correcto??
And the amount given to ‘charity’ was to their own clinton charity….how ’bout THAT for charity!

Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 9, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

SB
He is not behind yet
BUT HILLARY IS

Posted by: Lauren | April 9, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

OH FACTS – WHERE ARE YOU HIDING … NOT AT ABC! — FROM CBS — “UC Davis is planning to put its final bill out this week, and if the debt has not been settled within a month, they are going to turn the matter over to a collection agency. ”
So for a mid-Jan event, the final bill is going out – as per their own process – this week, and the campaign has until May 12 to pay it. This is not unpaid debt – it’s a bill that’s coming due.
By that standard, everyone here has unpaid debt which will be sent to the collections agency — (unless you’ve paid your credit cards/mortgages/phone/etc into next month!!)

Posted by: davis | April 9, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Hillary has run a disasterous campaign!
If she can’t even manage her campaign’s budget, how is she going to manage the Country’s budget?
You can tell alot about what kind of Candidate they are based on how they run their campaign.

Posted by: jj | April 9, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

Her campaign is the firs thing Hillary has ever managed in her life…and she managed to run it into debt!
Hillary, we can’t afford a “train on the job” candidate in this economy!

Posted by: stacy | April 9, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

“UC Davis is planning to put its final bill out this week,
the key word is Final.
I done billing in a Dr. office we would send out 2 regular bills Then on the 3 month we would place a sticker on it and the sticker read FINAL please pay the potion above. If it has been paid please disregard

Posted by: Lauren | April 9, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

Did you guys check out how tired and run-down Hillary looked yesterday in the hearings?
I get the feeling that is how she’ll look when she picks up the phone at 3:00 AM! NOT VERY REASSURING!

Posted by: jj | April 9, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Both Hillary Rodham and John McCain have managed to run their campaings into debt.
Obama’s campaign is soaring! He has managed his finances smartly!
Who would you trust with our economy?
Obama ’08

Posted by: THEECONOMYSTUPID | April 9, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

How is it Obama’s fault if the delegates from Fla and Mi do not get counted. These states had 18 months to get their act together, called Dean’s bluff and lost. BOTH CANDIDATES agreed not to campaign those states and shady Hillary stuck her nose in there and did it anyway. Even with Obama taking his name off the Mi ballot. He has never said do not count the votes let’s find a fair way is what he said. Lets keep the facts in context and by the Obama is gaining on Clinton in Pa.

Posted by: porterwayne757 | April 9, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

The 5 new ads Clinton is running in Pennsylvania are not going to help her bottom line and if she wins there she’ll have even less to campaign in the 9 remaining states.

Posted by: Cindy | April 9, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

jj posted:
“You can tell alot about what kind of Candidate they are based on how they run their campaign.”
Answer, and what about GW? He ran two ball buster campaigns agaisnt heavy weight Dems.

Posted by: countallthevotes | April 9, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

If Howard Dean discounts the rules set in place prior to the start of this race, then every state will try to jump the gun.
Haven’t you heard….MI and FL have already set their primary dates for the next election. Their primary is to start November 5, 2008, for the 2012 primary season.
The latest news has Ohio and New York attempting to push their primary dates up to November 4, 2008.

Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 9, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

MI and FL will go republican if they are not seated, as is.
They know who doesnt want their votes to count.
They dont need to be told anything by the Obama campaign, the Clinton campaign or Howard Dean.
They know. If Obama wins the nomination by not counting 8% of the voters he cannot win a general election.
Democrats either want to win the white house or they don’t.
MI and FL need to be counted.

Posted by: s.b. | April 9, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Why haven’t seen any article about Obama’s performance in the Iraq hearing? Guess he is not doing well. Just read the raw data about the hearing (can’t help laughting).

Posted by: Jake | April 9, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

countallthevotes:
Actually, what sunk Kerry were the swiftboat ads. Bush had nothing to do with it.
By the way, I love Bush…inspite of everything that has gone bad with the economy and the war…I cheered for him and refuse to place ALL the blame on him.

Posted by: jj | April 9, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

Just an observation, But I think its funny how barack didn’t want this to be about race and Hillary didn’t want it to be about gender. Look at the democrats now. Im indpendent but I do support Obama but if Hillary wins she has my vote cause Mcain doesn’t have any vison for the country. Now you guys can tear each other apart all you want but I hope Hillary supporters don’t cry sexisum then vote for Mccain because he is almost opposite of Hillary. You guys need to judge your values a little better and not be so bitter. Thats goes for both sides of this primary. PEACE LOVE NO WAR! Unite!

Posted by: Joe | April 9, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

jj,
Swiftboats did not sink Kerry; Kerry sunk Kerry. That should have been a nobrainer. During all the hoopla do you recall that strange photo of him in the stretchy bike suit and head gear with the very expensive bike?? He just did not have a clue in the end of how he was coming across.
Kerry sunk Kerry. Time willl tell what kind of a president GW really was.

Posted by: countallthevotes | April 9, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

LA in Indiana posted:
“If Howard Dean discounts the rules set in place prior to the start of this race, then every state will try to jump the gun.”
The DNC Rules did not require discounting the votes of any state. There was discretion afforded to craft a remedy in the event that a state was found to be in violation. Discounting votes is not mandated by the DNC Rules.

Posted by: countallthevotes | April 9, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

If I charged something on my credit card in January and hadn’t made a payment by Apil or May, there would be consequences. UC Davis can probably afford this better then some of the small businesses that her campaign has stiffed, but why should they. Of the three campaigns, hers is the only one that has left this mess wherever they go. Infighting, staff fired, irresponsible about debts, lies on end. . . This is not the picture of a person who I want representing my country to the world.

Posted by: karela | April 9, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

countallthevotes–RE: Kerry–
You’re kidding, right? Kerry didn’t win because he rode an expensive BIKE? He was a five-time decorated war veteran, but the “support the troops” party wore Purple Heart bandages at the convention and voted in the alcoholic service-evader.
Unbelievable. Propaganda works, people.
“Time willl tell what kind of a president GW really was. ”
Well for one thing, he’s a BIKE RIDER.

Posted by: maribelle | April 9, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

Clinton’s plan for the economy!
Creating jobs — for debt collectors!
Obama 2008 — Yes, WE CAN!!!

Posted by: Jackt51 -- Vietnam Vet and Proud Liberal | April 9, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

s.b.
Don’t count your chickens before they hatch! He’s not behind now, and likely will not be after NC, if at all.
And Electoral College is meaningless until November. Meaningless.
Obama 2008 — Yes, WE CAN!!!

Posted by: Jackt51 -- Vietnam Vet and Proud Liberal | April 9, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

Hillary is doing well in pa and inside state polls show her doing pretty good in NC among white females yard signs are poping up all over women unite and there are a lot of women who are voting for her in the next 10 states so I can’t wait to see how this thing plays out she’ll have enough money Kerry had to morg. his house to win it is unreal that Obama is spending $300.000 aday on ads in Pa. And people are sick of ads already.

Posted by: Bishop | April 9, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

Well..now we can add “Deadbeat” to the list. After all she and Bill only earned $109,000,000 during the last seven years. Paying your bills doesn’t appear to be high on her list of priorities. Shame on her! But…..maybe the “check’s in the mail”……NAAAAAHHHH!

Posted by: don | April 9, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

OKAY WOMEN! GATHER AROUND! HERE THIS CLEARLY!
Any woman who claims to be voting for Hillary simply because she is a woman is making a big mistake!
She is responsible for thousands of American soldiers dying when she wrecklessly voted for the Iraq War.
To reward her by giving her a single vote is a injustice to the American families that have to bury their children.
She is responsible for a flawed NAFTA agreement that caused the American people thousands and thousands of jobs.
To reward her by giving her a single vote would be a slap in the face to all those American workers who struggled to
put food on the table for their families and by no fault of theirs were robbed of their jobs.
Hillary Rodham’s lack of sound judgment has devestated this country!
HOW CAN ANYONE THINK OF VOTING FOR HER SIMPLY BECAUSE SHE IS A WOMAN!
That would be such an injustice!

Posted by: stacy | April 9, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

Hillary Clinton does not deserve to be president of the United States.
Her vote for the Iraq war.
Her support and lobbying for NAFTA
Her refusal to pay vendors for services rendered to her campaign.
Her lies after lies!
Her shady dealings with foreign governments.
Her taking money for corporations that sexually harrassed their female employees.
Her stocks with TATA Consultations.
Her religious cult.
THIS WOMAN IS CORRUPTION AT ITS BEST!

Posted by: megan | April 9, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

Jake
At the hearing, Obama acted like a republican. He’s trying to move toward the right now and his poor followers are being left behind without a clue that they’re being abandoned.
Such followers?

Posted by: Surelock Homes | April 9, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

Unless Obama’s reps are running around w/cash in their pocket (or a campaign credit card), they have bills that will be due in a month too. Where’s the outrage?![this is a non-story. Both campaigns have millions of dollars, are managing cashflow, and legally floating bills until payment is due. Unfortunately, HRC supporters who may be vendors to the Obama campaign aren't so infantile as to try and generate negative publicity in such a stupid way. In reality, if any of the supposed "stiffed" vendors really didn't expect bills to be paid, they would have gone to collections agency -- no one has.]

Posted by: lexie | April 9, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

Holy Cow!!!
First Hillary was shafting a food bank, then she was sticking to small businesses and now she’s short changing a school? Let’s now forget about the poor campaign workers with their unpaid health insurance bills.
Where will this end?
I don’t know people, but it sounds like Hillary may be in over her head here. Hate to say it, but her campaign is outta control.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | April 9, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Hillary walmart videoes to bust unions.She sits quietly by. Will this be the final nail in her coffin?

Posted by: Lauren | April 9, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

Wish I had thought of this, from a great blog post:
“In a move that’s sure to be seen as controversial, Hillary has contacted the NCAA Board of Directors to argue that Memphis is actually better qualified to be National Champion.
Ms. Clinton stated that Memphis, while losing the game, had actually shown more ability to act like a National Champion on Day One. She argued that Memphis had passed every test during the game, including scoring more points than Kansas for 38 minutes. For 38 minutes they had shown the experience necessary to be National Champion. ‘Just because some team comes along in the last minute and scores more points than the other guy doesn’t mean they’re necessarily able to be National Champion on Day One.’”
Obama 2008 — Yes, WE CAN!!!

Posted by: Jackt51 -- Vietnam Vet and Proud Liberal | April 9, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

Posted by: stacy,
Simple Stacy, gender is thicker than brains and even race. The persone that stood out to me the most was John E.
I was with John all the way in my head but with Hillary in my heart……long story short, I supported Hillary, sent her money, was planning to volunteer for her – then we were presented with a side of the Clinton’s none of knew existed…..more importantly, she has run the worst campaign for someone with the two biggest assets in politics MONEY and NAME recognition…….Anyway, I didn’t like what I saw…..and if she can’t manage a campaign effectively; especially against no name guy, she deserves to be defeated……Bottom line, his campagin has run circles around hers…..In conclusion, we are getting a very good look at how this people will govern the country so I am no longer going on EMOTION alone and my support for Hillary is gone. She has run an ineffective campaign. In fact, the only reason she is still in this, or so it appears to me, is because of sympathy, gender and ethnic pride…..otherwise, she would have been done a long time ago.
Of course I’m not an idiot and I’m NOT voting for some warmonger. McCain would rather spend our money building schools in Iraq, while the schools in this country is falling apart? Doesn’t make sense to me.

Posted by: Karen | April 9, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Karen you totaly nailed that one. I hope you are not the only one. Democrats unite! This will be over soon and will be for the best.

Posted by: Joe | April 9, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Lexie — sorry, you’re wrong. A direct comparison of the two campaigns’ filings shows Hillary owes tens of millions of dollars — including from Iowa and New Hampshire! Obama owes far, far less. It’s not the same. Research. Then comment.

Posted by: dan | April 9, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Did the University of California at Davis actually put out a statement on this? Or is this report from a “journalist” that supports Obama? It would seem unseemly for any university to come out with this type of information. I’m tired of all this nit-picking of Hillary’s campaign. Talk about real issues there are plenty of them to go around, the economy, the war, health insurance, take your pick.

Posted by: svsolis | April 9, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

what i find funny is 95% comments are about Obama…. this is about hrc not paying bills, when i first say this story i thought wee if she is 8.7mil pass due the Obama and Mcwar must be around the same… not sure about mcwar but Obamas .6 vs 8.7mil clintons…something just doesnt add up.
oh and didnt i hear something about her not paying helthcare for her staffers?

Posted by: mvpsdad | April 10, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.